Subliminal Priming—State of the Art and Future Perspectives
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Types of priming
- Effective priming
- Design protocol for priming studies
- Neurological impact of priming (examines prior studies that discuss the neurological basis of subliminal priming). This includes event-related potential (ERP) (e.g., P300), N1, and how priming effects these components, and the evaluation of various stimuli and their impacts on ERPs. The impacts of priming on ERPs of 100–250 ms are shown in Figure 3.
- Eye tracking
- Advertising
1.1. Types of Priming
1.1.1. Semantic Priming
1.1.2. Visual Priming
1.1.3. Response Priming
1.1.4. Perceptual and Conceptual Priming.
1.1.5. Positive and Negative Priming
1.1.6. Associative and Context Priming.
1.1.7. Olfactory Priming
2. Subliminal Priming Factors
2.1. Minimization/Removal of Contamination
2.2. Differences between Emotional and Neutral Stimuli
3. Design Protocol
4. Electrophysiological Impact
- Positive (arousing), such as “happiness” and “wonder”;
- Relatively negative (arousing), such as “brutality” and “danger”;
- Positive (non-arousing), such as “mild”;
- Negative (non-arousing), such as “laziness” and “lethargy”.
- Act independently from capacity-limited attention resources
- Are not susceptible to interference from other processes
- Can perform in parallel to other processes
- Are unconscious
4.1. The N4 Priming Effect
4.2. Motor Responses and the N4
5. Eye Tracking and Subliminal Priming
6. Subliminal Priming and Advertisements
6.1. Studies Validating the Impact of Priming
- Whether consumers’ choices were affected by priming
- Whether consumers’ choices were moderated by their individual feelings of thirst
6.2. Studies Negating the Impact of Priming
6.3. Popular Cases of Subliminal Priming in Media and Advertisement
- Politics: During the 2000 US presidential campaign, former President George W. Bush used priming to gain an advantage over his Democratic rival, Al Gore [178]. The Bush campaign launched a television ad containing a frame with the word “RATS” in a scaled-up font size. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) investigated this matter, but no penalties were issued in this case.
- War: Priming was applied to a scientific instrument called the tachistoscope, which projected images over an extremely brief period. The tachistoscope was used to improve soldiers’ reading speeds and test their eyesight during World War II.
- Music: British band Judas Priest was prosecuted for including subliminal messages in their songs, which resulted in suicide attempts by two young men [179]. The songs alleged to have an influence on their behavior were “Do It” and “Better By You, Better Than Me”. The judge was not convinced that the hidden messages existed, and the band was acquitted. The judge decided that the young men could not have attempted suicide unless they had the real intention of doing so, or that the messages could not have been perceived without the “power of suggestion”.
- Movie and TV shows: Product placement in films and television shows represents a form of subliminal/incidental advertising. A prime example of placing a product in a movie to subliminally increase sales was the placement of Ray Ban sunglasses in the Tom Cruise movie Top Gun. The brand became extremely popular when Tom wore them in the film [180].
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Barutchu, A.; Spence, C.; Humphreys, G.W. Multisensory enhancement elicited by unconscious visual stimuli. Exp. Brain Res. 2018, 236, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kawakami, N.; Miura, E.; Nagai, M. When you become a superman: Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli enhances men’s physical force. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lourenco, S.F.; Ayzenberg, V.; Lyu, J. A general magnitude system in human adults: Evidence from a subliminal priming paradigm. Cortex 2016, 81, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dehaene, S.; Cohen, L. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murphy, S.T.; Zajonc, R.B. Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1993, 64, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdelyi, M.H. Subliminal perception and its cognates: Theory, indeterminacy, and time. Conscious. Cogn. 2004, 13, 73–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenwald, A.G.; Draine, S.C.; Abrams, R.L. Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science 1996, 273, 1699–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saari, T.; Ravaja, N.; Laarni, J.; Turpeinen, M.; Kallinen, K. Psychologically targeted persuasive advertising and product information in e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Delft, The Netherlands, 25–27 October 2004; ACM: Delft, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 245–254. [Google Scholar]
- Ortells, J.J.; Kiefer, M.; Castillo, A.; Megías, M.; Morillas, A. The semantic origin of unconscious priming: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence during category congruency priming from strongly and weakly related masked words. Cognition 2016, 146, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, B.; Gao, C.; Wang, W.; Guo, C. Processing fluency hinders subsequent recollection: An electrophysiological study. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferrand, L.; New, B. Semantic and associative priming in the mental lexicon. In Mental Lexicon: Some Words to Talk about Words; Nova Science Publisher: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 25–43. [Google Scholar]
- Bar, M.; Biederman, I. Subliminal visual priming. Psychol. Sci. 1998, 6, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartram, D. The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cogn. Psychol. 1974, 6, 325–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biederman, I.; Cooper, E.E. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception 1991, 20, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Becker, S.; Moscovitch, M.; Behrmann, M.; Joordens, S. Long-term semantic priming: A computational account and empirical evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1997, 23, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cave, C.B. Very long-lasting priming in picture naming. Psychol. Sci. 1997, 8, 322–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Francken, J.; van Gaal, S.; de Lange, F. Immediate and long-term priming effects are independent of prime awareness. Conscious. Cogn. 2011, 20, 1793–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoshimoto, S.; Imai, H.; Kashino, M.; Takeuchi, T. Pupil response and the subliminal mere exposure effect. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kwan, L.Y.Y.; Yap, S.; Chiu, C.-Y. Mere exposure affects perceived descriptive norms: Implications for personal preferences and trust. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2015, 129, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stafford, T.; Grimes, A. Memory enhances the mere exposure effect. Psychol. Mark. 2012, 29, 995–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopp, B.; Mattler, U.; Goertz, R.; Rist, F. N2, p3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996, 99, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klotz, W.; Wolff, P. The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus. Psychol. Res. 1995, 58, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klotz, W.; Neumann, O. Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1999, 25, 976–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vorberg, D.; Mattler, U.; Heinecke, A.; Schmidt, T.; Schwarzbach, J. Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6275–6280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmidt, T.; Vorberg, D. Criteria for unconscious cognition: Three types of dissociation. Percept. Psychophys. 2006, 68, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Groot, A.M. Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1984, 36, 253–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beiderman, I.; Cooper, E.E. Size invariance in visual object priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1992, 18, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jolicoeur, P. A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape. Mem. Cogn. 1987, 15, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besner, D. Visual pattern recognition: Size preprocessing reexamined. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1983, 35A, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bundesen, C.; Larsen, A. Visual transformation of size. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1975, 1, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ellis, R.; Allport, D.A.; Humphreys, G.W.; Collis, J. Varieties of object constancy. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1989, 41A, 775–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jolicoeur, P.; Besner, D. Additivity and interaction between size ratio and response category in the comparison of size-discrepant shapes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1987, 13, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Larsen, A. Pattern matching: Effects of size ratio, angular difference in orientation, and familiarity. Percept. Psychophys. 1985, 38, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, A.; Bundesen, C. Size scaling in human pattern recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1978, 4, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kosslyn, S.M. Aspects of a cognitive neuroscience of mental imagery. Science 1987, 240, 1621–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullman, S. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition 1989, 32, 193–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaidya, C.J.; Gabrieli, J.D.; Monti, L.A.; Tinklenberg, J.R.; Yesavage, J.A. Dissociation between two forms of conceptual priming in alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology 1999, 13, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reisberg, D. Cognition: Exploring the Science of the Mind; WW Norton: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Mayr, S.B.; Axel, B. Negative priming as a memory phenomenon: A review of 20 years of negative priming research. J. Psychol. 2007, 215, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bentin, S.; McCarthy, G.; Wood, C.C. Event-related potentials, lexical decision, and semantic priming. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 60, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tipper, S.; Driver, J. Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli. Mem. Cogn. 1988, 16, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neill, W.T.V.; Leslie, A.; Terry, K.M.; Gorfein, D.S. Persistence of negative priming: Ii. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1992, 18, 993–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stanovich, K.E.W.; Richard, F. On priming by a sentence context. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1983, 112, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berger, J.; Meredith, M.; Wheeler, S.C. Contextual priming: Where people vote affects how they vote. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 8846–8849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cook, S.; Fallon, N.; Wright, H.; Thomas, A.; Giesbrecht, T.; Field, M.; Stancak, A. Pleasant and unpleasant odors influence hedonic evaluations of human faces: An event-related potential study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cook, S.; Kokmotou, K.; Soto, V.; Wright, H.; Fallon, N.; Thomas, A.; Giesbrecht, T.; Field, M.; Stancak, A. Simultaneous odour-face presentation strengthens hedonic evaluations and event-related potential responses influenced by unpleasant odour. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 672, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Williams, M.A.; Morris, A.P.; McGlone, F.; Abbott, D.F.; Mattingley, J.B. Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 2898–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fazio, R.H.; Olson, M.A. Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2003, 54, 297–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Milders, M.; Sahraie, A.; Logan, S. Minimum presentation time for masked facial expression discrimination. Cogn. Emot. 2007, 22, 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pessoa, L.; Japee, S.; Ungerleider, L.G. Visual awareness and the detection of fearful faces. Emotion 2005, 5, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Potter, M.C.; Wyble, B.; Hagmann, C.E.; McCourt, E.S. Detecting meaning in rsvp at 13 ms per picture. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2014, 76, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karremans, J.; Stroebe, W.; Claus, J. Beyond vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 42, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohan, D.M.; Kumar, P.; Mahmood, F.; Wong, K.F.; Agrawal, A.; Elgendi, M.; Shukla, R.; Ang, N.; Ching, A.; Dauwels, J.; et al. Effect of subliminal lexical priming on the subjective perception of images: A machine learning approach. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, P.; Mahmood, F.; Mohan, D.M.; Wong, K.; Agrawal, A.; Elgendi, M.; Shukla, R.; Dauwels, J.; Chan, A.H. On the Effect of Subliminal Priming on Subjective Perception of Images: A Machine Learning Approach. In Proceedings of the 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Chicago, IN, USA, 26–30 August 2014; pp. 5438–5441. [Google Scholar]
- Lang, S.F.; Nelson, C.A.; Collins, P.F. Event-related potentials to emotional and neutral stimuli. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1990, 12, 946–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matsukawa, J.; Snodgrass, J.G.; Doniger, G.M. Conceptual versus perceptual priming in incomplete picture identification. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2005, 34, 515–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Battig, W.F.M.; William, E. Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories a replication and extension of the connecticut category norms. J. Exp. Psychol. 1969, 80, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snodgrass, J.G.; Vanderwart, M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 1980, 6, 174–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shelton, J.R.; Martin, R.C. How semantic is automatic semantic priming? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1992, 18, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perea, M.; Rosa, E. The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychol. Res. 2002, 66, 180–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neely, J.H. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In Basic Processes in Reading; Routledge: London, UK, 2012; pp. 272–344. [Google Scholar]
- Ansorge, U.; Klotz, W. Manual and verbal responses to completely masked (unreportable) stimuli: Exploring some conditions for the metacontrast dissociation. Perception 1998, 27, 1177–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ansorge, U.; Neumann, O.; Becker, S.I.; Kälberer, H.; Kruse, H. Sensorimotor supremacy: Investigating conscious and unconscious vision by masked priming. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 2007, 3, 257–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmidt, T. The finger in flight: Real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychol. Sci. 2002, 13, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmidt, T.; Niehaus, S.; Nagel, A. Primes and targets in rapid chases: Tracing sequential waves of motor activation. Behav. Neurosci. 2006, 120, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmidt, T.; Schmidt, F. Processing of natural images is feedforward: A simple behavioral test. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2009, 71, 594–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mattler, U. Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2005, 58A, 577–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leuthold, H.; Kopp, B. Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychol. Sci. 1998, 9, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eimer, M.; Schlaghecken, F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1998, 24, 1737–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eimer, M.; Schlaghecken, F. Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biol. Psychol. 2003, 64, 7–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattler, U. Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials. Exp. Brain Res. 2003, 151, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vath, N.; Schmidt, T. Tracing sequential waves of rapid visuomotor activation in lateralized readiness potentials. Neuroscience 2007, 145, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Postman, L.; Keppel, G. Norms of Word Association; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Voss, J.L.; Schendan, H.E.; Paller, K.A. Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming. NeuroImage 2010, 49, 2879–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brown, C.M.; Hagoort, P. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Language; Brown, C.M., Hagoort, P., Eds.; The Neurocognition of Language; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
- Castle, P.C.; Van Toller, S.; Milligan, G.J. The effect of odour priming on cortical eeg and visual erp responses. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2000, 36, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watson, N.V.; Breedlove, S.M. The Mind’s Machine: Foundations of Brain and Behavior; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Gibbons, H. Evaluative priming from subliminal emotional words: Insights from event-related potentials and individual differences related to anxiety. Conscious. Cogn. 2009, 18, 383–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bruner, J.S.; Postman, L. Emotional selectivity in perception and reaction. J. Personal. 1947, 16, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdelyi, M.H. A new look at the new look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychol. Rev. 1974, 81, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Junghöfer, M.; Bradley, M.M.; Elbert, T.R.; Lang, P.J. Fleeting images: A new look at early emotion discrimination. Psychophysiology 2001, 38, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schupp, H.T.; Cuthbert, B.N.; Bradley, M.M.; Cacioppo, J.T.; Ito, T.; Lang, P.J. Affective picture processing; the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology 2000, 37, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schupp, H.T.; Junghöfer, M.; Weike, A.I.; Hamm, A.O. Emotional facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex. Psychol. Sci. 2003, 14, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schupp, H.T.; Stockburger, J.; Schmälzle, R.; Bublatzky, F.; Weike, A.I.; Hamm, A.O. Visual noise effects on emotion perception: Brain potentials and stimulus identification. Neuroreport 2008, 19, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cuthbert, B.N.; Schupp, H.T.; Bradley, M.M.; Birbaumer, N.; Lang, P.J. Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol. Psychol. 2000, 52, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gratton, G.; Coles, M.G.H.; Sirevaag, E.J.; Eriksen, C.W.; Donchin, E. Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1988, 14, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dehaene, S.; Naccache, L.; LeClec’H, G.; Koechlin, E.; Müller, M.; Dehaene-Lambertz, G.; van de Moortele, P.F.; Le Bihan, D. Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature 1998, 395, 597–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sur, S.; Sinha, V.K. Event-related potential: An overview. Ind. Psychiatry J. 2009, 18, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chartrand, T.L.; van Baaren, R.B.; Bargh, J.A. Linking automatic evaluation to mood and information processing style: Consequences for experienced affect, impression formation, and stereotyping. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2006, 135, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bodenhausen, G.V.K.; Geoffrey, P.; Süsser, K. Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1994, 66, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.B.; Mahzarin, R. Mood and heuristics: The influence of happy and sad states on sensitivity and bias in stereotyping. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 78, 1005–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernat, E.; Bunce, S.; Shevrin, H. Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2001, 42, 11–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crites, S.L., Jr.; Cacioppo, J.T.; Gardner, W.L.; Bernston, G.G. Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorization: II. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of attitude registration rather than attitude report. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol 1995, 68, 997–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yee, C.M.; Miller, G.A. Affective valence and information processing. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987, 40, 300–307. [Google Scholar]
- Roschmann, R.; Wittling, W. Topographic brain mapping of emotion-related hemisphere asymmetries. J. Neurosci. 1992, 63, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiefer, M.; Martens, U. Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: Task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. J. Exp. Psychol.-Gen. 2010, 139, 464–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Posner, M.I.; Snyder, C.R.R. Attention and Cognitive Control; Solso, R.L., Ed.; Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1975; pp. 55–85. [Google Scholar]
- Schneider, W.; Shiffrin, R.M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol. Rev. 1977, 84, 1–66. [Google Scholar]
- Van Elk, M.; van Schie, H.T.; Bekkering, H. Short-term action intentions overrule long-term semantic knowledge. Cognition 2009, 111, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kellenbach, M.L.; Michie, P.T. Modulation of event-related potentials by semantic priming: Effects of color-cued selective attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1996, 8, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McCarthy, G.; Nobre, A.C. Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1993, 88, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rees, G.; Russell, C.; Frith, C.D.; Driver, J. Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science 1999, 286, 2504–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Henik, A.; Friedrich, F.J.; Tzelgov, J.; Tramer, S. Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming. Mem. Cogn. 1994, 22, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiefer, M.; Martens, U.; Weisbrod, M.; Hermle, L.; Spitzer, M. Increased unconscious semantic activation in schizophrenia patients with formal thought disorder. Schizophr. Res. 2009, 114, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kiefer, M. Repetition priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: Further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deacon, D.; Hewitt, S.; Yang, C.-M.; Nagata, M. Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: Evidence that the n400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Cogn. Brain Res. 2000, 9, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiefer, M.; Brendel, D. Attentional modulation of unconscious “automatic” processes: Evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18, 184–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ibáñez, A.; Manes, F.; Escobar, J.; Trujillo, N.; Andreucci, P.; Hurtado, E. Gesture influences the processing of figurative language in non-native speakers: Erp evidence. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 471, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heil, M.; Rolke, B.; Pecchinenda, A. Automatic semantic activation is no myth: Semantic context effects on the n400 in the letter-search task in the absence of response time effects. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dennis, T.A.; Malone, M.M.; Chen, C.C. Emotional face processing and emotion regulation in children: An erp study. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2009, 34, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glenberg, A.M.; Kaschak, M.P. Grounding language in action. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2002, 9, 558–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bush, G.; Luu, P.; Posner, M.I. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kutas, M.; Federmeier, K.D. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerra, S.; Ibáñez, A.; Martín, M.; Bobes, M.A.; Reyes, A.; Mendoza, R.; Bravo, T.; Domínguez, M.; Sosa, M.V. N400 deficits from semantic matching of pictures in probands and first-degree relatives from multiplex schizophrenia families. Brain Cogn. 2009, 70, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gunter, T.C.; Bach, P. Communicating hands: Erps elicited by meaningful symbolic hand postures. Neurosci. Lett. 2004, 372, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Li, W.; Zinbarg, R.E.; Boehm, S.G.; Paller, K.A. Neural and behavioral evidence for affective priming from unconsciously perceived emotional facial expressions and the influence of trait anxiety. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Helfinstein, S.M.; White, L.K.; Bar-Haim, Y.; Fox, N.A. Affective primes suppress attention bias to threat in socially-anxious individuals. Behav. Res. Ther. 2008, 46, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hughes, G.; Velmans, M.; De Fockert, J. Unconscious priming of a no-go response. Psychophysiology 2009, 46, 1258–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yun, X.; Li, W.; Qiu, J.; Jou, J.; Wei, D.; Tu, S.; Zhang, Q. Neural mechanisms of subliminal priming for traumatic episodic memory: An erp study. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 498, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lui, M.; Rosenfeld, J.P. The application of subliminal priming in lie detection: Scenario for identification of members of a terrorist ring. Psychophysiology 2009, 46, 889–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chalfoun, P.; Frasson, C. Showing the positive influence of subliminal cues on learner’s performance and intuition: An erp study. Intell. Tutor. Syst. 2010, 5, 288–290. [Google Scholar]
- Eddy, M.; Schmid, A.; Holcomb, P.J. Masked repetition priming and event-related brain potentials: A new approach for tracking the time-course of object perception. Psychophysiology 2006, 43, 564–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holcomb, P.J.; Grainger, J. Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials. Brain Res 2007, 1180, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kanske, P.; Kotz, S.A. Concreteness in emotional words: Erp evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Res. 2007, 1148, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aravena, P.; Hurtado, E.; Riveros, R.; Cardona, J.F.; Manes, F.; Ibáñez, A. Applauding with closed hands: Neural signature of action-sentence compatibility effects. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wade, N.J.; Tatler, B.W. Did javal measure eye movements during reading? J. Eye Mov. Res. 2009, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Rayner, K.; Pollatsek, A. Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 1981, 33, 351–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rayner, K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 1998, 124, 372–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yarbus, A.L. Eye Movements and Vision; Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Allopenna, P.D.; Magnuson, J.S.; Tanenhaus, M.K. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. J. Mem. Lang. 1998, 38, 419–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, D.C.; Spivey, M.J. Representation, space and hollywood squares: Looking at things that aren’t there anymore. Cognition 2000, 76, 269–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanenhaus, M.; Spivey-Knowlton, M.; Eberhard, K.; Sedivy, J. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 1995, 268, 1632–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Balcetis, E.; David, D. See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 91, 612–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caspi, A.; Hirschberger, G.; Ein-Dor, T.; Zivotofsky, A.Z. Looking away from death: The influence of subliminal priming on eye movement decisions. J. Vis. 2006, 6, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fromberger, P.; Jordan, K.; von Herder, J.; Steinkrauss, H.; Nemetschek, R.; Stolpmann, G.; Müller, J. Initial orienting towards sexually relevant stimuli: Preliminary evidence from eye movement measures. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2012, 41, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knoeferle, P.; Crocker, M. Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence from german. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 2009, 62, 2338–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knoeferle, P.; Crocker, M.W. The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. J. Mem. Lang. 2007, 57, 519–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knoeferle, P.; Crocker, M.W. The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking. Cogn. Sci. 2006, 30, 481–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knoeferle, P.; Crocker, M.W.; Scheepers, C.; Pickering, M.J. The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition 2005, 95, 95–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frazier, L.; Munn, A.; Clifton, C. Processing coordinate structures. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2000, 29, 343–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frazier, L.; Taft, L.; Roeper, T.; Clifton, C.; Ehrlich, K. Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Mem. Cogn. 1984, 12, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blumenfeld, H.K.; Marian, V. Constraints on parallel activation in bilingual spoken language processing: Examining proficiency and lexical status using eye-tracking. Lang. Cogn. Process. 2007, 22, 633–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Stigchel, S.; Mulckhuyse, M.; Theeuwes, J. Eye cannot see it: The interference of subliminal distractors on saccade metrics. Vis. Res. 2009, 49, 2104–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mirman, D.; Yee, E.; Blumstein, S.E.; Magnuson, J.S. Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling. Brain Lang. 2011, 117, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nummenmaa, L.; Hyönä, J.; Calvo, M.G. Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures. Emotion 2006, 6, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fennis, B.M.; Pruyn, A.T.H. You are what you wear: Brand personality influences on consumer impression formation. J. Bus. Res. 2007, 60, 634–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitzsimons, G.M.; Chartrand, T.L.; Fitzsimons, G.J. Automatic effects of brand exposure on motivated behavior: How apple makes you “think different”. J. Consum. Res. 2008, 35, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johar, G.V.; Sengupta, J.; Aaker, J.L. Two roads to updating brand personality impressions: Trait versus evaluative inferencing. J. Mark. Res. 2005, 42, 458–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pratkanis, A.R.; Greenwald, A.G. Recent perspectives on unconscious processing: Still no marketing applications. Psychol. Mark. 1988, 5, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smeets, M.; Dijksterhuis, G. Smelly primes—When olfactory primes do or do not work. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Packard, V. The Hidden Persuaders; McKay: New York, NY, USA, 1957. [Google Scholar]
- Vicary, J.M. How psychiatric methods can be applied to market research. Printer’s Ink 1950, 11, 39–40. [Google Scholar]
- Verwijmeren, T.; Karremans, J.C.; Bernritter, S.F.; Stroebe, W.; Wigboldus, D.H.J. Warning: You are being primed! The effect of a warning on the impact of subliminal ads. J. Exp. Soc. Psychpol. 2013, 49, 1124–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vicary, J.M. The circular test of bias in personal interview surveys. Public Opin. Q. 1955, 19, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Key, B.W. Subliminal Seduction; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Key, B.W. Media Sexploitation; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Thorne, S.B.; Himelstein, P. The role of suggestion in the perception of satanic messages on rock-and-roll recordings. J. Psychol. 1984, 116, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strahan, E.J.; Spencer, S.J.; Zanna, M.P. Subliminal priming and persuasion: How motivation affects the activation of goals and the persuasiveness of messages. In Applying Social Cognition to Consumer-Focused Strategy; Psychology Press: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 267–280. [Google Scholar]
- Aarts, H.; Dijksterhuis, A.; DeVries, P. On the psychology of drinking: Being thirsty and perceptually ready. Br. J. Psychol. 2001, 92, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strahan, E.J.; Spencer, S.J.; Zanna, M.P. Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2002, 38, 556–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dijksterhuis, A.; Aarts, H.; Smith, P.K. The Power of the Subliminal: Subliminal Perception and Possible Application; Hassin, R., Uleman, J., Bargh, J.A., Eds.; The New Unconsciousness; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 77–106. [Google Scholar]
- Pratkanis, A.R.; Aronson, E. Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion; Henry Holt and Company LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Greenwald, A.G.; Spangenberg, E.R.; Pratkanis, A.R.; Eskenazy, J. Double-blind tests of subliminal self-help audiotapes. Psychol. Sci. 1991, 2, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Audley, B.C.; Mellett, J.L.; Williams, P.M. Self-improvement using subliminal audiotapes: Consumer benewt or consumer fraud? Presented at the Meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA, USA, April 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Merikle, P.M.; Skanes, H.F. Subliminal self-help audiotapes: Search for placebo effects. J. Appl. Psychol. 1992, 77, 772–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brannon, L.A.; Brock, T.C. The Subliminal Persuasion Controversy: Reality, Enduring Fable, and Polonious’ Weasel. In Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives; Shavitt, S., Brock, T.C., Eds.; Allyn & Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conway, M.; Ross, M. Getting what you want by revising what you had. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1984, 47, 738–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ross, M. Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychol. Rev. 1989, 96, 341–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ross, M.; Olson, J.M. An expectancy attribution model of the effects of placebos. Psychol. Rev. 1981, 88, 408–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mikulincer, M.; Shaver, P.R. The psychological effects of the contextual activation of security-enhancing mental representations in adulthood. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2015, 1, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGuire, A.; Gillath, O.; Jackson, Y.; Ingram, R. Attachment Security Priming as a Potential Intervention for Depressive Symptoms. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2018, 37, 44–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doche-Budzynski, L.; Budzynski, T.H. Subliminal self-esteem enhancement in adult type a males. Education 1989, 110, 50–56. [Google Scholar]
- Meerman, E.E.; Verkuil, B.; Brosschot, J.F. Decreasing pain tolerance outside of awareness. J. Psycholo. Res. 2011, 70, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shanks, D.R.; Newell, B.R.; Lee, E.H.; Balakrishnan, D.; Ekelund, L.; Cenac, Z.; Kavvadia, F.; Moore, C. Priming intelligent behavior: An elusive phenomenon. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gillis, R. Ferrari finds smoke without fire. The Wall Street Journal, 26 March 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Gillis, R.; Clegg, J. Ferrari scraps barcode logo. The Wall Street Journal, 9 May 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Weinberger, J.; Westen, D. Rats, we should have used clinton: Subliminal priming in political campaigns. Political Psychol. 2008, 29, 631–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pratkanis, A.R. The cargo-cult science of subliminal persuasion. Skept. Inq. 1992, 16, 260–272. [Google Scholar]
- Tsai, M.-t.; Wen-Ko, L.; Liu, M.-L. The effects of subliminal advertising on consumer attitudes and buying intentions. Int. J. Manag. 2007, 24, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Madzharov, A.V.; Block, L.G.; Morrin, M. The cool scent of power: Effects of ambient scent on consumer preferences and choice behavior. J. Mark. 2015, 79, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
TYPE OF PRIMING | EXPOSURE/ RESPONSE TIMES | STIMULI TYPES | REF. |
---|---|---|---|
Positive and Negative Priming A positive prime accelerates priming processing, while a negative prime slows priming processing. | In word-naming experiments, participants began each trial by pressing the space bar on a keyboard placed in front of them. A blank interval of 250 ms followed the disappearance of the default display. The prime display then appeared and remained on the screen until the onset of the participant’s naming response. The prime display contained a single subliminal prime with exposure times of 33–200 ms. Longer prime exposure times allowed participants to identity the prime. | An overwhelming amount of priming research has used visual stimuli, but audio priming using human voices and artificial sounds has also been reported. Twelve high-frequency nouns served as target and distractor words on the prime and probe displays. The following words were used in several experiments: “BOARD”, “FLUTE”, “TABLE”, “PILOT”, “CLOUD”, “QUEEN”, “TIGER”, “GUEST”, “GLASS”, “PRIZE”, “BAKER”, and “CLERK”. | [38,39,40,41,42] |
Associative and Context Priming (e.g., “sun” is an associative prime for “moon”.) | The trials began by fixating a participant’s attention to the default display. In one study [56], the phrase “get ready” appeared in the center of the screen for 500 ms. After fixation, a 500-ms blank interval was presented, and then the prime appeared for 500 ms. Another 500-ms blank interval followed the prime, and then the target image appeared. | Primes can be the names of the pictures, the pictures themselves, or the names of the categories to which a picture might belong. Standard categories were provided in a previous study [57]. The targets can be pictures or black-and-white line drawings. One study [58] contained a standardized set of 260 black-and-white line drawings. | [43,56,57,58] |
Semantic Priming (E.g., “Earth” is a semantic prime | Three prime durations were tested (i.e., 100 ms, 250 ms, and 500 ms). The prime was immediately followed by the onset of a stimulus at the same location on the screen as that of the prime. In the experiments conducted in one study [59], the exposure times for semantically related primes ranged from 250 to 750 ms. | Both the target and prime are word stimuli, including two types of primes:
| [60,61] |
Visual Priming This is priming using visual cues. | The exposure times for primes ranged from 42 to 56 ms (with an average of 47 ms), individually adjusted to each object based on pilot experiments. | The objects can be simple line drawings of tools, furniture, animals, clothes, vehicles, and other items, typically drawn with black, 2-pixel-wide lines on a white background. | [12,13,14] |
Response Priming The prime and target are presented in quick succession, typically less than 100 ms apart. | The intervals of prime exposure and stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) lasted 17‒100 ms. | Simple objects, like left and right arrows, can serve as prime and mask stimuli. Other examples include common shapes, such as squares, rectangles, hearts, and diamonds. | [22,23,24,25,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72] |
Perceptual and Conceptual Priming Perceptual priming is based on the form or format of the stimulus, while conceptual priming is based on the meaning of the stimulus. | Perceptual: The subjects pressed a mouse button to start each trial. A fixation dot was presented for 500 ms, followed by either a 50- or 100-ms display of the object picture. The picture was followed by a 500-ms mask: a randomly appearing arrangement of straight and curved lines. Conceptual: Trials began with the 500-ms display of a fixation cross, followed by the target word for 2 s. Participants were instructed to read the word on the screen aloud. Two variations were used in the trials:
| Perceptual: Simple line drawings of common objects may be used (e.g., plants or animals with basic names). The stimulus should consist of at least one pair with similar names but different shapes (e.g., a grand piano and an upright piano). Conceptual: For word association, standard word pairs can be used. The first word of each pair is designated as the cue, and the second word is the target (e.g., in “TUSK-elephant”, “TUSK” is the cue word and “elephant” is the target. | [73,74] |
Olfactory Priming The odor prime influences the evaluation of the target | A 3-s odor pulse was released, during which participants viewed a black screen. | Visual stimuli: neutral faces were used in the experiment. Out of the 18 female faces, nine were white/Caucasian, five were East Asian, and four were Afro-Caribbean. Out of the 18 male faces, 12 were white/Caucasian, five were afro-Caribbean and one was East Asian. | [45] |
Component | Stimulus | Summary | Location | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
P1, N1, P2, P3 | Mood adjectives (32 stimuli over 6 presentations). Subjects = 17. Duration: subliminal = 1 ms, supraliminal = 40 ms. | The study demonstrated that ERPs are sensitive to affective valences, whether consciously or unconsciously. | F3, F4, P3, P4, Cz, Pz, Oz | [92] |
P1 | Images of happy or fearful and surprised facial expressions (n = 140). Subjects = 17. Duration: primes (fearful or happy) = 30 ms, targets (surprised) = 800 ms. | Larger occipital P1 components were found with fearful rather than happy expressions. | A source analysis implicated the bilateral extrastriate cortex. | [116] |
N1, P2 | Threatening and neutral words were used as primes for groups with high and low social anxiety. The targets were images of neutral and angry facial expressions (n = 16). Subjects = 24. Duration: primes = 200 ms, targets = 500 ms. | The high social anxiety group showed attention bias after viewing the neutral primes but not the threatening primes, indicating suppression of the attention bias. The low social anxiety group demonstrated opposite effects. | O1/O2 | [117] |
N2, P3 | Go/no-go task with subliminal primes (14 blocks of 72 arrow shapes; trials = 1008). Subjects = 21. Duration: primes = 16 ms, targets = 100 ms. | Inhibition-related ERPs were modulated as a function of prime congruency. The inhibition of impending motor responses can be initiated by unconscious stimuli. | The primes influenced frontal inhibitory control mechanisms. | [118] |
P2, P3 | Earthquake-(un)related words (12 of each category). Subjects = 24. Duration: primes = 17 ms, targets = 1500 ms. | More positive ERP deflections in related words than unrelated words. | P2: Posterior cingulate cortex; P300: parahippocampal gyrus | [118,119] |
P3 | Names of acquaintances in a lie detection protocol (5 known names, 4 unknown names). Subjects = 14. Duration: primes = 17 ms, targets = 150 ms. | Subliminal primes modulate ERPs when the task involves lying. | Fz, Cz, Pz, Oz | [120] |
P3 | Logic-based learning paradigms (3 magic squares of odd order). Subjects = 46. Duration: primes = 33.33 ms, targets = unknown. | Subliminal “cues” increased learner performances. | Not stated | [121] |
N1.9, P1.9, N4 | Repeated images preceded by masked image primes (n = 80). Subjects = 16. Duration: primes = 50 ms, targets = 300 ms. | Reduced amplitudes in N/P190 that may reflect early processing of object-specific representations. Changes in N400 reflect more domain-general sematic processing. | Posterior/anterior (locations not specified) | [122] |
N2.5, N4 | Animal names in streams of words with masked primes (numbers unknown). Subjects = 24. Duration: primes = 40 ms, targets = 300 ms. | N250 reflects processing at the level of forms, while N400 reflects processing at the level of meaning. | Parietal (CP1) | [123] |
P2, N4 | Concrete and abstract emotional words (720 German nouns). Subjects = 30. | Concreteness affected N400 and LPC. | FC3, FC4 | [124] |
N4 | Action sentences (156 Spanish sentences: 104 related to hand actions, 52 neutral sentences). | N400 distinguished between compatible and incompatible primes and was more negative for incompatible primes. | Cz | [125] |
P6, N9 | Visual stimuli (3 ethnicities: white/Caucasian, East-Asian, and Afro-Caribbean) and olfactory stimuli (3 odor conditions: pleasant, unpleasant and a neutral control). Subjects = 20. Duration: primes = 3 s, targets = 300 ms. | Significant effects of odor were observed at 600 and 900 ms after face-onset | Left and right lateral frontal-temporal electrodes | [45] |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Elgendi, M.; Kumar, P.; Barbic, S.; Howard, N.; Abbott, D.; Cichocki, A. Subliminal Priming—State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8060054
Elgendi M, Kumar P, Barbic S, Howard N, Abbott D, Cichocki A. Subliminal Priming—State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Behavioral Sciences. 2018; 8(6):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8060054
Chicago/Turabian StyleElgendi, Mohamed, Parmod Kumar, Skye Barbic, Newton Howard, Derek Abbott, and Andrzej Cichocki. 2018. "Subliminal Priming—State of the Art and Future Perspectives" Behavioral Sciences 8, no. 6: 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8060054
APA StyleElgendi, M., Kumar, P., Barbic, S., Howard, N., Abbott, D., & Cichocki, A. (2018). Subliminal Priming—State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Behavioral Sciences, 8(6), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8060054