Next Article in Journal
Pomegranate Extract Administration Reverses Loss of Motor Coordination and Prevents Oxidative Stress in Cerebellum of Aging Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Unraveling Biotic and Abiotic Factors Shaping Sugarcane Straw Polyphenolic Richness: A Gateway to Artificial Intelligence-Driven Crop Management
Previous Article in Journal
Heme Oxygenase-1 and Its Role in Colorectal Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
LED Lights Influenced Phytochemical Contents and Biological Activities in Kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) Microgreens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/antiox12111990
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Composition of Salvia fruticosa Mill. Essential Oil and Its Protective Effects on Both Photosynthetic Damage and Oxidative Stress in Conocephalum conicum L. Induced by Environmental Heavy Metal Concentrations

by
Natale Badalamenti
1,2,†,
Giovanna Salbitani
3,†,
Piergiorgio Cianciullo
3,†,
Rosanna Bossa
3,
Francesca De Ruberto
4,
Valeria Greco
3,
Adriana Basile
3,*,
Viviana Maresca
3,*,
Maurizio Bruno
1,2,5 and
Simona Carfagna
3
1
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche (STEBICEF), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Ed. 17, 90128 Palermo, Italy
2
NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, 90133 Palermo, Italy
3
Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy
4
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Napoli, Italy
5
Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca “Riutilizzo Bio-Based Degli Scarti da Matrici Agroalimentari” (RIVIVE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(11), 1990; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12111990
Submission received: 17 October 2023 / Revised: 30 October 2023 / Accepted: 9 November 2023 / Published: 11 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidant and Protective Effects of Plant Extracts)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The genus Salvia L., belonging to the Lamiaceae family, contains more than 900 species distributed in various parts of the world. It is a genus containing aromatic plants used both in the culinary field and above all in the cosmetic area to produce several perfumes. Salvia fruticosa Mill., notoriously known as Greek Salvia, is a plant used since ancient times in traditional medicine, but today cultivated and used in various parts of Europe and Africa. Polar and apolar extracts of this plant confirmed the presence of several metabolites such as abietane and labdane diterpenoids, triterpenoids, steroids, and some flavonoids, causing interesting properties such as sedative, carminative, and antiseptic, while its essential oils (EOs) are mainly characterized by compounds such as 1,8-cineole and camphor. The aim of this work concerns the chemical analysis by GC and GC-MS, and the investigation of the biological properties, of the EO of S. fruticosa plants collected in eastern Sicily. The gas-chromatographic analysis confirmed the presence of 1,8-cineole (17.38%) and camphor (12.81%), but at the same time, also moderate amounts of α-terpineol (6.74%), β-myrcene (9.07%), camphene (8.66%), β-pinene (6.55%), and α-pinene (6.45%). To study the protective effect of EOs from S. fruticosa (both the total mixture and the individual compounds) on possible damage induced by heavy metals, an in vitro system was used in which a model organism, the liverwort Conocephalum conicum, was subjected to the effect of a mix of heavy metals (HM) prepared using values of concentrations actually measured in one of the most polluted watercourses of the Campania region, the Regi Lagni. Finally, the antioxidant response and the photosynthetic damage were examined. The exogenous application of the EO yields a resumption of the oxidative stress induced by HM, as demonstrated by the reduction in the Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) content and by the increased activity of antioxidant enzyme catalase (CAT) and glutathione-S-transferase (GST). Furthermore, plants treated with HMs and EO showed a higher Fv/Fm (maximal quantum efficiency of PSII in the dark) with respect to HMs-only treated ones. These results clearly indicate the protective capacity of the EO of S. fruticosa against oxidative stress, which is achieved at least in part by modulating the redox state through the antioxidant pathway and on photosynthetic damage.

1. Introduction

The Lamiaceae family (formerly Labiatae) includes several aromatic plants in all its parts widely cultivated all over the world comprising common herbs such as basil, mint, rosemary, sage, lavender, etc. Since ancient times Lamiaceae have been widely used in the culinary field by peoples like the Romans and the Greeks.
It is a widespread family, comprising more than 220 genera and 4000 species of annuals and perennial plants. A huge number of papers have been published on their chemistry concerning both the essential oils (EOs) (mainly monoterpene and sesquiterpene compounds), and the non-volatile constituents such as diterpenes (labdane, abietane, and clerodane diterpenes), triterpenes, and phenolics as well as on their ethno-pharmaceutical and biological properties [1,2].
Salvia L., the largest genus of this family, includes more than 900 species and is divided into five subgenera (Sclarea, Audibertia, Jungia, Leonia, and Salvia). Many species of this genus are used, due to their colored flowers, typically pink to red or purple to blue, as ornamental plants, whereas other ones have economic importance since they are utilized as flavoring agents in perfumery and cosmetics. The name “Salvia” (sauge in French and sawge in old English) derives from the Latin word “salvare” meaning “to heal or to be safe”, due to the folkloric belief of its “magical” therapeutic properties and its diffusion in popular medicine because of diverse biological activities, including antibacterial, spasmolytic, hemostatic, and many others [3].
The genus Salvia has a sub-cosmopolitan distribution, widely present in many regions of the world including the warmer and temperate zones of the world such as the Mediterranean, Central Asia, Pacific Islands, tropical Africa, and America, with the largest number of species (about 300) occurring in Mexico [4,5].
Salvia fruticosa Mill. (syn. S. triloba L., S. libanotica Boiss. and Gaill., S. lobryana Azn., S. cypria Unger and Kotschy, etc.), commonly known as Greek sage, is a perennial shrub native to Eastern Mediterranean including Southern Italy, Sicily, southern parts of the Balkan Peninsula to West Syria, Cyprus, and Libya [6]. It grows on dry rocky limestone soils or the edges of pine forests, riverbeds, and roadsides, at altitudes from 100 to 800 m a.s.l and it is common and abundant in plant communities of garigue in the eastern Mediterranean region, associated with Sarcopoterium spinosum, Micromeria nervosa, Cistus creticus, Cistus salvifolius. Due to the value of its EOs, it has been introduced in the Western Mediterranean region in Algeria, Morocco, Malta, Spain, and Portugal [7].
The use of S. fruticosa probably dates to 1400 B.C. as shown in the “blue bird fresco” in the House of Frescoes, Knossos, and its peculiar shape with opposed trilobate leaves was also represented on Iberic pottery, under Greek influence (400 B.C.). It has been used in folk medicine since ancient times [7].
The infusion of its leaves is extremely popular among the Palestinians of Israel for relieving headaches and in the treatment of rheumatism, heart disorders, stomach, abdominal, and ulcer pains, or for indigestion [8,9]. For similar purposes, to treat rheumatic pains, the infusion of leaves and tender shoots is used in North Africa [10]. In the markets of Jordan, it is also sold as a sedative, carminative, and stomachic, as an antiseptic and vulnerary [11]. In Turkey, this species is used for poor appetite stomachache, kidney, and gallbladder stones, and sands [12]. In Antalya, Turkey [12], North Africa [10], and among the Arabs of Israel [8,9] the infusion of leaves and young shoots of S. fruticosa is employed for colds, coughs, and influenza. Its use as a vulnerary and cicatrizing has been reported in Murcia and Israel, and it was cited in the ancient literature as hemostatic, cicatrizing, antiseptic, a remedy for sore throat, and anti-pruriginous effects [7]. The dried leaves are utilized to make a tea “faskomelo” that is sold in cafes in Greece and Turkey [13]. The fresh leaves are also infused with sugar or honey [13] and are reputed as medicinal in Greece. Several similar uses of this plant have been reported for Spain and Portugal [7].
Most of the health effects of S. fruticosa are attributable to the presence of bioactive substances that are metabolized by the body with the aid of extracts and infusions [14]. Usually, this aspect is attributable to the presence of active principles of an antioxidant nature such as polyphenols that influence the antioxidant state or modulate critical enzymes [15]. Due to all these beneficial properties, S. fruticosa is accepted as a medicinal Salvia species by the European Pharmacopeia and British Pharmacopeia [16].
From the aerial parts of S. fruticosa, several non-volatile metabolites have been isolated, including abietane diterpenoids, labdane diterpenoids, triterpenoids, steroids, and several flavonoids [17,18,19,20].
Many papers have been published on the EOs of different accessions of S. fruticosa (Table 1), but no one concerns the Sicilian population. Consequently, as a continuation of our research on plants of the Mediterranean area [21,22,23,24] and on the biological properties of EOs [23,25,26], the present paper reported on the EO composition of the aerial parts of S. fruticosa, collected in Sicily, as well the biological properties of the EO obtained from the full-flowering aerial parts.
The ability of EOs to exert a protective effect against damage from heavy metals in plant organisms is a topic of recent research and is still little studied. It has recently been demonstrated that the EO of Thymus leucotrichus can reduce Cd toxicity in the aquatic moss Leptodictyum riparium [24]. In particular, was demonstrated that the exogenous application of the EO yields a resumption of growth rate and a reduction in the number of dead cells; it also reduces the oxidative stress induced by Cd, as demonstrated by the reduction in the Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) content (with a decrease of 1.52% and 5%) and by the increased activity of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) (with an increase of 1.44% and 2.29%), catalase (CAT) (1.46% and 2.91%), and glutathione-S-transferase GST (1.57% and 1.90%). Furthermore, the application of the EO yields a reduction in DNA damage.
At the moment, however, there is no work in which the protective effect of EOs is studied with respect to damage caused by concentrations actually measured in a polluted environment. For this reason, it was decided to study the protective effect of the EO extracted from S. fruticosa, on another model organism, however, belonging to the Bryophyte group, the liverwort Conocephalum conicum, using a mix of heavy metals at the concentrations measured in two sites with high anthropic impact, chosen along the course of the Regi Lagni.
The Regi Lagni consists of a network of straight channels that collect meteoric, spring and, also, waste waters, carry them from the plain north of Naples to the Tyrrhenian Sea, covering a length of about 56 km [71]. The Regi Lagni basin has been declared a National Concern Site (NCS) by the Italian Government because of its huge contamination potential being in a completely careless condition and affected by severe contamination caused by heavy urbanization and industrialization (mainly chemical industry) as well as intensive agriculture and buffalo farms [71,72,73].
The model organism chosen is a bryophyte, as, unlike other terrestrial plants, it absorbs water, mineral salts, and all that is present in the environment, through the entire surface of the body, and is, therefore, entirely and inexorably subject to all its cells, to the positive or negative effects of all that is present in the solutions with which it comes into contact.
Furthermore, C. conicum is a plant often used in studies on the damage and metabolic responses induced by heavy metals because is a cosmopolitan species able to respond to local environmental pollution by changing its biological features.
The aim of this work is to study the protective effect of EO from S. fruticosa on possible damage induced by heavy metals. In vitro, the liverwort C. conicum, was subjected to the effect of a mix of heavy metals prepared using values of concentrations measured in two sites chosen along the Regi Lagni channels. To assess the protective effects, the photosynthetic damage and the antioxidant response were examined, with or without the exogenous application of the total mixture and the individual compounds. In particular, as for oxidative stress protection, ROS content and activity of antioxidant CAT and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) were measured. Regarding the protective capacity of the EO of S. fruticosa on photosynthetic damage, Fv/Fm (maximal quantum efficiency of PSII in the dark) with respect to HMs only treated ones, was considered.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Essential Oil Extraction

The flower in aerial parts of S. fruticosa was collected near Noto Antica, Syracuse, (Sicily, Italy) (36°57′27.37″ N; 15°02′18.76″ E) at 378 m a.s.l., on 12 June 2022, and a voucher specimen has been deposited in the STEBICEF Department, University of Palermo, Italy (PAL1135510). The fresh aerial parts (160 g) of S. fruticosa were subjected to hydrodistillation for 3 h using Clevenger’s apparatus [74]. The EO, yielding 1.2% (w/w), was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and stored in the freezer at −20 °C, until the time of analysis.

2.2. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) Analysis of Essential Oil

Analyses of EOs were performed according to the procedure reported by Rigano et al. [75]. Analysis of EO was performed by a Shimadzu QP 2010 plus equipped with an AOC-20i autoinjector and an apolar capillary column, DB-5 MS, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm and a data processor (GCsolution software v. 2.53, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The other column used was the polar Supelcowax 10 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) which had the same with the same length and thickness as the previous one listed here. The oven program was as follows: initial temperature 40 °C for 5 min, from 40 °C to 260 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min, then isothermal for 20 min. Helium was used as carrier gas (1 mL min−1). The injector and detector temperatures were set at 250 °C and 290 °C, respectively. The 1 μL of EO solution (3% EO/hexane v/v) was injected with split mode 1:10. The percentages are calculated by individually integrating the peak areas in the chromatogram. The analyses were performed in triplicate and the results are expressed as the average of three measurements ± standard deviation. Linear retention indexes (LRIs) were determined by using retention times of n-alkanes (C8-C40) and the peaks were identified by comparison with mass spectra with WILEY275, NIST 17, ADAMS, and FFNSC2 libraries.

2.3. Conocephalum Conicum Material

Samples of C. conicum L. Dum were collected in March 2020 from upstream of the Regi Lagni, identified by Prof. Adriana Basile and a sample was deposited in the herbarium of the Botanical Garden of the University Federico II Napoli (NAP 986-216). These samples were used for in vitro experiments.

2.4. In Vitro Growth

The samples of C. conicum were placed in Petri dishes (diameter 10 cm) after a careful but delicate removal of the layer of soil adhering to the lower surface held by the rhizoids, with a small brush, so that Mohr’s solution, pH 7,5 [76], wetted only the lower portion of the thallus. It was important not to “submerge” the samples to ensure that the plant was able to carry out gas exchange through the pores correctly.
The soluble salts CdCl2, CuSO4, Pb(CH3COO)2, and ZnCl2 were added to Mohr’s medium. In the control Mohr’s mediums Cl− and SO4 anions were added instead as K salts (KCl, K2SO4) to maintain the same concentrations as the exposure solutions. The heavy metal concentrations used are those measured at the field sites, indicated below as C1 upstream site (40°49′56.269″ N, 14 °35′27.103″ E), C2 downstream site (40°44′48.812″ N, 14°31′37.653″ E). The concentrations used are those reported in the study by Maresca et al., 2018 [77] and are shown in Table 2. The cultures were maintained for 7 days in a climatic room and the environmental parameters were set according to the environmental conditions registered in the field. In particular, the air temperature was maintained at 20.0 ± 1.5 °C, and 13.0 ± 0.7 °C, mean ± SD, during day and night, respectively; relative humidity was 70 ± 4% mean ± SD, 16 h light (Photosynthetic Active Radiation 400 μmolm−2 s−1)/8 h dark photoperiod. These environmental parameters were chosen according to the period of the year in which the collection took place so as not to subject the samples to further stress.

2.5. Treatment with the Total Extract of EO and the Individual Compounds

To test the effects of EO of S. fruticosa, the C. conicum samples were treated both with the total EO and with the single molecules present in higher percentages, namely 1,8-cineole, camphor, and β-myrcene.
Samples were treated with both total EO and single compounds at concentrations of 0.16% and 0.25% (v/v) as a spray for 7 days. The EO and individual compounds were dissolved in 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) followed by dilution with water containing the surfactant Tween 20 (0.1%, v/v). Each sample was sprayed simultaneously every day for 7 days. Treatments and sample names are shown in Table 3.

2.6. Detection of ROS and Antioxidant Enzymes’ Activity

For the quantitative measurement of ROS production, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescine diacetate (DCFH-DA) was used following the protocol reported in [77] Maresca et al., (2018). The amount of ROS was monitored by fluorescence (excitation wavelength of 350 nm and emission wavelength of 600 nm) using a multiplate reader (Synergy H4, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, California, USA).
CAT activity (Units (CAT) mg proteins−1) was kinetically measured (for 1 min at 25 °C, 15 s each read) as a decrease in the absorbance of H2O2 at 240 nm in 2 mL quartz cuvettes with a spectrophotometer UV-Vis (Cary 300, Agilent Technologies, Inc.) using a commercial kit (Sigma–Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO, USA). and The drop in absorbance at 240 nm is linear with the consumption of H2O2 and was used to quantify the umol H2O2 consumed (ε = 0.0436 mM−1, path length = 1 cm). By definition one unit of catalase is defined as the unit able to decompose 1.0 µmole of H2O2 per minute at pH 7.0 at 25 °C, and the CAT units in the samples were calculated accordingly. Glutathione S-transferase (GST, EC 2.5.1.18) activity was measured using a commercial kit (CS0410, Sigma). The reactions were monitored for 6 min at 25 °C using a multiplate reader (Synergy H4, Agilent Technologies, Inc.). The increase in absorbance at 340 nm that indicates the conjugation of reduced glutathione with the 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) was recorded and the umol of CDNB-GSH conjugates was quantified according to their molar extinction coefficient (ε = 5.3 mM−1, path length = 0.552 cm).
The quantification of total soluble proteins was carried out with Bradford assay (Bio-rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, California, U.S.A.) using bovine seroalbumin to calibrate the standard curve. Each assay was run in triplicate for each sample (N = 3)

2.7. Measurements of Chlorophyll Fluorescence

To define the photosynthetic capacity in the control and treated plants, samples were analyzed with a Maxi Imaging-PAM M-Series Chlorophyll Fluorometer (Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). Plants were acclimated in the dark for 30 min before analysis. After dark adaptation, the maximal quantum efficiency of PSII in the dark (Fv/Fm, where Fv is the variable and Fm is the maximal fluorescence in dark-adapted organisms) was measured. Regarding Fv/Fm, samples were illuminated with a saturating pulse, as reported in [78], and values derived from the formula Fv/Fm = (Fm − F0)/Fm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Profiling of Salvia Fruticosa EO

Hydro-distillation of the aerial parts of S. fruticosa, in full flowering period, gave an intense-yellow EO with a yield of 1.2% (w/w). Overall, forty-one compounds were found, representing 93.27% of the total composition. In Table 4, according to their linear retention indices on a DB-5 MS column, the components are listed and classified based on their chemical structures into eight different classes, the principal ones being monoterpene hydrocarbons (31.60%), and oxygenated sesquiterpenes (49.11%).
This EO was quite rich in 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol) (17.56%), and camphor (13.63%), both belonging to the oxygenated sesquiterpenes class. In the same group, it is worthy of mention the occurrence of a good quantity of α-terpineol (6.56%). Monoterpene hydrocarbons were characterized by the presence, in similar amounts, of four metabolites: β-myrcene (9.13%), camphene (8.69%), β-pinene (6.70%), and α-pinene (6.51%). Oxygenated sesquiterpenes (5.58%) were mainly represented by globulol (4.07%), whereas manool (3.01%) was the principal constituent of the oxygenated diterpenes (3.18%). These percentages are calculated assuming that the total of the compounds found is 100%.
The aspect that emerged from the GC-MS analysis of the EO collected in Sicily is the total similarity with the other EOs isolated in different parts (Greece, Israel, Lebanon, and Turkey) of the world from both cultivated and wild species. Compounds 1,8 cineole, camphor, α-pinene, and β-pinene are compounds present in almost all the EOs scientifically analyzed and published in the literature. Diversities emerged for compounds such as α- and β-thujone, ketone monoterpenes, sometimes present in high and modest quantities (samples of Albania, Brazil, Greece, and Turkey) and often absent or in minimal concentrations in various specimens (Cyprus, Italy, and Jordan).

3.2. ROS Quantificaztion and Antioxidant Enzymes

The production of ROS and the activation of catalase and glutathione-S-transferase were measured in the C. conicum gametophytes. Control and control-DMSO samples show the basal ROS signal (fluorescence intensity A.U.) produced by the basal cellular metabolism in the liverwort and other plants and participate in fundamental biological processes such as cell signaling, development, environmental stimuli, metabolism, etc. [79] (Figure 1A). Yet in C1 exposed gametophytes an increase in ROS was observed, with a clear and wider increase in C2 exposed samples. Alongside ROS increases, the enhancement of CAT and GST activities was observed. CAT and GST both participate in the enzymatic antioxidant defenses to balance the outburst of ROS in stress conditions e.g., during heavy metal exposure [80,81].
The application of the Salvia fruticosa total EO lowered the basal ROS as shown in CTRL-TE16 and CTRL-TE25 (Figure 1A) and enhanced both CAT and GST activities (Figure 1B,C) in a dose-dependent manner. The treatment of the C1 and C2 exposed gametophytes with EO (C1-C2TE16 and C1-C2TE25) significantly decreased ROS production compared to untreated samples (C1 and C2; Figure 1A).
The most abundant compounds of EO (camphor, β-myrcene, and 1,8 cineole) were tested separately to dissect their contribution to prevent ROS outbursts and enhance the enzymatic antioxidant response. As shown in Figure 1B,C camphor and 1,8 cineole induced CAT and GST activities to a greater extent with respect to β-myrcene thus aiding in lowering ROS production (Figure 1A). However, also the application of β-myrcene had the effect of augmenting CAT and GST activities and lower ROS outburnst, by inducing CAT and GST (CTRL-MYR16 and 25; Figure 1B,C).

3.3. Measurements of Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Samples of C. conicum were exposed to HM solutions (C1 and C2) in the presence or absence of different concentrations of EO (0.16% and 0.25%). Figure 2 shows a representative result of EO treatment imposed on HM-stressed plants. The complete EO application resulted in a significative Fv/Fm improvement on C1-CAM25 and C1-CIN16 with respect to only C1 HM treated. Indeed, in C2 the exposure to HM reduced the Fv/Fm by 25%, while the application of EO on samples C2-TE16 improved the chlorophyll fluorescence that maintaining values close to those of the CTRL. The results obtained by Imaging-PAM demonstrated a positive protection effect of EO on photosynthetic efficiency of photosystems II. In addition, the images captured by Imaging-PAM (Figure 2B) show the presence of not homogeneous damage occurring especially on leaves margins. This result depends on the natural curled shape of leaves that prevents the homogenous touch with the media.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the analytical chemical analysis by GC-MS of the EO of spontaneous Sicilian plants of S. fruticosa revealed the presence of bioactive compounds such as eucalyptol (17.38%), and camphor (12.81%), oxygenated sesquiterpenes class, and at the same time moderate amounts of monoterpenes such as α-terpineol (6.74%), β-myrcene (9.07%), camphene (8.66%), β-pinene (6.55%), and α-pinene (6.45%). The treatment of C.conicum with some EO relieves or avoids the photosystem damage due to HM exposure, allowing plants to maintain a good photosynthetic performance. This work shows preliminary data about a possible application of EO to enhance the efficiency of plants in phytoremediation processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. and S.C.; methodology, N.B., M.B. and V.M.; software, N.B.; validation, N.B., M.B., A.B. and S.C.; formal analysis, P.C., G.S., V.G., R.B. and F.D.R.; investigation, N.B. and M.B.; resources, N.B. and M.B.; data curation, N.B. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, N.B., M.B., V.M., P.C., G.S. and F.D.R.; writing—review and editing, M.B.; visualization, N.B. and M.B.; supervision, M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received external funding from National Biodiversity Future Center S.c.a.r.l., Piazza Marina 61 (c/o Palazzo Steri) Palermo, Italy, C.I. CN00000033—CUP UNIPA B73C22000790001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the National Research Council of Italy—Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (CNR-IPSP) for the use of the Maxi Imaging-PAM M-Series Chlorophyll Fluorometer (Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, Y.-B.; Ni, Z.-Y.; Shi, Q.-W.; Dong, M.; Kiyota, H.; Gu, Y.-C.; Cong, B. Constituents from Salvia Species and Their Biological Activities. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5967–6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mulas, M. Traditional Uses of Labiatae in The Mediterranean Area. Acta Hortic. 2006, 723, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ulubelen, A.; Birman, H.; Öksüz, S.; Topçu, G.; Kolak, U.; Barla, A.; Voelter, W. Cardioactive Diterpenes from the Roots of Salvia eriophora. Planta Med. 2002, 68, 818–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mohammadhosseini, M.; Pazoki, A.; Akhlaghi, H. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oils from Flowers, Stems, and Roots of Salvia Multicaulis Growing Wild in Iran. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2008, 44, 127–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guajardo Touche, E.M.; Loprz, E.G.; Reyes, A.P.; Sánchez, H.; Honecker, F.; Achenbach, H. Parryin, a Diterpene with a Tricyclic 6-7-5-Ring System from Salvia Parryi. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Plants of the World Online|Kew Science. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org/ (accessed on 13 September 2023).
  7. Rivera, D.; Obon, C.; Cano, F. The Botany, History and Traditional Uses of Three-Lobed Sage (Salvia fruticosa Miller) (Labiatae). Econ. Bot. 1994, 48, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yaniv, Z.; Dafni, A.; Palevitch, D. Labiatae as Medicinal Plants in Israel. In Aromatic Plants: Basic and Applied Aspects; Margaris, N., Koedam, A., Vokou, D., Eds.; World Crops: Production, Utilization, and Description ; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1982; pp. 265–269. ISBN 978-94-009-7642-9. [Google Scholar]
  9. Paleviteh, D.; Yaniv, Z.; Dafni, A.; Friedman, J. Medicinal Plants of Israel: An Ethnobotanical Survey. In Herbs, Spices, and Medicinal Plants; Craker, L., Simon, J., Eds.; Oryx Press: Phoenix, AZ, USA, 1986; pp. 281–345. [Google Scholar]
  10. Boulos, L. Medicinal Plants of North Africa; Reference Publications, Incorporated: Algonac, MI, USA, 1983; ISBN 978-0-917256-16-5. [Google Scholar]
  11. Karim, F.; Quraan, S. Medicinal Plants of Jordan; Centre for Jordanian Studies, Yarmouk University: Irbid, Jordan, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  12. Başer, K.H.C.; Honda, G.; Miki, W. Herb Drugs and Herbalists in Turkey; Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa: Tokyo, Japan, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  13. Huxley, A.J.; Huxley, A.; Taylor, A.W. Flowers of Greece and the Aegean; Chatto & Windus: London, UK, 1977; ISBN 978-0-7011-2190-7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bravo, L. Polyphenols: Chemistry, Dietary Sources, Metabolism, and Nutritional Significance. Nutr. Rev. 1998, 56, 317–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dai, J.; Mumper, R.J. Plant Phenolics: Extraction, Analysis and Their Antioxidant and Anticancer Properties. Molecules 2010, 15, 7313–7352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gali-Muhtasib, H. Anticancer and Medicinal Properties of Essential Oil and Extracts of East Mediterranean Sage (Salvia triloba). In Advances in Phytomedicine; Khan, M.T.H., Ather, A., Eds.; Lead Molecules from Natural Products; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 2, pp. 169–180. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nikolova, M.; Aneva, I. European Species of Genus Salvia: Distribution, Chemodiversity and Biological Activity. In Salvia Biotechnology; Georgiev, V., Pavlov, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–30. ISBN 978-3-319-73900-7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Abdelhalim, A.; Chebib, M.; Aburjai, T.; Johnston, G.A.R.; Hanrahan, J.R. GABAA Receptor Modulation by Compounds Isolated from Salvia Triloba. ABC 2014, 04, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, Y.; Yeap Foo, L. Polyphenolics of Salvia—A Review. Phytochem. 2002, 59, 117–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cvetkovikj, I.; Stefkov, G.; Acevska, J.; Stanoeva, J.P.; Karapandzova, M.; Stefova, M.; Dimitrovska, A.; Kulevanova, S. Polyphenolic Characterization and Chromatographic Methods for Fast Assessment of Culinary Salvia Species from South East Europe. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1282, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. De Feo, V.; Bruno, M.; Tahiri, B.; Napolitano, F.; Senatore, F. Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils from Thymus spinulosus Ten. (Lamiaceae). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3849–3853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Badalamenti, N.; Ilardi, V.; Rosselli, S.; Bruno, M.; Maggi, F.; Leporini, M.; Falco, T.; Loizzo, M.R.; Tundis, R. Ferulago nodosa Subsp. Geniculata (Guss.) Troia & Raimondo from Sicily (Italy): Isolation of Essential Oil and Evaluation of Its Bioactivity. Molecules 2020, 25, 3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Badalamenti, N.; Bruno, M.; Gagliano Candela, R.; Maggi, F. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil of Elaeoselinum asclepium (L.) Bertol subsp. meoides (Desf.) Fiori (Umbelliferae) Collected Wild in Central Sicily and Its Antimicrobial Activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 36, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Maresca, V.; Badalamenti, N.; Ilardi, V.; Bruno, M.; Bontempo, P.; Basile, A. Chemical Composition of Thymus leucotrichus Var. Creticus Essential Oil and Its Protective Effects on Both Damage and Oxidative Stress in Leptodictyum riparium Hedw. Induced by Cadmium. Plants 2022, 11, 3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Di Napoli, M.; Maresca, V.; Varcamonti, M.; Bruno, M.; Badalamenti, N.; Basile, A.; Zanfardino, A. (+)-(E)-Chrysanthenyl Acetate: A Molecule with Interesting Biological Properties Contained in the Anthemis secundiramea (Asteraceae) Flowers. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lauricella, M.; Maggio, A.; Badalamenti, N.; Bruno, M.; D’Angelo, G.D.; D’Anneo, A. Essential Oil of Foeniculum vulgare Subsp. Piperitum Fruits Exerts an Anti-tumor Effect in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2022, 26, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cvetkoviky, I.; Stefkov, G.; Karapandzova, M.; Kulevanova, S. Essential Oil Composition of Salvia Fruticosa Mill. Populations from Balkan Peninsula. Macedon. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 61, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schmiderer, C.; Torres-Londoño, P.; Novak, J. Proof of Geographical Origin of Albanian Sage by Essential Oil Analysis. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2013, 51, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Longaray Delamare, A.P.; Moschen-Pistorello, I.T.; Artico, L.; Atti-Serafini, L.; Echeverrigaray, S. Antibacterial Activity of the Essential Oils of Salvia officinalis L. and Salvia triloba L. Cultivated in South Brazil. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Savelev, S.U.; Okello, E.J.; Perry, E.K. Butyryl- and Acetyl-Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activities in Essential Oils of Salvia Species and Their Constituents. Phytother. Res. 2004, 18, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bellomaria, B.; Arnold, N.; Valentini, G.; Arnold, H.J. Contribution to the Study of the Essential Oils from Three Species of Salvia Growing Wild in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1992, 4, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pitarokili, D.; Tzakou, O.; Loukis, A.; Harvala, C. Volatile Metabolites from Salvia Fruticosa as Antifungal Agents in Soilborne Pathogens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3294–3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Katsiotis, S.; Iconomou, N.J. Qualitative and Quantitative Gasliquid Chromatographic Analysis of the Essential Oil of Salvia triloba Grown in Greece. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1984, 59, 29–32. [Google Scholar]
  34. Koliopoulos, G.; Pitarokili, D.; Kioulos, E.; Michaelakis, A.; Tzakou, O. Chemical Composition and Larvicidal Evaluation of Mentha, Salvia, and Melissa Essential Oils against the West Nile Virus Mosquito Culex Pipiens. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 107, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Soković, M.; Tzakou, O.; Pitarokili, D.; Couladis, M. Antifungal Activities of Selected Aromatic Plants Growing Wild in Greece. Nahrung 2002, 46, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Karousou, R.; Vokou, D.; Kokkini, S. Variation of Salvia Fruticosa Essential Oils on the Island of Crete (Greece). Bot. Acta 1998, 111, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Skoula, M.; Hilali, I.E.; Makris, A.M. Evaluation of the Genetic Diversity of Salvia Fruticosa Mill. Clones Using RAPD Markers and Comparison with the Essential Oil Profiles. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1999, 27, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Karioti, A.; Skaltsa, H.; Demetzos, C.; Perdetzoglou, D.; Economakis, C.D.; Salem, A.B. Effect of Nitrogen Concentration of the Nutrient Solution on the Volatile Constituents of Leaves of Salvia fruticosa Mill. in Solution Culture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 6505–6508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Skoula, M.; Abbes, J.E.; Johnson, C.B. Genetic Variation of Volatiles and Rosmarinic Acid in Populations of Salvia Fruticosa Mill Growing in Crete. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2000, 28, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kanias, G.D.; Souleles, C.; Loukis, A.; Philotheou-Panou, E. Statistical Study of Essential Oil Composition in Three Cultivated Sage Species. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1998, 10, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Leontaritou, P.; Lamari, F.N.; Papasotiropoulos, V.; Iatrou, G. Morphological, Genetic and Essential Oil Variation of Greek Sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.) Populations from Greece. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 150, 112346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sarrou, E.; Martens, S.; Chatzopoulou, P. Metabolite Profiling and Antioxidative Activity of Sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.) under the Influence of Genotype and Harvesting Period. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Koutsaviti, A.; Antonopoulou, V.; Vlassi, A.; Antonatos, S.; Michaelakis, A.; Papachristos, D.P.; Tzakou, O. Chemical Composition and Fumigant Activity of Essential Oils from Six Plant Families against Sitophilus oryzae (Col: Curculionidae). J. Pest. Sci. 2018, 91, 873–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Adam, K.; Sivropoulou, A.; Kokkini, S.; Lanaras, T.; Arsenakis, M. Antifungal Activities of Origanum Vulgare Subsp. Hirtum, Mentha spicata, Lavandula angustifolia, and Salvia fruticosa Essential Oils against Human Pathogenic Fungi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 1739–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Papageorgiou, V.; Gardeli, C.; Mallouchos, A.; Papaioannou, M.; Komaitis, M. Variation of the Chemical Profile and Antioxidant Behavior of Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Salvia fruticosa Miller Grown in Greece. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 7254–7264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Abd El-Wahab, M.A.; Toaima, W.I.M.; Hamed, E.S. Effect of Different Planting Locations in Egypt on Salvia fruticosa Mill. Plants. Egypt. J. Desert Res. 2015, 65, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Máthé, I.; Máthé, Á.; Hohmann, J.; Janicsák, G. Volatile and Some Non-Volatile Chemical Constituents of Mediterranean Salvia Species beyond Their Native Area. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 58, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Elmann, A.; Mordechay, S.; Rindner, M.; Larkov, O.; Elkabetz, M.; Ravid, U. Protective Effects of the Essential Oil of Salvia Fruticosa and Its Constituents on Astrocytic Susceptibility to Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Cell Death. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2009, 57, 6636–6641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Putievsky, E.; Ravid, U.; Dudai, N. The Essential Oil and Yield Components from Various Plant Parts of Salvia fruticosa. J. Nat. Prod. 1986, 49, 1015–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vergine, M.; Nicoli, F.; Negro, C.; Luvisi, A.; Nutricati, E.; Accogli, R.A.; Sabella, E.; Miceli, A. Phytochemical Profiles and Antioxidant Activity of Salvia Species from Southern Italy. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2019, 13, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Al-Kalaldeh, J.Z.; Abu-Dahab, R.; Afifi, F.U. Volatile Oil Composition and Antiproliferative Activity of Laurus nobilis, Origanum syriacum, Origanum vulgare, and Salvia triloba against Human Breast Adenocarcinoma Cells. Nutr. Res. 2010, 30, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. El Khoury, R.; Michael Jubeli, R.; El Beyrouthy, M.; Baillet Guffroy, A.; Rizk, T.; Tfayli, A.; Lteif, R. Phytochemical Screening and Antityrosinase Activity of Carvacrol, Thymoquinone, and Four Essential Oils of Lebanese Plants. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2019, 18, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Khoury, M.; Stien, D.; Eparvier, V.; Ouaini, N.; El Beyrouthy, M. Report on the Medicinal Use of Eleven Lamiaceae Species in Lebanon and Rationalization of Their Antimicrobial Potential by Examination of the Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Their Essential Oils. Evid. Based Complement Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 2547169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Arnold, N.; Nasser, H.; Baydoun, S. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oils of Five Salvia Species Growing Wild or Cultivated from Lebanon. Food Sci. Nutr. Res. 2018, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  55. Iriti, M.; Vitalini, S.; Arnold Apostolides, N.; El Beyrouthy, M. Chemical Composition and Antiradical Capacity of Essential Oils from Lebanese Medicinal Plants. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2014, 26, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Giweli, A.A.; Džamić, A.M.; Soković, M.; Ristić, M.S.; Janaćković, P.; Marin, P.D. The Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oil of Salvia Fruticosa Growing Wild in Libya. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2013, 65, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kocabas, I.; Kaplan, M.; Kurkcuoglu, M.; Baser, K.H.C. Effects of Different Organic Manure Applications on the Essential Oil Components of Turkish Sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.). Asian J. Chem 2010, 22, 1599–1605. [Google Scholar]
  58. Arslan, I.; Çelik, A. Free Radical Scavenging Activities and Essential Oil Analysis of Salvia cedronella Boiss. and S. fruticosa Mill. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2010, 13, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Karadağ, A.; İpekçi, E.; Yağcılar, A.; Demirbolat, I.; Kartal, M.; Siafaka, P.; Okur, N. Antibacterial Evaluation of Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton, Lavandula angustifolia Mill. and Salvia fruticosa Mill. Essential Oil Combinations in Mouthwash Preparations. Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils 2020, 7, 685474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Karik, Ü.; Çinar, O.; Tunçtürk, M.; Şekeroğlu, N.; Gezici, S. Essential Oil Composition of Some Sage (Salvia Spp.) Species Cultivated in İzmir (Turkey) Ecological Conditions. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2018, 52, s102–s107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Figueredo, G.; Ünver, A.; Chalchat, J.C.; Arslan, D.; Özcan, M.M. A Research on the Composition of Essential Oil Isolated from Some Aromatic Plants By Microwave And Hydrodistillation: The Composition Of Some Essential Oils. J. Food Biochem. 2012, 36, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Senol, F.S.; Orhan, I.E.; Erdem, S.A.; Kartal, M.; Sener, B.; Kan, Y.; Celep, F.; Kahraman, A.; Dogan, M. Evaluation of Cholinesterase Inhibitory and Antioxidant Activities of Wild and Cultivated Samples of Sage (Salvia Fruticosa) by Activity-Guided Fractionation. J. Med. Food 2011, 14, 1476–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Aşkun, T.; Başer, K.; Tümen, G.; Kürkçüoğlu, M. Characterization of Essential Oils of Some Salvia Species and Their Antimycobacterial Activities. Turk. J. Biol. 2010, 34, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chalchat, J.C.; Özcan, M.M.; Figueredo, G. The Composition of Essential Oils of Different Parts of Laurel, Mountain Tea, Sage and Ajowan. J. Food Biochem. 2011, 35, 484–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Topçu, G.; Öztürk, M.; Kuşman, T.; Demirkoz, A.; Kolak, U.; Ulubelen, A. Terpenoids, Essential Oil Composition, Fatty Acid Profile, and Biological Activities of Anatolian Salvia fruticosa Mill. Turk. J. Chem. 2013, 37, 619–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bayrak, A.; Akgül, A. Composition of Essential Oils from Turkish Salvia Species. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 846–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Özcan, M.M.; Figueredo, G.; Chalchat, J.C.; Chalard, P.; Al-Juhaimi, F.; Ghafoor, K.; El-Babiker, E.F. Chemical Constituents in Essential Oils of Salvia officinalis L. and Salvia fruticosa Mill. Z. Arznei Gewurzpfla. 2015, 20, 181–184. [Google Scholar]
  68. Gursoy, U.K.; Gursoy, M.; Gursoy, O.V.; Cakmakci, L.; Könönen, E.; Uitto, V.-J. Anti-Biofilm Properties of Satureja hortensis L. Essential Oil against Periodontal Pathogens. Anaerobe 2009, 15, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Süzgeç Selçuk, S.; Ozek, T.; Özek, G.; Yur, S.; Göger, F.; Gürdal, B.; Gülsoy Toplan, G.; Meriçli, A.H.; Baser, K.H.C. The Leaf and the Gall Volatiles of Salvia Fruticosa Miller from Turkey: Chemical Composition and Biological Activities. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2020, 15, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kosar, M.; Tunalier, Z.; Ozek, T.; Kürcüglu, M.; Can Baser, K.H. A Simple Method to Obtain Essential Oils from Salvia Triloba L. and Laurus nobilis L. by Using Microwave-Assisted Hydrodistillation. Z. Für Naturforschung C 2005, 60, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. di Martino, D. Ecologie dell’inquinamento Progetto di Territorio Attraverso la Bonifica. Available online: http://www.fedoa.unina.it/10025/ (accessed on 18 November 2021).
  72. Grezzi, G.; Ayuso, R.A.; De Vivo, B.; Lima, A.; Albanese, S. Lead Isotopes in Soils and Groundwaters as Tracers of the Impact of Human Activities on the Surface Environment: The Domizio-Flegreo Littoral (Italy) Case Study. J. Geochem. Explor. 2011, 109, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bove, M.A.; Ayuso, R.A.; De Vivo, B.; Lima, A.; Albanese, S. Geochemical and Isotopic Study of Soils and Waters from an Italian Contaminated Site: Agro Aversano (Campania). J. Geochem. Explor. 2011, 109, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Council of Europe. Determination of Essential Oils in Herbal Drugs. In European Pharmacopoeia; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2008; pp. 251–252. [Google Scholar]
  75. Rigano, D.; Formisano, C.; Rosselli, S.; Badalamenti, N.; Bruno, M. GC and GC-–MS Analysis of Volatile Compounds from Ballota nigra Subsp. Uncinata Collected in Aeolian Islands, Sicily (Southern Italy). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1934578X20920483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Esposito, S.; Sorbo, S.; Conte, B.; Basile, A. Effects of Heavy Metals on Ultrastructure and HSP70S Induction in the Aquatic Moss Leptodictyum Riparium Hedw. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2012, 14, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Maresca, V.; Fusaro, L.; Sorbo, S.; Siciliano, A.; Loppi, S.; Paoli, L.; Monaci, F.; Karam, E.A.; Piscopo, M.; Guida, M.; et al. Functional and Structural Biomarkers to Monitor Heavy Metal Pollution of One of the Most Contaminated Freshwater Sites in Southern Europe. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 163, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Maxwell, K.; Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll Fluorescence—A Practical Guide. J. Experim. Bot. 2000, 51, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. del Río, L.A. ROS and RNS in Plant Physiology: An Overview. J. Experim. Bot. 2015, 66, 2827–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shahid, M.; Pourrut, B.; Dumat, C.; Nadeem, M.; Aslam, M.; Pinelli, E. Heavy-Metal-Induced Reactive Oxygen Species: Phytotoxicity and Physicochemical Changes in Plants. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 232; Whitacre, D.M., Ed.; Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 1–44. ISBN 978-3-319-06746-9. [Google Scholar]
  81. Rajput, V.D.; Harish; Singh, R.K.; Verma, K.K.; Sharma, L.; Quiroz-Figueroa, F.R.; Meena, M.; Gour, V.S.; Minkina, T.; Sushkova, S.; et al. Recent Developments in Enzymatic Antioxidant Defence Mechanism in Plants with Special Reference to Abiotic Stress. Biology 2021, 10, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 12 01990 g001
Figure 1. ROS production (A), CAT, U/mL/mg of protein (B) and GST, umol/min/ug(prot) (C) in C. conicum samples. Bar marked with different letters are statistically different for ANOVA Tukey’s Post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. ROS production (A), CAT, U/mL/mg of protein (B) and GST, umol/min/ug(prot) (C) in C. conicum samples. Bar marked with different letters are statistically different for ANOVA Tukey’s Post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Antioxidants 12 01990 g001
Antioxidants 12 01990 g002
Figure 2. (A): Pictures of control and some of more significant samples of C. conicum, after 7 days of treatment. (B): Maximal quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) after 7 days of treatment, obtained by Imaging-PAM. Fv/Fm values of treated samples (C1, C2, C1-CAM25, C1-CIN16, C2-TE16) and not (CTRL) were showed bottom right of the panels. The false-color scale indicates the Fv/Fm values and range from black (0.0) to purple (1.0) is shown.
Figure 2. (A): Pictures of control and some of more significant samples of C. conicum, after 7 days of treatment. (B): Maximal quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) after 7 days of treatment, obtained by Imaging-PAM. Fv/Fm values of treated samples (C1, C2, C1-CAM25, C1-CIN16, C2-TE16) and not (CTRL) were showed bottom right of the panels. The false-color scale indicates the Fv/Fm values and range from black (0.0) to purple (1.0) is shown.
Antioxidants 12 01990 g002
Table 1. Main constituents (>3%) of the essential oils (EOs) of Salvia fruticosa, obtained by hydro-distillation, reported in literature.
Table 1. Main constituents (>3%) of the essential oils (EOs) of Salvia fruticosa, obtained by hydro-distillation, reported in literature.
OriginP.p.Compounds (%)Ref.
Albanial.1,8-cineole (38.9), camphor (8.4), α-pinene (5.9), α-thujone (5.4), α-terpineol (4.9), β-pinene (4.4), borneol (3.8), camphene (3.8), (E)-β-caryophyllene (3.5), β-thujone (3.4), myrcene (3.2)[26]
Albania,
7 localities		l.1,8-cineole (51.2–17.2), camphor (18.6–2.9), (E)-β-caryophyllene (16.0–0.7), β-thujone (10.4–1.1), α-pinene (6.0–1.7), camphene (6.0–0.5), α-terpineol (5.7–0), globulol (5.0–0), β-pinene (4.5–2.2), manool (4.5–0.8), α-terpenyl acetate (4.2–0), α-thujone (4.1–0.9)[27]
Albania,
Vlora		a.p.1,8-cineole (37.5–30.1), camphor (21.5–13.9), camphene (9.0–6.4), (E)-β-caryophyllene (8.1–5.3), α-pinene (7.1–6.6), β-pinene (5.6–4.5), myrcene (5.5–4.0)[28]
Brasila.p.α-thujone (20.1), 1,8-cineole (15.7), camphor (12.6), (E)-β-caryophyllene (11.8), α-humulene (7.5), viridiflorol (6.3), β-thujone (4.8), β-pinene (3.9)[29]
Cyprus, Troodosl.camphor (49.3–49.2), 1,8-cineole (21.5–17.6), (E)-β-caryophyllene (11.9–6.6), camphene (5.0–0), borneol (4.6–1.7), limonene (3.6–0)[30]
Cyprus,
6 localities		l.1,8-cineole (67.5–19.3), camphor (44.5–5.7), camphene (7.3–1.4), β-pinene (6.9–2.2), limonene (5.3–1.1), α-pinene (4.3–3.3)[31]
Cyprus,
4 localities		f.1,8-cineole (52.0–14.3), camphor (41.8–6.3), β-pinene (13.9–3.0), (E)-β-caryophyllene (8.7–4.4), camphene (6.5–2.1), α-pinene (5.7–1.8), borneol (5.2–3.5), limonene (3.1–1.6)[32]
Cyprus,
5 localities		s.1,8-cineole (54.7–4.0), camphor (44.2–7.6), (E)-β-caryophyllene (23.0–3.4), caryophyllene oxide (12.2–1.9), β-pinene (9.7–0), borneol (7.6–1.5), camphene (6.5–0), α-pinene (4.2–0)[31]
Greece,
3 localities		l.1,8-cineole (58.3–23.7), globulol (9.9–0), β-thujone (9.8–2.6), α-terpineol (6.4–3.2), manool (6.4–0), β-pinene (6.1–0.8), α-terpenyl acetate (5.2–0), α-pinene (4.2–0.4), (E)-β-caryophyllene (3.8–0.8), α-thujone (3.5–1.2),[27]
Greece,
15 localities		l.1,8-cineole (54.4–16.9), (E)-β-caryophyllene (15.6–0), camphor (15.4–0.6), α-thujone (14.5–0), β-thujone (9.0–0.6), β-pinene (9.0–0), viridiflorol (8.4–0), borneol (8.0–0), α-pinene (7.4–1.5), camphene (7.0–0), bornyl acetate (6.8–0), α-terpineol (6.7–0), myrcene (5.2–1.6)[32]
Greece,
8 localities		l.1,8-cineole (66.2–38.8), camphor (23.8–1,7), thujone (12.1–1.4), β-pinene (10.7–2.9), camphene (7.4–0.4), (E)-β-caryophyllene (7.3–1.2), α-pinene (6.7–3.7), myrcene (6.7–0)[33]
Greece,
Ikaria		a.p.camphor (23.1), α-pinene (12.7), borneol (12.6), camphene (9.0), 1,8-cineole (6.9), β-pinene (5.8), (E)-β-caryophyllene (5.3), α-terpineol (4.6), caryophyllene oxide (3.8)[34]
Greece, Kalymnosa.p.1,8-cineole (31.4), camphor (22.6), α-pinene (8.7), camphene (8.5), α-thujone (7.5), β-pinene (4.5), β-thujone (4.1)[34]
Greece,
Krete		a.p.1,8-cineole (41.4), camphor (12.1), β-thujone (10.3), β-pinene (6.4), α-pinene (5.4), α-terpineol (5.0), camphene (3.1)[35]
Greece,
Krete		a.p.1,8-cineole (64.2–22.7), camphor (30.3–0.8), β-thujone (25.6–0.9), α-thujone (19.2–1.0), camphene (9.9–0.2), β-pinene (9.4–3.5), α-terpineol (7.5–1.2), (E)-β-caryophyllene (6.9–0.2), myrcene (5.3–1.6), α-pinene (5.2–1.8),[36]
Greece,
Krete 		l.1,8-cineole (51.0–35.6), camphor (11.6–3.7), β-thujone (11.5–1.9), β-pinene (7.0–5.0), α-thujone (5.6–2.9), (E)-β-caryophyllene (4.7–1.3), α-pinene (4.5–3.6), camphene (3.2–0.7)[37]
Greece, Krete, clt NO3-N, 100 mg/Ll.1,8-cineole (37.5–26.8), viridiflorol (15.7–7.2), (E)-β-caryophyllene (13.0–0.2), 13-epi-manool (11.4–4.6), myrcene (7.0–3.7), α-humulene (6.0–4.8), α-pinene (5.1–3.7), β-pinene (4.6–4.5), α-aromadendrene (4.5–3.1), α-terpineol (3.6–2.5)[38]
Greece, Krete, clt NO3-N, 150 mg/Ll.1,8-cineole (28.6–22.5), 13-epi-manool (13.1–12.9), (E)-β-caryophyllene (12.2), viridiflorol (10.9–10.7), α-humulene (4.9–4.7), α-pinene (4.1–2.6), β-pinene (4.0–3.7), α-terpineol (3.8–3.0), myrcene (3.7–2.6), α-aromadendrene (3.6–3.0)[38]
Greece, Krete, clt NO3-N, 200 mg/Ll.viridiflorol (37.9–23.3), 13-epi-manool (25.7–14.3), (E)-β-caryophyllene (11.5–9.9), α-humulene (10.2–8.6), α-terpineol (6.6–6.2), caryophyllene oxide (3.9–3.3)[38]
Greece, Krete, cltl.1,8-cineole (59.3–48.1), β-pinene (11.9–10.3), α-pinene (10.0–9.3), myrcene (7.8–3.7), camphor (5.9–1.3), β-thujone (4.5–0.5)[39]
Greece, Krete, cltl.1,8-cineole (62.9–28.2), α-thujone (34.1–2.0), camphor (10.3–0.4), β-pinene (8.8–0.9), β-thujone (8.6–0.9), (E)-β-caryophyllene (5.6–1.4), myrcene (5.2–1.1), caryophyllene oxide (5.2–0.2), α-pinene (3.9–0.2)[40]
Greece, Peloponnesel.1,8-cineole (46.6–27.8), camphor (15.6–6.2), (E)-β-caryophyllene (9.7–4.0), camphene (7.4–2.5), α-pinene (7.1–4.1), β-pinene (5.4–3.3), myrcene (5.4–3.1), α-terpineol (4.0–2.0), β-thujone (3.0–0.6)[41]
Greece, clta.p.1,8-cineole (55.7–44.7), camphor (14.9–1.3), β-pinene (14.1–5.8), (E)-β-caryophyllene (7.2–1.4), camphene (5.9–0.5), α-pinene (5.9–3.5), myrcene (5.6–2.7), α-terpineol (5.2–2.1),[42]
Greece, clta.p.camphor (18.6), 1,8-cineole (16.6), camphene (7.0), (E)-β-caryophyllene (5.4), β-pinene (5.3), α-pinene (5.2), bornyl acetate (4.4), α-terpineol (3.9), α-thujone (3.8), β-thujone (4.1), limonene (3.1)[43]
Greece, Mt. Ochi, Eubeaa.p.1,8-cineole (56.3), β-pinene (7.8), (E)-β-caryophyllene (7.0), α-terpineol (5.6), β-thujone (4.1), α-pinene (4.0), myrcene (3.0)[43]
Greece, Sithonial.1,8-cineole (43.1), camphor (18.3), β-pinene (8.2), α-pinene (6.8), sabinene (4.8), myrcene (3.2),[44]
Greece, Zakynthosa.p.1,8-cineole (58.9–46.0), viridiflorol (7.0–2.1), camphor (5.8–07), (E)-β-caryophyllene (5.1–1.0), β-pinene (5.0–2.0), myrcene (4.6–3.2), α-terpineol (4.3–2.8), α-pinene (4.0–3.2), α-thujone (3.1–1.1)[45]
Egypt,
3 localities		a.p.camphor (23.7–5.1), 1,8-cineole (45.7–31.9), (E)-β-caryophyllene (11.5–0.9), β-pinene (9.9–6.7), camphene (8.7–1.9), α-pinene (5.7–2.9), myrcene (4.0–1.6)[46]
Hungary, clta.p.camphor (26.0), α-thujone (21.4), 1,8-cineole (16.9), viridiflorol (5.6), myrcene (4.3)[47]
Israel, clta.p.1,8-cineole (26.4), camphor (18.9), camphene (9.5), α-thujone (9.1), (E)-β-caryophyllene (5.0), α-humulene (3.9), β-pinene (4.7), α-pinene (4.4)[48]
Israel, cltl.1,8-cineole (44.0), α-pinene (18.6), (E)-β-caryophyllene (11.3), β-pinene (5.0), camphor (3.3)[49]
Israel, clts.α-pinene (37.3), 1,8-cineole (31.5), (E)-β-caryophyllene (7.6), β-pinene (7.0), camphor (6.8)[49]
Israel, cltf.α-pinene (31.5), 1,8-cineole (30.8), (E)-β-caryophyllene (10.4), β-pinene (6.6), camphor (5.6), α-terpinil acetate (3.4), camphene (3.1)[49]
Italy, Salento, clta.p.1,8-cineole (27.6), (E)-β-caryophyllene (18.3), limonene (8.8), humulene (7.6), myrcene (5.0), α-pinene (3.7), γ-gurjunene (3.7)[50]
Jordan, Ammanl.1,8-cineole (45.2), camphor (11.5), β-pinene (9.0), γ-terpineol (4.4), α-pinene (3.3)[51]
Lebanon, Ebrinea.p.1,8-cineole (33.5), β-pinene (9.8), α-pinene (8.0), (E)-β-caryophyllene (7.6), α-thujone (7.1), α-terpineol (6.4), camphor (5.6), α-terpinyl acetate (3.7), myrcene (3.5)[52]
Lebanona.p.1,8-cineole (57.3), (E)-β-caryophyllene (8.3), camphor (4.8), α-terpineol (4.2)[53]
Lebanona.p.1,8-cineole (21.5), β-pinene (10.1), α-terpineol (9.2), (E)-β-caryophyllene (7.3), camphor (6.3), camphene (5.0), γ-gurjunene (4.4)[54]
Lebanon, Nahr Ibrahima.p.1,8-cineole (48.7), (E)-β-caryophyllene (30.8), aromadendrene (3.3), β-pinene (3.2)[55]
Lybia,
Biadda		a.p.1,8-cineole (49.3), camphor (7.5), β-pinene (7.4), myrcene (7.4), α-pinene (5.1), (E)-β-caryophyllene (4.1), α-terpineol (3.2)[56]
Turkey, cultivateda.p.1,8-cineole (45.0), camphor (7.0), (E)-β-caryophyllene (5.7), β-pinene (5.3), β-thujone (5.1), α-pinene (5.0), camphene (3.0)[57]
Turkey, ÇakIroluka.p.1,8-cineole (11.6), camphor (10.4), α-thujone (10.4), β-gurjunene (8.2), α-humulene (7.5), β-thujone (4.8), β-pinene (3.9)[58]
Turkey, Iskilip, Çoruma.p.1,8-cineole (40.0), camphor (11.3), α-pinene (7.3), myrcene (4.5), camphene (3.9)[59]
Turkey, Izmir, cultivateda.p.1,8-cineole (57.2), β-pinene (8.2), myrcene (5.7), (E)-β-caryophyllene (4.8), α-pinene (3.4), camphor (3.1), β-thujone (3.1)[60]
Turkey, Konya marketl.1,8-cineole (51.2), α-thujone (5.8), α-pinene (4.4), β-pinene (3.1)[61]
Turkey, Kalkanl.1,8-cineole (456 mg/mL), thymol (39 mg/mL), camphor (36 mg/mL), α-pinene (27 mg/mL), β-pinene (20 mg/mL)[61]
Turkey, Konya, clta.p.1,8-cineole (36.2), camphor (19.1), thujone (7.8), β-pinene (6.4), α-pinene (5.3), (E)-β-caryophyllene (4.8), α-terpineol (3.9)[62]
Turkey, Marmaraa.p.1,8-cineole, (52.8), camphor (5.8), α-pinene (5.8), β-pinene (4.5), myrcene (3.8), camphene (3.1)[63]
Turkey, Mersina.p.α-pinene (31.0), isoborneol (27.2), borneol (7.6), 1,8-cineole, (6.9), camphene (6.1), β-pinene (3.9)[64]
Turkey, Muğlaa.p.1,8-cineole (58.9), α-pinene (5.6), β-pinene (5.2), myrcene (5.2), camphor (4.5), (E)-β-caryophyllene (4.2), α-terpineol (3.0)[65]
Turkey, Muğlaa.p.1,8-cineole (55.5), camphor (8.4), (E)-β-caryophyllene (5.2), borneol (4.6), β-pinene (4.3), α-pinene (3.2), myrcene (3.1)[66]
Turkey, Muğlaa.p.1,8-cineole (40.1), camphor (26.8), borneol (8.9), camphene (5.3), α-pinene (3.6)[67]
Turkey, West Mediteraeana.p.1,8-cineole (49.5), camphor (13.3), β-pinene (7.2), α-pinene (5.8), camphene (5.0), β-thujone (3.6)[68]
Turkey,
3 localities		l.1,8-cineole (47.1–27.2), camphor (19.8–9.3), camphene (10.7–3.8), α-pinene (7.1–5.7), β-pinene (5.8–5.7), borneol (4.4–1.5), α-thujone (3.4–1.9), (E)-β-caryophyllene (3.1–1,5)[69]
Turkey, commerciall.1,8-cineole (52.0), camphor (10.4), α-pinene (6.0), camphene (4.7), β-pinene (3.9), myrcene (3.3)[70]
P.p. = plant parts; a.p. = aerial parts; l. = leaves; f. = flowers; s. = stems; clt. = cultivated.
Table 2. The concentration of heavy metals (μg l−1) in waters of river measured in the two experimental sites (Acerra, C1; Castel Volturno, C2) (Maresca et al., 2018) [77].
Table 2. The concentration of heavy metals (μg l−1) in waters of river measured in the two experimental sites (Acerra, C1; Castel Volturno, C2) (Maresca et al., 2018) [77].
C1C2
Cu4743.46 ± 24.41 a10,812.52 ± 43.94 b
Zn4260.64 ± 11.02 a396,728.84 ± 1633.1 b
Cd1804.90 ± 9.38 a278,743.55 ± 685.84 b
Pb35.94 ± 4.50 a943.77 ± 22.53 b
Values are presented as mean ± st. dev; numbers not accompanied by the same letter are significantly different at p < 0.05, using the post-hoc Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Table 3. Outline of the experimental design.
Table 3. Outline of the experimental design.
Heavy Metals ExposureEO TreatmentCode
No exposure (without DMSO)No essential oilCTRL
No exposure (with DMSO)No essential oilCTRL-D
C1 Heavy Metals mixNo essential oilC1
C2 Heavy Metals mixNo essential oilC2
Total EO extract treatments
No exposure (with DMSO)Total EO extract 0.16%CTRL-TE16
C1 Heavy Metals mixTotal EO extract 0.16%C1-TE16
C2 Heavy Metals mixTotal EO extract 0.16%C2-TE16
No exposure (with DMSO)Total EO extract 0.25%CTRL-TE25
C1 Heavy Metals mixTotal EO extract 0.25%C1-TE25
C2 Heavy Metals mixTotal EO extract 0.25%C2-TE25
Pure EOs treatments
No exposure (with DMSO)Camphor 0.16%CTRL-CAM16
C1 Heavy Metals mixCamphor 0.16%C1-CAM16
C2 Heavy Metals mixCamphor 0.16%C2-CAM16
No exposure (with DMSO)Camphor 0.25%CTRL-CAM25
C1 Heavy Metals mixCamphor 0.25%C1-CAM25
C2 Heavy Metals mixCamphor 0.25%C2-CAM25
No exposure (with DMSO)β-myrcene 0.16%CTRL-MYR16
C1 Heavy Metals mixβ-myrcene 0.16%C1-MYR16
C2 Heavy Metals mixβ-myrcene 0.16%C2-MYR16
No exposure (with DMSO)β-myrcene 0.25%CTRL-MYR25
C1 Heavy Metals mixβ-myrcene 0.25%C1-MYR25
C2 Heavy Metals mixβ-myrcene 0.25%C2-MYR25
No exposure (with DMSO)1,8-cineole 0.16%CTRL-CIN16
C1 Heavy Metals mix1,8-cineole 0.16%C1-CIN16
C2 Heavy Metals mix1,8-cineole 0.16%C2-CIN16
No exposure (with DMSO)1,8-cineole 0.25%CTRL-CIN25
C1 Heavy Metals mix1,8-cineole 0.25%C1-CIN25
C2 Heavy Metals mix1,8-cineole 0.25%C2-CIN25
Table 4. Constituents of the EO of the flowering aerial parts of Salvia fruticosa collected in Sicily.
Table 4. Constituents of the EO of the flowering aerial parts of Salvia fruticosa collected in Sicily.
LRI aLRI bCompound%Identification c
85513181-Hexanol0.03 ± 0.001, 2, 3
8601344(Z)-4-Hexen-1-ol0.04 ± 0.001, 2
9231007Tricyclene0.12 ± 0.001, 2
9331025α-Pinene6.51 ± 0.271, 2, 3
9501040Camphene8.69 ± 0.381, 2, 3
9751080β-Pinene6.70 ± 0.211, 2, 3
9801412Oct-1-en-3-ol0.13 ± 0.001, 2
9891137β-Myrcene9.13 ± 0.381, 2, 3
102811721,8-Cineole (Eucalyptol)17.56 ± 0.74 1, 2, 3
10571240γ-Terpinene1.38 ± 0.04 1, 2
10601470(E)-Sabinene hydrate0.30 ± 0.011, 2
10741493(Z)-Sabinene hydrate0.06 ± 0.00 1, 2
10891250Terpinolene0.45 ± 0.021, 2
10971513β-Linalool0.19 ± 0.00 1, 2, 3
11001368α-Thujone1.26 ± 0.041, 2
11061386β-Thujone2.11 ± 0.081, 2
11281564(E)-p-2-Menthen-1-ol0.13 ± 0.001, 2
11301515Camphor13.63 ± 0.541, 2, 3
11421818p-Cymene-8-ol0.03 ± 0.001, 2
11511640Isoborneol0.04 ± 0.00 1, 2
11621690Borneol3.69 ± 0.131, 2
11681592Terpinene-4-ol1.90 ± 0.061, 2
11801705α-Terpineol6.56 ± 0.271, 2, 3
11851342(E)-1-Octenyl acetate0.07 ± 0.001, 2
12651546Bornyl acetate1.63 ± 0.061, 2
13002167Carvacrol0.02 ± 0.001, 2
13661674Isoledene0.04 ± 0.001, 2
14321583(E)-β-Caryophyllene2.12 ± 0.091, 2
14391833(E)-Geranylacetone0.04 ± 0.001, 2
14481690α-Humulene0.27 ± 0.011, 2
15181796(E)-Calamene0.16 ± 0.001, 2
15321716δ-Cadinene0.78 ± 0.021, 2
15522019Ledol0.03 ± 0.001, 2
15672119(Z)-3-Hexen-1-yl-benzoate0.12 ± 0.001, 2
15692129Spathulenol0.18 ± 0.001, 2
15781960Caryophyllene oxide1.21 ± 0.041, 2,
15902027Globulol4.07 ± 0.151, 2
15922073Viridiflorol0.04 ± 0.001, 2
16482250α-Eudesmol0.05 ± 0.001, 2
20342603Manool3.01 ± 0.111, 2
23193203Ferruginol0.17 ± 0.001, 2
Class of Compounds
Aliphatic alcohols0.20 ± 0.00
Aliphatic esters0.07 ± 0.00
Aromatic esters0.12 ± 0.00
Monoterpene hydrocarbons31.60 ± 1.30
Oxygenated monoterpenes49.11 ± 1.93
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons3.41 ± 0.12
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes5.58 ± 0.19
Oxygenated diterpenes3.18 ± 0.11
Total93.27 ± 3.65
a Linear Retention Index on a DB-5 MS column; b Linear Retention Index on a Supelcowax 10 column; c 1: linear retention index; 2: mass spectrum; 3: co-injection with authentic compound. Values are expressed as average of three measurements ± standard deviation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Badalamenti, N.; Salbitani, G.; Cianciullo, P.; Bossa, R.; De Ruberto, F.; Greco, V.; Basile, A.; Maresca, V.; Bruno, M.; Carfagna, S. Chemical Composition of Salvia fruticosa Mill. Essential Oil and Its Protective Effects on Both Photosynthetic Damage and Oxidative Stress in Conocephalum conicum L. Induced by Environmental Heavy Metal Concentrations. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12111990

AMA Style

Badalamenti N, Salbitani G, Cianciullo P, Bossa R, De Ruberto F, Greco V, Basile A, Maresca V, Bruno M, Carfagna S. Chemical Composition of Salvia fruticosa Mill. Essential Oil and Its Protective Effects on Both Photosynthetic Damage and Oxidative Stress in Conocephalum conicum L. Induced by Environmental Heavy Metal Concentrations. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(11):1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12111990

Chicago/Turabian Style

Badalamenti, Natale, Giovanna Salbitani, Piergiorgio Cianciullo, Rosanna Bossa, Francesca De Ruberto, Valeria Greco, Adriana Basile, Viviana Maresca, Maurizio Bruno, and Simona Carfagna. 2023. "Chemical Composition of Salvia fruticosa Mill. Essential Oil and Its Protective Effects on Both Photosynthetic Damage and Oxidative Stress in Conocephalum conicum L. Induced by Environmental Heavy Metal Concentrations" Antioxidants 12, no. 11: 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12111990

APA Style

Badalamenti, N., Salbitani, G., Cianciullo, P., Bossa, R., De Ruberto, F., Greco, V., Basile, A., Maresca, V., Bruno, M., & Carfagna, S. (2023). Chemical Composition of Salvia fruticosa Mill. Essential Oil and Its Protective Effects on Both Photosynthetic Damage and Oxidative Stress in Conocephalum conicum L. Induced by Environmental Heavy Metal Concentrations. Antioxidants, 12(11), 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12111990

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop