Next Article in Journal
Connectivity in the Dorsal Visual Stream Is Enhanced in Action Video Game Players
Next Article in Special Issue
Accentuation and Attention: From Perceptual Organization to Consciousness
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Language Proficiency on Selective Attention Patterns at Segmenting Boundaries in English Audio Sentences
Previous Article in Special Issue
Consciousness and Energy Processing in Neural Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

What Factors Affect Binocular Summation?

School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1205; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121205
Submission received: 24 October 2024 / Revised: 22 November 2024 / Accepted: 26 November 2024 / Published: 28 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Visual Perception to Consciousness)

Abstract

Binocular vision may serve as a good model for research on awareness. Binocular summation (BS) can be defined as the superiority of binocular over monocular visual performance. Early studies of BS found an improvement of a factor of about 1.4 (empirically), leading to models suggesting a quadratic summation of the two monocular inputs (√2). Neural interaction modulates a target’s visibility within the same eye or between eyes (facilitation or suppression). Recent results indicated that at a closely flanked stimulus, BS is characterized by instability; it relies on the specific order in which the stimulus condition is displayed. Otherwise, BS is stable. These results were revealed in experiments where the tested eye was open, whereas the other eye was occluded (mono-optic glasses, blocked presentation); thus, the participants were aware of the tested eye. Therefore, in this study, we repeated the same experiments but utilized stereoscopic glasses (intermixed at random presentation) to control the monocular and binocular vision, thus potentially eliminating awareness of the tested condition. The stimuli consisted of a central vertically oriented Gabor target and high-contrast Gabor flankers positioned in two configurations (orthogonal or collinear) with target–flanker separations of either two or three wavelengths (λ), presented at four different presentation times (40, 80, 120, and 200 ms). The results indicate that when utilizing stereoscopic glasses and mixing the testing conditions, the BS is normal, raising the possibility that awareness may be involved.
Keywords: collinear facilitation; lateral masking; binocular vision; binocular summation; spatial interactions; inter-ocular suppression; binocular advantage; stereo glasses; awareness; presentation time collinear facilitation; lateral masking; binocular vision; binocular summation; spatial interactions; inter-ocular suppression; binocular advantage; stereo glasses; awareness; presentation time

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yassin, M.; Lev, M.; Polat, U. What Factors Affect Binocular Summation? Brain Sci. 2024, 14, 1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121205

AMA Style

Yassin M, Lev M, Polat U. What Factors Affect Binocular Summation? Brain Sciences. 2024; 14(12):1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121205

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yassin, Marzouk, Maria Lev, and Uri Polat. 2024. "What Factors Affect Binocular Summation?" Brain Sciences 14, no. 12: 1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121205

APA Style

Yassin, M., Lev, M., & Polat, U. (2024). What Factors Affect Binocular Summation? Brain Sciences, 14(12), 1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121205

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop