Next Article in Journal
Thermal Tolerance and Preferred Temperature in the Critical Endangered Montseny Brook Newt (Calotriton arnoldi)
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic and Postural Changes in Forelimb Amputee Dogs: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bovine Genital Leptospirosis: An Update of This Important Reproductive Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

An Overview of Infectious and Non-Infectious Causes of Pregnancy Losses in Equine

1
Liaocheng Research Institute of Donkey High-Efficiency Breeding and Ecological Feeding, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
2
College of Veterinary Medicine, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
3
Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 511464, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2024, 14(13), 1961; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131961
Submission received: 20 May 2024 / Revised: 25 June 2024 / Accepted: 28 June 2024 / Published: 2 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Infectious Diseases on Livestock Reproduction)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Pregnancy loss is a major economic concern for the equine industry. It can be caused by both infectious agents (equine herpesvirus, bacteria, fungi, and parasites) and non-infectious factors (like twin pregnancies, endocrine disorders, and umbilical cord torsion). The increasing number of large-scale donkey breeding operations in China has brought attention to these reproductive challenges. To prevent pregnancy loss and maintain the overall health and productivity of horses, early detection, proper management, and control measures are crucial.

Abstract

Equine breeding plays an essential role in the local economic development of many countries, and it has experienced rapid growth in China in recent years. However, the equine industry, particularly large-scale donkey farms, faces a significant challenge with pregnancy losses. Unfortunately, there is a lack of systematic research on abortion during equine breeding. Several causes, both infectious and non-infectious, of pregnancy losses have been documented in equines. The infectious causes are viruses, bacteria, parasites, and fungi. Non-infectious causes may include long transportation, ingestion of mycotoxins, hormonal disturbances, twinning, placentitis, umbilical length and torsion, etc. In current review, we discuss the transmission routes, diagnostic methods, and control measures for these infectious agents. Early detection of the cause and appropriate management are crucial in preventing pregnancy loss in equine practice. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential causes of abortion in equines, including infectious agents and non-infectious factors. It emphasizes the importance of continued research and effective control measures to address this significant challenge in the equine industry.

1. Introduction

Reproductive failure is a major cause of economic losses in the equine industry. Equine abortion, which refers to the loss of pregnancy before 300 days’ gestation, presents a significant challenge for equine breeding enterprises [1,2,3,4,5]. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in equine practices, particularly large-scale donkey breeding, making the donkey industry a crucial part of husbandry in China [6,7]. Donkeys have recently emerged in China’s livestock industry due to their multiple roles, including ejiao (a traditional Chinese remedy that is made by extracting collagen from donkey skin) production [8,9,10], meat production [11,12,13], and milk production [14,15]. Despite their significance in the livestock industry, donkeys worldwide, including in China, face a range of issues, including reproductive problems [16,17].
Abortion in pregnant donkeys and mares can be caused by infectious [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25] or non-infectious agents [26]. The infectious agents responsible for abortion in donkeys and mares include viruses (equine arteritis virus, equine herpesvirus, equine infectious anemia virus, and West Nile virus) [27,28,29], bacteria (i.e., Salmonella, Streptococcus zooepidemicus, Escherichia coli, Rhodococcus equi, Leptospirosis, Chlamydia psittaci, and Equine monocytic ehrlichiosis) [30,31,32,33,34], fungi (i.e., Aspergillus spp. and Mucocuraceus fungi) [35,36,37], and parasites (i.e., Neosporosis and equine piroplasmosis) [38].
Non-infectious factors include endocrine disorders, umbilical cord torsion, twinning, toxicosis, and extensive management practices. Thus, early detection of the cause of abortion and appropriate management to prevent pregnancy loss are essential in equine practice [39,40,41,42]. This paper presents an overview of the potential causes of abortion in donkeys. These causes encompass a broad range of factors, including infectious and non-infectious agents. Additionally, we discuss the diagnosis and control measures for pathogenic agents. The study contributes to the development of a theoretical foundation for preventing abortion in the donkey industry.

2. Infectious Risk Factors Associated with Abortion and Pregnancy Losses in Equines

A range of infectious pathogens are responsible for abortion and pregnancy losses in equines. An overview of these infectious agents reported in previous research is provided below.

2.1. Viral Agents Associated with Abortion in Equines

Viral pathogens have become important factors in the study of equine abortion [43,44]. Among them, equine arteritis virus [45,46], equine herpesvirus [47,48,49], and equine infectious anemia virus [50,51] are the main viruses associated with equine abortion which lead to pregnancy loss. These studies highlight the critical impact of viral agents on reproductive health in equines, warranting comprehensive attention and research.

2.1.1. Equine Arteritis Virus (EAV)

EAV is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus that belongs to the family Arteriviridae (genus Alpharterivirus, order Nidovirales) [52]. It is an enveloped virus that specifically infects Equidae animals, including horses, donkeys, and zebras [52,53,54,55]. Infection of mares with EAV can lead to abortion, fetal death, and severe respiratory diseases [55,56]. EAV has two subtypes: North American (NA) and European (EU) [29,57]. The main mode of transmission for EAV is through respiratory secretions or close contact with infected animals. Male donkeys or stallions typically carry the virus and can transmit it to susceptible animals through breeding [58,59,60,61]. It is worth noting that a new strain of EAV, which differs from the EAV viruses found in horses and donkeys in North America and Europe, was isolated from the semen of a naturally infected South African donkey [58,62]. Additionally, a novel EAV strain was isolated from feral donkeys in Chile [29], highlighting the global threat of EAV to the donkey industry. Diagnosis of EAV involves clinical virus isolation, reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry, and serologic tests [52,63,64,65].

2.1.2. Equine Herpesvirus

Equine herpesvirus poses a significant threat to the equine industry due to its association with abortion, respiratory disease, neurologic disease, and neonatal death [66,67,68,69]. There are a total of nine identified herpesviruses (EHV-1-9). Horses are the natural hosts for EHV-1 to EHV-5, while donkeys serve as the natural hosts for EHV-6 to EHV-8, which are also known as asinine herpesviruses (AHV, AHV1-3). EHV-9 has been found in Thomson’s gazelle, giraffe, and polar bear. The Herpesviridae family is categorized into three subfamilies based on morphology and biological properties: Alphaherpesvirinae, Betaherpesvirinae, and Gamaherpesvirinae. Equine herpesviruses (EHVs) such as EHV-1, EHV-3, EHV-4, EHV-6, EHV-8, and EHV-9 belong to the Alphaherpesvirinae subfamily, while EHV-2, EHV-5, and EHV-7 are part of the Gamaherpesvirinae subfamily. EHV-1, EHV-7, and EHV-8 are particularly pathogenic EHVs closely associated with abortion in pregnant donkeys [66,67,68,69]. Consistently, Ali et al. [1] reported a case of EHV-1-induced abortion and neonatal deaths in pregnant mares and female donkeys in Egypt. Additionally, LeCuyer et al. [70] reported a case of abortion caused by EHV-7 in a female Mediterranean miniature donkey at the Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory. Wang et al. [19] also documented a case of EHV-8-induced abortion in a female donkey on the 296th day of pregnancy at a large-scale farm in China. EHVs can be transmitted through aerosols, feces, and water [71]. Diagnosis of EHVs-related diseases requires a combination of clinical history, presentation, PCR, virus isolation, immunohistochemistry, and serologic tests [72,73].

2.1.3. Equine Infectious Anemia Virus (EIAV)

Equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) is responsible for causing equine infectious anemia (EIA), which leads to symptoms such as fever, viremia, thrombocytopenia, weight loss, and abortion in horses. This virus belongs to the Retroviridae family, specifically the Lentivirus genus. Its impact on the global horse industry is significant, resulting in substantial economic losses [74]. Although the understanding of natural EIAV infection in donkeys is limited, a recent study by Costa VMD et al. detected EIAV-infected donkeys in Brazil using agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID), ELISA, and PCR. These findings provide direct evidence of donkeys carrying EIAV [27,51,75]. EIAV is transmitted through insect vectors and via the transplacental route. Accurate diagnosis and elimination methods are crucial for effectively controlling EIAV.

2.1.4. West Nile virus (WNV)

West Nile virus (WNV) is an enveloped RNA virus that belongs to the Flaviviridae genus. It is known to cause outbreaks of abortion and encephalitis in mares [76,77]. Currently, nine lineages of WNV have been identified, showing biological diversity [78]. Lineage 1 WNV is prevalent worldwide, including Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Australia, and America [79,80,81]. Previous studies have found WNV in donkeys in various countries, such as Turkey, Pakistan, Bulgaria, Nigeria, Algeria, Egypt, Senegal, Israel, and Palestine [79,82,83]. The transmission of West Nile virus (WNV) occurs through both horizontal routes, primarily through the bites of infected mosquitoes, and vertical routes, including intrauterine transmission from an infected mother to the developing fetus and lactation transmission from an infected mother to her nursing infant [84,85,86,87]. The general diagnostic criteria for WNV infection in equines include PCR and ELISAs [88,89]. The methods for controlling WNV depend on vaccination in horses and vector control [84,90,91].

2.2. Bacterial Agents Associated with Equine Abortion

Besides viral infections, bacterial pathogens are also responsible for a significant number of abortions in horses and donkeys. Based on available published data, Salmonella, Streptococcus, Escherichia, Rhodococcus equi, and Leptospira are considered the main bacterial causes of equine abortion.

2.2.1. Salmonella

Salmonella is a significant zoonotic disease worldwide, affecting a wide range of hosts, including humans, reptiles, farm animals, and insects [92,93]. It belongs to the Enterobacteriaceae family and can cause abortion, polyarthritis, and neonatal sepsis in sheep, cattle, and dogs [94,95,96,97]. Specifically, Salmonella abortus equine (S. abortus equi) induces equine abortion in pregnant mares during late pregnancy [20]. It also leads to neonatal septicemia and polyarthritis in horses in various countries, including Italy, Great Britain, Argentina, and the United States [98,99]. In recent years, there have been cases of abortion outbreaks among female donkeys in China’s large-scale donkey farms, caused by S. abortus equi. [20,21]. S. abortus equi is primarily transmitted through the fecal–oral route and direct contact with infected animals. Infected horses can shed the bacteria in their feces, contaminating the environment and leading to potential ingestion of the pathogen by other susceptible horses. Additionally, direct contact with infected animals, their secretions, or contaminated surfaces can also contribute to the spread of S. abortus equi. Control measures for Salmonella infection include the use of antibiotics, probiotics, yeasts, and bacteriophages [93,100].

2.2.2. Streptococcus zooepidemicus

Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus (S. zooepidemicus) causes abortion and respiratory disease in horses and donkeys [101,102]. It can infect a wide range of animals, including humans, monkeys, sheep, dogs, cattle, and swine [103,104], and is associated with various diseases in different species [105]. S. zooepidemicus-induced equine ascending placentitis is a common cause of abortion in mares [106]. Recently, Stout et al. found S. zooepidemicus to be present in healthy horses with a 55% positive rate using nanoscale real-time PCR detection [107]. Transmission of S. zooepidemicus occurs through animal contact or contamination of food or utensils [108]. PCR and ELISA detection are commonly used to diagnose S. zooepidemicus infection [109].

2.2.3. Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is considered a normal part of the gastrointestinal tract in horses. However, many strains of E. coli can cause diseases in the gastrointestinal tract, as well as other infections [110]. For example, both E. coli and S. zooepidemicus are primary pathogens of bacterial placentitis in mares [111]. E. coli is an opportunistic pathogen that can cause abortion in donkeys or horses with immune deficiency. Phenotypic identification and PCR detection are commonly used for diagnosing E. coli [112,113].

2.2.4. Rhodococcus equi

Rhodococcus equi (R. equi) causes severe pneumonia in foals and abortion in mares, as it is a member of the actinomycetes [114,115]. Nakamura et al. isolated R. equi from an aborted fetus at 196 days of gestation in mares [33]. Additionally, Szeredi et al. described two cases of equine abortion induced by R. equi infection at 7–8 months of gestation [34]. Evidence suggests that airborne and foodborne transmission are the primary routes of R. equi transmission [116,117]. PCR is used for early detection of R. equi infection [118]. Moreover, ELISA can also be used to diagnose R. equi infection [119].

2.2.5. Leptospirosis

Leptospirosis is a significant zoonotic disease that is widely distributed globally. It belongs to the family Leptospiraceae, order Spirochaetales, genus Leptospira, and can infect a wide range of hosts [120,121]. It is closely associated with syndromes and equine reproductive diseases [122]. Consistently, Leptospirosis-induced equine abortions have been reported in numerous cases [123,124]. One study found that donkeys are more susceptible than horses and mules [125]. The primary transmission route of leptospirosis depends on direct contact with infected animals or indirect contact with contaminated urine or water [126]. PCR and the Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) are currently convenient methods for diagnosing leptospirosis [127,128]. Thus, early diagnosis and strict implementation of biosecurity measures to limit the spread of these infectious agents within the herd might be helpful in effectively preventing and controlling bacterial abortions in equines.

2.3. Fungal Placentitis

Infectious causes are considered the critical factors associated with abortion in equine [25,129]. Consistently, fungal placentitis is caused by Aspergillus spp. and Mucocutaneous fungi, which also induce abortions in pregnant mares [36,37]. Aspergillus spp. is widespread in the environment, such as in animal excreta, soil, and water [130,131]. It is an opportunistic fungal infection in equines with low immunity. PCR and histopathology detection are effective methods for diagnosing fungal placentitis. Additionally, itraconazole has been found to be an effective drug for controlling fungal placentitis [36].

2.4. Parasitic Diseases

Neosporosis is closely related to Toxoplasma gondii and Sarcocystis spp. and belongs to the Apicomplexa phylum of the Sarcocystidae family [38]. It can infect various animals, including cattle, camels, ruminants, sheep, dogs, chickens, and horses [132,133,134,135,136,137]. Neosporosis can cause significant economic losses due to reproductive failure [138,139]. Consistently, one study reported a high exposure to Neospora spp. in horses and donkeys worldwide [140]. Similarly, another study reported that Neospora caninum is a major cause of abortion in donkeys in Iran, with a molecular prevalence of 34.5% in blood samples [141]. The data above demonstrate that Neosporosis has a significant impact on the economic and animal health of the horse and donkey industry. Transplacental transmission plays a crucial role in the epidemiology and circulation of Neosporosis, and the diagnosis is primarily conducted through PCR and serologic tests using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Currently, no effective vaccines for Neosporosis control have been developed, making biosecurity and scientific management the best choices for prevention [133].
Equine piroplasmosis (EP), caused by Theileria equi and Babesia caballi, affects equids such as horses, donkeys, mules, and zebras. It is a global tick-borne disease that has a significant impact on the horse and donkey industry [142,143]. Horses are more susceptible to EP than donkeys and require greater attention [144]. Some studies have reported cases of abortion in mares caused by T. equi in Brazil [145,146]. Additionally, one study found a high positive rate of T. equi in domestic and wild donkeys in Israel [147]. The possible transmission routes of EP include transplacental, direct-contact, and tick-borne transmission [148,149]. The diagnosis of EP primarily relies on DNA-based molecular diagnostic techniques such as PCR, microscopy observation, and serological tests using ELISA [150]. Control of the vectors has been the primary strategy for preventing EP [144,151].

3. Non-Infectious Risk Factors Associated with Pregnancy Loss

While infectious agents, such as viruses and bacteria, are the primary causes of equine abortions, there are also several non-infectious risk factors that can contribute to pregnancy loss in equines. These non-infectious risk factors include:

3.1. Twinning

Twinning is a major cause of pregnancy loss and abortion in the equine industry, including donkeys. Multiple ovulations contribute to a higher twinning percentage [152], resulting in pregnancy loss during the late months of gestation, when the lack of uterine space and nutrition becomes more obvious [153]. In the past, various measures were taken to reduce twinning in equines, such as eliminating older mares [154,155]. The introduction of ultrasonography and early identification of twins during gestation have been instrumental in reducing abortion in horses [156,157,158]. However, while twinning is a significant cause of abortion in equines, a more effective study of the breeding characteristics of individual jennies and mares is necessary. Consequently, Allen et al. reported that maiden and barren mares also have an increased incidence of twin foals [159]. Mares with foals at foot have a rare chance of having twins due to their high nutrient requirements, and mares with better nutrition have a greater likelihood of having twins. The twinning percentages during foal heat and three consecutive estruses were 15.0, 49.0, 23.0, and 15.0, respectively. The literature indicates that age is not a determining factor for twinning in mares, and abortion can occur at any stage of pregnancy, regardless of age. However, jennies and mares with a history of twinning should be closely monitored during subsequent pregnancies. The main factors contributing to twinning are multiple ovulations and the equine’s nutritional status.

3.2. Early Pregnancy Loss in Aging Equines

Pregnancy loss is a significant factor in equine reproductive medicine and has important implications for animal welfare and the economy. In mares, most pregnancy failures occur between the initial diagnosis and day 65 of gestation, a period commonly referred to as “early pregnancy loss.” In mares, the fertilization rate is not affected by age, but pregnancy loss is significantly higher in aging mares than in young ones [160,161]. Embryonic losses in older mares are much higher compared to young mares, specifically during the 0–6 oviductal days and 6–16 early uterine days [162,163]. Abnormal development of embryos is common in aging mares due to less viable or favorable environments in the oviduct [161].

3.3. Progesterone Deficiency

Pregnancy maintenance relies heavily on the secretion of progesterone produced by the corpus luteum (CL), and is essential until the endometrial cup forms around 35 days after ovulation. The developing embryo should migrate through the uterine lumen during the 6–16 days post-ovulation to ensure luteal maintenance and suppress endometrial PGF2α production [164,165], resulting in a condition known as “maternal recognition of pregnancy.” Multiple endometrial cysts may obstruct fetal movement and disrupt corpus luteum maintenance. A potential reason for deficient plasma progesterone concentrations in pregnant mares is the release of a stimulus that triggers PGF2α [164,165].
Progesterone analysis and pregnancy monitoring can help distinguish various stages of reproduction in mares. As shown in Figure 1, luteal progesterone levels are initially high during the gestation period, reaching their peak concentration at around 120 days of pregnancy and then declining. The corpus luteum produces progesterone to maintain pregnancy up to the fourth or fifth month, after which the placenta secretes sufficient progesterone.
Tests such as progesterone (P4), pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG), and estrone sulfate (EIS) can be used individually or in combination to assess pregnancy in horses. These tests are suitable for evaluating conception rates in horses with unidentified pregnancies, such as those that have been rescued, pasture-bred, or bought at auction. PMSG or estrone sulfate can be helpful in determining whether the placenta has been established in early-pregnancy mares. Hormonal treatment can prevent abortion due to circulating progesterone deficiency in horses. External progesterone immunization is one effective method to address low or inadequate maternal serum progesterone levels [166].

3.4. Umbilical Cord Torsion

Umbilical cord torsion is a pathological condition characterized by excessive twisting of the cord, leading to partial or complete obstruction of umbilical vessels or the urachus [167]. In this condition, the single vein that enters the fetal abdomen, an amniotic portion of the cord, merges with two umbilical veins that carry oxygenated blood from the placenta [168]. If the umbilical cord wraps around a part of the fetus, suffocation can occur. Jennies and other equine animals should be regularly checked during the last trimester of pregnancy because abnormal tension in fetal reflexes can cause misalignment of the head, neck, and forelimbs, potentially leading to abortion or dystocia. In such cases, the dead fetus is not immediately expelled, and there may be some tissue autolysis [169]. In addition, some stallions produce long cords, and these are more likely to become twisted. Various factors can influence umbilical cord length [170], and the number of twists is unknown [169]. Abortion in mares due to umbilical torsion is a sporadic condition, and fetal complications that lead to abortion are typically a future risk [169,171]. Normal mobility of the equine fetus’s umbilical cord can be observed using ultrasonography [172].

3.5. Mare Reproductive Loss Syndrome

Mare reproductive loss syndrome (MRLS), an abortigenic disease, primarily causes early and late fetal losses and is associated with an environmental factor rather than an abortigenic agent [173,174]. MRLS has been reported in several states, including the USA and Australia, and has resulted in significant economic losses in the equine industry [175,176]. For example, McDowell et al. reported that MRLS significantly affected the Ohio River Valley of the United States during the spring of 2001 and 2002, mainly due to Eastern tent caterpillars (ETC) [177,178]. Consistently, Burns et al. found that MRLS was associated with higher temperatures and low humidity [176]. The most effective method of controlling MRLS is to prevent horses, particularly pregnant mares, from being exposed to ETC and possibly other hairy caterpillars [177].

3.6. Exposure to Mycotoxins

Mycotoxins, such as aflatoxin, ochratoxin A, fumonisin, zearalenone, and deoxynivalenol, are frequently found as contaminants in animal feedstuff [179]. These mycotoxins can cause reproductive and immune-toxic diseases in various farm animals, including pigs, cows, sheep, horses, and poultry [180,181,182,183]. The diagnosis of mycotoxins primarily relies on PCR, ELISA, flow injection immunoassay (FIIA), chemiluminescence immunoassay (CL assay), lateral flow immunoassay, and flow-through immunoassay [184,185]. Recently, microbial detoxification technology has been widely used for mycotoxin degradation [186].

3.7. Managemental Issues

In recent years, extensive feeding management practices, including mechanical injuries and nutritional deficiencies, have been identified as significant causes of abortion in equines [4,7]. Furthermore, road transport in pregnant mares may lead to elevated cortisol due to stress, which may lead to abortion [155]. Thus, it is crucial for veterinarians and practitioners to be aware of these risk factors in order to effectively mitigate their impact (Table 1). By understanding the role of proper management, including feeding and prevention of mechanical injuries, strategies can be developed to prevent abortions and improve overall reproductive performance and productivity in the equine industry. Addressing these non-infectious risk factors through proper management, nutrition, and environmental control can help to reduce the incidence of equine abortions. Regular veterinary check-ups, close monitoring of the mare and donkey’s health, and prompt intervention in case of any complications are crucial in mitigating the impact of these non-infectious factors on equine reproductive success.

4. Conclusions

In summary, pregnancy loss has significant economic implications for the equine industry, and can also adversely affect reproductive performance and efficiency in horses and donkeys. This review article examines potential risk factors for pregnancy loss in equines and provides detailed guidance on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and management. By implementing appropriate management practices and promptly identifying the cause of pregnancy loss, equine reproductive success can be enhanced.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—original draft, project administration: L.L., M.Z.K., S.L., and C.W.; formal analysis and interpretation, software: data curation, validation, writing—review and editing: L.L., M.Z.K., S.L., M.F.A., H.M., A.K., Y.T., T.W., W.L., and C.W.; resources and funding: C.W. and T.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program for Youth (2022KJ287), The Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program for College Students (S202310447040, CXCY2023273), the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2022YFD1600103), The Shandong Province Modern Agricultural Technology System Donkey Industrial Innovation Team (grant no. SDAIT-27), Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry Project of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (grant number 19211162), The National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31671287), The Open Project of Liaocheng University Animal Husbandry Discipline (grant no. 319312105-26, 319312105-25, 319312101-14), The Open Project of Shandong Collaborative Innovation Center for Donkey Industry Technology (grant no. 3193308), Research on Donkey Pregnancy Improvement (grant no. K20LC0901), and Liaocheng University scientific research fund (grant no. 318052025).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are available in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ali, A.A.; Abdallah, F.; Shemies, O.A.; Kotb, G.; Nafea, M.R. Molecular characterization of equine herpes viruses type 1 and 4 among Arabian horse populations in Egypt during the period between 2021 and 2022. Open Veter. J. 2024, 14, 534–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cantón, G.J.; Navarro, M.A.; Asin, J.; Chu, P.; Henderson, E.E.; Mete, A.; Uzal, F.A. Equine abortion and stillbirth in California: A review of 1774 cases received at a diagnostic laboratory, 1990–2022. J. Veter. Diagn. Investig. 2023, 35, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Macleay, C.M.; Carrick, J.; Shearer, P.; Begg, A.; Stewart, M.; Heller, J.; Chicken, C.; Brookes, V.J. A scoping review of the global distribution of causes and syndromes associated with mid- to late-term pregnancy loss in horses between 1960 and 2020. Veter. Sci. 2022, 9, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Leon, A.; Richard, E.; Fortier, C.; Laugier, C.; Fortier, G.; Pronost, S. Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii and Neospora caninum in equine aborted foetuses and neonates. Prev. Veter. Med. 2012, 104, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Laugier, C.; Foucher, N.; Sevin, C.; Leon, A.; Tapprest, J. A 24-year retrospective study of equine abortion in Normandy (France). J. Equine Veter. Sci. 2011, 31, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, B.; Khan, M.Z.; Chai, W.; Ullah, Q.; Wang, C. Exploring Genetic Markers: Mitochondrial DNA and Genomic Screening for Biodiversity and Production Traits in Donkeys. Animals 2023, 13, 2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Seyiti, S.; Kelimu, A. Donkey industry in China: Current aspects, suggestions and future challenges. J. Equine Veter. Sci. 2021, 102, 103642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, X.; Ren, W.; Peng, Y.; Khan, M.Z.; Liang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Kou, X.; Wang, L.; et al. Elucidating the Role of Transcriptomic Networks and DNA Methylation in Collagen Deposition of Dezhou Donkey Skin. Animals 2024, 14, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, M.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, C. An analysis of skin thickness in the Dezhou donkey population and identification of candidate genes by RNA-seq. Anim. Genet. 2022, 53, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, C.; Li, H.; Guo, Y.; Huang, J.; Sun, Y.; Min, J.; Wang, J.; Fang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; et al. Donkey genomes provide new insights into domestication and selection for coat color. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, M.; Sun, L.; Du, X.; Ren, W.; Man, L.; Chai, W.; Zhu, M.; Liu, G.; Wang, C. Characterization of lipids and volatile compounds in boiled donkey meat by lipidomics and volatilomics. J. Food Sci. 2024, 89, 3445–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chai, W.; Qu, H.; Ma, Q.; Zhu, M.; Li, M.; Zhan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xu, J.; Yao, H.; Li, Z.; et al. RNA-Seq Analysis Identifies Differentially Expressed Gene in Different Types of Donkey Skeletal Muscles. Anim. Biotechnol. 2023, 34, 1786–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chai, W.; Xu, J.; Qu, H.; Ma, Q.; Zhu, M.; Li, M.; Zhan, Y.; Wang, T.; Gao, J.; Yao, H.; et al. Differential Proteomic Analysis to Identify Potential Biomarkers Associated with Quality Traits of Dezhou Donkey Meat Using A Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) Strategy. LWT 2022, 166, 113792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, M.; Huang, F.; Du, X.; Liu, G.; Wang, C. Analysis of the Differentially Expressed Proteins in Donkey Milk in Different Lactation Stages. Foods 2023, 12, 4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, M.; Li, Q.; Yu, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, D.; Song, W.; Zheng, Y.; Yue, X. Differentially expressed whey proteins of donkey and bovine colostrum revealed with a label-free proteomics approach. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 1224–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Z.; Huang, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Liu, G.; Wang, C. A survey report on the donkey original breeding farms in China: Current aspects and future prospective. Front. Veter. Sci. 2023, 10, 1126138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deng, L.; Shi, S.; Li, J.; Tang, C.; Han, Y.; Xie, P. A Survey of Smallholder Farms Regarding Demographics, Health Care, and Management Factors of Donkeys in Northeastern China. Front. Veter. Sci. 2021, 8, 626622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mai, Z.; Fu, H.; Miao, R.; Lu, C.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, Z.; Ji, P.; Hua, Y.; Wang, C.; Ma, Y.; et al. Serological investigation and isolation of Salmonella abortus equi in horses in Xinjiang. BMC Veter. Res. 2024, 20, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, T.; Hu, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, W.; Liu, G.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, W.; Wang, C.; Ren, H.; Li, L. Identification of equine herpesvirus 8 in donkey abortion: A case report. Virol. J. 2022, 19, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, M.; Liu, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Qi, P.; Yang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, W. Characterization of Salmonella isolated from donkeys during an abortion storm in China. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 161, 105080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, Y.; Chen, S.; Yi, Z.; Holyoak, R.; Wang, T.; Ding, Z.; Li, J. Nasopharyngeal microbiomes in Donkeys shedding Streptococcus equi Subspecies equi in comparison to healthy donkeys. Front. Veter. Sci. 2021, 8, 645627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.; Liu, K.J.; Sun, Y.H.; Cui, L.Y.; Meng, X.; Jiang, G.M.; Zhao, F.W.; Li, J.J. Abortion in donkeys associated with Salmonella abortus equi infection. Equine Veter. J. 2019, 51, 756–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lebrasseur, O.; More, K.D.; Orlando, L. Equine herpesvirus 4 infected domestic horses associated with Sintashta spoke-wheeled chariots around 4000 years ago. Virus Evol. 2024, 10, vead087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mohammed, A.K.; Zaid, N.W. Isolation and Identification of Pathogenic Streptococcus pyogenes from Vaginal and Cervical Cavity of Arabian Mares in Al-Zawraa Animals Park. Egypt. J. Vet. Sci. 2024, 55, 1493–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ruby, R.E.; Janes, J.G. Infectious Causes of Equine Placentitis and Abortion. Veter. Clin. Equine Pract. 2023, 39, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wolfsdorf, K. What to do and when: Management of equine twin pregnancies. UK-Vet Equine 2024, 8, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Costa, V.M.D.; Cursino, A.E.; Luiz, A.P.M.F.; Braz, G.F.; Cavalcante, P.H.; Souza, C.A.; Simplício, K.; Drumond, B.P.; Lima, M.T.; Teixeira, B.M.; et al. Equine Infectious Anemia Virus (EIAV): Evidence of circulation in donkeys from the Brazilian Northeast Region. J. Equine Veter. Sci. 2022, 108, 103795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Garvey, M.; Suárez, N.M.; Kerr, K.; Hector, R.; Moloney-Quinn, L.; Arkins, S.; Davison, A.J.; Cullinane, A. Equid herpesvirus 8: Complete genome sequence and association with abortion in mares. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rivas, J.; Neira, V.; Mena, J.; Brito, B.; Garcia, A.; Gutierrez, C.; Sandoval, D.; Ortega, R. Identification of a divergent genotype of equine arteritis virus from South American donkeys. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 1655–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Akter, R.; Sansom, F.M.; El-Hage, C.M.; Gilkerson, J.R.; Legione, A.R.; Devlin, J.M. A 25-year retrospective study of Chlamydia psittaci in association with equine reproductive loss in Australia. J. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 70, 001284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Holyoak, G.R.; Zeng, S. Treatments for Endometritis in Mares Caused by Streptococcus equi Subspecies zooepidemicus: A Structured Literature Review. J. Equine Veter. Sci. 2021, 102, 103430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Donahue, J.M.; Smith, B.J.; Redmon, K.J.; Donahue, J.K. Diagnosis and prevalence of leptospira infection in aborted and stillborn horses. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 1991, 3, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Long, M.T.; Goetz, T.E.; Whiteley, H.E.; Kakoma, I.; Lock, T.E. Identification of Ehrlichia risticii as the causative agent of two equine abortions following natural maternal infection. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 1995, 7, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nakamura, Y.; Nishi, H.; Katayama, Y.; Niwa, H.; Matsumura, T.; Anzai, T.; Ohtsu, Y.; Tsukano, K.; Shimizu, N.; Takai, S. Abortion in a Thoroughbred Mare Associated with an infection with avirulent Rhodococcus equi. Veter. Rec. 2007, 161, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Szeredi, L.; Molnár, T.; Glávits, R.; Takai, S.; Makrai, L.; Dénes, B.; Del Piero, F. Two Cases of Equine Abortion Caused by Rhodococcus equi. Veter. Pathol. 2006, 43, 208–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Murase, H.; Niwa, H.; Katayama, Y.; Sato, F.; Hada, T.; Nambo, Y. A Clinical Case of Equine Fungal Placentitis with Reference to Hormone Profiles and Ultrasonography. J. Equine Sci. 2015, 26, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Orellana-Guerrero, D.; Renaudin, C.; Edwards, L.; Rose, E.; Aleman, M.; Moore, P.F.; Dujovne, G. Fungal Placentitis Caused by Aspergillus terreus in a Mare: Case Report. J. Equine Veter. Sci. 2019, 83, 102799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cazarotto, C.J.; Balzan, A.; Grosskopf, R.K.; Boito, J.P.; Portella, L.P.; Vogel, F.F.; Fávero, J.F.; Cucco, D.d.C.; Biazus, A.H.; Machado, G.; et al. Horses seropositive for Toxoplasma gondii, Sarcocystis spp. and Neospora spp.: Possible risk factors for infection in Brazil. Microb. Pathog. 2016, 99, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bernard, M.; Donnelly, C.; Miller, A.; de Amorim, M.D. Diagnosis and Management of Placentitis with Severe Funisitis in a Multiparous Warmblood Mare. J. Equine Veter. Sci. 2024, 137, 105075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sielhorst, J.; Koether, K.; Volkmann, N.; Blanco, M.; Vicioso, R.; Baade, S.; Kemper, N.; de Mestre, A.M.; Sieme, H. Occurrence of Ultrasonographic Assessed Placental Abnormalities, Treatments, Pregnancy Outcome, and Subsequent Fertility on a Large Warmblood Stud Farm: A Retrospective Field Study. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2024, 137, 105076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Goehring, L.; Dorman, D.C.; Osterrieder, K.; Burgess, B.A.; Dougherty, K.; Gross, P.; Neinast, C.; Pusterla, N.; Soboll-Hussey, G.; Lunn, D.P. Pharmacologic Interventions for the Treatment of Equine Herpesvirus-1 in Domesticated Horses: A Systematic Review. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2024, 38, 1892–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Leon, A.; Pillon, C.; Tebourski, I.; Bruyas, J.F.; Lupo, C. Overview of the Causes of Abortion in Horses, Their Follow-Up and Management. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2023, 58, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ata, E.B.; Shaapan, R.M.; Ghazy, A.A.; Kandil, O.M.; Abou-Zeina, H.A. Epidemiological Aspects of Some Equine Viral Diseases. Iraqi J. Veter. Sci. 2023, 37, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lazić, S.; Savić, S.; Petrović, T.; Lazić, G.; Žekić, M.; Drobnjak, D.; Lupulović, D. Serological Examinations of Significant Viral Infections in Domestic Donkeys at the Special Nature Reserve “Zasavica”, Serbia. Animals 2023, 13, 2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kaps, M.; Wenderoth, J.; Aurich, J.; Aurich, C. Retrospective Analysis of Obligatory Testing Results for Equine Virus Arteritis Reveals a Decrease of Its Seroprevalence in Stallions Used for Artificial Insemination. Prev. Veter. Med. 2024, 223, 106096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Stasiak, K.; Socha, W.; Rola, J. Retrospective Study on Equine Viral Abortions in Poland between 1999 and 2022. J. Veter. Res. 2023, 67, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mahmoud, H.Y.; Fouad, S.S.; Amin, Y.A. Review of Two Viral Agents of Economic Importance to the Equine Industry (Equine Herpesvirus-1, and Equine Arteritis Virus). Equine Veter. Educ. 2023, 35, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pusterla, N.; Barnum, S.; Lawton, K.; Wademan, C.; Corbin, R.; Hodzic, E. Investigation of the EHV-1 Genotype (N752, D752, and H752) in Swabs Collected from Equids with Respiratory and Neurological Disease and Abortion from the United States (2019–2022). J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2023, 123, 104244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Soboll-Hussey, G.; Dorman, D.C.; Burgess, B.A.; Goehring, L.; Gross, P.; Neinast, C.; Osterrieder, K.; Pusterla, N.; Lunn, D.P. Relationship between Equine Herpesvirus-1 Viremia and Abortion or Equine Herpesvirus Myeloencephalopathy in Domesticated Horses: A Systematic Review. J. Veter. Intern. Med. 2023, 38, 1872–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lupulovic, D.; Savić, S.; Gaudaire, D.; Berthet, N.; Grgić, Ž.; Matović, K.; Deshiere, A.; Hans, A. Identification and Genetic Characterization of Equine Infectious Anemia Virus in Western Balkans. BMC Veter. Res. 2021, 17, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bueno, B.L.; Câmara, R.J.F.; Moreira, M.V.L.; Galinari, G.C.F.; Souto, F.M.; Victor, R.M.; Bicalho, J.M.; Ecco, R.; dos Reis, J.K.P. Molecular Detection, Histopathological Analysis, and Immunohistochemical Characterization of Equine Infectious Anemia Virus in Naturally Infected Equids. Arch. Virol. 2020, 165, 1333–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Balasuriya, U.B.; Go, Y.Y.; MacLachlan, N.J. Equine arteritis virus. Veter. Microbiol. 2013, 167, 93–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  53. Balasuriya, U.B.; Carossino, M.; Timoney, P.J. Equine Viral Arteritis: A Respiratory and Reproductive Disease of Significant Economic Importance to the Equine Industry. Equine Veter. Educ. 2018, 30, 497–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Adams, M.J.; Lefkowitz, E.J.; King, A.M.Q.; Harrach, B.; Harrison, R.L.; Knowles, N.J.; Kropinski, A.M.; Krupovic, M.; Kuhn, J.H.; Mushegian, A.R.; et al. Changes to taxonomy and the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2017). Arch. Virol. 2017, 162, 2505–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Balasuriya, U.B.; Carossino, M. Reproductive Effects of Arteriviruses: Equine Arteritis Virus and Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Infections. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2017, 27, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Câmara, R.J.; Bueno, B.L.; Resende, C.F.; Balasuriya, U.B.; Sakamoto, S.M.; Reis, J.K. Viral Diseases That Affect Donkeys and Mules. Animals 2020, 10, 2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, J.; Miszczak, F.; Pronost, S.; Fortier, C.; Balasuriya, U.B.; Zientara, S.; Fortier, G.; Timoney, P.J. Genetic Variation and Phylogenetic Analysis of 22 French Isolates of Equine Arteritis Virus. Arch. Virol. 2007, 152, 1977–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Z.; Guo, K.; Chu, X.; Liu, M.; Du, C.; Hu, Z.; Wang, X. Development and Evaluation of a Test Strip for the Rapid Detection of Antibody against Equine Infectious Anemia Virus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Otzdorff, C.; Beckmann, J.; Goehring, L.S. Equine Arteritis Virus (EAV) Outbreak in a Show Stallion Population. Viruses 2021, 13, 2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Snider, T.A. Reproductive Disorders in Horses. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 2015, 31, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Miszczak, F.; Legrand, L.; Balasuriya, U.B.; Ferry-Abitbol, B.; Zhang, J.; Hans, A.; Fortier, G.; Pronost, S.; Vabret, A. Emergence of Novel Equine Arteritis Virus (EAV) Variants during Persistent Infection in the Stallion: Origin of the 2007 French EAV Outbreak Was Linked to an EAV Strain Present in the Semen of a Persistently Infected Carrier Stallion. Virology 2012, 423, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Stadejek, T.; Mittelholzer, C.; Oleksiewicz, M.B.; Paweska, J.; Belák, S. Highly Diverse Type of Equine Arteritis Virus (EAV) from the Semen of a South African Donkey. Acta Veter. Hung. 2006, 54, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cook, R.F.; Barrandeguy, M.; Lee, P.Y.; Tsai, C.-F.; Shen, Y.-H.; Tsai, Y.-L.; Chang, H.F.; Wang, H.T.; Balasuriya, U.B. Rapid Detection of Equine Infectious Anaemia Virus Nucleic Acid by Insulated Isothermal RT—PCR Assay to Aid Diagnosis under Field Conditions. Equine Vet. J. 2019, 51, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pfahl, K.; Chung, C.; Singleton, M.D.; Shuck, K.M.; Go, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.; Campos, J.; Adams, E.; Adams, D.S.; Timoney, P.J.; et al. Further Evaluation and Validation of a Commercially Available Competitive ELISA (cELISA) for the Detection of Antibodies Specific to Equine Arteritis Virus (EAV). Veter. Rec. 2016, 178, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chung, C.; Wilson, C.; Timoney, P.; Balasuriya, U.; Adams, E.; Adams, D.S.; Evermann, J.F.; Clavijo, A.; Shuck, K.; Rodgers, S.; et al. Validation of an Improved Competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay to Detect Equine arteritis virus Antibody. J. Veter. Diagn. Investig. 2013, 25, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, L.; Li, S.; Li, W.; Yu, Y.; Sun, Q.; Chen, W.; Zhou, H.; Wang, C.; Li, L.; Xu, M.; et al. Rutin Prevents EqHV-8 Induced Infection and Oxidative Stress via Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling Pathway. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1386462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, S.; Xi, C.; Geng, Y.; Tian, W.; Li, L.; Wang, T.; Zhao, J. Pathogenicity and Host Cytokines Response of EqHV-8 Infection in C57BL/6J Mice. Microb. Pathog. 2024, 186, 106506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, T.; Li, S.; Hu, X.; Geng, Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, W.; Zhao, J.; Tian, W.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; et al. Heme Oxygenase-1 is an Equid Alphaherpesvirus 8 Replication Restriction Host Protein and Suppresses Viral Replication via the PKCβ/ERK1/ERK2 and NO/cGMP/PKG Pathway. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e03220-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, T.; Hu, L.; Li, R.; Ren, H.; Li, S.; Sun, Q.; Ding, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, L. Hyperoside Inhibits EHV-8 Infection via Alleviating Oxidative Stress and IFN Production Through Activating JNK/Keap1/Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling Pathways. J. Virol. 2024, 98, e00159-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. LeCuyer, T.E.; Rink, A.; Bradway, D.S.; Evermann, J.F.; Nicola, A.V.; Baszler, T.; Haldorson, G.J. Abortion in a Mediterranean Miniature Donkey (Equus asinus) Associated with a Gammaherpesvirus Similar to Equid herpesvirus 7. J. Veter. Diagn. Investig. 2015, 27, 749–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dayaram, A.; Seeber, P.A.; Greenwood, A.D. Environmental Detection and Potential Transmission of Equine Herpesviruses. Pathogens 2021, 10, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fürer, F.; Fraefel, C.; Lechmann, J. Multiplex Real-Time PCR for the Detection and Differentiation of Equid Gammaherpesvirus 2 and 5. J. Virol. Methods 2022, 310, 114615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pavulraj, S.; Eschke, K.; Theisen, J.; Westhoff, S.; Reimers, G.; Andreotti, S.; Osterrieder, N.; Azab, W. Equine Herpesvirus Type 4 (EHV-4) Outbreak in Germany: Virological, Serological, and Molecular Investigations. Pathogens 2021, 10, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Romo-Sáenz, C.I.; Tamez-Guerra, P.; Olivas-Holguin, A.; Ramos-Zayas, Y.; Obregón-Macías, N.; González-Ochoa, G.; Zavala-Diaz de la Serna, F.J.; Rodríguez-Padilla, C.; Tamez-Guerra, R.; Gomez-Flores, R. Molecular Detection of Equine Infectious Anemia Virus in Clinically Normal, Seronegative Horses in an Endemic Area of Mexico. J. Veter. Diagn. Investig. 2021, 33, 758–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kasem, S.; Hashim, O.; Alkarar, A.; Hodhod, A.; Elias, A.; Abdallah, M.; Al-Sahaf, A.; Al-Doweriej, A.; Qasim, I.; Abdel-Moneim, A.S. Serological Cross-Sectional Survey of Equine Infectious Anemia in Saudi Arabia. Pol. J. Veter. Sci. 2022, 25, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bertram, F.-M.; Thompson, P.N.; Venter, M. Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of West Nile Virus Infection in Horses in South Africa, 2016–2017. Pathogens 2020, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Venter, M.; Human, S.; van Niekerk, S.; Williams, J.; van Eeden, C.; Freeman, F. Fatal Neurologic Disease and Abortion in Mare Infected with Lineage 1 West Nile Virus, South Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 1534–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pachler, K.; Lebl, K.; Berer, D.; Rudolf, I.; Hubalek, Z.; Nowotny, N. Putative New West Nile Virus Lineage in Uranotaenia unguiculata Mosquitoes, Austria, 2013. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yıldırım, Y.; Yılmaz, V.; Yazıcı, K.; Öziç, C.; Ozkul, A.; Çağırgan, A.A. Phylogenetic Analysis of West Nile Virus: First Report of Lineage 1 in Donkey in Turkey. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. de Heus, P.; Kolodziejek, J.; Camp, J.V.; Dimmel, K.; Bagó, Z.; Hubálek, Z.; van den Hoven, R.; Nowotny, N. Emergence of Neuroinvasive West Nile Virus Lineage 2 in Hungary, 2018–2019. Pathogens 2020, 9, 707. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hadfield, J.; Brito, A.F.; Swetnam, D.M.; Vogels, C.B.F.; Tokarz, R.E.; Andersen, K.G.; Smith, R.C.; Bedford, T.; Grubaugh, N.D. Twenty years of West Nile virus spread and evolution in the Americas visualized by Nextstrain. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1008042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rusenova, N.; Rusenov, A.; Chervenkov, M.; Sirakov, I. Seroprevalence of West Nile Virus among Equids in Bulgaria in 2022 and Assessment of Some Risk Factors. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Selim, A.; Radwan, A.; ِArnaout, F. Seroprevalence and Molecular Characterization of West Nile Virus in Egypt. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 101473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cendejas, P.M.; Goodman, A.G. Vaccination and Control Methods of West Nile Virus Infection in Equids and Humans. Vaccines 2024, 12, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Simonin, Y. Circulation of West Nile Virus and Usutu Virus in Europe: Overview and Challenges. Viruses 2024, 16, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. de Wit, M.M.; Dimas Martins, A.; Delecroix, C.; Heesterbeek, H.; Ten Bosch, Q.A. Mechanistic Models for West Nile Virus Transmission: A Systematic Review of Features, Aims and Parametrization. Proc. R. Soc. B 2024, 291, 20232432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Blázquez, A.-B.; Sáiz, J.-C. West Nile Virus (WNV) Transmission Routes in the Murine Model: Intrauterine, by Breastfeeding and after Cannibal Ingestion. Virus Res. 2010, 151, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Folly, A.J.; Waller, E.S.; McCracken, F.; McElhinney, L.M.; Roberts, H.; Johnson, N. Equine Seroprevalence of West Nile Virus Antibodies in the UK in 2019. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hirota, J.; Shimizu, S.; Shibahara, T. Application of West Nile Virus Diagnostic Techniques. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2013, 11, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Odigie, A.E.; Stufano, A.; Schino, V.; Zarea, A.A.; Ndiana, L.A.; Mrenoshki, D.; Ugochukwu, I.C.; Lovreglio, P.; Greco, G.; Pratelli, A.; et al. West Nile Virus Infection in Occupational Settings—A Systematic Review. Pathogens 2024, 13, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Habarugira, G.; Suen, W.W.; Hobson-Peters, J.; Hall, R.A.; Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H. West Nile Virus: An Update on Pathobiology, Epidemiology, Diagnostics, Control and “One Health” Implications. Pathogens 2020, 9, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Gelaw, A.K.; Nthaba, P.; Matle, I. Detection of Salmonella from Animal Sources in South Africa between 2007 and 2014. J. South Afr. Veter. Assoc. 2018, 89, 10–e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gut, A.M.; Vasiljevic, T.; Yeager, T.; Donkor, O.N. Salmonella Infection—Prevention and Treatment by Antibiotics and Probiotic Yeasts: A Review. Microbiology 2018, 164, 1327–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Allen-Durrance, A.; Mazzaccari, K.M.; Woliver, C.L. Bacteremia and Late-Term Abortion Secondary to Salmonellosis in a Dog. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2022, 58, 262–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hyeon, J.-Y.; Helal, Z.H.; Polkowski, R.; Heishima, M.; Kim, J.; Lee, D.-H.; Risatti, G.R. Genetic Features of Salmonella Enterica Subspecies Diarizonae Serovar 61:k:1,5 Isolated from Abortion Cases in Sheep, United States, 2020. Res. Veter. Sci. 2021, 138, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, H.; Deng, X.; Cui, B.; Shao, Z.; Zhao, X.; Yang, Q.; Song, S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Abortion and Various Associated Risk Factors in Dairy Cow and Sheep in Ili, China. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Delcourt, C.; Yombi, J.C.; Vo, B.; Yildiz, H. Salmonella enteritidis during Pregnancy, a Rare Cause of Septic Abortion: Case Report and Review of the Literature. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019, 39, 554–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Grandolfo, E.; Parisi, A.; Ricci, A.; Lorusso, E.; de Siena, R.; Trotta, A.; Buonavoglia, D.; Martella, V.; Corrente, M. High Mortality in Foals Associated with Salmonella enterica Subsp. enterica Abortusequi Infection in Italy. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2018, 30, 483–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Neustroev, M.P.; Petrova, S.G. Developmental Results of a Vaccine against Salmonella-Induced Equine Abortion. Russ. Agric. Sci. 2020, 46, 530–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liu, W.; Han, L.; Song, P.; Sun, H.; Zhang, C.; Zou, L.; Cui, J.; Pan, Q.; Ren, H. Complete Genome Sequencing of a Tequintavirus Bacteriophage with a Broad Host Range against Salmonella Abortus equi Isolates from Donkeys. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 938616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Christley, R.M.; Hodgson, D.R.; Rose, R.J.; Wood, J.L.; Reids, S.W.; Whitear, K.G.; Hodgson, J.L. A Case-Control Study of Respiratory Disease in Thoroughbred Racehorses in Sydney, Australia. Equine Vet. J. 2001, 33, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ricard, R.M.; St-Jean, G.; Duizer, G.; Atwal, H.; Wobeser, B.K. A 13-Year Retrospective Study of Equine Abortions in Canada. Can. Vet. J. 2022, 63, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  103. Webb, K.; Jolley, K.A.; Mitchell, Z.; Robinson, C.; Newton, J.R.; Maiden, M.C.J.; Waller, A. Development of an Unambiguous and Discriminatory Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme for the Streptococcus Zooepidemicus Group. Microbiology 2008, 154, 3016–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Costa, M.O.; Lage, B. Streptococcus equi Subspecies zooepidemicus and Sudden Deaths in Swine, Canada. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 2522–2524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Fu, Q.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Zhao, X.; Xie, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, K.; Ma, C.; Liu, X. CD44 Facilitates Adherence of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus to LA-4 Cells. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 128, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bailey, C.S.; Macpherson, M.L.; Pozor, M.A.; Troedsson, M.H.; Benson, S.; Giguere, S.; Sanchez, L.C.; LeBlanc, M.M.; Vickroy, T.W. Treatment Efficacy of Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole, Pentoxifylline and Altrenogest in Experimentally Induced Equine placentitis. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Stout, A.E.; Hofmar-Glennon, H.G.; André, N.M.; Goodman, L.B.; Anderson, R.R.; Mitchell, P.K.; Thompson, B.S.; Lejeune, M.; Whittaker, G.R.; Goodrich, E.L. Infectious Disease Surveillance of Apparently Healthy Horses at a Multi-Day Show Using a Novel Nanoscale Real-Time PCR Panel. J. Veter. Diagn. Investig. 2021, 33, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Björnsdóttir, S.; Harris, S.R.; Svansson, V.; Gunnarsson, E.; Sigurðardóttir, O.G.; Gammeljord, K.; Steward, K.F.; Newton, J.R.; Robinson, C.; Charbonneau, A.R.L.; et al. Genomic Dissection of an Icelandic Epidemic of Respiratory Disease in Horses and Associated Zoonotic Cases. mBio 2017, 8, e00826-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. North, S.E.; Wakeley, P.R.; Mayo, N.; Mayers, J.; Sawyer, J. Development of a Real-Time PCR to Detect Streptococcus equi Subspecies equi. Equine Vet. J. 2014, 46, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Maddox, T.W.; Clegg, P.D.; Williams, N.J.; Pinchbeck, G.L. Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria from Horses: Epidemiology of Antimicrobial Resistance. Equine Veter. J. 2015, 47, 756–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kinoshita, Y.; Takechi, M.; Uchida-Fujii, E.; Miyazawa, K.; Nukada, T.; Niwa, H. Ten cases of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Hominissuis Infections Linked to Equine Abortions in Japan, 2018–2019. Vet. Med. Sci. 2020, 7, 621–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Karakaya, E.; Aydin, F.; Kayman, T.; Abay, S. Escherichia coli in Different Animal Feces: Phylotypes and Virulence Genes. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 39, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Mapes, S.; Rhodes, D.M.; Wilson, W.D.; Leutenegger, C.M.; Pusterla, N. Comparison of Five Real-Time pcr Assays for Detecting Virulence Genes in Isolates of Escherichia coli from Septicaemic Neonatal Foals. Veter. Rec. 2007, 161, 716–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Bordin, A.I.; Huber, L.; Sanz, M.; Cohen, N. Rhodococcus equi Foal Pneumonia: Update on Epidemiology, Immunity, Treatment, and Prevention. Equine Vet. J. 2022, 54, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Patterson-Kane, J.C.; Donahue, J.M.; Harrison, L.R. Placentitis, Fetal Pneumonia, and Abortion Due to Rhodococcus equi Infection in a Thoroughbred. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2002, 14, 157–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Witkowski, L.; Rzewuska, M.; Cisek, A.A.; Chrobak-Chmiel, D.; Kizerwetter-Świda, M.; Czopowicz, M.; Welz, M.; Kita, J. Prevalence and Genetic Diversity of Rhodococcus equi in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa), Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) and Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) in Poland. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Muscatello, G. Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in the foal—Part 1: Pathogenesis and epidemiology. Veter. J. 2012, 192, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Madrigal, R.G.; Shaw, S.D.; Witkowski, L.A.; Sisson, B.E.; Blodgett, G.P.; Chaffin, M.K.; Cohen, N.D. Use of Serial Quantitative PCR of the vapa Gene of Rhodococcus equi in Feces for Early Detection of R. equi Pneumonia in Foals. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2016, 30, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Phumoonna, T.; Muscatello, G.; Chicken, C.; Gilkerson, J.R.; Browning, G.F.; Barton, M.D.; Heuzenroeder, M.W. Clinical Evaluation of a Peptide-ELISA Based upon N-Terminal B-Cell Epitope of the Vapa Protein for Diagnosis of Rhodococcus equi Pneumonia in Foals. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 2006, 53, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Crecelius, E.M.; Burnett, M.W. Leptospirosis. J. Spec. Oper. Med. 2020, 20, 121–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Murillo, A.; Goris, M.; Ahmed, A.; Cuenca, R.; Pastor, J. Leptospirosis in Cats: Current literature Review to Guide Diagnosis and Management. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2020, 22, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Malalana, F. Leptospirosis in Horses: A European Perspective. Equine Vet. J. 2019, 51, 285–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Timoney, J.F.; Kalimuthusamy, N.; Velineni, S.; Donahue, J.M.; Artiushin, S.C.; Fettinger, M. A Unique Genotype of Leptospira Interrogans Serovar Pomona Type kennewicki is Associated with Equine Abortion. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 150, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Hamond, C.; Pinna, A.; Martins, G.; Lilenbaum, W. The Role of Leptospirosis in Reproductive Disorders in Horses. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2014, 46, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Khalili, M.; Sakhaee, E.; Bagheri Amiri, F.; Safat, A.A.; Afshar, D.; Esmaeili, S. Serological Evidence of Leptospirosis in Iran; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 138, 103833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Karpagam, K.B.; Ganesh, B. Leptospirosis: A Neglected Tropical Zoonotic Infection of Public Health Importance—An Updated Review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 39, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Adler, B.; de la Pena Moctezuma, A. Leptospira and Leptospirosis. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 140, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Verma, A.; Stevenson, B.; Adler, B. Leptospirosis in Horses. Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 167, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Fedorka, C.E.; Troedsson, M.H. The Immune Response to Equine Ascending Placentitis: A Narrative Review. Theriogenology 2023, 203, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Juraschek, L.M.; Kappenberg, A.; Amelung, W. Mycotoxins in Soil and Environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 814, 152425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Navale, V.; Vamkudoth, K.R.; Ajmera, S.; Dhuri, V. Aspergillus Derived Mycotoxins in Food and the Environment: Prevalence, Detection, and Toxicity. Toxicol. Rep. 2021, 8, 1008–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Qi, T.; Ai, J.; Yang, J.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Qin, Q.; Kang, M.; Sun, Y.; et al. Seroepidemiology of Neosporosis in Various Animals in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Front. Veter. Sci. 2022, 9, 953380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Lindsay, D.S.; Dubey, J.P. Neosporosis, Toxoplasmosis, and Sarcocystosis in Ruminants: An Update. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2020, 36, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Selim, A.; Abdelhady, A. Neosporosis among Egyptian Camels and Its Associated Risk Factors. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2020, 52, 3381–3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Sánchez-Sánchez, R.; Vázquez, P.; Ferre, I.; Ortega-Mora, L.M. Treatment of Toxoplasmosis and Neosporosis in Farm Ruminants: State of Knowledge and Future Trends. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 1304–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Silva, R.C.; Machado, G.P. Canine neosporosis: Perspectives on pathogenesis and management. Veter. Med. Res. Rep. 2016, 7, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Anderson, M.L.; Andrianarivo, A.G.; Conrad, P.A. Neosporosis in Cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 60–61, 417–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Changoluisa, D.; Rivera-Olivero, I.A.; Echeverria, G.; Garcia-Bereguiain, M.A.; de Waard, J.H.; Working Group “Applied Microbiology” of the School of Biological and University Engineering at Yachay Tech. Serology for Neosporosis, Q Fever and Brucellosis to Assess the Cause of Abortion in Two Dairy Cattle Herds in Ecuador. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. McAllister, M.M. Diagnosis and Control of Bovine Neosporosis. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2016, 32, 443–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Javanmardi, E.; Majidiani, H.; Shariatzadeh, S.A.; Anvari, D.; Shamsinia, S.; Ghasemi, E.; Kordi, B.; Shams, M.; Asghari, A. Global Seroprevalence of Neospora spp. in Horses and Donkeys: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Veter. Parasitol. 2020, 288, 109299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Rahmani, S.S.; Malekifard, F.; Tavassoli, M. Neospora caninum, a Cause of Abortion in Donkeys (Equus asinus) in Iran. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Bělková, T.; Bártová, E.; Řičařová, D.; Jahn, P.; Jandová, V.; Modrý, D.; Hrazdilová, K.; Sedlák, K. Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in horses in the Czech Republic. Acta Trop. 2021, 221, 105993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Ahedor, B.; Kothalawala, H.; Kanagaratnam, R.; Vimalakumar, S.C.; Otgonsuren, D.; Tuvshintulga, B.; Batmagnai, E.; Silva, S.S.P.; Sivakumar, T.; Yokoyama, N. First detection of Theileria equi in free-roaming donkeys (Equus africanus asinus) in Sri Lanka. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2022, 99, 105244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Onyiche, T.E.; Suganuma, K.; Igarashi, I.; Yokoyama, N.; Xuan, X.; Thekisoe, O. A Review on Equine Piroplasmosis: Epidemiology, Vector Ecology, Risk Factors, Host Immunity, Diagnosis and Control. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wise, L.N.; Pelzel-McCluskey, A.M.; Mealey, R.H.; Knowles, D.P. Equine Piroplasmosis. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 2014, 30, 677–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. De Sousa, S.H.; Paludo, G.R.; Freschi, C.R.; Machado, R.Z.; De Castro, M.B. Theileria equi Infection Causing Abortion in a Mare in Brazil. Veter. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2017, 8, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Tirosh-Levy, S.; Gottlieb, Y.; Arieli, O.; Mazuz, M.L.; King, R.; Horowitz, I.; Steinman, A. Genetic characteristics of Theileria equi in zebras, wild and domestic donkeys in Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Francoso, R.; Riccio, A.V.; Fernandes, C.B.; Alonso, M.A.; Belli, C.B. Transplacental Transmission of Theileria equi in Mules: Should We Worry? Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 264, 39–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ueti, M.W.; Palmer, G.H.; Scoles, G.A.; Kappmeyer, L.S.; Knowles, D.P. Persistently Infected Horses Are Reservoirs for Intrastadial Tick-Borne Transmission of the Apicomplexan Parasite Babesia equi. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 3525–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; Sugimoto, C. A perspective on Theileria equi infections in donkeys. Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 2009, 56, 171–180. [Google Scholar]
  151. El-Sayed, S.A.E.; AbouLaila, M.; ElKhatam, A.; Abdel-Wahab, A.; Rizk, M.A. An Epidemiological Survey of Theileria equi Parasite in Donkeys (Equus asinus) in Egypt. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2020, 21, 100449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Alamaary, M.; Ali, A. Abortion and Uterine Prolapse in a Thoroughbred Mare with Twin Pregnancy: Clinical and laboratory Findings and Treatment Approach. J. Equine Sci. 2020, 31, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Hodder, A.; Liu, I.; Ball, B. Current Methods for the Diagnosis and Management of Twin Pregnancy in the Mare. Equine Veter. Educ. 2008, 20, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Peere, S.; van Den Branden, E.; Papas, M.; Gerits, I.; Smits, K.; Govaere, J. Twin management in the mare: A review. Equine Veter. J. 2024, 56, 650–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Crabtree, J.R. Management of Twins in Horses. Practice 2018, 40, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Tan, D.K.S.; Krekeler, N. Success Rates of Various Techniques for Reduction of Twin Pregnancy in Mares. J. Am. Veter. Med. Assoc. 2014, 245, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Schnobrich, M.R.; Riddle, W.T.; Stromberg, A.J.; LeBlanc, M.M. Factors Affecting Live Foal Rates of Thoroughbred Mares That Undergo Manual Twin Elimination. Equine Veter. J. 2013, 45, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Sper, R.B.; Whitacre, M.D.; Bailey, C.S.; Schramme, A.J.; Orellana, D.G.; Ast, C.K.; Vasgaard, J.M. Successful Reduction of a Monozygotic Equine Twin Pregnancy via Transabdominal Ultrasound-Guided Cardiac Puncture. Equine Veter. Educ. 2012, 24, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Allen, W.R.; Brown, L.; Wright, M.; Wilsher, S. Reproductive Efficiency of Flatrace and National Hunt Thoroughbred Mares and Stallions in England. Equine Veter. J. 2007, 39, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Roach, J.M.; Foote, A.K.; Smith, K.C.; Verheyen, K.L.; de Mestre, A.M. Incidence and Causes of Pregnancy Loss After Day 70 of Gestation in Thoroughbreds. Equine Vet. J. 2021, 53, 996–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. de Mestre, A.M.; Rose, B.V.; Chang, Y.M.; Wathes, D.C.; Verheyen, K.L. Multivariable Analysis to Determine Risk Factors Associated with Early Pregnancy Loss in Thoroughbred Broodmares. Theriogenology 2019, 124, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Kahler, A.; McGonnell, I.M.; Smart, H.; Kowalski, A.A.; Smith, K.C.; Wathes, D.C.; de Mestre, A.M. Fetal Morphological Features and Abnormalities Associated with Equine Early Pregnancy Loss. Equine Vet. J. 2021, 53, 530–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Carluccio, A.; Bucci, R.; Fusi, J.; Robbe, D.; Veronesi, M.C. Effect of Age and of Reproductive Status on Reproductive Indices in Horse Mares Carrying Mule Pregnancies. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Hollinshead, F.K.; Mehegan, M.K.; Gunn, A.; Nett, T.; Bruemmer, J.E.; Hanlon, D.W. The Correlation of Endogenous Progesterone Concentration in Diestrus on Early Pregnancy Rate in Thoroughbred Mares. J. Equine Veter. Sci. 2022, 118, 104127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Allen, W.R. Luteal Deficiency and Embryo Mortality in the Mare. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2001, 36, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Raghupathy, R.; Szekeres-Bartho, J. Progesterone: A Unique Hormone with Immunomodulatory Roles in Pregnancy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Williamson, N.; Donahue, J.; Bolin, D.; Giles, R.; Harrison, L.; Hong, C.; Jackson, C.; Poonacha, K.; Vickers, M. Equine Placental Pathology: Kentucky Perspective. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Equine Placenta, Lexington, KY, USA; 2003; pp. 88–91. [Google Scholar]
  168. Smith, K.C.; Blunden, A.S.; Whitwell, K.E.; Dunn, K.A.; Wales, A.D. A Survey of Equine Abortion, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death in the UK from 1988 to 1997. Equine Veter. J. 2003, 35, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Frazer, G. Umbilical Cord Compromise as a Cause of Abortion. Equine Veter. Educ. 2007, 19, 535–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Lawson, J.M.; Verheyen, K.; Smith, K.C.; Bryan, J.S.; Foote, A.K.; de Mestre, A.M. The Equine Umbilical Cord in Clinically Healthy Pregnancies. Equine Veter. J. 2024, 56, 742–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Christoffersen, M.; Nielsen, S.B.; Madvig, C.B.; Agerholm, J.S. Potential Risk Factors for Fetal Loss Due to Umbilical Cord Torsion in the Mare. Theriogenology 2024, 214, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Bucca, S. Use of Ultrasonography in Fetal Development and Monitoring. Atlas Equine Ultrason. 2022, 383–406. [Google Scholar]
  173. Swerczek, T.W. An Alternative Model for Fetal Loss Disorders Associated with Mare Reproductive Loss Syndrome. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 6, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Campos, I.; Batista, B.; Matos, A.C.; Dutra, F.; Gomes, G.; Pinna, A.; Leite, J.; Ferreira, A. Pregnancy Loss Due to Amnionitis in Anglo-Arabian Mare—Case Report. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2020, 55, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Sebastian, M.M.; Bernard, W.V.; Riddle, T.W.; Latimer, C.R.; Fitzgerald, T.D.; Harrison, L.R. Review Paper: Mare Reproductive Loss Syndrome. Vet. Pathol. 2008, 45, 710–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Burns, S.J.; Westerman, A.G.; Harrison, L.R. Environmental Influences on Mare Reproductive Loss Syndrome: Do They Fit with a Toxin as the Causative Agent? J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022, 114, 104001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. McDowell, K.J.; Webb, B.A.; Williams, N.M.; Donahue, J.M.; Newman, K.E.; Lindemann, M.D.; Horohov, D.W. Invited Review: The Role of Caterpillars in Mare Reproductive Loss Syndrome: A Model for Environmental Causes of Abortion. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88, 1379–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Webb, B.A.; Barney, W.E.; Dahlman, D.L.; DeBorde, S.N.; Weer, C.; Williams, N.M.; Donahue, J.M.; McDowell, K.J. Eastern Tent Caterpillars (Malacosoma americanum) Cause Mare Reproductive Loss Syndrome. J. Insect Physiol. 2004, 50, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Yang, C.; Song, G.; Lim, W. Effects of Mycotoxin-Contaminated Feed on Farm Animals. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 389, 122087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Chiminelli, I.; Spicer, L.J.; Maylem, E.R.S.; Caloni, F. Emerging Mycotoxins and Reproductive Effects in Animals: A Short Review. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2022, 42, 1901–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Malekinejad, H.; Fink-Gremmels, J. Mycotoxicoses in Veterinary Medicine: Aspergillosis and penicilliosis. Vet. Res. Forum 2020, 11, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Caloni, F.; Cortinovis, C. Toxicological Effects of Aflatoxins in Horses. Veter. J. 2011, 188, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Liesener, K.; Curtui, V.; Dietrich, R.; Märtlbauer, E.; Usleber, E. Mycotoxins in Horse Feed. Mycotoxin Res. 2010, 26, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Rahman, H.U.; Yue, X.; Yu, Q.; Xie, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Li, P. Specific Antigen-Based and Emerging Detection Technologies of Mycotoxins. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 4869–4877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Lee, M.; Seo, D.J.; Jeon, S.B.; Ok, H.E.; Jung, H.; Choi, C.; Chun, H.S. Detection of Foodborne Pathogens and Mycotoxins in Eggs and Chicken Feeds from Farms to Retail Markets. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2016, 36, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Xu, H.; Wang, L.; Sun, J.; Wang, L.; Guo, H.; Ye, Y.; Sun, X. Microbial Detoxification of Mycotoxins in Food and Feed. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 4951–4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. El-Hage, C.; Legione, A.; Devlin, J.; Hughes, K.; Jenkins, C.; Gilkerson, J. Equine Psittacosis and the Emergence of Chlamydia psittaci as an Equine Abortigenic Pathogen in Southeastern Australia: A Retrospective Data Analysis. Animals 2023, 13, 2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. El-Hage, C.; Gilkerson, J. Chlamydia psittaci: An Emerging Cause of Equine Abortion and Fatal Neonatal Illness in South-Eastern Australia. Veter. Rec. 2023, 193, 3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Alshammari, A.; Gattan, H.S.; Marzok, M.; Selim, A. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Neospora spp. Infection in Equine in Egypt. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 20242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Akter, R.; El-Hage, C.M.; Sansom, F.M.; Carrick, J.; Devlin, J.M.; Legione, A.R. Metagenomic Investigation of Potential Abortigenic Pathogens in Foetal Tissues from Australian Horses. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Mureşan, A.; Mureşan, C.; Siteavu, M.; Avram, E.; Bochynska, D.; Taulescu, M. An Outbreak of Equine Herpesvirus-4 in an Ecological Donkey Milk Farm in Romania. Vaccines 2022, 10, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Tong, P.; Palidan, N.; Song, X.; Tian, S.; Zhang, L.; Wu, G.; Deng, H.; Jia, C.; Duan, R.; Suo, Y.; et al. Abortion Storm of Yili Horses is Associated with Equus caballus Papillomavirus 2 Variant Infection. Arch. Microbiol. 2024, 206, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Tong, P.; Duan, R.; Palidan, N.; Deng, H.; Duan, L.; Ren, M.; Song, X.; Jia, C.; Tian, S.; Yang, E.; et al. Outbreak of Neuropathogenic Equid Herpesvirus 1 Causing Abortions in Yili Horses of Zhaosu, North Xinjiang, China. BMC Veter. Res. 2022, 18, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Ahdy, A.M.; Ahmed, B.M.; Elgamal, M.A.; Shaalan, M.; Farag, I.M.; Mahfouz, E.R.; Darwish, H.R.; Sayed-Ahmed, M.Z.; Shalaby, M.A.; El-Sanousi, A.A. Detection of Equid Alphaherpesvirus 1 from Arabian Horses with different clinical presentations between 2016–2019 in Egypt. J. Equine Veter. Sci. 2022, 114, 103960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Galosi, C.M.; de la Paz, V.C.; Fernández, L.C.; Martinez, J.P.; Craig, M.I.; Barrandeguy, M.; Etcheverrigaray, M.E. Isolation of Equine Herpesvirus–2 from the Lung of an Aborted fetus. J. Veter. Diagn. Investig. 2005, 17, 500–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. de Almeida Campos, A.C.; Cicolo, S.; de Oliveira, C.M.; Molina, C.V.; Navas-Suárez, P.E.; Poltronieri dos Santos, T.; da Silveira, V.B.; Barbosa, C.M.; Baccarin, R.Y.A.; Durigon, E.L.; et al. Potential Outbreak by Herpesvirus in Equines: Detection, Clinical, and Genetic Analysis of Equid Gammaherpesvirus 2 (EHV-2). Braz. J. Microbiol. 2023, 54, 1137–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Patel, J.R.; Heldens, J. Equine Herpesviruses 1 (EHV-1) and 4 (EHV-4)–Epidemiology, Disease and Immunoprophylaxis: A Brief Review. Vet. J. 2005, 170, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Marenzoni, M.L.; Bietta, A.; Lepri, E.; Casagrande Proietti, P.; Cordioli, P.; Canelli, E.; Stefanetti, V.; Coletti, M.; Timoney, P.J.; Passamonti, F. Role of Equine Herpesviruses as Co-Infecting Agents in Cases of Abortion, Placental Disease and Neonatal Foal Mortality. Veter. Res. Commun. 2013, 37, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Bażanów, B.A.; Frącka, A.B.; Jackulak, N.A.; Staroniewicz, Z.M.; Ploch, S.M. A 34-Year Retrospective Study of Equine Viral Abortion in Poland. Pol. J. Veter. Sci. 2014, 17, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Divers, T.J.; Chang, Y.-F.; Irby, N.L.; Smith, J.L.; Carter, C.N. Leptospirosis: An Important Infectious Disease in North American Horses. Equine Vet. J. 2019, 51, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Donahue, J.M.; Williams, N.M. Emergent Causes of Placentitis and Abortion. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 2000, 16, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Baumann, S.; Gurtner, C.; Marti, H.; Borel, N. Detection of Chlamydia Species in 2 Cases of Equine Abortion in Switzerland: A Retrospective study from 2000 to 2018. J. Veter. Diagn. Investig. 2020, 32, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Chen, L.; Zhao, Z.J.; Meng, Q.F. Detection of Specific IgG-Antibodies Against Toxoplasma gondii in the Serum and Milk of Domestic Donkeys During Lactation in China: A Potential Public Health Concern. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 760400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Clausen, P.-H.; Chuluun, S.; Sodnomdarjaa, R.; Greiner, M.; Noeckler, K.; Staak, C.; Zessin, K.-H.; Schein, E. A Field Study to Estimate the Prevalence of Trypanosoma equiperdum in Mongolian Horses. Veter. Parasitol. 2003, 115, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Anderson, J.A.; Alves, D.A.; Cerqueira-Cézar, C.K.; da Silva, A.F.; Murata, F.H.; Norris, J.K.; Howe, D.K.; Dubey, J.P. Histologically, Immunohistochemically, Ultrastructurally, and Molecularly Confirmed Neosporosis Abortion in an Aborted Equine Fetus. Veter. Parasitol. 2019, 270, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Nagel, C.; Melchert, M.; Aurich, J.; Aurich, C. Road Transport of Late Pregnant Mares Advances the Onset of Foaling. J. Equine Veter. Sci. 2018, 66, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Agerholm, J.S.; Klas, E.-M.; Damborg, P.; Borel, N.; Pedersen, H.G.; Christoffersen, M. A Diagnostic Survey of Aborted Equine Fetuses and Stillborn Premature Foals in Denmark. Front. Veter. Sci. 2021, 8, 740621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Foote, A.K.; Ricketts, S.W.; Whitwell, K.E. A Racing Start in Life? The Hurdles of Equine Feto-Placental Pathology. Equine Veter. J. 2012, 44, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Summary of infectious and non-infectious causes of equine abortion.
Table 1. Summary of infectious and non-infectious causes of equine abortion.
ClassificationCausative Agent of AbortionClinical OutcomesSpeciesReferences
BacterialSalmonella abortus equiAbortionDonkey[20,22,100]
Salmonella abortus equiAbortionHorses[18]
Chlamydia psittaciAbortionHorses[30,187,188]
NeosporaAbortion Horses[189]
Escherichia coliAbortionHorses[190]
Mycobacterium avium subsp.AbortionHorses[111]
Streptococcus equiAbortionHorses[168]
ViralEHV-4Abortion, neurological and respiratory diseasesDonkey[191]
EHV-7Abortion in the first to second trimesterDonkey[70]
EHV-8Abortion, anorexia, sadness, unwillingness to moveDonkey[71]
Equus caballus papillomavirus 2(EcPV)AbortionHorses[192]
EHV-1Abortion, neonatal deathsHorses[1,48,49,193,194]
EHV-2Abortion, dyspnea, respiratory and neurological symptomsHorses[195,196]
EHV-4AbortionHorses[197]
EHV-5AbortionHorses[198]
EAVAbortionHorses[199]
FungalLeptospiraAbortion, stillbirthHorses[200,201]
AspergillusAbortion, classic signs of placentitis (premature udder development and milk dripping), stillbirthHorses[2,36,124]
ChlamydiaAbortionHorses[202]
Chlamydia psittaciAbortionHorses[203]
ParasiticToxoplasma gondiiAbortionDonkey[204]
Trypanosoma equiperdumAbortion, emaciationHorses[205]
Neospora caninumAborted fetusHorses[206]
ManagementFeeding mismanagementMRLS-type abortionsHorses[177]
Transport of late-pregnant maresInduced cortisol and abortionHorses[155]
Physiological changesTorsion of umbilical cordAbortion, stillbirthHorses[160,207]
Excessive length or shortness of the umbilical cordAbortionHorses[208]
Twin pregnancyAbortion followed by uterine prolapseHorses[152]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, L.; Li, S.; Ma, H.; Akhtar, M.F.; Tan, Y.; Wang, T.; Liu, W.; Khan, A.; Khan, M.Z.; Wang, C. An Overview of Infectious and Non-Infectious Causes of Pregnancy Losses in Equine. Animals 2024, 14, 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131961

AMA Style

Li L, Li S, Ma H, Akhtar MF, Tan Y, Wang T, Liu W, Khan A, Khan MZ, Wang C. An Overview of Infectious and Non-Infectious Causes of Pregnancy Losses in Equine. Animals. 2024; 14(13):1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131961

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Liangliang, Shuwen Li, Haoran Ma, Muhammad Faheem Akhtar, Ying Tan, Tongtong Wang, Wenhua Liu, Adnan Khan, Muhammad Zahoor Khan, and Changfa Wang. 2024. "An Overview of Infectious and Non-Infectious Causes of Pregnancy Losses in Equine" Animals 14, no. 13: 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131961

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop