Next Article in Journal
Quantification of the Total and Extractable Content of Micro- and Trace Elements in Linden Blossom and Infusions—The Impact of Urban Pollution on Health Risk for Samples from Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Previous Article in Journal
Spent Coffee Grounds (SCGs) as a Soil Amendment: The Effects of Composting Time on Early Sunflower Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Possible Impacts of Elevated CO2 and Temperature on Growth and Development of Grain Legumes

by
Rajanna G. Adireddy
1,2,*,
Saseendran S. Anapalli
1,
Krishna N. Reddy
1,
Partson Mubvumba
1 and
Justin George
3
1
Crop Production Systems Research Unit, USDA ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
2
ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research, Regional Station, Ananthapur 515701, India
3
Southern Insect Management Research Unit, USDA ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Environments 2024, 11(12), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120273
Submission received: 22 October 2024 / Revised: 25 November 2024 / Accepted: 27 November 2024 / Published: 2 December 2024

Abstract

:

Highlights

  • This review presents a summary of the literature on the effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on grain legumes
  • Fertilization effect of elevated CO2 has a positive effect on photosynthesis and biomass growth
  • Grain nutrition content of grain legumes can decrease
  • Pollinators’ visits to flowering plants can be higher, enhancing pollination

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most abundant greenhouse gas (GHG) in the atmosphere and the substrate for the photosynthetic fixation of carbohydrates in plants. Increasing GHGs from anthropogenic emissions is warming the Earth’s atmospheric system at an alarming rate and changing its climate, which can affect photosynthesis and other biochemical reactions in crop plants favorably or unfavorably, depending on plant species. For the substrate role in plant carbon reduction reactions, CO2 concentration ([CO2]) in air potentially enhances photosynthesis. However, N uptake and availability for protein synthesis can be a potential limiting factor in enhanced biomass synthesis under enriched [CO2] conditions across species. Legumes are C3 plants and symbiotic N fixers and are expected to benefit from enhanced [CO2] in the air. However, the concurrent increase in air temperatures with enhanced [CO2] demands more detailed investigations on the effects of [CO2] enhancement on grain legume growth and yield. In this article, we critically reviewed and presented the online literature on growth, phenology, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, productivity, soil health, and insect behavior under elevated [CO2] and temperature conditions. The review revealed that specific leaf weight, pod weight, and nodule number and weight increased significantly under elevated [CO2] of up to 750 ppm. Under elevated [CO2], two mechanisms that were affected were the photosynthesis rate (increased) and stomatal conductivity (decreased), which helped enhance water use efficiency in the C3 legume plants to achieve higher yields. Exposure of legumes to elevated levels of [CO2] when water stressed resulted in an increase of 58% in [CO2] uptake, 73% in transpiration efficiency, and 41% in rubisco carboxylation and decreased stomatal conductance by 15–30%. The elevated [CO2] enhanced the yields of soybean by 10–101%, peanut by 28–39%, mung bean by 20–28%, chickpea by 26–31%, and pigeon pea by 31–38% over ambient [CO2]. However, seed nutritional qualities like protein, Zn, and Ca were significantly decreased. Increased soil temperatures stimulate microbial activity, spiking organic matter decomposition rates and nutrient release into the soil system. Elevated temperatures impact insect behavior through higher plant feeding rates, posing an enhanced risk of invasive pest attacks in legumes. However, further investigations on the potential interaction effects of elevated [CO2] and temperatures and extreme climate events on growth, seed yields and nutritional qualities, soil health, and insect behavior are required to develop climate-resilient management practices through the development of novel genotypes, irrigation technologies, and fertilizer management for sustainable legume production systems.

1. Introduction

The primary greenhouse gases (GHGs) that warm the Earth’s atmospheric system are CO2, methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). GHGs emitted from anthropogenic activities absorb and retain more solar heat energy in the atmosphere, warming the earth’s surface more than usual and causing undesirable consequences to the global climate. Termed ‘climate change’, such changes can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on crop and food production systems worldwide from associated enhanced air temperatures and other extreme weather events [1,2]. Atmospheric [CO2] is expected to increase significantly from 421 ppm in 2024 to about 550–700 ppm by 2050 and 670–940 ppm by 2100 [2,3]. Changes in plant stomatal behavior and photosynthetic efficiency are the main factors influencing how rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations affect the metabolism of carbon and water in plants. Due to the well-known [CO2] fertilization effects, elevated [CO2] is frequently linked to higher biomass and crop yield. However, geographically, air temperatures during the crop growing season near the equator are already at, near, or above the upper optimum levels conducive for crop growth compared to places that are North and South of the equator. As such, areas closer to the equator face a decrease in production, and regions away from the equator are expected to increase production due to a further rise in temperatures [4,5]. The enhanced carbohydrates produced from the [CO2] fertilization effect significantly impact the nutritional composition and overall quality of food crops [6]. As such, enhanced [CO2] and air temperatures pose another major threat to global food security by adding uncertainty to the nutritional quality of plant-based food. In legumes, with elevated [CO2], higher rates of photosynthesis and enhanced production in soybeans and peanuts have been reported [7,8]. Research shows that the increase in photosynthetic rate also increases the translocation rate from source to sink, resulting in higher grain yield returns [9]. However, a drop in tissue nitrogen (N) levels and grain protein concentration were also observed in legumes exposed to enhanced [CO2], impacting seed qualities [10].
The impact of elevated [CO2] on crops varies with different photosynthetic pathways such as C3 vs. C4 or CAM (crassulacean acid metabolism), plant varieties and cultivars, geographical locations, soil fertility, and climates. In general, C3 crops stand to benefit from the [CO2] fertilization effect in the Rubisco-catalyzed carbon fixation reactions in the Calvin–Benson–Bassam photosynthesis cycle. In contrast, the impact of an air [CO2] enhancement mechanism mediated by the phosphoenolpyruvate enzyme before air enters the photosynthetic site in ] bundle sheath cells in C4 plants hinders their chances to reap an equal benefit from the enhanced atmospheric [CO2] like the C3 species. Reported results, in general, show that the C3 crops can have yield improvements between 20–35%, while the C4 crop yield improvement can be between 0–15% [11]. Therefore, there is a growing need to further understand the impact of climate change factors, specifically the rising [CO2] and air temperatures, on photosynthetic carbon assimilation and crop production. This understanding is crucial for predicting how these factors affect the growth and productivity of emerging crop cultivars and varieties for enhanced nutritional value and sustainable production.
Approximately 28 million km2 of land is classified as dry regions, and 46 million km2 is classified as semi-arid regions [12,13]. The air temperatures associated with GHG build-up in the atmosphere significantly impact water scarcity in those climates characterized by frequent droughts [14,15,16]. In those climates, although the enhanced stomatal resistance with [CO2] can improve consumptive water demands of the crops grown, increased air temperatures combined with the existing drought stress have often led to uncertain crop responses [14,17,18,19,20]. Legumes, in general, are significant food crops because of their crucial role in enriching soil through the symbiotic fixation of atmospheric N [21,22,23]. Globally, grain legumes cultivated in rainfed agroecology are often water-limited and are more susceptible to the negative impacts of drought compared to cereal crops, especially with the associated rise in temperatures [5]. Under drought, legumes have an advantage over non-leguminous plants with elevated [CO2] conditions because they have the potential to fix atmospheric N commensurate with increasing demands on the Calvin cycle [24,25,26,27,28].
In general, increased levels of [CO2] have been found to enhance growth by increasing the rate of photosynthesis across crop species. However, the distribution of the additional biomass produced across different plant organs vary within and between species [29,30]. Studies conducted in open-top chambers and a free-air [CO2] enrichment (FACE) experiment reported that the adverse effects of higher temperatures on crop growth could be offset by the fertilization effect of elevated [CO2] [31,32]. The response of legume crops to elevated [CO2] and temperatures, as reported in the literature, is illustrated and summarized in Figure 1. Elevated [CO2] affects crop physiology and yield and impacts soil as a significant component of the soil–plant–atmospheric continuum.
Soil is a spatially heterogeneous body and constitutes minerals, organic matter, air, microorganisms, and water [33,34,35]. Temperature and elevated [CO2] will directly and indirectly affect soil microbial activity, diversity, proliferation, nutrient cycle, and physical qualities, all critical for soil health and productivity. Consequently, increased soil temperatures will stimulate microbial activity, spiking organic matter decomposition rates and nutrient release into the soil system and atmosphere. For example, this can increase soil nitrification rates [36] and induce higher soil organic carbon (SOC) loss [37], negatively affecting the soil’s biological, chemical, and physical properties [38]. Likewise, climate change can impact pest and disease occurrences, host–pathogen interactions, distribution and ecology of insects, natural enemy populations, insect migration, and insect feeding habits, which may significantly setback agricultural production [39]. However, there is little or no evidence in the literature about soil health effects such as soil’s physical, chemical, and biological activities, pest resurgence, and insect feeding behavior on legumes under elevated [CO2] and temperature. In the past, studies have reported a lack of investigations focused on elucidating how legume plants physiologically, in terms of growth and development, respond to elevated carbon dioxide levels and temperature in different environments with varied water, temperature, and humidity conditions [40,41]. Studies on the combined effects of increased [CO2] and associated temperature on seed germination, phenology, and yield in legumes were also reported as lacking [42,43]. In this context, this review summarizes the available literature on the impacts of increased [CO2] and temperatures on legume stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, biomass growth, phenology, productivity, seed nutritional qualities, soil health, and insect behavior. Therefore, the objective of this review article was to determine how future climates with elevated temperatures and [CO2] in combination will affect grain legumes. The work was conducted based on a web of science collection of peer-reviewed papers, reports, and reviews using the search terms ‘legumes’, ‘elevated CO2’, ‘temperature’, ‘growth chamber’, ‘photosynthetic rate’, ‘stomatal conductivity’, ‘seed nutrient content’, ‘soil health’, ‘soil nutrient status’, ‘insect behavior’, and ‘pollinator response’. Based on the search items, 167 research and review articles were found, and evidence from 142 articles was utilized in this review article. The review can help researchers develop agronomic strategies to alleviate the impacts of climate change while also assisting breeders in developing novel genotypes that are more adaptable to the effects of climate change.

2. Mechanisms of Plant Responses to Elevated [CO2] and Temperature Stresses

Higher temperatures and increased CO2 concentrations can affect plant growth, metabolism, and crop productivity. Increased formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radicals (OH) can result from elevated temperatures. These ROS can oxidatively damage cellular structures in plants [44]. Similarly, heat stress affects photosystem II (PSII) more than photosystem I (PSI). The oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) involved in water splitting and oxygen evolution in PSII can be harmed by high temperatures [45]. Thus, reduced photosynthetic rates and a decline in electron transport efficiency are the outcomes of this damage. However, plants use adaptive mechanisms through physiological, biochemical, and molecular defenses, such as osmotic adjustments, protein accumulation, gene expression alterations, and antioxidant defense, to deal with these challenges. These responses can vary depending on crop type, species, stress intensity, and duration of exposure. Therefore, the primary response to heat stress and photodamage is the repair of the PSII reaction center, particularly the D1 protein. High temperatures often lead to the degradation of the D1 protein in PSII, causing photoinhibition. Upon recovery, plants increase the turnover of the D1 protein to restore PSII activity [46]. Similarly, plants synthesize heat shock proteins (HSPs) in response to elevated temperatures, which help in protein refolding, stabilization, and repair [47]. However, these defense mechanisms have been well-studied under high-temperature stress in plants. The combined effects of elevated [CO2] and temperature on mechanisms of plant responses need to be explored.
Plants use non-enzymatic antioxidants like ascorbate and glutathione as well as enzymatic antioxidants like superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidases (POD) to lessen the harmful effects of ROS [48]. These systems support cellular integrity preservation and ROS detoxification [49]. Likewise, some genes that code for proteins are frequently upregulated under heat-stress conditions. Under such conditions, plants are shielded by producing HSPs [50,51]. It is well known that proline, an amino acid, builds up in response to several environmental stressors, such as heat and high [CO2]. By stabilizing proteins and cellular membranes, proline acts as an osmo-protectant, shielding plants from osmotic stress [52,53]. Thus, proline buildup may be induced by increased [CO2], which could serve as an adaptive response to lessen heat stress. Elevated [CO2] typically stimulates carbohydrate production, and in combination with temperature stress, plants may accumulate sugars and polyols, which serve as osmolytes and protect cells from dehydration [54]. These reactions, however, might be complicated by the interplay between high [CO2] and temperature stress. These mechanisms were well established when the plants were exposed to single-factor stresses like heat or [CO2] stress. Furthermore, these mechanisms need to be established with future elevated [CO2] and high temperature studies in grain legumes.

3. Elevated [CO2] and Temperature Effects on Crop Growth and Development

3.1. Crop Phenology

Legumes have previously been reported to respond to elevated [CO2] levels depending on their growth stage. Studies by Srivastava et al. [55] and Das et al. [56] reported more pronounced effects during the early growth stages (0–20 days after germination) compared to the maturity stages. In general, legume plants were consistently exposed to elevated [CO2] until they reached maturity, with enhanced plant growth due to increased photosynthesis. This was attributed to decreased dark respiration during the early crop growth stages, but the mechanisms involved were not explained. Elevated [CO2] in chickpeas resulted in an accelerated process of reproductive development and advanced the initiation of flowering by 3–4 days [57]. However, when the elevated [CO2] was combined with increased levels of ozone (O3), a decrease of 2–3 days in the pod initiation stage was observed, attributed to enhanced translocation to leaves.
The impact of [CO2] and temperature on the phenology of legumes, as reported in the literature, was inconsistent. Some studies reported that plants exposed to 700 ppm [CO2] levels did not have any effect on Faba bean [58] and cowpea phenology [59]. However, other studies reported that increased [CO2] accelerated the time to flowering in soybeans and decreased the time to pod development [60,61,62]. Consequently, legume plants that exhibited delayed phenology also experienced a reduced crop growth rate when exposed to higher [CO2].
A rise in temperature from 29 °C/23 °C to 32 °C/29 °C (day–night cycle) decreased the length of the vegetative period by seven days in different soybean genotypes [20]. Renato et al. [63] reported a decrease of 11 days in the growth cycle of field beans when air temperature alone was increased by 5 °C. Similarly, greater temperature levels decreased cowpea growth by 14 and 23 days [20,63]. To summarize, responses of legumes to increased [CO2] and temperature in reported studies varied across different locations and types of legumes. The exact mechanisms that lead to the observed differences in crop duration in response to [CO2] at various stages of plant development remain unclear.

3.2. Photosynthesis

Elevated [CO2] significantly impacts plant growth and productivity, particularly in crop species that use the C3 photosynthetic pathway, by reducing rates of photorespiration in the photosynthetic carbon reduction reactions of the Calvin cycle [6,20,64,65]. Legume crops, in general, are known to be C3 plants. Such photosynthetic [CO2] acclimation response in C3 crops is attributed to the increased carboxylation and decreased oxylation efficiency of the RuBP carboxylase oxygenase enzyme from enhanced [CO2] levels in the air [66,67]. In this context, legumes such as peanuts, pigeon peas, soybeans, mung beans, and cowpeas were found to be highly sensitive to elevated [CO2] [14,18,28,62,68,69,70,71,72]. Typically, a significant quantity of chlorophyll a and b absorbs energy from photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) to be used in photosynthesis carbon reduction (PCR) activities [73]. During this process, carotenoids serve to shield the reaction center from excessive light and aid in capturing PAR by directing it towards auxiliary pigments of chlorophyll a. Hence, alterations in the pigment concentration in leaves are closely associated with the physiological condition and, consequently, the production of crops [74]. Since most research has been conducted in controlled conditions, the effects of elevated [CO2] on plant growth and development may not be the same as those experienced in field situations [75,76]. For instance, limited root growth constrains the plant’s ability to respond to elevated [CO2]. Another primary mechanism frequently used to explain the increased yield under elevated [CO2] is the reduction in stomatal conductance, which reduces transpiration water loss during drought [41,73,77,78,79].
The combined effects of enhanced [CO2] and temperature on stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rates under optimal light conditions were also reported to be more evident during drought stress [14]. They found that long-term exposure of peanut plants to elevated levels of [CO2] when water stressed resulted in an increase of 58% in [CO2] uptake, 73% in transpiration efficiency, and 41% in rubisco carboxylation (Table 1). Grain legumes respond differently to [CO2] fertilization depending on soil type, nutrient availability, water availability, and interactions with other environmental stresses. Elevated CO2 concentrations can accelerate photosynthesis, resulting in heightened biomass generation and possible yield increases but lowering vital nutrients such as vitamins, minerals, and proteins. When the physiological and biochemical responses of crops to elevated [CO2] are varied depending on their photosynthetic pathway, leaf photosynthetic pigments and antioxidative system are also synchronized [17,80,81]. In addition to reduced stomatal conductance, plants undergo physiological adaptations to improve their ability to withstand drought by generating isoflavones at vegetative and reproductive stages, as observed in soybeans under elevated [CO2] [6]. The production of isoflavones, which follow the phenylpropanoid pathway, uses a substantial amount of carbon [82]. As such, through this mechanism in legumes, it may be possible to sequester larger quantities of atmospheric carbon under future elevated [CO2] levels [83,84].
Increasing [CO2] levels and higher temperatures may have a cumulative effect in intensifying heat stress, partially due to decreased transpirational cooling from enhanced stomatal resistance [31,85]. Enhanced [CO2] at 740 ppm was shown to decrease stomatal conductance by 13–30%, causing a 2 °C increase in leaf temperature [73]. High temperatures can directly harm the photosynthetic apparatus, particularly PS-II [80]. Several locations within the chloroplast membranes susceptible to heat-induced damage have been identified [86,87,88]. When exposed to greater temperatures, plants redistribute their resources from shoots to roots [89,90,91]. The adverse impacts of elevated temperatures on crops vary depending on their optimum temperatures for the growth and development processes. Legume growth and development impacts from heat stress produced by the combined effects of enhanced [CO2] and temperature need further investigation.
Photosystem II (PSII) and photosystem I (PSI) are pigment–protein mega complexes embedded in the thylakoid membranes that drive photosynthesis, which is a crucial process for plant growth. High temperatures and high [CO2] levels can influence PSII and PSI functions in complex ways. To increase plant resistance to changing climatic conditions, it is essential to comprehend how these two photosystems react to such challenges. PSII is especially vulnerable to heat stress due to the breakdown of the OEC [45]. Similarly, the D1 protein, a crucial part of PSII, is extremely heat-sensitive and may break down more quickly at higher temperatures, which could impair PSII function and cause photoinhibition [92]. To fix PSII, plants respond by increasing the turnover rate of D1, but excessive heat can affect this repair system. Even though PSI is a little more stable than PSII, it can still be less effective in heat stress. Thus, PSI’s overall efficiency may be decreased by high temperatures that affect the electron transport chain [93]. Even though heat-induced damage to PSI is usually not as bad as it is to PSII, it can still reduce total photosynthetic efficiency, especially when exposed to heat for an extended period. Because more CO2 is available for carbon fixation, photosynthesis typically becomes more efficient under higher [CO2] conditions. Higher [CO2] usually increases PSI activity by increasing photosynthesis’s overall efficiency because more electrons are directed through PSI to reduce NADP⁺ [94]. This is especially advantageous for C3 plants, as photosynthesis is frequently hampered by [CO2] limitation in ambient conditions [95]. However, if high temperatures are prolonged, the recovery of photosynthetic efficiency might take longer, particularly in species sensitive to heat [96]. Therefore, the detrimental effects of heat can offset the beneficial effects of [CO2] enrichment on PSI function in extreme situations where high [CO2] and temperature stresses co-occur. Further, these mechanisms need to be established with a combination of future elevated [CO2] and high-temperature studies in grain legumes.

3.3. Growth and Productivity

Under elevated [CO2] conditions, seed vigor and germination rates have been reported to increase, decrease, or remain unchanged [42,43,97]. In these studies, impacts on various aspects of plant growth in peanuts [14,28,68,72], mung beans [31,45,71,98,99], peas [19,24], soybeans [6,79], pigeon peas [70], faba beans [16], cowpeas [20,69], chickpeas [46], and black gram [100] were investigated, measuring crop growth parameters such as leaf area, leaf size, number of nodules, specific leaf weight, shoot weight, number of pods, and seed yield. Increased levels of [CO2] in general have been reported to have beneficial effects on legume crop growth, development, and productivity (Table 1). Madhu and Hatfield [62] noticed a reduction in the number of soybean leaves by 14–23% and leaf area by 9.7–11.7% under increased [CO2] alone. Moreover, higher temperatures reduced photosynthesis and stomatal conductance, producing smaller leaves in plants [89,101,102]. In legumes, nodule growth is a significant process that fixes atmospheric nitrogen. However, the nitrogen fixation process in nodules is restricted by many environmental factors that control the flow of carbon into them [24]. Plants exposed to elevated [CO2] showed a significant increase in the number of root nodules by 114% in soybeans [62], 22% in faba beans [16], and 38% in pigeon peas [1]. Concurrently, the nodules of peas under high [CO2] conditions had a 38% greater leghemoglobin content [24]. The potential beneficial impacts of elevated [CO2] fertilization on grain legume yields may be attributed to improved soil health indicators with better nutrient cycling, as discussed in Section 3.6. Nevertheless, the influence of increased carbon dioxide levels on the productivity of grain legumes, including the concurrent effects of drought and soil quality, remains unclear. Heat stress can have detrimental effects on plants at all stages of growth and development. During the vegetative stage, it can hinder the growth of shoots and roots. During the reproductive stage, it can lead to pollen sterility and flower shedding [103]. Heat stress in beans, peas, and soybeans was studied, and these plants at the seedling stage exposed to elevated temperature of 28 °C for eight days resulted in 50–88% and 36–38% reduced germination percent/dead seeds in soybeans and beans, respectively [104]. Likewise, mung bean seeds treated for 10, 20, and 30 min at 50 °C significantly dropped seed germination [105]. According to Chakraborty and Pradhan [106], lentil seeds exposed to 35–40 °C for four hours showed less germination and slower seedling growth. Similarly, heat stress decreases the number of flowering branches and flowers in peanuts [107]. Therefore, due to the drastic reduction in germination, reduced growth and development under elevated temperatures by 2–3 °C significantly affect seed yield in peanuts [107], mung beans [108], lentils [109,110], and chickpeas [111].
Table 1. Effect of elevated CO2 concentration ([CO2]) and temperature in the atmosphere on crop yield and photosynthetic characters in different crops.
Table 1. Effect of elevated CO2 concentration ([CO2]) and temperature in the atmosphere on crop yield and photosynthetic characters in different crops.
Crop Method [CO2] LevelTemperature Level and ResponseElevated CO2 Response on YieldElevated CO2 Response on PhotosynthesisReference
Peanut
(Arachis hypogaea L.)
Canopy Evapotranspiration And Assimilation ChamberAC: 400 ppm
EC: 650 ppm
NoneIncreased pod yield by 39% under water stress.Increased 41% Rubisco efficiency, reduced 16% leaf N.[14]
Peanut
(Arachis hypogaea L.)
Open Top Chambers (OTC)AC: 380 ppm
EC: 550 ppm
EC: 700 ppm
NoneDecreased kernel yield by 32% at 550 ppm and 28% at 700 ppm. Pod yield unaffected. -[72]
Peanut
(Arachis hypogaea L.)
OTCAC: 375 ppm
EC: 548 ppm
EC: 730 ppm
NoneIncreased pod number by 16%. Increased net photosynthesis by 23%.
Reduced stomatal conductance by 42%.
[68]
Mung bean
(Vigna radiata L.)
Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE)AC: 400 ppm
EC: 550 ppm
NoneIncreased BM by 34%, seed yield by 34–50%.-[28]
Mung bean
(Vigna radiata L.)
FACE: Open Air ConditionAC: 400 ppm
EC: 550 ± 17 ppm
NoneIncreased BM 12%, seed yield 14%.Increased net photosynthesis by 7–19%, Chl and total Chl content by 11–12% [71]
Mung bean
(Vigna radiata L.)
Growth Chamber (Model ATC26, Winnipeg, MB).AC: 400 ppm
EC: 700 ppm
Day/night: 6/22 °C, 32/28 °C, Higher stem and leaf biomass, higher transpiration.-[31]
Mung bean
(Vigna radiata L.)
OTCEC: 600 ± 50 ppmNone[CO2] exposure of 0–20 days caused 28–35% higher shoot growth.Decreases in Chl
a by 10% and 18% at 15 and 35 days after germination.
[56]
Mung bean
(Vigna radiata L.)
OTCAC: Field experiment
EC: 700 ppm
NoneIncreased seed number and weight by 34.6% and 25%.It increased photosynthesis by 25–29%, chloride by 30–39%, and carotenoid production by 8–15%.[98]
Mung bean
(Vigna radiata L.)
FACEAC: 411 ± 15 ppm
EC: 550 ± 19 ppm
NoneIncrease in pod BM by 26%, seed yield by 26%, and plant BM by 17%.-[99]
Pea (Pisum sativum)Australian Grains Free-Air [CO2] Enrichment
(AGFACE)
AC: 400 ppm
EC: 550 ppm
NoneIncreased 33% number of nodulesReduced stomatal conductance by 44% with lower amino acid.[19]
Pea (Pisum sativum)OTCAC: 360 ppm
EC: 700 ppm
EC: 1000 ppm
NoneIncrease BM by 40% at 1000 ppm and leghemoglobin by 38%.No response.[24]
Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)Australian Grains Free-Air [CO2] EnrichmentAC: 400 ppm
EC: 550 ppm
NoneIncreased seed yield by 58% under irrigated and 23% under drought.-[16]
Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)OTCAC: 380 ppm
EC: 580 ppm
NoneIncreased yield and pods by 12% and 76% (Pusa-992 genotype).
Decrease seed yield by 33% (PS-2009 genotype).
-[70]
Cowpea (Vigna
Unguiculata)
Growth ChambersAC: 370 ppm
EC: 550 ppm
day/night: 26/20 °C, 29/23 °C, 32/29 °C Increased seed number and weight by 21 and 23%.Decreased pod number and weight by 23 and 24% under 32/29 °C and 29/23 °C.[20]
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)Rhizotron ChambersAC: 380 ppm
EC: 800 ppm
NoneDecreased number of leaves by 14–23%, leaf area by 10–12%. Increased number of pods by 55%.-[62]
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)OTCAC: 390 ± 30 ppm
EC: 550 ± 30 ppm
NoneReduced seed protein
by 2–6% in different genotypes.
-[6]
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)OTCAC: 410 ppm
EC: 610 ppm
NoneSeed yield with increases of 101% and 65% in high-WUE and low-WUE, respectively.Increased canopy photosynthesis by 37% (high-WUE genotype) and 76.3% (low-WUE genotype).[79]
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)FAOCE (Free-Air Ozone [CO2] Enrichment) ChambersAC: ambient.
EC: 550 ± 25 ppm
NoneIncreased seed yield
by 26–31%
Increased net photosynthetic rate by 11–17%.[57]
Black gram (Vigna mungo)OTCAC: 365 ppm
EC: 550 ppm and 700 ppm
NoneHigher BM by 65% at 700 ppm and 39% at 550 ppm. Higher HI by 39% at 550 ppm and 40% at 700 ppm.-[100]
Note: OTC: open top chambers; FACE: free-air [CO2] enrichment; AC: ambient [CO2]; EC: elevated [CO2]; HI: harvest index; BM: biomass; Chl: chlorophyll; WUE: water use efficient.
Soybean seed yield responded significantly to elevated [CO2] and an associated temperature rise, ranging from 10–95% [112,113] to 101% [79]. Laza et al. [14] reported a 39% increase in peanut pod production and a 58% increase in above-ground biomass when grown under enriched [CO2] in field-based canopy evapotranspiration and assimilation (CETA) chambers (Table 1). However, Bagudam et al. [72] reported a 32% and 28% decrease in peanut kernel yield in response to 550 and 700 ppm [CO2], respectively, in open-top chambers (Table 1). They also reported a decrease in kernel oil by 6.54% and 2.98% and protein content by 7.07% and 4.56%, respectively. Ji et al. [71] demonstrated that increased [CO2] had a beneficial impact on mung bean yield; however, the photosynthetic capability of the plants was significantly inhibited. Pigeon pea cultivars exhibited 52.3% more radiation use efficiency (RUE) under enhanced [CO2] levels [70]. At the stage of pod development, increased levels of [CO2] resulted in a reduction of the leaf nitrogen (N) concentration by 4.4–13.9%, and increased phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) uptake by 13.2% and 22.4%, respectively [99]. Enzymes such as sucrose synthase, pyrophosphorylase, and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase substantially increased, ranging from 33% to 50% [24]. Nevertheless, no notable disparity was observed in the activity of enzymes such as alkaline invertase and malate dehydrogenase. The overall responses to elevated [CO2] and temperature in legume crops and its associated impacts on plant growth and development attributes are depicted in Figure 2.

3.4. Grain Nutritional Content

The impacts of elevated [CO2] levels and temperatures on the nutritional content of seeds in legume crops have not been investigated in depth. In general, the reported studies showed a decline in seed protein content under elevated [CO2] levels, unlike cereals, due to an imbalance in N fixation, which results in lower N concentrations [10,114]. Studies conducted under elevated [CO2] conditions alone also showed decreased N concentration in seeds [6,19,71,115,116]. The decrease in N levels in plant organs may be attributed to increased carbohydrate buildup incommensurate with the N fixation levels under elevated [CO2] [115,117]. Weigel and Manderscheid [118] found that the decrease in protein content under elevated [CO2] could not be mitigated by providing more N fertilizer.
Burkey et al. [68] and Li et al. [6] reported that elevated [CO2] significantly enhanced soybean oil quality by increasing oleic acid and decreasing linoleic acid contents. Soba et al. [79] found decreased concentrations of calcium (Ca) and boron (B) in high-water-use efficient genotypes of soybeans and reduced levels of phosphorus (P) and zinc (Zn) in low-water-use efficient genotypes. Kennedy [119] documented a decrease in the levels of iron and zinc in soybeans and field peas, causing a considerable reduction in the overall concentration of free amino acids [6]. The iron and manganese content of peanut kernels were not impacted. In contrast, the copper content decreased by 13.93% and 26.19%, and the calcium content decreased by 24.33% and 8.20% at elevated [CO2] levels of 550 and 700 ppm, respectively [72]. Mishra and Agrawal [98] reported reductions in soluble protein content by 9.9% and sugars by 8.9 to 9.4%. An increase in total soluble sugars (9.3–15.1%) and starch content (15.5%) was also observed. Therefore, dietary nutrient deficiencies can become more apparent under elevated [CO2] levels in the future. Research conducted by Martel and Qaderi [120] demonstrated that elevated temperatures have a detrimental impact on the nitrogen balance index (NBI) in pea plants (Pisum sativum).

3.5. Soil Moisture or Drought Stress

Increased levels of [CO2] when soil moisture levels were nonlimiting resulted in a significant increase in the number of pods (54.8% to 122.4%) and weight of dried pods (29.8% to 56.6%) in soybeans [62]. Soil moisture availability and vapor pressure deficit often significantly impact photosynthesis and the stomatal conductance in plants grown under enhanced [CO2] [14,73,121,122,123]. Increases in [CO2] levels enhance the water status of legume plants by decreasing stomatal conductance, which helps increase WUE. This helps mitigate the negative impacts of drought stress on plant growth and other physiological processes [73,77,79,124,125,126]. However, Saha et al. [70] reported 10.7% more cumulative soil moisture depletions in plants grown under enhanced [CO2] levels. This suggests that plants under elevated [CO2] consume more soil water for enhanced photosynthesis rates. Further investigation can further elucidate the relationship between leaf area, stomatal conductance, and crop usage efficiency [73].

3.6. Soil Health

The microbial activity, diversity, proliferation, nutrient cycle, and the soil’s physical characteristics are directly and indirectly impacted by temperature and rising [CO2] levels [126,127]. Increased soil temperatures stimulate microbial activity, spiking organic matter decomposition rates and nutrient release into the soil system and atmosphere. For example, increased soil nitrification rates [36] and higher soil organic carbon (SOC) loss [37] negatively affect the soil’s biological, chemical, and physical properties [38]. Net accumulation of soil organic matter positively affects soil physical properties through soil particle aggregation, the process upon which soil structure develops [128,129]. As the frequency of extreme drought and flooding scenarios increases due to climate change, nitrification and denitrification processes will become important, as flooding creates anaerobic conditions conducive to denitrification, losing N to the atmosphere [36,130,131]. In general, enhanced plant development and root exudation typically result in larger soil organic carbon inputs when atmospheric [CO2] levels are higher [132]. This additional carbon can stimulate microbial activity by expanding the substrate available for breakdown. Similarly, increasing temperatures directly affect the microbiological activity of soil, generally accelerating the rates of decomposition and nutrient cycling. Temperature-induced improvements in microbial metabolism result in faster organic matter decomposition and better nutrient mineralization [133]. In addition to increasing soil respiration and enhancing plant nutrient availability, this may cause soils to release more CO2 into the atmosphere. For example, increased decomposition may lead to increased nutrient availability; but, if soil moisture is insufficient or if severe temperatures negatively affect microbial populations, nutrient uptake may be limited [134]. Studies on understanding the direct impact of elevated [CO2] and temperatures on soil-plant-microbiome interactions and other soil physical, chemical, and biological processes in legumes are lacking in the literature.

3.7. Legume Insect Pests

Insect herbivores’ interactions with their host plants may be impacted by elevated [CO2] levels [135,136]. The insect species Spodoptera litura exhibited increased feeding rates on mung bean leaves due to their low nutrient content under elevated [CO2] [137]. Likewise, increased temperature and [CO2] significantly impacted lepidopteran pest behavior [138,139]. However, such impacts on insect growth were species-specific. With elevated [CO2], soluble amino acids and protein in Phaseolus vulgaris and other legumes increased, which also improved the physiology of thrips and aphids during their larval stages [140,141]. The size of the aphid population on soybean plants increased significantly at 550 ppm [CO2], leading to a substantial loss in yield [142]. The parasitism rate of Aphidius avenae decreased under elevated [CO2], which impaired its ability to produce parasitoids [143]. Since insects are cold-blooded organisms, high temperatures profoundly impact insect behavior, longevity, and reproduction. Incidence of Helicoverpa armigera and Maruca vitrata in pigeon peas increased with rising temperatures [144]. Spodoptera litura’s peanut leaf-feeding rate increased with elevated temperature and [CO2] [145]. At higher temperatures, Popillia japonica (Japanese beetle) caused severe leaf damage in soybeans [146]. In summary, an increased risk of invasive pests attacking legume crops is expected under elevated temperatures and [CO2].
For efficient pollination, legumes like beans, peas, and lentils frequently depend on pollinators. Pollinators help in fertilization and seed formation by moving pollen from one flower to another. Reduced pollination efficiency may result from a drop in pollinator populations. In crops like soybeans and chickpeas, a decline in pollinator population can lead to a reduction in total yield and fewer seeds per pod [147]. Ensuring high agricultural output and optimizing seed set depend heavily on pollination efficiency. By encouraging cross-pollination, which expands the genetic pool of legume crops, pollinators support genetic variety. Plants with greater genetic diversity are more likely to be able to tolerate environmental challenges, diseases, and pests [148]. Similarly, elevated temperature and [CO2] levels would potentially affect pollinators’ behavior in leguminous crops. Honeybee pollinator visits to flowers increased under elevated [CO2] and temperature, leading to higher field bean pollination and seed set [149]. Heat stress from elevated air temperatures can also significantly affect the interaction between pollinators and legumes. Otieno et al. [149] observed a significant increase in pollination rate in Vicia faba beans under elevated temperature and [CO2] conditions. Further research is required to understand how the elevation in [CO2] and temperature influences mutualistic relationships of insect pests in legumes.

4. Gaps in Existing Research

Inconsistencies in phenological responses were observed in C3 legumes. For instance, some studies report accelerated flowering and pod development in legumes under elevated CO2 (e.g., chickpeas), while others find negligible effects or even delays (e.g., faba beans, cowpeas). A significant gap exists in photosynthetic processes between controlled environment studies and real-world field conditions. Similarly, research shows variable effects of elevated [CO2] on seed vigor, gemination, crop yield, and quality. The inconsistent results indicate a lack of knowledge about the responses of different genotypes and species of legumes to increased [CO2] at different phases of growth. Legumes’ reactions to increased [CO2] in controlled environments, however, might not fully translate to field conditions where additional factors (such as soil type, and bug and pest pressure) are involved. Simultaneously, less is known about the combined effects of increasing [CO2] and temperature on soil microbial communities and their functions in the cycling of nutrients, legume yield, and quality. Long-term research is required to evaluate the effects of persistently high [CO2] and temperature on soil fertility and health over time.

5. Conclusions

The reviewed literature generally shows a negative impact of rising temperatures caused by elevated atmospheric GHGs on agricultural productivity worldwide. However, while the fertilization effect of increasing [CO2] levels on crop growth is evident, the combined impact of rising temperatures and [CO2] levels on legume crops was less investigated. Under elevated [CO2] alone, two mechanisms affected were photosynthesis rate (increased) and stomatal conductivity (decreased), which helped enhance legume productivity and water use efficiency. Only a few studies have focused on investigating the nutritional status of legumes under elevated [CO2] and temperature conditions. Seed nutritional qualities like protein, Zn, and Ca were significantly decreased under elevated [CO2]. Increased soil temperatures enhance microbial activity, resulting in faster organic matter decomposition and nutrient release into the soil system while negatively altering the soil’s biological, chemical, and physical properties. However, less evidence about soil health indices under high [CO2] is available. Enhanced [CO2] and temperature significantly impact herbivore survival and natural enemy populations in legumes. Understanding the pest biology and trophic-level interactions under changing climate conditions is essential to develop integrated pest management strategies against major legume pests. Breeding genotypes appropriate for elevated [CO2] and temperature are required for adaptation. Further studies on the growth and development of legumes exposed to the combined effects of enhanced [CO2] and temperature under varying water availability and nutrient supply scenarios are required to adapt to the changing climates and lessen the impacts on production.

Author Contributions

R.G.A.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing—original draft. S.S.A.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Visualization, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. K.N.R.: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing—review and editing. P.M.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing—original draft. J.G.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing—original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable as no new data have been generated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that there are no conflicts of interest regarding publishing this work.

References

  1. Sreeharsha, R.V.; Mudalkar, S.; Sengupta, D.; Unnikrishnan, D.K.; Reddy, A.R. Mitigation of drought-induced oxidative damage by enhanced carbon assimilation and an efficient antioxidative metabolism under high [CO2] environment in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Photosynth. Res. 2019, 139, 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. IPCC 2023. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Lee, H., Romero, J., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; p. 184. [Google Scholar]
  3. NOAA 2024. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Carbon Dioxide Now More Than 50% Higher Than Pre-Industrial Levels 2024. Available online: www.noaa.gov (accessed on 15 March 2024).
  4. Iizumi, T.; Shiogama, H.; Imada, Y.; Hanasaki, N.; Takikawa, H.; Nishimori, M. Crop production losses associated with anthropogenic climate change for 1981–2010 compared with preindustrial levels. Int. J. Climatol. 2018, 38, 5405–5417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Karavolias, N.G.; Horner, W.; Abugu, M.N.; Evanega, S.N. Application of gene editing for climate change in agriculture. Front. Sust. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 685801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, Y.; Yu, Z.; Jin, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, G.; Liu, C.; Wu, J.; Wang, C.; Liu, X. Impact of elevated [CO2] on seed quality of soybean at the fresh edible and mature stages. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, D.; Heckathorn, S.A.; Wang, X.; Philpott, S.M. A meta-analysis of plant physiological and growth responses to temperature and elevated [CO2]. Oecologia 2012, 169, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vaidya, S.; Vanaja, M.; Sathish, P.; Anitha, Y.; Jyothi, L.N. Impact of elevated [CO2] on growth and physiological parameters of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. J. Plant Physiol. Pathol. 2014, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. van der Kooi, C.J.; Reich, M.; Löw, M.; De Kok, L.J.; Tausz, M. Growth and yield stimulation under elevated [CO2] and drought: A meta-analysis on crops. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 122, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Myers, S.S.; Zanobetti, A.; Kloog, I.; Huybers, P.; Leakey, A.D.B.; Bloom, A.J.; Carlisle, E.; Dietterich, L.H.; Fitzgerald, G.; Hasegawa, T.; et al. Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition. Nature 2014, 510, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ainsworth, E.A.; Davey, P.A.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Dermody, O.C.; Heaton, E.A.; Moore, D.J.; Morgan, P.B.; Naidu, S.L.; Yoora, H.S.; Zhu, X.G.; et al. A meta-analysis of elevated [CO2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2002, 8, 695–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. FAO 1990. Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Global Map of Aridity. Spatial Resolution of 10 Arc Minutes and Temporal Resolution of 1961–1990; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2009. Available online: https://data.apps.fao.org/map/catalog/static/api/records/221072ae-2090-48a1-be6f-5a88f061431a (accessed on 28 February 2024).
  13. Qader, S.H.; Dash, J.; Alegana, V.A.; Khwarahm, N.R.; Tatem, A.J.; Atkinson, P.M. The role of earth observation in achieving sustainable agricultural production in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Laza, H.E.; Baker, J.T.; Yates, C.; Mahan, J.R.; Burow, M.D.; Puppala, N.; Gitz, D.C.; Emendack, Y.Y.; Layland, N.; Ritchie, G.L.; et al. Effect of elevated CO2 on peanut performance in a semi-arid production region. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2021, 308–309, 108599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pang, J.; Turner, N.C.; Du, Y.L.; Colmer, T.D.; Siddique, K.H.M. Pattern of water use and seed yield under terminal drought in chickpea genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Parvin, S.; Uddin, S.; Tausz-Posch, S.; Fitzgerald, G.J.; Armstrong, R.; Tausz, M. Elevated [CO2] improves yield and N2 fixation but not grain N concentration of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) subjected to terminal drought. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 165, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ainsworth, E.A.; Leakey, A.D.B.; Ort, D.R.; Long, S.P. FACE-ing the facts: Inconsistencies and interdependence among field, chamber and modeling studies of elevated [CO2] impacts on crop yield and food supply. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ratnakumar, P.; Vadez, V. Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) genotypes tolerant to intermittent drought maintain a high harvest index and have small leaf canopy under stress. Funct. Plant Biol. 2011, 38, 1016–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Parvin, S.; Uddin, S.; Fitzgerald, G.J.; Tausz-Posch, S.; Armstrong, R.; Tausz, M. Free air [CO2] enrichment (FACE) improves water use efficiency and moderates drought effect on N2 fixation of Pisum sativum L. Plant Soil 2019, 436, 587–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Angelotti, F.; Barbosa, L.G.; Barros, J.R.A.; dos Santos, C.A.F. Cowpea development under different temperatures and carbon dioxide concentrations. Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop. 2020, 50, e59377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rana, D.S.; Dass, A.; Rajanna, G.A.; Kaur, R. Biotic and abiotic stress management in pulses. Indian J. Agron. 2016, 61, 238–248. [Google Scholar]
  22. Meena, H.N.; Ajay, B.C.; Rajanna, G.A.; Yadav, R.S.; Jain, N.K.; Meena, M.S. Polythene mulch and potassium application enhances peanut productivity and biochemical traits under sustained salinity stress condition. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 273, 107903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rajanna, G.A.; Dhindwal, A.S.; Sriharsha, V.P. Performance of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) under variable irrigation schedules and crop-establishment techniques. Indian J. Agron. 2016, 61, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cabrerizo, P.M.; González, E.M.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.M.; Arrese-Igor, C. Continuous CO2 enrichment leads to increased nodule biomass, carbon availability to nodules and activity of carbon-metabolizing enzymes but does not enhance specific nitrogen fixation in pea. Physiol. Plant. 2001, 113, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ross, D.J.; Newton, P.C.D.; Tate, K.R. Elevated [CO2] effects on herbage production and soil carbon and nitrogen pools and mineralization in a species-rich, grazed pasture on a seasonally dry sand. Plant Soil 2004, 260, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gamper, H.; Hartwig, U.A.; Leuchtmann, A. Mycorrhizas improve nitrogen nutrition of Trifolium repens after 8 yr of selection under elevated atmospheric [CO2] partial pressure. New Phytol. 2005, 167, 531–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rogers, A.; Ainsworth, E.A.; Leakey, A.D.B. Will elevated carbon dioxide concentration amplify the benefits of nitrogen fixation in legumes? Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dey, S.K.; Chakrabarti, B.; Prasanna, R.; Mittal, R.; Singh, S.D.; Pathak, H. Growth and biomass partitioning in mungbean with elevated carbon dioxide, phosphorus levels and cyanobacteria inoculation. J. Agrometeorol. 2016, 18, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hao, X.Y.; Han, X.; Lam, S.K.; Wheeler, T.; Ju, H.; Wang, H.R.; Li, Y.C.; Lin, E.D. Effects of fully open-air [CO2] elevation on leaf ultrastructure, photosynthesis, and yield of two soybean cultivars. Photosynthetica 2012, 50, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thompson, M.; Gamage, D.; Hirotsu, N.; Martin, A.; Seneweera, S. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning: A perspective on root sugar sensing and hormonal crosstalk. Front. Phys. 2017, 8, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Reardon, M.E.; Qaderi, M.M. Individual and interactive effects of temperature, carbon dioxide and abscisic acid on mung bean (Vigna radiata) plants. J. Plant Interact. 2017, 12, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, R.N.; Mukherjee, J.; Sehgal, V.K.; Bhatia, A. Effect of elevated ozone, carbon dioxide and their interaction on growth, biomass and water use efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Agrometeorol. 2017, 19, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Needelman, B.A. What are soils. Natl. Educ. Knowl. 2013, 4, 2. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gopinath, K.A.; Rajanna, G.A.; Venkatesh, G.; Jayalakshmi, M.; Kumari, V.V.; Prabhakar, M.; Rajkumar, B.; Chary, G.R.; Singh, V.K. Influence of crops and different production systems on soil carbon fractions and carbon sequestration in rainfed areas of Semiarid Tropics in India. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rajanna, G.A.; Suman, A.; Venkatesh, P. Mitigating Drought Stress Effects in Arid and Semi-Arid Agro-Ecosystems through Bioirrigation Strategies—A Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dai, Z.; Yu, M.; Chen, H.; Zhao, H.; Huang, Y.; Su, W.; Xia, F.; Chang, S.X.; Brookes, P.C.; Dahlgren, R.A.; et al. Elevated temperature shifts soil N cycling from microbial immobilization to enhanced mineralization, nitrification and denitrification across global terrestrial ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 5267–5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. García-Palacios, P.; Crowther, T.W.; Dacal, M.; Hartley, I.P.; Reinsch, S.; Rinnan, R.; Rousk, J.; van den Hoogen, J.; Ye, J.S.; Bradford, M.A. Evidence for large microbial-mediated losses of soil carbon under anthropogenic warming. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Page, K.L.; Dang, Y.P.; Dalal, R.C. The ability of conservation agriculture to conserve soil organic carbon and the subsequent impact on soil physical, chemical, and biological properties and yield. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ayyogari, K.; Sidhya, P.; Pandit, M.K. Impact of climate change on vegetable cultivation-a review. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 2014, 7, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lawrence, D.M.; Oleson, K.W.; Flanner, M.G.; Thornton, P.E.; Swenson, S.C.; Lawrence, P.J.; Zeng, X.; Yang, Z.L.; Levis, S.; Sakaguchi, K.; et al. Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 2011, 3, 27. [Google Scholar]
  41. Purcell, C.; Batke, S.P.; Yiotis, C.; Caballero, R.; Soh, W.K.; Murray, M.; McElwain, J.C. Increasing stomatal conductance in response to rising atmospheric [CO2]. Ann. Bot. 2018, 121, 1137–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thomas, J.M.G.; Prasad, P.V.V.; Boote, K.J.; Allen, L.H. Seed composition, seedling emergence and early seedling vigour of red kidney bean seed produced at elevated temperature and carbon dioxide. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2009, 195, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Marty, C.; Bassirirad, H. Seed germination and rising atmospheric [CO2] concentration: A meta-analysis of parental and direct effects. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sewelam, N.; Kazan, K.; Schenk, P.M. Global Plant Stress Signaling: Reactive Oxygen Species at the Cross-Road. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Murata, N.; Takahashi, S.; Nishiyama, Y.; Allakhverdiev, S.I. Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1767, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dannehl, H.; Wietoska, H.; Heckmann, H.; Godde, D. Changes in D1-protein turnover and recovery of photosystem II activity precede accumulation of chlorophyll in plants after release from mineral stress. Planta 1996, 199, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Al-Whaibi, M.H. Plant heat-shock proteins: A mini review. J. King Saud Uni. Sci. 2011, 23, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jomova, K.; Alomar, S.Y.; Alwasel, S.H.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Several lines of antioxidant defense against oxidative stress: Antioxidant enzymes, nanomaterials with multiple enzyme-mimicking activities, and low-molecular-weight antioxidants. Arch. Toxicol. 2024, 8, 1323–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dumanovic, J.; Nepovimova, E.; Natic, M.; Kuča, K.; Jaćevic, V. The Significance of Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Defense System in Plants: A Concise Overview. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 552969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ul-Haq, S.; Khan, A.; Ali, M.; Khattak, A.M.; Gai, W.X.; Zhang, H.X.; Wei, A.M.; Gong, Z.H. Heat Shock Proteins: Dynamic Biomolecules to Counter Plant Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mondal, S.; Karmakar, S.; Panda, D.; Pramanik, K.; Bose, B.; Singhal, R.K. Crucial plant processes under heat stress and tolerance through heat shock proteins. Plant Stress 2023, 10, 100227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Trovato, M.; Mattioli, R.; Costantino, P. Multiple roles of proline in plant stress tolerance and development. Rend. Lincei 2008, 19, 325–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hayat, S.; Hayat, Q.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wani, A.S.; Pichtel, J.; Ahmad, A. Role of proline under changing environments: A review. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1456–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ghosh, U.K.; Islam, M.N.; Siddiqui, M.N.; Khan, M.A.R. Understanding the roles of osmolytes for acclimatizing plants to changing environment: A review of potential mechanism. Plant Signal. Behav. 2021, 16, 1913306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Srivastava, A.C.; Pal, M.; Das, M.; Sengupta, U.K. Growth, [CO2] exchange rate and dry matter partitioning in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) grown under elevated [CO2]. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 39, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Das, M.; Zaidi, P.H.; Pal, M.; Sengupta, U.K. Stage sensitivity of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) to an elevated level of carbon dioxide. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2002, 188, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bhatia, A.; Mina, U.; Kumar, V.; Tomer, R.; Kumar, A.; Chakrabarti, B.; Singh, R.N.; Singh, B. Effect of elevated ozone and carbon dioxide interaction on growth, yield, nutrient content and wilt disease severity in chickpea grown in Northern India. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Prasad, P.V.V.; Boote, K.J.; Allen, L.H.; Thomas, J.M.G. Effects of elevated temperature and carbon dioxide on seed-set and yield of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Glob. Chang. Biol. 2002, 8, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ahmed, F.E.; Hall, A.E.; Madore, M.A. Interactive effects of high-temperature and elevated carbon dioxide concentration on cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Plant Cell Environ. 1993, 16, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ellis, R.H.; Craufurd, P.Q.; Summerfield, R.J.; Roberts, E.H. Linear relations between carbon dioxide concentration and rate of development towards flowering in sorghum, cowpea and soybean. Ann. Bot. 1995, 75, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Earl, H.J. Stomatal and non-stomatal restrictions to carbon assimilation in soybean (Glycine max) lines differing in water use efficiency. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2002, 48, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Madhu, M.; Hatfield, J. Elevated carbon dioxide and soil moisture on early growth response of soybean. Agric. Sci. 2015, 6, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Junior, C.E.G.; Medeiros, J.F.; Sobrinho, E.J.; Figueiredo, V.B.; Costa, J.P.N.; Santos, W.O. Development and water requirements of cowpea under climate change conditions in the Brazilian semi-arid region. Rev. Bras. Deengenharia Agríc. E Ambient. 2016, 20, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Booker, F.L.; Burkey, K.O.; Pursley, W.A.; Heagle, A.S. Elevated carbon dioxide and ozone effects on peanut: I. gas-exchange, biomass, and leaf chemistry. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 1475–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Leakey, A.D.; Ainsworth, E.A.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Rogers, A.; Long, S.P.; Ort, D.R. Elevated [CO2] effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: Six important lessons from FACE. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2859–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Erb, T.J.; Zarzycki, J. A short history of RubisCO: The rise and fall (?) of Nature’s predominant CO2 fixing enzyme. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 49, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Pearcy, R.W.; Bjorkman, O. Physiological effects. In Carbon Dioxide and Plants: The Response of Plants to Rising Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide; Lemon, E.R., Ed.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, USA, 1983; pp. 65–105. [Google Scholar]
  68. Burkey, K.O.; Booker, F.L.; Pursley, W.A.; Heagle, A.S. Elevated carbon dioxide and ozone effects on peanut: II. seed yield and quality. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 1488–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Singh, S.K.; Kakani, V.G.; Surabhi, G.K.; Reddy, K.R. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) genotypes response to multiple abiotic stresses. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2010, 100, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Saha, S.; Sehgala, V.K.; Nagarajana, S.; Pal, M. Impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 on radiation utilization and related plant biophysical properties in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Agric. For. Meteorol. 2012, 158–159, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cao, J.; Han, X.; Seneweera, S.; Li, P.; Zong, Y.-Z.; Dong, Q.; Lin, E.D.; Hao, X.-Y. Leaf photosynthesis and yield components of mung bean under fully open-air elevated [CO2]. J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 977–983. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bagudam, R.; Kancherla, E.; Abady, S.; Wankhade, A.P.; Deshmukh, D.B.; Vemula, A.; Kadirimangalam, S.R.; Kumar, S.S.; Reddy, S.N.; Pasupuleti, J. Influence of elevated [CO2] on growth, yield, haulm, and kernel quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Acta Physiol. Plant. 2023, 45, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Jia, B.; Zhou, G. Elevated-CO2 response of stomata and its dependence on environmental factors. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Blaceburn, G.A. Spectral indices for estimating photosynthetic pigment concentrations: A test using senescent tree leaves. Remote Sens. Environ. 1998, 19, 657–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. McLeod, A.R.; Long, S.P. Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) in global change research: A review. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1999, 28, 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  76. Long, S.P.; Ainsworth, E.A.; Rogers, A.; Ort, D.R. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: Plants FACE the future. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 591–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ainsworth, E.A.; Rogers, A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: Mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bernacchi, C.; Kimball, B.; Quarles, D.; Long, S.; Ort, D. Decreases in stomatal conductance of soybean under open-air elevation of [CO2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Soba, D.; Shub, T.; Runionc, G.B.; Priorc, S.A.; Fritschid, F.B.; Aranjueloa, I.; Sanz-Saezb, A. Effects of elevated [CO2] on photosynthesis and seed yield parameters in two soybean genotypes with contrasting water use efficiency. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 178, 104154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, Q.M.; Liu, B.B.; Wu, Y.; Zou, Z.R. Interactive effects of drought stresses and elevated [CO2] concentration on photochemistry efficiency of cucumber seedlings. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 1307–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Qaderi, M.M.; Reid, D.M. Crop responses to elevated carbon dioxide and temperature. In Climate Change and Crops; Singh, S.N., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2009; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  82. Ralston, L.; Subramanian, S.; Matsuno, M.; Yu, O. Partial reconstruction of flavonoid and isoflavonoid biosynthesis in yeast using soybean type I and type II chalcone isomerases. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 1375–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kretzschmar, F.D.S.; MarinhoAidar, M.P.; Salgado, I.; Braga, M.R. Elevated [CO2] atmosphere enhances production of defense-related flavonoids in soybean elicited by NO and a fungal elicitor. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 65, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. O’Neill, B.F.; Zangerl, A.R.; Dermody, O.; Bilgin, D.D.; Casteel, C.L.; Zavala, J.A.; Berenbaum, M.R. Impact of elevated levels of atmospheric [CO2] and herbivory on flavonoids of soybean (Glycine max L.). J. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 36, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Warren, J.M.; Norby, R.J.; Wullschleger, S.D. Elevated CO2 enhances leaf senescence during extreme drought in a temperate forest. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bukhov, N.G.; Mohanty, P. Elevated temperature stress effects on photosystems: Characterization and evaluation of the nature of heat induced impairments. In Concepts in Photobiology: Photosynthesis and Photomorphogenesis; Singal, G.S., Renger, G., Sopory, S.K., Irrgang, K.D., Govindjee, Eds.; Narosa Publishing House: New Delhi, India, 1999; pp. 617–648. [Google Scholar]
  87. Mohanty, P.; Kreslavski, V.D.; Klimov, V.V.; Los, D.A.; Mimuro, M.; Carpentier, R.; Allakhverdiev, S.I. Heat stress: Susceptibility, recovery and regulation. In Photosynthesis: Plastid Biology, Energy Conversion and Carbon Assimilation, Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration 34; Eaton-Rye, J.J., Tripathy, B.C., Sharkey, T.D., Eds.; Springer Science++Business Media B.V.: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 251–274. [Google Scholar]
  88. Morales, F.; Ancín, M.; Fakhet, D.; González-Torralba, J.; Gámez, A.L.; Seminario, A.; Soba, D.; Mariem, B.S.; Garriga, M.; Aranjuelo, I. Photosynthetic metabolism under stressful growth conditions as a bases for crop breeding and yield improvement. Plants 2020, 9, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Repková, J.; Brestič, M.; Olšovská, K. Leaf growth under temperature and light control. Plant Soil Environ. 2009, 55, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qaderi, M.M.; Basraon, N.K.; Chinnappa, C.C.; Reid, D.M. Combined effects of temperature, ultraviolet-B radiation, and watering regime on growth and physiological processes in canola (Brassica napus) seedlings. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 171, 466–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gliessman, S.R. Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems, 3rd ed.; CRC Press/Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; p. 371. [Google Scholar]
  92. Inagaki, N. Processing of D1 Protein: A Mysterious Process Carried Out in Thylakoid Lumen. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Chovancek, E.; Zivcak, M.; Botyanszka, L.; Hauptvogel, P.; Yang, X.; Misheva, S.; Hussain, S.; Brestic, M. Transient heat waves may affect the photosynthetic capacity of susceptible wheat genotypes due to insufficient photosystem I photoprotection. Plants 2019, 8, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. McClain, A.M.; Sharkey, T.D. Rapid CO2 changes cause oscillations in photosynthesis that implicate PSI acceptor-side limitations. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 3163–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Shanker, A.K.; Gunnapaneni, D.; Bhanu, D.; Vanaja, M.; Lakshmi, N.J.; Yadav, S.K.; Prabhakar, M.; Singh, V.K. Elevated CO2 and water stress in combination in plants: Brothers in arms or partners in crime? Biology 2022, 11, 1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Moore, C.E.; Meacham-Hensold, K.; Lemonnier, P.; Slattery, R.A.; Benjamin, C.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Lawson, T.; Cavanagh, A.P. The effect of increasing temperature on crop photosynthesis: From enzymes to ecosystems. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 2822–2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lamichaney, A.; Parihar, A.K.; Hazra, K.K.; Dixit, G.P.; Katiyar, P.K.; Singh, D.; Singh, A.K.; Kumar, N.; Singh, N.P. Untangling the influence of heat stress on crop phenology, seed set, seed weight, and germination in field pea (Pisum sativum L). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 2, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mishra, A.K.; Agrawal, S.B. Cultivar specific response of [CO2] fertilization on two tropical mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) cultivars: ROS generation, antioxidant status, physiology, growth, yield and seed quality. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2014, 200, 273–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, P.; Han, X.; Zong, Y.; Li, H.; Lin, E.; Han, Y.; Hao, X. Effects of free-air [CO2] enrichment (FACE) on the uptake and utilization of N, P and K in Vigna radiata. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 202, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Vanaja, M.; Reddy, P.R.; Lakshmi, N.J.; Maheswari, M.; Vagheera, P.; Ratnakumar, P.; Jyothi, M.; Yadav, S.K.; Venkateswarlu, B. Effect of elevated atmospheric [CO2] concentrations on growth and yield of black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)—A rainfed pulse crop. Plant Soil Environ. 2007, 53, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Martel, A.B.; Qaderi, M.M. Light quality and quantity regulate aerobic methane emissions from plants. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 159, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Sannagoudar, M.S.; Patil, R.H.; Rajanna, G.A.; Ghosh, A.; Singh, A.K.; Halli, H.M.; Khandibagur, V.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.V. Rising temperature coupled with reduced rainfall will adversely affect yield of kharif sorghum genotypes. Curr. Sci. 2023, 124, 921. [Google Scholar]
  103. Bita, C.E.; Gerats, T. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: Scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nemeskeri, E. Heat tolerance in grain legumes. Bodenkultur 2004, 55, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  105. Piramila, B.H.M.; Prabha, A.L.; Nandagopalan, V.; Stanley, A.L. Effect of heat treatment on germination, seedling growth and some biochemical parameters of dry seeds of black gram. Int. J. Pharm. Phytopharm. Res. 2012, 1, 194–202. [Google Scholar]
  106. Chakraborty, U.; Pradhan, D. High temperature-induced oxidative stress in Lens culinaris, role of antioxidants and amelioration of stress by chemical pre-treatments. J. Plant Inter. 2011, 6, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  107. Prasad, P.V.V.; Craufurd, P.Q.; Kakani, V.G.; Wheeler, T.R.; Boote, K.J. Influence of temperature during pre and post anthesis stages of floral development on fruit set and pollen germination in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 28, 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  108. Kaur, R.; Bains, T.S.; Bindumadhava, H.; Nayyar, H. Responses of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes to heat stress: Effects on reproductive biology, leaf function and yield traits. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 197, 527–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Barghi, S.S.; Mostafaii, H.; Peighami, F.; Zakaria, R.A. Path analysis of yield and its components in lentil under end season heat condition. Int. J. Agric. Res. Rev. 2012, 2, 969–974. [Google Scholar]
  110. Sita, K.; Sehgal, A.; HanumanthaRao, B.; Nair, R.M.; Prasad, P.V.V.; Kumar, S.; Gaur, P.M.; Farooq, M.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Varshney, R.K.; et al. Food legumes and rising temperatures: Effects, adaptive functional mechanisms specific to reproductive growth stage and strategies to improve heat tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Kumar, S.; Thakur, P.; Kaushal, N.; Malik, J.A.; Gaur, P.; Nayyar, H. Effect of varying high temperatures during reproductive growth on reproductive function, oxidative stress and seed yield in chickpea genotypes differing in heat sensitivity. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2013, 59, 823–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bunce, J.A. Elevated carbon dioxide effects on reproductive phenology and seed yield among soybean cultivars. Crop Sci. 2015, 55, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Li, Y.; Yu, Z.; Yang, S.; Jin, J.; Wang, G.; Liu, C.; Herbert, S.J.; Liu, X. Soybean intraspecific genetic variation in response to elevated [CO2]. Arc. Agron. Soil Sci. 2019, 65, 1733–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bellaloui, N.; Bruns, H.A.; Abbas, H.K.; Mengistu, A.; Fisher, D.K.; Reddy, K.N. Agricultural practices altered soybean seed protein, oil, fatty acids, sugars, and minerals in the Midsouth USA. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rogers, G.S.; Milham, P.J.; Thibaud, M.C.; Conroy, J.P. Interactions between rising [CO2] concentration and nitrogen supply in cotton. I. Growth and leaf nitrogen concentration. Funct. Plant Biol. 1996, 23, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Köhler, I.H.; Huber, S.C.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Baxter, I.R. Increased temperatures may safeguard the nutritional quality of crops under future elevated CO2 concentrations. Plant J. 2019, 97, 872–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Pérez-López, U.; Miranda-Apodaca, J.; Mena-Petite, A.; Muñoz-Rueda, A. Responses of nutrient dynamics in barley seedlings to the interaction of salinity and carbon dioxide enrichment. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 99, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Weigel, H.J.; Manderscheid, R. [CO2] enrichment effects on forage and grain nitrogen content of pasture and cereal plants. J. Crop Improv. 2005, 13, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kennedy, M. As carbon dioxide levels rise, major crops are losing nutrients. June 19, 2018 story on NPR’s Morning Edition. Available online: https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2018/06/19/616098095/as-carbon-dioxide-levels-rise-major-crops-are-losing-nutrients (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  120. Martel, A.B.; Qaderi, M.M. Does salicylic acid mitigate the adverse effects of temperature and ultraviolet-B radiation on pea (Pisum sativum) plants? Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 122, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Peak, D.; Mott, K.A. A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 162–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Chen, Y.; Yu, J.; Huang, B. Effects of elevated [CO2] concentration on water relations and photosynthetic responses to drought stress and recovery during rewatering in tall fescue. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2015, 140, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Nadeem, M.; Li, J.; Yahya, M.; Sher, A.; Ma, C.; Wang, X.; Qiu, L. Research progress and perspective on drought stress in legumes: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Manea, A.; Leishman, M.R. Competitive interactions between established grasses and woody plant seedlings under elevated [CO2] levels are mediated by soil water availability. Oecologia 2015, 177, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hatfield, J.L.; Dold, C. Water-use efficiency: Advances and challenges in a changing climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Tubiello, F.N.; Salvatore, M.; Ferrara, A.F.; House, J.; Federici, S.; Rossi, S.; Biancalani, R.; Condor Golec, R.D.; Jacobs, H.; Flammini, A.; et al. The contribution of agriculture, forestry and other land use activities to global warming, 1990–2012. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 2655–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Malhi, G.S.; Kaur, M.; Kaushik, P. Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Witzgall, K.; Vidal, A.; Schubert, D.I.; Höschen, C.; Schweizer, S.A.; Buegger, F.; Pouteau, V.; Chenu, C.; Mueller, C.W. Particulate organic matter as a functional soil component for persistent soil organic carbon. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Mendoza, O.; De Neve, S.; Deroo, H.; Sleutel, S. Mineralisation of ryegrass and soil organic matter as affected by ryegrass application doses and changes in soil structure. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2022, 58, 679–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Hu, J.; Liao, X.; Vardanyan, L.G.; Huang, Y.; Inglett, K.S.; Wright, A.L.; Reddy, K.R. Duration and frequency of drainage and flooding events interactively affect soil biogeochemistry and N flux in subtropical peat soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 727, 138740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Yi, L.; Sheng, R.; Wei, W.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, W. Differential contributions of electron donors to denitrification in the flooding-drying process of a paddy soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 177, 104527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lipson, D.A.; Wilson, R.F.; Oechel, W.C. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on soil microbial biomass, activity, and diversity in a chaparral ecosystem. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 8573–8580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Davidson, E.; Janssens, I. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 2006, 440, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Holland, E.A.; Braswell, B.H.; Sulzman, J.; Lamarque, J.F. Nitrogen deposition onto the United States and Western Europe: Synthesis of observations and models. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15, 38–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Massad, T.J.; Dyer, L.A. A meta-analysis of the effects of global environmental change on plant-herbivore interactions. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2010, 4, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zavala, J.A.; Nabity, P.D.; DeLucia, E.H. An emerging understanding of mechanisms governing insect herbivory under elevated CO2. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013, 58, 79–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Srivastava, A.C.; Tiwari, L.D.; Pal, M.; Sengupta, U.K. CO2-mediated changes in mung bean chemistry: Impact on plant–herbivore interactions. Curr. Sci. 2002, 82, 1148–1151. [Google Scholar]
  138. Akbar, S.M.; Pavani, T.; Nagaraja, T.; Sharma, H.C. Influence of CO2 and temperature on metabolism and development of Helicoverpa armigera (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera). Environ. Entomol. 2016, 45, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Zhang, Y.; Yang, D.; Wan, G.; Liu, B.; Xing, G.; Chen, F. Effects of elevated CO2 on plant chemistry, growth, yield of resistant soybean, and feeding of a target lepidoptera pest, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Ent. 2018, 47, 848–856. [Google Scholar]
  140. Guo, H.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Tong, B.; Harris, M.; Zhu-Salzman, K.; Ge, F. Pea aphid promotes amino acid metabolism both in Medicago truncatula and bacteriocytes to favor aphid population growth under elevated CO2. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 3210–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Qian, L.; Huang, Z.; Liu, X.; Li, C.; Gao, Y.; Gui, F.; Chang, X.; Chen, F. Effect of elevated CO2 on interactions between the host plant Phaseolus vulgaris and the invasive western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. O’Neill, B.F.; Zangerl, A.R.; DeLucia, E.H.; Casteel, C.; Zavala, J.A.; Berenbaum, M.R. Leaf temperature of soybean grown under elevated CO2 increases Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) population growth. Insect Sci. 2011, 18, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Yan, H.Y.; Guo, H.G.; Sun, Y.C.; Ge, F. Plant phenolics mediated bottom-up effects of elevated CO2 on Acyrthosiphon pisum and its parasitoid Aphidius avenae. Insect Sci. 2020, 27, 70–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Jat, B.L.; Pagaria, P.; Mali, G.; Khan, T. Impact of major environmental conditions on pest population dynamics and plant resistance mechanisms in legumes. Indian J. Plant Prot. 2021, 49, 215–226. [Google Scholar]
  145. Sreenivas, A.G.; Ashoka, J.; Nadagoud, S.; Kuchnoor, P.H. Effect of elevated CO2 and temperature on biochemistry of groundnut and its effect on development of leaf eating caterpillar, Spodoptera litura Fabricius. Legume Res. 2019, 42, 399–404. [Google Scholar]
  146. Niziolek, O.K.; Berenbaum, M.R.; DeLucia, E.H. Impact of elevated CO2 and increased temperature on Japanese beetle herbivory. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Garibaldi, L.A.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Winfree, R.; Aizen, M.A.; Bommarco, R. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 2013, 339, 1608–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ashman, T.L.; Knight, T.M.; Steets, J.A.; Amarasekare, P.; Burd, M.; Campbell, D.R.; Dudash, M.R.; Johnston, M.O.; Mazer, S.J.; Mitchell, R.J.; et al. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 2004, 85, 2408–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Otieno, M.; Peters, M.K.; Duque, L.; Steffan-Dewenter, I. Interactive effects of ozone and carbon dioxide on plant-pollinator interactions and yields in a legume crop. Environ. Adv. 2022, 9, 100285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Response of legumes to elevated [CO2] and temperature measured from open-top chambers, free-air [CO2] enrichment experiments (FACE), and controlled indoor and outdoor growth chambers.
Figure 1. Response of legumes to elevated [CO2] and temperature measured from open-top chambers, free-air [CO2] enrichment experiments (FACE), and controlled indoor and outdoor growth chambers.
Environments 11 00273 g001
Figure 2. Response of elevated [CO2] and temperature in legume crops. [1,6,98].
Figure 2. Response of elevated [CO2] and temperature in legume crops. [1,6,98].
Environments 11 00273 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adireddy, R.G.; Anapalli, S.S.; Reddy, K.N.; Mubvumba, P.; George, J. Possible Impacts of Elevated CO2 and Temperature on Growth and Development of Grain Legumes. Environments 2024, 11, 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120273

AMA Style

Adireddy RG, Anapalli SS, Reddy KN, Mubvumba P, George J. Possible Impacts of Elevated CO2 and Temperature on Growth and Development of Grain Legumes. Environments. 2024; 11(12):273. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120273

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adireddy, Rajanna G., Saseendran S. Anapalli, Krishna N. Reddy, Partson Mubvumba, and Justin George. 2024. "Possible Impacts of Elevated CO2 and Temperature on Growth and Development of Grain Legumes" Environments 11, no. 12: 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120273

APA Style

Adireddy, R. G., Anapalli, S. S., Reddy, K. N., Mubvumba, P., & George, J. (2024). Possible Impacts of Elevated CO2 and Temperature on Growth and Development of Grain Legumes. Environments, 11(12), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120273

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop