Next Article in Journal
Cerebrospinal Fluid Levels of Chromogranin A in Parkinson’s Disease and Multiple System Atrophy
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Neural Dynamics in Theta Oscillations Related to the Inhibition of Habitual Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Addressing the Need of a Translational Approach in Peripheral Neuropathy Research: Morphology Meets Function
Previous Article in Special Issue
Network Analysis of Induced Neural Plasticity Post-Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Investigating Brain Microstructural Alterations in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Systematic Review

Brain Sci. 2021, 11(2), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020140
by Abdulmajeed Alotaibi 1,2,*, Christopher Tench 1, Rebecca Stevenson 1, Ghadah Felmban 1,2, Amjad Altokhis 1,3, Ali Aldhebaib 2, Rob A. Dineen 1,4 and Cris S. Constantinescu 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(2), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020140
Submission received: 21 December 2020 / Revised: 15 January 2021 / Accepted: 17 January 2021 / Published: 22 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging Human Brain Connectivity in Health and Disease)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting review providing important insights on the potential efficiency of DTI for quantification and assessment of brain microvascular abnormalities in diabetic patients.

The authors also carefully discussed the relationships of such changes with cognitive functions and metabolic profile in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The manuscript is quite complete. As the Authors stated in the limitations section, despite the lack of quantitative analyses as well as the relatively small sample size in the research studies recruited, this article can put the basis for more specific interventions aimed at improving localization and quantification of neural damage in diabetes.

There are only minor comments that need to be addressed.

Minor comments

1) Page 2, line 46: please justify the text.

2) Figures are not sharp and do not make easy reading. Also, some figures (e.g. figures 2, 5, 6, 7, and 10) need a larger font size.

3) Page 12, line 352-352: please adjust the size of text.

4) Page 17, line 498: please correct the mistake in the sentence.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

 

Reviewer 2 Report

In an elaborate and well-researched literature review, the authors gathered data on white matter tractography and diabetes, making a distinction between Tp1 and Tp 2.

The bibliographic search is well-described.

The principles of DTI are briefly described. The data are interpreted with caution but the authors seem to convince us that some DTI parameters are (not specific for diabetes, I presume, please discuss) related to cognition.

The illustrations are many but add to the completeness of the review.

For the diabetologist and any clinician, the authors might relate the DTI findings to known or suspected pathologies in the brain  resulting from diabetes or its complications such as: Neuroinflammation, glucose transport at the BBB (cerebral insulin resistance), cerebral glucose metabolism, perfusion abnormalities. If such data are not available in the many articles, a theoretical discussion putting the DTI into a more familiar context would be welcome.

Line 25: Diabetic brain is neither an accepted nor an acceptable term.

Author Response

 "Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop