Next Article in Journal
Effect of Curcumin Intake on Skeletal Muscle Oxygen Saturation Parameters in Older Participants
Previous Article in Journal
Protective Role of Sulforaphane against Physiological Toxicity of Triphenyltin in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio haematopterus)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Physio-Biochemical and Transcriptome Analyses Reveal Contrasting Responses to Magnesium Imbalances in Leaves of Mulberry (Morus alba L.) Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

An Overview of the Mechanisms through Which Plants Regulate ROS Homeostasis under Cadmium Stress

1
College of Life Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
Institute of Food Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China
4
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
5
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing (UCASNJ), Nanjing 211135, China
6
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Jiangsu Vocational College of Agriculture and Forestry, Jurong 212400, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contribute equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2024, 13(10), 1174; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13101174
Submission received: 30 August 2024 / Revised: 21 September 2024 / Accepted: 24 September 2024 / Published: 26 September 2024

Abstract

:
Cadmium (Cd2+) is a non-essential and highly toxic element to all organic life forms, including plants and humans. In response to Cd stress, plants have evolved multiple protective mechanisms, such as Cd2+ chelation, vesicle sequestration, the regulation of Cd2+ uptake, and enhanced antioxidant defenses. When Cd2+ accumulates in plants to a certain level, it triggers a burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to chlorosis, growth retardation, and potentially death. To counteract this, plants utilize a complex network of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems to manage ROS and protect cells from oxidative damage. This review systematically summarizes how various elements, including nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, iron, and zinc, as well as phytohormones such as abscisic acid, auxin, brassinosteroids, and ethylene, and signaling molecules like nitric oxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydrogen sulfide, regulate the antioxidant system under Cd stress. Furthermore, it explores the mechanisms by which exogenous regulators can enhance the antioxidant capacity and mitigate Cd toxicity.

1. Introduction

Cadmium (Cd) is a water-soluble, non-essential element that is highly toxic to nearly all living organisms due to its neurotoxic and mutagenic properties [1]. Cd2+ is readily absorbed by plant roots and translocated to shoots and grains, even at low soil concentrations, thereby entering the food chain and posing a toxicity risk to humans [2,3]. Human activities such as the application of phosphate fertilizers, and the use of pesticides and herbicides further exacerbate Cd contamination in agricultural soils [4]. In plants, elevated Cd levels accelerate the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxides, leading to oxidative stress [5]. Additionally, Cd2+ accumulation inhibits photosynthesis and reduces water and nutrient uptake [6], resulting in growth retardation and, ultimately, plant death [7].
To survive under Cd stress, plants have developed various strategies to mitigate Cd toxicity, including the following: (i) Plants release specific root exudates that limit Cd2+ uptake from the soil. For example, jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) secretes lubimin and 3-hydroxylubimin, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) releases malate, and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants secrete oxalate, all of which reduce the Cd2+ uptake from Cd-contaminated soils [8,9,10]. (ii) Plants can also regulate Cd2+ uptake by modulating the expression levels of Cd2+ transporter genes [11,12]. However, no Cd2+-specific transporters have been identified in the plasma membranes of root cells to date. Instead, plants typically absorb Cd2+ through transporters that facilitate the uptake of other divalent ions, such as zinc (Zn2+), iron (Fe2+), calcium (Ca2+), manganese (Mn2+), magnesium (Mg2+), and copper (Cu2+) [11]. Several transporters with a Cd transport capacity have been identified, including zinc/iron-regulated transporter-like proteins (ZIPs), natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (NRAMPs), heavy metal ATPases (AtHMA4 and AtHMA9), cation exchanger family members (CAX2 and CAX5), and ABC transporters (OsPDR9 and AtPDR8) [13,14,15,16,17]. (iii) When intracellular Cd2+ reaches a certain concentration, plants synthesize small metal-binding peptides called phytochelatins (PCs) and cysteine-rich, metal-binding proteins known as metallothioneins (MTs). These molecules chelate Cd2+, forming various Cd-PC and Cd-MT complexes, which are then sequestered in the vacuole by vacuolar transporters [18,19]. The role of PCs and MTs in detoxifying Cd toxicity has been demonstrated in several species, including bacopa (Bacopa monnieri), nigrum (Solanum nigrum), and moringa (Moringa oleifera) [20,21,22]. (iv) Finally, plant cells have developed a sophisticated antioxidant defense system to counteract the harmful effects of ROS bursts induced by Cd2+ accumulation [23]. The antioxidant system consists of enzymatic antioxidants, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), peroxidase (POD), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), as well as non-enzymatic antioxidants, such as ascorbic acid (AsA), glutathione (GSH), carotenoids, proline, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds [18,24,25].
Although there have been numerous reviews summarizing the mechanisms of plant resistance to Cd stress, a systematic overview of the regulatory mechanisms of the antioxidant enzyme system and potential interactions remains lacking [19,23,26,27,28,29,30]. This review will provide a detailed summary of how Cd stress impacts the antioxidant system, how various elements, phytohormones, and signaling molecules regulate this system, the transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of the antioxidant system, and the role of exogenous modulators in enhancing antioxidant capacity under Cd stress.

2. Antioxidant Systems Involved in Regulating Cd-Induced ROS Bursts

Cd2+ accumulation in plants induces the production of ROS [31,32,33]. Under moderate stress conditions, plants can respond by enhancing their antioxidant systems to maintain intracellular redox homeostasis. However, excessively high concentrations of Cd2+ can impair the antioxidant system, leading to ROS accumulation and subsequent oxidative damage in plants [34]. The plant antioxidant system primarily comprises antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, CAT, and APX, as well as non-enzymatic antioxidants such as GSH and AsA (Figure 1) [4,35,36]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the activity levels of antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymatic antioxidants vary in response to multiple factors, including plant species, plant organs, Cd2+ concentration, and the composition of the growth substrate [37,38,39,40].
Briefly, at the onset of oxidative scavenging, Cd-stress-induced O2 is efficiently decomposed into H2O2 by SOD. Subsequently, H2O2 is reduced to H2O by APX or GPX within the ascorbic acid–glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle, as well as by CAT and POD [4,41,42,43]. Two other key antioxidant enzymes, MDHAR and DHAR, are involved in the regeneration of AsA in cells, while GR is responsible for reducing oxidized glutathione back to GSH (Figure 1) [41,43]. Additionally, redox enzymes such as thioredoxin reductase and ferredoxin-thioredoxin reductase, along with non-enzymatic antioxidants like carotenoids, proline, and flavonoids, also play roles in degrading Cd-induced ROS [18,24,25,44,45].
When Cd2+ enters the cell, it can trigger an explosion of ROS. Both Cd2+ and ROS can directly activate the transcription of stress-responsive genes, including those encoding antioxidant enzymes and MTs, through specific transcription factors, thereby mitigating the damage caused by cadmium stress. On the one hand, the cell promotes the accumulation of MTs and PCs, enhancing the formation of Cd2+-MT and Cd2+-PC complexes, which are subsequently transported to the vacuole. This process reduces Cd2+ accumulation in the cytoplasm and decreases ROS production. On the other hand, the cell employs its antioxidant system, comprising both enzymatic and non-enzymatic components, to degrade excess ROS and alleviate oxidative stress.

3. Mechanisms by Which Different Mineral Elements Regulate ROS Homeostasis under Cd Stress

The balance of nutrient elements is critical for plant growth and development. However, Cd stress inhibits the uptake, translocation, and utilization of essential elements such as iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K). This disruption directly affects the integrity or activity of antioxidant enzymes that rely on these metal elements as cofactors, indirectly exacerbating oxidative stress [46]. Therefore, the appropriate supplementation of essential mineral elements can effectively alleviate Cd toxicity. The roles of different elements in regulating Cd toxicity are summarized below.

3.1. Nitrogen (N)

Nitrogen (N) is a macronutrient that is essential for plant growth and development [42]. Previous studies have shown that proper N application can alleviate Cd toxicity in plants. Interestingly, the form of the N significantly influences plant responses to Cd stress [47]. Nitrate (NO3) and ammonium (NH4+) are the primary inorganic forms of N absorbed by plants [48,49]. Research indicates that the form of N can modulate the tolerance to Cd stress through the antioxidant system. For instance, in tomato plants, the availability of NH4+ was associated with the maintenance or even enhancement of key antioxidant enzymes such as CAT and APX under Cd stress [50]. In rice (Oryza sativa), an increase in the NH4+/NO3 ratio significantly up-regulated the activities of key antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, CAT, and APX, as well as increasing concentrations of non-enzymatic antioxidants like AsA and GSH. While our latest research findings indicate that, under Cd stress, NH4+ promotes the accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA) more effectively than NO3. This process activates OsbZIP20, which directly stimulates the transcription of OsCATA and OsAPX2, leading to enhanced activities of CAT and APX enzymes [51]. In summary, these results indicate that supplying NH4+ to plants can reduce Cd-induced ROS accumulation and enhance Cd tolerance [25,52,53]. However, opposite results were also observed in poplar (Populus deltoids) (Figure 2) [31]. Thus, the regulation of Cd tolerance by the N form varies between species, highlighting the need to investigate the molecular mechanisms of the N form regulation of Cd tolerance, rather than focusing solely on physiological aspects. Additionally, N forms also influence Cd2+ levels in plants (Figure 3) [31,54]. Therefore, selecting appropriate N fertilizers is crucial for improving Cd tolerance and reducing Cd2+ uptake in crops, thereby decreasing the risk of Cd2+ entering the food chain.

3.2. Phosphate (P)

Phosphorus (P) is another essential macronutrient involved in various cellular processes, including nucleic acid synthesis, membrane production, energy storage, and protein modification [55]. The impact of P fertilization on Cd2+ immobilization in soils has been widely studied in recent years, but there is limited research on the physiological functions of P in plants under Cd stress conditions [56,57]. Under Cd stress, P application in wheat (Triticum aestivum) was found to reduce Cd2+ uptake and slightly increase the uptake of K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+, while also enhancing the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, and CAT (Figure 2 and Figure 3) [58]. However, opposite effects were observed in rice, where P application altered the subcellular distribution of Cd2+, leading to an increase in total Cd2+ content in roots and stems by enhancing the Cd2+ accumulation in the cell wall and reducing its presence in other cellular fractions [59,60]. Therefore, the mitigating effect of P on Cd toxicity appears to be closely related to both crop species and their specific environmental conditions, and the underlying molecular mechanisms require further investigation.

3.3. Calcium (Ca)

Ca is an essential macronutrient for plant growth and development, playing critical roles in regulating cell membrane and cell wall stability, ion transport, photosynthesis, enzyme activation, and acting as a second messenger [61]. Due to the similar ionic radii of Ca2+ and Cd2+, early studies on Ca’s role in mitigating Cd toxicity primarily focused on how Ca inhibits the uptake and transport of Cd2+ [62,63]. However, recent studies in wheat suggest that the inhibition of Cd2+ uptake by Ca2+ is influenced by Ca2+-associated anions and pH changes, with Ca2+ itself not directly reducing Cd2+ uptake but inhibiting its translocation from roots to shoots [64]. Additionally, Ca deficiency in rice has been shown to exacerbate Cd toxicity by increasing Cd2+ accumulation, inhibiting CAT activity, and reducing GSH levels, highlighting Ca’s potential role in regulating Cd-induced oxidative stress [65]. Applications of CaCl2, calcium polypeptide (CaP), and CaO nanoparticles (CaO-NPs) have been found to enhance Cd tolerance in rice by increasing the AsA content and boosting the activities of enzymes such as SOD, CAT, APX, GST, MDHAR, and DHAR [66,67,68]. However, the precise regulatory mechanisms remain unclear (Figure 2). Unlike other elements, research on how Ca2+ mitigates Cd toxicity must first determine whether Ca2+ functions solely as a mineral element or also as a second messenger.

3.4. Iron (Fe)

Fe is an essential micronutrient that acts as a cofactor in many enzymes and plays a crucial role in various metabolic processes, including photosynthesis, respiration, and DNA synthesis [69,70]. Cd stress often leads to Fe deficiency, but exogenous Fe application can mitigate this in the following two ways: by promoting the formation of Fe plaques that inhibit Cd2+ uptake, and by enhancing the plant’s resistance to Cd-induced oxidative stress through strengthening the antioxidant system (Figure 2 and Figure 3) [12,71]. Foliar application of 50 or 100 µM of Fe-lysine (an Fe-amino acid chelate) in canola (Brassica napus) and peas (Pisum sativum) significantly increases the activities of SOD, CAT, and POD enzymes, thereby reducing the accumulation of H2O2 and MDA induced by cadmium stress [69,72]. Similarly, foliar applications of Fe-NPs and Fe3O4-NPs significantly increased the activities of CAT, SOD, and APX in radishes (Raphanus sativus) and maize (Zea mays), while also reducing Cd-induced MDA accumulation [73,74]. However, the exogenous application of Fe-EDTA and FeCl3 in rice inhibited CAT, POD, and SOD activities and reduced MDA content, possibly due to Fe’s inhibition of Cd2+ uptake, which lessens stress and consequently the induction of the antioxidant system [75,76,77]. In conclusion, Fe supplementation through the root system promotes Fe plaque formation, while foliar Fe application strengthens the antioxidant system and enhances the scavenging of Cd-induced ROS. Proper Fe application is a reliable strategy to reduce Cd toxicity. However, it is important to note that although they reduce the overall Cd2+ content in the plant, high levels of Fe supplied to the roots carry the risk of increasing the Cd2+ accumulation in aboveground tissues [76].

3.5. Zinc (Zn)

Zn is an essential micronutrient for plants, playing a key role in various aspects of plant growth and metabolism, including photosynthesis, cell division, and maintaining membrane integrity [78]. As a cofactor for over 300 enzymes, Zn is crucial for both enzyme activity and structural stability [79]. Additionally, due to the similar physical and chemical properties of Zn and Cd, exogenous Zn has been investigated as a potential antagonist to Cd toxicity [80]. Indeed, several studies on wheat and rice have demonstrated that the exogenous application of Zn alleviates Cd-induced oxidative stress by enhancing the activities of key antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, POD, CAT, and APX [81,82]. Notably, ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) have emerged as a significant tool in mitigating Cd toxicity in recent years [83]. Numerous studies have shown that ZnO-NPs can counteract Cd-induced ROS generation by upregulating the transcription of antioxidant enzyme genes and enhancing their activities. This effect has been observed in various species, including broccoli (Brassica oleracea), lettuce (Lactuca sativa), cabbage (Brassica parachinensis), maize, mung bean (Vigna radiata), rice, wheat, pepper (Capsicum annuum), and beans (Vicia faba) [84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. Additionally, ZnO-NPs have been found to reduce Cd2+ uptake and transport, thereby decreasing Cd2+ accumulation and toxicity in plants [83,95,96]. Interestingly, ZnO-NPs also promote the accumulation of salicylic acid (SA), and the combined action of SA and ZnO-NPs significantly enhances the antioxidant capacity of plants, suggesting a potential SA-dependent pathway through which ZnO-NPs exert their effects (Figure 2 and Figure 3) [83,97,98]. Given these promising findings, ZnO-NPs have garnered significant attention from researchers [83]. However, due to the distinct biological and physicochemical properties of ZnO-NPs, along with their potential risks to humans, such as ingestion, inhalation, and systemic diffusion via the circulatory system, further studies on the risk assessment of ZnO-NPs are necessary [99,100]. Addressing these risks is crucial to ensure the safe application of ZnO-NPs in agricultural practices [101,102].

3.6. Selenium (Se)

Se is an essential micronutrient for humans and animals, and it also plays a vital role in the growth and development of plants, which can benefit from moderate amounts of Se [103,104]. Se serves as a cofactor for several antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT, enabling it to antagonize oxidative stress [27]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the exogenous application of Se2+ or Se nanoparticles (Se-NPs) significantly enhances the antioxidant capacity of plants under Cd stress. This enhancement includes increased activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, POD, APX, and GR, as well as elevated levels of GSH, leading to the reduced accumulation of H2O2 and MDA (Figure 2) [27,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115]. Additionally, Se has been shown to significantly reduce Cd2+ uptake, thereby mitigating Cd stress (Figure 3) [27,105,107,110,112,113,115,116,117,118,119,120]. Particularly noteworthy is Se’s ability to respond to Cd stress by regulating phytohormones and other signaling molecules. For example, Se significantly promotes the accumulation of auxins and polyamines (PAs), while inhibiting the biosynthesis of ethylene (ET) and nitric oxide (NO), thus enhancing the Cd resistance of plants [108,115,121]. However, it is important to note that excessive Se can also exert stress on plants [117]. Therefore, when using Se to ameliorate Cd toxicity, careful attention must be paid to the dosage and method of application.

3.7. Silicon (Si)

Si is the second most abundant element in the Earth’s crust, following oxygen [122,123]. Although not essential for plant growth factors, Si is a beneficial element that plays a crucial role in supporting plant survival under heavy metal stress, including Cd stress [122,123,124]. Numerous studies have shown that the exogenous application of SiO32−, Si nanoparticles (Si-NPs), and SiO2 nanoparticles (SiO2-NPs) can significantly enhance the activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, CAT, POD, GR, and AOX, and maintain GSH-AsA homeostasis, thereby improving a plant’s resistance to Cd-induced oxidative stress (Figure 2) [109,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137]. Moreover, Si can regulate hormonal homeostasis by promoting the biosynthesis of brassinosteroids (BRs), jasmonic acid (JA), abscisic acid (ABA), and PAs, while inhibiting the accumulation of SA. It also synergizes with strigolactone (SL), BRs, and melatonin (MLT) to co-regulate the activities of enzymes such as SOD, CAT, and POD, thereby enhancing Cd tolerance in plants (Figure 2) [26,134,136,138,139,140]. Additionally, Si application has been reported to increase the uptake of mineral elements such as Mg, Fe, Zn, and Se, promote the formation of Fe plaques, and synergize with mineral elements such as K, Zn, Se, and boron to directly or indirectly modulate Cd2+ uptake and enhance antioxidant capacity (Figure 2 and Figure 3) [82,109,141,142,143,144].
These studies demonstrate that Si can enhance plants’ antioxidant capacity and improve their Cd resistance, with the added advantage that excess Si is not toxic to plant growth, making Si a potentially excellent amendment for mitigating Cd toxicity [134]. However, the specific molecular mechanisms underlying the Si-mediated reduction of Cd toxicity in plants remain poorly understood, and the practical application of different Si forms in soils requires further exploration and investigation.

3.8. Sulfur (S)

S is an essential macronutrient for plant growth and development, serving as a constituent of vitamins, Fe-S clusters, and defense compounds such as GSH, PCs, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S), all of which play critical roles in counteracting environmental stresses [145,146,147]. S can enhance plant resistance to Cd-induced oxidative stress by increasing the activities of antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, CAT, APX, GR, and DHAR, and by boosting levels of AsA and GSH [148,149,150,151]. Additionally, the application of S fertilizers increases H2S accumulation, which in turn activates H2S-dependent pathways that further enhance the antioxidant capacity of plants (Figure 2) [149]. Moreover, S regulates Cd2+ absorption and translocation in three key ways: by inducing the formation of CdS precipitates, thereby altering the bioavailability of Cd2+ in the soil [152,153]; by increasing the formation of Fe plaques on root surfaces, which reduces Cd2+ uptake [152,153]; and by promoting the chelation of Cd2+ by PCs, thereby controlling Cd translocation from roots to shoots [150,151,154,155]. However, the regulation of Cd2+ uptake and transport by S is closely linked to factors such as soil oxidation/reduction potential (Eh), the form of the S, and the crop species [148,150,151,154,155,156,157,158,159]. Therefore, careful consideration is required when applying S-containing fertilizers to Cd-contaminated soils.

3.9. Other Minerals

Cerium (Ce), a rare earth element, has been reported to enhance Cd resistance by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, and CAT in rice (Figure 2) [160]. However, a recent study indicated that applying 500 mg kg−1 of CeSO4 led to higher Cd2+ accumulation in both the roots and shoots of maize seedlings, while the same concentration of CeO2 nanoparticles (50 nm) promoted maize growth under Cd stress. This suggests that the mitigating effect of Ce on Cd stress is closely related to both the form and dosage of Ce [161]. Boron (B) has also been shown to increase the activities of CAT, SOD, and POD, while inhibiting Cd2+ uptake and transport, thereby improving Cd resistance in rice (Figure 2) [162]. Additionally, under Cd stress, arsenic (As) has been found to significantly reduce Cd2+ accumulation in rice and alleviate oxidative stress by increasing POD and SOD activities, as well as GSH and AsA levels (Figure 2) [163]. Moreover, TiO2 nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) have been reported to increase the activities of SOD, CAT, POD, and APX, enhancing the resistance of maize and rice to Cd-induced oxidative stress. This effect is partly achieved by inducing the expression of genes related to Fe uptake and utilization in plants (Figure 2 and Figure 3) [131,164].
The above studies demonstrate that the application of mineral nutrients can reduce Cd2+ accumulation and enhance antioxidant capacity. However, further research is needed to investigate the molecular mechanisms through which different mineral elements mitigate Cd toxicity, as well as the roles of hormones and signaling substances. Additionally, the relationship between different combinations of mineral elements and/or phytohormones (signaling molecules) and Cd tolerance warrants further exploration.

4. The Role of Plant Growth Regulators and Signaling Molecules in Regulating ROS Homeostasis under Cd Stress

Plant hormones, the most well-known growth regulators, including ABA, auxin, ET, BR, JA, and gibberellins (GAs), play a crucial role in regulating plant growth and development, as well as in the response to environmental stress. However, Cd stress disrupts the balance of endogenous hormone levels. As a result, the exogenous application of appropriate concentrations of phytohormones or their inhibitors can help alleviate Cd toxicity in plants [25,165]. In addition to phytohormones, plants utilize various other growth regulators and signaling molecules, such as MLT, SA, H2S, NO, and H2O2, to manage cadmium (Cd) stress.

4.1. Plant Growth Regulators

4.1.1. Abscisic Acid (ABA)

ABA is widely recognized as a “stress hormone” involved in the regulation of various environmental stresses, including salinity, drought, and heavy metal exposure [166,167,168,169]. Numerous studies have shown that Cd stress induces ABA accumulation, which enhances Cd resistance by boosting antioxidant enzyme activities and increasing antioxidant levels to scavenge Cd-induced ROS (Figure 2) [170]. Research has demonstrated that ROS accumulation increases and Cd resistance decreases in tomato ABA-deficient mutants under Cd stress [171]. Conversely, the exogenous application of ABA has been shown to mitigate Cd-induced ROS accumulation by enhancing the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, GR, CAT, and APX, as well as by increasing the levels of antioxidants like proline and AsA in various plant species, including lettuce and mung bean [172,173,174,175,176]. Although several transcription factors (TFs) have been identified as being involved in ABA’s regulation of antioxidant enzymes, the precise molecular mechanisms remain unclear [177]. Until recently, we discovered that OsbZIP20 is induced by Cd in rice and enhances its antioxidant capacity by directly activating OsAPX2 and OsCATA [51]. Beyond enhancing antioxidant capacity under Cd stress, ABA has also been reported to improve Cd tolerance in plants by reducing Cd2+ uptake and translocation, as highlighted in previous reviews (Figure 3).

4.1.2. Auxin

Auxin is a critical phytohormone involved in regulating plant growth, development, and stress responses [178]. Studies have shown that Cd exposure promotes root hair development by stimulating ROS bursts, a process in which auxin plays a significant role. Additionally, the exogenous application of auxin biosynthesis inhibitors, such as yucasin and 4-phenoxyphenylboronic acid, has been found to significantly reduce ROS bursts in tomato, rice, and Arabidopsis under Cd stress [179,180,181,182]. Furthermore, auxin has been shown to cause the denitrosylation of AtAPX1, partially inhibiting APX1 activity in Arabidopsis roots, suggesting that auxin acts as a facilitator in Cd-induced ROS bursts [183].
Several studies have also indicated that auxin can influence Cd stress by regulating Cd2+ accumulation, though the findings are conflicting. For instance, the exogenous application of the auxin, NAA, has been reported to increase the hemicellulose content in the cell walls of Arabidopsis, thereby enhancing Cd2+ fixation in the cell wall, reducing Cd2+ transport to aboveground parts, and decreasing Cd toxicity. Conversely, in rice, NAA has been shown to decrease the hemicellulose content in the cell wall and reduce Cd2+ uptake, resulting in increased Cd tolerance [184,185].
Moreover, there are differing conclusions on how Cd regulates auxin levels [108,180,184,185,186]. These results suggest a complex role for auxin in response to Cd stress [180]. The mechanism of auxin’s response to Cd stress may depend on factors such as the species, the site of action, and the timing, necessitating further in-depth studies.

4.1.3. Brassinosteroids (BRs)

BRs are phytohormones widely involved in the regulation of plant growth and development [32]. BRs also play a significant role in responding to various abiotic stresses, including drought, salinity, and heavy metal stress [187,188,189]. Studies have shown that the exogenous application of BRs, such as 28-homobrassinolide or 24-epibrassinolide, enhances the activities of SOD, CAT, and APX, and increases proline content, thereby protecting tomato plants from Cd-induced oxidative stress. This suggests that BRs contribute to enhancing Cd tolerance in plants (Figure 2) [189,190]. It is proposed that BRs may function by inhibiting and/or de-repressing the transcription of specific genes, inducing protein synthesis, and activating enzyme activity [189,191,192]. However, there remains a gap in the research regarding the regulation of the antioxidant system by BRs under Cd stress.

4.1.4. Ethylene (ET)

ET is another well-known “stress hormone” that plays a crucial role in defense responses to a wide range of stresses, including both biotic and abiotic factors [193,194]. Several studies in sunflowers, peas, and wheat have shown that Cd stress induces ET accumulation by upregulating the transcription of ACS genes [195,196,197,198]. It has been observed that Cd stress promotes root hair growth by enhancing ET biosynthesis, which in turn increases ROS accumulation in Arabidopsis root hairs [182]. As the Cd2+ concentration increases beyond 40 µM, both ET and ROS levels decrease compared to 40 µM of Cd2+, but they remain higher than in the control (0 µM Cd), suggesting that the Cd regulation of ET and ROS content is concentration dependent, at least in root hairs [182]. Interestingly, another study found that mild Cd stress (5 µM) rather than higher concentrations (e.g., 10 µM) promoted ROS production through the activation of alternative oxidase 1a (AOX1a), a terminal oxidase of the plant mitochondrial electron transport chain involved in regulating mitochondrial ROS production, potentially involving ET and NO [199,200,201]. These findings suggest that ET may function as a downstream signaling pathway in Cd-induced ROS production, and that this signaling pathway is dependent on the Cd concentration.

4.1.5. Jasmonic Acid (JA)

The role of JAs in controlling plant tolerance to abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, temperature, and heavy metals has been extensively studied [202]. Several studies have shown that Cd stress promotes the accumulation of endogenous JA [203,204,205,206]. Externally applied methyl jasmonate (MeJA) has been found to enhance the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, GPX, CAT, GR, APX, and POD, as well as increasing proline and GSH levels under Cd stress, thereby mitigating the oxidative damage induced by Cd (Figure 2) [203,205,206]. Furthermore, unlike other hormones, the regulation of APX enzyme activity by JA has been further elucidated at the protein structure level in rice. Cd2+ and AsA share similar binding sites on APX, and Cd2+ binding leads to changes in protein conformation, affecting the formation of the [APX-AsA] complex and reducing APX activity. In contrast, in the presence of JA, the interaction required for [OsAPX-AsA] complex formation is restored, helping to maintain APX activity under Cd stress [207]. Additionally, JA enhances Cd resistance by promoting ABA biosynthesis, reducing Cd2+ uptake, and increasing the uptake of other essential mineral nutrients (Figure 3) [203,206].

4.1.6. Salicylic Acid (SA)

SA is a ubiquitous phenolic hormone widely recognized for its extensive involvement in local and systemic plant defense responses [208]. An increasing number of studies have shown that SA also plays a crucial role in enhancing tolerance to both biotic and abiotic stresses [209]. Under Cd stress, endogenous SA accumulation is promoted, while exogenous SA application has been found to reduce H2O2 and MDA accumulation, suggesting that SA can alleviate the oxidative damage caused by Cd stress (Figure 3) [210,211,212,213]. Further studies have revealed that SA enhances the activities of enzymes such as SOD, POD, DHAR, and GR under Cd stress, though its effect on CAT and APX activities has produced contradictory results (Figure 2) [210,211,212,213,214,215]. Some studies found that exogenous SA treatment specifically inhibited CAT and APX activities, while others reported an enhancement of these activities [209]. This discrepancy may be due to SA’s ability to chelate Fe, and its role as a single electron donor, potentially affecting the CAT-dependent peroxidation cycle [209,216]. The content of endogenous non-chelated Fe may play a key regulatory role in determining CAT and APX enzyme activities.
In addition to these roles, SA has unique functions: it can directly scavenge hydroxyl radicals as an antioxidant [211,214], and it can bind to Cd2+ to form a Cd-SA complex, thereby reducing Cd2+ translocation [211,214,217]. Moreover, SA enhances Cd resistance in plants by promoting ABA synthesis, decreasing Cd2+ uptake, and increasing mineral uptake under Cd stress [209,211,217,218].

4.1.7. Melatonin (MLT)

MLT, also known as N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine, is a plant growth regulator that functions as a hormone in mammals. In plants, MLT functions as an antioxidant and growth regulator, playing roles in various physiological processes, including germination, photosynthesis, flowering, leaf senescence, root development, carbohydrate metabolism, and circadian rhythms, as well as in responses to environmental stresses [219,220]. Several studies have demonstrated that MLT enhances the resistance to Cd-induced oxidative stress by increasing the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, CAT, and APX (Figure 2) [220,221]. Interestingly, MLT has been found to synergistically interact with H2S to inhibit Cd2+ uptake and enhance antioxidant enzyme activity, thereby reducing Cd toxicity [220]. Moreover, a study in pepper plants showed that MLT promotes H2S biosynthesis, which in turn activates the antioxidant system and enhances the resistance to arsenic (As). The mitigating effect of MLT on As toxicity was abolished by the addition of H2S scavengers such as hypotaurine, suggesting that MLT alleviates As toxicity through an H2S-dependent pathway [222]. This raises the question of whether MLT similarly responds to Cd stress through H2S-dependent or independent pathways, which warrants further investigation. Additionally, MLT is known to regulate fruit ripening by promoting the accumulation of ET and ABA. Exploring whether this regulatory effect also plays a role in the plant response to Cd stress is equally deserving of in-depth study [223].

4.1.8. Other Phytohormones

In addition to the previously mentioned phytohormones, GA, strigolactone (SL), and PAs have also been reported to enhance Cd resistance by reducing Cd2+ uptake and increasing antioxidant capacity [121,224,225,226]. It has been observed that Cd stress can alter the levels of nearly all hormones, and the application of exogenous hormones or biosynthesis inhibitors can enhance plant responses to Cd stress by boosting their antioxidant capacity [23,25]. However, it remains unclear whether these changes in hormone levels are a direct response to Cd stress or a consequence of plant damage caused by Cd exposure. Elucidating these mechanisms will provide a solid theoretical foundation for a deeper understanding of plant responses to Cd stress and the enhancement of Cd resistance.

4.2. Signaling Molecules

4.2.1. Nitric Oxide (NO)

In plants, NO is a transient gaseous signaling molecule that enhances tolerance to heavy metal stress by boosting the antioxidant defense system [227,228]. Under Cd stress, endogenous NO levels are reduced; however, the exogenous application of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) significantly increases the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, POD, and APX, as well as proline levels, thereby reducing the accumulation of Cd-induced H2O2 and MDA in peas and wheat (Figure 2) [72,229,230,231]. Consistently, the overexpression of rat neuronal NO synthase in rice, which raises endogenous NO levels, was found to promote the transcription of OsCATA, OsCATB, and OsPOX, thereby enhancing their enzyme activities under Cd stress [232]. Additionally, NO promotes the biosynthesis of ABA and GA under Cd stress, activating ABA- and GA-dependent Cd tolerance mechanisms [233]. In summary, NO regulates antioxidant enzyme activity through five primary mechanisms: (i) activating the transcription of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes [232]; (ii) promoting Fe uptake, which is an essential cofactor for the functioning of CAT and POD [72,229,230,231,234]; (iii) directly interacting with ROS to prevent oxidative damage [235]; (iv) increasing endogenous ABA and GA accumulation under Cd stress [233]; and (v) accelerating GSH accumulation by directly upregulating the genes encoding rate-limiting enzymes in GSH biosynthesis, such as gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS) and glutathione synthetase (GSHS) [236].
However, numerous studies suggest that NO does not always mitigate Cd toxicity; in some cases, it can actually exacerbate Cd toxicity [237]. These studies indicate that Cd stress can promote NO synthesis, and NO accumulation may intensify Cd toxicity by inhibiting Cd2+ chelation by PCs and MTs, enhancing Cd2+ uptake, and reducing the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as CAT and APX (Figure 2) [72,237,238,239,240,241]. In fact, several factors influence the regulation of NO content under Cd stress, including the Cd2+ concentration, the treatment duration, and the plant species [237]. The mitigating effect of NO on Cd stress is closely related to its concentration; therefore, the dual effect of NO on Cd stress may depend on the level of endogenous NO accumulation [242,243,244]. Although it has been reported that nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and nitrate reductase (NR) are involved in the regulation of NO production under Cd stress, the specific mechanisms of Cd-induced NO production in plants remain unclear and require further investigation. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for clarifying the role of NO in regulating Cd stress [237].

4.2.2. Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2)

H2O2 is not only a byproduct of oxidative stress and a free radical but also functions as a signaling molecule that regulates plant growth, development, and stress responses [245]. Several studies have demonstrated that the exogenous application of low concentrations of H2O2 can mitigate the toxic effects of Cd stress on plants, with the effective concentration depending on the plant species. For instance, 0.1 μM of H2O2 has been shown to protect tomato plants from Cd stress by enhancing CAT and APX activities and increasing the accumulation of AsA and GSH (Figure 2) [246]. In rapeseed, pretreatment with 50 μM of H2O2 significantly increased the GSH content, thereby enhancing Cd tolerance [41]. Additionally, 100 μM of H2O2 has been found to reduce Cd2+ uptake, enhance the activities of SOD, CAT, APX, GPX, GR, and GST, and increase GSH and PC levels, thereby reducing Cd toxicity in rice [247,248,249,250,251].
Indeed, H2O2 does not act independently as a fundamental signaling molecule in many signaling pathways; rather, it functions within dynamic systems, interacting with several other phytohormones (such as GAs, CKs, ABA, JA, ET, BR, and SA) and signaling molecules (including NO and Ca2+) [245]. Recent molecular studies have revealed that H2O2 is also involved in the modulation of MAPK- and TF-dependent signal transduction, which is a critical strategy for plants to cope with environmental stresses [246,252]. Therefore, an in-depth study of the molecular mechanisms underlying the H2O2 signaling pathway is particularly important for understanding how plants effectively respond to various environmental stresses, including heavy metal stress.

4.2.3. Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)

H2S, an emerging signaling molecule, plays a significant role in plant stress responses, including responses to heavy metal stress [253,254]. H2S mitigates Cd toxicity in plants through several mechanisms, including the induction of APX persulfation [255,256], the stimulation of the AsA-GSH cycle [257], the protection of mitochondrial function [258], and the enhancement of antioxidant enzyme activities [254]. A comprehensive meta-analysis demonstrated that exogenous H2S increased the activities of CAT (~39.51%), POD (~22.59%), APX (~17.80%), and SOD (~12.86%), thereby reducing Cd stress-induced H2O2 (~24.52%) and MDA (~20.37%) levels [259]. Moreover, the effectiveness of H2S in mitigating Cd toxicity is closely related to the plant species, the application method of NaHS (an H2S donor), and the growing conditions [259].

5. Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Modification Regulation of ROS Homeostasis under Cd Stress

Several TFs have been reported to respond to Cd stress by regulating the activities of antioxidant enzymes or the levels of non-enzymatic antioxidants (Table 1). For instance, the transcription of AtMYB4, SaHsfA4c, and ZmWRKY4 is induced, while AtWRKY12 is inhibited by Cd stress [177,260,261,262]. Additionally, these TFs have been implicated in regulating Cd2+ chelation, uptake, and transport, which consequently affects the Cd2+ content and distribution in plants [33,260,262,263,264]. Therefore, it remains to be verified whether these TFs directly regulate the transcription of antioxidant-related genes or indirectly influence the antioxidant capacity by altering the Cd2+ content in plants.
Beyond transcriptional regulation, post-transcriptional modifications also play a role in modulating antioxidant enzyme activities under Cd stress. For example, in pea leaves, Cd stress increases CAT activity and reduces H2O2 accumulation by maintaining the S-nitrosylation level of CAT [72]. Interestingly, APX can be both inactivated by irreversible nitration and activated by reversible S-nitrosylation under salt stress [265]. Additionally, CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 8 (CPK8) has been shown to phosphorylate CAT3 in an ABA-dependent manner, thereby activating its activity and regulating H2O2 homeostasis under drought stress in Arabidopsis [266]. However, whether these post-transcriptional modifications also occur under Cd stress remains to be further investigated.
Table 1. Transcription factors involved in regulating Cd-induced oxidative stress.
Table 1. Transcription factors involved in regulating Cd-induced oxidative stress.
TF NamePlant SpeciesFunctions in PlantTarget GenesRef.
AtMYB4Arabidopsis thalianaAtMYB4 positively regulates Cd tolerance via promoting PCs and MT accumulation, and enhancing CAT, SOD, and APX activities.AtPCS1; AtMT1C; AtCAT3; AtSOD; AtAPX1[260]
AtMYB75Arabidopsis thalianaAtMYB75 positively regulates Cd tolerance via promoting anthocyanin, GSH, and PC biosynthesis and enhancing SOD, and CAT activities.AtACBP2; AtABCC2[33]
AtWRKY12Arabidopsis thalianaAtWRKY12 negatively regulates Cd toxicity via decreasing GSH and PC contents.AtGSH1; AtGSH2; AtPCS1; AtPCS2[262]
CaPF1Capsicum annuumOverexpression of CaPF1 increased Cd tolerance via enhancing APX, GR and SOD activities in Virginia pine.None[267]
MsbHLH115Medicago sativaOverexpression of MsbHLH115 increased Cd tolerance via enhancing Fe/Zn accumulation and SOD, POD and CAT acitivities in Arabidopsis.MsbHLH121; AtSOD1; AtPOD1[264]
PyWRKY75Populus yunnanensisOverexpression of PyWRKY75 increased Cd tolerance via enhancing POD, SOD, CAT, and APX activities, and increasing AsA, GSH, and PCs accumulation.None[263]
SaHsfA4cSedum alfrediiOverexpression of SaHsfA4c increased Cd tolerance via enhancing CAT, APX, and POD activities in Arabiposis and Sedum alfredii.SaCAT; SaAPX; SaPOD[261]
ThWRKY7Tamarix hispidaThWRKY7 can specifically bind to and activate ThVHAc1 and improve Cd stress tolerance by enhancing SOD, POD, and GPX acitivities.ThVHAc1; ThSOD; ThGPX; ThPOD[268]
OsbZIP20Oryza sativaOsbZIP20 can specially bind to and activate the transcription of OsCATA and OsAPX2 and improve Cd stress tolerance by enhancing CAT and APX activities.OsCATA; OsAPX2[51]
ZmWRKY4Zea maysOverexpression of ZmWRKY4 positively regulates Cd tolerance via enhancing SOD and APX activities.ZmSOD4; ZmAPX[177]

6. Application of Amendments for Mitigating Cd-Induced Oxidative Stress

In addition to the application of essential mineral elements, phytohormones, and signaling molecules, the exogenous application of certain amendments can also mitigate Cd toxicity. The mechanisms by which these amendments operate can be summarized as follows: (i) reducing the bioavailability of Cd2+ in the soil, thereby limiting the amount of Cd2+ that plants can absorb; (ii) promoting the formation of Fe plaques on the root surface, which hinder Cd2+ uptake; (iii) increasing the contents of lignin, PCs, MTs, and other compounds to promote Cd2+ sequestration and reduce its translocation; and (iv) enhancing the plant’s antioxidant capacity. Interestingly, the enhancement of the antioxidant capacity by these amendments is often closely linked to the reduced bioavailability of Cd2+ within the plant.

6.1. Citric Acid (CA)

CA is an intermediate of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle that provides cells with energy for respiration and various biochemical activities [269]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that CA can enhance heavy metal remediation in plants by promoting metal solubility and mobilization, as well as by increasing the activity of key enzymes in the antioxidant defense system (Table 2) [270,271]. CA treatment has been shown to promote the uptake of Cd2+ by roots and to facilitate its translocation from roots to stems, thereby increasing the Cd2+ accumulation in plant roots and stems [271]. Additionally, CA treatment enhances the activities of enzymes such as POD, CAT, APX, DHAR, MDHAR, GR, and GPX, and helps maintain GSH-AsA homeostasis, thereby bolstering the antioxidant capacity of plants [1,271,272].

6.2. β-Aminobutyric Acid (BABA)

BABA is a natural plant metabolite that acts as a priming activator, inducing a “primed state” in plants, which provides broad-spectrum resistance to a wide range of stresses, including pathogen infections and various abiotic stresses [273,274,275]. Under Cd stress, BABA-pretreated plants have been shown to enhance Cd tolerance by increasing the activities of APX, POX, and MDAR enzymes and maintaining the regeneration capacity of the AsA-GSH cycle (Table 2) [273,276,277]. Studies in Arabidopsis further demonstrated that the exogenous addition of BSO, an inhibitor of GSH synthesis, eliminated BABA-induced Cd tolerance, suggesting that BABA may enhance Cd tolerance in Arabidopsis through a GSH-dependent pathway [273]. Additionally, research in strawberries showed that BABA pretreatment significantly increased the levels of endogenous NO and H2S while reducing ABA levels, thereby enhancing Cd tolerance [277]. This suggests that BABA, as a priming activator, may synergistically enhance the plant’s ability to tolerate Cd by prematurely inducing multiple stress tolerance pathways.

6.3. Nanoenzymes

Nanoenzymes are a class of artificial enzymes that have garnered attention for their ability to mimic the characteristics and catalytic properties of natural enzymes [274]. Calcium hexacyanoferrate nanozyme (CaHCF-NPs) is a novel type of nanoenzyme reported to ameliorate Cd toxicity by mimicking the catalytic properties of various natural enzymes such as SOD, POD, CAT, GPX, APX, and thiol peroxidase (TPX). The exogenous application of CaHCF has been shown to effectively decompose excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby reducing oxidative stress damage in plants (Table 2). Additionally, CaHCF nanoparticles can decrease the Cd2+ accumulation in plants through ion exchange with Cd2+, further mitigating the oxidative damage induced by heavy metals. Moreover, CaHCF nanoparticles have been found to upregulate the expression of genes related to antioxidant defense, heavy metal detoxification, nutrient transport, and stress resistance, thereby enhancing plant resilience [278]. Despite the promising role of CaHCF in enhancing Cd resistance, the residue and safety assessment of CaHCF nanoparticles remain insufficient. Continuous monitoring and analysis of CaHCF nanoparticles at different stages of crop development are necessary to ensure their safety.

6.4. Exopolysaccharides (EPSs)

EPSs are exogenous active substances secreted by microorganisms such as fungi, bacteria, and algae, which play a crucial role in plant–microbe interactions. EPSs can protect plant growth under abiotic stresses by maintaining a healthy rhizosphere environment [279,280]. Several studies have demonstrated that EPSs can effectively ameliorate Cd toxicity in rice (Table 2). On one hand, EPSs promote lignin synthesis and cell wall remodeling, enhancing Cd resistance. Additionally, EPSs inhibit the expression of genes such as OsNramp1, OsNramp5, and OsHMA2, reducing Cd2+ uptake and translocation. On the other hand, EPSs activate the oxidative stress response, leading to increased activities of SOD, CAT, POD, and the AsA-GSH cycle under Cd stress, thereby boosting the plant’s antioxidant capacity [43,281,282]. Moreover, EPSs have been shown to promote the synthesis of linolenic acid, a precursor of JA, suggesting that the JA signaling pathway may also be involved in the regulation of Cd stress resistance by EPS [283,284]. In addition to EPSs, microorganisms can promote plant growth and antioxidant activity by secreting other signaling molecules such as riboflavin and lumichrome. These microorganisms can also significantly increase the content of flavonoids and other phenolic compounds in plants, further enhancing their antioxidant capacity [34,271,285,286,287,288,289].
Table 2. Amendments for enhancing antioxidant activity in plants under Cd stress.
Table 2. Amendments for enhancing antioxidant activity in plants under Cd stress.
AmendmentsDosesCd2+MediumPlant SpeciesFunctions in PlantRef.
CA0.5 mM/1.0 mM0.5 mM
/1.0 mM
SolutionBrassica junceaIncreasing the levels of AsA, GSH, and PC, while enhancing the activities of key antioxidant enzymes such as APX, MDHAR, DHAR GR, GPX, SOD, and CAT.[272]
BABA 200 μM100 μM
/150 μM
1/2 MSArabidopsis thalianaIncreasing GSH levels.[273]
20 mM//Fragaria ananassaIncreasing the endogenous levels of NO, H2S, and AsA.[277]
200 μM100 μMSolutionGlycine maxPriming and activating antioxidant defense mechanisms.[276]
Nanoenzymes120 μg/mL50 μM 1/2 MSArabidopsis thalianaEnhancing the activities of SOD, POD and CAT, while mimicking the activities of SOD, CAT, POD, TPX, GPX, and APX.[278]
150 μM1/2 MSSolanum lycopersicum
300 μMSolution
27 μg/mgSoil
EPS100 mg/L
/200 mg/L
50 μMSolutionOryza sativaEnhancing the activities of CAT and POD, while increasing the levels of GSH.[281]
250 mg/L30 μMSolutionOryza sativaIncreasing GSH levels.[43]
100 mg/L /400 mg/L10 μM
/25 μM
SolutionOryza sativaPromoting lignin biosynthesis and activating antioxidant activity.[282]
NAC500 μM50 μM
/200 μM
SolutionSolanum nigrumEnhancing the biosynthesis of GSH.[21]

6.5. N-Acetyl-Cysteine (NAC)

NAC is a compound derived from the acetylation of cysteine, which can be further degraded into cysteine and glutathione (GSH) in plants, acting as a broad-spectrum antioxidant. NAC has been shown to reduce the oxidative stress induced by herbicides and UV-B radiation [290,291,292]. A study in Solanum nigrum demonstrated that NAC treatment increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, APX, GSH-Px, and GR in roots under Cd stress, thereby enhancing the Cd tolerance of nigrum (Table 2) [21]. This suggests that NAC not only functions as an antioxidant but also acts as an inducer, stimulating the activities of various antioxidants and thereby boosting the plant’s overall antioxidant capacity.
Additionally, materials such as sepiolite, bentonite, biochar, and certain microbes are also involved in enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities under Cd2+ stress [25,293,294].

7. Concluding Remarks

Cd is not a redox-active metal and, therefore, it cannot generate ROS via the Fenton or Haber–Weiss reactions. Instead, Cd enhances ROS accumulation by disrupting the electron transport chain, weakening the antioxidant system, or interfering with the uptake and metabolism of essential mineral nutrients [18,24]. Cd-induced ROS include singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide anion (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radicals (OH), which oxidize cellular components such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, leading to cellular damage and destruction [18,24,295,296]. Plants have evolved several strategies to mitigate Cd toxicity, including chelation, compartmentalization, the reduction of uptake, active efflux, and the enhancement of the antioxidant capacity [18,24]. Among these, changes in antioxidant capacity are often closely related to the concentration of Cd2+ available in the plant. Consequently, in many cases, the enhancement of the antioxidant capacity under Cd stress by exogenous substances is primarily due to a reduction in the amount of Cd2+ available in the plant [37,38,39,40].
In agricultural practice, our requirements for Cd accumulation and antioxidant capacity are not always aligned. For conventional plants, we seek a combination of a low amount of Cd accumulation and a high antioxidant capacity, termed “low Cd, high antioxidant”, to reduce the risk of Cd entering the food chain. Conversely, for remediation plants, we aim for a high amount of Cd accumulation alongside a strong antioxidant capacity, referred to as “high Cd, high antioxidant”, to enhance the plant’s Cd remediation ability. However, previous research has primarily focused on elucidating Cd accumulation mechanisms, while studies on the regulatory mechanisms of antioxidant capacity and the synergistic effects on resistance and yield are still insufficient. Recent advancements in gene editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9, enable the targeted editing of specific genes. Therefore, a deeper exploration of the regulatory mechanisms underlying plants’ antioxidant capacity and the identification of key genes involved will provide a solid theoretical foundation for developing edible plants with “low Cd, high antioxidant, high yield” traits and remediation plants with “high Cd, high antioxidant, high yield” traits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.-W.D.; writing—original draft preparation, P.L., J.W., T.-T.L. and D.-W.D.; writing—review and editing, P.S., Q.M. and D.-W.D.; funding acquisition, D.-W.D., J.W. and P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Field Frontier Program of the Institute of Soil Science (ISSAS2412); the Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund (CX(22)3138); the Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL-KY2023-07); the Yafu Technology Innovation and Service Major Project of Jiangsu Vocational College of Agriculture and Forestry (No. 2024kj01); and the Fund Support Project of Jiangsu Vocational College of Agriculture and Forestry (No. 2021kj15).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Najeeb, U.; Jilani, G.; Ali, S.; Sarwar, M.; Xu, L.; Zhou, W.J. Insights into cadmium induced physiological and ultra-structural disorders in Juncus effusus L. and its remediation through exogenous citric acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aziz, R.; Rafiq, M.T.; Li, T.Q.; Liu, D.; He, Z.L.; Stoffella, P.J.; Sun, K.; Xiaoe, Y. Uptake of cadmium by rice grown on contaminated soils and its bioavailability/toxicity in human cell lines (Caco-2/HL-7702). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3599–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, Y.W.; Jiang, X.H.; Li, K.; Wu, M.; Zhang, R.F.; Zhang, L.; Chen, G.X. Photosynthetic responses of Oryza sativa L. seedlings to cadmium stress: Physiological, biochemical and ultrastructural analyses. BioMetals 2014, 27, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shah, A.A.; Aslam, S.; Akbar, M.; Ahmad, A.; Khan, W.U.; Yasin, N.A.; Ali, B.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S. Combined effect of Bacillus fortis IAGS 223 and zinc oxide nanoparticles to alleviate cadmium phytotoxicity in Cucumis melo. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 158, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jin, X.; Yang, X.; Islam, E.; Liu, D.; Mahmood, Q. Effects of cadmium on ultrastructure and antioxidative defense system in hyperaccumulator and non-hyperaccumulator ecotypes of Sedum alfredii Hance. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 156, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shamsi, I.H.; Jilani, G.; Zhang, G.P.; Wei, K. Cadmium stress tolerance through potassium nutrition in soybean. Asian J. Chem. 2008, 20, 1099–1108. [Google Scholar]
  7. Daud, M.K.; Sun, Y.; Dawood, M.; Hayat, Y.; Variath, M.T.; Wu, Y.X.; Raziuddin; Mishkat, U.; Salahuddin; Najeeb, U.; et al. Cadmium-induced functional and ultrastructural alterations in roots of two transgenic cotton cultivars. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Furze, J.M.; Rhodes, M.J.; Parr, A.J.; Robins, R.J.; Withehead, I.M.; Threlfall, D.R. Abiotic factors elicit sesquiterpenoid phytoalexin production but not alkaloid production in transformed root cultures of Datura stramonium. Plant Cell Rep. 1991, 10, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pinto, A.P.; Mota, A.M.; de Varennes, A.; Pinto, F.C. Influence of organic matter on the uptake of cadmium, zinc, copper and iron by sorghum plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 326, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sanità di Toppi, L.; Gabbrielli, R. Response to cadmium in higher plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1999, 41, 105–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaushik, S.; Ranjan, A.; Sidhu, A.; Singh, A.K.; Sirhindi, G. Cadmium toxicity: Its’ uptake and retaliation by plant defence system and ja signaling. BioMetals 2024, 37, 755–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, Q.; Wen, Q.R.; Ma, T.C.; Zhu, Q.H.; Huang, D.Y.; Zhu, H.H.; Xu, C.; Chen, H.F. Cadmium-induced iron deficiency is a compromise strategy to reduce Cd uptake in rice. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 206, 105155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abedi, T.; Mojiri, A. Cadmium uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): An overview. Plants 2020, 9, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fu, S.; Lu, Y.S.; Zhang, X.; Yang, G.Z.; Chao, D.; Wang, Z.G.; Shi, M.X.; Chen, J.G.; Chao, D.Y.; Li, R.B.; et al. The ABC transporter ABCG36 is required for cadmium tolerance in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5909–5918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gravot, A.; Lieutaud, A.; Verret, F.; Auroy, P.; Vavasseur, A.; Richaud, P. AtHMA3, a plant P-ATPase, functions as a Cd/Pb transporter in yeast. FEBS Lett. 2004, 561, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Korenkov, V.; Hirschi, K.; Crutchfield, J.D.; Wagner, G.J. Enhancing tonoplast Cd/H antiport activity increases Cd, Zn, and Mn tolerance, and impacts root/shoot Cd partitioning in Nicotiana tabacum L. Planta 2007, 226, 1379–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, X.S.; Feng, S.J.; Zhang, B.Q.; Wang, M.Q.; Cao, H.W.; Rono, J.K.; Chen, X.; Yang, Z.M. OsZIP1 functions as a metal efflux transporter limiting excess zinc, copper and cadmium accumulation in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Al-Khayri, J.M.; Banadka, A.; Rashmi, R.; Nagella, P.; Alessa, F.M.; Almaghasla, M.I. Cadmium toxicity in medicinal plants: An overview of the tolerance strategies, biotechnological and omics approaches to alleviate metal stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1047410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cobbett, C.; Goldsbrough, P. Phytochelatins and metallothioneins: Roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 159–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, L.; Wang, D.; Long, C.; Cui, Z.X. Effect of biodegradable chelators on induced phytoextraction of uranium- and cadmium-contaminated soil by Zebrina pendula Schnizl. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deng, X.; Xia, Y.; Hu, W.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Z. Cadmium-induced oxidative damage and protective effects of N-acetyl-L-cysteine against cadmium toxicity in Solanum nigrum L. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 180, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Singh, S.; Eapen, S.; D’Souza, S.F. Cadmium accumulation and its influence on lipid peroxidation and antioxidative system in an aquatic plant, Bacopa monnieri L. Chemosphere 2006, 62, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shaari, N.E.M.; Tajudin, M.; Khandaker, M.M.; Majrashi, A.; Alenazi, M.M.; Abdullahi, U.A.; Mohd, K.S. Cadmium toxicity symptoms and uptake mechanism in plants: A review. Braz. J. Biol. 2022, 84, e252143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kolahi, M.; Kazemi, E.M.; Yazdi, M.; Goldson-Barnaby, A. Oxidative stress induced by cadmium in lettuce (Lectuca sativa Linn.): Oxidative stress indicators and prediction of their genes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 146, 71–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Adrees, M.; Rizvi, H.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Hannan, F.; Qayyum, M.F.; Hafeez, F.; Ok, Y.S. Cadmium stress in rice: Toxic effects, tolerance mechanisms, and management: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 17859–17879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hou, L.; Ji, S.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.Z.; Zhang, L.; Liu, P. The mechanism of silicon on alleviating cadmium toxicity in plants: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1141138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ketta, M.; Tumová, E.; Stupka, R.; Cítek, J.; Chodová, D. Adverse effects of cadmium on poultry and role of selenium against it: An updated review. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2021, 66, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Soni, S.; Jha, A.B.; Dubey, R.S.; Sharma, P. Mitigating cadmium accumulation and toxicity in plants: The promising role of nanoparticles. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 168826. [Google Scholar]
  29. Vitelli, V.; Giamborino, A.; Bertolini, A.; Saba, A.; Andreucci, A. Cadmium stress signaling pathways in plants: Molecular responses and mechanisms. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 6052–6068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, H.W.; Lu, L.L. Transcription factors involved in plant responses to cadmium-induced oxidative stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1397289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bi, J.W.; Liu, X.C.; Liu, S.R.; Wang, Y.T.; Liu, M. Microstructural and physiological responses to cadmium stress under different nitrogen forms in two contrasting Populus clones. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 169, 103897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Han, C.; Wang, L.; Lyu, J.; Shi, W.; Yao, L.; Fan, M.; Bai, M.Y. Brassinosteroid signaling and molecular crosstalk with nutrients in plants. J. Genet. Genom. 2023, 50, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zheng, T.; Lu, X.; Yang, F.; Zhang, D. Synergetic modulation of plant cadmium tolerance via MYB75-mediated ROS homeostasis and transcriptional regulation. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 1515–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zaets, I.; Kramarev, S.; Kozyrovska, N. Inoculation with a bacterial consortium alleviates the effect of cadmium overdose in soybean plants. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2010, 5, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Z.; Feng, Y.X.; Guo, Z.P.; Han, M.L.; Yan, X.B. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviate cadmium toxicity and promote tolerance by modulating programmed cell death in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 469, 133917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sofo, A.; Scopa, A.; Nuzzaci, M.; Vitti, A. Ascorbate Peroxidase and Catalase Activities and Their Genetic Regulation in Plants Subjected to Drought and Salinity Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 13561–13578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Scebba, F.; Arduini, I.; Ercoli, L.; Sebastiani, L. Cadmium effects on growth and antioxidant enzymes activities in. Biol. Plant. 2006, 50, 688–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Radotic, K.; Ducic, T.; Mutavdzic, D. Changes in peroxidase activity and isoenzymes in spruce needles after exposure to different concentrations of cadmium. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2000, 44, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, F.T.; Qi, J.M.; Zhang, G.Y.; Lin, L.H.; Fang, P.P.; Tao, A.F.; Xu, J.T. Effect of cadmium stress on the growth, antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in two Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) Plant Seedlings. J. Integr. Agric. 2013, 12, 610–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dixit, V.; Pandey, V.; Shyam, R. Differential antioxidative responses to cadmium in roots and leaves of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Azad). J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Gill, S.S.; Alharby, H.F.; Razafindrabe, B.H.N.; Fujita, M. Hydrogen peroxide pretreatment mitigates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Brassica napus L.: An intrinsic study on antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, C.; Wang, Q.H.; Hou, X.C.; Zhao, C.Q.; Guo, Q. Overexpression of IlHMA2, from Iris lactea, improves the accumulation of and tolerance to cadmium in tobacco. Plants 2023, 12, 3460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wei, H.Y.; Li, Y.; Wei, L.; Peng, S.Y.; Zhang, B.; Xu, D.J.; Cheng, X. Exploring the mechanism of exopolysaccharides in mitigating cadmium toxicity in rice through analyzing the changes of antioxidant system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 461, 132678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hong, S.H.; Lee, S.S.; Chung, J.M.; Jung, H.S.; Singh, S.; Mondal, S.; Jang, H.H.; Cho, J.Y.; Bae, H.J.; Chung, B.Y. Site-specific mutagenesis of yeast 2-Cys peroxiredoxin improves heat or oxidative stress tolerance by enhancing its chaperone or peroxidase function. Protoplasma 2017, 254, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, H.B.; Yao, T.T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.C.; Song, J.Q.; Cui, C.C.; Ji, G.X.; Cao, J.N.; Muhammad, S.; Ao, H.; et al. CDSP32-overexpressing tobacco plants improves cadmium tolerance by modulating antioxidant mechanism. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 194, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, J.R.; Wei, Z.; Lu, X.F.; Liu, Y.Z.; Yu, W.J.; Li, C.X. Involvement of nitric oxide and melatonin enhances cadmium resistance of tomato seedlings through regulation of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle and ROS metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, Z.C.; Zhang, W.J.; Xu, S.J.; Shi, H.Z.; Wen, D.; Huang, Y.D.; Peng, L.J.; Deng, T.H.B.; Du, R.Y.; Li, F.R.; et al. Increasing ammonium nutrition as a strategy for inhibition of cadmium uptake and xylem transport in rice (Oryza sativa L.) exposed to cadmium stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 155, 734–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Di, D.W.; Sun, L.; Zhang, X.N.; Li, G.J.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W.M. Involvement of auxin in the regulation of ammonium tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil 2018, 432, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kronzucker, H.J.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M. Conifer root discrimination against soil nitrate and the ecology of forest succession. Nature 1997, 385, 59–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nasraoui-Hajaji, A.; Chaffei-Haouari, C.; Ghorbel, M.H.; Gouia, H. Growth and nitrate assimilation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) grown with different nitrogen source and treated with cadmium. Acta Bot. Gall. 2011, 158, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Di, D.W.; Li, T.T.; Yu, Z.L.; Cheng, J.; Wang, M.; Liu, C.F.; Wang, Y.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Yu, M.; Shi, W. Ammonium mitigates cadmium toxicity by activating the bZIP20-APX2/CATA transcriptional module in rice seedlings in an ABA-dependent manner. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 480, 135874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Shah, K.; Kumar, R.G.; Verma, S.; Dubey, R.S. Effect of cadmium on lipid peroxidation, superoxide anion generation and activities of antioxidant enzymes in growing rice seedlings. Plant Sci. 2001, 161, 1135–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Yan, T.; Zhang, X.; Xu, S.; Shi, H.; Deng, T.H.; Li, F.; Du, Y.; Du, R.; et al. Ammonium nutrition mitigates cadmium toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) through improving antioxidase system and the glutathione-ascorbate cycle efficiency. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 110010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Vazquez, A.; Recalde, L.; Cabrera, A.; Groppa, M.D.; Benavides, M.P. Does nitrogen source influence cadmium distribution in Arabidopsis plants? Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 191, 110163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Billini, M.; Hoffmann, T.; Kühn, J.; Bremer, E.; Thanbichler, M. The cytoplasmic phosphate level has a central regulatory role in the phosphate starvation response of Caulobacter crescentus. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ruangcharus, C.; Kim, S.U.; Hong, C.O. Mechanism of cadmium immobilization in phosphate-amended arable soils. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2020, 63, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, X.L.; Zou, H.T.; Liu, Q. Effects of phosphate and silicate combined application on cadmium form changes in heavy metal contaminated soil. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Arshad, M.; Ali, S.; Noman, A.; Ali, Q.; Rizwan, M.; Farid, M.; Irshad, M.K. Phosphorus amendment decreased cadmium (Cd) uptake and ameliorates chlorophyll contents, gas exchange attributes, antioxidants, and mineral nutrients in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Cd stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2016, 62, 533–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, H.J.; Zhang, J.L.; Christie, P.; Zhang, F.S. Influence of external zinc and phosphorus supply on Cd uptake by rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings with root surface iron plaque. Plant Soil 2007, 300, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Siebers, N.; Siangliw, M.; Tongcumpou, C. Cadmium uptake and subcellular distribution in rice plants as affected by phosphorus: Soil and hydroponic experiments. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2013, 13, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dong, Q.; Wallrad, L.; Almutairi, B.O.; Kudla, J. Ca2+ signaling in plant responses to abiotic stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Liu, J.L.; Feng, X.Y.; Qiu, G.Y.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.D.; Fu, Q.L.; Guo, B. Inhibition roles of calcium in cadmium uptake and translocation in rice: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, Y.T.; Wang, Z.Q.; Liu, Y.S.; Zhang, T.Q.; Liu, J.M.; You, Z.; Huang, P.P.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Wang, C. Plasma membrane-associated calcium signaling modulates cadmium transport. New Phytol. 2023, 238, 313–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sinegani, M.S.; Manzoor, M.; Mühling, K.H. Calcium-associated anions play a dual role in modulating cadmium uptake and translocation in wheat. Pollutants 2024, 4, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cho, S.C.; Chao, Y.Y.; Kao, C.H. Calcium deficiency increases Cd toxicity and Ca is required for heat-shock induced Cd tolerance in rice seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, H.B.; Tang, X.J.; Wang, T.J.; Liao, W.F.; Wu, Z.X.; Wu, M.L.; Song, Z.H.; Li, Y.D.; Luo, P. Calcium polypeptide mitigates Cd toxicity in rice via reducing oxidative stress and regulating pectin modification. Plant Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nazir, M.M.; Noman, M.; Ahmed, T.; Ali, S.; Ulhassan, Z.; Zeng, F.R.; Zhang, G.P. Exogenous calcium oxide nanoparticles alleviate cadmium toxicity by reducing Cd uptake and enhancing antioxidative capacity in barley seedlings. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 129498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rahman, A.; Mostofa, M.G.; Nahar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Exogenous calcium alleviates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by regulating the antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems calcium-induced cadmium stress tolerance in rice. Braz. J. Bot. 2016, 39, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Okla, M.K.; Saleem, M.H.; Saleh, I.A.; Zomot, N.; Perveen, S.; Parveen, A.; Abasi, F.; Ali, H.; Ali, B.; Alwasel, Y.A.; et al. Foliar application of iron-lysine to boost growth attributes, photosynthetic pigments and biochemical defense system in canola (Brassica napus L.) under cadmium stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tan, Z.; Li, J.; Guan, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, G. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis reveals roles of the NRAMP gene family in iron/cadmium interactions in peanut. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, R.; Fei, Y.; Pan, Y.; Zhou, P.; Adegoke, J.O.; Shen, R.; Lan, P. IMA peptides function in iron homeostasis and cadmium resistance. Plant Sci. 2023, 336, 111868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ortega-Galisteo, A.P.; Rodriguez-Serrano, M.; Pazmino, D.M.; Gupta, D.K.; Sandalio, L.M.; Romero-Puertas, M.C. S-Nitrosylated proteins in pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaf peroxisomes: Changes under abiotic stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 2089–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Aslam, A.; Noreen, Z.; Rashid, M.; Aslam, M.; Hussain, T.; Younas, A.; Fiaz, S.; Attia, K.A.; Mohammed, A.A. Understanding the role of magnetic (Fe3O4) nanoparticle to mitigate cadmium stress in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Bot. Stud. 2024, 65, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Razzaq, S.; Zhou, B.B.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Maqsood, M.A.; Hussain, S.; Bakhsh, G.; Zhang, Z.S.; Yang, Q.; Altaf, A.R. Cadmium stabilization and redox transformation mechanism in maize using nanoscale zerovalent-iron-enriched biochar in cadmium-contaminated soil. Plants 2022, 11, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khavari-Nejad, R.A.; Najafi, F.; Rezaei, M. The influence of cadmium toxicity on some physiological parameters as sffected by iron in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant. J. Plant Nutr. 2014, 37, 1202–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, M.W.; Liu, C.R.; Zhang, D.Q.; Wang, B.W.; Ding, S. The influence of iron application on the growth and cadmium stress tolerance of poplar. Forests 2022, 13, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shao, G.S.; Chen, M.X.; Wang, W.X.; Mon, R.X.; Zhang, G.P. Iron nutrition affects cadmium accumulation and toxicity in rice plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2007, 53, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sinclair, S.A.; Kramer, U. The zinc homeostasis network of land plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Res. 2012, 1823, 1553–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Thompson, M.W. Regulation of zinc-dependent enzymes by metal carrier proteins. BioMetals 2022, 35, 187–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Takahashi, R.; Ishimaru, Y.; Shimo, H.; Ogo, Y.; Senoura, T.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Nakanishi, H. The OsHMA2 transporter is involved in root-to-shoot translocation of Zn and Cd in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 1948–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hassan, M.J.; Zhang, G.P.; Wu, F.B.; Wei, K.; Chen, Z.H. Zinc alleviates growth inhibition and oxidative stress caused by cadmium in rice. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2005, 168, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jiang, Y.; Wei, C.; Jiao, Q.J.; Li, G.Z.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P.; Shah, T.R.; Fahad, S.; Zhang, J.J.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Interactive effect of silicon and zinc on cadmium toxicity alleviation in wheat plants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 458, 131933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hassan, M.U.; Huang, G.Q.; Haider, F.U.; Khan, T.A.; Noor, M.A.; Luo, F.; Zhou, Q.; Yang, B.J.; Ul Haq, M.I.; Iqbal, M.M. Application of zinc oxide nanoparticles to mitigate cadmium toxicity: Mechanisms and future prospects. Plants 2024, 13, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Akhtar, N.; Khan, S.; Jamil, M.; Rehman, S.U.; Rehman, Z.U.; Rha, E.S. Combine effect of ZnO NPs and bacteria on protein and gene’s expression profile of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant. Toxics 2022, 10, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ali, S.; Bai, Y.S.; Zhang, J.L.; Zada, S.; Khan, N.; Hu, Z.L.; Tang, Y.L. Discovering nature’s shield: Metabolomic insights into green zinc oxide nanoparticles Safeguarding Brassica parachinensis L. from cadmium stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 206, 108126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Anwar, T.; Qureshi, H.; Fatimah, H.; Siddiqi, E.H.; Anwaar, S.; Moussa, I.M.; Adil, M.F. Elucidating effect of ZnO-Nanoparticles and melatonin on physiological adjustments and growth of Solanum melongena under salinity stress. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 322, 112455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bashir, A.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Adrees, M.; Rehman, M.Z.U.; Qayyum, M.F. Effect of composted organic amendments and zinc oxide nanoparticles on growth and cadmium accumulation by wheat; a life cycle study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 23926–23936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hussain, A.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Rehman, M.Z.U.; Qayyum, M.F.; Nawaz, R.; Ahmad, A.; Asrar, M.; Ahmad, S.R.; Alsahli, A.A.; et al. Combined use of different nanoparticles effectively decreased cadmium (Cd) concentration in grains of wheat grown in a field contaminated with Cd. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 215, 112139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Karmous, I.; Gammoudi, N.; Chaoui, A. Assessing the potential role of zinc oxide nanoparticles for mitigating cadmium toxicity in Capsicum annuum L. under in vitro conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 719–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Khan, Z.S.; Rizwan, M.; Hafeez, M.; Ali, S.; Javed, M.R.; Adrees, M. The accumulation of cadmium in wheat (Triticum aestivum) as influenced by zinc oxide nanoparticles and soil moisture conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 19859–19870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, Y.Z.; Liang, L.X.; Li, W.; Ashraf, U.; Ma, L.; Tang, X.R.; Pan, S.G.; Tian, H.; Mo, Z.W. ZnO nanoparticle-based seed priming modulates early growth and enhances physio-biochemical and metabolic profiles of fragrant rice against cadmium toxicity. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Rashid, M.H.; Rahman, M.M.; Halim, M.A.; Naidu, R. Growth, metal partitioning and antioxidant enzyme activities of mung beans as influenced by zinc oxide nanoparticles under cadmium stress. Crop Pasture Sci. 2021, 73, 862–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Timilsina, A.; Adhikari, K.; Chen, H. Foliar application of green synthesized ZnO nanoparticles reduced Cd content in shoot of lettuce. Chemosphere 2023, 338, 139589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zha, Y.; Zhao, B.; Niu, T.X. Bamboo biochar and zinc oxide nanoparticles improved the growth of maize (Zea may L.) and decreased cadmium uptake in Cd-contaminated soil. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sharifan, H.; Moore, J.; Ma, X.M. Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles elevated iron and copper contents and mitigated the bioavailability of lead and cadmium in different leafy greens. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 191, 110177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Soni, S.; Jha, A.B.; Dubey, R.S.; Sharma, P. Alleviation of chromium stress in plants using metal and metal oxide nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 83180–83197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Peng, H.; Shahidi, F. Cannabis and Cannabis Edibles: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 1751–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Vankova, R.; Landa, P.; Podlipna, R.; Dobrev, P.I.; Prerostova, S.; Langhansova, L.; Gaudinova, A.; Motkova, K.; Knirsch, V.; Vanek, T. ZnO nanoparticle effects on hormonal pools in. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 593, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, S.B.; Tian, Y.F.; Jiang, P.Y.Z.; Lin, Y.; Liu, X.L.; Yang, H.S. Recent advances in the application of metabolomics for food safety control and food quality analyses. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 1448–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yu, H.; Park, J.Y.; Kwon, C.W.; Hong, S.C.; Park, K.M.; Chang, P.S. An overview of nanotechnology in food science: Preparative methods, practical applications, and safety. J. Chem. 2018, 2018, 5427978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. He, X.J.; Hwang, H.M. Nanotechnology in food science: Functionality, applicability, and safety assessment. J. Food Drug Anal. 2016, 24, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. McClements, D.J.; Rao, J. Food-grade nanoemulsions: Formulation, fabrication, properties, performance, biological fate, and potential toxicity. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 285–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Chauhan, R.; Awasthi, S.; Srivastava, S.; Dwivedi, S.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H.; Dhankher, O.P.; Tripathi, R.D. Understanding selenium metabolism in plants and its role as a beneficial element. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 49, 1937–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Qureshi, M.T.; Ahmad, M.F.; Iqbal, N.; Waheed, H.; Hussain, S.; Brestic, M.; Anjum, A.; Noorka, I.R. Agronomic bio-fortification of iron, zinc and selenium enhance growth, quality and uptake of different sorghum accessions. Plant Soil Environ. 2021, 67, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Boorboori, M.R.; Qiu, H.S.; Liu, J.Y.; Zhang, H.Y. Application of silicon and selenium in rice for reducing cadmium stress. Phyton-Int J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 92, 1873–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jia, K.Y.; Zhan, Z.P.; Wang, B.Q.; Wang, W.H.; Wei, W.J.; Li, D.W.; Huang, W.; Xu, Z.M. Exogenous selenium enhances cadmium stress tolerance by improving physiological characteristics of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) seedlings. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jiang, P.P.; Liu, J.; Chen, M.H.; Yu, G.; You, S.H.; Li, J.Y. Exogenous selenium improves the physiological resistance of cucumber to cadmium stress. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2020, 102, 455–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Luo, Y.; Wei, Y.; Sun, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Han, D.; Shao, H.; Jia, H.; Fu, Y. Selenium modulates the level of auxin to alleviate the toxicity of cadmium in tobacco. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Manzoor, M.; Abdalla, M.A.; Hussain, M.A.; Mühling, K.H. Silicon-selenium interplay imparts cadmium resistance in wheat through an up-regulating antioxidant system. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Naseem, M.B.B.; Ali, Q.; Ali, S.; Khalid, M.R.; Nawaz, M. Selenium application reduces cadmium uptake in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) by modulating growth, nutrient uptake, gas exchange, root exudates and antioxidant profile. Pak. J. Bot. 2023, 55, 1633–1646. [Google Scholar]
  111. Sakouhi, L.; Mahjoubi, Y.; Labben, A.; Kharbech, O.; Chaoui, A.; Djebali, W. Effects of cadmium-selenium interaction on glyoxalase and antioxidant systems of germinating Seeds. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 3084–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sun, H.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Yang, N.; Zhou, H.X.; Gao, Y.F.; Yu, J.; Wang, X.X. Effect of exogenous selenium on mineral nutrition and antioxidative capacity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings under cadmium stress. Plant Soil Environ. 2022, 68, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, B.W.; Zhang, D.Q.; Wang, W.F.; Song, Y.K.; Lu, M.F.; Ding, S. Foliar application of selenium reduces cadmium accumulation in walnut seedlings. Forests 2022, 13, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, M.; Li, H.B.; Dang, F.; Cheng, B.X.; Cheng, C.; Ge, C.H.; Zhou, D.M. Common metabolism and transcription responses of low-cadmium-accumulative wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars sprayed with nano-selenium. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 948, 174936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zhang, C.H.; Huang, R.Q.; Zhan, N.H.; Qin, L.J. Methyl jasmonate and selenium synergistically mitigative cadmium toxicity in hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants by improving antioxidase activities and reducing Cd accumulation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 82458–82469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ahmad, A.; Javad, S.; Iqbal, S.; Shahzadi, K.; Gatasheh, M.K.; Javed, T. Alleviation potential of green-synthesized selenium nanoparticles for cadmium stress in Solanum lycopersicum L: Modulation of secondary metabolites and physiochemical attributes. Plant Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Farooq, M.U.; Ishaaq, I.; Barutcular, C.; Skalicky, M.; Maqbool, R.; Rastogi, A.; Hussain, S.; Allakhverdiev, S.I.; Zhu, J. Mitigation effects of selenium on accumulation of cadmium and morpho-physiological properties in rice varieties. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 170, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Guo, Y.K.; Mao, K.; Cao, H.R.; Ali, W.; Lei, D.; Teng, D.Y.; Chang, C.Y.; Yang, X.F.; Yang, Q.; Niazi, N.K.; et al. Exogenous selenium (cadmium) inhibits the absorption and transportation of cadmium (selenium) in rice. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Nie, L.L.; Zhou, B.Q.; Hong, B.; Wang, X.D.; Chang, T.; Guan, C.Y.; Guan, M. Application of selenium can alleviate the stress of cadmium on rapeseed at different growth stages in soil. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Qin, X.M.; Zhao, P.; Liu, O.G.; Nie, Z.J.; Zhu, J.J.; Qin, S.Y.; Li, C. Selenium inhibits cadmium uptake and accumulation in the shoots of winte wheat by altering the transformation of chemical forms of cadmium in soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 8525–8537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kang, Y.Y.; Qin, H.Y.; Wang, G.H.; Lei, B.F.; Yang, X.; Zhong, M. Selenium nanoparticles mitigate cadmium stress in tomato through enhanced accumulation and transport of sulfate/selenite and polyamines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 1473–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. El-Saadony, M.T.; Desoky, E.S.M.; Saad, A.M.; Eid, R.S.M.; Selem, E.; Elrys, A.S. Biological silicon nanoparticles improve Phaseolus vulgars L. yield and minimize its contaminant contents on a heavy metals-contaminated saline soil. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 106, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Guntzer, F.; Keller, C.; Meunier, J.D. Benefits of plant silicon for crops: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bhat, J.A.; Shivaraj, S.M.; Singh, P.; Navadagi, D.B.; Tripathi, D.K.; Dash, P.K.; Solanke, A.U.; Sonah, H.; Deshmukh, R. Role of silicon in mitigation of heavy metal stresses in crop plants. Plants 2019, 8, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ashraf, H.; Ghouri, F.; Liang, J.; Xia, W.; Zheng, Z.; Shahid, M.Q.; Fu, X. Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles-based amelioration of Cd toxicity by regulating antioxidant activity and photosynthetic parameters in a line developed from wild rice. Plants 2024, 13, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chen, H.X.; Huang, X.Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, S.; Fan, C.W.; Fu, T.L.; He, T.B.; Gao, Z.R. Effect of silicon spraying on rice photosynthesis and antioxidant defense system on cadmium accumulation. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 15265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. He, S.; Lian, X.; Zhang, B.; Liu, X.; Yu, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, H. Nano silicon dioxide reduces cadmium uptake, regulates nutritional homeostasis and antioxidative enzyme system in barley seedlings (Hordeum vulgare L.) under cadmium stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 67552–67564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hu, Y.; Zhou, X.Q.; Shi, A.; Yu, Y.S.; Rensing, C.; Zhang, T.X.; Xing, S.H.; Yang, W.H. Exogenous silicon promotes cadmium (Cd) accumulation in Sedum alfredii Hance by enhancing Cd uptake and alleviating Cd toxicity. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1134370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Huang, X.Y.; Fan, C.W.; Xie, D.Y.; Chen, H.X.; Zhang, S.; Chen, H.; Qin, S.; Fu, T.L.; He, T.B.; Gao, Z.R. Synergistic effects of water management and silicon foliar spraying on the uptake and transport efficiency of cadmium in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plants 2023, 12, 1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Iwuala, E.; Olajide, O.; Abiodun, I.; Odjegba, V.; Utoblo, O.; Ajewole, T.; Oluwajobi, A.; Uzochukwu, S. Silicon ameliorates cadmium (Cd) toxicity in pearl millet by inducing antioxidant defense system. Heliyon 2024, 10, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lai, M.; Ghouri, F.; Sarwar, S.; Alomrani, S.O.; Riaz, M.; Haider, F.U.; Liu, J.; Imran, M.; Ali, S.; Liu, X.; et al. Modulation of metal transporters, oxidative stress and cell abnormalities by synergistic application of silicon and titanium oxide nanoparticles: A strategy for cadmium tolerance in rice. Chemosphere 2023, 345, 140439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Pan, T.W.; Dong, Q.Y.; Cai, Y.X.; Cai, K.Z. Silicon-mediated regulation of cadmium transport and activation of antioxidant defense system enhances Pennisetum glaucum resistance to cadmium stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 195, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Sabir, A.; Waraich, E.A.; Ahmad, M.; Hussain, S.; Asghar, H.N.; Haider, A.; Ahmad, Z.; Bibi, S. Silicon-mediated improvement in maize (Zea mays L.) resilience: Unrevealing morpho-physiological, biochemical, and root attributes against cadmium and drought stress. Silicon 2024, 16, 3095–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Tripathi, D.K.; Vishwakarma, K.; Singh, V.P.; Prakash, V.; Sharma, S.; Muneer, S.; Nikolic, M.; Deshmukh, R.; Vaculík, M.; Corpas, F.J. Silicon crosstalk with reactive oxygen species, phytohormones and other signaling molecules. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wang, X.S.; Li, H.Y.; Zhang, S.; Gao, F.W.; Sun, X.; Ren, X.K. Interactive effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon on the alleviation of cadmium toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Environ. Technol. 2023, 13, 4725–4736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Xu, L.A.; Xue, X.; Yan, Y.; Zhao, X.T.; Li, L.J.; Sheng, K.; Zhang, Z.Y. Silicon combined with melatonin reduces Cd absorption and translocation in maize. Plants 2023, 12, 3537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yan, G.C.; Jin, H.; Yin, C.; Huang, Q.Y.; Zhou, G.F.; Xu, Y.M.; He, Y.; Liang, Y.C.; Zhu, Z.J. Comparative effects of silicon and silicon nanoparticles on the antioxidant system and cadmium uptake in tomato under cadmium stress. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 904, 166819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Khan, S.R.; Ahmad, Z.; Khan, Z.; Khan, U.; Asad, M.; Shah, T. Synergistic effect of silicon and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduces cadmium accumulation by regulating hormonal transduction and lignin accumulation in maize. Chemosphere 2024, 346, 140507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sattar, A.; Sher, A.; Ijaz, M.; Ul-Allah, S.; Abbas, T.; Hussain, S.; Hussain, J.; Khalil, H.B.; Alharbi, B.M.; El-Yazied, A.A.; et al. Silicon and strigolecton application alleviates the adversities of cadmium toxicity in maize by modulating morpho-physiological and antioxidants defense mechanisms. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Shah, T.R.; Khan, Z.; Khan, S.R.; Imran, A.; Asad, M.; Ahmad, A.; Ahmad, P. Silicon inhibits cadmium uptake by regulating the genes associated with the lignin biosynthetic pathway and plant hormone signal transduction in maize plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 123966–123982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Liu, S.H.; Ji, X.H.; Chen, Z.L.; Xie, Y.H.; Ji, S.Y.; Wang, X.; Pan, S.F. Silicon facilitated the physical barrier and adsorption of cadmium of iron plaque by changing the biochemical composition to reduce cadmium absorption of rice roots. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 256, 114879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Su, Y.; Huang, X.; Li, L.; Muhammad, Z.A.; Li, M.L.; Zheng, T.D.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, D.; Ye, X.Y.; et al. Comparative responses of silicon to reduce cadmium and enrich selenium in rice varieties. Foods 2023, 12, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Wang, S.H.; Wang, F.Y.; Gao, S.C. Foliar application with nano-silicon alleviates Cd toxicity in rice seedlings. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 2837–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Zhao, H.H.; Li, P.Y. Immobilization of cadmium in paddy soil using a novel active silicon-potassium amendment: A field experimental study. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Alamri, S.; Ali, H.M.; Khan, M.I.R.; Singh, V.P.; Siddiqui, M.H. Exogenous nitric oxide requires endogenous hydrogen sulfide to induce the resilience through sulfur assimilation in tomato seedlings under hexavalent chromium toxicity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Lu, Y.; Wang, Q.F.; Li, J.; Xiong, J.; Zhou, L.N.; He, S.L.; Zhang, J.Q.; Chen, Z.A.; He, S.G.; Liu, H. Effects of exogenous sulfur on alleviating cadmium stress in tartary buckwheat. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Rather, B.A.; Mir, I.R.; Gautam, H.; Majid, A.; Anjum, N.A.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Appraisal of functional significance of sulfur assimilatory products in plants under elevated metal accumulation. Crop Pasture Sci. 2022, 73, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Alatawi, A.; Wang, X.K.; Maqbool, A.; Saleem, M.H.; Usman, K.; Rizwan, M.; Yasmeen, T.; Arif, M.S.; Noreen, S.; Hussain, A.; et al. S-fertilizer (elemental sulfur) improves the phytoextraction of cadmium through Solanum nigrum L. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mir, I.R.; Rather, B.A.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Nitric oxide- and sulfur-mediated reversal of cadmium-inhibited photosynthetic performance involves hydrogen sulfide and regulation of nitrogen, sulfur, and antioxidant metabolism in mustard. Stresses 2022, 2, 550–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Sun, X.X.; Wang, J.N.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Z.Q.; Yang, E.; Meng, J.; He, T.Y. Combined application of biochar and sulfur alleviates cadmium toxicity in rice by affecting root gene expression and iron plaque accumulation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 266, 115596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zang, Y.L.; Zhao, J.; Chen, W.K.; Lu, L.L.; Chen, J.Z.; Lin, Z.; Qiao, Y.B.; Lin, H.Z.; Tian, S.K. Sulfur and water management mediated iron plaque and rhizosphere microorganisms reduced cadmium accumulation in rice. J. Soil Sediments 2023, 23, 3177–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hassan, M.J.; Wang, Z.Q.; Zhang, G.P. Sulfur alleviates growth inhibition and oxidative stress caused by cadmium toxicity in rice. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 28, 1785–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kashem, M.A.; Singh, B.R. Metal availability in contaminated soils: II. Uptake of Cd, Ni and Zn in rice plants grown under flooded culture with organic matter addition. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2001, 61, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Shi, G.; Liu, H.; Zhou, D.; Zhou, H.; Fan, G.; Chen, W.; Li, J.; Lou, L.; Gao, Y. Sulfur reduces the root-to-shoot translocation of arsenic and cadmium by regulating their vacuolar sequestration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1032681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Shi, W.G.; Liu, W.Z.; Ma, C.F.; Zhang, Y.H.; Ding, S.; Yu, W.J.; Deng, S.R.; Zhou, J.; Li, H.; Luo, Z.B. Dissecting MicroRNA-mRNA Regulatory Networks Underlying Sulfur Assimilation and Cadmium Accumulation in Poplar Leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 1614–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Huang, L.J.; Hansen, H.C.B.; Yang, X.S.; Mu, J.; Xie, Z.J.; Li, S.Y.; Wu, G.M.; Hu, Z.Y. Effects of sulfur application on cadmium accumulation in brown rice under wheat-rice rotation. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 287, 117601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Liu, Z.; Wang, Q.Q.; Huang, S.Y.; Kong, L.X.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Li, H.F.; Wan, Y.N. The risks of sulfur addition on cadmium accumulation in paddy rice under different water-management conditions. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 118, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Shen, C.; Fu, H.L.; Liao, Q.; Huang, B.F.; Fan, X.; Liu, X.Y.; Xin, J.L.; Huang, Y.Y. Transcriptome analysis and physiological indicators reveal the role of sulfur in cadmium accumulation and transportation in water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 225, 112787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Wu, J.W.; Zhao, N.; Zhang, P.; Zhu, L.; Lu, Y.; Lei, X.; Bai, Z.Q. Nitrate enhances cadmium accumulation through modulating sulfur metabolism in sweet sorghum. Chemosphere 2023, 313, 137413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wu, M.; Wang, P.Y.; Sun, L.G.; Zhang, J.J.; Yu, J.; Wang, Y.W.; Chen, G.X. Alleviation of cadmium toxicity by cerium in rice seedlings is related to improved photosynthesis, elevated antioxidant enzymes and decreased oxidative stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 74, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ayub, M.A.; Rehman, M.Z.U.; Ahmad, H.R.; Fox, J.P.; Clubb, P.; Wright, A.L.; Anwar-ul-Haq, M.; Nadeem, M.; Rico, C.M.; Rossi, L. Influence of ionic cerium and cerium oxide nanoparticles on Zea mays seedlings grown with and without cadmium. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 322, 121137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Chen, D.M.; Chen, D.Q.; Xue, R.R.; Long, J.; Lin, X.H.; Lin, Y.B.; Jia, L.H.; Zeng, R.S.; Song, Y.Y. Effects of boron, silicon and their interactions on cadmium accumulation and toxicity in rice plants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 367, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Sun, Y.H.; Li, Z.J.; Guo, B.; Chu, G.X.; Wei, C.Z.; Liang, Y.C. Arsenic mitigates cadmium toxicity in rice seedlings. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 64, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Shafiq, T.; Yasmin, H.; Shah, Z.A.; Nosheen, A.; Ahmad, P.; Kaushik, P.; Ahmad, A. Titanium Oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in combination with cadmium tolerant Bacillus pumilus ameliorates the cadmium toxicity in maize. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Cao, F.B.; Cai, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhang, M.; He, X.Y.; Zhang, G.P.; Wu, F.B. Differences in photosynthesis, yield and grain cadmium accumulation as affected by exogenous cadmium and glutathione in the two rice genotypes. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 75, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Hu, B.; Deng, F.; Chen, G.; Chen, X.; Gao, W.; Long, L.; Xia, J.; Chen, Z.H. Evolution of abscisic acid signaling for stress responses to toxic metals and metalloids. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Sun, L.; Di, D.W.; Li, G.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Wu, X.; Shi, W. Endogenous ABA alleviates rice ammonium toxicity by reducing ROS and free ammonium via regulation of the SAPK9-bZIP20 pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 4562–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Tao, Q.; Jupa, R.; Dong, Q.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, B.; Yuan, S.; Yin, J.; Xu, Q.; Li, T.; et al. Abscisic acid-mediated modifications in water transport continuum are involved in cadmium hyperaccumulation in Sedum alfredii. Chemosphere 2021, 268, 129339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhang, J.; Hafeez, M.T.; Di, D.W.; Wu, L.; Zhang, L. Precise control of ABA signaling through post-translational protein modification. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 88, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Shen, C.; Yang, Y.M.; Sun, Y.F.; Zhang, M.; Chen, X.J.; Huang, Y.Y. The regulatory role of abscisic acid on cadmium uptake, accumulation and translocation in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 953717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Pompeu, G.B.; Vilhena, M.B.; Gratao, P.L.; Carvalho, R.F.; Rossi, M.L.; Martinelli, A.P.; Azevedo, R.A. Abscisic acid-deficient sit tomato mutant responses to cadmium-induced stress. Protoplasma 2017, 254, 771–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Dawuda, M.M.; Liao, W.; Hu, L.; Yu, J.; Xie, J.; Calderon-Urrea, A.; Wu, Y.; Tang, Z. Foliar application of abscisic acid mitigates cadmium stress and increases food safety of cadmium-sensitive lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) genotype. Peerj 2020, 8, e9270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Han, Y.S.; Wang, S.J.; Zhao, N.; Deng, S.R.; Zhao, C.J.; Li, N.F.; Sun, J.; Zhao, R.; Yi, H.L.; Shen, X.; et al. Exogenous abscisic acid alleviates cadmium toxicity by restricting Cd influx in Populus euphratica cells. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 35, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Leng, Y.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y.H.; He, L.F.; Li, S.W. Abscisic acid modulates differential physiological and biochemical responses of roots, stems, and leaves in mung bean seedlings to cadmium stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 6030–6043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Lu, Q.Y.; Chen, S.M.; Li, Y.Y.; Zheng, F.H.; He, B.; Gu, M.H. Exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) promotes cadmium (Cd) accumulation in Sedum alfredii Hance by regulating the expression of Cd stress response genes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 8719–8731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Shen, G.; Niu, J.; Deng, Z. Abscisic acid treatment alleviates cadmium toxicity in purple flowering stalk (Brassica campestris L. ssp. chinensis var. purpurea Hort.) seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 118, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Hong, C.; Cheng, D.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, D.; Chen, Y.; Tan, M. The role of ZmWRKY4 in regulating maize antioxidant defense under cadmium stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 482, 1504–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Di, D.W.; Zhang, C.; Luo, P.; An, C.-W. The biosynthesis of auxin: How many paths truly lead to IAA? Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 78, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Luo, P.; Di, D.W. Precise regulation of the TAA1/TAR-YUCCA auxin biosynthesis pathway in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Liu, H.; Wu, Y.; Cai, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, C.; Qiao, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S. Effect of auxin on cadmium toxicity-induced growth inhibition in Solanum lycopersicum. Toxics 2024, 12, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Guo, L.; Yang, S.; Tu, Z.; Yu, F.; Qiu, C.; Huang, G.; Fang, S. An indole-3-acetic acid inhibitor mitigated mild cadmium stress by suppressing peroxide formation in rice seedling roots. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 213, 108823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Bahmani, R.; Kim, D.; Modareszadeh, M.; Hwang, S. Cadmium enhances root hair elongation through reactive oxygen species in Arabidopsis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 196, 104813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Correa-Aragunde, N.; Foresi, N.; Delledonne, M.; Lamattina, L. Auxin induces redox regulation of ascorbate peroxidase 1 activity by S-nitrosylation/denitrosylation balance resulting in changes of root growth pattern in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3339–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Li, S.; Wang, H.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Chen, Z.J.; Shen, R.F.; Zhu, X.F. Auxin is involved in cadmium accumulation in rice through controlling nitric oxide production and the ability of cell walls to bind cadmium. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 904, 166644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Zhu, X.F.; Wang, Z.W.; Dong, F.; Lei, G.J.; Shi, Y.Z.; Li, G.X.; Zheng, S.J. Exogenous auxin alleviates cadmium toxicity in Arabidopsis thaliana by stimulating synthesis of hemicellulose 1 and increasing the cadmium fixation capacity of root cell walls. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 263, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Hu, Y.F.; Zhou, G.; Na, X.F.; Yang, L.; Nan, W.B.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Li, J.L.; Bi, Y.R. Cadmium interferes with maintenance of auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 965–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Chen, J.; Nolan, T.M.; Ye, H.; Zhang, M.; Tong, H.; Xin, P.; Chu, J.; Chu, C.; Li, Z.; Yin, Y. Arabidopsis WRKY46, WRKY54, and WRKY70 transcription factors are involved in brassinosteroid-regulated plant growth and drought responses. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1425–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Geng, Y.; Wu, R.; Wee, C.W.; Xie, F.; Wei, X.; Chan, P.M.; Tham, C.; Duan, L.; Dinneny, J.R. A spatio-temporal understanding of growth regulation during the salt stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 2132–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Hasan, S.A.; Hayat, S.; Ali, B.; Ahmad, A. 28-homobrassinolide protects chickpea (Cicer arietinum) from cadmium toxicity by stimulating antioxidants. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 151, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Hasan, S.A.; Hayat, S.; Ahmad, A. Brassinosteroids protect photosynthetic machinery against the cadmium induced oxidative stress in two tomato cultivars. Chemosphere 2011, 84, 1446–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Bajguz, A. Effect of brassinosteroids on nucleic acids and protein content in cultured cells of. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2000, 38, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Zhu, T.; Wei, C.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Liang, Z.; Song, X.; Fu, W.; Cui, Y.; Wang, Z.Y.; et al. The BAS chromatin remodeler determines brassinosteroid-induced transcriptional activation and plant growth in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 2024, 59, 924–939 e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Lin, Z.; Zhong, S.; Grierson, D. Recent advances in ethylene research. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3311–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Wang, K.L.; Li, H.; Ecker, J.R. Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S131–S151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Arteca, R.N.; Arteca, J.M. Heavy-metal-induced ethylene production in. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 1480–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Groppa, M.D.; Benavides, M.P.; Tomaro, M.L. Polyamine metabolism in sunflower and wheat leaf discs under cadmium or copper stress. Plant Sci. 2003, 164, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Rodríguez-Serrano, M.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Pazmiño, D.M.; Testillano, P.S.; Risueño, M.C.; del Río, L.A.; Sandalio, L.M. Cellular response of pea plants to cadmium toxicity: Cross talk between reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and calcium. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Schellingen, K.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Vandenbussche, F.; Prinsen, E.; Remans, T.; Vangronsveld, J.; Cuypers, A. Cadmium-induced ethylene production and responses in rely on ACS2 and ACS6 gene expression. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Keunen, E.; Schellingen, K.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Remans, T.; Colpaert, J.; Vangronsveld, J.; Cuypers, A. ALTERNATIVE OXIDASE1a modulates the oxidative challenge during moderate Cd exposure in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2967–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Millar, A.H.; Whelan, J.; Soole, K.L.; Day, D.A. Organization and regulation of mitochondrial respiration in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 62, 79–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Purvis, A.C.; Shewfelt, R.L. Does the alternative pathway ameliorate chilling injury in sensitive plant-tissues. Physiol. Plant 1993, 88, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Ali, M.S.; Baek, K.H. Jasmonic Acid Signaling Pathway in Response to Abiotic Stresses in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Ahmad, P.; Raja, V.; Ashraf, M.; Wijaya, L.; Bajguz, A.; Alyemeni, M.N. Jasmonic acid (JA) and gibberellic acid (GA) mitigated Cd-toxicity in chickpea plants through restricted cd uptake and oxidative stress management. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Keramat, B.; Kalantari, K.M.; Arvin, M.J. Effects of methyl jasmonate in regulating cadmium induced oxidative stress in soybean plant (Glycine max L.). Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2009, 3, 240–244. [Google Scholar]
  205. Singh, I.; Shah, K. Exogenous application of methyl jasmonate lowers the effect of cadmium-induced oxidative injury in rice seedlings. Phytochemistry 2014, 108, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Wang, F.B.; Wan, C.Z.; Wu, W.Y.; Pan, Y.; Cheng, X.M.; Li, C.; Pi, J.L.; Chen, X.H. Exogenous methyl jasmonate (MeJA) enhances the tolerance to cadmium (Cd) stress of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2023, 155, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Singh, I.; Shah, K. Evidences for structural basis of altered ascorbate peroxidase activity in cadmium-stressed rice plants exposed to jasmonate. BioMetals 2014, 27, 247–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Kawano, T.; Bouteau, F. Crosstalk between intracellular and extracellular salicylic acid signaling events leading to long-distance spread of signals. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 1125–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Liu, Z.P.; Ding, Y.F.; Wang, F.J.; Ye, Y.Y.; Zhu, C. Role of salicylic acid in resistance to cadmium stress in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Elazab, D.S.; El-Mahdy, M.; Youssef, M.; Eissa, M.A.; Amro, A.; Lambardi, M. Assessment of salicylic acid as a pretreatment on alleviating cadmium toxicity on in vitro banana shoots. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 5700–5712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Hayat, U.; Din, K.U.; Haider, A.; Ramzan, T.; Shahzad, B.A.; Ahmad, M.; Zulfiqar, U.; Maqsood, M.F.; Hussain, S.; Alwahibi, M.S.; et al. Salicylic acid-induced antioxidant defense system alleviates cadmium toxicity in wheat. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2024, 24, 3068–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Metwally, A.; Finkemeier, I.; Georgi, M.; Dietz, K.J. Salicylic acid alleviates the cadmium toxicity in barley seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Singh, S.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M.; Sharma, S.; Ramawat, N.; Dubey, N.K.; Tripathi, D.K.; Chauhan, D.K. Interactive effect of silicon (Si) and salicylic acid (SA) in maize seedlings and their mechanisms of cadmium (Cd) toxicity alleviation. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 1587–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Belkhadi, A.; Hediji, H.; Abbes, Z.; Nouairi, I.; Barhoumi, Z.; Zarrouk, M.; Chaibi, W.; Djebali, W. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid pre-treatment on cadmium toxicity and leaf lipid content in Linum usitatissimum L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2010, 73, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Torun, H.; Cetin, B.; Stojnic, S.; Petrík, P. Salicylic acid alleviates the effects of cadmium and drought stress by regulating water status, ions, and antioxidant defense in Pterocarya fraxinifolia. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 14, 1339201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Durner, J.; Klessig, D.F. Salicylic acid is a modulator of tobacco and mammalian catalases. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 28492–28501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Moussa, H.R.; El-Gamal, S.M. Effect of salicylic acid pretreatment on cadmium toxicity in wheat. Biol. Plant 2010, 54, 315–320. [Google Scholar]
  218. He, J.Y.; Ren, Y.F.; Pan, X.B.; Yan, Y.P.; Zhu, C.; Jiang, D. Salicylic acid alleviates the toxicity effect of cadmium on germination, seedling growth, and amylase activity of rice. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2010, 173, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Arnao, M.B.; Hernández-Ruiz, J. Melatonin as a regulatory hub of plant hormone levels and action in stress situations. Plant Biol. 2021, 23, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Zulfiqar, F.; Moosa, A.; Ali, H.M.; Hancock, J.T.; Yong, J.W.H. Synergistic interplay between melatonin and hydrogen sulfide enhances cadmium-induced oxidative stress resistance in stock (Matthiola incana L.). Plant Signal. Behav. 2024, 19, 2331357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Song, C.; Manzoor, M.A.; Mao, D.; Ren, X.; Zhang, W.W.; Zhang, Y.Y. Photosynthetic machinery and antioxidant enzymes system regulation confers cadmium stress tolerance to tomato seedlings pretreated with melatonin. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 323, 112550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Kaya, C.; Ugurlar, F.; Ashraf, M.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Bajguz, A.; Ahmad, P. The involvement of hydrogen sulphide in melatonin-induced tolerance to arsenic toxicity in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants by regulating sequestration and subcellular distribution of arsenic, and antioxidant defense system. Chemosphere 2022, 309, 136678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Arnao, M.B.; Hernández-Ruiz, J. Melatonin in flowering, fruit set and fruit ripening. Plant Reprod. 2020, 33, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Hassani, S.B.; Latifi, M.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Bonab, S.S.; Almanghadim, N.N.; Jafari, S.; Mohebbifar, E.; Ahangir, A.; Seifikalhor, M.; Rezadoost, H.; et al. Response to cadmium toxicity: Orchestration of polyamines and microRNAs in maize plant. Plants 2023, 12, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Hsu, Y.T.; Kao, C.H. Toxicity in leaves of rice exposed to cadmium is due to hydrogen peroxide accumulation. Plant Soil 2007, 298, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Shah, T.; Khan, Z.; Asad, M.; Imran, A.; Niazi, M.B.K.; Alsahli, A.A. Alleviation of cadmium toxicity in wheat by strigolactone: Regulating cadmium uptake, nitric oxide signaling, and genes encoding antioxidant defense system. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 202, 107916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Astier, J.; Gross, I.; Durner, J. Nitric oxide production in plants: An update. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3401–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Ma, M.; Wendehenne, D.; Philippot, L.; Hansch, R.; Flemetakis, E.; Hu, B.; Rennenberg, H. Physiological significance of pedospheric nitric oxide for root growth, development and organismic interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 2336–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Aswani, V.; Rajsheel, P.; Bapatla, R.B.; Sunil, B.; Raghavendra, A.S. Oxidative stress induced in chloroplasts or mitochondria promotes proline accumulation in leaves of pea (Pisum sativum): Another example of chloroplast-mitochondria interactions. Protoplasma 2019, 256, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Khan, E.A.; Ahmed, H.M.I.; Misra, M.; Sharma, P.; Misra, A.N.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Nitric oxide alleviates cadmium-impeded growth by limiting ROS accumulation in pea seedlings. Biocell 2022, 46, 2583–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Nawaz, M.; Saleem, M.H.; Khalid, M.R.; Ali, B.; Fahad, S. Nitric oxide reduces cadmium uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by modulating growth, mineral uptake, yield attributes, and antioxidant profile. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 9844–9856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Cai, W.; Wang, W.S.; Deng, H.; Chen, B.; Zhang, G.; Wang, P.; Yuan, T.T.; Zhu, Y.S. Improving Endogenous nitric oxide enhances cadmium tolerance in rice through modulation of cadmium accumulation and antioxidant capacity. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Liu, F.F.; Qiao, X.H.; Yang, T.; Zhao, P.; Zhu, Z.P.; Zhao, J.H.; Luo, J.M.; Xiong, A.S.; Sun, M. Nitric oxide promoted the seed germination of Cynanchum auriculatum under Cadmium Stress. Agronomy 2024, 14, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Tang, Y.; Lin, L.J.; Xie, Y.D.; Liu, J.; Sun, G.C.; Li, H.; Liao, M.A.; Wang, Z.H.; Liang, D.; Xia, H.; et al. Melatonin affects the growth and cadmium accumulation of Malachium aquaticum and Galinsoga parviflora. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2018, 20, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Hasan, M.K.; Liu, C.C.; Wang, F.N.; Ahammed, G.J.; Zhou, J.; Xu, M.X.; Yu, J.Q.; Xia, X.J. Glutathione-mediated regulation of nitric oxide, -nitrosothiol and redox homeostasis confers cadmium tolerance by inducing transcription factors and stress response genes in tomato. Chemosphere 2016, 161, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Innocenti, G.; Pucciariello, C.; Le Gleuher, M.; Hopkins, J.; de Stefano, M.; Delledonne, M.; Puppo, A.; Baudouin, E.; Frendo, P. Glutathione synthesis is regulated by nitric oxide in roots. Planta 2007, 225, 1597–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Wang, X.; Du, H.X.; Ma, M.; Rennenberg, H. The dual role of nitric oxide (NO) in plant responses to cadmium exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 892, 164597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Besson-Bard, A.; Gravot, A.; Richaud, P.; Auroy, P.; Duc, C.; Gaymard, F.; Taconnat, L.; Renou, J.P.; Pugin, A.; Wendehenne, D. Nitric oxide contributes to cadmium toxicity in Arabidopsis by promoting cadmium accumulation in roots and by up-regulating genes related to iron uptake. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1302–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. De Michele, R.; Vurro, E.; Rigo, C.; Costa, A.; Elviri, L.; Di Valentin, M.; Careri, M.; Zottini, M.; Sanità di Toppi, L.; Lo Schiavo, F. Nitric oxide is involved in cadmium-induced programmed cell death in Arabidopsis suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Elviri, L.; Speroni, F.; Careri, M.; Mangia, A.; di Toppi, L.S.; Zottini, M. Identification of in vivo nitrosylated phytochelatins in Arabidopsis thaliana cells by liquid chromatography-direct electrospray-linear ion trap-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. 2010, 1217, 4120–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Kaya, C.; Okant, M.; Ugurlar, F.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmad, P. Melatonin-mediated nitric oxide improves tolerance to cadmium toxicity by reducing oxidative stress in wheat plants. Chemosphere 2019, 225, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Wang, D.; Liu, Y.; Tan, X.; Liu, H.; Zeng, G.; Hu, X.; Jian, H.; Gu, Y. Effect of exogenous nitric oxide on antioxidative system and S-nitrosylation in leaves of Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud under cadmium stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 3489–3497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Wang, Q.H.; Liang, X.; Dong, Y.J.; Xu, L.L.; Zhang, X.W.; Hou, J.; Fan, Z.Y. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on cadmium toxicity, element contents and antioxidative system in perennial ryegrass. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 69, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Xu, L.L.; Dong, Y.J.; Kong, J.; Liu, S. Effects of root and foliar applications of exogenous NO on alleviating cadmium toxicity in lettuce seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 72, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Nazir, F.; Fariduddin, Q.; Khan, T.A. Hydrogen peroxide as a signalling molecule in plants and its crosstalk with other plant growth regulators under heavy metal stress. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 126486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Zhou, J.; Xia, X.J.; Zhou, Y.H.; Shi, K.; Chen, Z.X.; Yu, J.Q. OH1-dependent H2O2 production and subsequent activation of MPK1/2 play an important role in acclimation-induced cross-tolerance in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 595–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Chao, Y.Y.; Hsu, Y.T.; Kao, C.H. Involvement of glutathione in heat shock- and hydrogen peroxide-induced cadmium tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Plant Soil 2009, 318, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Chou, T.S.; Chao, Y.Y.; Kao, C.H. Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in heat shock- and cadmium-induced expression of ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase in leaves of rice seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Hu, Y.L.; Ge, Y.; Zhang, C.H.; Ju, T.; Cheng, W.D. Cadmium toxicity and translocation in rice seedlings are reduced by hydrogen peroxide pretreatment. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 59, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Wu, Z.Y.; Zhang, C.H.; Yan, J.L.; Yue, Q.A.; Ge, Y. Effects of sulfur supply and hydrogen peroxide pretreatment on the responses by rice under cadmium stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 77, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Zhang, H.X.; Lv, S.F.; Xu, H.W.; Hou, D.Y.; Li, Y.J.; Wang, F.Y. H2O2 is involved in the metallothionein-mediated rice tolerance to copper and cadmium toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Pitzschke, A.; Djamei, A.; Bitton, F.; Hirt, H. A major role of the MEKK1-MKK1/2-MPK4 pathway in ROS signalling. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 120–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Thakur, M.; Anand, A. Hydrogen sulfide: An emerging signaling molecule regulating drought stress response in plants. Physiol. Plant 2021, 172, 1227–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Yu, Y.; Dong, J.; Li, R.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Zhou, K.; Lin, X. Sodium hydrosulfide alleviates aluminum toxicity in Brassica napus through maintaining H2S, ROS homeostasis and enhancing aluminum exclusion. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 160073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Wang, P.; Fang, H.; Gao, R.; Liao, W. Protein persulfidation in plants: Function and mechanism. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Aroca, A.; Serna, A.; Gotor, C.; Romero, L.C. Sulfhydration: A cysteine posttranslational modification in plant systems. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 334–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Singh, S.K.; Suhel, M.; Husain, T.; Prasad, S.M.; Singh, V.P. Hydrogen sulfide manages hexavalent chromium toxicity in wheat and rice seedlings: The role of sulfur assimilation and ascorbate-glutathione cycle. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 307, 119509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Luo, S.L.; Tang, Z.Q.; Yu, J.H.; Liao, W.B.; Xie, J.M.; Lv, J.; Liu, Z.C.; Calderón-Urrea, A. Hydrogen sulfide inhibits cadmium-induced cell death of cucumber seedling root tips by protecting mitochondrial physiological function. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 3421–3432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Cao, H.; Song, K.; Hu, Y.; Li, Q.; Ma, T.; Li, R.; Chen, N.; Zhu, S.; Liu, W. The role of exogenous hydrogen sulfide in mitigating cadmium toxicity in plants: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 30273–30287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Agarwal, P.; Mitra, M.; Banerjee, S.; Roy, S. MYB4 transcription factor, a member of R2R3-subfamily of MYB domain protein, regulates cadmium tolerance via enhanced protection against oxidative damage and increases expression of PCS1 and MT1C in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2020, 297, 110501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Chen, S.; Yu, M.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Qiao, G.; Wu, L.; Han, X.; et al. SaHsfA4c from Sedum alfredii Hance enhances cadmium tolerance by regulating ROS-scavenger activities and heat shock proteins expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Han, Y.; Fan, T.; Zhu, X.; Wu, X.; Ouyang, J.; Jiang, L.; Cao, S. WRKY12 represses GSH1 expression to negatively regulate cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 99, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Wu, X.; Chen, Q.; Chen, L.; Tian, F.; Chen, X.; Han, C.; Mi, J.; Lin, X.; Wan, X.; Jiang, B.; et al. A WRKY transcription factor, PyWRKY75, enhanced cadmium accumulation and tolerance in poplar. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 239, 113630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Zhang, M.; Gao, J.Y.; Dong, S.C.; Chang, M.H.; Zhu, J.X.; Guo, D.L.; Guo, C.H.; Bi, Y.D. Alfalfa MsbHLH115 confers tolerance to cadmium stress through activating the iron deficiency response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1358673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Begara-Morales, J.C.; Sánchez-Calvo, B.; Chaki, M.; Valderrama, R.; Mata-Pérez, C.; López-Jaramillo, J.; Padilla, M.N.; Carreras, A.; Corpas, F.J.; Barroso, J.B. Dual regulation of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (APX) by tyrosine nitration and -nitrosylation. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Zou, J.J.; Li, X.D.; Ratnasekera, D.; Wang, C.; Liu, W.X.; Song, L.F.; Zhang, W.Z.; Wu, W.H. Arabidopsis CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE8 and CATALASE3 function in abscisic acid-mediated signaling and H2O2 homeostasis in stomatal guard cells under drought stress. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1445–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Tang, W.; Charles, T.M.; Newton, R.J. Overexpression of the pepper transcription factor CaPF1 in transgenic Virginia pine (Pinus Virginiana Mill.) confers multiple stress tolerance and enhances organ growth. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 59, 603–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Yang, G.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, C.; Gao, C. Overexpression of ThVHAc1 and its potential upstream regulator, ThWRKY7, improved plant tolerance of Cadmium stress. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 18752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Hu, L.X.; Zhang, Z.F.; Xiang, Z.X.; Yang, Z.J. Exogenous application of citric acid ameliorates the adverse effect of heat stress in Tall Fescue (Lolium arundinaceum). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Freitas, E.V.; Nascimento, C.W.; Souza, A.; Silva, F.B. Citric acid-assisted phytoextraction of lead: A field experiment. Chemosphere 2013, 92, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Gao, Y.; Miao, C.Y.; Mao, L.A.; Zhou, P.; Jin, Z.G.; Shi, W.J. Improvement of phytoextraction and antioxidative defense in Solanum nigrum L. under cadmium stress by application of cadmium-resistant strain and citric acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Al Mahmud, J.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Fujita, M. Insights into citric acid-induced cadmium tolerance and phytoremediation in Brassica juncea L.: Coordinated functions of metal chelation, antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 990–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Cao, S.Q.; Ren, G.; Jiang, L.; Yuan, H.B.; Ma, G.H. The role of β-aminobutyric acid in enhancing cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 56, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Justyna, P.G.; Ewa, K. Induction of resistance against pathogens by β-aminobutyric acid. Acta Physiol. Plant 2013, 35, 1735–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Ton, J.; Mauch-Mani, B. β-amino-butyric acid-induced resistance against necrotrophic pathogens is based on ABA-dependent priming for callose. Plant J. 2004, 38, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Hossain, Z.; Makino, T.; Komatsu, S. Proteomic study of β-aminobutyric acid-mediated cadmium stress alleviation in soybean. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 4151–4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Wang, L.; Liu, J.R.; Li, M.L.; Liu, L.; Zheng, Y.H.; Zhang, H. β-aminobutyric acid effectively postpones senescence of strawberry fruit by regulating metabolism of NO, H2S, ascorbic acid, and ABA. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Shen, X.; Yang, Z.Y.; Dai, X.Y.; Feng, W.; Li, P.; Chen, Y. Calcium hexacyanoferrate nanozyme enhances plant stress resistance by oxidative stress alleviation and heavy metal removal. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2402745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Bhagat, N.; Raghav, M.; Dubey, S.; Bedi, N. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: Insight into their role in plant abiotic stress tolerance. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 1045–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Naseem, H.; Ahsan, M.; Shahid, M.A.; Khan, N. Exopolysaccharides producing rhizobacteria and their role in plant growth and drought tolerance. J. Basic Microbiol. 2018, 58, 1009–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Li, K.T.; Peng, S.Y.; Zhang, B.; Peng, W.F.; Yu, S.J.; Cheng, X. Exopolysaccharides from reduces cadmium uptake and mitigates cadmium toxicity in rice seedlings. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Wei, H.Y.; Li, Y.; Yan, J.; Peng, S.Y.; Wei, S.J.; Yin, Y.B.; Li, K.T.; Cheng, X. Root cell wall remodeling: A way for exopolysaccharides to mitigate cadmium toxicity in rice seedling. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 443, 130186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. EL Arroussi, H.; Benhima, R.; Elbaouchi, A.; Sijilmassi, B.; EL Mernissi, N.; Aafsar, A.; Meftah-Kadmiri, I.; Bendaou, N.; Smouni, A. Dunaliella salina exopolysaccharides: A promising biostimulant for salt stress tolerance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 2929–2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Rachidi, F.; Benhima, R.; Kasmi, Y.; Sbabou, L.; El Arroussi, H. Evaluation of microalgae polysaccharides as biostimulants of tomato plant defense using metabolomics and biochemical approaches. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Anand, S.; Singh, A.; Kumar, V. Recent advancements in cadmium-microbe interactive relations and their application for environmental remediation: A mechanistic overview. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 17009–17038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Li, P.; Xiong, Z.Q.; Tian, Y.H.; Zheng, Z.Y.; Liu, Z.X.; Hu, R.W.; Wang, Q.M.; Ao, H.J.; Yi, Z.X.; Li, J. Community-based mechanisms underlying the root cadmium uptake regulated by Cd-tolerant strains in rice (Oryza sativa. L). Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1196130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Zhou, B.B.; Yang, Z.H.; Chen, X.P.; Jia, R.N.; Yao, S.X.; Gan, B.; Fan, D.L.; Yang, X.; Li, W.Q.; Chen, Y.H. Microbiological mechanisms of collaborative remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil with Bacillus cereus and lawn plants. Plants 2024, 13, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Zou, D.C.; Du, H.X.; Zhang, F.S.; Gao, L.; Xiong, B.C.; Guo, P.; Ma, M. Responses of co-inoculated with rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to cadmium under nitrogen excess condition. Plant Soil 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Zulfiqar, U.; Haider, F.U.; Maqsood, M.F.; Mohy-Ud-Din, W.; Shabaan, M.; Ahmad, M.; Kaleem, M.; Ishfaq, M.; Aslam, Z.; Shahzad, B. Recent advances in microbial-assisted remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil. Plants 2023, 12, 3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Alscher, R.G. Biosynthesis and antioxidant function of glutathione in plants. Physiol. Plant 1989, 77, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Iriti, M.; Castorina, G.; Picchi, V.; Faoro, F.; Gomarasca, S. Acute exposure of the aquatic macrophyte to the herbicide oxadiazon: The protective role of N-acetylcysteine. Chemosphere 2009, 74, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  292. Malanga, G.; Kozak, R.G.; Puntarulo, S. N-acetylcysteine-dependent protection against UV-B damage in two photosynthetic organisms. Plant Sci. 1999, 141, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Zhang, Z.Y.; Meng, J.; Dang, S.; Chen, W.F. Effect of biochar on relieving cadmium stress and reducing accumulation in super rice. J. Integr. Agric. 2014, 13, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Sun, Y.B.; Sun, G.H.; Xu, Y.M.; Liu, W.T.; Liang, X.F.; Wang, L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sepiolite, bentonite, and phosphate amendments on the stabilization remediation of cadmium-contaminated soils. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 166, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Dong, J.; Wu, F.B.; Zhang, G.P. Influence of cadmium on antioxidant capacity and four microelement concentrations in tomato seedlings (Lycopersicon esculentum). Chemosphere 2006, 64, 1659–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Srivastava, S.; Tripathi, R.D.; Dwivedi, U.N. Synthesis of phytochelatins and modulation of antioxidants in response to cadmium stress in Cuscuta reflexa: An angiospermic parasite. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Antioxidant systems involved in the response to Cd stress. Abbreviations: superoxide dismutase, SOD; catalase, CAT; ascorbate peroxidase, APX; peroxidase, POD; guaiacol peroxidase, GPX; glutathione reductase, GR; dehydroascorbate reductase, DHAR; monodehydroascorbate reductase dehydroascorbate, MDHAR; ascorbic acid, AsA; glutathione, GSH; glutathione oxidized, GSSG; phytochelatins, PCs; MTs, metallothioneins; monolignols, ML; oxidized monolignols, oxML; dehydroascorbate, DHA; monodehydroascorbate, MDHA.
Figure 1. Antioxidant systems involved in the response to Cd stress. Abbreviations: superoxide dismutase, SOD; catalase, CAT; ascorbate peroxidase, APX; peroxidase, POD; guaiacol peroxidase, GPX; glutathione reductase, GR; dehydroascorbate reductase, DHAR; monodehydroascorbate reductase dehydroascorbate, MDHAR; ascorbic acid, AsA; glutathione, GSH; glutathione oxidized, GSSG; phytochelatins, PCs; MTs, metallothioneins; monolignols, ML; oxidized monolignols, oxML; dehydroascorbate, DHA; monodehydroascorbate, MDHA.
Antioxidants 13 01174 g001
Figure 2. Regulation of antioxidant enzyme activities and antioxidant content by mineral elements, plant growth regulators, and signal molecules.The regulation of the catalytic activity of key antioxidant enzymes involved in induced oxidative stress—such as SOD, CAT, APX, POD, MDHAR, DHAR, GPX, and GR—as well as the levels of major non-enzymatic antioxidants, including GSH, AsA, proline, flavonoids, carotenoids, and phenolics, is influenced by various mineral elements, plant growth regulators, and signaling molecules. Abbreviations: superoxide dismutase, SOD; catalase, CAT; ascorbate peroxidase, APX; peroxidase, POD; guaiacol peroxidase, GPX; glutathione reductase, GR; dehydroascorbate reductase, DHAR; monodehydroascorbate reductase dehydroascorbate, MDHAR; ascorbic acid, AsA; glutathione, GSH; indole-3-acetic acid, IAA; gibberellin, GA; jasmonic acid, JA; brassinosteroids, BRs; abscisic acid, ABA; salicylic acid, SA; ethylene, ETH; strigolactone, SL; melatonin, MLT; hydrogen peroxide, H2O2; hydrogen sulfide, H2S; nitric oxide, NO.
Figure 2. Regulation of antioxidant enzyme activities and antioxidant content by mineral elements, plant growth regulators, and signal molecules.The regulation of the catalytic activity of key antioxidant enzymes involved in induced oxidative stress—such as SOD, CAT, APX, POD, MDHAR, DHAR, GPX, and GR—as well as the levels of major non-enzymatic antioxidants, including GSH, AsA, proline, flavonoids, carotenoids, and phenolics, is influenced by various mineral elements, plant growth regulators, and signaling molecules. Abbreviations: superoxide dismutase, SOD; catalase, CAT; ascorbate peroxidase, APX; peroxidase, POD; guaiacol peroxidase, GPX; glutathione reductase, GR; dehydroascorbate reductase, DHAR; monodehydroascorbate reductase dehydroascorbate, MDHAR; ascorbic acid, AsA; glutathione, GSH; indole-3-acetic acid, IAA; gibberellin, GA; jasmonic acid, JA; brassinosteroids, BRs; abscisic acid, ABA; salicylic acid, SA; ethylene, ETH; strigolactone, SL; melatonin, MLT; hydrogen peroxide, H2O2; hydrogen sulfide, H2S; nitric oxide, NO.
Antioxidants 13 01174 g002
Figure 3. Regulation of Cd2+ absorption by various elements, plant growth regulators, and signal molecules. Abbreviations: indole-3-acetic acid, IAA; gibberellin, GA; jasmonic acid, JA; brassinosteroids, BRs; abscisic acid, ABA; salicylic acid, SA; ethylene, ET; strigolactone, SL; melatonin, MLT; polyamines, PAs; hydrogen peroxide, H2O2; nitric oxide, NO.
Figure 3. Regulation of Cd2+ absorption by various elements, plant growth regulators, and signal molecules. Abbreviations: indole-3-acetic acid, IAA; gibberellin, GA; jasmonic acid, JA; brassinosteroids, BRs; abscisic acid, ABA; salicylic acid, SA; ethylene, ET; strigolactone, SL; melatonin, MLT; polyamines, PAs; hydrogen peroxide, H2O2; nitric oxide, NO.
Antioxidants 13 01174 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, P.; Wu, J.; Li, T.-T.; Shi, P.; Ma, Q.; Di, D.-W. An Overview of the Mechanisms through Which Plants Regulate ROS Homeostasis under Cadmium Stress. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13101174

AMA Style

Luo P, Wu J, Li T-T, Shi P, Ma Q, Di D-W. An Overview of the Mechanisms through Which Plants Regulate ROS Homeostasis under Cadmium Stress. Antioxidants. 2024; 13(10):1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13101174

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Pan, Jingjing Wu, Ting-Ting Li, Peihua Shi, Qi Ma, and Dong-Wei Di. 2024. "An Overview of the Mechanisms through Which Plants Regulate ROS Homeostasis under Cadmium Stress" Antioxidants 13, no. 10: 1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13101174

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop