Next Article in Journal
Effects of Maternal Care During Rearing in White Leghorn and Brown Nick Layer Hens on Cognition, Sociality and Fear
Previous Article in Journal
Fatty Acid Profile in Goat Milk from High- and Low-Input Conventional and Organic Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Voluntary Rein Tension in Horses When Moving Unridden in a Dressage Frame Compared with Ridden Tests of the Same Horses—A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Erratum

Erratum: Sigurjónsdóttir, H.; Haraldsson, H. Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses. Animals 2019, 9, 14

by
Hrefna Sigurjónsdóttir
1,* and
Hans Haraldsson
2
1
Faculty of Subject Teacher Education, School of Education, University of Iceland, Stakkahlíð, R105 Reykjavík, Iceland
2
Educational Research Institute, School of Education, University of Iceland, Stakkahlíð, R105 Reykjavík, Iceland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2019, 9(7), 453; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070453
Submission received: 12 July 2019 / Accepted: 15 July 2019 / Published: 17 July 2019
The authors wish to make the following correction to their paper [1]:
In Table 1, citations for groups O and N were wrong.
In Table 3, there was an error in the definition of stability. The distinction between stability category 3 (one owner, minor changes) and 4 (one owner, no changes) was not made in the table, while this distinction was used in analyses.
In Supplementary Table S1, the column for stability categories contained errors. The column for proportion of males in Supplementary Table S1 contained a combination of proportions and ratios and the column for group type was missing. These errors were only present in the Supplementary Table S1 and not in the data used for analyses.
All errors listed above have been corrected. The changes do not affect the scientific results. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Table 1. Information on the groups.
Table 1. Information on the groups.
Part# of Iceland, Place, Year, Months of StudyGroup IDFemalesMales *FoalsSub-AdultsAdultsObservation Time (hours)Pasture Size (ha)
NW, Bessastadir—2005 (7–8)A370909010030
NW, Bessastadir—2005 (7–8)B3790090100100
N, Holar—2003 (6–7)C1770240795.4
W, Skaney—1997 (5–6)D9,3523111412228478
W, Skaney—1999 (5–6)F35211076254888
SW, Litla-Thufa—2012 (7)G49049406.5
SW, Middalur—2012 (7–8)H621714030
SW, Eilifsdalur—2012 (7–8)I680955535
N, Holar—2001 (2–4)J33131007165726.5
N, Holar—2001 (2–4)K3316300195527.5
N, Holar—2001–2002 (12–5)L331810020810226.5
N, Holar—2002 (1–5)M33181200308127.5
SW, Baer—2009 (10–12)N391014042044100
SW, Fell—2009 (1–3)O39152306324130
* NW, Thoreyjan—2004 (7–8)P23271150287630
* NW, Thingeyrar—2006 (6–7)Q23321200331338
** S, Sel 1—2007 (5)R23,3418*** 2(1)1431781215
** S, Sel 2—2007 (5)S23,3411173981215
** S, Sel 3—2007 (5)T23,3429*** 2 (1)17102177215
** S, Sel 4—2007 (5)U23,3426*** 4 (3)1962477215
* The majority of individuals were geldings (n = 118), with n = 6 stallions and n = 5, 7–10-month-old colts. ** Groups with a stallion. *** Number of colts in brackets. NW is Northwest, N is North, W is West, SW is Southwest, and S is south. The superscripts on group IDs refer to previous published analyses of the data from the groups.
Table 3. Definitions of ranked variables which are used in the analyses.
Table 3. Definitions of ranked variables which are used in the analyses.
Age classes. A1: 1 year, A2: 2–3 years, A3: 4–6 years, A4: 7–9 years, A5: 10–20 years, A6: 21 and more. Twenty adult horses could not be assigned to a class. In Iceland, a year is added to the age of a horse on the first day of summer in early April.
Season. Autumn (October–December), winter (January–April), spring (May–June), summer (July–August).
Stability. 0: >5 owners, 1: 4–5 owners, 2: 2–3 owners, 3: 1 owner, minor changes, 4: 1 owner, no changes.
The classification assumes that the number of owners/caretakers of the horses in a group reflects the probability of changes in the composition (permanent and short-term removals and introductions). If all horses were unfamiliar in the beginning of the observation period, they got the lowest score (0).
Stallions. Absence in a group, (0), presence in a group, (1).
Number of associates (friends). The number of horses with which a horse allogrooms significantly more often than if they allogroomed with all in their group in a random manner (Chi-squared analyses, p < 0.05). If stay times in the groups differed between horses, the predicted values for the relevant dyads were corrected accordingly.
Table S1. Group characteristics.
Table S1. Group characteristics.
group
ID
group.
size
prop.
adults
no.of.
foals
prop. of malespres.of.stallionssize.of.
pasture
density (horses/ha)hay providedaggr.
median
subm.
median
allogr.
median
seasonstabilitymedian. no. friendsGroup type
A90.0001.000300.3001.000.891.34summer01Subadult group
B90.0000.0001000.0901.200.951.69summer02Subadult group
C240.0000.2905.44.4400.450.400.71summer13Subadult group
D340.5170.32084.2510.060.080.26spring43Non-breeding
F310.60140.32083.8810.200.240.40spring35.5Non-breeding
G130.5900.6906.52.0000.290.330.81summer21Non-breeding
H80.8810.250300.2700.250.290.50summer41Non-breeding
I140.5600.570350.4000.230.200.71summer31Non-breeding
J230.5000.43026.50.8710.210.330.39winter43Non-breeding
K191.0000.16027.80.6810.510.620.62winter22Non-breeding
L280.6700.36026.51.0610.550.690.20winter33Non-breeding
M301.0000.40027.81.0810.590.780.19winter22Non-breeding
N250.8000.5801000.2500.270.300.02autumn33Non-breeding
O380.7300.610301.2710.670.840.35winter12Non-breeding
P281.00150.041201.4000.050.030.25summer12Breeding group
Q330.52200.03184.1300.060.040.26summer01Breeding group
R200.75140.1012000.1000.080.050.26spring32Breeding group
S120.6370.0812000.0600.190.060.65spring42Breeding group
T310.57170.0612000.1600.040.040.32spring43Breeding group
U300.68190.1312000.1500.050.010.28spring42Breeding group

References

  1. Sigurjónsdóttir, H.; Haraldsson, H. Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses. Animals 2019, 9, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sigurjónsdóttir, H.; Haraldsson, H. Erratum: Sigurjónsdóttir, H.; Haraldsson, H. Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses. Animals 2019, 9, 14. Animals 2019, 9, 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070453

AMA Style

Sigurjónsdóttir H, Haraldsson H. Erratum: Sigurjónsdóttir, H.; Haraldsson, H. Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses. Animals 2019, 9, 14. Animals. 2019; 9(7):453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070453

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sigurjónsdóttir, Hrefna, and Hans Haraldsson. 2019. "Erratum: Sigurjónsdóttir, H.; Haraldsson, H. Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses. Animals 2019, 9, 14" Animals 9, no. 7: 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070453

APA Style

Sigurjónsdóttir, H., & Haraldsson, H. (2019). Erratum: Sigurjónsdóttir, H.; Haraldsson, H. Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses. Animals 2019, 9, 14. Animals, 9(7), 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070453

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop