Next Article in Journal
BLV-miR-B1-5p Promotes Staphylococcus aureus Adhesion to Mammary Epithelial Cells by Targeting MUC1
Previous Article in Journal
Farmers’ Attitudes in Connection with the Potential for Rodent Prevention in Livestock Farming in a Municipality in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 24
10.3390/ani13243810
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on Growth Performance, Intestinal Immune Response, Barrier Function, and Cecal Microflora of Broilers with Necrotic Enteritis

by
Peng Chen
1,
Huimin Lv
1,
Weiyong Liu
1,
Yang Wang
1,
Kai Zhang
1,
Chuanyan Che
2,
Jinshan Zhao
1 and
Huawei Liu
1,*
1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
2
College of Animal Science, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(24), 3810; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13243810
Submission received: 31 October 2023 / Revised: 7 December 2023 / Accepted: 8 December 2023 / Published: 10 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Poultry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Necrotic enteritis leads to decreased productivity and increased mortality in broilers. Antibiotics have been used to prevent and treat necrotic enteritis. However, the overuse of antibiotics leads to drug residues and resistance. Therefore, there is an urgent need to search for a safe, green, and pollution-free feed additive. Lactobacillus plantarum has been reported to improve immunity and intestinal flora to enhance the intestinal health and growth performance of broilers. In our study, dietary 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 reduced the levels of intestinal inflammatory factors and improved intestinal barrier function and cecal microflora, thus improved growth performance in broilers with necrotic enteritis. Our results provide a theoretical basis for application of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 as a feed additive in broiler production.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on growth performance, intestinal immune response, barrier function, and cecal microflora of broilers with necrotic enteritis. In total, 180 one-day-old male Cobb 500 broilers were randomly allocated into three groups comprising a non-infected control (NC) group, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge (NE) group, and basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge (HW1) group. Broilers in the NE and HW1 groups were orally given sporulated coccidian oocysts at day 14 and Clostridium perfringens from days 19 to 21. The results showed that the HW1 treatment increased (p < 0.05) the average daily gain of broilers from days 15 to 28 and from days 0 to 28 compared with the NE group. Moreover, the HW1 treatment decreased (p < 0.05) the oocysts per gram of excreta, intestinal lesion scores, ileal interleukin (IL) 1β and tumor necrosis factor α levels, and serum D-lactic acid and diamine oxidase levels, while increasing (p < 0.05) the ileal IL-10 level, thymus index, and protein expressions of ileal occludin and ZO-1. Additionally, the HW1 treatment decreased (p < 0.05) the jejunal and ileal villus height, jejunal villus height/crypt depth value, and cecal harmful bacterial counts (Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus), and increased (p < 0.05) the cecal Lactobacillus count. In conclusion, dietary supplementation with 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 could relieve necrotic enteritis infection-induced intestinal injury and improve growth performance in broilers by improving intestinal barrier function and regulating intestinal microbiology.

1. Introduction

Necrotic enteritis is a common intestinal disease mainly caused by NetB-producing strains of Clostridium perfringens [1,2], and often associated with one or more predisposing factors, such as pathogens (e.g., Eimeria) and diet ingredients (e.g., fish meal) [3,4]. The toxin secreted by Clostridium perfringens causes necrosis of intestinal mucosal cells [5] and the toxin penetrates the mucosal barrier into the blood, causing systemic symptoms [6,7]. In addition, necrotic enteritis was reported to cause intestinal ulcers, erosions, and other adverse effects [8], leading to decreased productivity and increased mortality in broilers [9,10]. Antibiotics have been used to prevent and treat necrotic enteritis. However, the overuse of antibiotics leads to drug residues and resistance. Thus, there is an urgent need to search for a safe, green, and pollution-free feed additive.
Probiotics, as a kind of green and pollution-free active microorganism, can effectively prevent the overgrowth of pathogens and the development of diseases in the gut of broilers [11,12]. Lactobacillus plantarum, as a probiotic, produces organic acids during metabolism such as lactic acid, acetic acid, and propionic acid, which can lower the pH of the intestine and inhibit the proliferation of harmful bacteria [13,14]. Studies showed that dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum decreased the oocyst shedding rate and improved the intestinal barrier in Eimeria-infected broilers [15], and improved the intestinal inflammation and decreased the enteric pathogens (Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis) in Clostridium perfringens-infected broilers [16]. Our previous works also revealed that Lactobacillus plantarum HW1, screened from the intestinal mucosa of healthy broilers, improved the growth performance and meat quality in meat geese [17], and had anti-Clostridium perfringens activities in vitro (unpublished data). However, the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on the growth performance and intestinal health of broilers with necrotic enteritis need to be further determined. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on the growth performance, intestinal immune response, barrier function, and cecal microflora of broilers with necrotic enteritis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval

All procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Qingdao Agricultural University.

2.2. Materials

Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 was isolated from intestinal mucosa of healthy broilers according to the method of Noohi et al. [18]. Briefly, the continuously diluted intestinal mucosa samples were plated on Man Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar medium at 37 °C with microaerobic conditions for 48 h and milky white colonies were selected for further purification. And Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 was deposited in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (Beijing, China; CGMCC No. 26160). We purchased a NetB toxin positive type A Clostridium perfringens (CVCC 2030) strain from the intestine of a broiler clinically diagnosed with necrotic enteritis at the China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control (Beijing, China). The laboratory of veterinary parasitology provided four Eimeria species (Eimeria necatrix, Eimeria tenella, Eimeria maxima, and Eimeria acervuline) at Qingdao Agricultural University, China.
Cryopreserved Clostridium perfringens CVCC2030 was thawed and cultured overnight at 37 °C in cooked meat medium (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China). The culture was then transferred to Trypticase Sulfite Neomycin (TSN) medium (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) by plate streaking and cultured anaerobically for 24 h, after which the single colony was then selected and cultured in cooked meat medium (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) to logarithmic growth stage. Cryopreserved Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 was activated and cultured in MRS medium (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) at 37 °C for 24 h. After this, Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 liquid solution was diluted until the concentration of bacteria reached the required concentration.

2.3. Animals and Experimental Design

A total of 180 one-day-old male Cobb 500 broilers (43.22 ± 1.44 g) were randomly allocated into three groups with six replicated cages of ten broilers each for a feeding period of 28 days (Table 1). The three groups included non-infected control (NC) group, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge (NE) group, and basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge (HW1) group. The dosage of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 was derived from a previous study in meat geese [17]. The HW1 group was given a diet containing 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 daily during days 0–28. The liquid Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 were sprayed on the feed during mixing. The viable bacteria count of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 was determined to ensure that each batch of mixed feed provided 4 × 106 CFU/g of diet. The dose of oocysts of Eimeria spp. and Clostridium perfringens CVCC 2030 in necrotic enteritis model were derived from the method of Pham et al. [19]. On day 14, broilers in the NE and HW1 groups were orally given with 1 mL saline containing 4 × 104 sporulated oocysts (Eimeria necatrix 1 × 104, Eimeria tenella 1 × 104, Eimeria maxima 1 × 104, and Eimeria acervuline 1 × 104), while broilers in the NC group were orally given an equivalent amount of normal saline. From days 19 to 21, all broilers in the NE and HW1 groups were daily given orally 1 mL Clostridium perfringens CVCC 2030 at 4 × 108 CFU/mL, and the broilers in the NC group were orally given an equivalent amount of normal sterile medium. The basal diet was formulated according to the requirements of the Cobb Broiler Management Guide [20] (Table 2). The size of cages used was 70 cm × 70 cm × 40 cm (length × width × height). The lighting schedule throughout the experiment consisted of 23 h of light and 1 h of darkness.

2.4. Growth Performance

Feed intake was weighed daily on a replicate basis every day. After 12 h of feed withdrawal, body weight was weighed on a replicate basis at days 0, 14, and 28. Average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), and feed/gain (F/G) ratio were calculated.

2.5. Sample Collection

On day 28, one broiler from each replicate (6 broilers per group) was randomly selected and blood samples were collected from the jugular vein into vacuum tubes containing coagulant (silicon dioxide). Serum samples were collected by centrifugation (3000× g) for 10 min at 4 °C and stored in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes at −20 °C. Then, selected broiler killed by cervical dislocation. Spleen, thymus, and bursa of Fabricius were collected and weighted. Segments of jejunum and ileum were collected and stored in 4% buffered formaldehyde. Duodenum, jejunum, and ileum samples were collected for lesion analysis. Ileal mucosa and cecal contents were collected for further analysis.

2.6. Measurement of Intestinal Lesion Scores and Eimeria Oocyst Counts

On day 19, broiler excreta samples on a replicate basis were collected and the oocysts per gram of excreta (OPG) count was calculated according to the method of Youn et al. [21]. On day 28, the lesions of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of broilers were scored by visual method according to the method of Johnson et al. [22], a score of 0 (no gross lesions), 1 (congested intestinal mucosa), 2 (small focal necrosis or ulceration; 1 to 5 foci), 3 (focal necrosis or ulceration; 6 to 15 foci), or 4 (focal necrosis or ulceration; 16 or more foci).

2.7. Relative Immune Organ Weight

Thymus, spleen, and bursa of Fabricius were weighed. The immune organ indices were calculated using the following formula: [immune organ weight (g)/bodyweight (g)] × 1000 [23].

2.8. Analysis of D-Lactic Acid, Diamine Oxidase (DAO), and Immune-Related Indices

From each replicate (6 broilers per group), 0.1 g ileum mucosa sample was homogenized with 0.9 mL normal saline. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation (3000× g) for 10 min. The levels of D-lactic acid and DAO in serum, and the levels of interleukin (IL) 1β, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) in the ileal mucosa were determined using ELISA kits from Jiangsu Meimian Industrial Co., Ltd. (Yancheng, China). Ileum mucosa samples were homogenized and measured for protein concentration using enhanced BCA protein assay kit (Biyuntian Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and values were expressed per milligram of protein.

2.9. Western Blotting Analysis

The proteins of six ileal mucosa samples from each group on day 28 were extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (Biyuntian Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Equal amounts of proteins were separated by electrophoresis, then proteins on the gel were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were blocked using 5% skimmed milk (Biyuntian Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and then incubated with the primary antibodies, such as anti-β-actin (Xavier Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), anti-ZO-1 (Xavier Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), and anti-occludin (Xavier Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were incubated with anti-rabbit IgG (Biyuntian Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) after washing with Tris Buffered Saline Tween. The blots were then developed via a CanoScan LiDE 100 scanner (Canon, Tokyo, Japan) using the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Biyuntian Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Quantification was carried out with Image J software (Version 1.8.0.112).

2.10. Intestinal Morphology

The intestinal segments were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Sections were placed on a glass slide and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and observed under a microscope (Eclipse 80i, Nikon Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Villus height and crypt depth was measured, and the villus height/crypt depth (V/C) value was calculated from above data [24].

2.11. Cultivation and Enumeration of Bacteria in Cecum

From each replicate (6 broilers per group), 1 g of cecal contents was serially diluted in 9 mL phosphate-buffered saline solution and mixed thoroughly. Total plate count was cultured with Plate Count agar (PCA) (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 48 h. Escherichia coli was cultured with Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 48 h. Clostridium perfringens was cultured with Tryptose Sulfite Cycloserine (TSC) agar (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) under anaerobic cabinet at 37 °C for 24 h. Lactobacillus was cultured with MRS agar (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 48 h. Staphylococcus aureus was cultured with Baird-Parker agar (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 48 h. Salmonella was cultured with Salmonella Shigella agar (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 48 h. The microflora numbers were calculated by plate count and expressed as log10 CFU per gram of cecum digest.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed with single factor analysis using SPSS Statistics 26.0 (SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA). The data on growth performance, immune organ indices, immune-related indices, intestinal morphology, intestinal permeability, and cecal microflora were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. The data on mortality, Eimeria oocyst counts, and intestinal lesion scores were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test. The differences among the three groups were compared by Duncan’s multiple comparison test. Statistical significance was determined at a significance level of p < 0.05 for all means and comparison groups.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance

There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the ADG, ADFI, and F/G ratio among the three groups from days 0 to 14 (Table 3). During days 15 to 28, the NE induction significantly decreased the ADG (p = 0.026) and ADFI (p = 0.035) compared with the NC group. Compared with the NE group, the HW1 treatment increased the ADG (p = 0.026). From days 0 to 28, compared with the NC group, the NE induction significantly decreased the ADG (p = 0.012) and ADFI (p = 0.013). Compared with the NE group, the HW1 treatment increased the ADG (p = 0.012). In addition, compared with the NC group, the NE induction significantly increased mortality (p = 0.031).

3.2. Intestinal Lesion Scores and Eimeria Oocyst Counts

Compared with the NC group, the NE induction significantly increased the duodenal lesion score (p < 0.001), jejunal lesion score (p = 0.001), and ileal lesion score (p < 0.001) (Figure 1 and Table 4). Compared with the NE group, the HW1 treatment significantly decreased the duodenal lesion score (p < 0.001), jejunal lesion score (p = 0.001), and ileal lesion score (p < 0.001). Moreover, compared with the NC group, the NE induction significantly increased the OPG (p < 0.001). Compared with the NE group, the HW1 treatment significantly decreased the OPG (p < 0.001).

3.3. Immune Organ Indices

Compared with the NC group, the NE induction significantly decreased the thymus index (p = 0.003) and spleen index (p = 0.045) (Table 5). Compared with the NE group, the HW1 treatment significantly increased the thymus index (p = 0.003). Moreover, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed for the bursa of Fabricius index.

3.4. Ileal Immune-Related Indices

Compared with the NC group, the NE induction significantly increased the TNF-α (p = 0.035) and IFN-γ (p = 0.039) levels and decreased the IL-10 (p = 0.015) level (Table 6). Compared with the NE group, the HW1 treatment significantly decreased the IL-1β (p = 0.047) and TNF-α (p = 0.035) levels and increased the IL-10 (p = 0.015) level. Meanwhile, the IL-6 and sIgA levels (p > 0.05) did not show significant differences among the three groups of broilers.

3.5. Intestinal Permeability

The serum D-lactic acid (p = 0.003) and DAO (p = 0.018) levels in NE group were higher than those in the NC and HW1 groups, but no significant differences were observed between the NC and HW1 groups (Figure 2).
The ileal protein expression of occludin (p = 0.037) in the NE group was lower than that in the NC and HW1 groups, but no significant differences were observed between the NC and HW1 groups (Figure 3). The ileal protein expression of ZO-1 (p = 0.017) in the NE group was lower than that in the HW1 group, but no significant differences were observed between the NC and HW1 groups.

3.6. Intestinal Morphology

As shown in Figure 4 and Table 7, on day 28, compared with the NC group, the NE induction significantly decreased the villus height (p = 0.009) in the ileal and villus height (p = 0.008) and V/C value (p = 0.025) in the jejunal. Compared with the NE group, the HW1 treatment significantly increased the villus height (p = 0.009) in the ileal and villus height (p = 0.008) and V/C value (p = 0.025) in the jejunal.

3.7. Cecal Bacterial Counts

Compared with the NC group, the NE induction significantly increased the Clostridium perfringens (p < 0.001), Salmonella (p < 0.001), Escherichia coli (p = 0.001), and Staphylococcus aureus counts (p = 0.020) in the cecum, and decreased the Lactobacillus count (p < 0.001) in the cecum (Table 8). The Clostridium perfringens count without log10 transformation in the NE group was over eight times higher than that in the NC group. Compared with the NE group, the HW1 treatment significantly decreased the Clostridium perfringens (p < 0.001), Salmonella (p < 0.001), Escherichia coli (p = 0.001), and Staphylococcus aureus counts (p = 0.020) in the cecum, and increased the Lactobacillus count (p < 0.001). However, the total plate count (p > 0.05) did not show significant differences among the three groups of broilers.

4. Discussion

The protein leakage caused by coccidia enters the intestinal cavity, thereby promoting the rapid proliferation and pathogenicity of Clostridium perfringens, and reducing the digestion and absorption capacity of the small intestine, and thus reduces the growth performance [25]. Intestinal lesion scores are often used to evaluate the severity of necrotic enteritis [26,27]. In this study, necrotic enteritis increased the mortality, intestinal lesion scores, and OPG, and decreased the ADG and ADFI, indicating that necrotic enteritis infection led to intestinal injury and adversely affected growth performance. However, dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 mitigated the negative effects in broilers challenged necrotic enteritis. Previous studies found that Lactobacillus plantarum alleviated the depressed growth performance and intestinal damage of broilers under Clostridium perfringens challenge [16,28]. Moreover, Wang et al. [15] reported that Lactobacillus plantarum P8 could decrease the number of fecal oocysts and intestinal lesion scores, and improve growth performance in broilers challenged with Eimeria.
The organ indices of the thymus, spleen, and bursa of Fabricius are an important index to evaluate the immune function and health status of broilers [29,30]. In this study, necrotic enteritis infection decreased the thymus index in broilers. This was consistent with a study of Song et al. [31], which also found that necrotic enteritis could decrease the thymus index, and increase peripheral blood NO levels and lysozyme activity in broilers with necrotic enteritis. The above results suggested that necrotic enteritis infection could cause systemic infection in broilers. However, dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 could increase the thymus index, indicating that Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 enhanced the immune system in broilers infected with necrotic enteritis. Zhang et al. [32] found that dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus in water increased the thymus index and the spleen index in broilers.
Villus height and crypt depth are important morphological parameters of the intestinal barrier, which play an important role in nutrient digestion and absorption [33,34]. Necrotic enteritis can cause various morphological changes in the gut, such as the decrease in villus height and V/C value [35]. In this study, dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 could increase the villus height and V/C value of broilers under necrotic enteritic challenge, indicating that dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 could protect small intestinal villi from the damage of necrotic enteritis, thus promoting the digestion and absorption of intestinal villi and improving the production performance in broilers. Similar results were found in studies by Yin et al. [36] and Wu et al. [37].
Tight junction proteins are the key components involved in intestinal barrier protection, and play an important role in blocking the entry of unwanted microorganisms, antigens, and related toxins [38]. In addition, DAO and D-lactic acid in the intestinal mucosal epithelium are released into the blood due to intestinal barrier damage [39,40]. Our study found that necrotic enteritis infection significantly decreased the ileal expression of occludin, and decreased the serum DAO and D-lactic acid levels in broilers. However, Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 could alleviate the adverse effects in necrotic-enteritis-challenged broilers. The results demonstrated that Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 alleviated the intestinal damage and improved the intestinal barrier function in necrotic-enteritis-challenged broilers. Other studies also found that Lactobacillus plantarum decreased the D-lactic acid and DAO levels, and increased the protein expression of occludin in broilers challenged by lipopolysaccharide or under heat stress [41,42].
In response to pathogen stimulation, the intestinal epithelium can generate pro-inflammatory factors like IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, which are intimately involved in triggering the inflammatory response within the intestines [43,44]. IL-10, an essential anti-inflammatory cytokine, inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β and IL-6 [45]. In the present study, necrotic enteritis increased the IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels in the ileum, and decreased the IL-10 level, indicating that necrotic enteritis infection caused the balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the intestine to be broken, resulting in intestinal inflammation. However, dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 could alleviate the adverse effects of necrotic enteritis in broilers. Similar results were found in studies by Deng et al. [46] and Gong et al. [16], who found that Lactobacillus plantarum could decrease the levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, and increase the IL-10 level in broilers under Listeria monocytogenes infection or Clostridium perfringens infection. Therefore, this study may provide new evidence for developing Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 as a novel feed additive to diet to prevent broilers from inflammatory response.
Gut microflora has important effects on growth performance and immune function by interacting with nutrition utilization and the development of gut system of broilers [47,48]. In our study, necrotic enteritis infection increased the Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus counts, and decreased the Lactobacillus count in the cecum of broilers, suggesting that necrotic enteritis infection caused cecal microflora disorder in broilers. However, Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 was able to alleviate the increase in harmful bacteria and improve the Lactobacillus count. These results were similar to a previous report in which Lactobacillus plantarum B1 decreased the Escherichia coli count and increased the Lactobacillus count in cecal digesta of broilers [13]. In addition, Lactobacillus exerts antibacterial activity by producing short-chain fatty acids and organic acids, thereby reducing the colonization of harmful bacteria, further facilitating the intestinal micro-ecosystem [49,50].

5. Conclusions

Dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 improved growth performance, immune organ indices, intestinal inflammatory response, barrier function, and cecal microflora in broilers with necrotic enteritis. Considering all these indices, Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 has potential for use as an alternative to antibiotics for the relief of necrotic enteritis in broiler production.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13243810/s1, Figure S1 Western blots raw data

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. (Huawei Liu) and P.C.; Methodology, H.L. (Huawei Liu) and C.C.; Validation, P.C., W.L., and H.L. (Huimin Lv); Formal Analysis, P.C.; Investigation, P.C., W.L., and H.L. (Huimin Lv); Resources, H.L. (Huawei Liu), J.Z., and C.C.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, P.C.; Writing—Review and Editing, H.L. (Huawei Liu), Y.W., and K.Z.; Project Administration, H.L. (Huawei Liu); Funding Acquisition, H.L. (Huawei Liu). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Qingdao Science and Technology Program (No. 22-3-7-xdny-11-nsh; 23-2-8-xdny-8-nsh), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. ZR2021MC118), and the Postgraduate Innovation Program of Qingdao Agricultural University (No. QNYCX22006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Qingdao Agricultural University (protocol code 20230420002 and date of 20 April 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data sets collected and analyzed in this study are available at the request of the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mehdizadeh, G.I.; Navarro, M.A.; Shrestha, J.; Li, A.; Uzal, F.; McClane, B.A. Pathogenicity and virulence of Clostridium perfringens. Virulence 2021, 12, 723–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Smyth, J.A.; Mishra, N.; Shivaprasad, H.L. Toxinotyping of Clostridium perfringens strains recovered from U.S. turkeys with necrotic enteritis. Avian Dis. 2022, 66, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bae, D.; Lee, J.W.; Chae, J.P.; Kim, J.W.; Eun, J.S.; Lee, K.W.; Seo, K.H. Characterization of a novel bacteriophage φCJ22 and its prophylactic and inhibitory effects on necrotic enteritis and Clostridium perfringens in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Prescott, J.F.; Smyth, J.A.; Shojadoost, B.; Vince, A. Experimental reproduction of necrotic enteritis in chickens. Avian Pathol. 2016, 45, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rood, J.I.; Adams, V.; Lacey, J.; Lyras, D.; McClane, B.A.; Melville, S.B.; Moore, R.J.; Popoff, M.R.; Sarker, M.R.; Songer, J.G.; et al. Expansion of the Clostridium perfringens toxin-based typing scheme. Anaerobe 2018, 53, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, H.; Gong, Y.; Xie, Y.; Sun, Q.; Li, Y. Clostridium butyricum protects the epithelial barrier by maintaining tight junction protein expression and regulating microflora in a murine model of dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 53, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Uzal, F.A.; Freedman, J.C.; Shrestha, A.; Theoret, J.R.; Garcia, J.; Awad, M.M.; Adams, V.; Moore, R.J.; Rood, J.I.; McClane, B.A. Towards an understanding of the role of Clostridium perfringens toxins in human and animal disease. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Alnassan, A.A.; Kotsch, M.; Shehata, A.A.; Krüger, M.; Daugschies, A.; Bangoura, B. Necrotic enteritis in chickens: Development of a straightforward disease model system. Vet. Rec. 2014, 174, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cooper, K.K.; Songer, J.G. Virulence of Clostridium perfringens in an experimental model of poultry necrotic enteritis. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 142, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Timbermont, L.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R.; Van Immerseel, F. Necrotic enteritis in broilers: An updated review on the pathogenesis. Avian Pathol. 2011, 40, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lutful Kabir, S.M. The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 3531–3546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chaucheyras-Durand, F.; Durand, H. Probiotics in animal nutrition and health. Benef. Microbes 2010, 1, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Peng, Q.; Zeng, X.F.; Zhu, J.L.; Wang, S.; Liu, X.T.; Hou, C.L.; Thacker, P.A.; Qiao, S.Y. Effects of dietary Lactobacillus plantarum B1 on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, and short chain fatty acid profiles in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 893–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zeng, Y.; Zeng, D.; Zhang, Y.; Ni, X.Q.; Wang, J.; Jian, P.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Yin, Z.Q.; Pan, K.C.; et al. Lactobacillus plantarum BS22 promotes gut microbial homeostasis in broiler chickens exposed to aflatoxin B1. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 102, e449–e459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, Y.; Lv, X.; Li, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, K.; Hao, X.; Liu, K.; Liu, H. Protective effect of Lactobacillus plantarum P8 on growth performance, intestinal health, and microbiota in Eimeria-infected broilers. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 705758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gong, L.; Wang, B.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, L.; Zeng, Z.; Zhang, H.; Li, W. Protective effects of Lactobacillus plantarum 16 and Paenibacillus polymyxa 10 against Clostridium perfringens infection in broilers. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 628374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qian, W.; Wang, B.W.; Zhang, M.A.; Fan, W.L.; Kong, M.; Wang, B.H.; Li, K.X.; Song, Y.J. Effects of Saccharicter-Penin and Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, slaughter performance, serum biochemical indexes and meat quality of meat geese. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2023, 35, 5746–5754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Noohi, N.; Papizadeh, M.; Rohani, M.; Talebi, M.; Pourshafie, M.R. Screening for probiotic characters in lactobacilli isolated from chickens revealed the intra-species diversity of Lactobacillus brevis. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pham, V.H.; Kan, L.; Huang, J.; Geng, Y.; Zhen, W.; Guo, Y.; Abbas, W.; Wang, Z. Dietary encapsulated essential oils and organic acids mixture improves gut health in broiler chickens challenged with necrotic enteritis. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 11, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cobb-Vantress. Cobb Broiler Management Guide. 2018. Available online: http://cobbsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/BROILER-GUIDE-ENG-2018.pdf. (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  21. Youn, H.J.; Noh, J.W. Screening of the anticoccidial effects of herb extracts against Eimeria tenella. Vet. Parasitol. 2001, 96, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Johnson, J.; Reid, W.M. Anticoccidial drugs: Lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp. Parasitol. 1970, 28, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, H.L.; Li, D.F.; Chang, B.Y.; Gong, L.M.; Dai, J.G.; Yi, G.F. Effects of Chinese herbal polysaccharides on the immunity and growth performance of young broilers. Poult. Sci. 2003, 82, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shan, C.; Sun, B.; Dalloul, R.A.; Zhai, Z.; Sun, P.; Li, M.; Yang, S.; Luan, W. Effect of the oral administration of astragalus polysaccharides on jejunum mucosal immunity in chickens vaccinated against newcastle disease. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 135, 103621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Van Immerseel, F.; De Buck, J.; Pasmans, F.; Huyghebaert, G.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R. Clostridium perfringens in poultry: An emerging threat for animal and public health. Avian Pathol. 2004, 33, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. He, Y.; Yang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Ito, K.; Zhang, B. Highly nutritious diet resists Salmonella Typhimurium infections by improving intestinal microbiota and morphology in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 7055–7065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wu, Y.; Shao, Y.; Song, B.; Zhen, W.; Wang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Shahid, M.S.; Nie, W. Effects of Bacillus coagulans supplementation on the growth performance and gut health of broiler chickens with Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, B.; Zhou, Y.; Mao, Y.; Gong, L.; Li, X.; Xu, S.; Wang, F.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, H.; Li, W. Dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum ameliorates compromise of growth performance by modulating short-chain fatty acids and intestinal dysbiosis in broilers under Clostridium perfringens challenge. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 706148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Choi, W.J.; Kim, J.H.; Han, G.P.; Kwon, C.H.; Kil, D.Y. Effects of dietary hatchery by-products on growth performance, relative organ weight, plasma measurements, immune organ index, meat quality, and tibia characteristics of broiler chickens. Anim. Biosci. 2021, 34, 1181–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, J.X.; Maria, T.C.; Zhou, B.; Xiao, F.L.; Wang, M.; Mao, Y.J.; Li, Y. Quercetin improves immune function in Arbor Acre broilers through activation of NF-κB signaling pathway. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 906–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Song, B.; Li, P.; Yan, S.; Liu, Y.; Gao, M.; Lv, H.; Lv, Z.; Guo, Y. Effects of dietary astragalus polysaccharide supplementation on the Th17/Treg balance and the gut microbiota of broiler chickens challenged with necrotic enteritis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 781934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, L.; Zhang, R.; Jia, H.; Zhu, Z.; Li, H.; Ma, Y. Supplementation of probiotics in water beneficial growth performance, carcass traits, immune function, and antioxidant capacity in broiler chickens. Open Life Sci. 2021, 16, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Moreno-Mendoza, Y.; López-Villarreal, K.D.; Hernández-Martínez, C.A.; Rodríguez-Tovar, L.E.; Hernández-Coronado, A.C.; Soto-Domínguez, A.; Hume, M.E.; Méndez-Zamora, G. Effect of moringa leaf powder and agave inulin on performance, intestinal morphology, and meat yield of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 738–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Tao, L.; Liu, H.; Dong, W.; Yang, G.; Li, L. Effects of dietary supplementation with itaconic acid on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, slaughter variables, blood biochemical parameters, and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Song, B.; He, J.; Pan, X.; Kong, L.; Xiao, C.; Keerqin, C.; Song, Z. Dietary macleaya cordata extract supplementation improves the growth performance and gut health of broiler chickens with necrotic enteritis. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 14, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yin, Y.; Liao, Y.; Li, J.; Pei, Z.; Wang, L.; Shi, Y.; Peng, H.; Tan, Y.; Li, C.; Bai, H.; et al. Lactobacillus plantarum GX17 benefits growth performance and improves functions of intestinal barrier/intestinal flora among yellow-feathered broilers. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1195382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, S.; Liu, Y.; Duan, Y.; Wang, F.; Guo, F.; Yan, F.; Yang, X.; Yang, X. Intestinal toxicity of deoxynivalenol is limited by supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum JM113 and consequentially altered gut microbiota in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 9, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Barekatain, R.; Chrystal, P.V.; Howarth, G.S.; McLaughlan, C.J.; Gilani, S.; Nattrass, G.S. Performance, intestinal permeability, and gene expression of selected tight junction proteins in broiler chickens fed reduced protein diets supplemented with arginine, glutamine, and glycine subjected to a leaky gut model. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 6761–6771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mantis, N.J.; Rol, N.; Corthésy, B. Secretory IgA’s complex roles in immunity and mucosal homeostasis in the gut. Mucosal. Immunol. 2011, 4, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Jia, P.; Ji, S.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, T. Dietary pterostilbene supplementation attenuates intestinal damage and immunological stress of broiler chickens challenged with lipopolysaccharide. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skz373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yu, Y.; Li, Q.; Zeng, X.; Xu, Y.; Jin, K.; Liu, J.; Cao, G. Effects of probiotics on the growth performance, antioxidant functions, immune responses, and caecal microbiota of broilers challenged by lipopolysaccharide. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 846649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Song, J.; Xiao, K.; Ke, Y.L.; Jiao, L.F.; Hu, C.H.; Diao, Q.Y.; Shi, B.; Zou, X.T. Effect of a probiotic mixture on intestinal microflora, morphology, and barrier integrity of broilers subjected to heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wu, Q.J.; Zhu, D.D.; Wang, D.D.; Zhang, B.B.; Ren, A.; Zhang, Z.B. Effects of dietary supplementation with glutamine on the lymphocyte proliferation and intestinal immune gene expression in broiler chickens infected with Salmonella Enteritidis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 139, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ashley, N.T.; Weil, Z.M.; Nelson, R.J. Inflammation: Mechanisms, costs, and natural variation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2012, 43, 385–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zheng, Y.W.; Zhang, J.Y.; Zhou, H.B.; Guo, Y.P.; Ma, Q.G.; Ji, C.; Zhao, L.H. Effects of dietary pyrroloquinoline quinone disodium supplementation on inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens challenged with lipopolysaccharide. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 5389–5398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Deng, Q.; Shi, H.; Luo, Y.; Zhao, H.; Liu, N. Effect of dietary Lactobacilli mixture on listeria monocytogenes infection and virulence property in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 3655–3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Giannenas, I.; Tontis, D.; Tsalie, E.; Chronis, E.F.; Doukas, D.; Kyriazakis, I. Influence of dietary mushroom Agaricus bisporus on intestinal morphology and microflora composition in broiler chickens. Res. Vet. Sci. 2010, 89, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tao, W.; Zhu, W.; Nabi, F.; Li, Z.; Liu, J. Penthorum chinense pursh compound flavonoids supplementation alleviates aflatoxin B1-induced liver injury via modulation of intestinal barrier and gut microbiota in broiler. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 255, 114805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. He, T.; Zhu, Y.H.; Yu, J.; Xia, B.; Liu, X.; Yang, G.Y.; Su, J.H.; Guo, L.; Wang, M.L.; Wang, J.F. Lactobacillus johnsonii L531 reduces pathogen load and helps maintain short-chain fatty acid levels in the intestines of pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica infantis. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 230, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, G.; Zhu, G.; Chen, C.; Zheng, Y.; Ma, F.; Zhao, J.; Lee, Y.K.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Lactobacillus strains derived from human gut ameliorate metabolic disorders via modulation of gut microbiota composition and short-chain fatty acids metabolism. Benef. Microbes 2021, 12, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 13 03810 g001
Figure 1. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on intestinal lesion scores in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group). NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge.
Figure 1. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on intestinal lesion scores in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group). NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge.
Animals 13 03810 g001
Animals 13 03810 g002
Figure 2. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on D-lactic acid and diamine oxidase in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge.
Figure 2. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on D-lactic acid and diamine oxidase in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge.
Animals 13 03810 g002
Animals 13 03810 g003
Figure 3. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on the tight junction protein expressions in the ileal mucosa of broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b,ab Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge (Figure S1).
Figure 3. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on the tight junction protein expressions in the ileal mucosa of broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b,ab Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge (Figure S1).
Animals 13 03810 g003
Animals 13 03810 g004
Figure 4. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on intestinal morphology in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group). NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge. Villus height: black line; Crypt depth: blue line. Images of transverse section were photographed under 50× magnification.
Figure 4. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on intestinal morphology in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group). NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge. Villus height: black line; Crypt depth: blue line. Images of transverse section were photographed under 50× magnification.
Animals 13 03810 g004
Table 1. The timetable of the experimental design.
Table 1. The timetable of the experimental design.
GroupsNCNEHW1
Day of the start of the experiment000
Number of broilers per group606060
Day of challenge with Eimeria spp.-1414
Days of challenge with Clostridium perfringens-19–2119–21
Days of treatment with Lactobacillus plantarum--0–28
Day of the end of the experiment282828
Number of evaluated broilers per group666
Table 2. Ingredients and nutrient levels in the basal diet (air-dried basis) %.
Table 2. Ingredients and nutrient levels in the basal diet (air-dried basis) %.
ItemContents
0–14 Days of Age15–28 Days of Age
Ingredients
Corn59.6363.96
Soybean meal34.0829.55
Soybean oil2.673.26
Limestone2.001.75
CaHPO40.480.30
DL-Methionine0.410.42
NaCl0.300.30
L-lysine HCl0.150.19
L-threonine0.080.07
Premix 10.100.10
Multi-vitamin 20.100.10
Total100.00100.00
Total nutrient levels 3
Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg)12.4812.78
Crude protein, %21.7419.95
Calcium, %0.980.82
Available phosphorus, %0.600.42
Lysine, %1.281.18
Methionine, %0.510.49
Threonine, %0.880.80
1 Provided per kilogram of diet: Fe (as ferrous sulfate) 40 mg; Cu (as copper sulfate) 15 mg; Zn (as zinc sulfate) 100 mg; Mn (as manganese sulfate) 100 mg; Se (as sodium selenite) 0.35 mg; I (as potassium iodide) 1.0 mg. 2 Provided per kilogram of diet: vitamin A (trans-retinyl acetate) 10,000 IU; vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 5000 IU; vitamin E (all-rac-α-tocopherol acetate) 80 IU; vitamin K3 (menadione) 3.0 mg; vitamin B1 (thiamin) 3.0 mg; vitamin B2 (riboflavin) 10.0 mg; vitamin B6 (pyridoxine HCl) 4.0 mg; vitamin B12 (cobalamin) 0.02 mg; nicotinic acid 60 mg; calcium pantothenate 15 mg; folic acid 2.0 mg; biotin 0.15 mg. 3 The nutrient levels were calculated values.
Table 3. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on growth performance in broilers with necrotic enteritis from days 0 to 28 (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 3. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on growth performance in broilers with necrotic enteritis from days 0 to 28 (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCNEHW1SEM 2p-Value
Day 0 to 14
Average daily gain (g)33.7531.8433.460.5520.330
Average daily feed intake (g)43.1142.4241.990.2410.157
Feed/gain ratio1.281.341.260.0230.317
Day 15 to 28
Average daily gain (g)64.18 a56.97 b63.47 a1.2690.026
Average daily feed intake (g)96.54 a90.04 b94.30 ab1.0870.035
Feed/gain ratio1.511.591.490.0300.413
Day 0 to 28
Average daily gain (g)48.85 a43.40 b48.46 a0.9040.012
Average daily feed intake (g)70.49 a66.39 b68.45 ab0.6290.013
Feed/gain ratio1.451.541.420.0260.142
Mortality (%)0.00 b8.33 a1.67 a2.4150.031
a,b,ab Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean.
Table 4. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on intestinal lesion scores and oocysts per gram of excreta in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 4. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on intestinal lesion scores and oocysts per gram of excreta in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCNEHW1SEM 2p-Value
Oocysts per gram of excreta 3 (×106/g of excreta)0.00 a2.87 c0.66 b3.023<0.001
Duodenum lesion score 40.00 b2.50 a0.83 b2.946<0.001
Jejunum lesion score 40.00 b2.67 a1.67 b2.8950.001
Ileum lesion score 40.00 c3.00 a1.67 b2.975<0.001
a,b,c Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean. 3 The oocytes of excreta are observed and counted by microscope. 4 A score of 0 (no gross lesions), 1 (congested intestinal mucosa), 2 (small focal necrosis or ulceration; 1 to 5 foci), 3 (focal necrosis or ulceration; 6 to 15 foci), or 4 (focal necrosis or ulceration; 16 or more foci).
Table 5. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on the values for immune organ indices in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 5. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on the values for immune organ indices in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCNEHW1SEM 2p-Value
Thymus index (g/kg)3.40 a2.96 b3.69 a0.0990.003
Spleen index (g/kg)1.31 a1.06 b1.19 ab0.0440.045
Bursa of Fabricius index (g/kg)2.282.062.230.0670.415
a,b,ab Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean.
Table 6. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on the immune-related indices in the ileal mucosa of broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 6. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on the immune-related indices in the ileal mucosa of broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCNEHW1SEM 2p-Value
Interleukin 1β (pg/mg)7.63 ab8.07 a7.48 b0.1050.047
Interleukin 6 (pg/mg)2.142.222.130.0360.598
Interleukin 10 (pg/mg)15.15 a13.60 b15.10 a0.2660.015
Tumor necrosis factor α (pg/mg)5.50 b5.94 a5.57 b0.0770.035
Interferon γ (pg/mg)36.81 b40.95 a39.36 ab0.6980.039
Secretory immunoglobulin A (μg/mg)1.621.541.610.0210.271
a,b,ab Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean.
Table 7. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on intestinal morphology in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 7. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on intestinal morphology in broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCNEHW1SEM 2p-Value
Jejunum
Villus height (µm)1147.23 a1069.55 b1204.25 a19.7900.008
Crypt depth (µm)230.60225.32200.876.7770.163
Villus height/crypt depth value5.05 b4.82 b5.99 a0.2010.025
Ileum
Villus height (µm)860.43 a773.22 b830.04 b13.1470.009
Crypt depth (µm)170.26170.17172.262.8250.936
Villus height/crypt depth value5.054.564.830.0930.085
a,b Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean.
Table 8. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on bacterial counts in the cecum of broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 8. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on bacterial counts in the cecum of broilers with necrotic enteritis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCNEHW1SEM 2p-Value
Total plate count (log10 CFU/g)7.837.997.880.0870.777
Lactobacillus (log10 CFU/g)6.84 a6.19 b6.68 a0.081<0.001
Clostridium perfringens (log10 CFU/g)5.34 c6.25 a5.81 b0.117<0.001
Salmonella (log10 CFU/g)4.09 b5.17 a3.96 b0.167<0.001
Escherichia coli (log10 CFU/g)4.27 a4.66 a3.52 b0.1510.001
Staphylococcus aureus (log10 CFU/g)6.39 b6.59 a6.30 b0.0480.020
a,b,c Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, basal diet; NE, basal diet + necrotic enteritis challenge; HW1, basal diet + 4 × 106 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 + necrotic enteritis challenge. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, P.; Lv, H.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Che, C.; Zhao, J.; Liu, H. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on Growth Performance, Intestinal Immune Response, Barrier Function, and Cecal Microflora of Broilers with Necrotic Enteritis. Animals 2023, 13, 3810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13243810

AMA Style

Chen P, Lv H, Liu W, Wang Y, Zhang K, Che C, Zhao J, Liu H. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on Growth Performance, Intestinal Immune Response, Barrier Function, and Cecal Microflora of Broilers with Necrotic Enteritis. Animals. 2023; 13(24):3810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13243810

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Peng, Huimin Lv, Weiyong Liu, Yang Wang, Kai Zhang, Chuanyan Che, Jinshan Zhao, and Huawei Liu. 2023. "Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum HW1 on Growth Performance, Intestinal Immune Response, Barrier Function, and Cecal Microflora of Broilers with Necrotic Enteritis" Animals 13, no. 24: 3810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13243810

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop