The Role of Relative Deprivation and Attribution Style in the Relationship between Organizational Fairness and Employees’ Service Innovation Behavior
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development
2.1. Organizational Fairness and Service Innovation Behavior
2.2. Mediation Effect of Relative Deprivation
2.3. Moderation Effect of Attribution Style
2.4. Moderated Mediating Effect of Attribution Style
3. Methodology
3.1. Data Collection and Research Objects
3.2. Sociodemographic Data
4. Analysis and Results
4.1. Reliability and Validity Test
4.2. Correlation Analysis
4.3. Hypothesis Testing
4.3.1. Testing of Main Effect
4.3.2. Intermediary Effect Testing
4.3.3. Moderation Effect Testing
4.3.4. Moderated Mediating Effect Testing
5. Conclusions and Discussion
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Discussion
5.2.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2.2. Management Implications
5.2.3. Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dai, R.; Feng, H.; Hu, J.; Jin, Q.; Li, H.; Wang, R.; Wang, R.; Xu, L.; Zhang, X. The impact of COVID-19 on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Evidence from two-wave phone surveys in China. China Econ. Rev. 2021, 67, 101607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mcdermott, C.M.; Prajogo, D.I. Service innovation and performance in SMEs. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2012, 32, 216–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, B.; Liu, L.; Wang, X. Study on the Impact of Customer Participation on Service Innovation Behavior of Employees—The Mediating Role of Information Sharing and the Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Soft Sci. 2021, 35, 109–115. [Google Scholar]
- Jung, H.S.; Yoon, H.H. Improving front-line service employees’ innovative behavior using conflict management in the hospitality industry: The mediating role of engagement. Tour. Manag. 2018, 69, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, L.; Liu, B.; Song, Y.; Li, Y. The Effect of Service-oriented High-performance Work System on Employee Service Innovative. J. Manag. Sci. 2019, 32, 16–27. [Google Scholar]
- Song, P.; Long, L. From passive to active: The effect of shared leadership on employee taking charge behavior and its mechanisms. J. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag. 2020, 34, 11–20. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, M.; Luo, T.; Tian, Y. The Effects of Open Innovation Based on Mergers and Acquisitions on Innovative Behavior of Enterprises: Evidence from Chinese Listed Enterprises. Front. Psychol. 2022, 12, 794531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, S.; Dhar, R. Employee service innovative behavior: The roles of leader-member exchange (LMX), work engagement, and job autonomy. Int. J. Manpow. 1980, 38, 242–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Qiu, Z. Perceived Overqualification and Innovative Behavior: High-Order Moderating Effects of Length of Service. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, P.; Bhatnagar, J.; Gupta, R.; Wadsworth, W. How work–family enrichment influence innovative work behavior: Role of psychological capital and supervisory support. J. Manag. Organ. 2019, 25, 58–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.; Lu, R.; Peng, L. Research on the Relationships Between Work Motivation, Perceived Self-efficacy and Employees’ Individual Innovation Behavior in Chinese Service Industry. R D Manag. 2009, 21, 42–49. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, L.; Guan, X.; Catherine, M. The Effect of Individual and Organizational Factors on Employee Innovative Behavior of Travel Service Provider. Tour. Trib. 2015, 30, 79–89. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Ye, X. The Multilevel Influence of Servant Leadership on Employee Innovative Behavior: The Role of Intra organizational Employee Navigation and Team Reflexivity. Hum. Resour. Dev. China 2020, 37, 20–32. [Google Scholar]
- Roberson, Q.M.; Stevens, C.K. Making sense of diversity in the workplace: Organizational justice and language abstraction in employees’ accounts of diversity-related incidents. J. Appl. Psychol. 2006, 91, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mccain, S.; Tsai, H.; Bellino, N. Organizational justice, employees’ ethical behavior, and job satisfaction in the casino industry. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 22, 992–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, B.; Li, L.; Xia, F.; Gong, S.; Liu, M.; Wang, X. Organizational Fairness and Rural Preschool Teachers’ Job Burnout: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and the Moderation Role of Family Support. J. Psychol. Sci. 2022, 43, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
- Cremer, D.D. Procedural and distributive justice effects moderated by organizational identification. J. Manag. Psychol. 2005, 20, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hur, W.M.; Sang, I.P.; Moon, T.W. The moderating roles of organizational justice on the relationship between emotional exhaustion and organizational loyalty in airline services. J. Serv. Mark. 2014, 28, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.; Zhu, L.; Ye, B. The Impact of Workplace Friendship on Employees’ Service Innovative Behavior: An Empirical Study on the Convention and Exhibition Industry. Tour. Trib. 2022, 37, 124–136. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z. Moderating Effect of Servant Leadership on the Motivation Mechanism of Organizational Innovation Climate Affecting Employees’ Innovation Behavior. J. South China Norm. Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2020, 6, 127–141. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, R.L.; Choi, S.B.; Kang, S.W. How Leaders’ Positive Feedback Influences Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Voice Behavior and Job Autonomy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1901. [Google Scholar]
- Nazir, S.; Shafi, A.; Atif, M.M.; Qun, W.; Abdullah, S.M. How organization justice and perceived organizational support facilitate employees’ innovative behavior at work. Empl. Relat. 2019, 41, 1288–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Yu, C.; Zhang, J. The Dual Mediating Paths from Organizational Justice to Entrepreneurial Team Creativity: Based on the Perspective of Social loafing and Team Efficacy. Sci. Technol. Prog. Policy 2021, 38, 137–144. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, G. The Study on Relationship between Employees’ Sense of Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Private Enterprises. Energy Procedia 2011, 5, 2030–2034. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q.; Li, E. Influence Mechanism of Organizational Justice Perception on Unsafe Behavior of Miners. Saf. Coal Mines 2019, 50, 244–248. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, D.; Guo, Y. Relative Deprivation: Wanting, Deserving, Resentment for not Having. J. Psychol. Sci. 2016, 39, 714–719. [Google Scholar]
- Kool, M.; Dierendonck, V. Servant leadership and commitment to change, the mediating role of justice and optimism. J. Organ. Change Manag. 2012, 25, 22–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benenson, J.F.; Christakos, B.A. The Greater Fragility of Females’ Versus Males’ Closest Same-Sex Friendships. Child Dev. 2003, 74, 1123–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, A. Relative Deprivation and Social Adaption: The Role of Mediator and Moderator. Acta Psychol. Sin. 2012, 44, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Yu, C.; Li, Y. The Relationship among Proactive Personality, Knowledge Sharing and Employee’s Innovation Behavior. Manag. Rev. 2016, 28, 123–133. [Google Scholar]
- Kleysen, R.F.; Street, C.T. Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. J. Intellect. Cap. 2001, 2, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, S.G.; Bruce, R.A. Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad. Manag. J. 1994, 37, 580–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenberg, J. Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. J. Manag. 1990, 16, 399–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asim, F.M.; Norashikin, M. The effects of organizational justice on workplace deviance and job satisfaction of employees: Evidence from a public sector hospital of Pakistan. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2015, 6, 342–352. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, W.; Jin, X.; Tan, S. Study on the Effect of the Labor Dispatched Employees’ Organizational Justice on Job Burnout—Based on the Psychological Capital as Mediating Variable. Econ. Manag. J. 2014, 36, 88–96. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, W.; Yang, J.; Fu, J. The Influences of Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Justice on Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Cynicism. Chin. J. Manag. 2015, 12, 530–537. [Google Scholar]
- Moorman, R.H. Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship? J. Appl. Psychol. 1991, 76, 845–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walumbwa, F.O.; Cropanzano, R.; Hartnell, C.A. Organizational justice, voluntary learning behavior, and job performance: A test of the mediating effects of identification and leader-member exchange. J. Organ. Behav. 2010, 30, 1103–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kizony, R.; Zeiling, G.; Krasovsky, T.; Bondi, M.; Weiss, P.L.; Kodesh, E.; Kafri, M. Using virtual reality simulation to study navigation in a complex environment as a functional-cognitive task; A pilot study. J. Vestib. Res. 2017, 27, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, A.; Sun, Y.; Xie, J.; Guo, H. A Review on Relationships between Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Justice. Chin. J. Manag. 2020, 17, 623–632. [Google Scholar]
- Fox, S.; Spector, P.E.; Miles, D. Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. J. Vocat. Behav. 2001, 59, 291–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jean-Marc, B.A.; Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. Relative deprivation in Tanzania: Relative concerns and empathy. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2022, 198, 398–408. [Google Scholar]
- He, W.; Chen, L. The Impact of Relative Deprivation on Cyber loafing: Based on the Mediating and Moderating Effect of Emotional Exhaustion and Time Stress. Nankai Bus. Rev. 2022, 25, 214–226. [Google Scholar]
- Schunk, D.H.; Maria, D.K. Motivation and social cognitive theory. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1987, 12, 169–171. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Lu, H.; Yang, N.; Tan, L. The New Perspective of Organizational Justice: The Perspectives of Resource Allocation Norm and Compensation Theory. Chin. J. Manag. 2018, 15, 837–846. [Google Scholar]
- Mehdad, A.; Khoshnami, A. Relationship between perceived organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Mediating role of organizational loyalty. Int. J. Psychol. 2016, 51, 767. [Google Scholar]
- Noon, M. News from behind my hand: Gossip in organizations. Organ. Stud. 1993, 14, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bufford, R.K. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory—Bandura, A.J. Psychol. Theol. 1986, 14, 341–342. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C. Reform-oriented Leaders and the Performance of Team with Knowledge: The Role of Psychological Capital and Sense of Organizational Justice. J. Shandong Univ. (Philos. Soc. Sci.) 2017, 6, 112–120. [Google Scholar]
- Kawakami, K.; Dion, K.L. Social Identity and Affect as Determinants of Collective Action—Toward an Integration of Relative Deprivation and Social Identity Theories. Theory Psychol. 1995, 5, 551–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Q.; Tang, Y.; Wei, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Z. The relationship between relative deprivation and online gaming addiction in college students: A moderated mediation model. Acta Psychol. Sin. 2018, 50, 1041–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tedeschi, J.T. Power, coercive actions, and aggression. Int. Rev. Sociol. 1993, 4, 183–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seligman, M.E.; Abramson, L.Y.; Semmel, A.; Baeyer, C. Depressive attributional style. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 1979, 88, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, A. New Advances in Attributional Theory. Educ. Res. Exp. 2003, 1, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
- Muramoto, Y.; Yamaguchi, S.; Kim, U. Perception of achievement attribution in individual and group contexts: Comparative analysis of Japanese, Korean, and Asian-American results. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 2, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tobar, B.L. Psychological intervention for detecting and managing attributional styles in two motorized sports: Rally and competitive karting. Rev. Psicol. Deporte 2008, 17, 205–219. [Google Scholar]
- Ambrose, M.L.; Schmlnke, M. The Role of Overall Justice Judgments in Organizational Justice Research: A Test of Mediation. J. Appl. Psychol. 2009, 94, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cho, B.; Lee, D.; Kim, K. How Does Relative Deprivation Influence Employee Intention to Leave a Merged Company? The Role of Organizational Identification. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2014, 53, 421–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lefcourt, H.M.; Baeyer, C.L.; Ware, E.E.; Cox, D.J. The multidimensional-multiattributional causality scale: The development of a goal specific locus of control scale. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 1979, 11, 286–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Ma, Q.; Zhao, Z. A Study on the Cause and Effect Variables of Relative Deprivation of Rural Tourism Residents: An Individual-Based Psychological Perspective. Hum. Geogr. 2020, 35, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
- Martinko, M.J.; Harvey, P.; Sikora, D.; Douglas, S.C. Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates’ attribution styles. Leadersh. Q. 2011, 22, 751–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Ye, H.; Ye, Y.; Xiong, M. The Relationship between the Sense of Belonging, Relative Deprivation and Aggressive Behavior of Migrant Children in School. Chin. J. Clin. Psychol. 2021, 29, 986–990. [Google Scholar]
- Folger, R.; Martin, C. Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 22, 531–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cropanzano, R.; Randall, M.L. Advance notice as a means of reducing relative deprivation. Soc. Justice Res. 1995, 8, 217–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zagefka, H.; Binder, J.; Brown, R.; Hancock, L. Who is to blame? The relationship between ingroup identification and relative deprivation is moderated by ingroup attributions. Soc. Psychol. 2014, 44, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Mao, Y.; Liang, B.; Wang, M. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Resilience in the Background of COVID-19. Hum. Resour. Dev. China 2020, 37, 35–47. [Google Scholar]
Constructs | Items | Std. Estimate | z (CR) | Cronbach’s α | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organizational fairness | Z1 | 0.923 | 0.923 | 0.92 | 0.857 |
Z2 | 0.921 | ||||
Z3 | 0.938 | ||||
Z4 | 0.943 | ||||
Z5 | 0.912 | ||||
Z6 | 0.917 | ||||
Relative deprivation | X1 | 0.881 | 0.876 | 0.866 | 0.759 |
X2 | 0.852 | ||||
X3 | 0.887 | ||||
X4 | 0.864 | ||||
Service innovation behavior | F1 | 0.898 | 0.895 | 0.883 | 0.682 |
F2 | 0.88 | ||||
F3 | 0.693 | ||||
F4 | 0.818 | ||||
Internal attribution style | W1 | 0.812 | 0.773 | 0.77 | 0.552 |
W2 | 0.683 | ||||
W3 | 0.758 | ||||
W4 | 0.712 | ||||
External attribution style | N1 | 0.831 | 0.719 | 0.723 | 0.534 |
N2 | 0.723 | ||||
N3 | 0.667 | ||||
N4 | 0.691 |
Average Value | SD | Gender | Age | Education | Working Years | Organizational Fairness | Relative Deprivation | Service Innovation Behavior | Internal Attribution Style | External Attribution Style | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | 1.482 | 0.501 | |||||||||
Age | 2.68 | 1.217 | 0.105 | ||||||||
Education | 3.194 | 0.694 | 0.107 | 0.327 | |||||||
Working years | 2.755 | 0.879 | 0.053 | 0.271 ** | 0.123 ** | ||||||
Organizational fairness | 3.536 | 0.989 | −0.007 | −0.029 | 0.042 | −0.081 | 0.925 | ||||
Relative deprivation | 2.564 | 0.989 | 0.021 | 0.247 | −0.027 | 0.169 | −0.923 ** | 0.871 | |||
Service innovation behavior | 3.481 | 1.045 | 0.017 | −0.092 | −0.055 | −0.176 ** | 0.846 ** | −0.846 ** | 0.826 | ||
Internal attribution style | 2.404 | 0.821 | 0.031 | 0.123 | −0.009 | 0.05 | 0.035 | 0.076 | 0.019 | 0.743 | |
External attribution style | 3.76 | 0.708 | 0.065 | −0.185 ** | −0.056 | −0.144 * | 0.406 ** | −0.329 ** | 0.407 ** | −0.320 ** | 0.731 |
X | → | Y | Non-Standardized Path | SE | z (CR) | p | Standardized Path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organizational fairness | → | Relative deprivation | −0.88 | 0.038 | −23.421 | 0 | −0.923 |
Organizational fairness | → | Service innovation behavior | 0.446 | 0.137 | 3.258 | 0.001 | 0.439 |
Relative deprivation | → | Service innovation behavior | −0.47 | 0.144 | −3.269 | 0.001 | −0.441 |
Service Innovation Behavior | Relative Deprivation | Service Innovation Behavior | |
---|---|---|---|
Constant | 0.442 * (2.366) | 5.686 ** (44.940) | 3.111 ** (3.664) |
Organizational fairness | 0.859 ** (15.324) | −0.880 ** (−23.174) | 0.446 ** (3.207) |
Relative deprivation | −0.469 ** (−3.215) | ||
R 2 | 0.716 | 0.852 | 0.745 |
Adjust R2 | 0.713 | 0.851 | 0.739 |
F | F (1,93) = 234.815, p = 0.000 | F (1,93) = 537.018, p = 0.000 | F (2,92) = 134.365, p = 0.000 |
Path | c Total Effect | a | b | a × b | a × b (Boot SE) | a × b (z) | a × b (p) | a × b (95% BootCI) | c’ | Test Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organizational fairness →Relative deprivation →Service innovation behavior | 0.859 ** | −0.880 ** | −0.469 ** | 0.413 | 0.151 | 2.742 | 0.006 | 0.018 ~ 0.666 | 0.446 ** | Partial mediation |
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | t | p | β | B | SE | t | p | β | B | SE | t | p | β | |
Constant | 3.137 | 0.063 | 49.705 | 0.000 ** | - | 3.137 | 0.061 | 51.16 | 0.000 ** | - | 3.087 | 0.064 | 48.386 | 0.000 ** | - |
Relative deprivation | −0.902 | 0.059 | −15.329 | 0.000 ** | −0.846 | −0.851 | 0.061 | −14.063 | 0.000 ** | −0.799 | −0.848 | 0.059 | −14.33 | 0.000 ** | −0.796 |
External attribution style | 0.28 | 0.11 | 2.555 | 0.012 * | 0.145 | 0.399 | 0.119 | 3.352 | 0.001 ** | 0.207 | |||||
Relative deprivation * External attribution style | −0.241 | 0.105 | −2.298 | 0.024 * | −0.135 | ||||||||||
R 2 | 0.716 | 0.735 | 0.75 | ||||||||||||
Adjust R 2 | 0.713 | 0.729 | 0.742 | ||||||||||||
F | F (1,93) = 234.975, p = 0.000 | F (2,92) = 127.732, p = 0.000 | F (3,91) = 90.880, p = 0.000 | ||||||||||||
ΔR 2 | 0.716 | 0.019 | 0.015 | ||||||||||||
ΔF | F (1,93) = 234.975, p = 0.000 | F (1,92) = 6.526, p = 0.012 | F (1,91) = 5.283, p = 0.024 |
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | t | p | β | B | SE | t | p | β | B | SE | t | p | β | |
Constant | 3.137 | 0.063 | 49.705 | 0.000 ** | - | 3.137 | 0.063 | 50.06 | 0.000 ** | - | 3.118 | 0.058 | 54.03 | 0.000 ** | - |
Relative deprivation | −0.902 | 0.059 | −15.329 | 0.000 ** | −0.846 | −0.908 | 0.059 | −15.51 | 0.000 ** | −0.853 | −0.913 | 0.054 | −16.966 | 0.000 ** | −0.857 |
Internal attribution style | 0.126 | 0.083 | 1.527 | 0.13 | 0.084 | 0.003 | 0.081 | 0.041 | 0.968 | 0.002 | |||||
Relative deprivation * Internal attribution style | 0.304 | 0.071 | 4.255 | 0.000 ** | 0.229 | ||||||||||
R 2 | 0.716 | 0.723 | 0.769 | ||||||||||||
Adjust R 2 | 0.713 | 0.717 | 0.762 | ||||||||||||
F | F (1,93) = 234.975, p = 0.000 | F (2,92) = 120.338, p = 0.000 | F (3,91) = 101.175, p = 0.000 | ||||||||||||
ΔR 2 | 0.716 | 0.007 | 0.046 | ||||||||||||
ΔF | F (1,93) = 234.975, p = 0.000 | F (1,92) = 2.333, p = 0.130 | F (1,91) = 18.104, p = 0.000 |
Intermediary Variable | Level | Level Value | Effect | BootSE | BootLLCI | BootULCI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Relative deprivation | Low level (−1SD) | 3.095 | 0.283 | 0.199 | −0.098 | 0.681 |
Average level | 3.689 | 0.42 | 0.153 | 0.12 | 0.732 | |
High level (1SD) | 4.284 | 0.556 | 0.141 | 0.256 | 0.844 |
Intermediary Variable | Level | Level Value | Effect | BootSE | BootLLCI | BootULCI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Relative deprivation | Low level (−1SD) | 1.582 | 0.726 | 0.192 | 0.308 | 1.063 |
Average level | 2.347 | 0.545 | 0.172 | 0.119 | 0.815 | |
High level (1SD) | 3.113 | 0.363 | 0.191 | −0.119 | 0.64 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, Z.; Liang, W.; Bao, Y.; Zhang, R. The Role of Relative Deprivation and Attribution Style in the Relationship between Organizational Fairness and Employees’ Service Innovation Behavior. Behav. Sci. 2022, 12, 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12120506
Li Z, Liang W, Bao Y, Zhang R. The Role of Relative Deprivation and Attribution Style in the Relationship between Organizational Fairness and Employees’ Service Innovation Behavior. Behavioral Sciences. 2022; 12(12):506. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12120506
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Zhao, Wangbing Liang, Yinggang Bao, and Ruili Zhang. 2022. "The Role of Relative Deprivation and Attribution Style in the Relationship between Organizational Fairness and Employees’ Service Innovation Behavior" Behavioral Sciences 12, no. 12: 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12120506
APA StyleLi, Z., Liang, W., Bao, Y., & Zhang, R. (2022). The Role of Relative Deprivation and Attribution Style in the Relationship between Organizational Fairness and Employees’ Service Innovation Behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 12(12), 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12120506