Next Article in Journal
Suppressive Effects of Gelsemine on Anxiety-like Behaviors Induced by Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Central Effects of the Designer Drug Mephedrone in Mice—Basic Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/brainsci12020190
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Peek into Pandora’s Box: COVID-19 and Neurodegeneration

by
Abhishek Chandra
† and
Ashu Johri
*,†
Independent Researcher, New York, NY 10065, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Formerly: Feil Family Brain & Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(2), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020190
Submission received: 6 January 2022 / Revised: 27 January 2022 / Accepted: 28 January 2022 / Published: 30 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Neurodegenerative Diseases)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ever since it was first reported in Wuhan, China, the coronavirus-induced disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has become an enigma of sorts with ever expanding reports of direct and indirect effects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on almost all the vital organ systems. Along with inciting acute pulmonary complications, the virus attacks the cardiac, renal, hepatic, and gastrointestinal systems as well as the central nervous system (CNS). The person-to-person variability in susceptibility of individuals to disease severity still remains a puzzle, although the comorbidities and the age/gender of a person are believed to play a key role. SARS-CoV-2 needs angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor for its infectivity, and the association between SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2 leads to a decline in ACE2 activity and its neuroprotective effects. Acute respiratory distress may also induce hypoxia, leading to increased oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. Infection of the neurons along with peripheral leukocytes’ activation results in proinflammatory cytokine release, rendering the brain more susceptible to neurodegenerative changes. Due to the advancement in molecular biology techniques and vaccine development programs, the world now has hope to relatively quickly study and combat the deadly virus. On the other side, however, the virus seems to be still evolving with new variants being discovered periodically. In keeping up with the pace of this virus, there has been an avalanche of studies. This review provides an update on the recent progress in adjudicating the CNS-related mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its potential to incite or accelerate neurodegeneration in surviving patients. Current as well as emerging therapeutic opportunities and biomarker development are highlighted.

1. Introduction

At the end of 2019, the whole world was caught off guard by the sudden and unprecedented emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections, which caused coronavirus-induced disease of 2019 (COVID-19). Although respiratory distress is the main feature of the disease, other symptoms have also been well described as mentioned later in this review. Thus far, several therapeutics have been tested, some of which are summarized in Table 1, however, there is still no cure and clinical care is limited to symptomatic treatment on a case-by-case basis. COVID-19 vaccines have been developed and more are in development, but none of them are 100% effective and we are still learning about the duration of efficacy for the various vaccines and the need for booster shots due to the regular emergence of new variants (https://www.who.int/news/item/22-12-2021-interim-statement-on-booster-doses-for-covid-19-vaccination---update-22-December-2021; accessed on 28 January 2022 [1,2,3,4]). The longer persisting adverse effects resulting from this viral infection are still not fully defined yet. This review is an attempt to compile the current knowledge on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 and also briefly describe the association of this virus with the nervous system. We begin with a brief description of general facts about COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2.

1.1. Chronology of COVID-19

The original SARS-CoV outbreak occurred in 2002, while severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported to the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) on 31 December 2019. A cluster of cases of “viral pneumonia” were first reported in Wuhan, the People’s Republic of China, which turned out to be caused by SARS-CoV-2 [5]. W.H.O. termed this disease as COVID-19 on 11 February 2020, and declared it a global pandemic on 11 March 2020 [6]. As of January 2022, almost all countries have been infected by this highly contagious virus, with over 370 million clinically detected cases and over 5.6 million deaths (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/; https://covid19.who.int/; accessed on 28 January 2022). The virus is still evolving and variants with new mutations are being discovered periodically [3].

1.2. Structure of SARS-CoV-2

The word corona is derived from the Ancient Greek (korōnè) and Latin (corona) meaning “garland” or “wreath”, or “crown”. In micrographs, the club-shaped glycoprotein spikes on the surface of coronaviruses give the appearance of a radiate crown, hence the name. SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the betacoronavirus genus of the order Nidovirales, family Coronaviridae and consists of positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) encapsulated with a membrane envelope. The four main structural proteins, namely spike (S) glycoprotein, envelope (E) glycoprotein, nucleocapsid (N) phosphoprotein, and membrane (M) proteins are encoded in the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome [7,8]. SARS-CoV-2 shares approximately 79.5% genomic homology with SARS-CoV [9]. A unique property of the SARS-CoV-2 versus other coronaviruses is the longer length of the spike protein, which has been suggested to contribute to its higher transmissibility [10].

1.3. Replication of SARS-CoV-2

SARS-CoV-2, as its predecessor, uses spike glycoproteins on its surface to bind to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on the plasma membrane of the mammalian host cells. It then uses serine protease transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) to prime the spike [11]. Receptor-mediated endocytosis guides the virus entry into the cell where it releases its +ssRNA, which multiplies using the cellular machinery, and, eventually, daughter nucleocapsids are released by exocytosis.

1.4. Organs Targeted by SARS-CoV-2

Along with pulmonary manifestations, SARS-CoV-2 virus also affects the heart, gastrointestinal system, liver, kidney, and the central nervous system (CNS), thus causing multiorgan failure. The most common symptoms of COVID-19 are fatigue, dry cough, and fever. Other comparatively less common symptoms include: nasal and chest congestion, conjunctivitis, headache, muscle or joint pain, skin rashes, nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, or chills. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 (frequently referred to as neuro-COVID or nCoV [12,13]) are acute encephalitis, encephalopathy, ataxia, tremors, stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic), hyposmia/anosmia, hypogeusia/dysgeusia/ageusia, Guillain-Barre-like syndrome, peripheral neuropathy and myopathy, delirium, nerve damage, irritability, or dizziness, anxiety, depression, fatigue and sleep disorders (https://www.who.int/COVID-19; https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Current-Research/Coronavirus-and-NINDS/nervous-system; accessed on 28 January 2022 [14,15,16,17]). Occurrence of these symptoms suggests an involvement of the nervous system [18,19,20,21,22].
There is a higher prevalence of the CNS complications in patients with severe disease. We discuss the progress made in investigating the repercussions of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the following text. Direct neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 as well as CNS damage attributable to hyperinflammatory responses are discussed. Finally, we describe the potential of SARS-CoV-2 infection to incite or accelerate neurodegeneration in surviving patients and some of the promising therapeutic approaches.
Table
Table 1. Therapeutics tested against COVID-19.
Table 1. Therapeutics tested against COVID-19.
S. No.Drugs/Therapies TestedMechanism/Site of ActionState of Success against COVID-19References
Antivirals
1RemdesivirA nucleotide analogue that inhibits the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2Shortened the time to recovery along with lower incidence of serious adverse events due to respiratory failure; improved survival but did not affect viral clearance [23,24,25,26]
2Lopinavir–ritonavirThe enzyme 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro) plays a crucial role in processing the viral RNA. As a protease inhibitor lopinavir–ritonavir inhibits the action of 3CLpro, thereby disrupting the process of viral replication and release from host cellsNo benefits observed[27]
3FavipiravirAn RdRp inhibitor, the active form of this prodrug acts as a substrate for the RdRp enzyme and gets incorporated in the viral RNA strand, preventing further extensionNo benefit.
Excessive ferritin forms a complex with favipiravir, thus reducing favipiravir levels in blood in moderate-to-severe disease. On the other hand, high levels of favipiravir and its inactive metabolite M1 inhibit the organic anion transporters in the kidneys resulting in enhanced reabsorption and reduced excretion of uric acid, thus increasing its concentration in blood		[28,29,30,31,32,33]
4Favipiravir in combination with hydroxychloroquineInhibition of RdRp and viral binding to host membraneOne trial is underway, while another found efficacy in treatment[34,35]
5ChloroquineAn antimalarial, inhibits the action of heme polymerase in malarial trophozoites, preventing the conversion of heme to hemozoin. Interferes with virus binding to the host membrane by increasing pH and inhibiting ACE2 receptorNo beneficial effects[36]
6HydroxychloroquineAn analogue of chloroquine, used to treat autoimmune diseases in addition to malaria. Mechanism of action similar to chloroquineDid not affect viral clearance; no beneficial effects[26,36]
7Hydroxychloroquine in combination with azithromycinAzithromycin is an antibioticCombination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin reduced viral load [37,38,39,40]
8Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg immunotherapy)IVIg is a blood preparation isolated and concentrated from healthy donors mainly consisting of IgG. High-dose IVIg could modulate the activation of cytokine network, neutralize autoantibodies, and regulate proliferation of immune cellsIn patients with severe disease, reduction in mortality was seen; in patients with non-severe COVID-19, no benefit was observed[41,42,43,44]
9Convalescent plasma (immunotherapy)Passive immunization approach using antibodies from survivorsEffective supplementary treatment if applied early in the disease course [45,46,47]
Steroids/anti-inflammatory compounds
10Dexamethasone (9α-fluoro-16α-methylprednisolone)A glucocorticoid that increases the production of anti-inflammatory compoundsIn hospitalized hypoxic COVID-19 patients, lower mortality was observed; another study is ongoing[48,49]
11MethylprednisoloneA synthetic glucocorticoid, with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effectsProduced better results than dexamethasone; better clinical outcome, i.e., laboratory markers of severity (CRP, D-dimer and LDH), and shorter recovery time, was observed with methylprednisolone, which has been attributed to its higher lung penetration compared to dexamethasone; reduced mortality [50,51,52,53]
12AnakinraA recombinant form of human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL1R)Safe and might be associated with reductions in both mortality and need for mechanical ventilation[54]
13Anakinra in combination with methylprednisoloneAnti-inflammatoryRisk of death was significantly lower for treated patients[55,56,57]
Janus kinase inhibitors
14RuxolitinibInhibitor of Janus kinases (JAK) 1 and 2, anti-inflammatoryDecreased the time on mechanical ventilation, hospitalization time, the need for vasopressor support, and decreased mortality and improved lung congestion. Phase III trial conducted by Novartis did not observe these beneficial effects[58,59,60]
15BaricitinibInhibitor of JAK, anti-inflammatory, and reduces receptor-mediated viral endocytosisA phase I/II clinical trial is under way [61]
16Baricitinib (in combination with Tocilizumab and Corticosteroids) JAK inhibitorThe addition of baricitinib did not substantially reduce mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Combination of baricitinib with corticosteroids was associated with greater improvement in pulmonary function[62,63]
17Baricitinib, ruxolitinib, tofacitinibJAK/STAT inhibitorReduce excessive inflammation [64,65]
Monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2
18BamlanivimabMonoclonal antibody treatment providing immediate, passive immunityAccelerated the natural decline in viral load over time[66]
19Bamlanivimab in combination with etesevimabThese antibodies attach to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 at two different sites, preventing its entry into the cellsStatistically significant reduction in SARS-CoV-2 viral load [67,68]
20Casirivimab in combination with imdevimabBind to different sites on the receptor binding domain of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, blocking its attachment to the human ACE2 receptorIn high-risk patients, this treatment significantly reduced rate of hospitalization [69,70,71]
Therapeutic antibodies targeting inflammatory cytokines
21TocilizumabMonoclonal antibody against interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptorReduction in mortality, intubation[72,73]
22Clazakizumab, olokizumab, siltuximab Monoclonal antibody against IL-6, IL-8Similar effects in diminishing leukocyte[74,75,76,77]
23Levilimab, sarilumabMonoclonal antibody against IL-6R/gp130Sustained clinical improvement[78,79,80]
24CanakinumabMonoclonal antibody against IL-1βFavorable prognosis compared to standard of care[81,82]
25Guselkumab, risankizumab, ustekinumabMonoclonal antibody against IL-12/IL-23Protects against COVID-19 in rheumatological patients[83,84,85]
26Ixekizumab, secukinumabMonoclonal antibody against IL-17ABeneficial effects of inhibiting IL-17[86,87,88]
27EmapalumabMonoclonal antibody antagonist of interferon IFN-γProtects against cytokine storm resistant to anakinra, tocilizumab, and JAK inhibitors[89]
28Infliximab, adalimumabMonoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α)Facilitated clinical recovery in severe and critical cases[90,91]
29Gimsilumab, lenzilumab, otilimab, TJ003234Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) neutralizationSafe and associated with faster improvement in clinical outcomes[92,93,94,95]
30NamilumabMonoclonal antibody against GM-CSFReduction in inflammation[96]
31MavrilimumabMonoclonal antibody against GM-CSF receptorImproved clinical outcomes[97,98]
Other compounds
32DapansutrileSelective and orally active NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitorClinical trials ongoing[99]
33EtanerceptTumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) inhibitorProtects against evolution to more severe disease[100,101]
34MelatoninBlocks the activity of cluster differentiation 147 (CD147)Has anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant activities[102,103,104]

2. SARS-CoV-2 and the Nervous System

SARS-CoV-2 is suspected to be a neurotropic virus, and there is evidence both in favor of and against this supposition. A broad organotropism of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was shown to occur in autopsied tissues including human brain [105,106]. SARS-CoV-2 was shown to infect and replicate in cells of neuronal origin [107]. Using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)-derived human neural progenitor cells (hNPCs), neurospheres, and brain organoids, Zhang et al. showed that these models expressed ACE2 and other key coronavirus entry-associated proteases, and were permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection and supported productive virus replication [108,109]. High-titer anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were found in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with encephalopathy and in comatose patients [110]. SARS-CoV-2 was also shown to disrupt the blood–CSF barrier function [111,112,113]. In electron micrographs of autopsied frontal lobe tissue, SARS-CoV-2 viral-like particles were observed in neural and capillary endothelial cells [114]. SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in brain tissue, [106,115,116] including SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA transcripts [105,117,118], and viral proteins in the epithelial cells within the olfactory bulb [119]. However, on the other hand, studies showed that SARS-CoV-2 does not replicate in the CNS, and its CNS effects may be attributable to the immune responses that are triggered by the infection [120,121].
It may not proliferate there, but there is plenty of evidence that SARS-CoV-2 does reach and infect individual mature neurons as mentioned in the preceding paragraph and shown quite comprehensively by a couple of recent studies [118,122]. The key question is then, how does the virus reach the CNS? A few putative sites have been proposed for the entry of SARS-CoV-2 in the CNS: (1) through damage to the blood–brain barrier (BBB) epithelial cells and leukocyte migration across the BBB (hematogenous route), (2) neuronal retrograde pathways (active axonal transport), and (3) through the olfactory bulb (Figure 1) [123,124,125,126,127].
The S protein was observed in the cytoplasm of endothelial cells that had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA [118]. The RNA was also detected in the olfactory mucosa and in the neuroanatomical areas receiving olfactory tract projections, suggesting neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 via axonal transport [118]. Direct evidence for the entry of the S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was shown in mice that were injected intravenously with radioiodinated S1 (I-S1) [122]. In these mice, the I-S1 was shown to cross the BBB by adsorptive transcytosis and gain entry into various brain regions and parenchymal brain space. Moreover, intranasally-administered I-S1 was also found to reach all the brain regions examined [122]. These observations are important in view of the theory that S1 protein may shed from SARS-CoV-2 and enter the brain to elicit the same responses as the whole virus itself. Thus, it may alter the same factors and inflame the brain from inside out, in turn, making the brain more susceptible to further injury. Furthermore, the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA in other brain regions, such as the cerebellum, that have no direct connection to the olfactory mucosa, suggests other parallel routes of infection, such as leukocytes carrying SARS-CoV-2 migrating across the BBB or viral entry via CNS endothelia. This assumption is supported by positive immunoreactivity to the SARS-CoV-2 S protein in cerebral and leptomeningeal endothelial cells [118]. The viral entry points in the CNS are further discussed below.

2.1. ACE2 Expression in Brain

The physiological function of the metalloproteinase ACE2 is to cleave Angiotensin-II into the vasodilator peptides Angiotensin-(1–7), and act as a central element in coordinating the effects of these peptides including neuroprotection [128]. In the context of COVID-19, as mentioned above, the ACE2 receptor aids SARS-CoV-2 entry into the cell. This fact has sparked renewed attention to the ACE2 expression in the nervous system. Indeed, several studies have shown that apart from the vascular and airway epithelia, lung parenchyma, kidney, and small intestine, ACE2 expression occurs in human and mouse brains, predominantly the cardiorespiratory neurons of the brainstem, as well as in non-cardiovascular areas such as the motor cortex and raphe [129,130,131,132,133,134,135]. ACE2 is ubiquitously present in brain vasculature, in astrocytes, in key components of BBB, and in discrete neuronal groups [136]. Low levels of ACE2 receptor expression were shown in neuronal and glial cells in the human CNS [137]. In brain cells expressing ACE2 receptors, neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 is presumed to occur primarily via the olfactory bulb causing neuronal death in mice [138,139]. The dependency of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the ACE2-receptor was shown via lentiviral overexpression of ACE2 in endothelial cells, and via uptake of the radioactively-labeled S1 subunit of spike protein in the brain [122,140]. Previously, the brain was shown to be the major target organ for SARS-CoV infection in mice transgenic for ACE2 receptor, where the virus entered via the olfactory bulb and produced rapid, transneuronal spread to other regions of the brain. Neuronal demise, primarily of those located in the cardiorespiratory centers in the medulla, was proposed as the main cause of death of the animal, and only the absence of ACE2 receptors prevented the severe disease symptoms [123]. These observations, combined with the fact that both the ACE2 expression and SARS-CoV-2 infection are detected in the neurons of the primary respiratory and cardiovascular control center of the brainstem, indicate a CNS-mediated pathway in the respiratory or cardiac insufficiency observed in COVID-19 patients [118,138,141]. Another receptor that has been implicated in mediating SARS-CoV-2 entry through binding to the S protein, is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein cluster differentiation (CD)147. Significant expression levels of ACE2, CD147, and serine protease TMPRSS2 were detected in human and mouse brain cell lines, and in different brain regions of mice [142]. It is of interest to note here that several previously identified ACE2 inhibitors are currently being repurposed to treat COVID-19 and need further verification from clinical trials regarding their efficacy [143]. However, it is yet to be conclusively determined whether or not patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular comorbidities on long-term therapy with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are at higher risk of poor outcomes from COVID-19 [144,145,146].

2.2. Cytokine Storm and Leaky BBB

Apart from the direct infection of CNS by SARS-CoV-2, systemic inflammation is also proposed to result in neurological manifestations seen in COVID-19 (neuro-COVID or nCoV) [147,148]. Cytokine storm is an acute systemic inflammatory syndrome that occurs when there is an overwhelming increase in proinflammatory circulatory cytokine levels, such as those observed in certain cases of COVID-19, (Interleukin (IL)-1β, -2, -4, -6, -7, -8, -9, -10, -18, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon γ-induced protein (IP)-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and -3, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α, cutaneous T cell-attracting chemokine, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-α) [148,149,150,151,152]. This further leads to hypercoagulability. Considering this, several anti-inflammatory drugs have been repurposed to prevent cytokine storm in COVID-19 (Table 1). Inflammation and a hypercoagulable state are associated with acute cerebrovascular disease in COVID-19 [153,154]. The sequence of events ultimately results in a profound loss of T cells in COVID-19 patients. The systemic inflammation results in widespread organ damage followed by neurological symptoms. Studies have suggested that the endothelial activation and BBB disruption caused by peripheral inflammation results in astrocyte and microglia activation, which, in turn, produce oxidative stress and neuroinflammation [155]. Several cytokines are known to be transported across the BBB from blood to brain [156]. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 directly infects the immune cells and, at the same time, makes the BBB physiologically “leaky”, resulting in an exaggerated immune response and inflammation of the brain [124,138]. Using intranasal administration of the SARS-CoV-2 in animals, Zhang et al. showed that the virus damages the BBB integrity by damaging basement membrane, followed by increased viral loads in brain tissue and the activation of neuroinflammatory responses [157]. Thus, both the cytokine storm as well as a direct viral interaction seem to cause a leaky BBB, thrusting the peripheral immune cells inside the brain and aggravating the neurological damage.

3. COVID-19 and Neurodegeneration

Neurodegeneration is characterized by selective and progressive loss of neurons in the CNS, peripheral nervous system, or both. Neuronal demise is a multifactorial phenomenon arising from a person’s genetic predispositions or metabolic/environmental risk factors. With changes in diet, life style, and environment, and with the increase in life expectancies, the epidemic of neurodegenerative diseases is on the rise. Advanced age is the major risk factor associated with some of these diseases including sporadic cases of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), other dementias, various tauopathies, etc. All of these diseases are associated with increased neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, as well as mitochondrial dysfunction. Due to the overlapping CNS effects, it has been speculated that COVID-19 may initiate or worsen neurodegenerative conditions in surviving patients [158,159,160]. There is especially greater concern in patients that develop the so-called long COVID, with a broad range of symptoms that do not resolve over an extended period of time [21,161]. Chronic systemic inflammation may leave detrimental impacts on the brain, particularly resulting in sustained activation of microglia and astrocyte subtypes [162]. In severe cases of COVID-19, cytokine storm occurs and high levels of proinflammatory cytokines are known to cause cognitive decline including difficulties with concentration, memory, fatigue, and/or executive function [163,164,165]. Exaggerated systemic- and neuroinflammation may alter the course of or precipitate neuropathology in neurodegenerative diseases [166,167]. Based on their previous studies and others, Heneka et al. have proposed that SARS-CoV-2 infection results in NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation which, in turn, produces impaired clearance and pathological accumulation of neurodegeneration-associated peptides such as amyloid β (Aβ) and tau [163,168,169,170]. Using 3D human brain organoids, Ramani et al. showed that SARS-CoV-2 preferably targets neurons, causing mislocalization of tau from axons to soma, tau hyperphosphorylation, and, ultimately, neuronal death [171]. An analysis of single-nucleus transcriptomic profiles revealed significant overlaps between COVID-19, and neuroinflammation and brain microvascular injury pathways that are implicated in AD [172]. This study further unveiled alterations of multiple common factors involved in cognitive impairment observed in COVID-19 and AD. There is evidence that SARS-CoV-2 can aggravate the clinical presentations of PD [173,174,175,176] and cause de novo problems with gait, movement, coordination, and balance [177,178,179,180]. The lasting impacts of SARS-CoV-2 infection on microglial plasticity and its contribution to the pathophysiology of post-COVID-19 neurological sequelae and disorders, including PD, were comprehensively discussed in a recent review [181]. In line with the above mentioned findings, cognitive impairment and dysexecutive syndrome consisting of inattention, disorientation, or poorly organized movements in response to command were observed to be persistent several months after the infection in COVID-19 survivors [182,183].
In addition to the direct adverse effects of SARS-CoV-2, the restrictive measures enforced due to COVID-19 such as home confinement and social distancing negatively impacted the general health and well-being of all individuals causing depression, anxiety and stress, and worsened the neuropsychiatric outcomes for AD patients [184,185,186,187,188]. Studies have shown that isolation and reduction in mobility increased psychological stress and produced an impairment of motor and nonmotor symptoms in PD patients [189,190,191,192]. There is also a prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among COVID-19 survivors and care givers [165,193,194,195,196].
It is clear from the preceding discussion that there is a risk for development/worsening of neurodegeneration among COVID-19 survivors. Neurons have a high metabolic demand and limited regenerative capacity, and they depend heavily on energy produced in mitochondria for their adequate functioning and survival. Therefore, we next focus on the mechanistic aspects of mitochondrial alterations and mitochondria-targeted therapeutic opportunities in COVID-19.

3.1. Oxidative Stress, Dysregulation of Iron Homeostasis, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Hyperferritinemia, also known as iron dysregulation, occurs in exaggerated inflammatory states and was shown to be associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 [149]. Iron dysregulation produces reactive oxygen species (ROS), enhances oxidative stress and results in iron-dependent cell death, termed ferroptosis [197,198]. The mitochondria are the focal point of cellular energy metabolism as well as oxidative homeostasis. Iron overload leads to abnormal mitochondrial morphology, resulting in a fragmented architecture, overproduction of mitochondrial ROS, alteration of mitochondrial membrane potential, elevated mitochondrial lipid peroxidation, and further accumulation of mitochondrial iron. Ferroptosis works by compromising mitochondrial functionalities by restricting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and anti-oxidant response, and the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is vulnerable to iron deposition [199,200,201,202]. An involvement of other organelles, including the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, and lysosomes, has been suggested in ferroptosis, although most studies emphasize a multifaceted regulation of ferroptosis by mitochondria [203]. Using computational modeling, SARS-CoV-2 genomic and subgenomic RNA was shown to localize in the host mitochondrial matrix and nucleolus [204]. Wu et al. [204] further showed that the 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions of SARS-CoV-2 contained the mitochondrial localization signals. SARS-CoV-2 disrupts the host ubiquitin system to inhibit the functions of IFN-I, which serves as the first response that is triggered upon encounter with the virus to stage the uprising of immune cells to the so-called antiviral state [205]. SARS-CoV-2 also targets a mitochondrial deubiquitinase involved in mitochondrial homeostasis and mitophagy, thus relaying the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 might affect mitochondrial function by altering ubiquitination [206]. An alternative open reading frame (Orf9b) within the nucleocapsid gene of SARS-CoV-2 was shown to interact with the outer mitochondrial membrane and inhibit IFN-I production [207,208]. Orf9b also directly interacts with a component of the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM70) and thus interferes with the import of the mtDNA transcription factor A (Tfam) [207,208,209]. SARS-CoV-2 suppresses mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I expression and impairs mitochondrial energy production [209]. Altered bioenergetics and mitochondrial dysfunction was observed in peripheral blood monocytes in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia [210]. A link between SARS-CoV-2 infection, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation, leading to persistent brain-fog, has been suggested [211,212]. The activation of the oxidative stress pathways coupled with mitochondrial dysfunction and innate immunity further exacerbate proinflammatory responses and thus play a major role in COVID-19 pathogenesis and severity [213,214,215]. Mitochondrial dysfunction and hallmark features of ferroptosis (including iron deposition, GSH depletion, and elevated lipid peroxidation, i.e., oxidative stress) are consistently observed in neurodegenerative diseases, including AD and PD [216,217,218].

3.2. Therapeutic Prospects

The transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) plays pivotal roles in oxidative defense and iron metabolism [219]. Nrf2 pathway is suppressed in biopsies obtained from COVID-19 patients [220]. Activators of Nrf2 help prevent ferroptotic death [221] and have been explored as potential therapeutic agents against COVID-19 [220,222].
Another pathway of interest from a therapeutic perspective and one that works upstream of Nrf2 is the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) pathway. PGC-1α is a widely studied master regulator of mitochondrial bioenergetics and anti-oxidant defense, and its impaired expression and/or function has been associated with various neurodegenerative disorders as well as metabolic diseases [223,224]. PGC-1α orchestrates the myriad of biological pathways via its interaction with and regulation of the expression of a variety of transcription factors including nuclear respiratory factor-1 (NRF-1), PPARs, 5′-adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK), Sirtuins, and Nrf2 [225,226,227]. AMPK is a key energy sensing molecule that modulates cell growth and proliferation, and is involved in several other important functions of the cell such as, autophagy, stress responses, mitochondrial homeostasis, and host immune function. AMPK phosphorylates and enhances the expression of ACE2. SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to interfere with AMPK functions [228]. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) activates PGC-1α through its deacetylation, and expression of SIRT1 was significantly decreased along with increased concentrations of plasma proinflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from COVID-19 patients [229]. Studies have pointed towards prominent roles of PPAR-α and PPAR-γ in inflammation and metabolic regulation [230]. PPARs have an established immune-modulatory role, and the use of PPAR as adjuvants to vaccines for COVID-19 has been prescribed due to their role in enhancing immunologic memory [231].
Therapeutic targeting of PGC-1α through small molecules or physical exercise is of interest because of three main reasons: firstly, it integrates all the above mentioned factors that are affected in COVID-19; secondly, due to its multifaceted roles in anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways as well as in improving mitochondrial function, all of which are disrupted in COVID-19; thirdly, it shows promise in neuroprotection [232,233,234,235,236,237,238]. Increased PGC-1α expression was shown to reduce NLRP3 inflammasome activation, proinflammatory cytokine production, and decrease neuroinflammation and depression-like behavior [239,240]. Several compounds have been identified in other models of neurological damage that reduce neuroinflammation and oxidative damage through AMPK/PGC-1α– or SIRT1/PGC-1α–mediated pathways and improve cognitive outcomes [241,242,243,244]. Melatonin is a hormone involved in control of the sleep–wake cycle and has anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, and mitochondrial protective properties. It increased PGC-1α, Nrf2, and other mitochondrial genes, and restored mitochondrial structure and function in in vitro models of AD [245]. The use of melatonin has been suggested as a potential adjuvant for COVID-19 [246,247,248]. A recent study showed that the combination of oral melatonin tablets with standard care substantially improves sleep quality and blood oxygen saturation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients [249].
In recent years, there has been increasing data for the effectiveness of natural extracts such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and saponins as potent anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory agents (reviewed in: [250]). Phytochemicals such as resveratrol, curcumin, mulberry extract, green tea polyphenols, etc., have been shown to energize mitochondria through the SIRT1/PGC-1α, AMPK/PGC-1α, or Nrf2/PGC-1α axis, and exert neuroprotective effects and improve overall health [251,252,253,254,255]. The therapeutic potential of thymoquinone, a component of Nigella sativa, against COVID-19 is worthy of further investigation due to multiple evidence of this compound’s efficacy in targeting the AMPK/PPARγ/PGC-1α and Nrf2/heme oxygenase (HO-1) pathway and in preventing SARS-CoV-2 entry into the cells [256,257,258]. Moreover, several plant-based compounds have antimicrobial activities, and some of the polyphenolic compounds, including flavonoids, terpenoids, hydrolysable tannins, etc., have potential inhibitory properties against ACE2 receptors [143,259]. Using molecular docking analysis, bioactive ligands were identified from medicinal plants that inhibited SARS-CoV-2 viral replication and transcription [260,261]. Such phytochemicals interrupt the viral entry into the host cell by interaction with ACE2, TMPRSS2, and spike glycoprotein and, consequently, halt viral replication, pathogenicity, and transmissibility. Many of the aforementioned compounds are already approved for use in other diseases. Suitable clinical trials ought to be conducted to investigate the neuroprotective effects of potential therapies, including drugs and physical exercise in patients with confirmed disease progression in COVID-19. The primary outcome measure would be neurodegeneration, which could be measured as whole brain atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Secondary outcome parameters may include other biomarkers associated with neurodegeneration, for example, regional brain atrophy, lesion load, white matter integrity, resting state functional connectivity, blood biomarkers, and physical, neuropsychiatric, and cognitive measurements. We briefly discuss some of the biomarkers currently being used and newer biomarkers that are being discovered and developed in COVID-19 and neuro-COVID.

3.3. Biomarker Identification and Development

Because of the novel and abrupt nature of the disease, several radiographic and laboratory parameters have been tried and tested to predict the progression of COVID-19. These biomarkers help clinicians in providing better prognostics and management of patients with the disease. One of the widely used biomarkers highly associated with disease progression in COVID-19 in both acute and mild cases is increased cytokine levels in blood [262]. Both CT scan scores and the elevated serum levels of inflammation and tissue damage markers, such as IL-6, IL-8, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), are used to monitor the condition of patients [263]. IL-6 was shown to be one of the more robust prognostic markers of survival, even more so than CRP, D-dimer, procalcitonin (PCT), lymphocyte, and ferritin [264,265]. TNF-α, known to contribute to organ damage, is a strong predictor of a poor outcome. At the same time, a combination of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a pleiotropic cytokine, and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13), a proinflammatory chemokine, was identified as an important predictor of severity of disease and death as an outcome [266]. Another study reported increased levels of IL-4 in the plasma of COVID-19 patients, which may indicate an adaptive response to neuroinflammation, and together with IL-6 levels may be used to predict outcome in neuro-COVID [13]. This study also analyzed the cargo of the neuronal-enriched extracellular vesicles (nEVs, also known as neuron-derived exosomes (NDEs)), which have been previously described as biomarkers in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related cognitive impairment, AD, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) [267,268]. Interestingly, they found increased levels of inflammatory and neurodegenerative proteins in the cargo of these nEVs, which, if persistent, may indicate synaptic disruption and neuronal damage reminiscent of AD, PD, and TBI [13]. Results from a very recent study seem to be in agreement with these findings as blood biomarkers of neuronal and glial degeneration were found to be elevated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with new onset cognitive dysfunction (specifically, toxic-metabolic encephalopathy, TME) [269]. Specifically, they showed increased levels of total tau, neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1) in the blood of neuro-COVID patients, which together indicated a profound neurological insult comparable to non-COVID patients with AD [269,270]. It is of great significance to note that these neurodegenerative biomarkers are also elevated after BBB disruption and were found to be associated with a higher risk of in-hospital death and reduced rates of discharge from hospital [269]. The discovery of such comparatively fewer invasive blood biomarkers for cognitive impairment could help in monitoring neuronal and other brain cell health in real time, and to determine treatment responses in neuro-COVID.

4. Conclusions

COVID-19 is fast turning into an endemic that the world population will have to live with over the next coming years. Currently, vaccination is our primary hope to protect us from the more severe consequences of this deadly disease, although some of the therapeutics also imparted improved clinical outcomes, as outlined in Table 1. SARS-CoV-2 has already taken a huge toll in terms of millions of deaths all over the world and long-lasting sequelae in COVID-19 survivors. Neurological consequences are being widely reported and mitochondrial involvement seems to be a crucial element in it. Targeting PGC-1α mediated pathways seems to be of benefit for the mitochondrial and neuronal health. We have discussed a few of the approaches above and many more are in development [271]. Direct mitochondrial transplantation from healthy cells was recently suggested as an innovative therapy in COVID-19 [272,273]. Although full of potential, further research in this approach is needed [274,275,276]. Recently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued an emergency use authorization for Merck’s molnupiravir developed with Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, and also approved Pfizer Inc’s Paxlovid for the treatment of COVID-19. A number of other therapies are being tested at lightning speed, giving hope for a potential cure [277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287]. However, in the current environment, the potential of holistic approaches including diet, exercise, and a healthy lifestyle cannot be underestimated in keeping the brain and mind healthy, as well as to boost natural immunity, as this virus does not seem to be letting up in the near future.

Author Contributions

A.C. wrote parts of the review. A.J. conceptualized, performed the literature search, and wrote the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully extend our heartfelt thanks to the brave corona warriors that are at the forefront. A.J. dedicates this research to the loving memory of her beloved father, always in our hearts.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kannan, S.R.; Spratt, A.N.; Sharma, K.; Chand, H.S.; Byrareddy, S.N.; Singh, K. Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: Unique features and their impact on pre-existing antibodies. J. Autoimmun. 2022, 126, 102779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Krause, P.R.; Fleming, T.R.; Peto, R.; Longini, I.M.; Figueroa, J.P.; Sterne, J.A.C.; Cravioto, A.; Rees, H.; Higgins, J.P.T.; Boutron, I.; et al. Considerations in boosting COVID-19 vaccine immune responses. Lancet 2021, 398, 1377–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aleem, A.; Akbar Samad, A.B.; Slenker, A.K. Emerging Variants of SARS-CoV-2 and Novel Therapeutics against Coronavirus (COVID-19); StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tregoning, J.S.; Flight, K.E.; Higham, S.L.; Wang, Z.; Pierce, B.F. Progress of the COVID-19 vaccine effort: Viruses, vaccines and variants versus efficacy, effectiveness and escape. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 21, 626–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Velavan, T.P.; Meyer, C.G. The COVID-19 epidemic. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2020, 25, 278–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Cucinotta, D.; Vanelli, M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wu, A.; Peng, Y.; Huang, B.; Ding, X.; Wang, X.; Niu, P.; Meng, J.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; et al. Genome Composition and Divergence of the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Originating in China. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 27, 325–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bakhiet, M.; Taurin, S. SARS-CoV-2: Targeted managements and vaccine development. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2021, 58, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, Z.; Lian, X.; Su, X.; Wu, W.; Marraro, G.A.; Zeng, Y. From SARS and MERS to COVID-19: A brief summary and comparison of severe acute respiratory infections caused by three highly pathogenic human coronaviruses. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Onofrio, L.; Caraglia, M.; Facchini, G.; Margherita, V.; Placido, S.; Buonerba, C. Toll-like receptors and COVID-19: A two-faced story with an exciting ending. Future Sci. OA 2020, 6, FSO605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Kruger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lou, J.J.; Movassaghi, M.; Gordy, D.; Olson, M.G.; Zhang, T.; Khurana, M.S.; Chen, Z.; Perez-Rosendahl, M.; Thammachantha, S.; Singer, E.J.; et al. Neuropathology of COVID-19 (neuro-COVID): Clinicopathological update. Free Neuropathol. 2021, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, B.; Tang, N.; Peluso, M.J.; Iyer, N.S.; Torres, L.; Donatelli, J.L.; Munter, S.E.; Nixon, C.C.; Rutishauser, R.L.; Rodriguez-Barraquer, I.; et al. Characterization and Biomarker Analyses of Post-COVID-19 Complications and Neurological Manifestations. Cells 2021, 10, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alquisiras-Burgos, I.; Peralta-Arrieta, I.; Alonso-Palomares, L.A.; Zacapala-Gomez, A.E.; Salmeron-Barcenas, E.G.; Aguilera, P. Neurological Complications Associated with the Blood-Brain Barrier Damage Induced by the Inflammatory Response during SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 58, 520–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Iadecola, C.; Anrather, J.; Kamel, H. Effects of COVID-19 on the Nervous System. Cell 2020, 183, 16–27.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lee, M.H.; Perl, D.P.; Nair, G.; Li, W.; Maric, D.; Murray, H.; Dodd, S.J.; Koretsky, A.P.; Watts, J.A.; Cheung, V.; et al. Microvascular Injury in the Brains of Patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 481–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Conklin, J.; Frosch, M.P.; Mukerji, S.S.; Rapalino, O.; Maher, M.D.; Schaefer, P.W.; Lev, M.H.; Gonzalez, R.G.; Das, S.; Champion, S.N.; et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging reveals cerebral microvascular injury in severe COVID-19. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 421, 117308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Graham, E.L.; Clark, J.R.; Orban, Z.S.; Lim, P.H.; Szymanski, A.L.; Taylor, C.; DiBiase, R.M.; Jia, D.T.; Balabanov, R.; Ho, S.U.; et al. Persistent neurologic symptoms and cognitive dysfunction in non-hospitalized Covid-19 “long haulers”. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2021, 8, 1073–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Doyle, M.F. Central nervous system outcomes of COVID-19. Transl. Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Taquet, M.; Geddes, J.R.; Husain, M.; Luciano, S.; Harrison, P.J. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry 2021, 8, 416–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Harapan, B.N.; Yoo, H.J. Neurological symptoms, manifestations, and complications associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). J. Neurol. 2021, 268, 3059–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roy, D.; Ghosh, R.; Dubey, S.; Dubey, M.J.; Benito-Leon, J.; Kanti Ray, B. Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 48, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Beigel, J.H.; Tomashek, K.M.; Dodd, L.E.; Mehta, A.K.; Zingman, B.S.; Kalil, A.C.; Hohmann, E.; Chu, H.Y.; Luetkemeyer, A.; Kline, S.; et al. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19—Final Report. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1813–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Garibaldi, B.T.; Wang, K.; Robinson, M.L.; Zeger, S.L.; Bandeen-Roche, K.; Wang, M.C.; Alexander, G.C.; Gupta, A.; Bollinger, R.; Xu, Y. Comparison of Time to Clinical Improvement with vs without Remdesivir Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e213071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mozaffari, E.; Chandak, A.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, S.; Thrun, M.; Gottlieb, R.L.; Kuritzkes, D.R.; Sax, P.E.; Wohl, D.A.; Casciano, R.; et al. Remdesivir Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Comparative Analysis of In-hospital All-cause Mortality in a Large Multicenter Observational Cohort. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, ciab875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Barratt-Due, A.; Olsen, I.C.; Nezvalova-Henriksen, K.; Kasine, T.; Lund-Johansen, F.; Hoel, H.; Holten, A.R.; Tveita, A.; Mathiessen, A.; Haugli, M.; et al. Evaluation of the Effects of Remdesivir and Hydroxychloroquine on Viral Clearance in COVID-19: A Randomized Trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2021, 174, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cao, B.; Wang, Y.; Wen, D.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Fan, G.; Ruan, L.; Song, B.; Cai, Y.; Wei, M.; et al. A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1787–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lou, Y.; Liu, L.; Yao, H.; Hu, X.; Su, J.; Xu, K.; Luo, R.; Yang, X.; He, L.; Lu, X.; et al. Clinical Outcomes and Plasma Concentrations of Baloxavir Marboxil and Favipiravir in COVID-19 Patients: An Exploratory Randomized, Controlled Trial. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 157, 105631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Yin, P.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, B.; Lu, M.; et al. Favipiravir Versus Arbidol for Clinical Recovery Rate in Moderate and Severe Adult COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 683296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Morikawa, G.; Kubota, K.; Kondo, D.; Takanashi, Y.; Minami, S.; Kinjo, T.; Moriiwa, Y.; Yanagida, A.; Okazawa, K.; Chiaki, T. Elevated blood favipiravir levels are inversely associated with ferritin levels and induce the elevation of uric acid levels in COVID-19 treatment: A retrospective single-center study. J. Infect. Chemother. 2022, 28, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Koseki, T.; Nakajima, K.; Iwasaki, H.; Yamada, S.; Takahashi, K.; Doi, Y.; Mizuno, T. Baseline uric acid levels and steady-state favipiravir concentrations are associated with occurrence of hyperuricemia among COVID-19 patients. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 115, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moriiwa, Y.; Morikawa, G.; Okazawa, K.; Yanagida, A. Optimization of Analytical Procedure for In-hospital Rapid Quantification of Serum Level of Favipiravir in the Pharmacological Treatment of COVID-19. Anal. Sci. 2021, 37, 1301–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mishima, E.; Anzai, N.; Miyazaki, M.; Abe, T. Uric Acid Elevation by Favipiravir, an Antiviral Drug. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2020, 251, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bosaeed, M.; Mahmoud, E.; Hussein, M.; Alharbi, A.; Alsaedy, A.; Alothman, A.; Aljeraisy, M.; Alqahtani, H.; Nashabat, M.; Almutairi, B.; et al. A Trial of Favipiravir and Hydroxychloroquine combination in Adults Hospitalized with moderate and severe Covid-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020, 21, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Alotaibi, M.; Ali, A.; Bakhshwin, D.; Alatawi, Y.; Alotaibi, S.; Alhifany, A.; Alharthi, B.; Alharthi, N.; Alyazidi, A.; Alharthi, Y.; et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Favipiravir Compared to Hydroxychloroquine for Management of Covid-19: A Retrospective Study. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021, 14, 5597–5606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Singh, B.; Ryan, H.; Kredo, T.; Chaplin, M.; Fletcher, T. Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 2, CD013587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gautret, P.; Lagier, J.C.; Parola, P.; Hoang, V.T.; Meddeb, L.; Mailhe, M.; Doudier, B.; Courjon, J.; Giordanengo, V.; Vieira, V.E.; et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: Results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 105949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gautret, P.; Hoang, V.T.; Lagier, J.C.; Raoult, D. Effect of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: Results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial, an update with an intention-to-treat analysis and clinical outcomes. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2021, 57, 106239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Million, M.; Roussel, Y.; Gautret, P.; Raoult, D. Effect of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin on SARS-CoV-2 clearance in COVID-19 patients, a meta-analysis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2021, 57, 106240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hache, G.; Rolain, J.M.; Gautret, P.; Deharo, J.C.; Brouqui, P.; Raoult, D.; Honore, S. Combination of Hydroxychloroquine Plus Azithromycin as Potential Treatment for COVID-19 Patients: Safety Profile, Drug Interactions, and Management of Toxicity. Microb. Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xiang, H.R.; Cheng, X.; Li, Y.; Luo, W.W.; Zhang, Q.Z.; Peng, W.X. Efficacy of IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin) for corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 96, 107732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huang, C.; Fei, L.; Li, W.; Xu, W.; Xie, X.; Li, Q.; Chen, L. Efficacy evaluation of intravenous immunoglobulin in non-severe patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 105, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kolahchi, Z.; Sohrabi, H.; Ekrami Nasab, S.; Jelodari Mamaghani, H.; Keyfari Alamdari, M.; Rezaei, N. Potential therapeutic approach of intravenous immunoglobulin against COVID-19. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2021, 17, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Moradimajd, P.; Samaee, H.; Sedigh-Maroufi, S.; Kourosh-Aami, M.; Mohsenzadagan, M. Administration of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of COVID-19: A review of available evidence. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 2675–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Katz, L.M. (A Little) Clarity on Convalescent Plasma for Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 666–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Libster, R.; Perez Marc, G.; Wappner, D.; Coviello, S.; Bianchi, A.; Braem, V.; Esteban, I.; Caballero, M.T.; Wood, C.; Berrueta, M.; et al. Early High-Titer Plasma Therapy to Prevent Severe Covid-19 in Older Adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fodor, E.; Muller, V.; Ivanyi, Z.; Berki, T.; Kuten Pella, O.; Hornyak, I.; Ambrus, M.; Sarkany, A.; Skazel, A.; Madar, A.; et al. Early Transfusion of Convalescent Plasma Improves the Clinical Outcome in Severe SARS-CoV2 Infection. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Group, R.C.; Horby, P.; Lim, W.S.; Emberson, J.R.; Mafham, M.; Bell, J.L.; Linsell, L.; Staplin, N.; Brightling, C.; Ustianowski, A.; et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Malaska, J.; Stasek, J.; Duska, F.; Balik, M.; Maca, J.; Hruda, J.; Vymazal, T.; Klementova, O.; Zatloukal, J.; Gabrhelik, T.; et al. Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19—Prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (REMED trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2021, 22, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ranjbar, K.; Moghadami, M.; Mirahmadizadeh, A.; Fallahi, M.J.; Khaloo, V.; Shahriarirad, R.; Erfani, A.; Khodamoradi, Z.; Gholampoor Saadi, M.H. Methylprednisolone or dexamethasone, which one is superior corticosteroid in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A triple-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jeronimo, C.M.P.; Farias, M.E.L.; Val, F.F.A.; Sampaio, V.S.; Alexandre, M.A.A.; Melo, G.C.; Safe, I.P.; Borba, M.G.S.; Netto, R.L.A.; Maciel, A.B.S.; et al. Methylprednisolone as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19; Metcovid): A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase IIb, Placebo-controlled Trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, e373–e381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pinzon, M.A.; Ortiz, S.; Holguin, H.; Betancur, J.F.; Cardona Arango, D.; Laniado, H.; Arias Arias, C.; Munoz, B.; Quiceno, J.; Jaramillo, D.; et al. Dexamethasone vs methylprednisolone high dose for Covid-19 pneumonia. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0252057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Thakur, M.; Datusalia, A.K.; Kumar, A. Use of steroids in COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2022, 914, 174579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pasin, L.; Cavalli, G.; Navalesi, P.; Sella, N.; Landoni, G.; Yavorovskiy, A.G.; Likhvantsev, V.V.; Zangrillo, A.; Dagna, L.; Monti, G. Anakinra for patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2021, 86, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bozzi, G.; Mangioni, D.; Minoia, F.; Aliberti, S.; Grasselli, G.; Barbetta, L.; Castelli, V.; Palomba, E.; Alagna, L.; Lombardi, A.; et al. Anakinra combined with methylprednisolone in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation: An observational cohort study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 147, 561–566.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pontali, E.; Volpi, S.; Signori, A.; Antonucci, G.; Castellaneta, M.; Buzzi, D.; Montale, A.; Bustaffa, M.; Angelelli, A.; Caorsi, R.; et al. Efficacy of early anti-inflammatory treatment with high doses of intravenous anakinra with or without glucocorticoids in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 147, 1217–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kyriazopoulou, E.; Poulakou, G.; Milionis, H.; Metallidis, S.; Adamis, G.; Tsiakos, K.; Fragkou, A.; Rapti, A.; Damoulari, C.; Fantoni, M.; et al. Early treatment of COVID-19 with anakinra guided by soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma levels: A double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1752–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Quiros, J.R.; Ross-Comptis, J.; Hathaway, D., 3rd; Sarfraz, A.; Sarfraz, Z.; Grigoryan, Z.; Romero, K.A.; Gapizov, A.; Principe-Meneses, F.S.; Somagutta, M.R.; et al. Ruxolitinib and the Mitigation of Severe COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Infect. Chemother. 2021, 53, 436–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lucijanic, M.; Kusec, R. Ruxolitinib withdrawal due to the COVID-19. Leukemia 2021, 35, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Iastrebner, M.; Castro, J.; Garcia Espina, E.; Lettieri, C.; Payaslian, S.; Cuesta, M.C.; Gutierrez Fernandez, P.; Mandrile, A.; Contreras, A.P.; Gervasoni, S.; et al. Ruxolitinib in severe COVID-19: Results of a multicenter, prospective, single arm, open-label clinical study to investigate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with COVID-19 and severe acute respiratory syndrome. Rev. Fac. Cien. Med. Univ. Nac. Cordoba 2021, 78, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Moreno-Gonzalez, G.; Mussetti, A.; Albasanz-Puig, A.; Salvador, I.; Sureda, A.; Gudiol, C.; Salazar, R.; Marin, M.; Garcia, M.; Navarro, V.; et al. A Phase I/II Clinical Trial to evaluate the efficacy of baricitinib to prevent respiratory insufficiency progression in onco-hematological patients affected with COVID19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2021, 22, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Masia, M.; Padilla, S.; Garcia, J.A.; Garcia-Abellan, J.; Navarro, A.; Guillen, L.; Telenti, G.; Mascarell, P.; Botella, A.; Gutierrez, F. Impact of the Addition of Baricitinib to Standard of Care Including Tocilizumab and Corticosteroids on Mortality and Safety in Severe COVID-19. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 749657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Rodriguez-Garcia, J.L.; Sanchez-Nievas, G.; Arevalo-Serrano, J.; Garcia-Gomez, C.; Jimenez-Vizuete, J.M.; Martinez-Alfaro, E. Baricitinib improves respiratory function in patients treated with corticosteroids for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: An observational cohort study. Rheumatology 2021, 60, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Satarker, S.; Tom, A.A.; Shaji, R.A.; Alosious, A.; Luvis, M.; Nampoothiri, M. JAK-STAT Pathway Inhibition and their Implications in COVID-19 Therapy. Postgrad. Med. 2021, 133, 489–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mortara, A.; Mazzetti, S.; Margonato, D.; Delfino, P.; Bersano, C.; Catagnano, F.; Lauriola, M.; Grosso, P.; Perseghin, G.; Ippoliti, G. Compassionate use of ruxolitinib in patients with SARS-Cov-2 infection not on mechanical ventilation: Short-term effects on inflammation and ventilation. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2021, 14, 1062–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, P.; Nirula, A.; Heller, B.; Gottlieb, R.L.; Boscia, J.; Morris, J.; Huhn, G.; Cardona, J.; Mocherla, B.; Stosor, V.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody LY-CoV555 in Outpatients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gottlieb, R.L.; Nirula, A.; Chen, P.; Boscia, J.; Heller, B.; Morris, J.; Huhn, G.; Cardona, J.; Mocherla, B.; Stosor, V.; et al. Effect of Bamlanivimab as Monotherapy or in Combination with Etesevimab on Viral Load in Patients with Mild to Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021, 325, 632–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dougan, M.; Nirula, A.; Azizad, M.; Mocherla, B.; Gottlieb, R.L.; Chen, P.; Hebert, C.; Perry, R.; Boscia, J.; Heller, B.; et al. Bamlanivimab plus Etesevimab in Mild or Moderate Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 1382–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Razonable, R.R.; Pawlowski, C.; O’Horo, J.C.; Arndt, L.L.; Arndt, R.; Bierle, D.M.; Borgen, M.D.; Hanson, S.N.; Hedin, M.C.; Lenehan, P.; et al. Casirivimab-Imdevimab treatment is associated with reduced rates of hospitalization among high-risk patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease-19. EClinicalMedicine 2021, 40, 101102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bierle, D.M.; Ganesh, R.; Razonable, R.R. Breakthrough COVID-19 and casirivimab-imdevimab treatment during a SARS-CoV-2 B1.617.2 (Delta) surge. J. Clin. Virol. 2021, 145, 105026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Falcone, M.; Tiseo, G.; Valoriani, B.; Barbieri, C.; Occhineri, S.; Mazzetti, P.; Vatteroni, M.L.; Suardi, L.R.; Riccardi, N.; Pistello, M.; et al. Efficacy of Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab and Casirivimab/Imdevimab in Preventing Progression to Severe COVID-19 and Role of Variants of Concern. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2021, 10, 2479–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Somers, E.C.; Eschenauer, G.A.; Troost, J.P.; Golob, J.L.; Gandhi, T.N.; Wang, L.; Zhou, N.; Petty, L.A.; Baang, J.H.; Dillman, N.O.; et al. Tocilizumab for Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, e445–e454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kulanthaivel, S.; Kaliberdenko, V.B.; Balasundaram, K.; Shterenshis, M.V.; Scarpellini, E.; Abenavoli, L. Tocilizumab in SARS-CoV-2 Patients with the Syndrome of Cytokine Storm: A Narrative Review. Rev. Recent Clin. Trials 2021, 16, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Vaidya, G.; Czer, L.S.C.; Kobashigawa, J.; Kittleson, M.; Patel, J.; Chang, D.; Kransdorf, E.; Shikhare, A.; Tran, H.; Vo, A.; et al. Successful Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia with Clazakizumab in a Heart Transplant Recipient: A Case Report. Transplant. Proc. 2020, 52, 2711–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Buryachkovskaya, L.; Lomakin, N.; Melkumyants, A.; Docenko, J.; Serebruany, V. Impact of olokizumab on platelets, leukocytes and erythrocytes during mild COVID-19. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 22, 549–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Palanques-Pastor, T.; Lopez-Briz, E.; Poveda Andres, J.L. Involvement of interleukin 6 in SARS-CoV-2 infection: Siltuximab as a therapeutic option against COVID-19. Eur. J. Hosp. Pharm. 2020, 27, 297–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gritti, G.; Raimondi, F.; Bottazzi, B.; Ripamonti, D.; Riva, I.; Landi, F.; Alborghetti, L.; Frigeni, M.; Damiani, M.; Mico, C.; et al. Siltuximab downregulates interleukin-8 and pentraxin 3 to improve ventilatory status and survival in severe COVID-19. Leukemia 2021, 35, 2710–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kaplon, H.; Reichert, J.M. Antibodies to watch in 2021. MAbs 2021, 13, 1860476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lomakin, N.V.; Bakirov, B.A.; Protsenko, D.N.; Mazurov, V.I.; Musaev, G.H.; Moiseeva, O.M.; Pasechnik, E.S.; Popov, V.V.; Smolyarchuk, E.A.; Gordeev, I.G.; et al. The efficacy and safety of levilimab in severely ill COVID-19 patients not requiring mechanical ventilation: Results of a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase III CORONA clinical study. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 70, 1233–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Khiali, S.; Rezagholizadeh, A.; Entezari-Maleki, T. A comprehensive review on sarilumab in COVID-19. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2021, 21, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Landi, L.; Ravaglia, C.; Russo, E.; Cataleta, P.; Fusari, M.; Boschi, A.; Giannarelli, D.; Facondini, F.; Valentini, I.; Panzini, I.; et al. Blockage of interleukin-1beta with canakinumab in patients with Covid-19. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Generali, D.; Bosio, G.; Malberti, F.; Cuzzoli, A.; Testa, S.; Romanini, L.; Fioravanti, A.; Morandini, A.; Pianta, L.; Giannotti, G.; et al. Canakinumab as treatment for COVID-19-related pneumonia: A prospective case-control study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 104, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Benhadou, F.; Del Marmol, V. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms following Guselkumab injection in a psoriatic patient. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020, 34, e363–e364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hansel, K.; Zangrilli, A.; Bianchi, L.; Peris, K.; Chiricozzi, A.; Offidani, A.; Diotallevi, F.; Fargnoli, M.C.; Esposito, M.; Amerio, P.; et al. A multicenter study on effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in psoriasis: An Italian 16-week real-life experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2021, 35, e169–e170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Messina, F.; Pampaloni, F.; Piaserico, S. Correspondence on ‘Recovery from COVID-19 in a patient with spondyloarthritis treated with TNF-alpha inhibitor etanercept. A report on a patient with COVID-19 with psoriatic arthritis receiving ustekinumab’. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021, 80, e79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Liu, P.; Huang, Z.; Yin, M.; Liu, C.; Chen, X.; Pan, P.; Kuang, Y. Safety and Efficacy of Ixekizumab and Antiviral Treatment for Patients with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Trials 2020, 21, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Bulat, V.; Situm, M.; Azdajic, M.D.; Likic, R. Potential role of IL-17 blocking agents in the treatment of severe COVID-19? Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 87, 1578–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zou, Y.; Meng, Z. Literature Overview of the IL-17 Inhibition from Psoriasis to COVID-19. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 14, 5611–5618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cure, E.; Kucuk, A.; Cure, M.C. Can emapalumab be life saving for refractory, recurrent, and progressive cytokine storm caused by COVID-19, which is resistant to anakinra, tocilizumab, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2021, 53, 226–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hachem, H.; Godara, A.; Schroeder, C.; Fein, D.; Mann, H.; Lawlor, C.; Marshall, J.; Klein, A.; Poutsiaka, D.; Breeze, J.L.; et al. Rapid and sustained decline in CXCL-10 (IP-10) annotates clinical outcomes following TNFalpha-antagonist therapy in hospitalized patients with severe and critical COVID-19 respiratory failure. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2021, 5, e146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fakharian, A.; Barati, S.; Mohamadi, M.; Dastan, F. Successful Management of COVID-19 with Adalimumab in a Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Patient. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Temesgen, Z.; Assi, M.; Shweta, F.N.U.; Vergidis, P.; Rizza, S.A.; Bauer, P.R.; Pickering, B.W.; Razonable, R.R.; Libertin, C.R.; Burger, C.D.; et al. GM-CSF Neutralization with Lenzilumab in Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Case-Cohort Study. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 2382–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Temesgen, Z.; Burger, C.D.; Baker, J.; Polk, C.; Libertin, C.R.; Kelley, C.F.; Marconi, V.C.; Orenstein, R.; Catterson, V.M.; Aronstein, W.S.; et al. Lenzilumab in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (LIVE-AIR): A phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lang, F.M.; Lee, K.M.; Teijaro, J.R.; Becher, B.; Hamilton, J.A. GM-CSF-based treatments in COVID-19: Reconciling opposing therapeutic approaches. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bonaventura, A.; Vecchie, A.; Wang, T.S.; Lee, E.; Cremer, P.C.; Carey, B.; Rajendram, P.; Hudock, K.M.; Korbee, L.; Van Tassell, B.W.; et al. Targeting GM-CSF in COVID-19 Pneumonia: Rationale and Strategies. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Fisher, B.A.; Veenith, T.; Slade, D.; Gaskell, C.; Rowland, M.; Whitehouse, T.; Scriven, J.; Parekh, D.; Balasubramaniam, M.S.; Cooke, G.; et al. Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): A randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. De Luca, G.; Cavalli, G.; Campochiaro, C.; Della-Torre, E.; Angelillo, P.; Tomelleri, A.; Boffini, N.; Tentori, S.; Mette, F.; Farina, N.; et al. GM-CSF blockade with mavrilimumab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation: A single-centre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020, 2, e465–e473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cremer, P.C.; Abbate, A.; Hudock, K.; McWilliams, C.; Mehta, J.; Chang, S.Y.; Sheng, C.C.; Van Tassell, B.; Bonaventura, A.; Vecchie, A.; et al. Mavrilimumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation (MASH-COVID): An investigator initiated, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021, 3, e410–e418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Quagliariello, V.; Bonelli, A.; Caronna, A.; Lombari, M.C.; Conforti, G.; Libutti, M.; Iaffaioli, R.V.; Berretta, M.; Botti, G.; Maurea, N. SARS-CoV-2 infection: NLRP3 inflammasome as plausible target to prevent cardiopulmonary complications? Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 24, 9169–9171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Onsun, N.; Gunes, B.; Yabaci, A. Retention and survival rate of etanercept in psoriasis over 15 years and patient outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: The real-world experience of a single center. Dermatol. Ther. 2021, 34, e14623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Brito, C.A.; Paiva, J.G.; Pimentel, F.N.; Guimaraes, R.S.; Moreira, M.R. COVID-19 in patients with rheumatological diseases treated with anti-TNF. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021, 80, e62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sehirli, A.O.; Sayiner, S.; Serakinci, N. Role of melatonin in the treatment of COVID-19; as an adjuvant through cluster differentiation 147 (CD147). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 8229–8233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Camp, O.G.; Bai, D.; Gonullu, D.C.; Nayak, N.; Abu-Soud, H.M. Melatonin interferes with COVID-19 at several distinct ROS-related steps. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2021, 223, 111546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Cross, K.M.; Landis, D.M.; Sehgal, L.; Payne, J.D. Melatonin for the Early Treatment of COVID-19: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Possible Efficacy. Endocr. Pract. 2021, 27, 850–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Puelles, V.G.; Lutgehetmann, M.; Lindenmeyer, M.T.; Sperhake, J.P.; Wong, M.N.; Allweiss, L.; Chilla, S.; Heinemann, A.; Wanner, N.; Liu, S.; et al. Multiorgan and Renal Tropism of SARS-CoV-2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 590–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Matschke, J.; Lutgehetmann, M.; Hagel, C.; Sperhake, J.P.; Schroder, A.S.; Edler, C.; Mushumba, H.; Fitzek, A.; Allweiss, L.; Dandri, M.; et al. Neuropathology of patients with COVID-19 in Germany: A post-mortem case series. Lancet Neurol. 2020, 19, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chu, H.; Chan, J.F.; Yuen, T.T.; Shuai, H.; Yuan, S.; Wang, Y.; Hu, B.; Yip, C.C.; Tsang, J.O.; Huang, X.; et al. Comparative tropism, replication kinetics, and cell damage profiling of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV with implications for clinical manifestations, transmissibility, and laboratory studies of COVID-19: An observational study. Lancet Microbe 2020, 1, e14–e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zhang, B.Z.; Chu, H.; Han, S.; Shuai, H.; Deng, J.; Hu, Y.F.; Gong, H.R.; Lee, A.C.; Zou, Z.; Yau, T.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects human neural progenitor cells and brain organoids. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 928–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Trujillo, C.A.; Gao, R.; Negraes, P.D.; Gu, J.; Buchanan, J.; Preissl, S.; Wang, A.; Wu, W.; Haddad, G.G.; Chaim, I.A.; et al. Complex Oscillatory Waves Emerging from Cortical Organoids Model Early Human Brain Network Development. Cell Stem Cell 2019, 25, 558–569.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Alexopoulos, H.; Magira, E.; Bitzogli, K.; Kafasi, N.; Vlachoyiannopoulos, P.; Tzioufas, A.; Kotanidou, A.; Dalakas, M.C. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the CSF, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, and neurological outcome: Studies in 8 stuporous and comatose patients. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 7, e893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jacob, F.; Pather, S.R.; Huang, W.K.; Zhang, F.; Wong, S.Z.H.; Zhou, H.; Cubitt, B.; Fan, W.; Chen, C.Z.; Xu, M.; et al. Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Cells and Brain Organoids Reveal SARS-CoV-2 Neurotropism Predominates in Choroid Plexus Epithelium. Cell Stem Cell 2020, 27, 937–950.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. McMahon, C.L.; Staples, H.; Gazi, M.; Carrion, R.; Hsieh, J. SARS-CoV-2 targets glial cells in human cortical organoids. Stem Cell Rep. 2021, 16, 1156–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Pellegrini, L.; Albecka, A.; Mallery, D.L.; Kellner, M.J.; Paul, D.; Carter, A.P.; James, L.C.; Lancaster, M.A. SARS-CoV-2 Infects the Brain Choroid Plexus and Disrupts the Blood-CSF Barrier in Human Brain Organoids. Cell Stem Cell 2020, 27, 951–961.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Paniz-Mondolfi, A.; Bryce, C.; Grimes, Z.; Gordon, R.E.; Reidy, J.; Lednicky, J.; Sordillo, E.M.; Fowkes, M. Central nervous system involvement by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 699–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Trypsteen, W.; Van Cleemput, J.; Snippenberg, W.V.; Gerlo, S.; Vandekerckhove, L. On the whereabouts of SARS-CoV-2 in the human body: A systematic review. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1009037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Song, E.; Zhang, C.; Israelow, B.; Lu-Culligan, A.; Prado, A.V.; Skriabine, S.; Lu, P.; Weizman, O.E.; Liu, F.; Dai, Y.; et al. Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain. J. Exp. Med. 2021, 218, e20202135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Solomon, I.H.; Normandin, E.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Mukerji, S.S.; Keller, K.; Ali, A.S.; Adams, G.; Hornick, J.L.; Padera, R.F., Jr.; Sabeti, P. Neuropathological Features of Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 989–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Meinhardt, J.; Radke, J.; Dittmayer, C.; Franz, J.; Thomas, C.; Mothes, R.; Laue, M.; Schneider, J.; Brunink, S.; Greuel, S.; et al. Olfactory transmucosal SARS-CoV-2 invasion as a port of central nervous system entry in individuals with COVID-19. Nat. Neurosci. 2021, 24, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Cantuti-Castelvetri, L.; Ojha, R.; Pedro, L.D.; Djannatian, M.; Franz, J.; Kuivanen, S.; van der Meer, F.; Kallio, K.; Kaya, T.; Anastasina, M.; et al. Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity. Science 2020, 370, 856–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bauer, L.; Lendemeijer, B.; Leijten, L.; Embregts, C.W.E.; Rockx, B.; Kushner, S.A.; de Vrij, F.M.S.; van Riel, D. Replication Kinetics, Cell Tropism, and Associated Immune Responses in SARS-CoV-2- and H5N1 Virus-Infected Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Models. mSphere 2021, 6, e0027021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Pedrosa, C.; Goto-Silva, L.; Temerozo, J.R.; Souza, L.R.Q.; Vitoria, G.; Ornelas, I.M.; Karmirian, K.; Mendes, M.A.; Gomes, I.C.; Sacramento, C.Q.; et al. Non-permissive SARS-CoV-2 infection in human neurospheres. Stem Cell Res. 2021, 54, 102436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Rhea, E.M.; Logsdon, A.F.; Hansen, K.M.; Williams, L.M.; Reed, M.J.; Baumann, K.K.; Holden, S.J.; Raber, J.; Banks, W.A.; Erickson, M.A. The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood-brain barrier in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2021, 24, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Netland, J.; Meyerholz, D.K.; Moore, S.; Cassell, M.; Perlman, S. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection causes neuronal death in the absence of encephalitis in mice transgenic for human ACE2. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 7264–7275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Li, Y.C.; Bai, W.Z.; Hashikawa, T. The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 552–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zubair, A.S.; McAlpine, L.S.; Gardin, T.; Farhadian, S.; Kuruvilla, D.E.; Spudich, S. Neuropathogenesis and Neurologic Manifestations of the Coronaviruses in the Age of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Review. JAMA Neurol. 2020, 77, 1018–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Wu, Y.; Xu, X.; Chen, Z.; Duan, J.; Hashimoto, K.; Yang, L.; Liu, C.; Yang, C. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020, 87, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Erickson, M.A.; Rhea, E.M.; Knopp, R.C.; Banks, W.A. Interactions of SARS-CoV-2 with the Blood-Brain Barrier. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bennion, D.M.; Haltigan, E.; Regenhardt, R.W.; Steckelings, U.M.; Sumners, C. Neuroprotective mechanisms of the ACE2-angiotensin-(1-7)-Mas axis in stroke. Curr. Hypertens Rep. 2015, 17, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Harmer, D.; Gilbert, M.; Borman, R.; Clark, K.L. Quantitative mRNA expression profiling of ACE 2, a novel homologue of angiotensin converting enzyme. FEBS Lett. 2002, 532, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Hamming, I.; Timens, W.; Bulthuis, M.L.; Lely, A.T.; Navis, G.; van Goor, H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 2004, 203, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Doobay, M.F.; Talman, L.S.; Obr, T.D.; Tian, X.; Davisson, R.L.; Lazartigues, E. Differential expression of neuronal ACE2 in transgenic mice with overexpression of the brain renin-angiotensin system. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2007, 292, R373–R381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Xia, H.; Lazartigues, E. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in the brain: Properties and future directions. J. Neurochem. 2008, 107, 1482–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Lin, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chen, A.F.; Lin, S.; Morris, M. RNA interference shows interactions between mouse brainstem angiotensin AT1 receptors and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Exp. Physiol. 2008, 93, 676–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Alenina, N.; Bader, M. ACE2 in Brain Physiology and Pathophysiology: Evidence from Transgenic Animal Models. Neurochem. Res. 2019, 44, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Li, M.Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.S. Expression of the SARS-CoV-2 cell receptor gene ACE2 in a wide variety of human tissues. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2020, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Hernandez, V.S.; Zetter, M.A.; Guerra, E.C.; Hernandez-Araiza, I.; Karuzin, N.; Hernandez-Perez, O.R.; Eiden, L.E.; Zhang, L. ACE2 expression in rat brain: Implications for COVID-19 associated neurological manifestations. Exp. Neurol. 2021, 345, 113837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Khan, S.; Gomes, J. Neuropathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Elife 2020, 9, e59136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Baig, A.M.; Khaleeq, A.; Ali, U.; Syeda, H. Evidence of the COVID-19 Virus Targeting the CNS: Tissue Distribution, Host-Virus Interaction, and Proposed Neurotropic Mechanisms. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 995–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Toljan, K. Letter to the Editor Regarding the Viewpoint “Evidence of the COVID-19 Virus Targeting the CNS: Tissue Distribution, Host-Virus Interaction, and Proposed Neurotropic Mechanism”. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 1192–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Nascimento Conde, J.; Schutt, W.R.; Gorbunova, E.E.; Mackow, E.R. Recombinant ACE2 Expression Is Required for SARS-CoV-2 to Infect Primary Human Endothelial Cells and Induce Inflammatory and Procoagulative Responses. mBio 2020, 11, e03185-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mohammed, M.; Berdasco, C.; Lazartigues, E. Brain angiotensin converting enzyme-2 in central cardiovascular regulation. Clin. Sci. 2020, 134, 2535–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Qiao, J.; Li, W.; Bao, J.; Peng, Q.; Wen, D.; Wang, J.; Sun, B. The expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 and CD147, and protease TMPRSS2 in human and mouse brain cells and mouse brain tissues. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 533, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Ahmad, I.; Pawara, R.; Surana, S.; Patel, H. The Repurposed ACE2 Inhibitors: SARS-CoV-2 Entry Blockers of Covid-19. Top. Curr. Chem. 2021, 379, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Kuster, G.M.; Pfister, O.; Burkard, T.; Zhou, Q.; Twerenbold, R.; Haaf, P.; Widmer, A.F.; Osswald, S. SARS-CoV2: Should inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system be withdrawn in patients with COVID-19? Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 1801–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. South, A.M.; Brady, T.M.; Flynn, J.T. ACE2 (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2), COVID-19, and ACE Inhibitor and Ang II (Angiotensin II) Receptor Blocker Use during the Pandemic: The Pediatric Perspective. Hypertension 2020, 76, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Meng, J.; Xiao, G.; Zhang, J.; He, X.; Ou, M.; Bi, J.; Yang, R.; Di, W.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; et al. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improve the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 757–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Pensato, U.; Muccioli, L.; Cani, I.; Janigro, D.; Zinzani, P.L.; Guarino, M.; Cortelli, P.; Bisulli, F. Brain dysfunction in COVID-19 and CAR-T therapy: Cytokine storm-associated encephalopathy. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2021, 8, 968–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Thepmankorn, P.; Bach, J.; Lasfar, A.; Zhao, X.; Souayah, S.; Chong, Z.Z.; Souayah, N. Cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection: The spectrum of its neurological manifestations. Cytokine 2021, 138, 155404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mehta, P.; McAuley, D.F.; Brown, M.; Sanchez, E.; Tattersall, R.S.; Manson, J.J.; on behalf of theHLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020, 395, 1033–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chen, G.; Wu, D.; Guo, W.; Cao, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, H.; Wang, T.; Zhang, X.; Chen, H.; Yu, H.; et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 2620–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Wan, S.; Yi, Q.; Fan, S.; Lv, J.; Zhang, X.; Guo, L.; Lang, C.; Xiao, Q.; Xiao, K.; Yi, Z.; et al. Relationships among lymphocyte subsets, cytokines, and the pulmonary inflammation index in coronavirus (COVID-19) infected patients. Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 189, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Yang, L.; Xie, X.; Tu, Z.; Fu, J.; Xu, D.; Zhou, Y. The signal pathways and treatment of cytokine storm in COVID-19. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Li, Y.; Li, M.; Wang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Chang, J.; Xian, Y.; Wang, D.; Mao, L.; Jin, H.; Hu, B. Acute cerebrovascular disease following COVID-19: A single center, retrospective, observational study. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 2020, 5, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Tan, C.W.; Low, J.G.H.; Wong, W.H.; Chua, Y.Y.; Goh, S.L.; Ng, H.J. Critically ill COVID-19 infected patients exhibit increased clot waveform analysis parameters consistent with hypercoagulability. Am. J. Hematol. 2020, 95, E156–E158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Huang, X.; Hussain, B.; Chang, J. Peripheral inflammation and blood-brain barrier disruption: Effects and mechanisms. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2021, 27, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Erickson, M.A.; Banks, W.A. Neuroimmune Axes of the Blood-Brain Barriers and Blood-Brain Interfaces: Bases for Physiological Regulation, Disease States, and Pharmacological Interventions. Pharmacol. Rev. 2018, 70, 278–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhang, L.; Zhou, L.; Bao, L.; Liu, J.; Zhu, H.; Lv, Q.; Liu, R.; Chen, W.; Tong, W.; Wei, Q.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood-brain barrier accompanied with basement membrane disruption without tight junctions alteration. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Hugon, J. Long-Covid: Cognitive Deficits (Brain Fog) and Brain Lesions in Non-Hospitalized Patients. Presse Med. 2021, 104090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. McAlpine, L.S.; Fesharaki-Zadeh, A.; Spudich, S. Coronavirus disease 2019 and neurodegenerative disease: What will the future bring? Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2021, 34, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Hu, C.; Chen, C.; Dong, X.P. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 664965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Proal, A.D.; VanElzakker, M.B. Long COVID or Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): An Overview of Biological Factors That May Contribute to Persistent Symptoms. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 698169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Thakur, K.T.; Miller, E.H.; Glendinning, M.D.; Al-Dalahmah, O.; Banu, M.A.; Boehme, A.K.; Boubour, A.L.; Bruce, S.S.; Chong, A.M.; Claassen, J.; et al. COVID-19 neuropathology at Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital. Brain 2021, 144, 2696–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Heneka, M.T.; Golenbock, D.; Latz, E.; Morgan, D.; Brown, R. Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2020, 12, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Ritchie, K.; Chan, D.; Watermeyer, T. The cognitive consequences of the COVID-19 epidemic: Collateral damage? Brain Commun. 2020, 2, fcaa069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Kaseda, E.T.; Levine, A.J. Post-traumatic stress disorder: A differential diagnostic consideration for COVID-19 survivors. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2020, 34, 1498–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Nalbandian, A.; Sehgal, K.; Gupta, A.; Madhavan, M.V.; McGroder, C.; Stevens, J.S.; Cook, J.R.; Nordvig, A.S.; Shalev, D.; Sehrawat, T.S.; et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 601–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Yang, A.C.; Kern, F.; Losada, P.M.; Agam, M.R.; Maat, C.A.; Schmartz, G.P.; Fehlmann, T.; Stein, J.A.; Schaum, N.; Lee, D.P.; et al. Dysregulation of brain and choroid plexus cell types in severe COVID-19. Nature 2021, 595, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Tejera, D.; Mercan, D.; Sanchez-Caro, J.M.; Hanan, M.; Greenberg, D.; Soreq, H.; Latz, E.; Golenbock, D.; Heneka, M.T. Systemic inflammation impairs microglial Abeta clearance through NLRP3 inflammasome. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e101064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ising, C.; Venegas, C.; Zhang, S.; Scheiblich, H.; Schmidt, S.V.; Vieira-Saecker, A.; Schwartz, S.; Albasset, S.; McManus, R.M.; Tejera, D.; et al. NLRP3 inflammasome activation drives tau pathology. Nature 2019, 575, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Olajide, O.A.; Iwuanyanwu, V.U.; Adegbola, O.D.; Al-Hindawi, A.A. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein S1 Induces Neuroinflammation in BV-2 Microglia. Mol. Neurobiol. 2022, 59, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Ramani, A.; Muller, L.; Ostermann, P.N.; Gabriel, E.; Abida-Islam, P.; Muller-Schiffmann, A.; Mariappan, A.; Goureau, O.; Gruell, H.; Walker, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 targets neurons of 3D human brain organoids. EMBO J. 2020, 39, e106230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhou, Y.; Xu, J.; Hou, Y.; Leverenz, J.B.; Kallianpur, A.; Mehra, R.; Liu, Y.; Yu, H.; Pieper, A.A.; Jehi, L.; et al. Network medicine links SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 infection to brain microvascular injury and neuroinflammation in dementia-like cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2021, 13, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Achbani, A.; Sine, H.; Naciri, A.; Baba, M.A.; Kharbach, A.; Bouchriti, Y.; Nejmeddine, M. Can the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Cause Parkinson’s Disease? Mov. Disord. 2020, 35, 1102–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Victorino, D.B.; Guimaraes-Marques, M.; Nejm, M.; Scorza, F.A.; Scorza, C.A. COVID-19 and Parkinson’s Disease: Are We Dealing with Short-term Impacts or Something Worse? J. Parkinsons Dis. 2020, 10, 899–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Helmich, R.C.; Bloem, B.R. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Parkinson’s Disease: Hidden Sorrows and Emerging Opportunities. J. Parkinsons Dis. 2020, 10, 351–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Kubota, T.; Kuroda, N. Exacerbation of neurological symptoms and COVID-19 severity in patients with preexisting neurological disorders and COVID-19: A systematic review. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2021, 200, 106349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Piscitelli, D.; Perin, C.; Tremolizzo, L.; Peroni, F.; Cerri, C.G.; Cornaggia, C.M. Functional movement disorders in a patient with COVID-19. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 41, 2343–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Mao, L.; Jin, H.; Wang, M.; Hu, Y.; Chen, S.; He, Q.; Chang, J.; Hong, C.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, D.; et al. Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. 2020, 77, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Brandao, P.R.P.; Grippe, T.C.; Pereira, D.A.; Munhoz, R.P.; Cardoso, F. New-Onset Movement Disorders Associated with COVID-19. Tremor. Other Hyperkinet. Mov. 2021, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Garg, A.; Goyal, S.; Comellas, A.P. Post-acute COVID-19 functional movement disorder. SAGE Open Med. Case Rep. 2021, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Awogbindin, I.O.; Ben-Azu, B.; Olusola, B.A.; Akinluyi, E.T.; Adeniyi, P.A.; Di Paolo, T.; Tremblay, M.E. Microglial Implications in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19: Lessons from Viral RNA Neurotropism and Possible Relevance to Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 670298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Becker, J.H.; Lin, J.J.; Doernberg, M.; Stone, K.; Navis, A.; Festa, J.R.; Wisnivesky, J.P. Assessment of Cognitive Function in Patients After COVID-19 Infection. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e2130645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Helms, J.; Kremer, S.; Merdji, H.; Clere-Jehl, R.; Schenck, M.; Kummerlen, C.; Collange, O.; Boulay, C.; Fafi-Kremer, S.; Ohana, M.; et al. Neurologic Features in Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2268–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Bartoszek, A.; Walkowiak, D.; Bartoszek, A.; Kardas, G. Mental Well-Being (Depression, Loneliness, Insomnia, Daily Life Fatigue) during COVID-19 Related Home-Confinement-A Study from Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Rodriguez-Fernandez, P.; Gonzalez-Santos, J.; Santamaria-Pelaez, M.; Soto-Camara, R.; Sanchez-Gonzalez, E.; Gonzalez-Bernal, J.J. Psychological Effects of Home Confinement and Social Distancing Derived from COVID-19 in the General Population-A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Castaldelli-Maia, J.M.; Marziali, M.E.; Lu, Z.; Martins, S.S. Investigating the effect of national government physical distancing measures on depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic through meta-analysis and meta-regression. Psychol. Med. 2021, 51, 881–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Huang, Y.; Zhao, N. Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in China: A web-based cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 288, 112954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Boutoleau-Bretonniere, C.; Pouclet-Courtemanche, H.; Gillet, A.; Bernard, A.; Deruet, A.L.; Gouraud, I.; Mazoue, A.; Lamy, E.; Rocher, L.; Kapogiannis, D.; et al. The Effects of Confinement on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Alzheimer’s Disease during the COVID-19 Crisis. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2020, 76, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Falla, M.; Dodich, A.; Papagno, C.; Gober, A.; Narduzzi, P.; Pierotti, E.; Falk, M.; Zappini, F.; Colosimo, C.; Turella, L. Lockdown effects on Parkinson’s disease during COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2021, 121, 1191–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Fabbri, M.; Leung, C.; Baille, G.; Bereau, M.; Brefel Courbon, C.; Castelnovo, G.; Carriere, N.; Damier, P.; Defebvre, L.; Doe de Maindreville, A.; et al. A French survey on the lockdown consequences of COVID-19 pandemic in Parkinson’s disease. The ERCOPARK study. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2021, 89, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Chaudhuri, K.R.; Rukavina, K.; McConvey, V.; Antonini, A.; Lorenzl, S.; Bhidayasiri, R.; Piemonte, M.E.P.; Lim, S.Y.; Richfield, E.; Walker, R.; et al. The impact of COVID-19 on palliative care for people with Parkinson’s and response to future pandemics. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2021, 21, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Luis-Martinez, R.; Di Marco, R.; Weis, L.; Cianci, V.; Pistonesi, F.; Baba, A.; Carecchio, M.; Biundo, R.; Tedesco, C.; Masiero, S.; et al. Impact of social and mobility restrictions in Parkinson’s disease during COVID-19 lockdown. BMC Neurol. 2021, 21, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Forte, G.; Favieri, F.; Tambelli, R.; Casagrande, M. COVID-19 Pandemic in the Italian Population: Validation of a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire and Prevalence of PTSD Symptomatology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Liu, C.H.; Zhang, E.; Wong, G.T.F.; Hyun, S.; Hahm, H.C. Factors associated with depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptomatology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Clinical implications for U.S. young adult mental health. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 290, 113172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Janiri, D.; Carfi, A.; Kotzalidis, G.D.; Bernabei, R.; Landi, F.; Sani, G.; for the Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Patients After Severe COVID-19 Infection. JAMA Psychiatry 2021, 78, 567–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Tu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Bi, Y.; Lu, X.; Kong, Y.; Wang, L.; Lu, Z.; Hu, L. Post-traumatic stress symptoms in COVID-19 survivors: A self-report and brain imaging follow-up study. Mol. Psychiatry 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Dixon, S.J.; Stockwell, B.R. The role of iron and reactive oxygen species in cell death. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Nakamura, T.; Naguro, I.; Ichijo, H. Iron homeostasis and iron-regulated ROS in cell death, senescence and human diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2019, 1863, 1398–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Lee, D.G.; Park, J.; Lee, H.S.; Lee, S.R.; Lee, D.S. Iron overload-induced calcium signals modulate mitochondrial fragmentation in HT-22 hippocampal neuron cells. Toxicology 2016, 365, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Zheng, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, J.; Zhao, S.; Fei, C.; Xiao, C.; Wu, D.; Wu, L.; Li, X.; Chang, C. Iron overload promotes mitochondrial fragmentation in mesenchymal stromal cells from myelodysplastic syndrome patients through activation of the AMPK/MFF/Drp1 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Volani, C.; Doerrier, C.; Demetz, E.; Haschka, D.; Paglia, G.; Lavdas, A.A.; Gnaiger, E.; Weiss, G. Dietary iron loading negatively affects liver mitochondrial function. Metallomics 2017, 9, 1634–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Gao, X.; Campian, J.L.; Qian, M.; Sun, X.F.; Eaton, J.W. Mitochondrial DNA damage in iron overload. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 4767–4775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Wu, H.; Wang, F.; Ta, N.; Zhang, T.; Gao, W. The Multifaceted Regulation of Mitochondria in Ferroptosis. Life 2021, 11, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Wu, K.E.; Fazal, F.M.; Parker, K.R.; Zou, J.; Chang, H.Y. RNA-GPS Predicts SARS-CoV-2 RNA Residency to Host Mitochondria and Nucleolus. Cell Syst. 2020, 11, 102–108.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Cao, Z.; Xia, H.; Rajsbaum, R.; Xia, X.; Wang, H.; Shi, P.Y. Ubiquitination of SARS-CoV-2 ORF7a promotes antagonism of interferon response. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2021, 18, 746–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Singh, K.K.; Chaubey, G.; Chen, J.Y.; Suravajhala, P. Decoding SARS-CoV-2 hijacking of host mitochondria in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2020, 319, C258–C267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Jiang, H.W.; Zhang, H.N.; Meng, Q.F.; Xie, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Zheng, Y.X.; Wang, X.N.; Qi, H.; Zhang, J.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Orf9b suppresses type I interferon responses by targeting TOM70. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 17, 998–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Gao, X.; Zhu, K.; Qin, B.; Olieric, V.; Wang, M.; Cui, S. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 Orf9b in complex with human TOM70 suggests unusual virus-host interactions. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Miller, B.; Silverstein, A.; Flores, M.; Cao, K.; Kumagai, H.; Mehta, H.H.; Yen, K.; Kim, S.J.; Cohen, P. Host mitochondrial transcriptome response to SARS-CoV-2 in multiple cell models and clinical samples. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Gibellini, L.; De Biasi, S.; Paolini, A.; Borella, R.; Boraldi, F.; Mattioli, M.; Lo Tartaro, D.; Fidanza, L.; Caro-Maldonado, A.; Meschiari, M.; et al. Altered bioenergetics and mitochondrial dysfunction of monocytes in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e13001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Stefano, G.B.; Ptacek, R.; Ptackova, H.; Martin, A.; Kream, R.M. Selective Neuronal Mitochondrial Targeting in SARS-CoV-2 Infection Affects Cognitive Processes to Induce ‘Brain Fog’ and Results in Behavioral Changes that Favor Viral Survival. Med. Sci. Monit. 2021, 27, e930886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Stefano, G.B.; Buttiker, P.; Weissenberger, S.; Martin, A.; Ptacek, R.; Kream, R.M. Editorial: The Pathogenesis of Long-Term Neuropsychiatric COVID-19 and the Role of Microglia, Mitochondria, and Persistent Neuroinflammation: A Hypothesis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2021, 27, e933015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Delgado-Roche, L.; Mesta, F. Oxidative Stress as Key Player in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) Infection. Arch. Med. Res. 2020, 51, 384–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Saleh, J.; Peyssonnaux, C.; Singh, K.K.; Edeas, M. Mitochondria and microbiota dysfunction in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Mitochondrion 2020, 54, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Valdes-Aguayo, J.J.; Garza-Veloz, I.; Badillo-Almaraz, J.I.; Bernal-Silva, S.; Martinez-Vazquez, M.C.; Juarez-Alcala, V.; Vargas-Rodriguez, J.R.; Gaeta-Velasco, M.L.; Gonzalez-Fuentes, C.; Avila-Carrasco, L.; et al. Mitochondria and Mitochondrial DNA: Key Elements in the Pathogenesis and Exacerbation of the Inflammatory State Caused by COVID-19. Medicina 2021, 57, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Zhou, J.; Jin, Y.; Lei, Y.; Liu, T.; Wan, Z.; Meng, H.; Wang, H. Ferroptosis Is Regulated by Mitochondria in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Neurodegener Dis. 2020, 20, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Viktorinova, A.; Durfinova, M. Mini-Review: Is iron-mediated cell death (ferroptosis) an identical factor contributing to the pathogenesis of some neurodegenerative diseases? Neurosci. Lett. 2021, 745, 135627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Johri, A.; Beal, M.F. Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2012, 342, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Dodson, M.; Castro-Portuguez, R.; Zhang, D.D. NRF2 plays a critical role in mitigating lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis. Redox Biol. 2019, 23, 101107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Olagnier, D.; Farahani, E.; Thyrsted, J.; Blay-Cadanet, J.; Herengt, A.; Idorn, M.; Hait, A.; Hernaez, B.; Knudsen, A.; Iversen, M.B.; et al. SARS-CoV2-mediated suppression of NRF2-signaling reveals potent antiviral and anti-inflammatory activity of 4-octyl-itaconate and dimethyl fumarate. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Liu, Z.; Lv, X.; Song, E.; Song, Y. Fostered Nrf2 expression antagonizes iron overload and glutathione depletion to promote resistance of neuron-like cells to ferroptosis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2020, 407, 115241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. McCord, J.M.; Hybertson, B.M.; Cota-Gomez, A.; Geraci, K.P.; Gao, B. Nrf2 Activator PB125((R)) as a Potential Therapeutic Agent against COVID-19. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Puigserver, P.; Spiegelman, B.M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1 alpha): Transcriptional coactivator and metabolic regulator. Endocr. Rev. 2003, 24, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  224. Rius-Perez, S.; Torres-Cuevas, I.; Millan, I.; Ortega, A.L.; Perez, S. PGC-1alpha, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress: An Integrative View in Metabolism. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 1452696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Canto, C.; Auwerx, J. PGC-1alpha, SIRT1 and AMPK, an energy sensing network that controls energy expenditure. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2009, 20, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  226. Gureev, A.P.; Shaforostova, E.A.; Popov, V.N. Regulation of Mitochondrial Biogenesis as a Way for Active Longevity: Interaction Between the Nrf2 and PGC-1alpha Signaling Pathways. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  227. Millichap, L.E.; Damiani, E.; Tiano, L.; Hargreaves, I.P. Targetable Pathways for Alleviating Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Neurodegeneration of Metabolic and Non-Metabolic Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Bhutta, M.S.; Gallo, E.S.; Borenstein, R. Multifaceted Role of AMPK in Viral Infections. Cells 2021, 10, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Bordoni, V.; Tartaglia, E.; Sacchi, A.; Fimia, G.M.; Cimini, E.; Casetti, R.; Notari, S.; Grassi, G.; Marchioni, L.; Bibas, M.; et al. The unbalanced p53/SIRT1 axis may impact lymphocyte homeostasis in COVID-19 patients. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 105, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Batabyal, R.; Freishtat, N.; Hill, E.; Rehman, M.; Freishtat, R.; Koutroulis, I. Metabolic dysfunction and immunometabolism in COVID-19 pathophysiology and therapeutics. Int. J. Obes. 2021, 45, 1163–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. AbdelMassih, A.F.; Menshawey, R.; Ismail, J.H.; Husseiny, R.J.; Husseiny, Y.M.; Yacoub, S.; Kamel, A.; Hozaien, R.; Yacoub, E.; Menshawey, E.; et al. PPAR agonists as effective adjuvants for COVID-19 vaccines, by modifying immunogenetics: A review of literature. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Eisele, P.S.; Furrer, R.; Beer, M.; Handschin, C. The PGC-1 coactivators promote an anti-inflammatory environment in skeletal muscle in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 464, 692–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  233. Burtscher, J.; Millet, G.P.; Place, N.; Kayser, B.; Zanou, N. The Muscle-Brain Axis and Neurodegenerative Diseases: The Key Role of Mitochondria in Exercise-Induced Neuroprotection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Nigro, E.; Polito, R.; Alfieri, A.; Mancini, A.; Imperlini, E.; Elce, A.; Krustrup, P.; Orru, S.; Buono, P.; Daniele, A. Molecular mechanisms involved in the positive effects of physical activity on coping with COVID-19. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2020, 120, 2569–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Heffernan, K.S.; Ranadive, S.M.; Jae, S.Y. Exercise as medicine for COVID-19: On PPAR with emerging pharmacotherapy. Med. Hypotheses 2020, 143, 110197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Burtscher, J.; Burtscher, M.; Millet, G.P. The central role of mitochondrial fitness on antiviral defenses: An advocacy for physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Redox Biol. 2021, 43, 101976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Ayres, J.S. A metabolic handbook for the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat. Metab. 2020, 2, 572–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Simmons, E.C.; Scholpa, N.E.; Schnellmann, R.G. Mitochondrial biogenesis as a therapeutic target for traumatic and neurodegenerative CNS diseases. Exp. Neurol. 2020, 329, 113309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Han, B.; Jiang, W.; Cui, P.; Zheng, K.; Dang, C.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Q.M.; et al. Microglial PGC-1alpha protects against ischemic brain injury by suppressing neuroinflammation. Genome Med. 2021, 13, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Fu, X.; Jiao, J.; Qin, T.; Yu, J.; Fu, Q.; Deng, X.; Ma, S.; Ma, Z. A New Perspective on Ameliorating Depression-Like Behaviors: Suppressing Neuroinflammation by Upregulating PGC-1alpha. Neurotox. Res. 2021, 39, 872–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Liu, B.; Huang, B.; Hu, G.; He, D.; Li, Y.; Ran, X.; Du, J.; Fu, S.; Liu, D. Isovitexin-Mediated Regulation of Microglial Polarization in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Neuroinflammation via Activation of the CaMKKbeta/AMPK-PGC-1alpha Signaling Axis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Han, B.; Jiang, W.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Zheng, K.; Cui, P.; Feng, Y.; Dang, C.; Bu, Y.; Wang, Q.M.; et al. Upregulation of neuronal PGC-1alpha ameliorates cognitive impairment induced by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Theranostics 2020, 10, 2832–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Wang, Y.; Guan, X.; Gao, C.L.; Ruan, W.; Zhao, S.; Kai, G.; Li, F.; Pang, T. Medioresinol as a novel PGC-1alpha activator prevents pyroptosis of endothelial cells in ischemic stroke through PPARalpha-GOT1 axis. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 169, 105640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.J.; Wang, H.; Du, Y.; Guan, J.; Wang, X.; Fu, J. NAD(+) improves cognitive function and reduces neuroinflammation by ameliorating mitochondrial damage and decreasing ROS production in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion models through Sirt1/PGC-1alpha pathway. J. Neuroinflam. 2021, 18, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Wang, C.F.; Song, C.Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, L.Y.; Ding, M.; Yang, H.; Wang, P.; Xu, L.L.; Xie, Z.H.; Bi, J.Z. Protective effects of melatonin on mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial structure and function in the HEK293-APPswe cell model of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 3542–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Zhang, R.; Wang, X.; Ni, L.; Di, X.; Ma, B.; Niu, S.; Liu, C.; Reiter, R.J. COVID-19: Melatonin as a potential adjuvant treatment. Life Sci. 2020, 250, 117583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. El-Missiry, M.A.; El-Missiry, Z.M.A.; Othman, A.I. Melatonin is a potential adjuvant to improve clinical outcomes in individuals with obesity and diabetes with coexistence of Covid-19. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 882, 173329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Castle, R.D.; Williams, M.A.; Bushell, W.C.; Rindfleisch, J.A.; Peterson, C.T.; Marzolf, J.; Brouwer, K.; Mills, P.J. Implications for Systemic Approaches to COVID-19: Effect Sizes of Remdesivir, Tocilizumab, Melatonin, Vitamin D3, and Meditation. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 14, 4859–4876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Mousavi, S.A.; Heydari, K.; Mehravaran, H.; Saeedi, M.; Alizadeh-Navaei, R.; Hedayatizadeh-Omran, A.; Shamshirian, A. Melatonin effects on sleep quality and outcomes of COVID-19 patients: An open-label, randomized, controlled trial. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 94, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Chodari, L.; Dilsiz Aytemir, M.; Vahedi, P.; Alipour, M.; Vahed, S.Z.; Khatibi, S.M.H.; Ahmadian, E.; Ardalan, M.; Eftekhari, A. Targeting Mitochondrial Biogenesis with Polyphenol Compounds. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 4946711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Wood Dos Santos, T.; Cristina Pereira, Q.; Teixeira, L.; Gambero, A.; Villena, J.A.; Lima Ribeiro, M. Effects of Polyphenols on Thermogenesis and Mitochondrial Biogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  252. Deng, X.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J.; Sun, X.; Shen, Z.; Dong, J.; Huang, J. Promotion of Mitochondrial Biogenesis via Activation of AMPK-PGC1a Signaling Pathway by Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) Extract, and Its Major Active Component 6-Gingerol. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 2101–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Rahman, M.A.; Rahman, M.H.; Biswas, P.; Hossain, M.S.; Islam, R.; Hannan, M.A.; Uddin, M.J.; Rhim, H. Potential Therapeutic Role of Phytochemicals to Mitigate Mitochondrial Dysfunctions in Alzheimer’s Disease. Antioxidants 2020, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Stromsnes, K.; Lagzdina, R.; Olaso-Gonzalez, G.; Gimeno-Mallench, L.; Gambini, J. Pharmacological Properties of Polyphenols: Bioavailability, Mechanisms of Action, and Biological Effects in In Vitro Studies, Animal Models, and Humans. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Guan, J.; Liu, Y.; Fu, J. Curcumin protects against cognitive impairments in a rat model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion combined with diabetes mellitus by suppressing neuroinflammation, apoptosis, and pyroptosis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 93, 107422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Xu, H.; Liu, B.; Xiao, Z.; Zhou, M.; Ge, L.; Jia, F.; Liu, Y.; Jin, H.; Zhu, X.; Gao, J.; et al. Computational and Experimental Studies Reveal That Thymoquinone Blocks the Entry of Coronaviruses into In Vitro Cells. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2021, 10, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Ahmad, A.; Raish, M.; Alkharfy, K.M. The potential role of thymoquinone in preventing the cardiovascular complications of COVID-19. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2021, 141, 106899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Badary, O.A.; Hamza, M.S.; Tikamdas, R. Thymoquinone: A Promising Natural Compound with Potential Benefits for COVID-19 Prevention and Cure. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2021, 15, 1819–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Muchtaridi, M.; Fauzi, M.; Khairul Ikram, N.K.; Mohd Gazzali, A.; Wahab, H.A. Natural Flavonoids as Potential Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Inhibitors for Anti-SARS-CoV-2. Molecules 2020, 25, 3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Alagu Lakshmi, S.; Shafreen, R.M.B.; Priya, A.; Shunmugiah, K.P. Ethnomedicines of Indian origin for combating COVID-19 infection by hampering the viral replication: Using structure-based drug discovery approach. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 39, 4594–4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Kumar Verma, A.; Kumar, V.; Singh, S.; Goswami, B.C.; Camps, I.; Sekar, A.; Yoon, S.; Lee, K.W. Repurposing potential of Ayurvedic medicinal plants derived active principles against SARS-CoV-2 associated target proteins revealed by molecular docking, molecular dynamics and MM-PBSA studies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 137, 111356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Yang, Y.; Shen, C.; Li, J.; Yuan, J.; Wei, J.; Huang, F.; Wang, F.; Li, G.; Li, Y.; Xing, L.; et al. Plasma IP-10 and MCP-3 levels are highly associated with disease severity and predict the progression of COVID-19. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 146, 119–127.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Han, H.; Ma, Q.; Li, C.; Liu, R.; Zhao, L.; Wang, W.; Zhang, P.; Liu, X.; Gao, G.; Liu, F.; et al. Profiling serum cytokines in COVID-19 patients reveals IL-6 and IL-10 are disease severity predictors. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 1123–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Del Valle, D.M.; Kim-Schulze, S.; Huang, H.H.; Beckmann, N.D.; Nirenberg, S.; Wang, B.; Lavin, Y.; Swartz, T.H.; Madduri, D.; Stock, A.; et al. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1636–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Pan, F.; Yang, L.; Li, Y.; Liang, B.; Li, L.; Ye, T.; Li, L.; Liu, D.; Gui, S.; Hu, Y.; et al. Factors associated with death outcome in patients with severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): A case-control study. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 17, 1281–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Perreau, M.; Suffiotti, M.; Marques-Vidal, P.; Wiedemann, A.; Levy, Y.; Laouenan, C.; Ghosn, J.; Fenwick, C.; Comte, D.; Roger, T.; et al. The cytokines HGF and CXCL13 predict the severity and the mortality in COVID-19 patients. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Pulliam, L.; Sun, B.; Mustapic, M.; Chawla, S.; Kapogiannis, D. Plasma neuronal exosomes serve as biomarkers of cognitive impairment in HIV infection and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurovirol. 2019, 25, 702–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Sun, B.; Fernandes, N.; Pulliam, L. Profile of neuronal exosomes in HIV cognitive impairment exposes sex differences. AIDS 2019, 33, 1683–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Frontera, J.A.; Boutajangout, A.; Masurkar, A.V.; Betensky, R.A.; Ge, Y.; Vedvyas, A.; Debure, L.; Moreira, A.; Lewis, A.; Huang, J.; et al. Comparison of serum neurodegenerative biomarkers among hospitalized COVID-19 patients versus non-COVID subjects with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer’s dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Clark, C.; Lewczuk, P.; Kornhuber, J.; Richiardi, J.; Marechal, B.; Karikari, T.K.; Blennow, K.; Zetterberg, H.; Popp, J. Plasma neurofilament light and phosphorylated tau 181 as biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease pathology and clinical disease progression. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2021, 13, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Malone, B.; Urakova, N.; Snijder, E.J.; Campbell, E.A. Structures and functions of coronavirus replication-transcription complexes and their relevance for SARS-CoV-2 drug design. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Baucom, C.; Jiang, X. Mitochondrial Organelle Transplantation Is a Potential Therapeutic for Mitochondria Dysfunction in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus Diseases. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2021, 11, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Babajani, A.; Hosseini-Monfared, P.; Abbaspour, S.; Jamshidi, E.; Niknejad, H. Targeted Mitochondrial Therapy with Over-Expressed MAVS Protein from Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A New Therapeutic Approach for COVID-19. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 695362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Yamada, Y.; Ito, M.; Arai, M.; Hibino, M.; Tsujioka, T.; Harashima, H. Challenges in Promoting Mitochondrial Transplantation Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Chernyak, B.V. Mitochondrial Transplantation: A Critical Analysis. Biochemistry 2020, 85, 636–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Park, A.; Oh, M.; Lee, S.J.; Oh, K.J.; Lee, E.W.; Lee, S.C.; Bae, K.H.; Han, B.S.; Kim, W.K. Mitochondrial Transplantation as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy for Mitochondrial Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Kumar, S.; Caliskan, D.M.; Janowski, J.; Faist, A.; Conrad, B.C.G.; Lange, J.; Ludwig, S.; Brunotte, L. Beyond Vaccines: Clinical Status of Prospective COVID-19 Therapeutics. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 752227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Anand, U.; Jakhmola, S.; Indari, O.; Jha, H.C.; Chen, Z.S.; Tripathi, V.; Perez de la Lastra, J.M. Potential Therapeutic Targets and Vaccine Development for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Pandemic Management: A Review on the Recent Update. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 658519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Zhang, C.; Jin, H.; Wen, Y.F.; Yin, G. Efficacy of COVID-19 Treatments: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 729559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Wang, M.; Wu, T.; Zuo, Z.; You, Y.; Yang, X.; Pan, L.; Hu, Y.; Luo, X.; Jiang, L.; Xia, Z.; et al. Evaluation of current medical approaches for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care 2021, 11, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Popp, M.; Stegemann, M.; Metzendorf, M.I.; Gould, S.; Kranke, P.; Meybohm, P.; Skoetz, N.; Weibel, S. Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 7, CD015017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Popp, M.; Stegemann, M.; Riemer, M.; Metzendorf, M.I.; Romero, C.S.; Mikolajewska, A.; Kranke, P.; Meybohm, P.; Skoetz, N.; Weibel, S. Antibiotics for the treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 10, CD015025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Ansems, K.; Grundeis, F.; Dahms, K.; Mikolajewska, A.; Thieme, V.; Piechotta, V.; Metzendorf, M.I.; Stegemann, M.; Benstoem, C.; Fichtner, F. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 8, CD014962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Wagner, C.; Griesel, M.; Mikolajewska, A.; Mueller, A.; Nothacker, M.; Kley, K.; Metzendorf, M.I.; Fischer, A.L.; Kopp, M.; Stegemann, M.; et al. Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 8, CD014963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Echeverria-Esnal, D.; Martin-Ontiyuelo, C.; Navarrete-Rouco, M.E.; De-Antonio Cusco, M.; Ferrandez, O.; Horcajada, J.P.; Grau, S. Azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19: A review. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2021, 19, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Bakadia, B.M.; He, F.; Souho, T.; Lamboni, L.; Ullah, M.W.; Boni, B.O.; Ahmed, A.A.Q.; Mukole, B.M.; Yang, G. Prevention and treatment of COVID-19: Focus on interferons, chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and vaccine. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 133, 111008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Juul, S.; Nielsen, E.E.; Feinberg, J.; Siddiqui, F.; Jorgensen, C.K.; Barot, E.; Holgersson, J.; Nielsen, N.; Bentzer, P.; Veroniki, A.A.; et al. Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: Second edition of a living systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (The LIVING Project). PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Brainsci 12 00190 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of SARS-CoV-2 entry routes. (A) SARS-CoV-2 enters the nasal cavity via droplets. It subsequently enters the blood through nasal submucosa. It may further obtain access to the olfactory nerves and, thus, the olfactory bulb by moving upstream. SARS-CoV-2 enters the lungs, crosses the thin alveolar membrane, and enters the blood to access all organs, including the brain. (B) SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 receptor and gains entry into endothelial cells, infects, and replicates in cells of neuronal origin, leading to inflammation and opening of the BBB. Inflammation then spreads to vascular mural cells and other brain cells, such as microglia and astrocytes. The resulting alteration in neuronal function and inflammation results in encephalopathy in COVID-19. (C) Another possible way that SARS-CoV-2 could gain entry into the brain is through blood–CSF (B–CSF) barrier by binding to the ACE2 receptor in choroid plexus epithelium.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of SARS-CoV-2 entry routes. (A) SARS-CoV-2 enters the nasal cavity via droplets. It subsequently enters the blood through nasal submucosa. It may further obtain access to the olfactory nerves and, thus, the olfactory bulb by moving upstream. SARS-CoV-2 enters the lungs, crosses the thin alveolar membrane, and enters the blood to access all organs, including the brain. (B) SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 receptor and gains entry into endothelial cells, infects, and replicates in cells of neuronal origin, leading to inflammation and opening of the BBB. Inflammation then spreads to vascular mural cells and other brain cells, such as microglia and astrocytes. The resulting alteration in neuronal function and inflammation results in encephalopathy in COVID-19. (C) Another possible way that SARS-CoV-2 could gain entry into the brain is through blood–CSF (B–CSF) barrier by binding to the ACE2 receptor in choroid plexus epithelium.
Brainsci 12 00190 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chandra, A.; Johri, A. A Peek into Pandora’s Box: COVID-19 and Neurodegeneration. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020190

AMA Style

Chandra A, Johri A. A Peek into Pandora’s Box: COVID-19 and Neurodegeneration. Brain Sciences. 2022; 12(2):190. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chandra, Abhishek, and Ashu Johri. 2022. "A Peek into Pandora’s Box: COVID-19 and Neurodegeneration" Brain Sciences 12, no. 2: 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop