Next Article in Journal
Editorial of Special Issue “Advances and Applications in Computational Geosciences”
Next Article in Special Issue
Early Pleistocene River-Fed Paleocoast in Western Umbria (Central Italy): Facies Analysis and Coastal Models
Previous Article in Journal
Automatic Tsunami Hazard Assessment System: “Tsunami Observer”
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatial Distribution of Benthic Foraminifera in the Neretva Channel (Croatia Coast): Faunal Response to Environmental Parameters

1
Istituto di Scienze Marine-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche ISMAR-CNR, Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy
2
Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche IGAG-CNR, Area della Ricerca di Roma 1, Via Salaria km29,3, 00015 MontelibrettiItaly, Italy
3
Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio, Università degli Studi del Molise, 86090 Pesche, Italy
4
Istituto di Scienze Marine-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche ISMAR-CNR, Calata Porta di Massa, 80133 Naples, Italy
5
Istituto di Scienze Polari-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche ISP-CNR, Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2022, 12(12), 456; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12120456
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 17 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quaternary Coastal Paleoenvironments)

Abstract

:
Benthic foraminiferal assemblages have been studied at 11 sediment surface samples located in the Neretva Channel covering the delta habitat and the adjacent open sea areas. The major objective of the investigation was to explore the main environmental parameters affecting the benthic foraminifera compositional changes. To this end, a statistical approach was applied that integrates micropaleontological data with physical, geochemical and sedimentological parameters (total organic carbon and grain size). Statistical analyses identified four distinct groups (cluster A1, A2, B1, B2) corresponding to different environmental settings. Cluster A1 groups samples under Neretva river influence and is characterized by Aubignyna perlucida, Nonionella turgida, Eggerelloides scaber and Rectuvigerina sp.; species able to live in organic-matter-rich sediments and in a wide range of oxygen content. Cluster A2 includes samples distant from the fluvial outlet and samples along the NW coast partially influenced by the Neretva river plume. In these environmental conditions, Ammonia beccarii, Bulimina marginata, Nonionella turgida and Textularia sp. resulted as the most characteristic taxa. Cluster B1 distinguishes the deepest stations which are in connection with the open Adriatic Sea. Here Asterigerinata mamilla, Buccella granulata, Cibicides group, Reussella spinulosa and Textularia sp. reach their maximum abundance associated with coarse-grained sediments. Cluster B2 groups samples collected in the inner bay of the southernmost sector of the studied area characterized by silt and clay and a negligible influence by river inputs. The benthic microfauna is principally composed of Miliolids, Porosononion granosum and Textularia sp.

1. Introduction

Benthic foraminifera (unicellular protists) have been widely used to reconstruct paleoenvironmental changes since they are very sensitive to ambient conditions including organic matter fluxes, oxygen content, salinity, type of substrate and others [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Moreover, foraminiferal assemblages are influenced by their immediate environment and have often served as modern and past analogues to characterize paleoenvironments [7,8,9]. Therefore, documenting and understanding the regional distribution and ecological response of foraminifera is of pivotal importance. The majority of surveys on the current distribution of benthic foraminifera have been carried out in the western part of the Adriatic Sea [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], whereas less is known about their presence on the eastern coast [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Here we report for the first time the distribution patterns of benthic foraminifera in the Neretva Channel, a semi-enclosed basin located along the southernmost part of the Croatian coast. The Neretva river is the fifth largest Mediterranean river, ranked by annual water discharge [27]. The river mouth and its adjacent semi-enclosed marine environment provide a good example of land–sea interactions, particularly between sediment type and organic matter content in a microtidal, low-wave energy, and river-dominated coastal sedimentary system [28]. While the sediment dynamics and geochemistry were examined [28,29,30], no investigation of the microfauna was performed. The aims of this study are: (1) to examine the quantitative distribution of the benthic foraminifera taxa in the Neretva Channel and (2) to identify the main factors affecting the spatial compositional changes of the foraminiferal assemblages. This kind of study adds information on benthic foraminiferal ecological preferences useful for a better reconstruction of past environmental conditions.

2. Study Area

The Neretva Channel is bounded to the NE by the Croatian coastline, to the NW by the open Adriatic Sea through the Korcula Channel, and to the SW by the Peljesac Peninsula (Figure 1). The hydrological setting is influenced by the intrusion of the highly saline oligotrophic waters from the open Adriatic Sea [31] and by the freshwater discharge from the Neretva River [28,32,33]. The Neretva is the largest river on the Croatian part of the eastern Adriatic coast, and the only one forming a deltaic system [34]. The Neretva Channel is a microtidal low-wave energy environment characterized by river-dominated sedimentation processes [30,35].
The surface sediment is composed mainly of clayey silt, in particular in the area in front of the river delta and in the northeast part of the channel. Sedimentation is uniform in most of the area; this is because the river creates a hypopycnal plume at the mouth that distributes fine-grained particles over the entire channel [23,29]. However, two coarser-grains depositional zones with different natures are observed [28]. In detail, in the north-western part of the channel, the sediment is composed mainly of sand, probably related to the influence of higher energy currents from the Adriatic Sea that remove the finer part of the sediments [28]. The southernmost part of the southeastern sector of the channel is instead characterized by relict sandy-silt sediment as this zone only receives river sediment sporadically during events of strong hydro-dynamism in the channel [28,30,36].
The mineral composition of sediments is quartz, calcite and clay, with a secondary presence of plagioclase and dolomite [30]. Marine sediment compositions are mainly controlled by the local geology, but can also reflect anthropogenic discharges from industrial and urban activities, thus increasing concentrations of trace metals and organic matter [37]. Most of the mainland coast is built of highly permeable limestone without a natural barrier between the groundwater of the karstic fields in the hinterland and the freshwater submarine springs [38]. Higher discharge of the submarine springs in winter causes a spreading of the less saline surface waters into the Neretva Channel and a compensatory inflow in the bottom layer. The strong NE “Bora” wind can, however, reverse that circulation. During the summer, the circulation pattern depends entirely on the wind direction [39].

3. Materials and Methods

Sediment samples were collected in 2006 during the NERES06 cruise on board R/V Bios DVA along three parallel NW–SE transects [28] (Figure 1; Table 1) in the frame of the Project ADRICOSM_NERES: ADRIatic sea integrated COastal areaS and river basin Management system—Environmental Regeneration and Sustainable Development of the delta of the NEretva river.
Here we report micropaleontological results of benthic foraminifera from the upper 0–2 cm surface sediment layer collected in 11 sites using Van Veen grab (G) and box-corer (BC) samplers (Table 1). In detail, small cores (about 30 cm long and 8 cm in diameter) were collected by subsampling the central part of the grab samples, which was assumed as relatively undisturbed.

3.1. Environmental Parameters

The environmental parameters used in this study are from the dataset provided and described in [28]. Here we consider sedimentological (percentage of clay/silt/sand) and geochemical (TOC, C/N) data performed on the same samples analysed for micropaleontological investigation (surface levels 0–2 cm).

3.2. Benthic Foraminiferal Analysis

In this study, we considered the total benthic foraminiferal assemblages (living and dead specimens). The total assemblage represents a more reliable picture of the population as it integrates many multiple generations (seasonal variation) of foraminifera [40,41]. Consequently, the considered foraminiferal content (living and dead specimens) corresponds to average environmental conditions throughout the deposition of the collected sediment layer (0–2 cm).
For foraminiferal investigation, samples were washed over a 63 μm sieve then oven-dried at 50 °C and weighed. Identification and counting analysis were performed under a Leica MZ 8 stereomicroscope on the sediment fraction > 125μm. We considered all specimens present in the whole sample or in representative aliquots using an Otto microsplitter, containing at least 300 specimens. Taxonomy identification of foraminifera was based mainly on systematic studies from Adriatic and extra-Mediterranean areas [42,43,44]. Online World Modern Foraminifera Database [45,46] was also consulted.
Less abundant species with similar ecological characteristics were merged together into major species groups. Adelosina mediterranensis and Adelosina sp. were merged into the Adeloisina group. Both species are indicative of shallow marine environments (e.g., [47]). Other porcelaneous taxa were grouped in Miliolids (Miliolinella, Pyrgo, Quinqueloculina, Spiroloculina and Triloculina genera).
Although phylogenetically distinct species, Lobatula lobatula (i.e., Cibicies lobatulus, [48]), and Cibicides refulgens are often grouped together in environmental studies due to their notable morphological similarity and intermediate forms between the two species [49]. They are both typical taxa of the infralittoral environment with strong near-bottom currents [50,51,52,53]. Here they are referred to as the Cibicides group.
Identified Elphidium specimens were divided into two groups based on different life strategies (having a keel or not, being infaunal or epifaunal, according to [24,26,54,55]). Keeled elphidiids species are here represented by Elphidium crispum and Elphidium macellum. They are known as typical epiphyte shallow marine taxa [54,56,57]. Unkeeled elphidiids species in our data set include only Porosononion granosum, an infaunal organism, abundant in marginal-marine environments that tolerates wide salinity changes (euryhaline) [54,58].
The data are reported in the percentage of specimens on the total assemblage (relative abundance %) and the number of specimens per gram of dry bulk sediment for each of the examined samples (BFN) (Supplementary Table S1). Foraminiferal biodiversity was estimated using different diversity indices: Shannon (H) (that varies from 0 for communities with only a single taxon to high values for communities with many taxa, each with comparable abundance); Dominance (D) evidences the occurrence of the opportunistic taxa (it ranges from 0, all taxa are equally present, to 1 one taxon dominates the community completely), and Simpson’s Index of Diversity (1-D) (the value of this index also ranges between 0 and 1, the greater the value, the greater the sample diversity. The index represents the probability that two individuals randomly selected from a sample will belong to different species).
All indices were calculated using the PAlaeontological STatistics (PAST) package [59,60].

3.3. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses include all taxa with relative abundance > 3% in at least one sample (total 23 taxa/groups) in order to reduce background noise due to the infrequent taxa.
As physical and chemical variables TOC, grain size and water depth were considered.
The foraminiferal assemblage was analysed by means of a cluster analysis based on Ward’s criterion [61]. In order to investigate patterns of covariance between the foraminiferal data and the chemical and physical variables, we performed a two-block partial least squares analysis (2B-PLS). This statistical technique is suitable for studying matrices with a relatively low sample size and highly correlated variables [62]. Recently it was successfully applied to examine relationships between benthic foraminiferal communities and seafloor morphology in the southern Mediterranean area [63]. The two-block PLS method differs from other established multivariate statistics (e.g., Canonical Correlation Analysis) in that it aims to find latent variables that can explain the covariance between two multivariate matrices, returning variables that explain the covariance between two sets of variables as much as possible [64]. All analyses were performed in R 4.2.0 (R Core Team 2022- Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria)

4. Results

4.1. Environmental Data

Sediment grain size analyses indicated that the Neretva Channel deposits are generally composed of clayey silts with a silty dominant fraction and a low fraction of sand (Figure 2). In particular, the percentage of clay is overall high in the entire channel, with a minimum of 52.30% in site 7 G and a maximum of 69.90% in site 8 G. In the upper 2 cm surface sediment, the coarser materials were found in the southernmost zone (sand 31% in site 15 G) and in the north-western sector of the channel (sand 51% and 39% at sites 7 G and 6 BC, respectively; Figure 3; [28]). As a consequence, the silt fraction was the lowest in the 7 G and 6 BC sites (3.02% and 4.24%, respectively).
Surficial Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (Figure 2) varies from 0.6% (6 BC) to 1.06% (1 BC). The maximum values of TOC are detected in samples in the sites close to the river mouth (1 BC and 2 BC) (Figure 2). The C/N ratios range from 6.81% (16 G) to 9.6 (1 BC) (Figure 2; [28]). Samples closer to the river mouth display significantly higher C/N ratios (Figure 2) indicative of a terrestrial signature due to the fluvial input [28].

4.2. Benthic Foraminifera

A total of 50 taxa were identified in the surface samples, including 4 groups (Adelosina, Cibicides, keeled and unkeeled elphidiis) and generic Miliolids (Table S1). The recorded individuals were predominantly calcareous forms (mainly Ammonia beccarii, Bulimina marginata, Bulimina elongata, Porosononion granosum, Nonionella turgida and Valvulineria bradyana) and agglutinated forms (e.g., Eggerelloides scaber, Lagenammina difflugiformis and Textularia sp.).
Regarding microhabitat, the most predominant were infaunal species, [4,14,65,66,67] such as Ammonia beccarii, Bulimina basispinosa, Bulimina elongata, Bulimina marginata, Nonionella turgida, Reussella spinulosa, Eggerelloides scaber and Textularia sp. Less abundant species were epifaunal taxa belonging to the keeled elphidiids and Quinqueloculina genera [47,54]. Miliolids ranged largely in the studied samples, from 4.55% (7 G) to 15.85% (16 G). The relative abundance of the common species (>3% in at least one sample) were listed in Table 2 and their spatial distribution is shown in Figure 3. These species were selected for statistical analyses.
Diversity indexes for the different assemblages are reported in Table 3 and Figure 4. On average, 43 taxa were identified per sample, ranging from a minimum of 35 (12 G) to a maximum of 50 taxa off the Neretva river mouth (1 BC, 2 BC). The number of specimens per gram of dry sediment mass (BFN) was largely variable, ranging from a minimum of 33 (12 G) to a maximum of 663 specimens (6 BC).
Benthic foraminiferal assemblages are characterized by the Shannon (H) index ranging between 2.77 in 6 BC and 3.29 in 2 BC, with a median of 3.03; Dominance (D) varied between 0.05 in 2 BC and 0.11 in 6 BC, with a median of 0.07; finally, the Simpson index (S) is not significantly different in the investigated area with comparable values throughout the samples, the extremes found in samples 6 BC and 2 BC (0.89–0.95, respectively) have a median of 0.92.
The cluster analysis on foraminiferal fauna enabled the distinction of two major groups of samples (A and B). Both of them can be subdivided into two more (A1, A2; and B1, B2) (Figure 5).
Cluster A1 comprises two box-corer samples (1 BC and 2 BC) sited in front of the Neretva river mouth. In these assemblages, the most common species are P. granosum (8.06–9.55%), V. bradyana (7.33–8.06%), Rectuvigerina sp. (6.91–8.77%), N. turgida (4.03–7.85%), A. beccarii (4.97–5.95%), A. perlucida (3.66–5.18%) and the agglutinants taxa Textularia sp. (11.13–11.78%) and E. scaber (3.07–8.64%). Abundance ranged from 29 to 38 individuals, H ranged from 3.06 to 3.29, D ranged from 0.05 to 0.07, and S from 0.93 to 0.95.
Cluster A2 includes samples 8 G, 9 BC, 11 G, 12 G and 14 G located along the northern part of the Croatian coastline and in the central sector of the Neretva channel. The benthic assemblages are mainly defined by the presence of Textularia sp. (14.01–17.96%), P. granosum (11.1–12.5%), Miliolids (7.03–9.66%), A. beccarii (5.38–9.80%), N. turgida (3.80–9.19%), B. marginata (3.70–10.25%), B. elongata (3.27–5.12%) and V. bradyana (2.09–7.76%). Abundance ranged from 33 to 76 individuals, H ranged from 2.93 to 3.19, D ranged from 0.06 to 0.08, and S from 0.93 to 0.94.
Cluster B1 groups the two deeper samples (6 BC and 7 G), located in the north-western sector, principally represented by Textularia sp. (20.36–23.73%), P. granosum, (15.9–17%), R. spinulosa (11.65–14.40%), Cibicides group (4.67–7.09%) and B. granulata (4.67–4.86%). Abundance ranged from 394 to 663 BFN, H ranged from 2.77 to 2.86, D ranged from 0.09 to 0.11, and S from 0.89 to 0.90.
Cluster B2 gathers two grab samples (15 G and 16 G) both located in the southeastern sector of the study area. It was mostly characterized by Textularia sp. (13.31–17.18%), P. granosum (13.2–20.6%), and R. spinulosa (5.76–6.17%). On the whole, in this cluster Miliolids are generally abundant (12.7–15.85%) and are represented by the Miliolinella subrotunda (3.52–6.31%). Abundance ranged from 54 to 199 individuals, H ranged from 3.03 to 3.06, D ranged from 0.07 to 0.08, and S from 0.92 to 0.93.

4.3. Two-Block Partial Least Squares

The results from the first axis of the 2B-PLS analysis are reported in Figure 6. The R2 for Block 1 (i.e., x-axis of the plot, Foraminifera Community) and Block 2 (i.e., y-axis of the plot, Chemical and Physical Variables) were 0.43 and 0.63, respectively. The analysis showed a gradient from the lower left quadrant to the upper right quadrant of the graph, with no notable outliers. Most samples are found in the lower left quadrant, where the most extreme points are represented by samples 1 BC and 2 BC located in front of the Neretva river. The variables most correlated with these observations (considering the covariance between the matrices) are certain taxa of the foraminifera community (led by V. bradyana, E. scaber, Rectuvigerina sp. and N. turgida) and chemical–physical variables such as silt content and total organic carbon (TOC%). On the contrary, in the upper right quadrant, only two samples (6 BC and 7 G) are found, which not only occur at greater depths and with a higher sand content, but also showed a different foraminiferal community, led by a different group of taxa (mostly R. spinulosa, B. granulata, and Asterigerinata mamilla). Some taxa (such as Bulimina sp., Miliolids, and Sigmoilopsis schlumbergeri) contribute little to the covariance, as do physico-chemical variables such as sand content.

5. Discussion

In the investigated area, the benthic foraminifera distribution results primarily correlated with three main factors: sediment grain size, total organic carbon and water depth. (Figure 6). This is in agreement with studies performed in tanatocenosis from the North Adriatic river-influenced shelf [14,19]. Both cluster analysis and 2B-PLS discriminate two distinct faunal groups with two additional sub-groups reflecting different depositional settings (clusters A1, A2, B1, B2).
Foraminiferal assemblages in samples collected in proximity to Neretva river (cluster A1) result primarily controlled by organic carbon content and by fine-grained substrate (silt). The benthic foraminiferal microfauna is characterized by the presence of shallow infaunal taxa (V. bradyana, N. turgida and B. elongata), commonly regarded as eutrophic species feeding on the low-quality organic matter [4,14,65,66,67]. The detected abundance of these taxa was favoured by the nutrient availability linked to the Neretva river discharge. In particular, the high relative presence of V. bradyana (Figure 3) was already documented as associated with high organic carbon content in the Rone prodelta [68], in front of the Ombrone River mouth (Italy) [69] and the Po delta [70]. N. turgida (Figure 3), an opportunistic and stress-tolerant species, is able to live in hypoxic sediments enriched in low-quality organic matter [16,70]. Similarly, B. elongata (Figure 3) is reported to thrive in shallow marine, silty to sandy substrates under the riverine influence [15,69,70,71].
In addition, A. beccarii and A. perlucida show relevant importance in this cluster (Figure 3). A. beccarii is well known to colonize environments under river influence, widely distributed in intertidal and subtidal zones [72]; it survives under a wide range of values of dissolved oxygen [73], salinity, and temperature [74]. In the Adriatic Sea, A. beccarii inhabits shallow and nutrient-rich environments near the coast under the direct influence of the Po River [17]. A. perlucida is an infaunal species tolerant of stressed environments [13], related to low salinity and shallow water settings [75]. Van der Zwaan and Jorissen [65] report that this species is typical of northern Adriatic clayey sediments where nutrient inputs by the rivers lead to periodic oxygen depletion events.
In the same way, the distribution pattern of the euryhaline taxa as E. scaber can be correlated to the Neretva freshwater input [76,77], decreasing with distance from the shore (Figure 3). The detected high abundance of E. scaber was documented in shallow, highly energetic, and organic-matter-rich environments [54,78]. Additionally, the abundance values of the agglutinated L. difflugiformis (mostly in samples 1 BC and 2 BC; Figure 3) are in agreement with fine-grained sediment enriched in organic matter [79]. The decrease in percentages of Rectuvigerina sp. from sample 1 BC to 2 BC (Figure 3) well correlates with the decrease in organic carbon supply moving offshore (Figure 2). This trend is in agreement with available studies showing that Rectuvigerina is a typical shallow continental shelf genus [80,81,82], generally living in sandy to muddy shelf environments with relatively high organic matter content [83,84]. It was also recorded in different oxic environments [77,85]. We do not have available data on oxygen content, however, the described assemblages suggest periodical oxygen deficiency. Within these areas, oxygen deficiency can be developed in response to the high organic matter concentrations [65].
The foraminiferal assemblage in samples collected in the central part and in the north-western direction along the Croatian coastline (cluster A2) is mainly composed of species characteristic to the infra-circalittoral zones of the Mediterranean and northern Adriatic seas [12,14,20,21,25,43,55,86,87]. Here, the significant presence of eutrophic taxa such as N. turgida, V. bradyana and Bulimina, associated with the percentages of A. beccarii (Figure 3) still reflect the riverine influx in the form of organic matter and sediment inputs, but to a much lesser degree than observed in sub-cluster A1. It results that foraminiferal distribution is affected by the position of the Neretva river plume that spreads along the coast in a NW direction during most of the year, decreasing its influx northward [28].
The data indicate that the principal factor influencing microfauna distribution, (group A) is the organic matter content from the fluvial input. In detail, the differences observed on clusters A1 and A2 are well correlated with the amount and the type of organic matter. Sediments of samples BC 1 and BC 2 (cluster A1) close to the river mouth are characterized by large amounts of terrestrial organic carbon with a clear terrestrial signature [28] whereas sediments at an intermediate distance from the river (cluster A2) contain lower contents of organic carbon showing the transition between terrestrial and marine origins [28].
Water depth and coarse-grained substratum (sand) are identified as the main drivers influencing the foraminiferal content in the northern sector (cluster B1), with open marine water entering the gulf. In this area, the lithology is mainly composed of sand due to the influence of higher energy currents from the Adriatic Sea that remove the finest part of the sediment [28]. Here R. spinulosa, Textularia sp. and B. granulata reach their maximum abundance (Figure 3). These species characterize sandy/muddy substrates along shelf edges subject to bottom currents [88] with slight tolerance of variable salinities [50,74]. Additionally, in the area we detect A. mamilla commonly related to high hydrodynamic energy levels with coarse-grained sediments [46,86]. The relatively deeper water and hydrodynamic conditions favoured also the presence of the Cibicides group (Figure 3) which is known to be associated with well-oxygenated environments with stable physico-chemical sea bottom conditions [50,51,52,53]. Cluster B1 hosts the highest number of species (Table 3), confirming favourable environmental conditions at the sea floor, and allowing the development of diversified benthic foraminiferal communities.
Cluster B2 is located in the southern sector south of the river mouth. This sector is an area where wave-generated longshore currents laterally redistribute the sediments, leading to the presence of relict deposits [28,30]. The relatively low amount of A. beccarii (Figure 3) and C/N values (Figure 2) correlate with the sediment grain size in this sector where the river influence is minimal. In this cluster, the higher percentages of Miliolids (Figure 3) may be explained by the shallow depth with low organic matter content at the sea bottom as similarly observed in other Mediterranean shallow marine settings [4,47]. The abundance of M. subrotunda supports available records documenting this species in an inner-shallow gulf environment with possible confined conditions [47]. The detected relatively high percentages of P. granosum, unkeeled elphidiis species, suggest the preference of this taxon for the coarse sediment and wide salinity change in agreement with observation performed in shallow water depth (8–22 m) around the Po delta area [19,67]. In the literature, this species is found in brackish-hypersaline bays, marshes, coastal lagoons, estuaries, and inner shelves [7,56,57,58,74]. In our dataset, the relatively low percentages of P. granosum observed in samples 1 BC and 2 BC suggest that this species does not correlate with high organic matter content. This agrees with [89] that considers P. granosum a third-order opportunist, increasing its abundance as a response to higher organic matter supply, but disappearing with maximum organic matter enrichment [89].

6. Conclusions

Modern benthic foraminiferal assemblages were investigated in the Neretva Channel to evidence their relationships with the environmental factors characterizing this area. Statistical analysis and an integrative partial least square approach (2B-PLS) highlighted that the diversity and distribution of benthic foraminifera studied in 11 sample sites are principally correlated with substrate grain size, organic matter content, and water depth.
The data showed that samples collected in front of the Neretva delta contain opportunistic species, well adapted to high input of organic matter and silt content such as A. perlucida, E. scaber, N. turgida and Rectuvigerina sp. (cluster A1). The areal foraminiferal species distribution indicates that the influence of the river discharge is a function of distance from the shore. At the samples furthest away from the river mouth, the assemblages were characterized by A. beccarii, B. marginata, N. turgida and Textularia sp. (cluster A2). These species living there seem to profit from the combination of a more labile organic matter with a transition between terrestrial and marine signatures.
In the north-west sector, thus in connection with the open Adriatic Sea, the coarse (sand) sediment samples include a highly diversified foraminiferal assemblage with the presence of A. mamilla, B. granulata, Cibicides group, R. spinulosa, and Textularia sp. (cluster B1) typical of well-oxygenated and hydrodynamic environments.
On the other hand, in the inner bay, in the south of the studied area, the samples are mainly composed of P. granosum and Miliolids reflecting the inner-shallow gulf with more confined environmental conditions (cluster B2).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/geosciences12120456/s1, Table S1: Number of specimens per gram of dry sediment mass (BFN) and relative percentage of specimens (%) for each investigated sample.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and supervision, L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C. and L.F.; quantitative micropaleontological analyses, A.G.; statistical analyses, M.I. and S.B.; bathymetry and map images, S.I.; collection samples and sedimentology, F.G.; funding acquisition, M.R.; data interpretation and discussion, L.C., L.F., A.G., S.B., M.I., S.I. and F.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funds were provided within the framework of the ADRICOSM-NERES project (2006–2007) (Environmental regeneration and sustainable development of the delta of the Neretva river), by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Table S1 generated during the study.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Frano Matic, Grozdan Kuspilic and Slavica Matijevc of the Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Split Croatia; Gabriele Marozzi and Costante Luttazzi for sampling and work at sea on R/V Bios and Nadia Pinardi for project coordination. We also would like to thank R. A. Martin and an anonymous referee for their constructive comments that improved the quality of the manuscript. We are very grateful to A. Ferretti for their suggestions and M. Marani for the English revision. This is ISMAR-CNR, Bologna scientific contribution 2072.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Murray, J. The niche of benthic foraminifera, critical thresholds and proxies. Mar. Micropaleontol. 2001, 41, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Jorissen, F.J.; Fontanier, C.; Thomas, E. Proxies in late Cenozoic Palaeoceanography: Part. 2: Biological Tracers and Biomarkers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 263–326. [Google Scholar]
  3. Frontalini, F.; Coccioni, R. Benthic foraminifera as bioindicators of pollution: A review of Italian research over the last three decades. Rev. Micropaléontol. 2011, 54, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Goineau, A.; Fontanier, C.; Jorissen, F.J.; Lansard, B.; Buscail, R.; Mouret, A.; Kerhervé, P.; Zaragosi, S.; Ernoult, E.; Artéro, C.; et al. Live (stained) benthic foraminifera from the Rhône prodelta (Gulf of Lion, NW Mediterranean): Environmental controls on a river-dominated shelf. J. Sea Res. 2011, 65, 58–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Martins, M.V.A.; Frontalini, F.; Laut, L.L.; Silva, F.S.; Moreno, J.; Sousa, S.; Zaaboub, N.; El Bour, M.; Rocha, F. Foraminiferal biotopes and their distribution control in Ria de Aveiro (Portugal): A multiproxy approach. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 8875–8897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Avnaim-Katav, S.; Almogi-Labin, A.; Sandler, A.; Sivan, D. Benthic foraminifera as palaeoenvironmental indicators during the last million years in the eastern Mediterranean inner shelf. Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl. 2013, 386, 512–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Benito, X.; Trobajo, R.; Cearreta, A.; Ibáñez, C. Benthic foraminifera as indicators of habitat in a Mediterranean delta: Implications for ecological and palaeoenvironmental studies. Estuarine, Coast. Shelf Sci. 2016, 180, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Minhat, F.I.; Satyanarayana, B.; Husain, M.-L.; Rajan, V.V. Modern benthic foraminifera in subtidal waters of johor: Implications for holocene sea-level change on the east coast of peninsular malaysia. J. Foraminifer. Res. 2016, 46, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kemp, A.C.; Cahill, N.; Engelhart, S.E.; Hawkes, A.D.; Wang, K. Revising estimates of spatially variable subsidence during the AD 1700 Cascadia earthquake using a Bayesian foraminiferal transfer function revising estimates of spatially variable subsidence. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2018, 108, 654–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Capotondi, L.; Bergami, C.; Orsini, G.; Ravaioli, M.; Colantoni, P.; Galeotti, S. Benthic foraminifera for environmental monitoring: A case study in the central Adriatic continental shelf. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 22, 6034–6049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Capotondi, L.; Mancin, N.; Cesari, V.; Dinelli, E.; Ravaioli, M.; Riminucci, F. Recent agglutinated foraminifera from the North Adriatic Sea: What the agglutinated tests can tell. Mar. Micropaleontol. 2019, 147, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Coccioni, R.; Frontalini, F.; Marsili, A.; Mana, D. Benthic foraminifera and trace element distribution: A case-study from the heavily polluted lagoon of Venice (Italy). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2009, 59, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Frontalini, F.; Coccioni, R. Benthic foraminifera for heavy metal pollution monitoring: A case study from the central Adriatic Sea coast of Italy. Estuarine, Coast. Shelf Sci. 2008, 76, 404–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jorissen, F.J. The distribution of benthic foraminifera in the Adriatic Sea. Mar. Micropaleontol. 1987, 12, 21–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jorissen, F.J. Benthic foraminifera from the Adriatic Sea: Principles of phenotypic variations. Utrecht Micropaleontol. Bull. 1988, 37, 1–174. [Google Scholar]
  16. Morigi, C.; Jorissen, F.J.; Fraticelli, S.; Horton, B.P.; Principi, M.; Sabbatini, A.; Capotondi, L.; Curzi, P.V.; Negri, A. Benthic foraminiferal evidence for the formation of the Holocene mud-belt and bathymetrical evolution in the central Adriatic Sea. Mar. Micropaleontol. 2005, 57, 25–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Donnici, S.; Barbero, R.S. The benthic foraminiferal communities of the northern Adriatic continental shelf. Mar. Micropaleontol. 2002, 44, 93–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Barbieri, G.; Amorosi, A.; Vaiani, S.C. Benthic foraminifera as a key to delta evolution: A case study from the late Holocene succession of the Po River Delta. Micropaleontology 2017, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barbieri, G.; Rossi, V.; Vaiani, S.C.; Horton, B.P. Benthic ostracoda and foraminifera from the North Adriatic Sea (Italy, Mediterranean Sea): A proxy for the depositional characterisation of river influenced shelves. Mar. Micropaleontolo. 2019, 153, 101772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ćosović, V.; Zavodnik, D.; Borčić, A.; Vidović, J.; Deak, S.; Moro, A. A checklist of Foraminifera of the Eastern Shelf of the Adriatic Sea. Zootaxa 2011, 3035, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Melis, R.; Celio, M.; Bouchet, V.; Varagona, G.; Bazzaro, M.; Crosera, M.; Pugliese, N. Seasonal response of benthic foraminifera to anthropogenic pressure in two stations of the Gulf of Trieste (northern Adriatic Sea, Italy): The marine protected area of Miramare versus the Servola water sewage outfall. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2019, 20, 120–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Capotondi, L.; Kaminski, M.A.; Mancin, N. The test wall of Nubeculina Cushman 1924 (Miliolida: Unptates on its agglutinated-porcellaneous wall structure from entire and sections specimens. Microplaeontology 2022, 68, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Popadić, A.; Vidović, J.; Ćosović, V.; Medaković, D.; Dolenec, M.; Felja, I. Impact evaluation of the industrial activities in the Bay of Bakar (Adriatic Sea, Croatia): Recent benthic foraminifera and heavy metals. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 76, 333–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vidović, J.; Ćosović, V.; Juračić, M.; Petricioli, D. Impact of fish farming on foraminiferal community, Drvenik Veliki Island, Adriatic Sea. Croatia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2009, 58, 1297–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vidović, J.; Dolenec, M.; Dolenec, T.; Karamarko, V.; Rožič, P. Benthic foraminifera assemblages as elemental pollution bioindicator in marine sediments around fish farm (Vrgada Island, Central Adriatic, Croatia). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 83, 198–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rožič, P.; Vidović, J.; Ćosović, V.; Hlebec, A.; Rožič, B.; Dolenec, M. A Multiparametric Approach to Unravelling the Geoenvironmental Conditions in Sediments of Bay of Koper (NE Adriatic Sea): Indicators of Benthic Foraminifera and Geochemistry. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 812622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ludwig, W.; Dumont, E.; Meybeck, M.; Heussner, S. River discharges of water and nutrients to the Mediterranean and Black Sea: Major drivers for ecosystem changes during past and future decades? Progr. Oceanog. 2009, 80, 99–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Giglio, F.; Romano, S.; Albertazzi, S.; Chiarini, F.; Ravaioli, M.; Ligi, M.; Capotondi, L. Sediment Dynamics of the Neretva Channel (Croatia Coast) Inferred by Chemical and Physical Proxies. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Romić, D.; Romic, M.; Zovko, M.; Bakic, H.; Ondrasek, G. Trace metals in the coastal soils developed from estuarine floodplain sediments in the Croatian Mediterranean region. Environ. Geochem. Heal. 2012, 34, 399–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jurina, I.; Ivanić, M.; Vdović, N.; Troskot-Čorbić, T.; Lojen, S.; Mikac, N.; Sondi, I. Deposition of trace metals in sediments of the deltaic plain and adjacent coastal area (the Neretva River, Adriatic Sea). J. Geochem. Explor. 2015, 157, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zore-Armanda, M.; Grbec, B.; Morović, M. Oceanographic properties of the Adriatic Sea. A point of view. Acta Adriat. 1999, 40, 39–54. [Google Scholar]
  32. Raicich, F. Note on Flow Rates of the Adriatic Rivers; Technical Report, RF02/94; Istituto Tasso Grafico Sperimentale Trieste: Trieste, Italy, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  33. Vidjak, O.; Bojanić, N.; Kuspilić, G.; Gladan, Z.N.; Ticina, V. Zooplankton community and hydrographical properties of the Neretva Channel (eastern Adriatic Sea). Helgoland Mar. Res. 2007, 61, 267–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ivanić, M.; Lojen, S.; Grozić, D.; Jurina, I.; Škapin, S.D.; Troskot-Čorbić, T.; Mikac, N.; Juračić, M.; Sondi, I. Geochemistry of sedimentary organic matter and trace elements in modern lake sediments from transitional karstic land-sea environment of the Neretva River delta (Kuti Lake, Croatia). Quat. Int. 2018, 494, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jurina, I.; Ivanic, M.; Vdovic, N.; Mikac, N.; Sondi, I. Mechanism of the land-sea interactions in the Neretva River delta (Croatia): The distribution pattern of sediments and trace element. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer. Medit. 2010, 39, 35. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jurina, I.; Ivanić, M.; Troskot-Čorbić, T.; Barišić, D.; Vdović, N.; Sondi, I. Activity concentrations and distribution of radionuclides in surface and core sediments of the Neretva Channel (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). Geol. Croat. 2013, 66, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kljaković-Gašpić, Z.; Bogner, D.; Ujević, I. Trace metals (Cd, Pb, Cu, Zn and Ni) in sediment of the submarine pit Dragon ear (Soline Bay, Rogoznica, Croatia). Environ. Earth Sci. 2008, 58, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bahun, S. Review of hydrogeological relations of the Maloston Bay. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Mali Ston Bay, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 12–24 November 1981. [Google Scholar]
  39. Vučak, Z.; Gačić, M.; Dadič, V. Characteristics of the current field in Mali Ston Bay. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Mali Ston Bay, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 12–24 November 1981. [Google Scholar]
  40. Debenay, J.P.; Tsakiridis, E.; Soulard, R.; Grossel, H. Factors determining the distribution of foraminiferal assemblages in Port Joinville Harbor (Ille d’Yeu, France): The influence of pollution. Mar. Micropaleontol. 2001, 43, 75–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yanko-Hombach, V.; Kondariuk, T.; Motnenko, I. Benthic foraminifera indicate environmental stress from river discharge to marine ecosystems: Example from the black sea. J. Foraminifer. Res. 2017, 47, 70–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. AGIP. Foraminiferi Padani: (Terziario e Quaternario): Atlante Iconografico e Distribuzione Stratigrafica, 2nd ed.; AGIP Mineraria: Milan, Italy, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cimerman, F.; Langer, M.R. Mediterranean Foraminifera; Academia Scientiarum et Artium Slovenica: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1991; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  44. Loeblich, R.; Tappan, H. Foraminiferal Genera and their Classification; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hayward, B.W.; Le Coze, F.; Vachard, D.; Gross, O. World Foraminifera Database. 2020. Available online: http://www.marinespecies.org/foraminifera (accessed on 1 December 2022).
  46. Hayward, B.W.; Cedhagen, T.; Kaminski, M.; Gross, O. World Modern Foraminifera Database. 2011. Available online: http://www.marinespecies.org/foraminifera (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  47. Vaiani, S.C. Miliolidae (benthic foraminifera) distribution and relative sea-level variation during the Holocene transgression from subsurface deposits of the Po River delta (Italy). GeoActa 2010, 9, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  48. Walker, G.; Jacob, E.; Kanmacher, F. (Eds.) Adam`s Essay on the Microscope; Dillon and Keating: London, UK, 1798. [Google Scholar]
  49. Schweizer, M. Evolution and molecular phylogeny of Cibicides and Uvigerina (Rotaliida, foraminifera). Geol. Ultraiectina 2006, 261, 1–167. [Google Scholar]
  50. Van der Zwaan, G.J. Paleoecology of Late Miocene foraminifera. Utrecht Micropal. Bull. 1982, 25, 201. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kouwenhoven, T.J. Survival under stress: Benthic foraminiferal patterns and Cenozoic biotic crises. Geol. Ultraiectina 2000, 186, 1–206. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kaiho, K. Effect of organic carbon flux and dissolved oxygen on the benthic foraminiferal oxygen index (BFOI). Mar. Micropaleontol. 1999, 37, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schweizer, M.; Pawlowski, J.; Kouwenhoven, T.; Van Der Zwaan, B. Molecular phylogeny of common cibicidids and related rotaliida (foraminifera) based on small subunit rdna sequences. J. Foraminifer. Res. 2009, 39, 300–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Murray, J.W. Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 1–426. [Google Scholar]
  55. Vidović, J.; Nawrot, R.; Gallmetzer, I.; Haselmair, A.; Tomašových, A.; Stachowitsch, M.; Ćosović, V.; Zuschin, M. Anthropogenically induced environmental changes in the northeastern Adriatic Sea in the last 500 years (Panzano Bay, Gulf of Trieste). Biogeosciences 2016, 13, 5965–5981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Langer, M.R. Epiphytic foraminifera. Mar. Micropaleontol. 1993, 20, 235–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mateu-Vicens, G.; Khokhlova, A.; Sebastián-Pastor, T. Epiphytic foraminiferal indices as bioindicators in mediterranean seagrass meadows. J. Foramin. Res. 2014, 44, 325–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pérez-Asensio, J.N.; Rodríguez-Ramírez, A. Benthic Foraminiferal Salinity index in marginal-marine environments: A case study from the Holocene Guadalquivir estuary, SW Spain. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2020, 560, 110021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. eHammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological statistic software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 9. [Google Scholar]
  60. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T. Paleontological Data Analysis; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2006; p. 351. ISBN 1-4051-1544-0. [Google Scholar]
  61. Legendre, P.; Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 24, pp. 1–990. [Google Scholar]
  62. Carrascal, L.M.; Galván, I.; Gordo, O. Partial least squares regression as an alternative to current regression methods used in ecology. Oikos 2009, 118, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ferraro, L.; Innangi, S.; Di Martino, G.; Russo, B.; Tonielli, R.; Innangi, M. Seafloor features and benthic foraminifera off Linosa Island (Sicily Channel, southern Mediterranean). J. Mar. Syst. 2020, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rohlf, F.J.; Corti, M. Use of Two-Block Partial Least-Squares to Study Covariation in Shape. Syst. Biol. 2000, 49, 740–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Van Der Zwaan, G.J.; Jorissen, F.J. Biofacial patterns in river-induced shelf anoxia. Geol. Soc. London, Spéc. Publ. 1991, 58, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Di Bella, L.; Pierdomenico, M.; Bove, C.; Casalbore, D.; Ridente, D. Benthic Foraminiferal Response to Sedimentary Processes in a Prodeltaic Environment: The Gulf of Patti Case Study (Southeastern Tyrrhenian Sea). Geosciences 2021, 11, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rossi, V.; Vaiani, S.C. Benthic foraminiferal evidence of sediment supply changes and fluvial drainage reorganization in Holocene deposits of the Po Delta, Italy. Mar. Micropaleontol. 2008, 69, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mojtahid, M.; Jorissen, F.; Lansard, B.; Fontanier, C.; Bombled, B.; Rabouille, C. Spatial distribution of live benthic foraminifera in the Rhône prodelta: Faunal response to a continental–marine organic matter gradient. Mar. Micropaleontol. 2009, 70, 177–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Frezza, V.; Carboni, M.G. Distribution of recent foraminiferal assemblages near the Ombrone River mouth (Northern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Rev. Micropaléontol. 2009, 52, 43–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Barmawidjaja, D.M.; Jorissen, F.; Puskaric, S.; Van Der Zwaan, G.J. Microhabitat selection by benthic Foraminifera in the northern Adriatic Sea. J. Foraminifer. Res. 1992, 22, 297–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bellotti, P.; Carboni, G.; Di Bella, L.; Palagi, I. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages in the depositional sequence of the Tiber Delta. Boll. Soc. Paleontol. It. Spec. 1994, 2, 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  72. Alve, E.; Murray, J.W. Marginal marine environments of the Skagerrak and Kattegat: A baseline study of living (stained) benthic foraminiferal ecology. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 1999, 146, 171–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Moodley, L.; Hess, C. Tolerance of Infaunal Benthic Foraminifera for Low and High Oxygen Concentrations. Biol. Bull. 1992, 183, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Murray, J.W. Ecology and Palaeoecology of Benthic Foraminifera: Longman Scientific and Technical; Routledge: London, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  75. Sabbatini, A.; Bonatto, S.; Gooday, A.J.; Morigi, C.; Pancotti, I.; Pucci, F.; Negri, A. Modern benthic foraminifers at northern shallow sites of Adriatic Sea and softwalled, monothalamous taxa: A brief overview. Micropaleontology 2010, 56, 359–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mendes, I.; Dias, J.; Schönfeld, J.; Ferreira, O. Distribution of living benthic foraminifera on the northern gulf of cadiz continental shelf. J. Foraminifer. Res. 2012, 42, 18–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Diz, P.; Francés, G. Distribution of live benthic foraminifera in the Ría de Vigo (NW Spain). Mar. Micropaleontol. 2008, 66, 165–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Di Bella, L.; Conte, A.M.; Conti, A.; Esposito, V.; Gaglioti, M.; Ingrassia, M.; De Vittor, C.; Bigi, S. Potential Resilience to Ocean Acidification of Benthic Foraminifers Living in Posidonia oceanica Meadows: The Case of the Shallow Venting Site of Panarea. Geosciences 2022, 12, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Burmistrova, I.I.; Khusid, T.A.; Belyaeva, N.V.; Chekhovskaya, M.P. Agglutinated abyssal foraminifers of the equatorial pacific. Oceanology 2007, 47, 824–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chendeş, C.; Kaminski, M.A.; Filipescu, S.; Aksu, A.E.; Yaşar, D. The response of modern benthic foraminifera assemblages to water-masses properties along the Southern Shelf of the Marmara Sea. Acta Paleontolo. Rom. 2004, 4, 69–80. [Google Scholar]
  81. Levy, A.; Mathieu, R.; Poignant, A.; Rosset, M.; Ubaldo, M.; Lebreiro, S. Foraminiféres actuels de le marge continentale portuguaise.-inventaire et distribution. Mem. Inst. Geol. Min. Esp. 1995, 32, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  82. De Rijk, S.; Troelstra, S.R.; Rohling, E. Benthic foraminiferal distribution in the mediterranean sea. J. Foraminifer. Res. 1999, 29, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Bizon, G.; Bizon, J.J. Ecologie des foraminifères en Méditerranée nord-occidentale. R. Les foraminifères des sédiments profonds. In Ecologie des Microorganismes en Méditerranée Occidentale; Association Francaise des Techniciencs du Petrole: Courbevoie, France, 1984; Volume 301, pp. 104–139. [Google Scholar]
  84. Mojtahid, M.; Jorissen, F.; Lansard, B.; Fontanier, C. Microhabitat selection of benthic foraminifera in sediments off the rhone river mouth (nw mediterranean). J. Foraminifer. Res. 2010, 40, 231–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ferraro, L.; Bonomo, S.; Alberico, I.; Cascella, A.; Giordano, L.; Lirer, F.; Vallefuoco, M. Live benthic foraminifera from the Volturno River mouth (central Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. 2018, 29, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jorissen, F.J.; Barmawidjaja, D.M.; Puskaric, S.; van der Zwaan, G.J. Vertical distribution of benthic Foraminifera in the northern Adriatic Sea: The relation with high organic flux. Mar. Micropaleontol. 1992, 19, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hohenegger, J.; Piller, W.E.; Baal, C. Horizontal and vertical spatial micro-distribution of foraminifers in the shallow subtidal Gulf of Trieste, northern Adriatic Sea. J. Foraminifer. Res. 1993, 23, 79–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Murray, J.W. Living benthic foraminifera: Biogeographical distributions and the significance of rare morphospecies. J. Micropalaeontology 2013, 32, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Jorissen, F.; Nardelli, M.P.; Almogi-Labin, A.; Barras, C.; Bergamin, L.; Bicchi, E.; El Kateb, A.; Ferraro, L.; McGann, M.; Morigi, C.; et al. Developing Foram-AMBI for biomonitoring in the Mediterranean: Species assignments to ecological categories. Mar. Micropaleontol. 2018, 140, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the study area with the locations of the 11 investigated samples (orange circles). Shaded relief image derived from bathymetric data with sun illumination from NW, 45° over the horizon and no vertical exaggeration. Elevation and bathymetry data from EMODnet gridded data (www.emodnet.eu/bathymetry, accessed on 13 October 2022 ). Bathymetry contour interval is 20 m. Red box in the inset indicates the study area.
Figure 1. Map of the study area with the locations of the 11 investigated samples (orange circles). Shaded relief image derived from bathymetric data with sun illumination from NW, 45° over the horizon and no vertical exaggeration. Elevation and bathymetry data from EMODnet gridded data (www.emodnet.eu/bathymetry, accessed on 13 October 2022 ). Bathymetry contour interval is 20 m. Red box in the inset indicates the study area.
Geosciences 12 00456 g001
Figure 2. Geochemical and sedimentological composition of surface sediments (grain size, TOC, and C/N). Black dots correspond to study sites; gray and white colors indicate land and sea ares respectively. Modified from [28].
Figure 2. Geochemical and sedimentological composition of surface sediments (grain size, TOC, and C/N). Black dots correspond to study sites; gray and white colors indicate land and sea ares respectively. Modified from [28].
Geosciences 12 00456 g002
Figure 3. Relative abundance (percentage) and spatial distribution of the most representative species as reported in Table 2. Black dots correspond to study sites; gray and white colors indicate land and sea areas respectively.
Figure 3. Relative abundance (percentage) and spatial distribution of the most representative species as reported in Table 2. Black dots correspond to study sites; gray and white colors indicate land and sea areas respectively.
Geosciences 12 00456 g003
Figure 4. Ecological indices describing the foraminiferal assemblages from the top 2 cm of sediment in the investigated sites (black dots). Gray and white colors indicate land and sea areas respectively.
Figure 4. Ecological indices describing the foraminiferal assemblages from the top 2 cm of sediment in the investigated sites (black dots). Gray and white colors indicate land and sea areas respectively.
Geosciences 12 00456 g004
Figure 5. Cluster analysis based on non-standardized relative percentage data of foraminifera > 3% at least on the sample. The dendrogram evidences two major groups (A and B). Both can be subdivided into two additional (cluster A1, A2, B1, B2) representing similarities in the faunistic content of the investigated samples (x axis).
Figure 5. Cluster analysis based on non-standardized relative percentage data of foraminifera > 3% at least on the sample. The dendrogram evidences two major groups (A and B). Both can be subdivided into two additional (cluster A1, A2, B1, B2) representing similarities in the faunistic content of the investigated samples (x axis).
Geosciences 12 00456 g005
Figure 6. Scatterplot of the first axis of 2B-PLS between foraminiferal community (Block 1) and chemical and physical variables (Block 2); inserts show the correlation within and between blocks.
Figure 6. Scatterplot of the first axis of 2B-PLS between foraminiferal community (Block 1) and chemical and physical variables (Block 2); inserts show the correlation within and between blocks.
Geosciences 12 00456 g006
Table 1. List of the 11 sites considered in this study with geographical coordinates and water depth.
Table 1. List of the 11 sites considered in this study with geographical coordinates and water depth.
SiteLatitudeLongitudeWater Depth (m)
1 BC43°00.702′17°25.080′24
2 BC43°00.017′17°23.998′29
6 BC43°05.946′17°14.193′47
7 G43°04.629′17°11.948′51
8 G43°07.120′17°16.524′46
9 BC43°04.878′17°19.591′39
11 G43°02.939′17°21.937′32
12 G43°01.496′17°22.343′34
14 BC43°08.256′17°22.343′29
15 G42°58.147′17°27.579′24
16 G42°56.645′17°29.626′26
Table 2. Relative percentages of the most common species (>3% in at least one sample) identified in the surface sediment layer (0–2 cm).
Table 2. Relative percentages of the most common species (>3% in at least one sample) identified in the surface sediment layer (0–2 cm).
Sample1 BC2 BC6 BC7 G8 G9 BC11 G12 G 14 BC15 G16 G
Adelosina group0.911.151.423.240.951.320.570.810.890.553.08
Ammonia beccarii4.975.952.842.236.645.383.419.808.933.022.20
Aubignyna perlucida3.665.18 0.190.452.701.843.871.781.76
Asterigerinata mamilla 0.191.833.041.330.450.431.43 2.470.44
Buccella granulata0.390.774.674.86 0.34 2.61
Bulimina basispinosa2.091.342.842.234.173.816.833.061.791.651.76
Bulimina elongata7.852.881.421.725.123.365.694.083.273.576.17
Bulimina marginata2.361.202.842.5310.256.053.706.334.170.554.41
Cibicides group0.651.544.677.091.902.581.282.043.571.922.20
Hanzawaia boueana0.130.191.423.750.190.34 2.61
Keeled elphidiids species1.041.151.422.232.093.252.841.842.380.553.96
Nonionella turgida7.854.031.620.713.809.196.836.127.444.661.76
Miliolids4.706.135.084.557.0310.219.667.558.6412.0715.85
Rectuvigerina sp.8.776.911.620.712.853.593.412.653.574.122.64
Reussella spinulosa0.653.6514.4011.654.933.363.561.633.275.766.17
Rosalina sp.0.923.841.424.363.611.461.421.842.085.084.41
Unkeeled elphidiids species9.558.0617.0415.9112.5211.6611.112.0410.4220.5813.22
Valvulineria bradyana7.338.06 2.093.597.407.765.651.921.76
Adercotryma glomeratum0.393.450.20 0.190.56 1.19
Eggerelloides scaber8.643.070.200.102.663.252.992.242.980.410.44
Lagenammina difflugiformis6.416.531.220.100.761.911.280.612.981.780.44
Sigmoilopsis schlumbergeri0.392.301.011.422.282.692.703.671.190.273.52
Textularia sp.11.7811.1323.7320.3615.7514.0116.6417.9615.4813.3117.18
Table 3. Diversity indexes for the foraminifera assemblages in the different samples: number of Taxa, number of specimens/gr sediment (BFN), Shannon–Wiener entropy index (H), Dominance (D) and Simpson’s Index of Diversity (1-D).
Table 3. Diversity indexes for the foraminifera assemblages in the different samples: number of Taxa, number of specimens/gr sediment (BFN), Shannon–Wiener entropy index (H), Dominance (D) and Simpson’s Index of Diversity (1-D).
SampleTaxaBFNShannon_HDominance_DSimpson_1-D
1 BC50383.060.070.93
2 BC50383.290.050.95
6 BC416632.770.110.89
7 G423942.870.100.90
8 G41673.060.070.93
9 BC50763.190.060.94
11 G44453.060.070.93
12 G35332.940.080.92
14 BC38293.070.070.93
15 G441993.030.080.92
16 G37543.060.070.93
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Capotondi, L.; Bonomo, S.; Graiani, A.; Innangi, M.; Innangi, S.; Giglio, F.; Ravaioli, M.; Ferraro, L. Spatial Distribution of Benthic Foraminifera in the Neretva Channel (Croatia Coast): Faunal Response to Environmental Parameters. Geosciences 2022, 12, 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12120456

AMA Style

Capotondi L, Bonomo S, Graiani A, Innangi M, Innangi S, Giglio F, Ravaioli M, Ferraro L. Spatial Distribution of Benthic Foraminifera in the Neretva Channel (Croatia Coast): Faunal Response to Environmental Parameters. Geosciences. 2022; 12(12):456. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12120456

Chicago/Turabian Style

Capotondi, Lucilla, Sergio Bonomo, Andrea Graiani, Michele Innangi, Sara Innangi, Federico Giglio, Mariangela Ravaioli, and Luciana Ferraro. 2022. "Spatial Distribution of Benthic Foraminifera in the Neretva Channel (Croatia Coast): Faunal Response to Environmental Parameters" Geosciences 12, no. 12: 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12120456

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop