Next Article in Journal
Computed Tomography Prevalence of Cervicothoracic Endplate Junction Alterations in Dogs
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Period of Calcium Propionate Supplementation in Arrival High-Risk Bull Calves: Growth Performance, Body Fat Reserves, and Serum Metabolites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 15
Issue 8
10.3390/ani15081169
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dysmagnesemia Incidence in Hospitalized Dogs and Cats: A Retrospective Study

by
Francesca Perini
,
Chiara Di Franco
* and
Angela Briganti
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(8), 1169; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081169
Submission received: 7 February 2025 / Revised: 14 April 2025 / Accepted: 17 April 2025 / Published: 18 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Clinical Studies)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Few studies have investigated magnesium disorders in veterinary medicine, and most have focused on total magnesium. The aim of the present study was to assess the incidence of dysmagnesemia in hospitalized dogs and cats by focusing on the ionized fraction, which is the biologically active form. Our results showed that hypomagnesemia was common in dogs, even if it was not associated with increased mortality or prolonged hospitalization. In contrast, magnesium disorders were uncommon in cats; however, when hypermagnesemia occurred, the mortality rate increased.

Abstract

Magnesium plays a vital role in the body. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate dysmagnesemia incidence in hospitalized patients. Medical records of 430 dogs and 310 cats were reviewed, including patients with at least one venous blood gas analysis upon admission. Normal ionized magnesium values were considered 0.5–1 mmol/L for both species, according to the machine range. Data collected included patient demographics, hospitalization details, and outcome. In dogs, hypomagnesemia occurred in 35.5%, hypermagnesemia in 1.1%, and normomagnesemia in 62.2%. No survival differences were observed, but males showed a higher hypomagnesemia incidence. Neurological (51%), neoplastic (50%), and endocrine (42%) diseases were most associated with hypomagnesemia. In cats, hypomagnesemia was found in 6.8%, hypermagnesemia in 8%, and normomagnesemia in 85.2%. Hypermagnesemic cats had 2.3 times higher mortality. Endocrine (28.6%), systemic (13.6%), and urinary (12.9%) disorders had a higher incidence of hypermagnesemia. Dysmagnesemia was not linked to hospitalization length or blood pressure changes. In conclusion, dogs showed a high incidence of hypomagnesemia that was not associated with increased mortality. In contrast, although hypermagnesemia had a low incidence in cats, it was associated with increased mortality.

1. Introduction

Although in the last few years critical care medicine has given more attention to magnesium, few studies have investigated its concentration in hospitalized veterinary patients [1]. Toll et al. (2002) reported a high incidence of hypomagnesemia in hospitalized cats and found a prolonged hospitalization time in dysmagnesemic patients, together with an increase in mortality [2]. In hospitalized dogs, previous studies reported an incidence of hypomagnesemia of 6.1% [3] and 54% [4], while 13% of dogs were hypermagnesemic [4]. Similarly to feline patients, hypomagnesemia in dogs was associated with a longer period of hospitalization, while hypermagnesemia was related to greater mortality [4]. Recently, Murray et al. (2023) investigated the correlation between total and ionized magnesium in dogs, discovering a prevalence of hypomagnesemia in 67% of cases for ionized magnesium and 18% for total magnesium [5].
In recent years, the scientific community has questioned whether it would be more useful to measure total magnesium or the ionized fraction. Both in humans and dogs, a low correlation between ionized and total magnesium was found in hospitalized patients [5,6,7]. In fact, low total magnesium concentration is often correlated with normal values of ionized magnesium, which could lead to unnecessary supplementation of this electrolyte [7]. Because ionized magnesium is the biologically active form, it is considered the correct fraction to be measured to detect dysmagnesemia in critically ill patients [8]. However, previous studies have mainly focused on total magnesium [2,3,4].
The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the incidence of magnesium disorders in hospitalized dogs and cats by assessing the ionized fraction through venous blood gas analysis. The second goal was to investigate any correlation between dysmagnesemia and the reason for admission, length of hospitalization, and patient’s outcome.

2. Materials and Methods

All medical records of dogs and cats admitted to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the University of Pisa, from April 2020 to June 2023, were retrospectively reviewed. If the same patient presented to the emergency department multiple times during the study period, only the first visit was considered. Patients were included if they had at least one complete venous blood gas analysis performed at admission (Stat Profile Prime Plus Critical Care Analyzer®, Nova Biomedical, Milan, Italy). Patients were excluded if the blood gas analysis was incomplete or if ionized magnesium was not measured.
In addition to magnesium, the following parameters were collected from the venous blood gas analysis performed at admission: pH, sodium, chlorine, calcium, potassium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, lactates, and glycemia.
Patients were classified as hypomagnesemic, normomagnesemic, or hypermagnesemic based on the first blood gas analysis, with normal values for ionized magnesium in the range of 0.5–1 mmol/L for both species according to the machine reference range.
Other recorded data included species, breed, sex, age, weight, reason for hospitalization, presence of comorbidities, outcome (defined as death, either through euthanasia or naturally, or discharge from the ICU), length of hospitalization, and systolic and mean arterial pressure (measured at the time of admission). No limits were imposed on breed, weight, sex, or age.
For statistical purposes, patients were classified into one of the following categories based on the primary cause of admission to the intensive care unit, as follows: cardiovascular, respiratory, gastroenteric, urinary, reproductive, endocrine, hematopoietic, immune-mediated, neurological, musculoskeletal, neoplastic, infectious, and systemic diseases.

2.1. Quality Control Procedures

Quality control for the Stat Profile Prime Plus Critical Care Analyzer® (Milan, Italy) was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Daily calibration was conducted to ensure the accuracy and precision of the device. In addition, control samples with known concentrations of electrolytes and gases were regularly tested to verify the analytical performance of the instrument. If deviations from expected values were detected, corrective actions, such as, for example, recalibration, were taken.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Data distribution was analyzed with a D’Agostino Pearson test; contingency was assessed with a Fisher’s test and a chi-square test. Results were examined with a Mann–Whitney or a Kruskal–Wallis test. A multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate the outcome in relation to dysmagnesemia.
The chi-square test was used to compare the outcome between dysmagnesemic and normomagnesemic patients. p values < 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

In the study, 430 dogs and 310 cats were enrolled. In dogs, the breeds were mostly mixed breed (n = 126), Jack Russell Terrier (n = 24), and Golden Retriever (n = 23). Furthermore, 191 were females (101 intact, 90 neutered), and 239 were males (201 intact, 38 neutered). The mean age was 7.2 ± 4.5 years, and the median weight was 19 kg (range of 0.5–70 kg).
For dogs, the mean value of magnesium was 0.54 ± 0.12 mmol/L. Upon admission, 153 dogs were hypomagnesemic (35.5%), five were hypermagnesemic (1.1%), and 272 were normomagnesemic (62.2%). No differences (p = 0.9) were found in the chi-square test between survivors and non-survivors for magnesium concentration, while males showed a significantly higher (p = 0.0006) incidence of hypomagnesemia than females.
In dogs, hypomagnesemia showed a higher incidence in neurological (51%), neoplastic (50%), and endocrine (42%) pathologies, but no significant differences were found. Moreover, other blood gas parameters were analyzed for statistical significance because of their known interactions with magnesium. In fact, pH (p = 0.00073), Na+ (p = 0.0002), Ca2+ (p = 0.041), and K+ (p < 0.0001) were significantly lower in hypomagnesemic dogs.
Furthermore, multiple logistic regression in dogs showed that dysmagnesemia in dogs was not associated with lower survival, a longer period of hospitalization, or changes in systolic arterial pressure (SAP) or mean arterial pressure (MAP).
Moreover, 57.79% of hypomagnesemic dogs had concurrent hypertension, 20.13% had concurrent hypocalcemia, and 33.77% had concurrent hyponatremia.
Among hypomagnesemic dogs with concurrent hypertension, 24.72% belonged to the gastroenteric category, as did 35.48% of hypomagnesemic dogs with concurrent hypocalcemia and 36.54% of hypomagnesemic dogs with concurrent hyponatremia.
Regarding cats, the most represented breeds were European shorthair (n = 269), Persian cats (n = 12), and Maine Coon (n = 6). Furthermore, 114 were females (30 intact, 84 neutered), and 196 were males (47 intact, 149 neutered). The mean age was 6.8 ± 4.9 years, and the median weight was 4.5 kg (range of 0.3–10 kg).
In cats, the mean value of magnesium was 0.69 ± 0.19 mmol/L. Upon admission, 21 cats were hypomagnesemic (6.8%), 25 were hypermagnesemic (8%), and 264 were normomagnesemic (85.2%). Hypermagnesemic cats had a mortality rate 2.3 times higher (p = 0.0001) than that of normomagnesemic and hypomagnesemic cats.
In cats, hypermagnesemia had a higher incidence in endocrine (28.6%), systemic (13.6%), and urinary (12.9%) pathologies, but no significant differences were highlighted.
Moreover, hypermagnesemic cats had significant increases in BUN (p < 0.0001), creatinine (p = 0.0004), and K+ (p = 0.0005), along with significant decreases in pH (p < 0.0001) and Ca2+ (p = 0.0007).
Multiple logistic regression in cats showed that dysmagnesemia was associated with a lower rate of discharge (dysmagnesemic cats had an odds ratio of 7.3 for not being discharged), but it was not associated with a longer period of hospitalization or changes in SAP or MAP.
Moreover, 64% of hypermagnesemic cats had concurrent hypertension, 20% had concurrent hypocalcemia, and 52% had concurrent hyponatremia.
Among hypermagnesemic cats with concurrent hypertension, 56.25% belonged to the urinary category. Similarly, 40% of those with concurrent hypocalcemia also fell into the urinary category. Among hypermagnesemic cats with concurrent hyponatremia, 23.08% belonged to the gastroenteric category, and 23.08% belonged to the urinary category.
Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the incidence of hypomagnesemia for dogs and hypermagnesemia for cats for each category. However, detailed definitive diagnoses within each category were not available due to limitations in the medical records.
In Table 1 and Table 2, the mean values of ionized magnesium and related parameters are presented for hypomagnesemic dogs and hypermagnesemic cats, respectively.

4. Discussion

This is the first study regarding the incidence of dysmagnesemia in critically ill dogs and cats that evaluates ionized magnesium instead of total magnesium. The increasing availability of blood gas analyzers in recent years has made assessing the ionized fraction of this cation more accessible in clinical practice.
Understanding disease predisposition to dysmagnesemia is essential, as alterations in magnesium concentrations could be associated with longer hospital stays or increased mortality [2,3,4].
In our study, upon admission, 153 dogs were hypomagnesemic (35.5%), five were hypermagnesemic (1.1%), and 272 were normomagnesemic (62.2%). Murray et al. (2023) reported an incidence of 67% for hypomagnesemia and 4% for hypermagnesemia when evaluating ionized magnesium in 45 hospitalized dogs [5]. The difference in dysmagnesemia incidence could be due to the number of subjects involved and the different cutoff values used. However, even in our study, dogs exhibited a higher incidence of hypomagnesemia than hypermagnesemia.
In this study, hypomagnesemia was not associated with increased mortality, in contrast with findings in previous studies [4]. In human medicine, hypomagnesemia is common in hospitalized patients [9,10,11,12,13] and associated with poor outcomes [14,15]. Moreover, hypomagnesemia in human medicine has a higher incidence in males [10,16], as observed in our study.
Hypomagnesemic dogs showed significantly lower concentrations of Na+, Ca2+, and K+, according to previous studies [3]. Magnesium acts as a cofactor for more than 300 enzymes [17], and it is fundamental to the function of the Na+/K+ ATPase pump. If hypomagnesemia occurs, pump activity decreases, causing sodium to remain in the intracellular space while potassium moves from the intracellular to the extracellular fluid, which is then excreted in the urine [18]. In fact, in the kidneys, hypomagnesemia increases the activity of ROMK (Renal Outer Medullary Potassium) channels, resulting in elevated potassium excretion in the tubules [18,19,20].
Furthermore, hypomagnesemia is associated with higher aldosterone levels [21], which stimulates urinary potassium excretion [22].
In fact, potassium deficiency is often unresponsive to supplementation until hypomagnesemia is corrected [23].
Regarding calcium, magnesium is a cofactor for cAMP production in the parathyroid glands. When hypomagnesemia occurs, cAMP production declines, leading to reduced parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion and, consequently, lower blood calcium concentrations [24,25,26]. Moreover, reduced cAMP production may lead to organ resistance to PTH [27].
Both calcium and magnesium are divalent cations, so they share similar renal reabsorption pathways. Specifically, the Calcium-Sensing Receptors (CaSR) in the kidneys detect their concentrations and adjust renal absorption accordingly [28,29].
Our study revealed a higher incidence of hypomagnesemia in dogs with neurological (51%) disorders, followed by neoplastic (50%), and endocrinological (42%) conditions. In our veterinary hospital, the most common neurological conditions leading to hospitalization include seizures, vestibular syndrome, disc herniations, and traumatic brain injury. In the nervous system, magnesium is very important for neuronal excitability and neuromuscular transmission, and it is necessary to protect nervous cells against excessive excitation, which can lead to cellular death [30,31]. This cation is essential for the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor function, as magnesium blocks the receptor and prevents ion influx. When depolarization occurs and glutamate interacts with the NMDA receptor, magnesium is displaced, allowing ions, mostly calcium, to enter [30]. When hypomagnesemia occurs, glutamatergic neurotransmission increases; in fact, low magnesium concentration is correlated with higher neuronal excitability and neuromuscular conduction, leading to muscle weakness, spasms, seizures, and tetany [1,32,33]. In human medicine, altered glutamatergic neurotransmission and hypomagnesemia are linked to various neurological conditions, including migraine, epilepsy, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease, stroke, depression, and anxiety [34]. In the secondary phase of traumatic brain injury (TBI), a massive release of glutamate occurs with overstimulation of NMDA receptors. Consequently, a great influx of calcium occurs, leading to magnesium depletion and cellular death [35,36]. Therefore, hypomagnesemia is often observed in TBI and correlates with poor neurological outcomes [37,38].
In some neurological disorders, magnesium supplementation has shown a neuroprotective effect, leading to better outcomes. In particular, oral magnesium supplementation may reduce seizures in epileptic children [39,40,41], while in TBI, magnesium supplementation results are mixed, as some studies have reported worse outcomes [42], while others have documented improvements [43].
In our study, hypomagnesemia had 50% incidence in neoplastic diseases. This could be attributed to several causes. First, magnesium is crucial for cellular metabolism [44,45]; thus, when hypomagnesemia occurs, cellular proliferation is inhibited [46]. However, neoplastic cells do not appear to be inhibited by low magnesium concentrations; instead, they tend to accumulate this cation [47], likely due to their overexpression of TRPM7 (Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin), a channel involved in active transcellular magnesium absorption [48]. The great accumulation of magnesium provides an advantage for neoplastic cells, as the cation is involved in many cellular metabolic pathways [49].
Moreover, hypomagnesemia may contribute to the development of neoplastic diseases by increasing inflammation and oxidative stress, which lead to a higher concentration of free radicals and, consequently, DNA damage and inefficient DNA repair mechanisms. This genetic instability can contribute to the development of neoplasia [50,51].
Additionally, hypomagnesemia is a common side effect of certain chemotherapeutic agents, and it may exacerbate other side effects of these drugs. For example, cisplatin is associated with hypomagnesemia due to its nephrotoxicity, which increases magnesium waste [52]. Because of its important side effects for the kidneys, cisplatin is no longer used, as it has been replaced by other drugs, as carboplatin, with fewer renal side effects. However, even carboplatin seems to be associated with hypomagnesemia [53].
Furthermore, during thalidomide therapy, hypomagnesemia may worsen myocardial toxicity, probably through loss of endogenous antioxidants or increased thalidomide toxicity [54].
In our study, endocrinological disorders showed a 42% incidence of hypomagnesemia. Magnesium is important for some hormones’ secretion, and, at the same time, its homeostasis is influenced by other hormones. Aldosterone, a mineralocorticoid hormone produced by the adrenal cortex, regulates water and sodium reabsorption. Hyperaldosteronism can be due to adrenal hyperplasia or neoplasia, or it can attributed to the activation of the renin–angiotensin system because of cardiovascular or renal failure [55,56]. It seems that aldosterone also increases magnesium clearance and excretion in urine [57], so hyperaldosteronism may cause hypomagnesemia [1]. In fact, one study reported that rats with induced hyperaldosteronism had hypomagnesemia due to increased urinary and fecal magnesium waste [58].
In human medicine, types II diabetes is often related to hypomagnesemia. In particular, even if magnesium absorption is maintained, urinary excretion of this electrolyte seems to be increased [59,60]. On the other hand, low magnesium concentration may impair insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells, as magnesium acts as a cofactor [61], and it may increase tissue insulin resistance [59]. However, Fincham et al. (2004) [62] did not find significant hypomagnesemia in diabetic dogs in their study. Nevertheless, they analyzed ionized magnesium only at the time of admission and not during hospitalization, so they assumed that the magnesium concentration could have changed during the hospital stay [62].
As previously mentioned, magnesium serves as a cofactor for cAMP production in the parathyroid glands, so reduced magnesium concentrations may lead to decreased PTH production and organ resistance to PTH [24,25,26,27]. Hypoparathyroidism, along with hypocalcemia, may also contribute to hypomagnesemia, as PTH increases magnesium absorption in the kidneys and in the gut and its release from the bones [63,64].
Although hypomagnesemia did not have a high incidence in the gastroenteric category, the results showed that 24.72% of those patients were hypertensive, 35.48% were hypocalcemic, and 36.54% were hyponatremic. The primary symptom of gastroenteric disorders is diarrhea, which can lead to the loss of electrolytes and fluids. Additionally, bowel inflammation can impair mineral absorption, contributing to hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia, and hyponatremia [1].
Furthermore, dehydration and abdominal pain caused by diarrhea can lead to increased sympathetic nervous system activity and activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. This results in vasoconstriction and an increase in plasma volume. Inflammation itself can also induce vasoconstriction due to oxidative stress [65,66,67].
Concerning cats, although hypermagnesemia did not have a high incidence (8%), patients with this disorder had a poorer outcome. In fact, their mortality rate was 2.3 times higher than that of the other two categories. We found a lower incidence of hypermagnesemia than Toll et al. (2002), who reported a prevalence of 18% in hospitalized cats [2]. This difference may be explained by the fact that we considered a larger sample, specifically, 310 cats, whereas they considered only 57 patients.
Another study reported an incidence of hypermagnesemia in cats with chronic kidney disease of 6% [68], which is quite similar to our results.
In our study, hypermagnesemia was more common in endocrine disorders (28.6%). This result differs from findings documented in the literature. Hospitalized cats with endocrine disorders typically suffer from diabetes mellitus (DM), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and hyperthyroidism. In cats with DM and DKA, magnesium deficiency is the most common dysmagnesemia, possibly due to an increased urinary fractional excretion of magnesium [9].
In human medicine, diabetic patients also frequently suffer from hypomagnesemia, although hypermagnesemia in diabetic patients has been associated with a higher incidence of microvascular complications [69].
It is possible that cats with DKA and metabolic acidosis develop hypermagnesemia because of the shift from the intracellular to the extracellular space [70]. This shift occurs because during metabolic acidosis, hydrogen ions’ (H+) concentration in the blood increases. To maintain acid–base balance, H+ ions are exchanged with intracellular cations, such as potassium and magnesium, displacing them from cells and leading to hypermagnesemia [71].
Hyperthyroidism can also enhance urinary excretion of magnesium, leading to hypomagnesemia [72]. On one hand, renal blood flow increases due to the positive chronotropic effect [73], the inotropic effect [74], and a decrease in systemic vascular resistance [75] induced by thyroid hormones. Additionally, these lead to greater production of nitric oxide in the kidneys, causing intrarenal vasodilatation and thus enhancing renal blood flow [76].
On the other hand, the glomerular filtration rate increases [77] due to increased renal blood flow, as well as the stimulatory effects of thyroid hormones on renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) activation [78,79].
It is possible that polyphagia, a common sign in hyperthyroid cats, increases oral intake of magnesium, which could compensate for urinary losses [80].
Moreover, chronic kidney disease and hyperthyroidism are often comorbid conditions [81]. In end-stage chronic kidney disease, hypermagnesemia may occur due to a reduction in GFR [82].
Sepsis was the most common finding in the systemic category. Mortality rate in septic cats is reported to be 40% [83]. In our study, this category had a high incidence of hypermagnesemia (13.6%). In children with sepsis, magnesium excess is associated with increased mortality [84]. First, cardiovascular effects must be considered, as magnesium acts as a calcium antagonist, blocking L-type calcium channels in the smooth muscle cells of blood vessels. Because calcium cannot enter the cells and is essential for muscle contraction, its absence reduces contractions in vascular smooth muscle cells, leading to vasodilation [85,86,87].
Moreover, magnesium excess can lead to arrhythmias, as this cation influences calcium and potassium channels, as well as the Na+/K+ ATPase pumps of myocardial cells [33,88].
Furthermore, hypermagnesemia can lead to muscle weakness and flaccid paralysis, which can also affect respiratory muscles, leading to hypoventilation and life-threatening respiratory depression [70,89,90,91].
In summary, the effects of hypermagnesemia may contribute to hemodynamic and systemic instability in septic patients, resulting in an increased risk of mortality.
We found that magnesium excess also had a high incidence in urinary disorders (12.9%), and it was associated with increased BUN, creatinine, and K+, while it was correlated with a significant decrease in pH and Ca2+. Although the association between hyponatremia and hypomagnesemia was not statistically significant, 23.08% of cats with both disorders belonged to the urinary category, and another 23.08% belonged to the gastroenteric category. This may be explained by the fact that hyponatremia can result from sodium losses through both the kidneys and the gastrointestinal tract [92].
As previously mentioned, end-stage chronic kidney disease is associated with hypermagnesemia due to the loss of renal function. In this situation, the kidneys cannot efficiently excrete magnesium in urine, leading to an accumulation of this electrolyte in the blood [82].
Urethral obstruction is a medical emergency in which cats cannot urinate because of the presence of urethral plugs, uroliths, or idiopathic factors [93]. In this condition, electrolyte disorders, such as hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, and hypermagnesemia, may develop [93,94,95].
The resultant metabolic acidosis frequently observed in obstructed cats may exacerbate hypermagnesemia for the reasons previously mentioned [70,71]. Unlike chronic metabolic acidosis, which leads to renal magnesium wasting due to the reduced expression of TRPM6 receptors in the kidneys [96], acute metabolic acidosis enhances magnesium absorption in the renal tubules, as magnesium is fundamental to compensate for H+ ions’ concentration. Further studies are needed, but it is possible that TRPM6 receptors are not rapidly downregulated.
The significant increase we found in hypermagnesemic cats for BUN, creatinine, and K+ can be explained by the high incidence of this electrolyte disorder in renal and urinary disorders [93,97]. Furthermore, renal dysfunction is common in septic cats [83], hyperthyroidism [81], and DKA, in which azotemia may result from dehydration or pre-existing renal insufficiency [98].
The decrease in pH and Ca2+ can also be attributed to the high prevalence of renal and urinary disorders [93]. Additionally, acidosis and hypocalcemia are frequently observed in septic patients. Hypocalcemia in sepsis may result from reduced conversion of vitamin D to calcitriol, its active form, in the kidneys, leading to decreased intestinal calcium absorption, reduced renal reabsorption, and, consequently, lower blood calcium concentrations [99]. Finally, hypocalcemia may also occur in DKA due to increased urinary excretion and metabolic acidosis, which leads to greater calcium binding to albumin [100].
Lastly, hypermagnesemia in cats was not associated with longer period of hospitalization or changes in blood pressure. Toll et al. (2002) found a longer period of hospitalization in both hyper- and hypomagnesemic cats [2], which is in contrast to the results of our study. This difference may be due to the smaller number of patients Toll et al. considered in their study, as they enrolled 57 cats admitted to the intensive care unit, while we analyzed the medical records of 310 feline patients.
Regarding blood pressure, given the high incidence of hypermagnesemia in urinary and endocrine categories, hypertension might be expected. In fact, high blood pressure frequently occurs in kidney disease [101,102,103,104] and hyperthyroidism [101,105]. Conversely, patients with septic shock suffer from hypotension [106,107]. The contrasting tendencies observed among different categories may explain the lack of statistically significant differences in blood pressure, despite the fact that 56.25% of hypermagnesemic cats with concurrent hypertension belonged to the urinary category. Further studies are needed to evaluate the presence of significant differences within each category.
In our study, hypomagnesemia in dogs did not appear to influence the prognosis, as it was not associated with increased mortality. However, in cats, hypermagnesemia was linked to higher mortality rates. This finding suggests that elevated magnesium concentrations may be indicative of a more severe clinical condition. Additionally, we observed that cats with hypermagnesemia also had a lower pH, which may contribute to the increased mortality observed. In fact, both hypermagnesemia and acidosis can negatively affect cardiovascular and respiratory function [1,70], potentially exacerbating the clinical outcome. Therefore, the association between hypermagnesemia and acidosis in cats may be a marker for poor prognosis and increased mortality.
Interestingly, the incidence of dysmagnesemia in both dogs and cats would have been different if reference ranges reported in the literature had been applied instead of those provided by the blood gas analyzer. In particular, considering a reference range for ionized magnesium of 0.43–0.6 mmol/L for dogs and 0.43–0.7 mmol/L for cats [108], hypomagnesemia would have been observed in 12% of dogs and in 2.6% of cats, while hypermagnesemia would have been observed in 22.8% of dogs and 30.6% of cats. However, we followed the reference range provided by the machine (0.5–1 mmol/L), as typically recommended, to ensure consistency with the analyzer’s internal calibration and clinical use. This highlights the importance of correctly establishing reference ranges, as their variability may significantly impact the diagnosis and prevalence of dysmagnesemia. In this study, the use of the machine reference range was considered the most appropriate approach, as it aligned with the manufacturer’s calibration standards.
This study has several limitations. First, being conducted at a single center may affect its generalizability. Moreover, evaluating the presence of significant differences in each category for hospitalization length, outcomes, electrolytes, and other parameter disorders would be of interest. It would also be valuable to analyze the incidence of dysmagnesemia for each pathology within the categories.
Furthermore, the retrospective nature of the study may have resulted in incomplete or inconsistent documentation of diagnoses and patient management. This could have affected the accuracy of our data, particularly regarding the assessment of magnesium concentrations and the categorization of underlying diseases. Additionally, the dependence on medical records for diagnosis documentation may create bias, as diagnoses were not made with the aim of specifically addressing the study’s objectives.
Moreover, we considered all patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit as critically ill, without using more specific criteria for inclusion. This broad definition could have affected the interpretation of the results by not fully capturing the severity of illness in each patient.
In addition, the incidence of hypomagnesemia may have been overestimated due to the administration of therapies that can reduce electrolyte concentration, such as proton pump inhibitors, diuretics, and chemotherapeutic agents. A prospective study would be necessary to evaluate the impact of such therapies and obtain a more accurate estimate of dysmagnesemia.
Finally, another limitation of this study is that renal and urinary conditions, including urethral obstruction, Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), were grouped together under the urinary category for simplicity. These conditions may influence ionized magnesium concentrations differently, and their inclusion as a single category could potentially obscure their individual effects. Further studies that differentiate these conditions would provide more detailed insights into their specific impact on ionized magnesium levels.

5. Conclusions

Dysmagnesemia was not associated with prolonged hospitalization in either dogs or cats. Moreover, dogs presented a higher incidence of hypomagnesemia, which was not associated with increased mortality. In contrast, in cats, although hypermagnesemia had a low incidence (8%), it was associated with increased mortality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. and F.P.; methodology, A.B. and F.P.; software, A.B.; validation, A.B., F.P., and C.D.F.; formal analysis, C.D.F.; investigation, F.P.; resources, A.B.; data curation, F.P.; writing—original draft preparation, F.P.; writing—review and editing, F.P. and C.D.F.; visualization, F.P.; supervision, A.B.; project administration, F.P.; funding acquisition, A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bateman, S.W. Disorders of magnesium: Magnesium deficit and excess. In Fluid, Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disorders in Small Animal Practice, 4th ed.; DiBartola, S.P., Ed.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2012; pp. 212–229. [Google Scholar]
  2. Toll, J.; Erb, H.; Birnbaum, N.; Schermerhorn, T. Prevalence and incidence of serum magnesium abnormalities in hospitalized cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2002, 16, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khanna, C.; Lund, E.M.; Raffe, M.; Armstrong, P.J. Hypomagnesemia in 188 dogs: A hospital population-based prevalence study. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 1998, 12, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Martin, L.G.; Matteson, V.L.; Wingfield, W.E.; van Pelt, D.R.; Hackett, T.B. Abnormalities of serum magnesium in critically ill dogs: Incidence and implications. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 1994, 4, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Murray, M.E.; Boiron, L.; Buriko, Y.; Drobatz, K.; Waddell, L.S. Total serum and ionized magnesium concentrations in healthy and hospitalized dogs. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2023, 33, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huijgen, H.J.; Soesan, M.; Sanders, R.; Mairuhu, W.M.; Kesecioglu, J.; Sanders, G.T. Magnesium levels in critically ill patients. What should we measure? Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2000, 114, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yeh, D.D.; Chokengarmwong, N.; Chang, Y.; Yu, L.; Arsenault, C.; Rudolf, J.; Lee-Lewandrowski, E.; Lewandrowski, K. Total and ionized magnesium testing in the surgical intensive care unit—Opportunities for improved laboratory and pharmacy utilization. J. Crit. Care 2017, 42, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Scarpati, G.; Baldassarre, D.; Oliva, F.; Pascale, G.; Piazza, O. Ionized or Total Magnesium levels, what should we measure in critical ill patients? Transl. Med. UniSa 2020, 23, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Norris, C.R.; Nelson, R.W.; Christopher, M.M. Serum total and ionized magnesium concentrations and urinary fractional excretion of magnesium in cats with diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1999, 215, 1455–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, S.; Jain, S.; Agrawal, S.; Honmode, A. Impact of serum magnesium levels in critically ill elderly patients-a study in a rural teaching hospital. J. Clin. Geront and Ger. 2016, 7, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thongprayoon, C.; Sy-Go, J.P.T.; Nissaisorakarn, V.; Dumancas, C.Y.; Keddis, M.T.; Kattah, A.G.; Pattharanitima, P.; Vallabhajosyula, S.; Mao, M.A.; Qureshi, F.; et al. Machine Learning Consensus Clustering Approach for Hospitalized Patients with Dysmagnesemia. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Al Alawi, A.M.; Berhane, T.; Majoni, S.W.; Falhammar, H. Characteristics and health outcomes of patients hospitalised with hypomagnesaemia: A retrospective study from a single centre in the Northern Territory of Australia. Intern. Med. J. 2022, 52, 1544–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Al Shukri, Z.; Al-Maqbali, J.S.; Al Alawi, A.M.; Al Riyami, N.; Al Riyami, S.; Al Alawi, H.; Al Farai, Q.; Falhammar, H. Incidence of Dysmagnesemia among Medically Hospitalized Patients and Associated Clinical Characteristics: A Prospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2023, 4, 6650620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Upala, S.; Jaruvongvanich, V.; Wijarnpreecha, K.; Sanguankeo, A. Hypomagnesemia and mortality in patients admitted to intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis. QJM 2016, 109, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shankar, P.; Reddy, V.M.; Devaraj, S. Hypomagnesemia as a predictor of mortality in critically ill pediatric patients in picu using prism score. Intern. J. Cont. Ped 2019, 6, 1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gautam, S.; Khapunj, A. Prevalence of hypomagnesemia among elderly patients attending a tertiary care centre: A descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA 2021, 59, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schwalfenberg, G.K.; Genuis, S.J. The Importance of Magnesium in Clinical Healthcare. Scientifica 2017, 2017, 4179326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Solomon, R. The relationship between disorders of K+ and Mg2+ homeostasis. Semin. Nephrol. 1987, 7, 253–262. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lu, Z.; MacKinnon, R. Electrostatic tuning of Mg2+ affinity in an inward-rectifier K+ channel. Nature 1994, 371, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, C.L.; Kuo, E. Mechanism of hypokalemia in magnesium deficiency. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007, 18, 2649–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Laurant, P.; Touyz, R.M. Physiological and pathophysiological role of magnesium in the cardiovascular system: Implications in hypertension. J. Hypertens. 2000, 18, 1177–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. DiBartola, S.P.; De Morais, H.A. Disorders of potassium: Hypokalemia and hyperkalemia. In Fluid, Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disorders in Small Animal Practice, 4th ed.; DiBartola, S.P., Ed.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2012; pp. 92–119. [Google Scholar]
  23. Whang, R.; Whang, D.D.; Ryan, M.P. Refractory potassium repletion. A consequence of magnesium deficiency. Arch. Intern. Med. 1992, 152, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rude, R.K. Renal cortical adenylate cyclase: Characterization of magnesium activation. Endocrinology 1983, 113, 1348–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gilman, A.G. Guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins and dual control of adenylate cyclase. J. Clin. Investig. 1984, 73, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hermans, C.; Lefebvre, C.; Devogelaer, J.P.; Lambert, M. Hypocalcaemia and chronic alcohol intoxication: Transient hypoparathyroidism secondary to magnesium deficiency. Clin. Rheumatol. 1996, 15, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rude, R.K.; Oldham, S.B.; Singer, F.R. Functional hypoparathyroidism and parathyroid hormone end-organ resistance in human magnesium deficiency. Clin. Endocrinol. 1976, 5, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dai, L.J.; Ritchie, G.; Kerstan, D.; Kang, H.S.; Cole, D.E.; Quamme, G.A. Magnesium transport in the renal distal convoluted tubule. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 51–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gamba, G.; Friedman, P.A. Thick ascending limb: The Na+:K+:2Cl− co-transporter, NKCC2, and the calcium-sensing receptor, CaSR. Pflugers Arch. 2009, 458, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vink, R.; Nechifor, M. Magnesium in the Central Nervous System [Internet]; Vink, R., Nechifor, M., Eds.; University of Adelaide Press: Adelaide, AU, Australia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gröber, U.; Schmidt, J.; Kisters, K. Magnesium in Prevention and Therapy. Nutrients 2015, 7, 8199–8226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Castilho, R.F.; Ward, M.W.; Nicholls, D.G. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial function, and acute glutamate excitotoxicity in cultured cerebellar granule cells. J. Neurochem. 1999, 72, 1394–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Humphrey, S.; Kirby, R.; Rudloff, E. Magnesium physiology and clinical therapy in veterinary critical care. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2015, 25, 210–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Olloquequi, J.; Cornejo-Córdova, E.; Verdaguer, E.; Soriano, F.X.; Binvignat, O.; Auladell, C.; Camins, A. Excitotoxicity in the pathogenesis of neurological and psychiatric disorders: Therapeutic implications. J. Psychopharmacol. 2018, 32, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Obrenovitch, T.P.; Urenjak, J. Is high extracellular glutamate the key to excitotoxicity in traumatic brain injury? J. Neurotrauma 1997, 14, 677–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. van den Heuvel, C.; Vink, R. The role of magnesium in traumatic brain injury. Clin. Calcium 2004, 14, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. McIntosh, T.K.; Juhler, M.; Wieloch, T. Novel pharmacologic strategies in the treatment of experimental traumatic brain injury: 1998. J. Neurotrauma 1998, 15, 731–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nayak, R.; Attry, S.; Ghosh, S.N. Serum Magnesium as a Marker of Neurological Outcome in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. Asian J. Neurosurg. 2018, 13, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Prebble, J.J. Primary infantile hypomagnesaemia: Report of two cases. J. Paediatr. Child. Health 1995, 31, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Unachak, K.; Louthrenoo, O.; Katanyuwong, K. Primary hypomagnesemia in Thai infants: A case report with 7 years follow-up and review of literature. J. Med. Assoc. Thai 2002, 85, 1226–1231. [Google Scholar]
  41. Visudhiphan, P.; Visudtibhan, A.; Chiemchanya, S.; Khongkhatithum, C. Neonatal seizures and familial hypomagnesemia with secondary hypocalcemia. Pediatr. Neurol. 2005, 33, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Temkin, N.R.; Anderson, G.D.; Winn, H.R.; Ellenbogen, R.G.; Britz, G.W.; Schuster, J.; Lucas, T.; Newell, D.W.; Mansfield, P.N.; Machamer, J.E.; et al. Magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2007, 6, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dhandapani, S.S.; Gupta, A.; Vivekanandhan, S.; Sharma, B.S.; Mahapatra, A.K. Randomized controlled trial of magnesium sulphate in severe closed traumatic brain injury. Ind. J. Neurotrauma 2008, 5, 27W33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Elin, R.J. Magnesium: The fifth but forgotten electrolyte. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1994, 102, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fawcett, W.J.; Haxby, E.J.; Male, D.A. Magnesium: Physiology and pharmacology. Br. J. Anaesth. 1999, 83, 302–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wolf, F.I.; Trapani, V. Cell (patho)physiology of magnesium. Clin. Sci. 2008, 114, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wolf, F.I.; Cittadini, A.R.; Maier, J.A. Magnesium and tumors: Ally or foe? Cancer Treat Rev. 2009, 35, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Guilbert, A.; Gautier, M.; Dhennin-Duthille, I.; Haren, N.; Sevestre, H.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Evidence that TRPM7 is required for breast cancer cell proliferation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2009, 297, C493–C502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Günther, T. Comment on the number of Mg2+-activated enzymes. Magnes. Res. 2008, 21, 185–187. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Castiglioni, S.; Maier, J.A. Magnesium and cancer: A dangerous liason. Magnes. Res. 2011, 24, S92–S100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lajer, H.; Daugaard, G. Cisplatin and hypomagnesemia. Cancer Treat. Rev. 1999, 25, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gaughran, G.; Qayyum, K.; Smyth, L.; Davis, A. Carboplatin and hypomagnesemia: Is it really a problem? Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 17, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Weglicki, W.B.; Stafford, R.E.; Dickens, B.F.; Mak, I.T.; Cassidy, M.M.; Phillips, T.M. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha by thalidomide in magnesium deficiency. Mol. Cell Biochem. 1993, 129, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Meuten, D.J.; Greenfield, C.L.; Anson, L.W.; Cook, C.S.; Fulghum, R.E. Idiopathic hyperaldosteronism in a dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1985, 187, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Feldman, E.C.; Nelson, R.W. Primary mineralocorticoid excess–primary hyperaldosteronism. In Canine and Feline Endocrinology and Reproduction, 3rd ed.; Feldman, E.C., Nelson, R.W., Eds.; WB Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2004; pp. 351–357. [Google Scholar]
  57. Horton, R.; Biglieri, E.G. Effect of aldosterone on the metabolism of magnesium. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1962, 22, 1187–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chhokar, V.S.; Sun, Y.; Bhattacharya, S.K.; Ahokas, R.A.; Myers, L.K.; Xing, Z.; Smith, R.A.; Gerling, I.C.; Weber, K.T. Hyperparathyroidism and the calcium paradox of aldosteronism. Circulation 2005, 111, 871–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Barbagallo, M.; Dominguez, L.J.; Galioto, A.; Ferlisi, A.; Cani, C.; Malfa, L.; Pineo, A.; Busardo’, A.; Paolisso, G. Role of magnesium in insulin action, diabetes and cardio-metabolic syndrome X. Mol. Aspects Med. 2003, 24, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wälti, M.K.; Zimmermann, M.B.; Walczyk, T.; Spinas, G.A.; Hurrell, R.F. Measurement of magnesium absorption and retention in type 2 diabetic patients with the use of stable isotopes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 78, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Gommers, L.M.; Hoenderop, J.G.; Bindels, R.J.; de Baaij, J.H. Hypomagnesemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Vicious Circle? Diabetes 2016, 65, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Fincham, S.C.; Drobatz, K.J.; Gillespie, T.N.; Hess, R.S. Evaluation of plasma-ionized magnesium concentration in 122 dogs with diabetes mellitus: A retrospective study. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2004, 18, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zofková, I.; Kancheva, R.L. The relationship between magnesium and calciotropic hormones. Magnes. Res. 1995, 8, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  64. Cole, D.E.C.; Quamme, G.A. Inherited disorders of renal magnesium handling. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000, 11, 1937–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chandar, J.; Zilleruelo, G. Hypertensive crisis in children. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2012, 27, 741–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Patel, H.P.; Mitsnefes, M. Advances in the pathogenesis and management of hypertensive crisis. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2005, 17, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Baracco, R.; Matoo, T.K. Pediatric hypertensive emergencies. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2014, 16, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. van den Broek, D.H.N.; Chang, Y.M.; Elliott, J.; Jepson, R.E. Prognostic importance of plasma total magnesium in a cohort of cats with azotemic chronic kidney disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2018, 32, 1359–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Al Harasi, S.; Al-Maqbali, J.S.; Falhammar, H.; Al-Mamari, A.; Al Futisi, A.; Al-Farqani, A.; Kumar, S.; Osman, A.; Al Riyami, S.; Al Riyami, N.; et al. Prevalence of Dysmagnesemia among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and the Associated Health Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Swaminathan, R. Magnesium metabolism and its disorders. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2003, 24, 47–66. [Google Scholar]
  71. Cascella, M.; Vaqar, S. Hypermagnesemia. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  72. Shibutani, Y.; Yokota, T.; Iijima, S.; Fujioka, A.; Katsuno, S.; Sakamoto, K. Plasma and erythrocyte magnesium concentrations in thyroid disease: Relation to thyroid function and the duration of illness. Jpn. J. Med. 1989, 28, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hammond, H.K.; White, F.C.; Buxton, I.L.; Saltzstein, P.; Brunton, L.L.; Longhurst, J.C. Increased myocardial beta-receptors and adrenergic responses in hyperthyroid pigs. Am. J. Physiol. 1987, 252, H283–H290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Walker, J.D.; Crawford, F.A.; Kato, S.; Spinale, F.G. The novel effects of 3,5,3’-triiodo-L-thyronine on myocyte contractile function and beta-adrenergic responsiveness in dilated cardiomyopathy. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1994, 108, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Celsing, F.; Blomstrand, E.; Melichna, J.; Terrados, N.; Clausen, N.; Lins, P.E.; Jansson, E. Effect of hyperthyroidism on fibre-type composition, fibre area, glycogen content and enzyme activity in human skeletal muscle. Clin. Physiol. 1986, 6, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Quesada, A.; Sainz, J.; Wangensteen, R.; Rodriguez-Gomez, I.; Vargas, F.; Osuna, A. Nitric oxide synthase activity in hyperthyroid and hypothyroid rats. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2002, 147, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. den Hollander, J.G.; Wulkan, R.W.; Mantel, M.J.; Berghout, A. Correlation between severity of thyroid dysfunction and renal function. Clin. Endocrinol. 2005, 62, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Haro, J.M.; Sabio, J.M.; Vargas, F. Renal beta-adrenoceptors in thyroxine-treated rats. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 1992, 15, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Asmah, B.J.; Wan Nazaimoon, W.M.; Norazmi, K.; Tan, T.T.; Khalid, B.A. Plasma renin and aldosterone in thyroid diseases. Horm. Metab. Res. 1997, 29, 580–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Disashi, T.; Iwaoka, T.; Inoue, J.; Naomi, S.; Fujimoto, Y.; Umeda, T.; Tomita, K. Magnesium metabolism in hyperthyroidism. Endocr. J. 1996, 43, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Geddes, R.; Aguiar, J. Feline Comorbidities: Balancing hyperthyroidism and concurrent chronic kidney disease. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2022, 24, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Swaminathan, R. Hypo—Hypermagnesaemia. In Oxford Textbook of Nephrology, 2nd ed.; Davison, A.M., Cameron, J.S., Gunfield, J.-P., Kerr, D.N.S., Ritz, E., Winearls, C., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998; pp. 271–310. [Google Scholar]
  83. Troìa, R.; Mascalzoni, G.; Calipa, S.; Magagnoli, I.; Dondi, F.; Giunti, M. Multiorgan dysfunction syndrome in feline sepsis: Prevalence and prognostic implication. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2019, 21, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, H.; Huang, J.; Jin, X.; Chen, C.; Zhang, A.; Wu, Y.; Chen, C. Hypermagnesaemia, but Not Hypomagnesaemia, Is a Predictor of Inpatient Mortality in Critically Ill Children with Sepsis. Dis. Markers 2022, 27, 3893653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Clark, B.A.; Brown, R.S. Unsuspected morbid hypermagnesemia in elderly patients. Am. J. Nephrol. 1992, 12, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, M.; Tashiro, M.; Berlin, J.R. Regulation of L-type calcium current by intracellular magnesium in rat cardiac myocytes. J. Physiol. 2004, 555, 383–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Stippler, M.; Crago, E.; Levy, E.I.; Kerr, M.E.; Yonas, H.; Horowitz, M.B.; Kassam, A. Magnesium infusion for vasospasm prophylaxis after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J. Neurosurg. 2006, 105, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Tangvoraphonkchai, K.; Davenport, A. Magnesium and Cardiovascular Disease. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2018, 25, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hutter, O.F.; Kostial, K. Effect of magnesium and calcium ions on the release of acetylcholine. J. Physiol. 1954, 124, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mordes, J.P.; Wacker, W.E. Excess magnesium. Pharmacol. Rev. 1977, 29, 273–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Oren, S.; Rapoport, J.; Zlotnik, M.; Brami, J.L.; Heimer, D.; Chaimovitz, C. Extreme hypermagnesemia due to ingestion of Dead Sea water. Nephron 1987, 47, 199–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. DiBartola, S.P. Disorders of sodium and water: Hypernatremia and hyponatremia. In Fluid, Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disorders in Small Animal Practice, 4th ed.; DiBartola, S.P., Ed.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2012; pp. 45–79. [Google Scholar]
  93. Segev, G.; Livne, H.; Ranen, E.; Lavy, E. Urethral obstruction in cats: Predisposing factors, clinical, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2011, 13, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Finco, D.R.; Cornelius, L.M. Characterization and treatment of water, electrolyte, and acid-base imbalances of induced urethral obstruction in the cat. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1977, 38, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Muller, K.M.; Burkitt-Creedon, J.M.; Epstein, S.E. Presentation Variables Associated with the Development of Severe Post-obstructive Diuresis in Male Cats Following Relief of Urethral Obstruction. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 783874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Nijenhuis, T.; Renkema, K.Y.; Hoenderop, J.G.; Bindels, R.J. Acid-base status determines the renal expression of Ca2+ and Mg2+ transport proteins. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006, 17, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Paepe, D.; Daminet, S. Feline CKD: Diagnosis, staging and screening—What is recommended? J. Feline Med. Surg. 2013, 15, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Schermerhorn, T. Understanding Diabetic Ketoacidosis. In Proceedings of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, Mexico City, Mexico, 11–14 May 2005. [Google Scholar]
  99. D’Elia, J.A.; Weinrauch, L.A. Calcium Ion Channels: Roles in Infection and Sepsis Mechanisms of Calcium Channel Blocker Benefits in Immunocompromised Patients at Risk for Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bruskiewicz, K.A.; Nelson, R.W.; Feldman, E.C.; Griffey, S.M. Diabetic ketosis and ketoacidosis in cats: 42 cases (1980–1995). J. Am. Vet Med. Assoc. 1997, 211, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Stiles, J.; Polzin, D.J.; Bistner, S.I. The prevalence of retinopathy in cats with systemic hypertension and chronic renal failure or hyperthyroidism. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1994, 30, 564–572. [Google Scholar]
  102. Wong, H.; Mylrea, K.; Feber, J.; Drukker, A.; Filler, G. Prevalence of complications in children with chronic kidney disease according to KDOQI. Kidney Int. 2006, 70, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Collins, A.J.; Foley, R.N.; Chavers, B.; Gilbertson, D.; Herzog, C.; Ishani, A.; Johansen, K.; Kasiske, B.L.; Kutner, N.; Liu, J.; et al. US Renal Data System 2013 Annual Data Report. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2014, 63, A7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Freedman, B.I.; Cohen, A.H. Hypertension-attributed nephropathy: What’s in a name? Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2016, 12, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kobayashi, D.L.; Peterson, M.E.; Graves, T.K.; Lesser, M.; Nicols, C.E. Hypertension in cats with chronic renal failure or hyperthyroidism. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 1990, 4, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Cortellini, S.; DeClue, A.E.; Giunti, M.; Goggs, R.; Hopper, K.; Menard, J.M.; Rabelo, R.C.; Rozanski, E.A.; Sharp, C.R.; Silverstein, D.C.; et al. Defining sepsis in small animals. J. Vet Emerg. Crit. Care 2024, 34, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mazzaferro, E. Magnesium Disorders. In Five Minute Veterinary Consult Clinical Companion Small Animal Emergency and Critical Care, 2nd ed.; Wiley Blackwell, Ed.; Wiley Blackwell: Ames, IA, USA, 2010; pp. 453–458. [Google Scholar]
Animals 15 01169 g001
Figure 1. Incidence of hypomagnesemia (%) in dogs.
Figure 1. Incidence of hypomagnesemia (%) in dogs.
Animals 15 01169 g001
Animals 15 01169 g002
Figure 2. Incidence of hypermagnesemia (%) in cats.
Figure 2. Incidence of hypermagnesemia (%) in cats.
Animals 15 01169 g002
Table 1. Mean values of analytes and parameters related to ionized magnesium in hypomagnesemic dogs.
Table 1. Mean values of analytes and parameters related to ionized magnesium in hypomagnesemic dogs.
ParameterMean Value
Mg2+0.44 ± 0.05 mmol/L
pH7.39 ± 0.06
Na+141.72 ± 6.4 mmol/L
Ca2+1.27 ± 0.12 mmol/L
K+3.99 ± 0.54 mmol/L
BUN18.15 ± 9.79 mg/dL
Creatinine1.39 ± 1.58 mg/dL
SAP149 ± 22 mmHg
MAP113 ± 17 mmHg
Table 2. Mean values of analytes and parameters related to ionized magnesium in hypermagnesemic cats.
Table 2. Mean values of analytes and parameters related to ionized magnesium in hypermagnesemic cats.
ParameterMean Value
Mg2+1.2 ± 0.5 mmol/L
pH7.18 ± 0.22
Na+147.17 ± 9.27 mmol/L
Ca2+1.19 ± 1.44 mmol/L
K+4.85 ± 2 mmol/L
BUN89.52 ± 79.7 mg/dL
Creatinine3.54 ± 3.52 mg/dL
SAP160 ± 31 mmHg
MAP123 ± 30 mmHg
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Perini, F.; Di Franco, C.; Briganti, A. Dysmagnesemia Incidence in Hospitalized Dogs and Cats: A Retrospective Study. Animals 2025, 15, 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081169

AMA Style

Perini F, Di Franco C, Briganti A. Dysmagnesemia Incidence in Hospitalized Dogs and Cats: A Retrospective Study. Animals. 2025; 15(8):1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Perini, Francesca, Chiara Di Franco, and Angela Briganti. 2025. "Dysmagnesemia Incidence in Hospitalized Dogs and Cats: A Retrospective Study" Animals 15, no. 8: 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081169

APA Style

Perini, F., Di Franco, C., & Briganti, A. (2025). Dysmagnesemia Incidence in Hospitalized Dogs and Cats: A Retrospective Study. Animals, 15(8), 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081169

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop