Next Article in Journal
Urban Environmental Quality Assessment by Spectral Characteristics of Mulberry (Morus L.) Leaves
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Trends in Pharmaceuticals Removal from Water Using Electrochemical Oxidation Processes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Environments
Volume 8
Issue 8
10.3390/environments8080086
environments-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Organic Fertilizer Mixed with Food Waste Dry Powder on the Growth of Chinese Cabbage Seedlings

by
Sang-Mo Kang
1,
Shifa Shaffique
1,
Lee-Rang Kim
1,
Eun-Hae Kwon
1,
Seong-Heon Kim
2,
Yun-Hae Lee
2,
Kalsoom Kalsoom
1,
Muhammad Aaqil Khan
1 and
In-Jung Lee
1,*
1
Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
2
Development Administration, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural, Wanju 55365, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Environments 2021, 8(8), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8080086
Submission received: 19 July 2021 / Revised: 20 August 2021 / Accepted: 20 August 2021 / Published: 23 August 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Food waste is a common global threat to the environment, agriculture, and society. In the present study, we used 30% food waste, mixed with 70% bio-fertilizers, and evaluated their ability to affect the growth of Chinese cabbage. The experiment was conducted using different concentrations of food waste to investigate their effect on Chinese cabbage growth, chlorophyll content, and mineral content. Leaf length, root length, and fresh and dry weight were significantly increased in plants treated with control fertilizer (CF) and fertilizer mixed with food waste (MF). However, high concentrations of food waste decreased the growth and biomass of Chinese cabbage due to salt content. Furthermore, higher chlorophyll content, transpiration efficiency, and photosynthetic rate were observed in CF- and MF-treated plants, while higher chlorophyll fluorescence was observed in the MF × 2 and MF × 6 treatments. Inductively coupled plasm mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) results showed an increase in potassium (K), calcium (Ca), phosphorous (P), and magnesium (Mg) contents in the MF and MF × 2 treatments, while higher sodium (Na) content was observed in the MF × 4 and MF × 6 treatments due to the high salt content found in food waste. The analysis of abscisic acid (ABA) showed that increasing amounts of food waste increase the endogenous ABA content, compromising the survival of plants. In conclusion, optimal amounts of food waste—up to MF and MF × 2—increase plant growth and provide an ecofriendly approach to be employed in the agriculture production system.

1. Introduction

It is estimated that about one-third to one-quarter of food is wasted. Food waste is also defined as food loss or unconsumed food [1], and it represents the portion of food that is not eaten by anyone [1]. There are various causes of food waste, which may occur at any point of the food chain system, for example during production, processing, distribution, consumption, or at the retail stage. It is estimated that 30–40% of food is wasted within the food chain [2,3]. Kumar et al. [4] reported that 42% of waste derives from households, 39% from food industries, and 5% occurs during distribution. In order to achieve development goals for a sustainable environment, it is necessary to minimize these quantities. Food waste has a worse effect on the environment and agriculture industry because compositing is not carried out properly [5]. Globally, 1.3 billion tons of food is wasted every year [6], an amount that is equivalent to more than half of the world’s annual cereal crop production (2.3 billion tons). Approximately 19 million tons of food waste is reported annually in Japan [7], 16.5 million tons in Taiwan, [8] and 4.3 million tons in Korea [9]. According to the World Economic Forum, in South Korea 95% of the food waste is recycled in the effort to become a zero waste society [10,11].
Various strategies can be adopted to minimize wastage [12,13]. Nowadays, the biggest challenges in food waste recovery are animal feeding, reducing the volume of surplus food generation, combating world hunger, providing food waste to rendering industries, and using it for soil amendments or incineration. In recent years, anaerobic digestion (AD) technology for FW resource treatment has attracted considerable attention due to its advantages, as it allows for the obtaining of clean energy and low carbon emissions, and can be used in fertilization programs [14,15]. After the AD processes, the biogas obtained can be upgraded to bio-methane, which is considered an attractive renewable energy, as it is generally used as fuel in the transport sector, or is injected into gas grids, saving tons of CO2-equivalent emissions [14,15]. On the other hand, AD technology allows for the recycling of nutrients when digestates are applied on agricultural lands, either used as food waste powder directly or mixed with other fertilizers [14,16]. For instance, anaerobic digestion for biogas production results in large amounts of liquid digestate, which contains high amounts of nutrients, such as nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus, as well as micronutrients in plant-available forms [17]. The long-term application of food waste organic fertilizer was shown to improve soil quality, stimulate crop yields, and even have a positive influence on the growth of soil bacteria [17]. Furthermore, food waste can be used as organic fertilizer by compositing natural biological degradation processes [2,18,19]. In accordance with the establishment of standards for fertilization processes and amendments to the designation notice, dry waste powder can be used as raw material for organic fertilizers [20,21]. In this case, it must include the standard values of less than 2% salt, less than 15% moisture, and less than 30% of all raw materials [20,22]. Soil salinity is a major abiotic stress that limits plant growth and development by affecting various physiological and biochemical processes. Previous reports have shown that there are many effective ways of improving salt-affected lands, such as water leaching, phytoremediation, and chemical remediation [23]. In particular, the remediation of salt affected soils through chemical agents includes the use of gypsum, organic matter (such as farmyard manure), green manure, or organic food waste [24]. It was also reported that the application of food waste improves the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil and enhances plant growth and development in various crops such as rice [23], tomato [25], pakchoi [26], and common bean [27].
As it contains salt (and salinity is the biggest obstacle to food waste fertilization), food waste cannot be used directly as fertilizer, and therefore a method that includes mixed fertilization is being proposed as an alternative [22,28]. It is urgent to prepare a plan to effectively utilize food waste as raw material for fertilizers. This research contributes to the development of technology aimed at improving the stability and homogenization of dry powder to be used as a substitute for mixed organic fertilizers [29,30]. When food waste is used as raw material for fertilization, various problems—such as excessive salt content, mixing of impurities, and odors—arise [31,32,33]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to ensure stability and verify the procedures that are essential for safe fertilization processes. In present study, food waste was mixed with organic fertilizer in dry powder form, and its effects on Chinese cabbage seedlings and on the soil environment were analyzed [34,35]. Furthermore, the combined effect of food waste and organic fertilizer on the growth (shoot/root), biomass (fresh/dry weight), and chlorophyll content were also investigated, together with the effect on phytohormonal regulation and content of minerals, such as N, P, and K.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Physicochemical Properties of Soil

For the analysis of physicochemical properties, we collected soil samples and sieved them to remove impurities. The soil was air dried under normal temperature and sieved through a 2 mm mesh for further analysis. A quantity of 10 g of dry soil was mixed with 50 mL of water (1:5) by vortexing every 10 min for 1 min. After 1 h, the pH and electrical conductivity were measured through a pH meter and EC meter, respectively. Subsequently, organic matter was quantified using the Mebius method. A quantity of 0.1–0.5 air-dried soil (0.5 mm) was mixed in 10 mL of 0.4 N dichromate solution, and 20 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid was added to a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask and heated on an electric plate at 100 °C for 5 min. After cooling, 200 mL of distilled water, 10 mL of concentrated phosphoric acid, and 1 mL of diphenylamine (16%) were added [36].

2.2. Measurement of Available Phosphorous, Nitrate, and Cation Exchange Capacity

For the analysis of phosphorous content, we used the molybdenum blue method with 1-amino-2-naphtol-4-sulfanic acid, on the basis of the leaching method described in detail by Lancaster [37,38]. In this method, the modified molybdenum is used to determine the quantity of enzymatically hydrolyzable phosphorus in the soil. 1-Amino-2-naphtol-4-sulfanic acid by Lancaster leaching method was followed for available phosphorus estimation. For the analysis of nitrogen content, the method of Calazans et al. [39] was adopted. The NH4+ adsorbed on soil particles was replaced with potassium chloride solution, alkalized with magnesium oxide and titrated to measure ammonia nitrogen. Then, Devarda’s alloy was added to convert NO3− to NH4+ for distillation titration, and nitrate nitrogen was measured. A quantity of 10 g of air-dried soil (2 mm) was mixed with 0.1 g of a mixture containing sulfate—copper sulfate and selenium (10:10:1)—and 3 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid in a 100 mL polyethylene Erlenmeyer flask; then, the contents were shaken for 30 min. The mixture inside the glass tube was digested in a sealed vial and was heated until it turned white. Toward the end of the digestion process, 10 mL of distilled water was added, and the extract was distilled in the presence of sodium hydroxide (13 mol/L) in a Kjeldahl distiller. The extract was placed into a boric acid solution until a total of 50 mL of condensate in the flasks was obtained. The distillate samples were titrated with 0.01 N H2SO4, and the total nitrogen content in soil samples was calculated.
For the analysis of cation exchange capacity, 10 g of soil dried at 40 °C was weighted and put in centrifuged tubes, and 50 mL of 1 N NH4OAc (pH 7) solution was added. The tubes were then kept in a shaking incubator for 3 h at 140 rpm and centrifuged at 600 rpm for 10 min. A 5.5 cm Buchner funnel with retentive filter paper was fit, the paper was moistened, and the soil extract was transferred. The decanted liquid was collected in a 100 mL volumetric flask and was added with 1 N NH4OAc solution until reaching a volume of 100 mL. The exchangeable bases (K, Na, Mg2, and Ca2) were determined through the ICP measurement method.

3. Experimental Set Up

The Chinese cabbage needed for the experiment was purchased from Seoul-baechu, (Danong, Gyeonggi province, South Korea), and seedlings were grown for 3 weeks in a 72 Cells Seedling Trays (11 × 21.25 × 1.8 inches) containing horticultural soil (peat moss (10–15%), coco peat (45–50%), zeolite (6–8%), and perlite (35–40%), along with NH+ (≈0.09 mg/g), NO3 (≈0.205 mg/g), PO (≈0.35 mg/g), and KO (≈0.1 mg/g)) purchased from (Shinsung Mineral Co., Ltd., Goesan, Korea) [40,41]. The organic fertilizer mixed with food (MF) waste was incorporated into the upper 10 cm soil layer, and supplemented with various amounts of food waste, on the basis of the experimental design. The pots (17.0 × 12.0 × 13 cm) were labeled properly and divided into six groups (A) NT: not treated control; (B) CF: controlled fertilizers (3.78 g per pot), which were added only with high quality uniform compound fertilizer from a registered company (poweralchandeul, Farmhannong Co., Ltd.,Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea, N-P2O5-K2O: 12-6-6); (C) MF: mixed fertilizer (10.61 g per pot) composed of castor oil cake/rapeseed oil/food waste powder (49:21:30), wherein a sub-group (MF × 2) was set up where the quantity of mixed fertilizer was double; (D) the amount of mixed fertilizer was increased four times; and (E) the amount of mixed fertilizer was increased six times.

4. Morphological Analysis

After 4 weeks of growth using organic fertilizers mixed with different concentrations of food waste, growth parameters, namely, root length, shoot length, fresh and dry weight, were measured. Furthermore, a LCpro T portable photosynthetic assay system (ADC Bioscientific Ltd., Herts, England) was used for the quantification of transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and photosynthetic rate.

5. Endogenous Abscisic Acid (ABA) Quantification

For the quantification of endogenous ABA, we used the detailed method by Khan et al. [42,43]. A quantity of 0.3 g of freeze-dried sample was treated with 30 mL of extract solution (isopropanol, 95%, and glacial acetic acid, 10%), and 100 ng of ABA standard [(±)−3,5,5,7,7,7-d6] was added. The suspension was filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated using a rotary evaporator. The residue was suspended in 4 mL of 1 N NaOH solution and rinsed three times with methylene chloride (3 mL) in order to eliminate traces of lipophilic material. After decreasing the pH of the aqueous phase to 3.5 by adding 6 N HCl, we extracted it through solvent extraction with ethyl acetate three times. The ethyl acetate extract was then evaporated and the dry residue was re-suspended in phosphate buffer solution (pH 8), which was passed through a polyvinylpolypyrrolidone column. The eluted phosphate buffer solution was once again partitioned three times with EtOAc, after adjusting to pH 3.5 with 6 N HCl. All three aliquots extracted were pooled and evaporated using the rotary evaporator. Subsequently, the fractions were methylated with diazomethane to detect and quantify ABA using GC-MS/SIM equipment (6890N network gas chromatograph, Agilent Technologies) (Scheme 1). ThermoQuest Crop. (Manchester, UK) software was used to monitor signal ions (m/z 1162 and 190 for Me-ABA, and m/z 166 and 194 for Me-[2H6]-ABA).

6. ICP Analysis of the Uptake of Different Elements

For the quantification of different elements absorbed, such as sodium (Na), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), phosphorous (P), and magnesium (Mg), we followed the methods described in Khan et al. [44] and Sahile et al. [45], using 200 mg of freeze-dried powder. All the samples were digested with 5 mL of HNO3 and 3 mL of H2O2 in a microwave oven. Subsequently, 3% of HNO3 was added to digest the samples and was injected in an inductively coupled plasm mass spectrometry analyzer (Optima 7900DV, Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

7. Statistical Analysis

The results of the current study were performed in a completely randomized design and were subjected to statistical analysis. The experiments were conducted as three parallels, and every replicate included 20 plants. Graphs were generated using Graph Pad Prism software (Version 6.01, San Diego, CA, USA), whereas means with standard error were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) in SAS (V9.1, Cary, NC, USA).

8. Results and Discussion

8.1. Physicochemical Properties of Soil

It is very important to monitor the physicochemical characteristics of soil because soil is a complex material that consists of various components, such as minerals, moisture, and organic matter [46]. These components greatly influence soil structure, texture, and porosity. Before the experiment, the electrical conductivity; organic matter content; and available phosphorus, nitrogen, calcium, potassium, magnesium, and sodium were analyzed (Table 1). Soil pH and electrical conductivity were 6.6 and 2.8 dS, respectively. Soil pH, whose optimal range is 5–7 for agricultural crops [47], plays a vital role in the regulation of nutrient availability [48], and is an indicator of the overall chemical status of soil [49]. Electrical conductivity is also an important indicator of soil health that affects plant nutrient availability and crop yield [50]. Moreover, soil is a major source of nutrients, and soil nutrient availability is essential in sustaining soil quality and plant productivity [51,52]. The nutrient contents obtained from soil analysis are the following: organic carbon, 20 g/kg; nitrate nitrogen, 141.8 mg/kg; available phosphorus, 330 mg/kg; K, 1.11 mg/kg; Mg, 3.65 mg/kg; and Na 0.6 mg/kg, as shown in Table 1. Crops plants need 16 essential elements that are vital for their normal growth [53]. The over-application of fertilizers, using water irrigation, can cause a micronutrient imbalance in soil and nutrients available to plants. Among the nutrients, organic matter increases the chemical and physical properties of soil that contribute to plant growth and development [54].

8.2. Effect of Food Waste on the Growth, Biomass, and Chlorophyll Content of Chinese Cabbage

Currently, food waste is one of the most urgent challenges facing the environment, society, and the economy because of the devastating effects it produces [55]. Different strategies are employed to manage/recycle wasted food, such as the use as fertilizer, and feeding [30]. However, using food waste as fertilizer presents a problem, namely, salinity stress. The excess sodium concentration of food waste may cause ionic imbalance, as it produces several morphological and physiological changes that inhibit crop growth and development [56,57,58]. However, optimal doses of food waste have been demonstrated to play a significant role in fertilization, as shown in Table 2 and Table 3. In the current experiment, the growth characteristics of Chinese cabbage were investigated. After four weeks, the CF- and MF-treated plants showed an increase in leaf length (12.6–12.9 cm), root length (11.8–15.3 cm), fresh weight (14.7–16.5 g), and dry weight (3.4–3.9 g) compared to the control NT plants, where the same parameters were lower: leaf length (11.8 cm), root length (9.3 cm), fresh weight (13.4 g), and dry weight (2.5 g). However, leaf length decreased in the MF × 2-, MF × 4-, and MF × 6-treated plants (Table 2). In Table 3, results show that chlorophyll fluorescence, which measures the photosynthetic rate, was higher in the MF × 2- and MF × 6-treated groups than in the other treated groups (CF, MF, and MF × 4), and ranged between 0.76 and 0.79, which satisfactorily meets the needs of plants. In contrast, the transpiration rate decreased in the MF × 2- and MF × 6-treated plants (Table 3). The level of stomatal conductance, which measures the water relationships within a plant, decreased to 0.03 ± 0.0 mol/m2 in the treated groups (except for CF), showing that the treated plants are not able to withstand drought or salinity stress. Similar results were also observed for the photosynthetic rates between treated and non-treated Chinese cabbage plants (Table 3).

8.3. Effect of Food Waste on ABA and Mineral Uptake in Chinese Cabbage

Phyto-hormones, especially ABA, play a crucial role in plant responses to various environmental conditions [59,60]. In the present study, higher ABA contents were observed in the MF × 2- and MF × 4-treated plants than in NT and CF-treated plants (Figure 1). In contrast, a decrease in ABA content was observed in MF × 6-treated plants, possibly due to an overdose of food waste that led to the death of plants, a hypothesis that is also supported by the observed growth parameters. The increase in ABA content in MF × 2 and MF × 4-treated plants might have been due to the double and quadruple increase in the salt content of food waste. This result also supports the observation [61,62,63] that high salinity in maize, rice, and soybean enhances ABA contents. Furthermore, this increase in ABA content was also correlated with the ICP analysis of Na content in Chinese cabbage plants, which showed a higher Na content in MF × 2–MF × 6-treated plants than in NT and CF-treated plants. This increase was due to the salt content present in food waste powder. Moreover, Na content also affected the uptake of K, Mg, Ca, and P mineral ions in Chinese cabbage (Table 4). The concentrations of potassium, calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium were higher in the MF and MF × 2 groups than in the MF × 4 and MF × 6 groups. The amount of sodium increases with increasing concentrations of food waste (which is alarming) and induces salinity stress. Excess sodium ions cause ionic imbalance, as they compete with potassium ions, possibly resulting in necrosis and chlorosis [63]. Higher contents of K were observed in the MF- and MF × 2 -treated plants, with significant effects on plant growth and photosynthetic rates. Previous studies showed that K plays a vital role in photosynthesis and in the translocation of nutrients in plants; it is considered a major nutrient, essential for plant growth and development [64]. Similarly, higher Mg concentrations also play an essential role in plant photosynthesis and growth, as this element is the central atom amid four nitrogen atoms in the chlorophyll molecule [65]. Another micronutrient is calcium (Ca), which provides structural support to the cell wall and acts as a secondary messenger when plants are stressed [66].
In summary, the combined application of organic and mineral fertilizers is the best approach to achieve multiple aims in terms of high yields, low-cost farming, and minimal negative environmental impacts. The good performance of this combination, together with the reduced expenses for mineral fertilizers, can encourage farmers to accept the use of organic fertilizers. Nabel et al. [67] reported that organic fertilization with digestates had a positive influence on soil properties (e.g., increased soil respiration and enhanced water-holding capacity), particularly in marginal sites. Organic fertilization via food waste would improve crop yields and soil fertility and should be considered as an effective strategy to manage compostable wastes. Mu et al. [68] reported the impacts of different compost treatments rates (10%, 30%, 50%, and 70% v/v), and synthetic fertilizers showed a positive effect on soil fertility, plant yield, and plant nutrient content in arugula and radish plants. Similarly, Dlamlnl et al. [69] also investigated the effect of organic food waste on soil conditions and on the yield of vegetables, and concluded that food waste fertilizers can be used as an alternative to synthetic fertilizers to increase crop yield and improve the physical properties of soil. At the same time, the negative impact of synthetic fertilizers on the environment would be reduced, as well as the impact of disposing of vegetable food waste in landfills.

9. Conclusions

In this study, Chinese cabbage was treated with different concentrations of food waste along with a 70% fertilizer component. An increase in Chinese cabbage growth parameters was observed up to the MF × 2 treatment. However, when the dose of food waste was further increased to four- and sixfold concentrations, plants showed inhibitory growth regulation. We demonstrated that the fertilization of seedlings with food waste within the optimal MF to MF × 2 range provides a valuable, ecofriendly, and low-cost biotechnological approach for the improvement of sustainable crop production. Further on-field studies are needed to observe the effect of food waste on the soil micro- and macronutrient composition, as well as on the fertility rate in the long term. In addition, as the release of Na+ increases soil salinity, it is necessary to determine the proper application doses of these organic by-products in order to avoid negative impacts on soil, the environment, and human health. Moreover, different strategies are needed to avoid the negative impact of sodium on the growth of crops, as food waste contains more salt.

Author Contributions

S.-M.K. and L.-R.K. conducted the experiments. E.-H.K. and K.K. conducted hormonal, and ICP analyses. S.-H.K. and Y.-H.L. help in resources, M.A.K. and S.S. wrote the manuscript and answered reviewer comments. I.-J.L. designed, supervised, and financed the research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Agenda Program (Project No. PJ015163032021) Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bratovcic, A.; Zohorović, M.; Odobasic, A.; Šestan, I. Efficiency of food waste as an organic fertilizer. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol. 2018, 7, 527–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Papargyropoulou, E.; Lozano, R.; Steinberger, J.K.; Wright, N.; bin Ujang, Z. The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 76, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Scherhaufer, S.; Moates, G.; Hartikainen, H.; Wald, K.; Obersteiner, G. Environmental impacts food waste in Europe. Waste Manag. 2018, 77, 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kumar, K.; Yadav, A.N.; Kumar, V.; Vyas, P.; Dhaliwal, H.S. Food waste: A potential bioresource for extraction of nutraceuticals and bioactive compounds. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2017, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Girotto, F.; Alibardi, L.; Cossu, R. Food waste generation and industrial uses: A review. Waste Manag. 2015, 45, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Paritosh, K.; Kushwaha, S.K.; Yadav, M.; Pareek, N.; Chawade, A.; Vivekanand, V. Food Waste to Energy: An Overview of Sustainable Approaches for Food Waste Management and Nutrient Recycling. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Melikoglu, M.; Lin, C.S.K.; Webb, C. Analysing global food waste problem: Pinpointing the facts and estimating the energy content. Cent. Eur. J. Eng. 2013, 3, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mao, I.-F.; Tsai, C.-J.; Shen, S.-H.; Lin, T.-F.; Chen, W.-K.; Chen, M.-L. Critical components of odors in evaluating the performance of food waste composting plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 370, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, J.-D.; Park, J.-S.; In, B.-H.; Kim, D.; Namkoong, W. Evaluation of pilot-scale in-vessel composting for food waste treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Broom, D. South Korea Once Recycled 2% of Its Food Waste. Now It Recycles 95%. In Proceedings of the World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/04/south-korea-recycling-food-waste/ (accessed on 12 April 2019).
  11. Shvetsova, O.A.; Lee, J.H. Minimizing the environmental impact of industrial production: Evidence from south korean waste treatment investment projects. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kiran, E.U.; Trzcinski, A.P.; Ng, W.J.; Liu, Y. Bioconversion of food waste to energy: A review. Fuel 2014, 134, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stenmarck, Â.; Jensen, C.; Quested, T.; Moates, G.; Buksti, M.; Cseh, B.; Juul, S.; Parry, A.; Politano, A.; Redlingshofer, B. Estimates of European Food Waste Levels; IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute: Stockholm, Sweden, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. Iglesias, R.; Muñoz, R.; Polanco, M.; Díaz, I.; Susmozas, A.; Moreno, A.D.; Guirado, M.; Carreras, N.; Ballesteros, M. Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion as an Energy Vector: Current Upgrading Development. Energies 2021, 14, 2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. David, A.; Govil, T.; Tripathi, A.K.; McGeary, J.; Farrar, K.; Sani, R.K. Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion: Enhanced and Sustainable Methane Production from Co-Digestion of Food and Lignocellulosic Wastes. Energies 2018, 11, 2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pilarska, A.A.; Pilarski, K.; Wolna-Maruwka, A.; Boniecki, P.; Zaborowicz, M. Use of Confectionery Waste in Biogas Production by the Anaerobic Digestion Process. Molecules 2019, 24, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Dragicevic, I.; Sogn, T.A.; Eich-Greatorex, S. Recycling of Biogas Digestates in Crop Production—Soil and Plant Trace Metal Content and Variability. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2018, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Schneider, F. Review of food waste prevention on an international level. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management; ICE Publishing: London, UK, 2013; pp. 187–203. [Google Scholar]
  19. Evans, D.M. Food Waste: Home Consumption, Material Culture and Everyday Life; Bloomsbury Publishing: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. Appelhof, M.; Olszewski, J. Worms Eat. My Garbage: How to Set Up and Maintain a Worm Composting System: Compost Food Waste, Produce Fertilizer for Houseplants and Garden, and Educate Your Kids and Family; Storey Publishing: Adams, MA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Choi, Y.-C.; Choi, J.-Y.; Kim, J.-G.; Kim, M.-S.; Kim, W.-T.; Park, K.-H.; Bae, S.-W.; Jeong, G.-S. Potential usage of food waste as a natural fertilizer after digestion by Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Int. J. Ind. Entomol. 2009, 19, 171–174. [Google Scholar]
  22. Owamah, H.I.; Dahunsi, S.O.; Oranusi, U.S.; Alfa, M.I. Fertilizer and sanitary quality of digestate biofertilizer from the co-digestion of food waste and human excreta. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cha-um, S.; Kirdmanee, C. Remediation of salt-affected soil by the addition of organic matter: An investigation into improving glutinous rice productivity. Sci. Agric. 2011, 68, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tejada, M.; Garcia, C.; Gonzalez, J.L.; Hernandez, M.T. Use of organic amendment as a strategy for saline soil remediation: Influence on the physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 1413–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tartoura, K.A.H.; Youssef, S.A.; Tartoura, E.-S.A.A. Compost alleviates the negative effects of salinity via up-regulation of antioxidants in Solanum lycopersicum L. plants. Plant. Growth Regul. 2014, 74, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zheng, S.; Jiang, J.; He, M.; Zou, S.; Wang, C. Effect of kelp waste extracts on the growth and development of Pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Rady, M.M.; Semida, W.M.; Hemida, K.A.; Abdelhamid, M.T. The effect of compost on growth and yield of Phaseolus vulgaris plants grown under saline soil. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2016, 5, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Diacono, M.; Montemurro, F. Effectiveness of organic wastes as fertilizers and amendments in salt-affected soils. Agriculture 2015, 5, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Damiani, M.; Pastorello, T.; Carlesso, A.; Tesser, S.; Semenzin, E. Quantifying environmental implications of surplus food redistribution to reduce food waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 289, 125813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barrera, E.L.; Hertel, T. Global food waste across the income spectrum: Implications for food prices, production and resource use. Food Policy 2021, 98, 101874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Peng, Y.; Ye, C.; Zhang, S. Effects of antibiotics on hydrolase activity and structure of microbial community during aerobic co-composting of food waste with sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 321, 124506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Andraskar, J.; Yadav, S.; Kapley, A. Challenges and Control Strategies of Odor Emission from Composting Operation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 193, 2331–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jin, C.; Sun, S.; Yang, D.; Sheng, W.; Ma, Y.; He, W.; Li, G. Anaerobic digestion: An alternative resource treatment option for food waste in China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021, 779, 146397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kaur, G.J.; Orsat, V.; Singh, A. Challenges and potential solutions to utilization of carrot rejects and waste in food processing. Br. Food J. 2021, 123, 2036–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yeo, J.; Oh, J.-i.; Cheung, H.H.L.; Lee, P.K.; An, A.K. Smart Food Waste Recycling Bin (S-FRB) to turn food waste into green energy resources. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 234, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mebius, L.J. A rapid method for the determination of organic carbon in soil. Anal. Chim. Acta 1960, 22, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, W.-S.; Kang, S.-S.; Kim, K.-I.; Hong, S.-D. Comparison of determination methods for available-P in soil of plastic film house. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fertil. 2006, 39, 163–172. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mehlich, A. New extractant for soil test evaluation of phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium, sodium, manganese and zinc. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1978, 9, 477–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Calazans, S.O.L.; Morais, V.A.; Scolforo, J.R.S.; Zinn, Y.L.; Mello, J.M.; Mancini, L.T.; Silva, C.A. Soil organic carbon as a key predictor of N in forest soils of Brazil. J. Soils Sediments 2018, 18, 1242–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Asaf, S.; Khan, A.L.; Khan, M.A.; Imran, Q.M.; Yun, B.-W.; Lee, I.-J. Osmoprotective functions conferred to soybean plants via inoculation with Sphingomonas sp. LK11 and exogenous trehalose. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 205, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Asaf, S.; Khan, M.A.; Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; Shahzad, R.; Kim, A.-Y.; Kang, S.-M.; Lee, I.-J. Bacterial endophytes from arid land plants regulate endogenous hormone content and promote growth in crop plants: An example of Sphingomonas sp. and Serratia marcescens. J. Plant Interact. 2017, 12, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Khan, M.A.; Asaf, S.; Khan, A.L.; Adhikari, A.; Jan, R.; Ali, S.; Imran, M.; Kim, K.M.; Lee, I.J. Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria augment growth and salinity tolerance in rice plants. Plant Biol. 2020, 22, 850–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Khan, M.A.; Asaf, S.; Khan, A.L.; Adhikari, A.; Jan, R.; Ali, S.; Imran, M.; Kim, K.-M.; Lee, I.-J. Halotolerant Rhizobacterial Strains Mitigate the Adverse Effects of NaCl Stress in Soybean Seedlings. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Khan, M.A.; Asaf, S.; Khan, A.L.; Jan, R.; Kang, S.-M.; Kim, K.-M.; Lee, I.-J. Rhizobacteria AK1 remediates the toxic effects of salinity stress via regulation of endogenous phytohormones and gene expression in soybean. Biochem. J. 2019, 476, 2393–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sahile, A.A.; Khan, M.A.; Hamayun, M.; Imran, M.; Kang, S.-M.; Lee, I.-J. Novel Bacillus cereus Strain, ALT1, Enhance Growth and Strengthens the Antioxidant System of Soybean under Cadmium Stress. Agronomy 2021, 11, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Naga Raju, M.; Golla, N.; Vengatampalli, R. Soil Physicochemical Properties. In Soil Enzymes: Influence of Sugar Industry Effluents on Soil Enzyme Activities; Maddela, N.R., Golla, N., Vengatampalli, R., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fomenky, N.N.; Tening, A.S.; Chuyong, G.B.; Mbene, K.; Asongwe, G.A.; Che, V.B. Selected physicochemical properties and quality of soils around some rivers of Cameroon. J. Soil Sci. Environ. Manag. 2018, 9, 68–80. [Google Scholar]
  48. Neina, D. The role of soil pH in plant nutrition and soil remediation. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2019, 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dixon, J.B.; Schulze, D.G. Soil Mineralogy with Environmental Applications; Soil Science Society of America Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  50. Brevik, E.C.; Fenton, T.E.; Lazari, A. Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping. Precis. Agric. 2006, 7, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Quinton, J.N.; Govers, G.; Van Oost, K.; Bardgett, R.D. The impact of agricultural soil erosion on biogeochemical cycling. Nat. Geosci. 2010, 3, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Li, J.; Nie, M.; Powell, J.R.; Bissett, A.; Pendall, E. Soil physico-chemical properties are critical for predicting carbon storage and nutrient availability across Australia. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 094088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Uchida, R. Essential nutrients for plant growth: Nutrient functions and deficiency symptoms. Plant Nutr. Manag. Hawaii’s Soils 2000, 4, 31–55. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lee, E.-P.; Han, Y.-S.; Lee, S.-I.; Cho, K.-T.; Park, J.-H.; You, Y.-H. Effect of nutrient and moisture on the growth and reproduction of Epilobium hirsutum L., an endangered plant. J. Ecol. Environ. 2017, 41, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sharma, P.; Gaur, V.K.; Sirohi, R.; Varjani, S.; Kim, S.H.; Wong, J.W. Sustainable processing of food waste for production of bio-based products for circular bioeconomy. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 325, 124684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Khan, M.A.; Sahile, A.A.; Jan, R.; Asaf, S.; Hamayun, M.; Imran, M.; Adhikari, A.; Kang, S.-M.; Kim, K.-M.; Lee, I.-J. Halotolerant bacteria mitigate the effects of salinity stress on soybean growth by regulating secondary metabolites and molecular responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Golwala, H.; Zhang, X.; Iskander, S.M.; Smith, A.L. Solid waste: An overlooked source of microplastics to the environment. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021, 769, 144581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Adhikari, A.; Khan, M.A.; Lee, K.E.; Kang, S.M.; Dhungana, S.K.; Bhusal, N.; Lee, I.J. The Halotolerant Rhizobacterium—Pseudomonas koreensis MU2 Enhances Inorganic Silicon and Phosphorus Use Efficiency and Augments Salt Stress Tolerance in Soybean (Glycine max L.). Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Khan, M.A.; Asaf, S.; Khan, A.L.; Jan, R.; Kang, S.-M.; Kim, K.-M.; Lee, I.-J. Thermotolerance effect of plant growth-promoting Bacillus cereus SA1 on soybean during heat stress. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Khan, M.A.; Asaf, S.; Khan, A.L.; Jan, R.; Kang, S.-M.; Kim, K.-M.; Lee, I.-J. Extending thermotolerance to tomato seedlings by inoculation with SA1 isolate of Bacillus cereus and comparison with exogenous humic acid application. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kubi, H.A.A.; Khan, M.A.; Adhikari, A.; Imran, M.; Kang, S.-M.; Hamayun, M.; Lee, I.-J. Silicon and Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Pseudomonas psychrotolerans CS51 Mitigates Salt Stress in Zea mays L. Agriculture 2021, 11, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Asaf, S.; Hamayun, M.; Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; Khan, M.A.; Jan, R.; Lee, I.J.; Hussain, A. Salt tolerance of Glycine max L. induced by endophytic fungus Aspergillus flavus CSH1, via regulating its endogenous hormones and antioxidative system. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 128, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Khan, M.A.; Hamayun, M.; Asaf, S.; Khan, M.; Yun, B.-W.; Kang, S.-M.; Lee, I.-J. Rhizospheric Bacillus spp. Rescues Plant Growth Under Salinity Stress via Regulating Gene Expression, Endogenous Hormones, and Antioxidant System of Oryza sativa L. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Woldemariam, S.H.; Lal, S.; Zelelew, D.Z.; Solomon, M.T. Effect of Potassium Levels on Productivity and Fruit Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). J. Agric. Stud. 2018, 6, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Zhang, J.; Li, B.; Zhang, J.; Christie, P.; Li, X. Organic fertilizer application and Mg fertilizer promote banana yield and quality in an Udic Ferralsol. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Maathuis, F.J.M. Physiological functions of mineral macronutrients. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nabel, M.; Schrey, S.D.; Poorter, H.; Koller, R.; Jablonowski, N.D. Effects of digestate fertilization on Sida hermaphrodita: Boosting biomass yields on marginal soils by increasing soil fertility. Biomass Bioenergy 2017, 107, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mu, D.; Hawks, J.; Diaz, A. Impacts on vegetable yields, nutrient contents and soil fertility in a community garden with different compost amendments. AIMS Environ. Sci. 2020, 7, 350–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dlamini, M.V.; Mukabwe, W.O.; Sibandze, N.N. The effects of organic liquid fertilizer (Vegetable waste) on moisture retention, soil physical properties and yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Grown in the malkerns area, a region in the kingdom of eswatini. Adv. Agric. Hortic. Entomol. 2020, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Environments 08 00086 sch001 550
Scheme 1. GC/MS–SIM conditions used for analysis and quantification of the ABA.
Scheme 1. GC/MS–SIM conditions used for analysis and quantification of the ABA.
Environments 08 00086 sch001
Environments 08 00086 g001 550
Figure 1. Endogenous abscisic acid quantification in Chinese cabbage. Each data point is the mean of at least three replicates. Error bars represent standard errors. The bars presented with different letters are significantly different from each other as evaluated by DMRT.
Figure 1. Endogenous abscisic acid quantification in Chinese cabbage. Each data point is the mean of at least three replicates. Error bars represent standard errors. The bars presented with different letters are significantly different from each other as evaluated by DMRT.
Environments 08 00086 g001
Table
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of the soil used in the experiment.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of the soil used in the experiment.
pH [1:5]ECOMNO3-NAPEx. Cation (cmol/kg)
[1:5] (dS/m)(g/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)KCaMgNa
6.62.820141.83301.1111.613.650.6
EC: electrical conductivity, AP: available phosphorus, OM: organic matter.
Table
Table 2. Growth characteristics of Chinese cabbage.
Table 2. Growth characteristics of Chinese cabbage.
FertilizationsNTCFMFMF × 2MF × 4MF × 6
Leaf Length (cm)11.8 ± 0.87 ab12.9 ± 2.19 a12.6 ± 0.95 a11.7 ± 0.76 ab10.9 ± 0.32 ab8.2 ± 0.46 b
Root Length (cm)9.3 ± 0.77 a11.8 ± 2.20 a15.3 ± 7.98 a11.1 ± 0.13 a11.7 ± 2.39 a9.8 ± 1.07 a
Fresh Weight (g)13.4 ± 4.33 ab14.7 ± 4.62 a16.5 ± 3.69 a9.5 ± 1.39 ab7.9 ± 1.81 ab3.3 ± 0.29 b
Dry Weight (g)2.5 ± 0.48 bc3.9 ± 0.61 a3.4 ± 0.13 ab2.6 ± 0.39 bc2.0 ± 0.35 cd1.2 ± 0.29 d
NT: not treated; CF: controlled fertilizer; MF: castor oilcakes 49, rapeseed oil cake 21, food waste powder 30; MF × 2 (mixed expeller cake and food waste powder); MF × 4 (mixed expeller cake and food waste powder); MF × 6 (mixed expeller cake and food waste powder). Each value represents mean + SD of three replicates. Values with different letters in rows are significantly different from each other, as evaluated by DMRT.
Table
Table 3. Photosynthetic characteristics of Chinese cabbage.
Table 3. Photosynthetic characteristics of Chinese cabbage.
FertilizationsNTCFMFMF × 2MF × 4MF × 6
Chlorophyll Contents mg/m2487.7 ± 27.28 b521.7 ± 13.13 a477.3 ± 34.89 b464.3 ± 38.52 b439.3 ± 40.91 c427.7 ± 37.53 c
Chlorophyll Fluorescence
(Fv/Fm)		0.80 ± 0.011 a0.79 ± 0.023 a0.79 ± 0.010 a0.81 ± 0.039 a0.76 ± 0.038 a0.82 ± 0.023 a
Transpiration Efficiencies
(mmol/m2)		2.0 ± 0.35 ab2.3 ± 0.31 a2.0 ± 0.37 ab1.6 ± 0.27 ab1.5 ± 0.24 ab1.3 ± 0.00 b
Stomatal Conductance
(mol/m2 s)		0.08 ± 0.020 a0.09 ± 0.015 a0.07 ± 0.013 ab0.05 ± 0.007 ab0.04 ± 0.007 b0.03 ± 0.000 b
Photosynthetic Rate
(µmol/m2s)		2.8 ± 0.04 a2.9 ± 1.14 a2.3 ± 0.81 ab2.0 ± 0.98 ab1.2 ± 0.33 ab0.2 ± 0.16 b
Each value represents mean + SD of three replicates. Values with different letters in rows are significantly different from each other, as evaluated by DMRT.
Table
Table 4. ICP analysis results for Chinese cabbage (ppm).
Table 4. ICP analysis results for Chinese cabbage (ppm).
FertilizationsNTCFMFMF × 2MF × 4MF × 6
K39,299.7 ± 1293.15 bc35,599.1 ± 1196.16 cd41,376.2 ± 1799.51 b45,963.0 ± 453.94 a34,778.5 ± 255.90 d33,702.2 ± 1560.46 d
Ca26,330.3 ± 313.83 c24,458.4 ± 46.37 e27,073.3 ± 235.13 b28,049.7 ± 72.54 a25,568.1 ± 144.60 d25,286.8 ± 70.72 d
P5196.9 ± 32.98 a5261.6 ± 58.48 a5152.1 ± 32.12 a5244.7 ± 36.28 a4894.4 ± 104.39 b4661.9 ± 25.51 c
Mg5597.6 ± 30.18 d5641.4 ± 17.84 cd5768.0 ± 3.47 bcd6046.8 ± 20.85 a5826.1 ± 132.71 bc5892.6 ± 2.15 ab
Na5368.8 ± 213.93 bc4543.9 ± 240.26 c5165.0 ± 343.59 bc5466.0 ± 102.77 bc6322.9 ± 179.15 b8739.3 ± 605.16 a
Each value represents the mean + SD of three replicates. Values with different letters in rows are significantly different from each other, as evaluated by DMRT.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, S.-M.; Shaffique, S.; Kim, L.-R.; Kwon, E.-H.; Kim, S.-H.; Lee, Y.-H.; Kalsoom, K.; Aaqil Khan, M.; Lee, I.-J. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Mixed with Food Waste Dry Powder on the Growth of Chinese Cabbage Seedlings. Environments 2021, 8, 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8080086

AMA Style

Kang S-M, Shaffique S, Kim L-R, Kwon E-H, Kim S-H, Lee Y-H, Kalsoom K, Aaqil Khan M, Lee I-J. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Mixed with Food Waste Dry Powder on the Growth of Chinese Cabbage Seedlings. Environments. 2021; 8(8):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8080086

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Sang-Mo, Shifa Shaffique, Lee-Rang Kim, Eun-Hae Kwon, Seong-Heon Kim, Yun-Hae Lee, Kalsoom Kalsoom, Muhammad Aaqil Khan, and In-Jung Lee. 2021. "Effects of Organic Fertilizer Mixed with Food Waste Dry Powder on the Growth of Chinese Cabbage Seedlings" Environments 8, no. 8: 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8080086

APA Style

Kang, S. -M., Shaffique, S., Kim, L. -R., Kwon, E. -H., Kim, S. -H., Lee, Y. -H., Kalsoom, K., Aaqil Khan, M., & Lee, I. -J. (2021). Effects of Organic Fertilizer Mixed with Food Waste Dry Powder on the Growth of Chinese Cabbage Seedlings. Environments, 8(8), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8080086

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop