Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant Activity and Mechanism of Action of Amwaprin: A Protein in Honeybee (Apis mellifera) Venom
Previous Article in Journal
Inflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines Are Synergistically Induced in a ROS-Dependent Manner by a Co-Culture of Corneal Epithelial Cells and Neutrophil-like Cells in the Presence of Particulate Matter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

18Beta-Glycyrrhetinic Acid Attenuates H2O2-Induced Oxidative Damage and Apoptosis in Intestinal Epithelial Cells via Activating the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway

1
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
2
College of Animal Science and Technology, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
3
College of Food Science and Engineering, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
4
College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2024, 13(4), 468; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13040468
Submission received: 5 March 2024 / Accepted: 6 April 2024 / Published: 16 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Health Outcomes of Antioxidants and Oxidative Stress)

Abstract

:
Oxidative stress causes gut dysfunction and is a contributing factor in several intestinal disorders. Intestinal epithelial cell survival is essential for maintaining human and animal health under oxidative stress. 18beta-Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) is known to have multiple beneficial effects, including antioxidant activity; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been well established. Thus, the present study evaluated the therapeutic effects of GA on H2O2-induced oxidative stress in intestinal porcine epithelial cells. The results showed that pretreatment with GA (100 nM for 16 h) significantly increased the levels of several antioxidant enzymes and reduced corresponding intracellular levels of reactive oxidative species and malondialdehyde. GA inhibited cell apoptosis via activating the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) signaling pathway, as confirmed by RNA sequencing. Further analyses demonstrated that GA upregulated the phosphorylation levels of PI3K and Akt and the protein level of B cell lymphoma 2, whereas it downregulated Cytochrome c and tumor suppressor protein p53 levels. Moreover, molecular docking analysis predicted the binding of GA to Vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 1, a primary membrane receptor, to activate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Collectively, these results revealed that GA protected against H2O2-induced oxidative damage and cell apoptosis via activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, suggesting the potential therapeutic use of GA to alleviate oxidative stress in humans/animals.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The mammalian intestine, a complex and highly regulated organ, is responsible for several key functions, including nutrient digestion and absorption, serving as a protective barrier against invasion by bacteria, and endocrine regulation through blood circulation [1]. Owing to its complex physiological and/or chemical environment, the intestine is susceptible to diverse stress injuries. Intestinal oxidative stress leads to various inflammatory bowel diseases such as ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and indeterminate colitis [2]. The impaired epithelial integrity of the intestine can even cause damage to external organs [3].
Oxidative stress is an imbalance between oxidation and antioxidation, which results in the excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4]. High exposure to ROS causes cell membrane damage and apoptosis and is one of the major factors leading to cell apoptosis. For instance, increased ROS levels in alcohol-exposed rats or humans led to decreased levels of tight junction (TJ) and adhesion (AJ) proteins in enterocytes, thereby accelerating apoptosis [5]. It has been reported that oxidative damage could upregulate pro-apoptotic proteins such as Cytochrome c (Cyt c) and BCL2-associated X (BAX) to promote cell apoptosis [6]. Moreover, oxidative stress causes intestinal stem cell and intestinal barrier damage in pigs by decreasing the expression of tight junction proteins [7]. Increased intestinal permeability can lead to piglet diarrhea, impair immune function, as well as reduce the growth performance of piglets [8]. Therefore, effective and safe nutritional approaches to prevent oxidative stress-induced cell apoptosis are of urgent need.
Licorice extract exhibits a range of potential biological activities, including antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antioxidant, and antidiabetic effects [9]. The main active component with antioxidant properties in licorice is 18beta-glycyrrhetinic acid (GA), which is a potential candidate for the prevention and/or treatment of oxidative stress. A previous study reported that GA improved kidney oxidative stress injury through upregulating endogenous antioxidants [10]. Additionally, it can protect the liver from oxidative injury by inhibiting free-radical production and lipid peroxidation [11]. Moreover, GA can also increase antioxidant enzyme levels and Bcl-2 expression to alleviate oxidative stress in rat liver [12]. However, the underlying mechanisms by which GA protects against damage caused by oxidative stress have not been explored in depth.
Therefore, we hypothesized that GA could be a potential candidate for the prevention of oxidative stress. Thus, the present study evaluated the protective effects of GA in oxidative stress-induced apoptosis and identified its molecular mechanisms. We established an in vitro oxidative stress model induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) using a porcine intestinal epithelial cell line (IPEC-J2). We demonstrated that GA protected IPEC-J2 cells from H2O2-induced oxidative stress by increasing cell viability and decreasing ROS production and cell apoptosis. GA directly bound to a master membrane receptor Vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 1 (VIPR1) as predicted by a molecular docking assay, and thereby activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) signaling. We also confirmed that GA pretreatment triggered the increase in B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) and decreased Cyt c and tumor suppressor protein p53 (p53), the key proteins involved in cell apoptosis. Our findings indicated that GA could be used as a potential agent for the prevention of diseases related to oxidative stress, such as acute/chronic intestine and/or liver disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Porcine IPEC-J2 cells were maintained in DMEM/F12 (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA) medium containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin (100 IU/mL)/streptomycin (100 µg/mL). IPEC-J2 cells were cultured in a controlled atmosphere of 95% humidity with 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

2.2. Detection of IPEC-J2 Cell Viability

IPEC-J2 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 2 × 104 cells per well and cultured for 24 h (reaching 70–80% confluence). GA (Yuanye, Shanghai, China) was dissolved in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO, purity ≥ 99%) and incubated with IPEC-J2 cells at various concentrations (50 nM, 100 nM, 500 nM, and 2 μM) and times (12 h, 24 h, and 48 h) according to previous studies [13,14,15]. Then, 200 μM of H2O2 was added to cells for 8 h. Subsequent procedures were carried out according to the instructions of a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) kit, and 10 μL of CCK-8 reagent was added to each well for 4 h at 37 °C. Finally, the absorbance value was measured at 450 nm using an Infinite F50 plate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland).

2.3. Assessment of Cellular Barrier

IPEC-J2 cells were seeded in six-well plates (5 × 105 cells per well) for 24 h, then treated with 100 nM of GA for another 24 h. Then, 200 μM of H2O2 was added for the last 8 h. The experimental treatment included the control (CK), H2O2-exposed (H2O2), pretreatment with GA for 24 h and exposure to 200 μM of H2O2 for 8 h (GA + H2O2), and pretreatment with GA for 24 h (GA) groups. The activities of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, Jiancheng, Nanjing, China), diamine oxidase (DAO, Jiangsu Meimian Industrial Co., Ltd., Yancheng, China), and the level of D-lactic acid (D-LA, Jiancheng, Nanjing, China) in the cell culture supernatant were determined using corresponding assay kits.

2.4. Apoptosis Analysis

IPEC-J2 cells were cultured in six-well plates at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells per well to attach for 24 h and then treated with 100 nM of GA for another 16 h. Following the GA treatment, IPEC-J2 cells were incubated with H2O2 for 8 h. The cells were digested with trypsin without ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), and the apoptosis was performed with an Annexin V-Fluorescein isothiocyanate/propidium iodide (FITC/PI) apoptosis detection kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The cells obtained were washed three times with PBS and centrifuged at 3000× g for 5 min at room temperature. Then, 200 μL of 1 × binding buffer and 5 μL of Annexin V-FITC were added to 100 μL of IPEC-J2 cell suspension at room temperature in a dark place for 15 min. Finally, 200 μL of 1 × binding buffer and 5 μL of PI staining solution were added before analysis (within 1 h) using a flow cytometer.

2.5. Intracellular ROS Levels

Intracellular ROS accumulation was measured with the fluorescent probe 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA; MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) as described previously [16]. IPEC-J2 cells were seeded in six-well cell culture plates, treated with 100 nM of GA for 24 h, and exposed to 200 μM of H2O2 after 8 h incubation. The cells were treated with 10 μM of DCFH-DA for 30 min at 37 °C. After washing with PBS, cells were visualized and photographed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica TCS SP8, Leica Microsystem, Hessen, Wetzlar, Germany). To evaluate ROS production, the fluorescence intensity was measured using a fluorescence microplate reader (Infinite 200 Pro, Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland) at excitation/emission wavelengths of 485/530 nm. Finally, fluorescence intensities were normalized with protein concentrations.

2.6. Redox Status Analysis

The cell and supernatant were collected to detect the malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase/oxidized glutathione disulfide (GSH/GSSG) rate, as well as the catalase (CAT) and superoxide anion radical scavenging activities, with commercial assay kits (Table S1) purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the MDA level was measured based on the chemical reactivity of MDA with thiobarbituric acid (TBA), resulting in the formation of a distinctive red product, which was quantitatively assessed at 532 nm. The SOD activity was measured based on the principle that the byproducts (superoxide anions) during xanthine oxidase-catalyzed xanthine oxidation oxidize hydroxylamine to nitrite, resulting in an amaranth purple color. The developed color was subsequently measured at 550 nm. The total GSH is measured by reacting GSH and GSSG with 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) to yield 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid (λ = 412 nm). Derivatized GSH with 2-vinylpyridine and only GSSG undergoes the DTNB reaction, and the GSSG level was measured at 412 nm. The GSH level was determined using the formula GSH = Total GSH − 2GSSG, and the ratio of GSH/GSSG was calculated. CAT reacts with H2O2, and this reaction can be halted by molybdenum to yield a yellow product. The activity of CAT was assessed by monitoring the reduction in absorbance at 405 nm, attributed to the degradation of H2O2.

2.7. RNA-Seq Library Construction and Analysis

The total RNA was assessed using the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). RNA-seq was conducted by the Novogene Company (Tianjin, China). The library fragments were purified with an AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, MA, USA). The PCR product was purified by using AMPure XP beads quantified by a Qubit2.0 Fluorometer and detected by an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer to obtain the final library. Subsequently, the relevant data were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000. High-quality RNA samples were further purified using the rRNA-depletion method and used to construct strand-specific RNA-seq libraries. The reads that matched perfectly or only had one single mispairing were analyzed further. Fragments per kilobase of transcript sequence per million mapped reads (FPKM) were used to determine differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and the DEGs were identified with the DESeq2 analysis procedure. Volcano plots were established by comparing log10 (statistical relevance) to log2 (fold change). Pathway enrichment analyses were used to identify functional classification or metabolic pathways enriched by the DEGs. Raw sequence data are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive with accession number PRJNA1005228.

2.8. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay

The quantitative real-time PCR was performed as described previously [17]. Briefly, the total RNA was extracted, and cDNA was reverse transcribed from 1 μg of RNA using a reagent kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. An RT-qPCR analysis was performed on an ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus). The primer sequences used in this study are listed in Table S3. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to calculate the gene expression levels of the target genes [18]. The relative mRNA expression levels were normalized with the reference gene GAPDH. Each gene was analyzed in triplicate.

2.9. Western Blot Analysis

The cultured IPEC-J2 cells were harvested to analyze protein abundance as described previously [19]. Briefly, the protein was extracted from cells by RIPA protein lysate containing protease inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. The concentrations of protein samples were detected with a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit following the manufacturer’s protocols. Protein samples (30 μg) were separated on SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. After being blocked for 1 h, cell membranes were incubated with primary and secondary antibodies. The detailed information on all the antibodies used is listed in Table S4. Finally, protein abundance was detected and quantified with an automatic chemiluminescence image analysis system (Tanon 5200, Hangzhou, China) and ImageJ 5.1 software. The expression levels of proteins were normalized with β-Actin.

2.10. Immunofluorescence and Confocal Microscopy

For the immunofluorescence study of p-Akt, IPEC-J2 cells were plated on glass slides in 24-well plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well for 24 h and then treated with 100 nM of GA for 16 h followed by 200 μM of H2O2 for 8 h. Subsequently, the plates with slides were washed in PBS for 5 min, followed by three PBS washes. The slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 37 °C for 1 h and then washed with PBS for 5 min, followed by three PBS washes. Cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (prepared with PBS) for 30 min at room temperature and washed in PBS for 5 min, followed by three PBS washes, and then blocked with 10% goat serum prepared with PBS (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, the p-Akt polyclonal rabbit antibody (9271, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and Alexa Fluor 647 goat anti-rabbit (4414S, Cell Signaling) were used at 1:100 in PBS with 5% goat serum. Cells were incubated with the primary antibody p-Akt overnight at 4 °C and washed again, followed by incubation with fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibodies at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, cells were washed again and incubated with 0.5 μg/mL of 2-(4-amidinophenyl)-6-indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride (DAPI) (1:2000 in PBS) for 10 min at room temperature, washed, and sealed with sealing liquid containing an anti-fluorescence quencher. Then, the observed images were collected under a fluorescence microscope using LAS-X software 1.4.6 (Leica TCS SP8, Leica Microsystem, Hessen, Wetzlar, Germany). The mean of the fluorescent intensity of the channels in each cell was measured using LAS-X for quantification. Images were processed using ImageJ, and graphs were generated by GraphPad Prism 8.0.

2.11. Molecular Docking

The binding mechanisms and activity between active ingredients and abundant target proteins were predicted by the molecular docking between small molecules and relevant targets [20]. To predict the interaction sites of GA with VIPR1 and PI3K, the 3D structure of GA (PDB ID: RES_d_1) from the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 12 June 2023)) was converted from the SDF to the mol2 format using Chem 3D software 4.0. The PDB format structures of the VIPR1 (UniProt: Q28992) and PI3K (PDB ID: 1E7U) were downloaded from UniProt and the Protein Data Bank and then the interaction of GA with VIPR1 and PI3K was analyzed using Autodock 1.5.6 and PyMOL 3.0 as described previously [21].

2.12. Statistical Analysis

All the data obtained from cell experiments were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were conducted with Duncan’s multiple range test using the SPSS 22.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Images were generated with GraphPad Prism 7. All analyses were performed with three independent experiments. All data are expressed as the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The values were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. GA Restores H2O2-Induced Cell Viability in IPEC-J2 Cells

Porcine IPEC-J2 cells were incubated with 200 μM of H2O2 for 8 h of induced intracellular oxidative stress [22,23,24]. We investigated the effect of exposure to 200 μM of H2O2 on the viability of IPEC-J2 cells using CCK-8 assays. We found that cell viability was significantly reduced to 70% after 8 h of incubation with 200 μM of H2O2 (p < 0.05, Figure S1A). Notably, GA did not affect the cell viability of IPEC-J2 cells when the concentration ranged from 50 nM to 2 μM with different incubation times (12 h, 24 h, and 48 h, respectively) (p > 0.05, Figure 1A). Next, we pretreated the IPEC-J2 cells with different doses of GA for 24 h to test the protective effect. As shown in Figure 1B, GA pretreatments restored the viability of oxidative stress-induced cells to the control levels (p > 0.05, Figure 1B). Notably, 24 h of incubation with 100 nM of GA significantly increased the cell viability both in the control and oxidative stress-induced IPEC-J2 cells (p < 0.05, Figure 1A,B). Thus, we treated IPEC-J2 cells with 100 nM of GA for 24 h for the remaining analyses in this study.

3.2. GA Protects IPEC-J2 Cells from Cell Injury and Apoptosis under Oxidative Stress

To determine whether GA benefits plasma membrane integrity, we measured the release of LDH in the culture supernatant of IPEC-J2 cells. The LDH release in H2O2-treated cells was increased by 65.86% compared with the control cells (p < 0.05, Figure 2A). Pretreatment with GA (100 nM) significantly attenuated the H2O2-induced increase in LDH release (p < 0.05, Figure 2A). However, no significant difference was observed in LDH release between the control and GA-treated group, signifying its safety (p > 0.05, Figure 2A). In addition, we detected the levels of d-lactic acid (D-LA) and DAO, two critical parameters reflecting the intestinal barrier function and degree of damage. Both D-LA and DAO levels/concentrations were significantly increased upon H2O2 treatment, while they were markedly decreased by pretreatment with GA (p < 0.05, Figure 2B,C). These findings indicated that GA improved the protective capacity of the cell plasma membrane.
To further explore the protective effect of GA on apoptosis, we conducted an Annexin V-FITC/PI assay by flow cytometry. A higher percentage of apoptotic cells (7.15%) was observed with H2O2 treatment compared with the control group (4.60%) (Figure 2D,E). GA pretreatment significantly inhibited H2O2-induced cell apoptosis (3.32%) (Figure 2D,E). These findings provided further evidence that GA prevented IPEC-J2 apoptosis and improved cell viability.

3.3. GA Reduces Cellular ROS Production and Increases Antioxidant Enzyme Secretion in IPEC-J2 Cells

To investigate whether the observed attenuation in apoptosis resulted from the antioxidative effect of GA, we conducted a DCFH-DA assay to measure the intracellular ROS production in IPEC-J2 cells. Exposure to H2O2 (200 μM) alone triggered a substantial ROS production in IPEC-J2 cells, as observed by an increase in green dots under the microscope and higher quantified green fluorescence intensity (Figure 3A,B), whereas pretreatment with GA (100 nM) reduced the level of H2O2-induced ROS production compared to the control (p < 0.01, Figure 3B). However, GA pretreatment did not affect ROS production in IPEC-J2 cells (Figure 3A,B). These data suggested that GA protected IPEC-J2 cells against H2O2-induced oxidative stress, partially at least, due to its ability to scavenge or inhibit ROS.
High ROS levels induce iNOS expression [25]. Inspired by this, we detected the mRNA expression of iNOS in IPEC-J2 cells and found that H2O2 significantly increased the mRNA level of iNOS, whereas GA pretreatment inhibited the H2O2-induced iNOS level (p < 0.05, Figure 3C). Exposure to 200 μM of H2O2 elevated MDA levels and reduced the GSH/GSSG ratio, whereas pretreatment with GA significantly reversed the changing trend of both the MDA level and the GSH/GSSG ratio induced by H2O2 (p < 0.05, Figure 3D,E). These results suggested that GA alleviated the oxidative stress induced by H2O2 in IPEC-J2 cells. Next, we investigated the effect of GA on H2O2-induced antioxidant enzyme activity. As shown in Figure 3F,G, SOD and CAT activities were increased with GA pretreatment compared with the group exposed to H2O2 alone (p < 0.05). Hydrogen peroxide, a byproduct of cell metabolism, can be degraded by CAT, which prevents it from producing damaging hydroxyl radicals. Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity was decreased in the IPEC-J2 cells exposed to 200 μM of H2O2 (p < 0.05), whereas GA pretreatment restored the hydroxyl radical scavenging activity in IPEC-J2 cells (p < 0.05, Figure 3H). Taken together, these results indicated that GA promoted the secretion of antioxidant enzymes in response to oxidative stress-induced damage.

3.4. GA Alleviates H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress by Activating the PI3K/Akt Pathway

RNA-seq was performed to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which GA alleviates H2O2-induced apoptosis and oxidative stress in IPEC-J2 cells (Table S5). The activation of the PI3K-Akt pathway, one of the most well-known ROS-regulated pathways, is known to inhibit cell apoptosis and promote cell survival [26]. Thus, we focused on the effects of GA on the PI3K-Akt pathway in IPEC-J2 cells. Ceruloplasmin (CP) inhibits lipid oxidation. Additionally, the mRNA expression of human proline-rich 5 like (PRR15L) and zinc finger protein 554 (ZNF554) was negatively correlated with apoptosis [27,28]. VIPR1 (VPAC1) can exert anti-inflammation or antioxidant activity. The MDA level induced by H2O2 was decreased through activating VIPR1 [29]. The PI3K/Akt pathway is activated to maintain physiological homeostasis by the Gβ subunit when VIPR1 (VPAC1 or PACAP) of the class B GPCRs is activated [30,31]. Pretreatment with GA and exposure to H2O2 significantly increased (p < 0.05) the mRNA expression of CP, ZNF554, and PRR15L compared with the group exposed to H2O2 alone (Figure 4A). H2O2-induced oxidative stress significantly decreased (p < 0.05) the mRNA expression of CP and VIPR1 compared with the control group (Figure 4B). These results indicated that GA probably activated the PI3K/Akt pathway in IPEC-J2 cells.
Western blot analysis was conducted to detect PI3K (p-PI3K) and Akt (p-Akt) phosphorylation levels in IPEC-J2 cells treated with GA without H2O2. However, GA alone did not affect the levels of either p-PI3K or p-Akt during steady-state conditions (without H2O2 exposure) (Figure 5A–C). Notably, under oxidative stress (with H2O2 exposure), GA pretreatment significantly increased (p < 0.05) the abundance of p-PI3K/PI3K and p-Akt/Akt, suggesting the activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (GA + H2O2 versus H2O2, Figure 5B,C). Furthermore, we characterized the subcellular localization of p-AKT by IF staining. GA pretreatment increased the abundance of p-Akt, mostly in the nucleus of H2O2-exposed IPEC-J2 cells (Figure 5D). Thus, it was conceivable that the protective role of GA in oxidative-stressed IPEC-J2 cells required the PI3K/Akt pathway.
To test our concept further, we assessed the effect of GA on the expression of several pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins in H2O2-exposed IPEC-J2 cells. The Western blotting results showed that H2O2 caused a reduction in the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2, whereas pretreatment with GA significantly attenuated BCL-2 expression (Figure 6A,B). The expression of BAX was not affected by either H2O2 or GA; the BCL2/BAX ratio remarkably decreased in the H2O2-treated cells and considerable elevation was observed when pretreated with GA (Figure 6A,D). In addition, the levels of p53 and Cyt c were increased by H2O2, whereas GA pretreatment reduced the p53 and Cyt c levels in IPEC-J2 cells (Figure 6A,E,F). Furthermore, we observed a consistent change in p53 and Cyt c mRNA levels by qPCR analysis (Figure 6G,H), suggesting that GA has an anti-apoptotic role in H2O2-exposed IPEC-J2 cells. Collectively, our findings indicated that GA alleviated IPEC-J2 cell apoptosis by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway under oxidative stress.

3.5. Molecular Binding between GA and Potential Target Proteins

To investigate the binding modes between GA and the potential targets of the PI3K/Akt pathway, a molecular docking simulation was performed. This is a method for studying the interaction and recognition between proteins and ligands. It is well known that the binding of a ligand to PACAP receptors (VIPR1 and VIPR2), master membrane receptors, activates the main second messengers of the PI3K/Akt pathway [31]. Considering that GA increased the mRNA expression of VIPR1 in IPEC-J2 cells, as indicated by both RNA-seq and RT-qPCR analysis, we reasoned that GA activates intracellular PI3K through VIPR1. The molecular docking result showed that GA binds to VIPR1, forming one or two hydrogen bonds with the protein residues (Figure 7A). Hydroxyl groups at C-3 and/or C-30 formed hydrogen bonds with VIPR1 (Arg 189 and Lys 196) (Table 1). Next, we explored whether GA directly binds to PI3K. We found that hydrogen bonds were formed between GA and PI3K at C-3 and/or C-30 sites (Figure 7B, Table 1). It is generally accepted that strong stable ligand–receptor binding correlates with a greater binding energy value and better docking [32]. The docking results showed that the binding energy between GA and VIPR1 was greater than that between GA with PI3K, suggesting that GA bound to the VIPR1 receptor, and thereby activated intracellular PI3K/Akt signaling to alleviate oxidative stress in IPEC-J2 cells.

4. Discussion

In this study, pretreatment with 100 nM of GA decreased the production of ROS in IPEC-J2 cells and increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes. GA was observed to have similar protective effects against ROS-induced oxidative stress in previous studies [33,34]. Other studies have reported that ROS-induced oxidative cellular damage is usually accompanied by increased LDH activity, thereby reducing membrane permeability and antioxidant activity [35,36]. We found that pretreatment with GA remarkably increased LDH activity to improve cell barrier integrity. We also found that GA decreased H2O2-induced cell apoptosis, and pretreatment with 100 nM of GA could reverse the reduction of cell viability in IPEC-J2 cells. Therefore, GA has the potential to protect intestinal barrier function and restore cell viability under oxidative stress.
An enhanced cell antioxidant defense system leads to ROS scavenging, thus alleviating oxidative stress. As one of the most important products of membrane lipid peroxide, MDA aggravates cell damage [37,38]. Superoxide anions, a relatively weak oxidant, trigger lipid peroxidation and lead to cell DNA damage and death [39]. CAT and glutathione peroxidase are known as the main antioxidant enzymes in cells [40,41]. A previous study reported that GA might increase the CAT activity to scavenge oxygen free radicals and verified this experimentally by the use of molecular docking [42]. To explore the effects of GA on antioxidant activity in vitro, we established an oxidative stress model using IPEC-J2 cells induced by H2O2 and found that GA exhibited promising in vitro O2•− scavenging activity and reduced the levels of ROS-induced cell lipid peroxide. However, GA supplementation did not increase the antioxidant-related gene expressions by RNA-seq. The discrepancies between mRNA expression and protein levels have also been observed by others. Röhrdanz et al. showed that the activity of antioxidant enzymes (such as CAT and SOD) was inconsistent with mRNA expression [43]. Xu et al. reported that an increase in MnSOD mRNA expression was not consistent with the increase in MnSOD activity [44]. These suggested that a translational block might exist for the antioxidant enzyme protein. It had been proved that the difference in protein level versus transcript level changes was controlled by a post-transcriptional modification mechanism [45].
The PI3K/Akt pathway plays an important role in oxidative stress [46]. In the present study, the p-Akt protein level was increased in the GA + H2O2 group, and pretreatment with GA significantly increased the p-Akt protein level compared with oxidative stress alone. We also found that pretreatment with GA could promote the expression level of Akt in the nucleus. Pretreatment with GA significantly decreased the protein levels and gene expression of Cyt c and p53, increasing the ratio of BCL2/BAX. These indexes are known to be related to the PI3K/Akt pathway. As a downstream effector of PI3K, Akt can inhibit oxidative stress by regulating downstream target proteins of the Bcl-2 family [47]. In addition, the Bcl-2 family of proteins controls mitochondrial permeability. Moreover, the Bcl-2 protein resides in the outer membrane of mitochondria to inhibit cytochrome release [48,49]. Oxidative stress may promote the leakage of Cyt c from mitochondria to cytoplasm by changing mitochondrial membrane permeability. In addition, Ghatei et al. reported that p53 promotes oxidative stress injury by downregulating the expression of BCL2 and decreasing the BCL2/BAX ratio [50]. These findings suggest that GA alleviates oxidative stress by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway. Oxidative stress might also interfere with the activity of Akt in the PI3K/Akt pathway by disrupting the oxidative redox homeostasis of cells [51]. Thus, we postulated that oxidative stress promoted p-Akt phosphorylation but affected its activity. However, it was unclear how GA may promote Akt activity. Thus, further in-depth studies are necessary to reveal the exact relationship between Akt activity and oxidative stress.
The small drug molecule binds to an amino acid residue on the receptor to form a drug–receptor complex. Small drug molecules can activate or inhibit the bioactivities of the receptors mainly by the use of intermolecular electrostatic interactions and ionic bonds, hydrogen bonds, and Van der Waals forces [52,53]. VIPR1 is a member of class B receptors belonging to the super-family of GPCR. Previous studies showed that the N-terminal ectodomain (N-ted) of the VPAC1 receptor plays a crucial role in small molecule agonist binding [54]. VIPR1 plays a crucial role in cell membrane functions. VIPR1 was activated by a ligand and further to activate the cAMP/PKA pathway to inhibit inflammation and oxidative stress, suggesting that VIPR1 was mainly used as a membrane receptor for signal transduction [55,56]. IPR1 could initiate a series of cellular regulatory processes to influence the physiological state of the cell, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and metabolism [57]. However, further in-depth studies are necessary to explore the cellular role of VIPR1. We found that GA could bind to the VIPR1 membrane receptor by molecular docking and improve the viability of IPEC-J2 cells. However, the binding of GA and VIPR1 would be validated for further investigations, such as the Western blot experiment as well as CETSA and radioligand binding experiments at the protein level, and the siRNA experiment would be performed at the cellular level. VIPR1 has tyrosine kinase domains that contribute to the development of cell growth [58]. Previous studies have reported that PI3K/Akt was activated downstream to improve cell survival when the VIPR1 receptor of the cell membrane was activated [59,60]. This implied that pretreatment by GA activated VIPR1 in the membrane to upregulate PI3K/Akt and inhibit cell apoptosis in IPEC-J2 cells. Previous studies have found that GA reduced oxidative stress injury by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway [61]. It is speculated that GA may directly promote the translocation of Akt to the membrane by binding to PI3K, thereby activating Akt and promoting its expression. These findings indicate that GA acts as a ligand and binds to VIPR1 in the cell membrane, thereby activating the intracellular PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to attenuate cell viability under oxidative stress. However, further studies are needed to explore the relationship between VIPR1 and PI3K in vitro and in vivo.

5. Conclusions

In summary, pretreatment with GA reduced oxidative stress-induced cell apoptosis by inhibiting the production of intracellular ROS, increasing antioxidant enzyme levels, and decreasing apoptotic protein/gene expression. Furthermore, GA pretreatment activated the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by binding to the VIPR1 of the outer cell membrane and then activating Akt in the inner cell membrane, thereby improving the viability of IPEC-J2 cells impaired by oxidative stress. The findings in the present study provided evidence for the development of GA as a prophylactic and/or therapeutic agent for diseases related to oxidative stress, such as aging and liver disease. Notably, our findings also provided data for the future application of GA as an antibiotic alternative to improve the intestinal health of animals.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox13040468/s1, Figure S1: Effect of hyperoxia and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) on cell viability in IPEC-J2 cells. (A) Cell viability in IPEC-J2 cells exposure to 200 uM H2O2 for 8 h. (B) Cell viability in IPEC-J2 cells pre-treated with GA for 24 h exposure to 200 μM H2O2 for 8 h. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with triplicate cultures of the representative experiments. (A) Data were analyzed by unpaired T-test. * p < 0.05 means significant difference between two groups; Figure S2: The western blot images of p-PI3K, PI3K, p-Akt, and Akt were run in parallel and left and right panels were run at different times. Figure S3: The western blot images of BCL2, BAX, p53, and Cytc were run in parallel and left and right panels were run at different times. Table S1: Information of the commercial assay kits. Table S2: The raw data of MDA level, SOD and CAT activity, and GSH/GSSG ratio. Table S3: Primer sequences of genes for quantitative real-time PCR. Table S4: Information of primary antibodies. Table S5: Quality of sequencing data from IPEC-J2 cells samples libraries.

Author Contributions

C.M. and W.S. designed the research and performed the experiments; W.S. and J.Z. (Junmin Zhang) provided technical support in the experiments; C.M. and W.S. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. C.M., F.W., J.Z. (Jiawei Zhu), S.W., Y.L., J.X., Q.Z., Y.Q., W.S. and J.Z. (Junmin Zhang) reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD1300301), the Key Research and Development Plan in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (2022BBF02020), and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project (ASTIP-IAS-12).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff and postgraduate students for the quality and safety of animal products and for providing technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors have declared that there were no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Camilleri, M.; Madsen, K.; Spiller, R.; Greenwood-Van Meerveld, B.; Verne, G.N. Intestinal barrier function in health and gastrointestinal disease. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2012, 24, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xu, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, S.; Qi, C.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, R.; Xiang, L.; Chen, L.; Zhu, Y.; Tang, C.; et al. Oxidative stress gene expression, DNA methylation, and gut microbiota interaction trigger Crohn’s disease: A multi-omics Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med. 2023, 21, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, D.K.; Chaudhari, S.N.; Lee, Y.; Sojoodi, M.; Adhikari, A.A.; Zukerberg, L.; Shroff, S.; Barrett, S.C.; Tanabe, K.; Chung, R.T.; et al. Inhibition of microbial deconjugation of micellar bile acids protects against intestinal permeability and liver injury. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabo2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Birben, E.; Sahiner, U.M.; Sackesen, C.; Erzurum, S.; Kalayci, O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organ J. 2012, 5, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cho, Y.E.; Yu, L.R.; Abdelmegeed, M.A.; Yoo, S.H.; Song, B.J. Apoptosis of enterocytes and nitration of junctional complex proteins promote alcohol-induced gut leakiness and liver injury. J. Hepatol. 2018, 69, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mo, F.; Zhou, X.; Yang, M.; Chen, L.; Tang, Z.; Wang, C.; Cui, Y. Trehalose Attenuates Oxidative Stress and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Apoptosis in IPEC-J2 Cells Subjected to Heat Stress. Animals 2022, 12, 2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liang, S.J.; Wang, X.Q. Deoxynivalenol induces intestinal injury: Insights from oxidative stress and intestinal stem cells. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 48676–48685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cao, S.; Wu, H.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Q.; Jiao, L.; Lin, F.; Hu, C.H. Diquat-induced oxidative stress increases intestinal permeability, impairs mitochondrial function, and triggers mitophagy in piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 1795–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pastorino, G.; Cornara, L.; Soares, S.; Rodrigues, F.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra): A phytochemical and pharmacological review. Phytother. Res. PTR 2018, 32, 2323–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abd El-Twab, S.M.; Hozayen, W.G.; Hussein, O.E.; Mahmoud, A.M. 18β-Glycyrrhetinic acid protects against methotrexate-induced kidney injury by up-regulating the Nrf2/ARE/HO-1 pathway and endogenous antioxidants. Ren. Fail. 2016, 38, 1516–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huo, H.Z.; Wang, B.; Liang, Y.K.; Bao, Y.Y.; Gu, Y. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects of licorice extract against CCl₄-induced oxidative damage in rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 6529–6543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mahmoud, A.M.; Hussein, O.E.; Hozayen, W.G.; Abd El-Twab, S.M. Methotrexate hepatotoxicity is associated with oxidative stress, and down-regulation of PPARγ and Nrf2: Protective effect of 18β-Glycyrrhetinic acid. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2017, 270, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, G.; Bei, B.; Feng, Y.; Li, X.; Jiang, Z.; Si, J.Y.; Qing, D.G.; Zhang, J.; Li, N. Glycyrrhetinic Acid Maintains Intestinal Homeostasis via HuR. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Malekinejad, M.; Pashaee, M.R.; Malekinejad, H. 18β-Glycyrrhetinic acid altered the intestinal permeability in the human Caco-2 monolayer cell model. Eur. J. Nutr. 2022, 61, 3437–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, S.Y.; Wang, W.J.; Dou, J.H.; Gong, L.K. Research progress on the protective effects of licorice-derived 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid against liver injury. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2021, 42, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, H.; Xue, X. Detection of Total Reactive Oxygen Species in Adherent Cells by 2′,7′-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein Diacetate Staining. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE 2020, 160, e60682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiao, K.; Liu, C.; Tu, Z.; Xu, Q.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Hu, C.A.; Liu, Y. Activation of the NF-κB and MAPK Signaling Pathways Contributes to the Inflammatory Responses, but Not Cell Injury, in IPEC-1 Cells Challenged with Hydrogen Peroxide. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 5803639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pfaffl, M.W.; Horgan, G.W.; Dempfle, L. Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2002, 30, e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Huang, C.; Ming, D.; Wang, W.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Ma, X.; Wang, F. Pyrroloquinoline Quinone Alleviates Jejunal Mucosal Barrier Function Damage and Regulates Colonic Microbiota in Piglets Challenged with Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wang, M.; Liu, F.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, R.; Liu, C.; Lin, C.; Zhu, C. Network pharmacology-based mechanism prediction and pharmacological validation of Xiaoyan Lidan formula on attenuating alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate induced cholestatic hepatic injury in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 270, 113816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seeliger, D.; de Groot, B.L. Ligand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2010, 24, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Xu, G.; Chen, H.; Lei, H.; Su, J. Effects of Quercetin on Proliferation and H₂O₂-Induced Apoptosis of Intestinal Porcine Enterocyte Cells. Molecules 2018, 23, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, Z.; Wang, H.; Fang, S.; Xu, C. Roles of endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy on H2O2-induced oxidative stress injury in HepG2 cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 4163–4174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Magenta, A.; Cencioni, C.; Fasanaro, P.; Zaccagnini, G.; Greco, S.; Sarra-Ferraris, G.; Antonini, A.; Martelli, F.; Capogrossi, M.C. miR-200c is upregulated by oxidative stress and induces endothelial cell apoptosis and senescence via ZEB1 inhibition. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18, 1628–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lin, Y.; Tang, G.; Jiao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xiao, J.; Li, C.; Chen, Z.; Cao, P. Propionibacterium acnes Induces Intervertebral Disc Degeneration by Promoting iNOS/NO and COX-2/PGE(2) Activation via the ROS-Dependent NF-κB Pathway. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 3692752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, C.; Li, C.; Chen, S.; Li, Z.; Jia, X.; Wang, K.; Bao, J.; Liang, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, M.; et al. Berberine protects against 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity in PC12 cells and zebrafish through hormetic mechanisms involving PI3K/AKT/Bcl-2 and Nrf2/HO-1 pathways. Redox Biol. 2017, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Than, N.G.; Romero, R.; Tarca, A.L.; Kekesi, K.A.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Juhasz, K.; Bhatti, G.; Leavitt, R.J.; Gelencser, Z.; et al. Integrated Systems Biology Approach Identifies Novel Maternal and Placental Pathways of Preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gates, K.C.; Goetzmann, L.N.; Cantlon, J.D.; Jeckel, K.M.; Anthony, R.V. Effect of proline rich 15-deficiency on trophoblast viability and survival. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, R.; Zhang, H.; Huang, L.; Liu, X.; Chen, J. Anti-hyperglycemic, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of VIP and a VPAC1 agonist on streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Peptides 2011, 32, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zibara, K.; Zeidan, A.; Mallah, K.; Kassem, N.; Awad, A.; Mazurier, F.; Badran, B.; El-Zein, N. Signaling pathways activated by PACAP in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cell. Signal. 2018, 50, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Asano, S.; Yamasaka, M.; Ozasa, K.; Sakamoto, K.; Hayata-Takano, A.; Nakazawa, T.; Hashimoto, H.; Waschek, J.A.; Ago, Y. Vasoactive intestinal peptide-VIPR2 signaling regulates tumor cell migration. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 852358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shou, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Duan, C.; Yang, Y.; Jia, Q.; Yuan, G.; Shi, J.; et al. Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Analysis on Molecular Mechanism of Qingzi Zhitong Decoction in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 727608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cao, L.J.; Li, H.D.; Yan, M.; Li, Z.H.; Gong, H.; Jiang, P.; Deng, Y.; Fang, P.F.; Zhang, B.K. The Protective Effects of Isoliquiritigenin and Glycyrrhetinic Acid against Triptolide-Induced Oxidative Stress in HepG2 Cells Involve Nrf2 Activation. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. Ecam 2016, 2016, 8912184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, D.; Sun, J.; Chang, S.; Li, X.; Shi, H.; Jing, B.; Zheng, Y.; Lin, Y.; Qian, G.; Pan, Y.; et al. Protective effect of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid against H2O2-induced injury in Schwann cells based on network pharmacology and experimental validation. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sheng, Y.; Liu, G.; Wang, M.; Lv, Z.; Du, P. A selenium polysaccharide from Platycodon grandiflorum rescues PC12 cell death caused by H2O2 via inhibiting oxidative stress. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Deng, F.; Zhao, B.C.; Yang, X.; Lin, Z.B.; Sun, Q.S.; Wang, Y.F.; Yan, Z.Z.; Liu, W.F.; Li, C.; Hu, J.J.; et al. The gut microbiota metabolite capsiate promotes Gpx4 expression by activating TRPV1 to inhibit intestinal ischemia reperfusion-induced ferroptosis. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1902719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xie, J.; Ye, H.; Du, M.; Yu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Shen, M. Mung Bean Protein Hydrolysates Protect Mouse Liver Cell Line Nctc-1469 Cell from Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Cell Injury. Foods 2019, 9, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Del Rio, D.; Stewart, A.J.; Pellegrini, N. A review of recent studies on malondialdehyde as toxic molecule and biological marker of oxidative stress. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. NMCD 2005, 15, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mao, J.W.; Yin, J.; Ge, Q.; Jiang, Z.L.; Gong, J.Y. In vitro antioxidant activities of polysaccharides extracted from Moso Bamboo-Leaf. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 55, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Chu, X.; Ji, H. Lactobacillus plantarum Exhibits Antioxidant and Cytoprotective Activities in Porcine Intestinal Epithelial Cells Exposed to Hydrogen Peroxide. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 8936907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhan, T.; Han, Y.; Tang, C.; Zhao, Q.; Sun, D.; Li, Y.; Jia, X.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, J. Metabolism and biological activity of α-tocopherol derived from vitamin E-enriched transgenic maize in broilers. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 4319–4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hu, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, C.P.; Zhu, Z.; Li, H.; Zeng, Q.; Xue, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Network pharmacology, molecular docking and in vivo and in vitro experiments to explore the molecular mechanism of licorice green tea beverage to scavenge oxygen free radicals. J. Food Biochem. 2022, 46, e14315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Röhrdanz, E.; Kahl, R. Alterations of antioxidant enzyme expression in response to hydrogen peroxide. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 1998, 24, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xu, C.L.; Wang, Y.Z.; Guo, J.; Liu, J.X.; Feng, J. Comparison of age-related differences in expression of antioxidant enzyme mRNA and activity in various tissues of pigs. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 147, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Maxwell, B.A.; Gwon, Y.; Mishra, A.; Peng, J.; Nakamura, H.; Zhang, K.; Kim, H.J.; Taylor, J.P. Ubiquitination is essential for recovery of cellular activities after heat shock. Science 2021, 372, eabc3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhong, W.; Qian, K.; Xiong, J.; Ma, K.; Wang, A.; Zou, Y. Curcumin alleviates lipopolysaccharide induced sepsis and liver failure by suppression of oxidative stress-related inflammation via PI3K/AKT and NF-κB related signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016, 83, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yao, H.; Han, X.; Han, X. The cardioprotection of the insulin-mediated PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs Drugs Devices Other Interv. 2014, 14, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Harris, M.H.; Thompson, C.B. The role of the Bcl-2 family in the regulation of outer mitochondrial membrane permeability. Cell Death Differ. 2000, 7, 1182–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jiang, X.; Jiang, H.; Shen, Z.; Wang, X. Activation of mitochondrial protease OMA1 by Bax and Bak promotes cytochrome c release during apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 14782–14787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ghatei, N.; Nabavi, A.S.; Toosi, M.H.B.; Azimian, H.; Homayoun, M.; Targhi, R.G.; Haghir, H. Evaluation of bax, bcl-2, p21 and p53 genes expression variations on cerebellum of BALB/c mice before and after birth under mobile phone radiation exposure. Iran J. Basic Med. Sci. 2017, 20, 1037–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Su, Z.; Burchfield, J.G.; Yang, P.; Humphrey, S.J.; Yang, G.; Francis, D.; Yasmin, S.; Shin, S.Y.; Norris, D.M.; Kearney, A.L.; et al. Global redox proteome and phosphoproteome analysis reveals redox switch in Akt. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Suresh, P.S.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, R.; Singh, V.P. An in silico [correction of insilico] approach to bioremediation: Laccase as a case study. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2008, 26, 845–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chen, G.; Huang, B.X.; Guo, M. Current advances in screening for bioactive components from medicinal plants by affinity ultrafiltration mass spectrometry. Phytochem. Anal. PCA 2018, 29, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Couvineau, A.; Laburthe, M. VPAC receptors: Structure, molecular pharmacology and interaction with accessory proteins. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 166, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Delgado, M.; Munoz-Elias, E.J.; Gomariz, R.P.; Ganea, D. Vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide prevent inducible nitric oxide synthase transcription in macrophages by inhibiting NF-kappa B and IFN regulatory factor 1 activation. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 4685–4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kojima, M.; Ito, T.; Oono, T.; Hisano, T.; Igarashi, H.; Arita, Y.; Kawabe, K.; Coy, D.H.; Jensen, R.T.; Nawata, H. VIP attenuation of the severity of experimental pancreatitis is due to VPAC1 receptor-mediated inhibition of cytokine production. Pancreas 2005, 30, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Steingart, R.A.; Solomon, B.; Brenneman, D.E.; Fridkin, M.; Gozes, I. VIP and peptides related to activity-dependent neurotrophic factor protect PC12 cells against oxidative stress. J. Mol. Neurosci. MN 2000, 15, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rahimi, N. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors: Molecular mechanisms of activation and therapeutic potentials. Exp. Eye Res. 2006, 83, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Cantley, L.C. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Science 2002, 296, 1655–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Feng, Z.; Sun, R.; Cong, Y.; Liu, Z. Critical roles of G protein-coupled receptors in regulating intestinal homeostasis and inflammatory bowel disease. Mucosal. Immunol. 2022, 15, 819–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, Z.; Ma, J.; He, Y.; Miu, K.K.; Yao, S.; Tang, C.; Ye, Y.; Lin, G. Nrf2-mediated liver protection by 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid against pyrrolizidine alkaloid-induced toxicity through PI3K/Akt/GSK3β pathway. Phytomed. Int. J. Phytother. Phytopharm. 2022, 102, 154162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) on the cell viability of IPEC-J2 cells exposed to oxidative stress. (A) Effect of GA on cell viability of IPEC-J2 cells. Cells were treated with GA 50 nM, 100 nM, 500 nM, and 2 μM GA for 12, 24, and 48 h, respectively. (B) Cells were treated with GA 50 nM, 100 nM, 500 nM, and 2 μM GA for 24 h, and exposed to 200 μM H2O2 for 8 h. (A,B) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were conducted with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Effect of glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) on the cell viability of IPEC-J2 cells exposed to oxidative stress. (A) Effect of GA on cell viability of IPEC-J2 cells. Cells were treated with GA 50 nM, 100 nM, 500 nM, and 2 μM GA for 12, 24, and 48 h, respectively. (B) Cells were treated with GA 50 nM, 100 nM, 500 nM, and 2 μM GA for 24 h, and exposed to 200 μM H2O2 for 8 h. (A,B) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were conducted with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05.
Antioxidants 13 00468 g001
Figure 2. Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) prevents oxidative stress-induced IPEC-J2 cell barrier damage and apoptosis. Cells were seeded for 24 h, pretreated with 100 nM GA for 16 h, then exposed to 200 μM H2O2 for 8 h. (AC) Effects of GA on lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and diamine oxidase (DAO) activity, and D-lactate (D-LA) level in IPEC-J2 cells exposed to H2O2. (D) Detection of apoptosis based on Annexin V-FITC staining and PI staining. Flow-cytometric analysis of apoptotic cells. (E) Quantification of apoptosis based on flow cytometry data. (AC,E) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. ns indicates no difference between two groups.
Figure 2. Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) prevents oxidative stress-induced IPEC-J2 cell barrier damage and apoptosis. Cells were seeded for 24 h, pretreated with 100 nM GA for 16 h, then exposed to 200 μM H2O2 for 8 h. (AC) Effects of GA on lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and diamine oxidase (DAO) activity, and D-lactate (D-LA) level in IPEC-J2 cells exposed to H2O2. (D) Detection of apoptosis based on Annexin V-FITC staining and PI staining. Flow-cytometric analysis of apoptotic cells. (E) Quantification of apoptosis based on flow cytometry data. (AC,E) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. ns indicates no difference between two groups.
Antioxidants 13 00468 g002
Figure 3. Effects of glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) on redox status of oxidative stress-induced IPEC-J2 cells. (A) The production of ROS was assessed by DCFH-DA staining and fluorescence microscopy. (B) ROS production was calculated. (C) The mRNA expression of iNOS in IPEC-J2 cells. (DH) Effect of GA on MDA level, GSH/GSSG, SOD, CAT, and superoxide anion radical scavenging activities in IPEC-J2 cells. (BH) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were analyzed with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. ns indicates no difference between two groups.
Figure 3. Effects of glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) on redox status of oxidative stress-induced IPEC-J2 cells. (A) The production of ROS was assessed by DCFH-DA staining and fluorescence microscopy. (B) ROS production was calculated. (C) The mRNA expression of iNOS in IPEC-J2 cells. (DH) Effect of GA on MDA level, GSH/GSSG, SOD, CAT, and superoxide anion radical scavenging activities in IPEC-J2 cells. (BH) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were analyzed with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. ns indicates no difference between two groups.
Antioxidants 13 00468 g003
Figure 4. Differentially expressed up- and downregulated genes based on heat map analysis. (A) The heatmap of gene expression; the red, white, and blue colors represent the upregulated, unchanged, and downregulated differentially expressed genes in the GA + H2O2 vs. H2O2 group. (BD) RT-qPCR validation of differentially expressed genes. (BD) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05. ns indicates no difference between two groups.
Figure 4. Differentially expressed up- and downregulated genes based on heat map analysis. (A) The heatmap of gene expression; the red, white, and blue colors represent the upregulated, unchanged, and downregulated differentially expressed genes in the GA + H2O2 vs. H2O2 group. (BD) RT-qPCR validation of differentially expressed genes. (BD) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05. ns indicates no difference between two groups.
Antioxidants 13 00468 g004
Figure 5. Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) regulates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in IPEC-J2 cells. (A) The protein expression of PI3K, p-PI3K, Akt, and p-Akt was measured by Western blot analysis with specific primary antibodies, and β-actin was used as a loading control. (B,C) Quantification of the relative protein expression was performed by densitometric analysis. (D) The expression level of p-Akt was assessed by immunofluorescence analysis. Representative images were taken at 200× magnification. DAPI was used as a nuclear counterstain. (B,C) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05. ns indicates no difference between two groups.
Figure 5. Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) regulates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in IPEC-J2 cells. (A) The protein expression of PI3K, p-PI3K, Akt, and p-Akt was measured by Western blot analysis with specific primary antibodies, and β-actin was used as a loading control. (B,C) Quantification of the relative protein expression was performed by densitometric analysis. (D) The expression level of p-Akt was assessed by immunofluorescence analysis. Representative images were taken at 200× magnification. DAPI was used as a nuclear counterstain. (B,C) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05. ns indicates no difference between two groups.
Antioxidants 13 00468 g005
Figure 6. Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) prevents oxidative stress-induced apoptosis by regulating the downstream targets of PI3K in IPEC-J2 cells. (AF) The protein expressions of p53, Cytc, BCL2, and BAX were measured by Western blotting with specific primary antibodies, and β-Actin was used as a loading control. (G,H) The mRNA expressions of p53 and Cytc. Quantification of the relative protein expression was performed by densitometric analysis. (BE) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05. ns indicates no difference between two groups.
Figure 6. Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) prevents oxidative stress-induced apoptosis by regulating the downstream targets of PI3K in IPEC-J2 cells. (AF) The protein expressions of p53, Cytc, BCL2, and BAX were measured by Western blotting with specific primary antibodies, and β-Actin was used as a loading control. (G,H) The mRNA expressions of p53 and Cytc. Quantification of the relative protein expression was performed by densitometric analysis. (BE) Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons with Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with three independent experiments. n = 3 means three independent experiments. The differences between two groups were considered significant at * p < 0.05. ns indicates no difference between two groups.
Antioxidants 13 00468 g006
Figure 7. Molecular binding of glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) with VIPR1 and PI3K. (A) The 3D structure interactions of GA with VIPR1. (B) The 3D structure interactions of GA with PI3K.
Figure 7. Molecular binding of glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) with VIPR1 and PI3K. (A) The 3D structure interactions of GA with VIPR1. (B) The 3D structure interactions of GA with PI3K.
Antioxidants 13 00468 g007
Table 1. Binding energy and docking amino acids sites of glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) and potential target proteins.
Table 1. Binding energy and docking amino acids sites of glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) and potential target proteins.
ProteinResidueAACDistance H-ABinding Energy/(kcal mol−1)
VIPR1189AARGC31.9−6.58
196ALYSC301.7−6.35
PI3K179AARGC31.9−5.39
531ALYSC301.8−5.39
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, C.; Wang, F.; Zhu, J.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhao, Q.; Qin, Y.; Si, W.; Zhang, J. 18Beta-Glycyrrhetinic Acid Attenuates H2O2-Induced Oxidative Damage and Apoptosis in Intestinal Epithelial Cells via Activating the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13040468

AMA Style

Ma C, Wang F, Zhu J, Wang S, Liu Y, Xu J, Zhao Q, Qin Y, Si W, Zhang J. 18Beta-Glycyrrhetinic Acid Attenuates H2O2-Induced Oxidative Damage and Apoptosis in Intestinal Epithelial Cells via Activating the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway. Antioxidants. 2024; 13(4):468. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13040468

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Cui, Fuxi Wang, Jiawei Zhu, Shiyi Wang, Yaqing Liu, Jianfang Xu, Qingyu Zhao, Yuchang Qin, Wei Si, and Junmin Zhang. 2024. "18Beta-Glycyrrhetinic Acid Attenuates H2O2-Induced Oxidative Damage and Apoptosis in Intestinal Epithelial Cells via Activating the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway" Antioxidants 13, no. 4: 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13040468

APA Style

Ma, C., Wang, F., Zhu, J., Wang, S., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Zhao, Q., Qin, Y., Si, W., & Zhang, J. (2024). 18Beta-Glycyrrhetinic Acid Attenuates H2O2-Induced Oxidative Damage and Apoptosis in Intestinal Epithelial Cells via Activating the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway. Antioxidants, 13(4), 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13040468

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop