The results of correlation analysis are presented and discussed separately for each type of corrosion.
3.1. Acidic Corrosion
The pH is an important parameter for indicating the alkalinity level of concrete. The pH of concrete decreases because of the penetration of the aggressive ions under the influence of aggressive media, thereby dissolving the alkali compounds. This is documented by the increase in the pH of all liquid media.
Concentrations of calcium and silicon in sulfuric acid solutions (of different concentrations) as a function of pH are given in
Figure 1,
Figure 2,
Figure 3 and
Figure 4.
As shown in
Figure 1,
Figure 2,
Figure 3 and
Figure 4, the statistical group consisted of 13 values representing the input data to compute the correlation coefficients. All the measured values were included in the calculation.
The dependency of pH gradients of sulfuric acid solutions of different concentrations during the experiments pH (A1) = f(pH (A2) is given in
Figure 5.
Correlations between leached-out amounts of calcium or silicon as main components of the cement matrix and changes in the pH values of the sulfuric acid solutions according to different concentrations are given in
Table 3.
No significant correlation was found between leached-out masses of calcium and the increase of the pH in acidic media. This could point to the fact that not only calcium compounds were responsible for the pH increase. An inverse correlation was observed for silicon dissolving, which means that the more silicon was dissolved, the lower the pH value in the leachate. This confirms the mechanism of sulfuric acid attack on concrete.
The first step in acidic corrosion by H
2SO
4 is linked to formation of calcium sulfate through a chemical reaction of sulfuric acid with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)
2)—Equation (2)—and C-S-H phase (
xCaO·SiO
2×aq) and its sub-sequent conversion to amorphous silica [
14] according to Equation (3).
Amorphous silica is soluble, and in the normal pH-range (4–9) the major dissolved species is H
4SiO
4, according to Equation (4) [
15].
A strong correlation with very high correlation closeness was expected between Ca leached-out masses, due to H
2SO
4 of different concentrations. However, as seen in
Table 4, the correlation coefficient was calculated to be equal to 0.69, which means only significant closeness. This proves that calcium compounds do not have the same leaching rate over the testing period in H
2SO
4 with different concentrations. These results are in accordance with Živica [
16], Myiamoto [
17], Colombani [
18] and Gay [
19], who reported that the degradation mainly concerned Portlandite, rather than C-S-H phase when concrete was exposed to acid attack.
An even lower correlation closeness with the correlation coefficient
Rxy = 0.43 was found for silicon dissolving due to different concentrations of H
2SO
4. These findings did not confirm similar leaching mechanisms and consequent behavior of calcium or silicon in the acidic leachates during the experiment. This is in accordance with Miyamoto [
17], who reported that the deterioration mechanism of concrete caused by sulfuric acid was different for high and low concentrations.
In addition, differences in leaching rates were much more visible when comparing the correlation coefficients of Ca/Si leaching (
Table 5). While in H
2SO
4 with pH = 3 (A1) a medium linear correlation was found between calcium and silicon leaching over a testing experimental period, an inverse correlation was calculated for the elements in H
2SO
4 with pH = 4 (A2).
The calculated low dependency can be due to the fact that, after leaching, calcium ions participating in chemical reactions in the leachate result in the formation of new sulfate compounds such as gypsum or ettringite which precipitate on the concrete surface as mentioned in [
20].
3.2. Sulfate Corrosion
Dependency of pH gradients of manganese sulfate solutions of different concentrations during the experiments pH(S1) = f(pH(S2)) is given in
Figure 10.
The correlation coefficients of dependency between leached-out Ca and Si ions, respectively, and pH of magnesium sulfate solution are given in
Table 6.
Similar to the analysis of acidic corrosion, no significant correlation between leached-out masses of calcium and the increase of pH in magnesium sulfate solutions was found during the experiment. This is contrary to the results of slag-based concrete composites, which were studied in [
21], where a strong correlation for Ca/pH leaching was found. The difference in the finding was probably due to the different chemical composition of the analyzed concrete. Thus, the main chemical reaction of concrete deterioration affected by magnesium sulfate, resulting in the formation of magnesium hydroxide—Equation (5)—was not confirmed.
Based on the calculated correlation coefficients (
Table 7), medium correlation for calcium and significant correlation for silicon were observed during the experiment in case of the magnesium sulfate solutions of different concentrations.
Surprisingly, a high correlation with a correlation coefficient equal to 0.72 was found (
Table 8) between leaching rates of calcium and silicon in magnesium sulfate and a sulfate ion concentration of 3 g/L (S1). However, the results for leaching rates in magnesium sulfate with a sulfate ion concentration of 10 g/L (S2) were found to be totally different. Comparing the leaching rates during the experimental period, an inverse correlation was calculated. The findings revealed that, in spite of the leaching medium having the same chemical composition, the leaching mechanisms of the analyzed compounds of calcium or silicon were not the same. The findings could be connected with a different behavior of calcium in the MgSO
4 media. A higher sulfate ion concentration of 10 g/L (S2) in the liquid medium could result in a more massive formation of calcium-based compounds precipitating on the concrete, compared to less concentrated MgSO
4 solution (3 g/L). Therefore, the concentration of Ca measured in the liquid could be lower than the one corresponding to the less concentrated MgSO
4 solution (3 g/L).
3.3. Leaching
When cement-based materials are subjected to water, even without any water pressure gradient, a leaching process is induced by calcium concentration gradients in the layer between the surface and the core of the material. Those gradients change the chemical equilibrium in the interphase, and the hydration products of concrete dissolve [
22,
23].
Figure 11 shows the dissolved Ca
2+ versus pH of water during the leaching experiment.
Dissolution and leaching of the hydration products, Ca(OH)
2, in particular, in water results in an increase in the pH values of water leachate [
24]. The pH and Ca concentration of water for the cement-based samples increased as the leaching period was increased in accordance with [
25]. However, a linear correlation between Ca
2+ and pH of the leaching agent could not be examined in this case. Hearn and Morley (1997) [
25] found that after a certain period (56 days), the pH and the concentration of Ca showed a tendency to converge into a constant value, which indicated the equilibrium state of the aqueous and solid phases. Haga et al. [
26] reported that the rate of leaching of Ca ions from Portlandite was observed to slow down after 28 days because of the lower difference in concentration gradients.
A linear correlation could be found for the relation of the amount of leached calcium to the square root of the leaching period, as presented in Roziere 2009 [
27]. On the other hand, an inverse linear correlation (
Rxy = −0.48) was calculated for Si and pH in potable water (
Figure 12) during the experiment, similarly to in acidic and sulfate media.
3.4. Correlation between Sulfate and Leaching Corrosion
Comparison of the leaching trends of calcium and silicon compounds in magnesium sulfate solution and in potable water via calculated correlation coefficients is presented in
Table 9.
Zero-correlation was observed for silicon leaching rates due to magnesium sulfate and potable water. This means that the leaching process and consequent behavior of silicon in leachate of magnesium sulfate differed from the water solution. This confirmed a totally different deterioration of sulfate resisting cement-based concrete regarding silicon leaching when affected by sulfate and leaching corrosion. Based on the low correlation coefficients, this could be concluded for calcium leaching as well. As is known, the deterioration of concrete can be caused by two mechanisms: (i) a dissolution of the cement paste constituents and their subsequent removal from the paste matrix due to its inherent high solubility; and (ii) chemical reactions within the paste, e.g., salt crystallization resulting in the expansion of concrete volume. The leaching process dominated when the concrete sample was subjected to water where the cement hydrates (Portlandite and C-S-H) dissociate, and the reduction in the concentration of Ca ions in the pore solution led to subsequent dissolution of cement hydrates. On the contrary, when the concrete sample was subjected to a magnesium sulfate solution, besides leaching, the crystallization of sulfate products, e.g., gypsum—Equation (5)—occurred. Sulfate resisting cement is a special type of cement, primarily used in cases with high sulfate corrosion resistance demands; an improved resistance of the concrete samples to sulfate attack is expected, compared to Portland-based cements. This is in accordance with other authors, e.g., Hossack [
28] and Eštokova [
29], who confirm the improved resistance of the concrete samples with the sulfate resisting cement and silica fume to sulfate attack. The finding proved that the performance of sulfate resisting cement-based concrete to sulfate attack was different from that for simple leaching corrosion caused by water.