Next Article in Journal
Biomimetic Membranes as a Technology Platform: Challenges and Opportunities
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact on CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 Separation Performance Using Cu-BTC with Supported Ionic Liquids-Based Mixed Matrix Membranes
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of PES/LSMM-OGCN Photocatalytic Membrane for Phenol Removal: Effect of OGCN Loading
Previous Article in Special Issue
Progress on Incorporating Zeolites in Matrimid®5218 Mixed Matrix Membranes towards Gas Separation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Single Gas Permeance Performance of High Silica SSZ-13 Zeolite Membranes

1
Institute of Advanced Materials, State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Zeolite Membrane Materials, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
2
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Graduate School Science and Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Tokiwadai 2-16-1, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8611, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2018, 8(3), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030043
Submission received: 10 June 2018 / Revised: 4 July 2018 / Accepted: 10 July 2018 / Published: 13 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zeolitic Membranes: Advances and Applications)

Abstract

:
Continuous and high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes were prepared on porous mullite supports from high SiO2/Al2O3 ratio or aluminum-free precursor synthesis gel. Single gas permeance (CO2 and CH4) of the high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane was decreased with the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio in the precursor synthesis gel, while the ideal CO2/CH4 selectivity of the membrane was gradually increased. Moreover, effects of synthesis conditions (such as H2O/SiO2 and RNOH/SiO2 ratios of precursor synthesis gel, crystallization time) on the single gas permeance performance of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes were studied in detail. Medium H2O/SiO2 and RNOH/SiO2 ratios in the initial synthesis gel were crucial to prepare the good CO2 perm-selective SSZ-13 zeolite membrane. When the molar composition of precursor synthesis gel, crystallization temperature and time were 1.0 SiO2: 0.1 Na2O: 0.1 TMAdaOH: 80 H2O, 160 °C and 48 h, CO2 permeance and ideal CO2/CH4 selectivity of the SSZ-13 zeolite membrane were 0.98 × 10−7 mol/(m2·s·Pa) and 47 at 25 °C and 0.4 MPa. In addition, the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of the corresponding SSZ-13 zeolite was 410 by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

As a high-quality, clean fuel and important chemical raw materials, natural gas has attracted a lot of attention recently. Global consumption of natural gas was projected to increase to 182 trillion m3 in 2030 [1]. CO2 content of natural gas was high in general, which could have a great influence on the combustion heat of natural gas. In addition, the high CO2 content natural gas would corrode the steel pipeline and increase the transportation equipment costs. Generally, specifications for natural gas require a CO2 concentration below 2–3% [2].
Currently, amine adsorption and cryogenic distillation are the main technologies for CO2 capture and separation, which are the energy-intensive and cost-intensive processes [3]. Membrane separation was expected to be a novel and energy efficient technology for CO2 capture and separation, which was no need for sorbent regeneration or desorption [4]. Baker et al. reported that polymeric membranes could separate CO2 from natural gas [5]. However, the high CO2 pressure could plasticize polymeric membranes and decrease separation performance of polymeric membranes [6]. Because the membrane had the inherent trade-off property for gas separation, it was difficult to obtain the high permeation and selectivity polymeric membrane [7]. Inorganic membranes have good hydrothermal stability, mechanical strength, and chemical resistance, which are promising candidates for gas separation [8]. Recently, zeolite membranes, such as zeolite T, DDR, MFI, CHA, and metal-organic framework (MOF) membranes have gained much attention for natural gas purification [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
SSZ-13 zeolite had a unique three-dimensional structure with eight-membered rings and intersecting channels with a ring diameter of 0.37 nm × 0.42 nm [24]. SSZ-13 zeolite membranes had good selectivity and permeance for CO2/CH4 separation [3,21,22]. In particular, the high-silica zeolite membrane had low polarity and few non-zeolitic molecular trafficking pathways [25,26,27]. In addition, the high-silica SSZ-13 membrane was successfully prepared on α-alumina hollow fibers, the optimal CO2 permeance and CO2/CH4 separation of the membrane were 2.5 × 10−7 mol/(m2·s·Pa) [28]. In order to prepare a high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane, the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of the initial synthesis gel was up to 40 in our previous study [3]. Kida et al. had successfully prepared the pure silica CHA-type zeolite membrane, and the synthesis procedure was complicated; for example, the H2O/SiO2 ratio of initial synthesis gel was only 5.7 [21]. A low H2O/SiO2 ratio means high costs of membrane preparation, which would affect the industrial application of an SSZ-13 zeolite membrane.
High silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes were prepared from the aluminum-free or high SiO2/Al2O3 ratio precursor synthesis gel by secondary hydrothermal synthesis, and the H2O/SiO2 ratio of the precursor synthesis gel was from 20 to 80 in this work. In order to optimize synthesis conditions of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes, influences of synthesis conditions (the RNOH/SiO2 and H2O/SiO2 ratios of the initial synthesis gel, crystallization time) on growth and single gas separation performance of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes were investigated in details.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation Procedure of SSZ-13 Zeolite and High Silica SSZ-13 Membranes

A high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane was synthesized on the porous mullite tubes (length: 10 cm, out diameter: 12 mm, inner diameter: 9 mm, thickness: 1.5 mm, average pore size: 1.3 μm, porosity: 30–40%, Nikkato Corp., Tokyo, Japan) by secondary hydrothermal synthesis. The synthesis procedure of SSZ-13 zeolite seed was as following, NaOH (96%, Junzheng, Wuhai, China), N, N, N-trimethyl-1-adamantammonium hydroxide (TMAdaOH, 25%, Ankai, Tokyo, Japan), Al(OH)3 (99%, Wako, Tokyo, Japan) were mixed by deionized water and stirred the mixture, and then colloidal silica (Ludox TM-40, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was slowly added into the mixture while continuously stirring. The molar composition of SSZ-13 zeolite seed synthesis gel was SiO2: 0.1 Na2O: 0.025 Al2O3: 0.1 TMAdaOH: 44 H2O. The mixture was aged at room temperature for 6 h, and transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and placed into an oven at 160 °C for 96 h. The SSZ-13 zeolite seeds were centrifuged with deionized water after hydrothermal synthesis and calcined at 550 °C for removing an organic template. The mullite tube was seeded by the home-made SSZ-13 zeolite seeds by rub-coating, and the molar composition of initial synthesis gel for SSZ-13 zeolite membrane was SiO2: 0.1 Na2O: x Al2O3: y TMAdaOH: zH2O (x = 0–0.025, y = 0.05–0.15, z = 20–80). The preparation procedure of the high silica SSZ-13 membrane was similar to our previous study [3]. NaOH, TMAdaOH, and Al(OH)3 were added into deionized water, and stirred to form a clear solution. Colloidal silica was slowly added to the clear solution, and the mixtures were aged 6 h at room temperature while continuously stirring. Thereafter, the precursor synthesis gel and seeded tubes were transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and placed into an oven at 160 °C for 24–78 h. The membrane was washed with deionized water, and TMdaOH of the membrane was removed at 550 °C for 10 h. Moreover, the synthesis procedure of different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio SSZ-13 zeolite was identical with the SSZ-13 zeolite membrane except a seeded mullite tube, and the SSZ-13 zeolite seed content in the precursor synthesis gel was 0.5 wt %.

2.2. Characterization and Single-Gas Permeation

Surface morphology and thickness of membranes were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, SU8020, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at acceleration voltages of 3–10 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD, Ultima IV, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) was used to identify the crystal phases of the SSZ-13 zeolite and membrane, and the test condition was Cu-Kα radiation with 2θ from 5° to 45º. SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of SSZ-13 zeolite was characterized by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF, S4 PIONEER, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA).
Permeance and ideal gas selectivity (CO2 and CH4) of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes were tested by single gas permeation measurements at room temperature and 0.4 MPa. As shown in Figure 1, SSZ-13 zeolite membranes were mounted in a stainless steel module, and each end of the membrane was installed with silicone O-rings and two stainless steel rings. The single gas permeance (Pi) was calculated by Equation (1):
Pi = ni/(A∙ΔP)
where ni (mol/s) was the membrane flux of component i, ΔP (Pa) was the pressure drop, and A (m2) was the effective surface area of the SSZ-13 zeolite membrane. The relevant ideal selectivity (S) of membranes was calculated with the ratio of CO2 and CH4 permeance as Equation (2):
S = P C O 2 / P C H 4

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of the SiO2/Al2O3 Ratio

The water adsorption property of zeolite membrane greatly depended on the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of membrane layer, and the hydrophobicity of the zeolite membrane was increased with the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio. Generally, high silica zeolite membrane had few defects, pinholes and a good gas separation performance [20,29], and Si-CHA zeolite membrane had better vapor resistance than the topologically analogous SSZ-13 zeolite membrane [21]. In order to investigate effects of SiO2/Al2O3 ratio on the growth and gas separation performance of SSZ-13 zeolite membrane, which were prepared from different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio precursor synthesis gels (SiO2/Al2O3 = 40~∞). The crystallization time and temperature of the membrane were 48 h and 160 ˚C. Molar composition of the synthesis gel was SiO2: 0.1 Na2O: xAl2O3: 0.1 TMAdaOH: 80 H2O (x = 0, 0.005, and 0.025). CO2 and CH4 permeation results of these membranes were given in Table 1. It is noted that the preparation procedure of the corresponding high silica SSZ-13 zeolite was identical with the high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane, and the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of corresponding high silica SSZ-13 zeolite was characterized by XRF. XRF results suggested that the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of the SSZ-13 zeolite membrane was increased with the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of the precursor synthesis gel, and SiO2/Al2O3 ratios of these membranes M-1, M-2 and M-3 were 31, 115 and 410, respectively. Because the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of seed crystals was 40, even though the membrane M-3 was prepared from the aluminum-free precursor gel, the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of the membrane was 410 for the aluminum-containing SSZ-13 zeolite crystals.
As shown in Figure 2, all membranes (M-1, 2 and 3) had typical CHA zeolite and mullite diffraction peaks by XRD patterns, which suggested that high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes were successfully prepared from high SiO2/Al2O3 ratio or aluminum-free precursor synthesis gel in this work. The intensity of typical CHA zeolite diffraction peaks of membranes M-2 and M-3 were higher than that of membrane M-1. In addition, Figure 3 showed surface and cross sectional SEM images of membrane M-1, M-2 and M-3. Crystal layer thicknesses of SSZ-13 zeolite membranes were independent of the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio in the precursor synthesis gel compact crystal layers, which was consistent with the previous reference [20]. Compactness of membrane M-2 and M-3 was better than the membrane M-1 (Figure 3a,c,e).
Gas separation performance of zeolite membranes was sensitive to non-zeolite defects in the zeolite membrane selective layer [30]. As shown in Table 1, CO2 permeance of SSZ-13 membranes were decreased with the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio in the precursor synthesis gel, while the CO2/CH4 selectivity of as-synthesized SSZ-13 zeolite membranes was gradually increased, which could be attributed to the fact that the membrane had few defects with the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio [20]. The high SiO2/Al2O3 ratio precursor gel was a favor for preparing defect-free zeolite membrane, and the membrane M-3 had a better ideal selectivity than membranes M-1 and 2, which had fully justified XRD patterns and SEM images (Figure 2 and Figure 3). CO2 permeance and CO2/CH4 ideal selectivity of the membrane M-3 were 0.98 × 10−7 mol/(m2·s·pa) and 47, respectively. Therefore, the high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane was successfully prepared from aluminum-free precursor synthesis gel and showed ideal CO2/CH4 selectivity in this work.

3.2. Effect of H2O/SiO2 Ratio

Generally, the Si-CHA or high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane were prepared from the concentrated synthesis gel, for example, H2O/SiO2 ratio of initial synthesis gel was only 5.7 [21]. In addition, H2O/SiO2 ratio had great effects on the concentration of each component in precursor synthesis gel, including the alkalinity of synthetic mixture. A medium alkaline environment was conducive to the growth of a defect-free zeolite membrane, but the zeolite crystals would be dissolved by strong alkalinity [31]. As presented in Table 1, high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes were prepared from a different H2O/SiO2 ratio and aluminum-free precursor synthesis gels (M-3, 4, 5, and 6), whose molar ratio was 1.0 SiO2: 0.1 Na2O: 0.1 TMAdaOH: zH2O in this study (z = 20–80).
XRD patterns of SSZ-13 zeolite membranes (M-3, 4, 5, and 6) were shown in Figure 4. There were no specific orientation and other zeolite or amorphous impurities of these membranes, indicating that these membranes had typical CHA topology. Figure 5 presented surface and cross-sectional SEM images of these membranes, when the H2O/SiO2 ratio in precursor synthesis gel was gradually increased, and the crystal morphology was changed from cubic crystals to spherical crystals (Figure 5a,c,e). Because there were too many nutrients for nuclei formation and zeolite growth with concentrated synthesis gel (H2O/SiO2 = 20), there were plenty of fine SSZ-13 zeolite covered on the membrane surface (Figure 5a). In addition, the thickness of membrane layer was independent of the H2O/SiO2 ratio in precursor synthesis gel. From the viewpoint of the balance of permeance and selectivity, when the H2O/SiO2 ratio in the precursor synthesis gel was 80, the membrane M-3 had a good single gas permeance in this work.

3.3. Effect of TMAdaOH/SiO2 Ratio

Table 1 summarized the single gas permeance of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes (M-4, 7, and 8), which were prepared from different TMAdaOH/SiO2 ratio initial synthesis gel (1.0 SiO2: 0.1 Na2O: y TMAdaOH: 20 H2O, y = 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15). Both permeance and selectivity of these high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes were improved with the TMAdaOH/SiO2 ratio in precursor synthesis gel, and the permeance and selectivity of the membrane M-8 were slightly decreased at extremely high TMAdaOH/SiO2 ratio in precursor gel (RNOH/SiO2 = 0.15).
In addition, XRD patterns and SEM images of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane with different TMAdaOH/SiO2 were shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7. Clearly, these membranes had typical CHA diffraction peaks, when the TMAdaOH/SiO2 ratio in precursor gel was 0.15, typical CHA zeolite diffraction peaks of the membrane M-8 were weak. The crystal size was increased with increasing RNOH/SiO2 ratio, and the fine SSZ-13 zeolite crystals on the membrane surface were gradually increased with increasing TMAdaOH/SiO2 ratio. Moreover, the membrane M-4 had a better single gas permeance performance than membranes M-7 and M-8, which were consistent with XRD patterns and SEM images. Hence, a medium-level TMAdaOH/SiO2 ratio of the precursor synthesis gel was critical of the preparation of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane from aluminum-free synthesis gel.

3.4. Effect of Synthesis Time

Effects of synthesis time on SSZ-13 zeolite membranes performance were investigated in this work, and the single gas permeance of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes (M-9, 10, 4 and 11) was shown in Table 1.
Figure 8 showed the XRD patterns of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes. All membranes had typical CHA zeolite diffraction peaks. SEM images of SSZ-13 zeolite membranes prepared with different synthesis times were shown in Figure 9. There were some fine particles on the membrane surface at 24 h, 36 h and 48 h, and the number of particles on the membrane surface was gradually decreased (Figure 9a,c,e). The crystal layer became dense, and the fine particles disappeared as the synthesis time increased to 72 h (Figure 9g,h). When the synthesis time was 48 h, the membrane M-4 showed the best single gas permeance and ideal selectivity in this work.
In addition, comparison of ideal selectivity (SCO2/CH4) through SSZ-13 zeolite membrane in literature was summarized in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, good single gas permeance performance and high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane were successfully prepared from the aluminum-free and high H2O/SiO2 ratio precursor synthesis gel.

4. Conclusions

A high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane had been successfully fabricated from an aluminum-free precursor synthesis gel using a secondary growth method. The SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of the high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane was up to 410 by XRF characterization. The ideal CO2/CH4 selectivity of as-synthesized SSZ-13 zeolite membranes was gradually increased with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio. The optimal molar composition of precursor synthesis gel, crystallization temperature and time were 1.0 SiO2: 0.1 Na2O: 0.1 TMAdaOH: 80 H2O, 160 °C and 48 h in this work. CO2 permeances and CO2/CH4 selectivity were 0.98 × 10−7 mol/(m2 s pa) and 47 at 25 °C and 0.4 MPa.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z. and X.C.; Methodology, M.Z.; Software, L.L.; Validation, L.L., T.W. and L.C.; Formal Analysis, C.Z.; Investigation, Y.Y.; Resources, H.W.; Data Curation, L.L.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, L.L. and M.Z.; Writing—Review & Editing, L.L. and M.Z.; Visualization, I.K.; Supervision, H.K.; Project Administration, X.C.; Funding Acquisition, M.Z. and X.C.

Funding

This work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21476099), International Science, Technology Cooperation Program of China (2015DFA50190), Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (20171BCB24005).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xiao, Y.; Low, B.T.; Hosseini, S.S.; Chung, T.S.; Paul, D.R. The strategies of molecular architecture and modification of polyimide-based membranes for CO2 removal from natural gas—A review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 561–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. NKEA: National Key Economic Area. Available online: http://kada.gov.my/en/web/guest/bidang-ekonomi-utama-negara-nkea (accessed on 2 April 2018).
  3. Zheng, Y.; Hu, N.; Wang, H.; Bu, N.; Zhang, F.; Zhou, R. Preparation of steam-stable high-silica CHA (SSZ-13) membranes for CO2/CH4 and C2H4/C2H6 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 475, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. An, W.; Swenson, P.; Wu, L.; Waller, T.; Ku, A.; Kuznicki, S.M. Selective separation of hydrogen from C1/C2 hydrocarbons and CO2 through dense natural zeolite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 69, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baker, R.W. Future directions of membrane gas separation technology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 4, 1393–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Staudt-Bickel, C.; Koros, W.J. Olefin/paraffin gas separations with 6FDA-based polyimide membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 170, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sanders, D.F.; Smith, Z.P.; Guo, R.; Robeson, L.M.; McGrath, J.E.; Paul, D.R.; Freeman, B.D. Energy-efficient polymeric gas separation membranes for a sustainable future: A review. Polymer 2013, 54, 4729–4761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yeo, Z.Y.; Chew, T.L.; Zhu, P.W.; Mohamed, A.R.; Chai, S.-P. Conventional processes and membrane technology for carbon dioxide removal from natural gas: A review. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2012, 21, 282–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cui, Y.; Kita, H.; Okamoto, K.-I. Zeolite T membrane: Preparation, characterization, pervaporation of water/organic liquid mixtures and acid stability. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 236, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tomita, T.; Nakayama, K.; Sakai, H. Gas separation characteristics of DDR type zeolite membrane. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2004, 68, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, H.; Zhu, G.; Li, H.; Zou, X.; Yin, X.; Yang, W.; Qiu, S.; Xu, R. Hierarchical growth of large-scale ordered zeolite Silicalite-1 membranes with high permeability and selectivity for recycling CO2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 118, 7211–7214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Choi, J.; Jeong, H.K.; Snyder, M.A.; Stoeger, J.A.; Masel, R.I.; Tsapatsis, M. Grain boundary defect elimination in a zeolite membrane by rapid thermal processing. Science 2009, 325, 590–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, S.; Falconer, J.L.; Noble, R.D. Improved SAPO-34 membranes for CO2/CH4 separations. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 2601–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Tokay, B.; Funke, H.H.; Falconer, J.L.; Noble, R.D. Template removal from SAPO-34 crystals and membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 363, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, R.; Ping, E.W.; Funke, H.H.; Falconer, J.L.; Noble, R.D. Improving SAPO-34 membrane synthesis. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 444, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carreon, M.L.; Li, S.; Carreon, M.A. AlPO-18 membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 2310–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wu, T.; Wang, B.; Lu, Z.; Zhou, R.; Chen, X. Alumina-supported AlPO-18 membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 471, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, B.; Hu, N.; Wang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Zhou, R. Improved AlPO-18 membranes for light gas separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 12205–12212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kalipcilar, H.; Bowen, T.; Noble, R.; Falconer, J. Synthesis and separation performance of SSZ-13 zeolite membranes on tubular supports. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 3458–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kosinov, N.; Auffret, C.; Borghuis, G.J.; Sripathi, V.G.P.; Hensen, E.J.M. Influence of the Si/Al ratio on the separation properties of SSZ-13 zeolite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 484, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kida, K.; Maeta, Y.; Yogo, K. Preparation and gas permeation properties on pure silica CHA-type zeolite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 522, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, B.; Zhou, R.; Bu, N.; Wang, Q.; Zhong, S.; Wang, B.; Hidetoshi, K. Room-temperature ionic liquids modified zeolite SSZ-13 membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 524, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Venna, S.R.; Jasinski, J.B.; Carreon, M.A. Structural evolution of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 18030–18033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hedin, N.; DeMartin, G.J.; Roth, W.J.; Strohmaier, K.G.; Reyes, S.C. PFG NMR self-diffusion of small hydrocarbons in high silica DDR, CHA and LTA structures. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008, 109, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Noack, M.; Mabande, G.T.P.; Caro, J.; Georgi, G.; Schwieger, W.; Kölsch, P.; Avhale, A. Influence of Si/Al ratio, pre-treatment and measurement conditions on permeation properties of MFI membranes on metallic and ceramic supports. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2005, 82, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Caro, J.; Albrecht, D.; Noack, M. Why is it so extremely difficult to prepare shape-selective Al-rich zeolite membranes like LTA and FAU for gas separation? Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 66, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Noack, M.; Kölsch, P.; Dittmar, A.; Stöhr, M.; Georgi, G.; Eckelt, R.; Caro, J. Effect of crystal intergrowth supporting substances (ISS) on the permeation properties of MFI membranes with enhanced Al-content. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2006, 97, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kosinov, N.; Auffret, C.; Sripathi, V.G.P.; Gücüyener, C.; Gascon, J.; Kapteijn, F.; Hensen, E.J.M. Influence of support morphologies on the detemplation and permeation of ZSM-5 and SSZ-13 zeolite membranes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 197, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, A.; Wang, N.; Caro, J. Synthesis of multi-layer zeolite LTA membranes with enhanced gas separation performance by using 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane as interlayer. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 164, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zones, S.I. Zeolite SSZ-13 and Its Method of Preparation. U.S. Patent 4544538, 1 October 1985. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hasegawa, Y.; Abe, C.; Nishioka, M.; Sato, K.; Nagase, T.; Hanaoka, T. Influence of synthesis gel composition on morphology, composition, and dehydration performance of CHA-type zeolite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 363, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kosinov, N.; Auffret, C.; Gücüyener, C.; Szyja, B.M.; Gascon, J.; Kapteijn, F.; Hensen, E.J.M. High flux high-silica SSZ-13 membrane for CO2 separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 13083–13092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Single gas permeation measurements: (1) cylinder; (2) reducing valve; (3) pressure gauge; (4) counterbalance valve; (5) membrane module; (6) soap bubble flowmeter.
Figure 1. Single gas permeation measurements: (1) cylinder; (2) reducing valve; (3) pressure gauge; (4) counterbalance valve; (5) membrane module; (6) soap bubble flowmeter.
Membranes 08 00043 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio; (a) M-1, SiO2/Al2O3 = 40; (b) M-2, SiO2/Al2O3 =200; (c) M-3, SiO2/Al2O3 = ∞.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio; (a) M-1, SiO2/Al2O3 = 40; (b) M-2, SiO2/Al2O3 =200; (c) M-3, SiO2/Al2O3 = ∞.
Membranes 08 00043 g002
Figure 3. Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio (a,b) M-1, SiO2/Al2O3 = 40; (c,d) M-2, SiO2/Al2O3 =200; (e,f) M-3, SiO2/Al2O3 = ∞.
Figure 3. Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio (a,b) M-1, SiO2/Al2O3 = 40; (c,d) M-2, SiO2/Al2O3 =200; (e,f) M-3, SiO2/Al2O3 = ∞.
Membranes 08 00043 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different H2O/SiO2 ratio, (a) M-4, H2O/SiO2 = 20; (b) M-5, H2O/SiO2 = 40; (c) M-6, H2O/SiO2 = 60; (d,b) M-3, H2O/SiO2 = 80.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different H2O/SiO2 ratio, (a) M-4, H2O/SiO2 = 20; (b) M-5, H2O/SiO2 = 40; (c) M-6, H2O/SiO2 = 60; (d,b) M-3, H2O/SiO2 = 80.
Membranes 08 00043 g004
Figure 5. Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different H2O/SiO2 ratio, (a,b) M-4, H2O/SiO2 = 20; (c,d) 40, H2O/SiO2 = 40; (e,f) M-6, H2O/SiO2 = 60; (g,h) M-3, H2O/SiO2 = 80.
Figure 5. Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different H2O/SiO2 ratio, (a,b) M-4, H2O/SiO2 = 20; (c,d) 40, H2O/SiO2 = 40; (e,f) M-6, H2O/SiO2 = 60; (g,h) M-3, H2O/SiO2 = 80.
Membranes 08 00043 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different TMAdaOH/SiO2 ratio, (a) M-7, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.05; (b) M-4, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.10; (c) M-8, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.15.
Figure 6. XRD patterns of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different TMAdaOH/SiO2 ratio, (a) M-7, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.05; (b) M-4, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.10; (c) M-8, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.15.
Membranes 08 00043 g006
Figure 7. Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different TMAdaOH/SiO2 ratio, (a,b) M-7, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.05; (c,d) M-4, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.10; (g,h) M-8, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.15.
Figure 7. Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membranes with different TMAdaOH/SiO2 ratio, (a,b) M-7, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.05; (c,d) M-4, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.10; (g,h) M-8, TMAdaOH/SiO2 = 0.15.
Membranes 08 00043 g007
Figure 8. XRD patterns of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane with different synthesis time, (a) M-9, 24 h; (b) M-10, 36 h; (c) M-4, 48 h; (d) M-11, 72 h.
Figure 8. XRD patterns of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane with different synthesis time, (a) M-9, 24 h; (b) M-10, 36 h; (c) M-4, 48 h; (d) M-11, 72 h.
Membranes 08 00043 g008
Figure 9. Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane with different synthesis time, (a,b) M-9, 24 h; (c,d) M-10, 36 h; (e,f) M-4, 48 h; (g,h) M-11, 72 h.
Figure 9. Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of high silica SSZ-13 zeolite membrane with different synthesis time, (a,b) M-9, 24 h; (c,d) M-10, 36 h; (e,f) M-4, 48 h; (g,h) M-11, 72 h.
Membranes 08 00043 g009
Table 1. Effects of molar composition of precursor synthesis gel and synthesis time on single gas permeance and ideal selectivity of SSZ-13 zeolite membranes (25 °C, 0.4 MPa).
Table 1. Effects of molar composition of precursor synthesis gel and synthesis time on single gas permeance and ideal selectivity of SSZ-13 zeolite membranes (25 °C, 0.4 MPa).
No.Molar Composition of Precursor Synthesis GelSynthesis Time (h)Gas PermeanceSCO2/CH4
SiO2/Al2O3H2O/SiO2TMAdaOH/SiO2 CO2 × 107 (mol/(m2∙s∙Pa))CH4 × 109 (mol/(m2∙s∙Pa))
M-140800.10486.7755.1012
M-2200800.10481.414.6730
M-3800.10480.982.1047
M-4200.10489.2046.0020
M-5400.10480.735.5513
M-6600.10481.005.2019
M-7200.05484.1532.0013
M-8200.15488.2050.0016
M-9200.10248,50121.007
M-10200.10364.9438.0013
M-11200.10724.0544.009
Note: Molar composition of precursor synthesis gel: as SiO2: 0.1 Na2O: x Al2O3: y TMAdaOH: zH2O (x = 0–0.025, y = 0.05–0.15, z = 20–80). Synthesis temperature: 160 °C.
Table 2. Comparison of preparation conditions and single gas permeance performance of SSZ-13 zeolite membranes in literature.
Table 2. Comparison of preparation conditions and single gas permeance performance of SSZ-13 zeolite membranes in literature.
Molar Ratio of Precursor Synthesis GelPressure Drop (MPa)Single Gas Permeance PerformanceReference (-)
H2O/SiO2SiO2/Al2O3CO2 Permeance × 107 (mol/(m2∙s∙Pa))SCO2/CH4
800.400.9847This work
44400.051.0011[19]
42500.603.0020[32]
80400.202.00360[3]
5.70.3015.0045[21]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, L.; Zhu, M.; Chen, L.; Zhong, C.; Yang, Y.; Wu, T.; Wang, H.; Kumakiri, I.; Chen, X.; Kita, H. Single Gas Permeance Performance of High Silica SSZ-13 Zeolite Membranes. Membranes 2018, 8, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030043

AMA Style

Liang L, Zhu M, Chen L, Zhong C, Yang Y, Wu T, Wang H, Kumakiri I, Chen X, Kita H. Single Gas Permeance Performance of High Silica SSZ-13 Zeolite Membranes. Membranes. 2018; 8(3):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Li, Meihua Zhu, Le Chen, Caijun Zhong, Yiming Yang, Ting Wu, Heli Wang, Izumi Kumakiri, Xiangshu Chen, and Hidetoshi Kita. 2018. "Single Gas Permeance Performance of High Silica SSZ-13 Zeolite Membranes" Membranes 8, no. 3: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030043

APA Style

Liang, L., Zhu, M., Chen, L., Zhong, C., Yang, Y., Wu, T., Wang, H., Kumakiri, I., Chen, X., & Kita, H. (2018). Single Gas Permeance Performance of High Silica SSZ-13 Zeolite Membranes. Membranes, 8(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030043

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop