Next Article in Journal
Owner-Perceived Undesirable Behaviours in Young Dogs and Changes with Age
Previous Article in Journal
Complete Functional Recovery of a Feline with Extensive Facial Injuries Following a Traffic Accident
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 15
Issue 8
10.3390/ani15081162
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Metopograpsus quadridentatus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Grapsidae) Mitochondrial Genome Reveals Gene Rearrangement and Phylogeny

by
Dan-Dan Bian
1,2,
Sheng Tang
1,3,
Song-Nan Wang
1,
Qiu-Ning Liu
1,* and
Bo-Ping Tang
1,*
1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-Agriculture, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, School of Wetlands, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng 224007, China
2
College of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
3
College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201308, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(8), 1162; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081162
Submission received: 3 March 2025 / Revised: 9 April 2025 / Accepted: 15 April 2025 / Published: 17 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

The marine crab Metopograpsus quadridentatus is categorized in the family Grapsidae, but its classification remains unclear because of limited differences in appearance among species. In this research, we examined its mitochondrial genome, which showed a gene order similar to that of ancient crustaceans, with the exception of the translocated trnH gene. Analysis of 13 protein-coding genes from 40 Brachyura species indicated that it belongs to the genus Metopograpsus and family Grapsidae, clarifying its evolutionary relationships and demonstrating the importance of mitochondrial genomes in taxonomic classification.

Abstract

The taxonomy of the genus Metopograpsus is still a matter of debate because its species have limited morphological differences. Mitochondrial genomes, which are highly informative and easily accessible genetic markers, have been widely used to study molecular evolution and clarify relationships among species. This study aims to investigate the mitochondrial genome of Metopograpsus quadridentatus, a species with unique ecological and evolutionary significance. By analyzing the mitochondrial genome, we seek to address taxonomic uncertainties and provide insights into the evolutionary history of this species. In this study, we sequenced and analyzed the mitochondrial genome of M. quadridentatus to investigate its gene rearrangement patterns and its place within Brachyura. We compared the gene order of M. quadridentatus with that of 40 other Brachyuran species and created phylogenetic trees based on the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs). We found that the mitochondrial gene arrangement of M. quadridentatus is mostly unchanged, similar to the original crustacean pattern, except for the movement of the trnH gene. Notably, the gene orders of several families, such as Eriphiidae, Grapsidae, Camptandriidae, Dotillidae, Plagusiidae, Ocypodidae, and Gecarcinidae, are the same. Phylogenetic analyses consistently placed M. quadridentatus within the genus Metopograpsus and the family Grapsidae, confirming its current taxonomic classification. These results offer important insights into evolutionary relationships and gene order conservation within Brachyura. Our study highlights the significance of mitochondrial genomes in resolving taxonomic uncertainties within the genus Metopograpsus.

1. Introduction

Mitochondria are organelles found in eukaryotic cells that house their own genetic material, known as the mitochondrial genome, characterized by a high mutation rate, lack of gene recombination, a high replication rate, and maternal inheritance [1,2]. In metazoans, the mitochondrial genome is a small double-stranded circular molecule typically 16–20 kbp in size [3]. It contains 13 protein-coding genes, including subunits of NADH dehydrogenase, cytochrome b, cytochrome c, and ATP synthase, along with transfer RNA genes, ribosomal RNA genes, and a non-coding control region that regulates the mitochondria genome’s transcription and replication. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in animals exhibits remarkable organizational precision [4]. It contains 13 protein-coding genes: ND1-6 and ND4L encode core catalytic subunits of Complex I, Cyt b acts as the electron transfer hub of Complex III, COI-III constitute the oxidative center of Complex IV, and ATP6/8 drive proton gradient conversion in Complex V. This compact arrangement, interspersed with 22 tRNA genes, reflects evolutionary optimization for genomic compression and expression regulation. Notably, newly identified regulatory elements within the D-loop control region—such as termination-associated sequences (TASs) and conserved sequence blocks (CSBs)—participate in replication initiation through secondary structure formation, with their polymorphic features now serving as vital molecular markers in population genetics [5].
The infraorder Brachyura consists of 98 families and nearly 7000 described species [6]. Metopograpsus quadridentatus is a type of marine crab commonly found in rock crevices or under rocks at low tide. It is found in various locations, including Malacca, Java, Bali, Kalimantan, New Guinea, the Indian Ocean, Guangdong, Fujian, Zhejiang, Shandong, and other areas in China [7]. Currently, Metopograpsus quadridentatus is classified under Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Grapsidae, genus Metopograpsus. Due to advancements in sequencing technology, especially next-generation sequencing, the time and cost required for sequencing have substantially decreased, making it simpler to acquire the mitochondrial genome sequence [8]. Mitochondrial gene-based molecular phylogenetic analyses first confirmed the monophyly of all six Metopograpsus crab species, revealing high intraspecific genetic variation and a pronounced phylogeographic structure in M. thukuhar and M. quadridentatus, suggesting the presence of undescribed evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) that require further taxonomic validation via nuclear DNA and morphological investigations [9]. Mitochondrial genome analysis is widely used in phylogenetic analysis, biogeography, population genetics, medicine, and ecology [10,11,12,13,14]. The mitochondrial genome of Helice wuana and its relatives offer crucial evidence on the origin, germline evolution, and unique genetic structure of crab [15]. The mitochondrial genome contains 37 genes, which theoretically have a high rearrangement potential. However, according to existing results, gene rearrangements are not very common. Similar gene rearrangements among different species are thought to be unlikely due to convergent evolution but instead suggest a certain phylogenetic relationship among species [16]. As a result, analyzing gene rearrangement is more appropriate for determining the superior phylogenetic relationship [17].
In this research, we analyzed the complete mitochondrial genome of M. quadridentatus and compared it with other brachyura species. By examining the amino acid and nucleotide sequences of 13 protein-coding genes, we built phylogenetic trees. Additionally, we studied the gene rearrangement patterns to determine the evolutionary placement of M. quadridentatus within the brachyura.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and DNA Extraction

Mature crabs (M. quadridentatus) were gathered from Xiamen, Fujian Province, China. Prior to DNA extraction, the specimen was kept in aerated tap water at a temperature of 21 ± 1 °C for a period of 1 week. DNA was extracted from muscle tissue samples using an Aidlab Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Aidlab, Beijing, China), and the extracted DNA was then preserved at −20 °C until amplification.

2.2. Sequencing and Analysis

Prior to mitochondrial genome amplification of M. quadridentatus, commercially prepared universal primers were obtained from Sunbiotec (Beijing, China) [18]. Genomic DNA amplification was conducted following standardized protocols provided with the Aidlab Extraction Kit (Beijing, China). Polymerase chain reactions were executed in 50 μL volumes comprising 5 μL of 10× Taq Plus Buffer (Mg2+ supplemented), 4 μL dNTP mixture, 2 μL forward/reverse primers (each), 2 μL template DNA, 34.5 μL molecular-grade ddH2O, and 0.5 μL Taq DNA polymerase RED. Thermal cycling parameters included an initial denaturation period at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 90 °C for 30 s, primer-specific annealing (49–58 °C for 35 s, with temperature optimized per primer pair), and extension at 72 °C (30 s to 4 min duration, scaled by target fragment size), concluding with terminal elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. Electrophoretic separation was conducted using 1% agarose gels (w/v) for PCR product visualization, followed by purification with Aidlab’s DNA Gel Extraction System (Beijing, China). The processed amplicons were subsequently cloned into T-vector systems for sequencing analysis (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).

2.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

Mitochondrial genome annotation of M. quadridentatus was performed via NCBI BLAST homology searches (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Sequence assembly and refinement were conducted using DNASTAR’s SeqMan module version 7 (DNAStar Inc., Madison, WI, USA) [19]. Genome architecture was visualized through OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) to generate a graphical genome map [20]. Transfer RNA identification and secondary structure prediction (cloverleaf conformation) were achieved using the tRNAscan-SE algorithm [21]. Nucleotide composition, synonymous codon usage bias, and compositional skewness (AT skew = [A − T]/[A + T]; GC skew = [G − C]/[G + C]) were quantified using MEGA 12 [22,23].

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

Mitogenomic sequences from Brachyura species and two outgroup taxa (Cherax destructor and Neopetrolisthes maculatus) were retrieved from NCBI GenBank (accessions in Table 1). Protein-coding genes (13 PCGs) were aligned using MAFFT v7 under the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code [24,25], with ambiguously aligned regions trimmed via Gblocks [26]. Consolidated alignments were generated using PhyloSuite’s sequence concatenation function [27,28]. Evolutionary model selection was optimized with PartitionFinder2 [29], followed by partitioned phylogenetic analyses using MrBayes v3.2 and IQ-TREE [30,31]. The GTR + I + G and MtRev + I + G + F models were chosen as the best models for nucleotide and amino acid phylogenetic analysis. The MrBayes software v3.2 underwent ten million generations with four chains, sampling every 100 generations, with a burn-in step of 5000 generations. The average standard deviation of the split frequency was less than 0.01, indicating convergence. The IQ-TREE software version 2 was run with 1000 bootstrapped replicates, and results were analyzed using Tracer v1.6. The effective sample size (ESS) value was over 200, showing convergence of the chains in the Markov chain Monte Carlo. Phylogenetic trees were visualized using the online tool Interactive Tree Of Life [32].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mitogenome Organization and Nucleotide Composition

The mitochondrial genome of M. quadridentatus exhibits a covalently closed circular configuration with double-stranded topology, spanning 15,523 base pairs (Figure 1). Consistent with typical Brachyuran mitochondrial architecture, it harbors 37 canonical genes: 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, 2 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, and a non-coding AT-rich regulatory region (Figure 2). Gene strand distribution reveals 14 tRNA genes (trnL2, trnK, trnD, trnG, trnA, trnR, trnN, trnS1, trnE, trnT, trnS2, trnI, trnM, and trnW) and all PCGs encoded on the minority strand, while the remaining genes (8 tRNAs, 2 rRNAs, and the AT-rich region) reside on the majority strand (Table 2). Genomic nucleotide composition demonstrates marked AT bias, with adenine (34.4%) and thymine (36.3%) collectively constituting 70.7% of the total bases, contrasted by cytosine (19.6%) and guanine (10.3%). The AT-rich region accounts for 70.4% of its sequence. Calculated compositional skews (AT skew = [A − T]/[A + T] = −0.025; GC skew = [G − C]/[G + C] = −0.314) indicate moderate adenine depletion and pronounced guanine deficiency. Comparative analysis across Brachyura reveals that M. quadridentatus shares the negative GC skew trend, while only 10 congeners exhibit marginally positive AT skew values (Table 3).

3.2. Protein-Coding Genes

As shown in Table 2, the 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) varied in length, ranging from 159 bp (atp8) to 1734 bp (nad5). The PCG region of the mitochondrial genome of M. quadridentatus was 11,172 bp in length and consisted of 13 genes (nad1–6, nad4L, cox1–3, atp6, atp8, and cytb). The start codon for 12 of the 13 protein-coding genes is ATG (T/G), while the start codon for the nad4 gene is CTG. The mitochondrial genome of M. quadridentatus exhibits standard termination codons (TAA or serine-encoding TCG) in ten protein-coding genes (PCGs), whereas cox1, cox2, and cytb feature incomplete T-nucleotide stop signals (Table 2). Codon utilization patterns across PCGs are summarized in Table 3, revealing a total of 3724 codons. Leucine (Leu, 15.9%) predominates as the most abundant amino acid, followed by serine (Ser, 9.80%) and phenylalanine (Phe, 8.83%). The highest-frequency codons include UUA (Leu), UUU (Phe), and AUU (isoleucine) (Table 4). Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) profiles for M. quadridentatus (Figure 3) corroborate these findings, validating codon bias trends observed in M. quadridentatus.

3.3. Transfer RNA and Ribosomal RNA Genes and Control Region

The mitochondrial genome of M. quadridentatus includes two ribosomal RNA genes, rrnL (1323 bp) and rrnS (832 bp), with a trnV gene positioned between them—a conserved feature among metazoans [55]. The genome encodes 22 tRNA genes (Table 2), ranging from 63 to 74 nucleotides (total combined length: 1475 bp). Eight tRNAs (trnH, trnF, trnP, trnL1, trnV, trnQ, trnC, and trnY) were encoded on the minority strand. tRNAscan-SE analysis predicted canonical cloverleaf secondary structures for all tRNAs (Figure 2), except trnS1, which exhibited an elongated dihydroxyuridine (DHU) arm and a distinctive auxiliary loop, a structural anomaly consistent with Brachyuran mitogenomes [56]. Genomic organization analysis identified 18 nucleotide overlaps (1–32 bp) and five intergenic spacers (2–7 bp), excluding the control region. A 568 bp control region, positioned between rrnS and trnI, harbors conserved sequences associated with replication origin and transcriptional regulation (Table 2).

3.4. Gene Arrangement

Mitochondrial gene rearrangement is a valuable tool for studying the evolutionary relationships of organisms at higher taxonomic levels [57]. In recent years, this technique has been used to elucidate the evolutionary history of various groups such as birds, marsupials, echinoderms, nematodes, and others [58]. When comparing the gene order of the entire mitochondrial genome of M. quadridentatus to the Pancrustacean ground pattern, we observed that, except for the translocation of trnH, the gene sequences were identical (Figure 4). The mitochondrial genome of Eucrate crenata exhibits a notable rearrangement involving the translocation of trnH-cac, which deviates from the conserved gene order typically observed in decapods. In most brachyuran crabs, trnH-cac is positioned between nad5 and nad4, a pattern considered ancestral for the group. However, in E. crenata, this tRNA gene is relocated between trnE-gaa and trnF-ttc, marking a significant structural divergence [59]. Such rearrangements, though uncommon in Brachyura, are increasingly recognized as phylogenetically informative markers [19]. The trnH translocation observed here may reflect lineage-specific evolutionary dynamics, potentially arising from mechanisms such as tandem duplication–random loss (TDRL) or recombination-mediated processes [42]. Additionally, when compared to the gene rearrangement of other brachyura species in our study, we found that the gene order was the same among families Eriphiidae, Grapsidae, Camptandriidae, Dotillidae, Plagusiidae, Ocypodidae, and Gecarcinidae. However, in Sesamidae, gene rearrangement was observed in the transposition of trnQ and trnI. The mechanism of mitochondrial genome rearrangement is believed to involve errors in light-strand replication and gene tandem duplication, which can occur due to replication errors such as incorrect start or stop signals and slipped mispairing [60]. The gene order of Varunidae, Macrophthalmidae, and one Pinnotheridae species, Tritodynamia horvathi, are the same. The gene rearrangement pattern of Homolidae, Raninidae, Orithyiidae, Oregoniidae, Majidae, Bythograeidae, Oziidae, Xanthidae, Leucosiidae, Matutidae, Eriphiidae, Menippidae, Carpiliidae, Ovalipidae, Geryonidae, Portunidae, and some Potamidae species are the same or similar [19]. This rearrangement gains further significance when contextualized within the phylogenetic framework [43]. While gene order conservation is often emphasized in mitogenomic studies, the trnH translocation in Brachyura underscores the utility of structural variations in resolving deep phylogenetic nodes, particularly within Decapoda, where traditional morphological classification faces challenges [25]. Our study also revealed frequent gene rearrangements in tRNAs, protein-coding genes, and rRNAs in Xenograpsus testudinatus and Etisus dentus, suggesting the occurrence of mitochondrial gene recombination [54].

3.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic reconstruction was initiated by identifying taxonomically proximate Brachyura species through NCBI BLAST homology screening. Nucleotide and amino acid sequences of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) from Brachyuran taxa (Table 1) were employed to resolve the phylogenetic position of M. quadridentatus. Topological congruence between the BI and ML trees permitted integration into a consensus phylogeny (Figure 5). Both analyses robustly placed M. quadridentatus and M. frontalis within a monophyletic clade, supported by statistically robust nodal values (posterior probability ≥ 0.95; bootstrap ≥ 90%), strongly suggesting a sister-group relationship between these congeners. Both M. quadridentatus and M. frontalis were clustered in the same branch with Grapsidae species. We can infer from this that M. quadridentatus belongs to genus Metopograpsus, family Grapsidae, which is consistent with the findings of a previous study [19]. The phylogenetic trees based on amino acid and nucleotide sequences have different topologies. In the phylogenetic trees based on nucleotide sequences, the topology is ((((((Sesermidae + Gecarcinidae) + Xenograpsidae) + (Ocypodidae + Plagusiidae)) + (Camptandriidae + Dotillidae)) + Grapsidae) + (Eriphiidae + Xanthidae)). The topology of the phylogenetic trees based on amino acid sequences is (((((Sesermidae + (Camptandriidae + Dotillidae)) + (Grapsidae + Gecarcinidae)) + (Ocypodidae + Plagusiidae)) + Xenograpsidae) + (Eriphiidae + Xanthidae)). This robust support for their placement within Grapsidae aligns with broader efforts to clarify brachyuran systematics, similarly resolving Grapsidae as a cohesive lineage using mitochondrial PCGs [40]. However, the conflicting higher-level topologies between nucleotide- and amino acid-based trees—such as Sesarmidae clustering with Gecarcinidae/Xenograpsidae in nucleotide trees versus Camptandriidae/Dotillidae in amino acid trees—underscore persistent challenges in reconstructing deep brachyuran relationships. These discrepancies echo Shen et al., who noted that mitochondrial sequence data, while valuable, often struggle to resolve rapid radiations or ancient divergences due to homoplasy and saturation, particularly in nucleotide alignments [52]. The polyphyly of traditional superfamilies like Grapsoidea and Ocypodoidea in our study further reflects the unresolved nature of brachyuran classification. For instance, the close association of Potamoidea (Parathelphusidae + Potamidae) with Thoracotremata, rather than their marine relatives in Heterotremata, parallels ecological transitions observed in freshwater crabs like Potamon [19]. Such anomalies suggest that adaptive radiations in novel niches (e.g., freshwater habitats) may obscure phylogenetic signals, as seen in Potamon’s origin in Western Asia and subsequent diversification across the Mediterranean [61]. This ecological divergence complicates molecular phylogenetics, as convergent adaptations can mimic shared ancestry, necessitating integrative approaches that combine mitochondrial data with nuclear loci or morphological traits [62]. The incongruent placements of Sesarmidae and Gecarcinidae in our trees also align with broader debates in brachyuran systematics. Zhang et al. similarly reported unstable relationships among Sesarmidae, Gecarcinidae, and Xanthidae in mitochondrial phylogenies, emphasizing the need for expanded taxon sampling [35]. Shen et al. further demonstrated that mitochondrial genomes alone may fail to resolve deep nodes without comprehensive representation of major lineages, a limitation exacerbated by the uneven sampling of families like Camptandriidae and Xenograpsidae in our study [52]. The reason for such discrepancies is that the classification of Brachyura crabs was not perfect, and more phylogenetic studies of Brachyura crabs are needed in the future. Owing to the ongoing development of DNA sequencing technology and bioinformatics, molecular technology can now be used to classify phylogeny [1,61]. The computing power of computers is increasing, which can be used to process molecular data. Using bioinformatic technology to analyze the mitogenome in the future will aid in evolutionary biology studies to classify crabs.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we analyzed the whole mitogenome of M. quadridentatus. Using gene arrangement patterns and phylogenetic analysis, we suggested that M. quadridentatus belongs to the Grapsidae family. While mitochondrial sequences remain a cornerstone of brachyuran phylogenetics, their limitations in resolving deep nodes call for methodological innovation. By combining mitochondrial data with nuclear markers, time-calibrated models, and robust taxon sampling, future studies can unravel the evolutionary history of Brachyura, particularly for ecologically divergent lineages like Grapsidae and Potamoidea.

Author Contributions

Formal Analysis, Methodology, and Writing—Original Draft, D.-D.B.; Formal Analysis, Investigation, Software, and Writing—Original Draft, S.T.; Formal Analysis and Validation, S.-N.W.; Project Administration, Supervision, and Writing—Review and Editing, Q.-N.L.; Funding Acquisition, Project Administration, and Resources, B.-P.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32270487). The study was sponsored by the Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province and the “Outstanding Young Talents” of YCTU.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Wetlands, Yancheng Teachers University (protocol code 2019009, 3 December 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study can be found in GenBank with accession no. MF198251.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tsang, L.M.; Schubart, C.D.; Ahyong, S.T.; Lai, J.C.Y.; Au, E.Y.C.; Chan, T.Y.; Ng, P.K.L.; Chu, K.H. Evolutionary History of True Crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) and the Origin of Freshwater Crabs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 31, 1173–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ma, H.; Ma, C.; Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Feng, N.; Ma, L. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence and gene organization of the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) with phylogenetic consideration. Gene 2013, 519, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rackham, O.; Filipovska, A. Organization and Expression of the Mammalian Mitochondrial Genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 606–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Wei, L.; Liu, B.; Liu, L.; Lü, Z.; Gong, L. Two complete mitogenomes of Ocypodoidea (Decapoda: Brachyura), Cleistostoma dilatatum (Camptandriidae) and Euplax sp. (Macrophthalmidae) and its phylogenetic implications. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2023, 42, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Gong, L.; Lu, X.; Jiang, L.; Liu, B.; Liu, L.; Lü, Z.; Li, P. Mitochondrial genome of Episesarma lafondii (Brachyura: Sesarmidae) and comparison with other sesarmid crabs. J. Ocean Univ. China 2021, 20, 1545–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guinot, D.; Jamieson, B.G.M.; Deforges, B.R. Relationship of Homolidae and Dromiidae: Evidence from Spermatozoal Ultrastructure (Crustacea, Decapoda). Acta Zool. 1994, 75, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, J.; Dai, A. Illustrated Fauna of China: Crustacea; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1964; Volume 2, pp. 1–142. [Google Scholar]
  8. Metzker, M.L. Sequencing Technologies—The Next Generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fratini, S.; Cannicci, S.; Schubart, C.D. Molecular phylogeny of the crab genus Metopograpsus H. Milne Edwards, 1853 (Decapoda: Brachyura: Grapsidae) reveals high intraspecific genetic variation and distinct evolutionarily significant units. Invertebr. Syst. 2018, 32, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lei, R.H.; Frasier, C.L.; Hawkins, M.T.R.; Engberg, S.E.; Bailey, C.A.; Johnson, S.E.; McLain, A.T.; Groves, C.P.; Perry, G.H.; Nash, S.D.; et al. Phylogenomic Reconstruction of Sportive Lemurs (Genus Lepilemur) Recovered from Mitogenomes with Inferences for Madagascar Biogeography. J. Hered. 2017, 108, 107–119. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mueller, R.L.; Macey, J.R.; Jaekel, M.; Wake, D.B.; Boore, J.L. Morphological Homoplasy, Life History Evolution, and Historical Biogeography of Plethodontid Salamanders Inferred from Complete Mitochondrial Genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 13820–13825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cerny, V.; Fernandes, V.; Costa, M.D.; Hajek, M.; Mulligan, C.J.; Pereira, L. Migration of Chadic Speaking Pastoralists Within Africa Based on Population Structure of Chad Basin and Phylogeography of Mitochondrial L3f Haplogroup. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Inak, G.; Lorenz, C.; Lisowski, P.; Zink, A.; Mlody, B.; Prigione, A. Concise Review: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Drug Discovery for Mitochondrial Disease. Stem Cells 2017, 35, 1655–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Janzen, D.H.; Burns, J.M.; Cong, Q.; Hallwachs, W.; Dapkey, T.; Manjunath, R.; Hajibabaei, M.; Hebert, P.D.N.; Grishin, N.V. Nuclear Genomes Distinguish Cryptic Species Suggested by Their DNA Barcodes and Ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 8313–8318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tang, B.P.; Liu, Y.; Xin, Z.Z.; Zhang, D.Z.; Wang, Z.F.; Zhu, X.Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.B.; Zhou, C.L.; Chai, X.Y.; et al. Characterisation of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Helice wuana (Grapsoidea: Varunidae) and Comparison with Other Brachyuran Crabs. Genomics 2018, 110, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kobayashi, G.; Itoh, H.; Fukuda, H.; Kojima, S. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Sand Bubbler Crab Scopimera globosa and Its Phylogenetic Position. Genomics 2021, 113, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ji, Y.T.; Zhou, X.J.; Yang, Q.; Lu, Y.B.; Wang, J.; Zou, J.X. Adaptive evolution characteristics of mitochondrial genomes in genus Aparapotamon (Brachyura, Potamidae) of freshwater crabs. BMC Genom. 2023, 24, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Simon, C.; Buckley, T.R.; Frati, F.; Stewart, J.B.; Beckenbach, A.T. Incorporating Molecular Evolution into Phylogenetic Analysis, and a New Compilation of Conserved Polymerase Chain Reaction Primers for Animal Mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2016, 37, 545–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Wu, Q.; Xu, X.; Wang, P.; Wang, Z. Insights into the Evolution of Brachyura (Crustacea: Decapoda) from Mitochondrial Sequences and Gene Order Rearrangements. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 170, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Greiner, S.; Lehwark, P.; Bock, R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) Version 1.3.1: Expanded Toolkit for the Graphical Visualization of Organellar Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W59–W64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lowe, T.M.; Eddy, S.R. tRNAscan-SE: A Program for Improved Detection of Transfer RNA Genes in Genomic Sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Suleski, M.; Sanderford, M.; Sharma, S.; Tamura, K. MEGA12: Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2024, 41, msae263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Perna, N.T.; Kocher, T.D. Patterns of Nucleotide Composition at Fourfold Degenerate Sites of Animal Mitochondrial Genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 1995, 41, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A Novel Method for Rapid Multiple Sequence Alignment Based on Fast Fourier Transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Talavera, G.; Castresana, J. Improvement of Phylogenies after Removing Divergent and Ambiguously Aligned Blocks from Protein Sequence Alignments. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56, 564–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiang, C.Y.; Gao, F.; Jakovlić, I.; Lei, H.P.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zou, H.; Wang, G.T.; Zhang, D. Using PhyloSuite for molecular phylogeny and tree-based analyses. iMeta 2023, 2, e87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.; Jakovlić, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.X.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An Integrated and Scalable Desktop Platform for Streamlined Molecular Sequence Data Management and Evolutionary Phylogenetics Studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lanfear, R.; Frandsen, P.B.; Wright, A.M.; Senfeld, T.; Calcott, B. PartitionFinder 2: New Methods for Selecting Partitioned Models of Evolution for Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 772–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Teslenko, M. Draft MrBayes, Version 3.2 Manual; Tutorials and Model Summaries. Systematic Biology 2011. MrBayes 3.2 Manual. Available online: https://web-genobioinfo.toulouse.inrae.fr/~formation/11_Phylogeny/doc/mb3.2_manual.pdf (accessed on 19 January 2024).
  31. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent Updates and New Developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W256–W259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, H.; Shen, M. The complete mitochondrial genome of spiny spooner Etisus dentatus (Herbst, 1785) using high-throughput sequencing. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2021, 6, 985–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhou, H.; Xu, J.; Yang, M.; Wu, B.; Yan, B.; Xiong, Y. Population genetic diversity of sesarmid crab (Perisesarma bidens) in China based on mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrial DNA A 2016, 27, 3255–3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Gong, L.; Lu, X.; Jiang, L.; Liu, B.; Liu, L.; Lü, Z.; Li, P.; Zhang, X. Gene rearrangements in the mitochondrial genome of Chiromantes eulimene (Brachyura: Sesarmidae) and phylogenetic implications for Brachyura. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 704–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, H.; Jung, J. Complete mitochondrial genome of the ghost crab Ocypode stimpsoni Ortmann, 1897 (Brachyura: Decapoda: Ocypodidae) and its phylogenetic relationship in Brachyura. Mitochondrial DNA B 2020, 5, 1699–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guan, M.; Liu, X.; Lin, F.; Xie, Z.; Fazhan, H.; Ikhwanuddin, M.; Tan, H.; Ma, H. The whole mitochondrial genome of the mangrove crab, Metopograpsus frontalis (Miers, 1880) (Decapoda, Grapsidae) and its phylogenetic relationship. Mitochondrial DNA B 2018, 3, 368–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Q.; Xu, C.; Wang, C.; Liu, G. The complete mitochondrial genome of red-clawed crab Chiromantes haematochir (Sesarmidae: Grapsidae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2019, 4, 53–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, J.Q.; Xing, Y.H.; Yao, W.J.; Xu, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Q. Phylomitogenomics reconfirm the phylogenetic position of the genus Metaplax inferred from the two grapsid crabs (Decapoda: Brachyura: Grapsoidea). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Z.F.; Wang, Z.Q.; Shi, X.J.; Wu, Q.; Tao, Y.; Guo, H.; Ji, C.; Bai, Y. Complete mitochondrial genome of Parasesarma affine (Brachyura: Sesarmidae): Gene rearrangements in Sesarmidae and phylogenetic analysis of the Brachyura. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 118, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tan, M.H.; Gan, H.M.; Lee, Y.P.; Linton, S.; Grandjean, F.; Bartholomei-Santos, M.L.; Miller, A.D.; Austin, C.M. ORDER within the chaos: Insights into phylogenetic relationships within the Anomura (Crustacea: Decapoda) from mitochondrial sequences and gene order rearrangements. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2018, 127, 320–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, J.; Xing, Y.; Yao, W.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, G.; Ding, Z. Characterization of four new mitogenomes from Ocypodoidea & Grapsoidea, and phylomitogenomic insights into thoracotreme evolution. Gene 2018, 675, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, Z.; Shi, X.; Tao, Y.; Wu, Q.; Bai, Y.; Guo, H.; Tang, D. The complete mitochondrial genome of Parasesarma pictum (Brachyura: Grapsoidea: Sesarmidae) and comparison with other Brachyuran crabs. Genomics 2019, 111, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lau, N.S.; Sam, K.K.; Ahmad, A.B.; Siti, K.-A.; Zafir, A.W.A.; Shu-Chien, A.C. Gene Arrangement and Adaptive Evolution in the Mitochondrial Genomes of Terrestrial Sesarmid Crabs Geosesarma faustum and Geosesarma penangensis. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 9, 778570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tan, M.H.; Gan, H.M.; Lee, Y.P.; Austin, C.M. The complete mitogenome of the ghost crab Ocypode ceratophthalmus (Pallas, 1772) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Ocypodidae). Mitochondrial DNA A 2016, 27, 2123–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, Z.; Shi, X.; Guo, H.; Tang, D.; Bai, Y.; Wang, Z. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Uca lacteus and comparison with other Brachyuran crabs. Genomics 2020, 112, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, X.; Tang, S.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Q.; Tang, B. Mitochondrial Genome of Grapsus albolineatus and Insights into the Phylogeny of Brachyura. Animals 2025, 15, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rodriguez-Pilco, M.A.; Leśny, P.; Podsiadłowski, L.; Schubart, C.D.; Baeza, J.A. Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Bromeliad Crab Metopaulias depressus (Rathbun, 1896) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae). Genes 2022, 13, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sung, J.M.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.K.; Karagozlu, M.Z.; Kim, C.B. The complete mitochondrial genome of Grapsus tenuicrustatus (Herbst, 1783) (Decapoda, Grapsidae). Mitochondrial DNA B 2016, 1, 441–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shen, H.; Braband, A.; Scholtz, G. Mitogenomic analysis of decapod crustacean phylogeny corroborates traditional views on their relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 66, 776–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ji, Y.-K.; Wang, A.; Lu, X.-L.; Song, D.-H.; Jin, Y.-H.; Lu, J.-J.; Sun, H.-Y. Mitochondrial genomes of two brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda) and phylogenetic analysis. J. Crust. Biol. 2014, 34, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ki, J.S.; Dahms, H.U.; Hwang, J.S.; Lee, J.S. The complete mitogenome of the hydrothermal vent crab Xenograpsus testudinatus (Decapoda, Brachyura) and comparison with brachyuran crabs. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D 2009, 4, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Miller, A.D.; Murphy, N.P.; Burridge, C.P.; Austin, C.M. Complete mitochondrial DNA sequences of the decapod crustaceans Pseudocarcinus gigas (Menippidae) and Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Palaemonidae). Mar. Biotechnol. 2005, 7, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Miller, A.D.; Nguyen, T.T.T.; Burridge, C.P.; Austin, C.M. Complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the Australian freshwater crayfish, Cherax destructor (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae): A novel gene order revealed. Gene 2004, 331, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ingman, M.; Kaessmann, H.; Pääbo, S.; Gyllensten, U. Mitochondrial Genome Variation and the Origin of Modern Humans. Nature 2000, 408, 708–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tang, B.P.; Xin, Z.Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, D.Z.; Wang, Z.F.; Zhang, H.B.; Chai, X.Y.; Zhou, C.L.; Liu, Q.N. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Sesarmops sinensis Reveals Gene Rearrangements and Phylogenetic Relationships in Brachyura. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, J.; Kan, X.; Miao, G.; Hu, S.; Sun, Q.; Tian, W. qMGR: A New Approach for Quantifying Mitochondrial Genome Rearrangement. Mitochondrion 2020, 52, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jühling, F.; Pütz, J.; Bernt, M.; Donath, A.; Middendorf, M.; Florentz, C.; Stadler, P.F. Improved Systematic tRNA Gene Annotation Allows New Insights into the Evolution of Mitochondrial tRNA Structures and into the Mechanisms of Mitochondrial Genome Rearrangements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 2833–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pang, X.; Han, C.; Guo, B.; Liu, K.; Lin, X.; Lu, X. The First Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Eucrate crenata (Decapoda: Brachyura: Goneplacidae) and Phylogenetic Relationships within Infraorder Brachyura. Genes 2022, 13, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rawlings, T.A.; Collins, T.M.; Bieler, R. Changing Identities: tRNA Duplication and Remolding within Animal Mitochondrial Genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 15700–15705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ghanavi, H.R.; Rahimi, P.; Tavana, M.; Rezaei Tavabe, K.; Jouladeh-Roudbar, A.; Doadrio, I. The Evolutionary Journey of Freshwater Crabs of the Genus Potamon (Decapoda: Brachyura: Potamidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2023, 180, 107690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Reyes, A.; Gissi, C.; Pesole, G.; Saccone, C. Asymmetrical Directional Mutation Pressure in the Mitochondrial Genome of Mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15, 957–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 15 01162 g001
Figure 1. A circular map of the mitogenome of Metopograpsus quadridentatus. Protein-coding and ribosomal genes are presented with standard abbreviations. Transfer RNA (tRNA) genes are shown by single-letter abbreviations, except for S1 = AGN, S2 = UCN, L1 = CUN, and L2 = UUR. The thick lines outside the circle indicate the major strand, whereas those inside the circle indicate the minor strand.
Figure 1. A circular map of the mitogenome of Metopograpsus quadridentatus. Protein-coding and ribosomal genes are presented with standard abbreviations. Transfer RNA (tRNA) genes are shown by single-letter abbreviations, except for S1 = AGN, S2 = UCN, L1 = CUN, and L2 = UUR. The thick lines outside the circle indicate the major strand, whereas those inside the circle indicate the minor strand.
Animals 15 01162 g001
Animals 15 01162 g002
Figure 2. Putative secondary structure of transfer RNA (tRNA) genes of mitogenome of Metopograpsus quadridentatus.
Figure 2. Putative secondary structure of transfer RNA (tRNA) genes of mitogenome of Metopograpsus quadridentatus.
Animals 15 01162 g002
Animals 15 01162 g003
Figure 3. The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values of the mitogenome of Metopograpsus quadridentatus.
Figure 3. The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values of the mitogenome of Metopograpsus quadridentatus.
Animals 15 01162 g003
Animals 15 01162 g004
Figure 4. The gene order patterns of Brachyuran species used in this study.
Figure 4. The gene order patterns of Brachyuran species used in this study.
Animals 15 01162 g004
Animals 15 01162 g005
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree inferred from nucleotide sequences and protein-coding genes of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) of mitogenome using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) estimation. Numbers on nodes are BI posterior probability (nucleotide), ML bootstrap support (nucleotide), BI (amino acid), and ML (amino acid).
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree inferred from nucleotide sequences and protein-coding genes of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) of mitogenome using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) estimation. Numbers on nodes are BI posterior probability (nucleotide), ML bootstrap support (nucleotide), BI (amino acid), and ML (amino acid).
Animals 15 01162 g005
Table 1. List of Brachyuran species used in this study.
Table 1. List of Brachyuran species used in this study.
Accession No.SpeciesSize (bp)A + T%Reference
MF198251.1Metopograpsus quadridentatus15,52370.4this study
OL661264.1Cleistostoma dilatatum15,44369.0[4]
NC_063602.1Plagusia squamosa15,46069.9unpulished
NC_063149.1Episesarma lafondii15,64075.9[5]
NC_061931.1Parasesarma eumolpe15,64675.5[19]
NC_057477.1Cardisoma armatum15,58669.0[19]
NC_057475.1Gecarcoidea lalandii15,57575.0[19]
NC_054248.1Etisus dentatus15,88471.9[33]
NC_051868.1Perisesarma bidens15,64174.8[34]
NC_047209.1Chiromantes eulimene15,89475.5[35]
NC_046797.1Ocypode stimpsoni15,55767.8[36]
NC_042401.1Austruca lactea15,65969.4unpublished
NC_042152.1Metopograpsus frontalis15,58769.8[37]
NC_042142.1Chiromantes haematocheir15,89975.6[38]
NC_041212.1Orisarma dehaani15,91775.7unpublished
NC_040977.1Nanosesarma minutum15,63777.7[39]
NC_039990.1Parasesarma affine15,63874.8[40]
NC_039111.1Cranuca inversa15,67771.0[41]
NC_039106.1Tubuca polita15,67271.6[41]
NC_039105.1Cardisoma carnifex15,59768.8[41]
NC_038180.1Dotilla wichmanni15,60068.5[42]
NC_038066.1Parasesarma pictum15,61175.6[43]
MZ725941.1Geosesarma penangense15,95578.4unpublished
MZ725940.1Geosesarma faustum15,88078.4[44]
MW255974.1Ocypode ceratophthalmus15,55569.5[45]
MN072632.2Tubuca rosea15,64371.1unpublished
MH816962.2Gecarcoidea natalis15,54572.2unpublished
MH796169.1Austruca lactea15,66169.6[46]
MF198247.1Grapsus albolineatus15,58067.4[47]
KX156954.1Orisarma neglectum15,92075.6unpublished
KX118277.1Metopaulias depressus15,76577.3[48]
KU589292.1Clistocoeloma sinense15,70675.7unpublished
KU343209.2Parasesarma tripectinis15,61274.2unpublished
KT878721.1Grapsus tenuicrustatus15,85865.0[49]
KR336554.1Orisarma sinense15,90575.7unpublished
KC107816.1Neopetrolisthes maculatus15,32471.2[50]
JF909979.1Ilyoplax deschampsi15,46069.6[51]
EU727203.1Xenograpsus testudinatus15,79873.9[52]
AY562127.1Pseudocarcinus gigas15,51570.5[53]
AY383557.2Cherax destructor15,89462.4[54]
Table 2. Annotation of complete mitochondrial genome of Metopograpsus quadridentatus.
Table 2. Annotation of complete mitochondrial genome of Metopograpsus quadridentatus.
GeneFromToSizeIntergenic NucleotidesStartStopStrand
cox1115341534 ATGTH
trnL11535160167 H
cox2161022976888ATGTH
trnK2298236669 H
trnD2367242963 H
atp824302588159 ATGTAAH
atp625823255674−7ATTTAH
cox332564046791 ATGTAH
trnG4047411266 H
nad341134463351 ATTTAAH
trnA4462452564−2 H
trnR45284591642 H
trnN46004668698 H
trnS146734740684 H
trnE47424810691 H
trnH48134877652 L
trnF48824944634 L
nad549706703173425ATGTAGL
nad467368085135032GTGTAAL
nad4L80798381303−7ATGTAAL
trnT839984646617 H
trnP8465853167 L
nad6853490395062ATTTAH
cytb904010,1741135 ATGTH
trnS210,17510,24167 H
nad110,26011,20794818ATGTAAL
trnL211,23011,2966722 L
rrnL11,29712,6191323 L
trnV12,62312,696743 L
rrnS12,69813,5298321 L
trnI14,09814,16669568 H
trnQ14,16414,23269−3 L
trnM14,24014,309707 H
nad214,31315,32010083ATTTAGH
trnW15,31915,38668−2 H
trnC15,39015,452633 L
trnY15,45615,523683 L
Table 3. Codon number and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) in Metopograpsus quadridentatus. * represents the termination codon.
Table 3. Codon number and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) in Metopograpsus quadridentatus. * represents the termination codon.
CodonCountRSCUCodonCountRSCUCodonCountRSCUCodonCountRSCU
UUU(F)2641.6UCU(S)1182.59UAU(Y)1251.64UGU(C)331.69
UUC(F)650.4UCC(S)240.53UAC(Y)270.36UGC(C)60.31
UUA(L)3113.15UCA(S)671.47UAA(*)51.43UGA(W)821.69
UUG(L)640.65UCG(S)80.18UAG(*)20.57UGG(W)150.31
CUU(L)1101.11CCU(P)621.65CAU(H)461.08CGU(R)191.38
CUC(L)250.25CCC(P)240.64CAC(H)390.92CGC(R)40.29
CUA(L)730.74CCA(P)561.49CAA(Q)631.73CGA(R)271.96
CUG(L)90.09CCG(P)80.21CAG(Q)100.27CGG(R)50.36
AUU(I)2581.73ACU(T)952.01AAU(N)971.4AGU(S)300.66
AUC(I)410.27ACC(T)310.66AAC(N)420.6AGC(S)90.2
AUA(M)1731.61ACA(T)561.19AAA(K)761.69AGA(S)721.58
AUG(M)420.39ACG(T)70.15AAG(K)140.31AGG(S)370.81
GUU(V)1151.71GCU(A)1162.25GAU(D)431.25GGU(G)601.04
GUC(V)80.12GCC(A)330.64GAC(D)260.75GGC(G)180.31
GUA(V)1211.8GCA(A)490.95GAA(E)551.49GGA(G)1081.88
GUG(V)250.37GCG(A)80.16GAG(E)190.51GGG(G)440.77
Table 4. Nucleotide composition and skewness of mitochondrial genome.
Table 4. Nucleotide composition and skewness of mitochondrial genome.
SpeciesFamilySize (bp)A (%)T (%)C (%)G (%)AT Skew
Metopograpsus frontalisGrapsidae15,58732.83719.311−0.06
Orisarma dehaaniSesarmidae15,91737.538.214.89.5−0.01
Orisarma neglectumSesarmidae15,92037.438.214.99.5−0.01
Orisarma sinenseSesarmidae15,90537.438.314.99.4−0.012
Chiromantes eulimeneSesarmidae15,89437.138.414.89.7−0.017
Episesarma lafondiiSesarmidae15,6403738.914.79.4−0.025
Chiromantes haematocheirSesarmidae15,89937.338.3159.4−0.013
Clistocoeloma sinenseSesarmidae15,70637.138.614.99.4−0.02
Geosesarma penangenseSesarmidae15,95538.340.113.18.5−0.023
Cardisoma armatumGecarcinidae15,58635.333.720.710.30.023
Perisesarma bidensSesarmidae15,64136.638.215.110.1−0.021
Cardisoma carnifexGecarcinidae15,59735.433.42110.10.028
Parasesarma eumolpeSesarmidae15,64636.738.814.79.8−0.027
Parasesarma tripectinisSesarmidae15,61236.23815.710.1−0.024
Nanosesarma minutumSesarmidae15,6373839.713.48.9−0.022
Geosesarma faustumSesarmidae15,88038.739.713.28.3−0.013
Metopaulias depressusSesarmidae15,76537.939.4148.7−0.019
Plagusia squamosaPlagusiidae15,46034.335.618.911.2−0.018
Cleistostoma dilatatumCamptandriidae15,44334.334.719.511.4−0.006
Grapsus albolineatusGrapsidae15,58033.43420.512.1−0.01
Cranuca inversaOcypodidae15,67735.835.218.110.90.008
Dotilla wichmanniDotillidae15,60033.834.720.710.8−0.014
Ilyoplax deschampsiDotillidae15,46034.135.519.710.7−0.019
Austruca lacteaOcypodidae15,65934.834.618.5120.003
Ocypode stimpsoniOcypodidae15,55733.734.120.811.4−0.006
Ocypode ceratophthalmusOcypodidae15,55533.835.719.411.1−0.028
Pseudocarcinus gigasEriphiidae15,5153535.518.710.8−0.006
Gecarcoidea lalandiiGecarcinidae15,57537.737.315.89.20.005
Gecarcoidea natalisGecarcinidae15,5453636.215.19.1−0.003
Parasesarma pictumSesarmidae15,61136.63914.69.8−0.032
Tubuca roseaOcypodidae15,64336.634.518.610.30.029
Parasesarma affineSesarmidae15,63836.638.215.110.1−0.022
Tubuca politaOcypodidae15,67236.63517.510.90.022
Austruca lacteaOcypodidae15,66134.934.718.5120.003
Etisus dentatusXanthidae15,88437.93410.417.80.054
Grapsus tenuicrustatusGrapsidae15,85831.933.122.812.1−0.018
Xenograpsus testudinatusXenograpsidae15,79836.737.216.89.3−0.007
Neopetrolisthes maculatusPorcellanidae15,32434.936.317.411.4−0.02
Cherax destructorParastacidae15,89432.130.324.113.50.029
Metopograpsus quadridentatusGrapsidae15,52334.336.119.510.2−0.025
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bian, D.-D.; Tang, S.; Wang, S.-N.; Liu, Q.-N.; Tang, B.-P. Comparative Analysis of Metopograpsus quadridentatus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Grapsidae) Mitochondrial Genome Reveals Gene Rearrangement and Phylogeny. Animals 2025, 15, 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081162

AMA Style

Bian D-D, Tang S, Wang S-N, Liu Q-N, Tang B-P. Comparative Analysis of Metopograpsus quadridentatus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Grapsidae) Mitochondrial Genome Reveals Gene Rearrangement and Phylogeny. Animals. 2025; 15(8):1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081162

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bian, Dan-Dan, Sheng Tang, Song-Nan Wang, Qiu-Ning Liu, and Bo-Ping Tang. 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Metopograpsus quadridentatus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Grapsidae) Mitochondrial Genome Reveals Gene Rearrangement and Phylogeny" Animals 15, no. 8: 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081162

APA Style

Bian, D.-D., Tang, S., Wang, S.-N., Liu, Q.-N., & Tang, B.-P. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Metopograpsus quadridentatus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Grapsidae) Mitochondrial Genome Reveals Gene Rearrangement and Phylogeny. Animals, 15(8), 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081162

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop