Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Locomotor Function and Functional Capability for Daily Activities in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Cross-Over Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Prolonged Social Isolation, Started Early in Life, Impairs Cognitive Abilities in Rats Depending on Sex
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Endovascular Treatment of Stroke Caused by Carotid Artery Dissection

by
Grzegorz Meder
1,*,
Milena Świtońska
2,3,
Piotr Płeszka
2,
Violetta Palacz-Duda
2,
Dorota Dzianott-Pabijan
4 and
Paweł Sokal
3
1
Department of Interventional Radiology, Jan Biziel University Hospital No. 2, Ujejskiego 75 Street, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2
Stroke Intervention Centre, Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Jan Biziel University Hospital No. 2, Ujejskiego 75 Street, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, Poland
3
Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Ujejskiego 75 Street, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, Poland
4
Neurological Rehabilitation Ward Kuyavian-Pomeranian Pulmonology Centre, Meysnera 9 Street, 85-472 Bydgoszcz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(11), 800; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110800
Submission received: 23 September 2020 / Revised: 21 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 30 October 2020

Abstract

:
Ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) is a devastating condition. Most LVOs are embolic in nature. Arterial dissection is responsible for only a small proportion of LVOs, is specific in nature and poses some challenges in treatment. We describe 3 cases where patients with stroke caused by carotid artery dissection were treated with mechanical thrombectomy and extensive stenting with good outcome. We believe that mechanical thrombectomy and stenting is a treatment of choice in these cases.

1. Introduction

Ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) is a devastating condition, bearing great risk of severe disability and death [1]. Most LVOs are embolic in nature. Although only a small proportion of all LVOs arise from an arterial dissection, it accounts for approximately 20% of strokes among individuals under the age of 45 [2,3]. While some dissections can be caused by traumatic arterial injury, in most cases, dissection is considered to be idiopathic. There are some conditions that can predispose to dissection such as atherosclerosis, hypertension, Marfan syndrome, and fibromuscular dysplasia [4]. Managing stroke caused by carotid dissection can be challenging. In this report, we present a series of three cases of patients with stroke due to acute extracranial carotid artery dissection that were admitted to our stroke centre and treated with mechanical thrombectomy and extensive stenting with good outcome. We believe that mechanical thrombectomy and stenting can be a treatment of choice in these cases.

2. Case Presentation

The first patient was a 34-year old woman, with no previous drug and medical history, involved, as a passenger, in a car accident a few hours before stroke symptoms appeared. After the accident, she was an Emergency Room (ER) patient in a local hospital undergoing observation and a series of tests: trauma computed tomography (CT) scan, X-ray scans etc., which only revealed fracture of the sternum, face, and scalp bruises. After a few hours, being in a well and stable condition, she suddenly deteriorated and presented with dense left-sided weakness. She was immediately transferred to the CT suite and non-contrast CT scan of the head was performed followed by CT angiography of the neck and head. The CT scan of the head, apart the aforementioned face and scalp bruises, was normal, while the CT angiography revealed right middle cerebral artery (MCA) and Internal Cerebral Artery (ICA) occlusion with probable carotid dissection as an underlying cause. The patient was transferred to our stroke centre for endovascular treatment. During diagnostic arteriography, we confirmed dissection and thrombosis of the right carotid artery in segments C1–C2 (Figure 1A).
The first treatment goal was to remove the thrombus and open the artery. We used, a 8F short introducer sheath in the groin and then placed a long neuro sheath (6F NeuronMax, Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) in the common carotid artery. Through the long sheath, an aspirating system (ACE68, Penumbra Inc.) was introduced into the ICA and the large thrombus was removed by aspiration only. The extent of the dissection and ICA-T occlusion were visualized (Figure 1B). With the microcatheter (Rebar 18, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and J-shaped microguidewire (Hybrid 1214, Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France), the true lumen of the dissected artery was found and catheterized to the point above the visible dissection (C3). In the next step, the ACE68 catheter was gently pushed over the Rebar microcatheter to the ICA terminus and then over the microguidewire, we pushed the Rebar microcatheter into the M2 segment of the MCA. In the next step, we used a stent-retriever (Catch V20, Balt Extrusion) and with continuous aspiration from the ACE68, we removed the clot from MCA-ICA, leaving the aspiration catheter in place. The last steps of the procedure consisted of placing three intracranial self-expanding braided stents (Leo+, Balt Extrusion) in a telescopic manner starting from the C3 ICA segment and moving caudally to the C1 segment and at the end, a braided carotid stent (Roadsaver, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) was placed to reach the CCA (Figure 2). After placing the stents, we performed an internal massage maneuver with the microcatheter and then balloon angioplasty of the stents using a 5 mm compliant intracranial balloon (Copernic, Balt Extrusion) in the ICA C1-C3 segments, a 5 mm PTA balloon (Submarine, Medtronic) in ICA C1 and a Roadsaver stent to obtain optimal stents apposition. During the procedure, the patient was given 5000 units of heparin through intravenous (IV) administration and a weight-based bolus of eptifibatide. After the procedure, the patient remained in the angio-suite for 30 min, during which time we performed three check-runs for early stent thrombosis. The patient was then transferred to the neurologic intensive care unit for 1 day with continuous eptifibatide IV; 4 h before it was completed, she was started on oral dual antiplatelet therapy: ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 75 mg once a day. She was in our hospital for 25 days, undergoing early neuro-rehabilitation with good clinical improvement: NIHSS 15→8 (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale). During the stay, we observed transient 1-day haematuria, which resolved without treatment. After 25 days, the patient was in stable condition modified Rankin Scale (mRS): 4/3 and transferred to the rehabilitation unit. After 3 months, she was independent, walking and had minor left-hand weakness (mRS 1). Control CT angiography showed patent stents in the right ICA and patent intracranial arteries.
The second patient was a 62-year old male, with a medical history of smoking and arterial hypertension—treated with lercanidypine and telmisartan. He was driving a truck when neurological symptoms associated with the right brain hemisphere (dense left-sided weakness) occurred, leading to a minor car accident. The patient was transferred to our hospital by a paramedic team. A CT scan performed at ER revealed occlusion of the right ICA and hyperdense right MCA. During diagnostic angiography, we confirmed right ICA occlusion, starting from the C1 segment. Using the same technique as described for the previous patient, we aspirated a large clot from the ICA, which allowed us to find a long ICA dissection (Figure 3).
After removing the clot from the ICA, we performed mechanical thrombectomy of the MCA and implanted four overlapping stents covering the dissected ICA segments (Figure 4). In this case, we also used braided intracranial stents (Leo+) and the last stent covering the CCA-ICA junction was a typical carotid laser-cut stent (Protégé, Medtronic). During the procedure, the patient was given IV of a weight-based bolus of eptifibatide and 5000 units of heparin, but we observed early clot formation at the top of the first implanted stent (C3) during the first control run. The clot was removed with an aspiration catheter (ACE68, Penumbra). After a 30-min observation with control angiographies every 10 min, the patient, without sequelae of the clot formation, was transferred to the neurology department where he underwent early rehabilitation, improving quickly (NIHSS 17→5). After 7 days, he was released to go home with no significant disability (mRS 1). Control CT angiography showed patent stents in the right ICA and patent intracranial arteries.
The third patient was a 56-year old male, with no previous medical and drug history, who suffered from a spontaneous left ICA C1 dissection with total ICA occlusion, pseudoaneurysm, and left MCA occlusion resulting in large left hemisphere syndrome, NIHSS 18 at admission. Using the technique described above, we removed the clot from the ICA and then from the MCA and stented the dissected ICA segment using 2 braided intracranial stents (Leo+, BALT) with good result (Figure 5). After 3 months of rehabilitation, the patient was discharged in stable condition, walking with minor aphasia and mild right arm weakness (mRS 2). We were unable to reach this patient for follow-up control CT angiography as he was a citizen of a foreign country and returned home after treatment.

3. Discussion

Arterial dissection is characterized by the penetration of blood into the arterial wall through a tear, which develops in one or more layers of the wall. If the tear is shallow, only the intima may be dissected, which can lead to the presence of an intimal flap with or without formation of the thrombus inside the true and false vessel lumen. Deeper tears of the arterial wall may lead to a sub-adventitial dissecting aneurysm or even transection of the arterial wall and lethal bleeding [4,5].
Most dissections occur spontaneously. The second most common causative factor is head or neck trauma, especially in car accident victims. Reported trauma can sometimes be very minor or even anecdotal like sudden head turns, playing golf, jumping or chiropractic maneuvers [4,5].
Severity of the disease, anatomical features, and potential complications are well characterized by the classification proposed by Colorado University [6,7] (Table 1). Apart from lethal bleeding due to artery transection, the second most serious and common complication of artery dissection are ischemic in nature. Although artery dissection is a rather uncommon cause of stroke in the general population, it accounts for 20% of strokes in patients under the age of 45. Those strokes are caused by thrombus formation and either occlusion or narrowing of the vessel lumen. Clots originating from the dissected artery segments may also migrate distally to cerebral arteries causing secondary occlusions.
The diagnosis of dissection is based on radiologic findings in ultrasound, CT, computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA); however, digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) is still considered to be the gold standard [5]. Typical radiologic findings include: narrowed and irregular vessel lumen, tapered ICA occlusion with the carotid bulb spared, double lumen appearance, pseudonaneurysm, intimal flap, or eccentric thickening of the arterial wall. In our experience, recognizing dissection as the cause of stroke is quite easy in young patients with trauma but may be challenging in older patients with unknown medical history and total artery occlusion as the radiologic features of the artery dissection may sometimes mimic tandem occlusions or massive emboli.
There is no clear consensus regarding management of dissections. Grade V is considered to be lethal. It is widely accepted that low grade [1] dissections with no bleeding and minor or transient ischemic symptoms can be treated with 3–6 months of antithrombotic therapy with anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents [8,9,10]. To our understanding, as the pharmacologic treatment of higher-grade dissections carries a very low success rate, the approach in these cases should be more aggressive i.e., surgical or endovascular [11,12]. In the case of stroke symptoms with intraluminal thrombus formation such as total artery occlusion or distal emboli, the only viable option seems to be prompt endovascular treatment.
The nature of the condition must indicate the type of endovascular treatment. The first goal is the same as in typical embolic stroke—to remove the clot within the time window advised for mechanical thrombectomy [13]. After this, further (especially intracranial) progression of the dissection should be prevented, and the artery should be kept patent.
There are two main methods of retrieving a thrombus from an artery: aspiration or using stent retrievers [14]. In our opinion, it is advisable to not introduce metal devices such as stent retrievers into the dissected artery segment in order to prevent vessel walls from incurring further damage. Moreover, if the artery is completely occluded, there is no clear answer as to whether the thrombus is inside the true or false lumen. In these cases, we always use aspiration first, which seems to be less traumatic and suction power can be adjusted. While it may be debatable in the cases described here whether the thrombus was aspirated from the true or false lumen, it is important to remove it in its entirety, or as much of it as possible. Suction applied to the false vessel lumen may even be beneficial, leading to its collapse and opening of the true lumen. Revealing the true vessel lumen is of great importance as it allows for the visualization of the extent of the dissection and potential distal emboli.
In two of the described cases, patients had thrombi in the intracranial arteries. Removing such clots requires placing catheters in the true vessel lumen. Catheterization may sometimes be difficult and has to be done gently to avoid progression of the dissection. We strongly suggest using a microcatheter with a J-shaped microguidewire placed in a large lumen aspiration catheter and confirm its advance and placement by injecting contrast into the microcatheter. Passing the intracranial thrombus with the microguidewire and microcatheter allows you to use a combination of a stent retriever and aspiration, which seems to be the most efficient method [15,16]. During clot removal, we leave the aspiration catheter in place to reduce the number of passes through the dissected segment of the artery. After removing the clot from intracranial arteries, you can progress to the next step, which involves placing stents to keep the artery patent.
Final confirmation of proper microcatheter placement is mandatory before stent placement. The technique used in the cases described here consists of placing intracranial braided stents in a telescopic manner starting from the top of the dissected segment and moving caudally to cover the whole damaged portion of the artery. If there is a need for microcatheter exchange, it should be done carefully with the long microguidewire left in place first in order to prevent losing the access route. We found that the intracranial braided stents made by Balt suited our needs best due to the largest diameter available being up to 5.5 mm, and longest length being up to 75 mm; this helps to reduce the number of necessary maneuvers and stents implanted. The radial force of the stent seems to be sufficient to push the damaged intima back against the vessel wall, especially when the false vessel lumen is collapsed after aspiration. In the case of dissections starting from the internal carotid origin, the last stent we used was a carotid stent, either braided or laser cut. In the final step, we performed balloon angioplasty to achieve the best possible stent apposition. Angioplasty is performed also from the top to the bottom using intracranial remodeling balloons at first, and then high-pressure balloons in the carotid or intracranial stents placed in the C1 segment if needed.
Placing stents in the acute phase requires a prompt introduction of antiplatelet therapy to avoid early in-stent thrombosis. In the cases described here, we administered 5000 IU of heparin before the first stent was placed, and patient weight-calculated (180 mcg/kg) bolus of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor-eptifibatide. We prefer unfractionated heparin to the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) such as enoxaparin, since in the case of intraprocedural bleeding, the effect of unfractionated heparin can be reversed by administration of protamine sulphate. After the procedure, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were infused continuously (2 mcg/kg/min) for 24 h. In emergency cases of stenting such as those described in this paper, we use GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors as the first line of antiplatelet treatment—as intravenous administration of these drugs, provide almost instant platelet inhibition. Of the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors we mostly choose eptifibatide since its effect is reversible and platelet function returns towards baseline within 4 h after stopping a continuous infusion.
Oral antiplatelets (300 mg of ASA and 180 mg of ticagrelor) were introduced 4 h before the end of the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors’ infusions. Oral dual antiplatelet therapy was continued for the next 3 months: 75 mg of ASA once a day with 90 mg ticagrelor twice a day, and after that 75 mg of ASA once a day for one year was prescribed. We have chosen a combination of ASA and ticagrelor because of their efficacy and safety profile [17]. Introducing anticoagulants and antiplatelets in patients with stroke and emergency stenting has been widely discussed, and although there are currently no clear guidelines regarding their use, recent papers show the safety of this approach [18,19,20,21,22].
Large extent of the brain ischemia prior to endovascular treatment (EVT) is a known predictor for both intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and later poor clinical outcome in patients with stroke [23,24,25]. In our institution, we use widely accepted 10-point Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) to assess the ischemic changes on a non-contrast head CT before treatment and avoid mechanical thrombectomy (MT), in patients with ASPECTS < 6 and MT combined with stenting in patients with ASPECTS < 7 [25]. The first two described patients were treated early (less than 3 h) in the time window for mechanical thrombectomy and had high (9–10) ASPECTS before the treatment. In control CT, which is made in every patient 24 h after EVT, they developed only moderate ischemic changes in the affected MCA territories, measuring 4 cm in diameter for the first patient and 3 cm for the second one. The third patient was treated in the 5th hour from the symptoms’ onset, with initial ASPECTS 7. In control CT, he developed large left MCA territory edema with slight 5 mm midline shift, both of which decreased significantly after 7 days of symptomatic treatment with mannitol and diuretics. In all cases, we achieved complete reperfusion during EVT and none of the patients developed ICH after EVT despite the introduction of antiplatelet drugs. Still, it is worth noting that caution should be taken when administering these medications to patients treated towards the end of the time window for MT, with low initial ASPECTS, incomplete reperfusion and especially in the case of trauma patients as it may trigger potential bleeding [23,26,27]. For each individual case, the expected benefits should outweigh the risk. We only noticed one event of bleeding, which occurred 3 days post-treatment as an episode of mild haematuria in the first patient and it resolved with no intervention and without sequelae. This patient had a full body trauma CT scan performed after the accident, which had been evaluated by two experienced radiologists and any active internal bleeding had been excluded. She also had another CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis after the episode of bleeding, showing the same result.

4. Conclusions and Future Directions

Mechanical thrombectomy and extensive artery stenting can be beneficial in patients with acute, high grade extracranial carotid artery dissections with artery occlusions and distal embolic complications. Medical consensus is lacking regarding ideal therapeutic strategy in those cases. Results of randomized-controlled trials like ongoing TITAN (Thrombectomy In TANdem lesion) (NCT03978988) will probably help to determine potential benefits and risk associated with acute stent placement and periprocedural antiplatelet therapy. Additionally, recent advances in vascular biology such as using microvessel-on-chip can potentially help to study in vitro the best practice regarding the use anti-coagulants and determine their optimal dose using humanized models [28,29].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, original draft preparation: G.M. Review and editing: G.M., M.Ś., P.P., V.P.-D. and D.D.-P. Supervision, funding acquisition: G.M., P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CTComputed tomography
DSADigital subtraction arteriography
EREmergency Room
GCSGlasgow Coma Scale
mRSmodified Rankin Scale
ICAInternal carotid artery
ICUIntensive Care Unit
MCAMiddle cerebral artery
MRAMagnetic resonance angiography
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging
NIHSSNational Institute of Health Stroke Scale
ICA segmentsBouthillier classification (C1–C7)
LVO:Large vessel occlusion
ASAacetylsalicylic acid
MTmechanical thrombectomy
EVTendovascular treatment
LMWHlow molecular weight heparin
ICHintracranial hemorrhage
ASPECTSAlberta Stroke Program Early CT score

References

  1. Rennert, R.C.; Wali, A.R.; Steinberg, J.A.; Santiago-Dieppa, D.R.; Olson, S.E.; Pannell, J.S.; Khalessi, A.A. Epidemiology, Natural History, and Clinical Presentation of Large Vessel Ischemic Stroke. Neurosurgery 2019, 85 (Suppl. 1), S4–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Nagumo, K.; Nakamori, A.; Kojima, S. Spontaneous intracranial internal carotidartery dissection: 6 case reports and a review of 39 cases in the literature. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 2003, 43, 313–321. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chandra, A.; Suliman, A.; Angle, N. Spontaneous dissection of the carotid andvertebral arteries: The 10-year UCSD experience. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2007, 21, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fusca, M.R.; Harrigan, M.R. Cerebrovascular dissections—A review part I: Spontaneous dissections. Neurosurgery 2011, 68, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mehdi, E.; Aralasmak, A.; Toprak, H.; Yıldız, S.; Kurtcan, S.; Kolukisa, M.; Asıl, T.; Alkan, A. Craniocervical Dissections: Radiologic Findings, Pitfalls, Mimicking Diseases: A Pictorial Review. Curr. Med. Imaging Rev. 2018, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Biffl, W.L.; Moore, E.E.; Offner, P.J.; Brega, K.E.; Franciose, R.J.; Burch, J.M. Blunt Carotid Arterial Injuries: Implications of a New Grading Scale. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 1999, 47, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Biffl, W.L.; Moore, E.E.; Offner, P.J.; Burch, J.M. Blunt Carotid and Vertebral Arterial Injuries. World J. Surg. 2001, 25, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stence, N.V.; Fenton, L.Z.; Goldenberg, N.A.; Armstrong-Wells, J.; Bernard, T.J. Craniocervical arterial dissectionin children: Diagnosis and treatment. Curr. Treat. Options Neurol. 2011, 13, 636–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Brott, T.G.; Halperin, J.L.; Abbara, S.; Bacharach, J.M.; Barr, J.D.; Bush, R.L.; Cates, C.U.; Creager, M.A.; Fowler, S.B.; Friday, G.; et al. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. Stroke 2011, 42, e420–e463. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lyrer, P.; Engelter, S.T. Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010, 10, CD000255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lavallée, P.C.; Mazighi, M.; Saint-Maurice, J.-P.; Meseguer, E.; Abboud, H.; Klein, I.F.; Houdart, E.; Amarenco, P. Stent-Assisted Endovascular Thrombolysis Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Internal Carotid and Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion. Stroke 2007, 38, 2270–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mourand, I.; Brunel, H.; Vendrell, J.-F.; Thouvenot, E.; Bonafé, A. Endovascular stent-assisted thrombolysis in acute occlusive carotid artery dissection. Neuroradiology 2010, 52, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wahlgren, N.; Moreira, T.; Michel, P.; Steiner, T.; Jansen, O.; Cognard, C.; Mattle, H.P.; van Zwam, W.; Holmin, S.; Tatlisumak, T.; et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: Consensus statement by ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update 2014/2015, supported by ESO, ESMINT, ESNR and EAN. Int. J. Stroke 2016, 11, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Procházka, V.; Jonszta, T.; Czerny, D.; Krajca, J.; Roubec, M.; Hurtikova, E.; Urbanec, R.; Streitová, D.; Pavliska, L.; Vrtkova, A. Comparison of Mechanical Thrombectomy with Contact Aspiration, Stent Retriever, and Combined Procedures in Patients with Large-Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018, 24, 9342–9353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lee, J.S.; Hong, J.M.; Lee, S.J.; Joo, I.S.; Lim, Y.C.; Kim, S.Y. The combined use of mechanical thrombectomy devices is feasible for treating acute carotid terminus occlusion. Acta Neurochir. 2013, 155, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Humphries, W.; Hoit, D.; Doss, V.T.; Elijovich, L.; Frei, D.; Loy, D.; Dooley, G.; Turk, A.S.; Chaudry, I.; Turner, R.; et al. Distal aspiration with retrievable stent assisted thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J. NeuroInterventional Surg. 2015, 7, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Chen, W.; Lin, Y.; Meng, X.; Chen, G.; Wang, Z.; Wu, J.; Wang, D.; Li, J.; Cao, Y.; et al. Ticagrelor plus aspirin versus clopidogrel plus aspirin for platelet reactivity in patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: Open label, blinded endpoint, randomised controlled phase II trial. BMJ 2019, 365, l2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Stampfl, S.; Ringleb, P.A.; Mohlenbruch, M.; Hametner, C.; Herweh, C.; Pham, M.; Bosel, J.; Haehnel, S.; Bendszus, M.; Rohde, S. Emergency Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Stenting in Combination with Intracranial Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2014, 35, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Matsubara, N.; Miyachi, S.; Tsukamoto, N.; Kojima, T.; Izumi, T.; Haraguchi, K.; Asai, T.; Yamanouchi, T.; Ota, K.; Wakabayashi, T. Endovascular intervention for acute cervical carotid artery occlusion. Acta Neurochir. 2013, 155, 1115–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Papanagiotou, P.; Roth, C.; Walter, S.; Behnke, S.; Grunwald, I.Q.; Viera, J.; Politi, M.; Körner, H.; Kostopoulos, P.; Haass, A.; et al. Carotid Artery Stenting in Acute Stroke. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, 2363–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jadhav, A.P.; Zaidat, O.; Liebeskind, D.S.; Yavagal, D.R.; Haussen, D.; Hellinger, F.R.; Jahan, R.; Jumaa, M.A.; Szeder, V.; Nogueira, R.G.; et al. Emergent Management of Tandem Lesions in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2019, 50, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, F.; Anadani, M.; Labreuche, J.; Spiotta, A.; Turjman, F.; Piotin, M.; Steglich-Arnholm, H.; Holtmannspötter, M.; Taschner, C.; Eiden, S.; et al. Impact of Antiplatelet Therapy During Endovascular Therapy for Tandem Occlusions. Stroke 2020, 51, 1522–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nawabi, J.; Kniep, H.; Schön, G.; Flottmann, F.; Leischner, H.; Kabiri, R.; Sporns, P.; Kemmling, A.; Thomalla, G.; Fiehler, J.; et al. Hemorrhage After Endovascular Recanalization in Acute Stroke: Lesion Extent, Collaterals and Degree of Ischemic Water Uptake Mediate Tissue Vulnerability. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dostovic, Z.; Dostovic, E.; Smajlovic, D.; Avdic, L.; Ibrahimagic, O.C. Brain Edema After Ischaemic Stroke. Med. Arch. 2016, 70, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Barber, P.A.; Demchuk, A.M.; Zhang, J.; Buchan, A.M. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. Lancet 2000, 355, 1670–1674, Erratum in 2000, 355, 2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferraris, V.A.; Bernard, A.C.; Hyde, B.; Kearney, P.A. The impact of antiplatelet drugs on trauma outcomes. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012, 73, 492–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Xu, L.; Ye, Z.; Dai, Q.; Liu, X.; Xu, G. Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage after Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Interv. Neurol. 2017, 6, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Salman, M.M.; Marsh, G.; Kusters, I.; Delincé, M.; Di Caprio, G.; Upadhyayula, S.; De Nola, G.; Hunt, R.; Ohashi, K.G.; Gray, T.; et al. Design and Validation of a Human Brain Endothelial Microvessel-on-a-Chip Open Microfluidic Model Enabling Advanced Optical Imaging. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zheng, Y.; Chen, J.; Craven, M.; Choi, N.W.; Totorica, S.; Diaz-Santana, A.; Kermani, P.; Hempstead, B.; Fischbach-Teschl, C.; López, J.A.; et al. In vitro microvessels for the study of angiogenesis and thrombosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 9342–9347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (A) Thrombosis and dissection of the right ICA, AP view. (B) Extent of the dissection, lateral view.
Figure 1. (A) Thrombosis and dissection of the right ICA, AP view. (B) Extent of the dissection, lateral view.
Brainsci 10 00800 g001
Figure 2. Stented right ICA (non DSA image).
Figure 2. Stented right ICA (non DSA image).
Brainsci 10 00800 g002
Figure 3. Right ICA, long dissection.
Figure 3. Right ICA, long dissection.
Brainsci 10 00800 g003
Figure 4. Four overlapping stents covering dissected ICA segments (non-subtracted image).
Figure 4. Four overlapping stents covering dissected ICA segments (non-subtracted image).
Brainsci 10 00800 g004
Figure 5. Stented left ICA with 2 overlapping stents covering the dissection and pseudoaneurysm with contrast medium stagnation (arrow) in late phase.
Figure 5. Stented left ICA with 2 overlapping stents covering the dissection and pseudoaneurysm with contrast medium stagnation (arrow) in late phase.
Brainsci 10 00800 g005
Table 1. Denver dissection grading system in blunt cerebrovascular injury and associated stroke rates.
Table 1. Denver dissection grading system in blunt cerebrovascular injury and associated stroke rates.
GradeType of DissectionStroke in Carotid Artery Dissection (%)Stroke in Vertebral Artery Dissection (%)
ILuminal irregularity or dissection with < 25% luminal narrowing319
IIIntimal flap or intramural hematoma with luminal narrowing ≥ 25% or intraluminal thrombus1140
IIIPseudoaneurysm3313
IVTotal occlusion4433
VTransection and free bleeding100N/A
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meder, G.; Świtońska, M.; Płeszka, P.; Palacz-Duda, V.; Dzianott-Pabijan, D.; Sokal, P. Endovascular Treatment of Stroke Caused by Carotid Artery Dissection. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110800

AMA Style

Meder G, Świtońska M, Płeszka P, Palacz-Duda V, Dzianott-Pabijan D, Sokal P. Endovascular Treatment of Stroke Caused by Carotid Artery Dissection. Brain Sciences. 2020; 10(11):800. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110800

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meder, Grzegorz, Milena Świtońska, Piotr Płeszka, Violetta Palacz-Duda, Dorota Dzianott-Pabijan, and Paweł Sokal. 2020. "Endovascular Treatment of Stroke Caused by Carotid Artery Dissection" Brain Sciences 10, no. 11: 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110800

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop