Next Article in Journal
Simulation of the Influence of External Factors on the Level of Use of the Regional Tourism Potential: A Practical Aspect
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Entrepreneurial Education on Technology-Based Enterprises Development: The Mediating Role of Motivation
Previous Article in Journal
R&D and Innovation Collaboration between Universities and Business—A PLS-SEM Model for the Spanish Province of Huelva
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perceptual Fluctuations within the Entrepreneurial Journey: Experience from Process-Based Entrepreneurship Training

School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, 51009 Tartu, Estonia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030084
Submission received: 16 July 2021 / Revised: 16 August 2021 / Accepted: 16 August 2021 / Published: 19 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Entrepreneurship Education)

Abstract

The entrepreneurial idea and opportunity are formed in the entrepreneurial process, which is characterized by entrepreneurial learning. During the entrepreneurial journey, the entrepreneur repeatedly reassesses the maturity of his business/venture idea and venture creation process to enter the market. The entrepreneur’s decisions are influenced by both objective and affective circumstances. This study aims to identify and map the fluctuations of idea–opportunity perception and affection by a student entrepreneur throughout the entrepreneurial learning journey simulating a genuine entrepreneurial (learning) process. The data collection of variables took place during an entrepreneurship course that modeled the entrepreneurial journey via process-based entrepreneurship training and applying feasibility and attractiveness self-assessment, observation and in-depth interviews. A small group of doctoral students developed their business ideas during a process-based entrepreneurship course. After each lesson and homework, they assessed the feasibility and attractiveness of their idea and opportunity. The results showed asynchronous fluctuations in these individual context-based perception variables, frequently depending on the progression of the entrepreneurial journey. The study added the concept of affective artifact and some generalizing dimensions to describe the entrepreneurial journey. Recommendations are given for the implementation and research of entrepreneurial process-based training.
Keywords: perceptual fluctuation; affect; entrepreneurial journey; entrepreneurial opportunity; entrepreneurial idea; perception; feasibility; attractiveness; process-based entrepreneurship training perceptual fluctuation; affect; entrepreneurial journey; entrepreneurial opportunity; entrepreneurial idea; perception; feasibility; attractiveness; process-based entrepreneurship training

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trabskaia, I.; Mets, T. Perceptual Fluctuations within the Entrepreneurial Journey: Experience from Process-Based Entrepreneurship Training. Adm. Sci. 2021, 11, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030084

AMA Style

Trabskaia I, Mets T. Perceptual Fluctuations within the Entrepreneurial Journey: Experience from Process-Based Entrepreneurship Training. Administrative Sciences. 2021; 11(3):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trabskaia, Iuliia, and Tõnis Mets. 2021. "Perceptual Fluctuations within the Entrepreneurial Journey: Experience from Process-Based Entrepreneurship Training" Administrative Sciences 11, no. 3: 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030084

APA Style

Trabskaia, I., & Mets, T. (2021). Perceptual Fluctuations within the Entrepreneurial Journey: Experience from Process-Based Entrepreneurship Training. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop