Next Article in Journal
Ketamine Reduces Avoidance Responses During Re-Exposition to Aversive Stimulus: Comparison Between (S)-Isomer and Racemic Mixture
Previous Article in Journal
Emotion Recognition Model of EEG Signals Based on Double Attention Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Associations of Depression Score with Dialkyl Phosphate Metabolites in Urine: A Cross-Sectional Study

Key Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science (Ministry of Education), School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1290; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121290
Submission received: 26 November 2024 / Revised: 19 December 2024 / Accepted: 20 December 2024 / Published: 21 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Neuropsychiatry)

Abstract

:
Objectives: Growing evidence suggests a link between organophosphate insecticides and depression disorder. These chemicals are metabolized and subsequently expelled through the urinary tract. The present study aims to investigate whether dialkyl phosphate metabolites associate with depression score and severity among the general population. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Depression was evaluated by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). All urinary dialkyl phosphate metabolites were quantitatively analyzed. The survey’s complex design parameters and sampling weights were considered. Results: 3035 eligible individuals were included. The estimated prevalence of mild and major depression was 18.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.9–19.7%) and 9.9% (95% CI: 8.7–11.0%). For each incremental unit in the level of urinary dimethyl phosphate (DMP), individuals were found to have a higher depression score of 0.77 and a significantly increased odds ratio (OR) of 1.13 (95% CI: 1.12–1.13) for mild depression and 2.75 (95% CI: 2.74–2.76) for major depression. Conclusions: Our findings indicate positive and independent associations between urinary dialkyl phosphate metabolites and an elevated risk of depression among the general population.

1. Introduction

The WHO has compiled estimates of the prevalence of depression in all regions of the world for 2015 according to available data sources [1]. These calculations indicate that one-year prevalence of depression among females is slightly higher in Africa and the Americas (5.8%), and slightly lower in the Western Pacific region (4.2%) compared to other regions of the world (5.0%). The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation has created recent estimations of depression point prevalence in different worldwide areas as part of their Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 [2]. The point estimated value of prevalence among people was highest in North America (4.4% for women and 2.5% for men), but lowest in the Western Pacific (2.3% for women and 1.3% for men); the value was moderate for both women (2.8–3.6%) and men (1.9–2.0%) in the rest of the world. Depression was estimated to be the 4th, 6th, and 14th leading cause of global disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) among people aged 10–24, 25–49, and 50–74 years, respectively, which brings a substantial health and economic burden to all societies [3]. What reasons account for such variations remains unclear. They might be attributed to the risk or protective factors. For instance, different reactions to questionnaires evaluating depressive symptoms might also explain some of the changes. Complex relationships of genetic, neurobiological, psychological, and social factors might contribute to the development of depression disorder. Publications suggest that depression has a relationship with pesticide exposure and metabolic disorders [4,5].
The purpose of pesticides is to poison and destroy insects, but they are not selectively toxic to the target organism and therefore toxic to other species, including human beings [6]. Organophosphate insecticides (OPIs) have been generally utilized all over the world [7], instead of organochlorine pesticides, accounting for 30% of the global insecticide market demand [8]. In 2001, OPIs accounted for 70% of total pesticides; however, the ratio has fallen after then and kept within 30 and 40%, based on the statistical data of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [9]. It has been obvious that prolonged low-dose exposure to OPIs probably exerts an adverse influence on numerous human body systems, such as the brain, respiratory system, nervous system, reproductive system, and endocrine system [10,11,12,13]. Although OPIs have been gradually restricted in the US since the Food Quality Protection Act passed in 1996, the extensive consumption of OPIs is easily accessible to a large number of people via multiple sources [8]. In addition, the detection of OPI metabolites in urine samples from the general population indirectly supports the former assumption [7]. Organophosphates are primarily metabolized in the liver and excreted through the urinary tract [6]. The organophosphates’ metabolic process produces nonspecific metabolites known as dialkyl phosphate, including dimethyl phosphate (DMP), diethyl phosphate (DEP), dimethyl thiophosphate (DMTP), diethyl thiophosphate (DETP), dimethyl dithiophosphate (DMDTP), and diethyl dithiophosphate (DEDTP), which could be detected in urine and used as exposure biomarkers for organophosphates.
Previous studies have shown that there is a link between OPIs and depression risk in US adults [11]; however, associations between OPIs and depression score as well as depression severity remain unclear. More evidence is needed to prove these viewpoints. Following the methods of Hongwei Cai et al. [14], the authors’ purpose was to figure out whether depression score and severity have associations with dialkyl phosphate metabolites in urine. Therefore, this paper focuses on not only depression score but also depression severity, using a large sample size and including several age groups.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design

The data stem from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015–2016 and 2017–2018 cycles. The investigation was permitted by The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Research Ethics Review Board, and written informed consent was acquired. More information is available on the website (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/Default.aspx (accessed on 30 September 2024)).
This study used data on population, physical examination, factors of daily life, and urine laboratory examinations. Solid phase extraction coupled with isotope dilution-ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to detect urine specimens. The lower limit of detection for dialkyl phosphate metabolites was 0.1 ng/mL and the highest found concentration was 622.000 ng/mL. Some covariates defined were as follows: (a) active physical activity status was at least 150 min per week of moderate intensity aerobic exercise and/or 75 min per week of energetic aerobic exercise [15], and (b) smoking status “yes” contained former and current smokers, while “no” stood for “never”. All kinds of dialkyl phosphate metabolites in urine were adjusted by creatinine. Eventually, 3035 individuals were involved in the succeeding analysis based on the exclusion standards (Scheme 1).

2.2. Measurement of Depression Score

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a nine-item depression screening tool used to determine the frequency of depression symptoms in the past two weeks. Scores range from 0 to 3, and every question has four different choices. Therefore, the total points, ranging from scores of 0 to 27, could be used to determine whether a participant suffers from depression disorder or not. A PHQ-9 score of 0–4 represents a participant who does not have depression, 5–9 a participant with mild depression, 10–14 moderate depression, 15–19 moderately severe depression, and 20–27 severe depression, respectively [16]. A PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 has a good performance in diagnosing major depression, with 88% sensitivity and specificity [14].

2.3. Statistics

All the analyses considered the complex design factors and sampling weights. Numerical variables are presented as weighted means and standard deviations (SDs). Categorical variables are presented as weighted proportions. Chi-square and Kruskal–Wallis H tests were conducted to compare categorical or numerical variables by degrees of depression, respectively. Linear regression was conducted to discover the associations of depression score with five types of dialkyl phosphate metabolites. Multiple logistic regression was conducted to discover the associations of depression severity with these metabolites. Three models were gradually conducted in order to adjust for possible confounding effects from various combinations of covariates. Age and gender were adjusted in Model 1. Race/ethnicity, education background, and family poverty–income ratio (PIR) were further adjusted in Model 2. Covariates in Model 2 including Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference, smoking status, and active physical activity were further adjusted in Model 3. The depression scores and depression severity were treated as the numerical variable and categorical variable, respectively. All the analyses were employed in IBM SPSS (version 22.0). Two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics. For total participants, the weighted mean age was 48 years. 64.1% of the people with moderate-to-severe depression (i.e., major depression with a PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) are female. The proportion of white people with minimal, mild, and moderate-to-severe depression was 64.5%, 65.2%, and 55.2%. People with a college degree or above accounted for 66.2%, 56.1%, and 52.3% of populations with minimal, mild, and moderate-to-severe depression. The proportion of rich individuals (i.e., PIR > 3) decreased with depression severity, but the proportion of poor people (PIR ≤ 1) increased with depression severity. In addition, depression severity was associated with BMI category, waist circumference, smoking status, and physical activity (p < 0.001).
Table 2 summarizes the overall prevalence of mild and major depression among various subpopulations in the US. The prevalence of both mild (11.6%, 95% CI: 10.4–12.8%) and major (6.5%, 95% CI: 5.5–7.4%) depression among women was higher than men’s (8.5%, 95% CI: 7.4–9.6%; 3.9%, 95% CI: 3.1–4.7%), and especially young and middle-aged women (i.e., age < 60 years) suffered badly (4.4%, 95% CI: 3.5–5.2%). Non-Hispanic white people were most vulnerable to depressive disorder, having a prevalence of 8.0% (95% CI: 6.9–9.0%) for mild depression and 3.4% (95% CI: 2.7–4.2%) for major depression. An increased susceptibility to depression was observed in populations and was linked with obesity, smoking status, and physical activity.
Table 3 summarizes the results of multiple logistic regression and linear regression of depression score and severity on DMP, DEP, DMTP, DETP, and DMDTP. Firstly, in the fully adjusted Model 3, the continuous PHQ-9 score had associations with a higher presence of DMP in urine (odds ratio (OR) = 1.77; 95% CI, 1.05–2.98; p = 0.032), and the estimation of effect size was not influenced by the various combinations of covariates. It also showed that individuals suffering from mild depression had a 13% increase (95% CI: 12–13%) in the odds of exposure to DMP compared to subjects with minimal depression after the PHQ-9 score was further categorized. Secondly, the significance remained with more covariates added in Model 2 and Model 3. When considering minimal depression as a control group, the effect size of major depression with the existence of DMP still had statistical significance in Model 3 (OR = 2.75; 95% CI: 2.74–2.76; p < 0.001). A PHQ-9 score of 5 or more was strongly associated with increased concentrations of DMP (OR = 5.56; 95% CI: 5.53–5.59; p < 0.001), DEP (OR = 2.58; 95% CI: 2.56–2.59; p < 0.001), DMTP (OR = 2.81; 95% CI: 2.80–2.82; p < 0.001), DETP (OR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.19–1.21; p < 0.001), and DMDTP (OR = 2.41; 95% CI: 2.39–2.42; p < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression Model 2 revealed that major depression was linked to increased concentrations of DMP (OR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.47–1.47; p < 0.001), DEP (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.31–1.31; p < 0.001), DMTP (OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.16–1.16; p < 0.001), and DMDTP (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.09–1.10; p < 0.001). Table 4 is a description of characteristics of study subjects according to dialkyl phosphate metabolites.

4. Discussion

A nationally representative sample of US adults was examined in this cross-sectional study, revealing a positive correlation between depression scores measured by the PHQ-9 and the presence of dialkyl phosphate metabolites in urine, regardless of other established risk factors. Our findings demonstrate that the influence of dialkyl phosphate metabolites on depression severity, particularly among those who suffer from major depression, has statistical significance after being adjusted by confounding covariates. Furthermore, analysis of the depression score suggests that these metabolites might contribute to the risk of developing major depression.
A survey conducted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has revealed that countries such as the United States and China engage in notable agricultural activities and are the world’s largest consumers of pesticides. Consequently, these countries’ governments have expressed significant concern regarding the biomonitoring of environmentally exposed populations [6]. Additionally, those developed countries that possess the financial and technological capabilities to conduct epidemiological studies and population biomonitoring on a large scale are also actively involved. Some of these countries conduct population surveys or extensive cohort studies to measure urinary dialkyl phosphates metabolites, enabling the monitoring of organophosphate exposure. The NHANES has been carried out since 1999 in the US. In recent years, urinary dialkyl phosphates have emerged as a common method of assessing exposure to organophosphates in epidemiological investigations. However, the detection of urinary dialkyl phosphates does not provide specificity with respect to the organophospate from which they were derived, or their toxicological potency [17]. This is a cross-sectional study that explores the correlation between depression score as well as severity and urinary dialkyl phosphate concentrations in the implementation of pesticides in agriculture.
Based on our knowledge, this marks the first study to explore the relationship between depression scores and dialkyl phosphate metabolites in urine among the general population. Prior research conducted by Jennifer et al. revealed that aircraft maintenance workers exposed to organophosphates exhibited a heightened likelihood of reporting depression symptoms. Notably, the incidence of depression was significantly associated with varying levels of self-reported exposure, ranging from low (OR = 1.21) to moderate (OR = 1.68) to high (OR = 2.70), regardless of the exposure route, whether it was through contact (OR = 1.68), inhalation (OR = 2.52), or ingestion (OR = 2.55) [18]. Similarly, Virginia et al. observed that UK sheep farmers with a history of low-level exposure to organophosphates were more prone to experiencing symptoms of anxiety and depression compared to unexposed controls, even after accounting for demographic and psychosocial risk factors [19]. However, the sample size of these prior studies was smaller than the current investigation, and they did not assess the concentrations of dialkyl phosphate metabolites in urine. In our current research, we have corroborated an independent impact of dialkyl phosphate metabolites on the risk of depression. Unlike other studies primarily focusing on organophosphate exposure, we have also presented evidence suggesting a potential association between dialkyl phosphate metabolites and mild depression, underscoring the importance of early intervention in depression management.
There may be underlying mechanisms that connect dialkyl phosphate metabolites to depression. Previous studies have employed repeated low-dose exposure to the organophosphate agent diisopropyl fluorophosphate (DFP) on rats over a five-day period, followed by assessments at three months post-exposure. These experiments observed symptoms of chronic depression in the exposed rats. Notably, chronic low-dose DFP exposure was associated with hippocampal neuronal damage, evident through Fluoro-Jade staining [20]. In another experiment, rats exposed to DFP exhibited significant long-term impairments in mood, anxiety, depression, and aggressive traits. Brain section analysis revealed significant losses of neuronal nuclei antigen principal neurons, parvalbumin inhibitory interneurons, and neurogenesis. Additionally, there was an increase in astrogliosis, microglial neuroinflammation, and mossy fiber sprouting [21]. There is abundant evidence in vivo demonstrating that organophosphate exposure leads to a reduction in N-acetylaspartate (NAA), a marker of neuronal metabolism, which has been confirmed to be reduced also in humans suffering from depression in recent articles and meta-analyses [22,23]. Hence, the observed association between urinary dialkyl phosphate metabolites and depression severity may be underpinned by physiopathological mechanisms involving neuronal metabolism. This overlap in findings suggests that organophosphate-induced reduction of NAA could contribute to the neurobiological basis of depression observed in exposed populations. This potential mechanism aligns with the chronic neuronal damage and neuroinflammation observed in animal models of organophosphate exposure. By disrupting neuronal metabolism and integrity, organophosphates may predispose individuals to depressive symptoms or exacerbate existing vulnerabilities, providing a plausible physiopathological explanation for the associations identified in the study.
The strengths of this study are as follows. Firstly, it is a groundbreaking attempt to assess the relationship between depression scores and urinary dialkyl phosphate metabolites. This exploration fills a crucial gap in our understanding of the potential environmental factors that may contribute to depressive symptoms. Secondly, the study boasts a large and nationally representative sample of the US general population. This ensures that the estimates of depression prevalence are not only accurate but also applicable to a wide range of adults in the United States, regardless of their race or ethnic background. The generality of these findings is a crucial aspect, as it enables a more comprehensive understanding of the issue at a national level. Moreover, the study avoids the limitations of the commonly used binary categorization of the PHQ-9 score (i.e., major depression or not). Instead, it incorporates the score into the models in a more nuanced and flexible manner. This approach allows for the detection of associations between urinary dialkyl phosphate metabolites and depression across a broader spectrum, including mild depression, which is often overlooked in traditional binary classifications.
Despite the strengths of this study, there are indeed several limitations that should be addressed. Firstly, the depression score was evaluated using a self-administered questionnaire, which may introduce subjectivity and potential biases. Although the questionnaire is widely used and validated, it is important to note that the externally validated depression status was not available for comparison or validation purposes [14]. This limits the accuracy and reliability of the depression score reported in this study. Secondly, the study focused on the associations between depression score and five types of organophosphates metabolites. However, DEDTP was excluded from the analysis due to concentrations that were too low to detect. This exclusion may have limited the scope of the study and prevented the examination of potential associations between DEDTP and depression. Finally, the cross-sectional nature of the survey design poses challenges in making causal inferences. The association found in this study might be affected by other unmeasured factors, and the causal relationship remains unclear. To strengthen the evidence and establish more robust causal relationships, prospective cohort studies or Mendelian randomization studies are needed. These studies can provide a longitudinal perspective and allow for the examination of temporal relationships between exposures and outcomes, while also accounting for potential confounders.
In conclusion, our findings indicate a positive and independent association between urinary dialkyl phosphate metabolites and depression score as well as severity among the general population in the United States. Given these findings, limiting the use of organophosphate pesticides and implementing suitable screening for the concentrations of these metabolites in urine may contribute to preventing the onset or progression of depression. Due to the study design, it is not known whether the observed association is specific to depression symptoms or whether it is common to other psychiatric disorders. The use of Mendelian randomization or longitudinal data would provide stronger evidence.

Author Contributions

H.Z. contributed to the study design, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the article. X.K. revised the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82173575) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2242023k30022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data stemmed from the combination of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015–2016 and 2017–2018 cycles. More information cis available on the website (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/Default.aspx, accessed on 30 September 2024).

Acknowledgments

We thank the participants and investigators who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The first author would like to thank researcher Tenglong Yan for opening the door to the new world of NHANES.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  2. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Results; Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation: Seattle, WA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Diseases, G.B.D.; Injuries, C. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1204–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Park, S.J.; Roh, S.; Hwang, J.; Kim, H.A.; Kim, S.; Lee, T.K.; Kang, S.H.; Ha, Y.J.; Jang, J.W.; Park, S. Association between depression and metabolic syndrome in korean women: Results from the korean national health and nutrition examination survey (2007–2013). J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 205, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Beard, J.D.; Umbach, D.M.; Hoppin, J.A.; Richards, M.; Alavanja, M.C.; Blair, A.; Sandler, D.P.; Kamel, F. Pesticide exposure and depression among male private pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Neves, A.P.; Rosa, A.C.S.; Larentis, A.L.; Vidal, P.J.d.S.R.; Gonçalves, E.S.; da Silveira, G.R.; dos Santos, M.V.C.; de Carvalho, L.V.B.; Alves, S.R. Urinary dialkylphosphate metabolites in the assessment of exposure to organophosphate pesticides: From 2000 to 2022. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 196, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Costa, L.G. Organophosphorus Compounds at 80: Some Old and New Issues. Toxicol. Sci. 2018, 162, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, J.-H.; Liu, M.-L.; Pu, Y.-Q.; Huang, S.; Jiang, N.; Huang, S.-Y.; Pu, X.-Y.; Dong, G.-H.; Chen, Y.-J. Biomarkers of organophosphate insecticides exposure and asthma in general US adults: Findings from NHANES 1999-2018 data. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 92295–92305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. van den Dries, M.A.; Lamballais, S.; El Marroun, H.; Pronk, A.; Spaan, S.; Ferguson, K.K.; Longnecker, M.P.; Tiemeier, H.; Guxens, M. Prenatal exposure to organophosphate pesticides and brain morphology and white matter microstructure in preadolescents. Environ. Res. 2020, 191, 110047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, Y.; Weng, X.; Liu, S.; Tan, Y.; Liang, H.; Li, Y.; Wen, L.; Chen, Q.; Jing, C. Associations of single and multiple organophosphate pesticide exposure with female infertility in the USA: Data from the 2015-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 23411–23421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, Y.; Song, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, S.; Sun, X.; Yi, W.; Pan, R.; Cheng, J.; Xu, Z.; Su, H. Association between organophosphorus pesticide exposure and depression risk in adults: A cross-sectional study with NHANES data. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 316 Pt 1, 120445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, X.; Wang, H.; Song, Q.; Li, N.; Liang, Q.; Su, W.; Liang, M.; Ding, X.; Sun, C.; Lowe, S.; et al. Association between exposure to organophosphorus pesticides and the risk of diabetes among US Adults: Cross-sectional findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Chemosphere 2022, 301, 134471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sharma, A.; Shukla, A.; Attri, K.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, P.; Suttee, A.; Singh, G.; Barnwal, R.P.; Singla, N. Global trends in pesticides: A looming threat and viable alternatives. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 201, 110812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cai, H.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, C.; Wang, Y.; Tu, X.; Duan, W. Associations of depression score with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis. J. Affect. Disord. 2023, 334, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Cao, S.; Lyu, S.; Duan, W. Association Between Weight Change and Leukocyte Telomere Length in U.S. Adults. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 650988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kroenke, K.; Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001, 16, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sudakin, D.L.; Stone, D.L. Dialkyl phosphates as biomarkers of organophosphates: The current divide between epidemiology and clinical toxicology. Clin. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hardos, J.E.; Whitehead, L.W.; Han, I.; Ott, D.K.; Waller, D.K. Depression Prevalence and Exposure to Organophosphate Esters in Aircraft Maintenance Workers. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 2016, 87, 712–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Harrison, V.; Mackenzie Ross, S. Anxiety and depression following cumulative low-level exposure to organophosphate pesticides. Environ. Res. 2016, 151, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Phillips, K.F.; Deshpande, L.S. Repeated low-dose organophosphate DFP exposure leads to the development of depression and cognitive impairment in a rat model of Gulf War Illness. Neurotoxicology 2016, 52, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Neff, M.J.; Reddy, D.S. Long-Term Neuropsychiatric Developmental Defects after Neonatal Organophosphate Exposure: Mitigation by Synthetic Neurosteroids. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2024, 388, 451–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shrot, S.; Anaby, D.; Krivoy, A.; Makarovsky, I.; Rosman, Y.; Bloch-Shilderman, E.; Lazar, S.; Bar-Shir, A.; Cohen, Y. Early in vivo MR spectroscopy findings in organophosphate-induced brain damage-potential biomarkers for short-term survival. Magn. Reson. Med. 2012, 68, 1390–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saccaro, L.F.; Tassone, M.; Tozzi, F.; Rutigliano, G. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of N-acetyl aspartate in first depressive episode and chronic major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2024, 355, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Flowchart of eligible participants included in this study.
Scheme 1. Flowchart of eligible participants included in this study.
Brainsci 14 01290 sch001
Table 1. General characteristics of study participants in the NHANES 2015–2018 cycle according to depression severity.
Table 1. General characteristics of study participants in the NHANES 2015–2018 cycle according to depression severity.
CharacteristicsTotal
(n = 3035)
Minimal
(n = 2276)
Mild
(n = 510)
Moderate to Severe
(n = 249)
p
Demographic
 Age (year)48 ± 1748 ± 1747 ± 1846 ± 17<0.001
  20–39, %35.934.738.342.5
  40–59, %35.335.635.032.6
  ≥60, %28.829.726.724.9
 Gender, female (%)50.147.157.464.1<0.001
 Race/ethnicity (%) <0.001
  Mexican American8.78.69.09.1
  Other Hispanic6.35.96.99.4
  Non-Hispanic White63.964.565.255.2
  Non-Hispanic Black11.711.511.814.3
  Other race9.39.67.112.0
 Education (%) <0.001
  Less than high school11.710.215.717.7
  High school or equivalent24.823.528.230.0
  College or above63.666.256.152.3
 PIR (%) <0.001
  ≤113.210.320.028.2
  1–335.833.841.343.7
  >351.055.838.728.1
Anthropometry
 BMI (%) <0.001
  Thin5.330.16.47.9
  Normal24.325.320.722.0
  Overweight30.732.824.922.2
  Obese39.737.148.048.0
 Waist circumference (cm)100.2 ± 17.299.6 ± 16.8102.3 ± 18.6101.7 ± 17.4<0.001
Behaviors
 Smoking (%)43.637.650.868.2<0.001
 Active physical activity (%)48.648.449.948.4<0.001
Note: data are presented as weighted means with standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and weighted proportions for categorical variables. Abbreviations: PIR, ratio of family income to poverty; BMI, body mass index.
Table 2. Prevalence of depression among various subpopulations in the US.
Table 2. Prevalence of depression among various subpopulations in the US.
CharacteristicsMild (95% CI, %)Moderate-to-Severe (95% CI, %)
Gender
 Male8.5 (7.4–9.6)3.9 (3.1–4.7)
 Female11.6 (10.4–12.8)6.5 (5.5–7.4)
Age by gender
 <60, male5.7 (4.8–6.6)2.3 (1.7–2.9)
 ≥60, male3.1 (2.4–3.9)1.7 (1.2–2.2)
 <60, female8.1 (7.0–9.2)4.4 (3.5–5.2)
 ≥60, female4.2 (3.4–5.0)2.3 (1.7–2.9)
PIR
 ≤15.4 (4.5–6.3)3.0 (2.3–3.7)
 1–38.9 (7.7–10.0)4.2 (3.4–5.1)
 >34.8 (4.0–5.7)1.7 (1.2–2.3)
Race/ethnicity
 Mexican American3.5 (2.7–4.2)1.9 (1.3–2.4)
 Other Hispanic2.4 (1.7–3.0)1.5 (1.0–2.0)
 Non-Hispanic White8.0 (6.9–9.0)3.4 (2.7–4.2)
 Non-Hispanic Black4.8 (4.0–5.7)2.7 (2.0–3.3)
 Other race2.6 (1.9–3.2)1.3 (0.8–1.7)
BMI
 Thin1.2 (0.7–1.6)0.7 (0.4–1.0)
 Normal4.1 (3.3–4.9)1.9 (1.3–2.5)
 Overweight5.6 (4.7–6.6)2.3 (1.7–2.9)
 Obese9.8 (8.7–11.0)5.4 (4.5–6.3)
Smoking5.5 (4.6–6.4)3.6 (2.8–4.3)
Active physical activity9.1 (8.0–10.2)4.6 (3.7–5.4)
Note: data are presented as ratios with 95% CIs. Abbreviations: PIR, ratio of family income to poverty; BMI, body mass index.
Table 3. Associations between depression score and urinary dialkyl phosphate metabolites.
Table 3. Associations between depression score and urinary dialkyl phosphate metabolites.
Model 1Model 2Model 3
OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)p
DMP
 PHQ-9 score1.19 (0.71–2.00)0.5071.47 (0.87–2.47)0.1481.77 (1.05–2.98)0.032
 PHQ-9 category
  ≤4Ref. Ref. Ref.
  5–90.87 (0.87–0.87)<0.0010.95 (0.95–0.95)<0.0011.13 (1.12–1.13)<0.001
  ≥101.25 (1.25–1.26)<0.0011.47 (1.47–1.47)<0.0012.75 (2.74–2.76)<0.001
 PHQ-9 score ≥ 53.86 (3.84–3.88)<0.0015.04 (5.01–5.07)<0.0015.56 (5.53–5.59)<0.001
 PHQ-9 score ≥ 101.30 (1.28–1.31)<0.0011.23 (1.22–1.24)<0.0010.94 (0.93–0.95)<0.001
DEP
 PHQ-9 score0.81 (0.44–1.49)0.4980.93 (0.51–1.70)0.8091.09 (0.60–2.00)0.773
 PHQ-9 category
  ≤4Ref. Ref. Ref.
  5–90.70 (0.70–0.70)<0.0010.78 (0.77–0.78)<0.0010.78 (0.78–0.79)<0.001
  ≥101.24 (1.24–1.24)<0.0011.31 (1.31–1.31)<0.0011.88 (1.87–1.88)<0.001
 PHQ-9 score ≥ 52.26 (2.24–2.27)<0.0012.19 (2.17–2.20)<0.0012.58 (2.56–2.59)<0.001
 PHQ-9 score ≥ 100.36 (0.35–0.36)<0.0010.37 (0.36–0.37)<0.0010.39 (0.39–0.40)<0.001
DMTP
 PHQ-9 score1.06 (0.70–1.61)0.7901.23 (0.80–1.87)0.3461.37 (0.90–2.09)0.144
 PHQ-9 category
  ≤4Ref. Ref. Ref.
  5–90.84 (0.84–0.84)<0.0010.88 (0.88–0.89)<0.0010.94 (0.94–0.94)<0.001
  ≥101.00 (1.00–1.00)0.3061.16 (1.16–1.16)<0.0011.83 (1.82–1.83)<0.001
 PHQ-9 score ≥ 52.32 (2.31–2.33)<0.0012.83 (2.82–2.84)<0.0012.81 (2.80–2.82)<0.001
 PHQ-9 score ≥ 100.71 (0.70–0.71)<0.0010.66 (0.66–0.66)<0.0010.57 (0.57–0.58)<0.001
DETP
 PHQ-9 score0.62 (0.37–1.04)0.0680.67 (0.40–1.12)0.1220.81 (0.48–1.36)0.422
 PHQ-9 category
  ≤4Ref. Ref. Ref.
  5–90.64 (0.64–0.64)<0.0010.70 (0.70–0.70)<0.0010.67 (0.67–0.67)<0.001
  ≥100.78 (0.78–0.78)<0.0010.80 (0.80–0.80)<0.0010.88 (0.87–0.88)<0.001
 PHQ-9 score ≥ 51.09 (1.09–1.10)<0.0011.09 (1.09–1.10)<0.0011.20 (1.19–1.21)<0.001
 PHQ-9 score ≥ 100.24 (0.24–0.24)<0.0010.29 (0.29–0.30)<0.0010.36 (0.35–0.36)<0.001
DMDTP
 PHQ-9 score0.86 (0.51–1.44)0.5650.94 (0.56–1.58)0.8021.11 (0.66–1.88)0.693
 PHQ-9 category
  ≤4Ref. Ref. Ref.
  5–90.77 (0.76–0.77)<0.0010.77 (0.77–0.77)<0.0011.00 (1.00–1.01)<0.001
  ≥100.92 (0.92–0.92)<0.0011.09 (1.09–1.10)<0.0011.76 (1.76–1.77)<0.001
 PHQ-9 score ≥ 51.79 (1.78–1.80)<0.0012.33 (2.32–2.35)<0.0012.41 (2.39–2.42)<0.001
 PHQ-9 score ≥ 100.57 (0.57–0.58)<0.0010.39 (0.39–0.39)<0.0010.39 (0.39–0.40)<0.001
Note: Model 1 was adjusted for age and gender. Model 2 was further adjusted for race/ethnicity, educational level, and ratio of family income to poverty. Model 3 included covariates in Model 2 plus body mass index, waist circumference, smoking status, and physical activity. Abbreviations: DMP, dimethyl phosphate; DEP, diethyl phosphate; DMTP, dimethyl thiophosphate; DETP, diethyl thiophosphate; DMDTP, dimethyl dithiophosphate.
Table 4. General characteristics of study participants in the NHANES 2015–2018 cycle according to dialkyl phosphate metabolites.
Table 4. General characteristics of study participants in the NHANES 2015–2018 cycle according to dialkyl phosphate metabolites.
CharacteristicsDMPpDEPpDMTPpDETPpDMDTPp
Demographic
 Age (year) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  20–39−5.961 (−6.265, −5.644) −5.746 (−6.042, −5.432) −6.275 (−6.639, −5.813) −6.836 (−7.159, −6.491) −6.940 (−7.204, −6.590)
  40–59−5.905 (−6.204, −5.566) −5.699 (−6.008, −5.412) −6.220 (−6.562, −5.793) −6.778 (−7.087, −6.427) −6.911 (−7.168, −6.528)
  ≥60−5.818 (−6.085, −5.520) −5.604 (−5.908, −5.351) −6.059 (−6.410, −5.678) −6.699 (−6.987, −6.328) −6.820 (−7.080, −6.442)
 Gender <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  Male−5.969 (−6.265, −5.666) −5.770 (−6.068, −5.466) −6.274 (−6.607, −5.789) −6.850 (−7.133, −6.480) −6.946 (−7.204, −6.600)
  Female−5.825 (−6.110, −5.529) −5.614 (−5.921, −5.320) −6.118 (−6.487, −5.735) −6.723 (−7.030, −6.374) −6.832 (−7.109, −6.470)
 Race/ethnicity <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  Mexican American−5.791 (−6.045, −5.485) −5.737 (−6.035, −5.465) −6.135 (−6.457, −5.723) −6.746 (−7.062, −6.420) −6.906 (−7.179, −6.599)
  Other Hispanic−5.904 (−6.175, −5.589) −5.699 (−6.016, −5.431) −6.192 (−6.533, −5.702) −6.784 (−7.050, −6.353) −6.918 (−7.178, −6.535)
  Non-Hispanic White−5.889 (−6.173, −5.598) −5.662 (−5.977, −5.366) −6.166 (−6.528, −5.754) −6.784 (−7.079, −6.410) −6.862 (−7.116, −6.479)
  Non-Hispanic Black−5.985 (−6.277, −5.665) −5.740 (−6.028, −5.466) −6.370 (−6.742, −5.968) −6.895 (−7.200, −6.504) −7.063 (−7.303, −6.746)
  Other race−5.845 (−6.198, −5.556) −5.699 (−6.005, −5.405) −6.249 (−6.596, −5.773) −6.757 (−7.043, −6.331) −6.850 (−7.137, −6.519)
 Education <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  Less than high school−5.851 (−6.204, −5.535) −5.783 (−6.060, −5.491) −6.222 (−6.533, −5.726) −6.827 (−7.075, −6.401) −6.962 (−7.228, −6.541)
  High school or equivalent−5.958 (−6.277, −5.693) −5.768 (−6.071, −5.450) −6.291 (−6.619, −5.866) −6.845 (−7.142, −6.484) −6.929 (−7.180, −6.606)
  College or above−5.865 (−6.152, −5.571) −5.644 (−5.950, −5.365) −6.148 (−6.537, −5.735) −6.744 (−7.072, −6.383) −6.862 (−7.133, −6.493)
 PIR <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  ≤1−5.926 (−6.220, −5.593) −5.770 (−6.078, −5.490) −6.277 (−6.651, −5.869) −6.832 (−7.127, −6.478) −6.983 (−7.228, −6.627)
  1–3−5.924 (−6.250, −5.623) −5.715 (−6.028, −5.424) −6.254 (−6.625, −5.814) −6.854 (−7.146, −6.484) −6.929 (−7.184, −6.555)
  >3−5.840 (−6.132, −5.565) −5.654 (−5.946, −5.363) −6.132 (−6.488, −5.703) −6.728 (−7.039, −6.380) −6.834 (−7.109, −6.473)
Anthropometry
 BMI <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  Thin−5.889 (−6.175, −5.521) −5.619 (−5.989, −5.264) −6.265 (−6.570, −5.600) −6.707 (−7.064, −6.382) −6.832 (−7.114, −6.456)
  Normal−5.848 (−6.155, −5.570) −5.633 (−5.937, −5.381) −6.104 (−6.454, −5.720) −6.642 (−6.940, −6.306) −6.804 (−7.069, −6.456)
  Overweight−5.850 (−6.136, −5.557) −5.693 (−5.968, −5.408) −6.173 (−6.531, −5.751) −6.724 (−7.058, −6.391) −6.868 (−7.137, −6.467)
  Obese−5.957 (−6.281, −5.641) −5.733 (−6.047, −5.418) −6.297 (−6.648, −5.858) −6.914 (−7.163, −6.543) −6.963 (−7.216, −6.658)
Behaviors
 Smoking <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  Yes−5.993 (−6.316, −5.771) −5.824 (−6.151, −5.507) −6.362 (−6.748, −5.943) −6.865 (−7.184, −6.587) −6.994 (−7.265, −6.707)
  No−5.862 (−6.153, −5.568) −5.688 (−5.961, −5.353) −6.183 (−6.493, −5.732) −6.770 (−7.094, −6.359) −6.879 (−7.137, −6.493)
 Active physical activity <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  Yes−5.907 (−6.181, −5.623) −5.708 (−6.031, −5.413) −6.241 (−6.582, −5.799) −6.833 (−7.142, −6.450) −6.915 (−7.184, −6.558)
  No−5.866 (−6.169, −5.553) −5.672 (−5.967, −5.374) −6.150 (−6.529, −5.727) −6.748 (−7.041, −6.400) −6.875 (−7.137, −6.512)
Notes: all values of metabolites were corrected for creatinine and adjusted by log10, and presented as weighted median with first and third quartiles. Abbreviations: PIR, ratio of family income to poverty; BMI, body mass index; DMP, dimethyl phosphate; DEP, diethyl phosphate; DMTP, dimethyl thiophosphate; DETP, diethyl thiophosphate; DMDTP, dimethyl dithiophosphate.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, H.; Kang, X. Associations of Depression Score with Dialkyl Phosphate Metabolites in Urine: A Cross-Sectional Study. Brain Sci. 2024, 14, 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121290

AMA Style

Zhao H, Kang X. Associations of Depression Score with Dialkyl Phosphate Metabolites in Urine: A Cross-Sectional Study. Brain Sciences. 2024; 14(12):1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121290

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Hai, and Xuejun Kang. 2024. "Associations of Depression Score with Dialkyl Phosphate Metabolites in Urine: A Cross-Sectional Study" Brain Sciences 14, no. 12: 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121290

APA Style

Zhao, H., & Kang, X. (2024). Associations of Depression Score with Dialkyl Phosphate Metabolites in Urine: A Cross-Sectional Study. Brain Sciences, 14(12), 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121290

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop