Is Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Effective in Patients Suffering from Concomitant Multiple Sclerosis or Parkinson’s Disease?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Search Strategy
2.2. Eligibility Criteria
3. Results
3.1. Concurrent Multiple Sclerosis and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
3.1.1. Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Concurrent MS and CSM
3.1.2. Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Patients with Concurrent MS and CSM
3.2. Concurrent Parkinson’s Disease and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
4. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mehndiratta, M.M.; Gulati, N.S. Central and peripheral demyelination. J. Neurosci. Rural Pract. 2014, 5, 84–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tracy, J.A.; Bartleson, J.D. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist 2010, 16, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hurwitz, B.J. The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and the clinical subtypes. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2009, 12, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Young, W.F. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in older persons. Am. Fam. Physician 2000, 62, 1064–1073. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Amano, S.; Roemmich, R.T.; Skinner, J.W.; Hass, C.J. Ambulation and parkinson disease. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 24, 371–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.J. Parkinson’s disease: Health-related quality of life, economic cost, and implications of early treatment. Am. J. Manag. Care 2010, 16, S87–S93. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Jankovic, J. Parkinson’s disease: Clinical features and diagnosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008, 79, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lebl, D.R.; Hughes, A.; Cammisa, F.P., Jr.; O’Leary, P.F. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. HSS J. 2011, 7, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brain, R.; Wilkinson, M. The association of cervical spondylosis and disseminated sclerosis. Brain 1957, 80, 456–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Young, W.F.; Weaver, M.; Mishra, B. Surgical outcome in patients with coexisting multiple sclerosis and spondylosis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1999, 100, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arnold, P.M.; Warren, R.K.; Anderson, K.K.; Vaccaro, A.R. Surgical treatment of patients with cervical myeloradiculopathy and coexistent multiple sclerosis: Report of 15 patients with long-term follow-up. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 2011, 24, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burgerman, R.; Rigamonti, D.; Randle, J.M.; Fishman, P.; Panitch, H.S.; Johnson, K.P. The association of cervical spondylosis and multiple sclerosis. Surg. Neurol. 1992, 38, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubelski, D.; Abdullah, K.G.; Alvin, M.D.; Wang, T.Y.; Nowacki, A.S.; Steinmetz, M.P.; Ransohoff, R.M.; Benzel, E.C.; Mroz, T.E. Clinical outcomes following surgical management of coexistent cervical stenosis and multiple sclerosis: A cohort-controlled analysis. Spine J. 2014, 14, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bashir, K.; Cai, C.Y.; Moore, T.A., 2nd; Whitaker, J.N.; Hadley, M.N. Surgery for cervical spinal cord compression in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurosurgery 2000, 47, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tan, L.A.; Kasliwal, M.K.; Muth, C.C.; Stefoski, D.; Traynelis, V.C. Is cervical decompression beneficial in patients with coexistent cervical stenosis and multiple sclerosis? J. Clin. Neurosci. 2014, 21, 2189–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lubelski, D.; Alvin, M.D.; Silverstein, M.; Senol, N.; Abdullah, K.G.; Benzel, E.C.; Mroz, T.E. Quality of life outcomes following surgery for patients with coexistent cervical stenosis and multiple sclerosis. Eur. Spine J. 2014, 23, 1699–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, R.; Miller, J.A.; Lubelski, D.; Alberts, J.L.; Mroz, T.E.; Benzel, E.C.; Krishnaney, A.A.; Machado, A.G. Quality of life outcomes following cervical decompression for coexisting parkinson’s disease and cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J. 2016, 16, 1358–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edwards, C.C., 2nd; Riew, K.D.; Anderson, P.A.; Hilibrand, A.S.; Vaccaro, A.F. Cervical myelopathy. Current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Spine J. 2003, 3, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klineberg, E. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A review of the evidence. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 2010, 41, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ransohoff, R.M. Natalizumab for multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 2622–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rudick, R.A.; Cohen, J.A.; Weinstock-Guttman, B.; Kinkel, R.P.; Ransohoff, R.M. Management of multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 337, 1604–1611. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Noseworthy, J.H.; Lucchinetti, C.; Rodriguez, M.; Weinshenker, B.G. Multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343, 938–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Clinical Guideline, C. National Clinical Guideline, C. National institute for health and care excellence: Clinical guidelines. In Multiple sclerosis: Management of Multiple Sclerosis in Primary and Secondary Care; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- De Lau, L.M.; Breteler, M.M. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006, 5, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nussbaum, R.L.; Ellis, C.E. Alzheimer’s disease and parkinson’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 1356–1364. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Toledano, M.; Bartleson, J.D. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurol. Clin. 2013, 31, 287–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chagas, H.; Domingues, F.; Aversa, A.; Vidal Fonseca, A.L.; de Souza, J.M. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion. Surg. Neurol. 2005, 64, S30–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fehlings, M.G.; Wilson, J.R.; Kopjar, B.; Yoon, S.T.; Arnold, P.M.; Massicotte, E.M.; Vaccaro, A.R.; Brodke, D.S.; Shaffrey, C.I.; Smith, J.S.; et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Results of the aospine north america prospective multi-center study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2013, 95, 1651–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, T.T.; Manzano, G.R.; Green, B.A. Modified open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy: Operative technique, outcome, and predictors for gait improvement. J. Neurosurg. 1997, 86, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matz, P.G.; Anderson, P.A.; Holly, L.T.; Groff, M.W.; Heary, R.F.; Kaiser, M.G.; Mummaneni, P.V.; Ryken, T.C.; Choudhri, T.F.; Vresilovic, E.J.; et al. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2009, 11, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mummaneni, P.V.; Kaiser, M.G.; Matz, P.G.; Anderson, P.A.; Groff, M.W.; Heary, R.F.; Holly, L.T.; Ryken, T.C.; Choudhri, T.F.; Vresilovic, E.J.; et al. Cervical surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2009, 11, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rao, R.D.; Gourab, K.; David, K.S. Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2006, 88, 1619–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Gnanalingham, K.; Casey, A.; Crockard, A. Quality of life assessment using the short form-12 (sf-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Comparison with sf-36. Spine 2006, 31, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanaka, J.; Seki, N.; Tokimura, F.; Doi, K.; Inoue, S. Operative results of canal-expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly patients. Spine 1999, 24, 2308–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Babat, L.B.; McLain, R.F.; Bingaman, W.; Kalfas, I.; Young, P.; Rufo-Smith, C. Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Construct failure and progressive deformity. Spine 2004, 29, 2006–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chapuis, S.; Ouchchane, L.; Metz, O.; Gerbaud, L.; Durif, F. Impact of the motor complications of Parkinson’s disease on the quality of life. Mov. Disord. 2005, 20, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koller, H.; Acosta, F.; Zenner, J.; Ferraris, L.; Hitzl, W.; Meier, O.; Ondra, S.; Koski, T.; Schmidt, R. Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson’s spine. Eur. Spine J. 2010, 19, 1785–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moon, S.H.; Lee, H.M.; Chun, H.J.; Kang, K.T.; Kim, H.S.; Park, J.O.; Moon, E.S.; Chong, H.S.; Sohn, J.S.; Kim, H.J. Surgical outcome of lumbar fusion surgery in patients with parkinson disease. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 2012, 25, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schrag, A.; Jahanshahi, M.; Quinn, N. What contributes to quality of life in patients with parkinson’s disease? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2000, 69, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Upadhyaya, C.D.; Starr, P.A.; Mummaneni, P.V. Spinal deformity and parkinson disease: A treatment algorithm. Neurosurg. Focus 2010, 28, E5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abboud, H.; Floden, D.; Thompson, N.R.; Genc, G.; Oravivattanakul, S.; Alsallom, F.; Swa, B.; Kubu, C.; Pandya, M.; Gostkowski, M.; et al. Impact of mild cognitive impairment on outcome following deep brain stimulation surgery for parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2015, 21, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Connolly, B.S.; Lang, A.E. Pharmacological treatment of parkinson disease: A review. JAMA 2014, 311, 1670–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Floden, D.; Busch, R.M.; Cooper, S.E.; Kubu, C.S.; Machado, A.G. Global cognitive scores do not predict outcome after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Mov. Disord. 2015, 30, 1279–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Floden, D.; Cooper, S.E.; Griffith, S.D.; Machado, A.G. Predicting quality of life outcomes after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Neurology 2014, 83, 1627–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Genc, G.; Abboud, H.; Oravivattanakul, S.; Alsallom, F.; Thompson, N.R.; Cooper, S.; Gostkowski, M.; Machado, A.; Fernandez, H.H. Socioeconomic status may impact functional outcome of deep brain stimulation surgery in Parkinson’s disease. Neuromodulation 2016, 19, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Machado, A.; Rezai, A.R.; Kopell, B.H.; Gross, R.E.; Sharan, A.D.; Benabid, A.L. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: Surgical technique and perioperative management. Mov. Disord. 2006, 21, S247–S258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Authors | Year | Number of Patients | Surgical Intervention | Mean Follow-Up Time (Months) | Main Study Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concurrent Multiple Sclerosis and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy | |||||
Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Concurrent MS and CSM | |||||
Brain and Wilkinson [9] | 1957 | 17 with MS and CSM | Laminectomy | -------- | Patients reported poor outcomes following laminectomy, particularly for those with disseminated sclerosis. |
Young et al. [10] | 1999 | 7 with MS and CSM | Decompression | 14 (range 6–24) | 5 patients showed postoperative improvement in spondylosis symptoms. 1 patient developed acute MS symptoms a day after surgery. |
Arnold et al. [11] | 2011 | 15 with MS and cervical myeloradiculopathy | Decompression, fusion, and fixation | 47 | 13 patients demonstrated objective improvement in upper and lower extremity strength and neck and/or upper extremity pain or paresthesias. |
Burgerman et al. [12] | 1992 | 6 with MS and CSM | Anterior cervical discectomy or cervical laminectomy | 30 (12–72) | Long-term improvement in 2/3 patients with anterior cervical discectomy. 1 patient treated with cervical laminectomy showed only transient clinical improvement. 3 patients (2 laminectomies, 1 anterior cervical discectomy) showed no change in symptoms. |
Lubelski et al. [13] | 2014 | 77 with MS and CSM; 77 with CSM | Cervical decompression | 57.7 ± 43.3 (MS and CSM); 49.4 ± 42.5 (CSM) | 39% in the MS group did not have myelopathy improvement in the short-term vs. 23% in the control group (p = 0.04) and, in the long-term, 44% in the MS group did not improve vs. 19% in the control group (p = 0.004). |
Bashir et al. [14] | 2000 | 14 with MS and spinal cord compression | Cervical decompression | 45.6 (range, 12.0–117.6) | All patients with neck pain reported improvement in or elimination of their pain (n = 11). 6/10 patients with cervical radiculopathy reported complete resolution of their radicular symptoms, and 4 reported a reduction. 7/13 patients with progressive myelopathy experienced no improvement in symptoms. |
Tan et al. [15] | 2014 | 18 with MS and CSM | Cervical decompression and fusion | 18 (range, 3–45) | 4 reported improvement (28.6%), 9 (64.3%) reported stabilization, and 1 (7.1%) described a worsening of myelopathy. All 7 patients with neck pain described elimination of or significant improvement in symptoms. |
Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Patients with Concurrent MS and CSM | |||||
Lubelski et al. [16] | 2014 | 13 with MS and CSM; 52 controls with CSM | Cervical decompression | 22.3 ± 10.6 (MS and CSM); 18.2 ± 10.8 (CSM) | QALY in the MS and CSM group did not change significantly from pre- to post-operation (p = 0.96) vs. a significant change in the control CSM group from a QALY of 0.50 to 0.64 (p < 0.0001). |
Concurrent Parkinson’s Disease and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy | |||||
Xiao et al. [17] | 2016 | 11 with PD and CSM; 44 controls with CSM | Cervical decompression | 12.4 ± 16.2 (PD and CSM); 13.4 ± 11.3 (CSM) | Patients with PD and CSM reported worse quality-of-life at last follow-up than controls (0.526 vs. 0.707, p = 0.01). PD and CSM patients did have improvement in pain-related disability. |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Purvis, T.E.; Lubelski, D.; Mroz, T.E. Is Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Effective in Patients Suffering from Concomitant Multiple Sclerosis or Parkinson’s Disease? Brain Sci. 2017, 7, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7040039
Purvis TE, Lubelski D, Mroz TE. Is Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Effective in Patients Suffering from Concomitant Multiple Sclerosis or Parkinson’s Disease? Brain Sciences. 2017; 7(4):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7040039
Chicago/Turabian StylePurvis, Taylor E., Daniel Lubelski, and Thomas E. Mroz. 2017. "Is Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Effective in Patients Suffering from Concomitant Multiple Sclerosis or Parkinson’s Disease?" Brain Sciences 7, no. 4: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7040039
APA StylePurvis, T. E., Lubelski, D., & Mroz, T. E. (2017). Is Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Effective in Patients Suffering from Concomitant Multiple Sclerosis or Parkinson’s Disease? Brain Sciences, 7(4), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7040039