Next Article in Journal
Carriage of Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli: Prevalence and Factors Associated with Fecal Colonization of Dogs from a Pet Clinic in Lower Saxony, Germany
Previous Article in Journal
Interspecific and Intraspecific Artificial Insemination in Domestic Equids
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/ani13040583
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physiological Impairment and Biochemical Modifications Induced by Triclosan in Mediterranean Mussels

by
Imen Bouzidi
1,2,
Karine Mougin
3,
Hamouda Beyrem
1,
Mohammed I. Alghonaim
4,
Sulaiman A. Alsalamah
4,
Ashraf A. Qurtam
4,
Ezzeddine Mahmoudi
1,
Fehmi Boufahja
4,* and
Badreddine Sellami
5
1
Laboratory of Environment Biomonitoring, Coastal Ecology Unit, Faculty of Sciences of Bizerta, University of Carthage, Zarzouna 7021, Tunisia
2
Institut Supérieur de Biotechnologies de Béja, Université de Jendouba, Jendouba 8189, Tunisia
3
Institut de Science des Matériaux, Université de Haute Alsace, IS2M-CNRS-UMR 7361, 15 Rue Jean Starcky, 68057 Mulhouse, France
4
Biology Department, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11623, Saudi Arabia
5
Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, Tabarka 8110, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(4), 583; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040583
Submission received: 19 January 2023 / Revised: 2 February 2023 / Accepted: 5 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Physiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The use of physiological and biochemical biomarkers in studying the effects of endocrine disruptors on aquatic invertebrates have rarely been adopted by scientists despite their obvious advantage. Applying such tools is discernible in reducing health risks for humans commonly consuming seafood such as bivalves and crustaceans. The outcomes of the current work support the use of the Mediterranean mussels as bioindicators of the presence of triclosan in the environment, and validate the usefulness of biomarkers and physiological features in determining thresholds and government policies.

Abstract

The effects of pharmaceutical under aquatic biota are still not well established. In this investigation, we assessed the results of a common pharmaceutical’s, triclosan (TCS), treatment on physiological and biochemical status of the Mediterranean mussels. Filtration and respiration rates were statistically reduced after treatment with highest considered concentration TCS2 = 100 µg·L−1. However, no modification (p > 0.05) was detected after treatment with TCS1 = 50 µg·L−1. For biochemical responses, oxidative stress parameters including H2O2 level and antioxidant enzymes were enhanced following concentration in considered organs. In parallel, Malondialdheyde content was measured in mussels after TCS treatment and lipid peroxidation occurred at high TCS concentration. Neurotoxicity evaluated by acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity was induced in gills and digestive glands after exposure to TCS2. Overall, physiological impairment, oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation and neurotoxicity could be induced by triclosan in mussels. The association of physiological and biochemical biomarkers constitute a useful tool to measure the impact of pharmaceuticals in marine organism.

1. Introduction

Various therapeutic and diagnostic uses of pharmaceuticals lead to the discharge of these products which eventually reach the marine environment. The origin of pharmaceuticals contamination of marine ecosystems is mainly continental, carried by rivers but also by wastewater from coastal cities, treated or not, discharged directly at sea through outfalls.
These chemicals can have profound biological effects [1], causing additional stress on marine life already affected by other sources. In addition, it is anticipated that as the population grows, the effects of pharmaceuticals on coastal habitats would worsen [2]. Furthermore, it is impossible to ignore the mounting pressure from human activities, which have important ramifications for assessing ocean risk and recognizing potential negative effects on the environment and on human health.
Among pharmaceuticals, antimicrobial agent contamination is a recent problem affecting both public health and the environment [3]. These substances are already largely used in consumer goods [4]. Due to their widespread distribution, they have been recorded in aquatic environments [5].
Triclosan (TCS) is an antimicrobial compound utilized in a number of home items, as well as in plastic products including toys for children and kitchenware [4]. This drug was used since the 1970s, and heavily in hundreds of everyday chemicals since the 1990s. This antimicrobial agent is detectable in waterways [6]. TCS is currently one of the compounds that has attracted the attention of several environmental agencies [7]. It has been identified in different aquatic compartments in very important amount [8,9]. The concentration of this antimicrobial in aquatic system varies from nanogram to microgram [10].
TCS is a hormone disruptor necessary for healthy growth and reproduction [11]. It penetrates the aquatic system through a variety of channels and poses a serious threat to the marine organism [6]. It adsorbs to soil and sediment and can become bioaccumulative [12]. Researchers are more interested in the existence of triclosan and its potential consequences [13,14]. The sublethal effects of antimicrobial agents on the physiological or metabolic parameters of aquatic organisms are essential for the evaluation of their chemical toxicity. These effects often occur at low concentrations and may be linked to the health of individuals and therefore to the health of the population. Physiological responses and oxidative biomarkers are pertinent parameters to identify environmentally stressful conditions [15,16,17,18,19].
Bivalves could be used to measure environmental chemical exposure [15]. These sentinel species are crucial biomonitoring tools because they absorb contaminants from the environment in their tissues [15]. Depending on how quickly a drug is absorbed, mussels may be more or less susceptible to its negative physiological and molecular effects.
The Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) is a good bioindicator species because of its broad distribution, long lifespan, and capacity to filter out pollutants from marine water [16]. This species is one of the most popular marine organisms used for environmental pollution quantification [17]. Additionally, given that this species is consumed globally, pharmaceutical contamination may endanger the environment and humankind.
The lack of knowledge regarding the consequences of TCS on marine organisms, especially on the physiological and metabolic parameters of aquatic organisms, makes the need for the availability of ecotoxicological data for this antimicrobial agent to be expanded.
In the current study, changes in the physiology and biochemical state after TCS contamination were examined using filtration and respiration rates and the oxidative biomarker analysis to underline the harmful effects of TCS in bivalves. This investigation could provide information on possible risks that could arise to marine organisms when exposed to this chemical.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Specimens’ Collection and Exposure Preparation

Mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis of similar size (shell length 45–55 mm) were collected from Bizerte lagoon, Tunisia (37°13′19.26″ N 9°55′46.24″ E). Upon return to the laboratory, the external side of the bivalves was polished. They were thereafter distributed in glass tanks (3 Liter volume) for an acclimatization under environmental condition for a week prior to TCS contamination. During the experiment, mussels lived in natural seawater which was renewed every two days.
Due to the fact that dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO) had no discernible impact on the biomarker responses, stock TCS solutions (purity 98%) were prepared by first dissolving TCS in DMSO, and then added to tanks [20]. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the marine bivalves’ metabolic profiles were unaffected by low concentration of DMSO [21]. DMSO and TCS (purity ≥ 96%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Co., St. Louis, MO, USA.
Firstly, we evaluated the physiological impact of TCS measuring the filtration and respirations capacities of mussels. To this aim, mussels (three replicates of 10 individuals per condition) were treated during 14 days to 0, 0 + DMSO, TCS1 = 50 µg·L−1 and TCS2 = 100 µg·L−1. The TCS concentrations were obtained after dissolution of 20 mg of TCS in 1 mL of DMSO. Exposures were performed under semi-static conditions, with daily changes of the entire volume of water and the addition of TCS stock solution in order to yield the final test nominal concentrations. A DMSO-treated group (15 µL/3 L = 5 µg·L−1) was established to examine the effects of the solvent and this represents the highest volume of DMSO used in the present study to allow a concentration 100 µg·L−1 TCS/seawater (TCS2). In parallel, to measure oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and neurotoxicity induced by TCS, three replicates of 10 individuals per condition were considered. During the experimental period, salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH were measured daily with a thermo-salinity meter (LF196; WTW, Weilheim, Germany), an oximeter (OXI 330/SET, WTW), and a pH meter (pH 330/SET-1, WTW), respectively. The temperature was maintained at 19 ± 2 °C, oxygen at 6.2 mg/L, and the salinity was 32‰. After exposure to TCS, tissues were excised, gills and digestive glands were then stored at −80 °C.

2.2. Physiological Parameters Determination

The physiological effects of TCS on mussels were determined by measuring the rates of respiration and filtration. Filtration rate measurements were made in closed chambers on the basis of the removal of neutral red dye (CAS: 553-24-2 purchased from Sigma-Aldrich) from the water column as reported in Coughlan [22]. Following exposure, 30 mussels from each treatment were individually distributed in 200 mL beakers that contained 100 mL of neutral red solution (1 mg·L−1). An aliquot of water was taken out of each beaker before adding the mussels to the solution in order to figure out the initial concentration (C0). The bivalves were taken out after 2 h; the residual solution (Ct) and initial aliquot (C0) were then acidified to pH 5 with 5% HCl. In order to determine the amounts of neutral red, the absorbance was finally measured at 550 nm. Standards of neutral red were measured along with the samples and used to establish a standard curve, from which dye concentrations could be extrapolated. FR was calculated using the following equation:
FR = [M/nt] log (C0/Ct)
where FR is the filtration rate (mg·indiv−1·h−1), M is the total volume of water, n is the number of clams used, t is the time in h and C0 and Ct the concentration values between two sampling times.
The respiration rate was measured as reported by Basti et al. [23], using calibrated oxygen electrodes linked to an oximeter. The reduction in oxygen concentrations was measured every half hour for three hours and calculated using the following equation:
RR = [Ct0 − Cti] × V/(ti − t0)
where RR is the respiration rate (mg·O2·h−1), Ct is the concentration of oxygen in the water (mg·O2·L−1) at time t (t0: initial time and ti: end time h) and V is the volume of the total solution in the sealed chamber.

2.3. Biomarker’s Determination

Digestive glands and gills of 30 fresh bivalves were separately homogenized into 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and centrifuged at 10,000 g for half an hour at 4 °C. The supernatants obtained were considered to measure H2O2 level, the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), catalase (CAT), and acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and the level of malondialdehyde (MDA).
The content of H2O2 was determined according to the Wolff method [24]. SOD activity was measured by the pyrogallol method in U·mg−1 protein as described Marklund and Marklund [25]. CAT activity was evaluated in nMol·min−1·mg−1 protein according to the Aebi method [26]. The reaction solution was composed of 80 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, and 50 mM H2O2 [27]. Following the GSH’s conjugation with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, the GST activity was measured at 340 nm [28]. AChE activity was evaluated according to the Ellman et al. [29] method and given in nMol·min−1·mg−1 protein. The intensity of lipid peroxidation was estimated according to Tkachenko and Grudniewska [30] and mean values were reported as nmol MDA per mg of protein. The content of proteins was measured by using as standard bovine serum albumin (BSA) as described by Bradford [31].
All reagents and equipment needed for biochemical determination were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Co., St. Louis, MO, USA.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

STATISTICA 8.0 software was used to conduct the statistical difference between experimental conditions. A one-way ANOVA was employed and Tukey’s HSD test was considered to find out which average values differed discernibly. The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05 for all statistical analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Triclosan Impact on Mussel’s Physiology

TCS statistically reduced mussel’s filtration rate following concentration gradient. For mussels treated with TCS1, no statistical difference (p > 0.05) was observed between the treated and the untreated group. In contrast, the FR in mussels exposed to TCS2 was reduced from 115 ± 4.58 to 72 ± 4.08 mg·indiv−1·h−1 (Figure 1A) showing a statistical difference (p < 0.05) in comparison to the untreated group confirmed by the one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test (Figure 1A).
After 14 days of TCS treatment, respiration (RR) was also changed. A very low RR (from 0.69 ± 0.06 to 0.56 ± 0.011 mg·O2·h−1) was detected for mussels treated with TCS2 = 100 g·L−1, exhibiting a statistical difference (p = 0.0012), compared to untreated mussels. Respiration was reduced following the concentration of TCS (Figure 1B).

3.2. Effects of Triclosan on Oxidative Stress Biomarkers

Figure 2 shows the mean variation of H2O2 production and antioxidant enzymes activities in considered organs after TCS contamination (Figure 2). No statistically, modifications for all considered parameters were found in the tissues of gills and digestive glands following TCS1 treatment. In contrast, treatment with TCS2 increased SOD activity by 25 and 76% in gills and digestive glands, respectively (Figure 2A). Additionally, mussels treated with TCS2 produced much more H2O2 in their gills and digestive glands. The digestive glands showed the biggest increase in H2O2 generation, with a mean value rising from 1.31 ± 0.11 nMol/min/mg proteins in the untreated group to 3.57 ± 0.14 nMol/min/mg proteins in the TCS2-treated group (Figure 2B). The exposure to TCS1 treatment was not followed by significant changes in CAT activity in either tissue (Figure 2C). However, the activity of this biomarker increased from 0.15 ± 0.013 µMol/min/mg proteins to 0.27 ± 0.009 µMol/min/mg proteins, in the digestive glands of mussels treated with TCS2 and from 0.08 ± 0.001 µMol/min/mg proteins to 0.32 ± 0.0009 µMol/min/mg proteins in the gills (Figure 2C).
GST showed a similar trend with an increase after exposure to TCS2, and a statistically significant change (p < 0.05) was recorded when compared activity of this marker between TCS2 treated mussels and control group (Figure 2D).

3.3. Effects of Triclosan on MDA Levels and AChE Activity

After being exposed to TCS1, no appreciable alteration was seen for MDA contents in the mussels’ considered tissues (Figure 3). However, contents were found to be higher following TCS2 treatment.
TCS2 also altered AChE activity which dramatically decreased (Figure 3) in the digestive glands, decreasing from 1.53 ± 0.02 µMol/min/mg proteins to 0.73 ± 0.01 µMol/min/mg proteins, and in gills, decreasing from 0.98 ± 0.002 µmol·min−1·mg−1 proteins to 0.56 ± 0.015 µMol/min/mg proteins.

4. Discussion

Water pollution from drug residues is a growing environmental concern, according to water policy experts, and they advise the rigorous monitoring of certain of these substances to ascertain the damage they may cause to aquatic life [32].
The physiologic parameters measurements including filtration and respiration capacities on bivalve mollusks were used for chemicals ecotoxicity quantification [33,34]. They gave a hint as to the probable effects of environmental contaminants on aquatic population and subsequently on a marine ecosystem. In addition, these parameters gave an explanation to the short-term functional adjustments of mussel nutrition under perturbation. In the present study, filtration and respiration capacities were measured to evaluate the toxicity of pharmaceutical TCS in marine mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis. Filtration and respiration capacities results indicated that TCS reduces both parameters in mussels during two weeks of treatment with 100 µg·L−1 of this drug. As previously proposed for other organisms subjected to external stressors, this reduction may be connected to the bio-uptake of TCS in the mussel treated with high TCS concentration, which causes a decrease in oxygen intake and aerobic cellular energy generation [35]. Our findings are consistent with other research that found a decrease in the feeding rate following contamination and suggested that this response was caused by anxious animals striving to reduce their exposure to contamination [36]. No significant modification was observed for both filtration and respiration capacities after exposure to TCS1 = 50 µg·L−1. This could be due to the TCS concentration being lower in this study compared to other studies [37,38]. In addition, this result may probably confirm the resistance of mussels and its ability to avoid the contaminant at this level, as confirmed for other bivalve expose to pharmaceuticals [39]. According to these authors, mussels kept their valves closed to prevent the buildup of carbamazepine in order to deal with exposure to this chemical. Similar to this, Gosling [40] noted that bivalves have the ability to quickly seal their valves as a form of defense when confronted with a stressful situation. Thus, less energy could be needed for respiration and feeding as a result of this closure [41]. In contrast, a slowing in the mussels’ metabolic ability might be the cause of the decrease in filtration and respiration capacities shown at high TCS concentration. As documented by Oliveira et al. [39] for mussels subjected to different amounts of carbamazepine, this is leading to reduced energy consumption being employed in other biological mechanisms.
Crossing the physiological parameters, the TCS could be accumulated with the mussel’s tissues leading to biochemical changes. To keep away organisms from an overload of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) followed by an oxidative stress status, antioxidant defense enzymes are usually activated. These enzymes’ significant contribution to antioxidant defense in bivalves has been proven [42]. Antioxidant enzymes are induced when ROS are produced in response to pollutants on exposed bivalves. In the current investigation, mussels exposed to TCS2 level had significantly higher SOD and CAT activities in the target organs. Since these enzymes are also involved in O2•− and H2O2 detoxification, this result supports the possibility of oxidative stress brought on by TCS exposure. Additionally, oxidative stress will develop if the generation of ROS rises [43]. In this work, the H2O2 content was increased in both organs after TCS2 treatment and this may potentially lead to antioxidant enzymes induction, especially CAT which acts as scavengers of hydrogen peroxide. A similar study has reported that SOD and CAT were induced in a concentration-dependent manner after exposure to diclofenac [44]. The authors demonstrated that Diclofenacs modulate SOD and CAT activities in stressed groups. The increase in SOD and CAT activities noticed in this study is a functional biological adjustment to neutralize oxidative stress related to ROS production after TCS exposure.
Phase II metabolism often involves the detoxification of TCS by the cytosolic multifunctional enzyme GST, which catalyzes the conjugation of several metabolites [45]. Additionally, earlier research revealed that the metabolism’s phase II (GST) was responsive to pharmaceutical concentrations [46]. In the current investigation, TCS2 treatment induced the GST activity in the considered organs.
Our results are in good agreement with a previous report [47] in which GST activity in Perna perna was only induced at the highest concentration of DCF. Previous investigations have also revealed an increase in this biomarker’s activity in aquatic invertebrates exposed to TCS [48,49].
TCS exposure modulates GST in a dose-dependent way, and researchers hypothesize that the formation of hazardous metabolites via lipo-peroxidation through the Fenton reaction is what causes the increase in GST. The optimization of oxidative stress related to ROS overproduction and the restoration of the cellular homeostasis may also be linked to the stimulation of GST activity [45]. The antioxidant enzyme responses of mussels to TCS exposure could lead to suggest that the impacts of pharmaceuticals are related to concentration and time as reported in previous investigations [50,51].
ROS overproduction could lead to cell membrane damage and MDA is a useful marker of oxidative damage when organisms are unable to handle oxidative stress [52]. In this work, the MDA level in mussels was increased following TCS2 treatment. According to similar findings, TCS exposure modifies MDA levels in zebrafish (Danio rerio), resulting in increased lipid peroxidation [53]. Furthermore, TCS increases ROS production, which damages the cell membrane, as explained by changes in MDA levels and oxidative biomarkers [52]. This disruption may be related to lipid synthesis and a degradation in treated mussels [54]. Because lipid peroxidation is sign of cell function loss under oxidative stress, the MDA response could explain the toxic effect of TCS [55]. Aside from antioxidant biomarkers, AChE can be used to predict significant or permanent long-term damage [46]. TCS2 treatment also reduced AChE activity in mussels’ organs, indicating that this compound has a toxic effect in marine mussels. Oliveira et al. [56] observed this inhibition in TCS-exposed zebrafish.
The obtained results in this study indicate that both physiological and biochemical analysis tests are more sensitive than the usual toxicity test (lethal concentration) and constitute a useful tool to measure the impact of TCS in marine mussels.

5. Conclusions

The mussel M. galloprovincialis exposed to TCS was affected during 14 days of the study. The physiological response and the antioxidant system were rapidly triggered in the gills and digestive glands. Evidence of cell membrane damage was also observed. Furthermore, the TCS induced AChE activity in a concentration-dependent manner and both organs were affected, suggesting a possible breakdown of the cholinergic neurotransmission functions. This investigation highlighted the important association of physiological impairments and biochemical changes in pharmaceutical toxicity determination. Furthermore, based on ecotoxicological data, it is also important to examine the possible degradation of TCS in marine ecosystems to reduce its concentration and then protect the environment.

Author Contributions

Biomarker assessment, writing—original draft, I.B.; validation and writing—original draft, K.M.; literature investigation, H.B.; review and editing, funding acquisition and review and editing, M.I.A.; literature investigation and formal analysis, S.A.A. and A.A.Q.; statistical analyses, E.M.; review and editing, F.B.; conceptualization, supervision, review and editing, B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University for funding this work through Research Group no. RG-21-09-91.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data in the article are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Franzellitti, S.; Buratti, S.; Du, B.; Haddad, S.P.; Chambliss, C.K.; Brooks, B.W.; Fabbri, E. A multibiomarker approach to explore interactive effects of propranolol and fluoxetine in marine mussels. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 205, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Neumann, B.; Vafeidis, A.T.; Zimmermann, J.; Nicholls, R.J. Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding—A global assessment. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Taştan, B.E.; Tekinay, T.; Celik, H.S.; Özdemir, C.; Cakir, D.N. Toxicity assessment of pesticide triclosan by aquatic organisms and degradation studies. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2017, 91, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Daughton, C.G.; Ternes, T. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: Agents of subtle change? Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 907–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Perron, M.M.; Ho, K.T.; Cantwell, M.G.; Burgess, R.M.; Pelletier, M.C. Effects of triclosan on marine benthic and epibenthic organisms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31, 1861–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Orvos, D.R.; Versteeg, D.J.; Inauen, J.; Capdevielle, M.; Rothenstein, A.; Cunningham, V. Aquatic toxicity of triclosan. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Int. J. 2002, 21, 1338–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Contaminants of Emerging Concern Including Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products. 2015. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/wqc/contaminants-emerging-concern-including-pharmaceuticals-and-personal-care-products (accessed on 21 December 2022).
  8. Zhao, J.-L.; Ying, G.-G.; Liu, Y.-S.; Chen, F.; Yang, J.-F.; Wang, L. Occurrence and risks of triclosan and triclocarban in the Pearl River system, South China: From source to the receiving environment. J. Hazard. Mat. 2010, 179, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pintado-Herrera, M.G.; Gonz_alez-Mazo, E.; Lara-Martín, P.A. Determining the distribution of triclosan and methyl triclosan in estuarine settings. Chemosphere 2014, 95, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montaseri, H.; Forbes, P.B. A review of monitoring methods for triclosan and its occurrence in aquatic environments. Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 85, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Veldhoen, N.; Skirrow, R.C.; Osachoff, H.; Wigmore, H.; Clapson, D.J.; Gunderson, M.P.; Helbing, C.C. The bactericidal agent triclosan modulates thyroid hormone-associated gene expression and disrupts postembryonic anuran development. Aquat. Toxicol. 2006, 80, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chalew, T.E.; Halden, R.U. Environmental exposure of aquatic and terrestrial biota to triclosan and triclocarban. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Ass. 2009, 45, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Duarte, B.; Feijão, E.; Cruz de Carvalho, R.; Matos, A.R.; Cabrita, M.T.; Novais, S.C.; Moutinho, A.; Lemos, M.F.L.; Marques, J.C.; Caçador, I.; et al. Effect Biomarkers of the Widespread Antimicrobial Triclosan in a Marine Model Diatom. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nobre, C.R.; Moreno, B.B.; Alves, A.V.; de Lima Rosa, J.; Fontes, M.K.; de Campos, B.G.; Pereira, C.D.S. Combined effects of polyethylene spiked with the antimicrobial triclosan on the swamp ghost crab (Ucides cordatus; Linnaeus, 1763). Chemosphere 2022, 304, 135169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cunha, S.C.; Pena, A.; Fernandes, J.O. Mussels as bioindicators of diclofenac contamination in coastal environments. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 225, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kanduč, T.; Medaković, D.; Hamer, B. Mytilus galloprovincialis as a bioindicator of environmental conditions: The case of the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea. Isotopes Environ. Health Stud. 2011, 47, 42–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martin-Diaz, M.L.; Franzellitti, S.; Buratti, S.; Valbonesi, P.; Capuzzo, A.; Fabbri, E. Effects of environmental concentrations of the antiepilectic drug carbamazepine on biomarkers and cAMP-mediated cell signaling in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Aquat. Toxicol. 2009, 94, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nilin, J.; Pestana, J.L.T.; Ferreira, N.G.; Loureiro, S.; Costa-Lotufo, L.V.; Soares, A.M. Physiological responses of the European cockle Cerastoderma edule (Bivalvia: Cardidae) as indicators of coastal lagoon pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 435, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fu, H.; Xia, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xu, T.; Xu, L.; Guo, Z.; Xu, H.; Xie, H.Q.; Zhao, B. Acetylcholinesterase is a potential biomarker for a broad spectrum of organic environmental pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 8065–8074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Haque, M.N.; Eom, H.J.; Nam, S.E.; Shin, Y.K.; Rhee, J.S. Chlorothalonil induces oxidative stress and reduces enzymatic activities of Na+/K+-ATPase and acetylcholinesterase in gill tissues of marine bivalves. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, W.; Fang, J.; Gao, Y.; Du, M.; Fang, J.; Wang, X.; Li, F.; Lin, F.; Jiang, Z. Biomarkers responses in Manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum after single and combined exposure to mercury and benzo[a]pyrene. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C. 2019, 220, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Coughlan, J. The estimation of filtering rate from the clearance of suspensions. Mar. Biol. 1969, 2, 356–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Basti, L.; Nagai, S.; Watanabe, S.; Oda, T.; Tanaka, Y. Neuroenzymatic activity and physiological energetics in Manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum, during short-term sublethal exposure to harmful alga, Heterocapsa circularisquama. Aquat. Toxicol 2016, 176, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wolff, S.P. Ferrous ion oxidation in presence of ferric ion indicator xylenol orange for measurement of hydroperoxides. Methods Enzymol. 1994, 233, 182–189. [Google Scholar]
  25. Marklund, S.; Marklund, G. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1974, 47, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aebi, H. Catalase. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis; Bergmeyer, H.U., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1974; pp. 671–684. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ni, W.; Trelease, R.N.; Eising, R. Two temporally synthesized charge subunits interact to form the five isoformes of cottonseed (Gossypium hirsutum) catalase. Biochemistry 1990, 269, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Habig, W.H.; Pabst, M.J.; Jakoby, W.B. Glutathione S-transferases.The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 25, 7130–7139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres, V.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tkachenko, H.; Grudniewska, J. Evaluation of oxidative stress markers in the heart and liver of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss walbaum) exposed to the formalin. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 42, 1819–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analyt. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Almeida, Â.; Silva, M.G.; Soares, A.M.; Freitas, R. Concentrations levels and effects of 17alpha-Ethinylestradiol in freshwater and marine waters and bivalves: A review. Environ. Res. 2020, 185, 109316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Donkin, P.; Widdows, J.; Evans, S.V.; Staþ, F.J.; Yan, T. Effect of Neurotoxic Pesticides on the Feeding Rate of Marine Mussels (Mytilus edulis). Pestic. Sci. 1997, 49, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Saidani, W.; Sellami, B.; Khazri, A.; Mezni, A.; Dellali, M.; Joubert, O.; Sheehane, D.; Beyrem, H. Metal accumulation, biochemical and behavioral responses on the Mediterranean clams Ruditapes decussatus exposed to two photocatalyst nanocomposites (TiO2 NPs and AuTiO2NPs). Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 208, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Barboza, L.G.A.; Vieira, L.R.; Branco, V.; Carvalho, C.; Guilhermino, L. Microplastics increase mercury bioconcentration in gills and bioaccumulation in the liver, and cause oxidative stress and damage in Dicentrarchus labrax juveniles. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Duquesne, S.; Liess, M.; Bird, D.J. Sub-lethal effects of metal exposure: Physiological and behavioural responses of the estuarine bivalve Macoma balthica. Mar. Environ. Res. 2004, 58, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Webb, S.; Gaw, S.; Marsden, I.D.; McRae, N.K. Biomarker responses in New Zealand green-lipped mussels Perna canaliculus exposed to microplastics and triclosan. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 201, 110871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rolton, A.; Champeau, O.; Barrick, A.; Boundy, M.; Tremblay, L.A.; Vignier, J. Characterization of the effects of triclosan on sperm and embryos of Mytilus and Perna mussel species. Aquat. Toxicol. 2022, 245, 106107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oliveira, P.; Almeida, Â.; Calisto, V.; Esteves, V.I.; Schneider, R.J.; Wrona, F.J.; Soares, A.M.; Figueira, E.; Freitas, R. Physiological and biochemical alterations induced in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis after short and long-term exposure to carbamazepine. Water Res. 2017, 117, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gosling, E. Bivalve Molluscs: Biology, Ecology and Culture; Fishing News Books: Oxford, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim, H.Y.; Bang, K.S. The effects of enteral feeding improvement massage on premature infants: A randomised controlled trial. J. Clin. Nurs. 2018, 27, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Soldatov, A.A.; Gostyukhina, O.L.; Golovina, I.V. Antioxidant enzyme complex of tissues of the bivalve Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam. under normal and oxidative-stress conditions: A review. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2007, 43, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, J.F.; Shen, H.; Wang, X.R.; Wu, J.C.; Xue, Y.Q. Effects of chronic exposure of 2,4-dichlorophenol on the antioxidant system in liver of freshwater fish Carassius auratus. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Freitas, R.; Coppola, F.; Costa, S.; Pretti, C.; Intorre, L.; Meucci, V.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Solé, M. The influence of temperature on the effects induced by Triclosan and Diclofenac in mussels. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 663, 992–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Parenti, C.C.; Ghilardi, A.; Della Torre, C.; Mandelli, M.; Magni, S.; Del Giacco, L.; Binelli, A. Environmental concentrations of triclosan activate cellular defense mechanism and generate cytotoxicity on zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 1752–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Maranho, L.A.; Baena-Nogueras, R.M.; Lara-Martín, P.A.; Del Valls, T.A.; Martín-Díaz, M.L. Bioavailability, oxidative stress, neurotoxicity and genotoxicity of pharmaceuticals bound to marine sediments. The use of the polychaete Hediste diversicolor as bioindicator species. Environ. Res. 2014, 134, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fontes, M.K.; Gusso-Choueri, P.K.; Maranho, L.A.; de Souza Abessa, D.M.; Mazur, W.A.; de Campos, B.G.; Guimarães, L.L.; de Toledo, A.; Lebre, M.S.; Marques, J.R.; et al. A tiered approach to assess effects of diclofenac on the brown mussel Perna perna: A contribution to characterize the hazard. Water Res. 2018, 132, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Canesi, L.; Ciacci, C.; Lorusso, L.C.; Betti, M.; Gallo, G.; Pojana, G.; Marcomini, A. Effects of Triclosan on Mytilus galloprovincialis hemocyte function and digestive gland enzyme activities: Possible modes of action on non-target organisms. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2007, 145, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Huang, X.; Tu, Y.; Song, C.; Li, T.; Lin, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Wu, C. Interactions between the antimicrobial agent triclosan and the bloom-forming cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa. Aquat. Toxicol. 2016, 172, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gonzalez-Rey, M.; Bebianno, M.J. Effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac exposure in mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Aquat. Toxicol. 2014, 148, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Świacka, K.; Maculewicz, J.; Świeżak, J.; Caban, M.; Smolarz, K. A multi-biomarker approach to assess toxicity of diclofenac and 4-OH diclofenac in Mytilus trossulus mussels-First evidence of diclofenac metabolite impact on molluscs. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 315, 120384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Peng, Y.; Luo, Y.; Nie, X.P.; Liao, W.; Yang, Y.F.; Ying, G.G. Toxic effects of triclosan on the detoxification system and breeding of Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicology 2013, 22, 1384–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, M.; Ai, W.; Sun, L.; Fang, F.; Wang, X.; Chen, S.; Wang, H. Triclosan-induced liver injury in zebrafish (Danio rerio) via regulating MAPK/p53 signaling pathway. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 222, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hosseinzadeh, M.; Gilabert, A.; Porte, C. Precision cut tissue slices to investigate the effects of triclosan exposure in Mytilus galloprovincialis. Toxicol. In Vitro 2022, 85, 105477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Storey, K.B. Oxidative stress: Animal adaptations in nature. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 1996, 29, 1715–1733. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Oliveira, R.; Domingues, I.; Koppe Grisolia, C.; Soares, A.M. Effects of triclosan on zebrafish early-life stages and adults. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2009, 16, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 13 00583 g001 550
Figure 1. Filtration rate (FR, (A)) and respiration rate (RR, (B)) of untreated mussels and mussels treated with DMSO (5 µg·L−1), 50 (TCS1) and 100 µg·L−1 (TCS2) of TCS. Values are means ± SD (n = 30). a and b: Significant differences are indicated by different letters compared to control at p < 0.05 (ANOVA, post hoc, Tukey HSD test, STATISTICA 8.0).
Figure 1. Filtration rate (FR, (A)) and respiration rate (RR, (B)) of untreated mussels and mussels treated with DMSO (5 µg·L−1), 50 (TCS1) and 100 µg·L−1 (TCS2) of TCS. Values are means ± SD (n = 30). a and b: Significant differences are indicated by different letters compared to control at p < 0.05 (ANOVA, post hoc, Tukey HSD test, STATISTICA 8.0).
Animals 13 00583 g001
Animals 13 00583 g002 550
Figure 2. Activities of SOD (A), H2O2 level (B), CAT (C) and GST (D), in gills and digestive glands of untreated mussels and mussels treated with 50 and 100 µg·L−1 of TCS. Values are represented by means ± SD (n = 30). Significant differences in digestive glands are indicated by different letters (a and b) compared to control at p < 0.05. Asterisks indicate significant difference in the gills at p < 0.05 compared to relative controls (ANOVA, post hoc, Tukey HSD test, STATISTICA 8.0).
Figure 2. Activities of SOD (A), H2O2 level (B), CAT (C) and GST (D), in gills and digestive glands of untreated mussels and mussels treated with 50 and 100 µg·L−1 of TCS. Values are represented by means ± SD (n = 30). Significant differences in digestive glands are indicated by different letters (a and b) compared to control at p < 0.05. Asterisks indicate significant difference in the gills at p < 0.05 compared to relative controls (ANOVA, post hoc, Tukey HSD test, STATISTICA 8.0).
Animals 13 00583 g002
Animals 13 00583 g003 550
Figure 3. MDA level and Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity, in gills and digestive glands of untreated mussels and mussels treated with 50 and 100 μg·L−1 of TCS. Values are means ± SD (n = 30). a and b: Significant differences in digestive glands are indicated by different letters compared to control at p < 0.05. *, is significantly different in the gills at p < 0.05 compared to relative controls (ANOVA, post hoc, Tukey HSD test, STATISTICA 8.0).
Figure 3. MDA level and Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity, in gills and digestive glands of untreated mussels and mussels treated with 50 and 100 μg·L−1 of TCS. Values are means ± SD (n = 30). a and b: Significant differences in digestive glands are indicated by different letters compared to control at p < 0.05. *, is significantly different in the gills at p < 0.05 compared to relative controls (ANOVA, post hoc, Tukey HSD test, STATISTICA 8.0).
Animals 13 00583 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bouzidi, I.; Mougin, K.; Beyrem, H.; Alghonaim, M.I.; Alsalamah, S.A.; Qurtam, A.A.; Mahmoudi, E.; Boufahja, F.; Sellami, B. Physiological Impairment and Biochemical Modifications Induced by Triclosan in Mediterranean Mussels. Animals 2023, 13, 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040583

AMA Style

Bouzidi I, Mougin K, Beyrem H, Alghonaim MI, Alsalamah SA, Qurtam AA, Mahmoudi E, Boufahja F, Sellami B. Physiological Impairment and Biochemical Modifications Induced by Triclosan in Mediterranean Mussels. Animals. 2023; 13(4):583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040583

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bouzidi, Imen, Karine Mougin, Hamouda Beyrem, Mohammed I. Alghonaim, Sulaiman A. Alsalamah, Ashraf A. Qurtam, Ezzeddine Mahmoudi, Fehmi Boufahja, and Badreddine Sellami. 2023. "Physiological Impairment and Biochemical Modifications Induced by Triclosan in Mediterranean Mussels" Animals 13, no. 4: 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040583

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop