Next Article in Journal
Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography Method to Determine the Inner 3D Geometry and the Main Runoff Directions of the Large Active Landslide of Pie de Cuesta in the Vítor Valley (Peru)
Previous Article in Journal
Slip Activation Potential of Fractures in the Crystalline Basement Rocks of Kuujjuaq (Nunavik, Canada) to Assess Enhanced Geothermal Systems Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differences in Geochemical Signatures and Petrogenesis between the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son Granitic Rocks in the Southern Kontum Massif, Vietnam

Department of Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2023, 13(11), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13110341
Submission received: 8 September 2023 / Revised: 3 November 2023 / Accepted: 6 November 2023 / Published: 7 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Geochemistry)

Abstract

:
Permian Ben Giang-Que Son and Triassic Van Canh granitic rocks are widely distributed across the southern Kontum Massif, the basement of which consists mainly of metasedimentary rocks. The Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks are classified as I- to S-type and ilmenite-series granitic rocks, while the Van Canh granitic rocks are classified as I-type and magnetite-series granitic rocks. Both granitic rock suites exhibit more or less adakitic properties, suggesting that the subduction of the high-temperature Song Ma Ocean crust, part of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean, beneath the Indochina Block produced adakitic magma. It is hypothesized that the differences between the two granitic rock suites were caused by differences in the quantities of incorporated continental crustal materials and carbon or graphite in clastic sedimentary rocks when their adakitic magma intruded into the continental crust. Based on their high initial Sr isotope ratios, the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks evidently incorporated a higher quantity of continental crustal materials compared to the Van Canh granitic rocks, resulting in the former showing the signatures of ilmenite-series and I- to S-type granitic rocks. Consequently, the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks have relatively high A/CNK ratios and high total Al contents in their biotite, whereas the Van Canh granitic rocks have low A/CNK ratios and low total Al contents in their biotite. The intrusion of the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks caused high-temperature metamorphism, which decomposed some of the carbon or graphite in the surrounding continental crustal materials, such as clastic sedimentary rocks. Meanwhile, the Van Canh granitic rocks, which intruded later than the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks, incorporated smaller quantities of carbon or graphite in continental crustal materials, resulting in them retaining the chemical characteristics of adakitic, magnetite-series, and I-type granitic rocks, different from the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks.

1. Introduction

The tectonic history of mainland Indochina can be explained by the subduction of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean and the amalgamation of the South China, Indochina, and Sibumasu blocks, which separated from the supercontinent of Gondwana [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
The Song Ma Suture, a partial relict of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean that once existed between the South China and Indochina blocks, runs from the northwest to the southeast of northern Vietnam (Figure 1) [5,15,19,20,21]. The Truong Son Fold Belt is located to the southwest of the Song Ma Suture and was generated by the amalgamation of the South China and Indochina blocks when the Song Ma Ocean was subducted beneath the Indochina Block. The Truong Son Fold Belt continues to the Kontum Massif, which is situated in central Vietnam (Figure 1). Moreover, in the south of the Kontum Massif, there are many Cretaceous granitic rocks that were formed during the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate, which form the Dalat–Kratie Zone [22].
The Kontum Massif comprises part of the eastern edge of the Indochina Block (Figure 1). Permian Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks (ca. 280–260 Ma) and Triassic Van Canh granitic rocks (ca. 251–229 Ma) are widely distributed across the southern part of the Kontum Massif [23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Based on the formation ages of these granitic rocks, most of the Kontum Massif is considered to belong to the Truong Son Fold Belt.
The basic classification of granitic rocks was proposed by Chapell and White [30] and Ishihara [31]. Chappell and White [30] classified granitic rocks as I-type (igneous rock) and S-type (sedimentary rock), based on differences in the source materials. Ishihara [31] classified granitic rocks as magnetite-series and ilmenite-series granite, based on their magnetic susceptibility. Although there are some differences between the two classifications, the former is considered to have been formed under relatively oxidizing conditions, while the latter is considered to have been formed under relatively reducing conditions. The Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks are reported to be I-type granitic rocks [32], while the Van Canh granitic rocks are reported to be S-type granitic rocks [29]. However, this study revealed that the Van Canh granitic rocks have high magnetic susceptibility; therefore, they should be classified as magnetite-series and I-type granitic rocks, contradicting their current classification as S-type granitic rocks. In this study, we conducted a detailed investigation of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks using samples taken from the Kontum and Gia Lai provinces, which occupy the southern part of the Kontum Massif. We performed in situ magnetic susceptibility measurements and collected granitic rock samples for whole-rock chemical composition analysis, Nd–Sr isotope ratio measurements, and biotite chemical composition analysis. On the basis of these data, we aimed to clarify the petrogenesis of both suites of granitic rocks in relation to the tectonic history between the South China Block, the Indochina Block, and the Song Ma Ocean.
Figure 1. Simplified tectonic setting map of southeast Asia. Data obtained from Metcalfe [5], Wang et al. [15], Cheng et al. [19], Kasahara et al. [20], Uchida et al. [21], Hung et al. [28], and this study. The study area is shown by the red square.
Figure 1. Simplified tectonic setting map of southeast Asia. Data obtained from Metcalfe [5], Wang et al. [15], Cheng et al. [19], Kasahara et al. [20], Uchida et al. [21], Hung et al. [28], and this study. The study area is shown by the red square.
Geosciences 13 00341 g001

2. Geological Settings

The northernmost part of Vietnam belongs to the South China Block, while the southern part, which is separated from the northernmost part by the Song Ma Suture, belongs to the Indochina Block. The southern part of Vietnam consists of the Truong Son Belt, the Kontum Massif, and the Dalat Zone (from north to south) (Figure 1) [4,5,13,15,22].
The Kontum Massif is located in central Vietnam and has the largest Precambrian basement in Southeast Asia. The Kontum Massif is delimited on its northern side by the east–west striking Tam Ky-Phuoc Son Suture (Figure 1); however, its other boundaries are not clear.
The basement of the Kontum Massif consists mainly of five different units of metasedimentary rocks, which were deposited in five periods from the Late Paleoproterozoic (1.80–1.65 Ga) to the Late Neoproterozoic–Early Paleozoic eras (0.61–0.51 Ga) [33]. It is considered that most of the Precambrian sediments came from southwestern Laurentia [33].
Precambrian metamorphic rocks are widely distributed across the Kontum Massif, forming the core of the Indochina Block. Ordovician-Silurian and Permian-Triassic high- to ultra-high-temperature metamorphic rocks (amphibolite- to granulite-facies) are also common [23,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. There are four complexes distributed across the Kontum Massif: the Kham Duc, Ngoc Linh, Kan Nak, and Dien Binh complexes (from northwest to southeast) [41]. The Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks investigated in this study are mainly distributed in the Kan Nak and Dien Binh complexes. The Kan Nack Complex experienced granulite- to amphibolite-facies metamorphism, while the Ngoc Linh Complex mainly comprises amphibolite-facies metamorphic rocks [33].

3. Materials and Methods

The distributions of Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks across the Kontum and Gia Lai provinces are shown in Figure 2. Granitic rock samples were collected from roadside outcrops and quarries, and we selected granitic rocks that were as fresh and little weathered as possible. In total, 10 Van Canh and 5 Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples were collected in this study [42]. Table 1 shows the latitudes and longitudes of each sampling site. Magnetic susceptibility was also measured at 10 points across each sampling site using a portable magnetic susceptibility meter (SM30, ZH Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic).
Thin sections were prepared from the collected granitic rock samples and mineral identification was performed under a polarizing microscope. The granitic rock samples were also ground using a tungsten carbide rod mill (TI-100, Heiko Seisakusho Ltd., Fukushima, Japan) and 5 g of powder from each rock sample was sent to Activation Laboratories Ltd., Ontario, Canada, for whole-rock chemical composition analysis. This analysis was requested according to the “4Litho” litho-geochemistry package. However, the tungsten and cobalt values were excluded from the analytical results owing to contamination during the pulverization of the rock samples using the tungsten carbide rod mill.
The biotite in the granitic rock samples was subjected to chemical composition analysis using an energy dispersive spectrometer (INCA ENERGY, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK), which was attached to a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-6360, Tokyo, Japan) (SEM-EDS) in Waseda University. The thin sections were carbon-coated prior to analysis. The accelerating voltage was 15 kV, and the current was adjusted so that the total X-ray counts on metallic cobalt were 2000 counts/s. The measurement time was around 60 s. The elements measured were Si, Ti, Al, Fe, Mn, Mg, Na, and K and synthetic SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, MnO, MgO, natural albite, and K-feldspar were used as the standard materials, respectively. In addition to microscopic observations, the SEM-EDS analysis results were also taken into consideration when determining whether the biotite was chloritized. If the number of K atoms was less than 1.6 on the basis of O = 22, the biotite was considered to be chloritized and was excluded from the results.
Nd–Sr isotope ratio measurements were performed on the collected rock samples at the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature in Kyoto, Japan. The separation of Nd and Sr from the collected rock samples was performed according to the method of Na et al. [43]. A multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (MC–ICP–MS; NEPTUNE, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was used for the analysis. The measured 87Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd isotope ratios were corrected using the abundance ratios of 86Sr/88Sr = 0.1194 [44] and 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219 [45] in nature. The 87Sr/86Sr ratio for the Sr standard sample (NIST SRM 987), which was measured at the same time as the unknown samples, was 0.710286 ± 0.000011 (2σ) (n = 5) and the 143Nd/144Nd ratio for the Nd standard sample (JNdi-1) was 0.511934 ± 0.000013 (2σ) (n = 6). The Sr and Nd isotope ratios for the measured rock samples were corrected using the isotope ratios of 87Sr/86Sr = 0.710250 (NIST SRM 987) [46] and 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512115 (JNdi-1) [47], respectively.

4. Results

4.1. Petrographic Description and Constituent Minerals

Photographs and photomicrographs under a polarizing microscope of representative Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples are shown in Figure 3. The rock sampling locations (latitude and longitude) and constituent minerals are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.
The Van Canh granitic rocks were coarse- to medium-grained and gray-white to slightly pink in color. The major constituent minerals were K-feldspar, plagioclase, quartz, biotite, and amphibole. Zircon, apatite, titanite, opaque minerals (magnetite and ilmenite), and epidote were also observed as minor constituent minerals. The chloritization of biotite was recognized in some samples.
The Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks were also medium-grained and gray-white to slightly pink in color. The main constituent minerals were K-feldspar, plagioclase, quartz, and biotite. Zircon, apatite, opaque minerals (ilmenite and pyrite), and muscovite were also observed as minor constituent minerals. The chloritization of biotite was recognized in some samples.
The Van Canh granitic rocks contained hornblende and small amounts of titanite, whereas the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks did not contain these minerals but were accompanied by small amounts of muscovite. These facts indicated that the Van Canh granitic rocks were I-type and magnetite-series granitic rock, while the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks were I- to S-type and ilmenite-series granitic rock [48,49].

4.2. Magnetic Susceptibility

The classification of magnetite-series and ilmenite-series granitic rocks was first proposed by Ishihara [31].
The magnetic susceptibility of samples from both granitic rock suites was measured at each outcrop, as shown in Figure 4. Because the average magnetic susceptibility of the Van Canh granitic rocks was higher than 3 × 10−3 SI units, they were classified as magnetite-series granitic rocks [48]. However, sample VN307 showed magnetic susceptibility values lower than 3 × 103 SI units at several points, which could have been due to the weathering of the granitic rocks on the ground surface. In contrast, all of the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks showed magnetic susceptibility values lower than 3 × 10−3 SI units and were classified as ilmenite-series granitic rocks [48].

4.3. Whole-Rock Chemical Composition

The whole-rock chemical composition analysis results for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples are summarized in Table 3.
A total alkali versus SiO2 (TAS) diagram for the granitic rock samples, based on the analytical results, is shown in Figure 5 [50,51]. On the basis of these results, many of the Van Canh granitic rocks were classified as granite, but there were some rocks showing diorite (VN313) to granodiorite (VN303, VN307, and VN316) compositions. In contrast, most of the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks were classified as granite and only one sample (VN309) was classified as granodiorite.
On the Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) versus Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) (A/NK versus A/CNK) diagram [52] (Figure 6), the Van Canh granitic rocks were plotted in the metaluminous to peraluminous region with Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) molar ratios <1.1, so they were classified as I-type granitic rocks [52]. The Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks were all plotted in the peraluminous region and were classified as I-type to S-type granitic rocks, with Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) molar ratios of around 1.1.
On the Zr versus 10,000 × Ga/Al diagram [53] (Figure 7), two Van Canh and one Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples were plotted in the A-type region, while the others were plotted in the I- and S-type regions. Combined with the data from the Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) versus Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) diagram, the Van Canh samples were classified as I-type granitic rocks, while the Ben Giang-Que Son samples were classified as I- to S-type granitic rocks.
On the basis of the Rb versus (Yb + Ta) tectonic classification diagram of Pearce [54] (Figure 8), the Van Canh granitic rocks were classified as volcanic arc to syn-collisional granitic rocks, while most of the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks were classified as syn-collisional granitic rocks.
On the Sr/Y versus Y diagram [55], which distinguishes adakitic and non-adakitic rocks (Figure 9), some of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks were plotted in the adakitic field. Overall, they also exhibited slightly higher Sr/Y ratios than those found in typical non-adakitic rocks. This indicated the higher or lower degrees of involvement of adakitic magma in both granitic rock suites.
Chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns [56] were constructed using the values from MaDonough and Sun [57] (Figure 10). The results revealed that all of the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks exhibited negative Eu anomalies. While many of the Van Canh granitic rock samples also exhibited negative Eu anomalies, these anomalies were smaller in some samples, such as VN307 and VN311, whereas one sample VN313 showed a slightly positive Eu anomaly, which may indicate an accumulation of plagioclase.

4.4. Chemical Compositions of Biotite

The biotite in the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks, except for one point, exhibited high total Al contents (2.6–3.4; on the basis of O = 22) and low Mg/(Mg + Fe) molar ratios (0.2–0.45) (Figure 11). In contrast, the biotite in the Van Canh granitic rocks tended to have low total Al contents (2.25–2.95; on the basis of O = 22) and high Mg/(Mg + Fe) molar ratios (0.3–0.65).

4.5. Nd–Sr Isotope Ratios

The results of the Nd–Sr isotope ratio analysis are summarized in Table 4. In addition, using the zircon U-Pb ages of ca. 240 Ma for the Van Canh granitic rocks [29] and ca. 270 Ma for the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks [28], the calculated initial Nd, (143Nd/144Nd)i, and Sr, (87Sr/86Sr)i isotope ratios are shown in Figure 12. The (143Nd/144Nd)i ratios of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks were 0.511872–0.512216 and 0.511820–0.511984, respectively, showing that there were no significant differences. In contrast, the (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks were 0.706821–0.716976 and 0.709143–0.729246, respectively, showing that the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks evidently had higher initial values.

5. Discussion

The Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks had intermediate compositions between I-type and S-type granitic rocks and were classified as ilmenite-series granitic rocks. Their initial Sr isotope ratio values indicated that they incorporated large quantities of continental crustal materials (Figure 12) [46,58]. Continental crustal materials, such as clastic sedimentary rocks, usually contain carbon or graphite [48,49]. Jiang et al. [33] demonstrated that the Kontum Massif basement consists mainly of different units of metasedimentary rocks, which were derived from clastic sedimentary rocks deposited in five periods. Magma becomes reductive when these continental crustal materials are incorporated. In magma that has become reductive due to the incorporation of carbon or graphite, Eu3+ is reduced to Eu2+ and is incorporated into plagioclase. As plagioclase is removed from the magma by differentiation, Eu3+ in the magma becomes relatively low, resulting in negative Eu anomalies in chondrite-normalized REE patterns. In addition, the incorporation of peraluminous continental crustal materials, such as clastic sedimentary rocks, increases A/CNK ratios and total Al contents in biotite. Reflecting these facts, the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks were classified as syn-collision granite in our tectonic setting classification diagram (Figure 8) [54]. Some of the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks could also be classified as adakitic rocks (Figure 9). Adakite is thought to be formed by the subduction of young oceanic crusts or ridges under relatively high temperatures [55]. The combined data suggested that the magma of the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks was formed by the subduction of the Song Ma Ocean beneath the Indochina Block, then the magma separated and ascended through the mantle to reach the continental crust (Figure 13). The initial Sr isotope ratio values indicated that high proportions of continental crustal materials were incorporated at this time. Adakitic magma tends to produce I-type and magnetite-series igneous rocks [3,19,59]; however, the subsequent incorporation of Al-rich continental crustal materials and the reduction by carbon or graphite housed within these materials, such as clastic sedimentary rocks, produces I- to S-type and ilmenite-series granitic rocks. Most of the granitic rocks in the Loei Fold Belt, formed by the subduction of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean between the Sibumasu Block and the Indochina Block beneath the Indochina Block, are classified as adakitic rocks [11,19,59].
On the other hand, the Van Canh granitic rocks were classified as I-type and magnetite-series granitic rocks. Hung et al. [28] considered the Van Canh granitic rocks to be S-type granite; however, this was an error. The incorporation of continental crustal materials was evident from their high initial Sr isotope ratios, but the amounts incorporated were relatively low compared to those in the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks (Figure 12). This was also reflected in the low A/CNK ratios and low total Al contents in the biotite in the Van Canh granitic rocks (Figure 11). Some of the Van Canh granitic rocks, as with the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks, were formed from adakitic magma. However, the quantities of continental crustal materials incorporated into the Van Canh granitic rocks were smaller than those in the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks. Adakitic magmatism has been reported in the Truong Son Fold Belt in Laos [3]. In addition, the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks (ca. 280–260 Ma) [29], which intruded before the Van Canh granitic rocks (ca. 251–229 Ma) [28], caused high-temperature metamorphism within the continental crust (Figure 13). Hence, carbon or graphite in the surrounding continental crustal materials is thought to have been decomposed, to some extent, owing to the intrusion of the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks. The later-intruding Van Canh granitic rocks, which incorporated continental crustal materials with less amount of carbon or graphite, were less reducing than the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks. This was reflected by their ability to maintain the magnetic susceptibility of magnetite-series granitic rocks (Figure 12) [48]. These differences in petrogenesis and tectonic history ultimately led to the differences in geochemical signatures and magnetic susceptibility between the Ben Giang-Que Son and Van Canh granitic rocks.

6. Conclusions

Ben Giang-Que Son and Van Canh granitic rocks are widely distributed across the southern Kontum Massif. Their zircon U–Pb ages indicate that the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks were formed during the Permian period (280–260 Ma) and that the Van Canh granitic rocks were formed during the Triassic period (251–229 Ma). Both the Ben Giang-Que Son and Van Canh granitic rocks were derived from magma of oceanic crust origin, generated by the subduction of the Song Ma Ocean, which is part of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean, beneath the Indochina Block. The Ben Giang-Que Son granitic magma was originally metaluminous but subsequently incorporated a large quantity of carbon or graphite-rich continental crustal materials, which chemically transformed the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks from I-type and magnetite-series granitic rocks into I- to S-type and ilmenite-series granitic rocks. The Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks have high A/CNK ratios and high total Al contents in their biotite due to the incorporation of continental crustal materials. The intrusion of the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks into the continental crust resulted in high-temperature metamorphic alterations, which decomposed some of the carbon or graphite contained in the surrounding continental crustal materials. The later-formed Van Canh granitic rocks were also derived from adakitic magma and incorporated continental crustal materials, but in smaller amounts compared to those in the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks. As a result, the Van Canh granitic rocks have relatively low A/CNK ratios and low total Al contents in their biotite. In addition, much of the carbon or graphite in the continental crustal materials was already decomposed by the high-temperature metamorphism associated with the intrusion of the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks; hence, the Van Canh granitic rocks retained I-type and magnetite-series signatures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.U.; methodology, E.U.; formal analysis, E.U., K.Y., T.Y. and N.M.; investigation, E.U., K.Y., T.Y. and N.M.; resources, E.U., K.Y., T.Y. and N.M.; data curation, E.U., K.Y., T.Y. and N.M.; writing—original draft preparation, E.U.; writing—reviewing and editing, E.U., K.Y., T.Y. and N.M.; visualization, E.U., K.Y., T.Y. and N.M.; supervision, E.U.; project administration, E.U.; funding acquisition, E.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a Waseda University Grant for Special Research Projects: 2022R-015.

Data Availability Statement

All data are included/referenced in this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted with the support of a Joint Research Grant for Environmental Isotope Study of the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature. The authors are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their insightful reviews and valuable comments to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sone, M.; Metcalfe, I. Parallel Tethyan sutures in mainland Southeast Asia: New insights for Paleo-Tethys closure and implications for the Indosinian orogeny. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 2008, 340, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ferrari, O.M.; Hochard, C.; Stampfli, G.M. An alternative plate tectonic model for the Palaeozoic-Early Mesozoic Palaeotethyan evolution of Southeast Asia (Northern Thailand–Burma). Tectonophys 2008, 451, 346–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sanematsu, K.; Murakami, H.; Duangsurigna, S.; Vilayhack, S.; Duncan, R.A.; Watanabe, Y. 40Ar/39Ar ages of granitoids from the Truong Son fold belt and Kontum massif in Laos. J. Mineral. Petrol. Sci. 2011, 106, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Metcalfe, I. Palaeozoic-Mesozoic History of SE Asia; Geological Society, London, Special Publications: London, UK, 2011; Volume 355, pp. 7–35. [Google Scholar]
  5. Metcalfe, I. Gondwana dispersion and Asian accretion: Tectonic and palaeogeographic evolution of eastern Tethys. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2013, 66, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Searle, M.P.; Whitehouse, M.J.; Robb, L.J.; Ghani, A.A.; Hutchison, C.S.; Sone, M.; Ng, S.W.P.; Roselee, M.H.; Chung, S.L.; Oliver, G.J.H. Tectonic evolution of the Sibumasu-Indochina terrane collision zone in Thailand and Malaysia: Constraints from new U-Pb zircon chronology of SE Asian tin granitoids. J. Geol. Soc. 2012, 169, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morley, C.K. Earth-science reviews late cretaceous—Early palaeogene tectonic development of SE Asia. Earth Sci. Rev. 2012, 115, 37–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Morley, C.K.; Ampaiwan, P.; Thanudamrong, S.; Kuenphan, N.; Warren, J. Development of the Khao Khwang Fold and Thrust Belt: Implications for the geodynamic setting of Thailand and Cambodia during the Indosinian Orogeny. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2013, 62, 705–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shellnutt, J.G.; Lan, C.Y.; Long, T.V.; Usuki, T.; Yang, H.J.; Mertzman, S.A.; Iizuka, Y.; Chung, S.L.; Wang, K.L.; Hsu, Y.W. Formation of Cretaceous Cordilleran and post-orogenic granites and their microgranular enclaves from the Datat zone, southern Vietnam: Tectonic implications for the evolution of Southeast Asia. Lithos 2013, 182–183, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Burrett, C.; Zaw, K.; Meffre, S.; Lai, C.K.; Khositanont, S.; Chaodumrong, P.; Udchachon, M.; Ekins, S.; Halpin, J. The configuration of Greater Gondwana- Evidence from LA ICPMS, U-Pb geochronology of detrital zircons from the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic of Southeast Asia and China. Gondwana Res. 2014, 26, 31–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kamvong, T.; Zaw, K.; Meffre, S.; Maas, R.; Stein, H.; Lai, C.K. Adakites in the Truong Son and Loei fold belts, Thailand and Laos: Genesis and implications for geodynamics and metallogeny. Gondwana Res. 2014, 26, 165–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Manaka, T.; Zaw, K.; Meffre, S.; Vasconcelos, P.M.; Golding, S.D. The Ban Houayxai epithermal Au-Ag deposit in the Northern Lao PDR: Mineralization related to the Early Permian arc magmatism of the Truong Son Fold Belt. Gondwana Res. 2014, 26, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zaw, K.; Meffre, S.; Lai, C.K.; Burrett, C.; Santosh, M.; Graham, I.; Manaka, T.; Salam, A.; Kamvong, T.; Cromie, P. Tectonics and metallogeny of mainland Southeast Asia—A review and contribution. Gondwana Res. 2014, 26, 5–30. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardiner, N.J.; Searle, M.P.; Robb, L.J.; Morley, C.K. Neo-Tethyan magmatism and metallogeny in Myanmar—An Andean analogue? J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015, 106, 197–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Y.; He, H.; Cawood, P.A.; Srithai, B.; Feng, Q.; Fan, W.; Zhang, Y.; Qiana, X. Geochronological, elemental and Sr-Nd-Hf-O isotopic constrains on the petrogenesis of the Triassic post-collisional granitic rocks in NW Thailand and its Paleotethyan implications. Lithos 2016, 266–267, 264–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Faure, M.; Nguyen, V.V.; Hoai, L.T.T.; Lepvrier, C. Early Paleozoic or Early-Middle Triassic collision between the South China and Indochina Blocks: The Controversy resolved? Structural insights from the Kon Tum Massif (Central Vietnam). J. Asian Earth Sci. 2018, 166, 162–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rossignol, C.; Bourquin, S.; Hallot, E.; Poujol, M.; Dabard, M.P.; Martini, R.; Villeneuve, M.; Cornée, J.J.; Brayard, A.; Roger, F. The Indosinian orogeny: A perspective from sedimentary archives of north Vietnam. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2018, 158, 352–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shi, M.; Zaw, K.; Liu, S.; Xu, B.; Meffre, S.; Cong, F.; Nie, F.; Peng, Z. Geochronology and petrogenesis of Carboniferous and Triassic volcanic rocks in NW Laos: Implications for the tectonic evolution of the Loei Fold Belt. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2021, 208, 104661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cheng, R.; Uchida, E.; Katayose, K.; Yarimizu, K.; Shin, K.C.; Kong, S.; Nakano, T. Petrogenesis and tectonic setting of Late Paleozoic to Late Mesozoic igneous rocks in Cambodia. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2019, 185, 104046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kasahara, N.; Niki, S.; Uchida, E.; Yarimizu, K.; Cheng, R.; Hirata, T. Zircon U–Pb chronology on plutonic rocks from northeastern Cambodia. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Uchida, E.; Nagano, S.; Niki, S.; Yonezu, K.; Saitoh, Y.; Shin, K.C.; Hirata, T. Geochemical and radiogenic isotopic signatures of granitic rocks in Chanthaburi and Chachoengsao provinces, southeastern Thailand: Implications for origin and evolution. J. Asian Earth Sci. X 2022, 8, 100111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thuy, N.T.B.; Satir, M.; Siebel, W.; Vennemann, T.; Long, T.V. Geochemical and isotopic constraints on the petrogenesis of granitoids from the Dalat zone, southern Vietnam. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2004, 23, 467–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nagy, E.A.; Maluski, H.; Lepvrier, C.; Schärer, U.; Thi, P.T.; Leyreloup, A.; Thich, V.V. Geodynamic significance of the Kontum massif in central Vietnam. Composite 40Ar/ 39Ar and U–Pb ages from Paleozoic to Triassic. J. Geol. 2001, 109, 755–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hoa, T.T.; Anh, T.T.; Phuong, N.T.; Dung, P.T.; Anh, T.V.; Andrey, E.L.; Alexander, S.B. Permo-Triassic intermediate felsic magmatism of the Truong Son belt, eastern margin of Indochina. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 2008, 340, 112–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nakano, N.; Osanai, Y.; Nguyen, T.M.; Miyamoto, T.; Hayasaka, Y.; Owada, M. Discovery of high-pressure granulite-facies metamorphism in northern Vietnam: Constraints on the Permo-Triassic Indochinese continental collision tectonics. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 2008, 340, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, J.L.; Dung, T.M.; Tang, Y.; Luat, N.Q.; Hai, T.T.; Wu, W.B.; Zhao, Z.D. Permo-Triassic granitoids in the northern part of the Truong Son belt, NW Vietnam: Geochronology, geochemistry and tectonic implications. Gondwana Res. 2012, 22, 628–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hieu, P.T.; Yang, Y.Z.; Binh, D.Q.; Nguyen, T.B.T.; Dung, L.T.; Chen, F. Late Permian to Early Triassic crustal evolution of the Kontum massif, central Vietnam: Zircon U-Pb ages and geochemical and Nd–Hf isotopic composition of the Hai Van granitoid complex. Int. Geol. Rev. 2015, 57, 1877–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hung, D.D.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Hieu, P.T.; Minh, N.T.; Minh, P.; Dung, N.T.; Hung, N.B.; Komatsu, T.; Hoang, N.; Kawaguchi, K. Van Canh Triassic granite in the Kontum Massif, central Vietnam: Geochemistry, geochronology, and tectonic implications. J. Asain Earth Sci. X 2022, 7, 100075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hieu, T.P.; Anh, N.T.Q.; Minh, O.; Thuy, N.T.B. Geochemistry, zircon U–Pb ages and HF isotopes of the Muong Luan granitoid pluton, Northwest Vietnam and its petrogenetic significance. Island Arc 2020, 29, e12330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chappell, B.W.; White, A.J.R. Two contrasting granite types. Pac. Geol. 1974, 8, 173–174. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ishihara, S. The magnetite-series and ilmenite-series granitic rocks. Min. Geol. 1977, 27, 293–305. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sang, Đ.Q. Petrographic characteristics and zircon U–Pb geochronology of granitoid rocks in the southern Bến Giằng, Quảng Nam province. Sci. Tech. Dev. 2011, 14, 17–30, (In Vietnamese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  33. Jiang, W.; Yu, J.H.; Griffin, W.L.; Wang, F.; Wang, X.; Pham, T.H.; Nguyen, D.L. Where did the Kontum Massif in central Vietnam come from? Precambrian Res. 2022, 377, 106725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Carter, A.; Roques, D.; Bristow, C.; Kinny, P. Understanding Mesozoic accretion in Southeast Asia: Significance of Triassic thermotectonism (Indosinian orogeny) in Vietnam. Geology 2001, 29, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nam, T.N.; Sano, Y.; Terada, K.; Toriumi, M.; Quynh, P.V.; Dung, L.T. First SHRIMP U–Pb zircon dating of granulites from the Kontum massif (Vietnam) and tectonothermal implications. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2001, 19, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Osanai, Y.; Owada, M.; Tsunogae, T.; Toyoshima, T.; Hokada, T.; Long, T.V.; Sajeev, K.; Nakano, N. Ultrahigh-temperature pelitic granulites from the Kontum massif, central Vietnam: Evidence for East Asian juxtaposition at ca. 250 Ma. Gondwana Res. 2001, 4, 720–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Osanai, Y.; Nakano, N.; Owada, M.; Nam, T.N.; Toyoshima, T.; Tsunogae, T.; Binh, P. Permo-Triassic ultrahigh-temperature metamorphism in the Kontum massif, central Vietnam. J. Miner Petrol. Sci. 2004, 99, 225–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Osanai, Y.; Owada, M.; Kamei, A.; Hamamoto, T.; Kagami, H.; Toyoshima, T.; Nakano, N.; Nam, T.N. The Higo metamorphic complex in Kyushu, Japan as the fragment of Permo-Triassic metamorphic complexes in East Asia. Gondwana Res. 2006, 9, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Osanai, Y.; Nakano, N.; Owada, M.; Nam, T.N.; Miyamoto, T.; Minh, N.T.; Nam, N.V.; Tri, T.V. Collision zone metamorphism in Vietnam and adjacent South-eastern Asia: Proposition for Trans Vietnam Orogenic Belt. J. Mineral. Petrol. Sci. 2008, 103, 226–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nakano, N.; Osanai, Y.; Owada, M.; Binh, P.; Hokada, T.; Kaiden, H.; Bui, V.T. Evolution of the Indochina Block from its formation to amalgamation with Asia: Constraints from protoliths in the Kontum Massif, Vietnam. Gondwana Res. 2021, 90, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hai, T.Q. The evolution of magmatism and metamorphism in Precambrian of Vietnam’s territory. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference for Geology of Indochina, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 5–7 December 1986; Volume 1, pp. 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  42. Department of Geology and Mineral Resources of Vietnem. Geological and Mineral Resources Map of Vietnam on 1:200,000. Kon Tun (D-48-XVIII), Pleiku (D-48-XXiV), An Khe (D-49-XiX), and Mang Den-Boeng Son (D-49-XIII&D-49-XIV). Ha Noi. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  43. Na, C.K.; Nakano, T.; Tazawa, K.; Sakagawa, M.; Ito, T. A systematic and practical method of liquid chromatography for the determination of Sr and Nd isotopic ratios and REE concentrations in geological samples. Chem. Geol. 1995, 123, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Walker, R.J.; Carlson, R.W.; Shirey, S.B.; Boyd, F.R. Os, Sr, Nd, and Pb isotope systematics of southern African peridotite xenoliths: Implications for the chemical evolution of subcontinental mantle. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 1989, 53, 1583–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wasserburg, G.J.; Jacobsen, S.B.; Depaolo, D.J.; McCulloch, M.T.; Wen, T. Precise determination of Sm/Nd ratios, Sm and Nd isotopic abundances in standard solutions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1981, 45, 2311–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Faure, G.; Mensing, T.M. Isotopes—Principles and Applications, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 347–411. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tanaka, T.; Togashi, S.; Kamioka, H.; Amakawa, H.; Kagami, H.; Hamamoto, T.; Yuhara, M.; Orihashi, Y.; Yoneda, S.; Shimizu, H.; et al. JNdi-1: A neodymium isotopic reference in consistency with LaJolla neodymium. Chem. Geol. 2000, 168, 279–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ishihara, S. The granitoid series and mineralization. In Economic Geology Seventy-Fifth Anniversary Volume; Skinner, B.J., Ed.; Economic Geology Publishing Company: Littleton, CO, USA, 1981; pp. 458–484. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chappell, B.W.; White, A.J.R. I- and S-type granites in the Lachlan Fold Belt. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 1992, 83, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cox, K.G.; Bell, J.D.; Pankhurst, R.J. The Interpretation of Igneous Rocks; Allen and Unwin: London, UK, 1979; p. 450. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wilson, M. Igneous Petrogenesis. In A Global Tectonic Approach; Unwin Hyman: London, UK, 1989; p. 466. [Google Scholar]
  52. Middlemost, E.A.K. Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system. Earth Sci. Rev. 1994, 37, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Whalen, J.B.; Currie, K.L.; Chappell, B.W. A-type granites: Geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis. Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 1987, 95, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pearce, J.A.; Harris, N.B.W.; Tindle, A.G. Trace element distribution diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. J. Petrol. 1984, 25, 956–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Defant, M.J.; Drummond, M.S. A model for Trondhje-Tonalite-Dacite Genesis and crustal growth via slab melting: Archean to modern comparisons. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth Banner 1990, 95, 21503–21521. [Google Scholar]
  56. Masuda, A.; Nakamura, N.; Tanaka, T. Fine structures of mutually normalized rare-earth patterns of chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1973, 37, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. McDonough, W.F.; Sun, S.S. The composition of the Earth. Chem. Geol. 1995, 120, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Schaefer, B.F. Radiogenic Isotope Geochemistry; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 40–56, 145–176. [Google Scholar]
  59. Nualkhao, P.; Takahashi, R.; Imai, A.; Charusiri, P. Petrochemistry of granitoids along the Loei Fold Belt, Northeastern Thailand. Resource Geol. 2018, 68, 395–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Map showing the distributions of Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks in the Kontum and Gia Lai provinces, based on the Geological and Mineral Resources Map of Vietnam [42].
Figure 2. Map showing the distributions of Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks in the Kontum and Gia Lai provinces, based on the Geological and Mineral Resources Map of Vietnam [42].
Geosciences 13 00341 g002
Figure 3. Photographs of representative samples of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks (left) and photomicrographs of the corresponding thin sections under cross-polarized light (right). Abbreviations: Q, quartz; Pl, plagioclase; Kf, K-feldspar; Bi, biotite; Hb, hornblende; Mgt, magnetite; Ilm, ilmenite.
Figure 3. Photographs of representative samples of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks (left) and photomicrographs of the corresponding thin sections under cross-polarized light (right). Abbreviations: Q, quartz; Pl, plagioclase; Kf, K-feldspar; Bi, biotite; Hb, hornblende; Mgt, magnetite; Ilm, ilmenite.
Geosciences 13 00341 g003
Figure 4. Magnetic susceptibility of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks from each sampling site. The minimum (left), mean (center), and maximum (right) values are shown.
Figure 4. Magnetic susceptibility of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks from each sampling site. The minimum (left), mean (center), and maximum (right) values are shown.
Geosciences 13 00341 g004
Figure 5. Classification of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples, on the basis of a total alkali versus SiO2 (TAS) diagram. The classification boundaries are from Cox et al. [50] and Wilson [51]. The dashed line is a boundary between alkalic and non-alkalic rocks.
Figure 5. Classification of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples, on the basis of a total alkali versus SiO2 (TAS) diagram. The classification boundaries are from Cox et al. [50] and Wilson [51]. The dashed line is a boundary between alkalic and non-alkalic rocks.
Geosciences 13 00341 g005
Figure 6. Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) versus Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) (A/NK versus A/CNK) diagram for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples, showing the classification of I- and S-type granitic rocks and the classification of metaluminous and peraluminous rocks [52]. The dashed line is a boundary between I-type and S-type granitic rocks.
Figure 6. Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) versus Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) (A/NK versus A/CNK) diagram for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples, showing the classification of I- and S-type granitic rocks and the classification of metaluminous and peraluminous rocks [52]. The dashed line is a boundary between I-type and S-type granitic rocks.
Geosciences 13 00341 g006
Figure 7. Zr versus 10,000 × Ga/Al diagram for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples, showing the classification of I-, S-, and A-type granitic rocks [53].
Figure 7. Zr versus 10,000 × Ga/Al diagram for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples, showing the classification of I-, S-, and A-type granitic rocks [53].
Geosciences 13 00341 g007
Figure 8. Tectonic setting classification diagram for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples (from Pearce et al. [54]). Abbreviations: VAG, volcanic arc granite; syn-COLG, syn-collision granite; WPG, within plate granite; ORG, ocean ridge granite.
Figure 8. Tectonic setting classification diagram for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples (from Pearce et al. [54]). Abbreviations: VAG, volcanic arc granite; syn-COLG, syn-collision granite; WPG, within plate granite; ORG, ocean ridge granite.
Geosciences 13 00341 g008
Figure 9. Classification of adakitic and non-adakitic rocks in the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples using the Sr/Y versus Y diagram (Defant and Drummond [55]).
Figure 9. Classification of adakitic and non-adakitic rocks in the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples using the Sr/Y versus Y diagram (Defant and Drummond [55]).
Geosciences 13 00341 g009
Figure 10. Chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns [56] of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples. The chemical compositions of the chondrite were taken from McDonough and Sun [57].
Figure 10. Chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns [56] of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples. The chemical compositions of the chondrite were taken from McDonough and Sun [57].
Geosciences 13 00341 g010
Figure 11. Relationship between the Mg/(Mg + Fe) molar ratios and total Al contents in the biotite (based on O = 22) of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples.
Figure 11. Relationship between the Mg/(Mg + Fe) molar ratios and total Al contents in the biotite (based on O = 22) of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples.
Geosciences 13 00341 g011
Figure 12. (87Sr/86Sr)i versus (143Nd/144Nd)i diagram for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples, calculated using the zircon U–Pb ages of ca. 240 Ma for the Van Canh granitic rocks [29] and ca. 270 Ma for the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks [28]. The initial Nd and Sr isotope ratio data (black dot) for depleted MORB mantle (DMM), enriched mantle 1 (EM1), enriched mantle 2 (EM2), high µ mantle (HIMU), and primitive mantle (PM) are from Faure and Mensing [46] and Schaefer [58].
Figure 12. (87Sr/86Sr)i versus (143Nd/144Nd)i diagram for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples, calculated using the zircon U–Pb ages of ca. 240 Ma for the Van Canh granitic rocks [29] and ca. 270 Ma for the Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rocks [28]. The initial Nd and Sr isotope ratio data (black dot) for depleted MORB mantle (DMM), enriched mantle 1 (EM1), enriched mantle 2 (EM2), high µ mantle (HIMU), and primitive mantle (PM) are from Faure and Mensing [46] and Schaefer [58].
Geosciences 13 00341 g012
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the tectonic evolution of the South China and Indochina blocks and the formation of the Van Canh (red) and Ben Giang-Que Son (yellow) granitic rocks.
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the tectonic evolution of the South China and Indochina blocks and the formation of the Van Canh (red) and Ben Giang-Que Son (yellow) granitic rocks.
Geosciences 13 00341 g013
Table 1. Sampling locations (latitude and longitude) of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples.
Table 1. Sampling locations (latitude and longitude) of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples.
Sample No.LatitudeLongitude
Van Canh granitic rockVN30114°07′52.1″ N107°57′36.4″ E
VN30314°11′10.9″ N108°06′16.7″ E
VN30414°03′11.6″ N108°15′19.7″ E
VN30713°58′45.9″ N108°41′14.5″ E
VN30813°58′11.2″ N107°41′05.0″ E
VN31013°58′24.8″ N107°29′09.3″ E
VN31114°02′06.7″ N107°27′21.9″ E
VN31213°49′57.2″ N107°50′22.9″ E
VN31313°46′18.0″ N107°32′32.4″ E
VN31613°22′47.4″ N108°07′50.6″ E
Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rockVN30214°26′09.7″ N108°08′16.8″ E
VN30513°46′01.4″ N108°31′26.2″ E
VN30613°58′12.4″ N108°44′31.9″ E
VN30913°57′31.9″ N107°29′06.3″ E
VN31513°25′37.0″ N108°05′36.5″ E
Table 2. Constituent minerals of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples.
Table 2. Constituent minerals of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples.
Granitic BodySample No.Rock TypeQPlKfBiHbZrApMuTiOpEpRuCpxTourAllaCalRemarks
Van Canh granitic rockVN301Biotite Granite Bi is partly altered.
VN303Biotite Granite Pl and Bi are altered.
VN304Hornblend Biotite Granite
VN307Hornblend Biotite Granite
VN308Hornblend Biotite Granite Bi is altered.
VN310Biotite Granite Bi is almost altered.
VN311Hornblend Biotite Granite Bl is partly altered.
VN312Biotite Granite Bl is partly altered.
VN313Diorite Bl is partly altered.
VN316Biotite Granite
Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rockVN302Biotite Granite Bi is almost altered.
VN305Biotite Granite
VN306Biotite Granite Pl and Bi are altered.
VN309Biotite Granite Bl is partly altered.
VN315Biotite Granite Bi is almost altered.
Modal proportions: ◎, >30 vol%; 〇, 30–10 vol%; △, 10–2 vol%; –, <2 vol%. Abbreviations: Q, quartz; Pl, plagioclase; Kf, K-feldspar; Bi, biotite; Hb, hornblende; Ch, chlorite; Zr, zircon; Ap, apatite; Mu, muscovite; Ti, titanite; Op, opaque minerals; Ep, epidote; Ru, rutile; Cpx, clinopyroxene; Tour, tourmaline; Alla, allanite; Cal, calcite.
Table 3. Whole-rock chemical compositions of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples.
Table 3. Whole-rock chemical compositions of the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples.
Locality Van Canh Granitic Rock Ben Giang-Que Son Granitic Rock
Sample No. VN301VN303VN304VN307VN308VN310VN311VN312VN313VN316VN302VN305VN306VN309VN315
SiO2%71.4666.9273.4568.2272.4572.3472.3472.7660.8663.6572.8770.1472.5668.2673.19
Al2O3%13.4315.2213.5514.6413.1413.4414.5813.2115.5416.031414.9713.5514.3613.45
Fe2O3(T)%2.463.221.843.722.092.071.462.065.544.891.372.72.234.681.94
MnO%0.0650.0470.0490.0530.0750.0320.0550.0620.0820.0740.0230.0370.0270.050.061
MgO%0.490.870.220.810.120.410.450.473.041.810.320.730.31.670.28
CaO%1.663.191.163.260.651.721.991.664.944.381.372.431.093.010.58
Na2O%3.023.593.363.083.432.583.343.182.873.193.152.812.243.383.74
K2O%4.724.115.13.185.715.014.434.112.493.684.724.785.951.654.82
TiO2%0.3680.430.1840.5040.2280.2270.2120.2670.8070.8380.240.4120.2880.5250.18
P2O5%0.080.10.020.120.010.060.040.050.230.170.060.130.090.050.01
LOI%1.071.660.611.190.90.741.0811.941.281.260.751.181.341.24
Total%98.8399.3699.5598.7798.898.6398.9998.8298.3410099.3999.8899.598.9899.5
Scppm667710346131135696
Beppm322232242233233
Vppm20511140<52018221108814269616
Bappm3787143176949349196433484096186062442386690
Srppm159326952781524424512578542424329712919197
Yppm26202415361210391735111118843
Zrppm19116617321133513694158192327149224221237275
Crppm<20<20<20<20<20<20<20<206020<20<20<2040<20
Nippm<20<20<20<20<20<20<20<2020<20<20<20<2020<20
Cuppm<10<10<10<10<10<10<10<10< 1010<10<10<1030<10
Znppm403050<3050<30<30<306050<3040506040
Gappm162117181715131619181919181918
Geppm122121121112212
Asppm<5<5< 5<5<5<5<5<5<5<5<5<5<5<5<5
Rbppm22017919510919418810924878137247185270141210
Nbppm11148713541391588131616
Moppm<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2
Agppm<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5
Inppm<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2
Snppm322121131253433
Sbppm<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5
Csppm3.71.82.42.22.83.51.37.21.72.48.45.73.86.92.4
Lappm48.838.562.844.413447.819.442.339.760.14675.21223361.5
Ceppm99.575.312685.525089.732.983.478.711881.914722363.6128
Prppm11.38.3514.19.2226.69.313.358.999.1313.28.2916.528.86.8114.6
Ndppm40.230.149.832.393.530.911.432.334.849.727.458.810124.153
Smppm7.25.89.25.414.25.12.16.26.29.34.49.217.94.610.4
Euppm0.981.10.471.120.950.730.830.71.391.390.591.021.180.661.11
Gdppm5.54.56.94103.31.85.34.67.335.311.23.48.2
Tbppm0.80.70.90.51.30.40.30.90.61.10.40.61.20.41.3
Dyppm4.43.852.872.21.65.43.16.32.12.64.91.97.7
Hoppm0.90.70.90.51.30.40.31.20.61.20.40.40.70.31.5
Erppm2.622.51.43.61.10.93.81.63.411.11.60.84.3
Tmppm0.380.30.350.190.510.160.140.630.240.490.150.140.20.120.66
Ybppm2.31.92.21.13.31.10.94.31.53.10.90.81.10.84.8
Luppm0.340.290.340.160.50.160.140.70.220.470.140.110.170.120.78
Hfppm4.94.44.74.87.73.32.24.34.47.53.65.45.65.88.5
Tappm1.61.810.81.410.82.10.81.31.711.31.93
Tlppm1.10.910.60.90.90.51.10.50.61.411.50.91
Pbppm202422142725162117154525421624
Bippm<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.40.61<0.4<0.4<0.4
Thppm28.613.825.212.72637.711.533.89.718.729.928.364.616.629.3
Uppm4.71.83.71.93.910.21.310.21.72.77.93.74.74.64.9
Table 4. Results of Sr and Nd isotope ratio measurements for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples.
Table 4. Results of Sr and Nd isotope ratio measurements for the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rock samples.
Sample No.U-Pb Age (Ma)87Sr/86Sr±1σ87Rb/86Sr (87Sr/86Sr)i143Nd/144Nd±1σ147Sm/144Nd(143Nd/144Nd)i
Van Canh granitic rockVN3012400.7227980.0000073.910850.7094470.5121470.0000070.1129440.511969
VN3030.7202070.0000093.921010.7068210.5120630.0000060.1215090.511872
VN3040.7295890.00000836.76880.7097700.5121350.0000050.1164970.511952
VN3070.7187470.0000071.256990.7144560.5120570.0000050.1054240.511892
VN3100.7230840.0000081.789200.7169760.5120730.0000070.1040790.511910
VN3110.7106420.0000041.106900.7068630.5123980.0000070.1161710.512216
VN3120.7291530.0000105.611240.7099980.5122110.0000070.1210470.512021
VN3130.7103420.0000080.2805030.7093850.5122040.0000060.1123510.512028
VN3160.7120220.0000090.9123020.7089070.5122440.0000050.1180030.512059
Ben Giang-Que Son granitic rockVN3022700.7214740.0000082.872630.7104390.5121630.0000050.1012650.511984
VN3050.7202050.0000082.736990.7096910.5120370.0000040.0986630.511862
VN3060.7412820.0000123.133350.7292460.5120170.0000040.1117570.511820
VN3090.7271500.0000094.196880.7110280.5120730.0000050.1203620.511860
VN3150.7326720.0000116.125120.7091430.5121400.0000070.1237410.511921
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uchida, E.; Yonezu, K.; Yokokura, T.; Mori, N. Differences in Geochemical Signatures and Petrogenesis between the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son Granitic Rocks in the Southern Kontum Massif, Vietnam. Geosciences 2023, 13, 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13110341

AMA Style

Uchida E, Yonezu K, Yokokura T, Mori N. Differences in Geochemical Signatures and Petrogenesis between the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son Granitic Rocks in the Southern Kontum Massif, Vietnam. Geosciences. 2023; 13(11):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13110341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uchida, Etsuo, Ko Yonezu, Takumi Yokokura, and Nasuka Mori. 2023. "Differences in Geochemical Signatures and Petrogenesis between the Van Canh and Ben Giang-Que Son Granitic Rocks in the Southern Kontum Massif, Vietnam" Geosciences 13, no. 11: 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13110341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop