Research on Determinants Affecting Users’ Impulsive Purchase Intention in Live Streaming from the Perspective of Perceived Live Streamers’ Ability
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Interaction
2.2. Affective Distance
2.3. Trust Theory
2.4. Aristotle’s Rhetorical Appeals
2.5. Impulsive Purchase Intention
3. Research Model and Hypotheses
3.1. Construction of Theoretical Framework
3.2. Research Hypotheses
3.2.1. Trust and Impulsive Purchase Intention
- (1)
- Affective trust and impulsive purchase intention
- (2)
- Cognitive trust and affective trust
3.2.2. Affective Distance
- (1)
- Affective distance and Affective trust
- (2)
- Affective distance and impulsive purchase intention
3.2.3. Affective Trust as Mediator
3.2.4. Perceived Live Interaction Ability
- (1)
- Responsiveness
- (2)
- Entertainment
- (3)
- Personalization
3.2.5. Perceived Linguistic Persuasion Ability
- (1)
- Emotional contagion
- (2)
- Expertise
- (3)
- Logic
- (4)
- Morality
3.3. Research Model
4. Research Methods
4.1. Measures
- (1)
- Perceived live streamers’ ability
- (2)
- Affective distance
- (3)
- Cognitive trust and affective trust
- (4)
- Impulsive purchase intention
4.2. Data Collection and Samples
5. Results Analysis and Hypothesis Testing
5.1. Assessment of Measurement Model
5.2. Hypothesis Testing
6. Discussion and Implications
6.1. Discussion
6.2. Theoretical Implications
6.3. Practical Implications
6.4. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- The 52nd Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. Available online: https://www.cnnic.net.cn/NMediaFile/2023/0908/MAIN1694151810549M3LV0UWOAV.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2023).
- China Online Performance (Live and Short Video) Industry Development Report (2022–2023). Available online: https://m.mp.oeeee.com/a/BAAFRD000020230517798029.html (accessed on 17 May 2023).
- Live E-Commerce Shopping Consumer Satisfaction Online Survey Report. Available online: https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_6799987 (accessed on 2 April 2020).
- Lee, C.-H.; Chen, C.-W. Impulse Buying Behaviors in Live Streaming Commerce Based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework. Information 2021, 12, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, B.; Chen, Z. Live streaming commerce and consumers’ purchase intention: An uncertainty reduction perspective. Inf. Manag. 2021, 58, 103509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, J.; Wohn, D.Y.; Mittal, A.; Sureshbabu, D. Utilitarian and Hedonic Motivations for Live Streaming Shopping. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (ACM TVX), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 26–28 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Chan, T.K.H.; Cheung, C.M.K.; Lee, Z.W.Y. The state of online impulse-buying research: A literature analysis. Inf. Manag. 2017, 54, 204–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Zhang, Y.H. Empirical study on information quality influencing factors based on network user experience and perception. J. China Soc. Sci. Tech. Inf. 2013, 32, 663–672. Available online: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-QBXB201306012.htm (accessed on 1 June 2023).
- Parboteeah, D.V.; Valacich, J.S.; Wells, J.D. The Influence of Website Characteristics on a Consumer’s Urge to Buy Impulsively. Inf. Syst. Res. 2009, 20, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Qin, F.; Wang, G.A.; Luo, C. The impact of live video streaming on online purchase intention. Serv. Ind. J. 2020, 40, 656–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, L. How to retain customers: Understanding the role of trust in live streaming commerce with a socio-technical perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2022, 127, 107052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, H.; Cheng, S.; Zhou, W.; Yu, S.; Lin, X. A Study on the Impact of Linguistic Persuasive Styles on the Sales Volume of Live Streaming Products in Social E-Commerce Environment. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, K.; Lu, J.; Guo, L.; Li, W. The dynamic effect of interactivity on customer engagement behavior through tie strength: Evidence from live streaming commerce platforms. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 56, 102251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Zou, X.; Lv, J. Why do consumers hesitate to purchase in live streaming? A perspective of interaction between participants. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2022, 55, 101193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.-Y.M.; Mun, J.M.; Johnson, K.K.P. In-store mobile usage: Downloading and usage intention toward mobile location-based retail apps. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 46, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Lu, Y.; Gupta, S.; Zhao, L. What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Inf. Manag. 2014, 51, 1017–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bronstein, J. Like me! Analyzing the 2012 presidential candidates’ Facebook pages. Online. Inform. Rev. 2013, 37, 173–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.-B.; Lee, H.; Lee, K.; Koo, C. The application of Aristotle’s rhetorical theory to the sharing economy: An empirical study of Airbnb. J. Travel. Tour. Mark. 2018, 35, 938–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Fang, J.; Yang, L.; Han, L.; Hossin, M.A.; Wen, C. The power of talk: Exploring the effects of streamers’ linguistic styles on sales performance in B2B livestreaming commerce. Inf. Process. Manag. 2023, 60, 103259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhagen, T.; van Dolen, W. The influence of online store beliefs on consumer online impulse buying: A model and empirical application. Inf. Manag. 2011, 48, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, X.; Cai, J. How attachment affects user stickiness on live streaming platforms: A socio-technical approach perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 60, 102478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dholakia, U.M. Temptation and resistance: An integrated model of consumption impulse formation and enactment. Psychol. Market. 2000, 17, 955–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, K.N.; Khalifa, M. System design effects on online impulse buying. Internet. Res. 2012, 22, 396–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, B.; Fan, W.; Zhou, M. Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 56, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Park, H. Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Lu, Y.; Wang, B.; Pan, Z. How do product recommendations affect impulse buying? An empirical study on WeChat social commerce. Inf. Manag. 2019, 56, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Whitla, P. How negative celebrity publicity influences consumer attitudes: The mediating role of moral reputation. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, J.-H.; Zhu, Y.-Q.; Wang, S.-H.; Li, Y.-J. Would you change your mind? An empirical study of social impact theory on Facebook. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Xu, X.-Y.; Tayyab, S.M.U.; Li, Q. How the live streaming commerce viewers process the persuasive message: An ELM perspective and the moderating effect of mindfulness. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2021, 49, 101087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, N.; Dash, S.B.; Mookerjee, A. Determinants of brand trust in high inherent risk products The moderating role of education and working status. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2016, 34, 394–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burton, S.; Soboleva, A. Interactive or reactive? Marketing with Twitter. J. Consum. Mark. 2011, 28, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, J.; Liang, X.; Xie, T.; Wang, H. See now, act now: How to interact with customers to enhance social commerce engagement? Inf. Manag. 2020, 57, 103324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, S.M.; Lee, J.K.; Ferle, C.L. Does place matter when shopping online? Perceptions of similarity and familiarity as indicators of psychological distance. J. Int. Advert. 2009, 10, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez-Ortega, B. Don’t believe strangers: Online consumer reviews and the role of social psychological distance. Inf. Manag. 2018, 55, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, S. Understanding user participation from the perspective of psychological ownership: The moderating role of social distance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 105, 106207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickert, S.; Sagara, N.; Slovic, P. Affective Motivations to Help Others: A Two-stage Model of Donation Decisions. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 2011, 24, 361–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, R.J.; Diener, E. Affect Intensity as An Individual Difference Characteristic—A Review. J. Res. Pers. 1987, 21, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Liang, H.; Qian, C. Studying Investment Decisions of Rewarded Crowdfunding Users with Emotional Distance and Text Analysis. Data. Ana. Kno. Dis. 2021, 5, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.L.; Starbird, K.; Orand, M.; Stanek, S.A.; Pedersen, H.T. Connected Through Crisis: Emotional Proximity and the Spread of Misinformation Online. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 14–18 March 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Darke, P.R.; Brady, M.K.; Benedicktus, R.L.; Wilson, A.E. Feeling Close from Afar: The Role of Psychological Distance in Offsetting Distrust in Unfamiliar Online Retailers. J. Retailing. 2016, 92, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altman, I.; Taylor, D.A. Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships; Holt, Rinehart & Winston: Toronto, ON, Canada, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Debrot, A.; Schoebi, D.; Perrez, M.; Horn, A.B. Touch as an Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Process in Couples’ Daily Lives: The Mediating Role of Psychological Intimacy. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 2013, 39, 1373–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ming, J.; Jianqiu, Z.; Bilal, M.; Akram, U.; Fan, M. How social presence influences impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce? The role of S-O-R theory. Int. J. Web. Inf. Syst. 2021, 17, 300–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.K.O.; Turban, E. A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. Int. J. Electron. Comm. 2001, 6, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McAllister, D.J. Affect-Based and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Acad. Manage. J. 1995, 38, 24–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, D.; Grayson, K. Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. J. Bus. Res. 2005, 58, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moorman, C.; Deshpande, R.; Zaltman, G. Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationship. J. Mark. 1993, 57, 81–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.Z.K.; Cheung, C.M.K.; Lee, M.K.O. Examining the moderating effect of inconsistent reviews and its gender differences on consumers’ online shopping decision. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2014, 34, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, L.; Duan, S.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, K.; Chen, S. The impact of online celebrity in livestreaming E-commerce on purchase intention from the perspective of emotional contagion. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 63, 102733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tirdatov, I. Web-Based Crowd Funding: Rhetoric of Success. Tech. Commun-Stc. 2014, 61, 3–24. Available online: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2014/00000061/00000001/art00002 (accessed on 1 February 2023).
- Reniers, R.L.E.P.; Corcoran, R.; Drake, R.; Shryane, N.M.; Voellm, B.A. The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. J. Pers. Assess. 2011, 93, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, L.J. Mitigating Psychological Reactance: The Role of Message-Induced Empathy in Persuasion. Hum. Commun. Res. 2010, 36, 397–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Applebaum, W. Studying customer behavior in retail stores. J. Mark. 1951, 16, 172–178. Available online: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002224295101600204?journalCode=jmxa (accessed on 1 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.-C.; Yao, J.-Y. What drives impulse buying behaviors in a mobile auction? The perspective of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 1249–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kimiagari, S.; Malafe, N.S.A. The role of cognitive and affective responses in the relationship between internal and external stimuli on online impulse buying behavior. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 61, 102567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, E.; Liu, J.; Li, K. Exploring the mechanism of live streaming e-commerce anchors’ language appeals on users’ purchase intention. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1109092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rook, D.W. THE BUYING IMPULSE. J. Consum. Res. 1987, 14, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adelaar, T.; Chang, S.; Lancendorfer, K.M.; Lee, B.; Morimoto, M. Effects of media formats on emotions and impulse buying intent. J. Inf. Technol. 2003, 18, 247–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Li, H.X.; Hu, F. Website attributes in urging online impulse purchase: An empirical investigation on consumer perceptions. Decis. Support. Syst. 2013, 55, 829–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sjoblom, M.; Torhonen, M.; Hamari, J.; Macey, J. The ingredients of Twitch streaming: Affordances of game streams. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 92, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.-C.; Lin, Y.-C. What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Zhu, C. Modeling and Quantifying the Impact of Personified Communication on Purchase Behavior in Social Commerce. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Hu, X.; Lu, J.; Ma, L. Effects of customer trust on engagement in live streaming commerce: Mediating role of swift guanxi. Internet. Res. 2021, 31, 1718–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Tractinsky, N.; Vitale, M. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Inform. Technol. Mange. 2000, 1, 45–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wongkitrungrueng, A.; Assarut, N. The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosshart, L.; Macconi, I. Defining “Entertainment”. Commun. Res. Trends. 1998, 18, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, C.-L.; Chang, K.-C.; Chen, M.-C. The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intention: Perceived playfulness and perceived flow as mediators. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 2012, 10, 549–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Yao, D.; Chen, X. Happiness Begets Money: Emotion and Engagement in Live Streaming. J. Mark. Res. 2021, 58, 417–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelman, H.C. PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE*. Public. Opin. Q. 1961, 25, 57–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y. Elucidating determinants of customer satisfaction with live-stream shopping: An extension of the information systems success model. Telemat. Inform. 2021, 65, 101707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M. Parasocial Interactions in Digital Tourism: Attributes of Live Streamers and Viewer Engagement Dynamics in South Korea. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, W.; Mao, J. Exploring the Influential Factors of Personal Media Bloggers on Followers’ Continuous Following Intention Based on Relationship Marketing Theory. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, S.I.; Lee, K.Y.; Yang, S.-B. How do uncertainty reduction strategies influence social networking site fan page visiting? Examining the role of uncertainty reduction strategies, loyalty and satisfaction in continuous visiting behavior. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 449–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Cenfetelli, R.T.; Aquino, K. Do different kinds of trust matter? An examination of the three trusting beliefs on satisfaction and purchase behavior in the buyer-seller context. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2016, 25, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, S.; Cha, S.Y.; Park, C.; Lee, I.; Kim, J. Getting closer and experiencing together: Antecedents and consequences of psychological distance in social media-enhanced real-time streaming video. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 1365–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruen, T.W.; Summers, J.O.; Acito, F. Relationship marketing activities, commitment, and membership behaviors in professional associations. J. Mark. 2000, 64, 34–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barclay, D.; Thompson, R.; Higgins, C. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Use as an Illustration. Technol. Stud. 1995, 2. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242663837_The_Partial_Least_Squares_PLS_Approach_to_Causal_Modeling_Personal_Computer_Use_as_an_Illustration (accessed on 1 January 2023).
- Chin, W.W. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 1998, 295–336. Available online: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-07269-010 (accessed on 1 January 2023).
- Cassel, C.; Hackl, P.; Westlund, A.H. Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures. J. Appl. Stat. 1999, 26, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.W.; Marcolin, B.L.; Newsted, P.R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Res. 2003, 14, 189–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Research, i. Report on Big Data analysis and trend research of China’s live streaming e-commerce industry in 2022–2023. Available online: https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/86233.html (accessed on 24 June 2022).
- Weiboyi. China Live Streaming E-Commerce Opportunity Insight Report 2023. Available online: https://finance.sina.com.cn/wm/2023-07-26/doc-imzcyvxv8659934.shtml (accessed on 26 July 2023).
- Fornell, C.; Bookstein, F.L. 2 Structural Equation Models—LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. J. Mark. Res. 1982, 19, 440–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Aristotle’s Rhetorical Appeals | Constructs | Definition |
---|---|---|
Ethos | Morality | Live streamers’ ability to illustrate their moral quality and shape honest images through linguistic expression [27]. |
Expertise | Live streamers’ knowledge and ability correlated to commodity trading conveyed by linguistic expression [46]. | |
Logos | Logic | Live streamers’ ability to provide a complete presentation structure and straightforward demonstration process through logical argument [17,28]. |
Pathos | Emotional contagion | Live streamers’ ability to convey emotions via linguistic expression and cause emotional resonance in consumers [51,52]. |
Constructs | Items | Measurement | References |
---|---|---|---|
Responsiveness (RP) | RP1 | The live streamer is pleased to have conversations with me. | Xue et al. [32] |
RP2 | The live streamer can swiftly reply to my questions. | ||
RP3 | The live streamer’s responses are tightly associated with my questions. | ||
RP4 | The live streamer can instantly provide pertinent information according to my questions. | ||
Entertainment (ET) | ET1 | The live streamer launches an exciting spike activity to attract me to interact with him. | Xue et al. [32] |
ET2 | The live streamer explains the product details interestingly, including funny ways of utilizing it. | ||
ET3 | In the live streaming room, I enjoy shopping by entertaining social activities related to the products or services with streamers. | ||
Personalization (PI) | PI1 | The live streamer will provide me with professional advice based on my product browsing. | Xue et al. [32] |
PI2 | The live streamer will pay attention to my requirements for products and services. | ||
PI3 | The live streamer will satisfy me with unique product recommendations that align with my requirements. | ||
Emotional contagion (EC) | EC1 | In live streaming, what the live streamer says can move my emotions. | Reniers et al. and Shen [51,52] |
EC2 | In live streaming, streamers’ words can touch me. | ||
EC3 | In live streaming, streamers’ words can make me feel the same emotions she/he does. | ||
Expertise (EP) | EP1 | The live streamer recommends goods or services with detailed explanations, making it seem like he/she is knowledgeable. | Johnson and Grayson [46] |
EP2 | The live streamer recommends goods or services in fluent language and makes it seem like he/she understands the product. | ||
EP3 | The live streamer uses specialized vocabulary during the live broadcast, giving the impression that he/she is a connoisseur. | ||
Logic (LO) | LO1 | Generally speaking, the live streamer speaks with reason and evidence. | Chang [28] |
LO2 | Generally speaking, the live streamer speaks clearly. | ||
LO3 | Generally speaking, the live streamer’s speech is logical. | ||
LO4 | Generally speaking, what the live streamer says is reasonable. | ||
Morality (MO) | MO1 | The way the live streamer talks makes people think he/she is an upright person. | Zhou [27] |
MO2 | The way the live streamer talks makes people think he/she is a frank person. | ||
MO3 | The way the live streamer talks makes people feel that he/she is a sincere person. | ||
MO4 | The way the live streamer talks makes people think he/she is a friendly person. | ||
Affective distance (AD) | AD1 | In live streaming, I sense that live streamers have an affinity. | Lu et al. [24] |
AD2 | In live streaming, I sense that live streamers are likeable. | ||
AD3 | In live streaming, I sense that live streamers can resonate with my emotions. | ||
Cognitive trust (CT) | CT1 | I think streamers are professional and dedicated during live broadcasts. | McAllister [45] |
CT2 | Given the past performance of the live streamer, I have no reason to doubt their ability to live stream and promote sales. | ||
CT3 | In live streaming, I will rely on recommendations from the live streamer for shopping. | ||
CT4 | I am full of confidence in the professional ability of the live streamer. | ||
CT5 | I think most people, even if they are not fans of live streamers, trust live streamers’ professional abilities. | ||
Affective trust (AT) | AT1 | The live streamer shows a warm and caring attitude towards the audience. | Srivastava et al. [30] |
AT2 | When the audience has questions about the product, I’m convinced the live streamer will reply seriously to them. | ||
AT3 | When the audience has questions about the product, I’m convinced the live streamer will actively respond to them. | ||
AT4 | I can freely ask the live streamer questions through bullet comments and know that the live streamer is willing to view these questions. | ||
Impulsive purchase intention (IPT) | IPT1 | When I watch live e-commerce broadcasts, I have an impulse to buy items that weren’t listed in the original purchasing plan. | Parboteeah et al. [9] |
IPT2 | When I watch live e-commerce broadcasts, I possess an intense desire to buy items that weren’t listed in the original purchasing plan. | ||
IPT3 | When I watch live e-commerce broadcasts, I possess a tendency to buy items that weren’t listed in the original purchasing plan. |
Variable | Classification | Population | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 147 | 44.55% |
Female | 183 | 55.45% | |
Education | High school degree and below | 4 | 1.21% |
Bachelor’s degree | 301 | 91.21% | |
Master’s degree and above | 25 | 7.58% | |
Age | 18–25 | 95 | 28.79% |
26–35 | 182 | 55.15% | |
36–45 | 42 | 12.73% | |
>46 | 11 | 3.33% |
Constructs | Items | Loading | T-Values | CR | AVE | Cronbach’s Alpha |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Responsiveness (RP) | RP1 | 0.774 | 29.743 | 0.864 | 0.613 | 0.79 |
RP2 | 0.791 | 32.827 | ||||
RP3 | 0.803 | 34.583 | ||||
RP4 | 0.763 | 26.641 | ||||
Entertainment (ET) | ET1 | 0.835 | 31.382 | 0.885 | 0.72 | 0.807 |
ET2 | 0.837 | 34.418 | ||||
ET3 | 0.874 | 43.249 | ||||
Personalization (PI) | PI1 | 0.85 | 41.547 | 0.847 | 0.649 | 0.731 |
PI2 | 0.783 | 17.792 | ||||
PI3 | 0.782 | 24.19 | ||||
Emotional contagion (EC) | EC1 | 0.856 | 53.539 | 0.858 | 0.668 | 0.754 |
EC2 | 0.751 | 22.939 | ||||
EC3 | 0.841 | 51.693 | ||||
Expertise (EP) | EP1 | 0.892 | 48.89 | 0.908 | 0.766 | 0.849 |
EP2 | 0.841 | 32.597 | ||||
EP3 | 0.891 | 56.41 | ||||
Logic (LO) | LO1 | 0.788 | 32.248 | 0.858 | 0.603 | 0.78 |
LO2 | 0.781 | 26.372 | ||||
LO3 | 0.77 | 29.481 | ||||
LO4 | 0.766 | 27.554 | ||||
Morality (MO) | MO1 | 0.78 | 30.061 | 0.853 | 0.593 | 0.771 |
MO2 | 0.764 | 26.937 | ||||
MO3 | 0.739 | 22.212 | ||||
MO4 | 0.795 | 31.647 | ||||
Affective distance (AD) | AD1 | 0.857 | 46.799 | 0.899 | 0.747 | 0.831 |
AD2 | 0.853 | 37.358 | ||||
AD3 | 0.883 | 66.379 | ||||
Cognitive trust (CT) | CT1 | 0.716 | 27.055 | 0.858 | 0.55 | 0.793 |
CT2 | 0.829 | 43.003 | ||||
CT3 | 0.702 | 18.048 | ||||
CT4 | 0.811 | 47.115 | ||||
CT5 | 0.634 | 14.582 | ||||
Affective trust (AT) | AT1 | 0.872 | 52.957 | 0.908 | 0.712 | 0.865 |
AT2 | 0.835 | 34.585 | ||||
AT3 | 0.829 | 39.03 | ||||
AT4 | 0.839 | 40.54 | ||||
Impulsive purchase intention (IPT) | IPT1 | 0.867 | 45.118 | 0.902 | 0.754 | 0.837 |
IPT2 | 0.876 | 55.597 | ||||
IPT3 | 0.861 | 47.428 |
Constructs | RP | ET | PI | EC | EP | LO | MO | AD | CT | AT | IPT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RP | 0.783 | ||||||||||
ET | 0.426 | 0.849 | |||||||||
PI | 0.547 | 0.367 | 0.806 | ||||||||
EC | 0.476 | 0.415 | 0.399 | 0.818 | |||||||
EP | 0.397 | 0.394 | 0.431 | 0.448 | 0.875 | ||||||
LO | 0.471 | 0.429 | 0.492 | 0.548 | 0.458 | 0.776 | |||||
MO | 0.46 | 0.418 | 0.443 | 0.553 | 0.388 | 0.585 | 0.770 | ||||
AD | 0.561 | 0.441 | 0.469 | 0.552 | 0.482 | 0.631 | 0.6 | 0.865 | |||
CT | 0.501 | 0.369 | 0.451 | 0.592 | 0.432 | 0.635 | 0.544 | 0.65 | 0.742 | ||
AT | 0.497 | 0.368 | 0.438 | 0.485 | 0.401 | 0.376 | 0.386 | 0.487 | 0.466 | 0.844 | |
IPT | 0.244 | 0.297 | 0.207 | 0.464 | 0.430 | 0.276 | 0.341 | 0.359 | 0.412 | 0.564 | 0.868 |
Constructs | RP | ET | PI | EC | EP | LO | MO | AD | CT | AT | IPT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RP1 | 0.774 | 0.323 | 0.446 | 0.39 | 0.318 | 0.409 | 0.327 | 0.41 | 0.373 | 0.363 | 0.166 |
RP2 | 0.791 | 0.357 | 0.342 | 0.328 | 0.315 | 0.269 | 0.273 | 0.409 | 0.321 | 0.382 | 0.206 |
RP3 | 0.803 | 0.345 | 0.456 | 0.336 | 0.288 | 0.396 | 0.417 | 0.462 | 0.437 | 0.38 | 0.145 |
RP4 | 0.763 | 0.31 | 0.459 | 0.434 | 0.323 | 0.394 | 0.408 | 0.47 | 0.427 | 0.426 | 0.244 |
ET1 | 0.369 | 0.835 | 0.302 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.391 | 0.328 | 0.341 | 0.287 | 0.333 | 0.254 |
ET2 | 0.349 | 0.837 | 0.335 | 0.379 | 0.391 | 0.358 | 0.409 | 0.365 | 0.352 | 0.276 | 0.291 |
ET3 | 0.367 | 0.874 | 0.299 | 0.332 | 0.28 | 0.349 | 0.329 | 0.413 | 0.303 | 0.328 | 0.218 |
PI1 | 0.47 | 0.333 | 0.85 | 0.316 | 0.354 | 0.442 | 0.384 | 0.43 | 0.403 | 0.407 | 0.139 |
PI2 | 0.391 | 0.276 | 0.783 | 0.308 | 0.323 | 0.386 | 0.365 | 0.362 | 0.367 | 0.32 | 0.196 |
PI3 | 0.462 | 0.271 | 0.782 | 0.346 | 0.37 | 0.352 | 0.317 | 0.334 | 0.312 | 0.323 | 0.173 |
EC1 | 0.433 | 0.388 | 0.336 | 0.856 | 0.429 | 0.485 | 0.499 | 0.491 | 0.538 | 0.463 | 0.441 |
EC2 | 0.251 | 0.292 | 0.26 | 0.751 | 0.325 | 0.325 | 0.364 | 0.346 | 0.322 | 0.283 | 0.281 |
EC3 | 0.451 | 0.332 | 0.368 | 0.841 | 0.339 | 0.507 | 0.476 | 0.495 | 0.554 | 0.418 | 0.395 |
EP1 | 0.377 | 0.358 | 0.4 | 0.397 | 0.892 | 0.436 | 0.332 | 0.454 | 0.415 | 0.355 | 0.363 |
EP2 | 0.304 | 0.324 | 0.369 | 0.382 | 0.841 | 0.396 | 0.365 | 0.366 | 0.306 | 0.346 | 0.373 |
EP3 | 0.353 | 0.349 | 0.363 | 0.398 | 0.891 | 0.373 | 0.332 | 0.436 | 0.398 | 0.354 | 0.397 |
LO1 | 0.419 | 0.43 | 0.418 | 0.48 | 0.404 | 0.788 | 0.452 | 0.527 | 0.488 | 0.354 | 0.251 |
LO2 | 0.321 | 0.365 | 0.346 | 0.402 | 0.322 | 0.781 | 0.466 | 0.473 | 0.492 | 0.322 | 0.243 |
LO3 | 0.319 | 0.292 | 0.365 | 0.392 | 0.332 | 0.77 | 0.477 | 0.438 | 0.467 | 0.226 | 0.167 |
LO4 | 0.4 | 0.249 | 0.396 | 0.426 | 0.363 | 0.766 | 0.424 | 0.517 | 0.521 | 0.264 | 0.194 |
MO1 | 0.376 | 0.296 | 0.368 | 0.404 | 0.283 | 0.437 | 0.78 | 0.506 | 0.433 | 0.338 | 0.264 |
MO2 | 0.339 | 0.354 | 0.326 | 0.488 | 0.349 | 0.488 | 0.764 | 0.48 | 0.451 | 0.309 | 0.273 |
MO3 | 0.296 | 0.285 | 0.309 | 0.399 | 0.193 | 0.445 | 0.739 | 0.396 | 0.363 | 0.219 | 0.198 |
MO4 | 0.399 | 0.345 | 0.359 | 0.407 | 0.355 | 0.43 | 0.795 | 0.455 | 0.42 | 0.312 | 0.309 |
AD1 | 0.514 | 0.396 | 0.416 | 0.505 | 0.44 | 0.577 | 0.579 | 0.857 | 0.557 | 0.458 | 0.314 |
AD2 | 0.448 | 0.374 | 0.432 | 0.441 | 0.359 | 0.507 | 0.423 | 0.853 | 0.566 | 0.351 | 0.295 |
AD3 | 0.489 | 0.373 | 0.37 | 0.482 | 0.446 | 0.548 | 0.543 | 0.883 | 0.565 | 0.447 | 0.322 |
CT1 | 0.443 | 0.243 | 0.41 | 0.452 | 0.297 | 0.505 | 0.41 | 0.463 | 0.716 | 0.392 | 0.307 |
CT2 | 0.359 | 0.355 | 0.395 | 0.55 | 0.41 | 0.539 | 0.465 | 0.559 | 0.829 | 0.365 | 0.387 |
CT3 | 0.295 | 0.336 | 0.262 | 0.429 | 0.349 | 0.34 | 0.299 | 0.432 | 0.702 | 0.374 | 0.33 |
CT4 | 0.369 | 0.271 | 0.337 | 0.422 | 0.279 | 0.528 | 0.437 | 0.524 | 0.811 | 0.327 | 0.309 |
CT5 | 0.39 | 0.152 | 0.238 | 0.318 | 0.262 | 0.414 | 0.391 | 0.42 | 0.634 | 0.265 | 0.176 |
AT1 | 0.408 | 0.384 | 0.386 | 0.413 | 0.379 | 0.299 | 0.325 | 0.415 | 0.413 | 0.872 | 0.499 |
AT2 | 0.457 | 0.316 | 0.375 | 0.428 | 0.384 | 0.306 | 0.319 | 0.415 | 0.374 | 0.835 | 0.444 |
AT3 | 0.391 | 0.241 | 0.394 | 0.352 | 0.334 | 0.299 | 0.314 | 0.387 | 0.361 | 0.829 | 0.528 |
AT4 | 0.422 | 0.3 | 0.32 | 0.448 | 0.253 | 0.366 | 0.347 | 0.428 | 0.425 | 0.839 | 0.426 |
IPT1 | 0.234 | 0.337 | 0.209 | 0.377 | 0.457 | 0.241 | 0.293 | 0.329 | 0.343 | 0.473 | 0.867 |
IPT2 | 0.2 | 0.177 | 0.138 | 0.378 | 0.304 | 0.222 | 0.258 | 0.331 | 0.35 | 0.517 | 0.876 |
IPT3 | 0.202 | 0.267 | 0.196 | 0.457 | 0.365 | 0.257 | 0.342 | 0.274 | 0.383 | 0.477 | 0.861 |
Independent Variable (IV) | Mediating Variable (M) | Dependent Variable (DV) | IV→DV (a) | IV→M (b) | IV + M→DV | Conclusion | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M→DV | IV→DV | ||||||
(c) | (d) | ||||||
Affective distance | Affective trust | Impulsive purchase intention | 0.361 *** | 0.490 *** | 0.510 *** | 0.111 NS | Complete mediation |
Cognitive trust | Affective trust | Impulsive purchase intention | 0.423 *** | 0.474 *** | 0.471 *** | 0.198 *** | Partial mediation |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chen, J.; Luo, J.; Zhou, T. Research on Determinants Affecting Users’ Impulsive Purchase Intention in Live Streaming from the Perspective of Perceived Live Streamers’ Ability. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030190
Chen J, Luo J, Zhou T. Research on Determinants Affecting Users’ Impulsive Purchase Intention in Live Streaming from the Perspective of Perceived Live Streamers’ Ability. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(3):190. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030190
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Jun, Junying Luo, and Tian Zhou. 2024. "Research on Determinants Affecting Users’ Impulsive Purchase Intention in Live Streaming from the Perspective of Perceived Live Streamers’ Ability" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 3: 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030190
APA StyleChen, J., Luo, J., & Zhou, T. (2024). Research on Determinants Affecting Users’ Impulsive Purchase Intention in Live Streaming from the Perspective of Perceived Live Streamers’ Ability. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030190