High-Involvement Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Resilience: The Mediating Role of Employee Technology Adaptation—A Case Study of South Sumatra
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. High-Involvement Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Resilience
2.2. High-Involvement Human Resource Management Practices and Technology Adaptation
2.3. Employee Technology Adaptation and Employee Resilience
2.4. Moderation of Employee Technology Adaptation
3. Methods
3.1. Measures
3.2. Samples and Procedures
3.3. Analysis
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.2. Goodness of Fit and Structural Equation Modeling
4.3. Hypotheses
4.4. Discussion
4.5. Managerial Implications
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Aca, Maurice Adiga, and Emanuel Ude Bassey. 2021. COVID 19 PANDEMIC: IMPLICATIONS ON HRM AND SUSTAINABILITY IN THE NEW NORMAL. African Journal of Business and Economic Development. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afshan, Gul, Muhammad Kashif, Firdous Khanum, Mansoor Ahmed Khuhro, and Akram Umair. 2021. High involvement work practices often lead to burnout, but thanks to humble leadership. Journal of Management Development 40: 503–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguiar-Quintana, Teresa, Thi Hong Hai Nguyen, Yasmina Araujo-Cabrera, and José M. Sanabria-Díaz. 2021. Do job insecurity, anxiety and depression caused by the COVID-19 pandemic influence hotel employees’ self-rated task performance? The moderating role of employee resilience. International Journal of Hospitality Management 94: 102868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alahmad, Rasha, and Lionel P. Robert, Jr. 2021. Capturing the complexity of cognitive computing systems: Co-adaptation theory for individuals. In SIGMIS-CPR’21: Proceedings of the 2021 Computers and People Research Conference. New York: ACM, pp. 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alberti, Fernando G., Ferrario Stefania, and Emanuele Pizzurno. 2018. Resilience: Resources and strategies of SMEs in a new theoretical framework. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital 15: 165–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alikaj, Albi, Ning Wei, and Bingqing Wu. 2020. Proactive personality and creative behavior: Examining the role of thriving at work and high-involvement HR practices. Journal of Business and Psychology 36: 857–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-kasasbeh, Ahmad Mofaddi, Muhammad Abi Sofian Abdul Halim, and Khatijah Omar. 2016. E-HRM, workforce agility and organizational performance: A review paper toward theoretical framework. The International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research 14: 10671–85. [Google Scholar]
- Alsamydai, Mahmood Jasim. 2014. Adaptation of the technology acceptance model (TAM) to the use of mobile banking services. International Review of Management and Business Research 3: 2016–28. [Google Scholar]
- Amir, Muhammad Taufiq, and Wustari L. Mangundjaya. 2021. How resilience affects employee engagement? A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 8: 1147–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appelbaum, Eileen, Thomas Bailey, Peter Berg, and Arne L. Kalleberg. 2000. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Arokiasamy, Anantha Raj A., and Jayaraman Krishnaswamy. 2021. Does perceived organizational support enhances employee resilience by lowering turnover intentions among academic expatriates in Vietnam: A mediator-moderator approach. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education 12: 2153–67. [Google Scholar]
- Asatiani, Aleksandre, and Esko Penttinen. 2019. Constructing continuities in virtual work environments: A multiple case study of two firms with differing degrees of virtuality. Information Systems Journal 29: 484–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayoko, Oluremi B. 2021. SMEs, innovation and human resource management. Journal of Management & Organization 27: 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bala, Hillol, and Viswanath Venkatesh. 2016. Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Science 62: 156–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bardoel, E. Anne, Trisha Michelle Pettit, Helen De Cieri, and Lindsay McMillan. 2014. Employee resilience: An emerging challenge for HRM. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 52: 279–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandarkar, Kaustubh Kamalesh, and Sonali Jadhav. 2022. Positive Psychology—A Catalyst Factor to Foster Employee Resilience. Journal of Positive School Psychology 6: 6303–17. [Google Scholar]
- Bondarouk, Tanya V., and Huub J. M. Ruël. 2009. Electronic human resource management: Challenges in the digital era. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 20: 505–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boxall, Peter, and Meng-Long Huo. 2021. Fostering the high-involvement model of human resource management: What have we learnt and what challenges do we face? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 60: 41–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BPS Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. 2022. Profil Industri Mikro dan Kecil Provinsi Sumatera Selatan 2020. Palembang: BPS Provinsis Sumatera Selatan, pp. 1–168. [Google Scholar]
- Braun, Thomas J., Bryan C. Hayes, Rachel L. Frautschy DeMuth, and Olya A. Taran. 2017. The development, validation, and practical application of an employee agility and resilience measure to facilitate organizational change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 10: 703–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brewster, Chris, Chul Chung, and Paul Sparrow. 2016. Globalizing Human Resource Management. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Bustinza, Oscar F., Ferran Vendrell-Herrero, Mnieves Perez-Arostegui, and Glenn Parry. 2019. Technological capabilities, resilience capabilities and organisational effectiveness. International Journal of Human Resource Management 30: 1370–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camuffo, Arnaldo, Federica De Stefano, and Chiara Paolino. 2017. Safety reloaded: Lean operations and high involvement work practices for sustainable workplaces. Journal of Business Ethics 143: 245–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caniëls, Marjolein C. J., and Isabella Hatak. 2022. Employee resilience: Considering both the social side and the economic side of leader-follower exchanges in conjunction with the dark side of followers’ personality. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 33: 297–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardy, Robert L., and Janice S. Miller. 2003. Technology: Implications for HRM. In Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research. Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 99–117. [Google Scholar]
- Carvalho, Ana, and Nelson Areal. 2016. Great place to work: Resilience in time of crisis. Human Resource Management 55: 479–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chênevert, Denis, Geneviève Jourdain, and Christian Vandenberghe. 2016. The role of high-involvement work practices and professional self-image in nursing recruits’ turnover: A three-year prospective study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 53: 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choochote, Kitimaporn, and Kitsiri Chochiang. 2015. Electronic human resource management (e-HRM) of hotel business in Phuket. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 6: 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciurea, Jeanina, Loredana Dinu, and Gabriel Dinu. 2021. The influence of digitalisation on SMEs. “Ovidius” University Annals, Economic Sciences Series 21: 490–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooke, Fang Lee, Geoffrey Wood, Meng Wang, and Alice Shuaishuai Li. 2021. Riding the tides ofmergers and acquisitions by building a resilient workforce: A framework forstudying the role of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review 31: 100747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danaeefard, Hassan, Atiye Sedaghat, Seyed Hosein Kazemi, and Ahmadali Khaef Elahi. 2022. Investment areas to enhance public employee resilience during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evidence from Iran. Public Organization Review 22: 837–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, Supriyo, Amit Kundu, and Arabinda Bhattacharya. 2020. Technology adaptation and survival of SMEs: A longitudinal study of developing countries. Technology Innovation Management Review 10: 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davison, Robert M., and Carol X. J. Ou. 2017. Digital work in a digitally challenged organization. Information & Management 54: 129–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Clercq, Dirk, Tasneem Fatima, and Sadia Jahanzeb. 2021. Gossiping about an arrogant leader: Sparked by inconsistent leadership, mitigated by employee resilience. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 57: 269–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Değirmenci, Bekir. 2022. The effect of job insecurity on job performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: The moderating role of employee resilience. Istanbul Management Journal 92: 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dressler, Marc, and Ivan Paunovic. 2021. Typology of winery SME brand strategies with implications for sustainability communication and co-creation. Sustainability 13: 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ejdys, Joanna, and Katarzyna Halicka. 2018. Sustainable adaptation of new technology—The case of humanoids used for the care of older adults. Sustainability 10: 3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elorza, Unai, Alaine Garmendia, Steven Kilroy, Karina Van de Voorde, and Jeske Van Beurden. 2022. The effect of high involvement work systems on organisational performance and employee well-being in a Spanish industrial context. Human Resource Management Journal 32: 782–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fachrunnisa, Olivia, Ardian Adhiatma, Najah Lukman, and Md. Noh Ab Majid. 2020. Towards SMEs’ digital transformation: The role of agile leadership and strategic flexibility. Journal of Small Business Strategy 30: 65–85. [Google Scholar]
- Falentina, Anna T., Budy P. Resosudarmo, Danang Darmawan, and Eny Sulistyaningrum. 2021. Digitalisation and the performance of micro and small enterprises in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 57: 343–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanić, Azra, Živka Pržulj, and Marija Lazarević-Moravčević. 2016. Characteristics of human resource management in SMEs in Serbia. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies 4: 238–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harter, James K., Frank L. Schmidt, and Theodore L. Hayes. 2002. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 268–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasgall, Alon, and Niv Ahituv. 2018. Implementing continuous adaptation to technology innovation in complex adaptive organizations. Journal of High Technology Management Research 29: 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hite, Linda M., and Kimberly S. McDonald. 2020. Careers after COVID-19: Challenges and changes. Human Resource Development International 23: 427–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, Baofeng, Zhaojun Han, Haozhe Chen, and Xiande Zhao. 2015. The effect of on supply chain integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 45: 716–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Husseina, Yousef Ahmed, and Dilber Çağlara. 2019. The effect of high involvement work systems on organizational performance: The mediating role of knowledge-based capital. Management Science Letters 9: 1361–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IMF. 2021. The IMF’s Response to COVID-19. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/About/FAQ/imf-response-to-covid-19 (accessed on 10 July 2021).
- Isidro, Ma Queenie Y., and Mendiola Teng Calleja. 2021. How do national values contribute to perceived organizational resilience and employee resilience in times of disaster? An example from the Philippines. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 24: 511–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janna, Nadira Nurul, Christian Wiradendi Wolor, and Usep Suhud. 2021. The role of e-training, career development, and employee resilience in increasing employee productivity in Indonesia state-owned enterprises. Business Excellence and Management 11: 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kee, Daisy Mui Hung, and Mohammad Rabiul Basher Rubel. 2021. Technology adaptation is on its way: The role of high involvement work practice. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research 25: 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilroy, Steven, Patrick C. Flood, Janine Bosak, and Denis Chênevert. 2017. Perceptions of high-involvement work practices, person-organization fit, and burnout: A time-lagged study of health care employees. Human Resource Management 56: 821–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Phil, Wonhyuk Cho, and In Yang. 2022. Workplace disruption in the public sector and HRM practices to enhance employee resilience. Journal of Public Personnel Administration 44: 86–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klepić, Iva. 2021. Correlation between training and education of human resources and business performance of small and medium enterprises. Naše gospodarstvo/Our Economy 67: 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A. Dushyanth, and Sunil Kumar. 2021. Building employee resilience through e-training: A case study of national hydroelectric power corporation’s unit. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 12: 2100–12. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P. Sai, and V. Tulasi Das. 2022. Role of employee resilience in employee engagement: An investigative study. United International Journal for Research & Technology 3: 144–52. [Google Scholar]
- Kurniawati, Elya, Idris Idris, Puji Handayati, and Sharina Osman. 2021. Digital transformation of MSMEs in Indonesia during the pandemic. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability 9: 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leask, Cristy, and Shaun Ruggunan. 2021. A temperature reading of COVID-19 pandemic employee agility and resilience in South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde 47: a1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Mingxing, Hira Salah Khan, Muhammad Salman Chughtai, and Thanh Tiep Le. 2022. Innovation onset: A moderated mediation model of high-involvement work practices and employees’ innovative work behavior. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 15: 471–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Shaoheng, and Christopher J. Rees. 2021. Employers’ perceptions of the labour contract law: Regulatory responses in the small and medium-sized enterprise sector in China. Personnel Review 50: 1056–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Fu, and Linlin Cao. 2021. Linking employee resilience with organizational resilience: The roles of coping mechanism and managerial resilience. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 14: 1063–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lyon, Aaron R., Jessica Knaster Wasse, Kristy Ludwig, Mark Zachry, Eric J. Bruns, Jürgen Unützer, and Elizabeth McCauley. 2016. The contextualized technology adaptation process (CTAP): Optimizing health information technology to improve mental health systems. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 43: 394–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maden, Ceyda. 2015. Linking high involvement human resource practices to employee proactivity. The role of work engagement and learning goal orientation. Personnel Review 44: 720–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, Nazaruddin, and Mudrifah Mudrifah. 2020. High involvement work system and performance: Evidence from Indonesian banking sector. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan 10: 219–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markopoulos, Evangelos, Ines Selma Kirane, Dea Balaj, and Hannu Vanharanta. 2020. Artificial intelligence and blockchain technology adaptation for human resources democratic ergonomization on team management. In Human Systems Engineering and Design II: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED2019): Future Trends and Applications, September 16–18, 2019. Edited by Tareq Ahram, Waldemar Karwowski, Stefan Pickl and Redha Taiar. Cham: Springer, pp. 445–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKinsey & Company. 2020. How COVID-19 Has Pushed Companies over the Technology Tipping Point—And Transformed Business Forever. Chicago: McKinsey. [Google Scholar]
- Mehmood, Khawaja Khalid, and Shahbano Saeed. 2021. Exploring the nexus between empowering leadership and work engagement through employee resilience during times of COVID-19. Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies 3: 375–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, Vu Hoang, and Hiep Ngoc Luu. 2022. How do human resource management practices affect innovation of small-and medium-sized enterprises in a transition economy? Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 34: 228–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Näswall, Katharina, Joana Kuntz, and Sanna Malinen. 2015. Employee resilience scale (EmpRes) Measurement properties. Resilient Organisations Research Report 2015: 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Phayaphrom, Bordin, Amy Wong, and Mamata Bhandar. 2021. The SME survival model for the technology transformation era. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences 24: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Priyono, Anjar, Abdul Moin, and Vera Nur Aini Oktaviani Putri. 2020. Identifying digital transformation paths in the business model of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, Complexity 6: 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raghuram, Sumita, N. Sharon Hill, Jennifer L. Gibbs, and Likoebe M. Maruping. 2019. Virtual works: Bridging research clusters. Academy of Management Annals 13: 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramdhani, Muhammad Ali, Hilmi Aulawi, Andri Ikhwana, and Yusuf Mauluddin. 2017. Model of green technology adaptation in small and medium-sized tannery industry. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 12: 954–62. [Google Scholar]
- Rehman, Khaliq Ur, Mário Nuno Mata, José Moleiro Martins, Sabita Mariam, João Xavier Rita, and Anabela Batista Correia. 2021. SHRM practices employee and organizational resilient behavior: Implications for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7: 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renkema, Maarten, Jan de Leede, and Llewellyn E. Van Zyl. 2021. High-involvement HRM and innovative behaviour: The mediating roles of nursing staff’s autonomy and affective commitment. Journal of Nursing Management 29: 2499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rubel, Mohammad Rabiul Basher, Daisy Mui Hung Kee, and Nadia Newaz Rimi. 2020. Matching people with technology: Effect of HIWP on technology adaptation. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management 7: 9–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubel, Mohammad Rabiul Basher, Daisy Mui Hung Kee, Nadia Newaz Rimi, and Yusliza Mohd Yusoff. 2016. Adapting technology: Effect of high involvement HRM and organisational trust. Behaviour & Information Technology 36: 281–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruck, Kevin, and Mary Welch. 2012. Valuing internal communication: Management and employee perspectives. Public Relations Review 38: 214–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saad, Muhammedamin Hussen, Geoffrey Hagelaar, Gerben van der Velde, and S. W. F. Omta. 2021a. Conceptualization of SMEs’ business resilience: A systematic literature review. Cogent Business & Management 8: 1938347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saad, Sameh M., Ramin Bahadori, and Hamidreza Jafarnejad. 2021b. The smart SME technology readiness assessment methodology in the context of industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 32: 1037–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, Waqas Mujahid, Sheikh Raheel Manzoor, and Muhammad khalil ur Rahman. 2021. Effect of high involvement work system on employee counterproductive work behavior: A mediating role of psychological capital. NICE Research Journal 14: 86–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siriyanun, Sirinya, Abdunrohman Mukem, and Kittisak Jermsittiparsert. 2019. Bridging workplace democracy and supply chain integration through high involvement of human resource practices. International Journal of Supply Chain Management 8: 685–96. [Google Scholar]
- Stec, Melissa, Carolyn Smith, and Emily Jacox. 2020. Technology enhanced teaching and learning: Exploration of faculty adaptation to iPad delivered curriculum. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 25: 651–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, Thomas, and Christine Cross. 2018. Do high-involvement work practices affect employee earnings in union and non-union settings in the Irish private sector? Personnel Review 47: 425–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez-Bustelo, Daniel, and Lucía Avella. 2019. The effectiveness of high-involvement work practices in manufacturing firms: Does context matter? Journal of Management & Organization 25: 303–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Xiaochen, and Shaheryar. 2020. Work-related flow: The development of a theoretical framework based on the high involvement HRM practices with mediating role of affective commitment and moderating effect of emotional intelligence. Hypothesis and Theory 11: 564444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wiliandri, Ruly. 2020. Conceptual approach to identify factors affecting the digital transformation of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Ekonomi Bisnis 25: 66–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, Stephen J., and Toby D. Wall. 2007. Work enrichment and employee voice in human resource management-performance studies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 18: 1335–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wuen, Chin Han, Fahmi Ibrahim, and Kabiru Jinjiri Ringim. 2021. Mediating effect of competitive strategy in the relationship between strategic human resource management and performance of small and medium enterprises in Brunei Darussalam. Middle East Journal of Management 8: 254–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yen, Po-Yin; Ann Scheck McAlearney, Cynthia J. Sieck, Jennifer L. Hefner, and Timothy R. Huerta. 2017. Health Information Technology (HIT) Adaptation: Refocusing on the Journey to Successful HIT Implementation. JMIR Medical Informatics 5: e28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zutshi, Ambika, John Mendy, Gagan Deep Sharma, Asha Thomas, and Tapan Sarker. 2021. From challenges to creativity: Enhancing SMEs’ resilience in the context of COVID-19. Sustainability 12: 136542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Item | Critical Ratio | Probability |
---|---|---|---|
High-involvement human resource management practices | Competency development | ||
Empowerment | 9.768 | 0.000 | |
Fair rewards | 10.974 | 0.000 | |
Information sharing | 9.833 | 0.000 | |
Recognition | 11.238 | 0.000 | |
Employee technology adaptation | Technology skills | ||
Technology familiarity | 9.713 | 0.000 | |
Technology adjusting | 10.978 | 0.000 | |
Technology accuracy | 9.826 | 0.000 | |
Technology frequency | 11.230 | 0.000 | |
Employee resilience | Effective collaboration | ||
Resolving crises | 10.369 | 0.000 | |
Managing high workloads | 5.071 | 0.000 | |
Learning from mistakes | 10.402 | 0.000 | |
Re-evaluating performance | 10.140 | 0.000 | |
Effective response | 10.948 | 0.000 | |
Seeking assistance | 10.706 | 0.000 | |
To approach managers | 10.797 | 0.000 | |
Using change | 10.676 | 0.000 |
Variable | Item | Factor Loadings |
---|---|---|
High-involvement human resource management practices | Competency development | 0.616 |
Empowerment | 0.753 | |
Fair rewards | 0.658 | |
Information sharing | 0.626 | |
Recognition | 0.654 | |
Employee technology adaptation | Technology skills | 0.675 |
Technology familiarity | 0.594 | |
Technology adjusting | 0.681 | |
Technology accuracy | 0.598 | |
Technology frequency | 0.695 | |
Employee resilience | Effective collaboration | 0.658 |
Managing high workloads | 0.297 | |
Resolving crises | 0.639 | |
Learning from mistakes | 0.621 | |
Re-evaluating performance | 0.683 | |
Effective response | 0.666 | |
Seeking assistance | 0.670 | |
To approach managers | 0.664 | |
Using change | 0.689 |
Item | X5 | X4 | X3 | X2 | X1 | Y2.9 | Y2.8 | Y2.7 | Y2.6 | Y2.5 | Y2.4 | Y2.3 | Y1.1 | Y1.5 | Y1.4 | Y1.3 | Y1.2 | Y1.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X5 | 3.666 | |||||||||||||||||
X4 | 1.427 | 3.343 | ||||||||||||||||
X3 | 1.610 | 1.359 | 3.641 | |||||||||||||||
X2 | 1.636 | 1.889 | 1.806 | 3.765 | ||||||||||||||
X1 | 1.529 | 1.268 | 1.416 | 1.727 | 3.481 | |||||||||||||
Y2.9 | 1.599 | 1.608 | 1.733 | 2.093 | 1.728 | 3.959 | ||||||||||||
Y2.8 | 1.505 | 1.152 | 1.573 | 1.812 | 1.697 | 1.708 | 3.531 | |||||||||||
Y2.7 | 1.509 | 1.532 | 1.491 | 1.925 | 1.433 | 1.538 | 1.881 | 3.699 | ||||||||||
Y2.6 | 1.697 | 1.610 | 1.726 | 2.007 | 1.428 | 1.804 | 1.812 | 1.767 | 4.029 | |||||||||
Y2.5 | 1.619 | 1.251 | 1.464 | 1.849 | 1.372 | 2.006 | 1.595 | 1.898 | 1.807 | 3.672 | ||||||||
Y2.4 | 1.779 | 1.321 | 1.510 | 1.841 | 1.465 | 1.751 | 1.373 | 1.487 | 1.614 | 1.634 | 4.064 | |||||||
Y2.3 | 1.427 | 1.412 | 1.734 | 1.651 | 1.225 | 1.782 | 1.627 | 1.435 | 1.526 | 1.724 | 1.704 | 3.803 | ||||||
Y2.1 | 1.690 | 1.604 | 1.765 | 1.735 | 1.338 | 1.760 | 1.429 | 1.576 | 1.459 | 1.588 | 1.738 | 1.721 | 3.813 | |||||
Y1.5 | 1.672 | 1.623 | 1.724 | 1.959 | 1.341 | 1.999 | 1.671 | 1.502 | 1.608 | 1.678 | 1.605 | 1.656 | 1.795 | 3.851 | ||||
Y1.4 | 1.842 | 1.309 | 1.474 | 1.530 | 1.317 | 1.431 | 1.707 | 1.684 | 1.818 | 1.675 | 1.093 | 1.665 | 1.633 | 1.574 | 4.378 | |||
Y.1.3 | 1.399 | 1.364 | 1.625 | 1.968 | 1.502 | 1.674 | 1.684 | 1.673 | 1.839 | 1.709 | 1.711 | 1.592 | 1.516 | 1.839 | 1.609 | 3.591 | ||
Y1.2 | 1.517 | 1.232 | 1.354 | 1.500 | 1.161 | 1.209 | 1.366 | 1.620 | 1.626 | 1.426 | 1.762 | 1.542 | 1.553 | 1.826 | 1.734 | 1.370 | 4.030 | |
Y1.1 | 1.564 | 1.372 | 1.427 | 1.790 | 1.405 | 1.891 | 1.407 | 1.915 | 1.716 | 1.934 | 1.565 | 1.639 | 1.886 | 1.858 | 1.689 | 1.507 | 1.612 | 3.885 |
Variable | Item | Critical Ratio | Probability |
---|---|---|---|
High-involvement human resource management practices | Competency development | 0.000 | |
Empowerment | 10.965 | 0.000 | |
Fair rewards | 9.887 | 0.000 | |
Information sharing | 9.512 | 0.000 | |
Recognition | 9.838 | 0.000 | |
Employee technology adaptation | Technology skills | 0.000 | |
Technology familiarity | 9.713 | 0.000 | |
Technology adjusting | 10.978 | 0.000 | |
Technology accuracy | 9.826 | 0.000 | |
Technology frequency | 11.230 | 0.000 | |
Employee resilience | Effective collaboration | 0.000 | |
Resolving crises | 10.369 | 0.000 | |
Learning from mistakes | 10.085 | 0.000 | |
Re-evaluating performance | 10.936 | 0.000 | |
Effective response | 10.697 | 0.000 | |
Seeking assistance | 10.781 | 0.000 | |
To approach managers | 10.655 | 0.000 | |
Using change | 11.050 | 0.000 |
Variable | Item | Factor Loadings | Composite Reliability | Average Extracted Variance |
---|---|---|---|---|
High-involvement human resource management practices | Competency development | 0.615 | 0.80 | 0.44 |
Empowerment | 0.755 | |||
Fair rewards | 0.659 | |||
Information sharing | 0.627 | |||
Recognition | 0.652 | |||
Employee technology adaptation | Technology skills | 0.675 | 0.78 | 0.42 |
Technology familiarity | 0.591 | |||
Technology adjusting | 0.682 | |||
Technology accuracy | 0.598 | |||
Technology frequency | 0.695 | |||
Employee resilience | Effective collaboration | 0.656 | 0.88 | 0.39 |
Resolving crises | 0.639 | |||
Learning from mistakes | 0.619 | |||
Re-evaluating performance | 0.685 | |||
Effective response | 0.668 | |||
Seeking assistance | 0.672 | |||
To approach managers | 0.665 | |||
Using change | 0.690 |
Hypothesis | Effect Value | Critical Ratio | Probability | Decision |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.485 | 2.043 | 0.041 | Accepted |
2 | 0.946 | 9.564 | 0.000 | Accepted |
3 | 0.529 | 2.232 | 0.026 | Accepted |
4 | 0.501 | - | - | Accepted |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cahyadi, A.; Marwa, T.; Poór, J.; Maulana, A.; Szabó, K. High-Involvement Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Resilience: The Mediating Role of Employee Technology Adaptation—A Case Study of South Sumatra. Adm. Sci. 2024, 14, 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14110292
Cahyadi A, Marwa T, Poór J, Maulana A, Szabó K. High-Involvement Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Resilience: The Mediating Role of Employee Technology Adaptation—A Case Study of South Sumatra. Administrative Sciences. 2024; 14(11):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14110292
Chicago/Turabian StyleCahyadi, Afriyadi, Taufiq Marwa, József Poór, Ahmad Maulana, and Katalin Szabó. 2024. "High-Involvement Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Resilience: The Mediating Role of Employee Technology Adaptation—A Case Study of South Sumatra" Administrative Sciences 14, no. 11: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14110292
APA StyleCahyadi, A., Marwa, T., Poór, J., Maulana, A., & Szabó, K. (2024). High-Involvement Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Resilience: The Mediating Role of Employee Technology Adaptation—A Case Study of South Sumatra. Administrative Sciences, 14(11), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14110292