Next Article in Journal
Active Packaging Film Developed by Incorporating Starch Aldehyde–Quercetin Conjugate into SPI Matrix
Previous Article in Journal
Hepatic Oxidative Stress and Cell Death Influenced by Dietary Lipid Levels in a Fresh Teleost
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phosphatidylserine Counteracts the High Stocking Density-Induced Stress Response, Redox Imbalance and Immunosuppression in Fish Megalobrama ambylsephala
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/antiox13070809
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Excessive Replacement of Fish Meal by Soy Protein Concentrate Resulted in Inhibition of Growth, Nutrient Metabolism, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Capacity, and Intestinal Development in Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides)

by
Hualiang Liang
1,
Mingchun Ren
1,*,
Lu Zhang
2,*,
Haifeng Mi
2,
Heng Yu
1,3,
Dongyu Huang
1,
Jiaze Gu
3 and
Tao Teng
2
1
Key Laboratory of Integrated Rice-Fish Farming Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi 214081, China
2
Tongwei Agricultural Development Co., Ltd., Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Healthy Culture of Aquatic Livestock and Poultry, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Healthy Aquaculture Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610093, China
3
Wuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi 214081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2024, 13(7), 809; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13070809 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 May 2024 / Revised: 27 June 2024 / Accepted: 1 July 2024 / Published: 4 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Antioxidants and Aquatic Animal Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study investigated the effects of replacing 0% (SPC0), 25% (SPC25), 50% (SPC50), 75% (SPC75), and 100% (SPC100) of fish meal (FM) with soy protein concentrate (SPC) on the growth, nutritional metabolism, antioxidant capacity, and inflammatory factors in juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) (17.03 ± 0.01 g). After 56 days of culturing, various growth parameters including FW, WGR, and SGR were not significantly different among SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups; however, they were significantly higher than those in SPC75 and SPC100 groups. Conversely, significantly lower FCR were determined for the SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups compared with that for the SPC100 group; specifically, no significant difference among SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups was found. Moreover, compared with SPC75 and SPC100 groups, a significantly higher FI was observed in the SPC0 group, whereas a significantly lower SR was observed in SPC100 compared with that in SPC0 and SPC25 groups. Compared with the SPC0 group, significantly lower mRNA levels of tor, rps6, 4ebp1, pparγ, and fas were found in SPC75 and SPC100. Additionally, the mRNA levels of cpt were significantly higher in SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups than in SPC75 and SPC100 groups. Moreover, the mRNA levels of scd and acc remained unchanged for all the groups. Replacement of FM with SPC did not significantly affect the mRNA levels of gk, pk, and pepck. Compared with the SPC0 group, significantly decreased activities of CAT were observed in the SPC50, SPC75, and SPC100 groups, and significantly decreased activities of GSH-Px were observed in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups. In addition, significantly lower activity of SOD was observed in SPC100 compared with the other groups. Moreover, compared with the other groups, the SPC75 and SPC100 groups had significantly decreased and increased contents of GSH and MDA, respectively, while significantly lower mRNA levels of nrf2, cat, sod, and gsh-px were found in SPC50, SPC75, and SPC100; however, significantly higher mRNA levels of keap1 were observed in SPC75 and SPC100 groups. Additionally, significantly higher mRNA levels of il-8 and nf-κb were found in the SPC50, SPC75, and SPC100 groups compared with the SPC0 group. Conversely, significantly lower mRNA levels of il-10 and significantly higher mRNA levels of tnf-α were found in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups compared with the other groups. Compared with the SPC0 group, mucosal thickness and villus height were significantly decreased in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups. Collectively, SPC replacing 50% FM did not affect its growth of juvenile largemouth bass. However, SPC replacing 50% or more FM might inhibit antioxidant capacity and immune capacity to even threaten the SR, resulting in impaired intestinal development in replacing FM level of 75% or more.

1. Introduction

Sustainable aquaculture ensures food security by providing high-quality protein worldwide [1]. Compared with 2015, aquatic feed production is expected to increase by 33% by 2025 [2]. Therefore, reducing the use of raw materials in feed production is crucial for ensuring the sustainable development of the aquaculture industry [2,3]. The growth and health of fish are largely affected by the availability of adequate nutrients irrespective of the farming system used [4]. Alternatively, the quality of the main protein source in the feed affects the nutritional value of fish [5]. In aquaculture, fish meal (FM) is considered a high-quality protein source due to the balanced composition of amino acids, protein content, antinutritional factors, unsaturated fatty acids, and so on [6]. However, FM is a majorly unsustainable ingredient in aquatic feed due to the overfishing of the ocean and its rising cost resulting from the continuous development of the aquaculture industry [3]. Moreover, there are limited or no prospects for increasing FM production in the future [7]. Nevertheless, inconsistency in the supply and price of FM pose considerable risks; therefore, identification, development, and utilization of FM alternatives remain a high-priority strategy for risk management in sustainable aquaculture development [8].
Soybean protein concentrate (SPC) is obtained by extracting defatted soybean flakes using water, ethanol, or methanol, and it has digestible protein and energy with better palatability compared to soybean meal; therefore, it is considered a quality protein source to replace FM [9]. In addition, most of the antinutritional factors of SPC are inactivated or removed [10,11]. Some studies have found that SPC could successfully replace part of FM in the feed of aquatic animals, such as rice field eel (Monopterus albus) [12], golden crucian carp (Cyprinus carpio × Carassius auratus) [13], Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) [14], golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus) [15], Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) [16], Totoaba (Totoaba macdonaldi) [17], red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) [18], and Florida pompano (Trachinotus carolinus) [19], suggesting the potential of SPC to replace FM in fish feed. However, excessive replacement of FM with SPC inhibited the growth, feed utilization, and feeding of the fish to even risk its survival rate [20,21,22]. The underlying mechanism could be plant-based protein-mediated inhibition of TOR, signaling transduction and downregulation of lipolysis-related factors, thereby inducing liver metabolic disorders and inhibition of metabolism [23,24]. Hence, it is important to determine the replacement proportion of FM with SPC in aquatic animal feed.
The healthy properties of soybeans are attributed to the soy isoflavones [25,26] and their metabolites which are capable of exerting anti-inflammatory effects [27]. Bitzer et al. [28] reported that SPC had a cellular protective role in vitro, alleviating the severity of inflammation and loss of intestinal barrier function in vivo. However, plant protein sources widely used in feed could induce intestinal inflammation in carnivorous fish [29,30]. The replacement of 20% FM with SPC did not affect the intestinal health of the fish; however, replacement above 40% negatively impacted the intestinal morphology-related indicators such as microvilli length, causing obvious symptoms of enteritis in pearl gentian groupers (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂) [31]. Furthermore, the partial replacement of FM with SPC was beneficial for improving the serum antioxidant capacity in rice field eels [12]. Zhu et al. [13] demonstrated that when SPC replaced 40% FM, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde (MDA) content were not significantly affected in golden crucian carp (Cyprinus carpio × Carassius auratus); however, a high proportion of SPC replacing FM could lead to decreased enzymes activities of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and catalase (CAT) in hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂) [32] and decreased enzymes activities of GSH-Px and total superoxide dismutase in starry flounder (Platichthys stellatus) [20].
Largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) is a native of North America. Due to its rapid growth rate, wide temperature tolerance, versatility in adapting to different conditions, and attractiveness as a food source, it has been widely cultivated in China [33] and other parts of the world [34]. As a carnivorous fish species, largemouth bass has a high demand for FM, constituting about 40–55% of dry matter [35,36]. SPC has immense potential in replacing FM and has been applied to other aquatic animals with good results [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]; however, research information on largemouth bass is insufficient. Hence, this experiment was designed to study the effects of the replacement of FM with SPC on the growth, nutritional metabolism, antioxidant status, and inflammatory factors of juvenile largemouth bass.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Diets

A total of five feed groups were designed as SPC0, SPC25, SPC50, SPC75, and SPC100 replacing 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of FM with SPC in the feed, respectively (Table 1). The main protein sources, including FM, SPC, soybean meal, and corn protein meal, were sieved through a screen size of 0.18 mm before meal preparation with sequential mixing of all the raw materials according to our previously reported method [37].

2.2. Culture Experiment

Largemouth bass was procured from the Freshwater Fisheries Research Center (FFRC) followed by the culture experiment at the FFRC base. The fish were acclimatized for two weeks before the breeding experiment. After 24 h of fasting, 300 fish (17.03 ± 0.01 g) were divided into 15 cages with 20 fish per cage by the randomness principle. They were fed twice a day (at 6:30 and 18:30) until they no longer surfaced to feed. The water quality conditions were water temperature of 24–29 °C with dissolved oxygen ≥6 mg/L (pH 7.4–8.0), respectively.

2.3. Sample Collection

At day 56 of the breeding experiment, fish were fasted for 24 h followed by counting and weighing to determine the growth parameters. Three fish were randomly selected in each cage and anesthetized (100 mg/L MS-222) to collect the liver and intestine samples, which were stored separately in cryopreservation tubes and immediately placed in liquid nitrogen for freezing. Thereafter, the samples were kept in the refrigerator at −80 °C for further use. In addition, the intestine tissues were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining analysis.

2.4. Experimental Determination Method

The experimental feed composition and whole fish components were measured as described by AOAC [38] and our previous study [39]. Briefly, the sample was dried in an oven at 105 °C to a constant weight for testing the moisture level, and the dried sample was ground into a powder for further analysis. The crude protein was quantified by the Kjeldahl nitrogen determination method on an automatic instrument (Haineng K1100, Jinan Haineng Instrument Co., Ltd., Jinan, China). The crude lipid in the sample was extracted by the Soxhlet extraction method in an automatic fat analyzer (Haineng SOX606, Jinan Haineng Instrument Co., Ltd., China). The ash content was analyzed at 550 °C for 5 h by burning in a Muffle furnace (XL-2A, Hangzhou Zhuochi Instrument Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). Additionally, energy in the feed was measured using an oxygen bomb calorimeter (IKA C6000, Stauffen, Germany). The activities of intestinal antioxidant enzymes and the levels of MDA and glutathione (GSH) were detected using a kit following our previous method [40]. In brief, the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), CAT, and GSH-Px were tested by hydroxylamine method, ammonium molybdenum acid method, and colorimetric method, respectively. The levels of GSH and MDA were tested by microplate method and thiobarbituric acid method, respectively. Assay kits purchased from Jian Cheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China).
The intestinal tissue samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for more than 48 h. After dehydration in the alcohol gradient, samples were embedded in wax, followed by sectioning and cooling at −20 °C in a refrigerator. The frozen sections were brought to room temperature, and the section of the intestine was performed through the following steps: fixation by 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydration by gradient alcohol and methyl salicylate clearing, paraffin embedding, slicing, staining, etc. Finally, pathological changes in intestine were analyzed with a Zeiss microscope (Axioplan 2, Oberkochen, Germany). The specific method can be found in our previous study [41].
Next, RNA was extracted from the liver and intestine samples by RNAiso Plus (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) reagent. The A260/280 value of 1.8–2.0 served as a standard for further experiments by using the NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer. The primers were synthesized by Shengong Bioengineering Co., LTD (Shanghai, China). CFX96 Touch (Bio-Rad, Singapore) was used for quantitative real-time PCR detection. The β-actin gene was selected as the reference gene to calculate mRNA levels using the standard curve method [42] and the gene expression levels were further standardized. The primers for gene amplification are shown in Table 2.

2.5. Data Analysis

SPSS (20.0) was used for one-way ANOVA, and the method of Tukey was used to analyze the significant difference among all groups (p < 0.05). Results were expressed as mean ± standard error, with different superscript letters representing significant differences (p ˂ 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance

Table 3 shows the results of growth performance. Various growth parameters including FW, WGR, and SGR were not significantly different among SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups (p > 0.05); however, they were significantly higher than those in SPC75 and SPC100 groups (p < 0.05). Conversely, significantly lower FCR was determined for the SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups compared with that for the SPC100 group (p < 0.05); specifically, no significant difference among SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups was found (p > 0.05). Moreover, compared with SPC75 and SPC100 groups, a significantly higher FI and SR was observed in the SPC0 group (p < 0.05).

3.2. Whole Fish Composition

The results of whole fish composition revealed no significant differences in the whole fish composition in the groups (p > 0.05; Table 4).

3.3. The mRNA Expression of Protein Metabolism-Related Genes in the Liver

Results revealed no significant differences between SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups in the mRNA levels of tor, rps6, and 4ebp1 (p > 0.05) (Figure 1a–c); however, significantly lower mRNA levels of those were found in SPC75 and SPC100 compared with the other groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 1a–c).

3.4. The mRNA Expression of Lipid and Glucose Metabolism-Related Genes in the Liver

The SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups revealed no significant differences in the mRNA levels of pparγ and fas (p > 0.05), which were significantly lower than those in the other groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 2a,b). Additionally, the mRNA levels of cpt were significantly higher in SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups than in SPC75 and SPC100 groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 2c). Moreover, the mRNA levels of scd and acc remained unchanged for all the groups (p > 0.05) (Figure 2d,e). Replacement of FM with SPC did not significantly affect the mRNA levels of gk, pk, and pepck (p > 0.05) (Figure 2f–h).

3.5. Intestinal Antioxidant Parameters

Compared with the SPC0 group, significantly decreased activities of CAT were observed in the SPC50, SPC75, and SPC100 groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 3a), and significantly decreased activities of GSH-Px were observed in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 3b). In addition, significantly lower activity of SOD was observed in SPC100 compared with the other groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 3c). Moreover, compared with the other groups, the SPC75 and SPC100 groups had significantly decreased and increased contents of GSH and MDA, respectively (p < 0.05) (Figure 3d,e).

3.6. The mRNA Expression of Antioxidant Genes in the Intestine

Compared with the SPC0 group, significantly lower mRNA levels of nrf2, cat, sod, and gsh-px were found in SPC50, SPC75, and SPC100 (p < 0.05) (Figure 4a,c–e); however, significantly higher mRNA levels of keap1 were observed in SPC75 and SPC100 groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 4b).

3.7. The mRNA Expression of Inflammatory Response-Related Genes in the Intestine

Compared with the SPC0 group, significantly higher mRNA levels of il-8 and nf-κb were found in the SPC50, SPC75, and SPC100 groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 5a–c). Conversely, significantly lower mRNA levels of il-10 and significantly higher mRNA levels of tnf-α were found in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups compared with the other groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 5d).

3.8. Intestinal Morphology

Compared with the SPC0 group, mucosal thickness and villus height were significantly decreased in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups (p < 0.05; Figure 6).

4. Discussion

In the study, varying concentrations of SPC (0%, 25%, and 50%) did not affect growth-performance-related parameters, including FW, WGR, SGR, FCR, FI, and SR. This is consistent with the previous findings of a study on largemouth bass by Cui et al. [45]. Metochis et al. [46] found that replacing 35% of FM with SPC improved the growth performance of Atlantic salmon significantly, indicating the potential of SPC in replacing FM in fish feed. However, when SPC replaced 60% FM in the feed, the growth was significantly decreased, while the FCR was significantly increased [47]. Our study has shown similar results where significant inhibition of the growth and feed utilization of juvenile largemouth bass was observed when SPC replaced 75% or higher proportion of FM. Therefore, it is evident that only a specific proportion of FM should be replaced with SPC as excessive SPC negatively impacts fish growth, feed utilization, and SR. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the whole body composition between the groups, which was consistent with the previous studies of largemouth bass [45].
Protein source replacement of FM can affect the protein synthesis in largemouth bass [41,48]. Hay and Sonenberg [49] showed that the TOR signaling pathway affects protein synthesis and controls cell growth. Our results demonstrated that SPC75 and SPC100 groups inhibited the mRNA levels of tor, rps6, and 4ebp1 in the liver relative to other groups, suggesting that at 75% or higher proportion of SPC replacing FM, the expression of the TOR signaling pathway-related genes would be inhibited, thereby reducing the protein synthesis. Similar results were demonstrated in previous studies when high levels of plant protein supplementation in feed reduced mRNA levels of core genes of the TOR signaling pathway [50]. The inhibition of the TOR signaling pathway and protein synthesis could also describe the decreased growth of largemouth bass after feeding SPC75 and SPC100 diets. In addition, FM replacement with other protein sources will affect the lipid metabolism in fish [51]. Our study showed that the mRNA levels of fas and pparγ (related to lipid synthesis) were significantly upregulated in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups, while those of cpt (related to lipid decomposition) were significantly downregulated. Alternatively, the replacement of FM with 75% or more SPC might limit lipolysis in largemouth bass by upregulating lipid synthesis and downregulating lipolysis-related genes, thereby causing fat accumulation. In Japanese perch (Lateolabrax japonicas), feeding a whole plant protein diet could cause fatty liver [52]. In summary, this study revealed that a 75% or higher proportion of SPC replacing FM significantly downregulated the expression of genes related to protein anabolism and lipolysis, thereby affecting the nutritional metabolic capacity of fish and inducing liver metabolic disorders. This might be the possible reason for the significantly decreased growth performance and feed utilization of largemouth bass fed with SPC75 and SPC100 diets. Previous studies on red sea bream (Pagrus major) have also reported that FM-free feed with SPC resulted in poor nutrient utilization and growth inhibition in fish [53].
Furthermore, GSH-Px, CAT, and SOD are the main antioxidant enzymes in fish [54]. GSH balances redox reactions by eliminating excess ROS, thereby protecting cells from oxidative stress [55]. Our results showed that significantly decreased activities of CAT were observed in the SPC50, SPC75, and SPC100 groups, and significantly decreased activities of GSH-Px and contents of GSH were observed in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups. In addition, significantly lower activity of SOD was observed in SPC100 compared with the other groups. In addition, MDA, a lipid peroxidation product, is an important index to measure cell damage and biotoxicity [56]. Our results showed significantly increased levels of MDA in the groups of SPC75 and SPC100, which was consistent with the previous studies. SPC replacing 60% or higher proportion of FM decreased SOD activity in the serum of starry flounder, and GSH-Px activity was significantly decreased when SPC replaced 80% and 100% of FM, which also presented lower MDA level in serum [20]. Moreover, the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their related mRNA levels are correlated [57]. The Nrf2 system could regulate the expression of antioxidant genes in fish [58]. We observed that significantly lower mRNA levels of nrf2, cat, sod, and gsh-px were found in SPC50, SPC75, and SPC100 and significantly higher mRNA levels of keap1 were observed in SPC75 and SPC100 groups. These results showed that SPC replacing 50% or more of FM could significantly decrease the intestinal antioxidant capacity of largemouth bass. In a similar study, when SPC replaced 60% of FM, the antioxidant capacity was significantly restrained in golden crucian carp [13]. In addition, our results showed that replacing 50% of FM with SPC did not affect SOD and GSH-Px activities in the intestine of largemouth bass; however, at a replacement ratio of 25%, GSH levels were significantly increased, which might be related to the presence of soybean isoflavones in SPC. Yang et al. [59] found that appropriate supplementation level of soybean isoflavones to the feed could increase the levels of GSH, SOD, and CAT in the muscle of grass carp while downregulating and upregulating the mRNA levels of keap1 and nrf2, respectively. Zhou et al. [60] also found that feed supplemented with an appropriate concentration of soy isoflavones could increase the SOD and CAT activities in golden pompano.
Conversely, the decreased FM content in feed can reduce the antioxidant capacity of fish, leading to intestinal inflammation [52]. Our results demonstrated that significantly higher mRNA levels of il-8 and nf-κb were found in the SPC50, SPC75, and SPC100 groups and significantly lower mRNA levels of il-10 and significantly higher mRNA levels of tnf-α were found in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups. These results indicated that high levels of replacement FM through SPC might cause inflammation. Similarly, in pearl gentian groupers, replacement of 20% FM with SPC did not affect il-10 and tnf-α significantly; however, significantly lower mRNA levels of anti-inflammatory factors and higher levels of proinflammatory factors were observed at 40% SPC [31]. Zhang et al. [52] found that Japanese seabass fed on whole plant protein feed caused inflammation. Chen et al. [61] also reported that 75% FM replaced with SPC in the diet of hybrid grouper caused inflammation in the fish intestines. Collectively, these findings suggested that a large proportion of SPC replacing FM might lead to an intestinal inflammatory response in largemouth bass, causing intestinal damage. Moreover, the morphology and structure of the intestine are critical for maintaining normal function and nutrient absorption [62,63,64]. Our results did not show any changes in the intestinal mucosal thickness and villus height in the SPC0, SPC25, and SPC50 groups; however, significant decreases in these parameters were found in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups relative to the SPC0 group. This might have resulted from the lack of active substances such as small peptides [65], which are abundantly present in FM and necessary for intestinal development and health; therefore, a significant reduction in FM decreased villous height in the intestines of largemouth bass. However, our results showed that reduced intestinal mucosal thickness and villi height in the SPC75 and SPC100 groups might cause malabsorption of nutrients in fish, thereby leading to slow growth of largemouth bass.

5. Conclusions

SPC replacing 50% FM in the feed did not affect growth. Furthermore, SPC replacing 75% or more FM could inhibit protein synthesis by lowing the gene expressions of tor, rps6, and 4ebp1, and might limit lipolysis in largemouth bass by upregulating lipid synthesis and downregulating lipolysis-related genes including pparγ, fas, and cpt, while there was no effect on the expression of genes related to glucose metabolism including gk, pk, and pepck. However, SPC replacing 50% or more FM might inhibit antioxidant capacity and immune capacity by regulating antioxidant enzyme activity and gene expressions. Furthermore, SPC replacing 75% or more FM could reduce the thickness of intestinal mucosa and villus height.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, H.L. and H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.; writing—review and editing, M.R. and L.Z.; project administration, M.R.; methodology, H.M. and T.T.; investigation, D.H. and J.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2023YFD2400601), the earmarked fund for CARS (CARS-46), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102806), and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, CAFS (NO. 2024JBFR01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to Management Rule of Laboratory Animals (Chinese Order No. 676 of the State Council, revised 1 March 2017). The study was approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of the Freshwater Fisheries Research Center (LAECFFRC-2023-05-13).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Lu Zhang, Haifeng Mi, and Tao Teng are employed by Tongwei Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest. Lu Zhang made important contributions to the revision of the draft manuscript. Haifeng Mi and Tao Teng made important contributions to experimental technique.

References

  1. Boyd, C.E.; McNevin, A.A.; Davis, R.P. The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply. Food Secur. 2022, 14, 805–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Salin, K.R.; Arun, V.V.; Mohanakumaran Nair, C.; Tidwell, J.H. Sustainable Aquafeed. In Sustainable Aquaculture. Applied Environmental Science and Engineering for a Sustainable Future; Hai, F., Visvanathan, C., Boopathy, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gasco, L.; Gai, F.; Maricchiolo, G.; Genovese, L.; Ragonese, S.; Bottari, T.; Caruso, G. Fishmeal Alternative Protein Sources for Aquaculture Feeds. In Feeds for the Aquaculture Sector; Springer Briefs in Molecular Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tacon, A.G.J.; Metian, M. Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: Trends and future prospects. Aquaculture 2008, 285, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Glencross, B.D.; Booth, M.; Allan, G.L. A feed is only as good as its ingredients—A review of ingredient evaluation strategies for aquaculture feeds. Aquac. Nutr. 2007, 13, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Olsen, R.L.; Hasan, M.R. A limited supply of fishmeal: Impact on future increases in global aquaculture production. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 27, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture-Sustainability in Action in the State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA); FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hardy, R.W. Utilization of plant proteins in fish diets: Effects of global demand and supplies of fishmeal. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, 770–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bauer, W.; Prentice-Hernandez, C.; Tesser, M.B.; Wasielesky, W., Jr.; Poersch, L.H.S. Substitution of fishmeal with microbial floc meal and soy protein concentrate in diets for the pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 2012, 342–343, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mambrini, M.; Roem, A.J.; Carvèdi, J.P.; Lallès, J.P.; Kaushik, S.J. Effects of replacing fish meal with soy protein concentrate and of DL-methionine supplementation in high-energy, extruded diets on the growth and nutrient utilization of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 77, 2990–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lusas, E.W.; Riaz, M.N. Soy protein products: Processing and use. J. Nutr. 1995, 125 (Suppl. 3), 573S–580S. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, J.Z.; Zhong, L.; Peng, M.; Chu, W.Y.; Liu, Z.P.; Dai, Z.Y.; Hu, Y. Replacement of fish meal with soy protein concentrate in diet of juvenile rice field eel Monopterus albus. Aquac. Rep. 2019, 15, 100235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, R.; Li, L.; Li, M.; Yu, Z.; Wang, H.H.; Wu, L.F. The effects of substituting fish meal with soy protein concentrate on growth performance, antioxidant capacity and intestinal histology in juvenile golden crucian carp, Cyprinus carpio × Carassius auratus. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 18, 100435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yoo, G.; Choi, W.; Bae, J.; Yu, H.; Lee, S.; Bai, S.C. Effects on Growth and Body Composition to Soy Protein Concentrate as a Fishmeal Replacement in Coho Salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. Korean J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2021, 54, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Y.; Han, H.; Qin, J.; Wang, Y. Replacement of fishmeal by soy protein concentrate with taurine supplementation in diets for golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus). Aquac. Nutr. 2015, 21, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hartviksen, M.; Bakke, A.M.; Vecino, J.G.; Ringø, E.; Krogdahl, Å. Evaluation of the effect of commercially available plant and animal protein sources in diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): Digestive and metabolic investigations. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 40, 1621–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Trejo-Escamilla, I.; Galaviz, M.A.; Flores-Ibarra, M.; González, C.A.Á.; López, L.M. Replacement of fishmeal by soya protein concentrate in the diets of Totoaba macdonaldi (Gilbert, 1890) juveniles: Effect on the growth performance, in vitro digestibility, digestive enzymes and the haematological and biochemistry parameters. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 4038–4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rossi, W.; Moxely, D.; Buentello, A.; Pohlenz, C.; Gatlin, D.M. Replacement of fishmeal with novel plant feedstuffs in the diet of red drum Sciaenops ocellatus: An assessment of nutritional value. Aquac. Nutr. 2013, 19, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Quintero, H.E.; Davis, D.A.; Rhodes, M.A. Soy protein concentrate as an alternative ingredient in Florida pompano (Trachinotus carolinus) diets. J. Appl. Aquac. 2012, 24, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, P.Y.; Wang, J.Y.; Song, Z.D.; Zhang, L.M.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.X.; Pan, Q. Evaluation of soy protein concentrate as a substitute for fishmeal in diets for juvenile starry flounder (Platichthys stellatus). Aquaculture 2015, 448, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hien, T.T.T.; Phu, T.M.; Tu, T.L.C.; Tien, N.V.; Duc, P.M.; Bengtson, D.A. Effects of replacing fish meal with soya protein concentrate on growth, feed efficiency and digestibility in diets for snakehead, Channa striata. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 3174–3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Freitas, L.E.L.; Nunes, A.J.P.; do Carmo Sá, M.V. Growth and feeding responses of the mutton snapper, Lutjanus analis (Cuvier 1828), fed on diets with soy protein concentrate in replacement of Anchovy fish meal. Aquac. Res. 2011, 42, 866–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Deng, J.M.; Mai, K.S.; Ai, Q.H.; Zhang, W.B.; Wang, X.J.; Xu, W.; Liufu, Z.G. Effects of replacing fish meal with soy protein concentrate on feed intake and growth of juvenile Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture 2006, 258, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, X.; Chi, S.Y.; Li, S.; Cheng, X.L.; Gao, W.H.; Xu, Q.Q.; Zhang, W.B.; Zhou, X.Q. Substitution of fish meal with enzyme-treated soybean in diets for juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Aquac. Nutr. 2021, 27, 1569–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mace, T.A.; Ware, M.B.; King, S.A.; Loftus, S.; Farren, M.R.; McMichael, E.; Scoville, S.; Geraghty, C.; Young, G.; Carson, W.E., 3rd; et al. Soy isoflavones and their metabolites modulate cytokine-induced natural killer cell function. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sakai, T.; Kogiso, M. Soy isoflavones and immunity. J. Med. Investig. 2008, 55, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nagata, C. Soy intake and chronic disease risk: Findings from prospective cohort studies in Japan. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 75, 890–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bitzer, Z.T.; Wopperer, A.L.; Chrisfield, B.J.; Tao, L.; Cooper, T.K.; Vanamala, J.; Elias, R.J.; Hayes, J.E.; Lambert, J.D. Soy protein concentrate mitigates markers of colonic inflammation and loss of gut barrier function in vitro and in vivo. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 40, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Urán, P.A.; Gonçalves, A.A.; Taverne-Thiele, J.J.; Schrama, J.W.; Verreth, J.A.J.; Rombout, J.H.W.M. Soybean meal induces intestinal inflammation in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008, 25, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yin, B.; Liu, H.Y.; Tan, B.P.; Dong, X.H.; Chi, S.Y.; Yang, Q.H.; Zhang, S.; Chen, L.Q. Cottonseed protein concentrate (CPC) suppresses immune function in different intestinal segments of hybrid grouper ♀ Epinephelus fuscoguttatus × ♂ Epinephelus lanceolatu via TLR-2/MyD88 signaling pathways. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 81, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, W.; Tan, B.P.; Deng, J.M.; Yang, Q.H.; Chi, S.Y.; Pang, A.B.; Xin, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.T. Soybean protein concentrate causes enteritis in juvenile pearl gentian groupers (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂). Anim. Nutr. 2023, 12, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, J.X.; Liang, D.Z.; Yang, Q.H.; Tan, B.P.; Dong, X.H.; Chi, S.Y.; Liu, H.Y.; Zhang, S. The effect of partial replacement of fish meal by soy protein concentrate on growth performance, immune responses, gut morphology and intestinal inflammation for juvenile hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 98, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bai, J.J.; Lutz-Carrillo, D.J.; Quan, Y.C.; Liang, S.X. Taxonomic status and genetic diversity of cultured largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides in China. Aquaculture 2008, 278, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Maezono, Y.; Miyashita, T. Community-level impacts induced by introduced largemouth bass and bluegill in farm ponds in Japan. Biol. Conserv. 2002, 109, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, D.; Wu, Y.B.; Lin, Y.Y.; Chen, J.M.; Karrow, N.; Ren, X.; Wang, Y. Dietary protein and lipid requirements for juvenile largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2017, 48, 782–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gu, J.Z.; Liang, H.L.; Ge, X.P.; Xia, D.; Pan, L.K.; Mi, H.F.; Ren, M.C. A study of the potential effect of yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) substitution for fish meal on growth, immune and antioxidant capacity in juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 120, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liang, H.L.; Xu, G.C.; Xu, P.; Zhu, J.; Li, S.L.; Ren, M.C. Dietary histidine supplementation maintained amino acid homeostasis and reduced hepatic fat accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass, Mieropterus salmoides. Aquac. Nutr. 2022, 2022, 4034922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ren, M.C.; Habte-Tsion, H.M.; Liu, B.; Miao, L.H.; Ge, X.P.; Xie, J.; Liang, H.L.; Zhou, Q.L.; Pan, L.K. Dietary leucine level affects growth performance, whole body composition, plasma parameters and relative expression of TOR and TNF-α in juvenile blunt snout bream, Megalobrama amblycephala. Aquaculture 2015, 448, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liang, H.L.; Xu, P.; Xu, G.C.; Zhang, L.; Huang, D.Y.; Ren, M.C.; Zhang, L. Histidine Deficiency Inhibits Intestinal Antioxidant Capacity and Induces Intestinal Endoplasmic-Reticulum Stress, Inflammatory Response, Apoptosis, and Necroptosis in Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides). Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, M.Y.; Liang, H.L.; Xie, J.; Chao, W.; Zou, F.Q.; Ge, X.P.; Ren, M.C. Diet supplemented with a novel Clostridium autoethanogenum protein have a positive effect on the growth performance, antioxidant status and immunity in juvenile Jian carp (Cyprinus carpio var. Jian). Aquac. Rep. 2021, 19, 100572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stone, D.A.; Gaylord, T.G.; Johansen, K.A.; Overturf, K.; Sealey, W.M.; Hardy, R.W. Evaluation of the effects of repeated fecal collection by manual stripping on the plasma cortisol levels, TNF-α gene expression, and digestibility and availability of nutrients from hydrolyzed poultry and egg meal by rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Aquaculture 2008, 275, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, F.; Xu, P.; Xu, G.; Huang, D.; Zhang, L.; Ren, M.; Liang, H. Dietary valine affects growth performance, intestinal immune and antioxidant capacity in juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2023, 295, 115541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xv, Z.C.; He, G.L.; Wang, X.L.; Hao, S.; Chen, Y.J.; Lin, S.M. Mulberry leaf powder ameliorate high starch-induced hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation in fish model. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2021, 278, 115012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cui, Z.H.; Zhang, J.Y.; Ren, X.; Wang, Y. Replacing dietary fish meal improves ecosystem services of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) farming. Aquaculture 2022, 550, 737830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Metochis, C.P.; Spanos, I.; Auchinachie, N.; Crampton, V.O.; Bell, J.G.; Adams, A.; Thompson, K.D. The effects of increasing dietary levels of soy protein concentrate (SPC) on the immune responses and disease resistance (furunculosis) of vaccinated and non-vaccinated Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 59, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mohd Faudzi, N.; Yong, A.S.K.; Shapawi, R.; Senoo, S.; Biswas, A.; Takii, K. Soy protein concentrate as an alternative in replacement of fish meal in the feeds of hybrid grouper, brown-marbled grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus) × giant grouper (E. lanceolatus) juvenile. Aquac. Res. 2018, 49, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Irm, M.; Taj, S.; Jin, M.; Luo, J.X.; Andriamialinirina, H.J.T.; Zhou, Q.C. Effects of replacement of fish meal by poultry by-product meal on growth performance and gene expression involved in protein metabolism for juvenile black sea bream (Acanthoparus schlegelii). Aquaculture 2020, 528, 735544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hay, N.; Sonenberg, N. Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 1926–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zhou, Q.L.; Habte-Tsion, H.M.; Ge, X.P.; Xie, J.; Ren, M.C.; Liu, B.; Miao, L.H.; Pan, L.K. Graded replacing fishmeal with canola meal in diets affects growth and target of rapamycin pathway gene expression of juvenile blunt snout bream, Megalobrama amblycephala. Aquac. Nutr. 2018, 24, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Peng, K.; Mo, W.Y.; Xiao, H.F.; Wang, G.X.; Huang, Y.H. Effects of black soldier fly pulp on growth performance, histomorphology and lipid metabolism gene expression of Micropterus salmoides. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 20, 100737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, Y.; Chen, P.; Liang, X.F.; Han, J.; Wu, X.F.; Yang, Y.H.; Xue, M. Metabolic disorder induces fatty liver in Japanese seabass, Lateolabrax japonicas fed a full plant protein diet and regulated by cAMP-JNK/NF-κB-caspase signal pathway. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 90, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tola, S.; Fukada, H.; Masumoto, T. Effects of feeding a fish meal-free soy protein concentrate-based diet on the growth performance and nutrient utilization of red sea bream (Pagrus major). Aquac. Res. 2019, 50, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kohen, R.; Nyska, A. Invited review: Oxidation of biological systems: Oxidative stress phenomena, antioxidants, redox reactions, and methods for their quantification. Toxicol. Pathol. 2002, 30, 620–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chakravarthi, S.; Jessop, C.E.; Bulleid, N.J. The role of glutathione in disulphide bond formation and endoplasmic-reticulum-generated oxidative stress. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Parvez, S.; Raisuddin, S. Protein carbonyls: Novel biomarkers of exposure to oxidative stress-inducing pesticides in freshwater fish Channa punctata (Bloch). Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2005, 20, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fontagné-Dicharry, S.; Lataillade, E.; Surget, A.; Larroquet, L.; Cluzeaud, M.; Kaushik, S. Antioxidant defense system is altered by dietary oxidized lipid in first-feeding rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 2014, 424, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ma, Q. Role of nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013, 53, 401–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yang, B.; Jiang, W.D.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, Y.Y.; Jiang, J.; Kuang, S.Y.; Tang, L.; Tang, W.N.; Wang, S.W. Soybean isoflavones improve the health benefits, flavour quality indicators and physical properties of grass carp (Ctenopharygodon idella). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0209570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhou, C.P.; Lin, H.Z.; Ge, X.P.; Niu, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.X.; Huang, Z.; Yu, W.; Tan, X.H. The Effects of dietary soybean isoflavones on growth, innate immune responses, hepatic antioxidant abilities and disease resistance of juvenile golden pompano Trachinotus ovatus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 47, 1043–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Chen, Y.; Liu, W.K.; Ma, J.; Wang, Y.R.; Huang, H. Comprehensive physiological and transcriptomic analysis revealing the responses of hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀ × E. lanceolatus ♂) to the replacement of fish meal with soy protein concentrate. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 46, 2037–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gao, Y.; Han, F.; Huang, X.; Rong, Y.; Wang, Y. Changes in gut microbial populations, intestinal morphology, expression of tight junction proteins, and cytokine production between two pig breeds after challenge with Escherichia coli K88: A comparative study. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 5614–5625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fang, H.H.; Xie, J.J.; Liao, S.Y.; Guo, T.Y.; Xie, S.W.; Liu, Y.G.; Tian, S.Y.; Niu, J. Effects of dietary inclusion of shrimp paste on growth performance, digestive enzymes activities, antioxidant and immunological status and intestinal morphology of hybrid snakehead (Channa maculata ♀ × Channa argus ♂). Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 472899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Al-Fataftah, A.R.; Abdelqader, A. Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis on heat-stressed broilers performance, intestinal morphology and microflora composition. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 198, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yang, P.X.; Li, X.Q.; Song, B.W.; He, M.; Wu, C.Y.; Leng, X.J. The potential of Clostridium autoethanogenum, a new single cell protein, in substituting fish meal in the diet of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides): Growth, feed utilization and intestinal histology. Aquac. Fish. 2023, 8, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 13 00809 g001aAntioxidants 13 00809 g001b
Figure 1. The mRNA expression of protein metabolism-related genes in the liver: (a) tor; (b) rps6; (c) 4ebp1. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Figure 1. The mRNA expression of protein metabolism-related genes in the liver: (a) tor; (b) rps6; (c) 4ebp1. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Antioxidants 13 00809 g001aAntioxidants 13 00809 g001b
Antioxidants 13 00809 g002aAntioxidants 13 00809 g002b
Figure 2. The mRNA expression of lipid and glucose metabolism-related genes in the liver: (a) fas; (b) pparγ; (c) cpt; (d) acc; (e) scd; (f) gk; (g) pk; (h) pepck. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Figure 2. The mRNA expression of lipid and glucose metabolism-related genes in the liver: (a) fas; (b) pparγ; (c) cpt; (d) acc; (e) scd; (f) gk; (g) pk; (h) pepck. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Antioxidants 13 00809 g002aAntioxidants 13 00809 g002b
Antioxidants 13 00809 g003aAntioxidants 13 00809 g003b
Figure 3. Intestinal antioxidant parameters: (a) CAT; (b) GSH-Px; (c) SOD; (d) GSH; (e) MDA. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Figure 3. Intestinal antioxidant parameters: (a) CAT; (b) GSH-Px; (c) SOD; (d) GSH; (e) MDA. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Antioxidants 13 00809 g003aAntioxidants 13 00809 g003b
Antioxidants 13 00809 g004aAntioxidants 13 00809 g004b
Figure 4. The mRNA expression of antioxidant genes in the intestine: (a) nrf2; (b) keap1; (c) sod; (d) gsh-px; (e) cat. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Figure 4. The mRNA expression of antioxidant genes in the intestine: (a) nrf2; (b) keap1; (c) sod; (d) gsh-px; (e) cat. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Antioxidants 13 00809 g004aAntioxidants 13 00809 g004b
Antioxidants 13 00809 g005aAntioxidants 13 00809 g005b
Figure 5. The mRNA expression of inflammatory response-related genes in the intestine: (a) nf-κb; (b) il-8; (c) tnf-α; (d) il-10. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Figure 5. The mRNA expression of inflammatory response-related genes in the intestine: (a) nf-κb; (b) il-8; (c) tnf-α; (d) il-10. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Antioxidants 13 00809 g005aAntioxidants 13 00809 g005b
Antioxidants 13 00809 g006aAntioxidants 13 00809 g006b
Figure 6. Intestinal morphology. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Figure 6. Intestinal morphology. The different letters of means are significantly different.
Antioxidants 13 00809 g006aAntioxidants 13 00809 g006b
Table 1. Experimental formula (dry matter, %).
Table 1. Experimental formula (dry matter, %).
IngredientsSPC0SPC25SPC50SPC75SPC100
Soy protein concentrate 1011.523.134.746.3
Fish meal 14533.7522.511.250
Soybean meal 11212121212
corn gluten meal 11313131313
Cassava starch55555
Wheat flour55555
Rice bran3.363.363.363.363.36
Microcrystalline cellulose9.046.9044.5662.2850
Fish oil3.94.55.15.76.3
Vitamins premix 21111 1
Mineral premix 211111
Calcium dihydrogen phosphate1.22.23.24.25.2
Choline chloride0.50.50.50.50.5
Lysine 00.1690.3350.50.666
Methionine 00.1170.2340.350.467
Threonine000.0570.0850.113
Valine 000.0480.070.093
Proximate analysis (dry basis)
Crude protein (%)47.2147.0947.0546.8246.83
Crude lipids (%) 9.429.929.949.919.87
Gross energy (kJ/g)17.1316.9817.0117.0816.99
Note: 1 The crude protein and crude lipids levels of the raw material are shown below, respectively. Fish meal, 67.63% and 9.46% g; soy protein concentrate, 63% and 4.1%; soybean meal, 53.26% and 4.25%; corn gluten meal, 59.24% and 3.3%. These materials were obtained from Wuxi Tongwei feedstuffs Co., Ltd. (Wuxi, China) 2 Mineral premix and vitamins premix were obtained from HANOVE Animal Health Products (Wuxi, China).
Table 2. Experimental primer.
Table 2. Experimental primer.
GenesForward (5′-3′)Reverse (5′-3′)Primer Source
tor 1TTTGGAACCAAACCCCGTCAATCAGCTCACGGCAGTATCGXM_038723321.1
rps6 2TCCAGAGACTCGTGACACCTAGCTTGGCATACTCTGAGGCXM_038713349.1
4ebp1 3CCAGGATCATCTATGACCGAAAGTGCAGCGATATTGTTGTTGTTCXM_038703879.1
fas 4AGTTGAAGGCTGCTGATGGCTGTGGATGATGTTGGTXP_028423094.1
acc 5TTACATCGCAGCCAACAGCTCTCCACCTTCCTCTACAXP_022609673.1
scd 6CGATGCTGCTTCTTCACTGACACGGTTCTGCCATTAXM_038735580.1
cpt 7TTACCGTATGGCTATGACTGGGCTCCGATAACACCTCTXP_027141042.1
pparγ 8GAGTTCTCAGTCAAGTTCAACAATGTAGCACCGTCTCCTMK614721.1
gk 9CCCTTGTGGGCAGGAGAAAAACAACTGAGTCCTCCTTGCGXP_023260296.1
pk 10CACGCAACACTGGCATCATCTCGAAGCTCTCACATGCCTCMT431526.1
pepck 11GGCAAAACCTGGAAGCAAGGATAATGGCGTCGATGGGGACMT431525.1
nrf2 12CCACACGTGACTCTGATTTCTCTCCTCCATGACCTTGAAGCATTranscriptome data
cat 13CTATGGCTCTCACACCTTCTCCTCTACTGGCAGATTCTMK614708.1
sod 14CCCCACAACAAGAATCATGCTCTCAGCCTTCTCGTGGAMK614709.1
gsh-px 15ATGGCTCTCATGACTGATCCAAAGACCAACCAGGAACTTCTCAAAMK614713.1
keap1 16GCACCTAACCGTGGAACTCAACCAGTTTTAGCCAGTCATTGTTCC[43]
nf-κb 17AGAAGACGACTCGGGGATGAGCTTCTGCAGGTTCTGGTCT[44]
il-8 18GAGGGTACATGTCTGGGGGACCTTGAAGGTTTGTTCTTCATCGTXM_038713529.1
tnf-α 19CTTCGTCTACAGCCAGGCATCGTTTGGCACACCGACCTCACC[36]
il-10 20CGGCACAGAAATCCCAGAGCCAGCAGGCTCACAAAATAAACATCT[36]
β-actinATGCAGAAGGAGATCACAGCCTAGTATTTACGCTCAGGTGGGGAF253319.1
Note: 1 tor, target proteins rapamycin; 2 rps6, ribosomal protein S6 kinase; 3 4ebp1, eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1; 4 fas, fatty acid synthetase; 5 acc, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; 6 scd, stearoyl-CoA desaturase; 7 cpt, carnitine palmitoyl transferase; 8 pparγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ; 9 gk, glucokinase; 10 pk, pyruvate kinase; 11 pepck, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; 12 nrf2, nuclear factor E2 related factor 2; 13 cat, catalase; 14 sod, superoxide dismutase; 15 gsh-px, glutathione peroxidase; 16 keap1, Kelch-like ECH associated protein 1; 17 nf-κb, nuclear factor kappa B; 18 il-8, interleukin-8; 19 tnf-α tumor necrosis factor α; 20 il-10, interleukin-10.
Table 3. Growth performance.
Table 3. Growth performance.
GroupsIW (g) 1FW (g) 2WGR (%) 3SGR (%/d) 4FCR 5FI (g fish−1d−1) 6SR (%) 7
SPC017.07 ± 0.0258.38 ± 0.13 c242.08 ± 0.91 c2.20 ± 0.00 c1.40 ± 0.03 a0.52 ± 0.00 c96.67 ± 1.67 c
SPC2517.03 ± 0.0257.96 ± 0.75 c240.25 ± 4.17 c2.19 ± 0.02 c1.41 ± 0.04 a0.51 ± 0.01 bc95.00 ± 2.89 bc
SPC5017.02 ± 0.0257.18 ± 1.95 c236.06 ± 11.71 c2.16 ± 0.06 c1.54 ± 0.04 a0.50 ± 0.01 bc88.33 ± 1.67 abc
SPC7517.03 ± 0.0251.07 ± 0.63 b199.84 ± 3.66 b1.96 ± 0.02 b1.76 ± 0.12 ab0.48 ± 0.00 ab85.00 ± 2.89 ab
SPC10017.02 ± 0.0240.78 ± 1.31 a139.65 ± 7.76 a1.56 ± 0.06 a1.99 ± 0.13 b0.45 ± 0.01 a83.33 ± 1.67 a
Note: All data are expressed as mean ± standard error. Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). 1 IW, initial average weight. 2 FW, final average weight. 3 Weight gain rate (WGR, %) = 100 × (final body weight (g) − initial body weight (g))/initial body weight (g). 4 Specific growth rate (SGR, %/d) = 100 × ((Ln (final body weight (g)) − Ln (initial body weight (g)))/days). 5 Feed conversion ratio (FCR) = dry feed fed (g)/wet weight gain (g). 6 Feed intake rate (FI, g fish−1d−1) = dry feed fed (g)/((total initial weight (g) + total final weight (g))/2/days). 7 Survival rate (SR, %) = 100 × (survival fish number/total fish number).
Table 4. Whole fish composition.
Table 4. Whole fish composition.
GroupsMoisture (%)Ash (%)Lipids (%)Protein (%)
SPC071.72 ± 0.333.49 ± 0.126.94 ± 0.2316.59 ± 0.35
SPC2571.08 ± 0.324.18 ± 0.316.45 ± 0.3216.59 ± 0.37
SPC5071.64 ± 0.214.42 ± 0.366.47 ± 0.7816.92 ± 2.22
SPC7571.81 ± 0.294.14 ± 0.425.69 ± 0.2216.43 ± 2.11
SPC10072.42 ± 0.294.18 ± 0.305.05 ± 0.2116.27 ± 1.62
Note: All data are expressed as mean ± standard error.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, H.; Ren, M.; Zhang, L.; Mi, H.; Yu, H.; Huang, D.; Gu, J.; Teng, T. Excessive Replacement of Fish Meal by Soy Protein Concentrate Resulted in Inhibition of Growth, Nutrient Metabolism, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Capacity, and Intestinal Development in Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides). Antioxidants 2024, 13, 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13070809

AMA Style

Liang H, Ren M, Zhang L, Mi H, Yu H, Huang D, Gu J, Teng T. Excessive Replacement of Fish Meal by Soy Protein Concentrate Resulted in Inhibition of Growth, Nutrient Metabolism, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Capacity, and Intestinal Development in Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides). Antioxidants. 2024; 13(7):809. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13070809

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Hualiang, Mingchun Ren, Lu Zhang, Haifeng Mi, Heng Yu, Dongyu Huang, Jiaze Gu, and Tao Teng. 2024. "Excessive Replacement of Fish Meal by Soy Protein Concentrate Resulted in Inhibition of Growth, Nutrient Metabolism, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Capacity, and Intestinal Development in Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides)" Antioxidants 13, no. 7: 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13070809

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop