The Use of a Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt for the Euthanasia of Neonate Piglets
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
Description of CASH Small Animal Tool
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals and Procedures
Device Application
- The absence of rhythmic breathing, which is controlled by structures within the medulla oblongata and innervated by the reticular activating system [13].
- The absence of a positive corneal reflex, a reflex with a neural pathway that passes adjacent to, and partially through, the reticular formation [13].
- The absence of a positive palpebral reflex, which is a brainstem reflex.
- The absence of response to painful stimuli (needle prick to the nose), a cortical arc reflex [13].
2.2. Post Mortem Examination of Heads
2.2.1. Section 1—Post Mortem Examination
2.2.2. Section 2—Sagittal Plane Assessment
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Factors Related to ‘Time to Loss of Movement’
3.2. Factors Related to ‘Movement Score’
3.3. Agonal Breathing
3.4. Post Mortem
3.5. Haematoma and Nasal Haemorrhages
3.6. Cranial Bone Displacement
4. Discussion
4.1. Post-Shot Movement
4.2. Agonal Breathing
4.3. Brain Damage
4.4. Incidental Brain Lesions
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mort, M.; Convery, I.; Baxter, J.; Bailey, C. Animal disease and human trauma: The psychosocial implications of the 2001 UK foot and mouth disease disaster. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. 2008, 11, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Whiting, T.L.; Marion, C.R. Perpetration-induced traumatic stress—A risk for veterinarians involved in the destruction of healthy animals. Can. Vet. J. 2011. 52, 794–796.
- Matthis, J.S. Selected employee attributes and perceptions regarding methods and animal welfare concerns associated with swine euthanasia. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Mason, C.W.; Humane Slaughter Association, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom. Personal communication, 2017.
- AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association). Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2000, 218, 669–696. [Google Scholar]
- AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association). Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, 2013 ed.; American Veterinary Medical Association: Schaumburg, IL, USA, 2013; p. 36. [Google Scholar]
- EFSA—Scientific Opinion of the AHAW Panel: Opinion of the Welfare Aspects of the Main Systems of Stunning and Killing the Main Commercial Species of Animals 2004. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/45.htm (accessed on 12 December 2017).
- Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC). Report on the Welfare of Farmed Animals at Slaughter or Killing Part 1: Red Meat Animals; Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs: London, UK, 2003.
- AASV and NPB. 2009. On Farm Euthanasia of Swine: Recommendations for the Producer. Publ. 04259-01/09. Available online: www.aasv.org/aasv/documents/SwineEuthanasia.pdf (accessed on 12 December 2009).
- Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC). Guidelines on: Euthanasia of Animals Used in Science. Ottawa, Canada. 2016. Available online: http://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Standards/Guidelines/Euthanasia.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2017).
- Grist, A.; Murrell, J.; McKinstry, J.L.; Knowles, T.G.; Wotton, S.B. Humane Euthanasia of Neonates I: Validation of the effectiveness of the Zephyr EXL Non-penetrating Captive Bolt system for euthanasia of new-born and weaned piglets up to 10 kg. Anim. Welf. 2017, 26, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grist, A.; Knowles, T.G.; Wotton, S.B. Humane Euthanasia of Neonates II: Field study of the effectiveness of the Zephyr EXL Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt system for euthanasia of new-born piglets. Anim. Welf. under review.
- Terlouw, E.M.C.; Bourguet, C.; Deiss, V. Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part I. Neurobiological mechanisms underlying stunning and killing. Meat Sci. 2016, 118, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hewitt, L. The Development of a Novel Device for Humanely Dispatching Casualty Poultry. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Sharp, T.M.; McLeod, S.R.; Leggett, K.E.A.; Gibson, T.J. Evaluation of a spring-powered captive bolt gun for killing kangaroo pouch young. Wildl. Res. 2014, 41, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altman, D.G.; Machin, D.; Bryant, T.N.; Gardner, M.J. Statistics with Confidence, 2nd ed.; BMJ Books: London, UK, 2000; ISBN 0727913751. [Google Scholar]
- Gregory, N.G. World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences; The Assessment of Welfare and the Scientific Aspects: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1993; p. 26. [Google Scholar]
- Terlouw, E.M.C.; Bourguet, C.; Deiss, V.; Mallet, C. Origins of movements following stunning and during bleeding in cattle. Meat Sci. 2015, 11, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Casey-Trott, T.M.; Millman, S.T.; Turner, P.V.; Nykamp, S.G.; Widowksi, T.M. Effectiveness of a non-penetrating captive bolt for euthanasia of piglets less than 3 d of age. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 5477–5484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Casey-Trott, T.M.; Millman, S.T.; Turner, P.V.; Nykamp, S.G.; Lawlis, P.C.; Widowksi, T.M. Effectiveness of a non-pentrating captive bolt for euthanasia of 3 kg to 9 kg pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 5166–5174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blackmore, D.K.; Newhook, J.C. Electroencephalographic studies of stunning and slaughter of sheep and calves. Part 3: The duration of insensibility induced by electrical stunning in sheep and calves. Meat Sci. 1982, 7, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackmore, D.K. Differences in behaviour between sheep and cattle during slaughter. Res. Vet. Sci. 1984, 37, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Perkin, R.M.; Resnik, D.B. The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary? J. Med. Ethics 2002, 28, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- St John, W.M. Noeud vital for breathing in the brainstem: Gasping—YES, eupnoea—doubtful. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 2625–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Summers, B.A.; Cummings, J.F.; de Lahunta, A. Veterinary neuropathology; Mosby: St. Louis, MO, USA, 1995; ISBN 0801650631. [Google Scholar]
Score | Descriptor | Description of intensity |
---|---|---|
0 | No activity | Very little clonic activity. |
1 | Mild activity | Some mild uncontrolled physical movement of limbs. |
2 | Moderate activity | Considerable uncontrolled physical movement of the limbs. |
3 | Severe | Severe uncontrolled physical convulsive movement, paddling of legs |
Parameter | U | Exact p | 1-grain | 1.25-grain | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | S.E. | Mean | S.E. | |||
Time to loss of movement (s) | 3760 | 0.446 | 101.88 | 4.49 | 86.95 | 4.21 |
Total Haemorrhage Score | 2522.5 | 0.014 | 4.63 | 0.57 | 4.32 | 0.13 |
Total Damage Score | 1543.5 | 0.000 | 7.22 | 0.14 | 8.68 | 0.26 |
Plate or Shard % | 1215 | 0.000 | 15.2 | 0.97 | 27.44 | 1.78 |
Presence of nose bleed | 3370.5 | 0.009 | 85.70% | 2.30% | 7.80% | 6.50% |
Parameter | B | S.E. | t | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 134.031 | 27.562 | 4.863 | 0.000 |
Dead weight (kg) | −1.935 | 5.628 | −0.344 | 0.731 |
Total brain haemorrhage score | 4.930 | 4.919 | 1.002 | 0.317 |
Total brain damage score | −3.270 | 2.023 | −1.616 | 0.108 |
Nose/skin haemorrhage/laceration | −36.856 | 9.906 | −3.721 | 0.000 |
Shard-plate displacement score | −0.412 | 0.280 | −1.473 | 0.142 |
Parameter | B | S.E. | t | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 1.491 | 0.408 | 3.651 | 0.000 |
Dead weight (kg) | 0.385 | 0.083 | 4.622 | 0.000 |
Nose/skin haemorrhage/laceration | 0.488 | 0.147 | 3.325 | 0.001 |
Total brain haemorrhage score | 0.024 | 0.073 | 0.324 | 0.746 |
Total brain damage score | −0.050 | 0.030 | −1.656 | 0.099 |
Shard-plate displacement Score | −0.003 | 0.004 | −0.752 | 0.453 |
Nose bleed or Skin laceration | Movement Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Yes | 1 | 26 | 77 | 60 |
No | 4 | 20 | 8 | 6 |
Cartridge Size | None | Nose Bleed (Nb) | Skin Broken (Sb) | Nb and Sb |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-grain | 14.3% (21) | 63.9% (94) | 2.7% (4) | 19.0% (28) |
1.25-grain | 30.9% (17) | 20.0% (11) | 41.8% (23) | 7.3% (4) |
Total | 18.8% (38) | 52.0% (105) | 13.4% (27) | 15.8% (32) |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Grist, A.; Lines, J.A.; Knowles, T.G.; Mason, C.W.; Wotton, S.B. The Use of a Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt for the Euthanasia of Neonate Piglets. Animals 2018, 8, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8040048
Grist A, Lines JA, Knowles TG, Mason CW, Wotton SB. The Use of a Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt for the Euthanasia of Neonate Piglets. Animals. 2018; 8(4):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8040048
Chicago/Turabian StyleGrist, Andrew, Jeff A. Lines, Toby G. Knowles, Charles W. Mason, and Stephen B. Wotton. 2018. "The Use of a Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt for the Euthanasia of Neonate Piglets" Animals 8, no. 4: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8040048
APA StyleGrist, A., Lines, J. A., Knowles, T. G., Mason, C. W., & Wotton, S. B. (2018). The Use of a Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt for the Euthanasia of Neonate Piglets. Animals, 8(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8040048