Next Article in Journal
Digital Transformation: Inevitable Change or Sizable Opportunity? The Strategic Role of HR Management in Industry 4.0
Next Article in Special Issue
The Persistent Constraints of New Public Management on Sustainable Co-Production between Non-Profit Professionals and Service Users
Previous Article in Journal
Acknowledgment to the Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2022
Previous Article in Special Issue
Invigorating Care Farm Ecosystem Based on Public Service Innovation: Case of South Korea
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Study on the Enablers and Challenges of Co-Creation for the Digital Common Household Unit Integrated Public Service in Malta

Adm. Sci. 2023, 13(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020029
by Judie Attard * and Keith Cortis *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Adm. Sci. 2023, 13(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020029
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published: 18 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It was easy to read the research provided both from the theory and empirical parts. Just slight English improvement would be beneficial. Also, may by the authors could rethink the title. It seems too long while the main idea of the topic is quite clear from the first it’s part.

Good luck for the author(-s) to publishing the paper

Author Response

Thank you for your review. The title has been revised and an overall spell-check was carried out. 

Best regards.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript does an excellent job demonstrating An Insight into the Enablers and Challenges of Co-Creation of Integrated Public Services. The author/s well defined the research question (p. 4) about what are current challenges and enablers to co-creation and co-production of a digital common household unit public service? The main strengths of this paper is that it addresses an interesting and timely question, finds a solution based on a carefully selected set of rules, and provides a clear answer. It could be argued that this is good enough to reach meaningful conclusions. The author/s have made this data readily accessible.

Author Response

Thank you for your review. An overall spell-check has been carried out. 

Back to TopTop