Determination of Total Mercury and Carbon in a National Baseline Study of Urban House Dust
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection and Preparation
2.2. Mercury Instrumentation
2.3. Carbon Instrumentation
2.4. Quality Control
2.5. Data Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Total Hg and TC in Certified Reference Materials and CHDS Samples
3.2. Relationship between Hg and TC in House Dust
3.3. Duplicate Uncertainty
3.4. Comparison of Sampling Methods (FD vs. HD)
3.5. Hg Distribution in the CHDS Homes
4. Conclusions
- This study has produced the first nationally representative baseline dataset for Hg in urban house dust. The median/geomean Hg concentration observed for indoor dust (0.68/0.70 mg/kg; n = 995) is 10 times higher than the average background concentrations reported for soil, glacial sediments, and lake sediments (0.07 mg/kg). The dust Hg dataset is log-normally distributed and reveals a subset of anomalously high Hg concentrations (>9.0 mg/kg; 0.7% of the studied homes). These results are consistent with elevated indoor/outdoor Hg ratios previously observed in previous smaller studies (n <65 homes), which were conducted in urban areas not impacted by mining or smelting activities or other Hg-releasing industries. In addition, they indicate the influence of anthropogenic Hg from indoor sources and/or carried home from occupational sources.
- A significant positive correlation was observed between total Hg and TC (r = 0.26; p < 0.00001) in indoor dust, which reflects the association between Hg and organic carbon previously observed in outdoor environmental media (soil and sediments). Total carbon concentrations determined in house dust (median 29.3%, geomean 28.5%; n = 1011) are consistent with previously published studies, which reported that the carbon content of indoor dust samples is typically 5–6 times higher than the corresponding garden soil samples.
- Based on quality assessment results, it is concluded that the solid sample analysis techniques used in the present study are well-suited for the determination of total Hg and TC in house dust. Analysis of certified reference materials for both analytes demonstrated excellent accuracy and reproducibility (within 97–102% recovery and <10% RSD). Additionally, this study showed that samples previously irradiated for neutron activation analysis (Hg LOD = 1 mg/kg) may be re-analyzed for Hg by the more sensitive DMA-80 method used in the present study (Hg LOD = 0.005 mg/kg).
- Duplicate analysis of the <80 µm dust samples yielded reproducibilities of 12% RSD for Hg and 2% RSD for TC, which are comparable with reproducibilities reported for certified reference materials that have been ground and milled to maximize homogeneity. These results support the use of the <80 µm particle size fraction for house dust monitoring studies.
- The comparison of sampling methods indicated no significant difference in Hg concentration between household vacuum samples and fresh or “active” dust samples collected from the same homes, indicating that collecting dust samples from the household vacuum system is a viable and cost-effective sampling approach for residential Hg monitoring.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization. Mercury and Health. Fact Sheet; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; Available online: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs361/en/ (accessed on 20 October 2021).
- Tchounwou, P.B.; Ayensu, W.K.; Ninashvili, N.; Sutton, D. Review: Environmental Exposure to Mercury and Its Toxicopathologic Implications for Public Health. Wiley Period. Inc. 2003, 18, 149–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ciani, F.; Rimondi, V.; Costagliola, P. Atmospheric mercury pollution: The current methodological framework outlined by environmental legislation. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2021, 14, 1633–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AMAP/UN Environment. Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2018; Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: Oslo, Norway; UN Environment Programme, Chemicals and Health Branch: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Clarkson, T.W. The Three Modern Faces of Mercury. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lye, E.; Legrand, M.; Clarke, J.; Probert, A. Blood total mercury concentrations in the Canadian population: Canadian Health Measures Survey cycle 1, 2007–2009. Can. J. Public Health 2013, 104, e246–e251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- North American Regional Action Plan on Mercury (NARAP). North American Implementation Task Force on Mercury—Phase II; NARAP: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2000; 31. [Google Scholar]
- Legrand, M.; Feeley, M.; Tikhonov, C.; Schoen, D.; Li-Muller, A. Methylmercury Blood Guidance Values for Canada. Can J Public Health 2010, 101, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- UNEP. Many Products Still Contain Mercury. These Alternatives Could Replace Them; UN Environment Program: Nairobi, Kenya, 2019; Available online: https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/many-products-still-contain-mercury-these-alternatives-could-replace-them (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Salthammer, T. Emerging indoor pollutants. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 224, 113423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majewski, G.; Kociszewska, K.; Rogula-Kozłowska, W.; Pyta, H.; Rogula-Kopiec, P.; Mucha, W.; Pastuszka, J.S. Submicron Particle-Bound Mercury in University Teaching Rooms: A Summer Study from Two Polish Cities. Atmosphere 2016, 7, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Butte, W.; Heinzow, B. Pollutants in House Dust as Indicators of Indoor Contamination. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2002, 175, 1–46. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen, P.E.; Subramanian, K.S.; Jessiman, B.J. A multi-element profile of housedust in relation to exterior dust and soils in the city of Ottawa, Canada. Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 267, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nedić, A.B.; Mira, M.; Pucarević, M.M.; Ninkov, J.M.; Nataša, S.; Stojić, N.S.; Milić, D.M. Mercury content and distribution in household dust and soil in the town of Šid. Matica Srpska J. Nat. Sci. Novi Sad. 2019, 137, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gaberšek, M.; Gosar, M. Towards a holistic approach to the geochemistry of solid inorganic particles in the urban environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 763, 144214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasmussen, P.E.; Friske, P.W.B.; Azzaria, L.M.; Garrett, R.G. Mercury in the Canadian Environment: Current Research Challenges. Geosci. Can. 1998, 25, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen, P.E.; Villard, D.J.; Gardner, H.D.; Fortescue, J.A.C.; Schiff, S.L.; Shilts, W.W. Mercury in lake sediments of the Precambrian Shield near Huntsville, Ontario, Canada. Environ. Geol. 1998, 33, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pant, P.; Allen, M.; Tansel, B. The role of organic carbon in facilitating mercury sorption and retention in the soil: Some field evidence from Oak Ridge, Tennessee-10391. In Proceedings of the WM2010 Conference, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 7–11 March 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen, P.E.; Beauchemin, S.; Nugent, M.; Dugandzic, R.; Lanouette, M.; Chénier, M. Influence of Matrix Composition on the Bioaccessibility of Copper, Zinc, and Nickel in Urban Residential Dust and Soil. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2008, 14, 351–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Zhou, M. Comparison of DMA-80 and ICP-MS Combined with Closed-Vessel Microwave Digestion for the Determination of Mercury in Coal. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2020, 8867653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilli, R.S.; Karlen, C.; Weber, M.; Rüegg, J.; Barmettler, K.; Biester, H.; Boivin, P.; Kretzschmar, R. Speciation and Mobility of Mercury in Soils Contaminated by Legacy Emissions from a Chemical Factory in the Rhône Valley in Canton of Valais, Switzerland. Soil Syst. 2018, 2, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- US-EPA. Method 7473: Mercury in Solids and Solutions by Thermal Decomposition, Amalgamation and Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; p. 17.
- Bissuti, I.; Hilke, I.; Raessler, M. Determination of total organic carbon—An overview of current methods. Trends Anal. Chem. 2004, 23, 716–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peña-Méndez, E.A.; Gajdošová, D.; Havel, J. Direct laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry of soil organic matter for fast soil fingerprints. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 26, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J. Comparisons of Three Methods for Organic and Inorganic Carbon in Calcareous Soils of Northwestern China. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leogrande, R.; Vitti, C.; Castellini, M.; Mastrangelo, M.; Pedrero, F.; Vivaldi, G.A.; Stellacci, A.M. Comparison of Two Methods for Total Inorganic Carbon Estimation in Three Soil Types in Mediterranean Area. Land 2021, 10, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasmussen, P.E.; Beauchemin, S.; Chénier, M.; Levesque, C.; MacLean, L.C.W.; Marro, L.; Jones-Otazo, H.; Petrovic, S.; McDonald, L.T.; Gardner, H.D. Canadian house dust study: Lead bioaccessibility and speciation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 4959–4965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rasmussen, P.E.; Levesque, C.; Chénier, M.; Gardner, H.D. Canadian House Dust Study: Population-based concentrations, loads and loading rates of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, and zinc inside urban homes. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 443, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rasmussen, P.E.; Levesque, C.; Chénier, M.; Gardner, H.D. Contribution of metals in resuspended dust to indoor and personal inhalation exposures: Relationships between PM10 and settled dust. Build. Environ. 2018, 143, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Synek, V. Evaluation of the standard deviation from duplicate results. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2008, 13, 335–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabata-Pendias, A. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; ISBN 9781420093681. [Google Scholar]
- Government of Ontario, Ontario Typical Range Soil Chemistry: Inorganics. Open Access Data. Available online: https://data.ontario.ca/dataset/ontario-typical-range-soil-chemistry/resource/05325545-6fa8-4dd8-9968-c250c347b6e7 (accessed on 9 September 2021).
- Nars, M.; Ogilvie, J.; Castonguay, M.; Rencz, A.; Arp, P.A. Total Hg concentrations in stream and lake sediments: Discerning geospatial patterns and controls across Canada. Appl. Geochem. 2011, 26, 1818–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- US-EPA. Mercury in Consumer Products. 2021. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/mercury/mercury-consumer-products#list (accessed on 18 October 2021).
- Huang, J.; Hopke, P.K.; Choi, H.D.; Laing, J.R.; Cui, H.; Zananski, T.J.; Chandrasekaran, S.R.; Rattigan, O.V.; Holsen, T.M. Mercury (Hg) emissions from domestic biomass combustion for space heating. Chemosphere 2011, 84, 1694–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baughman, T.A. Elemental mercury spills. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shock, S.S.; Noggle, J.J.; Bloom, N.; Yost, L.J. Evaluation of potential for mercury volatilization from natural and FGD gypsum products using flux-chamber tests. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 2282–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogunbileje, J.O.; Sadagoparamanujam, V.M.; Anetor, J.I.; Farombi, E.O.; Akinosun, O.M.; Okorodudu, A.O. Lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium, nickel, copper, zinc, calcium, iron, manganese and chromium (VI) levels in Nigeria and United States of America cement dust. Chemosphere 2013, 90, 2743–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agocs, M.M.; Etzel, R.A.; Parrish, R.G.; Paschal, D.C.; Campagna, P.R.; Cohen, D.S.; Kilbourne, E.M.; Hesse, J.L. Mercury exposure from interior latex paint. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990, 323, 1096–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; Xing, X.; Wen, D.; Wang, B.; Qin, N.; Wei, F.; Duan, X. Quantificational Exposure, Sources and Health Risks Posed by Heavy Metals in Indoor and Outdoor Household Dust in a Typical Smelting Area in China. Indoor Air 2020, 30, 872–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bavec, Š.; Gosar, M.; Miler, M.; Biester, H. Geochemical investigation of potentially harmful elements in household dust from a mercury-contaminated site, the town of Idrija (Slovenia). Environ. Geochem. Health 2017, 39, 443–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hagan, N.; Robin, N.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Halabi, S.; Gonzales, R.D.E.; Richter, D.; Vanderberg, J. Residential Mercury Contamination in Adobe Brick Homes in Huancavelica, Peru. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, A.; Simmonds, L. Elemental concentrations and metal bioaccessibility in UK household dust. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 371, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Warren, C.J.; Saurette, D.D.; Gillespie, A.W. Soil organic carbon content: Decreases partly attributed to dilution by increased depth of cultivation in southern Ontario. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2021, 101, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laamrani, A.; Voroney, P.R.; Berg, A.A.; Gillespie, A.W.; March, M.; Deen, B.; Martin, R.C. Temporal Change of Soil Carbon on a Long-Term Experimental Site with Variable Crop Rotations and Tillage Systems. Agronomy 2020, 10, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leppänen, M.; Peräniemi, S.; Koponen, H.; Sippula, O.; Pasanen, P. The effect of the shoeless course on particle concentrations and dust composition in schools. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 710, 136272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hunt, A.; Johnson, D.L.; Griffith, D.A. Mass transfer of soil indoors by track-in on footwear. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 370, 360–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wiśniewska, K.; Lewandowska, A.U.; Witkowska, A. Factors determining dry deposition of total mercury and organic carbon in house dust of residents of the Tri-city and the surrounding area (Baltic Sea coast). Air Qual. Atmos. Health. 2017, 10, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kubwabo, C.; Fan, X.; Rasmussen, P.E.; Wu, F. Determination of synthetic musk compounds in indoor house dust by gas chromatography–ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubwabo, C.; Rasmussen, P.E.; Kosarac, I.; Wu, F.; Zidek, A.; Kuchta, S.L. Analysis of selected phthalates in Canadian indoor dust collected using household vacuum and standardized sampling techniques. Indoor Air 2013, 23, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fan, X.; Kubwabo, C.; Rasmussen, P.E.; Wu, F. Simultaneous determination of thirteen organophosphate esters in settled indoor house dust and a comparison between two sampling techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 491-492, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubwabo, C.; Fan, X.; Rasmussen, P.E.; Wu, F.; Kosarac, I. Expanding the number of phthalates monitored in house dust. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2016, 96, 667–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasmussen, P.E.; Levesque, C.; Chénier, M.; Gardner, H.D. Rare earth elements and select actinoids in the Canadian House Dust Study. Indoor Air 2017, 27, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- FDA. Dental Amalgam Fillings. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/dental-devices/dental-amalgam-fillings (accessed on 30 July 2021).
- Rosco, R.J.; Gittleman, J.L.; Deddens, J.A.; Petersen, M.R.; Helperin, W.E. Blood Lead Levels Among Children of Lead-Exposed Workers: A Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1999, 36, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Total Mercury (mg/kg) | ||
NIST 2584 | Observed | 5.1 ± 0.44 |
(n = 83) | Certified | 5.2 ± 0.24 |
Recovery | 99% | |
RSD | 8.5% | |
NIST 2587 | Observed | 0.294 ± 0.023 |
(n = 142) | Certified | 0.290 ± 0.009 |
Recovery | 102% | |
RSD | 7.79% | |
Total Carbon (%) | ||
NIST 2710 | Observed | 3.1 ± 0.11 |
(n = 71) | Informative value | 3 |
Recovery | 102% | |
RSD | 3.6% | |
EuroVector Soil 1 | Observed | 3.4 ± 0.03 |
(n = 31) | Certified | 3.5 ± 0.066 |
Recovery | 97% | |
RSD | 0.92% |
Hg (mg/kg) | TC (%) | |
---|---|---|
N | 995 | 1011 |
LOD | 0.005 | 0.035 |
Geomean | 0.70 | 28.5 |
Arithmetic Mean ± SD | 1.24 ± 2.93 | 29.2 ± 5.83 |
Range (min–max) | 0.04–68.6 | 9.30–76.4 |
Percentiles | ||
5 | 0.15 | 19.4 |
10 | 0.21 | 21.8 |
25 | 0.37 | 26.0 |
50 (median) | 0.68 | 29.3 |
75 | 1.30 | 33.0 |
90 | 2.39 | 35.8 |
95 | 3.73 | 37.0 |
97.5 | 5.20 | 38.4 |
98 | 5.88 | 39.0 |
99 | 7.25 | 40.2 |
Mercury | Total Carbon | ||
---|---|---|---|
House dust duplicates | House dust duplicates | ||
Concentration range (mg/kg) | 0.23–1.39 | Concentration range (%) | 9–48 |
No. duplicate pairs in range | 480 | No. duplicate pairs in range | 56 |
relative SD of duplicates a | 12% | relative SD of duplicates a | 2% |
CRMs | CRMs | ||
NIST 2584 (n = 83) | EuroVector Soil 1 (n = 31) | ||
Observed relative U b | 9% | Observed relative U b | 1% |
Certified relative U c | 5% | Certified relative U c | 2% |
NIST 2587 (n = 142) | NIST 2710 (n = 71) | ||
Observed relative U b | 8% | Observed relative U b | 8% |
Certified relative U c | 3% | Certified relative U c | NR |
HD | FD | |
---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | 1.05 ± 1.32 | 1.30 ± 1.75 |
Geomean | 0.67 | 0.76 |
Median | 0.90 | 0.72 |
Range (min–max) | 0.10–7.25 | 0.13–8.74 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Levesque, C.; Rasmussen, P.E. Determination of Total Mercury and Carbon in a National Baseline Study of Urban House Dust. Geosciences 2022, 12, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020052
Levesque C, Rasmussen PE. Determination of Total Mercury and Carbon in a National Baseline Study of Urban House Dust. Geosciences. 2022; 12(2):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020052
Chicago/Turabian StyleLevesque, Christine, and Pat E. Rasmussen. 2022. "Determination of Total Mercury and Carbon in a National Baseline Study of Urban House Dust" Geosciences 12, no. 2: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020052
APA StyleLevesque, C., & Rasmussen, P. E. (2022). Determination of Total Mercury and Carbon in a National Baseline Study of Urban House Dust. Geosciences, 12(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020052