1. Introduction
A computer-generated hologram (CGH) is a useful form of technology in various industry fields, such as displays, the medical field, the military, and many culture-related fields, among others. Specifically, the holographic display, a promising candidate as a next-generation 3D display, forms points and faces in the air by modulating the amplitude and phase [
1]. However, holographic displays have inevitable problems, such as twin images, along with direct current (DC) noise, high-order noise, and speckle noise sources. Among them, high-order noise and the DC noise are caused by the periodic pixels of the spatial light modulator (SLM) used [
2,
3]. Conventionally, a 4f filtering system has been used for filtering DC and high-order noise types, as shown in
Figure 1a [
4,
5,
6]. However, the optical path length of a 4f filtering system is too long for it to be implemented in a compact holographic display. For this reason, several studies have attempted to filter out noise sources without using a 4f filtering system [
2,
3,
7]. The fundamental solution involves forming the pixels into a non-periodic structure; nevertheless, most previous studies have focused on modulating the signal based on periodic pixels. Research on obtaining more than the Nyquist frequency through random scattering materials has been conducted in the field of compressive sensing [
8,
9]. Especially in the field of displays, it has been reported that the viewing angle can be widened through a pinhole [
10], and the concept of removing high order through a random pinhole has been reported [
11,
12]. In this study, we present answers to the following question: “How much will high-order and DC noise disappear if pixels can be rearranged into a non-periodic structure?”. We analyzed the decrease in high order from adjusting the degree of the random deviation of the pinhole from the center of the LCD pixel. The result was successfully verified in a numerical simulation and a practical experiment.
2. Approach
First, a numerical simulation of high-order diffraction on non-periodic pixels was conducted in the Python environment. With periodic pixels, the intensity of DC noise is determined by the ratio between the active area and the dead space on the SLM. However, the proposed method causes the pixels and the dead space to exist in a non-periodic structure, as shown in
Figure 2. Thus, both high-order and DC noise are suppressed at the same ratio. There are several hologram calculation methods, such as the point cloud, depth layer, ray-tracing, and triangular mesh methods. Here, the point cloud method was used to obtain a hologram from the virtual objects in this study. The point cloud method is easy and intuitive to implement with non-periodic pixels, as it directly finds the phase value by calculating the distance from the points to the hologram plane. By contrast, a Fourier transform-based hologram should use the NUFFT (non-uniform fast Fourier transform) method [
8]. However, the two methods produce similar results. As shown in
Figure 2, the proposed point cloud hologram based on non-periodic pixels can be expressed as follows:
where
A,
,
, and
λ denote the amplitude of the point, horizontal pixel pitch, vertical pixel pitch, and incident beam wavelength, respectively.
is the distance from the points (
,
,
) to the non-periodic pixel hologram plane
, where
C is a random number generator that can produce 0 to
C values, randomly. If
C equals 0, the SLM becomes periodic pixels, whereas if
C equals 1, the SLM becomes fully non-periodic pixels.
3. Experiment and Result
All the variables in this study are shown in
Table 1. In the numerical simulation, the diffraction order’s intensity of a single point located 50 cm from the hologram plane was calculated, as shown in
Figure 3.
Figure 3a shows the conventional periodic pixels, for which the
C value equals 0 and where the first-order intensity is 0.77, whereas
Figure 3b shows fully non-periodic pixels, for which the
C value equals 1 and the first-order intensity is around 0.11. If the
C value exceeds 1.0, the first-order relative intensity converges to 0, as shown in
Table 2. However, such a condition is practically impossible, as the non-periodic pinhole array filter is attached within the pixel area, as shown in
Figure 2. Hence, here, we only consider
C values ranging from 0 to 1.
DC noise typically stems from a black matrix (i.e., dead space). Unfortunately, the fill factor of the best Liquid crystal on silicon SLM is not 100% but 90%. Hence, an additional bulky optical system is inevitable. However, the proposed method reorganizes the pixels and the black matrix into a non-periodic structure simultaneously. Therefore, the DC noise also decreases identically to how the high-order noise does in this case. This is one of the reasons why the proposed idea has potential.
In order to verify the feasibility of the proposed method practically, a ring point cloud model consisting of 66 points was reconstructed with an equivalent method via a single-point simulation. The inner ring and outer rings were positioned at 50 and 51 cm from the hologram plane, respectively. The observation was then made at the outer ring position. As a result, the high-order images of the non-periodic pixels vanished, as shown in
Figure 4.
In this paper, an LCG (linear congruential generator), commonly used as the random number function in C++, MATLAB, and Python, was used to produce the random numbers. However, unfortunately, the results of the LCG exhibited periodicity and tended to be biased to one side [
8]. Therefore, it cannot be said that the results of this study are optimal. If there is a more exquisite random number generator, the quality of the proposed idea will be improved. In addition, when the reconstructed hologram approaches the hologram plane, the background noise increases slightly. Usually, the reconstructed hologram is duplicated by high-order diffraction due to the periodicity of the pixels. By contrast, the proposed hologram is calculated based on non-periodic pixels; hence, it has no high-order diffraction and no duplicated holograms, but the hologram data are regarded as noise in the high-order diffraction region. Therefore, as shown in
Figure 5, the background intensity of the single-point hologram decreases according to an increase in the hologram reconstruction distance.
In order to perform a practical experiment, a custom-made pinhole array mask with every pinhole having a diameter of 3 μm was fabricated by photolithography, as shown in
Figure 6. The mask was then carefully attached to the SLM by a custom-made alignment stage.
The experimental conditions were identical to those in the numerical simulation, apart from the
C value. The reconstructed hologram was captured with a digital camera.
Figure 7 shows the optical system used in the experiment. In addition, the
C value in the practical context was determined as the effective pixel aperture divided by the pixel pitch. The effective pixel aperture was determined by the fill factor of the spatial light modulator. Our spatial light modulator had a 58% fill factor with a 36 μm pixel pitch; hence, the effective pixel aperture was only 20.88 μm. Therefore, unfortunately, the
C value could not exceed 0.58 in this experiment. Although the random pinhole array filter was created with a
C value of 0.6, which was suitable for our SLM,
Figure 8a,b demonstrate feasible performance in that the high-order images were eliminated.
Due to the small pixel size of the pinhole, the diffraction efficiency of the system decreased. The light intensity was measured using a laser power meter (Sanwa instrument, Tokyo, Japan). When there was no pinhole array, the intensity of the light before the SLM was 1.453 mw and after the SLM was 0.723 mw, and the light passing through with the random pinhole array filter was measured as 5.38 μm. The diffraction efficiency ratio with and without the pinhole array was 0.744%.