Next Article in Journal
A New Species of the Genus Gekko (Squamata: Sauria: Gekkonidae) from the Dabie Mountains, China
Previous Article in Journal
Do Poisonous Plants in Pastures Communicate Their Toxicity? Meta-Study and Evaluation of Poisoning Cases in Central Europe
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Occurrence of Freshwater Fish-Borne Zoonotic Helminths in Italy and Neighbouring Countries: A Systematic Review

1
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell’Università, 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
2
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle D’Aosta, Via Bologna 148, 10154 Torino, Italy
3
Department of Parasitology and Invasive Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Partyzantow Avenue 57, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2023, 13(24), 3793; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13243793
Submission received: 8 November 2023 / Revised: 29 November 2023 / Accepted: 30 November 2023 / Published: 8 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Aquatic Animals)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This systematic review focuses on the occurrence of fish-borne zoonotic helminths, including Clinostomum complanatum, Contracaecum rudolphii, Dibothriocephalus latus, Eustrongylides excisus, Opisthorchis felineus, and Pseudamphistomum truncatum, in freshwater fish populations of Italy and neighbouring countries. The study outlines the biological aspects and investigates the factors involved in the geographical expansion of these parasitic species. By synthesizing existing knowledge, we aim to compile epidemiological information concerning fish-borne zoonotic helminths and highlight the consumer risks. In conclusion, we encourage a One-Health approach in the context of food safety among EU countries to manage sanitary issues of all fish-borne zoonoses.

Abstract

In recent years, the consumption of fish products has surged in European countries, being an essential part of a healthy diet. Despite representing a small part of EU production, freshwater fisheries hold considerable significance for lake-dwelling populations and tourists seeking traditional dishes. This increased fish consumption has brought to light potential health risks associated with fish-borne zoonotic helminths (FBZHs), now acknowledged as global food-borne parasites. Fish-borne zoonotic helminths belong to various taxonomic groups, including nematodes (Anisakidae), trematodes (Opisthorchiidae and Heterophyidae), and cestodes (Diphyllobothriidae). More than 50 species of FBZH are known to cause human infections, derived from eating raw or undercooked aquatic foods containing viable parasites. Despite increased attention, FBZHs remain relatively neglected compared to other food-borne pathogens due to factors like chronic disease progression and under-diagnosis. This systematic review concentrates on the prevalence of six freshwater FBZHs (Clinostomum complanatum, Contracaecum rudolphii, Dibothriocephalus latus, Eustrongylides excisus, Opisthorchis felineus, and Pseudamphistomum truncatum) in Italy and neighbouring countries. The study explores the expansion of these parasites, analysing their biological and epidemiological aspects, and the factors that influence their proliferation, such as the increased cormorant population and the lake eutrophication phenomena. In summary, this research highlights the necessity for further research, the development of spatial databases, and the establishment of a unified European policy to effectively manage these multifaceted health concerns. It strongly advocates adopting a One-Health approach to address the growing incidence of parasitic zoonoses within the context of food safety in EU countries.

1. Introduction

In recent years, fish products have become an increasingly popular source of protein as an essential part of a healthy diet. In European countries (EU), the consumption of fish products per capita reached up to 24 Kg and about 1200 fish species have been commercialized. In 2021, extra-EU imports of fishery and aquaculture products totalled 6.23 million tonnes. Spain is in first place with 1.17 million tons (18.9%) and Italy in sixth place with 453,000 tons (7.3%) [1,2,3,4]. Freshwater fish products represent a small part of EU production; however, they have local commercial importance for the inhabitants of lake areas and for tourists attracted by traditional dishes. Various relevant fish species, carrying zoonotic parasites, could pose a risk for public health. In particular, fish-borne zoonotic helminths (FBZHs) are listed among the top food-borne parasites at the global level [4,5]. Fish-borne zoonotic helminths belong to various taxonomic groups, including nematodes (Anisakidae), trematodes (Opisthorchiidae and Heterophyidae), and cestodes (Dibothriocephalidae) [5]. More than 50 species of FBZH are known to cause human infections, derived from eating raw or undercooked aquatic foods containing viable parasites. Data on fish parasitic zoonoses have been initially limited to the populations living along coastal and lacustrine regions from low/middle-income countries, particularly in Asian countries where large quantities of raw fish products are traditionally consumed [6,7]. The latest epidemiological updates provide a new scenario characterized by both an increase in human cases and an expansion of the geographical distribution of parasitosis at a global level [6,8,9,10]. Increasing the global food trade, demographic changes, new culinary habits, and climate change are among the main factors influencing the spread of FBZHs [6,11]. In fact, the globalization of the food supply has favoured the trade of a wide variety of fish products worldwide [12]. In particular, the importation of fish products from countries which do not have well-developed food control systems could be a considerable risk factor for FBZHs spreading worldwide. International mobility facilitates the translocation of infectious agents from one country to another, resulting in the spreading of parasites to areas outside endemic zones [13,14]. Moreover, the rising interest of European consumers in exotic cuisine leads to a significant increase in ethnic restaurants and sales of exotic food [11,15,16]. Currently, the number of sushi restaurants outside Japan is estimated to be between 14,000 and 18,000 [17]. It is well known that the eating habit of consuming raw or undercooked fish dishes (e.g., sushi, sashimi, ceviche, tartare) represents a considerable risk of transmitting FBZH [6,18]. Besides human and societal behaviour, environmental variables (abiotic and biotic) of aquatic environments could directly influence the biology and epidemiology of parasites. The relationships between host–parasite systems confine their occurrence to regions (e.g., endemic areas) characterized by distinct biotic and abiotic factors that align with the parasite’s life cycle. Nevertheless, substantial shifts in climatic and hydrological conditions have resulted in the alteration of the geographical distribution of parasites [19,20]. Moreover, fluctuations and changes in abiotic/biotic factors may profoundly affect parasite–host systems, resulting in alterations to host biology (species performance, population dynamics, and distribution) and parasite prevalence [21]. In light of these considerations, it is clear that the distribution of parasites is the result of an intricately interconnected relationship between hosts, parasites, and the environment [22]. Despite recent epidemiological updates and increased attention from the scientific community, food-borne parasites remain neglected in comparison to other pathogens. There are various reasons behind the lack of attention given to this group of pathogens. In fact, several parasitic diseases that induce a chronic progression are considered less relevant or urgent. Furthermore, the long incubation periods of these parasitic infections may reduce the perception of their impact on health and lead to under-diagnosis [23]. In addition, notifying public health authorities is optional for most parasitic diseases. Official reports do not reflect the real prevalence or incidence of the diseases, which result in them being under-reported; therefore, their global impact on public health is unknown, mainly due to limited data. The emergence and recrudescence of parasitic diseases make it crucial to develop an understanding of parasites’ roles in fish populations and to define their impact on fish and human health. In this context, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) produced a document titled “Scientific opinion on risk assessment of parasites in fishery products”, which emphasized the need to outline the risk for consumers based on epidemiological studies of parasites in fishery products [24]. Freshwater fish are pivotal to the transmission of zoonotic helminths, representing a significant public health concern, especially in regions adjacent to water basins, such as the great sub-alpine lakes like Iseo, Como, Garda, and Maggiore. Here, the consumption of freshwater fish products is historically embedded in the culinary culture and draws numerous tourists. Italy, with its extensive river networks, lakes, and diverse freshwater ecosystems, represents an ideal environment for the occurrence and transmission of freshwater fish-borne zoonotic parasites. The aim of this systematic review was to collect evidence available in the scientific literature in order to gather information on the occurrence of freshwater FBZH in Italy and neighbouring countries. The retrieved data could be useful for public health authorities in identifying the freshwater fish species and investigating the aquatic environments and epidemiological determinants of this sanitary issue.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Review Question, Eligibility Criteria, Information Sources, and Search Strategies

The review question was: “What is the occurrence of freshwater FBZH in Italy and neighbouring countries?” Key elements were identified as: (i) population: fish, and (ii) outcome: freshwater FBZH (see Supplementary File S1 for the complete list of keywords). We considered all studies published in peer-reviewed journals in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection, without time limits. The first date searched was 7 March 2023, and an update of the search was conducted on 1 August 2023. The following criteria were used to select eligible studies: (i) English language and full-text availability; (ii) the study had to report data on freshwater FBZH detection; (iii) the study had to search freshwater FBZH as consequence of natural contamination (observational study); (iv) the study had to deal with farmed/captive or wild freshwater fish (food and/or feed and/or restocking and/or research purpose); (v) the study had to involve Italy or neighbouring countries (i.e., Austria, Croatia, France, Germany, Liechtenstein, Slovenia, and Switzerland).

2.2. Selection and Data Collection Processes

The screening process was carried out by three reviewers (VM, EL, MB), who categorized all studies obtained via the initial literature search based on title and abstract. In the case of a poorly explicative abstract or in the case of doubt about the available data, the study was included and evaluated at full-text level. Each record underwent a dual evaluation process, where two separate reviewers independently assessed it based on the preselected eligibility criteria (EL and MB). A third reviewer solved any conflicts (VM). After full-text retrieval, one reviewer (VM) extracted data from the included studies. Data were extracted from text, tables, or figures, and were entered into pre-defined tabular forms. Extracted data were controlled by another reviewer (EL), crosschecking the extracted data with the original data in the studies. Additionally, thanks to the in-depth knowledge of the subject of the authors, four additional papers (named “other research” in the Supplementary File S1) were included in the selection.

2.3. Data Items

We defined “study” as an investigation reporting data for freshwater FBZH in fish samples in Italy and neighbouring countries. General data related to the included studies were listed in tables reporting the following information: (i) fish species involved (scientific name, common name, number of total specimens sampled, and number of specimens positive for freshwater FBZH); (ii) infection indices (prevalence, mean intensity, and mean abundance); (iii) freshwater FBZH details (scientific name, morphological and/or molecular identification); (iv) country where the study was carried out; (v) details of the water collection; (vi) year and month of sampling.

2.4. Synthesis Methods

The data synthesis was presented in tables reporting, for each species of freshwater FBZH, details of its lifecycle and its occurrence in the study area: (i) country; (ii) type of water basin it was detected in; (iii) fish species; (iv) number of positive fish among the total analysed; (v) parasitological indexes; (vi) relative references.

2.5. Quality Assessment

Quality assessment was conducted taking into account relevant aspects for freshwater FBZH identification and sample characteristics to be considered in an observational study: (i) the presence of at least one of the three parasitological indexes (i.e., prevalence, mean intensity, mean abundance); (ii) parasite species morphological identification using published identification keys; (iii) molecular identification of the parasite species; (iv) geopositioning of the sampling site at least at municipality level, namely Local Administrative Unit (LAU) level 2, that is the lower level assigned for the Nomenclature of Territorial Units (NUTs) for statistics in the European Union; (v) the months in which the sampling activity occurred. The quality assessment of the included studies was carried out by one reviewer (MB) and verified by a second reviewer (EL). Each positive answer resulted in a point score; at the end of the assessment, the score ranged from 0 to 5.

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

In total, 24 papers investigating the occurrence of freshwater FBZH in the considered countries were included after the screening process (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The PRISMA flow chart presents the results of the literature searches and the screening process.
Figure 1. The PRISMA flow chart presents the results of the literature searches and the screening process.
Animals 13 03793 g001
Reviewing the 24 included papers, seven parasite species (i.e., C. complanatum, C. rudolphii, D. latus, E. excisus, E. mergorum, O. felineus, and P. truncatum) were identified in the countries of interest and described in 32 fish species from several water basins, most of them located in Italy (91%, 195/214 sites). The occurrence of FBZHs was registered only in wild fish species. This is in agreement with the literature data on other freshwater [25] and marine [26,27,28] species, stating that the risk related to the consumption of aquaculture products from European facilities is null or negligible. The absence of zoonotic parasites in aquaculture products, which was more extensively investigated for marine FBZHs, is mainly related to the use of commercial pellets as feed, which avoids the predation of infected intermediate hosts by farmed fish [29,30]. Indeed, the environment in which fish are farmed or caught directly influences the species and number of parasites in fish products [31]. An exhaustive overview that provides relevant information on the management of the top six parasites (C. complanatum, C. rudolphii, D. latus, E. excisus, O. felineus, and P. truncatum) is reported below. Given the limited presence of reports of O. felineus and P. truncatum in Italy, the authors decided to include Caffara et al. [32] despite the main aim of the paper indeed being different from the other selected papers (development of a Multiplex PCR method). In Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4, the relevant information retrieved from the elected article is summarized for each parasite species, with the exception of C. rudolphii and P. truncatum, detected only by Mattiucci et al. [33] and Caffara et al. [32], respectively, and reported in their specific section. Eustrongylides mergorum, reported only by Jakob et al. [34], has not been considered in this work because it is not listed as a valid species. In fact, the valid species comprise E. excisus, E. ignotus, and E. tubifex. In addition, the biological cycle of the FBZHs considered in this review has been graphically represented (see Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). To briefly summarize all the geographical location and the type of water body considered of the retrieved papers, Figure 6 and Table 5 have been added after the FBZHs description chapters. Complete information on fish species, parasite species, sampling site, and sampling period are available in the supplementary data (see Supplementary File S2).

3.2. Clinostomum complanatum (Rudolphi, 1814, Digenea: Clinostomidae): Clinostomiasis, Life cycle and Its Occurrence in the Study Area

Clinostomum complanatum is a digenean trematode belonging to the Clinostomidae family. The Clinostomum genus comprises 16 valid species. Nonetheless, due to the significant morphological diversity within the genus, the taxonomy remains convoluted, having undergone several revisions [35,36,37,38]. In humans, C. complanatum is the causative agent of Halzoun syndrome, a laryngeal pharyngitis provoked by the consumption of raw fish products containing vital parasites. The metacercariae excyst within the stomach and subsequently migrate to the throat’s mucosa, where they firmly attach [39,40,41,42,43]. It has been hypothesized that C. complanatum feeds on blood extracted from the host’s throat, leading to mucosal haemorrhage due to the adhesion-induced injury [40]. The therapeutic approach involves surgical endoscopic remotion of the parasite from the adhesion site. Notably, treatment is often challenging due to the trematode’s rapid mobility and strong adhesion to host tissues [41]. Human infection is rare, and it has not been reported in European countries [44]. However, since the first documented human case in Japan in the early 1900s [42], numerous cases have been reported in Asian countries, with a particular concentration in Korea [39,45,46,47]. Similarly to other species in this genus, C. complanatum has a heteroxenous life cycle involving two intermediate hosts and one definitive host [48] (Figure 2). In the definitive host, a fish-eating bird (e.g., Ardeids, the adult stage parasitises the buccal cavity and releases eggs into the aquatic environment through faeces [49,50]. These eggs then hatch into miracidia within a freshwater gastropod mollusc, the first intermediate host. Subsequent development involves sporocysts, rediae, and cercariae [51,52]. The cercariae exit the mollusc, swimming in the water column to encyst within the second intermediate hosts (fish and amphibians), where they mature into metacercariae, and the infective stage for the final hosts [53,54,55]. Although C. complanatum is rarely documented in European countries, a recent paper reported its presence in a Perca fluviatilis population from Endine Lake, a small Italian lake located in the sub-alpine area [44]. Previously the parasite had been detected in Cobitis bilineata caught in water basins in Piedmont [56] and in two species in Emilia Romagna region [57].
Figure 2. Life cycle of C. complanatum. Note: 1: Bird, the final host; 2: eggs, 3: Miracidia; 4: gastropod mollusc as the first intermediate host; 5: Cercariae; 6: fish as the second intermediate host.
Figure 2. Life cycle of C. complanatum. Note: 1: Bird, the final host; 2: eggs, 3: Miracidia; 4: gastropod mollusc as the first intermediate host; 5: Cercariae; 6: fish as the second intermediate host.
Animals 13 03793 g002
Table 1. Sampling location, fish host, and the parasitological indexes of C. complanatum.
Table 1. Sampling location, fish host, and the parasitological indexes of C. complanatum.
CountryWater BasinYearFish SpeciesP/NParasitological IndexesReferences
P%MIMA
ItalySillaro, Soligo, and Santerno riversN/AB. barbusN/AN/AN/AN/A[57]
N/AS. cephalusN/AN/AN/AN/A
ItalyWater basins in Piedmont2014C. bilineata12/304020.8[56]
ItalyLake Endine2019P. fluviatilis21/11218.751.330.25[44]
Note: P/N: N of positive specimens/N specimens; P%: prevalence; MI: mean intensity; MA: mean abundance; N/A: not available.

3.3. Contracaecum rudolphii (Hartwich, 1964, Nematoda: Anisakidae): Anisakidosis, Life Cycle, and Its Occurrence in the Study Area

Parasites of the genus Contracaecum are ascaridoid nematodes belonging to the family Anisakidae. With more than 100 species, Contracaecum is the most numerous genus in the Anisakidae family [58]. The taxonomic status of C. rudolphii comprises a complex of sibling species as revealed by molecular studies [59,60,61]. In particular, multilocus emanzyme electrophoresis was used to understand the extent of genetic variation among specimens from different geographical regions. This approach identified the presence of two closely related species within the C. rudolphii sensu lato group, respectively C. rudolphii A and C. rudolphii B [61] in Europe. Hosts play a significant role in improving the genetic diversity of parasites by facilitating gene exchange among different parasite populations, across various geographical areas [62]. Human anisakidosis is a parasitic disease caused by the ingestion of raw or undercooked fish products containing vital third-stage larvae of Anisakidae nematodes, including the Contracaecum species [63,64,65,66]. However, human infections caused by Contracaecum larvae have been reported much less frequently compared to infections caused by Anisakis larvae [67]. The disease caused by Contracaecum larvae leads to a severe and painful condition in humans, characterized by gastrointestinal pain, vomiting, and diarrhoea [66]. The massive presence of Contracaecum larvae in fish products can lead to market rejection and impose economic repercussions [68]. The life cycle of C. rudolphii is complex and remains partially understood. This parasite exhibits a broad host range, with 24 genera of fish-eating birds, including pelicans, herons, and mergansers, serving as definitive hosts [69]. In Europe, primary definitive hosts are cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) and sea ducks (Mergus merganser and Mergus serrator) [70,71]. Lesions in the avian host include fibrinous haemorrhagic exudates over the intestinal serosa. There are reports of mortality episodes in American Double-crested Cormorants (Nannopterum auritum) due to severe infections of hundreds of individuals of ascaridoids (C. multipapillatum, C. microcephalum, and C. rudolphii sensu lato) [72]. The adult stage resides in the proventriculus and intestines of birds, where they produce eggs after fertilization of the female by the male. These eggs lack a chitinous membrane, making them sensitive to physical and chemical factors and mechanical damage [73]. Avian definitive hosts excrete these eggs into aquatic environments through their faeces, giving rise to the second larval stage, a free-living larva [74]. When larvae are ingested by planktonic or benthic invertebrates (the first intermediate host), they grow within the host’s body without moulting [75]. Fish become infected when they consume these infected invertebrates containing the larvae L2. These larvae reach the abdominal cavity, grow and later moult to L3. The third-stage larvae then encyst themselves within the fish’s intestinal wall or migrate to other internal organs and encapsulate there. When infected fish are consumed by a final host, L3 larvae undergo two moults to reach the adult stage [76]. Among the retrieved papers, this parasite was detected only by Mattiucci et al. [33] in two Italian water bodies, Transimeno Lake and the River Marta, located in the Lazio region. The sibling species C. rudolphii A larvae was detected in coinfection with C. rudolphii B in fish from Trasimeno Lake (Carassius carassius and Atherina boyeri), while only C. rudolphii B was reported from freshwater fish species from the River Marta (Leuciscus cephalus, Barbus barbus) [33].

3.4. Dibothriocephalus latus (Linnaeus, 1758, Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidea; syn. Diphyllobothrium latum): Dibothriocephalosis Life Cycle, and Its Occurrence in the Study Area

Diphyllobothriosis is a fish-borne zoonosis caused by fish tapeworms of different genera belonging to the family Diphyllobothriidae. Based on newly published data, approximately 20 million individuals are believed to be affected on a global scale. Nevertheless, the exact prevalence of D. latus across the world remains uncertain [77]. One of the main causative agents of human diphyllobothriasis is D. latus. Generally, human infections are reported as asymptomatic or present mild clinical pictures and variable symptomatology [78]. Among 25% of the cases may manifest diarrhoea, abdominal pain, fatigue, headache, constipation, intestinal obstruction, and, sporadically, a non-lethal form of pernicious anaemia [79]. Haematological alterations result from the fast intestinal absorption of vitamin B12 caused by these parasites, which are attached to intestinal mucosa [77]. The diagnosis of diphyllobothriasis is based on coprological examination, aimed at detecting parasites’ eggs and proglottids. Clinical treatment involves anthelminthic drugs (praziquantel or niclosamide), which are commonly quite effective and make it possible for parasites to be expelled from infected patients [80]. The most effective way to prevent diphyllobothriasis is avoiding the consumption of raw or improperly treated fish products. At the beginning of the 20th century, Italy classified diphyllobothriasis as a notifiable disease due to the high prevalence of human cases [81]. Although a few isolated cases were noted later on, diphyllobothriasis was generally considered a minor public health concern [82,83,84]. However, in the last 20 years, a rising number of human diphyllobothriasis cases was observed in Italy, France, and Switzerland [85,86,87]. In fact, the endemic area of this parasite mainly concerns the great alpine lakes of these three countries [86,88,89,90,91,92,93].
The D. latus life cycle involves two intermediate hosts, a crustacean copepod (Cyclops) and a predatory freshwater fish (P. fluviatilis), and one definitive host, a fish-eating mammal (including humans) [87] (Figure 3). The parasites can also be transmitted to other paratenic hosts such as burbot (Lota lota), and pike (Esox sp.), and finally consumed by the definitive host [94]. The adult stage inhabits the intestine of the definitive host and produces eggs that are released through faeces. The resistance of these eggs to external factors is quite low and, for hatching, they must quickly reach a suitable water body [95]. The coracidium (first larval stage) swims actively and attracts predation by crustacean copepods, where it develops into a procercoid larva [96]. When the second intermediate host, a predatory fish, consumes an infected copepod, it contracts the parasite, which migrates from the intestine to the skeletal muscle, where it develops into the plerocercoid larva [87]. In P. fluviatilis the localization of plerocercoid larvae in the visceral cavity occurs rarely, while in pike and burbot mainly concerns the visceral cavity [89,94]. Humans acquire the infection by consuming raw or undercooked fish products containing viable plerocercoid larvae. The plerocercoid larvae migrate after ingestion to the intestine of the definitive host and develop into the mature stage. The reproductive potential of D. latus is extremely high (1 million eggs per day), so even sporadic human cases can give rise to a high prevalence in a fish population [97]. Fecal contamination of water bodies plays a pivotal role in maintaining the D. latus life cycle and the persistence of diphyllobothriasis in endemic areas [86,87,95]. The selected articles show a significant prevalence of D. latus in the fish population of sub-alpine lakes, undoubtedly reconfirming this region as an endemic area. In particular, concerning P. fluviatilis, the highest prevalence values were detected in Lake Como (46.5%) [98], followed by Lake Biel (37.5%) [94] and Lake Iseo (22.8%) [94]. The analysis of historical data shows wide variations in prevalence among studies conducted on the same lake (see Supplementary File S2). For example, in perch sampled from Lake Iseo, the prevalence ranged from 7.6% [89] to 22.8% [94]. Regarding Lake Como [98], the provided prevalence values range from 18.7% to 46.5%, depending on the sampling areas in the lake (Western, Eastern, North, and Centre); however, the sampling points were not georeferenced. It is clear that the total prevalence data of a lake are not representative and could be misleading for evaluating parasite occurrence. Accordingly, the latest papers on D. latus in Italy reveal new information on spatial distribution and show significant differences in prevalence values among the sampled areas of Lake Iseo [87,90]. In particular, Menconi et al. [87] provided a spatial analysis of D. latus occurrence in P. fluviatilis. This study georeferenced sampling points and associated the prevalence of D. latus with water E. coli load, demonstrating a significant relationship between these variables.
Figure 3. Life cycle of D. latus. Note: 1: definitive host; 2: eggs; 3: coracidia; 4: copepods crustacean—first intermediate host; 5: pike and burbot—paratenic host; 6: European perch—second intermediate host.
Figure 3. Life cycle of D. latus. Note: 1: definitive host; 2: eggs; 3: coracidia; 4: copepods crustacean—first intermediate host; 5: pike and burbot—paratenic host; 6: European perch—second intermediate host.
Animals 13 03793 g003
Table 2. Sampling location, fish host, and the parasitological indexes of Dibothriocephalus latus.
Table 2. Sampling location, fish host, and the parasitological indexes of Dibothriocephalus latus.
CountryWater BasinYearFish SpeciesP/NParasitological IndexesReferences
P%MIMA
Italy/SwitzerlandLake Maggiore N/AP. fluviatilis24/3097.810.72[99]
ItalyLake OrtaP. fluviatilis5/1533.310.33
ItalyLake Como2005/2007P. fluviatilis183/609301.25N/A[98]
Italy/SwitzerlandLake Maggiore2005–2008P. fluviatilis123/88014N/AN/A[91]
SwitzerlandLake Geneva2006–200827/5325.1N/AN/A
ItalyLake Iseo2013–2014P. fluviatilis35/4587.61.290.1[89]
L. lota1/263.800.123
E. Lucius5/771.416.411.71
Lake Como2013–2014P. fluviatilis108/42625.41.240.31
L. lota2/553.61.50.05
E. lucius16/1984.228.2523.79
Lake Maggiore2013–2014P. fluviatilis42/6356.61.050.07
E. lucius1/110011
ItalyLake Iseo2017P. fluviatilis19/14812.8N/AN/A[94]
201853/23222.8N/AN/A
Lake Como2017P. fluviatilis7/4615.2N/AN/A
Italy/SwitzerlandLake Maggiore2017P. fluviatilis8/4816.7N/AN/A
SwitzerlandLake Biel2018P. fluviatilis3/837.5N/AN/A
SwitzerlandLake Neuchâtel2018P. fluviatilis1/502N/AN/A
Switzerland/FranceLake Geneva2018P. fluviatilis10/1566.4N/AN/A
ItalyLake Iseo2019P. fluviatilis39/5986.51.070.07[90]
ItalyLake Iseo2020P. fluviatilis45/5508.1N/AN/A[87]
Note: P/N: N of positive specimens/N specimens; P%: prevalence; MI: mean intensity; MA: mean abundance; N/A: not available.

3.5. Eustrongylides excisus (Jagerskiold, 1909, Nematoda: Dioctophymatidae): Eustrongylidiasis, Life Cycle, and Its Occurrence in the Study Area

Eustrongylides spp. are nematodes belonging to the family of Dioctophymatidae [100]. The taxonomic status of the genus Eustrongylides has recently been subjected to several revisions, and molecular taxonomy leads to considering the following three species valid: E. tubifex, E. excisus, and E. ignotus. Eustrongylides nematodes are responsible for rare human infections; however, they could potentially impact public health [14]. According to current knowledge, five human cases have been reported, three in the USA [101,102,103] and two in Africa [104]. Human eustrongylidiasis is related to the consumption of infected raw fish meat. The infection is characterized by acute pain that occurs 24 h after the ingestion of the contaminated fish product, due to the larvae penetration into the gut wall. Medical treatment of the patients requires surgical removal of the encysted larvae [104,105]. Eustrongylides nematodes have a complex life cycle, including five developmental stages, and involving two intermediate hosts and one definitive host. The focus of infection is associated with freshwater environments [106] (Figure 4). The adult stage parasitises the mucosa of the oesophagus, proventriculus, and/or intestine of piscivorous birds (Ciconiformes and Phalacrocoracidae). The final hosts release eggs through their stool and, if ingested by aquatic oligochaetes (Tubifex, Lumbricus, and Limnodrilus), they develop into the second and third larval stages. Eutrophication of the water basin provides a high concentration of nutrients and facilitates the growth of oligochaete populations and could, therefore, play a pivotal role in the occurrence of Eustrongylides [107]. Several fish species (17 taxonomic orders) are known as second intermediate hosts [106,107,108,109,110]. Predatory fish species, such as perch and largemouth bass, have a greater potential to become highly infected by consuming infected fish, which amplifies the intensity of parasite infection [109]. Moreover, large predatory fishes, amphibians (Bufonidae), and reptiles (Natrix tessellata) may act as paratenic hosts and could infect final hosts [111,112]. Nematodes ascribable to the genus Eustrongylides are now widespread and reported on all continents [113]. The distribution of the dominating Eustrongylides species varies among countries; E. ignotus and E. tubifex are generally reported in North America, while E. excisus is common in Europe and the Middle East [100]. Bibliographical analysis indicates that E. excisus had never been reported in European countries prior to 2009 [34]; however, no further reports were made until 2015 [114]. After the report by Dezfuli et al. [114], this parasite has gained attention and numerous studies have been published (Table 3). Recent papers show an expanding geographical distribution of Eustrongylides nematodes in Italy, potentially linked to the growing cormorant population concentrated around lakes and other biotic and abiotic factors [109,115]. The expansion of this parasite is a multifactorial phenomenon, and understanding the interactions among key factors in the Eustrongylides life cycle is essential to comprehending its epidemiology. To trigger an epizootic event, multiple elements must occur: eutrophic wetlands supporting dense fish populations, infected birds attracted to fish, and nutrient-polluted sites providing suitable habitats for oligochaetes [69,116]. It is important to mention that, except for Germany [34], available data in this area of study exclusively concerns Italian lakes. Eustrongylides occurrence is widely registered in comestible and commercially relevant fish species such as perch (P. fluviatilis), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), and sand smelt (A. boyeri) [109,114,117,118,119,120]. Among these fish species, the highest prevalence value was recorded in perch from Lake Trasimeno (67.99%) [120]. The values previously found by Dezfuli et al. (6%) [114] and Branciari et al. (6.84%) [117] were instead significantly lower. Following, the highest prevalence values are attributable to M. salmoides (30%) fished in Lake Garda [109] and Lepomis gibbosus (18.3%) from Lake San Michele [118]. Bibliographic data reports the occurrence of Eustrongylides nematodes in new fish hosts including eel (Anguilla anguilla), black bullhead catfish (Ameiurus melas), tench (Tinca tinca), carp (Cyprinus carpio), wels catfish (Silurus glanis), and small thin lip grey mullet (Chelon ramada) [34,116,120]. The expansion of the range of fish species susceptible to E. excisus highlights the importance of ongoing parasitological research in fish species of commercial significance, especially in water basin where professional fishing is highly active.
Figure 4. Life cycle of E. excisus. Note: 1: bird host; 2: eggs; 3: oligochaete as first intermediate host; 4: fish as second intermediate host; 5: amphibians and reptiles may act as paratenic hosts.
Figure 4. Life cycle of E. excisus. Note: 1: bird host; 2: eggs; 3: oligochaete as first intermediate host; 4: fish as second intermediate host; 5: amphibians and reptiles may act as paratenic hosts.
Animals 13 03793 g004
Table 3. Sampling location, fish host, and the parasitological indexes of Eustrongylides excisus.
Table 3. Sampling location, fish host, and the parasitological indexes of Eustrongylides excisus.
CountryWater BasinYear of SamplingFish SpeciesP/NParasitological IndexesReferences
P%MIMA
GermanyLake Plon 2006A. anguilla16/3053.32.1N/A[34]
ItalyLake Trasimeno 2014P. fluviatilis31/5106N/AN/A[114]
Italy Lake Trasimeno 2015P. fluviatilis105/15366.841.30N/A[117]
M. salmoides29/15361.891N/A
A. boyeri1/7680.131N/A
ItalyLake Trasimeno N/AP. fluviatilis5/5100N/AN/A[121]
A. boyeri2/2
ItalyLake Garda 2020P. fluviatilis3/21214.4110.014[109]
M. salmoides6/20301.330.4
L. gibbosus4/1293.1010.023
ItalyLake Massacciuccoli 2019A. boyeri75/33172.310.2[119]
ItalyLake Trasimeno 2016P. fluviatilis4696/111,2354.2210.04[120]
2017961/23,3184.1210.04
201812,288/89,09413.681.260.17
201919,016/56,96233.383.421.14
202071,522/128,97955.457.053.91
202127,890/41,02167.998.286
2016M. salmoides143/30,3340.4710.005
2017148/81,9640.1810.002
2018162/40,2960.4010.4
2019485/77,4940.6310.01
202072/23,4980.3010.003
20215/19290.2610.003
2016T. tinca5551N/AN/AN/A
20175812N/AN/AN/A
20181/28010.03610.0004
20191/18010.0610.0006
20203/30520.1010.001
20211/7920.1310.0013
2016A. melas680N/AN/AN/A
20171079N/AN/AN/A
20181/13860.0710.0007
20191/26230.0410.0004
20201/28200.0410.0004
20213/1102.7210.0273
2016C. carpio1867N/AN/AN/A
20172720N/AN/AN/A
20181/40620.0210.0002
20191/49310.0210.0002
20201/57190.0210.0002
20211/57770.0210.0002
ItalyLake Annone 2019P. fluviatilis11/1149.66N/AN/A[122]
ItalyLake Massaciuccoli 2021–2022A. melas22/7728.61.70.49[116]
S. glanis42/56755.74.3
C. ramada258N/AN/A0.07
L. gibbosus1/234.310.04
M. salmoides1/42510.25
A. boyeri180/35005.110.05
Note: P/N: N of positive specimens/N specimens; P%: prevalence; MI: mean intensity; MA: mean abundance; N/A: not available.

3.6. Opisthorchis felineus (Rivolta, 1884, Trematoda: Opisthorchiidae): Opisthorchiasis, Lifecycle, and Its Occurrence in the Study Area

The family of Opisthorchiidae is a large group of trematodes that comprise 33 genera [123,124]. Opisthorchis felineus (Rivolta, 1884), Opisthorchis viverrini (Poirier, 1886), and Clonorchis sinensis (Cobbold, 1875) compose the triad of the primary agents of opisthorchiasis, affecting millions of people worldwide, especially in Asiatic countries [125]. Opisthorchis viverrini and C. sinensis are the most significant species reported, respectively, in Southeast Asia (Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Southern Vietnam) and East/Southeast Asia (China, Eastern Russia, Northern Vietnam, and South Korea) [6]. The main endemic area of O. felineus is associated with the Ob-Irtisch River basin (Russia) [124]. However, since 2003, human cases have been increasingly reported in Italy and other EU countries, with more than 200 human infections registered [126,127,128]. Opisthorchiasis is related to the consumption of raw/undercooked contaminated fish products [129,130]. Clinical manifestations depend on the number of ingested metacercariae. A low level of parasite infestation may cause mild or asymptomatic infections and result in a delayed or missed diagnosis, which could lead to chronic disease patterns. Opistorchis felineus’ chronic infections may induce severe liver disorders associated with the hepatobiliary system as cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, cholangitis, and periductal fibrosis [131,132]. Since Opisthorchis sp. cannot multiply in humans, high-intensity infections result from repeated exposures to contaminated raw fish preparations [133]. Opisthorchis viverrini and C. sinensis are considered biological carcinogens and classified as significant risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma, while O. felineus is not officially considered carcinogenic to humans [134]. Similar to other species within the Opisthorchiidae family, O. felineus has a complex life cycle linked to the freshwater environment, with two intermediate hosts and a definitive host. In particular, the life cycle involves a gastropod snail (Bithynia sp.) and a fish (Cyprinid) as the first and second intermediate hosts. Domestic cats and other fish-eating mammals (e.g., foxes), including humans, act as definitive hosts (Figure 5). The adult stage lives in biliary and pancreatic ducts, where it deposits eggs, which are released through faeces [135]. The eggs, when ingested by appropriate snail species, release the miracidia. Inside the snail, miracidia undergo three developmental stages, sporocysts, rediae, and cercariae [129]. Free-swimming cercariae leave the mollusc and, once they reach a fish host, they penetrate and encyst into the muscular tissue and develop into metacercariae, the infective stage for the final host [127,136]. Under favourable conditions (e.g., water temperature and light), the life cycle is completed within four or five months. Our data indicates that the occurrence of O. felineus in fish populations in Europe is exclusively reported in Italy, except for a record in Germany. In the temperate areas of Europe and Asia, O. felineus is described in at least 23 species belonging to the Cyprinidae family [124]. In the study area, T. tinca (Italy) and Rutilus rutilus and A. alburnous (Germany) are identified as suitable fish hosts [129,130].
Table 4. Sampling location, fish host and the parasitological indexes of Opisthorchis felineus.
Table 4. Sampling location, fish host and the parasitological indexes of Opisthorchis felineus.
CountryWater BasinYearFish SpeciesP/NParasitological IndexesReferences
P%MIMA
GermanyFinow canal1995R. rutilus38/5076N/AN/A[129]
1995S. erythrophthalmus8/5016N/AN/A
1995A. alburnus37/5074N/AN/A
1995A. brama18/5036N/AN/A
1995B. ballerus1/1114N/AN/A
1995B. bjoerkna2/1616N/AN/A
ItalyLake Bolsena 2007–2008T. tinca33/4475N/AN/A[130]
Bracciano2007–200883/8795.4N/AN/A
ItalyLake Bolsena N/AT. tincaN/AN/AN/AN/A[32]
Note: P/N: N of positive specimens/N specimens; P%: prevalence; MI: mean intensity; MA: mean abundance; N/A: not available.
Figure 5. Life cycle of O. felineus. Note: 1: definitive host; 2: eggs; 3: gastropod mollusc as first intermediate host; 4: Cercariae; 5: fish as second intermediate host; 6: Metacercariae.
Figure 5. Life cycle of O. felineus. Note: 1: definitive host; 2: eggs; 3: gastropod mollusc as first intermediate host; 4: Cercariae; 5: fish as second intermediate host; 6: Metacercariae.
Animals 13 03793 g005

3.7. Pseudamphistomum truncatum (Rudolphi, 1819, Trematoda: Opisthorchiidae): Pseudamphistomiasis, Life Cycle, and Its Occurrence in the Study Area

Pseudamphistomum truncatum is a digenetic trematode belonging to the family of Opisthorchiidae [32]. Due to the similar symptoms caused by Opisthorchiid species, such as adenomatous hyperplasia of the biliary epithelium or biliary system obstruction, it is essential to consider the food hygiene aspect and the zoonotic potential of P. truncatum. Human cases of pseudamphistomiasis are rare and poorly documented, with most reports originating from the Don River basin in Southwest European Russia. Outside this region, occurrences are sporadic [137]. In general, the life cycle of P. truncatus closely resembles that of species belonging to the Opisthorchis genus [138]. Pseudamphistomum truncatum has an indirect life cycle involving a broad group of fish-eating mammals (e.g., otter, mink, raccoon, and dog) as definitive hosts [139]. It relies on two intermediate hosts: freshwater gastropods as the first intermediate host (Bithynia tentaculata) and freshwater fish (Cyprinid) as the second intermediate host [123,140]. Adult parasites lay eggs in the host’s bile duct, which are transported to the intestines along with the bile and expelled through the faeces. For further development, the eggs must reach freshwater environments and be ingested by a Bithynia snail. Inside the mollusc, miracidia hatch, migrate to the hepatopancreas, and develop into rediae. The occurrence of liver flukes is influenced by the presence of snail species involved in the life cycle. Therefore, these parasites are generally found in areas densely populated with specific snail species [6]. Free-swimming cercariae exit the snail and can migrate within the water column to find the fish host. Upon contacting a suitable fish host, cercariae attach, penetrate the skin, and enter the muscle tissue, maturing into metacercariae. Infection of the final host occurs when the infected fish is consumed [141]. The occurrence of P. truncatum is primarily documented in wild carnivore mammals across Eurasia [139,140,142]. However, except for wild tench specimens sampled at Lake Como in 2020 by Caffara et al. [32], P. truncatum has never been described in fish populations within the study area.
Figure 6 summarizes the water bodies positive for FBZH in the study area, each designated with a distinct ID referenced in Table 5.
Figure 6. The map describes the study area and highlights the water bodies (rivers and lakes) positive for FBZH. Each spatial element is identified by an identification number (ID) is also reported in Table 5. Each macro area is identified by coloured zoom boxes presented on the right side (AD). The map was made using ESRI™ ArcMap software version 10.8.2.
Figure 6. The map describes the study area and highlights the water bodies (rivers and lakes) positive for FBZH. Each spatial element is identified by an identification number (ID) is also reported in Table 5. Each macro area is identified by coloured zoom boxes presented on the right side (AD). The map was made using ESRI™ ArcMap software version 10.8.2.
Animals 13 03793 g006
Table 5. The list of water bodies is reported, including some basic information, and identified by an identification number as shown on the map. * ID 16, named ‘Natural fresh water basins’, was not reported on the map because the authors of the reference article did not report the spatial information.
Table 5. The list of water bodies is reported, including some basic information, and identified by an identification number as shown on the map. * ID 16, named ‘Natural fresh water basins’, was not reported on the map because the authors of the reference article did not report the spatial information.
IDWater Body NameTypeCountry
1Lake Annone LakeItaly
2Lake Biel LakeSwiss
3Lake Bolsena LakeItaly
4Lake Bracciano LakeItaly
5Lake Como LakeItaly
6River Eider RiverItaly
7Lake Endine LakeItaly
8Lake Garda LakeItaly
9Lake Geneva LakeSwiss
10Lake Iseo LakeItaly
11Lake Lugano LakeItaly
12Lake Maggiore LakeItaly
13River Marta RiverItaly
14Lake Massaciuccoli LakeItaly
15Lake Mergozzo LakeItaly
16Natural fresh water basins (Piedemont region) *BasinItaly
17Lake Neuchâtel LakeSwiss
18Lake Orta LakeItaly
19Lake Plon LakeGermany
20Lake San Michele LakeItaly
21Lake Trasimeno LakeItaly
22Lake Varese LakeItaly
23Finnow CanalRiverGermany
24River Soligo RiverItaly
25River Sillaro RiverItaly
26River Santerno RiverItaly

3.8. Risk of Bias within Studies (Quality Evaluation)

The quality assessment of the included papers is reported in Table 6. Almost all of the papers (22 out of 24) reported at least one of the three parasitological indexes. Morphological and/or molecular identification of parasites at species level has been applied in 21 out of 24 papers. The extent (km2) of the water bodies examined in the included papers could be very variable. Consequently, providing precise geopositioning information (e.g., municipality, locality, or coordinates) would be a great help for advancing public health assessments and implementing preventive actions. It is noteworthy that among the retrieved papers, less than 40% (9/24) reported this level of geopositioning detail. As such, we would like to encourage authors to report precise geopositioning data of sample sites in future publications on this topic. The sampling period (months and years) is reported in 17 out of 24 papers. Among the 24 included papers, only four obtained the maximum quality assessment score (5 points) while only one study [32] found to be deficient in four quality criteria.
Table 6. Quality assessment of included papers.
Table 6. Quality assessment of included papers.
AuthorDoes the Paper Report at Least One of the Parasitological Indexes?Does the Paper Use the Morphological Keys for Parasite Species Identification?Does the Paper Identify the Parasite Species through Molecular Techniques?Does the Paper Ensure Detailed Geopositioning of the Sampling Sites?Does the Paper Report the Months of the Sampling Activity?Score
Menconi et al., 2020 [118]111115
Menconi et al., 2020 [90]111115
Menconi et al., 2021 [87]111115
Wicht et al., 2009 [98]111115
Castiglione et al., 2023 [116]111014
Gaglio et al., 2016 [56]111014
Guardone et al., 2021 [119]111014
Gustinelli et al., 2016 [89]111014
Hering-Hagenbeck and Schuster, 1996 [129]110114
Mattiucci et al., 2020 [33]111014
Menconi et al., 2020 [44]111104
Menconi et al., 2021 [109]111104
Wicht et al., 2009 [91]101114
Branciari et al., 2016 [117]110013
De Liberato et al., 2011 [130]101013
Franceschini et al., 2022 [120]101013
Mazzone et al., 2019 [121]111003
Radacovska et al., 2020 [94]101013
Rusconi et al., 2022 [122]111003
Caffara et al., 2011 [57]011103
Dezfuli et al., 2015 [114]100012
Jakob et al., 2009 [34]100012
Peduzzi Boucher-Rodoni, 2001 [99]100102
Caffara et al., 2020 [32]001001
Note: 1—the paper meets the quality criteria; 0—the paper is deficient in terms of the quality criteria.

4. Discussion

The present study is the first systematic review on zoonotic helminths affecting the European freshwater fish population. Results show that European perch (P. fluviatilis) is crucial to maintain the life cycle of D. latus and is a suitable intermediate host for C. complanatum and E. excisus [89,90,91,94,120]. According to our results, in EU countries P. fluviatilis could be considered the freshwater fish species of greatest concern for FBZHs. In fact, P. fluviatilis has several biological features which make it an essential parasite host. This fish species is widely distributed across European freshwater basins and is commonly eaten by many piscivorous birds. Its diet comprises the parasites’ intermediate hosts, such as zooplankton, benthic invertebrates, and fish [122]. Moreover, perch is among the most important products of local fisheries of Italian lacustrine areas and is included in traditional cuisine. A popular dish derived from perch is “Carpaccio di persico”, which is prepared with slices of raw fish meat [77,89]. The presence of C. complanatum has been recorded exclusively in P. fluviatilis from Endine Lake, a minor basin with no professional fishing. Consequently, the risk to consumers is relatively low. However, future studies may provide new reports, showing a different epidemiological picture. The alpine region remains confirmed as the endemic area for D. latus, and recent epidemiological trends advocate for a geographical approach to identifying high-risk areas and enhance the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants. The recent expansion of E. excisus in the Italian lacustrine area is linked to several factors, which create a favourable environment for the E. excisus’ life cycle. The increase in the cormorant population seems to be the main factor, followed by progressive lake eutrophication and rising temperatures [107,115,143]. Given the dimensions (3–5 cm) and the reddish colour of Eustrongylides spp. larvae, they can negatively affect the commercial value and the marketability of infected fish products. It is important to remark that fishery products evidently contaminated with parasites are not allowed on the market for human consumption [144]. Available data on the occurrence of O. felineus in the study area clearly indicates which fish species and lakes are at risk. In EU countries, consumption of the Cyprinid species is marginal; however, in Italy, around lacustrine areas, tench is included in traditional cuisine. In Italy, tench is popular and is included in the culinary tradition of the areas surrounding both the large subalpine lakes (Iseo, Garda, Como, and Maggiore) as well as the lakes of central Italy (Bolsena, Bracciano, and Trasimeno). In recent times, in Northern Italy and other EU countries, there has been a growing demand for tench fish from Lakes Bolsena and Bracciano, driven by relatively local lakeside markets [127]. Considering the pathogenicity of O. felineus for humans, further studies are needed to define the occurrence of this parasite in European fish fauna. This study’s data on Pseudamphistomum and C. rudolophii reveals only one reported case for each, indicating a low risk for consumers. However, in light of the recent epidemiological trend observed for E. excisus, we should not dismiss the possibility of potential geographical expansion and an increase in the prevalence of these parasites, or even the emergence of others. The presence of new parasite species underscores the importance of collaboration between the scientific community and the authorities responsible for hygiene and health controls in fish markets. Official control of fish-borne parasitic infections consists of a visual inspection of a few fish from each batch at the fish market by the veterinary services. However, this procedure cannot detect all infected fish. Thus, preventive measures are also based on consumer education. Knowledge of the survival of parasites along the entire food chain in fish products and reliable inactivation procedures are milestones for applying food safety principles. For these reasons, health authorities and governments should constantly inform consumers about the risks related to raw fish consumption. Therefore, our research findings can be used to create awareness among European sanitary authorities and translated into policies for managing fish-borne zoonotic parasites. Fish-borne zoonotic helminths are characterized by a complex epidemiology and life cycles, significantly influencing risks’ identification, prevention, and control. A clear comprehension of the life cycles of FBZHs is crucial to identify the potential source of infection and to design a risk map within the study area.

5. Conclusions

This study provides consistent epidemiological information on zoonotic helminths, describing their occurrence in freshwater fish populations of Italy and neighbouring countries, and highlighting potential risks to consumers. To date, data on the presence of zoonotic helminthic species and, in particular, seven FBHZs have been collected from wild fish species only and mostly in Italian water basins. Despite the fact that our findings predominantly reflect the Italian context, they highlight the need for further research in neighbouring countries to deepen our understanding of fish-borne zoonotic helminth occurrence and biology. The scientific community and health authorities should focus on expanding the parasitological survey where data are lacking. Defining outbreak areas and developing spatial databases will lead to target control efforts more efficiently and cost-effectively. The development of a joint European policy based on innovative strategies will help to fill the information gaps herein described. Providing actors throughout the food chain and sanitary authorities with reliable and updated information is critical for food safety management and decision-making. Educational programs are essential in establishing political participation in control programs at all societal levels and building consensus among the involved parties. Several improvements have been made for food-borne parasitic zoonoses, but with the current demographics and socioeconomic conditions, the occurrence of parasitic zoonoses will likely increase. In conclusion, we encourage a One-Health approach in the context of food safety among EU countries to manage the complex sanitary issues of all food-borne zoonoses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13243793/s1, File S1: Complete list of keywords of the research string and number of total results in each repository consulted online; File S2: Complete information on fish species, parasite species, sampling site, and sampling period of the selected papers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization led by V.M. and critiqued by E.L., M.B., L.G., M.P., E.B.-Z., L.C., A.M., G.A (Giuseppe Arcangeli)., and G.A. (Giorgia Angeloni); methodology, E.L. and M.B; software, E.L. and M.B.; validation, V.M., E.L., and M.B., formal analysis, V.M., E.L., and M.B.; investigation, V.M., E.L., and M.B.; resources, V.M., E.L., M.B., and G.A. (Giorgia Angeloni); data curation, V.M., E.L., and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, V.M., E.L., and M.B.; writing—review and editing, V.M., E.L., M.B., L.C., and G.A. (Giorgia Angeloni); visual presentation of GIS map, M.M.; supervision, V.M. and G.A. (Giorgia Angeloni); funding acquisition, G.A. (Giorgia Angeloni) All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from the Italian Ministry of Health, through Law 205/2017, art. 1, subparagraph 422 et seq.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and supplementary materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their special thanks to Stefano Giovini for illustrations of the parasites’ life cycle.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Armani, A.; Guardone, L.; La Castellana, R.; Gianfaldoni, D.; Guidi, A.; Castigliego, L. DNA Barcoding Reveals Commercial and Health Issues in Ethnic Seafood Sold on the Italian Market. Food Control 2015, 55, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Novoslavskij, A.; Terentjeva, M.; Eizenberga, I.; Valciņa, O.; Bartkevičs, V.; Bērziņš, A. Major Foodborne Pathogens in Fish and Fish Products: A Review. Ann. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. The EU Fish Market—Publications Office of the EU. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9ab6d1c4-71f2-11ed-9887-01aa75ed71a1 (accessed on 19 October 2023).
  4. Boireau, P.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; World Health Organization. Multicriteria-Based Ranking for Risk Management of Food-Borne Parasites: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting, 3–7 September 2012, FAO Headquarters, Rome, Italy; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014; p. 302. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouwknegt, M.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Graham, H.; Robertson, L.J.; van der Giessen, J.W.B.; Akkari, H.; Banu, T.; Koc, R.C.; Chalmers, R.; Cretu, C.M.; et al. Prioritisation of Food-Borne Parasites in Europe, 2016. Euro. Surveill. 2018, 23, 17–00161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chai, J.Y.; Murrell, K.D.; Lymbery, A.J. Fish-Borne Parasitic Zoonoses: Status and Issues. Int. J. Parasitol. 2005, 35, 1233–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lehel, J.; Yaucat-Guendi, R.; Darnay, L.; Palotás, P.; Laczay, P. Possible Food Safety Hazards of Ready-to-Eat Raw Fish Containing Product (Sushi, Sashimi). Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 867–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Slifko, T.R.; Smith, H.V.; Rose, J.B. Emerging Parasite Zoonoses Associated with Water and Food. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 1379–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Robertson, L.J.; Sprong, H.; Ortega, Y.R.; van der Giessen, J.W.B.; Fayer, R. Impacts of Globalisation on Foodborne Parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2014, 30, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cong, W.; Elsheikha, H.M. Biology, Epidemiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Selected Fish-Borne Parasitic Zoonoses. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2021, 94, 297. [Google Scholar]
  11. Broglia, A.; Kapel, C. Changing Dietary Habits in a Changing World: Emerging Drivers for the Transmission of Foodborne Parasitic Zoonoses. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 182, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Northrop-Clewes, C.A.; Shaw, C. Parasites. Br. Med. Bull. 2000, 56, 193–208. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12434231_Parasites#fullTextFileContent (accessed on 3 June 2023). [CrossRef]
  13. Kuchta, R.; Serrano-Martínez, M.E.; Scholz, T. Pacific Broad Tapeworm Adenocephalus Pacificus as a Causative Agent of Globally Reemerging Diphyllobothriosis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015, 21, 1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Eiras, J.C.; Pavanelli, G.C.; Takemoto, R.M.; Nawa, Y. An Overview of Fish-Borne Nematodiases among Returned Travelers for Recent 25 Years- Unexpected Diseases Sometimes Far Away from the Origin. Korean J. Parasitol. 2018, 56, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mascarello, G.; Pinto, A.; Marcolin, S.; Crovato, S.; Ravarotto, L. Ethnic Food Consumption: Habits and Risk Perception in Italy. J. Food Saf. 2017, 37, e12361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Macpherson, C.N.L. Human Behaviour and the Epidemiology of Parasitic Zoonoses. Int. J. Parasitol. 2005, 35, 1319–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Matsumoto, H. The Internationalization of Sushi. Kikkoman Food Cult. Semin. 2007, 15, 2–6. [Google Scholar]
  18. McCarthy, J.; Moore, T.A. Emerging Helminth Zoonoses. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 1351–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Polley, L.; Thompson, R.C.A. Parasite Zoonoses and Climate Change: Molecular Tools for Tracking Shifting Boundaries. Trends Parasitol. 2009, 25, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Poulin, R. The Structure of Parasite Communities in Fish Hosts: Ecology Meets Geography and Climate. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5442773_The_structure_of_parasite_communities_in_fish_hosts_Ecology_meets_geography_and_climate (accessed on 7 November 2023).
  21. Marcogliese, D.J. Implications of Climate Change for Parasitism of Animals in the Aquatic Environment. Can. J. Zool. 2001, 79, 1331–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Giari, L.; Castaldelli, G.; Timi, J.T. Ecology and Effects of Metazoan Parasites of Fish in Transitional Waters. Parasitology 2022, 149, 1829–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Selstad Utaaker, K.; Robertson, L.J. Climate Change and Foodborne Transmission of Parasites: A Consideration of Possible Interactions and Impacts for Selected Parasites. Food Res. Int. 2015, 68, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment of Parasites in Fishery Products. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cech, G.; Sándor, D.; Molnár, K.; Varga, Á.; Caffara, M.; Fioravanti, M.L.; Buchmann, K.; Székely, C. Digenean Trematodes in Hungarian Freshwater Aquacultures. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2021, 22, e00101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Castiglione, D.; Guardone, L.; Susini, F.; Alimonti, F.; Paternoster, V.; Ricci, E.; Nucera, D.; Armani, A. A Case Study on Farmed European Seabass and Gilthead Seabream in Central Italy: The Negligible Parasitological Risk of Nematode Larvae Paves the Way for the Freezing Derogation. Food Control 2021, 125, 107964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fioravanti, M.L.; Gustinelli, A.; Rigos, G.; Buchmann, K.; Caffara, M.; Pascual, S.; Pardo, M.A. Negligible Risk of Zoonotic Anisakid Nematodes in Farmed Fish from European Mariculture, 2016 to 2018. Eurosurveillance 2021, 26, 1900717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cammilleri, G.; Costa, A.; Graci, S.; Buscemi, M.D.; Collura, R.; Vella, A.; Pulvirenti, A.; Cicero, A.; Giangrosso, G.; Schembri, P.; et al. Presence of Anisakis Pegreffii in Farmed Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus Labrax L.) Commercialized in Southern Italy: A First Report. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 259, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Crotta, M.; Ferrari, N.; Guitian, J. Qualitative Risk Assessment of Introduction of Anisakid Larvae in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) Farms and Commercialization of Products Infected with Viable Nematodes. Food Control 2016, 69, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. González, M.Á.P.; Cavazza, G.; Gustinelli, A.; Caffara, M.; Fioravanti, M. Absence of Anisakis Nematodes in Smoked Farmed Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) Products on Sale in European Countries. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2020, 9, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Iwamoto, M.; Ayers, T.; Mahon, B.E.; Swerdlow, D.L. Epidemiology of Seafood-Associated Infections in the United States. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Caffara, M.; Gustinelli, A.; Mazzone, A.; Fioravanti, M.L. Multiplex PCR for Simultaneous Identification of the Most Common European Opisthorchiid and Heterophyid in Fish or Fish Products. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2020, 19, e00081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mattiucci, S.; Sbaraglia, G.L.; Palomba, M.; Filippi, S.; Paoletti, M.; Cipriani, P.; Nascetti, G. Genetic Identification and Insights into the Ecology of Contracaecum rudolphii A and C. Rudolphii B (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from Cormorants and Fish of Aquatic Ecosystems of Central Italy. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 1243–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jakob, E.; Hanel, R.; Klimpel, S.; Zumholz, K. Salinity Dependence of Parasite Infestation in the European Eel Anguilla Anguilla in Northern Germany. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sereno-Uribe, A.L.; Pinacho-Pinacho, C.D.; García-Varela, M.; De León, G.P.P. Using Mitochondrial and Ribosomal DNA Sequences to Test the Taxonomic Validity of Clinostomum complanatum Rudolphi, 1814 in Fish-Eating Birds and Freshwater Fishes in Mexico, with the Description of a New Species. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 2855–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, L.; Feng, Y.; Chen, H.M.; Wang, L.X.; Feng, H.L.; Yang, X.; Mughal, M.N.; Fang, R. Complete Mitochondrial Genome Analysis of Clinostomum complanatum and Its Comparison with Selected Digeneans. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 3249–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Feizullaev, N.A.; Mirzoeva, S.S. Revision of the Superfamily Clinostomoidea (Trematoda) and an Analysis of Its Classification. Parazitologiya 1983, 17, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gustinelli, A.; Caffara, M.; Florio, D.; Otachi, E.O.; Wathuta, E.M.; Fioravanti, M.L. First Description of the Adult Stage of Clinostomum cutaneum Paperna, 1964 (Digenea: Clinostomidae) from Grey Herons Ardea Cinerea L. and a Redescription of the Metacercaria from the Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.) in Kenya. Syst. Parasitol. 2010, 76, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hara, H.; Miyauchi, Y.; Tahara, S.; Yamashita, H. Human laryngitis caused by Cinostomum complanatum. Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 2014, 76, 181. [Google Scholar]
  40. Park, C.W.; Kim, J.S.; Joo, H.S.; Kim, J. A Human Case of Clinostomum complanatum Infection in Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 2009, 47, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, G.S.; Park, S.W.; Kim, J.; Seo, K.S.; You, K.W.; Chung, J.H.; Moon, H.C.; Hong, G.Y. A Case of Endoscopically Treated Laryngopharyngitis Resulting from Clinostomum complanatum Infection. Korean J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 69, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yamashita, J. Clinostomum complanatum, a Trematode Parasite New to Man. Annot. Zool. Jpn 1938, 17, 563–566. [Google Scholar]
  43. Witenberg, G. What Is the Cause of the Parasitic Laryngo-Pharyngitis in the near East (“Halzoun”)? Acta Med. Orient. 1944, 3, 191–192. [Google Scholar]
  44. Menconi, V.; Manfrin, C.; Pastorino, P.; Mugetti, D.; Cortinovis, L.; Pizzul, E.; Pallavicini, A.; Prearo, M. First Report of Clinostomum complanatum (Trematoda: Digenea) in European Perch (Perca Fluviatilis) from an Italian Subalpine Lake: A Risk for Public Health? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chung, D.I.; Moon, C.H.; Kong, H.H.; Choi, D.W.; Lim, D.K. The First Human Case of Clinostomum complanatum (Trematoda: Clinostomidae) Infection in Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 1995, 33, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kim, H.; Cho, S.W.; Oh, H.; Byeon, H.K. A Case of Unexpected Clinostomum complanatum Infection Initially Presenting as Foreign Body in Pharynx. Korean J. Parasitol. 2019, 57, 175–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Song, H.B.; Choi, M.H.; Chung, E.J. Human Laryngeal Infection by Clinostomum complanatum. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 98, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fedorčák, J.; Šmiga, Ľ.; Kutsokon, I.; Kolarčik, V.; Koščová, L.; Oros, M.; Koščo, J. Parasitic Infection of Cobitis Elongatoides Băcescu & Mayer, 1969 by Zoonotic Metacercariae Clinostomum complanatum (Rudolphi, 1814). J. Fish Dis. 2019, 42, 1677–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shamsi, S.; Halajian, A.; Tavakol, S.; Mortazavi, P.; Boulton, J. Pathogenicity of Clinostomum complanatum (Digenea: Clinostomidae) in Piscivorous Birds. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013, 95, 537–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wang, M.L.; Chen, H.Y.; Shih, H.H. Occurrence and Distribution of Yellow Grub Trematodes (Clinostomum complanatum) Infection in Taiwan. Parasitol. Res. 2017, 116, 1761–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dias, M.L.G.G.; Eiras, J.C.; Machado, M.H.; Souza, G.T.R.; Pavanelli, G.C. The Life Cycle of Clinostomum complanatum Rudolphi, 1814 (Digenea, Clinostomidae) on the Floodplain of the High Paraná River, Brazil. Parasitol. Res. 2003, 89, 506–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tavares-Dias, M.; Silva, L.M.A.; Florentino, A.C. Metacercariae of Clinostomum Leidy, 1856 (Digenea: Clinostomidae) Infecting Freshwater Fishes throughout Brazil: Infection Patterns, Parasite–Host Interactions, and Geographic Distribution. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 2023, 58, 116–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Caffara, M.; Bruni, G.; Paoletti, C.; Gustinelli, A.; Fioravanti, M.L. Metacercariae of Clinostomum complanatum (Trematoda: Digenea) in European Newts Triturus Carnifex and Lissotriton Vulgaris (Caudata: Salamandridae). J. Helminthol. 2014, 88, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shamsi, S.; Day, S.; Zhu, X.; McLellan, M.; Barton, D.P.; Dang, M.; Nowak, B.F. Wild Fish as Reservoirs of Parasites on Australian Murray Cod Farms. Aquaculture 2021, 539, 736584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Calhoun, D.M.; Leslie, K.L.; Riepe, T.B.; Achatz, T.J.; McDevitt-Galles, T.; Tkach, V.V.; Johnson, P.T.J. Patterns of Clinostomum Marginatum Infection in Fishes and Amphibians: Integration of Field, Genetic, and Experimental Approaches. J. Helminthol. 2019, 94, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gaglio, G.; Reina, V.; Caffara, M.; Gjurčević, E.; Iari, C.; Marino, F. Risk of Introduction of Clinostomum complanatum (Digenea: Clinostomidae) to Sicily through Use of Cobitis bilineata (Canestrini, 1865) as Live Baits. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304349188_Risk_of_introduction_of_Clinostomum_complanatum_Digenea_Clinostomidae_to_Sicily_through_use_of_Cobitis_bilineata_Canestrini_1865_as_live_baits (accessed on 7 November 2023).
  57. Caffara, M.; Locke, S.A.; Gustinelli, A.; Marcogliese, D.J.; Fioravanti, M.L. Morphological and Molecular Differentiation of Clinostomum complanatum and Clinostomum Marginatum (Digenea: Clinostomidae) Metacercariae and Adults. J. Parasitol. 2011, 97, 884–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Shamsi, S. Parasite Loss or Parasite Gain? Story of Contracaecum Nematodes in Antipodean Waters. Parasite Epidemiol. Control 2019, 4, e00087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhu, X.Q.; D’Amelio, S.; Gasser, R.B.; Yang, T.B.; Paggi, L.; He, F.; Lin, R.Q.; Song, H.Q.; Ai, L.; Li, A.X. Practical PCR Tools for the Delineation of Contracaecum rudolphii A and Contracaecum rudolphii B (Ascaridoidea: Anisakidae) Using Genetic Markers in Nuclear Ribosomal DNA. Mol. Cell. Probes 2007, 21, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Davidovich, N.; Tedesco, P.; Caffara, M.; Yasur-Landau, D.; Gustinelli, A.; Drabkin, V.; Minkova, E.; Aflalo, O.; Morick, D.; Fioravanti, M.L. Morphological Description and Molecular Characterization of Contracaecum Larvae (Nematoda: Anisakidae) Parasitizing Market-Size Hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis aureus x Oreochromis niloticus) and Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) Farmed in Israel. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2022, 26, e00147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mattiucci, S.; Turchetto, M.; Bragantini, F.; Nascetti, G. On the Occurrence of the Sibling Species of Contracaecum rudolphii Complex (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in Cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis) from Venice and Caorle Lagoons: Genetic Markers and Ecological Studies. Parassitologia 2002, 44, 105. [Google Scholar]
  62. Cole, R.; Viney, M. The Population Genetics of Parasitic Nematodes of Wild Animals. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Im, K.I.; Shin, H.J.; Kim, B.H.; Moon, S.I. Gastric Anisakiasis Cases in Cheju-Do, Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 1995, 33, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Younis, A.E.; Saad, A.I.; Rabei, J.M. The Occurrence of Contracaecum Sp. Larvae (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in Four Teleostean Species from Lake Nasser, Egypt: Morphological and Molecular Studies. J. Basic Appl. Zool. 2017, 78, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guardone, L.; Armani, A.; Nucera, D.; Costanzo, F.; Mattiucci, S.; Bruschi, F. Human Anisakiasis in Italy: A Retrospective Epidemiological Study over Two Decades. Parasite 2018, 25, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shamsi, S.; Barton, D.P. A Critical Review of Anisakidosis Cases Occurring Globally. Parasitol. Res. 2023, 122, 1733–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shamsi, S.; Butcher, A.R. First Report of Human Anisakidosis in Australia. Med. J. Aust. 2011, 194, 199–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. González, A.F.; Gracia, J.; Miniño, I.; Romón, J.; Larsson, C.; Maroto, J.; Regueira, M.; Pascual, S. Approach to Reduce the Zoonotic Parasite Load in Fish Stocks: When Science Meets Technology. Fish Res. 2018, 202, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Atkinson, C.T.; Thomas, N.J.; Hunter, D.B. Parasitic Diseases of Wild Birds. In Eustrongylidosis; Spalding, G.M., Forrester, D.J., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 289–315. [Google Scholar]
  70. Moravec, F. Parasitic Nematodes of Freshwater Fishes of Europe; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994; ISBN 9780792321729. [Google Scholar]
  71. Torres, P.; Valdivieso, J.; Schlatter, R.; Montefusco, A.; Revenga, J.; Marin, F.; Lamilla, J.; Ramallo, G. Infection by Contracaecum rudolphii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in the Neotropic Cormorant Phalacrocorax brasilianus, and Fishes from the Estuary of the Valdivia River, Chile. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 2000, 35, 101–108. [Google Scholar]
  72. Deardorff, T.; Overstreet, R. Contracaecum multipapillatum (C. robustum) from Fishes and Birds in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. J. Parasitol. 1980, 66, 853–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dziekońska-Rynko, J.; Rokicki, J. Life Cycle of the Nematode Contracaecum rudolphii Hartwig, 1964 (Sensu Lato) from Northern Poland under Laboratory Conditions. Helminthologia 2007, 44, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Huizinga, H.W. The Life Cycle of Contracaecum multipapillatum (von Drasche, 1882) Lucker, 1941 (Nematoda: Heterochelidae). J. Parasitol. 1967, 53, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Anderson, R.C. Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates: Their Development and Transmission; CABI Publishing: Oxon, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Valles-Vega, I.; Molina-Fernández, D.; Benítez, R.; Hernández-Trujillo, S.; Adroher, F.J. Early Development and Life Cycle of Contracaecum multipapillatum s.l. from a Brown Pelican Pelecanus Occidentalis in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Dis. Aquat. Organ 2017, 125, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Scholz, T.; Garcia, H.H.; Kuchta, R.; Wicht, B. Update on the Human Broad Tapeworm (Genus Diphyllobothrium), Including Clinical Relevance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Esteban, J.G.; Muñoz-Antoli, C.; Borras, M.; Colomina, J.; Toledo, R. Human Infection by a “Fish Tapeworm”, Diphyllobothrium latum, in a Non-Endemic Country. Infection 2014, 42, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Sharma, K.; Wijarnpreecha, K.; Merrell, N. Diphyllobothrium latum Mimicking Subacute Appendicitis. Gastroenterol. Res. 2018, 11, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Craig, P.; Ito, A. Intestinal Cestodes. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 20, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Regolamento Di Polizia Veterinaria. 1954. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/atto/serie_generale/caricaDettaglioAtto/originario?atto.dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=1954-06-24&atto.codiceRedazionale=054U0320&elenco30giorni=false (accessed on 7 June 2023).
  82. Scolari, C. Ricerche Sulla Frequenza Della Plerocercosi Da Diphyllobothrium latum Nei Pesci Dei Laghi Dell’Italia Settentrionale e Sulla Incidenza Della Infestione Nelle Diverse Specie Ittiche Recettive. Clin. Vet. 1955, 78, 210–214. [Google Scholar]
  83. Pampiglione, S.; Di Guardo, G. Bothriocephaliasis on Lake Maggiore: A Propos of a New Human Case. Riv. Parassitol. 1968, 29, 191–196. [Google Scholar]
  84. Grassi, L.; Carneri, I.D. Human Diphyllobothriasis on Lake Como. Riv. Parassii. 1969, 30, 101–144. [Google Scholar]
  85. Terramocci, R.; Pagani, L.; Brunati, P.; Gatti, S.; Bernuzzi, A.M.; Scaglia, M. Reappearance of Human Diphyllobothriasis in a Limited Area of Lake Como, Italy. Infection 2001, 29, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dupouy-Camet, J.; Peduzzi, R. Current Situation of Human Diphyllobothriasis in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2004, 9, 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Menconi, V.; Zoppi, S.; Pastorino, P.; Di Blasio, A.; Tedeschi, R.; Pizzul, E.; Mugetti, D.; Tomasoni, M.; Dondo, A.; Prearo, M. Relationship between the Prevalence of Dibothriocephalus latus (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidea) and the Load of Escherichia Coli: New Findings in a Neglected Fish-Borne Parasitic Zoonosis. Zoonoses Public Health 2021, 68, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Prearo, M.; Pavoletti, E.; Gustinelli, A.; Caffara, M.; Righetti, M.; Bona, M.C.; Scanzio, T.; Ru, G.; Fioravanti, M. Diphyllobothrium latum in Italy: Plerocercoids Larvae Distribution in Perch (Perca fluviatilis) Fillets. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2013, 2, e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gustinelli, A.; Menconi, V.; Prearo, M.; Caffara, M.; Righetti, M.; Scanzio, T.; Raglio, A.; Fioravanti, M.L. Prevalence of Diphyllobothrium latum (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae) Plerocercoids in Fish Species from Four Italian Lakes and Risk for the Consumers. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 235, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Menconi, V.; Pastorino, P.; Momo, I.; Mugetti, D.; Bona, M.C.; Levetti, S.; Tomasoni, M.; Pizzul, E.; Ru, G.; Dondo, A.; et al. Occurrence and Spatial Distribution of Dibothriocephalus latus (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidea) in Lake Iseo (Northern Italy): An Update. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wicht, B.; Limoni, C.; Peduzzi, R.; Petrini, O. Diphyllobothrium latum (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidea) in Perch (Perca fluviatilis) in Three Sub-Alpine Lakes: Influence of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on Prevalence. J. Limnol. 2009, 68, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Borroni, I.; Grimaldi, E. Frequenza Dell’infestione Muscolare Da Larve Plerocercoidi Di Diphyllobothrium latum (Cestoda Pseudophyllidea) Nel Pesce Persico (Perca fluviatilis) Dei Laghi Italiani (Anni 1968–1970). Riv. Parassitol. 1973, 34, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  93. Golay, M.; Mariaux, J. Situation de Diphyllobothrium latum L., 1758, Dans Quatre Lacs Du Plateau Suisse. Bull. De La Société Neuchâteloise Des Sci. Nat. 1995, 118, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  94. Radačovská, A.; Bazsalovicsová, E.; Costa, I.B.; Orosová, M.; Gustinelli, A.; Králová-Hromadová, I. Occurrence of Dibothriocephalus latus in European Perch from Alpine Lakes, an Important Focus of Diphyllobothriosis in Europe. Rev. Suisse De Zool. 2020, 126, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Von Bonsdorff, B. Diphyllobothriasis in Man; Academic Press Inc., Ltd.: London, UK, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  96. Scholz, T.; Kuchta, R. Fish-Borne, Zoonotic Cestodes (Diphyllobothrium and Relatives) in Cold Climates: A Never-Ending Story of Neglected and (Re)-Emergent Parasites. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2016, 4, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bylund, B.G. Diphyllobothrium latum. In Parasites of the Colder Climates; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; pp. 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wicht, B.; Gustinelli, A.; Fioravanti, M.L.; Invernizzi, S.; Peduzzi, R. Prevalence of the Broad Tapeworm Diphyllobothrium latum in Perch (Perca fluviatilis) and Analysis of Abiotic Factors Influencing Its Occurrence in Lake Lario (Como, Italy). Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol. 2009, 29, 58. [Google Scholar]
  99. Peduzzi, R.; Boucher-Rodoni, R. Resurgence of Human Bothriocephalosis (Diphyllobothrium latum) in the Subalpine Lake Region. J. Limnol. 2001, 60, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Honcharov, S.L.; Soroka, N.M.; Halat, M.V.; Dubovyi, A.I.; Zhurenko, V.V.; Halushko, I.A. Distribution of the Nematodes of the Genus Eustrongylides (Nematoda, Dioctophymatidae) in the World. Regul. Mech. Biosyst. 2022, 13, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Eberhard, M.L.; Hurwitz, H.; Sun, A.M.; Coletta, D. Intestinal Perforation Caused by Larval Eustrongylides (Nematoda: Dioctophymatoidae) in New Jersey. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1989, 40, 648–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wittner, M.; Turner, J.W.; Jacquette, G.; Ash, L.R.; Salgo, M.P.; Tanowitz, H.B. Eustrongylidiasis a Parasitic Infection Acquired by Eating Sushi. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989, 320, 1124–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Centers for Disease Control. Intestinal Perforation Caused by Larval Eustrongylides-Maryland. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 1982, 31, 383–389. [Google Scholar]
  104. Eberhard, M.L.; Ruiz-Tiben, E. Case Report: Cutaneous Emergence of Eustrongylides in Two Persons from South Sudan. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 90, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Narr, L.L.; O’Donnell, J.G.; Libster, B.; Alessi, P.; Abraham, D. Eustrongylidiasis—A Parasitic Infection Acquired by Eating Live Minnows. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 1996, 96, 400–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Spalding, M.G.; Forrester, D.J. Pathogenesis of Eustrongylides ignotus (Nematoda: Dioctophymatoidea) in Ciconiiformes. J. Wildl. Dis. 1993, 29, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Coyner, D.F.; Spalding, M.G.; Forrester, D.J. Epizootiology of Eustrongylides ignotus in Florida: Distribution, Density, and Natural Infections in Intermediate Hosts. J. Wildl. Dis. 2002, 38, 483–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Parasites of Centrarchidae from Southern Florida—Bangham—1939—Transactions of the American Fisheries Society—Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1577/1548-8659%281938%2968%5B263%3APOCFSF%5D2.0.CO%3B2 (accessed on 19 October 2023).
  109. Menconi, V.; Tedesco, P.; Pastorino, P.; Confortini, I.; Esposito, G.; Tomasoni, M.; Mugetti, D.; Gustinelli, A.; Dondo, A.; Pizzul, E.; et al. Could Fish Feeding Behaviour and Size Explain Prevalence Differences of the Nematode Eustrongylides excisus among Species? The Case Study of Lake Garda. Water 2021, 13, 3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Karmanova, É. Dioctophymidea of Animals and Man and the Diseases Which They Cause. 1968. Available online: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19692202125 (accessed on 9 June 2023).
  111. Melo, F.T.D.V.; Melo, C.D.S.B.; do Nascimento, L.d.C.S.; Giese, E.G.; Furtado, A.P.; dos Santos, J.N. Morphological Characterization of Eustrongylides Sp. Larvae (Nematoda, Dioctophymatoidea) Parasite of Rhinella Marina (Amphibia: Bufonidae) from Eastern Amazonia. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2016, 25, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Goncharov, S.L.; Soroka, N.M.; Pashkevich, I.Y.; Dubovyi, A.I.; Bondar, A.O. Infection of Predatory Fish with Larvae of Eustrongylides excisus (Nematoda, Dioctophymatidae) in the Delta of the Dnipro River and the Dnipro-Buh Estuary in Southern Ukraine. Vestn. Zool. 2018, 52, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Shamsi, S.; Francis, N.; Masiga, J.; Barton, D.P.; Zhu, X.; Pearce, L.; McLellan, M. Occurrence and Characterisation of Eustrongylides Species in Australian Native Birds and Fish. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2023, 30, e00189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Dezfuli, B.S.; Manera, M.; Lorenzoni, M.; Pironi, F.; Shinn, A.P.; Giari, L. Histopathology and the Inflammatory Response of European Perch, Perca fluviatilis Muscle Infected with Eustrongylides Sp. (Nematoda). Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Gagliardi, A.; Preatoni, D.G.; Wauters, L.A.; Martinoli, A. Selective Predators or Choosy Fishermen? Relation between Fish Harvest, Prey Availability and Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis) Diet. Ital. J. Zool. 2015, 82, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Castiglione, D.; Di Maggio, M.; Guardone, L.; Ricci, E.; Tinacci, L.; Guglielmone, G.; Coltraro, M.; Susini, F.; Armani, A. Eustrongylides excisus in Fish Species Caught in the Massaciuccoli Lake (Northwest Tuscany, Italy): Implications for Freshwater Fish Quality and Public Health. Food Control 2023, 153, 109894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Branciari, R.; Ranucci, D.; Miraglia, D.; Valiani, A.; Veronesi, F.; Urbani, E.; Lo Vaglio, G.; Pascucci, L.; Franceschini, R. Occurrence of Parasites of the Genus Eustrongylides Spp. (Nematoda: Dioctophymatidae) in Fish Caught in Trasimeno Lake, Italy. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2016, 5, 6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Menconi, V.; Riina, M.V.; Pastorino, P.; Mugetti, D.; Canola, S.; Pizzul, E.; Bona, M.C.; Dondo, A.; Acutis, P.L.; Prearo, M. First Occurrence of Eustrongylides Spp. (Nematoda: Dioctophymatidae) in a Subalpine Lake in Northwest Italy: New Data on Distribution and Host Range. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Guardone, L.; Ricci, E.; Susini, F.; Polsinelli, E.; Guglielmone, G.; Armani, A. First Detection of Eustrongylides excisus (Nematoda: Dioctophymatidae) in Big-Scale Sand Smelt (Atherina Boyeri) from the Lake Massaciuccoli (Northwest Tuscany, Italy): Implications for Public Health and Seafood Quality. Food Control 2021, 120, 107517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Franceschini, R.; Guardone, L.; Armani, A.; Ranucci, D.; Roila, R.; Valiani, A.; Susini, F.; Branciari, R. Five-Years Management of an Emerging Parasite Risk (Eustrongylides Sp., Nematoda) in a Fishery Supply Chain Located on Trasimeno Lake (Italy). Food Control 2022, 136, 108858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mazzone, A.; Caffara, M.; Gustinelli, A.; Agnetti, F.; Sgariglia, E.; Lo Vaglio, G.; Fioravanti, M.L. Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Larval and Adult Stages of Eustrongylides excisus (Nematoda: Dioctophymatoidea) with Histopathological Observations. J. Parasitol. 2019, 105, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Rusconi, A.; Prati, P.; Bragoni, R.; Castelli, M.; Postiglione, U.; Rigamonti, S.; Sassera, D.; Olivieri, E. Occurrence Of Eustrongylides excisus (Nematoda:Dioctophymatidae) In European Perch (Perca fluviatilis) And Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) In Lake Annone, Northern Italy. J. Parasitol. 2022, 108, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. King, S.; Scholz, T. Trematodes of the Family Opisthorchiidae: A Minireview. Korean J. Parasitol. 2001, 39, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Mordvinov, V.A.; Yurlova, N.I.; Ogorodova, L.M.; Katokhin, A.V. Opisthorchis felineus and Metorchis bilis Are the Main Agents of Liver Fluke Infection of Humans in Russia. Parasitol. Int. 2012, 61, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Petney, T.N.; Andrews, R.H.; Saijuntha, W.; Wenz-Mücke, A.; Sithithaworn, P. The Zoonotic, Fish-Borne Liver Flukes Clonorchis sinensis, Opisthorchis felineus and Opisthorchis viverrini. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 1031–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Armignacco, O.; Caterini, L.; Marucci, G.; Ferri, F.; Bernardini, G.; Natalini Raponi, G.; Ludovisi, A.; Bossù, T.; Gomez Morales, M.A.; Pozio, E. Human Illnesses Caused by Opisthorchis felineus Flukes, Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008, 14, 1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Pozio, E.; Armignacco, O.; Ferri, F.; Gomez Morales, M.A. Opisthorchis Felineus, an Emerging Infection in Italy and Its Implication for the European Union. Acta Trop. 2013, 126, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Pozio, E. How Globalization and Climate Change Could Affect Foodborne Parasites. Exp. Parasitol. 2020, 208, 107807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Hering-Hagenbeck, S.; Schuster, R. A Focus of Opisthorchiidosis in Germany. Appl. Parasitol. 1996, 37, 260–265. [Google Scholar]
  130. De Liberato, C.; Scaramozzino, P.; Brozzi, A.; Lorenzetti, R.; Di Cave, D.; Martini, E.; Lucangeli, C.; Pozio, E.; Berrilli, F.; Bossù, T. Investigation on Opisthorchis felineus Occurrence and Life Cycle in Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 177, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Fedorova, O.S.; Fedotova, M.M.; Zvonareva, O.I.; Mazeina, S.V.; Kovshirina, Y.V.; Sokolova, T.S.; Golovach, E.A.; Kovshirina, A.E.; Konovalova, U.V.; Kolomeets, I.L.; et al. Opisthorchis felineus Infection, Risks, and Morbidity in Rural Western Siberia, Russian Federation. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Fedorova, O.S.; Kovshirina, A.E.; Kovshirina, Y.V.; Hattendorf, J.; Onishchenko, S.V.; Katanakhova, L.L.; Taslicki, S.S.; Chizhikov, A.V.; Tataurov, I.A.; Vtorushin, S.V.; et al. Opisthorchis felineus Infection Is a Risk Factor for Cholangiocarcinoma in Western Siberia: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2023, 76, E1392–E1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. A Mordvinov, V.; P Furman, D. The Digenea Parasite Opisthorchis felineus: A Target for the Discovery and Development of Novel Drugs. Infect. Disord. Drug. Targets 2010, 10, 385–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Pakharukova, M.Y.; Correia da Costa, J.M.; Mordvinov, V.A. The Liver Fluke Opisthorchis felineus as a Group III or Group I Carcinogen. 4open 2019, 2, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Oliveira, P.; Pires, M.A.; Rodrigues, P.; Ginja, M.; Pires, M.J.; Pires, I.; Cardoso, L.; Antunes, L.; Rodrigues, M. Opisthorchis felineus in Cat: Case Report. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2005, 57, 556–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. K Schuster, R. Opisthorchiidosis-A Review. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets 2012, 10, 402–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kondrashin, A.V.; Morozova, L.F.; Stepanova, E.V.; Turbabina, N.A.; Maksimova, M.S.; Anikina, A.S.; Shahin-jafari, A.; Morozov, A.E.; Mikhaylov, D.V.; Kupriyanova, Y.D.; et al. A Rare Human Helminth Infection in Russia. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Kaewkes, S. Taxonomy and Biology of Liver Flukes. Acta Trop. 2003, 88, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Simpson, V.R.; Gibbons, L.M.; Khalil, L.F.; Williams, J.L.R. Cholecystitis in Otters (Lutra lutra) and Mink (Mustela vison) Caused by the Fluke Pseudamphistomum truncatum. Vet. Rec. 2005, 157, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Schuster, R.; Bonin, J.; Staubach, C.; Heidrich, R. Liver Fluke (Opisthorchiidae) Findings in Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in the Eastern Part of the Federal State Brandenburg, Germany—A Contribution to the Epidemiology of Opisthorchiidosis. Parasitol. Res. 1999, 85, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sherrard-Smith, E.; Perkins, S.E.; Chadwick, E.A.; Cable, J. Spatial and Seasonal Factors Are Key Determinants in the Aggregation of Helminths in Their Definitive Hosts: Pseudamphistomum truncatum in Otters (Lutra lutra). Int. J. Parasitol. 2015, 45, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Hawkins, C.J.; Caffrey, J.M.; Stuart, P.; Lawton, C. Biliary Parasite Pseudamphistomum truncatum (Opistorchiidae) in American Mink (Mustela vison) and Eurasian Otter (Lutra lutra) in Ireland. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 107, 993–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Van Eerden, M.R.; Parz-Gollner, R.; Marion, L.; Bregnballe, T.; Paquet, J.Y.; Volponi, S.; Van Rijn, S.; Carss, D.N. Numbers of Great Cormorants phalacrocorax carbo Wintering in the Western Palaearctic in January 2013. Ardea 2021, 109, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004. 2004. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:Ares(2023)2987790 (accessed on 10 June 2023).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Menconi, V.; Lazzaro, E.; Bertola, M.; Guardone, L.; Mazzucato, M.; Prearo, M.; Bilska-Zajac, E.; Cortinovis, L.; Manfrin, A.; Arcangeli, G.; et al. The Occurrence of Freshwater Fish-Borne Zoonotic Helminths in Italy and Neighbouring Countries: A Systematic Review. Animals 2023, 13, 3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13243793

AMA Style

Menconi V, Lazzaro E, Bertola M, Guardone L, Mazzucato M, Prearo M, Bilska-Zajac E, Cortinovis L, Manfrin A, Arcangeli G, et al. The Occurrence of Freshwater Fish-Borne Zoonotic Helminths in Italy and Neighbouring Countries: A Systematic Review. Animals. 2023; 13(24):3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13243793

Chicago/Turabian Style

Menconi, Vasco, Elena Lazzaro, Michela Bertola, Lisa Guardone, Matteo Mazzucato, Marino Prearo, Ewa Bilska-Zajac, Luana Cortinovis, Amedeo Manfrin, Giuseppe Arcangeli, and et al. 2023. "The Occurrence of Freshwater Fish-Borne Zoonotic Helminths in Italy and Neighbouring Countries: A Systematic Review" Animals 13, no. 24: 3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13243793

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop