Next Article in Journal
Bioclimatic Zoning for Sheep Farming through Geostatistical Modeling in the State of Pernambuco, Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
Dietary Supplementation with Putrescine Improves Growth Performance and Meat Quality of Wenchang Chickens
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Role of Lizards as Potential Pollinators of an Insular Plant Community and Its Intraspecific Variation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Contribution of Phytate-Degrading Enzymes to Chicken-Meat Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Encapsulated Propyl Propane Thiosulfonate (PTSO) on Apparent Ileal Digestibility and Productive Performance in Broiler Chickens

by
Gonzalo Villar-Patiño
1,2,
María del Carmen Camacho-Rea
3,
Myrna Elena Olvera-García
2,
Arturo Soria-Soria
2,
Julio César Baltazar-Vázquez
4,
Gabriela Gómez-Verduzco
5,
Lourdes Solano
3,
Guillermo Téllez
6 and
Aurora Hilda Ramírez-Pérez
5,*
1
Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias de la Salud y de la Producción Animal, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 3000, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
2
Grupo Nutec, El Marqués, Querétaro 76246, Mexico
3
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Departamento de Nutrición Animal, Tlalpan, Ciudad de México 14080, Mexico
4
Specialized Animal Nutrition Research Network, Grupo Nutec, San Juan del Río, Querétaro 76814, Mexico
5
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 3000, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
6
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(6), 1123; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061123
Submission received: 4 February 2023 / Revised: 5 March 2023 / Accepted: 20 March 2023 / Published: 22 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feed Additives in Broiler Nutrition)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

There are currently two main concerns in broiler production. The first concern is the production cost, the key to which is improving feed efficiency; the second relates to the environmental impact. Both are vitally important for business sustainability. Some existing nutritional strategies contribute to improving the use of nutrients to achieve better performance; one of these involves adding plant extract additives, as well as their bioactive compounds, to animal feed. These additives improve digestive processes and nutrient absorption. Allium species contain sulfur compounds, such as propyl propane thiosulfonate, which has been studied in broilers and was found to enhance the digestibility of energy, fat, and fiber. Nevertheless, as far as we know, there is no scientific research focused on the digestibility of amino acids and minerals, which play an important role in growth and feed efficiency. Moreover, decreasing the levels of nitrogen and other minerals in feces could reduce the amount of pollutants released into the environment. Our results show that the supplementation of encapsulated propyl propane thiosulfonate in the broiler chicken diet improves the apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids and energy compared to the control diet; a positive trend in the digestibility of phosphorus was also found.

Abstract

This study analyzed the effects of different dietary doses of encapsulated propyl propane thiosulfonate (Pe-PTSO) on the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of nutrients and productive performance in broilers. A total of 100 one-day-old Cobb 500 were housed in battery cages for 20 days. At 10 days of age, the birds were assigned to one of five diets: negative control (P0), 250 mg/kg of Pe-PTSO (P250), 500 mg/kg of Pe-PTSO (P500), 750 mg/kg of Pe-PTSO (P750), and positive control, nicarbazin–narasin (ION). Titanium dioxide was the external marker, which was added to the diets from day 17 to 20. In the birds fed the P250 diet, there was a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in the AID values for amino acids and energy compared to those that consumed the P0 diet. Furthermore, the P250 diet significantly increased (p ≤ 0.05) the average daily weight gain compared to the P0 diet. No significant differences were observed between treatments in average daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio. In summary, the inclusion of 250 mg of encapsulated PTSO per kg in broiler chickens diet improved the digestibility of amino acids and energy, as well as weight gain.

1. Introduction

Food security for the world population, which will grow by approximately 20% in the next 25 years, challenges the ability to produce food more efficiently and sustainably [1,2]. Poultry production is considered to be an environmentally and economically sustainable activity due to the ability of poultry to convert feed in meat [3]. However, the feed is considered the major economic cost of animal production, therefore, the scientific research to improve the utilization of nutrients by the broiler chicken evolve continuously. Poultry diets are formulated based on both digestibility and nutrient absorption, which allows us to know their utilization rate by the bird [4,5]. Increasing nutrient digestibility in the diet has been shown to enhance the productive performance of broiler chickens [5,6]. Different formulation strategies have been adopted to optimize the growth and improve feed efficiency of birds [7], such as fecal digestibility, true digestibility, standardized ileal digestibility, and apparent ileal digestibility (AID) [8]; all of them quantified digested dietary nutrients [9]. Currently, there are different feed additives, such as enzymes, prebiotic, probiotic, ionophores, and recently, the use of phytochemicals, which contributes to enhance nutrient digestion [10,11]. Narasin and nicarbazin, ionophore coccidiostats, are frequently used as feed additives in broiler diets; it has been reported that their supplementation increased crude protein digestibility and affects intestinal microbiota, improving gut health of broiler chickens [12]. Likewise, narasin has also been found to enhance feed efficiency in birds reared on different production systems, including caged systems without coccidia infection [13]. Scientific research about nutrient digestion using natural additives is increasing. Phytochemicals are natural plant compounds produced as secondary metabolites, which differ in chemical structure, biological activity, and plant origin [14,15]. These secondary metabolites are considered natural sources of feed additives, as well as natural growth promoters [16], which are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) [17]. They possess significant biological activities that affect gut health, improve intestinal morphology [18,19], modulate gut microbiota, and enhance the metabolic activity leading to improvements in both digestibility and nutrient utilization [18,19,20]. Phytochemicals are categorized into five main groups: terpenoids, polyphenols, phytosterols, alkaloids, and organosulfur compounds [21].
Propyl propane thiosulfonate (PTSO) is an organosulfur compound belonging to the genus Allium, derived from the natural degradation of propiin, which is the Allium flavor precursor [22,23]. Unlike other sulfur components from this Allium genus, PTSO is chemically stable but poorly soluble in water, hence it is necessary to provide it with a specialized carrier to increase its biological availability and absorption [24]. PTSO has been studied as an additive in animal nutrition showing beneficial results on growth performance [25,26,27,28]. In addition, it has antimicrobial effects, which have been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo against Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp., as well as Campylobacter jejuni in broilers [26,28]. Moreover, Peinado, et al. [27] reported that PTSO could modulate intestinal microbiota composition. Furthermore, different immunomodulatory effects of PTSO in broiler chickens have been reported [25]. However, there is limited research about the effect of PTSO on nutrient digestibility in poultry. In this sense, Peinado, et al. [27], who supplemented a broiler chickens diet with PTSO, found an increase in the digestibility of energy, fat, and acid-detergent and neutral detergent fibers.
To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies about the effect of PTSO on the digestibility of amino acids and phosphorus in broiler chickens.
We hypothesized that the inclusion of an encapsulated product of propyl propane thiosulfonate (Pe-PTSO) will improve the AID of amino acids, energy, and phosphorus, in a corn–soybean meal diet. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different doses of Pe-PTSO on AID of amino acids (arginine (Arg), lysine (Lys), leucine (Leu), threonine (Thr), histidine (His), isoleucine (Ile), valine (Val), and phenylalanine (Phe)), energy, and phosphorus, in a corn–soybean meal diet, as well as their effects on growth performance of broiler chickens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals, Diets, and Experimental Design

A total of 100 one-day-old Cobb 500 broiler chickens were housed in a facility equipped with battery cages (48 cm × 80 cm) and provided with manual feeders and automatic nipple drinkers. The environmental temperature was set to 30 °C during the first week; after that, it was maintained between 26 and 27 °C. Relative humidity was set between 55 and 60%.
From 1 to 20 days of age, the birds were fed a corn–soybean meal basal diet (Table 1) that met or slightly exceeded the nutritional needs of chickens of the Cobb 500 lineage. The pre-experimental period lasted from the first day until 9 days of age. At 10 days of age, the birds were weighed and allocated to 1 of 5 treatments in a completely randomized design, as follows: P0—a negative control (basal diet); P250—basal diet + 250 mg/kg of Pe-PTSO; P500—basal diet + 500 mg/kg of Pe-PTSO; P750—basal diet + 750 mg/kg of Pe-PTSO, and ION—a positive control (basal diet + 50 mg/kg of nicarbazin + 50 mg/kg of narasin).
Each treatment had 5 replicates. The experimental unit was the cage with 4 birds in each; the number of birds and replicates were as those reported in previous studies of ileal and total broiler digestibility [27,29,30]. In addition, access to drinking water and feed was provided ad libitum.

2.2. Pe-PTSO Supplementation

The PTSO used in this study was a product (Pe-PTSO) encapsulated into a matrix of dextrin and lecithin, having a concentration of 12 g/kg, as determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The retention time of the chromatography peak was indicated for the PTSO [31]; the databases of the NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectra Library, version 1.7 (Gaithersburg, MD, USA), were used. The analysis was carried out in the laboratory of the Center for Research in Applied Sciences and Advanced Technology of the National Polytechnic Institute (IPN, Querétaro, Mexico).

2.3. Growth Performance

The body weight (BW) of the birds was recorded at 10 days of age and at the end of the study (20 days of age), and was used to estimate the average daily weight gain (ADG). Feed intake was recorded to calculate the average daily feed intake (ADFI) and the feed conversion ratio (FCR).

2.4. Apparent Ileal Digestibility Study

Titanium dioxide was added to the diets at 5 g TiO2/kg, as an indigestible marker for the AID study [32]. The diets with TiO2 were offered from day 17 to 20. At the end of the experiment, all birds were humanely killed by cervical dislocation [5,33,34]. The content of the ileum at 2.0 cm from the ileocecal valve was collected in sterile bags and preserved at −70 °C in an ultra-low temperature freezer (Thermofisher Scientific, TSX, Waltham, MA, USA) until the analysis. The ileum content was vacuum dried (FreeZone Triad Benchtop Freeze Dryer, Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) and pulverized to a particle size of 0.5 mm.

Laboratory Analysis

A titanium dioxide reference curve was developed according to that reported by Short, et al. [32]. It was generated using a UV visible spectrophotometer (Agilent 8453/G1103A, Shanghai, China). The diets and ileal content were previously subjected to acid hydrolysis to quantify the amino acids (Arg, Lys, Leu, Thr, His, Ile, Val, and Phe) by ultra-performance high-resolution liquid chromatography using an ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters H-Class, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a diode array detector, following the AOAC 994.12 method [35]. The quantification of phosphorus (P) was performed using the photometric methodology suggested by AOAC (965.17) [36], using a spectrophotometer (Agilent 8453/G1103A, Shanghai, China). The energy was quantified using an adiabatic bomb (IKA Model C200 basic, Staufen, Germany) according to the ASTM D2015-66 method [37].
The AID of amino acids, energy, and phosphorus was calculated using the following equation:
AID = [1 − [(TiD × NI)/(ND × TiI)] × 100
where TiD is the concentration of TiO2 in the diet; NI is the concentration of the nutrient in the ileal digesta; ND is the concentration of the nutrient in the diet; and TiI is the concentration of TiO2 in the ileal digesta [38].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data were subjected to one-way ANOVA using JMP (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 2019) [39]. Tukey’s test was used for the post hoc analysis. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05, and a trend was set among p > 0.05 and ≤0.10. The initial body weight (IBW) at 10 days was used as a covariate for ADG, ADFI, and FCR. In addition, to determine whether the effect of the different doses of Pe-PTSO was linear, quadratic, or cubic, a follow-up trend analysis using orthogonal polynomial contrasts was performed for the AID data.

3. Results

3.1. Apparent Ileal Digestibility Study

Table 2 shows the AID of nutrients in broiler chickens fed diets containing different levels of Pe-PTSO. The digestibility of the basal diet used in this study exceeded 90%, which is in concordance with that value reported by An et al. [23], who also used diets based on corn–soybean meal. The AID of Arg, Lys, Leu, Thr, His, Ile, Val, and Phe, as well as energy, was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.01) in birds feed the P250 diet than in the birds fed the P0 diet. Overall, the average increase in the AID of amino acids was 2.3%; the lowest increment was observed in Arg (1.70%), and the greatest increase was observed in Ile (3.04%). In the P250 diet, the energy digestibility was 0.15 Mcal/kg higher than that in the P0 diet. Moreover, the P250 diet resulted in greater digestibility (p ≤ 0.05) for Arg, Lys, and Thr, as well as for energy, compared to the P750 diet.
Regarding phosphorus digestibility, there was a trend (p = 0.06) to improve it when 250 mg/kg Pe-PTSO was added to the diet. The ION and P500 treatments did not show differences (p > 0.05) for any nutrient evaluated.
The polynomial contrasts between the treatments are summarized in Table 3. There was a significant cubic positive response (p ≤ 0.05), rather than a linear or quadratic response, for the digestibility of all nutrients analyzed. As we mentioned above, the P250 diet resulted in the highest values for digestibility in all cases.

3.2. Growth Performance

The average initial body weight (IBW) of the chickens at 10 days of age is 286.6 gr.
The ADG was higher (p ≤ 0.05) in the broilers fed the P250 diet than in those fed the P0 diet, while the P500, P750, and ION groups did not show any differences (p > 0.05).
The ADFI showed a similar trend than ADG (p = 0.06), the highest value for P250 (74.92 g/d) and the lowest with P0 (67.87 g/d). Nevertheless, this increment against P0 was not observed with P500, P750, or ION birds.
The FCR was not affected (p > 0.05) by treatment (Table 4). It should be noted that no bird mortality was observed in the experimental period.

4. Discussion

4.1. Apparent Ileal Digestibility

Improving nutrient digestibility in the diets of poultry chickens has shown a positive impact on nutrition, productivity, as well as on the environment. Thus, increasing nutrient digestibility not only improves the optimal use of nutrients, but also constitutes a significant component of sustainable animal protein production [1,7]. The use of phytochemicals as additives in animal nutrition enhances digestive enzyme activity and productive performance [40,41].
It has been reported that PTSO improves the digestibility of energy, fat, and acid detergent and neutral detergent fibers in broiler chickens diets [27]. Nevertheless, to our knowledge there is not scientific research regarding the effect of PTSO on the digestibility of other nutrients, such as amino acids and phosphorus.
In this study, we observed that P250 was the only dose that positively affects the AID of amino acids and energy. We do not have enough fundamentals to explain why higher doses of PTSO did not increase the AID of nutrients. We could suggest that the responses to PTSO doses appear to behave under the law of diminishing returns, which states that at higher doses, the increases in the response variable lessens, until it reaches a point in which it begins to decrease [42]. Assuming this statement were true, then it is necessary to explore if there is a dose among P250 and P500 that increase the AID of nutrients. Regarding to ION treatment, our data suggests that it has not significant effect on AID.
The beneficial effect of Pe-PTSO on amino acid digestibility is important because amino acids are critical dietary components regulating physiological, metabolic, and structural functions [43]. In this sense, a study conducted by Brzóska, et al. [44], who fed broiler chickens by adding an extract of Allium sativum in the feed, an increase in crude protein content in the breast was observed, suggesting that the diet enhanced not only the amino acid digestibility, but also its absorption in the animals.
Furthermore, the increase of 4% (0.15 Mcal/kg) in energy digestibility observed in the current study is in concordance with the results reported by Peinado, et al. [27], who observed a similar magnitude, 3.8%, in the energy digestibility of broiler chickens diet supplemented with 90 mg of PTSO/kg and suggested that PTSO improved the intestinal structure. In addition, phosphorus digestibility showed a similar positive trend when 250 mg/kg of Pe-PTSO was added to the diet. Phosphorus is a non-renewable, expensive, and essential natural resource for agricultural production, so its digestibility must be assessed to reduce its excretion as much as possible. Excesses of N and P are associated with the eutrophication phenomenon that damages rivers, lakes, and oceans [45].
We suggest that improvement in the nutrient digestibility observed in our study could be due to better intestinal health, which has been reported by Peinado, et al. [26] and Ur Rahman, et al. [46], who supplemented broiler diets with Allium compounds, finding an increment in height and width of the intestinal villi, as well as a greater surface area, resulting in major absorption of nutrients. Moreover, it has been reported that PTSO modifies the gut microbiota, as the presence of enterobacteria decreased with this treatment, creating a better environment, reducing the negative effect of overgrowth of enterobacteria on the intestinal mucosa, and promoting the absorption of nutrients [27,47,48].

4.2. Productive Performance

Several studies have demonstrated the effects dietary supplementation with Allium sativum (garlic) and its secondary metabolites on productive performance and health in animals [22,23,49]. Kothari, et al. [50] supplemented poultry diets with Allium extracts; the results showed that the additive positively modulated bird growth, performance indices, lipid metabolism, and the gut ecosystem, as well as the immune response, especially under stressful and disease-challenged conditions. These findings indicate that garlic has a plethora of beneficial effects on the metabolism. Moreover, Brzóska, et al. [44] used a diet supplemented with a liquid garlic extract, and also reported improvements in the weights of broilers.
Not only have complete garlic extracts shown benefits, but also the secondary metabolites have been proven to impact growth performance [25,26]. In this sense, the results observed in our study demonstrate that dietary supplementation with 250 mg/kg of Pe-PTSO resulted in a significant increase in the ADG, compared to P0.
This result is in concordance with those presented by Kim, et al. [25], who offered a diet with 6.7 mg/kg of PTSO and 3.3 mg/kg of propyl-propane thiosulfinate (PTS) to broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria acervulina and reported that PTSO/PTS improved ADG and decreased fecal oocyst excretion compared with birds given a non-supplemented diet.
It is important to mention that in our study, the higher doses of Pe-PTSO, P500 and P750, did not show significant difference on ADG compared to P0, which may be explained because broiler chickens tended to decrease ADFI when the PTSO inclusion was increased from P250 to P500 or P750. Our results agree with Varmaghany, et al. [51], who observed that increasing the dose of garlic and its products reduces feed intake because it has a pungent smell and could reduce diet palatability [52]. Moreover, this effect is not exclusive for garlic and its products. Tahir, et al. [53] observed that using incremental doses of another phytochemical, eugenol, in broiler feed, affected the palatability, decreasing the ADFI while raising the inclusion of eugenol. Regarding to ION birds, our data suggests that it has no significant effect on performance.
Our results indicate that PTSO could enhance the performance of healthy broiler chickens when it is offered in a diet based on a corn–soybean meal. Moreover, Peinado, et al. [26] observed higher ADG when chicken diets were supplemented with 45 mg/kg of PTSO and a better FCR when chicken diets were supplemented with 45 or 90 mg/kg of PTSO. However, our findings did not show significant differences in the FCR. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning that there are discrepancies between the various studies in which Allium derivatives have been used to improve production parameters in poultry nutrition [54,55,56]. These discrepancies may be caused by a number of reasons; attempting to explain this phenomenon, Ruiz, et al. [28] pointed out that the variation in the productive performance of broilers when fed products derived from garlic (Allium sativum) could arise because the chemically stable active compounds in these products were not characterized in all studies.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the inclusion of 250 mg of encapsulated PTSO per kg in the broiler chicken diet improved the digestibility of amino acids and energy, as well as the ADG. However, further research is needed to explain the mode of action and the correct dose of Pe-PTSO.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.V.-P. and M.E.O.-G.; methodology, G.V.-P., M.E.O.-G. and J.C.B.-V.; validation, M.E.O.-G.; formal analysis, G.V.-P., M.d.C.C.-R., M.E.O.-G. and A.S.-S.; investigation, G.V.-P. and M.E.O.-G.; resources, M.E.O.-G.; data curation, G.V.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, G.V.-P. and M.d.C.C.-R.; writing—review and editing A.H.R.-P.; visualization, A.H.R.-P.; supervision, G.G.-V., L.S., G.T. and A.H.R.-P.; project administration, G.V.-P., M.E.O.-G. and J.C.B.-V.; funding acquisition, G.V.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was completely funded by Grupo Nutec (Avenida del Marqués 32, Parque Industrial Bernardo Quintana, El Marqués, Querétaro, Mexico, 76246), funding number iiia-2-19J-Pi.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This experiment was approved on 5 October 2020, by the Institutional Subcommittee for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (protocol SICUAE. DC-2020/3-6) of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), in compliance with the Mexican Official Norm NOM-062-ZOO-1999.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all staff members of the Specialized Animal Nutrition Research Network (SANUREN, Querétaro, México) who contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

At the time of submitting this manuscript, G. Villar-Patiño, M.E. Olvera-García, A. Soria-Soria, and J.C. Baltazar-Vázquez declare a potential direct conflict of interest as they work at Grupo NUTEC. “https://www.gponutec.com/ (accessed on 5 March 2023).” M.C. Camacho-Rea, G. Gómez-Verduzco, G. Téllez, L. Solano, and A.H. Ramírez-Pérez have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gerber, P.J.; Opio, C.I.; Steinfeld, H. Poultry Production and the Environment–A Review; Animal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2008; pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  2. FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021; Transforming Food Systems for Food Security, Improved Nutrition and Affordable Healthy Diets for All; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. FAO. Greenhouse gas emissions and fossil energy use from poultry supply chains. In Guidelines for Assessment. Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance Partnership; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Soomro, R.N.; Hu, R.; Qiao, Y.; El-Hack, M.E.A.; Abbasi, I.H.R.; Mohamed, M.A.E.; Bodinga, B.M.; Alagawany, M.; Yang, X.; Yao, J.; et al. Effect of Dietary Protein Sources and Amino Acid Balances on Performance, Intestinal Permeability and Morphology in Broiler Chickens. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 13, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Azizi, M.N.; Loh, T.C.; Foo, H.L.; Akit, H.; Izuddin, W.I.; Shazali, N.; Teik Chung, E.L.; Samsudin, A.A. Chemical Compositions of Brown and Green Seaweed, and Effects on Nutrient Digestibility in Broiler Chickens. Animals 2021, 11, 2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Elbaz, A.M.; El-Sheikh, S.E.; Abdel-Maksoud, A. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant state, ileal histomorphometry, and cecal ecology of broilers fed on fermented canola meal with and without exogenous enzymes. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2023, 55, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Maharjan, P.; Martinez, D.A.; Weil, J.; Suesuttajit, N.; Umberson, C.; Mullenix, G.; Hilton, K.M.; Beitia, A.; Coon, C.N. Review: Physiological growth trend of current meat broilers and dietary protein and energy management approaches for sustainable broiler production. Animal 2021, 15 (Suppl. S1), 100284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stein, H.H.; Fuller, M.F.; Moughan, P.J.; Sève, B.; Mosenthin, R.; Jansman, A.J.M.; Fernández, J.A.; de Lange, C.F.M. Definition of apparent, true, and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in pigs. Livest. Sci. 2007, 109, 282–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ravindran, V.; Bryden, W.L. Amino acid availability in poultry—In vitro and in vivo measurements. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1999, 50, 889–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lu, P.; Choi, J.; Yang, C.; Mogire, M.; Liu, S.; Lahaye, L.; Adewole, D.; Rodas-Gonzalez, A.; Yang, C. Effects of antibiotic growth promoter and dietary protease on growth performance, apparent ileal digestibility, intestinal morphology, meat quality, and intestinal gene expression in broiler chickens: A comparison. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krysiak, K.; Konkol, D.; Korczynski, M. Overview of the Use of Probiotics in Poultry Production. Animals 2021, 11, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kunzel, S.; Borda-Molina, D.; Kraft, R.; Sommerfeld, V.; Kuhn, I.; Camarinha-Silva, A.; Rodehutscord, M. Impact of coccidiostat and phytase supplementation on gut microbiota composition and phytate degradation in broiler chickens. Anim. Microbiome 2019, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yan, L.; Lv, Z.Z.; An, S.; Xing, K.; Wang, Z.G.; Lv, M.B.; Choct, M.; Guo, Y.M.; Zhou, G.L. Effects of rearing system and narasin on growth performance, gastrointestinal development, and gut microbiota of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 100840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wink, M. Phytochemical Diversity of Secondary Metabolites. In Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science; Universitat Heidelberg: Heidelberg, Germany; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York City, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zaynab, M.; Fatima, M.; Abbas, S.; Sharif, Y.; Umair, M.; Zafar, M.H.; Bahadar, K. Role of secondary metabolites in plant defense against pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 124, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hashemi, S.R.; Davoodi, H. Phytogenics as new class of feed additive In poultry industry. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2010, 9, 2295–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hashemi, S.R.; Zulkifli, I.; Hair Bejo, M.; Farida, A.; Somchit, M.N. Acute Toxicity Study and Phytochemical Screening of Selected Herbal Aqueous Extract in Broiler Chickens. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 4, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Jamroz, D.; Wiliczkiewicz, A.; Wertelecki, T.; Orda, J.; Skorupinska, J. Use of active substances of plant origin in chicken diets based on maize and locally grown cereals. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005, 46, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pirgozliev, V.; Mansbridge, S.C.; Rose, S.P.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Bravo, D. Immune modulation, growth performance, and nutrient retention in broiler chickens fed a blend of phytogenic feed additives. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 3443–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hassan, F.U.; Arshad, M.A.; Ebeid, H.M.; Rehman, M.S.; Khan, M.S.; Shahid, S.; Yang, C. Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet-Microbe Interaction. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 575801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Somani, S.J.; Modi, K.P.; Majumdar, A.S.; Sadarani, B.N. Phytochemicals and their potential usefulness in inflammatory bowel disease. Phytother. Res. 2015, 29, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sorlozano-Puerto, A.; Albertuz-Crespo, M.; Lopez-Machado, I.; Ariza-Romero, J.J.; Banos-Arjona, A.; Exposito-Ruiz, M.; Gutierrez-Fernandez, J. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Propyl-Propane-Thiosulfinate and Propyl-Propane-Thiosulfonate Derived from Allium spp. against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Human Samples. Biomed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7861207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Subramanian, M.S.; Nandagopal Ms, G.; Amin Nordin, S.; Thilakavathy, K.; Joseph, N. Prevailing Knowledge on the Bioavailability and Biological Activities of Sulphur Compounds from Alliums: A Potential Drug Candidate. Molecules 2020, 25, 4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abad, P.; Arroyo-Manzanares, N.; Rivas-Montoya, E.; Ochando-Pulido, J.M.; Guillamon, E.; García-Campaña, A.M.; Martinez-Ferez, A.; Plaizier, J. Effects of different vehiculization strategies for the allium derivative propyl propane thiosulfonate during dynamic simulation of the pig gastrointestinal tract. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 99, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, D.K.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Lee, S.H.; Lillehoj, E.P.; Bravo, D. Improved resistance to Eimeria acervulina infection in chickens due to dietary supplementation with garlic metabolites. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 109, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Peinado, M.J.; Ruiz, R.; Echavarri, A.; Rubio, L.A. Garlic derivative propyl propane thiosulfonate is effective against broiler enteropathogens in vivo. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 2148–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Peinado, M.J.; Ruiz, R.; Echávarri, A.; Aranda-Olmedo, I.; Rubio, L.A. Garlic derivative PTS-O modulates intestinal microbiota composition and improves digestibility in growing broiler chickens. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2013, 181, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ruiz, R.; Garcia, M.P.; Lara, A.; Rubio, L.A. Garlic derivatives (PTS and PTS-O) differently affect the ecology of swine faecal microbiota in vitro. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 144, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Smeets, N.; Nuyens, F.; Van Campenhout, L.; Delezie, E.; Pannecoucque, J.; Niewold, T. Relationship between wheat characteristics and nutrient digestibility in broilers: Comparison between total collection and marker (titanium dioxide) technique. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 1584–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hernandez, F.; Madrid, J.; Garcia, V.; Orengo, J.; Megias, M.D. Influence of two plant extracts on broilers performance, digestibility, and digestive organ size. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Pawliszyn, J. Handbook of Soli Phase Microextraction; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University of Waterloo: Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Short, F.J.; Gorton, P.; Wisema, J.; Boorman, K.N. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 1996, 59, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amad, A.A.; Manner, K.; Wendler, K.R.; Neumann, K.; Zentek, J. Effects of a phytogenic feed additive on growth performance and ileal nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 2811–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, E.; Barta, J.R.; Lambert, W.; Kiarie, E.G. Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in broiler chickens fed single or mixture of feed ingredients-based diets with or without Eimeria challenge. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. AOAC. Official Method 994.12 Amino Acids in Feeds. Performic Oxidation with Acid Hydrolisis—Sodium Metabisulfite Method. First Action 1994 Final Action 1997. Off. Method Anal. Anim. Feed. 2005, 4, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
  36. AOAC. Official Method 965.17 Phosphorus in Animal Feed and Pet Food. Photometric Method. First Action 1965 Fnial Action 1966. Off. Method Anal. Anim. Feed. 2005, 4, 61. [Google Scholar]
  37. ASTM D2015-96; Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Solid Fuel by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015; 40 CFR 60.45(f)(5)(ii). pp. 253–261.
  38. Mariscal, G.; Reis de Souza, T.C.; Parra, J. Apparent ileal digestibility of protein and aminoacids of canola meal in recently weaned piglets. Rev. MVZ Córdoba 2009, 14, 1544–1553. [Google Scholar]
  39. SAS Institute. JMP®. Version 15; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  40. Windisch, W.; Schedle, K.; Plitzner, C.; Kroismayr, A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, E140–E148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Mohammadi Gheisar, M.; Kim, I.H. Phytobiotics in poultry and swine nutrition–A review. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 17, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Darmani kuhi, H.; Rezaee, F.; Faridi, A.; France, J.; Mottaghitalab, M.; Kebreab, E. Application of the law of diminishing returns for partitioning metabolizable energy and crude protein intake between maintenance and growth in growing male and female broiler breeder pullets. J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 149, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ullah, Z.; Ahmed, G.; Nisa, M.U.; Sarwar, M. Standardized Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility of Commonly Used Feed Ingredients in Growing Broilers. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 29, 1322–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Brzóska, F.; Śliwiński, B.; Michalik-Rutkowska, O.; Śliwa, J. The Effect of Garlic (Allium Sativum L.) on Growth Performance, Mortality Rate, Meat and Blood Parameters in Broilers. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2015, 15, 961–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Li, X.; Zhu, T.; He, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, D. Assessment of eutrophication and nitrogen and phosphorus carrying capacity before and after removing pen culture (2013–2018) in Lake Changhu, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 5674–5686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ur Rahman, S.; Khan, S.; Chand, N.; Sadique, U.; Khan, R.U. In vivo effects of Allium cepa L. on the selected gut microflora and intestinal histomorphology in broiler. Acta Histochem. 2017, 119, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, G.B.; Seo, Y.M.; Kim, C.H.; Paik, I.K. Effect of dietary prebiotic supplementation on the performance, intestinal microflora, and immune response of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pelicano, E.R.; Souza, P.A.; Souza, H.B.A.; Figueiredo, D.F.; Boiago, M.M.; Carvalho, S.R.; Bordon, V.F. Intestinal Mucosa Development in Broiler Chickens Fed Natural Growth Promoters. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2005, 7, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. El-Saber Batiha, G.; Beshbishy, A.M.; Wasef, L.G.; Elewa, Y.H.A.; Al-Sagan, A.A.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Taha, A.E.; Abd-Elhakim, Y.M.; Devkota, H.P. Chemical Constituents and Pharmacological Activities of Garlic (Allium sativum L.): A Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kothari, D.; Lee, W.D.; Niu, K.M.; Kim, S.K. The Genus Allium as Poultry Feed Additive: A Review. Animals 2019, 9, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Varmaghany, S.; Karimi Torshizi, M.A.; Rahimi, S.; Lotfollahian, H.; Hassanzadeh, M. The effects of increasing levels of dietary garlic bulb on growth performance, systolic blood pressure, hematology, and ascites syndrome in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 1812–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chen, Y.J.; Kim, I.H.; Cho, J.H.; Yoo, J.S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y. Evaluation of dietary l-carnitine or garlic powder on growth performance, dry matter and nitrogen digestibilities, blood profiles and meat quality in finishing pigs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2008, 141, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tahir, M.; Chuzaem, S.; Widodo, E.; Hafsah. The Performance of Broilers Given Eugenol of Clove Leaf Essential Oil as a Feed Additive. Russ. J. Agric. Socio-Econ. Sci. 2019, 95, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Choi, I.H.; Park, W.Y.; Kim, Y.J. Effects of dietary garlic powder and {alpha}-tocopherol supplementation on performance, serum cholesterol levels, and meat quality of chicken. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 1724–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dey, A.; Samanta, A.R. Effect of feeding garlic (Allium sativum Linn.) as a growth promoter in broilers. Indian J. Anim. Health 1993, 32, 17–19. [Google Scholar]
  56. Javandel, F.; Navidshad, B.; Seifdavati, J.; Pourrahimi, G.H.; Baniyaghoub, S. The favorite dosage of garlic meal as a feed additive in broiler chicken ratios. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2008, 11, 1746–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. Ingredient and calculated chemical composition (g/kg as fed) and energy (Mcal/kg) of the basal diet.
Table 1. Ingredient and calculated chemical composition (g/kg as fed) and energy (Mcal/kg) of the basal diet.
Ingredientg/kg
Yellow corn513.9
Soybean meal406.0
Vegetable oil40.5
Calcium carbonate14.7
Calcium orthophosphate9.1
Sodium bicarbonate4.9
Methionine DL3.6
Refined salt2.0
L-lysine HCl2.2
L-Threonine1.1
Betaine anhydrous0.6
L-valine0.2
Biocholine0.2
Vitamins—mineral premix 10.9
Phytase 50000.1
Chemical Compositiong/kg
Dry matter883.9
Crude protein239.0
Crude fat62.0
Gross energy (Mcal/kg)4.0
Metabolizable energy (Mcal/kg)3.15
Calcium10.0
Total phosphorus5.9
Available phosphorus 4.5
Sodium2.3
Chloride2.0
Potassium9.5
DEB (mEq/kg) 2300
Arginine16.2
Lysine15.0
Leucine19.3
Threonine10.2
Histidine5.9
Isoleucine10.1
Valine11.2
Phenylalanine11.8
1 Content per kilogram: vitamin A (retinol acetate), 12,000 International Units (IU); vitamin D3, 5000 IU; vitamin E (DL-α-tocopherol acetate), 50 IU; vitamin K, 3 mg; thiamine, 3 mg; riboflavin, 9 mg; pantothenic acid, 15 mg; pyridoxine, 4 mg; biotin, 0.2 mg; folic acid, 2 mg; vitamin B12, 0.02 mg; manganese, 100 mg; zinc 100 mg; iron, 40 mg; copper, 15 mg; iodine, 1 mg; selenium, 0.35 mg. 2 Dietary electrolyte balance (DEB).
Table 2. Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids (%), energy (Mcal/kg), and phosphorus (%) in 20-day-old broiler chickens fed a corn–soybean diet supplemented with different inclusions of encapsulated propyl propane thiosulfonate (Pe-PTSO) or ION.
Table 2. Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids (%), energy (Mcal/kg), and phosphorus (%) in 20-day-old broiler chickens fed a corn–soybean diet supplemented with different inclusions of encapsulated propyl propane thiosulfonate (Pe-PTSO) or ION.
Treatment 1
Nutrient 2P0P250P500P750IONSEM 3p Value
Arg94.47 b96.17 a95.04 ab94.46 b95.25 ab0.30<0.01
Lys94.03 b95.90 a95.01 ab94.40 b94.80 ab0.31<0.01
Leu92.22 b94.52 a93.31 ab92.75 ab93.34 ab0.420.01
Thr90.25 b92.56 a91.39 ab90.57 b91.68 ab0.450.01
His92.97 b95.17 a93.57 ab93.68 ab93.56 ab0.410.01
Ile90.88 b93.92 a92.24 ab91.84 ab92.06 ab0.570.02
Val90.29 b93.16 a91.56 ab91.27 ab91.28 ab0.550.02
Phe92.52 b94.66 a93.58 ab92.95 ab93.45 ab0.470.05
Energy3.39 b3.54 a3.47 ab3.40 b3.45 ab0.030.01
P73.7979.4976.0972.8676.701.570.06
a,b Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). 1 P0, negative control, corn–soybean basal diet; P250, basal diet + 250 mg/kg Pe-PTSO; P500, basal diet + 500 mg/kg Pe-PTSO; P750, basal diet + 750 mg/kg Pe-PTSO; ION, positive control, basal diet + 50 mg/kg nicarbazin + 50 mg/kg narasin. 2 Arginine (Arg), lysine (Lys), leucine (Leu), threonine (Thr), histidine (His), isoleucine (Ile), valine (Val), phenylalanine (Phe), and phosphorus (P). 3 SEM, standard error of the mean, n = 5.
Table 3. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts trend analysis of the apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids, energy, and phosphorus in 20-day-old broiler chickens fed a corn–soybean diet supplemented with encapsulated propyl propane thiosulfonate (Pe-PTSO) 1.
Table 3. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts trend analysis of the apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids, energy, and phosphorus in 20-day-old broiler chickens fed a corn–soybean diet supplemented with encapsulated propyl propane thiosulfonate (Pe-PTSO) 1.
Linear TrendQuadratic TrendCubic Trend
Nutrient 2p ValueR2p ValueR2p ValueR2
Arg0.570.020.020.360.010.52
Lys0.91<0.010.010.400.010.52
Leu0.88<0.010.030.330.020.46
Thr0.94<0.010.030.350.020.45
His0.84<0.010.170.190.020.45
Ile0.73<0.010.060.280.020.45
Val0.69<0.010.030.260.020.44
Phe0.94<0.010.060.280.050.39
Energy0.83<0.010.020.370.020.47
P0.490.030.040.310.050.37
1 P0, negative control, corn–soybean basal diet; P250, basal diet + 250 mg/kg Pe-PTSO; P500, basal diet + 500 mg/kg Pe-PTSO; P750, basal diet + 750 mg/kg Pe-PTSO. 2 Arginine (Arg), lysine (Lys), leucine (Leu), threonine (Thr), histidine (His), isoleucine (Ile), valine (Val), phenylalanine (Phe), and phosphorus (P).
Table 4. Growth performance of broiler chickens fed a corn–soybean diet supplemented with encapsulated propyl propane thiosulfonate (Pe-PTSO) or ION.
Table 4. Growth performance of broiler chickens fed a corn–soybean diet supplemented with encapsulated propyl propane thiosulfonate (Pe-PTSO) or ION.
Treatments 2
Parameters 1P0P250P500P750IONSEM 3p Value
IBW (g)284.2282.9286.9289.2289.62.180.16
ADG (g/d)51.35 b57.33 a53.16 ab55.60 ab52.07 ab1.380.03
ADFI (g/d)67.8774.9268.0469.7370.051.750.06
FCR (g/g)1.321.311.281.261.340.030.23
1 IBW= initial body weight (10 d), ADG = average daily weight gain, ADFI = average daily feed intake, FCR = feed conversion ratio. 2 P0, negative control, corn–soybean basal diet; P250, basal diet + 250 mg/kg Pe-PTSO; P500, basal diet + 500 mg/kg Pe-PTSO; P750, basal diet + 750 mg/kg Pe-PTSO; ION, positive control, basal diet + 50 mg/kg nicarbazin + 50 mg/kg narasin. 3 SEM, standard error of the mean, n = 5. a,b Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Villar-Patiño, G.; Camacho-Rea, M.d.C.; Olvera-García, M.E.; Soria-Soria, A.; Baltazar-Vázquez, J.C.; Gómez-Verduzco, G.; Solano, L.; Téllez, G.; Ramírez-Pérez, A.H. The Effect of Encapsulated Propyl Propane Thiosulfonate (PTSO) on Apparent Ileal Digestibility and Productive Performance in Broiler Chickens. Animals 2023, 13, 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061123

AMA Style

Villar-Patiño G, Camacho-Rea MdC, Olvera-García ME, Soria-Soria A, Baltazar-Vázquez JC, Gómez-Verduzco G, Solano L, Téllez G, Ramírez-Pérez AH. The Effect of Encapsulated Propyl Propane Thiosulfonate (PTSO) on Apparent Ileal Digestibility and Productive Performance in Broiler Chickens. Animals. 2023; 13(6):1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Villar-Patiño, Gonzalo, María del Carmen Camacho-Rea, Myrna Elena Olvera-García, Arturo Soria-Soria, Julio César Baltazar-Vázquez, Gabriela Gómez-Verduzco, Lourdes Solano, Guillermo Téllez, and Aurora Hilda Ramírez-Pérez. 2023. "The Effect of Encapsulated Propyl Propane Thiosulfonate (PTSO) on Apparent Ileal Digestibility and Productive Performance in Broiler Chickens" Animals 13, no. 6: 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061123

APA Style

Villar-Patiño, G., Camacho-Rea, M. d. C., Olvera-García, M. E., Soria-Soria, A., Baltazar-Vázquez, J. C., Gómez-Verduzco, G., Solano, L., Téllez, G., & Ramírez-Pérez, A. H. (2023). The Effect of Encapsulated Propyl Propane Thiosulfonate (PTSO) on Apparent Ileal Digestibility and Productive Performance in Broiler Chickens. Animals, 13(6), 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop