Next Article in Journal
Reappraisal of the Continental Rifting and Seafloor Spreading That Formed the South China Sea
Previous Article in Journal
Safety Assessment of Concrete Gravity Dams: Hydromechanical Coupling and Fracture Propagation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review of Carboniferous-Triassic Tectonic-Magmatic Evolution of Luang Prabang–Loei Metallogenic Belt in Laos and Thailand and Implications for Gold–Copper Mineralization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deformation of the “Anorogenic” Wolf River Batholith, Wisconsin, USA: Understanding the Baraboo Orogeny Hinterland

1
Macalester College, Minneapolis, MN 55105, USA
2
Department of Geography, Geology, and the Environment, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61761, USA
3
Geology Department, Lawrence University, Appleton, WI 54911, USA
4
Midwest Institute of Geosciences and Engineering, Hobart, IN 46432, USA
5
Iowa State Geological Survey, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
6
School of Earth and Environment, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Department of Chemistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Geosciences 2025, 15(4), 150; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15040150
Submission received: 22 February 2025 / Revised: 1 April 2025 / Accepted: 9 April 2025 / Published: 16 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zircon U-Pb Geochronology Applied to Tectonics and Ore Deposits)

Abstract

:
The Mesoproterozoic (~1470 Ma) Wolf River batholith (WRB) is exposed over 6500 km2, encompassing 11 plutons that crosscut the Archean Marshfield and Proterozoic Penokean terranes. As the WRB is the classically defined anorogenic batholith, to test this hypothesis, seven igneous phases were analyzed using anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS), as a proxy for magmatic flow during intrusion, and the samples recorded a sub-horizontal emplacement in six different orientations. Paleopoles from six of eight igneous samples preserve a wide variety of sub-vertical orientations with two reversed and four normal polarities. The synorogenic Baldwin Conglomerate is the youngest rock (<1460 Ga) associated with WRB. Magnetic fabrics are horizontal, but multidomain and paleopole signatures, where interpretable, are sub-vertical. The North American APWP places middle Laurentia at low-latitude during Geon 14, and all our paleopoles are sub-vertical, not sub-horizontal, again suggesting post-intrusion deformation. Moreover, the McCauley gneiss (1886 Ma; U-Pb zircon), Rib Mountain Quartzite (1750 Ma MDA; U-Pb zircon, n = 150), Dells of the Eau Claire rhyolite (1483 Ma; U-Pb zircon, 1469 Ma; monazites-in-garnet), and Baldwin conglomerate (1460 Ma MDA; U-Pb zircons, n = 150) are sub-vertical inliers (xenoliths) in the igneous suite; the Proterozoic Wausau turbidite (1850 Ma MDA; U-Pb zircon, n = 150) was intruded by the WRB and dips 25°W. Here, we present a reinterpretation of the WRB as a deformed synorogenic rather than an anorogenic intrusion.

1. Introduction

During the Proterozoic, Laurentia grew through lateral orogenic accretion that youngs to the southeast, where subduction was northwest-dipping (Penokean orogen, Geon 18; Yavapai orogen, Geon 17; Mazatzal orogen, Geon 16; Baraboo orogen Geon 14 [1,2,3] including the emplacement of the ~1470 Ma Wolf River Batholith (WRB) [4,5] (Figure 1).
The Penokean Orogeny (1800–1900 Ma) is one of four contemporaneous Proterozoic orogenic belts that sutured the various Archean terranes together to form Laurentia [4,6]. The Penokean Orogeny deformed the Huron and Animikie basins, which include a diverse suite of metasedimentary and metavolcanics rocks [7]. The Penokean Orogeny had two phases: (1) A juvenile island arc called the Pembine–Wausau terrane collided with the southern margin of the Superior province with volcanoes formed in its back-arc basin. And (2) an Archean-cored microcontinent, called the Marshfield terrane, which likely rifted off the Wyoming province, collided to the south of the Pembine–Wausau terrane. The Yavapai (~1760 Ma), Mazatzal (~1660 Ma), and Baraboo (~1460 Ma) orogenies contributed to local deformation, metamorphism, and magmatism [2]. The Eau Pleine shear zone is a south-dipping Penokean terrane boundary that is crosscut by the WRB. The extent of the WRB is defined by a uniform magnetic low (Figure 2 and Figure 3), where the six inliers are too small (non-magnetic) to appear as magnetic anomalies.
Figure 2. Aeromagnetic map of Wisconsin (scale in nanoTesla, nT) highlighting the WRB, a magnetic low (from USGS Open file data).
Figure 2. Aeromagnetic map of Wisconsin (scale in nanoTesla, nT) highlighting the WRB, a magnetic low (from USGS Open file data).
Geosciences 15 00150 g002
Figure 3. Geologic map of the phases of the WRB and its relationship to host rocks. Dashed boxes indicate detailed local maps for Rib Mountain, the Dells of the Eau Claire River, and the Mountain shear zone. Sample locations are indicated (Table 1, Appendix A).
Figure 3. Geologic map of the phases of the WRB and its relationship to host rocks. Dashed boxes indicate detailed local maps for Rib Mountain, the Dells of the Eau Claire River, and the Mountain shear zone. Sample locations are indicated (Table 1, Appendix A).
Geosciences 15 00150 g003
Table 1. WRB samples *.
Table 1. WRB samples *.
Detrital Zircon
IgneousAge (Ma)OrientationAge Spectra (Ma)StrainAMSPaleopoleComment
Wauson Syenite (Site 9)1520 XX
Bowler Anorthosite (Site 11) XX
Tigerton Rapalivi Granite (Site 13) XX
Mountain Granite (Site 3)1470 XXMountain Shear Zone
Big Falls Granite (Site 14)1468 XX
Keshena Falls Granite (Site 12) XX
Badgley Rapids Mangerite (Site 2) XXCrosscutting Pseudotachylite; Mountain Shear Zone
Hager Granite (Site 1)1470 XX
Inliers
Rib Mountain Quartzite (Site 10)MDA75°, 90°1780, 2650, 3400LNS XCraddock et al., 2018 [7]; This study
Wausau Turbidite (Site 8)MDA0°, 30° W1880 X
Dells of Eau Claire Rhyolite (Site 7)1470300°, 90° XXZircon; Monazites in garnet; This study
Waupee Greenstone (Site 4)181265°, 90° XXHines Quartz Diorite (1812 Ma); Mountain Shear Zone
Baldwin Conglomerate (Site 5)MDA65°, 90°1460LNS XMedaris et al., 2021 [2]; Mountain Shear Zone
McCauley Gneiss (Site 6)187665°, 90° Mountain Shear Zone; This study
* Sample locations in Figure 3 and Appendix A.
The ~1470 Ma WRB is a ferroan rapakivi granite massif that underlies an area of ~9200 km2 in east–central Wisconsin, where it intrudes the Penokean terrane (both the Wausau–Pembine and Marshfield terranes), the Yavapai Province, and Baraboo Interval quartzites [8,9]. Historically, the WRB has been interpreted to be anorogenic, and its emplacement was only accompanied by contact metamorphism rather than regional metamorphism and deformation [9]. The WRB is now known to have been emplaced as part of a major plutonic, tectonic, sedimentary, and metamorphic event that occurred throughout southern Laurentia now known as the Baraboo Orogeny. Much of the Baraboo orogenic belt is composed of high-silica plutonic rocks of the south granite–rhyolite and east granite–rhyolite suites [10,11], known from sparse outcrop and many drill cores, whereas the WRB is ~1000 km inboard of the 1600 km wide Baraboo orogen margin and ~500 km inboard of the Nd anomaly boundary [10] that separates mid-crustal melts (north) from melts generated by underplating by mafic crust with a mantle source. The Baraboo orogen is the equivalent to the Picuris orogen to the southwest and the Pinware orogen to the northeast [3] and deforms the Baraboo Interval strata [2,12,13], the first sheet of mature sand to cover Laurentia [14].
To the west of the WRB occurs the older Wausau syenite (1520 Ma) and a younger, eastern group of five plutons [9,15,16,17]. Collectively, these plutons represent an A-type, alkali-rich granite massif. Petrologic and geochemical investigations suggest that the WRB derived from tonalitic crust at depths of 25 to 36 km and intruded at shallow (<4 km) depths [4,5].
WRB cooling ages of 1455–1385 Ma that young to the south indicate post-intrusion uplift [15,18]. Vertical microfractures (N40°W, 90°) occur throughout the WRB, the only hint of post-intrusion penetrative deformation [19]. Our contribution is to better understand the intrusion and deformation history by dating the six inliers (xenoliths, roof pendants), five of which are vertical within WRB, and by using magnetic techniques (paleopoles; AMS-anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility) to document their structural fabrics and histories. During Geon 14, central Laurentia was at a low latitude [20], which predicts sub-horizontal paleopoles and, because most plutons intrude vertically, sub-vertical AMS intrusion fabrics.
Field exposures are confined to road and stream cuts, so pluton–pluton contacts are rare. Similarly, most igneous outcrops are void of any foliation, primary layering, or fracture-joint fabric. There are, however, a variety of inliers around the complex which are well-exposed: Rib Mountain is a vertical quartzite, the Wausau turbidite is nicely exposed along the Wisconsin River and adjacent roads, the vertical metavolcanic sequence along the Dells of the Eau Claire River is a broad outcrop, and the vertical Baldwin Conglomerate and vertical Waupee greenstones are nicely exposed along the Mountain shear zone (Figure 3). Regional expression of the WRB and Baraboo orogeny is found throughout central Wisconsin in the form of Geon 14 metamorphic and hydrothermal alteration [17,21] and all the folded quartzites, mostly synclines [12].
Here, we present paleomagnetic and geochronologic data that reveal the “anorogenic” WRB is in fact internally deformed and has sheared margins. It is thus an integral part of the hinterland of the Baraboo orogenic belt [2,3]. Thus, fabrics in adjacent rocks of the Penokean orogenic belt, and the Proterozoic geology of the southern Superior Province need to be reconsidered in light of these observations.

2. Materials and Methods

U-Pb geochronologic analyses were conducted by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) at the Arizona LaserChron Center. Please refer to the Element2 methodology at www.laserchron.org (accessed on 10 January 2025) for the details of our analytical techniques. These U-Pb geochronology methods also have been described by [22,23]. The details of detrital zircon U-Pb age data are provided in Appendix B.
Samples for paleomagnetic analysis were collected from both the main igneous suite and five of the inliers (Table 1). Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) results are provided for seven WRB localities and two inliers. Alternating Field (AF) demagnetization results are provided for eight igneous rocks and five inliers (three sedimentary, two igneous). Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) is a technique used to determine the orientation of magnetic minerals within sediment or rock and depicts the primary structures and fabric within a rock body. This technique also detects weak deformation in rock bodies where foliation and lineation are not present in hand samples. Cores (or cubes) of these samples were oriented and prepared for AMS analysis. The Kappa Bridge is an AC susceptibility bridge with an automated sample handler for determining the anisotropy of low-field magnetic susceptibility at room temperature at the Institute for Rock Magnetism, University of Minnesota. The AMS technique has been used as a proxy for strains in foreland strata [24,25] and magmatic flow in dikes [26,27] and plutons [28,29,30]. An alternating current in the external “drive” coils produces an alternating magnetic field in the sample space with a frequency of 680 Hz and an amplitude of up to 1 mT. The induced magnetization of a sample is detected by a pair of “pickup” coils, with a sensitivity of 1.2E-6SI volume units. For anisotropy determination, a sample is rotated about three orthogonal axes, and susceptibility is measured at 1.8° intervals in each of the three measurement planes. In most samples, the Kmax and Kmin axes roughly perpendicular. Eight cubes were then demagnetized to determine a paleopole signature for each sample using stepwise alternating-field (AF) methods. The details of the paleomagnetic analysis is available by request from the authors.
We use earthquake data collected by the Earthscope Transportable Array to calculate receiver functions for stations across the region and, from these, generate Common Conversion Point (CCP) stacks. These new cross-sectional images of seismic impedance contrasts across east–central Wisconsin provide insight into crustal-scale structures.

3. Results

3.1. Local Geology and Geochronology

There is tremendous diversity in the field relations around the batholith (Figure 3), including Rapakivi granites and the older, intruded Wausau turbidite (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Other local observations include mangerite with cross-cutting pseudotachylite, deformed polymictic clasts in the Baldwin Conglomerate, flattened lapilli in the Dells of the Eau Claire River rhyolites, flattened, vertical pillows in the Waupee Greenstone inlier (Figure 6). Six inliers are known in and around the WRB. From west to east, these are Rib Mountain, the Wausau metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks, the rhyolites and garnet schist section exposed along the Dells of Eau Claire River, and the Baldwin Conglomerate, Waupee Greenstone and McCauley gneiss in the Mountain shear zone (Figure 3). From oldest to youngest, we describe the local geological details.

3.1.1. Eau Pleine Shear Zone (Sites 15 and 16)

The Marshfield terrane (Figure 1) includes Archean crust as old as 3000 Ma and was accreted to Laurentia during the Penokean orogen and the northern bounding fault is the Eau Pleine shear zone [6]. The Spirit Lake shear zone is the southern boundary of the Marshfield terrane, and these two terrane boundaries merge into the younger WRB. The Eau Pleine shear zone includes mylonitic gneisses (N120° E, 65° S), with pseudotachylite and top-to-the-north kinematics (Figure 7). The back-scatter SEM image reveals a nice foliation and many monazites, but the monazites were low-U and could not be dated. Zircons in the gneiss preserve a Concordia upper intercept age of ~2476 Ma (Lake DuBay), and mylonite zircons record ~1868 Ma Penokean orogenesis (Meyer’s Landing; Figure 8). The Lake DuBay sample has a ~259 Ma lower intercept, consistent with far-field Appalachian fluid migration and deformation [7,31]. The Meyer’s Landing sample is consistent with Penokean intrusions in the Marshfield terrane throughout the region [32].

3.1.2. The McCauley Gneiss (Site 6)

The N60°E striking Mountain shear zone [33,34] occurs in a reentrant along the northeast margin of the WRB. Major rock units here are the undated Waupee volcanics, which consist of deformed and metamorphosed felsic–mafic volcanic rocks, interbedded sedimentary rocks, and the previously undated McCauley granite and its deformed gneissic equivalent. Deformed (4:1:1 aspect ratios) pillows are present in the Waupee volcanics (65°, 90°, where layering is vertical, and the pillows face north). The same author reported an age of ~1815 Ma for an undeformed quartz diorite at the SW end of the shear zone. These rocks are overlain (to the north) by the metamorphosed and deformed Baldwin Conglomerate that has a maximum depositional age of ~1460 Ma [21], and the entire succession is intruded by the ~1470 Hagar Porphyry, a phase of the WRB [9].
The McCauley gneiss (Figure 9) has an upper Concordia intercept age of ~1876 Ma. The Baldwin has the same fabric orientation as the McCauley and Waupee and is intruded by the Hagar Porphyry, the contact of which is parallel to the fabric in the shear zone. The age of the Baldwin and the orientation of the contact suggest that at least part of the deformation within the shear zone must have occurred during the Baraboo orogeny.
The high Pb204 concentrations in zircon suggests that the Mountain shear zone may have been a conduit for hydrothermal fluids during the Paleozoic. Circulation may occur between the Precambrian basement and Paleozoic units during mineralization based on Pb-isotopes on Paleozoic-hosted galena [33]. Regional gradients in the Pb206/Pb204 isotopic signature of the galena stretch from northeastern Wisconsin to Iowa, Illinois, and Minnesota. These values are similar to the late-stage Pb-isotopic signature of Pb and Au mineralization in a Paleoproterozoic deposit in central Wisconsin [31], suggesting that fluids exchanged in both directions between Precambrian and Paleozoic rocks.

3.1.3. Rib Mountain (Site 10)

At 1942′ (592 m) in elevation, Rib Mountain is the second highest point in Wisconsin and is a large exposure of vertical, south-facing quartzite oriented at 90°, 90°. Shortening axes are 20°, 2°, a layer-normal fabric [12]. The detrital zircon age peaks are at 1900 and 2600 Ma, a Baraboo sand, with an MDA of 1784 ± 12 Ma [14]. The Rib Mountain inlier is a roof pendant in the Wausau syenite, which is surrounded by Penokean-age volcanic and plutonic rocks.

3.1.4. Brokaw Metasedimentary and Metavolcanic Rocks (Site 8)

A post-Penokean, pre-Baraboo succession of deformed metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks occur north of Wausau near town of Brokaw, WI (Figure 4) and are best exposed in the large 3 M quarry and Highway W north of Wausau and west of the river near the town of Brokaw, WI. LaBerge and Myers [35] completed the definitive mapping of Marathon County, Wisconsin. They interpreted Penokean metamorphosed and deformed Penokean plutonic, volcanic, and sedimentary rocks to be the oldest units in the Wausau, WI area. These rocks were subsequently eroded and blanketed by quartzites of the Baraboo interval and then intruded by syenite phases of the WRB during the Baraboo Orogeny. Reichoff [36] provided a detailed account of the petrology and sedimentology of what he interpreted to be Penokean rocks and presented an excellent account of the local geology in the vicinity of the 3 M quarry near Brokaw Wisconsin. Here, he defined a >1 km succession of dark colored rhyolitic volcanic rocks that are unconformably overlain by dark gray–green immature metasedimentary rocks that include argillite, metagraywacke and conglomerate that are lightly deformed (i.e., no strong cleavage or folding present in most Proterozoic supracrustal successions in the region), and tilted gently and moderately to the northeast. The succession is cut by an E-W trending diabase dike and steeply inclined-faults with small (>20 m) displacement. A prominent unimodal age peak of 1850 Ma is evident in one sample of a conglomeratic graywacke collected from the metasedimentary rock. The maximum age of deposition is 1812.1 ± 8.1 Ma. All zircons separated from unconformably underlying meta-rhyolite are interpreted to be inherited.

3.1.5. Baldwin Conglomerate (Site 5)

The ~100 m thick polymictic conglomerate is vertical (65°, 90°) and in unconformable contact with the Hager granite to the north and is truncated along the Mountain shear zone to the south. The conglomerate youngs to the south, and clasts have an aspect ratio of ~4:1:1, preserving a layer-normal shortening (LNS) fabric. The conglomerate was derived locally during the Baraboo orogen based on the detrital zircon spectra [2].

3.1.6. Dells of the Eau Claire River (Site 7)

The geology at the Dells of the Eau Claire River includes locally mylonitized rhyolitic volcanic rocks and associated garnet-bearing tuffs (Figure 10). The locality occurs less than 1 km west of the WRB. LaBerge and Myers [35] report ductile and brittle structures in a several km wide shear zone in volcanic rocks adjacent to the batholith and recognized that some of this deformation must have occurred during an unrecognized event after batholith emplacement and consequent regional garnet-grade metamorphism of Penokean-age volcanic rocks (Figure 11). In light of the newly defined Baraboo Orogeny [2], our aim was to determine the eruption age of felsic volcanic rocks at the Dells of the Eau Claire River. The Dells of Eau Claire county park, Highway Y in Marathon county contains a ~5 km area of rhyolites with flattened ashfall lapilli (Figure 6) and garnet-rich schist (sedimentary protolith) oriented 300°, 90°. A younging direction is not known.
Zircon fertility is low, but we managed to date eight grains. The oldest fraction (n = 3) ranges from 2713 to 2730 Ma. There is one grain with an age of 1746 Ma. They youngest suite (n = 4) ranges from 1463 to 1491 Ma, with a peak age of 1483 Ma (Figure 12). U-Pb monazite ages within garnets preserve an age of 1493 Ma but with huge (Pb207/Pb206; 280 Ma; Figure 13) errors and are included in Appendix B.
We interpret that the ~1483 Ma subset represents the emplacement (eruption) age of the meta-rhyolite, which means that these rocks are temporally and genetically related to the emplacement of the WRB and thus represent the first known occurrence of Wolf River age volcanic rocks. As the volcanic rocks here are deformed, this deformation must have occurred during the Baraboo Orogeny.
The Archean and Yavapai zircons are interpreted to be inherited. They may be xenocrysts in the rhyolitic magma, which would support the interpretation of Archean crust beneath the Penokean Pembine–Wausau terrane [6]. They also may be detrital and derived from the Superior Province to the north. The Yavapai zircon is most likely detrital and derived from the south.

3.1.7. Sibley Group

Atop the Sibley Peninsula, north of Lake Superior and near Nipigon, Ontario, is the flat-lying, 950 m thick Sibley Group [37]. The Group is sub-divided into the lower Pass Lake, middle Rossport, and upper Kama Hill sections. We have analyzed a sandstone bed from the basal Pass Lake Fm. (Loon Lake member), the maximum depositional age is ~1456 Ma, with age peaks at ~1860 (Penokean orogen) and ~2682 Ma (Superior province; Figure 14; Appendix B.1). Paleocurrents for the Sibley Group are mixed but mostly indicate sediment transport from the south [7]. We include this sample in this paper, as it is the first distal (to the north) Baraboo synorogenic deposit recognized, and is a large, undeformed outlier siting unconformably on Archean Wawa crystalline rocks.

3.2. Geophysical Investigation

3.2.1. Magnetic Fabrics

Lower hemisphere plots of AMS (Kmax is the long axis of the magnetic ellipsoid, Kmin is the short axis) indicate that intrusion of the various igneous phases was sub-horizontal. All the igneous samples are weakly anisotropic. The Bagley Rapids mangerite was intruded horizontally, ~E-W, the Big Falls granite was ~SW-NE, the Wausau syenite was NW-SE, the Mountain granite was NW-SE, and the Tigerton Rapakivi granite was ~N-S, as was the Hager granite; the Bowler anorthosite has no magnetic fabric. A summary AMS plot is part of the Discussion Section. We analyzed two batholith inliers, and both the Dells of the Eau Claire rhyolite (320°, 90°) and Waupee Greenstone (65°, 90°) are strongly anisotropic and preserve sub-vertical flow nearly within the vertical plane of the host (Figure 15).

3.2.2. Paleomagnetism

Eight WRB igneous phases were analyzed for their paleopole orientations. Alternating field (AF) demagnetization was effective, but there was considerable scatter in most samples, with reversed polarities in many, and only six samples yielded a meaningful result (Table 1 and Table 2; Figure 3, Figure 16 and Figure 17). The Big Falls and Tigerton Rapakivi granites were so altered that a paleopole vector could not be calculated, and a summary plot of acceptable paleopoles shows a wide variety of orientations (Figure 18).
We also analyzed five inliers and discarded the sheared Waupee Greenstone (Figure 6) and Dells of the Eau Claire rhyolite as uninterpretable. The remaining three inliers produced acceptable paleopoles, two in the lower hemisphere (normal polarity; Baldwin Conglomerate, Rib Mountain quartzite) and one in the upper hemisphere (reversed polarity; Wausau turbidite; Figure 17). The Wausau turbidite is older than the WRB and was tilted by this igneous intrusion. A summary plot is presented in Figure 18.

3.2.3. Seismic Profiles

We crafted a south-to-north section through eastern Wisconsin centered on the WRB (Figure 2) using receiver functions and Rayleigh wave tomography (Figure 19). The Moho discontinuity is located at 40 km depth. Wave velocity variations occur within the upper crust (<15 km), indicating either a layered intrusion that may thicken to the north or that the batholith extends to ~15 km depth. Regional analysis of velocity variations demonstrates a circular batholith profile at 8 km and in the mid-crust crust but seismic uniformity at depth (>25 km; Figure 20; yellow circle).

3.2.4. The Mountain Shear Zone

Sims [34] presents a map of the Mountain shear zone (65°, 90°) in the northeast portion of the WRB where a variety of rocks are enveloped by the Hager (north) and Mountain granites (south) in the vicinity of Mountain, WI, along Country Rd. W (Figure 21). From north to south, the Hager granite (1470 Ma) has a vertical contact with the Baldwin Conglomerate (<1450 Ma). The contact has no evidence of deformation and is interpreted as unconformable. The Baldwin Conglomerate is ~100 m thick (Figure 6B) and youngs to the south; its bedding is vertical, and its clasts have aspect ratios of ~4:1:1, with the shortening axis being horizontal (bedding-normal). Along county highway W, in a valley, are outcrops of vertical Waupee Greenstone. Pillows face north with aspect ratios of ~4:1:1 (Figure 6D); shortening is also horizontal (bedding-normal). The Waupee is co-eval with the Hines quartz diorite (1812 Ma) and in contact along strike (NE) with the McCauley gneiss (1877 Ma). South of the gneiss is the Mountain granite (1470 Ma). The Bagley Creek mangerite is also along the strike to the southwest and includes aplite dikes crosscut by pseudotachylite (Figure 6A) and may be part of the shear zone. While there is good outcrop, there are no contacts and no fault kinematic structures. Paleopoles for rocks in the shear zone are all very different (Figure 18C).

4. Discussion

Greenburg and Brown [38] reported ~300 outcroppings of purple–pink quartzite in Wisconsin and Minnesota, and these were all included as part of Baraboo interval strata. The analysis of U-Pb ages of detrital zircons for many of these quartzites reveals that there was once a continent-wide sheet of sand deposited across central North America [14,39]. The tectonic mystery is how this sheet of sand became a quartzite, deposited on crusts of many ages (Figure 1), and often folded into those crusts at ~1470 Ma [2] as upright synclines. Intrusion of the WRB, and its metasedimentary inliers, is part of this story.

4.1. Structural Overview

Malone et al. [14] have defined the extent of Baraboo-interval quartzites, and Medaris et al. [2] defined the ~1470 Ma Baraboo orogen based on the regional prevalence of Geon 14 mineral overgrowths, especially micas with a cleavage selvage in Waterloo quartzites. Deformation in the quartzites was first measured by [40]. Finite strains and compression axes derived from quartz deformation lamellae indicate SSE-NNW shortening across the region with a combination of layer-parallel and layer-normal fabrics (Figure 22) with a deformation gradient that weakens to the north. Vertical microfractures reported by [19] have the same orientation. Many of the Baraboo Quartzites are upright or south-verging synclines with top-to-the-south kinematics (Figure 23) and no observable local or regional detachment. Comparison of fold axes and axial planar cleavages, quartz fabrics, strain shortening axes, paleopoles, and inlier bedding (with southerly younging) all plot as SE-NW girdles on stereonets, a direction parallel with regional Baraboo orogen shortening (Figure 22) that conforms with the plane strain (shortening in the plane of transport) observation in most orogenic belts.
Metamorphic core complexes were first described in the Cordillera [41,42,43]. Because the WRB is enigmatic and anorogenic, ref. [37] suggested the WRB (Figure 1 and Figure 2) was a highland from which the surrounding deformed quartzites slid and these outcrops present a visually pleasing pattern of “allochthonous” quartzite outcrops with long run-out distances around the intrusion (Figure 23). The ~NE-SW alignment of the inliers in the batholith are roughly parallel to the lineation in Cordilleran core complexes that is parallel to the long axis of the periclinal dome. There are numerous shortcomings with a core complex model to explain the Baraboo orogen: the WRB is not a periclinal dome, there is no capping mylonite zone (i.e., no kinematic indicators either), there are large, vertical inliers atop (within) the intrusion, the upper plate Baraboo sands are now quartzites and up to 300 km from the alleged core complex source, and the folds have a consistent regional pattern, not a radial fold axis. Axial planar cleavages in all the folds strike SW-NE, consistent with a fold-and-thrust belt [44] (Table 3). Cordilleran core complexes have a distinctive, highly deformed mylonitic lower plate and a pristine, undeformed (no cleavage) upper plate with small (<1 km) transport distances.

4.2. Synorogenic Sedimentation and Inliers

Synorogenic sediment is transported by fluvial systems up to 3000 km across continental cratons, with the Grenville orogen being the first documented example with synorogenic detrital zircons prevalent in the Brock and Minto outliers in northwest Canada [44,45,46]. Remnants of the Baraboo orogen synorogenic sediments include the Baldwin Conglomerate (MDA: 1464 Ma) and the Sibley Group (MDA: 1454 Ma; Figure 14) north of Lake Superior. The Baldwin Conglomerate is 1500 km from the Baraboo subduction margin and is rotated to a vertical orientation as an inlier in the WRB, but most of the detrital zircons were derived locally. The Sibley Group section (1000 m) is 2000 km from the margin, is undeformed, and has a number of detrital zircon age peaks. The Sibley strata represent the Baraboo orogeny distal foreland and were subsequently buried by Grenville orogen synorogenic sediments from the east. That burial did not metamorphose the Sibley, whereas the Baraboo interval strata [14] were metamorphosed to quartzite, some flat-lying (Sioux, Barron, Necedah, etc.) and some folded and cleaved at 1470 Ma (Flambeau, McCaslin, Baraboo, Waterloo) [2].
The WRB includes two distinctive inliers, the vertical, south-facing Rib Mountain quartzite that has a Baraboo-interval detrital zircon spectra, and the vertical rhyolite-schist (sedimentary protolith) sequence exposed along the Dells of the Eau Claire River with zircon and monazite ages ~1455 Ma. Each of these successions was once horizontal and has since been rotated (folded and faulted) within the pluton to a vertical orientation. The Mountain shear zone includes the vertical Baldwin Conglomerate (100 m thick; MDA: 1464 Ma) in unconformable contact with the 1460 Ma Hager Granite on the north side of the valley (Figure 21). The south side includes the Mountain Granite (1470 Ma) and Bagley Mangerite (with pseudotachylite) in a complex relationship with the Penokean crustal rocks (Hines Quartz Diorite, McCauley Gneiss and Waupee Greenstone); all the contacts are sub-vertical, and the Mountain shear zone is poorly exposed, with no kinematic indicators, but presumed to be vertical. The Baldwin Conglomerate faces south on the north side of the fault, and the Waupee Greenstone pillows face north on the south side of the fault, presenting a challenge to palinspastic restoration (see Section 4.4).

4.3. Emplacement and Deformation Paleomagnetism

Our AMS results indicate a complex, sub-horizontal intrusion pattern, unlike AMS fabrics in layered intrusions [47] or in larger plutons [48,49]. Demagnetization of inliers within host plutonic intrusions resulted in random paleopole orientations, an expected result for rocks of different ages intruded at the same time (Figure 18). Paleopoles for the igneous suite were successful for six of eight samples; two have a reversed polarity, four have normal polarities, but none have a sub-horizontal orientation for rocks intruded at equatorial latitudes at ~1470 Ma [50,51,52]. Post-intrusion thrusting, either north or south-dipping, provides a mechanism to rotate sub-horizontal paleo-inclinations to being sub-vertical. Our seismic profiles (Figure 19 and Figure 20) suggest a shallow, nearly horizontal shape, perhaps a thrust sheet. Thick-skinned thrusting 1000 km in the foreland of the Baraboo orogen margin also redefines far-field orogenic shortening with deformation in Yavapai and Penokean crust and suggests shallow, N-dipping slab dip at 1460 Ma as a mechanism. There are no observed faults offsetting WRB, but the older Eau Pleine shear zone (south dip, top-to-the-north kinematics) and a thrust near Veedum, WI (E-W, 65°S dip) [12] are reactivation fault candidates.
Magnetic fabrics (AMS; n = 8) were measured as a proxy for magmatic intrusion; Kmax values were mostly sub-horizontal (Kmin was mostly sub-horizontal; Figure 18) and in many orientations. These horizontal Kmax orientations are either primary and part of a shallow intrusion (Figure 19) or are vertical flow fabrics rotated to horizontal by younger fault motions.

4.4. Palinspastic Restoration

The Wausau turbidites are a Penokean-aged deposit and dip 25°W following intrusion of the younger Wausau syenite; this is evidence of deformation related to the Baraboo orogen on the edge of the pluton. Rib Mountain is a large xenolith encased in Penokean crust and WRB [35] and is rotated from horizontal to vertical (Figure 17 and Figure 19). The paleopole is 348°, 67° and, when rotated to the south to horizontal, had a pre-deformation paleopole of 170°, 23°, more in-line with the location of central Wisconsin at 1470 Ma. A similar reconstruction of the vertical inlier rocks at the Dells of the Eau Claire River is not possible because there is no facing direction, and the paleopole data were uninterpretable.
The Mountain shear zone places south-facing rocks (Baldwin Conglomerate) on the north side of the fault in contact with north-facing rocks (pillows in the Waupee Greenstone) on the south side of a vertical contact (65°, 90°). Lacking any kinematic observations [34], interpreted an oblique-slip fault motion. On the north side of the fault the Hager Granite (75°, 45°) and Baldwin Conglomerate (14°, 60°) share a vertical unconformity, so a horizontal rotation to the south of the south-facing conglomerate results in paleopoles of 327°, 8° and 144°, 19°, respectively. These are similar values, supporting a low-latitude crystallization and subsequent rotation into the hanging wall of a north-dipping thrust. The rotated AMS Kmax contoured maxima become sub-vertical when the rocks are rotated to horizontal. On the south side of the fault, the north-facing, vertical Waupee Greenstones were rotated 90°to the north, rotating the intrusive Mountain Granite (40°, 51°) and Bagley Mangerite (328°, −30°), resulting in new paleopoles of 148°, 9° and 146°, −60°, respectively. All four samples, the Hager, Baldwin, Mountain, and Bagley, have rotated paleopole declinations and inclinations that fall on a common great circle; only the Bagley inclination (−60°, upper hemisphere) is confusing. Perhaps the Mountain shear zone is a boundary where south- and north-directed thrusts meet, a triangle zone, which is normal for the distal Baraboo orogen margin. Rotated AMS fabric-contoured Kmax values are vertical (Mountain Granite) and horizontal (Bagley: NE, 0°, Waupee: NW, 0°).
Thin-skin fold-and-thrust belts are dominated by hanging-wall anticlines that often verge in the direction of thrust transport, and footwall synclines are reported in two locations, both in the Cordilleran Sevier belt [53,54]. The Baraboo orogen presents the reverse relationship, no hanging-wall anticlines and a variety of synclines (Baraboo, Flambeau and McCaslin) folded into crystalline crust across the distal foreland (Figure 22 and Figure 23). The Baraboo syncline is topographically high, has a vertical northern limb, and is periclinal, plunging west on the west end and east on the east end. The fold continues to the east in the subsurface (Figure 2 and Figure 22). The Baraboo syncline has an axial-planar cleavage and kinematic indicators that suggest material movement into the fold core on the outer arc of the fold and material movement out of the core on the inner arc. This is a two-dimensional observation that is consistent with plane strain deformation, especially in thrust belts [9]. The base of the fold is underlain by a paleosol [55], which is underlain by a layer of rhyolite, then crystalline rocks (Baxter Hollow granite, locally). There is no observed fault surface or detachment under either limb of the fold. Refs. [13,56] proposed (strike-slip bounded) pull-apart basins into which the Baraboo succession was deposited non-horizontally (pre-folded), then folded into the north-verging syncline by north-dipping thrust faults [57]. The total thrust shortening of the Yavapai and Mazatzal crust must be significant to provide the overburden to metamorphose all the Baraboo arenites into quartzite; a palinspastic reconstruction of the Baraboo syncline is impossible since both fold limbs are eroded, so there are no pinpoints.

4.5. Regional Tectonics

The tectonic configuration of Laurentia when the WRB intruded included a north-dipping subduction complex on the southern margin. The WRB is the northernmost intrusion, 1000 km from the margin, and is a shallow intrusion emplaced into the Penokean and Yavapai crust (Figure 1) [1]. Ref. [2] reports penetrative deformation and widespread hydrothermal alteration across the Baraboo orogen foreland. We explored the shortcomings of a metamorphic core complex model (Figure 23; Table 3) which leaves a Laramide-style (thick-skinned; [58,59]) process of numerous faults that offset crystalline rocks metamorphosing and folding the arenites. Laramide structures in the Wyoming province resulted from flat-slab subduction [60]. The proximal Baldwin conglomerate is metamorphosed and deformed. The distal Sibley quartzite is not deformed. We need a hybrid tectonic mechanism to deform southern Laurentia, forming folded and cleaved quartzites across the region at <1470 Ma, a model supported by cooling (uplift) ages preserved in biotite [15,18] (Ar-Ar on biotite; 1475–1404 Ma) that young to the south, supporting south-directed thrusting (north-dipping thrusts) of the WRB (Figure 24). Faulting of Proterozoic crust, with south- and north-dipping thrusts, would also explain the rotation of paleopoles from horizontal (low-latitude) to sub-vertical and the AMS Kmax fabrics from sub-vertical to sub-horizontal (Figure 24 and Figure 25).

5. Conclusions

The WRB had a ~20 Ma intrusive history spanning 1470–1450 Ma in a foreland setting ~1000 km from the Baraboo orogen margin to the south. The high-silica melts were sourced in the shallow crust, and intrusion also captured a variety of shallow crustal remnants now present as inliers within the WRB. The WRB is deformed, based on the poor preservation of clean paleopoles, the variety of paleopole orientations (none are sub-horizontal), pseudotachylite, the rotation of inliers to vertical orientations, and microfractures. Deformation is younger than the youngest unit, the ~1460 Ma Baldwin Conglomerate, and deformation involved thrust faulting, perhaps making the WRB and much of the Yavapai and Mazatzal crust allochthonous.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.C. and D.H.M.; methodology, J.P.C., E.P.C., D.H.M. and R.P.; validation, J.E.M.; investigation, E.P.C. and R.P.; data curation, D.H.M.; writing—original draft preparation; J.P.C. and D.H.M.; Writing—review and editing J.E.M. and S.J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data may be requested from authors and will be available on ResearchGate.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Cam Craddock for taking Malone, Bjornerud, and John Craddock to the Mountain shear zone long ago. Subsequent insights into the WRB were provided by L. Gordon Medaris, Esther Stewart, and Lawford Anderson. Three anonymous reviewers improved this manuscript. The Institute for Rock Magnetism, University of Minnesota, facilitated all our magnetic lab work. Joe Meert (University of Florida) measured a later sample, the Hager granite. Suzanne Affinati created the BSE image in Figure 8 while searching for monazites. Grant EAR2050246 supported the Arizona LaserChron Center operations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
WRBWolf River Batholith
AMSAnisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility
U-PbUranium–Lead
SEMScanning Electron Microscope
RFReceiver Function
AFAlternating Field
ACAlternating Current
MaMegaannus (one million years)
MDAMaximum Depositional Age
kmKilometers
mMeters
cmCentimeter
mmMillimeter
nNumber
NdNeodymium
APWPApparent Polar Wander Path
nTNanoTesla
mTMilliTesla
HzHertz
LA-ICPMSLaser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
KmaxMaximum Magnetic Susceptibility Axis
KminMinimum Magnetic Susceptibility Axis
CCPCommon Conversion Point
LNSLayer-Normal Shortening
MSWDMean Squared Weighted Deviation

Appendix A

Table A1. Wolf River sample locations.
Table A1. Wolf River sample locations.
SampleLatitudeLongitudeComment
Wausau Syenite (Site 9)44°56′40.66″ N89°48′48.97″ WHighway 29, west of Wausau
Bowler Anorthosite (Site 11)44°49′19.16″ N88°59′42.62″ WCounty J, south of Bowler, WI
Tigerton Rapakivi Granite (Site 13)44°44′45.51″ N89°03′37.45″ WHighway 45, Tigerton, WI
Mountain Granite (Site 3)45°10′17.42″ N88°27′50.74″ WHighway 32–64, south of Mountain, WI
Big Falls Granite (Site 14)44°38′00.90″ N89°01′18.08″ WCounty E and Mud Lake Rd.
Keshena Falls Granite (Site 12)44°53′08.05″ N88°37′42.62″ WCounty 55 and the Wolf River
Bagley Rapids Mangerite (Site 2)45°09′24.68″ N88°28′08.45″ WBagley Rapids Campground
Hager Granite (Site 1)45°12′09.00″ N88°24′43.25″ WCounty W
Rib Mountain Quartzite (Site 10)44°55′15.24″ N89°41′33.62″ WRib Mountain Park
Wausau Turbidite (Site 8)45°00′51.79″ N89°37′15.79″ WCounty W, North of Wausau
Delles of Eau Claire Rhyolite (Site 7)45°00′16.86″ N89°20′18.33″ WDEC County Park, off County Y
Waupee Greenstone (Site 4)45°11′50.49″ N88°25′02.98″ WCounty W
Baldwin Conglomerate (Site 5)45°12′02.88″ N88°24′43.37″ WCounty W
McCauley Gneiss (Site 6)45°12′21.41″ N88°23′45.56″ WCounty W
Eau Pleine Shear Zone (Sites 15, 16)44°42′35.49″ N89°41′56.51″ WCounty 34, north of Dancy, WI; Railroad cut west of Meyer’s Landing
Restaurant before Lake Wisconsin.
44°40′29.64″ N89°41′22.40″ WDuBay Park & Boat Landing

Appendix B

Appendix B.1

Table A2. Sibley quartzite detrital zircon data.
Table A2. Sibley quartzite detrital zircon data.
Isotope Ratios Apparent Ages (Ma)
AnalysisU206 PbU/Th206 Pb ±207 Pb ±206 Pb ±Error206 Pb ±207 Pb ±206 Pb ±Best Age±Conc
(ppm)204 Pb 207 Pb (%)235 U (%)238 U(%)Corr.238 U (Ma)235 U(Ma)207 Pb (Ma)(Ma)(Ma)(%)
Spot 515783,1401.810.94360.63.20320.90.25430.60.731460.98.41457.96.81453.611.31453.611.3100.5
Spot 31240181,2921.710.92870.63.18591.10.25260.90.841452.112.11453.88.61456.211.41456.211.499.7
Spot 18101142,6051.110.92251.52.89172.00.22921.40.671330.216.41379.815.31457.328.51457.328.591.3
Spot 37147167,3512.510.91840.83.23161.30.25601.00.781469.413.41464.810.11458.015.51458.015.5100.8
Spot 5313179,0951.410.15920.73.73551.40.27541.20.861567.917.21579.011.51593.813.81593.813.898.4
Spot 7514857,4651.59.79660.64.11711.10.29270.90.821654.813.31657.79.11661.411.71661.411.799.6
Spot 38844,8781.79.21330.74.83001.10.32290.90.801803.814.21790.19.51774.212.41774.212.4101.7
Spot 3845788,6312.29.16120.74.31271.20.28670.90.781624.913.01695.89.61784.613.21784.613.291.1
Spot 19217153,0982.59.04950.74.96521.20.32601.00.841819.116.21813.410.31806.912.21806.912.2100.7
Spot 4276196,2262.09.01060.85.23761.20.34240.90.761898.414.71858.810.11814.714.01814.714.0104.6
Spot 393782,513,2543.38.98760.74.51201.30.29421.10.851662.715.91733.210.71819.412.41819.412.491.4
Spot 4026977,0673.68.95490.65.22781.20.33971.00.851885.116.81857.210.41826.011.81826.011.8103.2
Spot 8193119,3893.58.94900.75.09931.10.33110.80.781843.813.61836.09.31827.212.51827.212.5100.9
Spot 60340439,8411.98.94650.74.86631.20.31590.90.811769.714.61796.49.81827.712.21827.712.296.8
Spot 12139151,6453.88.93990.85.04631.30.32731.00.791825.516.31827.111.01829.014.31829.014.399.8
Spot 704451,5504.08.90120.95.18961.50.33521.20.771863.418.71850.912.71836.917.01836.917.0101.4
Spot 2416476,9512.88.86480.85.28271.30.33981.10.801885.717.41866.111.31844.314.41844.314.4102.2
Spot 68388188,7052.98.86400.65.13341.20.33021.00.871839.216.41841.710.01844.510.41844.510.499.7
Spot 7358122,7053.08.86350.65.21691.20.33551.10.891865.017.41855.410.31844.610.11844.610.1101.1
Spot 71313150,3202.78.86050.85.24441.40.33721.10.801873.018.11859.911.91845.215.11845.215.1101.5
Spot 17125270,9924.48.81560.85.24461.60.33551.40.871864.822.71859.913.71854.414.11854.414.1100.6
Spot 14268294,4862.68.80970.75.25021.40.33561.20.851865.518.81860.811.71855.613.11855.613.1100.5
Spot 2223132,4743.48.80390.65.18541.20.33121.00.851844.416.71850.210.41856.811.51856.811.599.3
Spot 5619189,2173.28.79510.75.09391.10.32510.80.781814.413.11835.19.11858.612.21858.612.297.6
Spot 67246130,2162.28.78460.85.26361.30.33551.00.801865.016.51863.010.81860.713.61860.713.6100.2
Spot 33241774,0394.28.78020.75.22711.20.33301.00.831852.915.81857.010.11861.611.91861.611.999.5
Spot 51149262,0862.48.77240.65.23561.20.33321.00.851854.116.01858.49.91863.211.01863.211.099.5
Spot 639144,2873.18.76380.75.02231.50.31941.30.891786.620.31823.112.41865.012.11865.012.195.8
Spot 279594,4322.38.74630.75.51231.30.34981.10.851933.717.91902.510.81868.611.81868.611.8103.5
Spot 47392176,7302.68.53530.85.31821.70.32941.50.891835.324.21871.814.51912.613.91912.613.996.0
Spot 5226151,5573.08.52070.65.51341.10.34091.00.861890.815.71902.79.61915.610.11915.610.198.7
Spot 54182426,0622.07.93090.66.15861.00.35440.80.761955.612.71998.68.72043.311.52043.311.595.7
Spot 34137123,0080.87.88540.75.69551.30.32591.10.861818.317.91930.711.42053.512.02053.512.088.5
Spot 22210148,2501.05.88530.610.76761.30.45981.10.872438.722.22503.311.72556.110.52556.110.595.4
Spot 13300174,8852.85.83750.611.23261.40.47581.30.902508.826.72542.613.32569.710.22569.710.297.6
Spot 6144730,7772.75.68280.511.06951.20.45641.10.892423.821.32529.011.12614.59.12614.59.192.7
Spot 63133168,9210.55.55420.813.17251.60.53091.40.882745.031.32692.115.12652.612.82652.612.8103.5
Spot 2111798,2722.15.49630.712.95721.40.51671.20.872685.327.12676.513.42669.911.62669.911.6100.6
Spot 32991,605,5011.05.49460.713.39761.30.53411.00.832758.823.52708.111.92670.411.52670.411.5103.3
Spot 69268158,9722.45.48280.612.94491.30.51501.10.882677.824.62675.612.02674.09.92674.09.9100.1
Spot 44230309,0381.55.47400.713.15521.30.52251.20.862709.825.62690.812.72676.611.32676.611.3101.2
Spot 35159409,2791.35.47220.613.25051.20.52611.00.862725.122.92697.711.32677.210.12677.210.1101.8
Spot 36166174,5631.15.47210.513.36801.10.53081.00.892744.722.52706.010.72677.28.72677.28.7102.5
Spot 74180137,4512.25.47180.513.24091.00.52570.80.852723.318.42697.09.32677.38.62677.38.6101.7
Spot 49264145,3770.65.46880.613.21351.10.52431.00.842717.521.22695.010.72678.210.12678.210.1101.5
Spot 646932,4801.95.46400.713.33711.20.52881.00.822736.222.52703.811.62679.711.72679.711.7102.1
Spot 23231122,5981.25.45720.713.41851.30.53131.10.842747.023.92709.612.12681.711.62681.711.6102.4
Spot 261781,029,1222.05.45420.812.99821.30.51441.10.822675.424.12679.512.72682.612.82682.612.899.7
Spot 45131253,9621.35.45370.613.56841.20.53691.00.862770.623.42720.111.42682.810.12682.810.1103.3
Spot 4822794,6521.55.45160.713.31701.40.52681.20.872727.827.22702.413.22683.411.32683.411.3101.7
Spot 5899382,2231.25.44630.612.50471.10.49421.00.852588.620.32643.110.52685.09.72685.09.796.4
Spot 20259458,0761.25.44480.713.06871.40.51631.20.872683.427.12684.613.42685.511.62685.511.699.9
Spot 41170115,5740.95.44090.713.36501.20.52761.00.822731.522.12705.811.52686.711.62686.711.6101.7
Spot 41941,089,4031.55.43750.613.33201.10.52600.90.862724.621.02703.410.42687.79.42687.79.4101.4
Spot 30191659,4871.35.43120.612.72411.20.50141.10.862620.023.22659.411.72689.610.42689.610.497.4
Spot 37314152,4171.35.43120.613.34531.20.52591.10.882724.224.12704.411.62689.69.42689.69.4101.3
Spot 29199233,2451.05.42510.613.35041.20.52551.00.872722.522.72704.811.12691.59.72691.59.7101.2
Spot 7342122,999,8051.65.41890.613.34770.90.52480.70.752719.614.42704.68.22693.49.62693.49.6101.0
Spot 1673130,6321.55.41660.713.10811.30.51521.00.832678.722.92687.511.92694.011.82694.011.899.4
Spot 43243544,5082.05.41150.713.10081.30.51441.10.852675.424.62686.912.52695.611.62695.611.699.3
Spot 57186304,2030.95.41130.613.32841.10.52330.90.862713.320.42703.210.22695.79.12695.79.1100.7
Spot 101691,147,4271.35.40920.613.32911.10.52311.00.842712.521.02703.210.72696.310.22696.310.2100.6
Spot 652533,487,6951.35.40140.713.50641.10.52930.90.792738.720.12715.710.82698.711.62698.711.6101.5
Spot 154561,975,2701.25.40020.713.26351.40.51971.30.892697.928.12698.613.52699.110.92699.110.9100.0
Spot 5014881,7321.15.39400.613.22341.40.51751.20.892688.726.92695.712.92701.010.22701.010.299.5
Spot 25264124,8220.85.38050.713.07581.10.51050.90.802658.719.92685.110.82705.111.42705.111.498.3
Spot 46213603,8842.05.35960.513.63191.00.53010.90.862742.020.12724.59.92711.58.92711.58.9101.1
Spot 66311752,8931.15.33320.613.67251.20.52911.00.842737.622.32727.311.22719.710.62719.710.6100.7
Spot 11135638,8342.35.29830.613.44561.10.51691.00.872686.021.52711.510.72730.59.22730.59.298.4
Spot 72198128,0511.95.28060.813.77121.10.52760.80.722731.518.12734.110.62736.012.82736.012.899.8
Spot 594178,5321.04.62500.717.88111.20.60010.90.783030.122.12983.411.32952.011.82952.011.8102.6
Spot 6285101,4130.64.53930.718.00931.30.59321.10.843002.226.12990.212.42982.111.22982.111.2100.7
Spot 553933,1742.74.53120.718.61651.10.61210.90.793078.320.83022.210.32985.010.52985.010.5103.1

Appendix B.2

Table A3. Delles of Eau Claire Monazite-in-garnet U-Pb geochronologic analyses.
Table A3. Delles of Eau Claire Monazite-in-garnet U-Pb geochronologic analyses.
Isotope Ratios Apparent Ages (Ma)
AnalysisUTh206 Pb208 PbU/Th206 Pb ±208 Pb ±207 Pb ±206 Pb ±Error206 Pb ±207 Pb ±206 Pb ±208 Pb ±Best Age±Conc
(ppm)(ppm)204 Pb204 Pb 207 Pb (% 2σ)232 Th(% 2σ)235 U (% 2σ)238 U(% 2σ)Corr.238 U (Ma 2σ)235 U(Ma 2σ)207 Pb (Ma 2σ)232 Th(Ma 2σ)(Ma)(Ma)(%)
Spot 46363193580997,1520.210.973213.80.1402.97443.70.236841.50.951370512.41401335.41448.5263.61394538.81394538.8103.4
Spot 7598332478,116617,2950.210.3632200.1403.0457460.22941.40.91329.3497.11419.1354.91556.63771468.6566.61468.6566.6109.7
Spot 52511713,98220,4860.211.411514.50.1402.830561.70.2344600.971357.3735.21363.6471.51373.6279.81489.8574.51489.8574.5100.7
Spot 133605679136,587551,9140.610.48191.70.1403.163510.80.240610.70.991389.8133.91448.383.61535.231.11536.3591.81536.3591.8106
Spot 313443729160,444418,3950.410.51631.80.19.63.56464.80.2724.40.921550.960.91541.737.9152934.31629.7150.21629.7150.299.2
Spot 68873925,163298,7630.110.885113.10.1403.625861.40.2864600.981623.4862.31555.2498.51463.8248.82022.6769.92022.6769.994.1
Spot 88433969,58399,2570.210.42453.60.233.45.049150.381914.60.972085.1259.81827.6127.41545.566.92869.98952869.989584.6
Spot 9001000100075.83.76422.10.7248.11582.41.31421.20.55408.943.93954.123.73279.932.310,303.1161.410,303.1161.482.9
Spot 237103123541300.41.44780.10.55.554.421814.70.571714.712914.9345.94076.7147.30NA8662.3385.68662.3385.60
55410540,068154373,544010.197221.502.90.061422.10.00455.50.2529.21.660.5131586.8402.346.71.446.71.42622.2
55410542,006292947,95405.82541503.40.114815.90.00495.40.3431.21.7110.416.62573.2250.348.71.648.71.62331.6
55411439,645140130,42808.033613.704.10.091114.70.00535.30.3634.21.888.612.52020.6243.646.71.946.71.92281.8
5549332,679258662,33507.700920.503.80.110821.50.00626.40.339.82.5106.721.82095.2361.7491.8491.81963.7
5549638,239232173,05103.65238.303.50.222311.90.00598.50.7237.93.2203.821.93327.2129.7441.5441.51632.3
55411538,0161881125,90206.206216.903.20.103318.40.00477.20.3929.92.299.817.52466.8286.749.21.649.21.62471
55411239,2741397142,13106.229415.503.90.09117.50.00418.20.4726.52.288.514.92460.5261.947.71.847.71.82781.5
5549034,9451383127,31706.821725.104.30.106926.10.00537.30.28342.5103.125.62305.8432.647.92.147.92.12235.6
55410635,893212113,99708.837518.703.60.073920.10.00477.40.3730.52.372.414.11849.9339.247.71.747.71.72553.8
55410040,0831688118,92306.805216.405.30.094917.70.00476.80.3830.1292.115.62309.928246.42.546.42.52508.6
55411538,190346111,91208.172626.202.70.08927.60.00538.90.3233.9386.622.91990.1467.448.31.348.31.32298.2
55411138,5701489132906.297414.603.80.112115.30.00514.80.3132.91.6107.815.72442.1247.145.91.745.91.72264.4
55411140,0171567128,82108.322125.703.50.07526.50.00456.50.2529.11.973.418.81957.8461.346.71.646.71.62666.7
44,069439940,279127,269615,3070.117.91161.603.30.52132.50.06771.80.75422.67.54268.5444.636.3431.314.2431.314.2104.4
44,069560436,884168,571832,9370.217.98131.303.50.51662.50.06742.20.86420.58.8422.98.743628.541314.441314.4103.1
44,069305124,194200,000815,0540.117.9562.204.30.54253.30.07072.40.74440.210.4440.111.7439.148.7430.818.5430.818.599.8
44,069224530,91980,168367,5700.117.70732.203.10.52592.80.06761.70.62421.57.1429.19.8470.148.5426.213.1426.213.1109.6
44,069227027,86396,585413,7450.118.35291.304.30.50892.10.06781.60.78422.76.7417.77.2390.329.3448.919448.91993.4
44,069321232,323455911,8190.118.7277204.30.4953.10.06732.30.76419.79.4408.310.3344.745.2421.518421.51884.4
44,069330238,39696,694413,8280.118.23631.405.20.51522.40.06821.90.81425.17.9421.98.2404.531.3424.221.9424.221.995.9
44,069261033,594310910,4510.119.5088204.90.48022.60.0681.60.644246.7398.28.5251.545.7428.120.9428.120.963.2
44,069263725,737928323,0150.118.15212.304.10.53332.90.07021.70.6437.67.343410.1414.951439.817.9439.817.995.6
44,069267635,17739,310186,5390.117.82811.603.60.51662.10.06681.40.644175.5422.97.445536.241714.741714.7107.6
44,069266527,258200,000875,7650.117.96671.902.90.53142.60.06931.70.68431.87.3432.79.1437.842.2430.812.5430.812.5101.2
44,069252128,57936,870176,5620.117.65271.803.40.52612.80.06742.20.76420.48.8429.29.9476.940.8424.614.2424.614.2111.1
44,069281528,767192,888879,8030.117.7811.703.10.517130.06672.40.82416.39.8423.210.4460.938.3426.512.9426.512.9108.9
44,069271430,549101,087500,0800.118.1481204.60.51672.80.0681.90.69424.47.84239.5415.444.4413.118.9413.118.998.2
44,069327128,351103,849450,2610.117.85771.5040.53222.30.0691.70.76429.97.2433.38.1451.333.145017.845017.8104.2
44,069282427,82620,59959,6810.117.95171.503.40.52572.80.06852.30.844279.6428.99.7439.633.8429.614.3429.614.3102.5
NIST61033101113139060.31.44440.10.57.160.550512.30.634612.313167.7307.44183.2122.80Na8627498.68627498.60
NIST6102263435911,33852,1220.510.406240.1403.167811.30.239210.60.941382.5132.21449.387.61548.874.61383.1534.71383.1534.7106.9
NIST6103497104635390.41.4330.10.66.556.858610.10.591210.112994.3242.84120.4101.20Na8853.7464.18853.7464.10
NIST6103393120838750.41.4380.10.610.859.63159.70.62229.713118.6239.8416896.90Na8987.1784.78987.1784.70
NIST6103198106036760.31.43080.10.66.561.364810.40.637110.413177.5259.84196.6103.60Na8954.7473.28954.7473.20

Appendix B.3

Table A4. Eau Pleine shear zone U-Pb geochronologic analyses.
Table A4. Eau Pleine shear zone U-Pb geochronologic analyses.
Isotope Ratios Apparent Ages (Ma)
AnalysisU206 PbU/Th206 Pb ±207 Pb ±206 Pb ±Error206 Pb ±207 Pb ±206 Pb ±Best Age±Conc
(ppm)204 Pb 207 Pb (%)235 U (%)238 U(%)Corr.238 U (Ma)235 U(Ma)207 Pb (Ma)(Ma)(Ma)(%)
Lake Dubay
SAMPLE 1 Spot 44349513,4852.17.31190.62.81381.90.14931.80.96897.015.31359.214.32185.99.62185.99.641.0
SAMPLE 1 Spot 20315612,5402.37.21511.22.89003.10.15132.90.93908.224.61379.323.62209.020.32209.020.341.1
SAMPLE 1 Spot 14290690831.97.00700.83.49853.70.17793.60.981055.335.01526.929.12259.613.72259.613.746.7
SAMPLE 1 Spot 35312826504.76.97261.33.81174.20.19283.90.951136.741.21595.233.52268.122.72268.122.750.1
SAMPLE 1 Spot 3276515,6152.26.93000.83.84293.10.19323.00.971138.931.61601.825.22278.713.62278.713.650.0
SAMPLE 1 Spot 6322117,9962.06.77190.95.02194.90.24684.80.981421.761.61823.041.52318.314.72318.314.761.3
SAMPLE 1 Spot 34307480261.76.76690.84.78461.80.23491.60.881360.219.11782.214.92319.614.52319.614.558.6
SAMPLE 1 Spot 19266730,3211.56.63250.75.42202.10.26091.90.941494.625.81888.317.62353.912.02353.912.063.5
SAMPLE 1 Spot 41240146,3771.96.60410.85.55783.90.26633.80.981522.151.31909.633.32361.314.02361.314.064.5
SAMPLE 1 Spot 46275682331.86.59060.85.26812.10.25191.90.911448.425.01863.718.02364.814.52364.814.561.2
SAMPLE 1 Spot 22248445371.86.57651.74.72785.00.22564.80.941311.456.61772.242.32368.428.52368.428.555.4
SAMPLE 1 Spot 43226515,8871.96.54850.96.28402.40.29862.20.921684.332.32016.220.82375.716.12375.716.170.9
SAMPLE 1 Spot 5191477,6631.86.47490.86.64342.00.31211.80.921751.128.12065.117.62394.913.62394.913.673.1
SAMPLE 1 Spot 50152518,1782.56.46150.69.07171.60.42531.40.922284.627.42345.314.22398.510.32398.510.395.3
SAMPLE 1 Spot 15217111,8491.76.44250.97.85223.20.36713.10.962015.553.42214.229.02403.515.92403.515.983.9
SAMPLE 1 Spot 12258227782.06.43090.93.96482.20.18502.00.911094.220.51627.018.12406.615.42406.615.445.5
SAMPLE 1 Spot 27227378841.96.42520.94.67292.10.21791.90.911270.522.41762.417.82408.114.92408.114.952.8
SAMPLE 1 Spot 48211969,8173.06.42160.78.50261.60.39621.40.902151.425.82286.214.32409.011.82409.011.889.3
SAMPLE 1 Spot 16207438,4901.76.41090.77.84311.70.36481.60.922005.126.92213.215.32411.811.42411.811.483.1
SAMPLE 1 Spot 25214916,9102.16.39660.86.73641.50.31271.30.861753.819.72077.413.22415.613.02415.613.072.6
SAMPLE 1 Spot 21224515,7291.76.38760.86.64322.00.30791.80.921730.327.42065.117.32418.012.72418.012.771.6
SAMPLE 1 Spot 45176825,7082.36.34650.77.95632.50.36642.40.962012.341.32226.122.52429.012.52429.012.582.8
SAMPLE 1 Spot 30233084,3461.56.33820.68.14171.40.37441.20.902050.221.72246.912.52431.210.32431.210.384.3
SAMPLE 1 Spot 11172326,3402.86.32421.08.25722.40.37892.20.912071.238.12259.621.52434.917.02434.917.085.1
SAMPLE 1 Spot 13172589,1531.96.29740.68.63192.10.39442.00.952143.335.92299.918.82442.110.82442.110.887.8
SAMPLE 1 Spot 401867304,8452.06.27150.610.53661.20.47951.10.872525.022.52483.111.52449.110.52449.110.5103.1
SAMPLE 1 Spot 41664207,9152.46.26830.79.41531.40.42821.20.872297.722.92379.312.52450.011.32450.011.393.8
SAMPLE 1 Spot 2188712,1372.76.26540.87.21771.60.32811.40.871829.322.92138.714.72450.813.72450.813.774.6
SAMPLE 1 Spot 29244114586.26.22041.33.95342.50.17842.20.851058.421.11624.720.62462.922.62462.922.643.0
SAMPLE 1 Spot 28148424,9782.16.19410.710.41451.70.46811.60.912475.132.52472.316.12470.112.22470.112.2100.2
SAMPLE 1 Spot 371729531,4921.76.17750.710.64921.30.47731.10.842515.623.42493.012.42474.612.12474.612.1101.7
SAMPLE 1 Spot 1175432531.86.11440.99.35492.10.41501.90.912237.935.82373.419.22491.914.92491.914.989.8
SAMPLE 1 Spot 1791244554.16.06120.89.27321.70.40781.50.882205.027.72365.415.52506.713.62506.713.688.0
SAMPLE 1 Spot 24131037,9621.46.05780.610.76421.30.47311.20.872497.323.82503.012.32507.610.92507.610.999.6
SAMPLE 1 Spot 7205723672.25.99281.37.11543.20.30942.90.911737.744.62126.028.72525.722.62525.722.668.8
SAMPLE 1 Spot 4975257471.35.84570.910.56771.90.44821.60.892387.432.82485.917.22567.414.42567.414.493.0
Meyer’s Landing
SAMPLE 2 Spot 87228881,9666.99.02840.74.96561.30.32531.10.851815.518.11813.511.41811.112.81811.112.8100.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 6871554313.38.97480.94.43442.00.28881.80.901635.426.31718.816.71821.915.91821.915.989.8
SAMPLE 2 Spot 8333681,7802.68.87390.65.14861.30.33151.10.891845.718.01844.210.71842.510.21842.510.2100.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 5238847,0434.68.79950.75.15311.40.32901.20.851833.618.51844.911.51857.712.71857.712.798.7
SAMPLE 2 Spot 7427730,0412.98.78860.65.25961.30.33541.10.861864.517.61862.310.71859.911.41859.911.4100.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 67194715,9851.68.76810.75.37981.40.34231.20.881897.519.71881.611.71864.111.91864.111.9101.8
SAMPLE 2 Spot 8120820,2642.78.76780.64.80151.20.30551.00.851718.314.81785.29.71864.210.91864.210.992.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 5127232,4012.78.76690.75.26041.30.33461.10.841860.817.21862.510.81864.412.51864.412.599.8
SAMPLE 2 Spot 6362736,8333.98.75210.74.61711.40.29321.20.871657.517.91752.411.71867.412.51867.412.588.8
SAMPLE 2 Spot 7537761,2541.98.75100.55.24261.00.33290.80.841852.313.11859.68.31867.69.61867.69.699.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 66648114,6901.98.74540.75.37371.50.34101.40.881891.422.21880.713.11868.812.91868.812.9101.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 5740747,7022.88.73980.55.24581.10.33271.00.901851.315.61860.19.21870.08.61870.08.699.0
SAMPLE 2 Spot 89494159,0512.78.72170.65.36301.60.33941.50.931883.724.11879.013.71873.710.91873.710.9100.5
SAMPLE 2 Spot 7923756,0353.68.71800.85.39321.20.34120.90.771892.215.21883.810.31874.513.71874.513.7100.9
SAMPLE 2 Spot 8247375,3562.78.71540.75.40391.30.34171.00.811895.016.61885.510.71875.013.31875.013.3101.1
SAMPLE 2 Spot 8030630,9062.88.71520.85.22941.20.33070.90.741841.713.71857.49.91875.014.11875.014.198.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 77502207,7741.98.68540.85.26381.50.33171.30.871846.721.61863.013.21881.213.71881.213.798.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 7319874,2333.78.67750.84.97941.20.31350.90.741758.013.51815.810.01882.814.41882.814.493.4
SAMPLE 2 Spot 58213164,1373.88.67000.85.34341.20.33611.00.781868.115.61875.810.51884.413.81884.413.899.1
SAMPLE 2 Spot 72279121,2982.78.65650.75.47631.30.34401.10.851905.718.91896.911.51887.212.61887.212.6101.0
SAMPLE 2 Spot 6249125,5522.08.65390.75.45601.20.34261.00.811899.116.31893.710.51887.712.81887.712.8100.6
SAMPLE 2 Spot 7641260,8863.08.61490.75.38741.30.33681.10.831871.017.21882.811.01895.912.91895.912.998.7
SAMPLE 2 Spot 53340137,4882.58.60720.75.32141.40.33231.30.881849.720.51872.312.41897.512.41897.512.497.5
SAMPLE 2 Spot 8678322,0082.98.59240.74.77772.10.29792.00.941680.729.41781.017.71900.613.01900.613.088.4
SAMPLE 2 Spot 54284782,4413.58.58370.85.30411.10.33040.80.741840.113.31869.59.71902.413.71902.413.796.7
SAMPLE 2 Spot 6031310,8842.98.57000.74.59991.30.28601.10.831621.715.91749.211.11905.313.21905.313.285.1
SAMPLE 2 Spot 8536372682.28.47300.75.35081.30.32901.10.851833.418.11877.011.41925.712.41925.712.495.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 7843272762.38.45210.85.03962.40.30912.20.941736.133.91826.020.21930.115.11930.115.189.9
SAMPLE 2 Spot 71234528501.28.27431.23.32052.10.19931.70.801171.818.11485.916.41968.122.31968.122.359.5
SAMPLE 2 Spot 5635923343.38.11432.65.05332.90.29751.40.481679.020.71828.324.82002.945.62002.945.683.8
SAMPLE 2 Spot 6941824742.47.94582.55.26522.70.30361.00.371708.914.91863.223.02040.044.32040.044.383.8
SAMPLE 2 Spot 59246620571.87.94020.63.45512.30.19912.20.961170.323.81517.018.22041.311.22041.311.257.3

Appendix B.4

Table A5. Eau Claire Dells U-Pb geochronologic analyses.
Table A5. Eau Claire Dells U-Pb geochronologic analyses.
Isotope Ratios Apparent Ages (Ma)
AnalysisU206 PbU/Th206 Pb ±207 Pb ±206 Pb ±Error206 Pb ±207 Pb ±206 Pb ±Best Age±Conc
(ppm)204 Pb 207 Pb (%)235 U (%)238 U(%)Corr.238 U (Ma)235 U(Ma)207 Pb (Ma)(Ma)(Ma)(%)
Spot 7192.6 1.3 3.02301.71550.23881.39490.811380.617.31413.413.11463.219.01463.219.03.0
Spot 9230.8 1.8 3.24441.58180.25311.27320.801454.216.61467.812.31487.617.81487.617.83.2
Spot 1167.9 3.5 3.22052.57240.25122.33420.911444.430.21462.119.91487.920.51487.920.53.2
Spot 6399.4 1.3 2.91791.87970.22711.65540.881319.219.71386.614.21491.716.91491.716.92.9
Spot 2214.8 2.7 4.55911.67220.30951.25150.751738.219.11741.813.91746.120.31746.120.34.6
Spot 430.8 2.4 13.14181.64930.51041.31520.802658.528.72689.915.62713.616.42713.616.413.1
Spot 8111.8 9 13.35561.61140.51821.32260.822691.529.12705.115.22715.315.22715.315.213.4
Spot 3236.2 2.5 14.05331.59340.54051.23110.772785.627.82753.315.12729.716.72729.716.714.1

Appendix B.5

Table A6. McCauley gneiss U-Pb geochronologic analyses.
Table A6. McCauley gneiss U-Pb geochronologic analyses.
Isotope Ratios Apparent Ages (Ma)
AnalysisU206 PbU/Th206 Pb ±207 Pb ±206 Pb ±Error206 Pb ±207 Pb ±206 Pb ±Best Age±Conc
(ppm)204 Pb 207 Pb (%)235 U (%)238 U(%)Corr.238 U (Ma)235 U(Ma)207 Pb (Ma)(Ma)(Ma)(%)
SAMPLE 1 Spot 22256.3163,551.11.18.70.74.661653.25430.29553.17030.97421669.146.61760.427.21870.413.31870.413.389.2
SAMPLE 1 Spot 20681.875,682.72.28.60.85.12622.21820.32122.08480.93991795.632.71840.518.81891.613.61891.613.694.9
SAMPLE 1 Spot 241113.139,049.41.48.70.95.13082.43120.32492.24900.92511813.635.61841.220.71872.516.71872.516.796.9
SAMPLE 1 Spot 251476.270,793.61.98.80.74.09655.58020.26175.53200.99141498.674.01653.645.61856.613.21856.613.280.7
-SAMPLE 1 Spot 311798.733,096.21.28.71.24.27996.015980.27145.90050.9808154.081.21689.549.61870.021.21870.021.282.8
SAMPLE 1 Spot 65000.6227,151.81.08.70.74.35661.91770.27371.78640.93151559.524.71704.115.81886.912.61886.912.682.6
SAMPLE 2 Spot 51272.132,400.92.78.80.75.26041.26960.33461.06480.83871860.817.21862.510.81864.412.51864.412.599.8
SAMPLE 2 Spot 52388.147,042.64.68.80.75.15311.35770.32901.15990.85431833.618.51844.911.51857.712.71857.712.798.7
SAMPLE 2 Spot 53339.9137,488.12.58.60.75.32141.44940.33231.27500.87971849.720.51872.312.41897.512.41897.512.497.5
SAMPLE 2 Spot 54284.0782,441.23.58.60.85.30411.13030.33040.83390.73781840.113.31869.59.71902.413.71902.413.796.7
SAMPLE 2 Spot 57407.347,701.72.88.70.55.24581.07940.33270.96850.89721851.315.61860.19.21870.08.61870.08.699.0
SAMPLE 2 Spot 58213.5164,137.13.88.70.85.34341.23040.33610.96450.78391868.115.61875.810.51884.413.81884.413.899.1
SAMPLE 2 Spot 60312.710,884.42.98.60.74.59991.33160.28601.11010.83371621.715.91749.211.11905.313.21905.313.285.1
SAMPLE 2 Spot 62490.925,552.32.08.70.75.45601.21840.34260.99070.81311899.116.31893.710.51887.712.81887.712.8100.6
SAMPLE 2 Spot 63627.036,833.33.98.80.74.61711.40560.29321.22450.87111657.517.91752.411.71867.412.51867.412.588.8
SAMPLE 2 Spot 66647.6114,690.51.98.70.75.37371.53140.34101.35310.88351891.422.21880.713.11868.812.91868.812.9101.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 701411.023,053.62.18.70.75.43761.48300.34441.28690.86781907.721.31890.812.71872.313.31872.313.3101.9
SAMPLE 2 Spot 72279.5121,298.42.78.70.75.47631.33920.34401.14270.85331905.718.91896.911.51887.212.61887.212.6101.0
SAMPLE 2 Spot 73197.974,233.53.78.70.84.97941.18400.31350.87490.73891758.013.51815.810.01882.814.41882.814.493.4
SAMPLE 2 Spot 74276.630,041.02.98.80.65.25961.25600.33541.084430.86341864.517.61862.310.71859.911.41859.911.4100.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 75376.861,253.81.98.80.55.24260.97300.33290.81610.83881852.313.11859.68.31867.69.61867.69.699.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 76412.360,885.73.08.30.75.38741.27990.33681.061780.82961871.017.21882.811.01895.912.91895.912.998.7
SAMPLE 2 Spot 77501.6207,774.21.98.70.85.26381.54480.33171.34330.86961846.721.61863.013.21881.213.71881.213.798.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 79237.356,035.33.68.70.85.39321.19800.34120.92400.77131892.215.21883.810.31874.513.71874.513.7100.9
SAMPLE 2 Spot 80306.330,905.52.88.70.85.22941.15850.33070.85330.73661841.713.71857.49.91875.014.11875.014.198.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 81208.220,264.52.78.80.64.80151.15440.30550.98340.85191718.314.81785.29.71864.210.91864.210.992.2
SAMPLE 2 Spot 82472.675,356.32.78.70.75.40391.25280.34171.01140.80731895.016.61885.510.71875.013.31875.013.3101.1
SAMPLE 2 Spot 83336.381,779.92.68.90.65.14861.25720.33151.12390.89401845.718.01844.210.71842.510.21842.510.2100.2
-SAMPLE 2 Spot 86782.922,008.32.98.60.74.77772.11340.29791.98580.93961680.729.41781.017.71900.613.01900.613.088.4
SAMPLE 2 Spot 89493.7159,050.72.78.70.65.36301.59490.33941.47670.92591883.724.11879.013.71873.710.91873.710.9100.5
Sample 4 Spot 27716.141,410.92.38.90.95.19252.59210.33422.41830.93291858.539.01851.422.11843.316.91843.316.9100.8
Sample 4 Spot 29936.337,945.11.98.70.74.91213.58840.30903.52060.98111735.753.61804.330.31884.612.51884.612.592.1
-Sample 4 Spot 30632.332,727.91.98.70.75.51611.93900.34941.82630.94191931.730.51903.116.71872.111.71872.111.7103.2
Sample 4 Spot 33650.59479.03.98.71.04.72872.62210.29752.42290.92401679.135.81772.322.01884.118.11884.118.189.1
Sample 4 Spot 342212.724,054.21.68.71.24.45714.80050.28284.65630.97001605.466.21723.039.81869.021.11869.021.185.9
Sample 4 Spot 4692.631,206.51.68.70.45.39892.01110.33941.96230.97561883.832.11884.717.21885.77.91885.77.999.9
Sample 4 Spot 51819.669,834.81.58.80.85.28674.64980.33564.58790.98671865.774.31866.739.71867.813.71867.813.799.9
1. Analyses with >10% uncertainty (1-sigma) in 206 Pb/238 U age are not included. 2. Analyses with >10% uncertainty (1-sigma) in 206 Pb/207 Pb age are not included, unless 206 Pb/238 U age is <500 Ma. 3. Best age is determined from 206 Pb/238 U age for analyses with 206 Pb/238 U age <1000 Ma and from 206 Pb/207 Pb age for analyses with 206 Pb/238 Uage > 1000 Ma. 4. Concordance is based on 206 Pb/238 U age/206 Pb/207 Pb age. Value is not reported for 206 Pb/238 U ages <500 Ma because of large uncertainty in 206 Pb/207 Pb age. 5. Analyses with 206 Pb/238 U age > 500 Ma and with >20% discordance (<80% concordance) are not included. 6. Analyses with 206 Pb/238 U age > 500 Ma and with >5% reverse discordance (<105% concordance) are not included. 7. All uncertainties are reported at the 1-sigma level, and include only measurement errors. 8. Systematic errors are as follows (at 2-sigma level): [sample 1: 2.5% (206 Pb/238 U) and 1.4% (206 Pb/207 Pb)]. These values are reported on cells U1 and W1 of NUagecalc. 9. Analyses conducted by LA-MC-ICPMS, as described by Gehrels et al. [22]. 10. U concentration and U/Th are calibrated relative to Sri Lanka zircon standard and are accurate to ~20%. 11. Common Pb correction is from measured 204 Pb with common Pb composition interpreted from Stacey and Kramers [61]. 12. Common Pb composition assigned uncertainties of 1.5 for 206 Pb/204 Pb, 0.3 for 207 Pb/204 Pb, and 2.0 for 208 Pb/204 Pb. 13. U/Pb and 206 Pb/207 Pb fractionation is calibrated relative to fragments of a large Sri Lanka zircon of 563.5 ± 3.2 Ma (2-sigma). 14. U decay constants and composition as follows: 235 U = 9.8485 × 10−10, 238 U = 1.55125 × 10−10, 238 U/235 U = 137.88. 15. Weighted mean and concordia plots determined with Isoplot [62].

References

  1. Whitmeyer, S.J.; Karlstrom, K.E. Tectonic model for the Proterozoic growth of North America. Geosphere 2007, 3, 220–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Medaris, L.G., Jr.; Singer, B.S.; Jicha, B.R.; Malone, D.H.; Schwartz, J.J.; Stewart, E.K.; Van Lankvelt, A.; Williams, M.L.; Reiners, P.W. Early Mesoproterozoic evolution of midcontinental Laurentia: Defining the geon 14 Baraboo orogeny. Geosci. Front. 2021, 12, 101174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Daniel, C.G.; Pfeifer, L.S.; Jones, J.V., III; McFarlane, C.M. Detrital zircon evidence for non-Laurentian provenance, Mesoproterozoic (ca. 1490–1450) deposition and orogenesis in a reconstructed orogenic belt, northern New Mexico, USA: Defining the Picuris orogeny. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2013, 125, 1423–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anderson, J.L. Mineral equilibria and crystallization conditions in the late Precambrian Wolf River Rapakivi Massif, Wisconsin. Am. J. Sci. 1980, 280, 289–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Anderson, J.L.; Cullers, R.L. Geochemistry and evolution of the Wolf River Batholith, a late Precambrian rapakivi massif in north Wisconsin, USA. Prec. Res. 1978, 7, 287–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Van Wyck, N.; Johnson, C.M. Common lead, Sm-Nd, and U-Pb constraints on petrogenesis, crustal architecture, and tectonic setting of the Penokean orogeny (Paleoproterozoic) in Wisconsin. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1997, 109, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Craddock, J.P.; Malone, D.H.; Schmitz, M.D.; Gifford, J.N. Strain variations across the Proterozoic Penokean orogen, USA and Canada. Prec. Res. 2018, 318, 25–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Medaris, L.G.; Anderson, J.L.; Myles, J.P. The Wolf River Batholith-a Precambrian Rapakivi Massif in Northeastern Wisconsin. Inst. L. Sup. Geol. 1973, 7, 9–29. [Google Scholar]
  9. Van Schmus, W.R.; Medaris, L.G.; Banks, P.O. Geology and age of the Wolf River Batholith, Wisconsin. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1975, 86, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bickford, M.E.; Van Schmus, W.R.; Karlstrom, K.E.; Mueller, P.A.; Kamenov, G.D. Mesoproterozoic- trans-Laurentian magmatism: A synthesis of continent-wide age distributions, new SIMS U-Pb ages, zircon saturation temperatures, and Hf and Nd isotopic compositions. Prec. Res. 2015, 265, 286–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Freiburg, J.T.; McBride, J.H.; Malone, D.H.; Leetaru, H.E. Petrology, geochronology and geophysical characterization of Mesoproterozoic rocks in central Illinois, USA. Geosci. Front. 2020, 11, 581–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Craddock, J.P.; McKiernan, A.W. Tectonic implications of finite strain variations in Baraboo–interval quartzites (ca. 1700 Ma), Mazatzal orogen, Wisconsin and Minnesota, USA. Prec. Res. 2007, 156, 175–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Marshak, S.; Wilkerson, S.M.; Defrates, J. Kinematic and tectonic implications of crenulation cleavage, kink bands, and mesoscopic folds in the Baraboo Syncline, Wisconsin (~1.45 Ga Picuris Orogen). J. Struc. Geol. 2024, 175, 105007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Malone, D.H.; Craddock, J.P.; Holm, D.; Kreiger, A.; Baumann, S.J. Continent-scale sediment dispersal for the Proterozoic Baraboo Interval quartzites in the Laurentian midcontinent. Terra Nova 2022, 34, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Holm, D.; Lux, D. Depth of emplacement and tilting of the Middle Proterozoic (1470 Ma) Wolf River batholith, Wisconsin: 40Ar/39Ar thermochronologic constraints. Can. J. Ear. Sci. 1998, 35, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dewane, T.J.; Van Schmus, W.R. U-Pb geochronology of the Wolf River batholith, north-central Wisconsin: Evidence for successive magmatism between 1448 Ma and 1468 Ma. Prec. Res. 2007, 157, 215–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Medaris, L.G.; Singer, B.S. 40Ar/39Ar dating of geon 14 K-metasomatism and hydrothermal alteration in the southern Lake Superior region. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog. 2010, 42, 47. [Google Scholar]
  18. Peterman, Z.E.; Sims, P.K. The Goodman Swell: A lithospheric flexure caused by crustal loading along the midcontinent rift system. Tectonics 1988, 7, 1077–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jang, B.A.; Wang, H.F.; Ren, X.; Kowallis, B.J. Precambrian paleostress from microcracks and fluid inclusions in the Wolf River batholith of central Wisconsin. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1989, 101, 1457–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meert, J.G.; Stuckey, W. Revisiting the paleomagnetism of the 1.476 Ga St. Francois Mountains igneous province, Missouri. Tectonics 2022, 21, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Medaris, L.G.; Singer, B.S.; Brown, P.E.; Jicha, B.R.; Smith, M.E. Wolf River-age brecciation in the Baraboo quartzite, Wisconsin: Implications for Proterozoic tectonics in the Lake Superior region. Inst. Lake Sup. Geol. 2002, 48, 24–25. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gehrels, G.E.; Valencia, V.; Ruiz, J. Enhanced precision, accuracy, efficiency, and spatial resolution of U-Pb ages by laser ablation–multicollector–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry. Geoch. Geoph. Geosys. 2008, 9, Q03017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gehrels, G.; Pecha, M. Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotope geochemistry of Paleozoic and Triassic passive margin strata of western North America. Geosphere 2014, 1, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, W.W.; Jackson, M.; Craddock, J.P. Relationship between remagnetization, magnetic fabric and deformation in Paleozoic carbonates. Tectonophysics 1993, 221, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Evans, M.A.; Lewchuk, M.T.; Elmore, R.D. Strain partitioning of deformation mechanisms in limestones: Examining the relationship of strain and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility. J. Struct. Geol. 2003, 25, 1525–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. DeFrates, J.; Malone, D.H.; Craddock, J.P. Anisotropic magnetic susceptibility (AMS) analysis of basalt dikes at Cathedral Cliffs, WY: Implications for Heart Mountain faulting. J. Struc. Geol. 2006, 28, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ernst, R.E.; Baragar, W.R.A. Evidence from magnetic fabric for the flow pattern of magma in the Mackenzie giant radiating dyke swarm. Nature 1992, 356, 511–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bouchez, J.L. Granite is never isotropic: An introduction to AMS studies of granitic rocks. In Granite: From Segregation Melt to Emplacement Fabrics; Bouchez, J.-L., Hutton, D.H.W., Stephens, W.E., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997; pp. 95–112. [Google Scholar]
  29. Craddock, J.P.; Kennedy, B.K.; Pawlisch, M.S.; Cook, A.L.; Johnston, S.T.; Jackson, M. Anhysteretic magnetic susceptibility dike studies in three tectonic settings: Mid-ocean ridge, accreted terrane and Archean–Proterozoic crust. Tectonophysics 2008, 448, 15–124. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wallenberg, A.; Dafov, M.; Malone, D.H.; Craddock, J.P. Geochronology and paleomagnetism of an Archean harzburgite intrusion, eastern Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming. Mtn. Geol. 2020, 57, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Haroldson, E.L.; Beard, B.L.; Satoski, A.M.; Brown, P.E.; Johnson, C.M. Gold remobilization associated with Mississippi Valley-type fluids: A Pb isotope perspective. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2018, 130, 1583–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Holm, D.; Medaris, L.G.; McDannell, K.T.; Schneider, D.A.; Schulz, K.; Singer, B.S.; Jicha, B.R. Growth, overprinting, and stabilization of Proterozoic provinces in the southern Lake Superior region. Prec. Res. 2020, 339, 105587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Craddock, J.P.; Malone, D.H.; Porter, R.; Compton, J.; Luczaj, J.; Konstantinou, A.; Day, J.E.; Johnston, S.T. Paleozoic reactivation structures in the Appalachian-Ouachita-Marathon foreland: Far-field deformation across Pangea. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2017, 169, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sims, P.K.; Klasner, J.S.; Peterman, Z.E. The Mountain Shear Zone, Northeastern Wisconsin—A Discrete Ductile Deformation Zone Within the Early Proterozoic Penokean Orogen; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1904; pp. 1–15.
  35. LaBerge, G.L.; Myers, P.E. Precambrian geology of Marathon County, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin-Extension, Geological and Natural History Survey: Madison, WI, USA, 1983; IC 45. [Google Scholar]
  36. Reichhoff, C.L. Geology of a Lower Proterozoic Volcaniclastic Sequence near Wausau, Marathon County, Wisconsin. Master’s Thesis, University of Minnesota-Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA, 1986; p. 131. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rogala, B.; Fralick, P.W.; Heaman, L.M.; Metsaranta, R. Lithostratigraphy and chemostratigraphy of the Mesoproterozoic Sibley Group, northeastern Ontario, Canada. Can. J. Ear. Sci. 2007, 44, 1131–1149. [Google Scholar]
  38. Greenburg, J.K.; Brown, B.A. Cratonic sedimentation during the Proterozoic: An orogenic connection in Wisconsin and the Midwest. J. Geol. 1984, 92, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Holm, D.K.; Schneider, D.A.; Coath, C.D. Age and deformation of Early Proterozoic quartzites in the southern Lake Superior region: Implications for extent of foreland deformation during final assembly of Laurentia. Geology 1998, 26, 907–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dalziel, I.W.D.; Stirewalt, L. Stress history of folding and cleavage development, Baraboo syncline, Wisconsin. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1975, 86, 1671–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Davis, G.H. Shear-zone model for the origin of metamorphic core complexes. Geology 1983, 11, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lister, G.S.; Davis, G.A. The origin of metamorphic core complexes and detachment faults during Tertiary continental extension in the northern Colorado River region, USA. J. Struc. Geol. 1989, 11, 65–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wust, S.J. Regional orientation of extension directions in Cordilleran metamorphic core complexes. Geology 1986, 14, 828–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Romano, D.; Holm, D.K.; Foland, K.A. Determining the extent and nature of Mazatzal-related overprinting of the Penokean orogenic belt in the southern Lake Superior region, north-central USA. Prec. Res. 2000, 104, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rainbird, R.H.; Stern, R.A.; Rayner, N.; Jefferson, C.W.; Delaney, G. Age, provenance, and regional correlation of the Athabasca Group, Saskatchewan and Alberta, constrained by igneous and detrital zircon geochronology. Bull.-Geol. Surv. Can. 2007, 588, 193. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rainbird, R.H.; Rayner, N.M.; Hadlari, T.; Heaman, L.M.; Ielpi, A.; Turner, E.C.; MacNaughton, R.B. Zircon provenance data record the lateral extent of pancontinental, early Neoproterozoic rivers and erosional unroofing history of the Grenville orogeny. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2017, 129, 1408–1423. [Google Scholar]
  47. Maes, S.M.; Tikoff, B.; Ferre, E.C.; Brown, P.E.; Miller, J.D. The Sonju Lake Intrusion, Northeast Minnesota: Internal structure and emplacement history inferred from magnetic fabrics. Prec. Res. 2007, 157, 269–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tikoff, B.; Davis, M.; Teyssier, C.; St. Blanquat, M.; Habert, G.; Morgan, S. Fabric studies within the Cascade Lake shear zone. Sierra Nevada Mountains, California. Tectonophysics 2005, 400, 209–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tikoff, B.; St. Blanquat, M.; Teyssier, C. Translation and the resolution of the pluton space problem. J. Struc. Geol. 1999, 21, 1109–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Emslie, R.F.; Irving, E.; Park, J.K. Further paleomagnetic results from the Michikamau intrusion, Labrador. Can. J. Ear Sci. 1976, 13, 1052–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Elston, D.P.; Bressler, S.L. Paleomagnetic poles and polarity zonation from the Middle Proterozoic Belt Supergroup, Montana and Idaho. J. Geophys. Res. 1980, 85, 339–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Harlan, S.S.; Geissman, J.W.; Snee, L.W. Paleomagnetism of Proterozoic mafic dikes from the Tobacco Root Mountains, southwest Montana. Prec. Res. 2002, 163, 239–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Brumbaugh, D.S.; Dresser, H.W. Exposed step in Laramide thrust fault, southwest Montana. AAPG Bull. 1975, 660, 2142–2149. [Google Scholar]
  54. Craddock, J.P.; Malone, D.H. An overview of strains in the Sevier thin-skinned thrust belt, Idaho and Wyoming (Latitude 42° N). Geol. Soc. Am. Sp. Pap. 2022, 555, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  55. Medaris, L.G.; Driese, S.G.; Stinchcomb, G.E. The Paleoproterozoic Baraboo paleosol revisited: Quantifying mass fluxes of weathering and metasomatism, chemical climofunctions, and atmospheric pCO2 in a chemically heterogeneous protolith. Prec. Res. 2017, 301, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Stewart, E.D.; Stewart, E.K.; Walker, A.; Zambito, J.J. Revisiting the Paleoproterozoic Baraboo interval in southern Wisconsin: Evidence for syn-depositional tectonism along the south-central margin of Laurentia. Prec. Res. 2018, 314, 221–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stewart, E.K.; Brengman, L.A.; Stewart, E.D. Revised Provenance, Depositional Environment, and Maximum Depositional Age for the Baraboo (<ca. 1714 Ma) and Dake (<ca. 1630 Ma) Quartzites, Baraboo Hills, Wisconsin. J. Geol. 2021, 129, 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gries, R.R. North-south compression of Rocky Mountain foreland structures. In Rocky Mountain Foreland Basins and Uplifts; Lowell, J.D., Ed.; Rocky Mountain Association of Geologist: Denver, CO, USA, 1983; pp. 9–32. [Google Scholar]
  59. Gries, R.R. Rocky Mountain foreland structures: Changes in compression direction through time. In Petroleum and Tectonics in Mobile Belts; Letouzy, J., Ed.; Editions Technip: Paris, France, 1989; pp. 129–148. [Google Scholar]
  60. Craddock, J.P.; Malone, D.H.; Konstantinou, A.; Spruell, J.; Porter, R. Calcite twinning strains associated with Laramide uplifts, Wyoming Province. In Tectonic Evolution of the Sevier-Laramide Hinterland, Thrust Belt, and Foreland, and Postorogenic Slab Rollback (180–20 Ma); Geological Society of America: Boulder, CO, USA, 2022; Volume 555, pp. 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  61. Stacey, J.S.; Kramers, J.D. Approximation of terrestrial lead isotope evolution by a two-stage model. EPSL 1975, 26, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ludvig, K.R. Isoplot Ex ver. 3.6. BGCSP; United States Geological Survey: Denver, CO, USA, 2008; Volume 4, p. 77.
Figure 1. Simplified geologic and tectonic map of the southern Superior province indicating the relationship of the Geon 14 WRB various terranes in the region. The red square here, and the white square in Figure 2 indicates the detailed study area included in Figure 3.
Figure 1. Simplified geologic and tectonic map of the southern Superior province indicating the relationship of the Geon 14 WRB various terranes in the region. The red square here, and the white square in Figure 2 indicates the detailed study area included in Figure 3.
Geosciences 15 00150 g001
Figure 4. Geologic map of the Wausau, Wisconsin area, including the Wausau turbidite (Site 8), the Wausau syenite (Site 9), and the Rib Mountain quartzite (Site 10). Red lines are roads (with road numbers). Sample locations are indicated.
Figure 4. Geologic map of the Wausau, Wisconsin area, including the Wausau turbidite (Site 8), the Wausau syenite (Site 9), and the Rib Mountain quartzite (Site 10). Red lines are roads (with road numbers). Sample locations are indicated.
Geosciences 15 00150 g004
Figure 5. Field photo of the Tigerton rapakivi granite (top; Site 11) and the Wausau turbidite (bottom; Site 8). Width of lower photo is 1.5 m.
Figure 5. Field photo of the Tigerton rapakivi granite (top; Site 11) and the Wausau turbidite (bottom; Site 8). Width of lower photo is 1.5 m.
Geosciences 15 00150 g005
Figure 6. Field photos of WRB rocks: (A) Mangerite at Bagley Rapids with a late-stage aplite dike crosscut by pseudotachylite; (B) Baldwin Conglomerate; (C) flattened lapilli, Dells of Eau Claire rhyolite inlier; and (D) flattened pillows in Waupee greenstones along the Mountain shear zone.
Figure 6. Field photos of WRB rocks: (A) Mangerite at Bagley Rapids with a late-stage aplite dike crosscut by pseudotachylite; (B) Baldwin Conglomerate; (C) flattened lapilli, Dells of Eau Claire rhyolite inlier; and (D) flattened pillows in Waupee greenstones along the Mountain shear zone.
Geosciences 15 00150 g006
Figure 7. Schematic geologic map of the Eau Pleine shear zone along the northern boundary of the Archean Marshfield terrane (Figure 1) with sample sites 15 (Meyer’s Landing) and 16 (Lake DuBay).
Figure 7. Schematic geologic map of the Eau Pleine shear zone along the northern boundary of the Archean Marshfield terrane (Figure 1) with sample sites 15 (Meyer’s Landing) and 16 (Lake DuBay).
Geosciences 15 00150 g007
Figure 8. (Top left) Eau Pleine shear zone rocks with pseudotachylite. (Top right) Top to the north shear sense indicator showing north-verging reverse movement. (Lower left) Age of gneiss at Lake DuBay. (Lower right) Age of gneiss at Meyers Landing.
Figure 8. (Top left) Eau Pleine shear zone rocks with pseudotachylite. (Top right) Top to the north shear sense indicator showing north-verging reverse movement. (Lower left) Age of gneiss at Lake DuBay. (Lower right) Age of gneiss at Meyers Landing.
Geosciences 15 00150 g008
Figure 9. (Top) Geologic map of the Mountain shear zone and surrounding areas. (Lower left) Concordia age of the McCauley gneiss. (Lower right) Field photo of the McCauley gneiss with steeply inclined, NE-trending fabric.
Figure 9. (Top) Geologic map of the Mountain shear zone and surrounding areas. (Lower left) Concordia age of the McCauley gneiss. (Lower right) Field photo of the McCauley gneiss with steeply inclined, NE-trending fabric.
Geosciences 15 00150 g009
Figure 10. (A) Geologic map of the Dells of the Eau Claire river and county park (orange square). (B) Air photo showing the meta-rhyolite succession B, Site 7 (see Figure 11). Red star is the sample locality.
Figure 10. (A) Geologic map of the Dells of the Eau Claire river and county park (orange square). (B) Air photo showing the meta-rhyolite succession B, Site 7 (see Figure 11). Red star is the sample locality.
Geosciences 15 00150 g010
Figure 11. (A) Undeformed garnet in meta-rhyolite tuff. (B) Slab of meta-rhyolite showing strong planar fabric. Field of view is 10 cm. (C) Andalusite in meta-rhyolite. (D) Garnet with micaceous overgrowth in mylonitized rhyolite tuff. (E) Euhedral quartz phenocrysts in groundmass in meta-rhyolite. (F) Boudinaged garnet with mica overgrowths in meta-rhyolite tuff. Field of view for (A,C,E) is 3.5 mm.
Figure 11. (A) Undeformed garnet in meta-rhyolite tuff. (B) Slab of meta-rhyolite showing strong planar fabric. Field of view is 10 cm. (C) Andalusite in meta-rhyolite. (D) Garnet with micaceous overgrowth in mylonitized rhyolite tuff. (E) Euhedral quartz phenocrysts in groundmass in meta-rhyolite. (F) Boudinaged garnet with mica overgrowths in meta-rhyolite tuff. Field of view for (A,C,E) is 3.5 mm.
Geosciences 15 00150 g011
Figure 12. Concordia plot (top), probability density plot (middle), and weighted mean age (bottom) of the Dells of the Eau Claire rhyolite.
Figure 12. Concordia plot (top), probability density plot (middle), and weighted mean age (bottom) of the Dells of the Eau Claire rhyolite.
Geosciences 15 00150 g012
Figure 13. Weighted mean age of monazite inclusions of garnet in the Dells of the Eau Claire tuff (top). Monazite (bright spots) inclusions in garnet (bottom).
Figure 13. Weighted mean age of monazite inclusions of garnet in the Dells of the Eau Claire tuff (top). Monazite (bright spots) inclusions in garnet (bottom).
Geosciences 15 00150 g013
Figure 14. Outcrop photos of the lower Sibley Group near Pass Lake (upper left) and the middle and upper members along the Trans-Canadian Highway with two Keweenaw-aged sills (upper right). Probability density plot of Sibley Quartzite detrital zircon age spectrum (lower left). Maximum depositional age of the Sibley Quartzite (lower right).
Figure 14. Outcrop photos of the lower Sibley Group near Pass Lake (upper left) and the middle and upper members along the Trans-Canadian Highway with two Keweenaw-aged sills (upper right). Probability density plot of Sibley Quartzite detrital zircon age spectrum (lower left). Maximum depositional age of the Sibley Quartzite (lower right).
Geosciences 15 00150 g014
Figure 15. Lower hemisphere projections of AMS data for rocks in the WRB (Kmax-filled circles, Kmin-hollow circles) and for the Dells of Eau Claire rhyolite and Waupee greenstone inliers (lower right).
Figure 15. Lower hemisphere projections of AMS data for rocks in the WRB (Kmax-filled circles, Kmin-hollow circles) and for the Dells of Eau Claire rhyolite and Waupee greenstone inliers (lower right).
Geosciences 15 00150 g015
Figure 16. Lower hemisphere projections of paleopole data (N is up) for WRB samples. Open circles are in the upper hemisphere (n = 8 cubes/sample site). AF demagnetization steps are color-coded, see inset boxes.
Figure 16. Lower hemisphere projections of paleopole data (N is up) for WRB samples. Open circles are in the upper hemisphere (n = 8 cubes/sample site). AF demagnetization steps are color-coded, see inset boxes.
Geosciences 15 00150 g016
Figure 17. Lower hemisphere projections of paleopole data for inliers in the WRB. Open circles are in the upper hemisphere (n = 8 cubes/sample site). Bedding as indicated.
Figure 17. Lower hemisphere projections of paleopole data for inliers in the WRB. Open circles are in the upper hemisphere (n = 8 cubes/sample site). Bedding as indicated.
Geosciences 15 00150 g017
Figure 18. Lower hemisphere stereonets of paleopole data for WRB igneous (A) and inlier (B) rocks and the Mountain shear zone (C). Filled circles are normal polarity; open circles are reversed polarity. Combined AMS data (filled circles = Kmax; open circles = Kmin) for all igneous samples (D).
Figure 18. Lower hemisphere stereonets of paleopole data for WRB igneous (A) and inlier (B) rocks and the Mountain shear zone (C). Filled circles are normal polarity; open circles are reversed polarity. Combined AMS data (filled circles = Kmax; open circles = Kmin) for all igneous samples (D).
Geosciences 15 00150 g018
Figure 19. Receiver function (RF; top) and shear velocity (bottom) prole along a N-S transect from Michigan’s Upper Peninsula to southern Wisconsin (inset).
Figure 19. Receiver function (RF; top) and shear velocity (bottom) prole along a N-S transect from Michigan’s Upper Peninsula to southern Wisconsin (inset).
Geosciences 15 00150 g019
Figure 20. Shear velocity maps at different depths with the WRB indicated (yellow circle).
Figure 20. Shear velocity maps at different depths with the WRB indicated (yellow circle).
Geosciences 15 00150 g020
Figure 21. Cross-section of the Mountain shear zone (Figure 3). The Baldwin Conglomerate youngs to the south and is in fault contact with the vertical Waupee Greenstone with vertical pillows that young to the north. This fault contact is <1460 Ma.
Figure 21. Cross-section of the Mountain shear zone (Figure 3). The Baldwin Conglomerate youngs to the south and is in fault contact with the vertical Waupee Greenstone with vertical pillows that young to the north. This fault contact is <1460 Ma.
Geosciences 15 00150 g021
Figure 22. Summary of Baraboo orogen structural components, including strain gradients across Wisconsin (A), a potential south-dipping thrust at Veedum, WI (B), the sub-surface continuation of the Baraboo syncline ((C); see Figure 2). Strain ellipse locations (yellow): B = Barron, F = Flambeau, M = McCaslin, SS = Seven Sisters, BB = Baraboo, W = Waterloo, WR = Wolf River batholith.
Figure 22. Summary of Baraboo orogen structural components, including strain gradients across Wisconsin (A), a potential south-dipping thrust at Veedum, WI (B), the sub-surface continuation of the Baraboo syncline ((C); see Figure 2). Strain ellipse locations (yellow): B = Barron, F = Flambeau, M = McCaslin, SS = Seven Sisters, BB = Baraboo, W = Waterloo, WR = Wolf River batholith.
Geosciences 15 00150 g022
Figure 23. Schematic map of the WRB with inclusive, vertical inliers and the surrounding Baraboo interval quartzites and their upper plate runout distances if a metamorphic core complex model is proposed for the tectonic evolution of the Baraboo orogen.
Figure 23. Schematic map of the WRB with inclusive, vertical inliers and the surrounding Baraboo interval quartzites and their upper plate runout distances if a metamorphic core complex model is proposed for the tectonic evolution of the Baraboo orogen.
Geosciences 15 00150 g023
Figure 24. Simplified map shows the WRB and vertical inliers (red, upper map). Three schematic cross-sections represent the horizontal magnetic field (1470 Ma from Meert and Schuster, 2002 [20]), and horizontal inliers before north-directed thrusting (middle section) or south-directed thrust imbrication rotated the paleopoles and inliers to vertical.
Figure 24. Simplified map shows the WRB and vertical inliers (red, upper map). Three schematic cross-sections represent the horizontal magnetic field (1470 Ma from Meert and Schuster, 2002 [20]), and horizontal inliers before north-directed thrusting (middle section) or south-directed thrust imbrication rotated the paleopoles and inliers to vertical.
Geosciences 15 00150 g024
Figure 25. Schematic representation of the WRB relative to long-term accretion of crust onto the Archean Superior craton, as Laurentia grew by orogenic accretion, younging to the south (open thrust triangles are on the hanging walls, indicating N-dipping subduction). Sibley Group strata were transported north from Baraboo crust and, perhaps, the WRB, if it were a highland (Baldwin Conglomerate).
Figure 25. Schematic representation of the WRB relative to long-term accretion of crust onto the Archean Superior craton, as Laurentia grew by orogenic accretion, younging to the south (open thrust triangles are on the hanging walls, indicating N-dipping subduction). Sibley Group strata were transported north from Baraboo crust and, perhaps, the WRB, if it were a highland (Baldwin Conglomerate).
Geosciences 15 00150 g025
Table 2. WRB paleopoles *.
Table 2. WRB paleopoles *.
Rock TypeN (#Samples)Declination (°)Inclination (°)α95kComment
Wauson Syenite Igneous8318.8152.9594.6214.52
Bowler AnorthositeIgneous8254.9744.7592.475.29
Tigerton Rapalivi GraniteIgneous8 Complex Demagnetization
Mountain GraniteIgneous840.7251.15103.3328.98
Big Falls Granite Igneous8 Complex Demagnetization
Keshena Falls GraniteIgneous8121.49−56.9392.5732.35
Badgley Rapids MangeriteIgneous8328.05−30.0491.1176.25
Hager GraniteIgneous876.3645.2693.1927.02
Rib Mountain QuartziteInlier8348.6367.0792.425.84
Wausau TurbiditeInlier8275.52−20.391.11158.9
Dells of Eau Claire RhyoliteInlier8 Complex Demagnetization
Waupee GreenstoneInlier8 Complex Demagnetization
Baldwin ConglomerateInlier813.9960.1791.11146.85
* Sample locations in Appendix A.
Table 3. Wolf River core complex?
Table 3. Wolf River core complex?
Structural FeatureWolf River ComplexCore ComplexComment
Antiformal domeNoYes
Detachment MyloniteNoYes
Syn-uplift IntrusionsNoYesWRB intruded Penokean crust
Pristine Upper PlateNoYesWRB upper plate rocks are quartzite
Upper Plate Runout?Yes?NoIf true, 1–100 km
Tectonic Setting (km from margin)1000 km500 km
Many MCC, margin-parallel?NoYes
Synorogenic Strata?YesNoBaldwin Conglomerate and Sibley Group have 1460 Ma detrital zircons.
Roof Pendants, Xenoliths, and Inliers?YesNoWRB inliers are vertical, oriented ~E-W
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Craddock, J.P.; Malone, D.H.; Craddock, E.P.; Baumann, S.J.; Malone, J.E.; Porter, R. Deformation of the “Anorogenic” Wolf River Batholith, Wisconsin, USA: Understanding the Baraboo Orogeny Hinterland. Geosciences 2025, 15, 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15040150

AMA Style

Craddock JP, Malone DH, Craddock EP, Baumann SJ, Malone JE, Porter R. Deformation of the “Anorogenic” Wolf River Batholith, Wisconsin, USA: Understanding the Baraboo Orogeny Hinterland. Geosciences. 2025; 15(4):150. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15040150

Chicago/Turabian Style

Craddock, John P., David H. Malone, Erica P. Craddock, Steven J. Baumann, John E. Malone, and Ryan Porter. 2025. "Deformation of the “Anorogenic” Wolf River Batholith, Wisconsin, USA: Understanding the Baraboo Orogeny Hinterland" Geosciences 15, no. 4: 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15040150

APA Style

Craddock, J. P., Malone, D. H., Craddock, E. P., Baumann, S. J., Malone, J. E., & Porter, R. (2025). Deformation of the “Anorogenic” Wolf River Batholith, Wisconsin, USA: Understanding the Baraboo Orogeny Hinterland. Geosciences, 15(4), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15040150

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop