Next Article in Journal
Korean Red Ginseng Attenuates Particulate Matter-Induced Senescence of Skin Keratinocytes
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Profile and Bioactivity Evaluation of Salvia Species from Eastern Europe
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ameliorative Effects of Lactobacillus paracasei L14 on Oxidative Stress and Gut Microbiota in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Rats

1
State Key Laboratory of Resource Insects, College of Sericulture, Textile and Biomass Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(8), 1515; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081515
Submission received: 30 June 2023 / Revised: 25 July 2023 / Accepted: 27 July 2023 / Published: 28 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Health Outcomes of Antioxidants and Oxidative Stress)

Abstract

:
Bioprospecting of more novel probiotic strains has attained continuous interest. This study aimed to investigate the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus paracasei strain L14, an isolate from a traditional Chinese dairy product, on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) rats. Preventive supplementation of strain L14 showed excellent anti-diabetic effects on high-fat diet/low-dose streptozotocin (HFD/STZ)-induced T2DM rats. It significantly reduced hyperglycemia, protected pancreatic β-cell and liver function, and ameliorated oxidative stress while considerably improving dyslipidemia and inflammation. Furthermore, the strain modulated the gut microbiota to alleviate gut dysbiosis. Interestingly, most of these biochemical parameters could even restore to normal levels by the intervention of strain L14. The whole-genome sequencing of L14 was performed to provide a critical molecular basis for its probiotic activities. Genes related to antioxidant systems and other beneficial microbial metabolites like exopolysaccharides (EPS) biosynthesis were found. This study demonstrates that probiotic L. paracasei L14 has good potential for applications in functional food and pharmaceutical industries.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

As a chronic metabolic disease, diabetes presents a significant risk to public health. T2DM accounts for approximately 90% of all cases. About 537 million people between the ages of 20 and 79 suffered from diabetes worldwide in 2021, which increased by 16% compared to 2019 and accounted for 10.5% of the global adult population. Furthermore, about half of diabetic cases remain undiagnosed [1]. Some of the primary characteristics of T2DM include hyperglycemia, insulin resistance (IR), and inadequate insulin production. T2DM is also related to oxidative stress, inflammatory status, dyslipidemia, and gut dysbiosis [2]. Studies have shown that gut microbiota contributes critically to the pathophysiology of T2DM via host–microbiota interactions, potentially by affecting gut barrier function, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, gut hormone secretion, and energy metabolism [3,4].
Probiotics, especially Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, have emerged as a novel strategy to alleviate the occurrence and development of T2DM by regulating gut microbiota and producing advantageous metabolites like short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and other compounds [5]. For example, L. paracasei HII01 exhibited antihyperglycemic action in rats with T2DM via gut microbial regulation and promoting gut functionality [6]. L. plantarum SHY130 showed anti-diabetic properties in mice with HFD/STZ-induced T2DM by improving glucose homeostasis via the regulation of the enteroinsular axis [7]. Although extensive research has confirmed the beneficial effect of probiotics in preventing and treating T2DM, the specific regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. In addition, probiotics show strain-specific properties and different strains may work via different mechanisms. Therefore, screening and clinical verification of more specific probiotics for T2DM are necessary.
L. paracasei L14, isolated from a traditional Chinese dairy product, shows high dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPPIV) and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities in vitro [8,9]. This study focuses on the preventive effects of strain L14 on T2DM rats and its possible mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The T2DM Rat Model Induced by HFD/STZ

The Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (certificate number SCXK (Beijing) 2016-0001, Beijing, China) supplied the 18 male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats (8 weeks old, specific-pathogen-free (SPF)), which were kept at Tsinghua University. The Tsinghua University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (SYXK2014-0024; Beijing, China) approved all the animal protocols used in this study. The Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC) approved the animal laboratory facility.
The design of the animal experiments followed previously described methods [10], as shown in Figure 1. The experiments consisted of three groups (each with n = 6, 2 in each cage): the normal (N) group, diabetic control (C) group, and L. paracasei L14 (L14) protection group. After a 1-week acclimation period (week 0), the rats in group N received a normal chow between weeks 1 and 12, while the remaining animals received a HFD comprising 0.5% sodium cholate and 10% lard, 20% sucrose, and 67% of the normal diet. Meanwhile, the rats in the L14 group were orally administered with 1010 CFU/head of strain L14 once daily from weeks 1 to 12. At week 5, the rats in the C and L14 groups were subjected to a 16 h fasting period, after which they were intraperitoneally injected with fresh streptozotocin (STZ) (a cold 0.1 mol/L citrate buffer was used for dissolution at pH 4.2) at a 30 mg kg–1 body weight (BW) dosage, while the rats in the N were administered with an equal volume of vehicle buffer. One week after injection (at week 6), the fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were recorded, while T2DM was deemed present at FBG > 11.1 mmol L–1.

2.2. The FBG, BW, and Water and Food Consumption

Blood was collected weekly from the tail veins of the rats to monitor the FBG, after which a glucometer was used for analysis (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The BW and consumption of water and feed were also monitored every week.

2.3. Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)

The OGTT was conducted at week 12. The rats were exposed to a fasting period of 12 h before receiving glucose at a dosage of 2 g kg–1 BW. The glucose levels in the blood were detected at 0 min, 30 min, 60 min, and 120 min.

2.4. Biochemical Parameters

After 12 weeks, the rats were fasted for a 12 h period and sacrificed using isoflurane. Blood was acquired via the inferior vena cava and subjected to centrifugation to separate the serum for biochemical examination. The homeostatic model (HOMA-IR) was used to quantify the IR via the following calculation: HOMA-IR = FBG (mmol L–1) × Fasting blood insulin (mU L–1)/22.5. The insulin, lipid profiles, inflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress were determined with commercial kits (Beijing Sino-UK Institute of Biological Technology, Beijing, China).

2.5. Histopathological Examination of the Pancreas and Liver Tissues

At the end of week 12, the pancreas and liver tissues isolated from the rats in the different groups were fixed in a 10% paraformaldehyde solution. Next, the paraffin was used to embed the fixed tissues, which were sliced into sections of 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for examination via light microscopy.

2.6. Gut Microbiota Analysis

At the end of week 12, fresh feces were collected from the rats, and genomic DNA was extracted for the gut microbiota analyses, as previously described [11]. The extracted DNA was processed by an external service using an Illumina MiSeq Platform (Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology, Shanghai, China). Furthermore, the amplification of the hypervariable V3-V4 area of the ribosomal 16S RNA gene was achieved using universal primers (338F: 5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′ and 806R: 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). The Illumina MiSeq platform was used to perform further paired-end sequencing. Raw 16S rRNA reads have been made available on the SRA under the BioProject number PRJNA830649. After demultiplexing, the resulting sequences were quality filtered with fastp (v0.19.6) and merged with FLASH (v1.2.7). The optimized sequences were further de-noised using the DADA2 plugin in the QIIME2 (v.2020.2), and the de-noised sequences are usually called amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). To minimize the influence of sequencing depth on the subsequent analysis of alpha and beta diversity, the number of sequences from all samples was rarefied to 17,999, which still reached an average Good’s coverage of 99.98%. Taxonomic allocation of ASVs was performed using the classify-sklearn (Naive Bayes) implemented in QIIME2 and the SILVA 16S rRNA database (v138).
Bioinformatic analysis of the gut microbiota was carried out using the Majorbio Cloud platform (https://cloud.majorbio.com, accessed on 18 June 2023). Based on the ASVs information, alpha diversity indices, including Chao1 richness and Shannon index, were calculated with Mothur v1.30.2, while the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity Vegan v2.4.3 package was employed to determine the beta diversity via principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). Linear discriminant effect size (LEfSe) evaluation determined the differentially abundant biomarkers in the groups. The correlations between the T2DM-related indices and the top 28 most abundant genera were assessed using a pairwise Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, which was presented in a heatmap.

2.7. Whole-Genome Sequencing of L. paracasei L14

The whole genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina Novaseq6000 and Nanopore PromethION platforms by Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd. The Nanopore PromethION platform provides long-read sequences that are highly beneficial for the de novo assembly of genomes, especially for resolving complex regions; however, it has a relatively high error rate. On the other hand, the Illumina NovaSeq6000 platform only generates short-read sequences but is extremely accurate. Thus, the two platforms were combined to leverage the advantages of both platforms to achieve high-quality genome assembly with both long-distance continuity and high accuracy. The generated data were performed bioinformatics analysis using the free online platform of Majorbio Cloud Platform (http://cloud.majorbio.com, accessed on 10 June 2023). Specifically, the raw Illumina sequencing reads were quality-filtered using fastp v0.23.0. Nanopore reads were extracted, basecalled, demultiplexed, and trimmed using ONT Guppy with the minimum Q score cutoff of 7. The clean short and long reads were then co-assembled to construct complete genomes using Unicycle v0.4.8 [12], and Pilon v1.22 was then used to polish the assembly to reduce the rate of small errors. The coding sequences (CDS) were predicted using Prodigal v2.6.3 and annotated from NR, Swiss-Prot, Pfam, GO, COG, and KEGG databases using sequence alignment tools such as BLAST, Diamond, and HMMER. A whole-genome blast search (e-value < 10−5) was performed against the above databases.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were evaluated using the Student’s t-test when two groups were compared and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison test when more than two groups were compared by SPSS v.20. A difference was deemed significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. L. paracasei L14 Reduces Hyperglycemia, Improves IR, and Protects Pancreatic Beta-Cell Function in the T2DM Rat Model Induced by HFD/STZ

The T2DM phenotypical traits such as weight loss, higher water consumption, as well as higher food intake were observed in the C group (Figure 2A–C). However, in group L14, there was only a slight drop in body weight after the STZ injection, followed by a steady rise. The average water and food intake were significantly lower in group L14 compared to group C levels (p < 0.05).
After STZ injection, the average FBG concentration of group C increased dramatically to 16.6 mmol L–1 in one week (Figure 3A, p < 0.05). This level was maintained until the conclusion of the experiment, indicating the success of the model establishment. Contrarily, the FBG in the L14 prevention group showed no obvious changes following STZ injection, which was markedly lower than that in group C, possibly because preventive Lactobacillus supplementation for four weeks before modeling provided some protection against diabetes.
This research also assessed the impact of strain L14 on glucose intolerance and IR. As shown in Figure 3B, the glucose tolerance in group C was severely impaired, displaying a significantly higher glucose area under the curve (AUC) after OGTT compared to the N group (p < 0.05). Preventive supplementation with strain L14 significantly reduced these levels by 54% compared to the C group (p < 0.05), exhibiting no substantial differences from group N (p > 0.05). The HOMA-IR in group C was considerably higher than in group N, indicating severe IR in group C (Figure 3C), while ingestion of the strain L14 significantly reduced the HOMA-IR level compared to group C (p < 0.05). This indicated that L. paracasei L14 improved the glucose tolerance and IR of the rats as a preventative measure.
The pancreatic histological analysis exposed obvious differences in the islet morphology (Figure 3D), as indicated via insulin and glucagon double-immunofluorescence staining. In group C, the number of β-cells (insulin-positive) in the islet was obviously decreased, and its arrangement was loose. Degenerative changes of β-cells, such as irregular nuclear size and morphology, nuclear shrinkage or karyolysis, and cell necrosis, were also found in group C. In addition, the number of α-cells (glucagon-positive) was considerably higher compared with the N group. However, the L14 group improved the pathological appearance with a marked increase in the β-cell number, which is closely arranged and evenly distributed in the islets. These results indicated that the strain L14 protected against β-cell destruction and restricted α-cell expansion in HFD/STZ-induced rats, consequently protecting β-cell function, which was in line with other findings that probiotics protect the islets of Langerhans from destruction and prevent hyperglycemia [10]. The administration of the L14 strain also significantly ameliorated the pathological state of the liver by improving its histological morphology (Figure 3E).
Recently, there have been many studies on regulating blood glucose by probiotics [13], but very few strains can restore blood glucose to normal levels. Interestingly, preventive supplementation of probiotic strain L14 was able to restore most of the biochemical parameters to normal levels, suggesting excellent effects for preventing or delaying the onset of T2DM. The ability to survive and colonize the gut is an important property for the probiotics to perform their beneficial functions. Thus, the gut colonization ability of strain L14 was examined, and results showed that it displayed an excellent colonization ability, with bacterial counts of 2.4 × 105 CFU/g ileum and 2.9 × 106 CFU/g colon, respectively.

3.2. L. paracasei L14 Ameliorates the Hyperlipidemia Status and Improves the Inflammatory and Antioxidant Status of the T2DM Rats Exposed to HFD/STZ

T2DM is often accompanied by lipid metabolic disorders. In this study, the TC and LDL-C levels were considerably higher in group C than in the N group, while the increase in the two biochemical parameters of group L14 was substantially attenuated (Figure 4A, p < 0.05). An HFD causes inflammation, which is reportedly the primary factor contributing to IR [14]. Therefore, this study investigated whether the strain L14 could alleviate inflammation in diabetic rats. As shown in Figure 4B, the TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 pro-inflammatory factors in group C were substantially higher than in the N group (p < 0.05), while that of the anti-inflammatory factor, IL-10, displayed a considerable decline. However, in the L14 intervention group, the pro-inflammatory factors were downregulated, and the IL-10 level was upregulated. Studies have shown that FFA and LPS can trigger pro-inflammatory factor production and inhibit the insulin signaling pathway, consequently aggravating IR [15,16,17]. The C group displayed substantially higher FFA and LPS levels than the N group. However, supplementation with strain L14 significantly reduced the FFA and LPS levels (Figure 4B, p < 0.05). These results indicated that L. paracasei strain could inhibit the inflammatory response by regulating FFA, LPS, and inflammation-related cytokine levels to alleviate IR in the HFD/STZ subjects.
Studies have shown that oxidative stress is a vital trigger for IR, as well as the subsequent occurrence, development, and complications of T2DM [18]. Oxidative stress also contributes to other disorders, including aging, cancer, atherosclerosis, and neurodegenerative disease [19]. Figure 4C shows the effect of Lactobacillus on oxidative stress in rat livers. The levels of the CAT, GSH-PX, and SOD antioxidant enzymes in the C group rats were considerably lower than in group N (p < 0.05). The MDA content was substantially higher, suggesting impaired antioxidant capacity in the C group. The administration of L. paracasei L14 substantially elevated the CAT, GSH-PX, and SOD content, while the MDA decreased, even returning to normal levels. Therefore, L. paracasei improved oxidative stress levels in T2DM rats. Consequently, it is speculated that the L. paracasei L14 strain may protect the host from oxidative damage caused by hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia via its antioxidant effect.

3.3. L. paracasei L14 Modulates the Intestinal Microbiota to Alleviate HFD/STZ-Induced Dysbiosis

The gut microbiome is vital for the pathophysiology of T2DM, influencing gut barrier function, systemic inflammation, and IR [20,21]. The modulation of the microbiota is also increasingly accepted for managing this disease. This study examined whether gut microbiota modification was responsible for the enhanced effect of L14 on T2DM. First, the α-diversity metric was measured using the Ace and Shannon indexes, respectively, to evaluate microbial richness and diversity (Figure 5A,B). The Ace and Shannon indexes in the L14 group were substantially higher than the C group (p < 0.05), indicating an increase in the number of species and diversity after L14 treatment. PCoA based on the Bray–Curtis distance depicted the dissimilarities between the fecal microbiota of the different groups (p = 0.001, Figure 5C).
HFD/STZ treatment also affected the intestinal bacterial composition of the rats. Oral gavage with strain L14 significantly changed the genus level proportion compared to group C (Figure 5D). The Bacteroides, Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, and Parasutterella levels decreased significantly, while that of norank_f_Muribaculaceae, Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group, Ruminococcus, unclassified_f_Oscillospiraceae, and Eubacterium_xylanophilum_group were considerably higher in the HFD/STZ-treated rats of the L14 group (Figure 5E). The results indicated that the L14 strain ameliorated HFD/STZ-induced dysbiosis by regulating the intestinal microbiota structure associated with α- and β-diversity and the proportion of potentially beneficial species.
To further determine the differential biomarkers between the C and L14 groups, the LEfSe method was used to calculate the LDA scores. Results indicated that the L14 group was enriched with potential beneficial microbiota, such as norank_f_Muribaculaceae and Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group (Figure 6A). Muribaculaceae was reported to show a significant negative correlation with inflammatory status [22,23]. The Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group was associated with increased butyric or propionic acid production, as well as increased gut hormone secretion and decreased FBG, pro-inflammatory factors, and lipid profiles [11,24]. Contrarily, Bacteroides, Turicibacter, and [Ruminococcus]_torques_group were enriched in the C group (Figure 6A). Bacteroides (Gram-negative bacteria) are strongly associated with a long-term fat diet and the impairment of intestinal barrier function. This leads to a higher bacterial LPS translocation into the blood, inducing low-grade inflammation and decreasing insulin sensitivity [25]. Turicibacter and [Ruminococcus]_torques_group are positively correlated with colitis, IR, and diabetes by affecting gut health [26]. Significantly increased levels of these bacteria were found during the early diabetic stage [27].
The interaction between the microbiome and T2DM-related parameters was illustrated using a Spearman correlation heatmap (Figure 6B). The species enriched in the L14 group, namely norank_f_Muribaculaceae, and Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group, were positively associated with IL-10 and CAT levels and negatively linked to the MDA level. Moreover, the Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group and Ruminococcus displayed a negative correlation with LPS, IL-8, and MDA levels and a positive correlation with SOD levels. The Alloprevotella and Eubacterium_xylanophilum_group were negatively associated with LPS, IL-6, and TNF-α and positively associated with SOD and CAT levels. Contrarily, the bacteria in the C group, namely Bacteroides, Romboutsia, and Turicibacter, were positively associated with the FBG, OGTT_AUC, LPS, FFA, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 levels, and negatively correlated with GSH and SOD. Therefore, altered gut microbiota homeostasis affects the development of T2DM, and supplementation with the probiotic strain L14 partially restores the gut microbiota to relieve oxidative stress, inflammation, and IR.
It would have been better to include the initial gut microbiota data in this experiment; however, in this study, exactly consistent experimental conditions were controlled at the first-week acclimation period, the rats were randomly divided, and the L14 group received strain L14 administration since week two. Therefore, it could exclude the possibility that differential gut microbiota in the L14 group come from the beginning.

3.4. Whole-Genome Analysis of L. paracasei L14

To better understand the molecular basis of the probiotic activities of strain L14, whole-genome sequencing was performed (Figure 7A). It contains a circular chromosome and a plasmid of a total of 3,003,403 bp and (C + G)% 46.35%. The chromosome contains 2999 protein-coding sequences (CDS), 59 tRNA, and 15 rRNA genes. Phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene revealed that L14 was 100% identical to L. casei Zhang, L. paracasei 8700, L. casei 12A, L. paracasei CAUH 35 (CP012187.1), L. paracasei FAM18149 (CP017261.1), and L. paracasei TK1501 (CP017716.1) (Figure 7B). The comparative genome analysis of the above strains showed that the genome size ranged from 2.71 to 2.94 Mb, with the same GC content being 46% (Table 1). The strains contained one to six chromosomes, and the number of protein-coding genes ranged from 2641 to 2803.
According to the genome annotation, 16 antioxidant-related genes (Table 2) were found. The oxidoreductase-related gene clusters mainly include ahpC: Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase C, gpx: Glutathione peroxidase, nrdH: Glutaredoxin-like protein, MnSOD: Superoxide dismutase [Mn], mntH: Nramp family divalent metal transporter, trxA: Thioredoxin, trxB: Thioredoxin reductase, msrA: peptide-methionine (S)-S-oxide reductase, msrB: peptide-methionine (R)-S-oxide reductase, NAD(P)/FAD-dependent oxidoreductase, and srlD: SDR family oxidoreductase. Among these genes, ahpC, trxA, trxB, and msrAB constitute the thioredoxin (Trxs) system, and gpx and nrdH constitute the glutathione-glutaredoxin (Grxs) system. The Trxs and Grxs play an essential role in protecting cells from ROS damage by controlling the thiol–disulfide balance [28]. Superoxide dismutase [Mn] (MnSOD) and Glutathione peroxidase (gpx) are among the most important antioxidant enzymes preventing cells from oxidative stress [29]. Therefore, it was inferred that these antioxidant-related genes were responsible for the excellent antioxidant capacity of L. paracasei L14 in vivo.
In addition, one EPS cluster composed of 20 genes (from LPAR_2145 to LPAR_2164) was found in the genome (Table 3). Our previous experiments also found that this strain could form ropy colonies on MRS plates, and a long string could produce when the colony was picked with pipette tips. These indicated that strain L14 possesses better EPS production ability. EPS are important microbial metabolites that show a significant influence on bacterial adhesion, biofilm formation, aggregation, and survival [30]. In addition to being widely used in improving the quality of food products, probiotics-derived EPS have been recently reported to have various health-promoting effects such as antioxidant, anti-diabetic, immunomodulatory, antimicrobial, and antitumor activity [31]. Therefore, the good probiotic properties of strain L14 might be partly attributed to its production of EPS. At the same time, EPS could be extracted to exploit novel value-added functional foods or be used in the pharmaceutical industry.

4. Conclusions

Preventative supplementation of probiotic L. paracasei L14 displays an excellent preventive effect on T2DM rats by improving oxidative stress, IR, inflammation, dyslipidemia, and protecting beta-cell and liver function while modulating the intestinal microbiota to alleviate gut dysbiosis. Whole-genome sequencing of L. paracasei L14 found some important genes associated with the antioxidant system and EPS biosynthesis, providing a critical molecular basis for its probiotic properties. Thus, probiotic L. paracasei L14 has good potential for applications in food adjuvants or pharmaceutical industries to prevent the onset of diabetes. Further clinical trials are needed to validate the efficacy of L. paracasei L14 in humans.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z., S.C. and X.T.; methodology, Z.Z., Y.Y. and X.Z.; validation, Z.Z.; investigation, Z.Z., Y.Y. and X.Z.; writing—original draft, Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, F.D. and X.T.; resources, S.C. and X.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the “Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (SWU-KT22002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the Tsinghua University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (SYXK2014-0024; Beijing, China).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The complete genome sequence of L. paracasei L14 was deposited in the GenBank (CP129524, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CP129524.1/, accessed on 26 June 2023). This strain has been deposited in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC No. 4015).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 10th Edition. 2021. Available online: https://diabetesatlas.org/resources/ (accessed on 16 May 2023).
  2. Kobyliak, N.; Falalyeyeva, T.; Mykhalchyshyn, G.; Kyriienko, D.; Komissarenko, I. Effect of alive probiotic on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes patients: Randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2018, 12, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bielka, W.; Przezak, A.; Pawlik, A. The role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fan, Y.; Pedersen, O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zepeda-Hernandez, A.; Garcia-Amezquita, L.E.; Requena, T.; Garcia-Cayuela, T. Probiotics; prebiotics, and synbiotics added to dairy products: Uses and applications to manage type 2 diabetes. Food Res. Int. 2021, 142, 110208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Toejing, P.; Khat-Udomkiri, N.; Intakhad, J.; Sirilun, S.; Chaiyasut, C.; Lailerd, N. Putative mechanisms responsible for the antihyperglycemic action of Lactobacillus paracasei HII01 in experimental type 2 diabetic rats. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, G.; Song, J.; Huang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Suo, H. Lactobacillus plantarum SHY130 isolated from yak yogurt attenuates hyperglycemia in C57BL/6J mice by regulating the enteroinsular axis. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zeng, Z.; Luo, J.Y.; Zuo, F.L.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, H.Q.; Chen, S.W. Screening for potential novel probiotic Lactobacillus strains based on high dipeptidyl peptidase IV and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 20, 486–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zeng, Z.; Chen, Y.L.; Chen, S.W. Screening for potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains based on α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2020, 51, 350–356. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zeng, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Yu, R.; Zhang, J.; Ma, H.; Chen, S.S. Ameliorative effects of probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei NL41 on insulin sensitivity, oxidative stress, and beta-cell function in a type 2 diabetes mellitus rat model. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019, 63, e1900457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zeng, Z.; Guo, X.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, Q.; Chen, S. Lactobacillus paracasei modulates the gut microbiota and improves inflammation in type 2 diabetic rats. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 6809–6820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PloS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Wang, G.Q.; Liu, J.; Xia, X.Y.; Ai, L.Z. Probiotics-based interventions for diabetes mellitus: A review. Food Biosci. 2021, 43, 101172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Malesza, I.J.; Malesza, M.; Walkowiak, J.; Mussin, N.; Walkowiak, D.; Aringazina, R.; Bartkowiak-Wieczorek, J.; Madry, E. High-Fat, western-style diet, systemic inflammation, gut microbiota: A narrative review. Cells 2021, 10, 3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wood, L.G.; Li, Q.; Berthon, B.S.; Gibson, P.G.; Baines, K.J. Saturated fatty acids, but not n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids or carbohydrates, increase airway inflammation in non-obese asthmatics. Respirology 2017, 22, 64. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lipke, K.; Kubis-Kubiak, A.; Piwowar, A. Molecular mechanism of lipotoxicity as an interesting aspect in the development of pathological states-current view of knowledge. Cells 2022, 11, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Riedel, S.; Pheiffer, C.; Johnson, R.; Louw, J.; Muller, C.J.F. Intestinal barrier function and immune homeostasis are missing links in obesity and type 2 diabetes development. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 12, 833544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, A.; Kukreti, R.; Saso, L.; Kukreti, S. Mechanistic insight into oxidative stress-triggered signaling pathways and type 2 diabetes. Molecules 2022, 27, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Leyane, T.S.; Jere, S.W.; Houreld, N.N. Oxidative stress in ageing and chronic degenerative pathologies: Molecular mechanisms involved in counteracting oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, L.L.; Zhang, J.H.; Cheng, Y.; Zhu, M.; Xiao, Z.F.; Ruan, G.C.; Wei, Y.L. Gut microbiota: A new target for T2DM prevention and treatment. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 958218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, Z.; Sun, B.; Yu, D.S.; Zhu, C.S. Gut microbiota: An important player in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 834485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lagkouvardos, I.; Lesker, T.R.; Hitch, T.C.A.; Gálvez, E.J.C.; Smit, N.; Neuhaus, K.; Wang, J.; Baines, J.F.; Abt, B.; Stecher, B.; et al. Sequence and cultivation study of Muribaculaceae reveals novel species, host preference, and functional potential of this yet undescribed family. Microbiome 2019, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zhao, Q.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, H.; Dai, Z.; Yang, X.; Ren, X.; Xue, Y.; Shen, Q. Cooked Adzuki Bean reduces high-fat diet- induced body weight gain, ameliorates inflammation, and modulates intestinal homeostasis in mice. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 918696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nie, Q.; Hu, J.; Chen, H.; Geng, F.; Nie, S. Arabinoxylan ameliorates type 2 diabetes by regulating the gut microbiota and metabolites. Food Chem. 2022, 371, 131106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cani, P.D.; Amar, J.; Iglesias, M.A.; Poggi, M.; Knauf, C.; Bastelica, D.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Fava, F.; Tuohy, K.M.; Chabo, C.; et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1761–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Caparros-Martin, J.A.; Lareu, R.R.; Ramsay, J.P.; Peplies, J.; Reen, F.J.; Headlam, H.A.; Ward, N.C.; Croft, K.D.; Newsholme, P.; Hughes, J.D.; et al. Statin therapy causes gut dysbiosis in mice through a PXR-dependent mechanism. Microbiome 2017, 5, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhou, W.; Xu, H.Y.; Zhan, L.B.; Lu, X.G.; Zhang, L.J. Dynamic development of fecal microbiome during the progression of diabetes mellitus in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Carmel-Harel, O.; Storz, G. Roles of the glutathione- and thioredoxin-dependent reduction systems in the Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae responses to oxidative stress. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2000, 54, 439–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Feng, T.; Wang, J. Oxidative stress tolerance and antioxidant capacity of lactic acid bacteria as probiotic: A systematic review. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1801944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zeng, Z.; Zuo, F.L.; Marcotte, H. Putative adhesion factors in vaginal Lactobacillus gasseri DSM 14869: Functional characterization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00800-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Pourjafar, H.; Ansari, F.; Sadeghi, A.; Samakkhah, S.A.; Jafari, S.M. Functional and health-promoting properties of probiotics’ exopolysaccharides; isolation, characterization, and applications in the food industry. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental design. The T2DM rat model was established via HFD (induced IR) and low-dose STZ injection (specifically destroyed pancreatic β-cells). Therefore, insufficient insulin production after the STZ depletion of the β-cells failed to compensate for IR, resulting in hyperglycemia. N: normal group consisting of the control subjects without HFD/STZ. C: T2DM model subjects exposed to HFD/STZ. L14: the prevention group consisting of rats intragastrically administered with the L. paracasei L14 from weeks 1 to 12 and exposed to HFD/STZ treatment. The FBG levels, BW, and water and food consumption were recorded weekly. OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test.
Figure 1. Experimental design. The T2DM rat model was established via HFD (induced IR) and low-dose STZ injection (specifically destroyed pancreatic β-cells). Therefore, insufficient insulin production after the STZ depletion of the β-cells failed to compensate for IR, resulting in hyperglycemia. N: normal group consisting of the control subjects without HFD/STZ. C: T2DM model subjects exposed to HFD/STZ. L14: the prevention group consisting of rats intragastrically administered with the L. paracasei L14 from weeks 1 to 12 and exposed to HFD/STZ treatment. The FBG levels, BW, and water and food consumption were recorded weekly. OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test.
Antioxidants 12 01515 g001
Figure 2. The effect of strain L14 on BW (A), water consumption (B), and food consumption (C). The data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Different letters signify substantially different values (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. The effect of strain L14 on BW (A), water consumption (B), and food consumption (C). The data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Different letters signify substantially different values (p < 0.05).
Antioxidants 12 01515 g002
Figure 3. The effect of strain L14 on FBG (A), oral glucose tolerance at week 12 (B), and HOMA-IR (C). The data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6), *** p < 0.001 and ** p < 0.01. Different letters signify substantially different values (p < 0.05). (D) Representative islets after double-immunofluorescence staining, insulin (expressed in green), glucagon (expressed in red), and DAPI (expressed in blue) (scale bar = 10 µm and magnification ×400). (E) Representative liver samples after HE staining (scale bar = 5 µm and magnification ×100). N: normal group rats without HFD/STZ. C: T2DM model rats exposed to HFD/STZ. L14: the prevention group consisting of rats intragastrically administered with the L. paracasei L14 strain.
Figure 3. The effect of strain L14 on FBG (A), oral glucose tolerance at week 12 (B), and HOMA-IR (C). The data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6), *** p < 0.001 and ** p < 0.01. Different letters signify substantially different values (p < 0.05). (D) Representative islets after double-immunofluorescence staining, insulin (expressed in green), glucagon (expressed in red), and DAPI (expressed in blue) (scale bar = 10 µm and magnification ×400). (E) Representative liver samples after HE staining (scale bar = 5 µm and magnification ×100). N: normal group rats without HFD/STZ. C: T2DM model rats exposed to HFD/STZ. L14: the prevention group consisting of rats intragastrically administered with the L. paracasei L14 strain.
Antioxidants 12 01515 g003
Figure 4. The effect of strain L14 on the biochemical parameters of diabetic rats. (A) Serum lipidlevels. (B) Serum inflammatory cytokines, FFA and LPS levels. (C) Oxidative stress levels. The data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Different letters signify substantially different values (p < 0.05). ns: p > 0.05.
Figure 4. The effect of strain L14 on the biochemical parameters of diabetic rats. (A) Serum lipidlevels. (B) Serum inflammatory cytokines, FFA and LPS levels. (C) Oxidative stress levels. The data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Different letters signify substantially different values (p < 0.05). ns: p > 0.05.
Antioxidants 12 01515 g004
Figure 5. The strain L14 modulated the gut microbiota in T2DM rats. (A) The α-diversity of the microbiota in the feces. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3), while different letters indicate substantially different values (p < 0.05). (B) The PCoA based on the Bray–Curtis distance. (C) The average relative gut microbiota abundance of the samples at a genus level. (D) The proportional abundance of the bacteria displays the most significant changes at the genus level. (E) The proportional abundance of the bacteria displaying the most significant changes at the genus level, * p <0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. The strain L14 modulated the gut microbiota in T2DM rats. (A) The α-diversity of the microbiota in the feces. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3), while different letters indicate substantially different values (p < 0.05). (B) The PCoA based on the Bray–Curtis distance. (C) The average relative gut microbiota abundance of the samples at a genus level. (D) The proportional abundance of the bacteria displays the most significant changes at the genus level. (E) The proportional abundance of the bacteria displaying the most significant changes at the genus level, * p <0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Antioxidants 12 01515 g005
Figure 6. The LEfSe results of the significantly different biomarkers between the C and L14 groups according to the LDA score (log 10) (A) and Spearman correlation heatmap of the top 28 genera and T2DM-related parameters (B). The colors signify negative correlations (blue) and positive correlations (red). Substantial correlations are expressed as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6. The LEfSe results of the significantly different biomarkers between the C and L14 groups according to the LDA score (log 10) (A) and Spearman correlation heatmap of the top 28 genera and T2DM-related parameters (B). The colors signify negative correlations (blue) and positive correlations (red). Substantial correlations are expressed as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Antioxidants 12 01515 g006
Figure 7. Whole-genome sequencing of L. paracasei L14. (A) Circular genome map of L. paracasei L14 created by software Circos. From outside to the center: (1) Genome size identification. (2) Coding sequences on forward strain (color by COG categories). (3) Coding sequences on reverse strand (color by COG categories). (4) rRNA and tRNA. (5) GC content. (6) GC skew (green and orange). (B) 16s rRNA gene-based phylogenetic tree.
Figure 7. Whole-genome sequencing of L. paracasei L14. (A) Circular genome map of L. paracasei L14 created by software Circos. From outside to the center: (1) Genome size identification. (2) Coding sequences on forward strain (color by COG categories). (3) Coding sequences on reverse strand (color by COG categories). (4) rRNA and tRNA. (5) GC content. (6) GC skew (green and orange). (B) 16s rRNA gene-based phylogenetic tree.
Antioxidants 12 01515 g007
Table 1. Comparison of the genome of L. paracasei L14 with the genomes of similar strains.
Table 1. Comparison of the genome of L. paracasei L14 with the genomes of similar strains.
No.OrganismStrainAssembly AccessionGenome Size (Mb)Scaffold No.Chromosome No. G + C (%)Protein-Coding Sequences
1L. paracaseiZhangGCF_000019245.42.8622462641
2L. paracasei8700GCF_000155515.22.9433462803
3L. casei12AGCF_000359565.22.9111462682
4L. paracaseiCAUH35GCF_001191565.12.7755462690
5L. paracaseiFAM18149GCF_002442835.12.7166462730
6L. paracaseiTK1501GCF_002257625.12.941146.52665
Table 2. Antioxidant-related genes in the L. paracasei L14 genome.
Table 2. Antioxidant-related genes in the L. paracasei L14 genome.
Locus Tag(s)Accession No.GenePredicted Encoded FunctionProtein Size
PUK88_12395WP003567571.1ahpCAlkyl hydroperoxide reductase C187aa
PUK88_04685WP003601666.1gpxGlutathione peroxidase 157aa
PUK88_07930WP005685874.1nrdHGlutaredoxin-like protein76aa
PUK88_09810WP012491719.1 Superoxide dismutase [Mn] 205aa
PUK88_00185WP011673942.1mntHNramp family divalent metal transporter458aa
PUK88_04200WP010493758.1trxAThioredoxin 103aa
PUK88_01345WP003568841.1 Thioredoxin family protein104aa
PUK88_04960WP003564228.1trxBThioredoxin–disulfide reductase315aa
PUK88_06640WP003590482.1msrApeptide–methionine (S)-S-oxide reductase276aa
PUK88_08180WP003565681.1msrBpeptide–methionine (R)-S-oxide reductase150aa
PUK88_06850WP003574830.1 GAF domain-containing protein160aa
PUK88_11715WP003595937.1 NAD(P)/FAD-dependent oxidoreductase632aa
PUK88_02000WP016370227.1 sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase subunit266aa
PUK88_02065WP019862015.1srlDSDR family oxidoreductase267aa
PUK88_02200WP003577685.1 sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase subunit266aa
PUK88_13525WP019862015.1 SDR family oxidoreductase266aa
Table 3. Putative EPS cluster in L. paracasei L14.
Table 3. Putative EPS cluster in L. paracasei L14.
Locus Tag(s)Predicted Encoded FunctionProtein
Size
Domain
PUK88_10270polysaccharide deacetylase332aaPolysaccharide deacetylase (PF01522)
PUK88_10275sulfatase-like hydrolase/transferase774aaSulfatase (PF00884)
PUK88_10280EpsG family protein349aaEpsG family (PF14897)
PUK88_10285CpsD/CapB family tyrosine–protein kinase211aaAAA domain (PF13614); NUBPL iron-transfer P-loop NTPase (PF10609); CobQ/CobB/MinD/ParA nucleotide-binding domain (PF01656)
PUK88_10290Wzz/FepE/Etk N-terminal domain-containing protein230aaChain-length-determinant protein (PF02706)
PUK88_10295O-unit flippase-like protein479aa-
PUK88_10300glycosyltransferase378aaGlycosyl transferase group 1 (PF00534)
PUK88_10305glycosyltransferase family 2 protein321aaGlycosyl transferase family 2 (PF00535); Glycosyltransferase-like family 2 (PF13641); Glycosyltransferase-like family 2 (PF10111)
PUK88_10310hypothetical protein558aa-
PUK88_10315hypothetical protein579aa-
PUK88_10320GW dipeptide domain-containing protein693aaGW (Gly-Tryp) dipeptide domain (PF01183); Glycosyl hydrolases family 25 (PF13457)
PUK88_10325glycosyltransferase family 39 protein495aaDolichyl-phosphate-mannose-protein mannosyltransferase (PF13231)
PUK88_10330acyltransferase346aaAcyltransferase family (PF01757)
PUK88_10335glycosyltransferase family 2 protein330aaGlycosyl transferase family 2 (PF00535)
PUK88_10340UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase, wecB380aaUDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase (PF02350)
PUK88_10345hypothetical protein288aa-
PUK88_10350sugar transferase466aaBacterial sugar transferase (PF13727); CoA-binding domain (PF02397)
PUK88_10355Glycosyl transferase246aaGlycosyltransferase sugar-binding region containing DXD motif (PF04488)
PUK88_10360glycosyltransferase family 2 protein252aaGlycosyl transferase family 2 (PF00535)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, X.; Dai, F.; Chen, S.; Tong, X. Ameliorative Effects of Lactobacillus paracasei L14 on Oxidative Stress and Gut Microbiota in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Rats. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081515

AMA Style

Zeng Z, Yang Y, Zhong X, Dai F, Chen S, Tong X. Ameliorative Effects of Lactobacillus paracasei L14 on Oxidative Stress and Gut Microbiota in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Rats. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(8):1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081515

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Zhu, Yi Yang, Xinxin Zhong, Fangyin Dai, Shangwu Chen, and Xiaoling Tong. 2023. "Ameliorative Effects of Lactobacillus paracasei L14 on Oxidative Stress and Gut Microbiota in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Rats" Antioxidants 12, no. 8: 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081515

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop