Next Article in Journal
Are We Facing a New Colposcopic Practice in the HPV Vaccination Era? Opportunities, Challenges, and New Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Proteome-Wide Mapping and Reverse Vaccinology Approaches to Design a Multi-Epitope Vaccine against Clostridium perfringens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis

by
Hanna Yolanda
1,2 and
Theerapong Krajaejun
3,*
1
Section for Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
2
Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta 14440, Indonesia
3
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2021, 9(10), 1080; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101080
Submission received: 20 July 2021 / Revised: 27 August 2021 / Accepted: 8 September 2021 / Published: 26 September 2021

Abstract

The fungus-like microorganism Pythium insidiosum causes pythiosis, a life-threatening infectious disease increasingly reported worldwide. Antimicrobial drugs are ineffective. Radical surgery is an essential treatment. Pythiosis can resume post-surgically. Immunotherapy using P. insidiosum antigens (PIA) has emerged as an alternative treatment. This review aims at providing up-to-date information of the immunotherapeutic PIA, with the focus on its history, preparation, clinical application, outcome, mechanism, and recent advances, in order to promote the proper use and future development of this treatment modality. P. insidiosum crude extract is the primary source of immunotherapeutic antigens. Based on 967 documented human and animal (mainly horses) pythiosis cases, PIA immunotherapy reduced disease morbidity and mortality. Concerning clinical outcomes, 19.4% of PIA-immunized human patients succumbed to vascular pythiosis instead of 41.0% in unimmunized cases. PIA immunotherapy may not provide an advantage in a local P. insidiosum infection of the eye. Both PIA-immunized and unimmunized horses with pythiosis showed a similar survival rate of ~70%; however, demands for surgical intervention were much lesser in the immunized cases (22.8% vs. 75.2%). The proposed PIA action involves switching the non-protective T-helper-2 to protective T-helper-1 mediated immunity. By exploring the available P. insidiosum genome data, synthetic peptides, recombinant proteins, and nucleic acids are potential sources of the immunotherapeutic antigens worth investigating. The PIA therapeutic property needs improvement for a better prognosis of pythiosis patients.
Keywords: pythiosis; Pythium insidiosum; antigen; treatment; immunotherapy pythiosis; Pythium insidiosum; antigen; treatment; immunotherapy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yolanda, H.; Krajaejun, T. History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101080

AMA Style

Yolanda H, Krajaejun T. History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis. Vaccines. 2021; 9(10):1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101080

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yolanda, Hanna, and Theerapong Krajaejun. 2021. "History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis" Vaccines 9, no. 10: 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101080

APA Style

Yolanda, H., & Krajaejun, T. (2021). History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis. Vaccines, 9(10), 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101080

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop