The Triumph of Substance: Decoding the “Functional Infotainment” Model for Sex Education on Douyin
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Design
Ethical Considerations and Data Governance
2.2. Themes
2.3. Information
2.4. Entertainment
2.5. Infotainment
2.6. Video Content Coding
2.7. Comment Content Coding
2.8. Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Sample Composition and Overall Video Topic Distribution
3.2. Differences in the Use of Informational and Entertainment Strategies
3.3. Effects of “Information–Entertainment” Combinations on User Interaction Behaviors
3.4. Effects of “Information–Entertainment” Combinations on Comment Content
4. Discussion
4.1. Cultural Adaptation in Content Production: Medical Dominance and the Avoidance of Social Issues
4.2. The Dual Effect of Platform Mechanisms: The Tension Between Algorithmic Guidance and Content Governance
4.3. The Dominance of Functional Infotainment: The Informational Core as the Key Driver of User Engagement
5. Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
References
- Bailo, F., Meese, J., & Hurcombe, E. (2021). The institutional impacts of algorithmic distribution: Facebook and the Australian news media. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 20563051211024963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barriuso-Ortega, S., Fernández-Hawrylak, M., & Heras-Sevilla, D. (2024). Sex education in adolescence: A systematic review of programmes and meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 166, 107926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernhard, U., & Scharf, W. (2008). “Infotainment” in der Presse. Publizistik, 53(2), 231–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brants, K., & Neijens, P. (1998). The infotainment of politics. Political Communication, 15(2), 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpena, F., Giné, X., Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2024). Entertainment-education for better health: Insights from a field experiment. Journal of Development Studies, 60(5), 745–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Céspedes, L., Fleerackers, A., & Maggio, L. A. (2024). “Giving them the best information I could with whatever I had at hand”: Physicians’ online health communication practices in a post-normal science context. Journal of Science Communication, 23(6), A04. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandra-Mouli, V., Lane, C., & Wong, S. (2015). What does not work in adolescent sexual and reproductive health: A review of evidence on interventions commonly accepted as best practices. Global Health: Science and Practice, 3(3), 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, A. (2025). Safe spaces for feminist activists online: Chinese networked feminists’ self-censorship strategies in response to online misogyny and government censorship. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y., Wang, Q., Huang, X., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Ni, T., Pan, G., Luo, D., & Ni, Y. (2024). The quality and reliability of short videos about thyroid nodules on Bilibili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study. Digital Health, 10, 20552076241288831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Z., & Li, Y. (2024). Like, comment, and share on TikTok: Exploring the effect of sentiment and second-person view on the user engagement with TikTok news videos. Social Science Computer Review, 42(1), 201–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). (2024, March). The 53rd statistical report on China’s internet development. Available online: https://www.cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/202405/P020240509518443205347.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2025).
- Chou, W.-Y. S., Gaysynsky, A., & Cappella, J. N. (2020). Where we go from here: Health misinformation on social media. American Journal of Public Health, 110(S3), S273–S275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(9), e2023301118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, X., & Wang, J. (2023). Effect of online video infotainment on audience attention. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, L. S., León, B., Bourk, M. J., & Finkler, W. (2020). Transformation of the media landscape: Infotainment versus expository narrations for communicating science in online videos. Public Understanding of Science, 29(7), 688–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Kloet, J., Poell, T., Zeng, G., & Chow, Y. F. (2019). The platformization of Chinese society: Infrastructure, governance, and practice. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engel, E., Gell, S., Heiss, R., & Karsay, K. (2024). Social media influencers and adolescents’ health: A scoping review of the research field. Social Science & Medicine, 340, 116387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fowler, L. R., Schoen, L., Smith, H. S., & Morain, S. R. (2022). Sex education on TikTok: A content analysis of themes. Health Promotion Practice, 23(5), 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Ortega, A., & García-Avilés, J. A. (2023). Innovation in narrative formats redefines the boundaries of journalistic storytelling: Instagram Stories, TikTok and comic journalism. In M.-C. Negreira-Rey, J. Vázquez-Herrero, J. Sixto-García, & X. López-García (Eds.), Blurring boundaries of journalism in digital media: New actors, models and practices (pp. 185–197). Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillespie, T., Aufderheide, P., Carmi, E., Gerrard, Y., Gorwa, R., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Roberts, S. T., Sinnreich, A., & Myers West, S. (2020). Expanding the debate about content moderation: Scholarly research agendas for the coming policy debates. Internet Policy Review, 9(4), 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldstein, I., Edelson, L., Nguyen, M. K., Goga, O., McCoy, D., & Lauinger, T. (2023). Understanding the (in)effectiveness of content moderation: A case study of Facebook in the context of the US Capitol riot. arXiv, arXiv:2301.02737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, M. C., & Appel, M. (2024). Narrative transportation: How stories shape how we see ourselves and the world. In B. Gawronski (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 70, pp. 1–82). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hase, V., Boczek, K., & Scharkow, M. (2023). Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform, multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Digital Journalism, 11(8), 1499–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendrickx, J., & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2024). Dissecting social media journalism: A comparative study across platforms, outlets and countries. Journalism Studies, 25(9), 1053–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Z., Fu, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Guo, F., Hee, J., & Tang, K. (2023). Effects of sexuality education on sexual knowledge, sexual attitudes, and sexual behaviors of youths in China: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 72(4), 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). (2010). From choice, a world of possibilities: IPPF framework for comprehensive sexuality education (CSE). Available online: https://www.ippf.org/sites/default/files/ippf_framework_for_comprehensive_sexuality_education.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2025).
- Jebril, N., Albæk, E., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Infotainment, cynicism and democracy: The effects of privatization vs personalization in the news. European Journal of Communication, 28(2), 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keogh, S. C., Stillman, M., Leong, E., Awusabo-Asare, K., Sidze, E., Monzón, A. S., & Motta, A. (2020). Measuring the quality of sexuality education implementation at the school level in low- and middle-income countries. Sex Education, 20(2), 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirkpatrick, C. E., & Lawrie, L. L. (2024). TikTok as a source of health information and misinformation for young women in the United States: Survey study. JMIR Infodemiology, 4, e54663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kite, J., Chan, L., MacKay, K., Corbett, L., Reyes-Marcelino, G., Nguyen, B., Bellew, W., & Freeman, B. (2023). A model of social media effects in public health communication campaigns: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e46345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kohler, S., & Dietrich, T. C. (2021). Potentials and limitations of educational videos on YouTube for science communication. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 581302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubler, K. (2023). Influencers and the attention economy: The meaning and management of attention on Instagram. Journal of Marketing Management, 39(11–12), 965–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X., Kang, J., & Liang, J. (2024). Quality assessment and audience engagement with a sexuality education video: Evidence from China. Health Education Journal, 83(8), 892–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W., Li, J., Li, H., Zheng, H., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Adaptation of global standards of comprehensive sexuality education in China: Characteristics, discussions, and expectations. Children, 10(2), 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, J., Shen, X., & Hesketh, T. (2020). Sexual knowledge, attitudes and behaviours among undergraduate students in China—Implications for sex education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marinov, R. (2020). Mapping the infotainment literature: Current trajectories and suggestions for future research. The Communication Review, 23(1), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellado, C. (2015). Professional roles in news content: Six dimensions of journalistic role performance. Journalism Studies, 16(4), 596–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellado, C. (2020). Theorizing journalistic roles. In C. Mellado (Ed.), Beyond journalistic norms: Role performance and news in comparative perspective (pp. 22–45). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morain, M., & Swarts, J. (2012). YouTutorial: A framework for assessing instructional online video. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(1), 6–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newman, N. (2022). How publishers are learning to create and distribute news on TikTok. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Available online: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/how-publishers-are-learning-create-and-distribute-news-tiktok (accessed on 28 August 2025).
- Olsson, S. E., Friedlich, N., Bolds, A., Hodge, A., Jamali, T., & Lagomichos, M. (2024). Exploring menstrual education via TikTok: A descriptive content analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health, 75(2), 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592(7855), 590–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peña-Fernández, S., Larrondo-Ureta, A., & Morales-i-Gras, J. (2022). Current affairs on TikTok: Virality and entertainment for digital natives. Profesional de la Información, 31(1), e310106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Scherr, S., & Legnante, G. (2012). Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 221–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryffel, F. A., & Wirth, W. (2020). How perceived processing fluency influences the illusion of knowing in learning from TV reports. Journal of Media Psychology, 32(1), 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sciberras, R., & Tanner, C. (2024). ‘Sex is so much more than penis in vagina’: Sex education, pleasure and ethical erotics on Instagram. Sex Education, 24(3), 344–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, W., & Li, J. (2024). New digital divide shaped by algorithm? Evidence from agent-based testing on Douyin’s health-related video recommendation. Communication Research, 51(7), 867–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephenson, M. T., & Palmgreen, P. (2001). Sensation seeking, message sensation value, and processing of anti-drug public service announcements. Communication Monographs, 68(1), 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsuriel, K., Dvir-Gvirsman, S., Ziv, L., Afriat-Aviv, H., & Ivan, L. (2021). Servant of two masters: How social media editors balance between mass media logic and social media logic. Journalism, 22(8), 1983–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. (2018). International technical guidance on sexuality education: An evidence-informed approach. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260770 (accessed on 28 August 2025).
- Vázquez-Herrero, J., Negreira-Rey, M. C., & López-García, X. (2022). Let’s dance the news! How the news media are adapting to the logic of TikTok. Journalism, 23(8), 1717–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., Carretero Gomez, S., & Pujol Priego, L. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens—With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C., Wang, H., Yang, Z., & Ding, S. (2025). Divergent routes of health infotainment in changing public health attitudes: A GPT-2 analysis of users’ responses to health infotainment. Journal of Health Communication, 30(1–3), 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waszak, P. M., Kasprzycka-Waszak, W., & Kubanek, A. (2018). The spread of medical fake news in social media—The pilot quantitative study. Health Policy and Technology, 7(2), 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winkler, J. R., Appel, M., Schmidt, M.-L. C. R., & Richter, T. (2023). The experience of emotional shifts in narrative persuasion. Media Psychology, 26(2), 141–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirz, D. S., & Zai, F. (2025). Infotainment on social media: How news companies combine information and entertainment in news stories on Instagram and TikTok. Digital Journalism, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. (2015). Sexual health, human rights and the law. World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564984 (accessed on 28 August 2025).
- Xie, Y., Wang, X., Mu, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Li, X., Dai, L., Li, Q., Li, M., Chen, P., Zhu, J., & Liang, J. (2021). Characteristics and adverse outcomes of Chinese adolescent pregnancies between 2012 and 2019. Scientific Reports, 11, 12508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, L., Ngai, C. S. B., Singh, R. G., & Chen, F. (2024). Social media users’ engagement with fear appeal elements in government’s health crisis communication via state-owned media. Journal of Health Communication, 29(8), 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, J., Abidin, C., & Schäfer, M. S. (2021). Research perspectives on TikTok and its legacy apps: Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 15, 3161–3172. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z. (2021). Infrastructuralization of Tik Tok: Transformation, power relationships, and platformization of video entertainment in China. Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 219–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Source | Dependent Variable | Style | IRR | 95% CI | p | Significance | Nagelkerke R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical Professional | Likes | Low Information-High Entertainment | 0.77 | [0.47, 1.27] | 0.305 | 0.433 | |
Medical Professional | Likes | High Information-Low Entertainment | 4.63 | [3.85, 5.57] | <0.001 | *** | 0.433 |
Medical Professional | Likes | High Information-High Entertainment | 18.34 | [15.24, 22.07] | <0.001 | *** | 0.433 |
Medical Professional | Comments | Low Information-High Entertainment | 0.24 | [0.14, 0.39] | <0.001 | *** | 0.881 |
Medical Professional | Comments | High Information-Low Entertainment | 16.9 | [14.04, 20.35] | <0.001 | *** | 0.881 |
Medical Professional | Comments | High Information-High Entertainment | 64.33 | [53.41, 77.47] | <0.001 | *** | 0.881 |
Medical Professional | Favorites | Low Information-High Entertainment | 0.45 | [0.27, 0.74] | 0.002 | ** | 0.48 |
Medical Professional | Favorites | High Information-Low Entertainment | 1.94 | [1.61, 2.33] | <0.001 | *** | 0.48 |
Medical Professional | Favorites | High Information-High Entertainment | 11.49 | [9.55, 13.82] | <0.001 | *** | 0.48 |
Medical Professional | Shares | Low Information-High Entertainment | 0.29 | [0.17, 0.47] | <0.001 | *** | 0.319 |
Medical Professional | Shares | High Information-Low Entertainment | 8.92 | [7.42, 10.73] | <0.001 | *** | 0.319 |
Medical Professional | Shares | High Information-High Entertainment | 22.35 | [18.58, 26.90] | <0.001 | *** | 0.319 |
Source | Dependent Variable | Style | IRR | 95% CI | p | Significance | Nagelkerke R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual Creator | Likes | Low Information-High Entertainment | 0.29 | [0.24, 0.36] | <0.001 | *** | 0.48 |
Individual Creator | Likes | High Information-Low Entertainment | 3.48 | [3.1, 3.91] | <0.001 | *** | 0.48 |
Individual Creator | Likes | High Information-High Entertainment | 11.13 | [9.98, 12.41] | <0.001 | *** | 0.48 |
Individual Creator | Comments | Low Information-High Entertainment | 0.18 | [0.15, 0.22] | <0.001 | *** | 0.447 |
Individual Creator | Comments | High Information-Low Entertainment | 5.13 | [4.57, 5.75] | <0.001 | *** | 0.447 |
Individual Creator | Comments | High Information-High Entertainment | 10.47 | [9.39, 11.67] | <0.001 | *** | 0.447 |
Individual Creator | Favorites | Low Information-High Entertainment | 0.26 | [0.21, 0.31] | <0.001 | *** | 0.441 |
Individual Creator | Favorites | High Information-Low Entertainment | 11.7 | [10.43, 13.13] | <0.001 | *** | 0.441 |
Individual Creator | Favorites | High Information-High Entertainment | 17.55 | [15.74, 19.57] | <0.001 | *** | 0.441 |
Individual Creator | Shares | Low Information-High Entertainment | 0.04 | [0.03, 0.05] | <0.001 | *** | 0.459 |
Individual Creator | Shares | High Information-Low Entertainment | 7.85 | [7.0, 8.81] | <0.001 | *** | 0.459 |
Individual Creator | Shares | High Information-High Entertainment | 9.59 | [8.6, 10.7] | <0.001 | *** | 0.459 |
Source | Group | OR | 95% CI | p | Significance | Nagelkerke R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical Professional | Low Information-High Entertainment | 0.55 | [0.07, 4.53] | 0.582 | 0.133 | |
Medical Professional | High Information-Low Entertainment | 2.93 | [1.62, 5.31] | <0.001 | *** | 0.133 |
Medical Professional | High Information-High Entertainment | 3.43 | [1.90, 6.20] | <0.001 | *** | 0.133 |
Individual Creator | Low Information-High Entertainment | 0.38 | [0.18, 0.79] | 0.010 | ** | 0.229 |
Individual Creator | High Information-Low Entertainment | 3.11 | [2.28, 4.25] | <0.001 | *** | 0.229 |
Individual Creator | High Information-High Entertainment | 2.10 | [1.54, 2.86] | <0.001 | *** | 0.229 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shi, Y.; Gao, H. The Triumph of Substance: Decoding the “Functional Infotainment” Model for Sex Education on Douyin. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091226
Shi Y, Gao H. The Triumph of Substance: Decoding the “Functional Infotainment” Model for Sex Education on Douyin. Behavioral Sciences. 2025; 15(9):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091226
Chicago/Turabian StyleShi, You, and Hao Gao. 2025. "The Triumph of Substance: Decoding the “Functional Infotainment” Model for Sex Education on Douyin" Behavioral Sciences 15, no. 9: 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091226
APA StyleShi, Y., & Gao, H. (2025). The Triumph of Substance: Decoding the “Functional Infotainment” Model for Sex Education on Douyin. Behavioral Sciences, 15(9), 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091226