Next Article in Journal
Black Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas agassizii) Life History in the Sanctuary of Colola Beach, Michoacan, Mexico
Next Article in Special Issue
Interspecific and Intraspecific Artificial Insemination in Domestic Equids
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Viscoelastic Coagulation Monitoring System (VCM Vet®) and Its Correlation with Thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) in Diseased and Healthy Dogs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbiological Quality of Raw Donkey Milk from Serbia and Its Antibacterial Properties at Pre-Cooling Temperature
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/ani13030408
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Donkey Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability: A Scoping Review

by
Marta De Santis
1,
Samanta Seganfreddo
1,*,
Alberto Greco
2,
Simona Normando
3,
Daniele Benedetti
4,
Franco Mutinelli
1 and
Laura Contalbrigo
1
1
National Reference Centre for Animal Assisted Interventions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell’Università, 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
2
Research Center “E. Piaggio”, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy
3
Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell’Università, 14, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
4
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana “M. Aleandri”, 00178 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(3), 408; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030408
Submission received: 22 December 2022 / Revised: 18 January 2023 / Accepted: 20 January 2023 / Published: 25 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Research Advances in Donkey and Mule Science and Medicine)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Heart rate variability (HRV) is an increasingly used research tool in animal science and is employed as a noninvasive physiological measure in animal welfare assessment, including horses. This review explores the use of heart rate (HR) and HRV in clinics and research on another, less studied, equine species: the donkey. It discusses the lack of studies and some of the technical and interpretative difficulties that can be encountered in HRV analysis in this species, highlighting the potential of this tool and the need for further studies to determine the optimal methods for its measurement and interpretation.

Abstract

Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) are commonly used physiological measures in animals. While several studies exist on horse HRV, less information is available for donkeys. This scoping review aims to understand the extent and type of published evidence on donkey HR and HRV, their clinical and research applications, the devices used, and the analysis performed. Only quantitative primary studies published in English were considered. Four different databases were queried through the Web of Science platform, with additional evidence identified by citation chasing. After a two-stage screening phase, data were extracted considering study and population characteristics, information on HR/HRV analysis, and applications. The majority of the 87 included articles (about 80%) concerned a sample size of up to 20 individuals and were published since 2011 (about 65%). Forty-one articles employed an electronic device for signal acquisition (mainly electrocardiographs and heart rate monitors), yet only two articles reported HRV parameters. The literature on donkey HRV is lacking, and this gap can be filled by gaining knowledge on donkey characteristics and finding useful tools for welfare assessment. Comparison with what is known about the horse allows a discussion of the technical and interpretative difficulties that can be encountered with donkeys.

1. Introduction

Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) are commonly used physiological parameters in animals. While HR indicates the average number of heartbeats per minute, HRV corresponds to the fluctuation in the inter-beat intervals (IBIs) and is deemed a finer measure of the functioning of the autonomic nervous system [1,2]. In humans, HRV analysis has grown in popularity since the 1960s, thanks to the advancement of digital signal processing techniques and the discovery of its clinical relevance in fetuses and heart patients [3,4,5]. Over the last decades, the interest in HRV research (and clinical) applications has also increased in nonhuman animals, as it is considered a sensitive physiological measure that can be also registered through noninvasive equipment [1,6].
With regard to the Equidae family, which includes horses and donkeys, we found at least four reviews dealing with HR/HRV analysis in horses, revealing a relatively wide number of studies on the topic [1,7,8,9]. The range of applications in this species is ever-growing. HRV analysis sounds promising for the diagnosis of pathological conditions [8,10,11], for the stress assessment of riding horses in the sport and competition context [12,13], during transport [14,15] or animal-assisted interventions [16,17], and for the investigation of the horse emotional state and the mechanisms involved in human–horse interactions and relationships [9,18,19,20].
This spread of HRV analysis goes hand in hand with the advancement of technologies aimed at obtaining increasingly accurate signals using even more easy-to-wear and user-friendly devices. Wearable technologies have been also developed for horses, employing electrocardiograms (ECGs), Holter monitors, telemetric transmitters, heart rate monitors that record IBIs, and recently, photoplethysmographs. Each of these systems has its pros and cons in terms of costs, wearability, reliability, and quantity and quality of data recorded [1,8,21].
Actually, in horses, as well as in other animals, HRV analysis methodologies and data interpretation are still debated. As reported by several authors, techniques and analysis methods suffer from little standardization in the veterinary field, and the results are difficult to compare directly across studies [1,7,8]. In our opinion, the need for standardization and the many questions surrounding HRV analysis make it particularly interesting to study whether and how these physiological measures are used in different animal species. Although HRV analysis in horses is gaining popularity, from a preliminary search conducted through Web of Science and Google Scholar on another equine species, i.e., the donkey, it seems that much less information is available on the aforementioned cardiac parameters and on the way in which they are registered and used; furthermore, no reviews specifically on the topic were identified. As titled in a paper by Burden and Thiemann (2015), “donkeys are different”, their specific variations from the horse should be taken into consideration in the clinical and research contexts. These authors provided an overview of the differences between the two equine species, including behavioral, nutritional, anatomical, and physiological ones. The reported reference ranges for donkeys’ temperature, pulse, and respiration are different from those of horses, as well as their biochemical and hematological parameters [22].
Recently, donkeys are gaining popularity, partly due to the increasing variety of roles that this species plays in human society [23]. Indeed, on the one hand, donkeys are used as a workforce, as well as for milk and meat production; on the other hand, they are kept as companion animals and involved in different kinds of human–animal interactions, including animal-assisted interventions (AAIs). Therefore, it is interesting to investigate the use of HR and HRV in donkey clinics and research, especially in relation to animal welfare, where noninvasive and reliable indicators are sorely needed [23,24]. For example, it would be worthwhile to investigate whether these measures have been used to analyze the effect of potential stressors on the donkeys’ autonomic nervous system.
Hence, this scoping review had the aim of understanding the extent and type of published evidence about donkey heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV), the analysis methodologies employed, and the clinical and research application of these physiological parameters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Protocol

A protocol was developed according to the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) methodology for scoping reviews [25] and is available upon request to the authors. The current review was written following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) [26].

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

Studies reporting primary data on HR and/or HRV in donkeys (Equus asinus) of all ages and genders were included in this scoping review, with the exception of data on donkey embryos or fetuses, which were excluded as they go beyond the scope of this review. No geographical or date restrictions were applied to included studies. Due to time and resource limitations, only studies published in English were included. Only published peer-reviewed primary studies or short communications were considered, with no restriction regarding quantitative study designs: experimental and quasi-experimental, as well as analytical and descriptive observational, study designs were included. On the contrary, qualitative studies, reviews, books, commentaries, editorials, letters, and conference proceedings were excluded.

2.3. Information Sources, Search, and Selection

The search was run in January 2022 through the Web of Science (WoS) platform in the following databases: WoS Core Collection, KCI Korean Journal Database, MEDLINE®, and SciELO Citation Index. The search query is shown in Table 1. After checking for duplicates, one reviewer (M.D.S.) proceeded through the first step of the study selection process (title/abstract screening), discussing any doubt with a second reviewer (S.S.). The full-text screening was then carried out independently by two reviewers (M.D.S. and S.S.). Any disagreement was resolved through discussion or confrontation with an additional reviewer (L.C.). The selected full-text papers were screened through by citationchaser [27], an online tool developed for backward and forward citation chasing (August 2022). The list of references and citations was downloaded and screened by the two reviewers (M.D.S. and S.S.) to retrieve any additional source of information by applying the same eligibility criteria described in Section 2.2.

2.4. Data Charting and Synthesis of the Results

Full-text articles included were charted using a data extraction tool from a review by Latremouille and colleagues as a model [28]. The tool was then adapted in an iterative manner, based on the available data, for the purposes of this review. Data charting included the following sections and items: (a) characteristics of the studies (year of publication, journal, country where the study was performed, and type of publication); (b) characteristics of the population (sample size, breed/subspecies, age and weight of the sample, and sex); (c) information on HR/HRV analysis: parameters reported (HR, HR baseline, RR, i.e., R-wave-to-R-wave interval, RMSSD, i.e., root mean square of the differences between adjacent NN intervals, SDNN, i.e., SD of normal-to-normal or R-wave-to-R-wave intervals, HF, i.e., high frequency, LF, i.e., low frequency, PQRS intervals or morphology/amplitude description, and ECG trace reported) and methodologies for signal acquisition and analysis (kind of devices and analysis software used); (d) HR/HRV applications. As for applications, the framework proposed by Latremouille et al. [28] was used to classify studies into four major categories: physiological conditions; pathological conditions; responses to external stimuli; outcome predictions. Within each category, the reviewers then inductively divided the articles into subcategories. Extracted data, summarized as numbers and/or percentages, are presented through tables or graphs depending on the best graphic visualization, according to the authors, and accompanied by a narrative summary.

3. Results

3.1. Selection of Articles

Of the 158 records identified via the database search, 57 were included. Backward and forward citation chasing from these 57 records resulted in the inclusion of a further 30 records, with a total number of 87 records included for data charting. The PRISMA flow diagram [26] in Figure 1 illustrates the screening process. The data charting tool with all the extracted data from each article is reported in Supplementary Materials. A graphical and narrative synthesis of extracted data is presented in the paragraphs below.

3.2. Characteristics of Articles

The included articles were published by 49 different journals, with Table 2 listing the top publishing journals. Publication dates range from 1969 to today, with 63% of articles (n = 55) that were published in the last decade (precisely from 2011), as shown in Figure 2. Most articles were from Africa (n = 25), Asia (n = 19), and North/Central America (n = 19) (Figure 3A: distribution of literature by region), with USA, Iran, and Egypt being the three countries where more studies were conducted (Figure 3B: distribution of literature by nation). Overall, 83% of articles (n = 72) were classified as original research articles, whereas the remaining (n = 15) were short communications or case reports.

3.3. Population

Most of the articles, about 80% (n = 68), concerned a donkey population of up to 20 individuals. Among these, studies that enrolled 5–10 individuals were the most frequent (n = 39), as shown in Table 3. The studies were also divided according to the age and weight of the donkeys involved (Table 4); most of them employed a population older than 5 years (n = 51) and weight of 100–200 kg (n = 52), although some of the studies fell into different age [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64] or weight categories [29,30,31,33,34,36,41,42,43,45,46,47,48,53,58,62,63,65,66,67,68,69].
Two other characteristics that were taken into account to analyze the population were sex and any breed or subspecies, if mentioned, in order to characterize the sample of donkeys included in the studies. Sex was specified in most of the included articles (n = 71), and the overall ratio between the number of males and females was in favor of males (M/F ratio = 1.5), although some articles presented exclusively male [39,40,41,42,50,54,65,66,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87] or female samples [55,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97]. More than half of the articles (n = 52) did not specify anything about the breed or subspecies of donkeys under study, whilst the remainder enrolled Miniature (n = 11) [37,53,61,66,70,73,79,81,85,91,98], Amiata (n = 4) [63,99,100,101], Nubian or Jerusalem (n = 4) [50,71,92,102], Martina Franca (n = 3) [63,77,97], and other (Mammoth asses [58,93]; Somali [103,104]; Nordestino and North-east Brasilian [95,105]; Abyssinian [44], African [88], Dezhou [39]; Malian [75]; Mexican burro [76]; Nevisan [90]; Sardinian [101]; Zamorano-leones [43]; general feral [68], local [67], and cross [63] breeds) donkeys.
Table
Table 3. Sample size of the included studies (n = 87).
Table 3. Sample size of the included studies (n = 87).
Sample Sizen (%)References
1–415 (17%)[53,70,80,81,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,103,104]
5–1039 (45%)[31,32,33,35,36,38,41,49,50,54,58,61,64,65,66,67,69,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,82,83,84,95,96,98,101,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112]
11–2014 (16%)[34,37,39,42,55,56,63,68,78,79,99,102,113,114]
21–5010 (11%)[29,30,45,46,48,51,57,62,85,100]
51–1006 (7%)[40,43,44,59,97,115]
>1003 (3%)[47,52,60]
n: number of articles.
Table
Table 4. Age and weight categories (n = 87).
Table 4. Age and weight categories (n = 87).
Age Category (Years)n (%)References 1
<114 (16%)[29,30,41,51,52,58,59,60,61,72,88,91,92,100]
1–549 (56%)[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,78,79,82,84,85,90,94,98,106,113,115]
>5–1046 (53%)[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,52,53,54,55,56,57,59,60,61,62,63,64,70,73,75,80,83,89,93,95,99,101,102,105]
>10–2019 (22%)[41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,52,53,59,60,61,62,69,71,81,87]
>208 (9%)[45,46,47,48,59,60,61,86]
Not reported/“adult”15 (17%)[68,74,76,77,96,97,103,104,107,108,109,110,111,112,114]
Weight category (kg)n (%)References 1
<10015 (17%)[29,30,41,42,45,53,65,66,67,72,88,92,112,113,115]
100–20052 (60%)[29,30,31,32,33,34,37,38,40,41,42,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,53,54,55,56,57,62,65,66,67,68,70,71,73,74,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,90,94,95,96,98,102,105,106,109,110,111,114]
>200–30019 (22%)[31,33,34,35,36,43,45,46,47,48,58,62,63,64,68,69,87,89,99]
>30010 (11%)[33,36,39,43,46,47,58,63,69,93]
Not reported17 (20%)[51,52,59,60,61,75,76,77,78,91,97,100,101,103,104,107,108]
n: number of articles; kg: kilograms. 1 Some studies are reported into more than one category, since the subjects enrolled fell into more than one age and weight category.

3.4. HR/HRV Analysis and Signal Acquisition

According to the pre-established inclusion criteria, all the studies had to report primary data on HR and/or HRV in donkeys. The HR parameter was the most prevalent, and its value was reported in all articles (n = 87). On the other hand, the parameters related to HRV were much less frequently reported, as shown in Table 5. Four other studies reported the average R–R interval, which is the interval between two R peaks of the ECG trace and corresponds to the IBI. These studies employed a Holter ECG [87] or an electrocardiograph [37,43,96] to record the signal without reporting any further HRV analysis (which could be achieved on the basis of the R–R interval time series).
Overall, the signal was acquired through different methodologies and devices, as reported by the authors: auscultation or pulse detection (n = 23) [35,36,39,40,50,51,52,58,59,65,68,71,73,74,85,90,95,98,104,105,108,110,112], electrocardiograph (n = 10) [37,41,43,45,49,76,83,89,96,103], heart rate monitor (n = 10) [29,30,32,38,64,75,78,97,101,114], multiparametric device with ECG (n = 4) [66,77,99,111], ultrasound system (n = 2) [46,48], Holter monitor (n = 2) [63,87], pulse oximeter (n = 1) [54], telemetry (n = 1) [94], or their combination (n = 11) [33,47,53,69,70,72,81,86,88,92,106]. The remaining n = 23 studies did not specify the signal acquisition methods and/or devices.
Lastly, some studies using a Holter monitor and/or electrocardiograph also reported other data that are briefly listed as follows for completeness: elements of PQRS morphology or amplitude description (n = 14) [37,43,45,53,63,70,81,86,87,88,89,92,96,106], images of the ECG trace (n = 9) [43,45,53,70,86,87,88,89,92], and PQRS intervals (n = 5) [37,43,45,89,96].
In the n = 41 articles employing various electronic devices for signal acquisition (thus excluding n = 23 studies in which HR was collected through auscultation/pulse palpation and n = 23 studies in which the device was not specified), the brand and/or model of the device used was reported in almost all cases (n = 37). Instead, the software used for analysis was specified in n = 5 articles [63,75,96,97,101], including the two articles reporting HRV parameters (Table 5). Specifically, Polar Protrainer 5 (Polar Electro Europe BV) [75] and Polar FlowSync software (Polar®) [101] were used for HRV analysis.

3.5. Application of HR/HRV Parameters

In n = 21 studies (around 24%), the parameters related to HR/HRV were reported as physiological measures collected on normal/healthy donkeys. Some of them (n = 6) were considered purely normative, i.e., reporting donkey’s HR/HRV reference or baseline values. The remaining articles, in addition to considering a sample of donkeys in physiological conditions, also examined the effect of different variables, such as age, sex, and season, on HR/HRV. These records are detailed in Table 6a. Normative/physiological HR/HRV data can be found even in other studies as resting/baseline values (n = 47) [31,32,33,34,35,36,38,39,41,42,49,54,55,56,57,58,61,64,65,66,67,69,72,73,76,78,79,82,83,84,85,95,96,98,99,101,102,103,106,107,109,110,111,112,113,114,115] and/or referring to a control group (n = 2) [85,108]. Lastly, one article concerned a population of donkeys with both physiological and pathological conditions [47].
Overall, N = 11 studies (about 13%) reported HR/HRV data in relation to a series of pathological conditions. All of these studies were case reports/short communications, as detailed in Table 6b. Some other studies implying the experimental exposure to physical, biological, or chemical potentially pathogenic agents [56,76,85,107,108] were classified in the last category, which reported HR/HRV parameters in response to external stimuli. This category consisted of n = 55 studies (63%). Most of them (n = 33) collected cardiac frequency in response to anesthesia, sedation, or analgesia, while the others considered exposure to other drugs or treatments, work and exercise (with different conditions), heat stress/dehydration, etc. A list of the applications and their references is shown in Table 6c. No studies were classified in the category of outcome predictions.
As for the HRV parameters reported in the two studies listed in Table 5, their applications were classified as follows: the RMSSD parameter was reported in two studies investigating the response to external stimuli, specifically, donkey’s response to AAI [101] and different driving methods [75]. This last study also reported other HRV parameters, namely, SDNN, HF, and LF.

4. Discussion

This review allowed us to explore the currently available literature on donkey HR and HRV and showed that HRV analysis is still largely unexplored in this species. The only two articles identified that reported HRV parameters [75,101] were from the past 10 years. This may be related to the fact that HRV analysis is a relatively recent field of research, especially in animals; on the other hand, most of the studies identified through this review were from the last 10 years, reflecting what McLean and Navas Gonzalez [23] already reported, i.e., that donkeys are recently gaining popularity, and that the scientific literature on this species is growing.
Looking generally at the studies reporting HR, their geographic distribution was wide, reflecting the wide distribution and versatility of donkeys (a characteristic already mentioned in Section 1). The selected studies were mainly small-scale, with a sample size of up to 20 individuals, and they showed a fair variety in terms of the age and weight ranges of the sample. It is known from the literature that individual and environmental variables can influence cardiac parameters (e.g., [29]). Table 6a shows what has been studied so far in terms of general reference values, while also considering the abovementioned variables, basically for HR. This review also made it possible to identify studies in which parameters related to donkey ECG, measured by either electrocardiographic or Holter monitors, were presented. Some of these studies were already mentioned and discussed by Mendoza and colleagues [116], who summarized the main features of donkey ECG. As commented by these authors, the different amount of information available on the cardiovascular system of horses and donkeys is also related to the differences in use between the two species. Indeed, in horses, cardiovascular diseases are frequently found during examinations due to poor sports performance. On the other hand, in donkeys, these examinations are less common, as they are less involved in riding and sporting activities [116]. Rather, 10% of the articles identified analyzed donkey performance and HR/HRV response in relation to work and exercise.
In terms of applications, HR was mainly reported—and examined—as a vital parameter in clinical cases (Table 6b) or to monitor the effect of anesthesia/sedation/analgesia or particular treatments and medications in the clinical setting (Table 6c). Compared to the horse, the donkey has peculiar characteristics, which are related to a number of evolutionary adaptations to semi-arid climates. Given the different fluid balance and water partition, pharmacokinetics differs between equine species, and anesthesia, sedation, and analgesia require species-specific protocols, as well as other anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics [22]. Other studies (shown in Table 6c) analyze the HR response to various potentially stressful stimuli such as work, heat, and transportation. The two studies reporting HRV were also part of this last group; the first compared HRV parameters (specifically RMSSD, SDNN, LF, and HF) in donkeys subjected to different training methods, while the second considered RMSSD before, during, and after AAI sessions. It would be interesting to further investigate these parameters as stress indicators in donkeys, comparing their responses to different stimuli. For example, they could be analyzed to assess the autonomic responses of donkeys to simple stimuli (visual, olfactory, etc.), thereby gaining more information about the perceptual and discriminatory abilities of this species. Alternatively, different management conditions or different types of training could be compared. Lastly, the effect of human–donkey interaction could be explored further, including the context of AAI, e.g., with different types of interventions and approaches to the animal.
Hence, some considerations can be made about HRV analysis in donkeys, also based on what has been reported in horses. HRV is a physiological measure that can be collected noninvasively and has several possible research applications to explore, including welfare assessment. The aforementioned peculiarities and adaptations of the donkey’s physiology affect the functioning of the autonomic nervous system, which is involved in the regulation of body homeostasis. Analysis of HRV could be pivotal to analyze its mechanisms and regulation. Each HRV parameter has its own significance in terms of SNA activation. Regarding the parameters mentioned in this review, the SDNN is influenced by both parasympathetic and sympathetic activity, RMSSD is related to vagal (parasympathetic) activity, and LF mainly reflects baroreflex activity in resting conditions, while HF is influenced by parasympathetic activity and corresponds to the variations of HR linked to respiration [2]. All of these parameters are derived from time-domain (SDNN and RMSSD) or frequency-domain (LF and HF) analysis and are among the most commonly used in the literature for the horse [1]. The analysis of HRV also allows for other time- and frequency-domain parameters to be derived, as well as nonlinear indices. However, the interpretation of these parameters is in some ways still debated, given the complex interaction that occurs between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems and other homeostatic mechanisms in the regulation of HRV [2,7].
Consequently, more studies and a shared methodology are needed to compare results. As for methods, for instance, special attention should be paid to the devices used for data collection. In horses, some critical issues in the use of heart rate monitors have been identified, and the use of ECG is recommended [1,7]. Despite this, a number of studies have compared data obtained from different heart rate monitors and ECG to assess the reliability of these devices [117,118,119,120]. It would be helpful to also carry out this comparison with donkeys. Donkeys have wider subcutaneous fat and thicker skin than horses [116], and these factors, along with their dense fur, can pose an obstacle IBI detection. In addition, there are a number of further issues related to HRV analysis to consider, as revealed in the horse literature. To name a few, frequency band thresholds for HRV analysis are species-specific [1,7], and, to our knowledge, they have not yet been determined in the donkey. Moreover, the length of recordings and the degree of artefact correction seem to play a crucial role [8,120], and these aspects also need to be taken into account in HRV analysis. In particular, as discussed by Broux and colleagues [11], several software programs are already used for HRV analysis in horses (some of which are simpler to use and others of which are more complex). However, each of these programs uses its own, generally unknown, QRS detection algorithm and type of filtering that may affect HRV analysis and, thus, the results obtained. In order to limit these issues related to the heterogeneity of study methodologies, as Latremouille and colleagues [28] concluded in their review of human neonatal HRV, consistency in reporting can be a first step, including information on the devices and analysis software used, data handling, and calculated parameters.

Limitations of the Study

Although our review followed a rigorous methodology, we identified some weak points. Firstly, the initial search was designed with a narrow breadth, but this limitation was compensated for (at least partially) by the citation chasing phase, which allowed additional records to be identified. In addition, books and abstracts were excluded from the search, although they could have provided more data. However, we decided to focus our search on scientific papers because they undergo a peer-review process that makes the reported data more reliable. Moreover, the first screening phase (title and abstract screening) was carried out by only one reviewer, although any doubts were discussed with the other two reviewers.

5. Conclusions

This scoping review allowed us to analyze the existing literature in relation to donkey HR and HRV. It enabled us to highlight how, compared to the horse, the literature on HRV in the donkey is lacking; this gap can be filled in order to learn more about the characteristics of the species and find useful tools for welfare assessment. Similarly, the comparison with what is known for the horse allowed us to present some of the technical and interpretative difficulties that may also be found in the donkey. Lastly, this review can be a useful tool to find information on studies related to HR and HRV and their applications in the Equus asinus species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13030408/s1: Table S1. Data charting of included articles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M. and L.C.; methodology, M.D.S., L.C. and S.S.; investigation, M.D.S. and S.S.; data curation, M.D.S., L.C. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.S.; writing—review and editing, L.C., S.S., S.N., A.G., D.B. and F.M.; visualization, M.D.S. and S.S.; supervision, A.G., D.B. and S.N. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was part of a research project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (RC IZSVe 14/18).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AAIanimal-assisted intervention
ECGelectrocardiogram
HRheart rate
HRVheart rate variability
IBIinter-beat interval
JBIJoanna Briggs Institute
PRISMA-ScRPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews
RRR-wave-to-R-wave interval
RMSSDroot mean square of the differences between adjacent NN intervals
SDNNstandard deviation of normal-to-normal or R-wave-to-R-wave intervals
HFhigh frequency
LFlow frequency
WoSWeb of Science

References

  1. von Borell, E.; Langbein, J.; Després, G.; Hansen, S.; Leterrier, C.; Marchant-Forde, J.; Marchant-Forde, R.; Minero, M.; Mohr, E.; Prunier, A.; et al. Heart Rate Variability as a Measure of Autonomic Regulation of Cardiac Activity for Assessing Stress and Welfare in Farm Animals—A Review. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 92, 293–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shaffer, F.; Ginsberg, J.P. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front. Public Health 2017, 5, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Billman, G.E. Heart Rate Variability—A Historical Perspective. Front. Physiol. 2011, 2, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Malik, M.; Bigger, J.T.; Camm, A.J.; Kleiger, R.E.; Malliani, A.; Moss, A.J.; Schwartz, P.J. Heart Rate Variability: Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation and Clinical Use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation 1996, 93, 1043–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ernst, G. Hidden Signals—The History and Methods of Heart Rate Variability. Front. Public Health 2017, 5, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gaidica, M.; Dantzer, B. Quantifying the Autonomic Response to Stressors—One Way to Expand the Definition of “Stress” in Animals. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2020, 60, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Stucke, D.; Große Ruse, M.; Lebelt, D. Measuring Heart Rate Variability in Horses to Investigate the Autonomic Nervous System Activity—Pros and Cons of Different Methods. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015, 166, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mitchell, K.J.; Schwarzwald, C.C. Heart Rate Variability Analysis in Horses for the Diagnosis of Arrhythmias. Vet. J. 2021, 268, 105590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kelly, K.J.; McDuffee, L.A.; Mears, K. The Effect of Human–Horse Interactions on Equine Behaviour, Physiology, and Welfare: A Scoping Review. Animals 2021, 11, 2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Frick, L.; Schwarzwald, C.C.; Mitchell, K.J. The Use of Heart Rate Variability Analysis to Detect Arrhythmias in Horses Undergoing a Standard Treadmill Exercise Test. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019, 33, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Broux, B.; De Clercq, D.; Vera, L.; Ven, S.; Deprez, P.; Decloedt, A.; van Loon, G. Can Heart Rate Variability Parameters Derived by a Heart Rate Monitor Differentiate between Atrial Fibrillation and Sinus Rhythm? BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. von Lewinski, M.; Biau, S.; Erber, R.; Ille, N.; Aurich, J.; Faure, J.M.; Möstl, E.; Aurich, C. Cortisol Release, Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability in the Horse and Its Rider: Different Responses to Training and Performance. Vet. J. 2013, 197, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Szabó, C.; Vizesi, Z.; Vincze, A. Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability of Amateur Show Jumping Horses Competing on Different Levels. Animals 2021, 11, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Munsters, C.C.B.M.; De Gooijer, J.W.; Van Den Broek, J.; Van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan, M.M.S. Heart Rate, Heart Rate Variability and Behaviour of Horses during Air Transport. Vet. Rec. 2013, 172, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Schmidt, A.; Möstl, E.; Wehnert, C.; Aurich, J.; Müller, J.; Aurich, C. Cortisol Release and Heart Rate Variability in Horses during Road Transport. Horm. Behav. 2010, 57, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gehrke, E.K.; Baldwin, A.; Schiltz, P.M. Heart Rate Variability in Horses Engaged in Equine-Assisted Activities. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2011, 31, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Contalbrigo, L.; Borgi, M.; De Santis, M.; Collacchi, B.; Tuozzi, A.; Toson, M.; Redaelli, V.; Odore, R.; Vercelli, C.; Stefani, A.; et al. Equine-Assisted Interventions (EAIs) for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): Behavioural and Physiological Indices of Stress in Domestic Horses (Equus Caballus) during Riding Sessions. Animals 2021, 11, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Scopa, C.; Greco, A.; Contalbrigo, L.; Fratini, E.; Lanatà, A.; Scilingo, E.P.; Baragli, P. Inside the Interaction: Contact With Familiar Humans Modulates Heart Rate Variability in Horses. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 582759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, K.E.; Kim, J.G.; Lee, H.; Kim, B.S. Behavioral and Cardiac Responses in Mature Horses Exposed to a Novel Object. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2021, 63, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hall, C.; Randle, H.; Pearson, G.; Preshaw, L.; Waran, N. Assessing Equine Emotional State. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018, 205, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guidi, A.; Lanata, A.; Baragli, P.; Valenza, G.; Scilingo, E. A Wearable System for the Evaluation of the Human-Horse Interaction: A Preliminary Study. Electronics 2016, 5, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Burden, F.; Thiemann, A. Donkeys Are Different. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015, 35, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McLean, A.K.; Navas Gonzalez, F.J.; Gonzalez, F.J.N. Can Scientists Influence Donkey Welfare? Historical Perspective and a Contemporary View. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018, 65, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. De Santis, M.; Seganfreddo, S.; Galardi, M.; Mutinelli, F.; Normando, S.; Contalbrigo, L. Donkey Behaviour and Cognition: A Literature Review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021, 244, 105485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Peters, M.; Godfrey, C.; McInerney, P.; Munn, Z.; Tricco, A.; Khalil, H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; Aromataris, E., Munn, Z., Eds.; JBI: North Adelaide, Australia, 2020; Available online: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global (accessed on 11 January 2022). [CrossRef]
  26. Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.J.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Haddaway, N.R.; Grainger, M.J.; Gray, C.T. Citationchaser: A Tool for Transparent and Efficient Forward and Backward Citation Chasing in Systematic Searching. Res. Synth. Methods 2022, 13, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Latremouille, S.; Lam, J.; Shalish, W.; Sant’Anna, G. Neonatal Heart Rate Variability: A Contemporary Scoping Review of Analysis Methods and Clinical Applications. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e055209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zakari, F.O.; Ayo, J.O.; Rekwot, P.I.; Kawu, M.U.; Minka, N.S. Diurnal Rhythms of Heart and Respiratory Rates in Donkeys of Different Age Groups during the Cold-Dry and Hot-Dry Seasons in a Tropical Savannah. Physiol. Rep. 2018, 6, e13855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zakari, F.O.; Avazi, D.O.; Ayo, J.O. Effect of the Depth of Insertion of the Thermometer on the Rectal Temperature of Donkeys During the Hot-Dry Season in a Tropical Savannah. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020, 92, 103147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hamed, M.A.; Abouelnasr, K.S.; Ibrahim, H.M.M.; El-khodery, S.A. Comparative, Sedative, and Analgesic Effects of Epidural Dexmedetomidine and Xylazine in Donkeys (Equus asinus). J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017, 59, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mueller, P.J.; Jones, M.T.; Rawson, R.E.; Van Soest, P.J.; Hintz, H.F. Effect of Increasing Work Rate on Metabolic Responses of the Donkey (Equus asinus). J. Appl. Physiol. 1994, 77, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Matthews, N.S.; Peck, K.E.; Mealey, K.L.; Taylor, T.S.; Ray, A.C. Pharmacokinetics and Cardiopulmonary Effects of Guaifenesin in Donkeys. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 1997, 20, 442–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mostafa, M.B.; Farag, K.A.; Zomor, E.; Bashandy, M.M. The Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Detomidine (Domosedan) in Donkeys. J. Vet. Med. Ser. A 1995, 42, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. El-Kammar, M.H.; Gad, S.B. Antagonism of Detomidine-Induced Sedation, Analgesia, Clinicophysiological, and Hematobiochemical Effects in Donkeys Using IV Tolazoline or Atipamezole. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2014, 34, 784–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. El-Kammar, M.H.; Gad, S.B. Evaluation of the Sedative, Analgesic, Clinicophysiological and Haematological Effects of Intravenous Detomidine, Detomidine-Butorphanol, Romifidine and Romifidine-Butorphanol in Standing Donkeys. Equine Vet. Educ. 2014, 26, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Samimi, A.S.; Tajik, J. Reference Values for Some Clinical, Hematobiochemical and Electrocardiographic Parameters in Miniature Donkeys: The Effect of Sex, Age and Season. Comp. Clin. Path. 2017, 26, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mueller, P.J.; Rawson, R.E.; Soest, P.J.; Hintz, H.F. Influence of Nutritional Status on Metabolic Responses to Exercise in Donkeys. Equine Vet. J. 1995, 27, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, F.; Wu, S.; Yang, W.; Yu, J.; Liu, B.; Zeng, S. Effects of Exercise on Donkey Semen Parameters and Some Physiological Indices. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022, 117, 104079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lizarraga, I.; Beeler-Marfisi, J.; Marshall, D.L.; Hassan, M.; Castillo-Alcala, F.; Simon, B.T.; Fraites, T.; Thrall, M.A. Reference Intervals for Hematological and Biochemical Analytes in a Single Herd of Clinically Healthy Gelding Donkeys in Saint Kitts. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022, 110, 103858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Joubert, K.E.; Briggs, P.; Gerber, D.; Gottschalk, R.G. The Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Detomidine-Butorphanol and Detomidine Alone in Donkeys. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 1999, 70, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Elzubair, A.A.; Seri, H.I.; Ghurashi, M.A.H.; Bulldan, A.G.A. Quality of Anaesthesia Induced Using Diazepam-Thiopentone Sodium in Donkeys. Sudan J. Sci. Technol. 2015, 162, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  43. Escudero, A.; González, J.R.; Benedito, J.L.; Prieto, F.R.; Ayala, I. Electrocardiographic Parameters in the Clinically Healthy Zamorano-Leones Donkey. Res. Vet. Sci. 2009, 87, 458–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lemma, A.; Moges, M. Clinical, Hematological and Serum Biochemical Reference Values of Working Donkeys (Equus asinus) Owned by Transport Operators in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2009, 21, 127. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rezakhani, A.; Yazdanmehr, M.M. The Normal Electrocardiographic Parameters of the Domestic Donkey (Equus asinus). Zentralbl. Veterinarmed. A 1977, 24, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Farag, A.M.M.; Ibrahim, H.M.M. Reference Values and Repeatability of B-Mode and M-Mode Echocardiographic Parameters in Healthy Donkey (Equus asinus)-The Guide to Assess Healthy Heart. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020, 88, 102929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Roberts, S.L.; Dukes-McEwan, J. Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease in the Donkey: Clinical, Echocardiographic and Pathological Observations. Vet. Rec. 2016, 179, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Roberts, S.L.; Dukes-McEwan, J. Echocardiographic Reference Ranges for Sedentary Donkeys in the UK. Vet. Rec. 2016, 179, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Molinaro Coelho, C.M.; Duque Moreno, J.C.; da Goulart, D.S.; Caetano, L.B.; Soares, L.K.; Coutinho, G.H.; Alves, G.E.; da Silva, L.A.F. Evaluation of Cardiorespiratory and Biochemical Effects of Ketamine-Propofol and Guaifenesin-Ketamine-Xylazine Anesthesia in Donkeys (Equus asinus). Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2014, 41, 602–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ayo, J.O.; Dzenda, T.; Zakari, F.O. Individual and Diurnal Variations in Rectal Temperature, Respiration, and Heart Rate of Pack Donkeys during the Early Rainy Season. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2008, 28, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Umaru, M.G.; Lawal, A.I.; Esievo, K.A.N. Baseline Vital, Haematological and Serum Biochemical Parameters of Donkeys. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health 2015, 7, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Etana, M.; Endeabu, B.; Jenberie, S.; Negussie, H. Determination of Reference Physiological Values for Working Donkeys of Ethiopia. Ethiop. Vet. J. 2011, 15, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. De Lange, L.; Van Steenkiste, G.; Vernemmen, I.; Vera, L.; Cromheeke, K.M.C.C.; Walser, U.; Meert, H.; Decloedt, A.; Loon, G. Successful Application of Closed Loop Stimulation Pacemakers with Remote Monitoring in 3 Miniature Donkeys with Syncope. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2021, 35, 2920–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Alsobayil, F.A.; El-Shafaey, E.-S.; Sadan, M.; Alshoshan, A.-A. Evaluation of Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Donkeys (Equus asinus) Premedicated With Xylazine and Induced With Thiopental. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019, 77, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Daradka, M.; Ibtihal, K. Ovariectomy in Jenny Using Subarachnoid Propofol Administration. Vet. Surg. 2014, 43, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. El-Ashker, M.R.; El-Sebaei, M.G.; Aamer, H.G. The Influence of Experimentally-Induced Endotoxaemia on Clinical Variables and Markers of Systemic Inflammation in Donkeys (Equus asinus). Vet. Med. 2017, 62, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hamed, M.A.; Rizk, M.A.; Hafez, A.; El–Mahdi, A.S.; El-khodery, S.A. Comparative Effect of Intravenous Administration of Medetomidine, Tramadol, and Medetomidine/Tramadol Combination on Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in Clinically Healthy Donkeys (Equus asinus). J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018, 69, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Matthews, N.S.; Taylor, T.S.; Hartsfield, S.M.; Williams, J.D. A Comparison of Injectable Anaesthetic Regimens in Mammoth Asses. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 1992, 24, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pritchard, J.C.; Barr, A.R.S.; Whay, H.R. Validity of a Behavioural Measure of Heat Stress and a Skin Tent Test for Dehydration in Working Horses and Donkeys. Equine Vet. J. 2010, 38, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. French, J.M.; Patrick, V.H. Reference Values for Physiological, Haematological and Biochemical Parameters in Domestic Donkeys (Equus asinus). Equine Vet. Educ. 1995, 7, 33–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Samimi, A.S. Clinical and Paraclinical Effects of Transportation on Miniature and Domestic Donkeys. Comp. Clin. Path. 2017, 26, 773–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ibrahim, H.M.M.; El-Ashker, M.R. Reference Values and Repeatability of Transabdominal Ultrasonographic Gastrointestinal Tract Thickness and Motility in Healthy Donkeys (Equus asinus). J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020, 92, 103153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Guccione, J.; Piantedosi, D.; Di Loria, A.; Veneziano, V.; Ciaramella, P. Long-Term Electrocardiography Recording with Holter Monitoring in 15 Donkeys. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2014, 34, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Matthews, N.S.; Taylor, T.S.; Potter, G.D. Physiologic Responses during an Exhaustive Driving Test in Donkeys: Effect of Conditioning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998, 59, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Naddaf, H.; Baniadam, A.; Rasekh, A.; Arasteh, A.; Sabiza, S. Cardiopulmonary Effects during Anaesthesia Induced and Maintained with Propofol in Acepromazine Pre-Medicated Donkeys. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2015, 42, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Matthews, N.S.; Taylor, T.S.; Sullivan, J.A. A Comparison of Three Combinations of Injectable Anesthetics in Miniature Donkeys. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2002, 29, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Abd-Almaseeh, Z.T. Comparative Anesthetic Protocols: Propofol and Thiopental in Xylazine Premedicated Donkeys. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2008, 7, 1563–1567. [Google Scholar]
  68. Woolnough, A.P.; Hampton, J.O.; Campbell, S.; Lethbridge, M.R.; Boardman, W.S.J.J.; Sharp, T.; Rose, K. Field Immobilization of Feral’Judas’ Donkeys (Equus asinus) by Remote Injection of Medetomidine and Ketamine and Antagonism with Atipamezole. J. Wildl. Dis. 2012, 48, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Taylor, E.V.; Baetge, C.L.; Matthews, N.S.; Taylor, T.S.; Barling, K.S. Guaifenesin-Ketamine-Xylazine Infusions to Provide Anesthesia in Donkeys. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2008, 28, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Smith, P.A.; Aldridge, B.M.; Kittleson, M.D. Oleander Toxicosis in a Donkey. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2003, 17, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ayo, J.O.; Dzenda, T.; Olaifa, F.; Ake, S.A.; Sani, I. Diurnal and Seasonal Fluctuations in Rectal Temperature, Respiration and Heart Rate of Pack Donkeys in a Tropical Savannah Zone. J. Equine Sci. 2014, 25, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Maney, J.K.; Dzikiti, B.T. Evaluation of Xylazine–Alfaxalone Anesthesia for Field Castration in Donkey Foals. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2020, 47, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Samimi, A.S. Evaluation of the Sedative and Clinical Effects of Xylazine, Detomidine, Medetomidine and Dexmedetomidine in Miniature Donkeys. N. Z. Vet. J. 2020, 68, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Maney, J.K.; Durham, H.E.; Goucher, K.P.; Little, E.L. Induction of Anesthesia and Recovery in Donkeys Sedated with Xylazine: A Comparison of Midazolam–Alfaxalone and Midazolam–Ketamine. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2018, 45, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. McLean, A.K.; Heleski, C.R.; Yokoyama, M.T.; Wang, W.; Doumbia, A.; Dembele, B. Improving Working Donkey (Equus asinus) Welfare and Management in Mali, West Africa. J. Vet. Behav. 2012, 7, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wykoff, M.H.; Short, C.E. Effects of Neutron Irradiation on Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressures in the Burro (Equus asinus). Am. J. Vet. Res. 1969, 30, 73–76. [Google Scholar]
  77. Suriano, R.; Varasano, V.; Robbe, D.; Carluccio, A.; Straticò, P.; Contri, A.; Petrizzi, L. Intraoperative Analgesic Effect of Intrafunicular Lidocaine Injection During Orchiectomy in Isoflurane-Anesthetized Martina Franca Donkeys. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2014, 34, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Olaifa, F.H.; Ayo, J.O.; Aluwong, T.; Rekwot, P.I.; Zakari, F.O. Ergonomic Study of Donkeys Administered with Pycnogenol® and Subjected to Packing during the Hot-Dry Season in Northern Nigeria. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Samimi, A.S.; Poostfroush, S.; Samimi, K.; Tajik, J. Comparative Anti-inflammatory Effects of Insulin and Dexamethasone on Cardiovascular Biomarkers and Antioxidants in Miniature Donkeys Subjected to Induced Carbohydrate Overload. Equine Vet. Educ. 2021, 34, eve.13524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Oliveira, M.; Moreira, A.R.; Melo-Franco, B.; Moreira, B.; Cunha, E.; Cabral Neto, G.; Féré, S.; Pissarra, H.; da Peleteiro, M.C.; Sales-Luís, J.P. Surgical Resolution of Preputial Sarcoid in a Donkey. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013, 33, 809–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. d’Anselme, O.; Robel, M.; Schwarzwald, C.; Ringer, S.K. Anaesthesia Management of Transvenous Implantation of a Single-chamber, Rate-adaptive Pacemaker in a Donkey with High-grade Second and Third Degree Atrioventricular Block. Vet. Rec. Case Rep. 2022, 10, e363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Odette, O.; Simon, B.T.; Ebner, L.S.; Lizarraga, I.; Sun, X.; Cox, S.K. The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Midazolam after Intravenous Administration to Donkeys (Equus africanus asinus). Can. J. Vet. Res. 2022, 86, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Parentoni, R.N.; Henrique, F.V.; de Brasil, A.W.L.; Dias, R.A.; de Araújo, A.L.; de Mendes, R.S.; Martins, E.F.; da Costa, J.M.; de Souza, A.P.; da Nóbrega, P.I. Detomidine and Xylazine, at Different Doses, in Donkeys (Equus asinus). Braz. J. Vet. Med. 2020, 42, e100820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Abu-Ahmed, H.M. Assessment of Clinical Anesthesia and Cardiopulmonary Effects of Propofol in Detomidine Premedicated Donkeys. Res. Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2015, 5, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  85. Samimi, A.S.; Samimi, K.; Karimiafshar, M.; Tajik, J. Comparative Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Insulin and Flunixin on Acute-Phase Responses and Cardiovascular Biomarkers During Inflammatory Phase in Miniature Donkeys. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019, 81, 102788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zehetner, V.; Lipnik, K.; Url, A.; de Heus, P.; Fröhlich, W.; Cavalleri, J.-M.V.; Berger, S. Pulmonary Fibrosis in a Donkey. Pferdeheilkd. Equine Med. 2021, 37, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ertelt, A.; Bertram, C.A.; Stumpff, F.; Kuban, S.; Klopfleisch, R.; Lübke-Becker, A.; Gehlen, H. Atrial Standstill in a Donkey with Digitoxin Intoxication. Pferdeheilkd. Equine Med. 2020, 36, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sedlinská, M.; Kabeš, R.; Novák, M.; Kološ, F.; Melková, P. Single-Chamber Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation in a Donkey with Complete AV Block: A Long-Term Follow-Up. Animals 2021, 11, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Morimoto, T.; Horvath, S.M.; Yousef, M.K. The Electrocardiogram of Burros. J. Electrocardiol. 1975, 8, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xue, C.; Cavanaugh, S.M. Echocardiographic Findings of a Donkey (Equus asinus) Jenny with Suspected Mitral Valve Dysplasia. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022, 111, 103871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Barton, A.K.; Ohnesorge, B. Concurrent Unilateral Choanal Atresia and Congenital Laryngeal Deformity in a Miniature Donkey. Vet. Rec. 2009, 164, 93–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pibarot, P.; Vrins, A.; Salmon, Y.; Difruscia, R. Implantation of a Programmable Atrioventricular Pacemaker in a Donkey with Complete Atrioventricular Block and Syncope. Equine Vet. J. 1993, 25, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Podico, G.; Gray, S.M.; Wang, L.; Canisso, I.F. A Novel Streptococcus Species Causing Clinical Mastitis in a Pregnant Donkey. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2021, 33, 979–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yousef, M.K.; Dill, D.B. Resting Energy Metabolism and Cardiorespiratory Activity in the Burro Equus asinus. J. Appl. Physiol. 1969, 27, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lucas Castillo, J.A.; Gozalo-Marcilla, M.; Werneck Fonseca, M.; Possebon, F.S.; da Rosa, A.C.; de Araujo Aguiar, A.J. Sedative and Cardiorespiratory Effects of Low Doses of Xylazine with and without Acepromazine in Nordestino Donkeys. Equine Vet. J. 2018, 50, 831–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kojouri, G.A.; Rezakhani, A.; Torki, E. The Effects of Verapamil Hydrochloride on Electrocardiographic (ECG) Parameters of Domestic Donkey (Equus asinus). J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2007, 27, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. De Palo, P.; Maggiolino, A.; Albenzio, M.; Caroprese, M.; Centoducati, P.; Tateo, A. Evaluation of Different Habituation Protocols for Training Dairy Jennies to the Milking Parlor: Effect on Milk Yield, Behavior, Heart Rate and Salivary Cortisol. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018, 204, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Samimi, A.S.; Molaei, M.M.; Azari, O.; Rezaei, M.A.; Hashemian, A. Comparative Evaluation of the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Caudal Epidural Administration of Lidocaine Alone or in Combination With Xylazine, Detomidine, Medetomidine, and Dexmedetomidine in Mediterranean Miniature Donkeys. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022, 113, 103915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Evangelista, F.; Tayari, H.; Degani, M.; Nocera, I.; Briganti, A. Sedative and Respiratory Effects of Intramuscular Detomidine and Butorphanol in Donkeys Sedated for Bronchoalveolar Lavage. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018, 69, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bonelli, F.; Nocera, I.; Conte, G.; Panzani, D.; Sgorbini, M. Relation between Apgar Scoring and Physical Parameters in 44 Newborn Amiata Donkey Foals at Birth. Theriogenology 2020, 142, 310–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Panzera, M.; Alberghina, D.; Statelli, A. Ethological and Physiological Parameters Assessment in Donkeys Used in Animal Assisted Interventions. Animals 2020, 10, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Minka, N.S.; Ayo, J.O. Effects of Shade Provision on Some Physiological Parameters, Behavior and Performance of Pack Donkeys (Equinus Asinus) during the Hot-Dry Season. J. Equine Sci. 2007, 18, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Maloiy, G.M.O. Temperature Regulation in the Somali Donkey (Equus asinus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Physiol. 1971, 39, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bouts, T.; Dodds, J.; Berry, K.; Arif, A.; Taylor, P.; Routh, A.; Gasthuys, F. Detomidine and Butorphanol for Standing Sedation in a Range of Zoo-Kept Ungulate Species. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2017, 48, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. de Paiva, A.L.C.; Ferreira, J.; Nunes, T.L.; Mouta, A.N.; Fernandes, N.S.; Cavalcante, J.M.; Júnior, R.A.B.; de Paula, V.V. Northeast Brazilian Donkeys Have Little Physiological Responses Influenced by Tropical Conditions. Biol. Rhythm Res. 2021, 52, 1383–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Emami, M.R.; Seifi, H.; Tavakoli, Z. Effects of Totally Intravenous Thiopental Anesthesia on Cardiopulmonary and Thermoregulatory System in Donkeys. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2006, 29, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Brown, D.G. Clinical Changes in Burros and Shetland Ponies after Vaccination with Venezuelan Equine Encephalomyelitis Vaccine, TC-83. Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin. 1972, 67, 505–506. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  108. Ikede, B.O.; Akpokodje, J.U.; Hill, D.H.; Ajidagba, P.O.A.A. Clinical, Haematological and Pathological Studies in Donkeys Experimentally Infected WithTrypanosoma Brucei. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 1977, 9, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Sarrafzadeh-Rezaei, F.; Rezazadeh, F.; Behfar, M. Comparison of Caudal Epidural Administration of Lidocaine and Xylazine to Xylazine/Ketamine Combination in Donkey (Equus asinus). Iran. J. Vet. Surg. 2007, 2, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  110. Forhead, A.; Smart, D.; Smith, R.; Dobson, H. Transport-Induced Stress Responses in Fed and Fasted Donkeys. Res. Vet. Sci. 1995, 58, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Amin, A.A.; Mohammed, M.S. Cardiopulmonary Effects of Detomidine-Propofol and Ketamine Administration in the Donkeys. Al Anbar J. Vet. Sci 2012, 5, 168–172. [Google Scholar]
  112. Varshney, J.P.; Uppal, R.K.; Yadav, M.P.; Uppal, P.K.; Yadav, M.P. Evaluation of Xylazine Hydrochloride as Sedative in Donkeys. Indian Vet. J. 1996, 73, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  113. Abakar, J.A.; Ghurashi, M.A.H.; Seri, H.I. Evaluation of Some Anaesthetic Protocols for Induction of Anaesthesia in Donkeys (Equus asinus) in Sudan. J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 2014, 15, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  114. Gebresenbet, G.; Aradom, S.; Kaumbutho, P.G. Performance and Welfare Status of Working Donkeys. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. A 2016, 6, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Patei, A.M.; Wadhwani, K.N.; Parnerkar, S.; Pandya, P.R.; Saiyed, L.H.; Gupta, R.S. Observation on Aspects of Work Efficiency, Feeding Management, Income Generation by Donkeys (Equus asinus) in Urban Gujarat. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 70, 877–879. [Google Scholar]
  116. Mendoza, F.J.; Toribio, R.E.; Perez-Ecija, A. Donkey Internal Medicine—Part II: Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Neurologic, Urinary, Ophthalmic, Dermatology, and Musculoskeletal Disorders. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018, 65, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Haughan, J.; Manriquez, M.; Cohen, N.D.; Robinson, M.A.; de Solis, C.N. Comparison of Novel Wearable Cardiac Monitors to Yield Accurate Exercising ECG and Heart Rate Data in Horses. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2021, 17, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Parker, M.; Goodwin, D.; Eager, R.A.; Redhead, E.S.; Marlin, D.J. Comparison of Polar® Heart Rate Interval Data with Simultaneously Recorded ECG Signals in Horses. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2009, 6, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ille, N.; Aurich, J.; Erber, R.; Aurich, C. Comparison of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Obtained by Heart Rate Monitors and Simultaneously Recorded Electrocardiogram Signals in Nonexercising Horses. J. Vet. Behav. 2014, 9, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mott, R.; Dowell, F.; Evans, N. Use of the Polar V800 and Actiheart 5 Heart Rate Monitors for the Assessment of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) in Horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021, 241, 105401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 13 00408 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for record identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for record identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion.
Animals 13 00408 g001
Animals 13 00408 g002 550
Figure 2. Distribution of studies published by 6 year intervals (n = 87).
Figure 2. Distribution of studies published by 6 year intervals (n = 87).
Animals 13 00408 g002
Animals 13 00408 g003 550
Figure 3. Distribution of the selected literature by region ((A), n = 86) and nation ((B), n = 86). “Other” includes Ethiopia (n = 2), Germany (n = 2), India (n = 2), Iraq (n = 2), Kenya (n = 2), Sudan (n = 2), Australia (n = 1), Austria (n = 1), Belgium (n = 1), Canada (n = 1), China (n = 1), the Czech Republic (n = 1), Jordan (n = 1), Mali (n = 1), Pakistan (n = 1), Portugal (n = 1), Saudi Arabia (n = 1), South Africa (n = 1), Spain (n = 1), and Switzerland (n = 1). One record was excluded because a country was not specified.
Figure 3. Distribution of the selected literature by region ((A), n = 86) and nation ((B), n = 86). “Other” includes Ethiopia (n = 2), Germany (n = 2), India (n = 2), Iraq (n = 2), Kenya (n = 2), Sudan (n = 2), Australia (n = 1), Austria (n = 1), Belgium (n = 1), Canada (n = 1), China (n = 1), the Czech Republic (n = 1), Jordan (n = 1), Mali (n = 1), Pakistan (n = 1), Portugal (n = 1), Saudi Arabia (n = 1), South Africa (n = 1), Spain (n = 1), and Switzerland (n = 1). One record was excluded because a country was not specified.
Animals 13 00408 g003
Table
Table 1. Search query formulated for Web of Science platform.
Table 1. Search query formulated for Web of Science platform.
Web of Science (All Databases Option):
(TS = ((heart rate OR heart rate variability OR HRV OR HR or IBI OR telemetry OR electrocardio* OR heart rate monitor OR Holter OR echocardio*))) AND TS = ((donkey OR equus asinus))
Table
Table 2. Top journal publishing three or more articles on the topic of interest of this review (n = 87).
Table 2. Top journal publishing three or more articles on the topic of interest of this review (n = 87).
Journal Namen (%)
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science19 (22%)
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia5 (6%)
Equine Veterinary Journal4 (5%)
Equine Veterinary Education3 (3%)
Veterinary Record3 (3%)
n: number of articles.
Table
Table 5. HRV analysis methods (n = 87).
Table 5. HRV analysis methods (n = 87).
HRV Parametersn (%)Kind of Device Used [Reference]
RMSSD (time-domain analysis)2 (2%)Heart rate monitor [75,101]
SDNN (time-domain analysis)1 (1%)Heart rate monitor [75]
HF (frequency-domain analysis)1 (1%)Heart rate monitor [75]
LF (frequency-domain analysis)1 (1%)Heart rate monitor [75]
n: number of articles.
Table
Table 6. HR/HRV applications (n = 87).
Table 6. HR/HRV applications (n = 87).
(a) Physiological Conditionn (%)References 1
Normative6 (7%)[40,45,46,51,62,89]
Age effect6 (7%)[29,30,37,44,52,60]
Sex effect7 (8%)[37,43,47,48,52,60,100]
Season/environmental variables effect5 (6%)[29,37,50,71,105]
Time of the day/diurnal rhythm effect8 (9%)[29,30,50,52,63,71,94,105]
Other effects9 (10%)Individual variation [50]; activity/workload [44]; fasting/feeding [94]; respiratory rate [47,52]; body temperature [52]; M-mode or 2D variables [48]; different Apgar scores [100]; weight/BCS [44].
(b) Pathological conditionsn (%)References 1
Heart disease with pacemaker implantation 4 (5%)[53,81,88,92]
Intoxication/toxicosis2 (2%)[70,87]
Other6 (7%)Cardiovascular [47]; congenital disease [91]; mastitis [93]; preputial sarcoid [80]; pulmonary fibrosis [86]; suspected mitral valve dysplasia [90]
(c) Response to external stimulin (%)References 1
Anesthesia/sedation/analgesia33 (38%)[31,33,34,35,36,41,42,49,54,55,57,58,65,66,67,68,69,72,73,74,77,82,83,84,95,98,99,104,106,109,111,112,113]
Other drugs or treatments8 (9%)Anti-inflammatory [79,85]; calcium-channel blocker [96]; experimental infection with Trypanosoma brucei [108]; radiation [76]; vaccination with or without radiation [107]; induced endotoxaemia [56]; pycnogenol [78]
Work and exercise9 (10%)[32,38,39,64,75,78,102,114,115]
Heat stress/dehydration3 (3%)[59,102,103]
Other4 (5%)AAI [101]; different habituation protocols for the milking parlor [97]; transportation [61,110]
n: number of articles. 1 Some studies are reported in more than one category.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Santis, M.; Seganfreddo, S.; Greco, A.; Normando, S.; Benedetti, D.; Mutinelli, F.; Contalbrigo, L. Donkey Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability: A Scoping Review. Animals 2023, 13, 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030408

AMA Style

De Santis M, Seganfreddo S, Greco A, Normando S, Benedetti D, Mutinelli F, Contalbrigo L. Donkey Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability: A Scoping Review. Animals. 2023; 13(3):408. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030408

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Santis, Marta, Samanta Seganfreddo, Alberto Greco, Simona Normando, Daniele Benedetti, Franco Mutinelli, and Laura Contalbrigo. 2023. "Donkey Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability: A Scoping Review" Animals 13, no. 3: 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030408

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop