Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewaters and Other Aqueous Streams by Pressure-Driven Membrane Technologies: An Outlook on Reverse Osmosis, Nanofiltration, Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Potential from a Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Data Sources and Methodology
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Pressure-Driven Membrane Technologies for Heavy Metal Removal (1972–2023)
3.1.1. Publication Year, Document Type and Language of Publications
3.1.2. Publication Distribution of Countries and Institutions
3.1.3. Distribution of Output in Subject Categories and Journals
3.1.4. Most Frequently Cited Papers
3.1.5. Distribution Analysis of Author Keywords and Trending Topics of the Research
3.2. Bibliometric Network Analysis
3.3. Review of Hot Topics and Perspectives
3.3.1. Reverse Osmosis
3.3.2. Nanofiltration
3.3.3. Ultrafiltration
3.3.4. Microfiltration
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Londoño Franco, L.F.; Londoño Muñoz, P.T.; Muñoz Garcia, F.G. Los Riesgos de los Metales Pesados en la Salud Humana y Animal. Biotecnol. Sector Agropecu. Agroind. 2016, 14, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Zhou, M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Duan, C.; Wang, X.; Zhao, S.; Bai, X.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; et al. A Global Meta-Analysis of Heavy Metal(Loid)s Pollution in Soils near Copper Mines: Evaluation of Pollution Level and Probabilistic Health Risks. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 835, 155441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Ma, R.; Li, Z. Human Health Risk Assessment of Groundwater in Hetao Plain (Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 4669–4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendryx, M.; Zullig, K.J.; Luo, J. Impacts of Coal Use on Health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2019, 41, 397–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lebrón, A.M.W.; Torres, I.R.; Valencia, E.; Dominguez, M.L.; Garcia-Sanchez, D.G.; Logue, M.D.; Wu, J. The State of Public Health Lead Policies: Implications for Urban Health Inequities and Recommendations for Health Equity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thevenon, F.; Graham, N.D.; Chiaradia, M.; Arpagaus, P.; Wildi, W.; Poté, J. Local to Regional Scale Industrial Heavy Metal Pollution Recorded in Sediments of Large Freshwater Lakes in Central Europe (Lakes Geneva and Lucerne) over the Last Centuries. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 412–413, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.F.; Jiang, Y.; Shu, Y.; Hu, X.; Liu, L.; Luo, F. Effects of Mining Wastewater Discharges on Heavy Metal Pollution and Soil Enzyme Activity of the Paddy Fields. J. Geochemical Explor. 2014, 147, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, R.S.; Abuarab, M.E.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Baioumy, M.; Mokhtar, A. Assessment of Environmental and Toxicity Impacts and Potential Health Hazards of Heavy Metals Pollution of Agricultural Drainage Adjacent to Industrial Zones in Egypt. Chemosphere 2023, 318, 137872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alonso, E.; Santos, A.; Callejón, M.; Jiménez, J.C. Speciation as a Screening Tool for the Determination of Heavy Metal Surface Water Pollution in the Guadiamar River Basin. Chemosphere 2004, 56, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaskelevičius, B.; Lynikiene, V. Investigation of Influence of Lapės Landfill Leachate on Ground and Surface Water Pollution with Heavy Metals. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 2009, 17, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umer, M.I.; Abduljabar, P.A.; Hamid, N.A.M. Assessment of Ground Water Pollution by Heavy Metals and Anions in Kwashe Industrial Area, Duhok City, Kurdistan Region. Iraq. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 454, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.M.; Karim, M.R.; Zheng, X.; Li, X. Heavy Metal and Metalloid Pollution of Soil, Water and Foods in Bangladesh: A Critical Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Gojenko, B.; Yu, J.; Wei, L.; Luo, D.; Xiao, T. A Review of Water Pollution Arising from Agriculture and Mining Activities in Central Asia: Facts, Causes and Effects. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 291, 118209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ministerio de Medio Ambiente de Chile. Informe Consolidado Emisiones y Transferencias de Contaminantes 2021; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente de Chile: Santiago de Chile, Chile, 2023; ISBN 9789567204939.
- Zaimee, M.Z.A.; Sarjadi, M.S.; Rahman, M.L. Heavy Metals Removal from Water by Efficient Adsorbents. Water 2021, 13, 2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, H.; Min, X.; Tang, C.J.; Sillanpää, M.; Zhao, F. Recent Advances in Membrane Filtration for Heavy Metal Removal from Wastewater: A Mini Review. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 49, 103023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Beni, E.; Giurlani, W.; Fabbri, L.; Emanuele, R.; Santini, S.; Sarti, C.; Martellini, T.; Piciollo, E.; Cincinelli, A.; Innocenti, M. Graphene-Based Nanomaterials in the Electroplating Industry: A Suitable Choice for Heavy Metal Removal from Wastewater. Chemosphere 2022, 292, 133448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, E.S.; Roh, H.S.; Dev, S.; Khan, M.A.; Abou-Shanab, R.A.I.; Chang, S.W.; Jeon, B.H. Algae as a Green Technology for Heavy Metals Removal from Various Wastewater. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazrafshan, E.; Mohammadi, L.; Ansari-Moghaddam, A.; Mahvi, A.H. Heavy Metals Removal from Aqueous Environments by Electrocoagulation Process—A Systematic Review. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2015, 13, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagchi, S.; Behera, M. Assessment of Heavy Metal Removal in Different Bioelectrochemical Systems: A Review. J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 2020, 24, 04020010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrestha, R.; Ban, S.; Devkota, S.; Sharma, S.; Joshi, R.; Tiwari, A.P.; Kim, H.Y.; Joshi, M.K. Technological Trends in Heavy Metals Removal from Industrial Wastewater: A Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osman, A.I.; Chen, Z.; Elgarahy, A.M.; Farghali, M.; Mohamed, I.M.A.; Priya, A.K.; Hawash, H.B.; Yap, P.S. Membrane Technology for Energy Saving: Principles, Techniques, Applications, Challenges, and Prospects. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2024, 5, 2400011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Li, J. Fluxes and Driving Forces in Membrane Separation Processes. In Encyclopedia of Membranes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, B.; Balomajumder, C.; Sabapathy, M.; Gumfekar, S.P. Pressure-Driven Membrane Process: A Review of Advanced Technique for Heavy Metals Remediation. Processes 2021, 9, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakalár, T.; Pavolová, H.; Kozáková, L.; Puškárová, P.; Vasilková Kmecová, M. Combined Microfiltration and Reverse Osmosis Process for Mining Water Treatment. E3S Web Conf. 2019, 105, 02026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Qin, H.; Lin, H.; Chhuon, K. Application of Microfiltration Membrane Technology in Water Treatment. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 571, 012158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drioli, E.; Giorno, L. Comprehensive Membrane Science and Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; Volume 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Mungray, A.A.; Kulkarni, S.V.; Mungray, A.K. Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater Using Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration Technique: A Review. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 2012, 10, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Fan, W.; Zhou, T.; Li, X. Removal of Chelated Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution: A Review of Current Methods and Mechanisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 678, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, Y.; Feng, X. Polymer-Enhanced Ultrafiltration: Fundamentals, Applications and Recent Developments. J. Memb. Sci. 2019, 586, 53–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Guo, X.; Cao, K.; Li, B.; Li, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wen, R.; Li, X.; Li, S.; Ma, L. Effective Charge-Discriminated Group Separation of Metal Ions under Highly Acidic Conditions Using Nanodiamond-Pillared Graphene Oxide Membrane. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 8051–8061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figueira, M.; Rodríguez-Jiménez, D.; López, J.; Reig, M.; Cortina, J.L.; Valderrama, C. Experimental and Economic Evaluation of Nanofiltration as a Pre-Treatment for Added-Value Elements Recovery from Seawater Desalination Brines. Desalination 2023, 549, 116321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, N.; Yusof, N.; Lau, W.J.; Jaafar, J.; Ismail, A.F. Recent Trends of Heavy Metal Removal from Water/Wastewater by Membrane Technologies. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 76, 17–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hankins, N.P.; Singh, R. Emerging Membrane Technology for Sustainable Water Treatment; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Cao, T.; Dykstra, J.E.; Porada, S.; Biesheuvel, P.M.; Elimelech, M. Salt and Water Transport in Reverse Osmosis Membranes: Beyond the Solution-Diffusion Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 16665–16675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fu, F.; Wang, Q. Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewaters: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fernández-Medrano, V.; Cuartas-Uribe, B.; Bes-Piá, M.A.; Mendoza-Roca, J.A. Application of Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Tannery Wastewater Reuse. Water 2022, 14, 2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrade, L.H.; Aguiar, A.O.; Pires, W.L.; Miranda, G.A.; Teixeira, L.P.T.; Almeida, G.C.C.; Amaral, M.C.S. Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Applied to Gold Mining Effluent Treatment and Reuse. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abejón, R. A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Selenium in Drinking Water during the 1990–2021 Period: Treatment Options for Selenium Removal. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abejón, R. An Overview to Technical Solutions for Molybdenum Removal: Perspective from the Analysis of the Scientific Literature on Molybdenum and Drinking Water (1990–2019). Water 2022, 14, 2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Ji, Z.; Gu, S.; Ma, Z.; Yan, Z.; Liang, Y.; Chang, H.; Liang, H. Mapping the Research on Desulfurization Wastewater: Insights from a Bibliometric Review (1991–2021). Chemosphere 2023, 314, 137678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, M.; Zeng, H. A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Progress in Sulfate-Rich Wastewater Pollution Control Technology. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 238, 113626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plaza-Garrido, A.; Limaico, M.; Villamar-Ayala, C.A. Influence of Wastewater Treatment Technologies on Virus Removal under a Bibliometric-Statistical Analysis. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 47, 102642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halepoto, H.; Gong, T.; Memon, H. Current Status and Research Trends of Textile Wastewater Treatments—A Bibliometric-Based Study. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 1042256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Başhan, V.; Çetinkaya, A.Y. Influential Publications and Bibliometric Approach to Heavy Metal Removals for Water. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, T.; Zhou, J.; Liu, F.; Xu, B.M.; Pan, Y. Recent Progress of Adsorptive Ultrafiltration Membranes in Water Treatment—A Mini Review. Membranes 2022, 12, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajeswari, S.; Saravanan, P.; Linkesver, M.; Rajeshkannan, R.; Rajasimman, M. Identifying Global Status and Research Hotspots of Heavy Metal Remediation: A Phase Upgrade Study. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 324, 116265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elsevier. SCOPUS: Your Brilliance, Connected. Scopus Fact-Sheet; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Herrera-Viedma, E.; López-Robles, J.R.; Guallar, J.; Cobo, M.J. Global Trends in Coronavirus Research at the Time of COVID-19: A General Bibliometric Approach and Content Analysis Using SciMAT. Prof. Inf. 2020, 29, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolling, M.L.; Furstenau, L.B.; Sott, M.K.; Rabaioli, B.; Ulmi, P.H.; Bragazzi, N.L.; Tedesco, L.P.C. Data Mining in Healthcare: Applying Strategic Intelligence Techniques to Depict 25 Years of Research Development. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Furstenau, L.B.; Sott, M.K.; Homrich, A.J.O.; Kipper, L.M.; Dohan, M.S.; López-Robles, J.R.; Cobo, M.J.; Tortorella, G.L. An overview of 42 years of lean production: Applying bibliometric analysis to investigate strategic themes and scientific evolution structure. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2021, 33, 1068–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, J. Californium Based System for the Automated Detection of Heavy Metals in Inland Waters; University of Missouri Press: Columbia, MO, USA, 1972; pp. 72–85. [Google Scholar]
- Lanouette, K.H. Heavy Metal Removal from Complex Wastes. Am. Dyest. Rep. 1973, 62, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
- Wilmoth, R.C.; Hill, R.D. Mine Drainage Pollution Control Via Reverse Osmosis. Min. Eng. 1973, 25, 45–47. [Google Scholar]
- Lafuente, R.; Paneque, P.; Vargas, J. The Role Played by Environmental Concern and Institutional Trust in Changing Public Preferences for Water Management. Environ. Policy Gov. 2018, 28, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tilbury, D. Environmental Education for Sustainability: Defining the New Focus of Environmental Education in the 1990s. Environ. Educ. Res. 1995, 1, 195–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiorillo, D.; Senatore, L. Pro-Social Behaviours, Waste Concern and Recycling Behaviour in Italy at the End of the 1990s. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 2020, 22, 127–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsen, G.R. The NGOs and the International Environment in the 1990s. Forum Dev. Stud. 1996, 23, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, D. Water Resources Management of the People’s Republic of China: Framework, Reform and Implementation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; ISBN 3030619311. [Google Scholar]
- Vighi, M.; Finizio, A.; Villa, S. The Evolution of the Environmental Quality Concept: From the US EPA Red Book to the European Water Framework Directive. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2006, 13, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmona, B.; Abejón, R. Innovative Membrane Technologies for the Treatment of Wastewater Polluted with Heavy Metals: Perspective of the Potential of Electrodialysis, Membrane Distillation, and Forward Osmosis from a Bibliometric Analysis. Membranes 2023, 13, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wambu, E.W.; Ho, Y.-S. A Bibliometric Analysis of Drinking Water Research in Africa. Water SA 2016, 42, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abejón, R.; Moya, L. Cross-Laminated Timber: Perspectives from a Bibliometric Analysis (2006–2018). Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 17, 429–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Acebo, H.; Linares-Unamunzaga, A.; Abejón, R.; Rojí, E. Research Trends in Pavement Management during the First Years of the 21st Century: A Bibliometric Analysis during the 2000–2013 Period. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abejón, R. A Bibliometric Study of Scientific Publications Regarding Hemicellulose Valorization during the 2000–2016 Period: Identification of Alternatives and Hot Topics. ChemEngineering 2018, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abejón, R.; Pérez-Acebo, H.; Clavijo, L. Alternatives for Chemical and Biochemical Lignin Valorization: Hot Topics from a Bibliometric Analysis of the Research Published During the 2000–2016 Period. Processes 2018, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, G.; Liu, X.; Du, H.; Zuo, J.; Wang, L. Way Forward for Alternative Energy Research: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1994–2013. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 48, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamel, R.E. The Dominance of English in the International Scientific Periodical Literature and the Future of Language Use in Science. AILA Rev. 2007, 20, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guziurová, T. Discourse Reflexivity in Written Academic English as Lingua Franca: Code Glosses in Research Articles. Discourse Interact. 2020, 13, 36–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayen, S.; Thomas, G.O.; Lee, H.K.; Obbard, J.P. Organochlorine Pesticides and Heavy Metals in Green Mussel, Perna Viridis in Singapore. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2004, 155, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taghinia Hejabi, A.; Basavarajappa, H.T.; Karbassi, A.R.; Monavari, S.M. Heavy Metal Pollution in Water and Sediments in the Kabini River, Karnataka, India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 182, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sany, S.B.T.; Salleh, A.; Sulaiman, A.H.; Sasekumar, A.; Rezayi, M.; Tehrani, G.M. Heavy Metal Contamination in Water and Sediment of the Port Klang Coastal Area, Selangor, Malaysia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2013, 69, 2013–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakarvorty, M.; Dwivedi, A.K.; Shukla, A.D.; Kumar, S.; Niyogi, A.; Usmani, M.; Pati, J.K. Geochemistry and Magnetic Measurements of Suspended Sediment in Urban Sewage Water Vis-à-Vis Quantification of Heavy Metal Pollution in Ganga and Yamuna Rivers, India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamari, A.; Yusof, N.; Abdullah, H.; Haraguchi, A.; Abas, M.F. Assessment of Heavy Metals in Water, Sediment, Anabas Testudineus and Eichhornia Crassipes in a Former Mining Pond in Perak, Malaysia. Chem. Ecol. 2017, 33, 637–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhagwatwar, A.; Hara, N.; Ynalvez, M.A. Out of Asia: Understanding the Nexus between Technology Usage and Research Productivity in Japan, Singapore, and Taiwan. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baber, Z. Globalization and Scientific Research: The Emerging Triple Helix of State-Industry-University Relations in Japan and Singapore. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2001, 21, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, K.S.; Park, H.W.; So, M.; Leydesdorff, L. Has Globalization Strengthened South Korea’s National Research System? National and International Dynamics of the Triple Helix of Scientific Co-Authorship Relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics 2012, 90, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, Y.; Kim, E.; Kim, W. The Scientific and Technological Interdisciplinary Research of Government Research Institutes: Network Analysis of the Innovation Cluster in South Korea. Policy Stud. 2021, 42, 132–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moed, H.F. Iran’s Scientific Dominance and the Emergence of South-East Asian Countries as Scientific Collaborators in the Persian Gulf Region. Scientometrics 2016, 108, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutt, B.; Nikam, K. Scientometrics of Collaboration Pattern in Solar Cell Research in India. Ann. Libr. Inf. Stud. 2014, 61, 65–73. [Google Scholar]
- Payumo, J.G.; Sutton, T.C. A Bibliometric Assessment of Asean Collaboration in Plant Biotechnology. Scientometrics 2015, 103, 1043–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barakat, M.A. New Trends in Removing Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewater. Arab. J. Chem. 2011, 4, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fakhru’l-Razi, A.; Pendashteh, A.; Abdullah, L.C.; Biak, D.R.A.; Madaeni, S.S.; Abidin, Z.Z. Review of Technologies for Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 530–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azimi, A.; Azari, A.; Rezakazemi, M.; Ansarpour, M. Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewaters: A Review. ChemBioEng Rev. 2017, 4, 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurniawan, T.A.; Chan, G.Y.S.; Lo, W.H.; Babel, S. Physico-Chemical Treatment Techniques for Wastewater Laden with Heavy Metals. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 118, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolisetty, S.; Peydayesh, M.; Mezzenga, R. Sustainable Technologies for Water Purification from Heavy Metals: Review and Analysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 463–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guibal, E. Interactions of Metal Ions with Chitosan-Based Sorbents: A Review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 38, 43–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulligan, C.N.; Yong, R.N.; Gibbs, B.F. Surfactant-Enhanced Remediation of Contaminated Soil: A Review. Eng. Geol. 2001, 60, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suresh Kumar, K.; Dahms, H.U.; Won, E.J.; Lee, J.S.; Shin, K.H. Microalgae—A Promising Tool for Heavy Metal Remediation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 113, 329–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, P.; Zhu, M.; Wang, K.; Zhong, M.; Wei, J.; Wu, D.; Xu, Z.; Zhu, H. Selective Ion Penetration of Graphene Oxide Membranes. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American Water Works Association AWWA M46. Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration; American Water Works Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; ISBN 9781583214916. [Google Scholar]
- Aminzadeh, R.; Mousavi, S.M.; Nazari, H.R. Treatment of Forging Industry Wastewater Using Non-Hybrid and Hybrid Processes. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2018, 17, 2627–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerrity, D.; Pecson, B.; Shane Trussell, R.; Rhodes Trussell, R. Potable Reuse Treatment Trains throughout the World. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 2013, 62, 321–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, F.S.; Qin, J.J.; Wai, M.N.; Lim, A.L.; Adiga, M. A Pilot Study on a Membrane Process for the Treatment and Recycling of Spent Final Rinse Water from Electroless Plating. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 29, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, W.; Zhang, G.; Meng, Q.; Zhang, H. Characteristics and Application of Multiple Membrane Process in Plating Wastewater Reutilization. Desalination 2008, 222, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, H.A.; Sachit, D.E.; Al-Furaiji, M. Applications and Challenges of the Reverse Osmosis Membrane Process: A Review. J. Eng. Sustain. Dev. 2023, 27, 630–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sachit, D.E.; Veenstra, J.N. Foulant Analysis of Three RO Membranes Used in Treating Simulated Brackishwater of the Iraqi Marshes. Membranes 2017, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smara, A.; Delimi, R.; Poinsignon, C.; Sandeaux, J. Electroextraction of Heavy Metals from Diluted Solutions by a Process Combining Ion-Exchange Resins and Membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 44, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epimakhov, V.N.; Oleinik, M.S.; Moskvin, L.N. Reverse-Osmosis Filtration Based Water Treatment and Special Water Purification for Nuclear Power Systems. At. Energy 2004, 96, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thaçi, B.S.; Gashi, S.T. Reverse Osmosis Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater Effluents Using Biowaste Materials Pretreatment. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 2019, 28, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arabi, A.K.; Akram, B.; Mirbagheri, S.A. Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Combining Two Systems of Adsorption Column and Reverse Osmosis. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2021, 17, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Z.J.; Jiang, S.K.; Chao, X.Y.; Zhang, C.X.; Shi, Q.; Wang, Z.Y.; Liu, M.L.; Sun, S.P. Removing Miscellaneous Heavy Metals by All-in-One Ion Exchange-Nanofiltration Membrane. Water Res. 2022, 222, 118888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lasisi, K.H.; Ajibade, T.F.; Zhang, K. 3, 3′-Diaminodiphenyl Sulfone Engagement in Polysulfonamide-Based Acid-Resistant Nanofiltration Membrane Fabrication for Efficient Separation Performance and Heavy Metal Ions Removal from Wastewater. J. Memb. Sci. 2022, 661, 120909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Hu, S.; Yu, F.; He, Z.; Zeng, G.; Feng, Z.; Sengupta, A. Construction of Fe3O4@MXene Composite Nanofiltration Membrane for Heavy Metal Ions Removal from Wastewater. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 1000–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, K.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, J. Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water by Calcium Alginate Hydrogel Nanofiltration Membrane with High Anti-Fouling Performance. Gaofenzi Cailiao Kexue Yu Gongcheng Polymeric Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 32, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. An Approach for Detecting, Quantifying, and Visualizing the Evolution of a Research Field: A Practical Application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory Field. J. Informetr. 2011, 5, 146–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Feng, Z.; Rui, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Z. A Review on Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes for Water Purification. Polymers 2019, 11, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, M.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Rong, H.; Zeng, G. New Trends in Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 6509–6518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aoufi, B.; Didi, M.A.; Azzouz, A. Influence of Operating Conditions on the Retention of Severe Industrial Wastewater by Nanofiltration. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 102, 1292–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samavati, Z.; Samavati, A.; Goh, P.S.; Fauzi Ismail, A.; Sohaimi Abdullah, M. A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Nanofiltration Membranes for Heavy Metal Removal from Wastewater. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023, 189, 530–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borji, H.; Ayoub, G.M.; Bilbeisi, R.; Nassar, N.; Malaeb, L. How Effective Are Nanomaterials for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Water and Wastewater? Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barakat, M.A.; Schmidt, E. Polymer-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Process for Heavy Metals Removal from Industrial Wastewater. Desalination 2010, 256, 90–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garba, M.D.; Usman, M.; Mazumder, M.A.J.; Al-Ahmed, A. Inamuddin Complexing Agents for Metal Removal Using Ultrafiltration Membranes: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 1195–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaqub, M.; Lee, S.H. Heavy Metals Removal from Aqueous Solution through Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration: A Review. Environ. Eng. Res. 2019, 24, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Shevate, R.; Hilke, R.; Peinemann, K.V. Novel Adsorptive Ultrafiltration Membranes Derived from Polyvinyltetrazole-Co-Polyacrylonitrile for Cu(II) Ions Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 301, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, S.; Kumar Majumder, S. Fabrication of the Polysulfone-Based Composite Ultrafiltration Membranes for the Adsorptive Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Their Contaminated Aqueous Solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 401, 126036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hezarjaribi, M.; Bakeri, G.; Sillanpää, M.; Chaichi, M.J.; Akbari, S.; Rahimpour, A. Novel Adsorptive PVC Nanofibrous/Thiol-Functionalized TNT Composite UF Membranes for Effective Dynamic Removal of Heavy Metal Ions. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 284, 111996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jana, S.; Purkait, M.K.; Mohanty, K. Preparation and Characterization of Low-Cost Ceramic Microfiltration Membranes for the Removal of Chromate from Aqueous Solutions. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 47, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doke, S.M.; Yadav, G.D. Process Efficacy and Novelty of Titania Membrane Prepared by Polymeric Sol-Gel Method in Removal of Chromium(VI) by Surfactant Enhanced Microfiltration. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 255, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, N.; Mir, F.Q. Chromium(VI) Removal Using Micellar Enhanced Microfiltration (MEMF) from an Aqueous Solution: Fouling Analysis and Use of ANN for Predicting Permeate Flux. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 44, 102438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madaeni, S.S.; Heidary, F. Effect of Surface Modification of Microfiltration Membrane on Capture of Toxic Heavy Metal Ions. Environ. Technol. 2012, 33, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, R.; Gao, B.; Men, J. Microfiltration Membrane Possessing Chelation Function and Its Adsorption and Rejection Properties towards Heavy Metal Ions. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 1441–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekulić, Z.; Antanasijević, D.; Stevanović, S.; Trivunac, K. The Prediction of Heavy Metal Permeate Flux in Complexation-Microfiltration Process: Polynomial Neural Network Approach. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2019, 230, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsou, E.; Malamis, S.; Haralambous, K. Pre-Treatment of Industrial Wastewater Polluted with Lead Using Adsorbents and Ultrafiltration or Microfiltration Membranes. Water Environ. Res. 2011, 83, 298–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, H.; Kwak, S.Y. Surface Functionalization of PTFE Membranes with Hyperbranched Poly(Amidoamine) for the Removal of Cu2+ Ions from Aqueous Solution. J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 448, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Ji, C.; Yuan, R.; Wu, H.; Li, A. TAP/GMA@CN Metal-Chelating Membrane for Enhanced and Efficient Capture of Cu(II). J. Memb. Sci. 2019, 570–571, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Guan, S.; Sato, A.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Yang, R.; Hsiao, B.S.; Chu, B. Nanofibrous Microfiltration Membranes Capable of Removing Bacteria, Viruses and Heavy Metal Ions. J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 446, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adam, M.R.; Othman, M.H.D.; Kurniawan, T.A.; Puteh, M.H.; Ismail, A.F.; Khongnakorn, W.; Rahman, M.A.; Jaafar, J. Advances in Adsorptive Membrane Technology for Water Treatment and Resource Recovery Applications: A Critical Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.Q.; Cheng, Z.F. Recent Advances in Adsorptive Membranes for Removal of Harmful Cations. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasir, A.M.; Goh, P.S.; Abdullah, M.S.; Ng, B.C.; Ismail, A.F. Adsorptive Nanocomposite Membranes for Heavy Metal Remediation: Recent Progresses and Challenges. Chemosphere 2019, 232, 96–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrinic, I.; Korenak, J.; Povodnik, D.; Hélix-Nielsen, C. A Feasibility Study of Ultrafiltration/Reverse Osmosis (UF/RO)-Based Wastewater Treatment and Reuse in the Metal Finishing Industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 101, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricci, B.C.; Ferreira, C.D.; Marques, L.S.; Martins, S.S.; Reis, B.G.; Amaral, M.C.S. Assessment of the Chemical Stability of Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes Employed in Treatment of Acid Gold Mining Effluent. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 174, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samaei, S.M.; Gato-Trinidad, S.; Altaee, A. Performance Evaluation of Reverse Osmosis Process in the Post-Treatment of Mining Wastewaters: Case Study of Costerfield Mining Operations, Victoria, Australia. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 34, 101116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.O.; Chung, J. Feasibility of Combining Reverse Osmosis-Ferrite Process for Reclamation of Metal Plating Wastewater and Recovery of Heavy Metals. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 15192–15199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boricha, A.G.; Murthy, Z.V.P. Preparation, Characterization and Performance of Nanofiltration Membranes for the Treatment of Electroplating Industry Effluent. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 65, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borbély, G.; Nagy, E. Removal of Zinc and Nickel Ions by Complexation-Membrane Filtration Process from Industrial Wastewater. Desalination 2009, 240, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lumami Kapepula, V.; García Alvarez, M.; Sang Sefidi, V.; Buleng Njoyim Tamungang, E.; Ndikumana, T.; Musibono, D.D.; Van Der Bruggen, B.; Luis, P. Evaluation of Commercial Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Surface Water in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Clean Technol. 2022, 4, 1300–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanif, A.; Ali, S.; Hanif, M.A.; Rashid, U.; Bhatti, H.N.; Asghar, M.; Alsalme, A.; Giannakoudakis, D.A. A Novel Combined Treatment Process of Hybrid Biosorbent–Nanofiltration for Effective Pb(Ii) Removal from Wastewater. Water 2021, 13, 3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otero, J.A.; Otero-Fernández, A.; Fernández, M.D.; Palacio, L.; Prádanos, P. Use of Nanofiltration Aromatic Polyamide Membranes, Case Study: Influence of Operating Conditions on the Rejection of Pb (II) in Aqueous Solutions at Industrial Pilot Plant. Procedia Eng. 2012, 44, 2023–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malamis, S.; Katsou, E.; Takopoulos, K.; Demetriou, P.; Loizidou, M. Assessment of Metal Removal, Biomass Activity and RO Concentrate Treatment in an MBR-RO System. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209–210, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kheriji, J.; Tabassi, D.; Hamrouni, B. Removal of Cd(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution and Industrial Effluent Using Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes. Water Sci. Technol. 2015, 72, 1206–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozgun, H.; Ersahin, M.E.; Erdem, S.; Atay, B.; Kose, B.; Kaya, R.; Altinbas, M.; Sayili, S.; Hoshan, P.; Atay, D.; et al. Effects of the Pre-Treatment Alternatives on the Treatment of Oil-Gas Field Produced Water by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 1576–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jellouli Ennigrou, D.; Gzara, L.; Ramzi Ben Romdhane, M.; Dhahbi, M. Cadmium Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Polyelectrolyte Enhanced Ultrafiltration. Desalination 2009, 246, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sudilovskiy, P.S.; Kagramanov, G.G.; Kolesnikov, V.A. Use of RO and NF for Treatment of Copper Containing Wastewaters in Combination with Flotation. Desalination 2008, 221, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prieto, J.C.G.; Galende, P.P.; Silverio, J.M.C.; Roig, M.G. A Pilot Plant Study of the Processes of Filtration and Adsorption of Drinking Water through Granular Activated Carbons: A Comparative Study. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2013, 13, 74–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, C.M.; Xu, Z.L.; Fang, X.H.; Cheng, L. Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) by Ultra-Low-Pressure Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2007, 24, 1297–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cséfalvay, E.; Pauer, V.; Mizsey, P. Recovery of Copper from Process Waters by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis. Desalination 2009, 240, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.S.; Bringas, E.; Tan, N.R.; Ortiz, I.; Ghahramani, M.; Alaei Shahmirzadi, M.A. Recent Progress in Development of High Performance Polymeric Membranes and Materials for Metal Plating Wastewater Treatment: A Review. J. Water Process Eng. 2016, 9, 78–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiril Mert, B.; Kestioglu, K. Recovery of Cr(III) from Tanning Process Using Membrane Separation Processes. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2014, 16, 1615–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hintermeyer, B.H.; Lacour, N.A.; Perez Padilla, A.; Tavani, E.L. Separation of the Chromium(III) Present in a Tanning Wastewater by Means of Precipitation, Reverse Osmosis and Adsorption. Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 2008, 38, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
- Zakmout, A.; Sadi, F.; Portugal, C.A.M.; Crespo, J.G.; Velizarov, S. Tannery Effluent Treatment by Nanofiltration, Reverse Osmosis and Chitosan Modified Membranes. Membranes 2020, 10, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khobragade, M.U.; Nayak, A.K.; Pal, A. A Review on the Removal Technologies of Nickel(II) Ion from Aqueous Solution. Recent Patents Eng. 2017, 11, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.S.; Nazif, A.; Alaei Shahmirzadi, M.A.; Ortiz, I. Fabrication, Tuning and Optimization of Poly (Acrilonitryle) Nanofiltration Membranes for Effective Nickel and Chromium Removal from Electroplating Wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 187, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basaran, G.; Kavak, D.; Dizge, N.; Asci, Y.; Solener, M.; Ozbey, B. Comparative Study of the Removal of Nickel(II) and Chromium(VI) Heavy Metals from Metal Plating Wastewater by Two Nanofiltration Membranes. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 21870–21880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vishnu, G.; Palanisamy, S.; Joseph, K. Assessment of Fieldscale Zero Liquid Discharge Treatment Systems for Recovery of Water and Salt from Textile Effluents. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colla, V.; Matino, I.; Branca, T.A.; Fornai, B.; Romaniello, L.; Rosito, F. Efficient Use of Water Resources in the Steel Industry. Water 2017, 9, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.O.; Cho, K.H.; Park, T.W.; Lim, S.R.; Kang, S.; Kim, Y.M. Application of a Combined Three-Stage System for Reclamation of Tunnel Construction Wastewater. Environ. Technol. 2015, 36, 2357–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.W.; Kwon, T.O.; Moon, I.S. Performance of Polyamide Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Steel Wastewater Reuse. Desalination 2005, 177, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richards, L.A.; Richards, B.S.; Rossiter, H.M.A.; Schäfer, A.I. Impact of Speciation on Fluoride, Arsenic and Magnesium Retention by Nanofiltration/Reverse Osmosis in Remote Australian Communities. Desalination 2009, 248, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coronell, O.; Mi, B.; Mariñas, B.J.; Cahill, D.G. Modeling the Effect of Charge Density in the Active Layers of Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes on the Rejection of Arsenic(III) and Potassium Iodide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pezeshki, H.; Hashemi, M.; Rajabi, S. Removal of Arsenic as a Potentially Toxic Element from Drinking Water by Filtration: A Mini Review of Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Techniques. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jarma, Y.A.; Karaoğlu, A.; Tekin, Ö.; Baba, A.; Ökten, H.E.; Tomaszewska, B.; Bostancı, K.; Arda, M.; Kabay, N. Assessment of Different Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Simultaneous Removal of Arsenic and Boron from Spent Geothermal Water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 124129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, F.F.; Liu, W.J.; Wang, X.M. Comparison of Polyamide Nanofiltration and Low-Pressure Reverse Osmosis Membranes on As(III) Rejection under Various Operational Conditions. Desalination 2014, 334, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kweon, J.H.; Hur, H.W.; Seo, G.T.; Jang, T.R.; Park, J.H.; Choi, K.Y.; Kim, H.S. Evaluation of Coagulation and PAC Adsorption Pretreatments on Membrane Filtration for a Surface Water in Korea: A Pilot Study. Desalination 2009, 249, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Nan, J.; Ji, X.; Wu, F.; Ye, X.; Ge, Z. Effect of Adsorption and Coagulation Pretreatment Sequence on Ultrafiltration Membrane Fouling: Process Study and Targeted Prediction. Desalination 2022, 540, 115967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Tang, X.; Xu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Li, G.; Liang, H. Hybrid UF/NF Process Treating Secondary Effluent of Wastewater Treatment Plants for Potable Water Reuse: Adsorption vs. Coagulation for Removal Improvements and Membrane Fouling Alleviation. Environ. Res. 2020, 188, 109833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chitpong, N.; Husson, S.M. High-Capacity, Nanofiber-Based Ion-Exchange Membranes for the Selective Recovery of Heavy Metals from Impaired Waters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 179, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berbar, Y.; Hammache, Z.E.; Bensaadi, S.; Soukeur, R.; Amara, M.; der Bruggen, B. Van Effect of Functionalized Silica Nanoparticles on Sulfonated Polyethersulfone Ion Exchange Membrane for Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solutions. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 32, 100953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, D.; Tang, Y. Adsorption of Cadmium and Strontium on Cellulose/Alginic Acid Ion-Exchange Membrane. J. Memb. Sci. 1999, 162, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otrembska, P.; Gega, J. Separation of Nickel(II) and Cadmium(II) Ions with Ion-Exchange and Membrane Processes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 2675–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherugar, P.; Naik, N.S.; Padaki, M.; Nayak, V.; Gangadharan, A.; Nadig, A.R.; Déon, S. Fabrication of Zinc Doped Aluminium Oxide/Polysulfone Mixed Matrix Membranes for Enhanced Antifouling Property and Heavy Metal Removal. Chemosphere 2021, 275, 130024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, Y.; Abdulkarem, E.; Naddeo, V.; Banat, F.; Hasan, S.W. Synthesis of Super Hydrophilic Cellulose-Alpha Zirconium Phosphate Ion Exchange Membrane via Surface Coating for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 690, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Jin, P.; Xu, D.; Zheng, J.; Zhan, Z.M.; Gao, Q.; Yuan, S.; Xu, Z.L.; Van der Bruggen, B. Triethanolamine Modification Produces Ultra-Permeable Nanofiltration Membrane with Enhanced Removal Efficiency of Heavy Metal Ions. J. Memb. Sci. 2022, 644, 120127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Zheng, J.; Jin, P.; Xu, D.; Yuan, S.; Zhao, R.; Depuydt, S.; Gao, Y.; Xu, Z.L.; Van der Bruggen, B. A PEI/TMC Membrane Modified with an Ionic Liquid with Enhanced Permeability and Antibacterial Properties for the Removal of Heavy Metal Ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 435, 129010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Castro-Muñoz, R.; González-Melgoza, L.L.; García-Depraect, O. Ongoing Progress on Novel Nanocomposite Membranes for the Separation of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Water. Chemosphere 2021, 270, 129421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Damiri, F.; Andra, S.; Kommineni, N.; Balu, S.K.; Bulusu, R.; Boseila, A.A.; Akamo, D.O.; Ahmad, Z.; Khan, F.S.; Rahman, M.H.; et al. Recent Advances in Adsorptive Nanocomposite Membranes for Heavy Metals Ion Removal from Contaminated Water: A Comprehensive Review. Materials 2022, 15, 5392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bera, A.; Trivedi, J.S.; Kumar, S.B.; Chandel, A.K.S.; Haldar, S.; Jewrajka, S.K. Anti-Organic Fouling and Anti-Biofouling Poly(Piperazineamide) Thin Film Nanocomposite Membranes for Low Pressure Removal of Heavy Metal Ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 343, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khosravi, M.J.; Hosseini, S.M.; Vatanpour, V. Performance Improvement of PES Membrane Decorated by Mil-125(Ti)/Chitosan Nanocomposite for Removal of Organic Pollutants and Heavy Metal. Chemosphere 2022, 290, 133335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, X.; Shao, H.; Liu, N.; Chang, J.; He, S.; Qin, S. Enhancing Polysulfone Nanocomposite Membrane Heavy-Metal-Removal Performance Using an Amine-Functionalized Separation Layer with 3D Nanonetworks. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moradi, G.; Zinadini, S.; Rajabi, L.; Ashraf Derakhshan, A. Removal of Heavy Metal Ions Using a New High Performance Nanofiltration Membrane Modified with Curcumin Boehmite Nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 390, 124546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dadari, S.; Rahimi, M.; Zinadini, S. Novel Antibacterial and Antifouling PES Nanofiltration Membrane Incorporated with Green Synthesized Nickel-Bentonite Nanoparticles for Heavy Metal Ions Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 134116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, L.; Yue, C.; Zhang, G. Epoxied SiO2 Nanoparticles and Polyethyleneimine (PEI) Coated Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) Membrane for Improved Oil Water Separation, Anti-Fouling, Dye and Heavy Metal Ions Removal Capabilities. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 630, 416–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, X.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Pan, S.; Zhang, X.; Sun, X.; Shen, J.; Han, W.; Wang, L. Internal Pore Decoration with Polydopamine Nanoparticle on Polymeric Ultrafiltration Membrane for Enhanced Heavy Metal Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 314, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qasem, N.A.A.; Mohammed, R.H.; Lawal, D.U. Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater: A Comprehensive and Critical Review. npj Clean Water 2021, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, H.; Dhupper, R.; Shrivastava, A.; Kumari, M. Enhancing Groundwater Remediation Efficiency through Advanced Membrane and Nano-Enabled Processes: A Comparative Study. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2023, 23, 100975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engstler, R.; Reipert, J.; Karimi, S.; Vukušić, J.L.; Heinzler, F.; Davies, P.; Ulbricht, M.; Barbe, S. A Reverse Osmosis Process to Recover and Recycle Trivalent Chromium from Electroplating Wastewater. Membranes 2022, 12, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nur-E-Alam, M.; Mia, M.A.S.; Ahmad, F.; Rahman, M.M. An Overview of Chromium Removal Techniques from Tannery Effluent. Appl. Water Sci. 2020, 10, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pervov, A.; Aung, H.Z.; Spitsov, D. Treatment of Mine Water with Reverse Osmosis and Concentrate Processing to Recover Copper and Deposit Calcium Carbonate. Membranes 2023, 13, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masindi, V. Recovery of Drinking Water and Valuable Minerals from Acid Mine Drainage Using an Integration of Magnesite, Lime, Soda Ash, CO2 and Reverse Osmosis Treatment Processes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 3136–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, N.A.D.; Nguyen, V.H.; Babel, S. Operation of Different Reverse Osmosis (RO) Membrane Modules for the Treatment of High-Strength Wastewater to Enhance the Recovery of Clean Water—A Case Study in Bac Ninh, Vietnam. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorfing, D.; Ahmadi, A.; Laborie, S.; Olives, R.; Falcoz, Q.; Py, X.; Tiruta-Barna, L. Energy and Environmental Performance of a New Solar Boiler with Heat Recovery for Seawater Desalination. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 32, 330–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Rubayan, A.K.; Mansour, R.B.; Al-Sulaimana, F.A. Performance and Cost Analyses of Hybrid Diesel-Photovoltaic Powered Small Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis System in Saudi Arabia. Desalin. Water Treat. 2022, 263, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomaa, M.R.; Al-Bawwat, A.K.; Al-Dhaifallah, M.; Rezk, H.; Ahmed, M. Optimal Design and Economic Analysis of a Hybrid Renewable Energy System for Powering and Desalinating Seawater. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 2473–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietrasanta, A.M.; Mussati, S.F.; Aguirre, P.A.; Schmidhalter, I.; Morosuk, T.; Mussati, M.M. Optimal Sizing of Seawater Desalination Systems Using Wind-Solar Hybrid Renewable Energy Sources. Renew. Energy 2023, 215, 118970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shumiye, W.B.; Ancha, V.R.; Tadese, A.K.; Zeru, B.A. Exergy Analysis of Solar-Geothermal Based Power Plant Integrated with Boiling, and Reverse Osmosis Water Purification. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2022, 15, 100255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cha, G.; Choi, S.; Lee, H.; Kim, K.; Ahn, S.; Hong, S. Improving Energy Efficiency of Pretreatment for Seawater Desalination during Algal Blooms Using a Novel Meshed Tube Filtration Process. Desalination 2020, 486, 114477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abushawish, A.; Bouaziz, I.; Almanassra, I.W.; AL-Rajabi, M.M.; Jaber, L.; Khalil, A.K.A.; Takriff, M.S.; Laoui, T.; Shanableh, A.; Atieh, M.A.; et al. Desalination Pretreatment Technologies: Current Status and Future Developments. Water 2023, 15, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Kaabi, A.; Al-Sulaiti, H.; Al-Ansari, T.; Mackey, H.R. Assessment of Water Quality Variations on Pretreatment and Environmental Impacts of SWRO Desalination. Desalination 2021, 500, 114831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Essa, F.A.; Selim, F.; El-Sebaey, M.S. Performance and Control of a Reverse Osmosis Unit Integrated with Pelton Wheel to Supply Emergency Electric Loads under Various Operating Conditions. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2023, 33, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nafey, A.S.; Sharaf, M.A.; García-Rodríguez, L. Thermo-Economic Analysis of a Combined Solar Organic Rankine Cycle-Reverse Osmosis Desalination Process with Different Energy Recovery Configurations. Desalination 2010, 261, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peñate, B.; García-Rodríguez Lourdes, L. Energy Optimisation of Existing SWRO (Seawater Reverse Osmosis) Plants with ERT (Energy Recovery Turbines): Technical and Thermoeconomic Assessment. Energy 2011, 36, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrews, W.T.; Pergande, W.F.; McTaggart, G.S. Energy Performance Enhancements of a 950 M3/d Seawater Reverse Osmosis Unit in Grand Cayman. Desalination 2001, 135, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, G.; Wang, S.; Song, D.; Liu, S.; Wang, H. Review of Performance Improvement of Energy Recovery Turbines in the Reverse Osmosis Desalination. Desalin. Water Treat. 2018, 119, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arenas Urrea, S.; Díaz Reyes, F.; Peñate Suárez, B.; de la Fuente Bencomo, J.A. Technical Review, Evaluation and Efficiency of Energy Recovery Devices Installed in the Canary Islands Desalination Plants. Desalination 2019, 450, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Wang, K.; Xiao, Y.; Ma, Q.; Song, D.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Y. Developmental Impediment and Prospective Trends of Desalination Energy Recovery Device. Desalination 2024, 578, 117465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schunke, A.J.; Hernandez Herrera, G.A.; Padhye, L.; Berry, T.A. Energy Recovery in SWRO Desalination: Current Status and New Possibilities. Front. Sustain. Cities 2020, 2, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.; Sanders, K.T.; Childress, A.E. Reclaiming Wastewater with Increasing Salinity for Potable Water Reuse: Water Recovery and Energy Consumption during Reverse Osmosis Desalination. Desalination 2021, 520, 115316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Zhao, Y.; Lai, G.S.; Wang, R. Fabrication of Fluorinated Polyamide Seawater Reverse Osmosis Membrane with Enhanced Boron Removal. J. Memb. Sci. 2022, 662, 121009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J. Optimizing Interfacial Polymerization with UV-Introduced Photo-Fries Rearrangement for Enhancing RO Membrane Performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 437, 135380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falath, W. Novel Stand-Alone PVA Mixed Matrix Membranes Conjugated with Graphene Oxide for Highly Improved Reverse Osmosis Performance. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Yang, Q.; Sun, Q.; Song, N.; Yu, L.; Dong, L. Alkaline Responsive Self-Healing Nanocontainer Composite Reverse Osmosis Membrane by Layer Self-Assembly: Enhanced Permeable and Chlorine Resistance Properties. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022, 113, 530–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutariya, B.; Raval, H. Energy and Resource-Efficient Reverse Osmosis System with Tunable Recovery for Brackish Water Desalination and Heavy Metal Removal. Water Environ. J. 2022, 36, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsarayreh, A.A.; Al-Obaidi, M.A.; Al-Hroub, A.M.; Patel, R.; Mujtaba, I.M. Evaluation and Minimisation of Energy Consumption in a Medium-Scale Reverse Osmosis Brackish Water Desalination Plant. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Hotmani, O.M.A.; Al-Obaidi, M.A.; John, Y.M.; Patel, R.; Manenti, F.; Mujtaba, I.M. Minimisation of Energy Consumption via Optimisation of a Simple Hybrid System of Multi Effect Distillation and Permeate Reprocessing Reverse Osmosis Processes for Seawater Desalination. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2021, 148, 107261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Deshmukh, A.; Du, Y.; Elimelech, M. Minimal and Zero Liquid Discharge with Reverse Osmosis Using Low-Salt-Rejection Membranes. Water Res. 2020, 170, 115317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zelinski, R.; Silvestre, W.P.; Duarte, J.; Livinalli, N.F.; Zeni, M.; Baldasso, C. Evaluation of the Use of Reverse Osmosis in the Treatment of Galvanic Effluents. J. Membr. Sci. Res. 2023, 9, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Livinalli, N.F.; Silvestre, W.P.; Duarte, J.; Peretti, I.; Baldasso, C. Study of Reverse Osmosis Performance for Manganese and Iron Removal from Raw Freshwater. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2023, 210, 1961–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, T.; Liu, X.; Li, T.; Park, S.; Anger, B. A Tale of Two Foulants: The Coupling of Organic Fouling and Mineral Scaling in Membrane Desalination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 7129–7149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, H.A.; Sachit, D.E.; Al-Furaiji, M.H. Treatment of Power Plant Wastewater Using Reverse Osmosis Process. Desalin. Water Treat. 2023, 283, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, B.; Suwarno, S.R.; Tan, H.S.; Kim, L.H.; Hochstrasser, F.; Chong, T.H.; Burkhardt, M.; Pronk, W.; Fane, A.G. Gravity-Driven Microfiltration Pretreatment for Reverse Osmosis (RO) Seawater Desalination: Microbial Community Characterization and RO Performance. Desalination 2017, 418, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corral, A.F.; Yenal, U.; Strickle, R.; Yan, D.; Holler, E.; Hill, C.; Ela, W.P.; Arnold, R.G. Comparison of Slow Sand Filtration and Microfiltration as Pretreatments for Inland Desalination via Reverse Osmosis. Desalination 2014, 334, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, M.A.; Amin, S.; Mohamed, A.A. Fouling in Reverse Osmosis Membranes: Monitoring, Characterization, Mitigation Strategies and Future Directions. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Najid, N.; Hakizimana, J.N.; Kouzbour, S.; Gourich, B.; Ruiz-García, A.; Vial, C.; Stiriba, Y.; Semiat, R. Fouling Control and Modeling in Reverse Osmosis for Seawater Desalination: A Review. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2022, 162, 107794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, S.; Li, Y.; Ladewig, B.P. A Review of Reverse Osmosis Membrane Fouling and Control Strategies. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 595, 567–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, S.; Liao, Z.; Fane, A.; Li, J.; Tang, C.; Zheng, C.; Lin, J.; Kong, L. Engineering Antifouling Reverse Osmosis Membranes: A Review. Desalination 2021, 499, 114857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ankoliya, D.; Mehta, B.; Raval, H. Advances in Surface Modification Techniques of Reverse Osmosis Membrane over the Years. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 293–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavaiya, A.R.; Raval, H.D. Highly Selective and Antifouling Reverse Osmosis Membrane by Crosslinkers Induced Surface Modification. Environ. Technol. 2022, 43, 2155–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasongo, G.; Steenberg, C.; Morris, B.; Kapenda, G.; Jacobs, N.; Aziz, M. Surface Grafting of Polyvinyl Alcohol (Pva) Cross-Linked with Glutaraldehyde (Ga) to Improve Resistance to Fouling of Aromatic Polyamide Thin Film Composite Reverse Osmosis Membranes Using Municipal Membrane Bioreactor Effluent. Water Pract. Technol. 2019, 14, 614–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, S.K.; Yong, W.F. Recent Progress of Zwitterionic Materials as Antifouling Membranes for Ultrafiltration, Nanofiltration, and Reverse Osmosis. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021, 3, 4390–4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, L.; Dong, J.; Zhao, X.; Pan, J. Multiple Interface Reactions Enabled Zwitterionic Polyamide Composite Reverse Osmosis Membrane for Enhanced Permeability and Antifouling Property. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62, 2904–2912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, S.; Xiao, J.; Liu, L.; Qin, Y.; Li, S.; Hu, Y. High Flux and Highly Fouling-Resistant Polyamide Reverse Osmosis Membrane Having Inner and Outer Zwitterion-like Layers. Desalination 2023, 565, 116823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhury, R.R.; Gohil, J.M.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S.K. Antifouling, Fouling Release and Antimicrobial Materials for Surface Modification of Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 313–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Z.; Feng, X.; Lu, X. Bioinspired N-Oxide-Based Zwitterionic Polymer Brushes for Robust Fouling-Resistant Surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 7298–7308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Q.; Xu, G.R. Graphene Oxide (GO) as Functional Material in Tailoring Polyamide Thin Film Composite (PA-TFC) Reverse Osmosis (RO) Membranes. Desalination 2016, 394, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, L.; Ding, A.; Li, G.; Liang, H. Application of Cellulose Nanocrystals in Water Treatment Membranes: A Review. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkhouzaam, A.; Qiblawey, H. Functional GO-Based Membranes for Water Treatment and Desalination: Fabrication Methods, Performance and Advantages. A Review. Chemosphere 2021, 274, 129853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrabi, M.; Vatanpour, V.; Teber, O.O.; Masteri-Farahani, M.; Mortazavi, S.S.; Abbasi, A.; Koyuncu, I. Enhanced Negative Charge of Polyamide Thin-Film Nanocomposite Reverse Osmosis Membrane Modified with MIL-101(Cr)-Pyz-SO3H. J. Memb. Sci. 2022, 664, 121066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asadollahi, M.; Bastani, D.; Mousavi, S.A.; Heydari, H.; Mousavi, D.V. Improvement of Performance and Fouling Resistance of Polyamide Reverse Osmosis Membranes Using Acrylamide and TiO2 Nanoparticles under UV Irradiation for Water Desalination. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peydayesh, M.; Mohammadi, T.; Nikouzad, S.K. A Positively Charged Composite Loose Nanofiltration Membrane for Water Purification from Heavy Metals. J. Memb. Sci. 2020, 611, 118205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, L.; Zhang, M.; Fang, C.; Feng, W.; Zhu, L.; Xu, Y. Positively Charged Poly (N-Vinyl Imidazole) Gel-Filled Loose Nanofiltration Membranes: Performances and Modelling Analysis. J. Memb. Sci. 2021, 625, 118975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lari, S.; Parsa, S.A.M.; Akbari, S.; Emadzadeh, D.; Lau, W.J. Fabrication and Evaluation of Nanofiltration Membrane Coated with Amino-Functionalized Graphene Oxide for Highly Efficient Heavy Metal Removal. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 4615–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suhalim, N.S.; Kasim, N.; Mahmoudi, E.; Shamsudin, I.J.; Mohammad, A.W.; Zuki, F.M.; Jamari, N.L.A. Rejection Mechanism of Ionic Solute Removal by Nanofiltration Membranes: An Overview. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, N.; Yu, H.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, X.; Yin, S.; Zhou, G.; Zhang, X.; Bao, J.; He, G. Pressure-Driven Li+/Mg2+ Selective Permeation through Size-Sieving Nanochannels: The Role of the Second Hydration Shell. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 327, 124818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Zhao, B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J. Asymmetrically Charged Polyamide Nanofilm of Intrinsic Microporosity Containing Quaternary Ammonium Groups for Heavy Metal Removal. J. Memb. Sci. 2024, 698, 122620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maher, A.; Sadeghi, M.; Moheb, A. Heavy Metal Elimination from Drinking Water Using Nanofiltration Membrane Technology and Process Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology. Desalination 2014, 352, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hedayatipour, M.; Jaafarzadeh, N.; Ahmadmoazzam, M. Removal Optimization of Heavy Metals from Effluent of Sludge Dewatering Process in Oil and Gas Well Drilling by Nanofiltration. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 203, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Sun, J.; Bao, H.; Li, S.; Zhang, L.; Bao, X.; Li, F.; He, Q. Preparation of ZrO2/TiO2/Al2O3 Nanofiltration Lab-Scale Membrane for Filtering Heavy Metal Ions. Coatings 2022, 12, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshiura, J.; Ishii, K.; Saito, Y.; Nagataki, T.; Nagataki, Y.; Ikeda, A.; Nomura, M. Permeation Properties of Ions through Inorganic Silica-Based Membranes. Membranes 2020, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhowmick, K.; Roy, S.; Bhowmick, S.; Jain, R.; Majumdar, S.; Sahoo, G.C.; Mondal, P. Fabrication of Robust Ceramic Supported Polymeric Composite Nanofiltration Membrane for Heavy Metal Contaminated Wastewater Treatment. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 50, 103287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kyriakou, N.; Boorsma, E.; Aardema, G.J.; Ritsema van Eck, G.; Drobek, M.; de Beer, S.; Nijmeijer, A.; Winnubst, L.; Pizzoccaro-Zilamy, M.A. Hybrid Ceramic Nanofiltration Membranes Prepared by Impregnation and Solid-State Grafting of Organo-Phosphonic Acids. J. Memb. Sci. 2023, 687, 122041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voicu, S.I.; Thakur, V.K. Graphene-Based Composite Membranes for Nanofiltration: Performances and Future Perspectives. Emergent Mater. 2022, 5, 1429–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anand, A.; Unnikrishnan, B.; Mao, J.Y.; Lin, H.J.; Huang, C.C. Graphene-Based Nanofiltration Membranes for Improving Salt Rejection, Water Flux and Antifouling–A Review. Desalination 2018, 429, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raheem, I.; Mubarak, N.M.; Karri, R.R.; Solangi, N.H.; Jatoi, A.S.; Mazari, S.A.; Khalid, M.; Tan, Y.H.; Koduru, J.R.; Malafaia, G. Rapid Growth of MXene-Based Membranes for Sustainable Environmental Pollution Remediation. Chemosphere 2023, 311, 137056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Sun, Q.; Tian, J.; Van der Bruggen, B.; Zhu, J. Non-Polyamide Nanofiltration (NPA-NF) Membrane: A Non-Mainstream but Indispensable Member of the “Membrane Family”. Desalination 2023, 564, 116772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, Y.; Li, L.; Shen, Z.; Cheng, J.; He, K. Engineering Metal-Organic-Framework (MOF)-Based Membranes for Gas and Liquid Separation. Membranes 2023, 13, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mallakpour, S.; Azadi, E. Novel Methodologies and Materials for Facile Fabrication of Nanofiltration Membranes. Emergent Mater. 2022, 5, 1263–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naz, A.; Sattar, R.; Siddiq, M. Polymer Membranes for Biofouling Mitigation: A Review. Polym. Technol. Mater. 2019, 58, 1829–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, Y.M.; Samineni, L.; Ren, T.; Schantz, A.B.; Song, W.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, M. Prospective Applications of Nanometer-Scale Pore Size Biomimetic and Bioinspired Membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2021, 620, 118968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asif, M.B.; Iftekhar, S.; Maqbool, T.; Pramanik, B.K.; Tabraiz, S.; Sillanpää, M.; Zhang, Z. Two-Dimensional Nanoporous and Lamellar Membranes for Water Purification: Reality or a Myth? Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 432, 134335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yang, J.; Bai, L.; Qu, D.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wiesner, M.R.; Liang, H. Mechanistic Insights of Nanofillers Tuning Polymer Microstructures for Enhanced Separation Performance of Nanofiltration Membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 341, 126847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Covaliu-Mierlă, C.I.; Păunescu, O.; Iovu, H. Recent Advances in Membranes Used for Nanofiltration to Remove Heavy Metals from Wastewater: A Review. Membranes 2023, 13, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Der Bruggen, B.; Segers, D.; Vandecasteele, C.; Braeken, L.; Volodin, A.; Van Haesendonck, C. How a Microfiltration Pretreatment Affects the Performance in Nanofiltration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2004, 39, 1443–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Lee, C.H. Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration as a Pretreatment for Nanofiltration of Surface Water. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Wang, S.; Wang, T.; Duan, M.; Su, Y.; Han, H.; Lin, X.; Li, Z. Application of Microfiltration-Nanofiltration Combined Technology for Drinking Water Advanced Treatment in a Large-Scale Engineering Project. Aqua Water Infrastruct. Ecosyst. Soc. 2021, 70, 619–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, N.N.R.; Mohammad, A.W.; Mahmoudi, E.; Ang, W.L.; Leo, C.P.; Teow, Y.H. An Overview of the Modification Strategies in Developing Antifouling Nanofiltration Membranes. Membranes 2022, 12, 1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, W.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, B.; Bao, X.; Guo, Y.; Cui, F. A Novel Polyester Composite Nanofiltration Membrane Prepared by Interfacial Polymerization Catalysed by 4-Dimethylaminopyridine: Enhanced the Water Permeability and Anti-Fouling Ability. Polymer 2018, 153, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Gao, J.; Ge, Y.; Yu, S.; Liu, M.; Gao, C. A Combined Interfacial Polymerization and In-Situ Sol-Gel Strategy to Construct Composite Nanofiltration Membrane with Improved Pore Size Distribution and Anti-Protein-Fouling Property. J. Memb. Sci. 2021, 623, 119097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, X.; Wang, L.; Fu, H.; Wang, Y.; Hu, D.; Feng, X. Interfacial Polymerization Process Based on Diffusion Control: Role of Chemical Composition and Morphology on Fouling Resistance. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 110511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.L.; Tsai, C.C.; Zheng, N.Y. Improving the Organic and Biological Fouling Resistance and Removal of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products through Nanofiltration by Using in Situ Radical Graft Polymerization. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 635, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soyekwo, F.; Wen, H.; Liao, D.; Liu, C. Fouling-Resistant Ionic Graft-Polyamide Nanofiltration Membrane with Improved Permeance for Lithium Separation from MgCl2/LiCl Mixtures. J. Memb. Sci. 2022, 659, 120773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abuhabib, A.A.; Mohammad, A.W.; Hilal, N.; Rahman, R.A.; Shafie, A.H. Nanofiltration Membrane Modification by UV Grafting for Salt Rejection and Fouling Resistance Improvement for Brackish Water Desalination. Desalination 2012, 295, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayyavoo, J.; Nguyen, T.P.N.; Jun, B.M.; Kim, I.C.; Kwon, Y.N. Protection of Polymeric Membranes with Antifouling Surfacing via Surface Modifications. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 506, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Wang, F.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Xiong, R.; Ma, J. Strong Improvement of Nanofiltration Performance on Micropollutant Removal and Reduction of Membrane Fouling by Hydrolyzed-Aluminum Nanoparticles. Water Res. 2020, 175, 115649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Purushothaman, M.; Arvind, V.; Saikia, K.; Vaidyanathan, V.K. Fabrication of Highly Permeable and Anti-Fouling Performance of Poly(Ether Ether Sulfone) Nanofiltration Membranes Modified with Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Polisetti, V.; Ray, P. Nanoparticles Modified Polyacrylonitrile/Polyacrylonitrile–Polyvinylidenefluoride Blends as Substrate of High Flux Anti-Fouling Nanofiltration Membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abazari, M.; Mahdavi, H. Synthesis and Application of MoS2 Quantum Dots-Decorated ZnO Nanoparticles for the Fabrication of Loose Nanofiltration Membranes with Improved Filtration, Anti-Fouling, and Photocatalytic Performance. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 185, 391–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansourpanah, Y.; Madaeni, S.S.; Rahimpour, A.; Farhadian, A.; Taheri, A.H. Formation of Appropriate Sites on Nanofiltration Membrane Surface for Binding TiO2 Photo-Catalyst: Performance, Characterization and Fouling-Resistant Capability. J. Memb. Sci. 2009, 330, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Boffa, V.; Gaggero, E.; Meng, F.; Navone, R.; Sun, D.; Calza, P.; Nulati Yesibolati, M.; Kjær Kristensen, P.; Yue, Y. Metal-Organic Framework-Intercalated Graphene Oxide Nanofiltration Membranes for Enhanced Treatment of Wastewater Effluents. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 486, 150207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nompumelelo, K.S.M.; Edward, N.N.; Muthumuni, M.; Moloko, M.; Makwena, M.J. Fabrication, Modification, and Mechanism of Nanofiltration Membranes for the Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8, e202300741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Ghzizel, S.; Jalté, H.; Bachiri, B.; Zdeg, A.; Tiyal, F.; Hafsi, M.; Taky, M.; Elmidaoui, A. Demineralization of Underground Water by a Nanofiltration Plant Coupled with a Photovoltaic and Wind Energy System. Desalin. Water Treat. 2018, 130, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jalté, H.; El-Ghzizel, S.; Tahaikt, M.; Elmidaoui, A.; Taky, M. Nitrate Removal by Nanofiltration Powered by a Hybrid System of Renewable Energies (Solar and Wind): Technico-Economic Assessment. Desalin. Water Treat. 2022, 270, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonzalez, B.; Heijman, S.G.J.; Rietveld, L.C.; van Halem, D. Arsenic Removal from Geothermal Influenced Groundwater with Low Pressure NF Pilot Plant for Drinking Water Production in Nicaraguan Rural Communities. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 667, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghermandi, A.; Naoum, S.; Alawneh, F.; Offenbach, R.; Tripler, E.; Safi, J.; Safi, M.; Messalem, R. Solar-Powered Desalination of Brackish Water with Nanofiltration Membranes for Intensive Agricultural Use in Jordan, the Palestinian Authority and Israel. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 76, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samper, E.; Rodríguez, M.; De la Rubia, M.A.; Prats, D. Removal of Metal Ions at Low Concentration by Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) Using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) and Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonate (LAS). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 65, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Yuan, F.; Zeng, G.; Li, X.; Gu, Y.; Shi, L.; Liu, W.; Shi, Y. Influence of PH on Heavy Metal Speciation and Removal from Wastewater Using Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration. Chemosphere 2017, 173, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Xie, Y.; Zhu, B.; Zeng, Y.; Zhou, H.; Ai, P.; Chen, G. Positively Charged PVC Ultrafiltration Membrane via Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration for Removing Trace Heavy Metal Cations. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 46, 102552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kose-Mutlu, B.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Wiesner, M.R. Separation of Rare Earth Elements from Mixed-Metal Feedstocks by Micelle Enhanced Ultrafiltration with Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate. Environ. Technol. 2022, 43, 1013–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staszak, K.; Karaś, Z.; Jaworska, K. Comparison of Polymeric and Ceramic Membranes Performance in the Process of Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration of Cadmium(II) Ions from Aqueous Solutions. Chem. Pap. 2013, 67, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landaburu-Aguirre, J.; Pongrácz, E.; Sarpola, A.; Keiski, R.L. Simultaneous Removal of Heavy Metals from Phosphorous Rich Real Wastewaters by Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 88, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, S.P.; Sarkar, B. Use of Rhamnolipid in Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration for Simultaneous Removal of Cd+2 and Crystal Violet from Aqueous Solution. Asia-Pacific J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 14, e2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munoz-Cupa, C.; Bassi, A.; Liu, L. Investigation of Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) Using Rhamnolipid for Heavy Metal Removal from Desalter Effluent. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 100, 2322–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Zeftawy, M.A.M.; Mulligan, C.N. Use of Rhamnolipid to Remove Heavy Metals from Wastewater by Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 77, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, F.; Du, Y.; Guo, M.; Zhao, M.; Luo, L.; Cui, T.; Deng, S.; Jin, M.; Lyu, Z.; Long, X. Application of Biosurfactant Surfactin for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Water and Soil via a Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 327, 124947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juang, R.S.; Lin, S.H.; Peng, L.C. Flux Decline Analysis in Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration of Synthetic Waste Solutions for Metal Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 161, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tortora, F.; Innocenzi, V.; Prisciandaro, M.; Vegliò, F.; Mazziotti di Celso, G. Heavy Metal Removal from Liquid Wastes by Using Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016, 227, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghadge, S.; Chavan, M.; Divekar, A.; Vibhandik, A.; Pawar, S.; Marathe, K. Mathematical Modelling for Removal of Mixture of Heavy Metal Ions from Waste-Water Using Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) Process. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baek, K.; Yang, T.W. Competitive Bind of Anionic Metals with Cetylpyridinium Chloride Micelle in Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration. Desalination 2004, 167, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Z.; Huang, J.; Peng, Q.; Yu, D.; Wang, S.; Liang, D. Risk Assessment for Human Health in a Seleniferous Area, Shuang’an, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 17701–17710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwarze, M.; Groß, M.; Moritz, M.; Buchner, G.; Kapitzki, L.; Chiappisi, L.; Gradzielski, M. Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) of Metal Cations with Oleylethoxycarboxylate. J. Memb. Sci. 2015, 478, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muller, J.; Ding, X.; Geneste, A.; Zajac, J.; Prelot, B.; Monge, S. Complexation Properties of Water-Soluble Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) (PVA)-Based Acidic Chelating Polymers. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 255, 117747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patil, P.N.; Marathe, K.V. Selective Separation of Nickel (II) and Cobalt (II) from Waste Water by Using Continuous Cross-Flow Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration with Addition of Chelating Agent. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, S.; Dasgupta, J.; Farooq, U.; Sikder, J.; Drioli, E.; Curcio, S. Experimental Analysis, Modeling and Optimization of Chromium (VI) Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Polymer-Enhanced Ultrafiltration. J. Memb. Sci. 2014, 456, 139–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balaska, F.; Bencheikh-Lehocine, M.; Chikhi, M.; Meniai, A.H.; Bouledjouidja, A. Experimental Study and Simulation of Complexation Reaction of Chromium by EDTA for Its Recovery by Ultrafiltration. Energy Procedia 2012, 19, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dang, T.T.H.; Li, C.W.; Choo, K.H. Comparison of Low-Pressure Reverse Osmosis Filtration and Polyelectrolyte-Enhanced Ultrafiltration for the Removal of Co and Sr from Nuclear Plant Wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 157, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jana, S.; Saikia, A.; Purkait, M.K.; Mohanty, K. Chitosan Based Ceramic Ultrafiltration Membrane: Preparation, Characterization and Application to Remove Hg(II) and As(III) Using Polymer Enhanced Ultrafiltration. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 170, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bliznyuk, V.N.; Kutsevol, N.V.; Kuziv, Y.I.; Husson, S.M.; DeVol, T.A. Efficient Retention and Alpha Spectroscopy of Actinides from Aqueous Solutions Using a Combination of Water-Soluble Star-like Polymers and Ultrafiltration Membranes. Polymers 2022, 14, 3441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Zhou, M.; Fan, L.; Dai, Z.; Qiu, Y. Selective Separation of Dy(III), Yb(III) and Y(III) by Complexation and Orderly Decomplexation Coupling with Ultrafiltration Based on Rotating Disk Membrane and a DFT Study. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 341, 126665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, D.; Li, W.; Fan, L.; Qiu, Y. Separation of La(III), Ce(IV) and Ca(II) from Bastnaesite Using Acidic Phosphonic Chitosan and Rotating Disk Membrane. J. Rare Earths 2024, 42, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palencia, M.; Rivas, B.L.; Pereira, E. Metal Ion Recovery by Polymer-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Using Poly(Vinyl Sulfonic Acid): Fouling Description and Membrane-Metal Ion Interaction. J. Memb. Sci. 2009, 345, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dündar, O.A.; Mehenktaş, C.; Arar, Ö. Removal of Antimony(III) and Antimony(V) from Water Samples through Water-Soluble Polymer-Enhanced Ultrafiltration. Environ. Res. 2022, 215, 114324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Köker, B.; Cebeci, M.S. Removal of Cr(VI) from Tanning Wastewater Using Chitosan-SDS Complexes in PEUF: Optimization and Analysis via Response Surface Methodology. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 54, 103966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zambianchi, M.; Khaliha, S.; Bianchi, A.; Tunioli, F.; Kovtun, A.; Navacchia, M.L.; Salatino, A.; Xia, Z.; Briñas, E.; Vázquez, E.; et al. Graphene Oxide-Polysulfone Hollow Fibers Membranes with Synergic Ultrafiltration and Adsorption for Enhanced Drinking Water Treatment. J. Memb. Sci. 2022, 658, 120707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yang, C.; Meng, H.; Li, S.; Sarp, S.; Li, Z. Bio-Inspired Fabrication of Adsorptive Ultrafiltration Membrane for Water Purification: Simultaneous Removal of Natural Organic Matters, Lead Ion and Organic Dyes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfalahy, H.N.; Al-Jubouri, S.M. Preparation and Application of Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membranincorporating NaX Zeolite for Lead Ions Removal from Aqueous Solutions. Desalin. Water Treat. 2022, 248, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babaei, E.; Hashemifard, S.A. Polycarbonate/Copper Oxide Mixed Matrix Membrane for Separation of Lead and Cadmium from Industrial Effluents. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 619–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Shaeli, M.; Smith, S.J.D.; Jiang, S.; Wang, H.; Zhang, K.; Ladewig, B.P. Long-Term Stable Metal Organic Framework (MOF) Based Mixed Matrix Membranes for Ultrafiltration. J. Memb. Sci. 2021, 635, 119339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Huang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, F.; Zhu, C.; Pang, H.X.; Tan, J.J.; Xu, B.M. Covalent-Crosslinking IRMOF-3-NH2/PVC Ultrafiltration Membrane for Simultaneous Removal of Bisphenol A and Cd2+ Ions in Water. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 403, 136868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehghankar, M.; HMTShirazi, R.; Mohammadi, T.; Tofighy, M.A. Synthesis and Modification Methods of Metal-Organic Frameworks and Their Application in Modification of Polymeric Ultrafiltration Membranes: A Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Lee, S.; Hong, K.; Hong, S. Evaluation of Membrane Fouling Potential by Multiple Membrane Array System (MMAS): Measurements and Applications. J. Memb. Sci. 2010, 362, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enoch, G.D.; van den Broeke, W.F.; Spiering, W. Removal of Heavy Metals and Suspended Solids from Wastewater from Wet Lime (Stone)-Gypson Flue Gas Desulphurization Plants by Means of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Crossflow Microfiltration Membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 1994, 87, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, L.T.; Do, A.T.; Pham, T.H.; Nguyen, K.T.; Duong, H.C. Decentralised, Small-Scale Coagulation-Membrane Treatment of Wastewater from Metal Recycling Villages—A Case Study from Vietnam. Water Sci. Technol. 2020, 82, 2125–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zioui, D.; Martins, P.M.; Aoudjit, L.; Salazar, H.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Wastewater Treatment of Real Effluents by Microfiltration Using Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride–Hexafluoropropylene) Membranes. Polymers 2023, 15, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Urgun-Demirtas, M.; Benda, P.L.; Gillenwater, P.S.; Negri, M.C.; Xiong, H.; Snyder, S.W. Achieving Very Low Mercury Levels in Refinery Wastewater by Membrane Filtration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 215–216, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lim, J.L.; Park, N.S.; Kang, S.; Kim, C.H.; Lee, S.; Kim, S. Iron and Manganese Fouling in Microfiltration as a Pretreatment of Seawater Reverse Osmosis Processes. Desalin. Water Treat. 2011, 33, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashok Kumar, S.; Subathra, K.; Srinivasan, G.; Jayaraman, S.; Gnanasekaran, G.; Kanimozhi, G.; Govindaradjane, S. Impact of Tween-80 and Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration in Dairy Wastewater Treatment. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2021, 44, 913–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, M.; Usman, M.; Siddiq, M.; Rasool, N.; Saif, M.J.; Imran, M.; Rana, U.A. Removal of Ni(II) from Aqueous Solution by Using Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration. Water Sci. Technol. 2015, 72, 946–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.-S.; Zhang, P.; Shen, S.-Y.; Su, Q.-W.; Jiang, Y.-N.; Wang, J.-L.; Zhou, M.-Y.; Qiu, Z.-L.; Zhu, B.-K. The Efficient Removal of Low Concentration Hexavalent Chromium via Combining Charged Microporous Membrane and Micellar Adsorption Filtration. J. Polym. Eng. 2023, 43, 556–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajec, P.; Paulenova, A. Micellar Enhanced Microfiltration of Strontium. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1994, 183, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniş, Ü.; Keskinler, B. Chromate Removal from Wastewater Using Micellar Enhanced Crossflow Filtration: Effect of Transmembrane Pressure and Crossflow Velocity. Desalination 2009, 249, 1356–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olcay, A.N.; Polat, M.; Polat, H. Ancillary Effects of Surfactants on Filtration of Low Molecular Weight Contaminants through Cellulose Nitrate Membrane Filters. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 492, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Shi, L.; Zeng, G.; Li, H.; Huang, H.; Gu, Y.; Shi, Y.; Yi, K.; Li, X. Removal of Cd(II) by Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration: Role of SDS Behaviors on Membrane with Low Concentration. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydiner, C.; Bayramoglu, M.; Keskinler, B.; Ince, O. Nickel Removal from Waters Using a Surfactant-Enhanced Hybrid Powdered Activated Carbon/Microfiltration Process. II. The Influence of Process Variables. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trivunac, K.; Sekulić, Z.; Stevanović, S. Zinc Removal from Wastewater by a Complexation-Microfiltration Process. J. Serbian Chem. Soc. 2012, 77, 1661–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekulić, Z.; Antanasijević, D.; Stevanović, S.; Trivunac, K. Application of Artificial Neural Networks for Estimating Cd, Zn, Pb Removal Efficiency from Wastewater Using Complexation-Microfiltration Process. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 14, 1383–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, P.; Ye, M.; Xiao, X.; Lin, X.; Dai, W. Research on Low-Concentration Metals Removal Simultaneously from Electroplating Wastewater by the Method of Chelate Precipitation-Microfiltration. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2017, 11, 769–777. [Google Scholar]
- Qian, F.; Shi, M.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, F. Influence of Organic Matter Property on Heavy Metal Removal by Combined Coagulation-Microfiltration and Nanofiltration Processes. Chin. J. Endem. 2016, 10, 3634–3640. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, H.; Hsiao, B.; Chu, B. Electrospun Nanofibrous Membrane for Heavy Metal Ion Adsorption. Curr. Org. Chem. 2013, 17, 1361–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Jiang, B.; Yin, X.; Ma, H.; Hsiao, B.S. Highly Permeable Nanofibrous Composite Microfiltration Membranes for Removal of Nanoparticles and Heavy Metal Ions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 233, 115976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, B.; Zhang, D.; Li, Y. Preparation of PSSS-Grafted Polysulfone Microfiltration Membrane and Its Rejection and Removal Properties towards Heavy Metal Ions. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019, 30, 1096–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lahnafi, A.; Elgamouz, A.; Tijani, N.; Jaber, L.; Kawde, A.N. Hydrothermal Synthesis and Electrochemical Characterization of Novel Zeolite Membranes Supported on Flat Porous Clay-Based Microfiltration System and Its Application of Heavy Metals Removal of Synthetic Wastewaters. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022, 334, 111778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Y.; Zou, Y.; Zou, X.; Jiang, Y.; Song, S.; Qin, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, L. Study on the Adsorption Performance of Multi-Base Composite Magnesia Cementitious Material Microfiltration Membrane for Different Heavy Metal Ions. Mater. Lett. 2023, 335, 133488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.; Ahmed, A.; Gad, A. Chemical and Microstructural Analyses for Heavy Metals Removal from Water Media by Ceramic Membrane Filtration. Water Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.-H.; Lee, S.Y.; Rha, S.; Lee, Y.; Jo, H.Y.; Lee, S. Treatment of Heavy Metal Wastewater by Ceramic Microfilter Functionalized with Magnesium Oxides. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, X.; Gan, L.; Tong, Z.; Gao, H.; Meng, S.; Zhang, W.; Wang, P.; Chen, Y. Robust Cellulose-Based Composite Adsorption Membrane for Heavy Metal Removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 406, 124746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ki, C.S.; Gang, E.H.; Um, I.C.; Park, Y.H. Nanofibrous Membrane of Wool Keratose/Silk Fibroin Blend for Heavy Metal Ion Adsorption. J. Memb. Sci. 2007, 302, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Language | Publications | Contribution (%) |
---|---|---|
English | 2085 | 94.39 |
Chinese | 61 | 2.76 |
German | 11 | 0.50 |
Russian | 10 | 0.45 |
Persian | 10 | 0.45 |
French | 7 | 0.32 |
Croatian | 2 | 0.09 |
Japanese | 2 | 0.09 |
Arabic | 1 | 0.05 |
Lithuanian | 1 | 0.05 |
Polish | 1 | 0.05 |
Portuguese | 1 | 0.05 |
Spanish | 1 | 0.05 |
Undefined | 16 | 0.72 |
Country | Publications | Contribution (%) |
---|---|---|
China | 471 | 21.36 |
India | 356 | 16.15 |
United States | 213 | 9.66 |
Iran | 161 | 7.30 |
Malaysia | 94 | 4.26 |
United Kingdom | 76 | 3.45 |
Spain | 72 | 3.27 |
Germany | 70 | 3.17 |
Canada | 68 | 3.08 |
Italy | 66 | 2.99 |
South Korea | 66 | 2.99 |
Saudi Arabia | 65 | 2.95 |
Turkey | 62 | 2.81 |
France | 61 | 2.77 |
Institution | Country | Publications | Contribution (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Ministry of Education (China) | China | 51 | 2.31 |
Chinese Academy of Sciences | China | 51 | 2.31 |
University Teknologi Malaysia | Malaysia | 44 | 2.00 |
National University of Singapore | Singapore | 28 | 1.27 |
Zhejiang University of Technology | China | 26 | 1.18 |
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences | China | 25 | 1.13 |
Zhejiang University | China | 23 | 1.04 |
Razi University | Iran | 23 | 1.04 |
Harbin Institute of Technology | China | 22 | 1.00 |
Hunan University | China | 20 | 0.91 |
Anna University | India | 20 | 0.91 |
Subject | Publications | Contribution (%) |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1145 | 51.93 |
Chemistry | 798 | 36.19 |
Chemical Engineering | 770 | 34.92 |
Engineering | 579 | 26.26 |
Materials Science | 501 | 22.72 |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 267 | 12.11 |
Medicine | 136 | 6.17 |
Energy | 122 | 5.53 |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 117 | 5.31 |
Physics and Astronomy | 115 | 5.22 |
Source | SJR (2022) | IF (2022) | JCI (2022) | Publications | Contribution (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal of Membrane Science | 1.910 | 9.5 | 1.85 | 109 | 4.94 |
Desalination | 1.471 | 9.9 | 1.93 | 99 | 4.49 |
Chemosphere | 1.727 | 8.8 | 1.55 | 72 | 3.27 |
Desalination and Water Treatment | 0.267 | 1.1 | 0.25 | 70 | 3.17 |
Separation and Purification Technology | 1.339 | 8.6 | 1.37 | 62 | 2.81 |
Journal of Hazardous Materials | 2.570 | 13.6 | 1.93 | 61 | 2.77 |
Chemical Engineering Journal | 2.803 | 15.1 | 1.99 | 51 | 2.31 |
Water Science and Technology | 0.548 | 2.7 | 0.43 | 51 | 2.31 |
Water Research | 3.338 | 12.8 | 2.15 | 41 | 1.86 |
Membranes | 0.489 | 4.2 | 0.61 | 36 | 1.63 |
Journal of Environmental Management | 1.678 | 8.7 | 1.46 | 29 | 1.32 |
Science of the Total Environment | 1.946 | 9.8 | 1.68 | 29 | 1.32 |
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering | 1.198 | 7.7 | 0.94 | 26 | 1.18 |
Separation Science and Technology | 0.470 | 2.8 | 0.40 | 25 | 1.13 |
Ranking | Article | Times Cited |
---|---|---|
1 | Title: Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review Author(s): Fu, F., Wang Q. Journal: Journal of Environmental Management Year: 2011 | 6980 |
2 | Title: New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater Author(s): Barakat, M.A. Journal: Arabian Journal of Chemistry Year: 2011 | 2335 |
3 | Title: Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment Author(s): Fakhu’l-Razl, A., Pendashteh, A., Abbullah, L.C., (…), Madaeni, S.S., Abidin, Z.Z. Journal: Journal of Hazardous Materials Year: 2009 | 1729 |
4 | Title: Physico-chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals Author(s): Kurniawan, T.A., Chan, G.Y.S., Lo, W.-H., Babel, S. Journal: Chemical Engineering Journal Year: 2006 | 1666 |
5 | Title: Interactions of metal ions with chitosan-based sorbents: a review Author(s): Gulbal, E. Journal: Separation and Purification Technology Year: 2004 | 1640 |
6 | Title: Sustainable technologies for water purification from heavy metals: review and analysis Author(s): Bolisetty, S., Peydayesh, M., Mezzenga, R. Journal: Chemical Society Reviews Year: 2019 | 917 |
7 | Title: Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: A review Author(s): Mulligan, C.N., Yong, R.N., Gibbs, B.F. Journal: Engineering Geology Year: 2001 | 895 |
8 | Title: Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters: A review Author(s): Azimi, A., Azari, A., Rezakazemi, M., Ansarpour, M. Journal: ChemBioEng Reviews Year: 2017 | 831 |
9 | Title: Selective ion penetration of graphene oxide membranes Author(s): Sun, P., Zhu, M., Wang, K., (…), Xu, Z., Zhu, H. Journal: ACS Nano Year: 2013 | 631 |
10 | Title: Microalgae—A promising tool for heavy metal remediation Author(s): Suresh Kumar, K., Dahms, H.U., Won, E.J., Lee, J.-S., Shin, K.H. Journal: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Year: 2015 | 603 |
Cluster | Number of Documents | Centrality | Density |
---|---|---|---|
Subperiod 1 (1972–2010) | |||
Heavy Metal | 411 | 140.29 | 49.30 |
Heavy Metal Removal | 168 | 108.90 | 27.35 |
Metal | 133 | 101.49 | 13.76 |
Subperiod 2 (2011–2020) | |||
Procedures | 159 | 250.47 | 113.32 |
Heavy Metal | 763 | 353.07 | 68.82 |
Heavy Metal Removal | 288 | 300.98 | 34.80 |
Cadmium | 206 | 166.74 | 18.44 |
Water Treatment | 185 | 119.91 | 15.63 |
Hydrophilicity | 151 | 124.70 | 18.11 |
Ion Exchange | 147 | 129.78 | 11.50 |
Efficiency | 49 | 74.19 | 4.15 |
Subperiod 3 (2021–2023) | |||
Microfiltration | 461 | 242.02 | 80.28 |
Water Pollutant | 165 | 195.96 | 64.94 |
Nanofiltration | 180 | 127.22 | 33.32 |
Pollutant Removal | 181 | 170.66 | 20.33 |
Scanning Electron Microscopy | 91 | 111.64 | 12.97 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Castro, K.; Abejón, R. Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewaters and Other Aqueous Streams by Pressure-Driven Membrane Technologies: An Outlook on Reverse Osmosis, Nanofiltration, Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Potential from a Bibliometric Analysis. Membranes 2024, 14, 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14080180
Castro K, Abejón R. Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewaters and Other Aqueous Streams by Pressure-Driven Membrane Technologies: An Outlook on Reverse Osmosis, Nanofiltration, Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Potential from a Bibliometric Analysis. Membranes. 2024; 14(8):180. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14080180
Chicago/Turabian StyleCastro, Katherinne, and Ricardo Abejón. 2024. "Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewaters and Other Aqueous Streams by Pressure-Driven Membrane Technologies: An Outlook on Reverse Osmosis, Nanofiltration, Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Potential from a Bibliometric Analysis" Membranes 14, no. 8: 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14080180