Next Article in Journal
Life Cycle Assessment Project for the Brazilian Egg Industry
Next Article in Special Issue
A New Species of Ultratenuipalpus (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) from Brazil and Re-Description of Ultratenuipalpus meekeri (De Leon), the Type Species of the Genus, with DNA Barcodes
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Valorisation Strategies to Improve Spent Coffee Grounds’ Nutritional Value as an Ingredient for Ruminants’ Diets
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Unique Cauda-Liked Structure Represents a New Subfamily of Cunaxidae: Description of New Taxa and Discussion on Functional Morphology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Genus Neoseiulus Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Shanxi, China †

1
College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agriculture University, Taigu 030801, China
2
Plant Health & Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, Auckland 1072, New Zealand
3
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ZooBank link: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9AEDDDFC-F810-43E5-8F59-BF8E53343101.
Animals 2023, 13(9), 1478; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091478
Submission received: 23 March 2023 / Revised: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 26 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Ecology, Evolution, Systematics and Behaviour of Mites)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Phytoseiid mites are widely distributed on plants and in soil; they can prey on many phytophagous mites and pests and play an important role in biological control programs. The genus Neoseiulus Hughes is one of the largest genera within the Phytoseiidae family, comprising 14.6% of the family’s species worldwide. At present, there are few reports investigating Neoseiulus from Shanxi Province; however, the study on the species diversity of Neoseiulus is helpful to enrich the resource species bank of Phytoseiidae and provide more detailed basis for species identification. We report the discovery of five additional species in Shanxi, and redescribed four of them. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara) is recorded for the first time in China, and N. neoreticuloides (Liang and Hu) is considered a new junior synonym of N. bicaudus (Wainstein). We provide a key to assist in the identification of the known species of Neoseiulus in Shanxi.

Abstract

The genus Neoseiulus in Shanxi Province is reviewed and seven species are recorded from the province. Four of these are redescribed and detailed taxonomic information are provided. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara) is recorded for the first time in China and Neoseiulus neoreticuloides (Liang and Hu) is considered a new junior synonym of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein). Additionally, a diagnostic key to the known species of Neoseiulus in Shanxi is provided.

1. Introduction

The genus Neoseiulus Hughes [1] is one of the largest genera within the Phytoseiidae family, comprising 361 (14.6%) of the family’s species worldwide [2,3,4]. In China, it is also a big genus, with 57 recorded species, accounting for 17.1% of the Phytoseiidae species in the country [3,5,6,7].
Shanxi is a province located in the northern part of China and covers a total area of 156,700 square kilometers. The majority of the province, over two-thirds, sits on the loess plateau. The climate is characterized as semiarid, with lower annual rainfall and longer dry seasons. In the south, the monthly 24 h average temperature ranges from −3 °C to 32 °C, while in the north, it ranges from −9.8 °C to 21.9 °C. The annual precipitation falls between 400 mm and 650 mm, with over 70% of the rainfall occurring between June and September. The most common natural vegetation consists of shrubs and grasses, and forested areas, mainly found on mountain slopes, only cover approximately 20% of the land area. Due to these factors, Shanxi has a lower biodiversity in comparison to areas located in southern China.
The knowledge of Neoseiulus species in Shanxi is limited. Currently, only two species have been recorded, namely N. womersleyi (Schicha) [8] (previously identified as N. pseudolongispinosus) [6,9,10,11] and N. zwoelferi Dosse [12]. The objective of this study is to report the discovery of five additional species in Shanxi, clarify the identity of N. neoreticuloides [13], and provide redescriptions of N. bicaudus (Wainstein) [14], N. lushanensis (Zhu and Chen) [15], N. paraki (Ehara) [16,17] and N. tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov) [18]. Additionally, this paper aims to provide a key to assist in the identification of the known species of Neoseiulus in Shanxi.

2. Materials and Methods

The mites were collected using the beating method. The whole plant or branches of plants were beaten with a stick over a black rectangular plastic plate. Specimens were picked up with a fine soft hairbrush and kept in absolute ethanol before being taken to the laboratory. The mites were cleared and macerated in Nesbitt’s fluid until they became translucent, then transferred to distilled water for 2–3 min to dissolve the Nesbitt’s fluid before being mounted in Hoyer’s medium on slides under a dissecting microscope (Zeiss DV4, Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Gottingen, Germany and Optec SZ650, Chongqing Optec Instrument Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China). Using a compound microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with differential interference contrast (DIC), the specimens were examined, measured, and photographed. Illustrations were created using a drawing tube (Nikon Y-IDT, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) attached to the microscope and were edited with Photoshop CC2018. The voucher specimens are deposited in the Entomological Microscopy Laboratory of College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University.
Measurements were taken along the midline from the anterior to posterior margins for the length of the dorsal shield, sternal shield, epigynal shield and ventrianal shield. The width of the dorsal shield was measured at the level of s4, the sternal shield (or sternogenital in males) at the level of st2, the genital shield at the level of st5, and the ventrianal shield at the level of ZV2. All measurements were presented in micrometers (μm) for the specimen used for illustration and other specimens in parentheses. The terminology of the idiosomal and leg chaetotaxy, and pore-like structures follow that of Rowell et al. (1978) [19] and Chant and McMurtry (2007) [2], Evans (1963) [20], and Athias-Henriot (1975) [21], respectively. The setal pattern system of idiosoma follows that of Chant and Yoshida-Shaul (1992) [22].

3. Results

Neoseiulus Hughes, 1948
Type species: Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes, 1948: 141.

3.1. Redescriptions of Species

3.1.1. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein, 1962) (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5)

Amblyseius bicaudus Wainstein, 1962: 146.
Typhlodromus bicaudus (Wainstein), Hirschmann 1962: 2 [23].
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) bicaudus (Wainstein), Ehara, 1966: 20 [24].
Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), Congdon, 2002: 23 [25]; Wang et al., 2015: 456 [26].
Amblyseius neoreticuloides Liang and Hu, 1988: 317 [13].
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) neoreticuloides (Liang and Hu), Wu et al., 2009: 105 [6].
Neoseiulus neoreticuloides (Liang and Hu). New synonym.
  • Diagnosis (female). Dorsal shield elongate oval, reticulated throughout, bearing 17 pairs of setae, 16 pairs of lyrifissures and 7 pairs of solenostomes, S4, S5, Z4 and Z5 serrated, others smooth; Z5 longer than others. Peritremes extending anteriorly to level of j1. Sternal shield reticulated, bearing three pairs of setae. Ventrianal shield approximately pentagonal, reticulated; solenostomes (gv3) posteromedian to JV2, circular. Calyx of spermathecal apparatus cup-shaped and basally stalked, and stalk approximately as long as width of atrium; atrium nodular at junction with minor duct, minor duct thread-like for a short distance and then expanded, forming a cylindrical tube. Fixed digit of chelicera with six teeth, movable digit with a tooth. Palpgenu with genu setae al1 and al2 rod-like. Leg genu II with seven setae. Only basitarsus of leg IV with a macroseta.
  • Redescription. Female (n = 7). Dorsal idiosoma (Figure 1A and Figure 2A). Idiosomal setal pattern 10A:9B/JV-3:ZV. Dorsal shield elongate oval, fully reticulate, has a waist located slightly below R1, 394 (380–412) long, 183 (181–189) wide; muscle marks visible between j3 and Z4, a pair of muscle marks present in front of J5. Dorsum with 17 pairs of setae and 16 pairs of lyrifissures (id1, id2, id4, id6, idx, idx1, idl2, idl3, idl4, idm1, idm2, idm3, idm4, idm5, idm6 and is1) and 7 pairs of solenostomes (gd1, gd2, gd4, gd5, gd6, gd8 and gd9); lyrifissures id3 and solenostomes gd3 on peritremal shield. All dorsal setae smooth except for serrated S4, S5, Z4 and Z5; Z5 longer than others. Lateral setae r3 and R1 smooth, on interscutal membrane. Peritremes extending anteriorly close to j1, posterior part of peritremal shield (Figure 1B) curved and pointed, protuberance of exopodal shield at level of the stigmata. Lengths of setae: j1 22 (22–24), j3 28 (27–31), j4 13 (12–14), j5 13 (11–14), j6 16 (15–16), J2 18 (15–19), J5 12 (12–14), r3 27 (26–30), R1 25 (24–26), s4 31 (27–33), S2 29 (29–32), S4 34 (32–36), S5 41 (39–44), z2 22 (19–27), z4 20 (16–21), z5 11 (11–13), Z1 20 (19–22), Z4 35 (34–41), Z5 80 (80–95).
Figure 1. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Posterior part of peritremal shield and exopodal shield; (C) Ventral idiosoma; (D) Spermathecal apparatus; (E) Chelicera; (F) Palp.
Figure 1. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Posterior part of peritremal shield and exopodal shield; (C) Ventral idiosoma; (D) Spermathecal apparatus; (E) Chelicera; (F) Palp.
Animals 13 01478 g001
3.
Ventral idiosoma (Figure 1C and Figure 2B). Sternal shield reticulated, 79 (77–83) long, 74 (74–77) wide; anterior margin laterally convex, forming a flat M-shaped projection, posterior margin concave, arched above the level of bases of st3; three pairs of setae (st1, st2 and st3) and two pairs of lyrifissures (iv1 and iv2) present on sternal shield, iv1 positioned posteriad of st1, iv2 positioned between st2 and st3, and close to st3. Metasternal platelets small, each bearing a seta st4 and a lyrifissure iv3. Epigynal shield slightly striated, 132 (125–136) long, 76 (73–76) wide. Lengths of setae: st1 25 (24–29), st2 24 (21–24), st3 23 (21–25), st4 24 (22–27), st5 24 (20–25). Approximately four slender transverse sclerites present between epigynal and ventrianal shields. Ventrianal shield approximately pentagonal, transversally striated and a few oblique striae present between transverse striae, 136 (134–142) long, 100 (97–108) wide, bearing 3 pairs of preanal setae (JV1, JV2 and ZV2), a pair of paranal setae (PA) and a postanal seta (PST), and a pair of circular solenostomes (gv3) posteromedial to JV2, distance gv3gv3 36 (36–43); 4 pairs of setae (JV4, JV5, ZV1 and ZV3) and 5 pairs of lyrifissures present on soft cuticle surrounding ventrianal shield, JV5 serrate, others smooth. A pair of tiny platelets (sgpa) posteroparaxial to ZV1 adjacent to anterior corners of ventrianal shield. Lengths of setae: JV1 18 (17–20), JV2 17 (16–18), JV4 17 (16–20), JV5 52 (52–60), ZV1 18 (18–20), ZV2 18 (17–19), ZV3 15 (15–17). Primary metapodal platelet 32 (30–35) long, 4 (4–6) wide; secondary platelet 15 (12–17) long, 2 (2–3) wide.
4.
Spermatheca (Figure 1D and Figure 3A,B). Calyx of spermathecal apparatus cup-shaped and basally stalked, 11 (10–12) long; stalk approximately as long as width of atrium, atrium nodular at junction with minor duct; minor duct thread-like for a short distance and then expanded, forming a cylindrical tube; major duct slender.
5.
Gnathosoma. Chelicera (Figure 1E and Figure 2C) with fixed digit 37 (33–37) long, bearing six teeth, pilus dentilis located at the level of fourth tooth, 6 (6–8) long; movable digit 32 (31–34) long, bearing single tooth. Palp (Figure 1F). Trochanter with two simple setae; femur with a spatulate and four simple setae; genu bearing two rod-like setae (al1 and al2) and four simple setae; tarsal apotele two-tined.
6.
Legs (Figure 4A–D). Leg I 357 (341–362) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-0/1-0/2-1, femur 2-3/1-2/2-2, genu 2-2/1-2/1-2, tibia 2-2/1-2/1-2, basitarsus 0-0/0-1/0-0. Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I (Figure 4E) with nine modified setae. Leg II 300 (290–303) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-0/1-0/2-1, femur 2-3/1-2/1-1, genu 2-2/0-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/1-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Leg III 307 (295–307) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-1/1-0/2-0, femur 1-2/1-1/0-1, genu 1-2/1-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/1-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Leg IV 400 (386–404) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/0-0, trochanter 1-1/1-0/2-0, femur 1-2/1-1/0-1, genu 1-2/1-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/0-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Legs I–III without obvious macrosetae; leg IV with a smooth macroseta on basitarsus, 73 (73–78) long.
7.
Male (n = 4). Dorsal idiosoma (Figure 5A). Dorsal shield elongate oval, presenting distinct reticulation throughout, 312 (301–312) long, 163 (153–166) wide; muscle marks visible between j3 and J5; dorsum bearing 19 pairs of setae, 16 pairs of lyrifissures (id1, id2, id4, id6, idx, idx1, idl2, idl3, idl4, idm1, idm2, idm3, idm4, idm5, idm6 and is1) and 7 pairs of solenostomes (gd1, gd2, gd4, gd5, gd6, gd8 and gd9). Setae S5, Z4 and Z5 serrate, others smooth; Z4 and Z5 longer than others. Peritremes anteriorly ending at level between j1 and j3. Lengths of setae: j1 21 (19–21), j3 24 (24–27), j4 14 (13–14), j5 13 (13–15), j6 16 (14–17), J2 19 (17–19), J5 12 (10–12), r3 27 (24–27), R1 23 (22–26), s4 29 (29–32), S2 31 (30–32), S4 34 (32–34), S5 36 (34–39), z2 20 (17–20), z4 15 (15–20), z5 14 (12–14), Z1 19 (19–21), Z4 43 (43–46), Z5 69 (67–69).
8.
Ventral idiosoma (Figure 5B). Sternogenital shield sparsely striated between st1 and st4, reticulate between st3 and st4, 133 (132–137) long, 61 (60–63) wide; anterior margin prominently convex, posterior margin nearly straight, bearing five pairs of setae (st1, st2, st3, st4 and st5) and three pairs of lyrifissures (iv1, iv2 and iv3); lengths of setae: st1 23 (19–23), st2 18 (17–18), st3 17 (16–18), st4 18 (17–18), st5 19. Ventrianal shield subtriangular, reticulate throughout, 122 (114–122) long, 133 (127–133) wide; with three pairs of preanal setae (JV1, JV2 and ZV2), a pair of paranal setae (PA) and a postanal seta (PST), three pairs of lyrifissures, a pair of circular solenostomes (gv3) posteromesad to JV2, distance gv3gv3 28 (27–32), two pairs of marginal muscle marks situated anterolateral to anus. Setae JV5 serrate, and a pair of lyrifissures on soft cuticle surrounding ventrianal shield. Lengths of setae: JV1 15 (14–15), JV2 17 (16–17), JV5 44 (41–45), ZV2 19 (18–20).
Figure 2. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Figure 2. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Animals 13 01478 g002
9.
Gnathosoma. Chelicera (Figure 5C) with fixed digit 24 (22–24) long, bearing four teeth, movable digit 23 (21–23) long, bearing a tooth. Spermatodactyl L-shaped, with acute toe and heel, shaft 16 (16–17) long, foot 7 (6–7) long. Palp and hypostome with same chaetotaxy as in female.
10.
Legs. Leg chaetotaxy same as those in adult female.
Figure 3. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), female spermathecal apparatus: (A) Shanxi specimen; (B) Holotype of N. neoreticuloides (The spermathecal apparatuses are marked with arrows) (from Weinan Wu).
Figure 3. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), female spermathecal apparatus: (A) Shanxi specimen; (B) Holotype of N. neoreticuloides (The spermathecal apparatuses are marked with arrows) (from Weinan Wu).
Animals 13 01478 g003
Figure 4. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), female. (A) Leg I; (B) Leg II; (C) Leg III; (D) Leg IV; (E) Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I.
Figure 4. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), female. (A) Leg I; (B) Leg II; (C) Leg III; (D) Leg IV; (E) Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I.
Animals 13 01478 g004
11.
Materials examined. A total of 10♀ and 1♂, Dabaishi Village, Taigu County, Shanxi Province, 37°20′12″ N, 112°38′50″ E, 1340 m, e.g., Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. (Poaceae), 31 August 2020, Y. Liu, M. Ma, B. Zhang and F.-X. Ren coll.; 13♀ and 1♂, Shanxi Agriculture University, Taigu County, Shanxi Province, 37°25′15″ N, 112°34′37″ E, 794 m, Hemerocallis fulva (L.) L. (Asphodelaceae), 7 October 2013, Qing-Hai Fan coll. (accession no.: T13_0009); 8♀ and 1♂, same locality and host as T13_0009, 2 July 2016, M. Ma coll.; 1♀, same locality and host as T13_0009, 5 July 2016, M. Ma coll. (T16_0002); 1♀ and 1♂, locality and host as T13_0009, 27 June 2016, Y.-X. Li coll.; 9♀, same locality and host as T13_0009, but 28 June 2016, M. Ma coll.; 4♀ and 1♂, same collection locality and host as T13_0009, 10 October 2013, M. Ma and Y.-N. Zhao coll. (T13_0017); 8♀ and 3♂, same locality and host as T13_0009, 20 September 2014, M.-J. Yi and B.-Q. Su coll. (T14_0299).
Figure 5. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), male. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Figure 5. Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), male. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Animals 13 01478 g005
12.
Remarks. This species was originally described from grass found in Kazakhstan [14]. Subsequently, it has been collected from various hosts, including the following: almond trees [27], Cichorium intybus [28]; Citrus spp., Cydonia oblonga, Fragaria ananassa, Malus communis, Prunus avium, Prunus domestica, Prunus persica [29]; Cupressus sp. [30]; Cynodon dactylon, Phoenix dactylifera [31]; Populus nigra var. thevestina (Dode) bean [26]; pussy willow [32]; raspberry, low-growing vegetation [25]; Setaria macrostachya, Phalaris minor, Cynodon dactylon, Pinus strobus, Aster spinosus, Haplopappus, Peyanum mexicanum, Rhynchelytrum repens, Asclepias curassavica, Distichilis stricta [33]; Setaria viridis (present paper); Tropaeolum majus [34]; Ulmus pumila [13]; Vitis vinifera [35] in the Nearctic, Neotropical and Palearctic realms [3]. In China, it has been recorded as Neoseiulus neoreticuloides from Ningxia (Yinchuan) [13], and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [26].
13.
The type specimen of Neoseiulus neoreticuloides was an adult female collected from Ulmus pumila (Siberian elm) in Ningxia. It should be noted that the host information was mistakenly attributed to Platycladus orientalis in the English abstract of the same publication, which actually pertains to a different species, Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) yinchuanensis, by Liang and Hu. The specimens collected from Shanxi are consistent with the description provided by Liang and Hu (1988) [13] and Wu et al. (2009) [6]. Based on the presence of a stalk between the calyx and atrium of the spermatheca, N. neoreticuloides should be assigned to the paraki species subgroup. After comparing N. neoreticuloides with N. bicaudus (Table 1), we did not find any significant differences. Therefore, based on our observations, we consider N. neoreticuloides to be conspecific with N. bicaudus. As N. bicaudus has taxonomic priority, we conclude that N. neoreticuloides is a junior synonym of N. bicaudus.

3.1.2. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen, 1985) (Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11)

Amblyseius lushanensis Zhu and Chen, 1985: 273.
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), Wu et al. 2009: 152 [6].
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) longisiphonulus Wu and Lan, 1989: 248 [36]; synonym by Wu et al. 2009: 152.
Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), Chant and McMurtry, 2003: 37 [37]; Moraes et al. 2004: 131 [38].
  • Diagnosis (female). Dorsal shield oval, mostly smooth but striated anterolaterally, bearing 17 pairs of setae, 16 pairs of lyrifissures and 7 pairs of solenostomes, all smooth but Z4 and Z5 serrate; j3, S2, s4, z2, z4, Z4 and Z5 longer than others. Peritremes extending anteriorly close to base of j1. Sternal shield obviously wider than long, sparsely striated, bearing three pairs of setae. Ventrianal shield approximately pentagonal, transversally striated and a few oblique striae present between transverse striae, with three pairs of preanal setae; solenostomes (gv3) posteromedian to JV2, crescent-shaped. Calyx of spermathecal apparatus elongate trumpet-shaped, arms distally thickened and flaring distally, atrium very large, bifurcate at junction with major duct, major duct membranous and thick-walled, as broad as atrium and then gradually reduced. Fixed digit of chelicera with five–six teeth and movable digit with one tooth. Palpgenual setae al1 and al2 rod-like. Leg genu II with 7 setae. Genu, tibia and basitarsus of leg IV each with a macroseta.
Figure 6. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Posterior part of peritremal shield and exopodal shield; (C) Ventral idiosoma; (D) Spermathecal apparatus; (E) Chelicera; (F) Palp.
Figure 6. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Posterior part of peritremal shield and exopodal shield; (C) Ventral idiosoma; (D) Spermathecal apparatus; (E) Chelicera; (F) Palp.
Animals 13 01478 g006
2.
Redescription. Female (n = 7). Dorsal idiosoma (Figure 6A and Figure 7A). Idiosomal setal pattern 10A:9B/JV-3:ZV. Dorsal shield oval, with a waist at level of R1; 399 (373–411) long, 262 (242–271) wide; shield mostly smooth but with a few striae at anterolateral margins between j1 and z2; muscle marks visible between j3 and Z4. Dorsum with 17 pairs of setae, 16 pairs of lyrifissures (id1, id2, id4, id6, idx, idx1, idl2, idl3, idl4, idm1, idm2, idm3, idm4, idm5, idm6 and is1) and 7 pairs of solenostomes (gd1, gd2, gd4, gd5, gd6, gd8 and gd9); lyrifissures id3 and solenostomes gd3 on peritremal shield. Dorsal setae Z4 and Z5 serrated, others smooth, j3, s4, S2, z2, z4, Z4 and Z5 longer than others. Lateral setae r3 and R1 smooth, on interscutal membrane. Peritremes extending anteriorly close to bases of j1, posterior part of peritremal shield (Figure 6B) curved and pointed, protuberance of exopodal shield in front of stigmata. Lengths of setae: j1 30 (22–30), j3 50 (44–52), j4 19 (18–20), j5 20 (16–23), j6 23 (18–23), J2 21 (17–24), J5 10 (9–10), r3 36 (32–37), R1 21 (20–24), s4 77 (71–80), S2 58 (52–65), S4 34 (26–37), S5 23 (18–27), z2 39 (34–42), z4 48 (43–49), z5 14 (12–14), Z1 35 (28–36), Z4 82 (74–82), Z5 83 (70–83).
Figure 7. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), female. (A) Dorsal idiosoma; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Figure 7. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), female. (A) Dorsal idiosoma; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Animals 13 01478 g007
3.
Ventral idiosoma (Figure 6C and Figure 7B). Sternal shield mostly smooth, striated laterally, 66 (65–69) long, 82 (82–88) wide; anterior margin weakly convex, forming a weak M-shaped median projection; posterior margin obviously concave, arched above the level of bases of st3; three pairs of setae (st1, st2 and st3) and two pairs of lyrifissures (iv1 and iv2) present, iv1 positioned posteriad of st1, iv2 positioned between st2 and st3, and close to st3. Metasternal platelets small, each bearing a seta st4 and a lyrifissure iv3. Epigynal shield smooth, 134 (127–139) long, 85 (78–85) wide, with two pairs of muscle scars between st5st5. Lengths of setae: st1 29 (29–37), st2 31 (31–37), st3 31 (30–36), st4 29 (29–37), st5 25 (25–32). A slender transverse sclerite (sometimes broken into three or four parts) present between epigynal and ventrianal shields. Ventrianal shield approximately pentagonal, 134 (124–144) long, 119 (114–126) wide, transversally striated and a few oblique striae present between transverse striae, bearing three pairs of preanal setae (JV1, JV2 and ZV2), a pair of paranal setae (PA) and a postanal seta (PST), and a pair of obviously crescent-shaped solenostomes (gv3) posteromedial to JV2, distance gv3gv3 21 (17–30); two pairs of marginal muscle marks situated anterolateral to anus; four pairs of setae (JV4, JV5, ZV1 and ZV3) and five pairs of lyrifissures present on soft cuticle surrounding ventrianal shield. Lengths of setae: JV1 24 (23–30), JV2 28 (21–28), JV4 26 (20–26), JV5 59 (46–62), ZV1 29 (23–31), ZV2 25 (25–29), ZV3 21 (17–21). Primary metapodal platelet 29 (26–31) long, 5 wide; secondary platelet 12 (12–15) long, 2 wide.
Figure 8. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), female. (AC) Variation in spermathecal apparatus.
Figure 8. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), female. (AC) Variation in spermathecal apparatus.
Animals 13 01478 g008
Figure 9. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), female. (A) Leg I; (B) Leg II; (C) Leg III; (D) Leg IV; (E) Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I.
Figure 9. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), female. (A) Leg I; (B) Leg II; (C) Leg III; (D) Leg IV; (E) Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I.
Animals 13 01478 g009
4.
Spermatheca (Figure 6D and Figure 8A–C). Calyx of spermathecal apparatus elongate trumpet-shaped, distally thickened and flaring, 50 (47–51) long; a large atrium nodular at base of calyx and without a neck, bifurcate at junction with major duct; major duct membranous and thick-walled, as wide as atrium and then gradually reduced.
5.
Gnathosoma. Chelicera (Figure 6E and Figure 7C) with fixed digit 41 (38–41) long, bearing five–six teeth, pilus dentilis located at the level of tooth six, 7 (7–9) long, movable digit 37 (33–38) long, bearing a single tooth. Palp (Figure 6F). Trochanter with two setae; femur with a spatulate and four simple setae; genu bearing two rod-like setae (al1 and al2) and four simple setae; tarsal apotele two-tined.
6.
Legs (Figure 9A–D). Leg I 416 (413–433) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-0/1-0/2-1, femur 2-3/1-2/2-2, genu 2-2/1-2/1-2, tibia 2-2/1-2/1-2, basitarsus 0-0/0-1/0-0. Apical sensorial setal cluster (Figure 9E) with nine modified setae. Leg II 333 (323–334) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-0/1-0/2-1, femur 2-3/1-2/1-1, genu 2-2/0-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/1-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Leg III 325 (318–329) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-1/1-0/2-0, femur 1-2/1-1/0-1, genu 1-2/1-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/1-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Leg IV 445 (436–457) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/0-0, trochanter 1-1/1-0/2-0, femur 1-2/1-1/0-1, genu 1-2/1-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/0-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Legs I–III without macrosetae. Genu, tibia and basitarsus of leg IV each with a smooth macroseta, SgeIV 56 (50–59), StiIV 36 (33–38) and StIV 81 (76–86).
Figure 10. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), male. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Figure 10. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), male. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Animals 13 01478 g010
7.
Male (n = 4). Dorsal idiosoma (Figure 10A and Figure 11A). Dorsal shield oval, 308 (306–309) long, 216 (211–216) wide; mostly smooth but striated anterolaterally; muscle marks visible between j3 and J2; dorsum bearing 19 pairs of setae, 16 pairs of lyrifissures (id1, id2, id4, id6, idx, idx1, idl2, idl3, idl4, idm1, idm2, idm3, idm4, idm5, idm6 and is1) and 7 pairs of solenostomes (gd1, gd2, gd4, gd5, gd6, gd8 and gd9). Z4 and Z5 slightly serrated, other setae smooth; j3, s4, S2, z2, z4, Z4 and Z5 longer than others. Peritremes extending anteriorly close to j1. Lengths of setae: j1 21 (21–23), j3 41 (38–42), j4 19 (19–21), j5 19 (19–23), j6 23 (21–23), J2 21 (19–21), J5 9 (7–11), r3 30 (26–30), R1 22 (20–24), s4 56 (51–56), S2 48 (43–48), S4 32 (30–32), S5 28 (22–29), z2 33 (29–33), z4 28 (28–37), z5 14 (13–15), Z1 26 (26–32), Z4 58 (58–62), Z5 56 (56–63).
Figure 11. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), male. (A) Dorsal idiosoma; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Figure 11. Neoseiulus lushanensis (Zhu and Chen), male. (A) Dorsal idiosoma; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Animals 13 01478 g011
8.
Ventral idiosoma (Figure 10B and Figure 11B). Sternogenital shield mostly smooth but a few striae present at lateral margins, 122 (120–124) long, 77 (72–77) wide; anterior margin and posterior margin nearly straight, bearing five pairs of setae (st1, st2, st3, st4 and st5) and three pairs of lyrifissures (iv1, iv2 and iv3); lengths of setae: st1 26 (26–31), st2 25 (25–30), st3 27 (27–30), st4 22 (22–29), st5 25 (23–25). Ventrianal shield subtriangular, reticulated throughout, anterior margin convex medially, 152 (134–152) long, 144 (141–144) wide, with six pairs of preanal setae (JV1, JV2, JV4, ZV1, ZV2 and ZV3), a pair of paranal setae (PA) and a postanal seta (PST); four pairs of lyrifissures on ventrianal shield, a pair of crescent-shaped solenostomes (gv3) posteromedian to JV2, distance gv3gv3 16 (16–22). Setae JV5 and three pairs of lyrifissures on soft cuticle surrounding ventrianal shield. Lengths of setae: JV1 19 (19–25), JV2 20 (20–25), JV4 23 (21–23), JV5 33 (31–39), ZV1 18 (18–25), ZV2 22 (22–26), ZV3 17 (17–19).
9.
Gnathosoma. Chelicera (Figure 10C and Figure 11C) with fixed digit 28 (28–31) long, bearing five teeth; movable digit 26 (26–29) long, bearing a tooth. Spermatodactyl T-shaped, with acute toe and heel, shaft 22 (20–22) long, foot 47 (46–49) long. Palp and hypostome with same chaetotaxy as in female.
10.
Legs. Leg chaetotaxy same as that in adult female.
11.
Materials examined. A total of 2♀ and 2♂, Dabaishi Village, Taigu County, Shanxi Province, 37°20′12″ N, 112°38′50″ E, 1340 m asl, e.g., Sanguisorba officinalis L. (Rosaceae), 31 August 2020, M. Ma and B. Zhang coll.; 15♀ and 3♂, same locality, Setaria viridis (Poaceae), 21 August 2021, Y. Liu, M. Ma, B. Zhang and F.-X. Ren coll.
12.
Remarks. Neoseiulus lushanensis is classified in the womersleyi species subgroup within the barkeri species group [37]. Originally described from grass in Jiangxi Province, it has also been recorded in Guizhou, Henan, Hunan, Shandong, and Zhejiang provinces [6]. This paper reports the first record of it in Shanxi Province, where we observed a variation in the length of seta Z1. Compared to specimens from Jiangxi (23.4) [15] and Guizhou (26.5–27.5) [6], those from Shanxi have a longer Z1 (35 (28–36)). In earlier descriptions, the striation on the anterolateral margins of the dorsal shield were often overlooked, as was the case in the original description provided by Zhu and Chen (1985) and the subsequent redescription presented by Wu et al. (2009). It is worth noting that the original description may have presented an incorrect number of preanal setae in males, which should be six pairs instead of three pairs.

3.1.3. Neoseiulus makuwa (Ehara, 1972)

Amblyseius (Amblyseius) makuwa Ehara, 1972: 154.
Amblyseius makuwa (Ehara), Wu et al., 1991 [39]: 147; Wu et al., 1997: 99 [40].
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) makuwa (Ehara), Ehara and Amano, 1998: 37 [41]; Wu et al. 2009: 151 [6].
Neoseiulus makuwa (Ehara), Moraes et al., 1986: 87 [42]; Chant and McMurtry, 2003: 33 [37]; Moraes et al., 2004: 131 [38].
  • Material examined. A total of 1♀, Dabaishi Village, Taigu County, Shanxi Province, 37°20′12″ N, 112°38′50″ E, 1340 m, e.g., Setaria viridis (Poaceae), 31 August 2020, Y. Liu, M. Ma, B. Zhang and F.-X. Ren coll.
  • Remarks. The species was first described from Cucumis melo L. var. makuwa Makino in Kyushu, Japan, by Ehara (1972), and has since been reported in six other Asian countries including China, as well as one African country [3]. The current study documents the first record of this species in Shanxi Province.

3.1.4. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara, 1967) (Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15)

Amblyseius (Amblyseius) paraki Ehara, 1967: 216; Ehara and Yokogawa, 1977: 52 [43]; Ehara et al., 1994: 126 [44].
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) paraki (Ehara), Ehara and Amano, 1998: 35 [41].
Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara), Moraes et al., 1986: 92 [42]; Chant and McMurtry, 2003: 23 [37]; Moraes et al., 2004: 137 [38].
Typhlodromip paraki (Ehara), Ehara and Amano, 2004: 9 [45]; Ryu, 2013: 292 [46].
This is the first record for China.
  • Diagnosis (female). Dorsal shield elongate oval, strongly reticulate, bearing 17 pairs of setae, 16 pairs of lyrifissures and 7 pairs of solenostomes, all smooth except Z5 serrated; s4, Z4 and Z5 longer than others. Peritremes extending anteriorly to bases of j1. Sternal shield reticulated, bearing three pairs of setae. Ventrianal shield approximately pentagonal, loosely reticulated, solenostomes (gv3) small and rounded, posterior to JV2. Calyx of spermathecal apparatus bell-shaped and basally stalked, stalk approximately twice as long as width of atrium; atrium broadened at junction with minor duct, minor duct thread-like; major duct narrower than atrium. Fixed digit of chelicera with four–five teeth and movable digit edentate. Palpgenu with genu setae al1 and al2 rod-like. Genu II with eight setae. Genu, tibia and basitarsus of leg IV each with a macroseta.
  • Redescription. Female (n = 3). Dorsal idiosoma (Figure 12A and Figure 13A). Idiosomal setal pattern 10A:9B/JV-3:ZV. Dorsal shield elongate oval, strongly reticulate, with a waist at level of R1, 404 (375–404) long, 198 (178–198) wide; muscle marks visible between j3 and Z4. Dorsum with 17 pairs of setae, 16 pairs of lyrifissures (id1, id2, id4, id6, idx, idx1, idl2, idl3, idl4, idm1, idm2, idm3, idm4, idm5, idm6 and is1) and 7 pairs of solenostomes (gd1, gd2, gd4, gd5, gd6, gd8 and gd9)); lyrifissures id3 and solenostomes gd3 on peritremal shield. All dorsal setae smooth except Z5 serrated; Z4 and Z5 longer than others. Lateral setae r3 and R1 smooth, on interscutal membrane. Peritremes extending anteriorly to bases of j1, posterior part of peritremal shield (Figure 12B) curved and bluntly pointed, protuberance of exopodal shield situated at level of stigmata. Lengths of setae: j1 26, j3 33 (32–35), j4 19 (18–19), j5 16 (16–18), j6 22 (21–25), J2 25 (24–26), J5 12 (12–14), r3 29 (29–32), R1 27 (27–35), s4 41 (41–44), S2 39 (38–42), S4 34 (33–38), S5 34 (33–37), z2 28 (28–29), z4 30 (30–33), z5 19 (19–21), Z1 26 (26–29), Z4 42 (42–49), Z5 65 (65–70).
Figure 12. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Posterior part of peritremal shield and exopodal shield; (C) Ventral idiosoma; (D) Spermathecal apparatus; (E) Chelicera; (F) Palp.
Figure 12. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Posterior part of peritremal shield and exopodal shield; (C) Ventral idiosoma; (D) Spermathecal apparatus; (E) Chelicera; (F) Palp.
Animals 13 01478 g012
3.
Ventral idiosoma (Figure 12C and Figure 13B). Sternal shield reticulated, 81 (76–81) long, 85 (80–85) wide; anterior margin convex, forming a flat M-shaped projection, posterior margin weakly concave, with two small lateral projections; three pairs of setae (st1, st2 and st3) and two pairs of lyrifissures (iv1 and iv2) present on sternal shield, iv1 positioned posteriad of st1, iv2 positioned between st2 and st3, and closer to st3 than to st2. Metasternal platelets small, each bearing a seta st4 and a lyrifissure iv3. Epigynal shield slightly striated, 136 (126–136) long, 85 (71–85) wide. Lengths of setae: st1 29 (29–30), st2 25 (25–27), st3 28 (26–28), st4 30 (27–30), st5 25 (25–27). A slender transverse sclerite present between epigynal and ventrianal shields. Ventrianal shield (Figure 14A,B) approximately pentagonal, loosely reticulated throughout, 145 (135–145) long, 111 (97–111) wide, bearing three pairs of preanal setae (JV1, JV2 and ZV2), a pair of paranal setae (PA) and a postanal seta (PST), and a pair of solenostomes (gv3) posterior to JV2, gv3 small and round, distance gv3gv3 53 (48–53); four pairs of setae (JV4, JV5, ZV1 and ZV3) and five pairs of lyrifissures present on soft cuticle surrounding ventrianal shield. A pair of tiny platelets (sgpa) posteroparaxial to ZV1 close to anterior corners of ventrianal shield. Lengths of setae: JV1 21 (18–21), JV2 25 (22–25), JV4 20 (19–22), JV5 45 (40–48), ZV1 22 (20–22), ZV2 22 (21–22), ZV3 19 (17–19). Primary metapodal platelet 25 (23–25) long, 5 (5–6) wide; secondary platelet 13 (11–13) long, 2 (2–3) wide.
Figure 13. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Figure 13. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Animals 13 01478 g013
4.
Spermatheca (Figure 12D and Figure 14C). Calyx of spermathecal apparatus 19 (18–20) long, bell-shaped and basally stalked, stalk approximately twice as long as width of atrium, atrium broadened at junction with minor duct, minor duct thread-like; major duct approximately half width of atrium.
5.
Gnathosoma. Chelicera (Figure 12E and Figure 13C) with fixed digit 34 long, bearing four–five teeth, pilus dentilis located at the level of fourth tooth, 5 (5–6) long; movable digit 33 (31–33) long, without teeth. Palp (Figure 12F). Trochanter with two setae; femur with a spatulate and four simple setae; genu bearing two rod-like setae (al1 and al2) and four simple setae; tarsal apotele two-tined.
Figure 14. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara), female. (A,B) Variation in ventrianal shield; (C) Spermathecal apparatus.
Figure 14. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara), female. (A,B) Variation in ventrianal shield; (C) Spermathecal apparatus.
Animals 13 01478 g014
Figure 15. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara), female. (A) Leg I; (B) Leg II; (C) Leg III; (D) Leg IV; (E) Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I.
Figure 15. Neoseiulus paraki (Ehara), female. (A) Leg I; (B) Leg II; (C) Leg III; (D) Leg IV; (E) Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I.
Animals 13 01478 g015
6.
Legs (Figure 15A–D). Leg I 392 (374–406) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-0/1-0/2-1, femur 2-3/1-2/2-2, genu 2-2/1-2/1-2, tibia 2-2/1-2/1-2, basitarsus 0-0/0-1/0-0. Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I (Figure 15E) with 10 modified setae. Leg II 323 (311–333) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-0/1-0/2-1, femur 2-3/1-2/1-1, genu 2-2/1-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/1-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Leg III 324 (314–333) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-1/1-0/1-1, femur 1-2/1-1/0-1, genu 1-2/1-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/1-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Leg IV 427 (419–451) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/0-0, trochanter 1-1/1-1/1-0, femur 1-2/1-1/0-1, genu 1-2/1-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/0-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Legs I–II without macrosetae, genu and tibia of leg III each with a smooth macroseta, SgeIII 31 (29–32), StiIII 27 (25–28); genu, tibia and basitarsus of leg IV each with a smooth macroseta, SgeIV 40 (39–40), StiIV 39 (39–41), StIV 78 (70–78).
7.
Males. Not found in the current study.
8.
Materials examined. A total of 3♀, Dabaishi Village, Taigu County, Shanxi Province, 37°20′12″ N, 112°38′50″ E, 1340 m, e.g., Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. (Poaceae), 31 August 2020, Y. Liu, M. Ma, B. Zhang and F.-X. Ren coll.
9.
Remarks. The female of this species was originally described from apple trees in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan [16]. Subsequently, Ehara and Yokogwa (1977) provided information on the male morphology. Both sexes of N. paraki have four–five teeth on the fixed digit, while the movable digit is edentate in females but has one tooth in males [43]. While this species has also been reported in South Korea, specimens from this country have seven teeth on the fixed digit and one tooth on the movable digit, and their epigynal shield is strongly reticulated [46]. In contrast, the epigynal shield of our specimens is slightly striated. One of our specimens exhibited a structural anomaly where iv3 was positioned off the metasternal platelet on the right side.

3.1.5. Neoseiulus tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov, 1972) (Figure 16, Figure 17, Figure 18 and Figure 19)

Amblyseius tauricus Livshitz and Kuznetsov, 1972: 24; Wu and Lan, 1991: 316 [47]; Wu and Ou, 1999: 105 [48].
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov), Wu et al., 2009: 92 [6].
Neoseiulus tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov), Moraes et al., 1986: 92 [42]; Chant and McMurtry, 2003: 23 [37]; Moraes et al., 2004: 147 [38].
  • Diagnosis (female). Dorsal shield elongate oval, reticulated throughout, bearing 17 pairs of setae, 16 pairs of lyrifissures and 7 pairs of solenostomes, all smooth except Z4 and Z5, which were serrated; Z4 and Z5 longer than others. Peritremes extending anteriorly to bases of j1. Sternal shield striated laterally, bearing three pairs of setae. Ventrianal shield approximately pentagonal, mostly transversally striated and a few oblique striae present between transverse striae; solenostomes (gv3) not discernible. Calyx of spermathecal apparatus funnel-shaped and constricted medially, arms apically flaring; atrium positioned right at base of calyx; major duct membranous, gradually expanded after a short distance. Fixed digit of chelicera with four teeth and movable digit with a tooth. Palpgenu with genu setae al1 and al2 tapered, spiniform. Genu II with seven setae. Genu, tibia and basitarsus of leg IV each with a macroseta.
  • Redescription. Female (n = 4). Dorsal idiosoma (Figure 16A and Figure 17A). Idiosomal setal pattern 10A:9B/JV-3:ZV. Dorsal shield elongate oval, reticulated, with a waist at level of R1, 347 (328–347) long, 171 (160–171) wide; muscle marks visible between j1 and Z4, 2 pairs of muscle marks present in front of J5. Dorsum with 17 pairs of setae and 16 pairs of lyrifissures (id1, id2, id4, id6, idx, idx1, idl2, idl3, idl4, idm1, idm2, idm3, idm4, idm5, idm6 and is1) and 7 pairs of solenostomes (gd1, gd2, gd4, gd5, gd6, gd8 and gd9); lyrifissures id3 and solenostomes gd3 on peritremal shield. All dorsal setae smooth except Z4 and Z5, which were serrated; Z4 and Z5 longer than others. Lateral setae r3 and R1 smooth, on interscutal membrane. Peritremes extending anteriorly to bases of j1, posterior part of peritremal shield (Figure 16B) nearly straight and with a blunt tip, protuberance of exopodal shield at level of stigmata. Lengths of setae: j1 19 (15–19), j3 18 (17–19), j4 11, j5 12 (11–12), j6 13 (12–13), J2 14 (12–14), J5 9 (9–10), r3 15 (15–18), R1 16 (14–18), s4 26 (24–26), S2 24 (24–26), S4 23 (21–23), S5 21 (20–22), z2 18 (14–18), z4 16 (15–17), z5 12 (11–13), Z1 19 (15–19), Z4 37 (36–37), Z5 48 (48–53).
  • Ventral idiosoma (Figure 16C and Figure 17B). Sternal shield striated laterally, 68 (62–68) long, 73 (69–73) wide; anterior margin convex, posterior margin nearly plane; three pairs of setae (st1, st2 and st3) and two pairs of lyrifissures (iv1 and iv2) present on sternal shield, lyrifissure iv1 positioned posteriad of st1, iv2 positioned between st2 and st3, and close to st3. Metasternal platelets small, each bearing a seta st4 and a lyrifissure iv3. Epigynal shield with a few longitudinal and oblique striae and two pairs of muscle scars between st5 and st5; 118 (110–120) long, 65 (63–68) wide. Lengths of setae: st1 29 (25–29), st2 24 (24–26), st3 28 (22–28), st4 23 (20–23), st5 22 (21–23). A slender transverse sclerite present between epigynal and ventrianal shields. Ventrianal shield approximately pentagonal, striated, 122 (110–122) long, 92 (89–92) wide, bearing three pairs of preanal setae (JV1, JV2 and ZV2), a pair of paranal setae (PA) and a postanal seta (PST), solenostomes (gv3) not discernible; four pairs of setae (JV4, JV5, ZV1 and ZV3) and five pairs of lyrifissures present on soft cuticle surrounding ventrianal shield. A pair of tiny platelets (sgpa) posteroparaxial to ZV1 adjacent to anterior corners of ventrianal shield. Lengths of setae: JV1 20 (19–20), JV2 22 (17–22), JV4 21 (21–22), JV5 50 (50–56), ZV1 21 (17–21), ZV2 19 (18–20), ZV3 11 (11–13). Primary metapodal platelet 27 (26–32) long, 6 (5–6) wide; secondary platelet 13 (11–16) long, 3 (3–4) wide.
Figure 16. Neoseiulus tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Posterior part of peritremal shield and exopodal shield; (C) Ventral idiosoma; (D) Spermathecal apparatus; (E) Chelicera; (F) Palp.
Figure 16. Neoseiulus tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Posterior part of peritremal shield and exopodal shield; (C) Ventral idiosoma; (D) Spermathecal apparatus; (E) Chelicera; (F) Palp.
Animals 13 01478 g016
4.
Spermatheca (Figure 16D and Figure 18A,B). Calyx of spermathecal apparatus elongate, funnel-shaped and constricted medially, flaring distally, 24 (23–24) long; atrium incorporated within base of calyx; minor duct thread-like; major duct membranous, gradually broadened after a short distance.
Figure 17. Neoseiulus tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Figure 17. Neoseiulus tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov), female. (A) Dorsal shield; (B) Ventral idiosoma; (C) Chelicera.
Animals 13 01478 g017
5.
Gnathosoma. Chelicera (Figure 16E and Figure 17C) with fixed digit 27 (27–30) long, bearing four teeth, pilus dentilis located at the level of fourth tooth, 7 long; movable digit 26 (25–26) long, bearing a single tooth. Palp (Figure 16F). Trochanter with two setae; femur with a spatulate and four simple setae; genu bearing two tapered spiniform setae (al1 and al2), and four simple setae; tarsal apotele two-tined.
6.
Legs (Figure 19A–D). Leg I 339 (327–342) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-0/1-0/2-1, femur 2-3/1-2/2-2, genu 2-2/1-2/1-2, tibia 2-2/1-2/1-2, basitarsus 0-0/0-1/0-0. Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I (Figure 19E) with 10 modified setae. Leg II 268 (253–268) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-0/1-0/2-1, femur 2-3/1-2/1-1, genu 2-2/0-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/1-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Leg III 268 (245–268) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/1-0, trochanter 1-1/1-0/1-1, femur 1-2/1-1/0-1, genu 1-2/1-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/1-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Leg IV 352 (328–352) long, setal formula: coxa 0-0/1-0/0-0, trochanter 1-1/1-1/1-0, femur 1-2/1-1/0-1, genu 1-2/1-2/0-1, tibia 1-1/1-2/0-1, basitarsus 1-1/0-1/0-1. Legs I–III without macrosetae. Genu, tibia and basitarsus of leg IV each with a smooth macroseta, SgeIV 30 (30–33), StiIV 21 (20–23), StIV 49 (48–50).
7.
Males. Not found in the present study.
Figure 18. Neoseiulus tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov), female. (A,B) Variation in spermathecal apparatus.
Figure 18. Neoseiulus tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov), female. (A,B) Variation in spermathecal apparatus.
Animals 13 01478 g018
Figure 19. Neoseiulus tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov), female. (A) Leg I; (B) Leg II; (C) Leg III; (D) Leg IV; (E) Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I.
Figure 19. Neoseiulus tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov), female. (A) Leg I; (B) Leg II; (C) Leg III; (D) Leg IV; (E) Apical sensorial setal cluster of tarsus I.
Animals 13 01478 g019
8.
Materials examined. A total of 4♀, Dabaishi Village, Taigu County, Shanxi Province, 37°20′12″ N, 112°38′50″ E, 1340 m, e.g., Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. (Poaceae), 31 August 2020, Y. Liu, M. Ma, B. Zhang and F.-X. Ren coll.
9.
Remarks. Neoseiulus tauricus was first described by Livshitz and Kuznetsov (1972). In China, it was previously recorded from weeds in Inner Mongolia [47]. We observed that seta JV5 in our specimens is smooth, whereas it was originally described as serrated [18]. Additionally, we noted that the left lyrifissure iv3 is off the metasternal platelet. The macroseta on tibia IV in our Shanxi specimens is indistinct, as reported in [6,40], whereas it is only slightly shorter than that on genu IV in Livshitz and Kuznetsov (1972).

3.1.6. Neoseiulus womersleyi (Schicha, 1975)

Amblyseius womersleyi Schicha, 1975: 101; Schicha, 1987: 96 [49].
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) womersleyi (Schicha), Tseng, 1983: 54 [50]; Ehara et al., 1994: 123 [44].
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) womersleyi (Schicha), Ehara and Amano, 1998: 30 [41]; Wu et al., 2009: 65 [6].
Neoseiulus womersleyi (Schicha), Moraes et al., 1986: 86 [42]; Beard, 2001: 84 [51]; Chant and McMurtry, 2003: 37 [37]; Moraes et al., 2004: 152 [38]; Liao et al., 2020: 288 [52].
Amblyseius pseudolongispinosus Xin, Liang and Ke, 1981: 75 [9]; Wu et al. 1997: 43 [40]; synonymy by Tseng, 1983: 57 [50].
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) pseudolongispinosus (Xin, Liang and Ke), Wu et al., 2009: 65 [6].
Neoseiulus pseudolongispinosus (Xin, Liang and Ke), Ma et al., 2015: 15 [10].
  • Materials examined. A total of 2♀, Jincheng City, Shanxi Province, 35°29′31″ N, 112°49′47″ E, 624 m, e.g., weed, 19 August 2014, Y.-N. Zhao coll.; 1♂, Shanxi Agriculture University, Taigu County, Shanxi Province, 37°25′24″ N, 112°34′53″ E, 794 m, weed, 20 September 2014, M.-J. Yi and B.-Q. Su coll.
  • Remarks. This species was originally described from strawberry in Australia [8] and later recorded in China, Japan and South Korea [3]. In 1981, Xin et al. described a new species, Amblyseius pseudolongispinosus, based on specimens collected from various plant species in different regions of China. This species has been reported in Mainland China under the name Amblyseius pseudolongispinosus, although Tseng, from Taiwan, synonymized it with Amblyseius womersleyi in 1983. Our examination of specimens from different localities in China, as well as the original description and specimens from New Zealand, supports Tseng’s decision to synonymize the two species.

3.1.7. Neoseiulus zwoelferi (Dosse, 1957)

Typhlodromus zwoelferi Dosse, 1957: 301 [53].
Cydnodromus zwoelferi (Dosse), Muma, 1961: 290 [54].
Amblyseius zwoelferi (Dosse), Schuster and Pritchard, 1963: 268 [55].
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) zwoelferi (Dosse), Wainstein, 1975: 920 [56].
Amblyseius subreticulatus Wu, 1987: 264 [57]; synonym by Zhang et al. 2021: 20 [12].
Third bullet.
  • Materials examined. A total of 17♀, 5♂, 8 deutonymph, 8 protonymphs, 6 larvae, e.g., laboratory culture in Shanxi Agriculture University, 8 June 2020–23 September 2020, B. Zhang, M. Ma and S. Jiao. coll.; 5♀, Taigu, e.g., Hemerocallis fulva L. (Asphodelaceae), 7 October 2013, Q.-H. Fan coll.; 1♀, Taigu, e.g., Hemerocallis fulva L. (Asphodelaceae), 6 August 2014, M. Ma coll.; 17♀, 2♂, 1 protonymph. Ningwu, Luyashan National Nature Reserve, e.g., weed, 6 August 2014, B. Zhang and M. Ma coll.; 1♀, Ningwu, Luyashan National Nature Reserve, e.g., Hippophae rhamnoides L. (Elaeagnaceae), B.-Q. Su and M.-J. Yin coll.; 1♀, 1♂, Taigu, e.g., weed, 20 August 2014, B.-Q. Su and M.-J. Yin coll.
  • Remarks. The original description of this species was based on specimens collected from apple leaves in Oldenburg, Germany [53]. Since then, it has been found in eighteen countries in the Palearctic realm, one country in the Indomalayan realm, and one country in the Nearctic realm [3]. In China, it has a broad geographical range, being present from the far northeast (Heilongjiang) to the far northwest (Xinjiang) and the southern coast (Guangdong).

3.2. Key to Adult Females of Neoseiulus in Shanxi Province

1. Most dorsal idiosomal setae (except j1 and J5) serrated; setae j46, Z1, S2 and S4 extending beyond bases of setae in next row. ………….… N. womersleyi (Schicha)
- Most dorsal idiosomal setae smooth, except Z5, which is barbed, Z4, S4 and S5, which are barbed or smooth; setae j46, Z1, S2 and S4 not extending beyond bases of setae in the next row. ……………………………………………….……………… 2
2. Atrium of spermathecal apparatus bifurcated at junction with major duct; calyx elongate trumpet-shaped; spermatodactyl of male T-shaped. …………………… 3
- Atrium of spermathecal apparatus not bifurcated at junction with major duct; calyx does not elongate trumpet-shaped; spermatodactyl of male L-shaped. ….… 4
3. Setae z4, s4 and Z4 long, extending beyond or nearly reaching to bases of setae in next row; macrosetae present on genu, tibia and basitarsus of leg IV. ……………. …………………………………………………………. N. lushanensis (Zhu and Chen)
- Setae z4, s4 and Z4 short, far from bases of setae in next row; macrosetae only on genu and basitarsus of leg IV. ……………………………………. N. makuwa (Ehara)
4. Calyx of spermathecal apparatus not stalked, immediately attached to calyx; major duct expanded, approximately as wide as medial part of calyx; palpgenu anterior lateral setae al1 and al2 tapered, spiniform; solenostomes (gv3) absent. ………….. …………..……………………………………… N. tauricus (Livshitz and Kuznetsov)
- Calyx of spermathecal apparatus basally stalked; major duct slender; palpgenu setae al1 and al2 cylindrical, rod-like; solenostomes (gv3) present. ………………. 5
5. Genu II with 7 setae; genu IV without obvious macrosetae; S4 and S5 serrated. … …………………………………………………………………... N. bicaudus (Wainstein)
- Genu II with 8 setae; genu IV with macroseta at least 1.5 times length of other setae; S4 and S5 smooth. …………………………………………………………………. 6
6. Calyx of spermathecal apparatus basally pointed, V-shaped; seta S4 approximately half distance S4S5; s4 approximately half distance s4z5. …… N. zwoelferi (Dosse)
- Calyx of spermathecal apparatus basally rounded, U-shaped; S4 nearly as long as distance S4S5; s4 longer than distance s4z5. …………………….. N. paraki (Ehara)

4. Discussion

Neoseiulus is the third most abundant and most widely distributed genus across the globe after Typhlodromus and Amblyseius in Phytoseiidae. The species of this genus are predominantly found in plants on every continent, except Antarctica, and their largest diversity is concentrated in tropical and subtropical regions. The ancestral habitat of Neoseiulus is presumed to be amongst plants that grew close to the ground as well as the ground litter [37]. The species documented above are unexceptional inhabitants of plants, much as most other species in the genus Neoseiulus. The green foxtail (Setaria viridis), a species that is abundant in Shanxi and other areas in northern China, appears to be an ideal habitat for the Neoseiulus in Shanxi, hosting five (N. bicaudus, N. lushanensis, N. makuwa, N. paraki and N. tauricus) out of the seven species recorded; however, for some species, this is based on a small number of specimens.
Ten species groups are recognized in Neoseiulus and two of them contain four species subgroups each, while the others remain undivided [3,37,38]. The species found in Shanxi can be classified into two groups: barkeri species group (N. lushanensis, N. makuwa and N. womersleyi) and cucumeris species group (N. bicaudus, N. paraki and N. zwoelferi in paraki species subgroup and N. tauricus in ceratoni species subgroup).
The classification of Neoseiulus primarily relies on variations in the morphology of the spermatheca [2,6,33,37,49,51]. In addition, other characteristics utilized include the idiosomal setal pattern, dorsal idiosomal setal ratio, ornamentation of the dorsal shield, length-to-width ratio of the sternal shield, the position of sternal seta st3, the shape of the female ventrianal shield, the shape and position of solenostomes gv3, the number of teeth on the movable and fixed cheliceral digits of females, the number of macrosetae on leg IV, the number of setae on genu II, and the shape of the male spermatodactyl. Taxonomists have continuously searched for new morphological characteristics to improve the systematics of Phytoseiidae. Certain characteristics, such as the shape of the posterior section of the peritremal shield and exopodal shields, the location of gland pores and poroids/lyrifissures on the dorsal and ventral idiosomal shields, as well as on the peritremal shield, in addition to the shape of the specialized setae on femur (al) and genu (al1, al2), and leg chaetotaxy, are presented in a number of publications [2,33,37,51,52,58,59,60,61,62,63]. Further research is necessary to comprehensively evaluate these characteristics in a systematic way.
This is the first review of the genus Neoseiulus in Shanxi Province, recording seven species which account for 12.3% of the total known species of this genus in China. Among the findings, N. paraki (Ehara), recorded in the current work, was previously only known to be present in Japan and South Korea. Additionally, the study confirms N. neoreticuloides (Liang and Hu) as a new junior synonym of N. bicaudus (Wainstein). It should be noted that, as there have been no previous surveys of phytoseiid mites in the province, the data presented here may be limited, and it is likely that more species have yet to be discovered.

5. Conclusions

The study of Neoseiulus in Shanxi Province has added valuable information to the study of phytoseiid fauna in the area. The redescriptions of four species contribute to the enrichment and provide a more detailed basis for species identification. The recording of N. paraki in China for the first time expands the known distribution of this species, and synonymizing N. neoreticuloides with N. bicaudus clarifies the taxonomic status of these species. The diagnostic key provided will assist in the identification of the known species of Neoseiulus in Shanxi and will be useful for future studies on the genus. In brief, this study highlights the importance of conducting further investigations into the species diversity and distribution across different geographical locations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and M.M.; methodology, M.M. and Q.-H.F.; software, Y.L. and F.-X.R.; validation, Y.L., M.M. and Q.-H.F.; formal analysis, M.M. and Q.-H.F.; investigation, Y.L., M.M. and F.-X.R.; resources, M.M. and Q.-H.F.; data curation, Y.L. and F.-X.R.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, M.M. and Q.-H.F.; visualization, Y.L., M.M. and F.-X.R.; supervision, M.M. and Q.-H.F.; project administration, Y.L. and F.-X.R.; funding acquisition, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Shanxi Scholarship Council of China (HGKY2019044), the State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests (SKLOF202215), and the Plant Protection Pioneer Special Training Program of the Plant Protection College at Shanxi Agricultural University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our appreciation to Xuenong Xu (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for his valuable comments on the draft, Weinan Wu (Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources) for sharing a photograph of the spermathecal apparatus of N. neoreticuloides, and Bin Zhang (Shanxi Agriculture University) for his assistance in collecting specimens.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hughes, A.M. The Mites Associated with Stored Food Products; Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: London, UK, 1948; pp. 1–168. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chant, D.A.; McMurtry, J.A. Illustrated Keys and Diagnoses for the Genera and Subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the World (Acari: Mesostigmata); Indira Publishing House: West Bloomfield, MI, USA, 2007; pp. 1–219. [Google Scholar]
  3. Phytoseiidae Database. Available online: www.lea.esalq.usp.br/phytoseiidae (accessed on 14 January 2023).
  4. Döker, İ.; Khaustov, V.A.; Joharchi, O. Redescriptions of two little known species of Neoseiulus Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with description of a new species from Russia. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2021, 26, 672–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liao, J.-R.; Ho, C.-C.; Ko, C.-C. Survey of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) in the Penghu Islands with two new records and descriptions of two new species. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2021, 26, 641–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, W.N.; Ou, J.F.; Huang, J.L. Fauna Sinica, Invertebrata Vol. 47, Arachnida, Acari, Phytoseiidae; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2009; pp. 1–511. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu, W.N.; Fang, X.D. Phytoseiidae Systematics and Management of Pests; Guangdong Science and Technology Press: Guangzhou, China, 2021; pp. 1–411. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schicha, E. A new predacious species of Amblyseius Berlese from strawberry in Australia, and A. longispinosus (Evans) redescribed (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Aust. J. Entomol. 1975, 14, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xin, J.-L.; Liang, L.-R.; Ke, L.-S. A new species of the genus Amblyseius from China (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol. 1981, 7, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, M.; Li, S.-C.; Fan, Q.-H. Mites and ticks (Acari) in Shanxi Province, China: An annotated checklist. Zootaxa 2015, 4006, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tang, Y.; Yang, R.Y.; Zeng, W. Penthaleus major (Dugès) damages young corns in Daxian. China Plant Prot. 2004, 24, 33. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, B.; Ma, M.; Fan, Q.-H. Morphological ontogeny of Neoseiulus zwoelferi (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Zootaxa 2021, 5086, 7–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liang, L.R.; Hu, C.Y. Two new species of the phytoseiid mites from Ningxia, China (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Entomotaxonomia 1988, 10, 317–319. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wainstein, B.A. Some new predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes) of the USSR fauna. Rev. Entomol. Urss 1962, 41, 230–240. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhu, Z.-M.; Chen, X.-W. A new species of Amblyseius Berlese from Mt. Lushan of Jiangxi (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Acta Zootaxon. Sin. 1985, 10, 273–275. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ehara, S. Phytoseiid Mites from Hokkaido (Acarina: Mesostigmata)(With 71 Text-figures). J. Fac.Sci. Hokkaido Univ. 1967, 16, 212–233. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ehara, S. Some phytoseiid mites from Japan, with descriptions of thirteen new species (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Mushi 1972, 46, 137–173. [Google Scholar]
  18. Livschitz, I.Z. Phytoseiid mites from Crimea (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae). Proc. State Nikita Bot. Gard. 1972, 61, 13–64. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rowell, H.J.; Chant, D.A.; Hansell, R.I.C. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Can. Entomol. 1978, 110, 859–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Evans, G.O. Observations on the Chaetotaxy of the Legs in the Freeliving Gamasina (Acari: Mesostigmata). Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1963, 10, 277–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Athias-Henriot, C. Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini. II. Le relevé organotaxique de la face dorsale adulte (Gamasides protoadéniques, Phytoseiidae). Acarologia 1975, 17, 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chant, D.A.; Yoshida-Shaul, E. Adult idiosomal setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Int. J. Acarol. 1992, 18, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hirschmann, W. Gangystematik der Parasitiformes. Acarologie Schriftenreihe fur Vergleichende Milbenkunde. Hirschmann-Verl. Furth. Bay 1962, 5, 80. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ehara, S. A tentative catalogue of predatory mites of Phytoseiidae known from Asia, with descriptions of five new species from Japan. Mushi 1966, 39, 9–30. [Google Scholar]
  25. Congdon, B.D. The family Phytoseiidae (Acari) in western Washington State with descriptions of three new species. Int. J. Acarol. 2002, 28, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, B.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, J.; Xu, X. Re-description of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) newly recorded from Xinjiang, China. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2015, 20, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Asali Fayaz, B.; Khanjani, M.; Molavi, F.; Ueckermann, E.A. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) of apple and almond trees in regions of western and southwestern Iran. Acarologia 2011, 51, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Asali Fayaz, B.; Khanjani, M.; Uckermann, E. Description of immature stages and redescription of female and male of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein, 1962)(Acari: Phytoseiidae) from west of Iran. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 2011, 46, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Faraji, F.; Çobanoğlu, S.; Çakmak, I. A checklist and a key for the Phytoseiidae species of Turkey with two new species records (Acari: Mesostigmata). Int. J. Acarol. 2011, 37, 221–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sahraoui, H.; Grissa, K.L.; Kreiter, S.; Douin, M.; Tixier, M.-S. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) of Tunisian citrus orchards: Catalogue, biogeography and key for identification. Acarologia 2012, 52, 433–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Palevsky, E.; Gal, S.; Ueckermann, E.A. Phytoseiidae from date palms in Israel with descriptions of two new taxa and a key to the species found on date palms worldwide (Acari: Mesostigmata). J. Nat. Hist. 2009, 43, 1715–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rahmani, H.; Kamali, K.; Faraji, F. Predatory mite fauna of Phytoseiidae of northwest Iran (Acari: Mesostigmata). Turk. J. Zool. 2010, 34, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Denmark, H.A.; Evans, G.A. Phytoseiidae of North America and Hawaii: (Acari: Mesostigmata); Indira Publishing House: West Bloomfield, MI, USA, 2011; pp. 1–415. [Google Scholar]
  34. Negm, M.W.; Alatawi, F.J.; Aldryhim, Y.N. A new species of Neoseiulus Hughes, with records of seven species of predatory mites associated with date palm in Saudi Arabia (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Zootaxa 2012, 3356, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liao, J.-R.; Ho, C.-C.; Ko, C.-C. Predatory mites (Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) intercepted from samples imported to Taiwan, with description of a new species. Zootaxa 2021, 4927, 301–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, W.N.; Lan, W.M. Two new species of Amblyseius Berlese from Kuizhou Province (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Acta Entomol. Sin. 1989, 32, 248–250. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chant, D.A.; McMurtry, J.A. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part I. Neoseiulini new tribe. Int. J. Acarol. 2003, 29, 3–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Moraes, G.J.; McMurtry, J.A.; Denmark, H.A.; Campos, C.B. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 2004, 434, 1–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, W.N.; Lan, W.M.; Liu, Y.H. Phytoseiid mites of lychee from China, and their value for application. Nat. Enemies Insects 1991, 13, 82–91. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wu, W.N.; Liang, L.R.; Lan, W.M. Acari: Phytoseiidae; Economic Insect Fauna of China, Science Press: Beijing, China, 1997; pp. 1–227. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ehara, S.; Amano, H. A revision of the mite family Phytoseiidae in Japan (Acari, Gamasina), with remarks on its biology. Species Divers. 1998, 3, 25–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. de Moraes, G.J.; McMurtry, J.A.; Denmark, H.A. A Catalog of the Mite Family Phytoseiidae: References to Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution and Habitat; EMBRAPA—DDT: Brasilia, Brazil, 1986; pp. 1–353. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ehara, S.; Yokogawa, M. Two new Amblyseius from Japan with notes on three other species (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Proc. Jpn. Soc. Syst. Zool. 1977, 13, 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ehara, S. Contribution to the knowledge of the mite family Phytoseiidae in Japan (Acari: Gamasina). J. Fac. Educ. Tottori Univ. Nat. Sci. 1994, 42, 119–160. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ehara, S.; Amano, H. Checklist and keys to Japanese Amblyseiinae (Acari: Gamasina: Phytoseiidae). J. Acarol. Soc. Jpn. 2004, 13, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ryu, M.O. Key to the species of the genus Typhlodromips (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with a new and a newly recorded species in Korea. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 52, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, W.N.; Lan, W.M. Two new species and one new record of the genus Typhlodromus from Northwest China (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sin. 1991, 16, 328–332. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, W.-N.; Ou, J.-F. A new species group of the genus Amblyseius, with descriptions of two new species (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from China. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 1999, 4, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schicha, E. Phytoseiidae of Australia and Neighboring Areas; Indira Publishing House: West Bloomfield, MI, USA, 1987; pp. 1–187. [Google Scholar]
  50. Tseng, Y.-H. Further study on phytoseiid mites from Taiwan (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Chin. J. Entomol. 1983, 3, 33–74. [Google Scholar]
  51. Beard, J.J. A review of Australian Neoseiulus Hughes and Typhlodromips De Leon (Acari: Phytoseiidae: Amblyseiinae). Invertebr. Syst. 2001, 15, 73–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liao, J.-R.; Ho, C.-C.; Lee, H.-C.; Ko, C.-C. Phytoseiidae of Taiwan (Acari: Mesostigmata); National Taiwan University Press: Taipei, Taiwan, 2020; pp. 1–538. [Google Scholar]
  53. Dosse, G. Morphologie und biologie von Typhlodromus zwölferi n. sp. (Acar., Phytoseiidae). Z. Angew. Entomol. 1957, 41, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Muma, M.H. Subfamilies, genera, and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Bull. Fla. State Mus. Biol. Sci. 1961, 5, 267–302. [Google Scholar]
  55. Schuster, R.; Pritchard, A. Phytoseiid mites of California. Hilgardia 1963, 34, 191–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wainstein, B.A. Predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes) of Yaroslavl Province. Entomol. Obozr. 1975, 54, 914–922. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wu, W.N. New species and new records of phytoseiid mites from Northeast China. II. Amblyseius Berlese (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Acta Zootaxon. Sin. 1987, 12, 260–270. [Google Scholar]
  58. Athias-Henriot, C. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasina) d’Algérie. I. Genres Blattisocius Keegan, Iphiseius Berlese, Amblyseius Berlese, Phytoseius Ribaga, Phytoseiulus Evans. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. Nord 1957, 48, 319–352. [Google Scholar]
  59. Denmark, H.A.; Muma, M.H. A revision of the genus Amblyseius Berlese, 1914 (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Occas. Pap. Fla. State Collect. Arthropods 1989, 4, 1–149. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kolodochka, L.A. Four new species of phytoseiid mites of the fauna of the USSR (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Vestn. Zool. 1979, 5, 32–40. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kolodochka, L.A. New species of phytoseiid mites from the fauna of the USSR (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae). Vestn. Zool. 1980, 2, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kolodochka, L.A. Two new species of the genus Neoseiulus (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) with redescriptions of N. bicaudus and N. micmac based on holotypes. Vestn. Zool. 2018, 52, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ragusa, S. Observation on the genus Neoseiulus Hughes (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Redefinition. Composition. Geography. Description of two new species. Rev. Suisse Zool. 1983, 90, 657–678. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Comparison of morphological characteristics of Neoseiulus neoreticuloides and N. bicaudus.
Table 1. Comparison of morphological characteristics of Neoseiulus neoreticuloides and N. bicaudus.
N. neoreticuloides [13] N. bicaudus [36]N. bicaudus [28]N. bicaudus [31]N. bicaudus [26]
Dorsal shieldreticulate, 415.7 long, 206.7 widethin net-like on posterior part, 400 long, 180 widereticulate, 402–410 long, 190–200 widereticulate, 388–401 long, 167–202 widereticulate, 375–425 long, 160–178 wide
Peritreme extending to level between j1 and j3extending forward to level of bases of setae j1extending to level between j1 and j3extending to level between j1 and j3, close to j3extending to level between j1 and j3, close to j1
j1252522–25 23–25 22–26
j3303126–31 28–30 27–32
j4151514 14–16 12–15
j5-1513–15 14–15 12–15
j6161716–20 16–19 15–18
J219.52117–20 17–19 17–22
J5141414–16 12–15 12–15
r3343429–33 29–32 30–35
R1303025–31 28–32 30–32
s4323430–34 30–34 30–37
S233.53532–38 32–36 33–40
S437.54344–46 36–40 35–42
S539.54553–61 42–46 40–49
z2242318–23 21–29 20–26
z4202018–19 13–18 16–20
z515.51414–15 13–15 12–15
Z1232021–23 21–24 20–25
Z4394035–41 34–38 36–42
Z5839892–99 87–95 82–97
Sternal shieldscarcely striatedsmoothreticulatedscarcely striatedreticulated
Ventrianal shieldapproximately triangle135 long, 117 wide, sub-triangular135–140 long, 110 wide, approximately triangle133–141 long, 99–120 wide, approximately triangle135–145 long, 102–114 wide, approximately triangle
Distance gv3gv3--40–46-36–47
JV5serrate; 60serrate; 63serrate; 64–78serrateserrate; 60 (55–65)
Fixed digit6 teeth6 teeth6 teeth6 teeth7 teeth
Movable digit1 tooth1 tooth1 tooth1 tooth2 teeth
Calyx of spermathecal apparatusbowl-shapedcup-shapedbowl-shapedbowl-shapedbell-shaped
Macroseta StIV 7473 (73–78)64–74 70–73 67–85
Note: “-” indicates that the article does not describe this feature.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Ren, F.-X.; Fan, Q.-H.; Ma, M. The Genus Neoseiulus Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Shanxi, China. Animals 2023, 13, 1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091478

AMA Style

Liu Y, Ren F-X, Fan Q-H, Ma M. The Genus Neoseiulus Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Shanxi, China. Animals. 2023; 13(9):1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091478

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yu, Fang-Xu Ren, Qing-Hai Fan, and Min Ma. 2023. "The Genus Neoseiulus Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Shanxi, China" Animals 13, no. 9: 1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091478

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop