Next Article in Journal
Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal from Urban Wastewater: Experimental Tests and Model Simulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Anesthetic Gases: Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Strategies for Fluranes and Nitrous Oxide
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Risk Assessment of Glyphosate and Aminomethylphosphonic Acid (AMPA) in Portuguese Groundwater Ecosystems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluating Indoor Air Quality in Residential Environments: A Study of PM2.5 and CO2 Dynamics Using Low-Cost Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Cytotoxicity, Inflammatory Responses, and Aging Effects of Human Skin Cells in Response to Fine Dust Exposure

Department of Chemical Engineering, Soongsil University, 369, Sangdo-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Environments 2024, 11(11), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11110259
Submission received: 15 September 2024 / Revised: 3 November 2024 / Accepted: 16 November 2024 / Published: 19 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Quality, Health and Climate)

Abstract

:
Airborne fine dust pollution poses a significant threat to both respiratory and skin health, yet the skin’s physiological response to such exposure has been underexplored. This study investigates the impact of fine dust on skin cells, focusing on their metabolic activity, inflammatory responses, and aging-related changes. We found that exposure to fine dust model compounds led to dose-dependent cytotoxicity, with PM2.5-Ions exhibiting higher toxicity compared to PM10-PAHs. Human epithelial keratinocytes (HEKn) showed heightened sensitivity to fine dust, marked by increased inflammation, particularly with elevated IL-8 expression in response to PM2.5-Ions. Additionally, fine dust exposure resulted in reduced cell density, slower proliferation, and decreased migration, notably at higher concentrations of PM2.5-Ions. These changes are indicative of accelerated aging processes, including compromised cell function and structural integrity. Live cell imaging and correlation analyses highlighted significant links between metabolic activity, cell morphology, and IL-8 secretion. These findings provide critical insights into the differential impacts of fine dust components on skin cells, emphasizing the potential acceleration of aging processes and underscoring the need for further research on cellular responses to environmental stress and the development of protective measures against urban fine dust exposure. Overall, this study, which contributes to addressing the skin health risks posed by air pollutants, could be actively used in environmental science, dermatology, and public health.

1. Introduction

Airborne fine dust pollution is on the rise, presenting a rapidly increasing and significant threat to both the environment and human health [1]. Fine dust particles suspended in the atmosphere not only affect respiratory health but also make direct contact with the skin, rendering the skin one of the primary organs exposed to external pollutants [2]. While research on the health effects of fine dust has mainly concentrated on its impacts on pulmonary [3] and cardiovascular systems [4], the consequences for skin health have often been overlooked. Nonetheless, the skin is highly responsive to environmental exposures and serves as the body’s first line of defense [5]. Therefore, understanding the intricate interplay between fine dust and skin health has become a matter of paramount importance [6].
Fine dust particles, specifically PM2.5 (fine dust with diameters below 2.5 μm) and PM10 (below 10 μm), encompass a complex mixture of organic and inorganic compounds [7], including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), trace elements, and ions [8]. PAHs are classified as carcinogens and are known to induce inflammation and cancer development [9,10]. Exposure to trace elements affects cognitive and mental disorders, while ions are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases [11]. Despite the well-documented adverse effects of fine dust on various organ systems [12], the impact on skin health remains relatively unexplored. The skin is the largest organ of the human body and serves as a protective barrier against the external environment. It consists mainly of the epidermis and dermis, and understanding how the cells in each layer respond to and recover from the infiltration of fine dust is essential. Therefore, epidermal keratinocytes, representing the epidermal layer, and dermal fibroblasts, representing the dermal layer, were selected to analyze the physiological effects. Skin cells, comprising epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts, directly encounter fine dust, triggering responses such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and DNA damage [2,13].
Therefore, this study aims to bridge the gap in our understanding of the physiological responses of skin cells to fine dust exposure. Utilizing a fine dust model compound capable of simulating diverse environmental conditions, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the metabolic activity and behavior of skin cells. Exposure to model fine dust compounds induces dose-dependent cytotoxicity, with PM2.5-ions exhibiting higher toxicity compared to PM10-PAHs. Human epidermal keratinocytes (HEKn) showed increased sensitivity to fine dust, leading to heightened inflammation, particularly marked by increased IL-8 expression in response to PM2.5-ions. Moreover, exposure to fine dust resulted in reduced cell density, delayed proliferation, and decreased migration, with these effects being more pronounced at higher concentrations of PM2.5-ions. These changes indicate an accelerated aging process, characterized by impaired cellular function and structural integrity. Live cell imaging and correlation analysis highlighted significant associations between metabolic activity, cell morphology, and IL-8 secretion. Interestingly, our investigation includes a simulated mixed model emulating Seoul’s atmospheric fine dust composition, which showcases reduced cellular toxicity compared to individual components. This finding underscores the complex interactions inherent in real-world fine dust and highlights the importance of considering the holistic impact of fine dust pollution on skin health.

2. Experimental Methods

2.1. Preparation and Treatment of Fine Dusts

Fine dusts were classified based on size into fine dust with diameters below 2.5 μm (PM2.5) and below 10 μm (PM10). To evaluate the physiological effects of fine dust on skin cells, certified reference materials (CRMs) with various particle sizes and chemical properties were purchased and used. Three types of CRMs were used in this study: CRM-PM2.5-Ions (ERM-CZ110, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), CRM-PM10-PAHs (ERM-CZ100, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), and CRM-PM10-Trace (ERM-CZ1200, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). The three types of CRMs consist of various chemical and physical compounds, including polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), trace elements, ions, organic compounds, transition metals, and biological components. CRM-PMs were sterilized under UV light for 30 min, dispersed in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Biowest, Nuaillé, France) at a concentration of 500 μg/mL, and sonicated for one hour. Final concentrations of 2, 10, 50, and 100 μg/mL were prepared by diluting the CRM-PM stock solutions in proliferation media. The composition of each CRM-PM component is detailed in Tables S1–S3.

2.2. Cell Culture of Human Skin Cells

In this study, epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts were selected to analyze the physiological effects of fine dust on skin cells within the epidermis and dermis of the skin. Human dermal fibroblasts, neonatal (HDFn cells in passages 3 to 5, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), were cultured in a 75-cm2 cell culture flask using Human Fibroblast Expansion Basal Medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with Low Serum Growth Supplement (LSGS, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (P/S, 100x, Biowest, Nuaillé, France). Human epidermal keratinocytes (HEKn cells in passages 1 to 3, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) were cultured in a 75-cm2 cell culture flask using EpiLife™ Medium, with 60 µM calcium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with Human Keratinocyte Growth Supplement (HKGS, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (P/S, 100x, Biowest, Watertown, MA, USA). Cells were maintained in a 5% CO2, 37 °C environment, with a media change every two days. When reaching 80% confluence, cells were detached from the flask using 0.25% Trypsin (Biowest, France) for further experimentation. Throughout each experimental process, cells were observed using an optical microscope (Nikon Eclipse TS100, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Cell Viability Assay

To assess the toxic impact of fine dust on skin cells, cell viability was measured using the MTT assay with optical density (OD) readings. Viable cells can reduce MTT to formazan compounds, and cell viability can be calculated by measuring the absorbance of the formazan compounds produced in the cells. HDFn and HEKn cells were seeded at a concentration of 1 × 105 cells/well in a 96-well plate, and after 3 and 24 h, they were treated with CRM-PMs. CRM-PMs concentrations of 2, 10, 50, and 100 μg/mL were administered for 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Following CRM-PMs treatment, cells were cultured in a 5% CO2, 37 °C environment. Subsequently, media containing CRM-PMs were removed, and cells were washed twice with PBS. A solution of MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium) bromide, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at a concentration of 5 mg/mL in PBS was added to each well at 10% (v/v) and incubated for 4 h. After incubation, a lysis buffer solution composed of 50% (w/v) N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and 10% (w/v) SDS was added to each well, and the generated formazan was allowed to dissolve at room temperature for 2 h. Absorbance at 570 nm was then measured using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The absorbance values of the MTT solution-containing media were subtracted from the absorbance values of each sample to process the results.

2.4. Measurement of Inflammatory Cytokine IL-8

To assess the inflammatory response of skin cells to fine dust, the expression levels of the inflammatory cytokine Interleukin 8 (IL-8) were determined. HDFn and HEKn cells were seeded at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/mL in a 48-well plate, and fine dust was cultured at a concentration of 50 μg/mL for 48 h. Culture supernatants were collected at 12 and 48 h and stored at −40 °C until further analysis. An in vitro enzyme immunoassay was performed using the Human IL-8 ELISA Kit (Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA). The media were mixed with antibody solutions and incubated on antibody plates at 37 °C for 2 h. After washing with PBS, a substrate solution (TMBZ solution) was added, and the reaction proceeded at room temperature for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by adding stop solution, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The experimental procedures followed the protocol provided by the kit manufacturer, and the quantity of IL-8 was determined using the standard curve obtained from the IL-8 standard solution.

2.5. Analysis of Cell Behavior in Response to Fine Dust

To assess the pivotal actions of cells, particularly proliferation and migration, crucial for wound recovery, HEKn cells were employed. Initially, HEKn cells were seeded at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/well in a 48-well plate, and after 24 h, they were treated with fine dust at final concentrations of 2 and 50 μg/mL. Each experimental group was fixed at n = 5. Over a 7-day period, live cell imaging was conducted using a microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti) at consistent coordinates, capturing cell images at 15-min intervals, alongside the control group without fine dust treatment. For cell proliferation, HEKn cell numbers were measured at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72-h intervals. ImageJ (bundled with Java 8) was employed for image preprocessing to ensure uniformity and particle analysis for quantification, maintaining consistent measurement conditions. Subsequently, the measured cell numbers were divided by the area to analyze the cell density per unit area. Cell motility was evaluated using the Trackmate plugin in ImageJ, tracking cell movement positions at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48-h intervals. The analysis included assessing the distance covered during each time interval. Plugin settings and image preprocessing for cell movement distance analysis were standardized. Utilizing the recorded cell movement distances, the overall migration speed over time and instantaneous migration speed at 12-h intervals were analyzed, shedding light on the impact of fine dust composition and concentration on cell motility.

2.6. Analysis of Cytotoxicity and Growth Inhibition of Mixed Fine Dust

The composition of fine dust in the actual atmosphere varies depending on the season, location, and other factors. The effect of fine dust contained in the actual atmosphere, which consists of mixed components, on skin cells will be more complex than that of fine dusts of a single component. In this study, to determine differences in toxicity between individual fine dust model compounds and fine dust mixtures on skin cells, the effects of fine dust mixtures on the activity of skin cells were evaluated. The simulated composition of the fine dust mixture was based on representative atmospheric conditions during the winter in Seoul, Korea. The composition of representative fine dusts in Seoul (Seoul-PMs) is 22.6% of PM10-PAHs, 45.6% of PM10-Trace, and 31.7% of PM2.5-Ions [14]. To determine the effect of the Seoul-PMs, an MTT assay was performed on HEKn cells at concentrations of 2 μg/mL and 50 μg/mL. In addition, in order to investigate the inhibitory effect of the model fine dusts used on the growth of HEKn cells, the non-competitive inhibition model, which is one of the models that explains the inhibitory effect of bacterial growth, was used for analysis. Using this model equation, the growth inhibition constant (KI) and the reduced inhibition constant (α) were obtained for individual fine dusts [15].
μ = μ m [ S ] K m 1 + [ I ] K I + [ s ] 1 + [ I ] K I
where, μ and μ m are the specific growth rate and the maximum specific growth rate, respectively, and K m and S are the saturation constant and substrate concentration, respectively. Moreover, [I] and K I are the concentrations and the inhibition constant of an inhibitor (fine dusts), respectively. The reciprocal plot for the non-competitive inhibition model is as follows:
1 μ K m μ m 1 + [ I ] K I 1 [ S ] = K m μ m [ S ] 1 + [ I ] K I
The inhibition constant for each of the fine dusts was obtained from the intercept (−KI) of the x-axis in a plot of 1/μ versus [I]. The concentration of individual or mixed inhibitors with different toxicities can be generalized to the concentration of the reference substance using the reduced inhibition constant ( α i ) [15]
α i = K I , i K I , R e f = [ I ] i [ I ] R e f
where, K I , i and K I , R e f are the inhibition constants of the i-component and reference inhibitor, respectively, and [I]i and [I]Ref are the concentrations of the i-component and reference inhibitor, respectively.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Students’ t-tests were conducted using the R statistical programming environment. Bar graphs and scatter graphs with error bars indicate the mean and standard deviation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Cytotoxicity of Skin Cells in Response to Fine Dust

The cytotoxic effects of fine dust on skin cells (HDFn and HEKn) were assessed using the MTT assay. Post-seeding stabilization periods of 3 h for HDFn and 12 h for HEKn were followed by exposure to varied fine dust concentrations (2, 10, 50, 100 μg/mL) over 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Cell viability, normalized to respective control groups, was measured through absorbance. The pre- and post-MTT treatment cell images for HDFn are detailed in Figure 1a. The control group showed a steady viability increase over 48 h (Figure 1b). In comparison, fine dust-exposed HDFn demonstrated a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability, which was particularly evident at 50 μg/mL and higher concentrations (Figure 1c–e). At a low concentration of 2 µg/mL, the cell viability of HDFn exposed to CRM-PM2.5-ions for 12 h decreased by 12.7% compared to the control group. Furthermore, the reduction in cell viability was 2.5 times greater than that observed with PAHs, a known carcinogenic component of fine dust. This underscores HDFn’s concentration-dependent cytotoxicity to fine dust, with smaller particle sizes exerting a greater impact. The direct influence of PM2.5-Ion composition on cellular toxicity is plausible, given its constituents, such as Na+ and Ca2+. For HEKn viability measurements, pre- and post-MTT treatment cell images are illustrated in Figure 2a. The control group for untreated HEKn exhibited an 11.01% viability increase after 48 h, indicating gradual metabolic activity augmentation (Figure 2b). Similar to HDFn, HEKn exposed to fine dust showed reduced cell viability compared to their respective control groups at each time point (Figure 2c–e). HEKn displayed higher cytotoxicity than HDFn, especially when exposed to 2 μg/mL of fine dust for 12 h, resulting in reductions of 25.76%, 34.02%, and 38.33% for PM10-PAHs, PM10-Trace, and PM2.5-Ions, respectively.
Examining the initial cytotoxic impact on both skin cell types and evaluating HDFn and HEKn cytotoxicity over 48 h of prolonged exposure reveals that HDFn’s cell viability decreases with increasing concentrations of PM10-PAHs and PM10-Trace. This is consistent with cell viability being dependent on fine dust concentration [16] and cytotoxicity being induced by PM, depending on the dose and exposure time [17]. PM2.5-Ions, however, maintain relatively stable cell viability beyond 10 μg/mL. Moreover, at higher concentrations, cell viability converges to around 0.4. Conversely, HEKn, irrespective of the fine dust type, exhibits approximately 0.5 cell viability up to 10 μg/mL. However, at higher concentrations, PM10-PAHs and PM10-Trace tend to sustain cell viability, while PM2.5-Ions result in lower cell viability (Figure 3a,b). The two cells showed different cytotoxicity trends depending on the type of fine dust, which emphasizes the vulnerability of HEKn, which forms the outermost layer of the skin, especially since cytotoxicity is associated with the overproduction of nitric oxide (NO) [18], and NO is known to stimulate cell death [19]. NO inhibits the activity of PARP-1, a DNA repair protein [20], suggesting that HEKn, which are susceptible to fine dust, may experience prolonged skin damage and slower recovery from exposure to fine dust during wound healing or skin conditions. The barrier of the skin epidermis is formed by tight junctions, making it difficult for external substances to penetrate healthy skin. However, these results indicate that when fine dust penetrates unhealthy or wounded skin, the epidermis sustains greater damage from the fine dust compared to the dermis. This suggests that recovery of the skin barrier may be challenging, potentially leading to a deterioration in skin health.

3.2. Evaluation of Inflammatory Cytokine Expression Induced by Fine Dust

Fine dust, by compromising the skin’s epidermal barrier function and triggering immune responses, induces inflammatory reactions associated with allergen activation [21]. Among the various pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines generated during this process, IL-8, specifically secreted upon stimulation, plays a crucial role [22]. It recruits polymorphonuclear cells, such as immune cells and neutrophils, to the inflammatory site, directly influencing functions like cell death and proliferation in skin cells [23]. Therefore, to assess the inflammatory response of skin cells to fine dust, a quantitative analysis of IL-8 secretion was conducted. Both HDFn and HEKn exhibited an increase in IL-8 expression over time, even without exposure to fine dust, with HDFn displaying more vigorous basal IL-8 expression than HEKn. When comparing the IL-8 expression levels of both skin cells exposed to fine dust, it was observed that HEKn responded more sensitively to all types of fine dust than HDFn. Examining HDFn’s IL-8 expression, it was noted that PM10-PAHs and PM10-Trace exhibited relatively minimal stimulation compared to PM2.5-Ions. Furthermore, when exposed to PM10-PAHs and PM10-Trace, the initial 12-h expression was higher than subsequent periods, while cells exposed to PM2.5-Ions displayed increased expression after 12 h (Figure 4a). In contrast, HEKn exhibited an increase in IL-8 expression after 12 h when exposed to PM10-PAHs and PM10-Trace, while cells exposed to PM2.5-Ions showed higher expression in the initial 12 h (Figure 4b). Notably, the decrease in IL-8 expression after 12 h of exposure to PM2.5-Ions may be attributed to reduced cell viability due to exposure to 50 μg/mL of PM2.5-Ions, leading to cell death [24]. Living cells, when exposed to stimuli or danger signals, induce necrosis or apoptosis, accompanied by inflammatory responses [25]. Along with cytokines, the resulting oxidative stress occurs when cells produce free radicals, which oxidize DNA and cause cells to become necrotic [26]. When oxidative stress is triggered, cells with reduced antioxidant capacity react with cell membranes, fatty acids, and proteins with excess free radicals, damaging cell function and DNA, leading to disease [27]. In summary, considering cell viability and the expression of the inflammatory cytokine IL-8, fine dust stimulation induces cell death, triggering an inflammatory response and activating the production of inflammatory cytokines. The higher cell survival rate in HDFn due to fine dust exposure may explain the comparatively lower IL-8 expression than in HEKn. Moreover, the higher absolute expression of IL-8 measured in the dermis suggests that if fine dust penetrates the dermis, it could induce a more substantial inflammatory response.

3.3. Proliferative Characteristics of HEKn in Response to Fine Dust

While metabolic activity of skin cells in response to fine dust was confirmed through cell survival assessments via MTT assay and cytokine evaluations based on IL-8 secretion, the dynamic behaviors influenced by cell proliferation, such as monolayer formation and cell migration, cannot be evaluated. As the epidermal layer-forming HEKn creates a monolayer with tight junctions, visually analyzing and quantifying the differences between fine dust-exposed cells and normal cells are crucial. Thus, in this study, HEKn was treated with fine dust, and changes over time following 72 h of exposure were monitored using live cell imaging equipment. To assess the proliferation rate and monolayer formation of HEKn, cell density per unit area was measured. The cell density of the control group, untreated with fine dust, increased 3.2 times from the initial measurement to 956.63 ± 33.49 cells/mm2 after 72 h. Fine dust-exposed HEKn showed a lower cell density compared to the control group, with PM2.5-Ions exhibiting the lowest density, 1.8 times lower than the control group (Figure 5a). PM10-PAHs and PM10-Trace displayed cell densities slightly lower than the control group but higher than PM2.5-Ions. HEKn treated with 50 μg/mL displayed significantly lower cell density than those exposed to 2 μg/mL (Figure 5b), indicating that higher fine dust concentrations reduce cell proliferation rates. In particular, HEKn exposed to PM2.5-Ions showed a 3.4 times lower proliferation rate compared to the control group, indicating that smaller particle sizes have a greater impact. Quantifying proliferation rates through cell counts revealed that higher fine dust concentrations lead to decreased proliferation, especially for PM2.5-Ions, which showed 1.6 times lower at 2 μg/mL and 2.8 times lower at 50 μg/mL compared to the control group.
Exposure to fine dust particles induces oxidative stress, inflammation, and DNA damage in cells [28], and these cellular responses can disrupt normal cellular metabolic activity and affect the rate of cell proliferation. The findings also support the concept that PAHs, trace elements, and ions in particulate matter directly affect cell viability and proliferation [29]. PAHs and trace-element fine dusts, as insoluble substances, appear to cause significant physical damage to cells, thereby reducing cell viability. Additionally, by occupying areas where cells need to proliferate, these fine dusts hinder adhesion with substrates essential for cell survival and proliferation, thus affecting the proliferation rate. Furthermore, fine dusts containing ionic components, which include some soluble substances, seem to cause both physical and chemical damage, thereby reducing both cell viability and proliferation rate. Exposure to fine dust has been associated with the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [30], suggesting that fine dust further modulates cellular responses and potentially affects cell proliferation rates. In summary, the analysis of cell density and proliferation rates confirms that HEKn is influenced by fine dust exposure, aligning with the quantitative data analyzed through live cell imaging and the trend observed in MTT assay cell survival. Notably, lower concentrations dominate in components and particle size, while higher concentrations significantly impair proliferation regardless of components. These results suggest potential effects on wound healing rates due to impacts on monolayer formation and tight junctions.

3.4. Analysis of HEKn Migration in Response to Fine Dust

Observations through live cell imaging confirmed that cell migration is affected by fine dust, in addition to its impact on cell proliferation. Cell movement is a crucial process for cells to adapt to their environment and reach appropriate positions for functional purposes. Cell migration is regulated by a variety of molecular processes, including changes in cell shape, cell structural arrangement, adhesion, and interactions with the extracellular matrix [31], and growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines contribute to regulating cell migration [32]. This cellular movement and these mechanical changes play a key role in various biological processes, including tissue formation, immune defense, inflammation, and cancer progression [33]. Therefore, the influence of fine dust on the migration of skin cells was analyzed using live cell imaging, capturing HEKn responsible for the skin barrier function over 48 h at 15-min intervals. Quantitative analysis of parameters such as displacement distance and velocity was conducted using the Trakmate plugin in ImageJ (Figure 6a). Fine dust-exposed HEKn exhibited shorter displacement distances compared to the control group. Notably, cells exposed to 50 μg/mL of fine dust showed significantly shorter displacement distances than those exposed to 2 μg/mL, indicating a concentration-dependent effect (Figure 6b). Particularly, samples exposed to PM2.5-Ions, characterized by smaller particle sizes, consistently displayed the shortest displacement distances at all concentrations. Cells exposed to 50 μg/mL of PM2.5-Ions exhibited an 11.4-fold reduction in displacement distance compared to the control group. These results suggest that cellular damage and oxidative stress act within the cell and affect cell migration [34]. Fine dust, especially with smaller particle sizes, not only lowers cell survival but also influences cell movement and activity. The impact of fine dust concentration and particle size on cell mobility was evident in HEKn, indicating that higher concentrations and smaller particle sizes result in reduced cell movement. Moreover, restricting cell migration is the same as weakening cell migration due to exposed particles altering cell morphology and limiting cell range of motion [35]. Additionally, momentary movement speeds were analyzed at 6 and 12-h intervals to assess the temporal dynamics of cell migration. Unexposed cells showed an initial increase in movement speed up to 24 h, followed by a decrease. This phenomenon could be attributed to increased cell numbers during HEKn proliferation, causing cells to be surrounded and movement to decrease. This is equivalent to saying that when a cell is exposed to certain stimuli or stressors, it can undergo rapid proliferation in response to repair and regeneration signals by the cell’s defense mechanisms [36]. However, if a cell is constantly stimulated by external and stressful factors, it may inhibit cell proliferation or cause cell death as a programmed protective response mechanism [37,38].
Examination of the movement speed of HEKn exposed to 2 μg/mL of fine dust revealed faster movement compared to the control group up to 12 h, followed by a gradual reduction in speed (Figure 6c). For cells exposed to 50 μg/mL, a significant reduction in movement speed was observed compared to 2 μg/mL (Figure 6d). Notably, PM2.5-Ions at 50 μg/mL showed movement speeds 2.1 times slower than the control group up to 24 h, suggesting that higher concentrations of fine dust hinder both cell survival and movement. This means that when a cell is exposed to certain toxins or DNA-damaging agents, to prevent the proliferation of damaged cells, the cell activates cellular checkpoint mechanisms [39], stopping cell division or inducing apoptosis [40], and inhibiting migration and proliferation. The recovery and regeneration of the epidermis proceed through a process where the proliferation of keratinocytes leads to the formation of the basal layer, followed by their differentiation to stratum corneum. The introduction of fine dust hinders keratinocyte proliferation, slowing down basal layer formation, and acts as a defect in the tight junctions within the basal layer, thereby weakening structural integrity. Additionally, cell death caused by fine dust creates debris, which can further contribute to these defects, leading to secondary damage. These processes slow down skin recovery and regeneration, and prolonged exposure may alter cellular metabolic activity and ultimately result in tissue deformation. Therefore, these findings demonstrate that various cellular behaviors—including not only cytotoxicity but also migration, proliferation, and other behaviors—are all affected, which significantly impacts the recovery and regeneration of skin tissue.

3.5. Correlation Analysis of HEKn Metabolic and Behavioral Characteristics in Response to Fine Dust

A comprehensive analysis of the impact of fine dust on HEKn cells was conducted by integrating results from cell viability, IL-8 secretion, proliferation, and migration assessments. The correlation between MTT assay-derived cell viability and proliferation, reflecting actual proliferation rates and cell density, was investigated (Figure 7a). Despite slight variations depending on the type of fine dust, a linear trend indicated that both cell viability and proliferation increase as concentrations decrease. Additionally, the correlation between HEKn’s migration speed, proliferation rate, and the IL-8 inflammatory response factor was examined (Figure 7b). The migration and proliferation rates of HEKn exponentially declined as fine dust concentrations decreased. This suggests that fine dust not only hinders cell proliferation and movement but also impairs cell viability. Conversely, IL-8 secretion decreased as fine dust concentrations decreased. The danger signal from fine dust induces necrosis and apoptosis, triggering inflammatory responses in cells. Thus, the increased IL-8 secretion, reduced proliferation and migration, and cell death collectively indicate the influence of fine dust. This emphasizes that cell viability assessments can predict proliferation, movement, and metabolic activity of HEKn cells.

3.6. Cytotoxicity and Growth Inhibition of Mixed Fine Dust

The specific growth rate and inhibitory effect of HEKn cells according to changes in the concentration of fine dusts are shown in Figure 8a. In the control group where PMs were not added, the growth rate of HEKn cells was about 0.03 d−1. The growth rate was inhibited as the PMs concentration increased. At 50 μg/mL, the growth rate was approximately 0.004~0.009 d−1 depending on the species of PMs, which was reduced by approximately 68~87% compared to the control group. As a result of analyzing the inhibition mechanism using experimental data on the growth rate of HEKn cells according to the concentration change of individual PMs, the inhibitory action of the three PM models was interpreted as a non-competitive inhibition model (Equation (1)).
In this paper, PM2.5-Ions, which have the strongest inhibitory effect on HEKn cells, were selected as the reference inhibitor. Using experimental data on the cell growth of HEKn cells exposed to various concentrations of fine dusts, K I , i and α i for each fine dust obtained from Equations (2) and (3) are summarized in Table 1. In addition, the two concentrations (low and high) of the Seoul-PMs were converted to the concentration of PM2.5-Ions, a reference material, using the following Equation (4), and the reduced PM2.5-Ions concentration is presented in Table 1.
[ I ] R e d u c e d   P M I o n s = [ I ] i α i
The inhibition constant for each fine dust and the reduced inhibition constant evaluated using the most toxic PM2.5-Ions as the reference material are summarized in Table 1. The smaller the inhibition constant, the stronger the toxicity of fine dusts. The toxicity of fine dusts to HEKn cells is in the following order: PM2.5-Ions, PM10-PAHs, and PM10-Trace.
The normalized cellular viability of HEKn cells (Figure 3b) according to changes in the concentrations of three types of PMs was redrawn based on the reduced PMs concentration converted to the concentration of PM2.5-Ions, a reference substance, using the reduced inhibition constant (Figure 8c). Despite the different toxicity of each PM, the cellular viability of each PMs was similar when the reduced PMs concentration was the same. These results suggest that the toxicity of each PMs can be generalized to that of the reference substance by using the reduced inhibition constant, even if the toxicity is different. As shown in Table 1, Figure 9 shows the cellular viability of HEKn cells according to the concentration change of Seoul-PMs, which simulates the composition of PMs in the air of typical Seoul during the winter. The normalized cellular viability was about 0.66 at low concentration of Seoul-PM (2 μg/mL) and about 0.53 at high concentration of Seoul-PM (50 μg/mL). The cellular viability in Low Seoul-PMs (2 μg/mL) was similar to that of PM10-PAHs and PM10-Trace at the same concentration and was higher than that of PM2.5-Ions. The cellular viability of high Seoul-PMs (50 μg/mL) was higher than that of the three types of PMs at the same concentration. The concentrations of the reduced PM, which is a mixture of low concentration (2 μg/mL) and high concentration (50 μg/mL) of Seoul-PMs converted to PM2.5-Ions, are 1.15 and 28.78 μg/mL, respectively. When the concentration of PM2.5-Ions was 1.15 and 28.78 μg/mL, the predicted cellular viability was 0.66 and 0.53, respectively, but the viability of HEKn cells exposed to the same concentration of Seoul-PMs was higher (Figure 9b).
The results in Figure 8 and Figure 9 demonstrate that: (1) The individual inhibitory actions of substances with different levels of cytotoxicity are determined by using an appropriate inhibition model equation to determine the inhibition constant and the reduced inhibition constant; (2) The concentration of individual toxic substances can be converted from the reduced inhibition constant to the reference inhibitor concentration; and (3) Ultimately, the toxicity of each toxic substance can be generalized to the toxicity (inhibitory action) of the reference substance, and a comparative analysis of each toxicity is possible. The reduced inhibition constant is derived from inhibition model equations to analyze the growth inhibition (enzyme activity inhibition) effect of toxic substances on microorganisms. This study is the first case of applying this inhibition model to human cells and air pollutants, suggesting that it is useful not only for microorganisms such as bacteria and yeast, but also for human and animal cells.
Although many studies have investigated the physiological effects of fine dust on cells, it is challenging to identify offset effects or synergistic effects between specific toxic substances due to the mixture of various components [41,42]. However, this will be very useful in understanding the toxicity of mixtures as well as single toxic substances. The relative toxicity of single substances can be evaluated by comparing the values of each inhibition constant. If the concentration of each toxic substance is converted to the concentration of the reference substance using the reduced inhibition constant, the toxicity of a substance can be directly compared with that of various toxic substances. The toxicity of a mixture acts as a weight corresponding to the concentration and inherent toxicity of each substance constituting the mixture or causes a synergy effect or offset effect between the toxic substances constituting the mixture. From Figure 9b, which is the result obtained by applying this method, it can be seen that the mixture Seoul-PM shows an offsetting effect of displaying lower toxicity than the inherent toxicity of each constituent PM toward HEKn cells.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the physiological effects of fine dust on skin cells were analyzed based on their behavioral characteristics. Even at minimal concentrations, fine dust substantially hindered the growth of both HEKn and HDFn cells, with PM2.5-Ions exerting the most pronounced effects. Notably, HEKn displayed heightened sensitivity to fine dust, consistently eliciting inflammatory responses across all fine dust components, as is particularly evidenced by elevated IL-8 expression in PM2.5-Ions. Moreover, behavioral analyses of HEKn unveiled diminished cell density, proliferation rates, and migration distances, notably accentuated at a high PM2.5-Ions concentration (50 μg/mL). Interestingly, a simulated mixed model mirroring Seoul’s atmospheric fine dust composition revealed reduced cellular toxicity compared to individual components, underscoring the complexity of real-world fine dust interactions. The findings collectively underscore that fine dust elicits inflammation in skin cells, precipitating reduced proliferation, migration, and heightened cell mortality. This comprehensive understanding illuminates the intricate interplay between fine dust exposure and skin cell responses, offering promising avenues for further exploration into cellular metabolism and behavior under environmental stressors. Overall, this study, which contributes to addressing the skin health risks posed by air pollutants, could be actively used in environmental science, dermatology, and public health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/environments11110259/s1, Table S1: Composition of CRM-PM10-PAHs. Table S2: Composition of CRM-PM10-Trace. Table S3. Composition of CRM-PM10-Ions.

Author Contributions

T.E.K. and J.W.L. have contributed equally to this study. J.H.J. and H.W.R. conceptualization; T.E.K. and J.W.L. investigation and data acquisition; T.E.K. and J.W.L. formal analysis; T.E.K., J.W.L., J.H.J. and H.W.R. writing manuscript; J.H.J. and H.W.R. funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2024-00358960) and by the Ministry of Education (NRF–2020R1A6A1A03044977).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shaddick, G.; Thomas, M.L.; Mudu, P.; Ruggeri, G.; Gumy, S. Half the world’s population are exposed to increasing air pollution. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2020, 3, f23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fitoussi, R.; Faure, M.-O.; Beauchef, G.; Achard, S. Human skin responses to environmental pollutants: A review of current scientific models. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 306, 119316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hamra Ghassan, B.; Guha, N.; Cohen, A.; Laden, F.; Raaschou-Nielsen, O.; Samet Jonathan, M.; Vineis, P.; Forastiere, F.; Saldiva, P.; Yorifuji, T.; et al. Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 906–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pope, C.A.; Burnett Richard, T.; Turner Michelle, C.; Cohen, A.; Krewski, D.; Jerrett, M.; Gapstur Susan, M.; Thun Michael, J. Lung Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Associated with Ambient Air Pollution and Cigarette Smoke: Shape of the Exposure–Response Relationships. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 1616–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Saw, C.L.L.; Yang, A.Y.; Huang, M.T.; Liu, Y.; Lee, J.H.; Khor, T.O.; Su, Z.Y.; Shu, L.; Lu, Y.; Conney, A.H.; et al. Nrf2 null enhances UVB-induced skin inflammation and extracellular matrix damages. Cell Biosci. 2014, 4, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parrado, C.; Mercado-Saenz, S.; Perez-Davo, A.; Gilaberte, Y.; Gonzalez, S.; Juarranz, A. Environmental Stressors on Skin Aging. Mechanistic Insights [Review]. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kelly, F.J.; Fussell, J.C. Size, source and chemical composition as determinants of toxicity attributable to ambient particulate matter. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 60, 504–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Valavanidis, A.; Fiotakis, K.; Vlachogianni, T. Airborne Particulate Matter and Human Health: Toxicological Assessment and Importance of Size and Composition of Particles for Oxidative Damage and Carcinogenic Mechanisms. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C 2008, 26, 339–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jindal, S.; Chaudhary, Y.; Aggarwal, K.K. Toxicity of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and their biodegradation in the environment. In Green Chemistry Approaches to Environmental Sustainability; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 43–66. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sombiri, S.; Balhara, N.; Attri, D.; Kharb, I.; Giri, A. An overview on occurrence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food chain with special emphasis on human health ailments. Discov. Environ. 2024, 2, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Coxon, T.; Goldstein, L.; Odhiambo, B.K. Analysis of spatial distribution of trace metals, PCB, and PAH and their potential impact on human health in Virginian Counties and independent cities, USA. Environ. Geochem. Health 2019, 41, 783–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Glencross, D.A.; Ho, T.-R.; Camiña, N.; Hawrylowicz, C.M.; Pfeffer, P.E. Air pollution and its effects on the immune system. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 151, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, L.; Lee, W.; Cui, Y.R.; Ahn, G.; Jeon, Y.-J. Protective effect of green tea catechin against urban fine dust particle-induced skin aging by regulation of NF-κB, AP-1, and MAPKs signaling pathways. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 252, 1318–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. gon Ryou, H.; Heo, J.; Kim, S.Y. Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 air pollution, and possible impacts of study characteristics in South Korea. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cho, K.-S.; Ryu, H.-W.; Choi, H.-M. Toxicity evaluation of complex metal mixtures using reduced metal concentrations: Application to iron oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 18, 1298–1307. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Akhtar, U.S.; McWhinney, R.D.; Rastogi, N.; Abbatt JP, D.; Evans, G.J.; Scott, J.A. Cytotoxic and proinflammatory effects of ambient and source-related particulate matter (PM) in relation to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cytokine adsorption by particles. Inhal. Toxicol. 2010, 22 (Suppl. 2), 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yang, X.; Feng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.; Shi, Y.; Liang, S.; Zhao, T.; Fu, Y.; Duan, J.; Sun, Z. Cytotoxicity induced by fine particulate matter (PM2.5) via mitochondria-mediated apoptosis pathway in human cardiomyocytes. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 161, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Marmolino, D.; Manto, M. Pregabalin antagonizes copper-induced toxicity in the brain: In vitro and in vivo studies. Neurosignals 2011, 18, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Huang, Y.-C.T.; Soukup, J.; Harder, S.; Becker, S. Mitochondrial oxidant production by a pollutant dust and NO-mediated apoptosis in human alveolar macrophage. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2003, 284, C24–C32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, X.; Cooper, K.L.; Huestis, J.; Xu, H.; Burchiel, S.W.; Hudson, L.G.; Liu, K.J. S-nitrosation on zinc finger motif of PARP-1 as a mechanism of DNA repair inhibition by arsenite. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 80482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, H.B.; Choi, M.G.; Chung, B.Y.; Um, J.Y.; Kim Jin, C.; Park, C.W.; Kim, H.O. Particulate matter 2.5 induces the skin barrier dysfunction and cutaneous inflammation via AhR- and T helper 17 cell-related genes in human skin tissue as identified via transcriptome analysis. Exp. Dermatol. 2023, 32, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Coquette, A.; Berna, N.; Vandenbosch, A.; Rosdy, M.; De Wever, B.; Poumay, Y. Analysis of interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) expression and release in in vitro reconstructed human epidermis for the prediction of in vivo skin irritation and/or sensitization. Toxicol. Vitr. 2003, 17, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yoshizumi, M.; Nakamura, T.; Kato, M.; Ishioka, T.; Kozawa, K.; Wakamatsu, K.; Kimura, H. Release of cytokines/chemokines and cell death in UVB-irradiated human keratinocytes, HaCaT. Cell Biol. Int. 2008, 32, 1405–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hetland, R.B.; Cassee, F.R.; Refsnes, M.; Schwarze, P.E.; Låg, M.; Boere AJ, F.; Dybing, E. Release of inflammatory cytokines, cell toxicity and apoptosis in epithelial lung cells after exposure to ambient air particles of different size fractions. Toxicol. Vitr. 2004, 18, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Huang, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhou, R. NLRP3 inflammasome activation and cell death. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2021, 18, 2114–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Federico, A.; Morgillo, F.; Tuccillo, C.; Ciardiello, F.; Loguercio, C. Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress in human carcinogenesis. Int. J. Cancer 2007, 121, 2381–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khansari, N.; Shakiba, Y.; Mahmoudi, M. Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress as a major cause of age-related diseases and cancer. Recent Pat. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Discov. 2009, 3, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yuhong, H.; Thomas, C.; Sandrah, P.E.; Tingyu, Y.; Xinci, C.; Mario, V.; Nathan, P.; Fred, L.; Deborah, L.; Nathana, L.; et al. Joint effects of traffic-related air pollution and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy on maternal postpartum depressive and anxiety symptoms. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kermani, M.; Rahmatinia, T.; Oskoei, V.; Norzaee, S.; Shahsavani, A.; Farzadkia, M.; Kazemi, M.H. Potential cytotoxicity of trace elements and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons bounded to particulate matter: A review on in vitro studies on human lung epithelial cells. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 55888–55904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Leikauf, G.D.; Kim, S.-H.; Jang, A.-S. Mechanisms of ultrafine particle-induced respiratory health effects. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luo, J.; Walker, M.; Xiao, Y.; Donnelly, H.; Dalby, M.J.; Salmeron-Sanchez, M. The influence of nanotopography on cell behaviour through interactions with the extracellular matrix—A review. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 15, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weaver, D.F. Amyloid beta is an early responder cytokine and immunopeptide of the innate immune system. Alzheimer’s Dement. Transl. Res. Clin. Interv. 2020, 6, e12100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Di, X.; Gao, X.; Peng, L.; Ai, J.; Jin, X.; Qi, S.; Li, H.; Wang, K.; Luo, D. Cellular mechanotransduction in health and diseases: From molecular mechanism to therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Qing, Y.; Xiang, X.; Li, S.; Wang, M.; Liang, Z.; Ren, J. Integrated evaluation the antioxidant activity of epicatechin from cell dynamics. Biotechnol. Prog. 2023, 39, e3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cheng, Y.; Ren, J.; Fan, S.; Wu, P.; Cong, W.; Lin, Y.; Lan, S.; Song, S.; Shao, B.; Dai, W. Nanoparticulates reduce tumor cell migration through affinity interactions with extracellular migrasomes and retraction fibers. Nanoscale Horiz. 2022, 7, 779–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Prudovsky, I. Cellular mechanisms of FGF-stimulated tissue repair. Cells 2021, 10, 1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bedoui, S.; Herold, M.J.; Strasser, A. Emerging connectivity of programmed cell death pathways and its physiological implications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 678–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cohen, S.M.; Ellwein, L.B. Cell Proliferation in Carcinogenesis. Science 1990, 249, 1007–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Campos, A.; Clemente-Blanco, A. Cell cycle and DNA repair regulation in the damage response: Protein phosphatases take over the reins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Heydarnezhad Asl, M.; Pasban Khelejani, F.; Bahojb Mahdavi, S.Z.; Emrahi, L.; Jebelli, A.; Mokhtarzadeh, A. The various regulatory functions of long noncoding RNAs in apoptosis, cell cycle, and cellular senescence. J. Cell. Biochem. 2022, 123, 995–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wei, H.; Yuan, W.; Yu, H.; Geng, H. Cytotoxicity induced by fine particulate matter (PM2.5) via mitochondria-mediated apoptosis pathway in rat alveolar macrophages. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 25819–25829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, J.; Shi, Y.; Asweto, C.O.; Feng, L.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z. Fine particle matters induce DNA damage and G2/M cell cycle arrest in human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 25071–25081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cytotoxicity characterization of human dermal Fibroblasts (HDFn) by particulate matters. (a) Bright-field images of HDFn cells treated with 50 μg/mL of PMs before and after the MTT assay. (b) Cellular metabolic activity measured at each time, normalized to the metabolic activity characterized right after cell stabilization in the well. (c) Cell viability measured at each time, normalized to the characterized pure medium group at each time, comparing different concentrations of (c) PAHs, (d) Trace, and (e) Ions (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005).
Figure 1. Cytotoxicity characterization of human dermal Fibroblasts (HDFn) by particulate matters. (a) Bright-field images of HDFn cells treated with 50 μg/mL of PMs before and after the MTT assay. (b) Cellular metabolic activity measured at each time, normalized to the metabolic activity characterized right after cell stabilization in the well. (c) Cell viability measured at each time, normalized to the characterized pure medium group at each time, comparing different concentrations of (c) PAHs, (d) Trace, and (e) Ions (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005).
Environments 11 00259 g001
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity characterization of human epidermal keratinocytes (HEKn) by particulate matters. (a) Bright-field images of HEKn cells treated with 50 μg/mL of PMs before and after the MTT assay. (b) Cellular metabolic activity measured at each time, normalized to the metabolic activity characterized right after cell stabilization in the well. (c) Cell viability measured at each time, normalized to the characterized pure medium group at each time, comparing different concentrations of (c) PAHs, (d) Trace, and (e) Ions (*** p < 0.0005).
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity characterization of human epidermal keratinocytes (HEKn) by particulate matters. (a) Bright-field images of HEKn cells treated with 50 μg/mL of PMs before and after the MTT assay. (b) Cellular metabolic activity measured at each time, normalized to the metabolic activity characterized right after cell stabilization in the well. (c) Cell viability measured at each time, normalized to the characterized pure medium group at each time, comparing different concentrations of (c) PAHs, (d) Trace, and (e) Ions (*** p < 0.0005).
Environments 11 00259 g002
Figure 3. Assessing the impact of cells on particulate matters. Compare cell viability with each type of fine dust concentration after 48 h in (a) HDFn and (b) HEKn.
Figure 3. Assessing the impact of cells on particulate matters. Compare cell viability with each type of fine dust concentration after 48 h in (a) HDFn and (b) HEKn.
Environments 11 00259 g003
Figure 4. Assessing metabolic activity induced by particulate matters. Expression levels of the particulate matter-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-8 in (a) HDFn and (b) HEKn cells. IL-8 expression was assessed after treatment with 50 μg/mL of particulate matter and expressed IL-8 levels were evaluated per cell.
Figure 4. Assessing metabolic activity induced by particulate matters. Expression levels of the particulate matter-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-8 in (a) HDFn and (b) HEKn cells. IL-8 expression was assessed after treatment with 50 μg/mL of particulate matter and expressed IL-8 levels were evaluated per cell.
Environments 11 00259 g004
Figure 5. Characterization of HEKn proliferation rate induced by fine dusts. HEKn cells were imaged using live cell imaging and analyzed with ImageJ. Each fine dust material was treated at concentrations of (a) 2 μg/mL and (b) 50 μg/mL, then compared to the control. (c) Proliferation rates of HEKn cells at 48 h were assessed (*** p < 0.0005).
Figure 5. Characterization of HEKn proliferation rate induced by fine dusts. HEKn cells were imaged using live cell imaging and analyzed with ImageJ. Each fine dust material was treated at concentrations of (a) 2 μg/mL and (b) 50 μg/mL, then compared to the control. (c) Proliferation rates of HEKn cells at 48 h were assessed (*** p < 0.0005).
Environments 11 00259 g005
Figure 6. Analysis of the behavior of HEKn affected by particulate matter. (a) HEKn activity in each fine dust component was analyzed by ImageJ. (b) The migration distance of HEKn treated with each particulate matter was analyzed compared to the control. HEKn were treated with 2 μg/mL and 50 μg/mL concentrations of each particulate matter for 48 h and analyzed (*** p < 0.0005). The hourly proliferation instantaneous rate of HEKn by particulate matter was evaluated by treating (c) 2 μg/mL and (d) 50 μg/mL of each material. The asterisks in (d) indicate statistical significance compared to the 2 µg/mL group (*** p < 0.0005).
Figure 6. Analysis of the behavior of HEKn affected by particulate matter. (a) HEKn activity in each fine dust component was analyzed by ImageJ. (b) The migration distance of HEKn treated with each particulate matter was analyzed compared to the control. HEKn were treated with 2 μg/mL and 50 μg/mL concentrations of each particulate matter for 48 h and analyzed (*** p < 0.0005). The hourly proliferation instantaneous rate of HEKn by particulate matter was evaluated by treating (c) 2 μg/mL and (d) 50 μg/mL of each material. The asterisks in (d) indicate statistical significance compared to the 2 µg/mL group (*** p < 0.0005).
Environments 11 00259 g006
Figure 7. Correlation between metabolic activity toward fine dust and morphological analysis of HEKn. (a) Proliferation rate and cell survival rate. (b) Correlation between cell migration speed and proliferation rate and IL-8 secretion. The correlation between metabolic activity and morphological analysis of HEKn responding to particulate matter was evaluated. The injection amount of each PM was 50 μg/mL, and each analysis item was evaluated for 48 h.
Figure 7. Correlation between metabolic activity toward fine dust and morphological analysis of HEKn. (a) Proliferation rate and cell survival rate. (b) Correlation between cell migration speed and proliferation rate and IL-8 secretion. The correlation between metabolic activity and morphological analysis of HEKn responding to particulate matter was evaluated. The injection amount of each PM was 50 μg/mL, and each analysis item was evaluated for 48 h.
Environments 11 00259 g007
Figure 8. Specific growth rate of HEKn cells according to changes in PM concentration (a), plot of [I] and 1/μ by non-competitive inhibition model (b) and normalized cell viability with the reduced PMs (c) (from Figure 3b).
Figure 8. Specific growth rate of HEKn cells according to changes in PM concentration (a), plot of [I] and 1/μ by non-competitive inhibition model (b) and normalized cell viability with the reduced PMs (c) (from Figure 3b).
Environments 11 00259 g008
Figure 9. Normalized cellular viability of HEKn cells according to changes in the concentration of Seoul-PMs. (a) PMs concentration and (b) the reduced PMs as PM2.5-Ions.
Figure 9. Normalized cellular viability of HEKn cells according to changes in the concentration of Seoul-PMs. (a) PMs concentration and (b) the reduced PMs as PM2.5-Ions.
Environments 11 00259 g009
Table 1. The inhibition constant (KI) and the reduced inhibition constant ( α i ) of fine dusts on HEKn cells and concentration of the simulated Seoul-PMs.
Table 1. The inhibition constant (KI) and the reduced inhibition constant ( α i ) of fine dusts on HEKn cells and concentration of the simulated Seoul-PMs.
CRM-PMsKI,i
(μg/mL)
αi
[-]
Composition of
Representative Seoul-PMs (%)
[14]
Concentration of
Simulated Seoul-PMs (μg/mL)
Reduced Concentration of the
Seoul-PMs as PM2.5-Ions (μg/mL)
Low PMsHigh PMsLow PMsHigh PMs
PM10-PAHs22.92.3222.60.4511.300.204.87
PM10-Trace27.92.8245.60.9122.800.328.06
PM2.5-Ions9.91.0031.70.6415.850.6315.85
Total100.02.0050.001.1528.78
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, T.E.; Lim, J.W.; Jeong, J.H.; Ryu, H.W. Differential Cytotoxicity, Inflammatory Responses, and Aging Effects of Human Skin Cells in Response to Fine Dust Exposure. Environments 2024, 11, 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11110259

AMA Style

Kim TE, Lim JW, Jeong JH, Ryu HW. Differential Cytotoxicity, Inflammatory Responses, and Aging Effects of Human Skin Cells in Response to Fine Dust Exposure. Environments. 2024; 11(11):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11110259

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Tae Eun, Jun Woo Lim, Jae Hyun Jeong, and Hee Wook Ryu. 2024. "Differential Cytotoxicity, Inflammatory Responses, and Aging Effects of Human Skin Cells in Response to Fine Dust Exposure" Environments 11, no. 11: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11110259

APA Style

Kim, T. E., Lim, J. W., Jeong, J. H., & Ryu, H. W. (2024). Differential Cytotoxicity, Inflammatory Responses, and Aging Effects of Human Skin Cells in Response to Fine Dust Exposure. Environments, 11(11), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11110259

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop