Seasonal Variation in the Body Composition, Carcass Composition, and Offal Quality in the Wild Fallow Deer (Dama dama L.)
by
, and
Marek Stanisz
1,
Maciej Skorupski
2,
Marta Bykowska-Maciejewska
1,
Joanna Składanowska-Baryza
1 and
Agnieszka Ludwiczak
1,* 1
Department of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Sloneczna 1, 62-002 Zlotniki, Poland
2
Department of Game Management and Forest Protection, Faculty of Forestry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(6), 1082; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061082
Submission received: 13 February 2023
/
Revised: 13 March 2023
/
Accepted: 15 March 2023
/
Published: 17 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Products)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Game meat popularity is connected with the fact that harvesting game is part of the sustainable management of game species. As hunted animals grow in their natural environments—with access to natural forage, exercise, and unlimited possibilities to perform natural behaviors—consumers are enabled to think about game meat as a healthy product, obtained from animals that grew in welfare-friendly conditions. On the other hand, the popularity of using offal (including those from game species) in dishes or processed products is lower compared to muscle tissue and differs among cultures and regions. Nevertheless, we should remember that offal is a nutritional and valuable animal product, and its use allows us to limit the amounts of utilized by-products, and therefore should also be considered from the perspective of sustainability in the meat production chain and its environmental effects.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to examine the seasonal variation in the body composition, carcass composition, and quality of edible internal organs from the fallow deer hunt-harvested in the summer (n = 9) and the winter (n = 10) seasons. The weight and proportion of the mesenteric and omental fat were greater for the animals harvested in the winter (1.12 kg and 2.75%) compared to those from the summer season (0.43 kg and 1.02%). The winter-harvested animals had more perinephric fat (0.75 kg and 1.84%) than those hunted in summer (0.26 kg and 1.84%). The gastrointestinal tract of the fallow deer hunted in summer was more filled with feed and therefore heavier (7.92 kg) compared to those from the winter season (5.16 kg). The proportion of fat was significantly greater in the carcasses obtained in winter compared to the summer season (6.55% vs. 3.79%). No seasonal variety was found in the physicochemical characteristics of the edible offal, but the content of extractable fat was significantly affected by the season. In conclusion, the effect of the season on the slaughter value of the hunt-harvested fallow deer was limited to a variation in the proportion of some of the internal organs and affected the fat deposition in the body of the examined animals. The season significantly affected the fat content in the carcass and the extractable fat content in the examined offal.
Disclaimer:
This paper includes a section on the nutritional quality of wild deer offal. The internal organs of wild animals, particularly the liver and digestive tract, are at high risk of containing parasites (or pathogens), therefore constituting a health risk to humans if infected animals are not efficiently detected. This is the reason why, in several countries, the offal consumption of wild animals is forbidden. Under Regulation 1703 (2015) of the Ministry for Agriculture and Rural Development of Poland, this is allowed, and Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and Council does not prohibit it. However, by this disclaimer note, we call the attention of the readers that offal consumption from wild deer may constitute a health risk.
1. Introduction
Body composition and weight are good indicators of energy status in wild and farmed cervids, and both of these traits are affected by both the season and the age of the animals [1,2,3,4]. The fat depots in the body of farmed and wild animals, including the mesenteric, omental, and perinephric fat, are also commonly used to assess the body condition [5,6]. Research focusing on the effect of the seasons on the body composition of wild ungulates is of significant importance as the proportion of the most valuable cuts and the not-edible parts (skin, head, and feet) determines the profitability of this special branch in the meat industry [7,8,9,10,11]. According to the available research, the seasonal changes in the body condition of wild animals are related to the photoperiod and feed availability, with the second factor strictly dependent upon the type of environment and the population density [12,13,14,15]. Venison is valued as a culinary meat in different parts of the world [16,17,18,19], but its popularity in the production of processed products is also increasing [20]. Meat processing gives the possibility of utilizing edible animal offal and leads to the production of shelf-stable meat products. The most valuable animal offal used in meat processing, as well as for culinary purposes, are the liver, kidneys, heart, and tongue [21,22,23,24]. The hunting seasons for game species vary among European countries. In Poland, the hunting season is defined by the Directive of the Ministry of Environment [25], and for fallow deer females, it ranges between 1 September and 15 January.
The goal of our study was to examine the seasonal differences in the body composition, carcass composition, and offal quality in wild fallow deer. The summer and winter seasons were selected in this study to contrast the poorest and the best season with regard to food availability in wildlife. This study should be interesting to game processors, as depending on the slaughter value and offal quality, the processing chain may vary.
2. Materials and Methods
In this study, the hunters obtained an additional agreement from the Ministry of the Environment (Agreement no. DL-III.6713.15.2016) to harvest fallow deer in the summer season (from 1 August till 30 September) for scientific purposes. The decision was supported by the great number of heads of this species and the lack of participation in the reproduction of two year old animals. According to Polish legislation, hunters are responsible for the assessment of the health of hunted deer by means of the inspection of the internal organs during the act of dressing out the animal in the field [26]. Game carcasses and their edible offal can be obtained through direct sail and can be consumed [26].
2.1. Animals and Acquisition of Edible Offal
The research material was 19 two year old fallow deer does (bled body weight of 40–41 kg), hunt-harvested in the same hunting area of western Poland in the summer season (July; n = 9) and in the winter (December; n = 10). The fallow deer in this study were harvested in accordance with the requirements of the Polish Hunting Law implemented by the Government of Poland. The age was determined by a trained hunter after the shot through the replacement and the level of wear of the premolars and molars. Only animals in their second year of life were intended for use in this study. The animals were shot during a snipe hunt (in the head or in the neck), bled out, and weighted (referred to as the bled body weight). Next, the deer were hung by the Achilles tendon. The hot carcass weight was recorded after the removal of the skin, head, internal organs, and feet. The following non-edible carcass parts and internal organs were weighted: head, skin, front and hind feet, gastrointestinal tract, mesenteric and omental fat, perinephric fat, edible offal. These were weighted separately, and all of the internal organs were weighted together (trachea, lung, heart, liver, diaphragm, kidneys, spleen). Additionally, in order to examine the effect of the season on the edible offal quality, the liver, kidneys, heart, and tongue were weighed separately and defined with the term: point of measurement (PM). All of these procedures were conducted in a game collection point. After evisceration, the carcasses were transported to a slaughterhouse in a meat truck, under chilled conditions (+2 °C). After 24 h from the hunting, the deer carcasses were halved and the half-carcasses were jointed according to the methodology proposed by Stanisz et al. [24] into cuts: neck, shoulder, loin, ribs with flank, and leg. The carcass parts were dissected into meat, fat, and bones, and the proportion of these tissues in the carcass and carcass parts was calculated. The edible offal was kept at +2 °C during storage.
2.2. Physicochemical Traits of Edible Offal
The pH of the edible internal organs was measured with a temperature-compensated portable pH-meter, pH 1140 (Mettler Toledo, Urdorf, Switzerland) equipped with a combination glass calomel electrode (Lo 406-M6-DXK-S7/25). Before the measurement, the pH equipment was calibrated with 4.0 and 7.0 buffers.
The water holding capacity (WHC, %) was measured according to the method of Grau and Hamm [27] in modification of Pohja and Niinivaara [28]. Samples (0.300 g) of ground material were placed on filter paper between two glass tiles. A force of 2 kg was applied to each sample for 5 min. Then, the samples were removed from the filter paper and reweighed immediately to calculate the change in their weight, referred to as free water. Plasticity (cm2) measurement was conducted according to the method of Pohja and Niinivaara [28], simultaneously with the free water measurement. The plasticity was expressed as the area of the pressed sample, marked on the filter paper, scanned, and measured using the ImageJ ver. 1.52 g software.
The examination of the chemical composition of the offal was conducted 24 h postmortem, according to the AOAC methodology [29]. The analysis included the determination of the dry matter content, total protein content with the Kjeldahl procedure (K-424 Buchi digestion unit; Büchi Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland), extractable fat content by Soxhlet extraction (SoxtecTM 8000, FOSS, Warsaw, Poland), and ash content (FCF 12 SM, CZYLOK, Jastrzebie-Zdroj, Poland). On the basis of the obtained data, the content of moisture and the water-to-protein ratio were calculated.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The effect of the hunting season on the body weight, carcass weight, carcass parts and offal:
where:
Yij = μ + αi + eij.
μ—the overall mean of the analyzed trait,
αi—the effect of the ith season (i = 1, 2),
eij—random error.
The effect of the hunting season, organs, and time postmortem on the pH was calculated with the model:
where:
Yijkl = μ + αi + πj + γj(k) + βj(k)(l) + (αγβ)ikl + eijkl.
μ—the overall mean of the analyzed trait,
αi—the fixed effect of the ith season (i= 1, 2),
πj—the random effect of jth animal (j = 1, 2, 3,…19),
γj(k)—the random effects of kth organs nested in jth animal,
βj(k)(l)—the effect of lth time postmortem (l = 1, 2) as the repeated measures nested in the kth organ (k = 1, 2, 3, 4) nested in jth animal,
(αγβ)ikl—interaction (hunting season × organ × time postmortem)
eijkl—the random error.
The effect of the hunting season and organs on the dry matter, crude protein, extractable fat, ash, and the W/P, moisture, WHC, and plasticity of the fallow deer was calculated according to the model:
where:
Yijk = μ + αi + πj + γj(k) + (αγ)ik + eijk.
μ—the overall mean of the analyzed trait,
αi—the fixed effect of the ith season (i = 1, 2),
πj—the random effect of jth animal (j = 1, 2, 3,…19),
γj(k)—the random effects of kth organ nested in jth animal,
(αγ)ik—interaction (hunting season × organ)
eijk—the random error.
All of the statistical calculations were conducted using SAS ver.9.4 [30]. Tukey–Kramer adjustment was implemented for multiple comparisons of the Least Squares Mean (LSM) differences.
3. Results
3.1. Body Composition
The carcass characteristic of the fallow deer hunt-harvested in two seasons are given in Table 1. A higher proportion of hot and cold carcass weight was noted in the winter compared to the summer season (p = 0.038 and p = 0.029). The weight and proportion of mesenteric and omental fat (p = 0.001) and perinephric fat (p = 0.001) were also higher in the deer hunted in winter compared to those in the summer season. The weight and proportion of the full gastrointestinal tract (p = 0.019 and p = 0.016) were greater for the animals shot in the summer compared to those obtained in the winter season. The weight and proportion of the liver, kidneys, heart, tongue (Table 2), and carcass cuts did not show seasonal variation (Table 3). The composition of the fallow deer carcasses and carcass parts is presented in Table 4. The weight and proportion of fat were almost two times greater in the carcasses obtained in winter compared to those from the summer season (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001). Among the analyzed carcass cuts, the most significant seasonal variation in the fat content was observed for the shoulder, ribs with flank, and neck.
3.2. Physicochemical Characteristics of Edible Internal Organs
The physicochemical characteristics of the offal are presented in Table 5. The variety found in the values of these characteristics was connected with the point of measurement, but not with the season. The highest pH values were noted at 24 h and 48 h postmortem in the kidneys and heart (p < 0.0001). The tongue was characterized by the lowest percentage of moisture, WHC, and plasticity among the examined points of measurement (p < 0.0001). The highest moisture content was found in the kidneys (p < 0.0001). The heart was characterized by the highest percentage of WHC (p < 0.0001), while the liver samples revealed the greatest plasticity (p < 0.0001). The chemical composition of the offal from the wild fallow deer analyzed in this study differed between seasons in the extractable fat content (p = 0.002) (Table 6).
4. Discussion
4.1. Seasonal Variation in Body Weight and Fat Deposition
The season has a strong effect on the body weight, and the fat tissue reserves are included in a group of parameters that indicate the condition of wild animals [12,16]. In our study, we have noted the influence of the season on the hot and cold carcass weight; in both cases, it referred to the weight revealed as a percentage of the bled body weight. There was no seasonal variation in the carcass weight (both hot and cold) revealed in kilograms, similar to the results presented by Serrano et al. [18] for Iberian wild red deer. Serrano et al. [18] pointed out the effect of the season on the percentage of some cut yields in the carcass weight. In contrast to our results and those presented by Serrano [18], in the research of Ceacero et al. [16], the authors noted seasonal variation (culling in late autumn vs in late summer) in the growth performance and carcass traits in farmed fallow deer. Moreover, the literature points to a seasonally varied deposition of fat in the bodies of wild and farmed cervids. Among the fat depots, kidney fat and visceral fat are of the utmost importance [31,32]. In free-living animals, late summer and autumn are the time when the fat reserves are built up, while winter is a period of fat reserve consumption. The fluctuations of body conditions in wild cervids are affected by additional factors, such as milk production in the case of lactating does and rut in the case of bucks [16,17,33]. Ceacero et al. [16] compared fallow deer culled in late autumn and late winter and stated that the percentage of internal fat was on the same level in both groups, but the kidney fat index increased from late autumn until late winter. In the present study, a higher weight and proportion of mesenteric and omental fat and of perinephric fat were noted in the deer carcasses obtained in early winter compared to those from the late summer season. Yokoyama et al. [31] also noted seasonal changes in the amount of perinephric fat in the free-living sika deer. They found in their study that the perinephric fat weight was the greatest in August and the lowest in February. The seasonal patterns of the changes body weight and body composition in deer are associated with the changes in the percentage of body fat, protein, and water. In the winter season, the body fat and protein reserves depend on the pre-winter and post-winter levels of these components [13,34]. In the present study, the proportion of fat was significantly greater in the carcasses, as well as in the individual carcass parts, of the deer obtained in winter compared to those from the summer season. As pointed out by Volpelli et al. [35], there are additional sources of variation in the weight of the carcass and organs, such as the diet and age of the fallow deer. The available literature points out the seasonal variation in the quality of venison [15,36].
4.2. Effect of Season on Internal Organs and Venison
Although no effect of the season on the offal weight was found in our study, many researchers have observed seasonal fluctuations in the weight of some internal organs from wild deer. The variations in the weight of the gastrointestinal tract are caused by seasonal changes in the degree of filling the rumen with green forage [7,13,34]. This phenomenon is connected to the reduction in appetite in free-living animals and the decreased voluntary intake of feed [14,33]. The effect of the season on the weight and proportion of the full gastrointestinal tract was also observed in our study. Yokoyama et al. [31] noted a significant seasonal variation in the kidney weight in wild sika deer and explained it with energy expenditure, protein and fat catabolism, and fluctuations in the concentration of photoperiod-sensitive hormones. According to Arnold [33], the fluctuations in the weight of the liver in wild ruminants also reflect the magnitude of seasonal changes in the body condition. According to the available literature, venison quality shows a seasonal variation. Serrano et al. [18] examined the venison from Iberian wild red deer and noted that the longissimus thoracis et lumborum muscle from winter-harvested animals was characterized by greater pH48 (5.89 vs. 5.81; p < 0.001) and lower L* (36.5 vs. 38.3; p < 0.01) and b* (13.8 vs. 15.3; p < 0.01) compared to those from the autumn season. The venison from the deer hunted in autumn contained more extractable fat compared to those from the winter season (0.16 vs. 0.10 g/100 g LTL; p < 0.01). Stevenson et al. [7] present the rut as the major cause of seasonal variation in the venison chemical composition. The season influenced the shear force value and the winter venison was tougher than the autumn-harvested venison (20.5 vs. 18.5 N; p = 0.05). Stanisz et al. [14] reported that the season (winter vs summer) influences the attributes of the venison from fallow deer hunt-harvested in Poland, including the pH value, L*, a*, b*, purge loss, WHC, cooking loss, shear force, protein, and extractable fat content. The seasonal variation in the venison chemical composition was also stated by García Ruiz et al. [3]. Wiklund et al. [36] examined the quality of the venison of wild red deer and found that the WHC in venison obtained in December was greater compared to the meat of animals harvested in March, July, and September (p < 0.001). These findings in the quality of meat suggest that a seasonal variation in the quality of the offal can also be expected. However, the results of our study indicate that the offal physicochemical traits were not affected by the season, but by the organ itself. Some data on the physicochemical quality of the edible internal organs of animals can be found in the literature. Compared to the results in our study, slightly higher pH values in the offal from farm-raised fallow deer were given by Stanisz et al. [24]. The pH after 24 h from the slaughter measured 5.96 in the liver, 6.52 in the kidneys, 6.44 in the heart, and 5.79 in the tongue. In the study of Ludwiczak et al. [21] the pH of the offal of wild boars of different sexes and ages was measured, and amounted to 6.12–6.31 in the liver, 6.32–6.54 in kidneys, 5.81–5.98 in the heart, and 5.52–5.66 in the tongue. In general, irrespective of the species, the pH in the kidneys is higher compared to the other offal [21,22,37]. As expected on the basis of the previously presented seasonal variation in body weight and body composition, the extractable fat content in the offal from the winter harvest was greater compared to the offal of the deer obtained in the summer season.
5. Conclusions
To conclude, the results of this study indicate that the body composition and carcass composition of wild fallow deer show a significant seasonal variation in terms of the fat content. The animals harvested in the winter season are characterized by an increased visceral fat content and greater content of fat in the carcass compared to the deer hunted in summer. The effect of the season was also noted in the fat content of the offal from the fallow deer, but no seasonal variation in the physicochemical traits of these organs was found.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.S. (Marek Stanisz) and M.S. (Maciej Skorupski); methodology, M.S. (Marek Stanisz), M.S. (Maciej Skorupski) and A.L.; software, M.S. (Marek Stanisz); validation, M.S. (Marek Stanisz), M.S. (Maciej Skorupski) and A.L.; investigation, A.L.; resources, M.S. (Maciej Skorupski) and M.B.-M.; data curation, M.B.-M., J.S.-B., A.L. and M.S. (Marek Stanisz); writing—original draft preparation, A.L.; writing—review and editing, A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The article was written as part of research conducted by statutory funding of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science University of Life Sciences, Poland.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the fact that the study was conducted on game animals harvested by means of standard hunting procedures. Hunters are responsible for the management of the structure and size of deer populations in Poland, therefore the research material consisted of deer harvested according to the annual hunting plan.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data available on request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Lorenzo, J.M.; Maggiolino, A.; Gallego, L.; Pateiro, M.; Serrano, M.P.; Domínguez, R.; García, A.; Landete-Castillejos, T.; De Palo, P. Effect of age on nutritional properties of Iberian wild red deer meat. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 1561–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kudrnáčová, E.; Bartoň, L.; Bureš, D.; Hoffman, L.C. Carcass and meat characteristics from farm-raised and wild fallow deer (Dama dama) and red deer (Cervus elaphus): A review. Meat Sci. 2018, 141, 9–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García Ruiz, A.C.; Mariscal, M.A.; Viñas, G.; Soriano, A. Influence of hunting season stage and ripening conditions on microbiological, physicochemical and sensory characteristics of venison (Cervus elaphus) chorizo sausages. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2010, 22, 386–394. [Google Scholar]
- Maggiolino, A.; Pateiro, M.; Serrano, M.P.; Landete-Castillejos, T.; Domínguez, R.; García, A.; Gallego, L.; De Palo, P.; Lorenzo, J.M. Carcass and meat quality characteristics from Iberian wild red deer (Cervus elaphus) hunted at different ages. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 1938–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rineg, T. Evaluating body condition of free-ranging red deer (Cervus elaphus), with special reference to New Zealand. N. Z. J. Sci. Technol. 1995, 36B, 429–463. [Google Scholar]
- Stephenson, T.R.; Bleich, V.C.; Pierce, B.M.; Mulcahy, G.P. Validation of mule deer body composition using in vivo and post-mortem indices of nutritional condition. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2002, 30, 557–564. [Google Scholar]
- Stevenson, J.M.; Seman, D.L.; Littlejohn, R.P. Seasonal variation in venison quality in mature, farmed red deer stags in New Zealand. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 70, 1389–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torbit, S.C.; Carpenter, L.H.; Alldredge, A.W.; Swift, D.M. Mule deer body composition: A comparison of methods. J. Wildl. Manag. 1985, 49, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Żmijewski, T.; Modzelewska-Kapituła, M.; Pomianowski, J.; Ziomek, A. Farm-raised fallow deer (Dama dama L.) carcass characteristics and meat nutritional value. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 3211–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Żochowska-Kujawska, J.; Kotowicz, M.; Sobczak, M.; Lachowicz, K.; Wójcik, J. Age-related changes in the carcass composition and meat quality of fallow deer (Dama dama L.). Meat Sci. 2019, 147, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monteith, K.L.; Stephenson, T.R.; Bleich, V.C.; Conner, M.M.; Pierce, B.M.; Bowyer, R.T. Risk-sensitive allocation in seasonal dynamics of fat and protein reserves in a long-lived mammal. J. Anim. Ecol. 2013, 82, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ninov, N.P. Somatometric characteristics of the fallow deer (Dama dama L.) in Bulgaria. Acta Zool. Bulg. 2003, 55, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
- Janiszewski, P.; Daszkiewicz, T.; Cilulko, J. The effect of wintering conditions on the body weight and carcass quality of farm-raised fallow deer (Dama dama). Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 21, 668–673. [Google Scholar]
- Stanisz, M.; Skorupski, M.; Ślósarz, P.; Bykowska-Maciejewska, M.; Składanowska-Baryza, J.; Stańczak, Ł.; Krokowska-Paluszak, M.; Ludwiczak, A. The seasonal variation in the quality of venison from wild fallow deer (Dama dama)—A pilot study. Meat Sci. 2019, 150, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lizana, V.; Muniesa, A.; Cardells, J.; López-Ramon, J.; Aguiló-Gisbert, J.; Lomillos, J.M.; Gortázar, C. Safe Game: Hygienic Habits in Self-Consumption of Game Meat in Eastern Spain. Foods 2022, 11, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ceacero, F.; Clar, M.A.; Ny, V.; Kotrba, R. Differential effects of ruminally protected amino acids on fattening of fallow deer in two culling periods. Animal 2020, 14, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuroiwa, A.; Kuroe, M.; Yahara, T. Effects of density, season, and food intake on sika deer nutrition on Yakushima Island, Japan. Ecol. Res. 2017, 32, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serrano, M.P.; Maggiolino, A.; Landete-Castillejos, T.; Pateiro, M.; Barbería, J.P.; Fierro, Y.; Domínguez, R.; Gallego, L.; García, A.; De Palo, P.; et al. Quality of main types of hunted red deer meat obtained in Spain compared to farmed venison from New Zealand. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunová, S.; Sendra, E.; Haščík, P.; Vuković, N.L.; Vukić, M.D.; Hsouna, A.B.; Mnif, W.; Kacániová, M. Microbiological Quality of Deer Meat Treated with Essential Oil Litsea cubeba. Animals 2022, 12, 2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanisz, M.; Ludwiczak, A.; Pietrzak, M.; Ślósarz, P. The quality of meat and edible by-products from kids with different inheritance of Boer goat. Small Rumin. Res. 2015, 125, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ludwiczak, A.; Składanowska-Baryza, J.; Stanisz, M. Effect of age and sex on the quality of offal and meat from the wild boar (Sus scrofa). Animals 2020, 10, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Razmaitė, V.; Pileckas, V.; Šiukščius, A.; Juškienė, V. Fatty Acid Composition of Meat and Edible Offal from Free-Living Red Deer (Cervus elaphus). Foods 2020, 9, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soriano, A.; Sánchez-García, C. Nutritional Composition of Game Meat from Wild Species Harvested in Europe. In Meat and Nutrition; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanisz, M.; Ludwiczak, A.; Buda, P.; Pietrzak, M.; Bykowska, M.; Kryza, A.; Ślósarz, P. The effect of sex on the dressing percentage, carcass, and organ quality in the fallow deer (Dama dama). Ann. Anim. Sci. 2015, 15, 1055–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Official Gazette. The Directive of the Ministry of the Environment from March 16th, the Year 2005, Defines the Hunting Seasons for Game Species; Official Gazette: Quezon City, Philippines, 2005; Volume 48, p. 459.
- Official Gazette. The Directive of the Ministry of the Environment from September 30th, the Year 2015, Defines the Veterinary Requirements in the Production of Animal-Origin Products Meant for Direct Sale; Official Gazette: Quezon City, Philippines, 2015; Volume 0, p. 1703.
- Grau, R.; Hamm, G. Eineeinfachemetode zur bestimmung di wasserbindung in muskel. Naturwissenschafen 1953, 40, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pohja, M.S.; Niinivaara, F.P. Die Bestimmung der Wasserbindund des Fleishesmittels der Konstantdruckmethode. Fleischwirtschaft 1957, 9, 193–195. [Google Scholar]
- AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, 18th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- SAS. User’s Guide, v. 6.12, 4th ed.; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2012; Volume 2, p. 846. [Google Scholar]
- Yokoyama, M.; Onuma, M.; Suzuki, M.; Kaj, K. Seasonal fluctuations of body condition in northern sika deer on Hokkaido Island, Japan. Acta Theriol. 2001, 46, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takahashi, H.; Yokoyama, M.; Suzuki, M.; Onuma, M.; Ichimura, Y.; Yamanaka, M.; Okada, H. Measuring rump fat of the Hokkaido sika deer Cervus nippon yesonesis. Mamm. Study 2004, 29, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, W. Review: Seasonal differences in the physiology of wild northern ruminants. Animal 2020, 14, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Del Guidice, G.D.; Mech, L.D.; Kunkel, K.E.; Gesl, E.M.; Seal, U.S. Seasonal patterns of weight, hematology and serum characteristics of free-ranging female white-tailed deer in Minnesota. Can. J. Zool. 1992, 70, 974–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volpelli, L.A.; Valusso, R.; Piasenter, E. Carcass quality in the male fallow deer (Dama dama): Effects of age and supplementary feeding. Meat Sci. 2002, 60, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiklund, E.; Dobbie, P.; Stuart, A.; Littlejohn, R.P. Seasonal variation in red deer (Cervus elaphus) venison (M. longissimus dorsi) drip loss, calpain activity, colour and tenderness. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 720–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tomović, V.; Žlender, B.; Jokanović, M.; Tomović, M.; Šojć, B.; Skaljac, S.; Kevrešan, Z.; Tasić, T.; Ikonić, O.; Okanović, D. Physical and chemical characteristics of edible offal from free-reared Swallow-Belly Mangalica pigs. Acta Aliment. Hung. 2016, 45, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1.
Seasonal variation in the slaughter value of the fallow deer (LSM ± SE).
| Season | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Summer | Winter | p-Value |
| BBW 1 | 41.8 ± 2.4 | 40.9 ± 3.8 | 0.589 |
| Hot carcass weight, kg | 23.12 ± 1.23 | 23.89 ± 1.22 | 0.628 |
| Hot carcass weight, % BBW | 55.31 ± 1.09 | 58.41± 1.01 | 0.038 |
| Cold carcass weight, kg | 22.62 ± 1.21 | 23.47 ± 1.19 | 0.537 |
| Cold carcass weight, % BBW | 54.12 ± 1.02 | 57.38 ± 0.95 | 0.029 |
| Front feet, kg | 0.62 ± 0.06 | 0.64 ± 0.05 | 0.983 |
| Front feet, % BBW | 1.49 ± 0.08 | 1.55 ± 0.09 | 0.986 |
| Hind feet, kg | 0.73 ± 0.07 | 0.75 ± 0.06 | 0.986 |
| Hind feet, % BBW | 1.75 ± 0.08 | 1.83 ± 0.09 | 0.968 |
| Head, kg | 2.16 ± 0.21 | 2.29 ± 0.27 | 0.843 |
| Head, % BBW | 5.17 ± 0.39 | 5.59 ± 0.38 | 0.965 |
| Skin, kg | 3.62 ± 0.36 | 3.74 ± 0.39 | 0.628 |
| Skin, % BBW | 8.66 ± 0.99 | 9.14 ± 0.98 | 0.243 |
| Other organs 2, kg | 2.93 ± 0.19 | 2.86 ± 0.22 | 0.342 |
| Other organs 2, % BBW | 7.02 ± 0.64 | 7.01 ± 0.63 | 0.999 |
| Gastro-intestinal tract (full), kg | 7.92 ± 0.52 | 5.16 ± 0.38 | 0.019 |
| Gastro-intestinal tract (full), % BBW | 18.95 ± 1.31 | 12.62 ± 1.29 | 0.016 |
| Mesenteric and omental fat, kg | 0.43 ± 0.12 | 1.12 ± 0.15 | 0.001 |
| Mesenteric and omental fat, % BBW | 1.02 ± 0.08 | 2.75 ± 0.09 | 0.001 |
| Perinephric fat, kg | 0.26 ± 0.07 | 0.75 ± 0.09 | 0.001 |
| Perinephric fat, % BBW | 0.63 ± 0.05 | 1.84 ± 0.07 | 0.001 |
1 BBW—bled body weight; 2 Other organs—trachea, lung, heart, liver, diaphragm, kidneys, spleen.
Table 2.
Seasonal variation in the proportion of edible internal organs in the bled body weight (LSM ± SE).
Table 2.
Seasonal variation in the proportion of edible internal organs in the bled body weight (LSM ± SE).
| Season | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Summer | Winter | p-Value |
| Liver, kg | 0.823 ± 0.109 | 0.842 ± 0.112 | 0.896 |
| Liver, % BBW | 1.97 ± 0.24 | 2.06 ± 0.25 | 0.697 |
| Kidneys, kg | 0.112 ± 0.026 | 0.119± 0.029 | 0.912 |
| Kidenys, % BBW | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.06 | 0.854 |
| Heart, kg | 0.388 ± 0.042 | 0.379 ± 0.044 | 0.867 |
| Heart, % BBW | 0.93 ± 0.16 | 0.92 ± 0.16 | 0.988 |
| Tongue, kg | 0.147 ± 0.015 | 0.158 ± 0.016 | 0.798 |
| Tongue, % BBW | 0.35 ± 0.07 | 0.39 ± 0.08 | 0.826 |
BBW—bled body weight.
Table 3.
Seasonal variation in the proportion of carcass parts in the cold carcass weight (LSM ± SE).
Table 3.
Seasonal variation in the proportion of carcass parts in the cold carcass weight (LSM ± SE).
| Season | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Summer | Winter | p-Value |
| Leg, kg | 8.87 ± 0.39 | 9.41 ± 0.41 | 0.071 |
| Leg, % CCW 1 | 39.23 ± 0.52 | 40.11 ± 0.51 | 0.178 |
| Loin, kg | 4.98 ± 0.32 | 5.18 ± 0.29 | 0.194 |
| Loin, % CCW 1 | 22.04 ± 0.30 | 22.09 ± 0.38 | 0.843 |
| Shoulder, kg | 4.30 ± 0.26 | 4.43 ± 0.27 | 0.896 |
| Shoulder, % CCW 1 | 19.01 ± 0.28 | 18.87± 0.26 | 0.869 |
| Ribs with flank, kg | 3.06 ± 0.23 | 3.07 ± 0.19 | 0.992 |
| Ribs with flank, % CCW 1 | 13.53 ± 0.19 | 13.02 ± 0.21 | 0.369 |
| Neck, kg | 1.40 ± 0.15 | 1.39 ± 0.15 | 0.783 |
| Neck, % CCW 1 | 6.19 ± 0.28 | 5.91 ± 0.26 | 0.492 |
1 CCW—cold carcass weight.
Table 4.
Seasonal variation in the composition of carcass and carcass cuts.(LSM ± SE).
| Item | Summer | Winter | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carcass | |||
| Lean, kg | 17.36 ± 0.23 | 17.38 ± 0.43 | 0.984 |
| Lean, % | 76.74 ± 0.31 a | 74.07 ± 0.32 b | 0.032 |
| Fat, kg | 0.86 ± 0.11 B | 1.54 ± 0.12 A | 0.001 |
| Fat, % | 3.79 ± 0.25 B | 6.55 ± 0.24 A | 0.001 |
| Bones, kg | 4.41 ± 0.18 | 4.55 ± 0.18 | 0.965 |
| Bones, % | 19.47 ± 0.62 | 19.38 ± 0.61 | 0.896 |
| Leg | |||
| Lean, kg | 6.88 ± 0.36 | 7.08 ± 0.36 | 0.692 |
| Lean, % | 77.57 ± 0.79 a | 75.23 ± 0.78 b | 0.039 |
| Fat, kg | 0.33 ± 0.11 | 0.59 ± 0.11 | 0.124 |
| Fat, % | 3.75 ± 0.28 B | 6.23 ± 0.27 A | 0.002 |
| Bones, kg | 1.66 ± 0.15 | 1.74 ± 0.15 | 0.766 |
| Bones, % | 18.68 ± 0.65 | 18.54 ± 0.64 | 0.794 |
| Loin | |||
| Lean, kg | 3.63 ± 0.28 | 3.63 ± 0.28 | 0.996 |
| Lean, % | 72.88 ± 0.72 a | 69.96 ± 0.73 b | 0.016 |
| Fat, kg | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.06 | 0.063 |
| Fat, % | 4.29 ± 0.38 B | 7.63 ± 0.39 A | 0.003 |
| Bones, kg | 1.14 ± 0.11 | 1.16 ± 0.11 | 0.901 |
| Bones, % | 22.83 ± 0.32 | 22.41 ± 0.33 | 0.637 |
| Shoulder | |||
| Lean, kg | 3.36 ± 0.22 | 3.29 ± 0.22 | 0.862 |
| Lean, % | 78.27 ± 0.74 b | 75.32 ± 0.74 a | 0.038 |
| Fat, kg | 0.12 ± 0.03 B | 0.24 ± 0.03 A | 0.001 |
| Fat, % | 2.81 ± 0.29 B | 5.53 ± 0.29 A | 0.001 |
| Bones, kg | 0.81 ± 0.09 | 0.83 ± 0.09 | 0.859 |
| Bones, % | 18.92 ± 0.35 | 19.15 ± 0.35 | 0.629 |
| Ribs with flank | |||
| Lean, kg | 2.43 ± 0.19 | 2.15 ± 0.19 | 0.659 |
| Lean, % | 79.35 ± 0.82 a | 76.06 ± 0.82 b | 0.021 |
| Fat, kg | 0.16 ± 0.04 b | 0.24 ± 0.04 a | 0.034 |
| Fat, % | 5.42 ± 0.41 B | 8.63 ± 0.41 A | 0.001 |
| Bones, kg | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.598 |
| Bones, % | 15.23 ± 0.24 | 15.31 ± 0.24 | 0.629 |
| Neck | |||
| Lean, kg | 1.05 ± 0.11 | 0.93 ± 0.11 | 0.842 |
| Lean, % | 74.79 ± 0.65 | 73.12 ± 0.65 | 0.758 |
| Fat, kg | 0.02 ± 0.001 B | 0.04 ± 0.001 A | 0.001 |
| Fat, % | 1.68 ± 0.22 B | 3.46 ± 0.22 A | 0.001 |
| Bones, kg | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 0.796 |
| Bones, % | 23.53 ± 0.29 | 23.42 ± 0.29 | 0.862 |
A, B (a, b) Values in rows with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.01 (p < 0.05).
Table 5.
Seasonal variation in the physicochemical traits of edible organs from the wild fallow deer (LSM ± SE).
Table 5.
Seasonal variation in the physicochemical traits of edible organs from the wild fallow deer (LSM ± SE).
| Season | Organs | Effect (p-Value) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | Kidneys | Heart | Tongue | S | O | T | Interaction | ||
| pH24 | Summer | 5.82 ± 0.04 A | 6.23 ± 0.04 B | 6.18 ± 0.04 B | 5.66 ± 0.04 A | 0.066 | <0.0001 | 0.001 | S*O*T 0.071 |
| pH48 | 5.84 ± 0.04 A | 6.25 ± 0.04 B | 6.19 ± 0.04 B | 5.65 ± 0.04 A | |||||
| pH24 | Winter | 5.77 ± 0.04 A | 6.24 ± 0.04 B | 6.17 ± 0.04 B | 5.63 ± 0.04 A | ||||
| pH48 | 5.78 ± 0.04 A | 6.25 ± 0.04 B | 6.16 ± 0.04 B | 5.62 ± 0.04 A | |||||
| Moisture (%) | Summer | 79.23 ± 0.31 A | 80.95 ± 0.31 B | 72.52 ± 0.31 C | 68.13 ± 0.31 D | 0.158 | <0.0001 | - | S*O 0.364 |
| Winter | 78.94 ± 0.33 A | 80.12 ± 0.33 B | 72.06 ± 0.33 C | 68.42 ± 0.33 D | |||||
| WHC (%) | Summer | 31.04 ± 0.73 A | 27.47 ± 0.73 B | 34.08 ± 0.73 C | 19.71 ± 0.73 D | 0.183 | <0.0001 | - | S*O 0.182 |
| Winter | 30.62 ± 0.78 A | 27.17 ± 0.78 B | 33.81 ± 0.78 C | 19.97 ± 0.78 D | |||||
| Plasticity (cm2) | Summer | 4.23 ± 0.18 A | 2.89 ± 0.18 Ba | 3.76 ± 0.18 C | 2.16 ± 0.18 Bb | 0.643 | <0.0001 | - | S*O 0.764 |
| Winter | 4.16 ± 0.19 A | 2.77 ± 0.19 Ba | 3.59 ± 0.19 C | 2.14 ± 0.19 Bb | |||||
A, B, C, D (a, b) Values in rows with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.01 (p < 0.05); effects of fixed factors: S—season; O—internal organ; T—time; interactions between factors: S*O*T, S*O.
Table 6.
Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of edible internal organs from the wild fallow deer (LSM ± SE).
Table 6.
Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of edible internal organs from the wild fallow deer (LSM ± SE).
| Item | Season | Organs | Effect (p-Value) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | Kidneys | Heart | Tongue | Season | Organ | ||
| Dry matter (%) | Summer | 20.77 ± 0.31 A | 19.05 ± 0.31 B | 27.48 ± 0.31 C | 31.87 ± 0.31 D | 0.158 | <0.0001 |
| Winter | 21.06 ± 0.33 A | 19.87 ± 0.33 B | 27.94 ± 0.33 C | 31.58 ± 0.33 D | |||
| Crude protein 1 | Summer | 17.84 ± 0.37 A | 15.97 ± 0.37 B | 20.80 ± 0.37 C | 16.44 ± 0.37 B | 0.425 | <0.0001 |
| Winter | 17.79 ± 0.39 A | 16.07 ± 0.39 B | 20.69 ± 0.39 C | 16.17 ± 0.39 B | |||
| Extractable fat 1 | Summer | 1.38 ± 0.12 A | 1.26 ± 0.12 A | 1.53 ± 0.12 A | 13.86 ± 0.12 B | 0.002 | <0.0001 |
| Winter | 1.71 ± 0.11 A | 1.76 ± 0.11 A | 1.57 ± 0.11 A | 14.26 ± 0.11 B | |||
| Ash 1 | Summer | 1.31 ± 0.03 A | 1.26 ± 0.03 A | 1.11 ± 0.03 B | 1.01 ± 0.03 C | 0.168 | 0.019 |
| Winter | 1.33 ± 0.02 A | 1.29 ± 0.02 A | 1.13 ± 0.02 B | 1.04 ± 0.02 C | |||
| W/P 2 | Summer | 4.45 ± 0.13 A | 5.09 ± 0.13 B | 3.49 ± 0.13 C | 4.15 ± 0.13 A | 0.601 | <0.0001 |
| Winter | 4.24 ± 0.13 A | 5.10 ± 0.13 B | 3.59 ± 0.13 C | 4.24 ± 0.13 A | |||
A, B, C, D Values in rows with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.01; 1 Expressed as percentage of dry matter; 2 W/P—water to protein ratio.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Stanisz, M.; Skorupski, M.; Bykowska-Maciejewska, M.; Składanowska-Baryza, J.; Ludwiczak, A. Seasonal Variation in the Body Composition, Carcass Composition, and Offal Quality in the Wild Fallow Deer (Dama dama L.). Animals 2023, 13, 1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061082
AMA Style
Stanisz M, Skorupski M, Bykowska-Maciejewska M, Składanowska-Baryza J, Ludwiczak A. Seasonal Variation in the Body Composition, Carcass Composition, and Offal Quality in the Wild Fallow Deer (Dama dama L.). Animals. 2023; 13(6):1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061082
Chicago/Turabian StyleStanisz, Marek, Maciej Skorupski, Marta Bykowska-Maciejewska, Joanna Składanowska-Baryza, and Agnieszka Ludwiczak. 2023. "Seasonal Variation in the Body Composition, Carcass Composition, and Offal Quality in the Wild Fallow Deer (Dama dama L.)" Animals 13, no. 6: 1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061082
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
