Next Article in Journal
Karyotypic and Molecular Analysis of Pterygoplichthys pardalis (Castelnau 1855) from the Lower Amazon River
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Epidemiological Investigation of Cyclospora spp. in Holstein Cattle in Partial Areas of the Yunnan Province, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/ani13091532
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Histopathological Characteristic of Gastric Carcinoma in the Belgian Tervueren and Groenendael Dog: A Comparison of Two Classification Methods

by
Christina Kijan
1,†,
Sanne Hugen
1,†,
Rachel E. Thomas
2,
Anita M. Oberbauer
3,
Peter A. J. Leegwater
1,
Hille Fieten
1,
Alexander J. German
4 and
Paul J. J. Mandigers
1,5,*
1
Expertise Centre Genetics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands
2
Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands
3
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
4
Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Wirral, Neston CH64 7TE, UK
5
IVC Evidensia Referral Hospital Arnhem, Meander 10, 6825 MB Arnhem, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2023, 13(9), 1532; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091532
Submission received: 30 March 2023 / Revised: 27 April 2023 / Accepted: 1 May 2023 / Published: 3 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Companion Animals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Gastric carcinoma is a type of stomach cancer that occurs more frequently in Tervueren and Groenendael dogs compared to other breeds. In this study, gastric tumour biopsies of 61 Belgian Shepherd dogs were examined for inflammation and tumour location, and subsequently classified using the World Health Organization (WHO) and Laurén classifications, which are commonly used in classifying human gastric carcinoma, as there is no gold standard for the histological evaluation of canine gastric carcinoma as of yet. Survival time after the onset of symptoms was recorded and was investigated in relation to tumour classification. An intestinal type (according to the Laurén classification) and a tubular tumour pattern (according to the WHO classification) were both associated with a longer median survival time. This may aid the practising veterinarian as a prognostic tool for canine gastric carcinoma and provide information regarding the use and reliability of the use of both scoring systems.

Abstract

Gastric carcinoma is generally considered to be a rare disease in dogs, carrying a grave prognosis. However, in the Tervueren and Groenendael varieties of the Belgian Shepherd dog breed, the disease is highly prevalent. While histopathology is the gold standard for diagnosing gastric carcinoma, there is no general consensus on the methods for histological classification in these cases. Biopsies of a group of 61 dogs with confirmed gastric carcinoma (45 Tervueren and 16 Groenendael) were examined and classified according to World Health Organization (WHO) and Laurén classifications. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to compare survival between the different subtypes and simple and multiple linear regression were used to analyse the association between age of onset and breed variant, sex, neuter status, location of the tumour, inflammation score, and Laurén and WHO classifications. Mean age at diagnosis was significantly different in Groenendael (10.1 ± 2.01) and Tervueren dogs (8.5 ± 1.90). The Laurén classification resulted in 29 (48%) diffuse- and 32 (52%) intestinal-type tumours. Applying the WHO classification resulted in 30 (49%) tubular carcinoma growth patterns and 31 (51%) others. Median survival time was significantly reduced for the diffuse type as compared to the intestinal type according to the Laurén classification, with the same median survival time results for tubular compared to non-tubular subtypes according to the WHO classification (median survival time of 61 vs. 182 days, respectively). Using the WHO and Lauren classification on tumour biopsies may help the practising clinician in the prognostication of gastric carcinoma in Tervueren and Groenendael dogs.

1. Introduction

Gastric cancers (including adenocarcinoma, leiomyosarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumour and lymphoma) account for <1% of all tumours in dogs and are typically malignant. Gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) is the most prevalent type of gastric cancers. The prognosis in dogs with gastric neoplasia is poor, with median survival times reported of just 33 to 72 days after starting treatment [1,2,3]. Metastasis at the time of diagnosis is reported to be 70–90% [1,4,5], and the most common sites of metastasis are the regional lymph nodes, omentum, duodenum, liver, pancreas, spleen, oesophagus, adrenal glands and lungs [1,4,5,6]. Surgical management is often precluded by the tumour location at the curvature minor of the stomach and, even when performed at early stages of the disease, the response is usually poor, and adjuvant chemotherapy has not been shown to provide additional or curative value [1,7,8].
The strong breed predisposition of GC in Belgian Shepherds is indicative of a hereditary component; however, the genetic background has not yet been elucidated [9]. In Tervueren and Groenendael dogs, a high incidence and a likely genetic predisposition has been previously described [4,10,11,12,13,14]. It is, however, unknown if these dogs truly belong to one phenotype, or if different subtypes of gastric carcinoma can be relevant for prognosis and possible aetiology.
Gastroscopy with the collection of biopsies for histopathological examination is the diagnostic standard in dogs suspected of gastric tumours. The classification of histological biopsies can be an important tool for the prognostication of tumours; however, a general consensus regarding the histological evaluation of canine GC has not been described in the literature. Various tumour classification methods exist for human gastric carcinoma, including the WHO classification and the Laurén classification, with the WHO classification being the most widely used method [15,16,17]. The Laurén classification system and an amended scheme based on WHO classifications are also mostly used for the histopathology of GC in domestic animals [18]. The Laurén classification has been applied to gastric carcinoma in dogs in past studies too, providing a basis for a past WHO classification in 1976 [19]. Research conducted in 1978 with a sample size of 26 found that the two main histologic types of human gastric adenocarcinoma also occurred in dogs [20]. In this study, the following WHO categories according to growth pattern [15,16,18] were used: tubular carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, signet ring cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma. Alternative to using the WHO classification, staging in human gastric carcinoma cases can follow the Laurén classification into intestinal type or diffuse type. Differentiation between the types is based on general structure, cell structure, secretion, growth pattern and mode of growth [17]. Even though both the Laurén and WHO staging systems are used in animals as well, the clinical significance of the classification of gastric carcinoma in dogs is currently unclear [18,21].
While the role of inflammatory cells has not yet been fully studied in canine gastric carcinomas, and therefore the potential of inflammation score as a prognostic factor is not yet known, the investigation of inflammatory infiltrate may be of importance, as inflammatory cells play a complex and multifaceted role in the aetiology of gastric carcinoma in humans [22]. In humans, Helicobacter pylori infections are an additionally known risk factor for the development of GC that can be confirmed by histopathology [23,24,25]. H. pylori causes both cell proliferation and gastric inflammation, predisposing the gastric lining to neoplasia. However, there has not been any evidence found of H. pylori playing a role in the development of GC in canines [9,26,27,28]. In addition, while GC mostly occur in the curvature minor, they can expand to or start in other anatomical regions of the stomach as well, such as the cardia. It is currently unknown if tumours occurring at a region different from the minor curvature constitute the same or a different clinicopathological group.
The main aim of the current study is the comparison between the WHO and the Laurén classification schemes and whether they are of influence on the age of onset and survival in 61 cases of gastric carcinoma in the Tervueren and Groenendael variants of the Belgian Shepherd dog breed. Additionally, we investigated the influence of the involvement of the curvature minor or cardia, inflammation status and the presence of Helicobacter-like organisms, thereby exploring the function of tumour classifications and other pathological factors as prognostic indicators. This information will shed new light on the added value of histological biopsies for veterinary clinicians with cases of canine gastric carcinoma, thus aiding the practicing clinician in optimizing individual treatment plans, substantiating the election for further surgical excision or euthanasia, and will contribute to a growing consensus on the histopathological classification of canine gastric carcinoma.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Collection

Histopathological classification was performed on 61 cases of canine GC. Forty-three of the study dogs were identified from Belgian Shepherd dogs in the Netherlands, referred for gastroduodenoscopy to one of the authors (PJJM), between 2003 and May 2017, whilst the remaining 18 dogs were reported to the authors from owners, breeders and referring veterinarians. For the latter cases, veterinarians were asked to send biopsy material for assessment. Information regarding the patients (onset of symptoms, patient description) was obtained via questionnaire from the owners and through a form and patient files (endoscopic findings, diagnosis) from the practitioner, in the case of referrals. Thirteen different veterinarians participated in the referral of the 18 externally obtained cases.

2.2. Gastroscopy and Collection of Biopsies

Preparation for the gastroscopy (Figure 1) as well as the endoscopy itself was performed as described previously [29]. The complete stomach was examined macroscopically and if an abnormality was observed, 3–6 biopsies were obtained from both the edges and centre of the visually abnormal tissue. If a post-mortem examination was conducted, biopsies were taken during necropsy. The location of the tumour was noted per case, focussing on whether or not the curvature minor and cardia were involved, as these are specific locations that often heavily complicate surgical excision. Biopsies of normal tissue were not included in this study. In total, the samples of 17 out of 61 dogs were taken during necropsy. For these cases, this resulted in large biopsies.

2.3. Histological Evaluation

All biopsies were fixed in formalin and processed routinely, and 10 µm thick sections were stained according to standard procedures with haematoxylin and eosin. All slides from gastric carcinoma cases available were re-examined by a single pathologist (RT) who was not aware of the original histopathological diagnosis. Slides were intermixed with 15 gastritis cases, all Belgian Shepherd dogs, to ensure complete blinding.

2.4. Histopathology

All slides of gastric carcinoma biopsies were scored according to the WHO classification (Figure 2), according to the criteria in Table 1, and according to the Laurén classification as used for dogs into the intestinal subtype and the diffuse subtype. In cases where more than one WHO cell type was present, the predominant pattern or cell type was used to classify the tumours. Slides were also scored for the presence of gastric spiral-like organisms (=GHLO; gastric Helicobacter-like organisms) and, if present, whether superficial or intraglandular. The degree of inflammation associated with the gastric tumour was determined according to the reference values for normal canine superficial gastric leucocytes published by Day et al. [30], in which respective values of intraepithelial lymphocytes, lamina propria lymphocytes, lamina propria eosinophils and lamina propria plasma cells are listed. The data from this scheme were extrapolated to be used on the tumour samples. Inflammation status was scored as either normal (normal intraepithelial lymphocytes; sparse population of approximately 1–2 cells per stretch of 50 epithelial cells), mild (a mild increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes; individual lymphocytes, up to 10 per stretch of 50 epithelial cells), moderate (a moderate increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes; lymphocytes may cluster in groups of up to 4 cells), or severe (increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes; epithelium is more diffusely infiltrated by lymphocytes, the same applies to the neutrophilic and eosinophilic granulocyte component. There may be up to 20 per stretch of 50 epithelial cells) [30]. No exact cell counts were documented though, and the eventual scoring was subjectively based on the opinion of the pathologist during histology.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Computer software was used for data analysis (R Version 4.2.2, R-studio, 31 October 2022), with the level of statistical significance set at p < 0.05 for 2-sided analyses. The significance of the veterinarians involved in the biopsies (cases from PJJM vs. those from referring veterinarians) was first tested via a simple linear regression with the clinics and age of onset (based on time of formal diagnosis by endoscopy) as explanatory variables. Either Wilcoxon rank sums tests or two-sample T-test were used to explore differences in onset for sex, variant and neuter status based on distribution of the data. Age of onset was reported as mean ± standard deviation. Simple linear regression was used to test a relation between age of onset (dependent variable) with sex, variant, neuter status, WHO subtype, Laurén classification, inflammation status and involvement of the lesser curvature or cardia as explanatory (independent) variables. Linear regression for WHO subtype was performed twice, either by grouping all non-tubular types (subtype 2) or by combining the tubulopapillary type with the tubular type (subtype 3), as the tubulopapillary growth pattern is a mixed type. The validity of models was tested by confirming that residuals were normally distributed (using QQ-plots and the Shapiro–Wilk test), as well as using the non-constant error variance test and Breusch–Pagan test (for homoscedasticity). Influential data points were examined using Cook’s distance. Associations between age and explanatory variables were further explored using multiple regression, by including different combinations of explanatory variables, with multi-collinearity tested using variance inflation factors (VIFs) and the best-fit model determined using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Significant variables were then tested using the chi-squared test for associations with either classification method.
Survival analysis was used to determine the survival time from the first signs of gastric cancer as described by the owner, with the primary endpoint being death from gastric cancer. Major outliers were identified and removed from the analysis. A stratified Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to stratify the data, with referring veterinarians as the stratification variable (cases from PJJM vs. those from referring veterinarians). This added a random effect in the models to correct for any biases related to having cases from different veterinarians. Initially, Kaplan–Meier curves were created to assess the association of explanatory variables (e.g., variant, sex, neuter status, WHO subtype, Laurén classification, inflammation status and involvement of the lesser curvature or cardia) and survival. Survival was further assessed with simple and multiple Cox’s regression analysis, stratified according to referring veterinarian as explained above. Given that none of the dogs were alive at time of analysis, and all dogs died with GC as the cause of death, there were no censored data. This includes owner-elected euthanasia due to poor prognosis and clinical presentation. Each variable was tested using simple regression, with variables of significance on simple Cox’s regression being entered into a multiple regression model. This model was further stratified using backwards elimination of variables, with multi-collinearity tested using VIFs and the best-fit model determined using the BIC. The assumptions of the Cox proportional hazards model were tested using Schoenfeld residuals. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and tests were two-sided.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Data

Histopathological data were available from 61 Belgian Shepherd dogs, with 45 belonging to the Tervueren and 16 to the Groenendael variants, respectively. The dataset comprised 30 females (20 neutered) and 31 males (15 neutered, one unknown) (Table 2). Details regarding the age of onset of all dogs’ signs or symptoms were provided by the owners by questionnaire. These symptoms could consist of vomiting, anorexia, diarrhoea, polyuria/polydipsia and weight loss, and these data were further used as the onset within the survival analysis. No intent to curative treatment, other than purely palliative, was employed in any of the dogs included in this study. They were managed palliatively with stomach lining protectants, gastric acid inhibitors and anti-emetics. Further patient information and findings from endoscopic examination were provided by either question form or the patient file by the practitioner. Information regarding the location of the tumour was available for 52 dogs, whilst in 29 dogs, the degree of tumour-associated inflammation was scored. An outlier was identified and removed within the analysis. Simple linear regression analysis revealed a difference in age of onset at diagnosis between breed variants (p = 0.009), with Tervueren dogs (8.5 ± 1.90 years) being diagnosed at a younger age than Groenendael dogs (10.1 ± 2.01 years). The two different breed variants were not associated with either Laurén classification (p = 0.891) or WHO classification (p = 0.654). Mean age at diagnosis was 8.9 ± 2.01 years for all dogs (Figure 3), and the onset of symptoms was, on average, 110 days before diagnosis.

3.2. Tumour Classification and Pathology

All gastric tumour specimens were gastric carcinomas; no other tumour type was present in any of the gastric tumours in the Belgian Shepherds. All 61 samples were scored based on the WHO criteria (Table 1) and the Laurén classification, resulting in 29 (48%) dogs that were characterized as the diffuse type and 32 (52%) as the intestinal type. When classifying according to the WHO criteria, 12 (20%) were classified as mucinous, 5 (8%) as signet-ring type, 30 (49%) as tubular, 0 (0%) as papillary, 2 (3%) as tubulopapillary and 12 (20%) as unclassified. As not enough of the non-tubular types were available in the database, all non-tubular types were grouped together (subtype 2) or all types were grouped together excluding the tubular and tubulopapillary types (subtype 3). Further analysis regarding the WHO classification was completed by dividing the tubular type and subtype 2. As only breed variant was significant in the univariable linear regression analysis, no multiple regression analysis was performed for age of onset.
The curvature minor (CM) and cardia were involved in 42 (69%) and 4 (7%) dogs (Table 2), respectively, and there was no difference in the age of onset between these groups. There was no difference in either age at diagnosis (p = 0.400) or survival time (p = 0.998) between CM-positive (mean age, 9.0 years ± 2.14; survival time, 135 days (7–730 days)) and CM-negative (mean age, 8.4 years ± 1.90; survival time, 155 days (55–379 days)) dogs. Similarly, there was no association with either age at diagnosis (p = 0.780) or survival time (p = 0.663) between dogs with tumours involving (mean age, 8.6 years ± 1.47; survival time, 155 days (121–379 days)) or not involving (mean age, 8.9 years ± 2.18; survival time, 134 days (7–730 days)) the cardia. The results of the univariable linear regression analyses are summarised in Table 3. In some cases, the clinical records contained a note regarding ulceration of the associated gastric mucosa, and such changes could usually also be identified on histological examination. An association between both classification schemes was determined (p = 2793 × 10−12). Twenty-nine (48%) tumours were labelled as diffuse according to the Laurén classification, and these were all non-tubular according to WHO classifications. Thirty (49%) tumours were labelled as intestinal according to the Laurén classification, and these were all tubular according to WHO classifications. Two (3%) of the tumours labelled as diffuse through the Laurén classifications were scored as non-tubular with the WHO classifications; however, these were mixed types. Histological classification according to both the WHO and Laurén criteria is reported in Table 4. GHLO were reported in two of the biopsies (3%), with a superficial pattern reported in one case and an intraglandular pattern in the other. The tumour-associated inflammation score was mild (1) in 18 cases (30%), moderate (2) in 39 cases (64%), and severe (3) in 2 cases (3%). Two cases received no inflammation score due to the amount of necrosis present. Because of low numbers, the inflammation scores for moderate and severe were merged. No significant association was found between inflammation score and age of onset. No further analyses were conducted in regard to specific inflammatory cells. Because GHLO were only detected in 2 out of 61 dogs, statistical analysis was not possible for this variable.

3.3. Survival Analysis

One female dog from the 61 histologically scored dogs was identified as an outlier in the survival analysis, with a survival time of 1553 days after the first signs of GC appeared. Although the cause of death was proven to be due to GC, the initial gastrointestinal issues occurred 730 days before the formal diagnosis and, therefore, might have been a consequence of another underlying disease. Given that a lead time to diagnosis of over a year has only been observed in one other case in the database, this was assumed to be due to a data error and, as a result, the dog was removed from further analysis.
In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model for total survival time after the start of symptoms with WHO and Laurén classification as variables (significant in the univariable Cox PH models), both did not have an effect (p= 0.379 and p = 0.822, respectively). This might be because these variables are correlated. In simple regression, based on the Laurén classification, the median total survival time was shorter for dogs with diffuse gastric carcinoma (median 61 days) compared to intestinal-type gastric carcinoma (median, 182 days; Table 5; Figure 4; p= 0.006). There were similar findings when survival time was assessed according to the WHO classifications for the tubular type compared with non-tubular types combined (p= 0.004) (Table 6; Figure 5). There was no significant influence of sex, neutering, tumour location, severity of inflammation or complete WHO staging on age of onset or survival. Total survival time was not significantly associated with the age of onset.

4. Discussion

The Belgian shepherd dog breed comprises four varieties: Malinois, Laekenois, Tervueren and Groenendael. Dogs of the Tervueren and Groenendael varieties are often crossed with one another, and recent work using principal component analysis has demonstrated complete overlapping of the Tervueren and Groenendael family clusters in [31,32]. The authors have observed that gastric carcinomas are highly prevalent in both Tervueren and Groenendael shepherd dogs, whilst there can be both early and late onset within families with a high prevalence of the disease. In the current study, we characterised gastric carcinoma in a group of 61 confirmed cases of Belgian shepherd dogs. The relatively high prevalence and poor prognosis within this breed suggests that exploring a genetic basis for the condition can provide insight into reducing the disease. Mean age of onset was similar to findings in previously reported case series of gastric carcinoma in Belgian shepherd dogs [4] and other breeds [21,33]. In contrast to these earlier, smaller studies, we did not find a male predisposition, as previously reported [9].
Mean age at diagnosis is 8.9 years in these breed varieties (Figure 3). A significant difference in the age of onset for the Groenendael and Tervueren varieties in the Belgian shepherd dogs was found, with Tervueren dogs being diagnosed at a younger age. However, this finding should further be investigated in a cohort with more Groenendael dogs and a more equal distribution between the varieties. As no association was found between the breed variants and the classification schemes, a cause for this difference in age could be variant specific.
The gold standard of diagnosis is biopsies taken during gastroscopy, laparotomy or during post-mortem examination. The lesion typically involves the curvature minor of the stomach (69% of cases) and this location, in combination with the advanced stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis, renders curative surgery almost always impossible. When more than one cell type was present in a case, the predominant pattern or cell type was used for classification. As total representations of the tumours were usually not available, a compromise was made by ensuring that every case had at least three different biopsies to heighten the predictive value of the biopsies for the rest of the mass. Prognosis is poor with a mean survival from time of first symptoms to death of approximately 6 months (182 days).
Histologically, multiple scoring systems have been used in the past; the most frequently used systems are the WHO and Laurén classifications. This is the first study looking at the pathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma within this dog breed and its significance for the veterinary clinician. The histological evaluation of canine gastric carcinoma is frequently conducted with a scheme based on the 2010 WHO classification for human gastric carcinoma according to growth pattern [18]. Different growth patterns can exist within one tumour and the classification is based on the most dominant pattern present. Sometimes, both a papillary and tubular pattern are similarly present and in such cases the term tubulopapillary is used. Tubular carcinomas (1) can best be recognised by their duct-like branches, which can vary in amount of dilatation due to the volume of mucus build-up within the lumen, causing flattening of the cell morphology. This type of tumour carries a better prognosis than the other subtypes in humans. Papillary adenocarcinomas (2) can be clearly recognised by their finger-like projections (papillae) which are lined with cancerous cells, specifically cylindrical or cuboidal cells. The degree of differentiation can vary as well as the complexity of the branching structures. The third category consists of mucinous adenocarcinomas (3) which are defined by extracellular mucin pools made by glands on the epithelium of the tumour cells. These pools can result in visible gaps between the cells histologically. Over half of the mucinous carcinoma usually consists of mucin pools. These tumours are often poorly differentiated and have a worse prognosis than the other subtypes in humans. Other cancerous cells, such as signet-ring cells, can be found in these tumours as well. Signet-ring cell carcinomas (4) are carcinomas that are again defined by large masses of mucin; however, in this case, it is present within the cell as mucin vacuoles that push the nucleus to the periphery of the cell. If more than half of the tumour has cells with these characteristic intracytoplasmic mucin vacuoles, the tumour will be staged as a signet-ring cell carcinoma. In human patients, it has been proven that correct staging of the gastric tumour has great value for further prognosis and preferred treatment [17,18,21,34]. In contrast, using the WHO classification system for gastric carcinoma, there was no association between either age of onset or survival in this study, with the different subtypes analysed individually. Due to the multiple subgroups in this staging system, the number of dogs per group was insufficient to enable statistical comparisons. However, when comparing the most represented WHO classification (tubular) to the other WHO types grouped together, a significantly longer survival time was observed for the tubular type. Larger studies inclusive of more breeds are needed to demonstrate whether the WHO system has clinical relevance and applicability for gastric carcinoma in the Tervueren and Groenendael variants.
When considering the Laurén classification, the diffuse type of gastric cancer carcinoma carries a worse prognosis in humans [35,36] and a has distinct developmental pathway distinguishing it from the intestinal type [37,38]. The intestinal type is defined by glandular lumina or more rarely by tracts in the epithelia and substantial and varying cells that are often hyperchromatic. They often form well-defined masses. The cells are usually more neatly organised and cohesive than those in the diffuse type, with an unbroken formation between the cells. In the diffuse type, differentiation and arrangement of the cells is poor. Instead of a well-defined mass, these cells are usually arranged in small clusters. Either the clusters or individual cells then cause infiltration of the rest of the tissues. In humans, the diffuse type carries a significantly worse prognosis than the intestinal type [17,39]. In the current study, tumour type, based on the Laurén classification, was significantly associated with survival. Scoring canine GC according to the Laurén classification has comparable prognostic results to humans, with the diffuse type having a worse prognosis. Whether to use both Laurén and WHO classification methods on gastric GC slides remains a point of discussion. Usually, diffuse (Laurén) patterns of tumours were non-tubular (WHO) too, indicating a similar prognostic result. Further research in a larger cohort of dogs with GC is needed to study whether to prefer the WHO or the Laurén classification, with more cases within the different non-tubular types of the WHO classification.
Besides tumour classification, investigation of the inflammation status of the patient is thought to be of influence for prognostication in humans [22]. In humans, CD8+ T cells are associated with a better prognosis, whereas other cells, including tumour-associated macrophages and neutrophils, are associated with a poorer prognosis [40,41]. For this study, biopsies were scored as mildly, moderately, or severely inflamed based on inflammatory cell counts in the mucosa of the biopsies. However, no significance with either age of onset or survival was found. Further research regarding the inflammatory microenvironment in canine GC is required to better understand its role in the aetiology of GC, possibly providing new means of therapeutic management.
The involvement of the cardia and curvature minor were not associated with age of onset or survival time in this study. However, the number of cases with a gastric carcinoma involving the cardia was too low to make definitive statements as to whether they are a different clinicopathological subgroup. More research is needed to further examine the involvement of different locations within the stomach, including the fundus, curvature major, gastric body and antrum.
Mean age of onset was in concordance with previously reported case series of gastric carcinoma in Belgian shepherds [4] and other breeds [21,33]. In contrast to these earlier, smaller studies, we found that the sex distribution consisted of 29 males to 32 females; hence, there was no male predisposition to gastric carcinoma in Belgian Shepherds as has been previously reported [9].
The poor prognosis for gastric carcinoma in dogs is due to the aggressiveness and invasiveness of the condition, the very poor treatment options when diagnosed late in the stage of the disease and therefore also due to the limited and non-specific clinical signs [9]. Many dogs were presented for endoscopy or exploratory laparotomy at an advanced stage of the disease, with euthanasia frequently elected at or shortly after diagnosis. Twenty-one of the dogs were euthanised within two days of diagnosis, because of the poor prognosis in combination with severe clinical signs that compromised the welfare of the animals. These dogs still contributed to the analysis and, therefore, in this study, survival was defined as time from first clinical signs to death; however, the variation in detection of clinical signs and reporting specificity makes this parameter less reliable.
Unlike in the development of intestinal-type gastric carcinoma in humans, the role of helicobacter infection in dogs is questionable. Helicobacter has been reported with widely varying frequencies in canine gastric samples with and without gastric pathology [26,27,28,42]. In the present study, helicobacter was only investigated using routine H&E slides for the presence of typical helical bacteria. More sensitive and specific techniques for investigating the presence of helicobacter in gastric biopsies include PCR, immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and ancillary stains such as Giemsa would be desirable. Using H&E only may have led to underreporting; however, H&E can be sufficient for detecting routine helicobacter presence [43,44]. With only two gastric biopsies positive for helicobacter, of which only one was intraglandular, the involvement of helicobacter in the etiopathogenesis of gastric cancer in Belgian Shepherds is unlikely.
Limitations of the current study are due to sample size, especially with the small numbers of WHO-classified types other than the tubular type. A larger sample size of Belgian Shepherds would permit the confirmation of the histopathological scoring and additional breeds would be useful to determine whether the findings in the Belgian Shepherd were applicable to other breeds. Even with the absence of enough different subtypes, though, the better prognosis in tubular-classified GC is clear. In addition, the inclusion of more necropsy data would give more insight into the reproducibility and representative nature of gastric endoscopic biopsies.
The relatively high prevalence and poor prognosis within this breed suggests that exploring a genetic basis for the condition can provide insight into reducing the disease. To successfully conduct a genetic study, a clear phenotype must be further explored with the addition of relevant external factors for canine gastric carcinoma.

5. Conclusions

In this study consisting of 61 well-defined cases of gastric carcinoma in the Tervueren and Groenendael variants of the Belgian Shepherd dog breed, histological evaluation according to the Laurén classification has shown potential as a prognostic clinical tool for veterinarians and may prove to be important for genetic studies that require clear phenotype classification. Tervueren dogs had a younger age of onset compared to the Groenendael dogs; however, these breed variants were not associated with the different classification methods. The mean survival time for the diffuse type was 4 months shorter than for the intestinal type in the Lauren classification. In the WHO classification, non-tubular tumours showed a 4-month shorter mean survival time. Both observations are in line with prognoses based on these classifications in humans.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.J.J.M. and S.H.; methodology, A.J.G. and C.K.; validation, P.J.J.M., H.F. and P.A.J.L.; formal analysis, A.J.G.; investigation, S.H., C.K. and P.J.J.M.; resources, P.J.J.M.; data curation, C.K. and A.J.G.; writing—original draft preparation, C.K. and S.H.; writing—review and editing, C.K. and S.H.; visualization, R.E.T., P.J.J.M., A.J.G. and C.K.; supervision, P.J.J.M.; project administration, P.J.J.M., S.H. and C.K.; funding acquisition, P.J.J.M.; critical revision, H.F., P.J.J.M., A.M.O., P.A.J.L., H.F. and A.J.G.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded through a grant from the Dutch Cancer fund for animals (NKfD) and support from the Dutch Belgian Shepherd breed associations. A.J.G.’s academic position at the University of Liverpool is funded by Royal Canin.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used can be acquired through the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are very thankful for all the help of Anne-Marie Smolders in the data collection and to all involved veterinarians and dog owners. We are thankful to Jacquelyn Evans, from the Baker Institute for Animal Health Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, for reading and providing advice on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

A.J.G. is an employee of the University of Liverpool, but his position is financially supported by Royal Canin. He has also received financial remuneration and gifts for providing educational material, speaking at conferences and consultancy work. All such remuneration has been for projects unrelated to the current work.

Abbreviations

GCGastric carcinoma
WHOWorld Health Organization
GHLOGastric Helicobacter-like organisms

References

  1. Swann, H.M.; Holt, D.E. Canine gastric adenocarcinoma and leiomyosarcoma: A retrospective study of 21 cases (1986–1999) and literature review. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2002, 38, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Eisele, J.; McClaran, J.K.; Runge, J.J.; Holt, D.E.; Culp, W.T.; Liu, S.; Long, F.; Bergman, P.J. Evaluation of risk factors for morbidity and mortality after pylorectomy and gastroduodenostomy in dogs. Vet. Surg. 2010, 39, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gualtieri, M.; Monzeglio, M.G.; Scanziani, E. Gastric neoplasia. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1999, 29, 415–440. [Google Scholar]
  4. Scanziani, E.; Giusti, A.M.; Gualtieri, M.; Fonda, D. Gastric carcinoma in the Belgian shepherd dog. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1991, 32, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sullivan, M.; Lee, R.; Fisher, E.W.; Nash, A.S.; McCandlish, I.A. A study of 31 cases of gastric carcinoma in dogs. Vet. Rec. 1987, 120, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lingeman, C.H.; Garner, F.M.; Taylor, D.O. Spontaneous gastric adenocarcinomas of dogs: A review. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1971, 47, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. von Babo, V.; Eberle, N.; Mischke, R.; Meyer-Lindenberg, A.; Hewicker-Trautwein, M.; Nolte, I.; Betz, D. Canine non-hematopoietic gastric neoplasia. Epidemiologic and diagnostic characteristics in 38 dogs with post-surgical outcome of five cases. Tierärztliche Prax. Ausg. K Kleintiere/Heimtiere 2012, 40, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Araújo, D.; Cabral, I.; Vale, N.; Amorim, I. Canine Gastric Cancer: Current Treatment Approaches. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hugen, S.; Thomas, R.E.; German, A.J.; Burgener, I.A.; Mandigers, P.J.J. Gastric carcinoma in canines and humans, a review. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2017, 15, 692–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Candido, M.V.; Syrja, P.; Kilpinen, S.; Spillmann, T. Canine breeds associated with gastric carcinoma, metaplasia and dysplasia diagnosed by histopathology of endoscopic biopsy samples. Acta Vet. Scand 2018, 60, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Candido, M.V.; Syrja, P.; Hanifeh, M.; Lepajoe, J.; Salla, K.; Kilpinen, S.; Noble, P.M.; Spillmann, T. Gastric mucosal pathology in Belgian Shepherd dogs with and without clinical signs of gastric disease. Acta Vet Scand. 2021, 63, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lubbes, D.; Mandigers, P.J.; Heuven, H.C.; Teske, E. Incidence of gastric carcinoma in Dutch Tervueren shepherd dogs born between 1991 and 2002. Tijdschr. Diergeneeskd. 2009, 134, 606–610. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Seim-Wikse, T.; Jorundsson, E.; Nodtvedt, A.; Grotmol, T.; Bjornvad, C.R.; Kristensen, A.T.; Skancke, E. Breed predisposition to canine gastric carcinoma—A study based on the Norwegian canine cancer register. Acta Vet. Scand. 2013, 55, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fonda, D.; Gualtieri, M.; Scanziani, E. Gastric carcinoma in the dog: A clinicopathological study of 11 cases. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1989, 30, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, B.; El Hajj, N.; Sittler, S.; Lammert, N.; Barnes, R.; Meloni-Ehrig, A. Gastric cancer: Classification, histology and application of molecular pathology. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2012, 3, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bosman, F.T.; Carneiro, F.; Hruban, R.H.; Theise, N.D. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System, WHO Classification of Tumours, 4th ed; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010; Volume 3, ISBN 13 978-92-832-2432-7. Available online: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Who-Classification-Of-Tumours/WHO-Classification-Of-Tumours-Of-The-Digestive-System-2010 (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  17. Lauren, P. The Two Histological Main Types of Gastric Carcinoma: Diffuse and So-Called Intestinal-Type Carcinoma. An Attempt at a Histo-Clinical Classification. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 1965, 64, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Head, K.W.; Cullen, J.M.; Dubielzig, R.R.; Else, R.W.; Misdorp, W.; Patnaik, A.K.; Tateyama, S.; Van der Gaag, I. Histological Classification of Tumors of the Alimentary System of Domestic Animals; Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, American Registry of Pathology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Worldwide Reference on Comparative Oncology: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2003; ISBN 1881041867. [Google Scholar]
  19. Head, K.W. Tumors of the Lower Alimentary Tract; Bull WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1976; Volume 53, pp. 167–186. [Google Scholar]
  20. Patnaik, A.K.; Hurvitz, A.I.; Johnson, G.F. Canine gastric adenocarcinoma. Vet. Pathol. 1978, 15, 600–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Carrasco, V.; Canfran, S.; Rodriguez-Franco, F.; Benito, A.; Sainz, A.; Rodriguez-Bertos, A. Canine gastric carcinoma: Immunohistochemical expression of cell cycle proteins (p53, p21, and p16) and heat shock proteins (Hsp27 and Hsp70). Vet. Pathol. 2011, 48, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chung, H.W.; Lim, J.B. Role of the tumor microenvironment in the pathogenesis of gastric carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 1667–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Correa, P.; Houghton, J. Carcinogenesis of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 2007, 133, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Parsonnet, J. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 1993, 22, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Venerito, M.; Vasapolli, R.; Rokkas, T.; Delchier, J.C.; Malfertheiner, P. Helicobacter pylori, gastric cancer and other gastrointestinal malignancies. Helicobacter 2017, 22 (Suppl. 1), e12413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Amorim, I.; Freitas, D.P.; Magalhaes, A.; Faria, F.; Lopes, C.; Faustino, A.M.; Smet, A.; Haesebrouck, F.; Reis, C.A.; Gartner, F. A comparison of Helicobacter pylori and non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter spp. Binding to canine gastric mucosa with defined gastric glycophenotype. Helicobacter 2014, 19, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kubota-Aizawa, S.; Ohno, K.; Fukushima, K.; Kanemoto, H.; Nakashima, K.; Uchida, K.; Chambers, J.K.; Goto-Koshino, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Sekizaki, T.; et al. Epidemiological study of gastric Helicobacter spp. in dogs with gastrointestinal disease in Japan and diversity of Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto. Vet. J. 2017, 225, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cattoli, G.; van Vugt, R.; Zanoni, R.G.; Sanguinetti, V.; Chiocchetti, R.; Gualtieri, M.; Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C.M.; Gaastra, W.; Kusters, J.G. Occurrence and characterization of gastric Helicobacter spp. in naturally infected dogs. Vet. Microbiol. 1999, 70, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mandigers, P.J.; Biourge, V.; van den Ingh, T.S.; Ankringa, N.; German, A.J. A randomized, open-label, positively-controlled field trial of a hydrolyzed protein diet in dogs with chronic small bowel enteropathy. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010, 24, 1350–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Day, M.J.; Bilzer, T.; Mansell, J.; Wilcock, B.; Hall, E.J.; Jergens, A.; Minami, T.; Willard, M.; Washabau, R. Histopathological standards for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal inflammation in endoscopic biopsy samples from the dog and cat: A report from the World Small Animal Veterinary Association Gastrointestinal Standardization Group. J. Comp. Pathol. 2008, 138 (Suppl. 1), S1–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wijnrocx, K.; Francois, L.; Stinckens, A.; Janssens, S.; Buys, N. Half of 23 Belgian dog breeds has a compromised genetic diversity, as revealed by genealogical and molecular data analysis. J. Anim. Breed Genet. 2016, 133, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Parker, H.G.; Dreger, D.L.; Rimbault, M.; Davis, B.W.; Mullen, A.B.; Carpintero-Ramirez, G.; Ostrander, E.A. Genomic Analyses Reveal the Influence of Geographic Origin, Migration, and Hybridization on Modern Dog Breed Development. Cell Rep. 2017, 19, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Seim-Wikse, T.; Kolbjornsen, O.; Jorundsson, E.; Benestad, S.L.; Bjornvad, C.R.; Grotmol, T.; Kristensen, A.T.; Skancke, E. Tumour gastrin expression and serum gastrin concentrations in dogs with gastric carcinoma are poor diagnostic indicators. J. Comp. Pathol. 2014, 151, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yakirevich, E.; Resnick, M.B. Pathology of gastric cancer and its precursor lesions. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 42, 261–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, L.; Wang, Z.W.; Ji, J.; Zhang, J.N.; Yan, M.; Zhang, J.; Liu, B.Y.; Zhu, Z.G.; Yu, Y.Y. A cohort study and meta-analysis between histopathological classification and prognosis of gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qiu, M.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Shao, J.; Lu, J.; Jin, Y.; Wei, X.; Zhang, D.; et al. Lauren classification combined with HER2 status is a better prognostic factor in Chinese gastric cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Correa, P. Gastric cancer: Overview. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 42, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. McLean, M.H.; El-Omar, E.M. Genetics of gastric cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Berlth, F.; Bollschweiler, E.; Drebber, U.; Hoelscher, A.H.; Moenig, S. Pathohistological classification systems in gastric cancer: Diagnostic relevance and prognostic value. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 5679–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bowen, R.C.; Little, N.A.B.; Harmer, J.R.; Ma, J.; Mirabelli, L.G.; Roller, K.D.; Breivik, A.M.; Signor, E.; Miller, A.B.; Khong, H.T. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic indicator in gastrointestinal cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 32171–32189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, H.E.; Chae, S.W.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, M.A.; Lee, H.S.; Lee, B.L.; Kim, W.H. Prognostic implications of type and density of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in gastric cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2008, 99, 1704–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hermanns, W.; Kregel, K.; Breuer, W.; Lechner, J. Helicobacter-like organisms: Histopathological examination of gastric biopsies from dogs and cats. J. Comp. Pathol. 1995, 112, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hartman, D.J.; Owens, S.R. Are routine ancillary stains required to diagnose Helicobacter infection in gastric biopsy specimens? An institutional quality assurance review. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2012, 137, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Amorim, I.; Smet, A.; Alves, O.; Teixeira, S.; Saraiva, A.L.; Taulescu, M.; Reis, C.; Haesebrouck, F.; Gartner, F. Presence and significance of Helicobacter spp. in the gastric mucosa of Portuguese dogs. Gut Pathog. 2015, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 13 01532 g001 550
Figure 1. Photo courtesy of the authors. (A) Diagnostic imaging through endoscopy depicting canine gastric carcinoma. (B) Ulcerations on the gastric wall of an affected dog.
Figure 1. Photo courtesy of the authors. (A) Diagnostic imaging through endoscopy depicting canine gastric carcinoma. (B) Ulcerations on the gastric wall of an affected dog.
Animals 13 01532 g001
Animals 13 01532 g002 550
Figure 2. Histopathology of gastric carcinoma according to WHO, with H&E staining; photo courtesy of the authors. (A) Tubular gastric carcinoma, (B) mucinous gastric carcinoma, (C) undifferentiated gastric carcinoma, (D) signet-ring gastric carcinoma.
Figure 2. Histopathology of gastric carcinoma according to WHO, with H&E staining; photo courtesy of the authors. (A) Tubular gastric carcinoma, (B) mucinous gastric carcinoma, (C) undifferentiated gastric carcinoma, (D) signet-ring gastric carcinoma.
Animals 13 01532 g002
Animals 13 01532 g003 550
Figure 3. Histogram depicting the distribution of ages at diagnosis across all participating Belgian Shepherd dogs.
Figure 3. Histogram depicting the distribution of ages at diagnosis across all participating Belgian Shepherd dogs.
Animals 13 01532 g003
Animals 13 01532 g004 550
Figure 4. The Kaplan–Meier curve depicting survival based on the Laurén classification.
Figure 4. The Kaplan–Meier curve depicting survival based on the Laurén classification.
Animals 13 01532 g004
Animals 13 01532 g005 550
Figure 5. The Kaplan–Meier curve depicting survival based on the WHO classification.
Figure 5. The Kaplan–Meier curve depicting survival based on the WHO classification.
Animals 13 01532 g005
Table
Table 1. Histological characteristics according to Head, K.W. et al., published by the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in cooperation with the American Registry of Pathology and the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Worldwide Reference on Comparative Oncology in 2003 [18]. Epithelial malignancies of the stomach, when recognised as adenocarcinoma, are first subdivided into tubular, papillary, tubulopapillary or signet-ring cell tumours. For this study, we also added the mucinous type. They are then classified as squamous cell carcinoma (not considered in this work) or undifferentiated carcinoma.
Table 1. Histological characteristics according to Head, K.W. et al., published by the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in cooperation with the American Registry of Pathology and the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Worldwide Reference on Comparative Oncology in 2003 [18]. Epithelial malignancies of the stomach, when recognised as adenocarcinoma, are first subdivided into tubular, papillary, tubulopapillary or signet-ring cell tumours. For this study, we also added the mucinous type. They are then classified as squamous cell carcinoma (not considered in this work) or undifferentiated carcinoma.
Tumour TypeDefinition
TubularA malignant tumour composed of tubules embedded in connective tissue.
PapillaryA tumour in which the malignant epithelium is thrown up into papillary projections.
TubulopapillaryA malignant tumour showing both tubular and papillary features.
MucinousIntracytoplasmic acid mucin-containing vacuoles; goblet cell appearance (i.e., single large vacuole); eosinophilic granules of neutral mucin
Signet-ringA malignant tumour in which more than half is composed of epithelial cells containing intracellular acid or neutral mucin, displacing the nucleus to one side of the cells. Poor differentiation
UndifferentiatedA malignant tumour that has epithelial characteristics with no evidence of squamous or glandular differentiation.
Table
Table 2. Number of samples and available data per variable. Abbreviations: C—cardia; CM—curvature minor; M—male; MN—male neutered; F—female; FN—female neutered.
Table 2. Number of samples and available data per variable. Abbreviations: C—cardia; CM—curvature minor; M—male; MN—male neutered; F—female; FN—female neutered.
Sample Count with Tumour LocationSexAge of Onset (Diagnosis)p-Value with Age of Onset (Diagnosis)
Tervueren45 (2 C, 34 CM)10 M, 11 MN, 11 F, 12 FN8.5 ± 1.90p = 0.009
Groenendael16 (2 C, 9 CM)3M, 11MN, 1MN-unknown, 1 F, 8FN10.1 ± 2.01
Total61 60
Table
Table 3. Results of the univariable regression analyses.
Table 3. Results of the univariable regression analyses.
Dependent Variable (Age of Onset)Univariable Regression
CategoryEstimatep-Value
Groenendael Breed1.53120.009
Tumour (location CM yes) 0.66270.396
Tumour (location cardia yes)−0.31850.777
Sex (female)−0.062290.907
Neuter status (neutered)−0.16310.767
WHO subtype (subtype other)0.071190.894
Laurén classification (intestinal)−0.19580.714
Inflammation (mild)0.76600.478
Table
Table 4. WHO and Laurén classifications strongly associate with one another (p = 2793 × 10−12), with all intestinal (Laurén)-type tumours being either tubular or tubulopapillary according to the WHO scheme. Abbreviations: I—intestinal; D—diffuse.
Table 4. WHO and Laurén classifications strongly associate with one another (p = 2793 × 10−12), with all intestinal (Laurén)-type tumours being either tubular or tubulopapillary according to the WHO scheme. Abbreviations: I—intestinal; D—diffuse.
WHO and
(Laurén)
Mucinous12 (D = 12, I = 0 )
Signet-ring5 (D = 5, I = 0)
Tubular29 (D = 0, I = 29)
Papillary0
Tubulopapillary (mixed)2 (D = 0, I = 2)
Unclassified12 (D = 12, I = 0)
Table
Table 5. Survival over time according to the Laurén classification, with 26 dogs in the diffuse category and 29 dogs in the intestinal category.
Table 5. Survival over time according to the Laurén classification, with 26 dogs in the diffuse category and 29 dogs in the intestinal category.
Survival Time Laurén = Diffuse
Time in Daysn Survivedn CasualtiesSurvivalStd.ErrLower 95% CIUpper 95% CI
02601.0000.0001.0001.000
10010160.3850.09540.2370.625
200370.1150.06270.03980.334
300210.0770.05230.0200.291
400110.0390.03770.0060.263
Survival time Laurén = intestinal
Time in daysn survivedn casualtiesSurvivalStd.errLower 95% CIUpper 95% CI
02901.0000.0001.0001.000
1002270.7560.0800.6180.932
2001390.4480.09230.2990.671
300860.2410.0800.1270.460
400340.1030.0570.0350.302
500210.0690.0470.0180.263
600200.0690.0470.0180.263
700110.0350.0340.0050.237
Table
Table 6. Survival over time according to the WHO classification, consisting of 27 dogs in the tubular category and 28 dogs in a primarily non-tubular category (subtype 2).
Table 6. Survival over time according to the WHO classification, consisting of 27 dogs in the tubular category and 28 dogs in a primarily non-tubular category (subtype 2).
Survival Time WHO = Tubular
Time in Daysn Survivedn CasualtiesSurvivalSTD.ErrLower 95% CIUpper 95% CI
02701.0000.0001.0001.000
1002160.7780.0800.6360.952
2001290.4440.0960.2920.678
300850.2590.0840.1370.490
400340.1110.0610.0380.323
500210.0740.0500.0200.281
600200.0740.0500.0200.281
700110.0370.0360.0050.253
Survival time WHO = primarily non-tubular
Time in daysn survivedn casualtiesSurvivalStd.errLower 95% CIUpper 95% CI
02801.0000.0001.0001.000
10011170.3930.0920.2480.623
200470.1430.0660.0580.354
300220.0710.0490.0190.272
400110.0360.0350.0050.245
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kijan, C.; Hugen, S.; Thomas, R.E.; Oberbauer, A.M.; Leegwater, P.A.J.; Fieten, H.; German, A.J.; Mandigers, P.J.J. The Histopathological Characteristic of Gastric Carcinoma in the Belgian Tervueren and Groenendael Dog: A Comparison of Two Classification Methods. Animals 2023, 13, 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091532

AMA Style

Kijan C, Hugen S, Thomas RE, Oberbauer AM, Leegwater PAJ, Fieten H, German AJ, Mandigers PJJ. The Histopathological Characteristic of Gastric Carcinoma in the Belgian Tervueren and Groenendael Dog: A Comparison of Two Classification Methods. Animals. 2023; 13(9):1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091532

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kijan, Christina, Sanne Hugen, Rachel E. Thomas, Anita M. Oberbauer, Peter A. J. Leegwater, Hille Fieten, Alexander J. German, and Paul J. J. Mandigers. 2023. "The Histopathological Characteristic of Gastric Carcinoma in the Belgian Tervueren and Groenendael Dog: A Comparison of Two Classification Methods" Animals 13, no. 9: 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091532

APA Style

Kijan, C., Hugen, S., Thomas, R. E., Oberbauer, A. M., Leegwater, P. A. J., Fieten, H., German, A. J., & Mandigers, P. J. J. (2023). The Histopathological Characteristic of Gastric Carcinoma in the Belgian Tervueren and Groenendael Dog: A Comparison of Two Classification Methods. Animals, 13(9), 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091532

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop