Next Article in Journal
B Cells Isolated from Individuals Who Do Not Respond to the HBV Vaccine Are Characterized by Higher DNA Methylation-Estimated Aging Compared to Responders
Previous Article in Journal
Vaccination with Tozimameran Induces T-Cell Activation, but Not Senescent or Exhaustive Alterations, in Kidney Transplant Recipients
 
 
Systematic Review
Peer-Review Record

Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Subunit Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Vaccines 2024, 12(8), 879; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12080879
by Yuhang Wu †, Yuqiong Lu †, Yuwei Bai, Bingde Zhu, Feng Chang *,‡ and Yun Lu *,‡
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Vaccines 2024, 12(8), 879; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12080879
Submission received: 22 June 2024 / Revised: 23 July 2024 / Accepted: 24 July 2024 / Published: 2 August 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

 

Manuscript titled "Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of Subunit Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials", by Wu et al, is self-explanatory on the intent and content. The manuscript is well written and to the point relevant to the results obtained with adequate background to highlight the need for this study.

 

The methodology (PRISMA) followed eliminates and narrows down the sample size during the screening process, pls provide explanation/details on the records excluded.

 

The table 1 needs to be submitted in a landscape orientation, current form is inconvenient to read. Table legend needs more explanation.

 

The text in the figures is not very clear to read. The figures are a mix of table and graph, can this be made more legible.

 

There should be a section in discussion on the limitations of methodology and finding of this study.

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

NA

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop