Next Article in Journal
Conventional and HD-tDCS May (or May Not) Modulate Overt Attentional Orienting: An Integrated Spatio-Temporal Approach and Methodological Reflections
Previous Article in Journal
Pyridoxine-Dependent Epilepsy and Antiquitin Deficiency Resulting in Neonatal-Onset Refractory Seizures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Test–Retest Reliability of Synchrony and Metastability in Resting State fMRI

College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(1), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010066
Submission received: 30 November 2021 / Revised: 23 December 2021 / Accepted: 28 December 2021 / Published: 31 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Neurotechnology and Neuroimaging)

Abstract

In recent years, interest has been growing in dynamic characteristic of brain signals from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Synchrony and metastability, as neurodynamic indexes, are considered as one of methods for analyzing dynamic characteristics. Although much research has studied the analysis of neurodynamic indices, few have investigated its reliability. In this paper, the datasets from the Human Connectome Project have been used to explore the test–retest reliabilities of synchrony and metastability from multiple angles through intra-class correlation (ICC). The results showed that both of these indexes had fair test–retest reliability, but they are strongly affected by the field strength, the spatial resolution, and scanning interval, less affected by the temporal resolution. Denoising processing can help improve their ICC values. In addition, the reliability of neurodynamic indexes was affected by the node definition strategy, but these effects were not apparent. In particular, by comparing the test–retest reliability of different resting-state networks, we found that synchrony of different networks was basically stable, but the metastability varied considerably. Among these, DMN and LIM had a relatively higher test–retest reliability of metastability than other networks. This paper provides a methodological reference for exploring the brain dynamic neural activity by using synchrony and metastability in fMRI signals.
Keywords: synchrony; metastability; test–retest reliability; resting-state network; resting state fMRI synchrony; metastability; test–retest reliability; resting-state network; resting state fMRI

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, L.; Wei, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, B.; Guo, H.; Yang, Y.; Xiang, J. Test–Retest Reliability of Synchrony and Metastability in Resting State fMRI. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010066

AMA Style

Yang L, Wei J, Li Y, Wang B, Guo H, Yang Y, Xiang J. Test–Retest Reliability of Synchrony and Metastability in Resting State fMRI. Brain Sciences. 2022; 12(1):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Lan, Jing Wei, Ying Li, Bin Wang, Hao Guo, Yanli Yang, and Jie Xiang. 2022. "Test–Retest Reliability of Synchrony and Metastability in Resting State fMRI" Brain Sciences 12, no. 1: 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010066

APA Style

Yang, L., Wei, J., Li, Y., Wang, B., Guo, H., Yang, Y., & Xiang, J. (2022). Test–Retest Reliability of Synchrony and Metastability in Resting State fMRI. Brain Sciences, 12(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010066

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop