Next Article in Journal
Effects of Feeding Methionine Hydroxyl Analogue Chelated Zinc, Copper, and Manganese on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Mineral Excretion, and Welfare Conditions of Broiler Chickens: Part 2: Sustainability and Welfare Aspects
Previous Article in Journal
Unlocking Gut Health: The Potent Role of Stilbenoids in Intestinal Homeostasis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/ani15030418
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reproductive Traits and Hatchling Characteristics of the Endemic Sardinian Grass Snake (Natrix helvetica cetti): First Field Data, with Screening for Ophidiomyces ophidiicola

by
Matteo Riccardo Di Nicola
1,2,*,
Luca Colla
3,
Sergio Mezzadri
4,
Anna Cerullo
5,*,
Giuseppe Esposito
1,
Paolo Pastorino
1,
Giovanni Paolino
6,
Pierluigi Acutis
1,
Daniele Marini
7,8 and
Francesco Paolo Faraone
9
1
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, Via Bologna 148, 10154 Turin, Italy
2
Wildlife Health Ghent, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
3
Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze, 43124 Parma, Italy
4
Via Palmerio, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
5
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy
6
Unit of Dermatology and Cosmetology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
7
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy
8
Department of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18A, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
9
Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, Via Archirafi, 18, 90123 Palermo, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(3), 418; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030418
Submission received: 25 December 2024 / Revised: 23 January 2025 / Accepted: 1 February 2025 / Published: 3 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Herpetology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

The Sardinian grass snake (Natrix helvetica cetti) is an endangered subspecies endemic to Sardinia, Italy, with a highly fragmented distribution. This study reports the first documented clutch from a wild melanistic female, yielding nine healthy hatchlings. Detailed phenotypic and biometric data were collected and compared to other Natrix natrix complex species, revealing the smallest recorded snout-to-vent length for a gravid female N. helvetica, suggesting unique traits for this subspecies. Both the dam and hatchlings tested negative for Ophidiomyces ophidiicola, the pathogen responsible for ophidiomycosis. These findings address significant gaps in knowledge about the reproductive biology of N. h. cetti, offering helpful insights for the conservation and management of this rare and vulnerable subspecies.

Abstract

The Sardinian grass snake, Natrix helvetica cetti, is an island-endemic subspecies with a restricted and highly fragmented distribution confined to Sardinia, Italy. Information on its reproductive biology and wild offspring remain scarce in the scientific literature. This present study reports the first recorded data on a clutch of eggs laid by a wild melanistic female N. h. cetti that exhibited lethargy when observed basking, prompting a brief period of health monitoring and screening for the presence of the pathogenic fungus Ophidiomyces ophidiicola (Oo). The clutch yielded nine hatchlings, for which phenotypic data are provided and compared with existing information on the Natrix natrix complex. Both the adult female and its offspring tested negative in the Oo screening. The body size of the adult grass snake, specifically its snout-to-vent length of 48.3 cm, is the smallest ever recorded for a gravid female N. helvetica. This may indicate that maturity is reached at particularly small sizes, a distinctive trait of this intriguing island subspecies, suggesting the need for further investigation.

1. Introduction

The reptiles of the Sardinian–Corsican island system display a composite biogeography, comprising species likely introduced by human activity [1,2,3,4] and endemic taxa [5,6,7,8]. The Sardinian grass snake, Natrix helvetica cetti, is an endemic snake subspecies with a highly fragmented and restricted geographic distribution, primarily in the highlands of the southern and eastern part of Sardinia main island, Italy [9,10,11]. It has been classified as ‘endangered’ in the latest assessment by the Italian Committee for the IUCN [12]. For a summary of the current taxonomic status of the subspecies, see Section 3.1.1. in Di Nicola et al. and references therein [11]. Research on N. h. cetti is scarce, particularly in comparison to that of other members of the Natrix natrix complex, and a huge knowledge gap regarding its reproductive biology has been highlighted [10,11]. It is known that it is an oviparous snake, with a reproductive cycle analogous to that of the mainland Natrix natrix complex [10], and, at birth, N. h. cetti hatchlings measure around 15 cm in length [13]. Regarding the Natrix natrix complex reproduction, it is known that mating begins in early spring (see Table 1), with frequent occurrences of mating balls [14,15,16]. The oviposition occurs from June to September, with clutch sizes ranging from four to one-hundred-and-five and an average of nine; the average egg dimensions are 9–24 × 21–40 mm, with a weight of 3–5 g [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Collective oviposition of up to 4000 eggs are known [15,22]. Eggs are laid under the soil, under decomposing wood or inside manure piles [16,18,19,23]. In some cases, females also use artificial objects, such as plastic sheets, to deposit their clutches [24]. The incubation period ranges from 22 to 77 days depending on the temperature [16,19,20,21,22,23,25]. On average, hatchlings have a length of 11–25 cm and weigh 2.5–5 g, depending on the incubation temperature [15,18,19,21,23,25]. Idrisova and Khairutdinov [25] identified excessively high incubation temperature as a significant factor influencing deviations in pholidosis, occurrence of malformations and variations in hatchling colouration.
In the present study, we provide the first detailed description of an oviposition event in N. h. cetti, including biometric data of the gravid female and its clutch, comparing these findings to existing data on the N. natrix complex. In this species complex, reproductive success for both males and females appears to be positively correlated with body size, and clutch size is positively correlated with female size (see [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]). However, in island populations, a reduction in female size is often observed [26,27,28]; hence, we expect a similar decrease in size at maturity for N. h. cetti.
The adult female was observed during a screening for the presence of Ophidiomyces ophidiicola (Oo), the pathogenic fungus responsible for ophidiomycosis (see [29,30,31]), which has not yet been detected in Sardinia ([32]; Di Nicola et al., in preparation). As she exhibited apparently lethargic behaviour, she was temporarily held for a clinical examination, and both the dam and the hatchlings were screened for the presence of Oo.
Table 1. Literature data on reproduction in the Natrix natrix complex. Hatchling size is expressed in total length, except where indicated otherwise in brackets. N. n. = N. natrix; N. a. = N. astreptophora; N. h. = N. helvetica.
Table 1. Literature data on reproduction in the Natrix natrix complex. Hatchling size is expressed in total length, except where indicated otherwise in brackets. N. n. = N. natrix; N. a. = N. astreptophora; N. h. = N. helvetica.
TaxonOviposition PeriodClutch SizeEgg Dimensions (mm; g)IncubationHatchling Size (cm; g)Reference
N. n. complex 6–10523–40 × 13–2030–75 days12–22; 3 [18]
N. n. complexJun–Jul6–7020–40 × 9–24 3–11 weeks11–22[19]
N. n. complexJun–Aug8–3221–40 × 11–24; 3–530–33 days [15]
N. n. complexEarly summer12–50 45–50 days [20]
N. n. complex 8–40 15–18[33]
N. a.Late Jun–Early Jul6–50 60 days14.5–21.6[34]
N. a. 9–26 [35]
N. a.Late Jun–Early Jul12–29 15.2 (SVL)[36]
N. n. vulgarisLate Jul4–24 22–45 days19–22; 2.5–5[21]
N. n. scutataJun–Jul4–1343 × 13; 5.810 weeks [16]
N. n. scutata 25–5216–25; 2–5[25]
N. h. helveticaJun–Sep11–5321–37 × 11–243–8 weeks15–21[17]
N. h. helvetica 6–10 weeks [37]
N. h. helvetica 13–47 16.6–19[38]
N. h. helveticaLate Jun–Early Jul8–40 [39]
N. h. helvetica 70 [40]
N. h. helvetica 28 31–63 days [41]
N. h. cettiEarly Jul927–44 × 16–19 44 days18.5–21.1; 2.7–3.8This study

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Sampling and Phenotypic Processing

The fieldwork, which included the skin swabbing of potentially captured snakes, was carried out to investigate the presence of the pathogen O. ophidiicola among free-ranging snakes in southwestern Sardinia. This survey took place within the Sette Fratelli forest complex (approximate coordinates: 39°18′ N, 9°24′ E, WGS 84; Figure 1a) following a dirt path through a Quercus ilex L. forest on a northwest-facing slope. The weather was clear, with moderate wind (averaging around 21 km/h) and temperatures ranging from a minimum of 19 °C to a maximum of 28 °C.
At approximately 10:30 am, a melanistic adult female N. h. cetti was found along a path’s edge near shelters formed by shrubs and rocks (altitude: about 560 m a.s.l.), basking almost fully exposed to the sun. Despite being warm from sun exposure, the snake displayed neither escape nor death-feigning behaviour when approached. At first glance, it appeared healthy, with no visible skin lesions and a slightly enlarged terminal trunk segment, consistent with a gravid individual. However, due to its unusually lethargic behaviour, a decision was made to temporarily detain the snake for further veterinary monitoring, in accordance with the health screening procedures established in our fieldwork authorisation. The snake was provisionally housed in an 80 × 40 × 40 cm glass terrarium that had been thoroughly cleaned and disinfected prior to use. The set up included an absorbent paper substrate, a humid chamber filled with moss and wood fragments from the capture site, an artificial shelter and a water dish. Additionally, a timer-controlled UVB lamp was installed to mimic the seasonal light cycle (15 h of light).
The snake was tested for Oo presence using a double cutaneous dry swab. Every swab was performed with a single sterile cotton-tipped applicator with ten repetitions on the dorsal scales, ventral scales and head region to cover the whole skin surface. Dry swabs tips were placed in 1.5 mL tubs and subsequently stored at −20 °C. No invasive collection of skin fragments was carried out as the animal had no suspect skin lesions.
On 2 July 2023, four days after being detained, the snake laid a clutch of nine eggs that were promptly placed in an open container with moss as a substrate and maintained at a controlled temperature (range 26–28 °C) in an incubator. Following oviposition, the dam was kept under observation for two days (Figure 1b) and, after confirming its health status, was released at the exact location where it was found six days earlier. The release occurred mid-morning under favourable climatic conditions to ensure the snake could meet its thermal and light requirements (see [42,43]).
Given the documented cases of postnatal transmission of Oo from dams to offspring [44], every hatchling was tested for Ophidiomyces presence using only their postnatal ecdysis to minimise invasiveness via cutaneous dry swab or scale clipping. All hatchlings were kept under observation until completing their postnatal ecdysis. Following an accurate clinical examination of each individual, the hatchlings were released at the same location where the mother was captured. The release occurred one day after hatching, during mid-morning, to take advantage of favourable climatic conditions and ensure adequate exposure to heat and light [42,43]. Handling of the hatchlings was minimised by obtaining measurements from detailed macro photographs analysed using the software ImageJ (version 1.54k) [45]. Each snake was sexed by analysing the shape of the cloacal region and on the basis of the scale counts [10], and the following continuous and discrete measurements were taken (see [46,47]): snout–vent length (SVL, from the tip of the rostral scale to the cloaca); tail length (TL, from the cloaca to the tip of the tail); snout length (SL, from the tip of the rostral scale to the posterior end of the frontal scale); distance between nostrils (DBN); horizontal eye diameter (ED); pileus length (PL, from the tip of the rostral scale to the posterior margin of the parietal scales suture); and pileus width (PW, distance between the external margin of the parietal scales). Total length (TotL) was derived as the sum of SVL and TL. The body weight (BW) of all hatchlings was measured using a VEVOR HZ-B50002 balance (readability: 0.01 g). For the pholidotic analysis, the dorsal (DS), ventral (VS), subcaudal (ScS), supralabial (SS), preocular (PrS), postocular (PoS) and temporal scales (TS) were counted. Ventral scales were counted following the Dowling method [48]. The colour pattern of each snake was assessed following Di Nicola et al. [11]. To avoid any form of stress, individual eggs were measured only after hatching.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test and diagnostic plots, and square root transformation was applied to reduce deviations from normality. A one-way ANOVA was performed to test for differences on biometric and meristic characters between sexes. Statistical analyses were conducted using the stats package and base R functions in R version 4.4.1 [49]; the box plots were created using Python 3.10 via Google Colab [50,51].

2.3. Laboratory Analysis

The presence of Ophidiomyces ophidiicola was evaluated using SYBR Green-based qPCR, following the methodology outlined by Marini et al. [32,52]. DNA was extracted from dry swabs (placed in 1.5 mL tubes at sampling) by adding 100 μL of PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (ThermoFisher, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 50 mg of 0.5 mm zirconium oxide beads. To extract DNA from moults, 3 to 5 fractions (ca. 0.5 × 0.5 cm) were placed in 1.5 mL tubes by adding 50 μL of PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (ThermoFisher, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 50 mg of 0.5 mm zirconium oxide beads. Samples were homogenised for 60 s using a Bullet Blender Storm 24 (Next Advance, Inc., New York, NY, USA) and then centrifuged at 13,000 RPM for 30 s; this process was repeated twice. The samples were subsequently heated at 95 °C for 13 min using a Techne® Dri-Block® DB-2D (Buch & Holm, Herlev, Denmark), cooled for 5 min and centrifuged again at 13,000 RPM for 30 s. Next, 50 μL of nuclease-free water was added, and after centrifugation under the same conditions, 50–75 μL of the supernatant was transferred to new 1.5 mL tubes. Following another round of centrifugation, 30–50 μL of DNA extract was obtained. DNA concentrations were measured Nanodrop 2000c spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The DNA extracts were diluted to 12.5 ng/μL and used immediately. Adhering to the protocol from Marini et al. [32,52], each DNA sample was tested in triplicate using SYBR Green-based qPCR assays targeting the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region of the ribosomal RNA gene complex (primers from Bohuski et al. [53]) and the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (nad1) gene (primers from Lorch et al. [54]) specific to O. ophidiicola. Each 10 μL qPCR reaction comprised 5 μL of iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA), 50 ng of DNA (4 μL of a 12.5 ng/μL solution), 0.7 μL of nuclease-free water and 0.3 μL of a 10 μM primer mix. Amplifications were conducted on a CFX385™ Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) with the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min; 40 cycles consisting of 95 °C for 3 s and 60 °C for 30 s; followed by a melt curve analysis from 65 °C to 95 °C, increasing by 0.5 °C increments with readings every 5 s. The qPCR results, including Ct values, melting curves and relative fluorescence units (RFUs), were analysed using Bio-Rad CFX Maestro software 1.1 (v.4.1.2). Detailed information on PCR assay efficiency, the controls used and RFU analysis in the End-Point mode of the software is available in Marini et al. [32].

3. Results

The melanistic adult female Sardinian grass snake, which was found and detained for further observations, measured 58.8 cm in total length (48.3 cm SVL + 10.5 cm tail). Four days after being placed in captivity, the snake laid a clutch of nine eggs beneath moss litter. Following 44 days of incubation at 27–28 °C, the first egg hatched during the night, with the remaining eight eggs hatching within the subsequent 24–36 h, totalling nine hatchlings in apparently excellent health. The post-hatching egg lengths ranged from 2.7 to 4.4 cm (Figure 2). Six to eighteen hours post-hatching, all hatchlings displayed pre-ecdysis conditions, characterised by dull-appearing skin and blue eyes (Figure 3). The postnatal ecdysis process was completed within 24 h of hatching.
Five out of nine hatchlings were identified as females and four as males (Table 2).
The hatchlings measured between 18.5 to 21.1 cm in total length, with an average of 20.2 cm ± 0.8 cm standard deviation (SD). Males had significantly longer tails (TL) (mean ± SD: 3.7 ± 0.2 cm vs. 3.2 ± 0.1 cm; F = 28.51, p = 0.0010), more subcaudals (ScS) (58.8 ± 1.0 vs. 49.2 ± 0.8; F = 253.94, p = 0.0000) and more ventral scales (VS) (170.0 ± 2.0 vs. 164.8 ± 0.8; F = 28.50, p = 0.0010) compared to females (Figure 4). TL also determines a higher TotL in males (20.9 ± 0.19 cm vs. 19.6 ± 0.8 cm; F = 10.61, p = 0.0033), since there are no significant differences in SVL between the two sexes (16.9 ± 0.2 cm vs. 16.4 ± 0.8 cm; F = 1.73, p = 0.2262). No significant differences were found in the other analysed characters (Table 2).
Both the dam and the offspring tested negative for Oo molecular detection, as no specific Oo DNA was detected by qPCR, neither from the dry swabs of the adult female nor from the hatchlings’ shed skins.

4. Discussion

The Sardinian endemic grass snake subspecies, Natrix helvetica cetti, possesses numerous characteristics, including aspects of its reproductive biology, which remain largely unstudied. In this present study, we report data on a clutch of nine eggs laid by a melanistic adult female measuring 48.3 cm SVL. Regarding body size, this represents the smallest value recorded for a mature female of N. helvetica, as the literature reports minimum SLV values between 53 and 66 cm for this species [37,38,55]. For the other taxa of the N. natrix complex, minimum values greater than 60 cm SVL are usually reported for mature females [16,21,36,56]. However, in some Iranian populations of N. natrix, values as low as 35 cm SVL can be inferred, as noted by Ahmadzadeh et al. [57]. While our single data point is insufficient to establish a trend, it warrants further targeted investigations, as it suggests additional distinctive traits in this subspecies, which is already known for its smaller size compared to mainland populations [10,26,58,59]. Body size at maturity is an extremely plastic trait in snakes, especially in island populations, which can significantly diverge compared to mainland populations [60,61], sometimes in a very short time [62,63]. This was already observed for N. natrix, for which a decrease in size is also known in some island populations [27,28]. This dwarfism pattern and, sometimes, the reduction in sexual dimorphism, are possibly determined by the absence of large preys, such as the European toad, Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758), which are usually selected by adult females [26,27]. In Sardinia, in fact, the presence of B. bufo was only recently confirmed due to local introduction events [64].
The clutch size, as well as the eggs’ dimensions, align with data from the Natrix natrix complex (Table 1). Despite oviposition occurring in a controlled environment, the female chose moss litter for egg-laying, corroborating preferences reported in earlier studies [16,18,21,23]. The incubation period lasted 44 days, which agrees with the range reported by previous authors (see Table 1) and closely matches the 42-day incubation period recorded by Townson [41] for N. helvetica under comparable conditions. The clutch size observed in this instance is lower than the range reported for the N. natrix complex (Table 1). This is consistent with the general trend in this species group, where the number of eggs is typically positively correlated with maternal size [16,21,38,56]. On the other hand, hatchlings’ body size in the N. natrix complex is usually considered not influenced by clutch size and maternal body size [21,56]. In line with this, the mean size of hatchlings of N. h. cetti both in terms of total length and weight (20.2 cm; 3.4 g) was comparable to values reported in previous studies for other species within the complex, even when incubation set-ups varied significantly [21]. Despite adult grass snakes being sexually dimorphic in size [28,56], hatchlings generally exhibit no differences in body size between sexes, also in terms of TotL [56]. Our findings confirmed this pattern in terms of SVL, as occurs in other populations of N. helvetica (cf. [55]), but not as regards TotL, influenced by the longer tail (TL) in males. This pattern is also observable in adults of the N. natrix complex, at least in the SVL/TL ratio [55,65,66,67]. The pholidotic characters reported here align with the range reported for this subspecies [10].
Wagner et al. [68] reported that for most Natricidae the postnatal ecdysis occurs immediately or within four days. Interestingly, all the N. h. cetti hatchlings featured in this study completed their postnatal ecdysis within a 24-h period of hatching. This aspect deserves further investigation, as it may have been influenced by the incubation parameters.
The melanistic colour pattern of the gravid female was compatible with what Goldenberg et al. [69] described as “charcoal” (see also [70]), and it was included in category IV by Di Nicola et al. [11]. Melanism, the most common form of colour polymorphism in snakes and animals in general [71], is typically associated in ectotherms with the thermal melanism hypothesis [69,72,73]. This hypothesis suggests that darker colouration enhances heat absorption, offering thermal advantages. However, the “charcoal” dark morphotype in N. helvetica is associated with high UV environments, implying a role in protection against solar radiation [69]. According to a recent review by Sahlean et al. [74], the ecological and functional traits of melanism in snakes have been studied by various authors, while the genetic bases are still not understood. Despite the melanistic colouration of the mother, none of the hatchlings in this study exhibited melanism. This may be because melanism usually does not develop at birth but emerges during ontogenesis (see [74,75]). Observations of N. helvetica populations in Sicily, where charcoal adults predominate, support that this morph is generally absent in yearlings (Faraone F.P., unpublished data).
However, the hatchlings exhibited a heavily barred pattern similar to category III as reported by Di Nicola and colleagues [11]. Additionally, none of the juveniles had a light-coloured collar.
The absence of Ophidiomyces ophidiicola in the monitored snakes aligns with other studies in Sardinia ([32]; Di Nicola et al. in preparation). While this finding is reassuring regarding the absence of the pathogen in this delicate insular ecosystem, limited research and reduced field efforts remain factors that may influence these results. Therefore, ongoing health surveillance for emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), including other fungal pathogens such as Parananniziopsis spp. [76], is essential.
Although this study sheds some light on N. h. cetti reproductive biology, it is crucial to emphasise the lack of data on this subspecies. To better understand and preserve this endemic snake subspecies, further research is urgently needed to study its biology, ecology and ethology. Such information is fundamental for an integrative approach to the study, monitoring and conservation of N. h. cetti.

5. Conclusions

The present work marks a pioneering exploration into the reproductive biology of the Sardinian grass snake, Natrix helvetica cetti. Our findings provide the first description of clutch characteristics and hatchling biometrics for this endangered subspecies, revealing notably small dam body size. Both the mother and her hatchlings tested negative for Oo, supporting that this pathogen does not currently pose a threat to the species in Sardinia. Future research should concentrate on longitudinal studies to track population trends and further explore the genetic and environmental factors affecting reproductive traits in this island-endemic subspecies. Additionally, it is important to continue health surveillance of EIDs to manage potential emergency conditions promptly.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.D.N.; methodology, M.R.D.N., S.M. and F.P.F.; formal analysis, M.R.D.N., L.C. and F.P.F.; investigation, M.R.D.N., S.M., A.C., G.E., P.P., G.P., P.A. and D.M.; data curation, M.R.D.N., L.C. and F.P.F.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.D.N., L.C., D.M. and F.P.F.; writing—review and editing, M.R.D.N., S.M., A.C., G.E., P.P., G.P., P.A., D.M. and F.P.F.; visualization, M.R.D.N. and A.C.; supervision, M.R.D.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The capture and temporary detention of snakes were carried out following MRDN’s permits: MiTE/Ministry of Ecological Transition (MiTE N. 0024526.28-02-2022), approved by ISPRA on 23 February 2022 (Protocol N. 0009384/2022); Regione Autonoma della Sardegna (Determination N. 251, Protocol N. 6747 of 14/03/2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Fritz, U.; Harris, D.J.; Fahd, S.; Rouag, R.; Martínez, E.G.; Casalduero, A.G.; Širokỳ, P.; Kalboussi, M.; Jdeidi, T.B.; Hundsdörfer, A.K. Mitochondrial Phylogeography of Testudo Graeca in the Western Mediterranean: Old Complex Divergence in North Africa and Recent Arrival in Europe. Amphib.-Reptil. 2009, 30, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Senczuk, G.; Colangelo, P.; De Simone, E.; Aloise, G.; Castiglia, R. A Combination of Long Term Fragmentation and Glacial Persistence Drove the Evolutionary History of the Italian Wall Lizard Podarcis siculus. BMC Evol. Biol. 2017, 17, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Faraone, F.P.; Melfi, R.; Di Nicola, M.R.; Giacalone, G.; Lo Valvo, M. Phylogenetic Relationships of the Italian Populations of Horseshoe Whip Snake Hemorrhois Hippocrepis (Serpentes, Colubridae). Acta Herpetol. 2020, 15, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mori, E.; Andreone, F.; Viviano, A.; Faraone, F.P.; Di Nicola, M.R.; Borri, B.; Bruni, G.; Mazza, G.; Banchi, R.; Zaccaroni, M. Aliens Coming by Ships: Distribution and Origins of the Ocellated Skink Populations in Peninsular Italy. Animals 2022, 12, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Harris, D.J.; Arnold, E.N.; Thomas, R.H. A Phylogeny of the European Lizard Genus Algyroides (Reptilia: Lacertidae) Based on DNA Sequences, with Comments on the Evolution of the Group. J. Zool. 1999, 249, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Salvi, D.; Harris, D.J.; Bombi, P.; Carretero, M.A.; Bologna, M.A. Mitochondrial Phylogeography of the Bedriaga’s Rock Lizard, Archaeolacerta Bedriagae (Reptilia: Lacertidae) Endemic to Corsica and Sardinia. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 56, 690–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Salvi, D.; Pinho, C.; Harris, D.J. Digging up the Roots of an Insular Hotspot of Genetic Diversity: Decoupled Mito-Nuclear Histories in the Evolution of the Corsican-Sardinian Endemic Lizard Podarcis tiliguerta. BMC Evol. Biol. 2017, 17, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rodríguez, V.; Buades, J.M.; Brown, R.P.; Terrasa, B.; Pérez-Mellado, V.; Corti, C.; Delaugerre, M.; Castro, J.A.; Picornell, A.; Ramon, M.M. Evolutionary History of Podarcis tiliguerta on Corsica and Sardinia. BMC Evol. Biol. 2017, 17, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schultze, N.; Spitzweg, C.; Corti, C.; Delaugerre, M.; Di Nicola, M.R.; Geniez, P.; Lapini, L.; Liuzzi, C.; Lunghi, E.; Novarini, N.; et al. Mitochondrial Ghost Lineages Blur Phylogeography and Taxonomy of Natrix helvetica and N. Natrix in Italy and Corsica. Zool. Scr. 2020, 49, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vanni, S.; Cimmaruta, R. Natrix Cetti Gené, 1839. In Fauna d’Italia, Vol. XLV, Reptilia; Corti, C., Capula, M., Luiselli, L., Sindaco, R., Razzetti, E., Eds.; Calderini: Bologna, Italy, 2010; pp. 538–545. [Google Scholar]
  11. Di Nicola, M.R.; Pozzi, A.V.; Mezzadri, S.; Faraone, F.P.; Russo, G.; Dorne, J.L.M.C.; Minuti, G. The Endangered Sardinian Grass Snake: Distribution Update, Bioclimatic Niche Modelling, Dorsal Pattern Characterisation, and Literature Review. Life 2023, 13, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lista Rossa IUCN Dei Vertebrati Italiani 2022; Comitato Italiano IUCN e Ministero Dell’Ambiente e Della Sicurezza Energetica: Roma, Italy, 2022.
  13. Luiselli, L. Resource Partitioning and Interspecific Competition in Snakes: The Search for General Geographical and Guild Patterns. Oikos 2006, 114, 193–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Luiselli, L. Individual Success in Mating Balls of the Grass Snake, Natrix natrix: Size Is Important. J. Zool. 1996, 239, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kabisch, K. Natrix Natrix (Linnaeus, 1758)–Ringelnatter. In Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas; Böhme, W., Ed.; Band 3/IIA: Schlangen II; Aula-Verl.: Wiebelsh, Germany, 1999; pp. 513–580. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shiravi, A.; Hojati, V.; Faghiri, A. The Reproductive Cycle in the Grass Snake, Natrix natrix (Serpentes: Colubridae) in Iran. Russ. J. Herpetol. 2012, 19, 217–220. [Google Scholar]
  17. Angel, F. Reptiles et Amphibiens; Lechevalier: London, UK, 1946. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lanza, B. Guide per Il Riconoscimento Delle Specie Animali Delle Acque Interne Italiane: Anfibi, Rettili (Amphibia, Reptilia); Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche: Rome, Italy, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bruno, S.; Maugeri, S. Serpenti d’Italia e d’Europa; Mondadori: Milan, Italy, 1990; ISBN 88-374-1086-7. [Google Scholar]
  20. Staniszewski, M. The Manual of Lizards and Snakes; Tetra Press: The Woodlands, TX, USA, 1990; 156p. [Google Scholar]
  21. Luiselli, L.; Capula, M.; Shine, R. Food Habits, Growth Rates, and Reproductive Biology of Grass Snakes, Natrix natrix (Colubridae) in the Italian Alps. J. Zool. 1997, 241, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kabisch, K. Die Ringelnatter, Natrix natrix (L.); Die Neue Brehem-Bucherei: Wittenberg, Germany, 1978; Volume 483. [Google Scholar]
  23. Matz, G.; Vanderhaege, M. Guide du Terrarium; Delachaux et Niestle, éditeurs: Paris, France, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  24. De Leo, F.; Scali, S.; Donelli, O. Use of Natural and Artificial Shelters in a Snake Community of Northern Italy. In Societas Herpetologica Italica: Atti del V Congresso nazionale: Calci (PI), 29 Settembre-3 Ottobre 2004—(Atti; 27); Firenze University Press: Florence, Italy, 2006; pp. 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Idrisova, L.A.; Khairutdinov, I.Z. The Effect of Incubation Temperature on the Morphological Features of Grass Snake Natrix natrix (Linnaeus, 1758) (Ophidia: Colubridae). Russ. J. Herpetol. 2018, 25, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Luiselli, L.; Filippi, E.; Capula, M. Geographic Variation in Diet Composition of the Grass Snake (Natrix natrix) along the Mainland and an Island of Italy: The Effects of Habitat Type and Interference with Potential Competitors. Herpetol. J. 2005, 15, 221–230. [Google Scholar]
  27. Madsen, T.; Shine, R. Phenotypic Plasticity in Body Sizes and Sexual Size Dimorphism in European Grass Snakes. Evolution 1993, 47, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Blosat, B. Morphologie, Aut-Und Popluationsökologie Einer Reliktpopulation der Zypriotischen Ringelnatter, Natrix natrix Cypriaca (Hecht, 1930). Ph.D. Thesis, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Bonn, Bonn, Germany, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lorch, J.M.; Knowles, S.; Lankton, J.S.; Michell, K.; Edwards, J.L.; Kapfer, J.M.; Staffen, R.A.; Wild, E.R.; Schmidt, K.Z.; Ballmann, A.E.; et al. Snake Fungal Disease: An Emerging Threat to Wild Snakes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371, 20150457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Di Nicola, M.R.; Coppari, L.; Notomista, T.; Marini, D. Ophidiomyces Ophidiicola Detection and Infection: A Global Review on a Potential Threat to the World’s Snake Populations. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2022, 68, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Franklinos, L.H.V.; Lorch, J.M.; Bohuski, E.; Rodriguez-Ramos Fernandez, J.; Wright, O.N.; Fitzpatrick, L.; Petrovan, S.; Durrant, C.; Linton, C.; Baláž, V.; et al. Emerging Fungal Pathogen Ophidiomyces Ophiodiicola in Wild European Snakes. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marini, D.; Di Nicola, M.R.; Crocchianti, V.; Notomista, T.; Iversen, D.; Coppari, L.; Di Criscio, M.; Brouard, V.; Dorne, J.-L.C.M.; Rüegg, J.; et al. Pilot Survey Reveals Ophidiomycosis in Dice Snakes Natrix tessellata from Lake Garda, Italy. Vet. Res. Commun. 2023, 47, 1707–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ferri, V. I Serpenti d’Italia e d’Europa; De Vecchi Editore: Milano, Italy, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  34. Galán, P.; Fernández Arias, G. Anfibios e Réptiles de Galicia; Xerais de Galicia: Pontevedra, Spain, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  35. Braña, F. Natrix natrix (Linnaeus, (1758). In Fauna Iberica vol. 10: Reptiles; Salvador, A., Ramos, M.A., Eds.; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas: Madrid, Spain, 1998; pp. 454–466. [Google Scholar]
  36. Feriche, M. Ecología de la Reproducción en Colúbridos del Sureste de la Península Ibérica. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Granada, Granada, Spain, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith, M. The British Amphibian and Reptiles; Collins: London, UK, 1951. [Google Scholar]
  38. Petter-Rousseaux, A. Recherches sur la Croissance et le Cycle d’activité Testiculaire de Natrix natrix Helvetica (Lacépède). Rev. D’Écol. Terre Vie 1953, 7, 175–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Smith, M. The British Amphibian and Reptiles, 5th ed.; Collins: London, UK, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  40. Naulleau, G. Les Serpents de France. Rev. Fr. D’Aquariol. Herpétologie 1984, 11, 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  41. Townson, S. Incubation of Grass Snake (Natrix natrix helvetica) Eggs. Br. Herpetol. Soc. Bull. 1990, 34, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  42. Figueroa-Huitrón, R.; Pérez-Mendoza, H.A.; de la Vega-Pérez, A.H.D.; Méndez-De la Cruz, F.B.; Ochoa-Ochoa, L.M. The Effect of Thermal Gradient Design on the Evaluation Ofthermoregulation in Snakes. Herpetol. J. 2019, 29, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Seebacher, F.; Franklin, C.E. Physiological Mechanisms of Thermoregulation in Reptiles: A Review. J. Comp. Physiol. B 2005, 175, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Britton, M.; Allender, M.C.; Hsiao, S.-H.; Baker, S.J. Postnatal Mortality in Neonate Rattlesnakes Associated with Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2019, 50, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jablonski, D.; Asztalos, M.; Yılmaz, C.; Avcı, A. The Range-Wide Mitochondrial Lineage of Natrix natrix scutata (Pallas, 1771) Presented in the Northern Zagros Mountains. Evol. Syst. 2023, 7, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Oitaven, L.P.C.; Calado, S.S.; Da Costa, H.N.; Cruz, G.S.; Monrós, J.S.; Mesquita, D.O.; Teixeira, Á.A.C.; Teixeira, V.W.; De Moura, G.J.B. Trophic Ecology of Gymnodactylus geckoides Spix, 1825 (Squamata, Phyllodactylidae) from Caatinga, Northeastern Brazil. Herpetozoa 2022, 35, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dowling, H.G. A Proposed Standard System of Counting Ventrals in Snakes. Brit. J. Herpetol. 1951, 1, 97–99. [Google Scholar]
  49. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2023; Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 7 December 2024).
  50. McKinney, W. Python for Data Analysis: Data Wrangling with Pandas, NumPy, and Jupyter, 3rd ed.; O’Reilly: Beijing, China; Boston, MA, USA; Farnham, UK; Sebastopol, CA, USA; Tokyo, Japan, 2022; ISBN 978-1-0981-0400-9. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bisong, E. Google Colaboratory. In Building Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models on Google Cloud Platform; Apress: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2019; pp. 59–64. ISBN 978-1-4842-4469-2. [Google Scholar]
  52. Marini, D.; Szczygieł, P.; Kurek, K.; Di Nicola, M.R.; Dorne, J.-L.C.M.; Marenzoni, M.L.; Rüegg, J.; Bury, S.; Kiraga, Ł. Retrospective Detection of Ophidiomyces Ophidiicola from Snake Moults Collected in Bieszczady Mountains, Poland. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bohuski, E.; Lorch, J.M.; Griffin, K.M.; Blehert, D.S. TaqMan Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of Ophidiomyces Ophiodiicola, the Fungus Associated with Snake Fungal Disease. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lorch, J.M.; Price, S.J.; Lankton, J.S.; Drayer, A.N. Confirmed Cases of Ophidiomycosis in Museum Specimens from as Early as 1945, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 1986–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gregory, P.T. Sexual Dimorphism and Allometric Size Variation in a Population of Grass Snakes (Natrix natrix) in Southern England. J. Herpetol. 2004, 38, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Madsen, T. Growth Rates, Maturation and Sexual Size Dimorphism in a Population of Grass Snakes, Natrix natrix, in Southern Sweden. Oikos 1983, 40, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ahmadzadeh, F.; Carretero, M.A.; Mebert, K.; Faghiri, A.; Ataei, S.; Hamidi, S.; Böhm, W. Preliminary Results on Biological Aspects of the Grass Snake, Natrix natrix in the Southern Coastal Area of the Caspian Sea. Acta Herpetol. 2011, 6, 209–221. [Google Scholar]
  58. Camerano, L. Monografia Degli Ofidi Italiani. Parte Seconda. Colubridi e Monografia Dei Cheloni Italiani. Mem. R. Acad. Sci. Torino Ser. 1891, 2, 403–481. [Google Scholar]
  59. Capula, M.; Rugiero, L.; Luiselli, L. Ecological Observations on the Sardinian Grass Snake, Natrix natrix cetti. Amphib.-Reptil. 1994, 15, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rugiero, L.; Luiselli, L. Ecological Notes on an Isolated Population of the Snake Elaphe Quatuorlineata. Herpetol. J. 1996, 6, 53–55. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tomović, L.; Anđelković, M.; Golubović, A.; Arsovski, D.; Ajtić, R.; Sterijovski, B.; Nikolić, S.; Crnobrnja-Isailović, J.; Lakušić, M.; Bonnet, X. Dwarf Vipers on a Small Island: Body Size, Diet and Fecundity Correlates. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2022, 137, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Savidge, J.A.; Qualls, F.J.; Rodda, G.H. Reproductive Biology of the Brown Tree Snake, Boiga Irregularis (Reptilia: Colubridae), during Colonization of Guam and Comparison with That in Their Native Range. Pac. Sci. 2007, 61, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Montes, E.; Feriche, M.; Ruiz-Sueiro, L.; Alaminos, E.; Pleguezuelos, J.M. Reproduction Ecology of the Recently Invasive Snake Hemorrhois Hippocrepis on the Island of Ibiza. Curr. Zool. 2020, 66, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cossu, I.M.; Frau, S.; Delfino, M.; Chiodi, A.; Corti, C.; Bellati, A. First Report of Bufo Bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) from Sardinia (Italy). Acta Herpetol. 2018, 13, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  65. Thorpe, R.S. Biometric Analysis of Incipient Speciation in the Ringed Snake, Natrix natrix (L.). Experientia 1975, 31, 180–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Thorpe, R.S. Quantitative Handling of Characters Useful in Snake Systematics with Particular Reference to Intraspecific Variation in the Ringed Snake Natrix Natrix (L.). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1975, 7, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Thorpe, R.S. Multivariate Analysis of the Population Systematics of the Ringed Snake, Natrix natrix (L). Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. B Biol. Sci. 1979, 78, 1–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wagner, C.; Miller, A.K.; Engelbrecht, H.M.; Greene, H.W.; Alexander, G.J. When to Shed? Patterns and Drivers of Time to First Ecdysis in Snakes. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 13, e10364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Goldenberg, J.; Bisschop, K.; Bruni, G.; Di Nicola, M.R.; Banfi, F.; Faraone, F.P. Melanin-based Color Variation in Response to Changing Climates in Snakes. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 14, e11627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bruni, G.; Di Nicola, M.R.; Banfi, F.; Faraone, F.P. Distribution and Characterization of Melanism in Grass Snakes from Italy. Nat. Sicil. 2022, 46, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lorioux, S.; Bonnet, X.; Brischoux, F.; De Crignis, M. Is Melanism Adaptive in Sea Kraits? Amphib.-Reptil. 2008, 29, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bogert, C.M. Thermoregulation in Reptiles, A Factor in Evolution. Evolution 1949, 3, 195–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Di Nicola, M.R.; Faraone, F.P.; Pozzi, A.V.; Borgianni, N.; Laddaga, L.; Dorne, J.-L.M.C.; Minuti, G. The Tale of the Black Viper: Distribution and Bioclimatic Niche Modelliof Melanistic Vipera Aspis in Italy. Acta Herpetol. 2024, 19, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sahlean, T.C.; Martin, R.A.; Spaseni, P.; Gherghel, I.; Strugariu, A. Melanism in Polymorphic Terrestrial Snakes: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J. Biogeogr. 2024, 52, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nilson, G.; Andrén, C. Morphology and Taxonomic Status of the Grass Snake, Natrix natrix (L.) (Reptilia, Squamata, Colubridae) on the Island of Gotland, Sweden. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1981, 72, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Blanvillain, G.; Martínez-Freiría, F.; Hoyt, J.R.; Lorch, J.M.; Martinez-Silvestre, A. Paranannizziopsis spp. Infection in Wild Vipers, Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2024, 30, 1000–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 15 00418 g001
Figure 1. Map of Italy divided into regions, with a detailed inset of Sardinia on the right. The red dot indicates the area of Sette Fratelli, Sardinia, where the gravid female Natrix helvetica cetti was found (a). Dorsal view of the melanistic adult female after egg-laying (b).
Figure 1. Map of Italy divided into regions, with a detailed inset of Sardinia on the right. The red dot indicates the area of Sette Fratelli, Sardinia, where the gravid female Natrix helvetica cetti was found (a). Dorsal view of the melanistic adult female after egg-laying (b).
Animals 15 00418 g001
Animals 15 00418 g002
Figure 2. Eggs on graph paper after hatching (a) and the nine hatchling Natrix helvetica cetti only a few hours old (b–l).
Figure 2. Eggs on graph paper after hatching (a) and the nine hatchling Natrix helvetica cetti only a few hours old (b–l).
Animals 15 00418 g002
Animals 15 00418 g003
Figure 3. Hatchling in pre-ecdysis condition with dull-appearing skin and blue eyes.
Figure 3. Hatchling in pre-ecdysis condition with dull-appearing skin and blue eyes.
Animals 15 00418 g003
Animals 15 00418 g004
Figure 4. Differences in tail length (a), ventral scales (b) and subcaudal scales (c) between males and females in the nine Natrix helvetica cetti newborns.
Figure 4. Differences in tail length (a), ventral scales (b) and subcaudal scales (c) between males and females in the nine Natrix helvetica cetti newborns.
Animals 15 00418 g004
Table 2. Morphometric data for the nine Natrix helvetica cetti newborns, descriptive statistics and univariate results of the one-way ANOVA test between sexes. R: right side; L: left side; 1: first row; 2: second row, * = significant differences between sexes.
Table 2. Morphometric data for the nine Natrix helvetica cetti newborns, descriptive statistics and univariate results of the one-way ANOVA test between sexes. R: right side; L: left side; 1: first row; 2: second row, * = significant differences between sexes.
juv. 1juv. 2juv 3.juv. 4juv. 5juv. 6juv. 7juv. 8juv. 9Mean ± SDFp
SexMFMFMFMFF df = 8
TotL (cm) *20.919.921.120.620.718.520.719.319.720.2 ± 0.89.50.0179
SVL (cm)17.416.717.317.416.915.516.915.916.516.7 ± 0.63.50.1055
TL (cm) *3.53.23.83.23.833.83.43.23.4 ± 0.328.50.0011
PL (mm)98.58.69.39.38.98.99.29.59.0 ± 0.30.30.6025
PW (mm)5.45.55.15.65.55.45.25.45.65.4 ± 0.24.40.0730
SL (mm)6.25.766.56.76.26.36.56.86.3 ± 0.30.00.8859
DBN (mm)2.92.92.8332.82.72.93.12.9 ± 0.11.20.3015
ED L (mm)21.81.81.81.81.91.91.81.91.9 ± 0.10.50.5140
ED R (mm)221.91.81.921.91.821.9 ± 0.10.00.9228
BW (g)3.73.53.33.83.52.73.23.33.33.4 ± 0.30.20.6404
DS19191919191919191919.0 ± 0.0
VS *167165171164171166171164165167.1 ± 2.928.50.0011
ScS *58495950584960504853.4 ± 4.8253.90.0000
SS L7777777777.0 ± 0.0
SS R7778787777.2 ± 0.42.10.1930
PrS L2111111111.1 ± 0.31.30.2924
PrS R1111111121.1 ± 0.30.80.4071
PoS L3333323322.8 ± 0.42.10.1930
PoS R3333323332.9 ± 0.30.80.4071
TS 1L1111111111 ± 0.0
TS 2L1111222221.6 ± 0.50.10.7980
TS 1R1111111111 ± 0.0
TS 2R2112131221.7 ± 0.73.30.1118
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Nicola, M.R.; Colla, L.; Mezzadri, S.; Cerullo, A.; Esposito, G.; Pastorino, P.; Paolino, G.; Acutis, P.; Marini, D.; Faraone, F.P. Reproductive Traits and Hatchling Characteristics of the Endemic Sardinian Grass Snake (Natrix helvetica cetti): First Field Data, with Screening for Ophidiomyces ophidiicola. Animals 2025, 15, 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030418

AMA Style

Di Nicola MR, Colla L, Mezzadri S, Cerullo A, Esposito G, Pastorino P, Paolino G, Acutis P, Marini D, Faraone FP. Reproductive Traits and Hatchling Characteristics of the Endemic Sardinian Grass Snake (Natrix helvetica cetti): First Field Data, with Screening for Ophidiomyces ophidiicola. Animals. 2025; 15(3):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Nicola, Matteo Riccardo, Luca Colla, Sergio Mezzadri, Anna Cerullo, Giuseppe Esposito, Paolo Pastorino, Giovanni Paolino, Pierluigi Acutis, Daniele Marini, and Francesco Paolo Faraone. 2025. "Reproductive Traits and Hatchling Characteristics of the Endemic Sardinian Grass Snake (Natrix helvetica cetti): First Field Data, with Screening for Ophidiomyces ophidiicola" Animals 15, no. 3: 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030418

APA Style

Di Nicola, M. R., Colla, L., Mezzadri, S., Cerullo, A., Esposito, G., Pastorino, P., Paolino, G., Acutis, P., Marini, D., & Faraone, F. P. (2025). Reproductive Traits and Hatchling Characteristics of the Endemic Sardinian Grass Snake (Natrix helvetica cetti): First Field Data, with Screening for Ophidiomyces ophidiicola. Animals, 15(3), 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030418

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop