Next Article in Journal
Using QTL to Identify Genes and Pathways Underlying the Regulation and Production of Milk Components in Cattle
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Fermented Milk and Meat Products—Quality, Nutritional Value and Safety
Previous Article in Journal
Two Types of Management for the Noninvasive Treatment of Pectus Excavatum in Neonatal Puppies—Case Reports
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbiological Biodiversity of Regional Cow, Goat and Ewe Milk Cheeses Produced in Poland and Antibiotic Resistance of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Them
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/ani13050907
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health-Promoting Ingredients in Goat’s Milk and Fermented Goat’s Milk Drinks

by
Beata Paszczyk
,
Marta Czarnowska-Kujawska
,
Joanna Klepacka
* and
Elżbieta Tońska
Department of Commodity and Food Analysis, The Faculty of Food Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-726 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(5), 907; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050907
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 24 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 2 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Fermented Milk and Meat Products—Quality, Nutritional Value and Safety)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Goat’s milk has beneficial effects on health condition maintenance, physiological function, and nutrition of both children and elderly people, and according to some authors, can be consumed without inducing adverse symptoms by people suffering from cow milk allergy. The content of bioactive ingredients (fatty acids, vitamins, micro, and macroelements) in goat’s milk and its products varies greatly and depends on many factors, for example, breed, animal husbandry conditions, lactation phase, and feeding. The nutritional importance of goat’s milk increases in response to the growing interest of consumers. In Poland, the commercial offer of goat’s milk products increases constantly. Local breeders and sellers appear on the market, offering their products, often of organic origin. Despite the growing popularity of goat products, the knowledge of their composition, including their health-promoting ingredients, is still incomplete. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the contents of selected compounds, such as fatty acids, with particular emphasis on the content of cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA) acid, minerals, and folates, in organic and commercial goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks available on the Polish market.

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the content of health-promoting compounds, and fatty acids, with particular emphasis on the content of cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA) acid, selected minerals, folates in organic and commercial goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks. The analyzed milk and yoghurts had various contents of particular groups of fatty acids, CLA, minerals, and folates. Raw organic goat’s milk had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher content of CLA (3.26 mg/g fat) compared to commercial milk (2.88 mg/g fat and 2.54 mg/g fat). Among the analyzed fermented goat’s milk drinks, the highest CLA content (4.39 mg/g fat) was determined in commercial natural yoghurts, while the lowest one was in organic natural yoghurts (3.28 mg/g fat). The highest levels of calcium (1322.9–2324.4 µg/g), phosphorus (8148.1–11,309.9 µg/g), and copper (0.072–0.104 µg/g) were found in all commercial products and those of manganese (0.067–0.209 µg/g) in organic products. The contents of the other assayed elements (magnesium, sodium, potassium, iron, and zinc) did not depend on the production method, but only on the product type, i.e., the degree of goat’s milk processing. The highest folate content in the analyzed milks was found in the organic sample (3.16 µg/100 g). Organic Greek yoghurts had a several times higher content of folates, reaching 9.18 µg/100 g, compared to the other analyzed fermented products.

1. Introduction

Milk and dairy products contain many bioactive compounds valuable for human health and occurring in an easily absorbable form, such as fatty acids, micronutrients (especially calcium, magnesium, potassium, zinc, and phosphorus), and folates–B vitamins [1,2]. However, cow’s milk and dairy products may not be suitable for all consumers, for instance, children with protein diathesis, allergic patients, convalescents, the elderly, and people suffering from anemia, osteoporosis, and malabsorption syndrome. Goat’s milk is recommended for these groups of the population as an alternative [3]. It has a high biological value and exhibits nutritional properties. It is also characterized by a smaller diameter of fat globules than the milk of cows and contains more short-chain and polyunsaturated fatty acids [4]. Furthermore, it is digested faster than cow’s milk and hence can be recommended to people allergic to the latter [5].
Milk fat is a complex mixture of over 400 different fatty acids (FAs) with four to twenty-six carbon atoms, making it the most complex natural fat [6]. Fatty acids of milk fat are acids with different degrees of saturation (saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated). Unsaturated acids are mainly cis acids and trans isomers of these acids are found in smaller amounts. In milk fat, the fatty acids are mostly straight-chain and have an even number of carbon atoms, but fatty acids with an odd number of carbon atoms and branched-chain fatty acids are present as well. Studies conducted by many authors have indicated that the fatty acids present in milk fat may affect human health in different ways [5,7]. The main isomer of conjugated dienes in milk fat, acid cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA), has, among others, anti-carcinogenic, anti-atherosclerotic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties [8,9,10,11,12]. Trans-vaccenic acid, which is the major trans C18:1 isomer in milk fat, shows anti-carcinogenic and anti-atherogenic effects [13]. In turn, the main MUFA of milk fat, oleic acid (cis9 C18:1), enhances the activity of low-density lipoprotein receptors, while decreasing the cholesterol concentration in the serum [14]. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) also exhibit various bioactivities, such as anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects, as well as preventive and therapeutic effects on several diseases, whereas branched-chain fatty acids (BCFAs) have been shown to elicit anti-carcinogenic effects [15,16,17]. In turn, n–3 PUFAs play a meaningful role in heart disease prevention and immune response improvement. Linolenic acid (C18:3) exhibits anti-carcinogenic and anti-atherogenic properties [18,19], while (n–6) PUFAs improve insulin sensitivity and thus, reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes [20].
Mammalian milk is also a significant source of minerals in the human diet. It contains, for example, calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium, chlorine, iodine, magnesium, and small amounts of zinc, iron, and manganese [21,22]. In the European diet, milk is regarded as the best source of calcium, and its high bioavailability is closely correlated with a higher content of casein, lactose, and vitamin D. The absorption of calcium from milk reaches 80%, while the availability of this element from other products, for example, vegetables or cereals, is limited due to the presence of fiber, phytic and phenolic compounds, and oxalic acid [23,24,25]. Calcium deficiency in food increases the risk of developing such diseases as arterial hypertension, colorectal cancer, ischemic heart disease, osteoporosis, and kidney stones [25,26]. For consumers with malabsorption syndrome, it can be extremely beneficial to consume goat’s milk because the retention of ingredients from this product is better than from cow’s milk. In addition to calcium, this also applies to iron, which results from a greater share of nucleotides than in cow’s milk, which contributes to better absorption of this element in the intestines [27]. Iron plays an important role in supplying oxygen to human organs and muscles, and its deficiency can lead to anemia [28], which, in 2019, was diagnosed in almost 30% of women across the world aged 15–49 and in about 40% of the children aged 6–59 months (in Africa the rate was 60%) [29].
The alkaline pH of goat’s milk is associated primarily with the content of calcium, potassium, and sodium, and its salty aftertaste is due to the high content of chlorine. Compared to cow’s milk, goat’s milk has a relatively high level of magnesium, which prevents stress, increases the body’s immunity, and is a cofactor in many enzymatic reactions [21]. The contents of micro and macroelements in goat’s milk and products make it vary greatly and depend on many factors, for example, species, breed, or breeding conditions of animals, including, especially, their feeding, or lactation phase [26,27,30,31,32,33].
Folates occur naturally in foods, both those of plant and animal origin, as reduced folic acid derivatives. These essential dietary components belong to the family of water-soluble B vitamins. The name folic acid refers only to the synthetic form of the vitamin [34]. Folates are indispensable in the reactions of one-carbon groups, especially for the synthesis of DNA, RNA, and proteins. They are donors of methyl groups used in the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine [35]. Unfortunately, their deficiency is common worldwide [36]. Prolonged too low folate consumption promotes, among others, atherosclerotic processes, increasing the risk of development of cardiovascular (ischemic heart disease, stroke, thromboembolism) and neurodegenerative (Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s) diseases. Adequate folate intake and status have also been associated with a reduced incidence of certain types of cancer (colon cancer, breast, cervix, lungs, pancreas), depressive mental disorders, and macrocytic anemia [34,35,37,38,39,40]. Young women of childbearing age are particularly vulnerable to deficiency of this vitamin. The results of epidemiological surveys indicate that an insufficient folate status in future mothers increases the probability of congenital heart defects, urinary tract abnormalities, cleft palate, limb defects, and neural tube defects (NTD) in newborns [41,42,43]. However, deficiencies can be effectively prevented by providing a folic acid dose of 400 µg per day [44]. In addition to the use of dietary supplements and foods enriched with synthetic folic acid, it is recommended, above all, to regularly consume products naturally rich in these vitamins. An example of products popular among consumers, which represent a natural source of bioactive substances, including folates, are milk and milk products [34,45].
In Europe, cow’s milk is most often used in dairy production. However, the popularity of goat’s milk and goat’s milk products among consumers is being observed to grow. These products are especially appreciated by pioneers of taste in regional and organic food who look for new and unique flavor sensations. The commercial offer of goat’s milk products increases year by year. Local breeders and sellers appear on the market, offering cheeses, cottage cheese, yoghurts, and kefirs made of goat’s milk, often of organic origin [46,47,48]. Despite growing interest, the knowledge of the content of many valuable compounds in goat’s milk is incomplete. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the contents of health-promoting compounds, including fatty acids, with particular emphasis on the content of cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA) acid, selected minerals, and folates in organic and commercial goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The experimental materials were organic goat’s milk, ecological fermented goat’s milk drinks, commercial goat’s milk, and commercial fermented goat’s milk drinks available on the Polish market (Table 1). The analyzed products were purchased in March 2021.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Analysis of Fatty Acids (FAs)

The fat from the milk and yoghurts was extracted with the Folch method [49]. The IDF method was used to convert fatty acids into the corresponding fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) (ISO 15884:2002) [50]. The methyl esters obtained were then analyzed by gas chromatography (GC). Chromatographic separation was performed using a Hewlett-Packard 6890 gas chromatograph (Műnster, Germany) with a flame-ionization detector (FID) and a capillary column with a length of 100 m and an internal diameter of 0.25 mm. The liquid phase was CP Sil 88 (Chrompack, Middelburg, The Netherlands) and the film thickness was 0.20 μm., The analyses were carried out under the following temperature conditions: column temperature 60 °C; 5 °C/min increase to 180 °C; injector temperature 225 °C; and detector temperature 250 °C. The sample injection volume was 0.4 μL (split mode—50:1). Helium was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. Fatty acids were identified based on a comparison of their retention times, with the retention times of fatty acid methyl esters of reference milk fat (BCR Reference Materials, CRM 164 symbol)(Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany), and literature data [51,52]. The cis9trans11 CLA isomer was identified using a mixture of CLA methyl esters (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Other positional trans isomers were identified using the standards of methyl esters of these isomers (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, and Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The contents of fatty acids were expressed in mg/g fat according to the applicable standard (methyl ester of C21:0 acid, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2.2. Analysis of Minerals

The mineral content of milk and fermented dairy products was established by wet mineralization in a mixture of nitric acid and perchloric acid (3:1, v/v). The samples were mineralized in a block heating digester (DK 20, VELP Scientifica, Usmate, Italy) for 4–5 h by gradually increasing the temperature from 120 to 200 °C. The mineralized samples were transferred to 25-mL volumetric flasks, and the flasks were filled up with deionized water. Reagent samples were prepared simultaneously. The contents of copper (Cu—324.8 nm), manganese (Mn—279.5 nm), iron (Fe—248.3 nm), zinc (Zn—213.9 nm), magnesium (Mg—285.2), and calcium (Ca—422.7 nm) were determined with Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS), using an iCE 3000 Series atomic absorption spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) equipped with a GLITE data station, deuterium lamp background correction, and various cathodic lamps. In determining the Ca content, an aqueous solution of lanthanum chloride was added to obtain an La+3 concentration of 0.5% to eliminate the effects of P. The contents of sodium (Na—589 nm) and potassium (K—766.5 nm) were determined with the Atomic Emission Spectrometry (AES) in an acetylene-air flame, using the same spectrometer, but working in emission mode. Phosphorus (P—610 nm) content was determined using the colorimetric method with ammonium molybdate (VI), sodium sulfate (IV), and hydroquinone. A VIS 6000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) was used for the absorbance measurements.

2.2.3. Analysis of Folates

Folates: 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-CH3-H4folate) and tetrahydrofolate (H4folate) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and prepared according to Konings [53]. The concentration of the standards was calculated using the molar absorption coefficients given by Blakley [54]. Protease (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, with 1% (w/v) sodium ascorbate and 0.1% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol (in the amount of 4 mg/mL). This was done just before the analysis to avoid contamination with bacteria that can synthesize folate during incubation. Some γ-Glutamyl hydrolase, from rat blood plasma, was purchased from Europa Bioproducts Ltd. (Cambridge, UK) and prepared according to Patring et al. [55]. Samples were prepared in triplicate under dim light. A 10 g sample (exact to 0.001 g) was weighed into 30-mL centrifuge flasks (30-mL PPCO Oak Ridge PPCO Nalgene centrifuge tube; Rochester, NY, USA). Then, 20 mL of an extraction buffer (0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, with 1% (w/v) sodium ascorbate and 0.1% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol) were added. The mixture was shaken (2500 rpm/10 s Vortex 4 basic IKA Vortex 4 basic; Staufen, Germany) and heated in a water bath at 100 °C for 15 min with occasional shaking. Then, the samples were cooled in an ice bath to 20 °C, and 0.25 mL of γ-glutamyl hydrolase and 1 mL of protease were added. The samples were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. Then, to inactivate the enzymes, the samples were heated for 5 min at 100 °C and cooled in an ice bath. Afterwards, they were centrifuged for 20 min at 12,000 rpm/4 °C (MPW-350R; Warsaw, Poland). After centrifugation, the supernatant was poured into 50-mL dark glass measuring flasks. An amount of 10 mL of the extraction buffer was added to the sediment remaining in the tubes, and the mixture was shaken and centrifuged again. The resulting supernatant was poured into the same measuring flasks. The volume of the flasks was supplemented with the extraction buffer and the whole sample was filtered through paper filters into 25-mL bottles.
Sample purification was carried out using Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) on Strong Anion Exchange (SAX) Bakerbond SPE JT cartridges (3 mL × 500 mg Solid Phase Extraction Column and PP (polypropylene), Quaternary Amine (N+) Anion Exchange; Philipsburg, MT, USA), as described by Jastrebova et al. [56]. Folate separation was carried out using the HPLC system (Shimadzu Nexera-i LC-2040 C plus; Shimadzu Co.; Kyoto, Japan) and the C18 LC column (150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm, Luna 100Å; Phenomenex; Torrance, CA, USA) as described previously [57]. Identification and calculation of folate content were performed based on a standard with a known folate content (fluorescence detection, 290 nm excitation, and 360 nm emission wavelengths).

2.2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify significant differences in the contents of fatty acids, minerals, and folates between organic and commercial goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks. Statistically different results were assessed using the Duncan’s test at a significance level of p < 0.05. The Statistica software package version 13.3 (StatSoft, Kraków, Poland, 2016) was used [58].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fatty Acid Composition

Fat extracted from the analyzed goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks had various contents of fatty acids (Table 2). The major fatty acids identified in the tested samples were saturated fatty acids (SFAs). Their highest content was determined in fat from organic natural yoghurts (604.77 mg/g fat). Fat from the other analyzed yoghurts had a significantly (p < 0.05) lower content of SFAs. The highest content of branched-chain fatty acids (BCFAs) was found in fat from kefirs (15.54 mg/g fat), and that of odd-chain fatty acids (OCFAs) in fat from organic probiotic yoghurts (17.23 mg/g fat). The content of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) was the highest in fat from the raw milk (236.43 mg/g fat), while the lowest in fat extracted from UHT milk (160.23 and 159.34 mg/g fat, respectively). The highest content of PUFAs (29.82 mg/g fat) was determined in fat from natural yoghurts (producer 2). Significantly (p < 0.05) lower contents of PUFAs were determined in the other analyzed products. The present study indicates that fat extracted from commercial natural yoghurts (producer 2) had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher content of n-3 (4.69 mg/g fat) and n-6 PUFAs (16.80 mg/g fat) compared to the other tested products (Table 2). The lowest content of n-3 PUFAs was found in fat from commercial natural yoghurts (producer 1) (1.76 mg/g fat) and that of n-6 PUFAs in fat from organic probiotic yoghurts (10.42 mg/g fat). Determination of the contents of n-6 and n-3 fatty acids is particularly important from a nutritional point of view. An adequate supply of these acids in the diet is indicated to reduce the risk of the development of many diseases [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. These acids cannot be synthesized in the body and must be derived from the diet. Although their everyday content is important, even more important is their ratio. Excessive amounts of n-6 PUFAs and a high n-6/n-3 ratio in the diet contribute to the pathogenesis of many diseases. An increased level of n-3 PUFAs and a lower n-6/n-3 ratio have a suppressive effect [65]. In our study, the n-6/n-3 ratio determined in organic goat’s milk was 5.29, and in commercial milk—5.72 (milk, producer 2) and 4.76 (milk, producer 1) (Table 2). In the tested fermented products, the n-6/n-3 ratio was the lowest in fat from organic Greek and organic probiotic yoghurts (3.00 and 3.16, respectively). The highest ratio (8.37) was determined in fat from commercial natural yoghurts (producer 1) (Table 2). According to Cossignani et al. [67], the n-6/n-3 ratio in goat’s milk was 5.8. In a previous study, Paszczyk et al. [68] showed that the ratio of these acids in goat’s milk was 6.98, and in goat yoghurts—6.04. Dairy products with a lower n-6/n-3 ratio are characterized by a better composition of fatty acids supporting the proper functioning of the body.
The acid, cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA), which is the major CLA isomer in food, is a very important acid from a nutritional point of view. In milk and dairy products, it accounts for over 80–90% of the total CLA content [69]. The data presented in Table 2 indicate that the analyzed products had various contents of this acid. Among the goat’s milk samples, a higher CLA content was determined in fat extracted from raw organic milk (3.26 mg/g fat). Both commercial UHT kinds of milk had a significantly (p < 0.05) lower average CLA content, i.e., 2.88 and 2.54 mg/g fat, respectively. Cossignani et al. [67] reported a higher cis9trans 11 C18:2 acid content in goat’s milk of 3.9 mg/g fat. Differences in the quality and composition of ruminant milk are due to many factors, such as animal breed, age, lactation stadium, and health condition as well as the production system, diet, etc. [70,71,72,73,74,75,76].
Previous investigations have indicated that the composition of fatty acids, including the content of CLA, in fermented milk products may differ from the milk they were made from. The content of CLA in dairy products may be influenced by industrial technological treatments and the additives used [77,78,79,80,81]. According to research by other authors, the content of CLA in fermented dairy products is influenced by the strains of lactic acid bacteria used in the production process. Studies [82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90] have also shown that selected bacterial strains are capable of synthesizing CLA during fermentation, but this process can be influenced by many factors, such as the number of cells, appropriate substrate concentration, and incubation conditions. In the analyzed fermented goat’s milk drinks, the highest CLA content (4.39 mg/g fat) was determined in fat from commercial natural yoghurts (producer 2) (Table 2). In the tested organic products, Greek yoghurt produced with the vaccine containing strains of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus, and probiotic yoghurts produced with strains of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lactobacillus casei, also had a high content of this acid (4.19 and 4.07 mg/g fat, respectively). The lowest CLA content, 3.28 mg/g fat, was determined in fat from organic natural yoghurt (Table 2) produced with the same strains as Greek yoghurt, which confirms the importance of the quality of the yoghurt vaccines used and the fermentation conditions applied for the synthesis of bioactive ingredients, including CLA.
The most important trans fatty acids (TFAs) in the human diet are monounsaturated fatty acids with 18 carbon atoms. The study showed that the average total content of trans C18:1 isomers in the fat extracted from the analyzed products varied (Table 2). The highest content of trans C18:1 was found in fat extracted from commercial natural yoghurts (17.19 and 16.61 mg/g fat), whereas the lowest was in fat from organic natural yoghurts (10.89 mg/g fat) and UHT milk (producer 2) (10.88 mg/g fat). Considering the group of trans C18:1, all samples contained the highest amounts of trans10 + trans11 isomers. The major TFA in milk fat is vaccenic acid (trans11 C18:1, VA). Its content in milk fat largely depends on the way animals are fed [69]. In ruminant milk from conventionally fed cows, this acid constitutes about 40–50% of all trans C18:1. Contents of other trans C18:1 isomers, such as trans9 and trans10, are much lower (by 5% and 10% on average, respectively) [91,92]. Milk fat also contains trans C18:2 isomers; however, their content is lower compared to the content of trans C18:1 isomers. The conducted research showed that the average content of trans C18:2 isomers in the fat extracted from the analyzed products was diversified, with the highest value noted for Greek yoghurt fat (4.97 mg/g fat), and significantly (p < 0.05) lower than for the other analyzed products (Table 2).

3.2. Mineral Composition

The elements that were present in the tested samples in the largest amounts were potassium, calcium, and phosphorus, with their contents noted in the range of: 1117.4–1965.3 µg/g, 1125.5–2324.4 µg/g and 1130.5–11,309.9 µg/g, respectively, regardless of product type (Table 3). The high content of these elements in goat’s milk and its products was also demonstrated by Mohammed et al. [93], who determined them in goat yoghurts at the level of 1873.3 µg/g (potassium), 1256.7 µg/g (calcium) and 923.3 µg/g (phosphorus). Bezerril et al. [94] considered these compounds to be the most important minerals found in goat’s milk products, emphasizing the role of calcium and phosphorus in the formation of the casein structure. They showed that one portion of yoghurt (100 g) would provide almost 78% of the recommended daily intake of phosphorus, 67% of calcium, and approx. 34% of potassium. These authors also claimed that goat yoghurts were a good source of sodium, which is consistent with our study results. Sodium content in all analyzed samples was in the range of 307.0–522.8 µg/g, and the next element in terms of content was magnesium (126.3–205.4 µg/g). Similar contents of these elements in goat’s milk have been reported by many authors [22,25,68,95] who point out the high bioavailability of magnesium from goat’s milk products when compared to those obtained from cow’s milk.
The minerals that were present in the tested products, in the smallest amounts, were: zinc (2.556–4.663 µg/g), copper (0.024–0.104 µg/g), manganese (0.029–0.209 µg/g), and iron (0.208–0.300 µg/g). A similar content of these elements in goat’s milk was also indicated by Zamberlin et al. [27], who determined zinc at the level of 2.420 µg/g, copper at 0.110 µg/g, manganese at 0.055 µg/g, and iron in the range from 0.360 to 0.750 µg/g, depending on milk origin and goat breed.
Analyzing the effect of milk processing on the content of the tested minerals, it should be stated that the levels of potassium, calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium were related to the degree of milk treatment. They were present in greater amounts in fermented beverages compared to milk, but this relationship was observed only in the case of commercial products (Table 3). Bergillos-Meca et al. [96] reported the similarity of quantitative changes of these components in raw and fermented goat’s milk and they showed statistically significant correlations between the levels of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and zinc, proving their similar susceptibility to changes during milk processing. The higher content of these elements in yoghurts obtained from goat’s milk in laboratory conditions was also demonstrated in our previous study [68]. We assayed potassium at 1797.0 µg/g in raw goat’s milk, and at 2486.2 µg/g in yoghurt obtained using a thermostatic method. These changes ranged from 1536.6 to 2178.5 µg/g in the case of calcium, from 1168.8 to 1566.2 in the case of phosphorus, and from 104.3 to 150.3 µg/g in the case of magnesium.
The levels of sodium, iron, and zinc were not related to the degree of goat’s milk processing neither in organic nor industrial production, while manganese turned out to be the element whose content was related to the degree of milk processing. This component was present in the highest amount in organic goat’s milk (0.209 µg/g), and in products obtained from it were lower by two or even three times. The content of manganese depended significantly on the f treatment method because its level was almost 10 times higher in organic milk than in commercial milk. There is little information in the available literature on the changes in manganese levels that occur during the processing of goat’s milk or milk from other mammals. Certain information on this subject was provided by Al Sidawi et al. [97], who analyzed 195 samples of cow’s milk and 25 samples of cheese from different regions of Georgia and showed that the level of this element in the analyzed milk differed 4-fold, and in cheese 3-fold, depending on the origin of the samples. Some changes in the level of manganese occurring during milk processing were also indicated by Quintana et al. [98], but the differences they identified were primarily related to the type of milk, not the degree of process advancement.
Comparing the content of mineral compounds in all organic and commercial products, regardless of their type, it should be stated that the processing method had a significant impact on the levels of calcium, phosphorus, and copper. A significantly higher level of these elements was found in all products from commercial production, and the most noticeable differences were observed in the case of phosphorus whose level was 6–10 times higher than in organic products. Such a high content of phosphorus in industrial products may be related to the level of this element in commercial feed obtained from raw materials cultivated in areas fertilized with phosphorus. This element is very important in the nutrition of mammals, because it is, in terms of content, the second highest component of the skeleton after calcium, and its deficiency causes growth inhibition, reduced productivity, and deterioration of animal fertility. Cereal grain and protein supplements, often used in industrial animal nutrition, are also good sources of phosphorus [99].
Similarly, high differences in both types of production were observed in the case of manganese, significantly higher levels of which were detected in products of organic origin, compared to commercial products (definite differences were up to 10 times). The greatest impact on the observed relationships may have been the way the goats were fed, especially the share of some cereal products or legumes in feed mixtures, which are a particularly good source of this element [100,101].

3.3. Folate Content

The available literature data mainly concern the content of folates in cow’s milk and cow’s milk products [88,102,103,104,105]. Table 4 presents folate contents in the tested goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks. In all tested products, the main folate form was methyl form (5-CH3-H4folate). Small amounts of H4folate were also determined in most of the analyzed samples. Previous studies on cow’s milk and beverages also indicated that 5-CH3-H4folate was the major or even the only identified form of folate [88,103,104,105,106,107]. Folate content in the tested material differed significantly (p < 0.05) among products. Among the milk samples, the highest folate content was determined in raw organic goat’s milk (3.16 µg/100 g). Both commercially sterilized milks, UHT 1 and UHT 2 had significantly (p < 0.05) lower folate contents, i.e., 1.87 and 2.24 µg/100 g respectively. In previous studies on cow’s milk [104,107,108], transport and storage conditions as well as high-temperature treatment, solar radiation, and acidity below neutral were indicated as possible factors causing folate losses during milk processing. Folate content in all tested milk was higher than that presented in Food Composition Tables for goat’s milk, 1 µg/100 g, but lower than that set for cow’s milk with 3.2% fat content, 5 µg/100 g [109]. Although according to other authors [104,110,111], the content of folates in cow’s milk is not high (4–10 µg/100 g) compared to other rich sources of this vitamin, such as green leafy vegetables, yeast, grains, or animal liver, due to the high frequency of consumption of dairy products, they can be a significant source of this vitamin in an everyday diet [102]. Available research studies indicate that milk and dairy products can contribute up to 15% of daily folate intake, especially in the young generation and in countries with high consumption of these products, like Sweden and the Netherlands [52,102,112].
A much higher folate content of 9.18 µg/100 g, compared to other tested fermented products, was found in organic Greek yoghurt, with a simple composition of yoghurt vaccine including Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (Table 4). The lowest folate content, 1.60 µg/100 g, was determined in probiotic yoghurt. In the study of Gujska et al. [104], the folate content in fresh one-day stored yoghurts from cow’s milk did not exceed 3.5 µg/100 g, and a significant (p < 0.05) folate loss was observed within 34 days of cold storage. In the authors’ previous study [88] on cow’s milk yoghurts fermented with different yoghurt vaccines, higher folate levels of 4.5–10.5 µg/100 g were determined in fresh products. However, even those higher folate amounts in commercial yoghurts, when eaten in a normal daily portion, cannot meet more than 10–20% of the daily recommended intake of this vitamin. In the work on fermented milk beverages, additional attention was also paid to the possibility of folate consumption by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) during storage [113,114]. On the other hand, various studies have indicated that the selection of appropriate bacterial cultures can promote folate synthesis during fermentation [88,110,115,116,117,118]. However, this promotion depends on many factors, such as the applied starter culture (the strain, the combination of LAB), cultivation conditions, the incubation time as well as the composition of the culture medium, and the presence of folate precursors [113,115,119]. In the study of Laiño et al. [115], among different combinations, a strain of Lactobacillus delbruecki subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus yielded the best results in milk in terms of folate content, which is consistent with the results obtained in our study for organic Greek yoghurt. Similarly, previous studies [120] on the folate content of various strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have shown that the selection of appropriate starter cultures is very important when improving the folate content in foods produced with the use of yeast. In the tested organic kefir, despite a very diverse mixture of starter cultures declared by the manufacturer, the determined folate content of 0.99 µg/100 g was the lowest among all analyzed products.

4. Conclusions

The research provides basic knowledge on the content of selected health-promoting components of goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk products. Until recently, it has been believed that fat content in products is a source of energy accumulated in the fatty tissue required to build cell membranes. Today, fat’s role as a component demonstrating health-promoting properties in the human body is gaining emphasis.
The study results show that goat’s milk and fermented products are a good source of components valuable from a nutritional point of view, such as fatty acids, minerals, and folates. The amount of these nutrients depended on milk processing and production methods, which resulted in significant differences in the content of health-promoting compounds determined in goat’s milk and fermented milk drinks, as well as in organic and commercial products. The potential for obtaining increased levels of such compounds as folates and CLA was observed for organic Greek yoghurt, as well as for selected minerals, depending on the production method. However, further studies are needed to identify the impact of the quality of the raw material and the selection of starter cultures on the content of different bioactive compounds in the final product.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.P.; methodology, B.P., M.C.-K. and E.T. validation B.P., M.C.-K. and E.T.; data analysis, B.P., M.C.-K., J.K. and E.T. writing—original draft preparation, B.P., M.C.-K. and J.K.; writing—review and editing, B.P., M.C.-K. and J.K.; visualization, B.P., M.C.-K. and J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rizzoli, R. Dairy products, yogurts, and bone health. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 99, 1256S–1262S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Korhenen, H. Bioactive Components in Bovine Milk. In Bioactive Components in Milk and Dairy Products; Park, Y.W., Ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Singapore, 2009; pp. 15–42. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lad, S.S.; Aparnathi, K.D.; Mehta, B.; Velpula, S. Goat milk in human nutrition and health—A review. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 1781–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Park, Y.W.; Juárez, M.; Ramos, M.; Haenlein, G.F.W. Physico-chemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 68, 88–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Albenzio, M.; Santillo, A.; Avando, M.; Nudda, A.; Chesse, S.; Pirisi, A.; Banni, S. Nutritional properties of small ruminant food products and their role on human health. Small Rumin. Res. 2016, 136, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jensen, R.G. The composition of bovine milk lipids: January 1995 to December 2000. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 295–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hanuš, O.; Samková, E.; Krížová, L.; Hasoňová, L.; Kala, R. Role of fatty acids in milk fat and the influence of selected factors on their variability—A Review. Molecules 2018, 23, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Akalln, A.S.; Tokusoglu, O. A Potential Anticarcinogenic Agent: Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA). Pak. J. Nutr. 2003, 2, 109–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Parodi, P.W. Anti-Cancer Agents in Milkfat. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 2003, 58, 114–118. [Google Scholar]
  10. Aydin, R. Conjugated Linoleic Acid: Structure, Sources and Biological Properties. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2003, 29, 189–195. [Google Scholar]
  11. Park, Y. Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA): Good or Bad Trans Fat? J. Food Compos. Anal. 2009, 22, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kee, J.-I.; Ganesan, P.; Kwak, H.-S. Bioactive Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) in Milk. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2010, 30, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lim, J.-N.; Oh, J.-J.; Wang, T.; Lee, J.-S.; Kim, S.-H.; Kim, Y.-H.; Lee, H.-G. trans-11 18:1 vaccenic acid (TVA) has a direct anti-carcinogenic effect on MCF-7 human mammary adenocarcinoma cells. Nutrients 2014, 6, 627–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chen, J.; Liu, H. Nutritional Indices for Assessing Fatty Acids: A Mini-Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Claeys, W.L.; Verraes, C.; Cardoen, S.; de Block, J.; Huyghebaer, A.; Raes, K.; Dewettinck, K.; Herman, L. Consumption of raw or heated milk from different species: An evaluation of the nutritional and potential health benefits. Food Control 2014, 42, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wongtangtintharn, S.; Oku, H.; Iwasaki, H.; Toda, T. Effect of branched-chain fatty acids on fatty acid biosynthesis of human breast cancer cells. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2004, 50, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Adamska, A.; Rutkowska, J. Odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk fat—Characteristic and health properties. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. 2014, 68, 957–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balta, I.; Stef, L.; Pet, I.; Iancu, T.; Stef, D.; Corcionivoschi, N. Essential Fatty Acids as Biomedicines in Cardiac Health. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Haug, A.; Hostmark, A.T.; Harstad, O.M. Bovine milk in human nutrition: A review. Lipids Health Dis. 2007, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Arnould, V.M.-R.; Soyeurt, H. Genetic variability of milk fatty acids. J. Appl. Genet. 2009, 50, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chauhan, S.; Powar, P.; Mehra, R. A review on nutritional advantages and nutraceutical properties of cow and goat milk. Int. J. Appl. Res. 2021, 7, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pietrzak-Fiećko, R.; Kamelska-Sadowska, A.M. The comparison of nutritional value of human milk with other mammals’ milk. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Olza, J.; Aranceta-Bartrina, J.; González-Gross, M.; Ortega, R.M.; Serra-Majem, L.; Varela-Moreiras, G.; Gil, Á. Reported Dietary Intake, Disparity between the Reported Consumption and the Level Needed for Adequacy and Food Sources of Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium and Vitamin D in the Spanish Population: Findings from the ANIBES Study. Nutrients 2017, 9, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Klepacka, J.; Tońska, E.; Rafałowski, R.; Czarnowska-Kujawska, M.; Opara, B. Tea as a Source of Biologically Active Compounds in the Human Diet. Molecules 2021, 26, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yadav, A.K.; Singh, J.; Yadav, S.K. Composition, nutritional and therapeutic values of goat milk: A review. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 2016, 35, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cordeiro, A.R.R.d.A.; Bezerra, T.K.A.; Madruga, M.S. Valuation of Goat and Sheep By-Products: Challenges and Opportunities for Their Use. Animals 2022, 12, 3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zamberlin, S.; Antunac, N.; Havranek, J.; Samarzija, D. Mineral elements in milk and dairy products. Mljekarstvo 2012, 62, 111–125. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wieczorek, M.; Schwarz, F.; Sadlon, A.; Abderhalden, L.A.; de Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, C.; Spahn, D.R.; Schaer, D.J.; Orav, E.J.; Egli, A.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; et al. Iron deficiency and biomarkers of inflammation: A 3-year prospective analysis of the DO-HEALTH trial. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2022, 34, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. WHO. The Global Health Observatory. Anaemia in Women and Children. WHO Global Anaemia Estimates, 2021 Edition: Global Anaemia Estimates in Women of Reproductive Age, by Pregnancy Status, and in Children Aged 6–59 Months. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/anaemia_in_women_and_children (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  30. Currò, S.; De Marchi, M.; Claps, S.; Salzano, A.; De Palo, P.; Manuelian, C.L.; Neglia, G. Differences in the Detailed Milk Mineral Composition of Italian Local and Saanen Goat Breeds. Animals 2019, 9, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Rutherfurd, S.M.; Darragh, A.J.; Hendriks, W.H.; Prosser, C.G.; Lowry, D. Mineral retention in three-week-old piglets fed goat and cow milk infant formulas. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 4520–4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Li, S.; Delger, M.; Dave, A.; Singh, H.; Ye, A. Seasonal Variations in the Composition and Physicochemical Characteristics of Sheep and Goat Milks. Foods 2022, 11, 1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ferreira, F.G.; Leite, L.C.; Alba, H.D.R.; Pina, D.d.S.; Santos, S.A.; Tosto, M.S.L.; de Freitas Júnior, J.E.; Rodrigues, C.S.; Mesquita, B.M.A.d.C.; Carvalho, G.G.P.d. Licury Cake in Diets for Lactating Goats: Qualitative Aspects of Milk and Cheese. Animals 2023, 13, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rampersaud, G.C.; Kauwell, G.P.A.; Bailey, L.B. Folate: A Key to Optimizing Health and Reducing Disease Risk in the Elderly. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2003, 22, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Arnesen, E.; Refsum, H.; Bonaa, K.H.; Ueland, P.M.; Forde, O.H.; Nordrehaug, J.E. Serum total homocysteine and coronary heart disease. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1995, 24, 704–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dhonukshe-Rutten, R.A.M.; de Vries, J.H.M.; de Bree, A.; van der Put, N.; van Staveen, W.A.; de Groot, L.C.P.G.M. Dietary intake and status of folate and vitamin B12 and their association with homocysteine and cardiovascular disease in European populations. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Morris, M.S.; Jacques, P.F.; Rosenberg, I.H.; Selhub, J. Folate and vitamin B-12 status in relation to anemia, macrocytosis, and cognitive impairment in older, Americans in the age of folic acid fortification. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 85, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, X.; Qin, X.; Demirtas, H.; Li, J.; Mao, G.; Huo, Y. Efficacy of folic acid supplementation in stroke prevention: A meta-analysis. Lancet 2007, 369, 1876–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Choi, S.W.; Mason, J.B. Folate and carcinogenesis: An integrated scheme. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Selhub, J.; Jacques, P.F.; Wilson, P.W.F.; Rush, D.; Rosenberg, I.H. Vitamin status and intake as primary determinants of homocysteinemia in an elderly population. JAMA 1993, 270, 2693–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bean, L.J.; Allen, E.G.; Tinker, S.W.; Hollis, N.D.; Locke, A.E.; Druschel, C.; Hobbs, C.A.; O’Leary, L.; Romitti, P.A.; Royle, M.H.; et al. Lack of maternal folic acid supplementation is associated with heart defects in Down syndrome: A report from the National Down Syndrome Project. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 2011, 91, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Li, Z.; Ye, R.; Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Ren, A. Folic acid supplementation during early pregnancy and the risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Hypertension 2013, 61, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wen, S.W.; Guo, Y.; Rodger, M.; White, R.R.; Yang, Q.; Smith, G.N.; Perkins, S.L.; Walker, M.C. Folic Acid Supplementation in Pregnancy and the Risk of Pre-Eclampsia—A Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Jarosz, M.; Stoś, K.; Przygoda, B.; Matczuk, E.; Stolińska-Fiedorowicz, H.; Kłys, W. Vitamins. In Standards for the Population of Poland; Jarosz, M., Ed.; IŻŻ: Warsaw, Poland, 2017; pp. 166–170. Available online: https://ncez.pl/upload/normy-net-1.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022). (In Polish)
  45. Górska-Warsewicz, H.; Rejman, K.; Laskowski, W.; Czeczotko, M. Milk and Dairy Products and Their Nutritional Contribution to the Average Polish Diet. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Panday, A.J.; Ghodke, K.M. Goat and sheep milk products other than cheeses and yoghurt. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 68, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yangilar, F. As a Potentially Functional Food: Goats’ Milk and Products. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2013, 1, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bogdan, N. Composition and characteristics of goat milk: A review. In Proceedings of the Conferința “Modern Technologies in the Food Industry”, Chişinău, Moldova, 20–22 October 2016; pp. 135–140. [Google Scholar]
  49. Christie, W.W. (Ed.) The Isolation of Lipids from Tissues. Recommended Procedures. Chloroform-Methanol(2:1,v/v) Extraction and “Folch” Wash. In Lipid Analysis. Isolation, Separation, Identification and Structural Analysis of Lipids; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA; Toronto, ON, Canada; Tokyo, Japan; Sydney, Australia; Braunschweig, Germany, 1973; pp. 39–40. [Google Scholar]
  50. ISO 15884:2002 (IDF 182:2002); Milkfat: Preparation of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  51. Kramer, J.K.G.; Cruz-Hermantez, C.; Deng, Z.; Zhou, J.; Jahreis, G.; Dugan, M.E.R. Analysis of conjugated linoleic acid and trans 18:1 isomers in syntetic and animal products. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 1137S–1145S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. LeDoux, M.; Chardigny, J.-M.; Darbois, M.; Soustre, Y.; Sébédio, J.-L.; Laloux, L. Fatty acid composition of French butters, with special emphasis on conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2005, 18, 409–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Konings, E.J.M. A Validated Liquid Chromatographic Method for Determining Folates in Vegetables, Milk Powder, Liver, and Flour. J. AOAC Int. 1999, 82, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Blakley, R.L. The Biochemistry of Folic Acid and Related Pteridines. In North-Holland Research Monographs; North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1969; pp. 1–570. [Google Scholar]
  55. Patring, J.; Wandel, M.; Jägerstad, M.; Frølich, W. Folate content of Norwegian and Swedish Flours and Bread Analysed by Use of Liquid Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2009, 22, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jastrebova, J.; Witthöft, C.; Grahn, A.; Svensson, U.; Jägerstad, M. HPLC Determination of Folates in Raw and Processed Beetroots. Food Chem. 2003, 80, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Czarnowska-Kujawska, M.; Starowicz, M.; Barišić, V.; Kujawski, W. Health-Promoting Nutrients and Potential Bioaccessibility of Breads Enriched with Fresh Kale and Spinach. Foods 2022, 11, 3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. STATISTICA, Version 13.1; StatSoft: Kraków, Poland, 2021.
  59. Williams, C.M. Dietary fatty acids and human health. Anim. Res. 2000, 49, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Connor, W.E. Importance of n−3 fatty acids in health and disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 71, 171S–175S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Holub, D.J.; Holub, B.J. Omega-3 fatty acids from fish oils and cardiovascular disease. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2004, 263, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wijendran, V.; Hayes, K.C. Dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acid balance and cardiovascular health. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2004, 24, 597–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Palmquist, D. Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Metabolism, Health, and Nutrition and for Modified Animal Product Foods. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2009, 25, 207–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Willett, W.C. The role of dietary n-6 fatty acids in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. J. Cardiovasc. Med. 2007, 8, S42–S45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Simopoulos, A.P. The Importance of the Omega-6/Omega-3 Fatty Acid Ratio in Cardiovascular Disease and Other Chronic Diseases. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008, 233, 674–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Russo, G.L. Dietary n−6 and n−3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: From biochemistry to clinical implications in cardiovascular prevention. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2009, 77, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cossignani, L.; Giua, L.; Urbani, E.; Simonetti, M.S.; Blasi, F. Fatty acid composition and CLA content in goat milk and cheese samples from Umbrian market. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2014, 12, 905–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Paszczyk, B.; Tońska, E.; Łuczyńska, J. Health-promoting value of cow, sheep and goat milk and yogurts. Mljecarstvo 2019, 69, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lock, A.; Bauman, D. Modifying milk fat composition of dairy cows to enhance fatty acids beneficial to human health. Lipids 2006, 39, 1197–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Soyeurt, H.; Dardenne, P.; Gillon, A.; Croquet, C.; Vanderick, S.; Mayeres, P.; Bertozzi, C.; Gengler, N. Variation in fatty acid contents of milk and milk fat within and across breeds. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 4858–4865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Zunong, M.; Hanada, M.; Aibibula, Y.; Okamato, M.; Tanaka, K. Variations in conjugated linoleic acid concentrations in cow`s milk, depending on feeding systems in different seasons. Asian–Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 21, 1466–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kelsey, J.A.; Corl, B.A.; Collier, R.J.; Bauman, D.E. The effect of breed, parity and stage of lactation on conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in milk fat from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sc. 2003, 86, 2588–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Frelich, J.; Šlachta, M.; Hanuš, O.; Špička, J.; Samková, E.; Węglarz, A.; Zapletal, P. Seasonal variation in fatty acid composition of cow milk in relation to the feeding system. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2012, 30, 219–229. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hanuš, O.; Krížová, L.; Samková, E.; Špička, J.; Kučera, J.; Klimešová, M.; Roubal, P.; Jedelská, R. The effectof cattle bread, season and type of diet on the fatty acid profile of raw milk. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2016, 59, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Tudisco, R.; Cutrignelli, M.I.; Calabrò, S.; Piccolo, G.; Infascelli, F. Influence of organic systems on milk fatty acid profile and CLA in goats. Small Rum. Res. 2010, 88, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zervas, G.; Tsiplakou, E. The effect of feeding systems on the characteristics of products from small ruminants. Small Rumin. Res. 2011, 101, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Khan, I.T.; Nadeem, M.; Imran, M.; Ayaz, M.; Ajmal, M.; Ellahi, M.Y.; Khalique, A. Antioxidant capacity and fatty acids characterization of heat treated cow and buffalo milk. Lipids Health Dis. 2017, 16, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Pestana, J.M.; Gennari, A.; Monteiro, B.W.; Lehn, D.N.; Souza, C.F.V. Effects of Pasteurization and Ultra-High Temperature Processes on Proximate Composition and Fatty Acid Profile in Bovine Milk. Am. J. Food Technol. 2015, 10, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Ajmal, M.; Nadeem, M.; Imran, M.; Junaid, M. Lipid compositional changes and oxidation status of ultra-high temperature treated milk. Lipids Health Dis. 2018, 17, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Simionato, J.I.; Hiroki, A.P.; Katsuda, M.S.; Pedrão, M.R.; Dias, L.F.; Evelazio de Souza, N. Effects of Seasonality on the Proximate Composition and Fatty Acid Profile in Cow Milk. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. Eng. 2012, 2, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Laučienė, L.; Andrulevičiūtė, V.; Sinkevičienė, I.; Sederevičius, A.; Musayeva, K.; Šernienė, L. Analysis of fatty acid composition and healthy lipids indices in raw and processed milk. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2019, 7, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Santos Júnior, O.O.; Pedrao, M.R.; Dias, L.F.; Paula, L.N.; Coro, F.A.G.; De Souza, N.E. Fatty Acid Content of Bovine Milkfat From Raw Milk to Yoghurt. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2012, 9, 1300–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gassem, M.; Osman, M.; Mohamed Ahmed, I.; Abdel Rahman, I.; Fadol, M.; Al-Maiman, S. Effect of fermentation by selected lactic acid bacteria on the chemical composition and fatty acids of camel milk. J. Camel. Practice. Research. 2016, 23, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kim, Y.; Liu, R. Increase of Conjugated Linoleic Acid Content in Milk by Fermentation with Lactic Acid Bacteria. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1731–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ogawa, J.; Kishino, S.; Ando, A.; Sugimoto, S.; Mihara, K.; Shimizu, S. Production of Conjugated Fatty Acids by Lactic Acid Bacteria. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2005, 100, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Serafeimidou, A.; Zlatanos, S.; Kritikos, G.; Tourianis, A. Change of fatty acid profile, including conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) content, during refrigerated storage of yogurt made of cow and sheep milk. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2013, 31, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Paszczyk, B.; Brandt, W.; Łuczyńska, J. Content of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and trans isomers of C18:1 and C18:2 acids in fresh and stored fermented milks produced with selected starter cultures. Czech. J. Food Sci. 2016, 34, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Czarnowska-Kujawska, M.; Paszczyk, B. Changes in the folate content and fatty acid profile in fermented milk produced with different starter cultures during storage. Molecules 2021, 26, 6063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Domagała, J.; Sady, M.; Najgebauer-Lejko, D.; Czernicka, M.; Witeska, I. The content of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in cream fermented using different starter cultures. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2009, 25, 745–751. [Google Scholar]
  90. Hennessy, A.; Ross, R.; Devery, R.; Stanton, C. Optimization of a Reconstituted Skim Milk Based Medium for Enhanced CLA Production by Bifidobacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 106, 1315–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shingfield, K.J.; Chilliard, Y.; Toivonen, P.; Kairenius, P.; Givens, D.I. Trans fatty acids and bioactive lipids in ruminant milk. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008, 606, 3–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ascherio, A.; Katan, M.B.; Zock, P.L.; Stampfer, M.J.; Willett, W.C. Trans fatty acids and coronary heart disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 340, 1994–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Mohammed, A.E.I.; Elgasim, E.A.; Basheer, E.O.; Elhassan, I.H. Physicochemical, minerals and fatty acids of yoghurt as affected by milk source. Int. J. Innov. 2022, 9, 24–38. Available online: https://ijiset.com/vol9/v9s8/IJISET_V9_I08_03.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  94. Bezerril, F.F.; Magnani, M.; Pacheco, M.T.B.; Souza, M.F.V.; Figueiredo, M.T.B.; Lima, M.S.; Borges, G.S.C.; Oliveira, M.E.G.; Pimentel, T.C.; Queiroga, R.C.R.E. Pilosocereus gounellei (xique-xigue) jam is a source of fibers and mineral and improves the nutritional value and the technological properties of goat milk yogurt. LWT 2021, 139, 110512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Teixera, J.L.P.; Baptista, D.P.; Orlando, E.A.; Gigante, M.L.; Pallone, J.A.L. Effect of processing on the bioaccessibility of essential minerals in goat and cow milk and dairy products assessed by different static in vitro digestion models. Food Chem. 2022, 374, 131739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Bergillos-Meca, T.; Cabrera-Vique, C.; Artacho, R.; Moreno-Montoro, M.; Navarro-Alarcon, M.; Olalla, M.; Gimenez, R.; Ruiz-Lopez, M.D. Influence of milk ultrafiltration on Ca, Mg, Zn and P levels in fermented goats’s milk. Small Rumin. Res. 2015, 124, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Al Sidawi, R.; Ghambashidze, G.; Urushadze, T.; Ploeger, A. Heavy Metal Levels in Milk and Cheese Produced in the Kvemo Kartli Region, Georgia. Foods 2021, 10, 2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Quintana, A.V.; Olalla-Herrera, M.; Ruiz-Lopez, M.D.; Moreno-Montoro, M.; Navarro-Alarcon, M. Study of the effect of different fermenting microorganisms on the Se, Cu, Cr, and Mn contents in fermented goat and cow milks. Food Chem. 2015, 188, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, W.; Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; Liu, D.; Zou, C.; Chen, X. Quantitative evaluation of the grain zinc in cereal crops caused by phosphorus fertilization. A meta-analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 41, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Castro-Montoya, J.M.; Dickhoefer, U. The nutritional value of tropical legume forages fed to ruminants as affected by their growth habit and fed form: A systematic review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 269, 114641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Park, S.; Cho, E.; Chung, H.; Cho, K.; Sa, S.; Balasubramanian, B.; Choi, T.; Jeong, Y. Digestibility of phosphorous in cereals and co-products for animal feed. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Forssén, K.M.; Jägerstad, M.I.; Wigertz, K.; Witthöft, C.M. Folate and dairy products: A critical update. J. Am. College Nutr. 2000, 19, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Rad, H.A.; Khosroushahi, Y.A.; Khalili, M.; Jafarzadeh, S. Folate bio-fortification of yoghurt and fermented milk: A review. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2016, 96, 427–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Gujska, E.; Czarnowska, M.; Michalak, J. Content of folates in fresh and cold stored kefirs and yoghurts. Food Sci. Technol. Qual. 2014, 5, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Holasova, M.; Fiedlerova, V.; Roubal, P.; Pechacova, P.M. Possibility of increasing natural folate content in fermented milk products by fermentation and fruit component addition. Czech J. Food Sci. 2005, 23, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Wigertz, K.; Jägerstad, M. Comparison of a HPLC and radioprotein-binding assay for the determination of folates in milk and blood samples. Food Chem. 1995, 54, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lin, M.Y.; Young, C.M. Folate levels in cultures of lactic acid bacteria. Int. Diary J. 2000, 10, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Strandler, H.S.; Patring, J.; Jägerstad, M.; Jastrebova, J. Challenges in the determination of unsubstituted food folates: Impact of stabilities and conversions on analytical results. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 2367–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kunachowicz, H.; Przygoda, B.; Nadolna, I.; Iwanow, K. Tabele Składu i Wartości Odżywczej Żywności, Wydanie II Zmienione. Food Composition Tables; PZWL: Warsaw, Poland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  110. Hugenschmidt, S.; Schwenninger, S.M.; Gnehm, N.; Lacroix, C. Screening of a natural biodiversity of lactic and propionic acid bacteria for folate and vitamin B12 production in supplemented whey permeate. Int. Dairy J. 2010, 20, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Laiño, J.E.; Del Valle, M.J.; De Giori, G.S.; LeBlanc, J.G.J. Applicability of a Lactobacillus amylovorus strain as co-culture for natural folate bio-enrichment of fermented milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 191, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Becker, W. Dietary habits and nutrient intake in Sweden 1989. In Swedish National Food Administration; Livsmedelsverketsförlag: Uppsala, Sweden, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  113. Saubade, F.; Hemery, Y.M.; Guyot, J.P.; Humblot, C.H. Lactic acid fermentation as a tool for increasing the folate content of foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3894–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. LeBlanc, J.G.; De Giori, G.S.; Smid, E.J.; Hugenholtz, J.; Sesma, F. Folate production by lactic acid bacteria and other food-grade microorganisms. In Communicating Current Research and Educational Topics and Trends in Applied Microbiology; FORMATEX: Badajoz, Spain, 2007; pp. 329–339. [Google Scholar]
  115. Laiño, J.E.; Juarez del Valle, M.; Savoy de Giori, G.; LeBlanc, J.G.J. Development of a high folate concentration yogurt naturally bio-enriched using selected lactic acid bacteria. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 54, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jägerstad, M.; Jastrebova, J.; Svensson, U. Folates in fermented vegetables—A pilot study. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 37, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Holasova, M.; Fiedlerova, V.; Roubal, P.; Pechacova, M. Biosynthesis of folates by lactic acid bacteria and propionibacteria in fermented milk. Czech J. Food Sci. 2004, 22, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Gangadharan, D.; Nampoothiri, K.M. Folate production using Lactococcus lactis ssp cremoris with implications for fortification of skim milk and fruit juices. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 244, 1859–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Divya, J.B.; Nampoothiri, K.M. Folate fortification of skim milk by a probiotic Lactococcus lactis CM28 and evaluation of its stability in fermented milk on cold storage. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 3513–3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Hjortmo, S.; Patring, J.; Jastrebova, J.; Andlid, T. Inherent biodiversity of folate content and composition in yeasts. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 16, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Test material description.
Table 1. Test material description.
ProductsCharacteristics of Starter Culture (According to the Information Provided by the Producer)
Organic products
Raw milk
Natural yoghurtStreptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus
Probiotic yoghurtStreptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei
Greek yoghurtStreptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus
KefirStreptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, Lactococcus lactis subsp. Lactis Biovar diacetylactis, Leuconostoc mesenteries subsp. cremoris, Debarymyces hansenii, Kluyveromyces marxianus subsp. marxianus
Commercial products
UHT milk (producer 1)
UHT milk (producer 2)
Natural yoghurt (producer 1)Lactobacillus delbruecki sub. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus
Natural yoghurt (producer 2)Cultures of lactic acid bacteria
Table
Table 2. Content of fatty acid groups (mg/g fat) in fat from goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks (Mean ± SD).
Table 2. Content of fatty acid groups (mg/g fat) in fat from goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks (Mean ± SD).
ProductsΣSFA 1ΣSCFA 2ΣBCFA 3ΣOCFA 4ΣMUFA 5ΣPUFA 6n-3n-6n-6/n-3trans C18:1trans C18:2cis9trans11
C18:2(CLA)
Organic products
Raw milk (n = 4)528.40 d,e ± 17.38105.41 e ± 2.3712.74 c ± 0.4614.11 b,c,d ± 0.57236.43 a ± 7.0121.18 d ± 0.512.16 g ± 0.1011.43 c,d ± 0.355.29 c ± 0.1014.66 b ± 0.394.32 b,c ± 0.103.26 d ± 0.06
Natural yoghurt (n = 4)604.77 a ± 23.76130.71 a ± 4.9714.96 a,b ± 0.6916.44 a,b ± 0.65231.13 a,b ± 9.7921.23 d ± 0.832.27 g ± 0.1611.82 c ± 0.485.22 c ± 0.2210.89 e ± 0.623.93 c,d ± 0.183.28 d ± 0.10
Probiotic yoghurt (n = 4)584.70 a,b ± 4.58129.23 a ± 1.7714.54 a,b ± 0.2217.23 a ± 0.14180.79 d,e ± 3.6022.08 d ± 0.343.30 c ± 0.0410.42 e ± 0.193.16 g ± 0.0314.79 b ± 0.264.29 b,c ± 0.094.07 b ± 0.08
Greek yoghurt (n = 4)526.84 d,e ± 18.93114.11 c ± 2.7714.15 a,b,c ± 0.5614.83 b,c ± 0.58196.35 c ± 7.8424.22 b,c ± 1.393.76 b ± 0.1111.29 c,d ± 0.603.00 g ± 0.0813.93 c ± 0.744.97 a ± 0.554.19 b ± 0.14
Kefir (n = 4)587.52 a,b ± 27.67122.56 b ± 4.9715.54 a ± 0.8116.25 a,b ± 0.98220.82 b ± 10.2420.96 d ± 0.852.66 e ± 0.1510.86 d,e ± 0.524.09 e ± 0.0812.65 d ± 0.433.67 d ± 0.053.77 c ± 0.19
Commercial products
UHT milk
(producer 1) (n = 4)		512.76 e ± 6.80107.65 d ± 1.5511.49 d,e ± 0.1712.91 c,d ± 0.18160.23 f ± 2.0525.04 b ± 0.313.06 d ± 0.0414.57 b ± 0.184.76 d ± 0.0514.96 b ± 0.264.53 b ± 0.112.88 e ± 0.05
UHT milk
(producer 2) (n = 4)		565.88 b,c ± 17.42112.80 c,d ± 2.8711.13 e ± 0.3712.38 d ± 0.43159.34 f ± 5.8822.09 d ± 0.862.46 f ± 0.0814.00 b ± 0.475.72 b ± 0.0110.88 e ± 0.513.09 e ± 0.202.54 f ± 0.11
Natural yoghurt (producer 1) (n = 4)547.98 c,d ± 9.14127.22 a,b ± 3.2013.83 b,c ± 2.4312.23 d ± 2.65190.98 c,d ± 4.1023.80 c ± 0.421.76 h ± 0.0614.68 b ± 0.288.37 a ± 0.2917.19 a ± 0.253.54 d ± 0.303.82 c ± 0.08
Natural yoghurt (producer 2) (n = 4)500.89 e ± 18.25114.83 c ± 4.6511.88 d,e ± 0.7212.19 d ± 3.34178.63 e ± 11.4229.82 a ± 1.144.69 a ± 0.1216.80 a ± 0.903.58 f ± 0.2316.61 a ± 0.553.95 c,d ± 0.374.39 a ± 0.26
n—number of samples; Mean—mean value; SD—standard deviation; a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h—different letters within the column indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), 1 Σ SFA—sum of all saturated fatty acids; 2 Σ SCFA—sum of short-chain fatty acids (C4:0–C10:0); 3 Σ BCFA—sum of branched-chain fatty acids; 4 Σ OCFA—sum of odd-chain fatty acids; 5 Σ MUFA—sum of monounsaturated fatty acids; 6 Σ PUFA—sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Table
Table 3. Minerals content in goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks (µg/g) (Mean ± SD).
Table 3. Minerals content in goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks (µg/g) (Mean ± SD).
ProductsMgCaNaKPCuMnFeZn
Organic products
Raw milk (n = 4)156.4 d ± 2.7021125.5 h ± 5.725347.1 e ± 6.8811745.1 b,c,d ± 169.4201373.7 e ± 3.7310.040 e ± 0.0040.209 a ± 0.0050.286 c,d ± 0.0044.398 b ± 0.185
Natural yoghurt (n = 4)166.9 c ± 6.0461165.4 g ± 23.985365.3 d ± 7.7811690.7 c,d ± 247.3831365.1 e ± 22.6820.040 e ± 0.0020.118 b ± 0.0030.267 e ± 0.0114.239 c ± 0.095
Probiotic yoghurt (n = 4)162.2 c ± 3.0261237.6 e ± 28.320319.6 f ± 5.2781965.3 a ± 24.2851143.9 f ± 39.7920.024 f ± 0.0030.067 e ± 0.0040.330 a ± 0.0183.681 d,e ± 0.067
Greek yoghurt (n = 4)162.6 c ± 1.8001195.2 f ± 14.710365.6 d ± 7.9981791.1 a,b,c ± 67.5801331.1 e ± 26.6550.052 d ± 0.0040.091 d ± 0.0040.275 d,e ± 0.0143.863 d ± 0.088
Kefir (n = 4)155.5 d ± 0.8751193.9 f ± 16.575341.8 e ± 2.1131582.6 d ± 62.1131130.5 f ± 18.4380.028 f ± 0.0020.097 c ± 0.0020.289 c,d ± 0.0113.678 e ± 0.065
Commercial products
UHT milk
(producer 1) (n = 4)		126.3 f ± 2.6951322.9 d ± 4.343522.8 a ± 1.7491243.0 d,e ± 13.4619382.9 c ± 71.2190.104 a ± 0.0010.029 g ± 0.00010.303 c ± 0.0033.149 f ± 0.017
UHT milk
(producer 2) (n = 4)		139.1 e ± 1.0591554.6 c ± 9.720307.0 g ± 1.8021117.4 e ± 4.7268148.1 d ± 22.0300.072 c ± 0.0020.030 g ± 0.00040.208 f ± 0.0042.556 g ± 0.008
Natural yoghurt
(producer 1) (n = 4)		205.4 a ± 2.8691645.8 b ± 9.114425.4 c ± 13.4041931.1 a,b ± 24.93210,591.2 b ± 232.5350.104 a ± 0.0050.044 f ± 0.0020.278 d,e ± 0.0013.729 d,e ± 0.068
Natural yoghurt
(producer 2) (n = 4)		172.9 b ± 0.8162324.4 a ± 21.891454.2 b ± 11.0791777.6 a,b,c ± 2.78811,309.9 a ± 276.3170.097 b ± 0.0020.042 f ± 0.0020.310 b ± 0.0094.663 a ± 0.019
n—number of samples; Mean—mean value; SD—standard deviation; a,b,c,d,e,f,g—different letters within the column indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Folate content in goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks (Mean ± SD).
Table 4. Folate content in goat’s milk and fermented goat’s milk drinks (Mean ± SD).
ProductsFolates (µg/100 g)
Organic products
Raw milk3.16 1,b ± 0.03
Natural yoghurt2.36 c,d ± 0.09
Probiotic yoghurt1.60 f ± 0.06
Greek yoghurt9.18 a ± 0.42
Kefir0.99 g ± 0.06
Commercial products
UHT milk
(producer 1)		1.87 e ± 0.01
UHT milk
(producer 2)		2.24 d ± 0.05
Natural yoghurt
(producer 1)		2.56 c ± 0.04
Natural yoghurt
(producer 2)		3.32 b ± 0.18
1 Folate content is expressed as means with standard deviations from triplicates per fresh weight unit. Folates is the sum of 5-CH3-H4folate and H4folate expressed as folic acid content using a molar absorption coefficient given by Blakely [54]; a,b,c,d,e,f,g—different letters within the column indicate a statistically significant difference at p < 0.05 in the Duncan test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paszczyk, B.; Czarnowska-Kujawska, M.; Klepacka, J.; Tońska, E. Health-Promoting Ingredients in Goat’s Milk and Fermented Goat’s Milk Drinks. Animals 2023, 13, 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050907

AMA Style

Paszczyk B, Czarnowska-Kujawska M, Klepacka J, Tońska E. Health-Promoting Ingredients in Goat’s Milk and Fermented Goat’s Milk Drinks. Animals. 2023; 13(5):907. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050907

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paszczyk, Beata, Marta Czarnowska-Kujawska, Joanna Klepacka, and Elżbieta Tońska. 2023. "Health-Promoting Ingredients in Goat’s Milk and Fermented Goat’s Milk Drinks" Animals 13, no. 5: 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050907

APA Style

Paszczyk, B., Czarnowska-Kujawska, M., Klepacka, J., & Tońska, E. (2023). Health-Promoting Ingredients in Goat’s Milk and Fermented Goat’s Milk Drinks. Animals, 13(5), 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050907

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop