Next Article in Journal
Seroprevalence survey of Hepatitis E Virus in Domestic Pigs in Guangdong, China
Previous Article in Journal
Craniocervical Morphometry in Pomeranians—Part II: Associations with Chiari-like Malformation and Syringomyelia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Variability in Leishmaniasis-Causing Leishmania infantum in Humans and Dogs from North-East Spain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First Evidence of Leishmania infantum Antibodies in Sheep (Ovis aries) from Southern Germany

by
Benjamin Ulrich Bauer
1,
María Eugenia Lebrero
2,3,
Martin Ganter
1,
Teresa Navarro
2,4,
Antonio Fernández
2,3,
Marta Ruíz de Arcaute
2,4,
Aurora Ortín
2,4,
Sergio Villanueva-Saz
2,3,4,*,
Diana Marteles
2,3,*,
Héctor Ruiz
2,4,
María Climent
4,5,
Pablo Quílez
2,4 and
Delia Lacasta
2,4
1
Clinic for Swine and Small Ruminants, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany
2
Animal Pathology Department, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
3
Clinical Immunology Laboratory, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
4
Small Ruminant Clinical Service, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
5
Anatomy, Embryology and Animal Genetics, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(13), 1860; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131860
Submission received: 7 May 2024 / Revised: 9 June 2024 / Accepted: 21 June 2024 / Published: 24 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Leishmania Infection in Animals)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In Europe, the protozoan parasite Leishmania infantum is transmitted by sandflies. A recent study found that sheep had antibodies against this parasite, triggering questions about the role of these animals in the life cycle. Therefore, blood samples from sheep and goats from two southern German states, Baden-Wuerttemberg (BW) and Bavaria (BAV), were tested for antibodies using a method called ELISA. Details, such as the species, sex and age, were recorded to assess any association between seropositivity and these animal characteristics. A total of seven sheep flocks from BW and seven from BAV were included, comprising 274 sheep and 10 goats in BW, and 277 sheep and 78 goats in BAV. In BW, four sheep from three flocks had antibodies, and in BAV, the same number of sheep tested positive but from four different flocks. Overall, 1.45% of sheep had antibodies against L. infantum, while all goats tested negative. No significant links were found between the presence of antibodies and the factors examined. Our study shows that sheep in areas not typically associated with Leishmania can still be exposed to it. Further research is needed to determine if sheep could help us identify new areas where sandflies live and where the disease could spread.

Abstract

In Europe, Leishmania infantum is the most prevalent Leishmania species, and this protozoan is transmitted by phlebotomine sandflies. A recent publication has shown that sheep harbor L. infantum antibodies. This raises questions about the epidemiological role of small ruminants. Therefore, sera from small ruminants located in two southern German federal states, Baden-Wuerttemberg (BW) and Bavaria (BAV), were analyzed with an ELISA to determine the presence of L. infantum antibodies. The species, sex and age (gimmer vs. ewe) were recorded, and a univariate analysis was conducted to determine possible associations. In total, seven sheep flocks (274 sheep/10 goats) from BW and seven sheep flocks (277 sheep/78 goats) from BAV were examined. In BW, four sheep from three flocks tested positive for L. infantum antibodies. In BAV, the same number of positive sheep were detected but in four flocks. The total seropositivity rate in sheep was 1.45%. All goats tested negative. No significant association (p > 0.05) was detected between Leishmania seropositivity and the variables evaluated. Our study reveals the exposure of sheep to L. infantum in a non-endemic area. Further investigation is needed to determine whether sheep can be used as sentinels to identify new phlebotomine habitats and Leishmania risk areas.

1. Introduction

The protozoan parasites of the Leishmania species are transmitted by phlebotomine sandflies and cause leishmaniasis in humans and leishmaniosis in animals. The zoonotic vector-borne disease is endemic in tropical and subtropical climates, including the Mediterranean basin [1]. In Europe, Leishmania infantum is the most prevalent Leishmania species, and this protozoan is transmitted by different species of phlebotomies [2]. Humans infected with L. infantum may develop either visceral leishmaniasis, including fever and splenomegaly, or cutaneous leishmaniasis, characterized by skin ulcers [3]. Dogs are considered the main domestic reservoir, and clinical manifestations of canine leishmaniosis cause cutaneous lesions, ocular and general abnormalities [1,3]. Moreover, other carnivores, such as cats, could have a direct impact as urban reservoirs in cities related to the stray cat populations in endemic areas of L. infantum infection [4,5]. In Africa and Asia, the exposure of small ruminants to Leishmania species has been reported [6,7], but this is less the case in Europe [8]. However, recent publications from Spain showed that almost 10% of tested sheep harbored L. infantum antibodies, and a clinical case of leishmaniosis in a goat with generalized exfoliative dermatitis was described [9,10]. This raises a question about the epidemiological role of sheep and goats in the Leishmania life cycle and whether small ruminants can act as reservoir hosts. The impact of climate change on vector distribution and vector-borne disease incidence is evident [11]. Its influence on leishmaniosis distribution is shown in the effect of temperature on sandflies’ development, although final proof for this hypothesis is still pending [2]. The northward expansion of L. infantum is largely attributed to the movement of infected dogs, presenting a significant challenge in countries with limited or absent populations of sandfly vectors, such as Germany [1]. In 1999, the first plebotomine sandflies, Phlebotomus mascittii, were detected in the southwest of the German federal state Baden-Wuerttemberg. In the following years, more P. mascittii were identified in this region, which is known as Upper Rhine Valley and has the hottest summer climate in Germany [12,13,14]. It is assumed that P. mascittii might transmit L. infantum, but its vector competence is still not proven [2]. Autochthonous cases of human/canine/feline and equine leishmaniosis in Germany are reported as a rare event, and Germany is still classified as a non-endemic country [13]. Information on the exposure to L. infantum in German small ruminants is missing. Sheep and goats are kept very extensively and used for conservation grazing, having frequent access to the natural habitat of vectors, and can, therefore, be used as sentinel animals for the surveillance of vector-borne pathogens [15,16]. The occurrence of sandflies in Southwest Germany is likely underestimated, and global warming may expand their habitat, increasing the risk of sandfly-borne infections [12]. These issues reinforce the necessity of Leishmania surveillance in Germany and the investigation of potential new reservoir hosts.
The first objective of the present pilot study was to identify L. infantum antibodies in sheep and goats originating from a German region known for its presence of P. mascittii. The second objective was to include small ruminant flocks from a district where phlebotomines have not been discovered before in the investigations to detect L. infantum antibodies in a previously unknown area. Our generated information will help to estimate the distribution of sandflies and L. infantum, which is in the spirit of the One Health approach by using small ruminants as sentinel animals [16].

2. Materials and Methods

Serum samples from small ruminants were obtained in Germany from a previous prevalence study on Coxiella burnetii antibodies [17]. The required sample size from each flock was calculated on the assumptions of a 3% expected prevalence, 95% confidence interval, 80% power and 5% precision, leading to a maximum of 44 animals sampled per herd. If goats were kept on the same farm, their sample size was independently calculated under the same assumptions, regardless of the number of sheep sampled. From this sample pool, sera from seven flocks (BW1–7) located in the federal state of Baden-Wuerttemberg were selected to determine L. infantum antibodies (Figure 1). These farms are situated in the Upper Rhine Valley. Additionally, seven sheep flocks (BAV1–7) located in the district Lower Franconia in the federal state of Bavaria were included in the study (Figure 1). In this area, phlebotomine vectors have not been previously detected, but it was predicted that this area would be suitable for sandfly species in the future due to climate change [18]. Most sheep farms were visited from the end of December 2017 until early March 2018, but farm BW5 was sampled in May 2018. Nine farms (BAV2–4, BW1–5, BW7) kept sheep, and five farms (BAV1, BAV5–7, BW6) consisted of sheep and goats. The species, sex and age of each animal were recorded. Based on their age and sex, the animals were classified as gimmers/doelings (=female nulliparous sheep/goat < 2 years old), ewes/does and rams/bucks (≥2 years old).
The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed on all sera, as described previously [10]. A 100 µL aliquot of sheep sera diluted 1:100 in PBST and 1% dry skimmed milk (PBST-M) was added to each well. The plates were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in a moist chamber. After washing the plates for 3 min three times with PBST, followed by one wash with PBS for 1 min, 100 µL of Protein A/G conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was added per well. Protein A/G conjugated is capable of interacting with the fragment crystallisable region from immunoglobulin G of all antibody species for several animals, including sheep, dogs, cats and ferrets. The plates were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in the moist chamber and were washed again with PBST and PBS, as described above. The substrate solution (ortho-phenylene-diamine) and stable peroxide substrate buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) were added at 100 µL per well and developed for 20 ± 5 min at room temperature in the dark. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 µL of 2.5 M H2SO4 to each well. Absorbance values were read at 492 nm in an automatic microELISA reader (Microplate Photometer Biosan Hipo MPP-96, Riga, Latvia). As a positive control, each plate included three serum samples, including a sick seropositive dog, a sick seropositive cat and a sick seropositive goat diagnosed with clinical leishmaniosis [9]. By contrast, sera from healthy, non-infected sheep were used as a negative control. The same positive and negative sera were used for all assays. All samples were run in duplicate. The cut-off in sheep was set to 0.38 optical density units (OD units) (mean + 3 standard deviations (SD) of values from 90 sheep from non-endemic areas such as northern Spain). In the case of goats, the cut-off was set to 0.26 OD units (mean + 3 standard deviations (SD) of values from 50 healthy goats from non-endemic areas such as northern Spain, mountainous area of the Basque Country and Huesca, areas where livestock farmers have not documented cases of canine leishmaniosis). In all cases, results above these values were considered positive.
Data collected for the entire population were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Univariate analysis of categorical data was performed to determine possible associations between L. infantum seropositivity and the following variables: age, sex and farm. The significance of this difference was assessed using Fisher’s exact test or Chi-square. A p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. The SPSS v.22 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used.

3. Results

In total, 274 sheep and 10 goats from Baden-Wuerttemberg and 277 sheep and 78 goats from Bavaria were analyzed. In Baden-Wuerttemberg, four sheep from three flocks (BW1, BW2, BW6) tested positive for L. infantum antibody. In Bavaria, the same number of positive sheep were detected, but in four flocks (BAV1, BAV2, BAV4, BAV6) (Table 1). Finally, the global seroprevalence of L. infantum infection in small ruminants, including sheep and goats, was 1.25% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64–2.45%). In the case of sheep, the global seroprevalence was 1.45% (95[CI] 0.74–2.84). All 88 goats tested negative. When considering the regions, the seroprevalence in sheep in Baden-Wuerttemberg was 1.46% (95[CI] 0.57–3.69), and 1.44% (95[CI] 0.56–3.65) in Bavaria. More details are presented in Table 1 and Table 2.
No significant association (p > 0.05) was detected between Leishmania seropositivity and the variables age, sex and farm.
Additionally, new cut-offs of the ELISA technique were determined based on optical density from seronegative results from the animals included in this study. For this purpose, the new cut-off in sheep was set to 0.27 optical density units (OD units) (mean + 3 standard deviations (SD) of values from the 543 seronegative sheep), whilst the new cut-off in goats was set to 0.20 OD units (mean + 3 standard deviations (SD) of values from 88 seronegative goats).

4. Discussion

The epidemiological role of small ruminants in endemic areas of L. infantum infection is unknown. However, an epidemiological study performed in an endemic area of canine leishmaniosis in Spain detected a seroprevalence of 9.27% in sheep, based on the ELISA technique [10]. In the present pilot study, the number of seropositive sheep was lower compared to the findings of that Spanish serological study. This difference is probably due to the fact that Germany is not considered an endemic country of leishmaniosis. In sheep and goats from Greece where Leishmania is also endemic, no seropositive small ruminants were detected [19]. However, that Greek study utilized a different in-house ELISA, unfortunately hampering comparison with our results.
In Germany, to date, several thousand dogs imported from Leishmania-endemic countries have tested positive for L. infantum, making it the most prevalent vector-borne pathogen in this cohort [13,20]. Autochthones cases of leishmaniosis have hardly been reported in humans, dogs, cats and horses in Germany [13]. In dogs, in the absence of competent vectors for L. infantum transmission, other transmission routes are implicated, including venereal, vertical and bite wounds [21,22]. The presence of seropositive sheep together with the detection and identification of P. mascittii in the Upper Rhine Valley (Baden-Wuerttemberg) in the same year [12] suggest an exposure to L. infantum. The vector competence of P. mascittii to transmit L. infantum is still not confirmed. Nevertheless, L. infantum DNA has been detected in P. mascittii in several countries, such as Austria, Italy and Serbia [23,24,25]. Many Leishmania spp. are adapted to specific sandfly species for transmission [25]. In contrast, it is assumed that L. infantum is transmitted by multiple vectors, which makes the vector competence of P. mascittii more likely [25]. Therefore, further research is needed to prove this hypothesis.
The clinical impact of Leishmania spp. infection in small ruminants seems to be minor. The first case of leishmaniosis was reported in a goat in Kenya, exhibiting both visceral and cutaneous lesions, and Leishmania aethiopica was suspected to be the causative agent [26]. The second case in a goat was recently reported in Spain, with the diseased animal showing skin lesions for several months and L. infantum antibodies being detected [9]. After medication with anti-Leishmania drugs, the goat recovered. Amastigote stages of Leishmania spp. were detected in a sheep with a swollen ear and the overlying skin thickened and encrusted [27]. This is, so far, the only reported case in sheep of cutaneous leishmaniosis. After experimental infection of sheep with Leishmania donovani and of goats with Leishmania major, clinical signs were hardly observed, and the inoculated pathogens were not recovered from skin aspirates after 28 days and 42 days post-infection, respectively [28,29]. Only one sheep of six developed L. donovani antibodies [28]. The authors concluded that small ruminants are unlikely to be reservoirs for the tested Leishmania species [28,29]. However, those studies are more than 25 years old, and modern standard methods like PCR were not utilized. Incorporating such methods may provide new insights into the replication ability of Leishmania species in small ruminants. Nevertheless, the most recent autochthonous case of cutaneous leishmaniosis in a cow in Switzerland caused by Leishmania sp. siamensis [30] confirms the clinical susceptibility of ruminants to Leishmania, although such cases are rare and might depend on the Leishmania species.
An important aspect of seroepidemiological studies is the adaptation of the cut-off technique, depending on whether the study is performed in an endemic or non-endemic area of L. infantum infection. This fact has direct implications, with differences between sensitivity and specificity values depending on whether these diagnostic parameters are estimated in non-endemic or endemic areas [31]. The ELISA technique used in our study was used previously to detect the presence of seropositive animals in endemic areas [10], with higher optical density cut-offs (0.38 in sheep and 0.26 in goats) in comparison with the cut-offs (0.27 in sheep and 0.20 in goats) described in the present study.
The presence of sheep with Leishmania antibodies shows the possible exposition to L. infantum in a traditionally non-endemic country. Moreover, the detection of four seropositive sheep in Southwest Baden-Wuerttemberg is a further indication of the existence of phlebotomies sandflies in the Upper Rhine Valley, as reported by others [12,13]. As a result of climate change, it is important to perform active and passive surveillance on vectors and vector-borne pathogens to obtain detailed information related to the potential spread to new geographical areas or the introduction of new pathogens in areas that were classified as non-endemic. In the present pilot study, four antibody-positive sheep were identified in Bavaria (Lower Franconia), an area where no phlebotomine sandflies were detected previously but where predicted favorable climate conditions for sandflies exist [18]. The three positive females were raised on the Bavarian sheep farms, but the origin of the seropositive ram cannot be identified anymore. Therefore, it is highly likely that at least the two ewes and the gimmer were exposed to L. infantum in Northwest Bavaria. To determine whether sheep can be used as sentinels to identify new sandfly habitats and Leishmania risk areas, light traps need to be set up in proximity to the sheep flocks with seropositive animals. This approach is compliant with the One Health concept, as leishmaniasis is also a serious disease in humans. The early detection of potential new risk areas will raise awareness for disease recognition and prevention, as autochthonous human leishmaniasis is still a rare disease in Germany [32]. However, it is predicted that factors such as climate change will trigger the further northward spread of Leishmania species, with the risk of new endemic countries such as Germany [2]. Moreover, potential clinical leishmaniosis has to be considered not only in small ruminants but also in herding dogs, which are frequently used for sheep flocks.

5. Conclusions

Our study reveals the exposure of sheep to L. infantum in a non-endemic country. Therefore, it is important to consider the possibility of clinical leishmaniosis in animals and humans in Germany, although it is still a rare event. Further investigations are needed to determine whether sheep can be used as sentinels to identify new phlebotomine habitats and Leishmania risk areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.U.B., M.G. and D.L.; methodology, M.E.L. and T.N.; software, A.F. and D.M.; validation, M.R.d.A. and A.O.; formal analysis, A.F., D.M. and M.C.; investigation, B.U.B., H.R., M.C. and P.Q.; resources, M.G.; data curation, B.U.B. and S.V.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.U.B., M.E.L. and D.L.; writing—review and editing, B.U.B., M.G., T.N., A.F., M.R.d.A., A.O., H.R. and D.L.; visualization, B.U.B. and P.Q.; supervision, B.U.B. and D.L.; project administration, B.U.B., S.V.-S. and D.L.; funding acquisition, A.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by funding from the Aragon Government (AR15_23R) and the European Social Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Serum samples from sheep and goats are available from a previously conducted study [17], which was approved by the federal state governments of Baden-Wuerttemberg (AZ 35-9185.82/D-18/01, AZ 35-9185.82/A-1/18) and Bavaria (RUF-55.2.2-2532-2-651-5). The study was conducted in accordance with German Animal Welfare Legislation and the EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments. All animals were handled in accordance with high ethical standards and national legislation.

Informed Consent Statement

The samples were available from a previous study [17]. Informed consent was obtained from all participating farmers.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Maria Ángeles Lostao (University of Zaragoza, Spain) for her excellent technical assistance in performing this study. Thanks also go to Frederik Kiene (University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Germany) for kindly providing support with the graphical illustration (Figure 1).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Montaner-Angoiti, E.; Llobat, L. Is leishmaniasis the new emerging zoonosis in the world? Vet. Res. Commun. 2023, 47, 1777–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ready, P.D. Leishmaniasis emergence in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2010, 15, 19505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Miró, G.; López-Vélez, R. Clinical management of canine leishmaniosis versus human leishmaniasis due to Leishmania infantum: Putting “One Health” principles into practice. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 254, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alcover, M.M.; Basurco, A.; Fernandez, A.; Riera, C.; Fisa, R.; Gonzalez, A.; Verde, M.; Garrido, A.M.; Ruíz, H.; Yzuel, A.; et al. A cross-sectional study of Leishmania infantum infection in stray cats in the city of Zaragoza (Spain) using serology and PCR. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Villanueva-Saz, S.; Martínez, M.; Nijhof, A.M.; Gerst, B.; Gentil, M.; Müller, E.; Fernández, A.; González, A.; Yusuf, M.S.M.; Greco, G.; et al. Molecular survey on vector-borne pathogens in clinically healthy stray cats in Zaragoza (Spain). Parasites Vectors 2023, 16, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Han, S.; Wu, W.-P.; Chen, K.; Osman, I.; Kiyim, K.; Zhao, J.; Hou, Y.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.-Y.; Zheng, C.-J. Epidemiological survey of sheep as potential hosts for Leishmania in China. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rohousova, I.; Talmi-Frank, D.; Kostalova, T.; Polanska, N.; Lestinova, T.; Kassahun, A.; Yasur-Landau, D.; Maia, C.; King, R.; Votypka, J.; et al. Exposure to Leishmania spp. and sand flies in domestic animals in northwestern Ethiopia. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cardoso, L.; Schallig, H.; Persichetti, M.F.; Pennisi, M.G. New Epidemiological Aspects of Animal Leishmaniosis in Europe: The Role of Vertebrate Hosts Other Than Dogs. Pathogens 2021, 10, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ruiz, H.; Serra, J.F.; Fernández, A.; Verde, M.; Arenal, J.; Solsona, A.; Bolea, S.; Villanueva-Saz, S. Clinical leishmaniosis due to Leishmania infantum in a goat: Clinical findings and treatment response. Anim. Sci. Proc. 2023, 14, 173–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Villanueva-Saz, S.; Lebrero, M.E.; Solsona, A.; Ramos, J.J.; de Arcaute, M.R.; Ruíz, H.; Pérez, M.D.; Bello, J.M.; Verde, M.; Ortín, A.; et al. Presence of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in sheep (Ovis aries) in Spain. Vet. Res. Commun. 2024, 48, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. George, A.M.; Ansumana, R.; de Souza, D.K.; Niyas, V.K.M.; Zumla, A.; Bockarie, M.J. Climate change and the rising incidence of vector-borne diseases globally. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2024, 139, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Oerther, S.; Jöst, H.; Heitmann, A.; Lühken, R.; Krüger, A.; Steinhausen, I.; Brinker, C.; Lorentz, S.; Marx, M.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J.; et al. Phlebotomine sand flies in Southwest Germany: An update with records in new locations. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Naucke, T.J.; Menn, B.; Massberg, D.; Lorentz, S. Sandflies and leishmaniasis in Germany. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103 (Suppl. S1), S65–S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Naucke, T.J.; Pesson, B. Presence of Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) mascittii Grassi, 1908 (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Germany. Parasitol. Res. 2000, 86, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Helmer, C.; Eibach, R.; Tegtmeyer, P.C.; Humann–Ziehank, E.; Runge, M.; Ganter, M. Serosurvey of Schmallenberg Virus Infections in Sheep and Goat Flocks in Lower Saxony, Germany. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2015, 62, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bauer, B.U.; Könenkamp, L.; Stöter, M.; Wolf, A.; Ganter, M.; Steffen, I.; Runge, M. Increasing awareness for tick-borne encephalitis virus using small ruminants as suitable sentinels: Preliminary observations. One Health 2021, 12, 100227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wolf, A.; Prüfer, T.L.; Schoneberg, C.; Campe, A.; Runge, M.; Ganter, M.; Bauer, B.U. Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii in German sheep flocks and evaluation of a novel approach to detect an infection via preputial swabs at herd-level. Epidemiol. Infect. 2020, 148, e75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Haeberlein, S.; Fischer, D.; Thomas, S.M.; Schleicher, U.; Beierkuhnlein, C.; Bogdan, C. First Assessment for the Presence of Phlebotomine Vectors in Bavaria, Southern Germany, by Combined Distribution Modeling and Field Surveys. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kantzoura, V.; Diakou, A.; Kouam, M.K.; Feidas, H.; Theodoropoulou, H.; Theodoropoulos, G. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with zoonotic parasitic infections in small ruminants in the Greek temperate environment. Parasitol. Int. 2013, 62, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schäfer, I.; Volkmann, M.; Beelitz, P.; Merle, R.; Müller, E.; Kohn, B. Retrospective evaluation of vector-borne infections in dogs imported from the Mediterranean region and southeastern Europe (2007–2015). Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Naucke, T.J.; Lorentz, S. First report of venereal and vertical transmission of canine leishmaniosis from naturally infected dogs in Germany. Parasites Vectors 2012, 5, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Naucke, T.J.; Amelung, S.; Lorentz, S. First report of transmission of canine leishmaniosis through bite wounds from a naturally infected dog in Germany. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vaselek, S.; Ayhan, N.; Oguz, G.; Erisoz Kasap, O.; Savić, S.; Di Muccio, T.; Gradoni, L.; Ozbel, Y.; Alten, B.; Petrić, D. Sand fly and Leishmania spp. survey in Vojvodina (Serbia): First detection of Leishmania infantum DNA in sand flies and the first record of Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) mascittii Grassi, 1908. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zanet, S.; Sposimo, P.; Trisciuoglio, A.; Giannini, F.; Strumia, F.; Ferroglio, E. Epidemiology of Leishmania infantum, Toxoplasma gondii, and Neospora caninum in Rattus rattus in absence of domestic reservoir and definitive hosts. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 199, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Obwaller, A.G.; Karakus, M.; Poeppl, W.; Töz, S.; Özbel, Y.; Aspöck, H.; Walochnik, J. Could Phlebotomus mascittii play a role as a natural vector for Leishmania infantum? New data. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Williams, A.O.; Mutinga, J.; Rodgers, M. Leishmaniasis in a domestic goat in Kenya. Mol. Cell. Probes 1991, 5, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. van der Lugt, J.J.; Carlyon, J.F.; de Waal, D.T. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in a sheep. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 1992, 63, 74–77. [Google Scholar]
  28. Anjili, C.O.; Ngichabe, C.K.; Mbati, P.A.; Lugalia, R.M.; Wamwayi, H.M.; Githure, J.I. Experimental infection of domestic sheep with culture-derived Leishmania donovani promastigotes. Vet. Parasitol. 1998, 74, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Anjili, C.O.; Olobo, J.O.; Mbati, P.A.; Robert, L.; Githure, J.I. Experimental infection of domestic goats with Leishmania major through bites of infected Phlebotomus duboscqi and needle inoculation of culture-derived promastigotes. Vet. Res. Commun. 1994, 18, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lobsiger, L.; Müller, N.; Schweizer, T.; Frey, C.F.; Wiederkehr, D.; Zumkehr, B.; Gottstein, B. An autochthonous case of cutaneous bovine leishmaniasis in Switzerland. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adel, A.; Berkvens, D.; Abatih, E.; Soukehal, A.; Bianchini, J.; Saegerman, C. Evaluation of Immunofluorescence Antibody Test Used for the Diagnosis of Canine Leishmaniasis in the Mediterranean Basin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bogdan, C.; Schönian, G.; Bañuls, A.L.; Hide, M.; Pratlong, F.; Lorenz, E.; Röllinghoff, M.; Mertens, R. Visceral leishmaniasis in a German child who had never entered a known endemic area: Case report and review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 32, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Geographical allocation of the 14 sheep flocks from southern Germany (Baden-Wuerttemberg and Bavaria), which were analyzed for L. infantum antibodies. Each point represents one flock.
Figure 1. Geographical allocation of the 14 sheep flocks from southern Germany (Baden-Wuerttemberg and Bavaria), which were analyzed for L. infantum antibodies. Each point represents one flock.
Animals 14 01860 g001
Table 1. The numbers of sheep and goats according to their origin (German federal state) and sex analyzed for Leishmania infantum antibodies.
Table 1. The numbers of sheep and goats according to their origin (German federal state) and sex analyzed for Leishmania infantum antibodies.
StateFemale Sheep (Ewes/Gimmers)RamsFemale Goats (Does/Doelings)BucksTotal (Sheep/Goats)
Baden-Wuerttemberg259 (215/44)1510 (8/2)0274/10
Bavaria247 (161/86)3073 (64/9)5277/78
Total506 (376/130)4583 (72/11)5551/88
Table 2. Details of sheep tested positive for Leishmania infantum antibodies from Baden-Wuerttemberg and Bavaria, Germany.
Table 2. Details of sheep tested positive for Leishmania infantum antibodies from Baden-Wuerttemberg and Bavaria, Germany.
StateFlock IDFlock Seroprevalence (%)
([Confidence Interval])
Animal IDSexEstimated Age (Year)ELISA Result 1
Baden-Wuerttem-bergBW14.76% [1.32–15.79]556Ewe30.42
1103Ewe30.39
BW22.86% [0.51–14.53]21277Ewe40.43
BW61.92% [0.34–10.12]0860Ewe70.40
BavariaBAV11.32% [0.23–7.08]4259Ewe30.42
BAV22.50% [0.44–12.88]6902Ewe60.40
BAV42.50% [0.44–12.88]0362Ram40.41
BAV62.38% [0.42–12.32]15Gimmer10.47
1 ELISA positivity threshold: ≥0.38 optical density units (OD units).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bauer, B.U.; Lebrero, M.E.; Ganter, M.; Navarro, T.; Fernández, A.; Ruíz de Arcaute, M.; Ortín, A.; Villanueva-Saz, S.; Marteles, D.; Ruiz, H.; et al. First Evidence of Leishmania infantum Antibodies in Sheep (Ovis aries) from Southern Germany. Animals 2024, 14, 1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131860

AMA Style

Bauer BU, Lebrero ME, Ganter M, Navarro T, Fernández A, Ruíz de Arcaute M, Ortín A, Villanueva-Saz S, Marteles D, Ruiz H, et al. First Evidence of Leishmania infantum Antibodies in Sheep (Ovis aries) from Southern Germany. Animals. 2024; 14(13):1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131860

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bauer, Benjamin Ulrich, María Eugenia Lebrero, Martin Ganter, Teresa Navarro, Antonio Fernández, Marta Ruíz de Arcaute, Aurora Ortín, Sergio Villanueva-Saz, Diana Marteles, Héctor Ruiz, and et al. 2024. "First Evidence of Leishmania infantum Antibodies in Sheep (Ovis aries) from Southern Germany" Animals 14, no. 13: 1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131860

APA Style

Bauer, B. U., Lebrero, M. E., Ganter, M., Navarro, T., Fernández, A., Ruíz de Arcaute, M., Ortín, A., Villanueva-Saz, S., Marteles, D., Ruiz, H., Climent, M., Quílez, P., & Lacasta, D. (2024). First Evidence of Leishmania infantum Antibodies in Sheep (Ovis aries) from Southern Germany. Animals, 14(13), 1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131860

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop