Next Article in Journal
Do All Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors Have the Same Lipid Profile? Review of Randomised Controlled Trials in Naïve and Switch Scenarios in HIV-Infected Patients
Previous Article in Journal
A Demographic and Regional Comparison of Opioid-Related Hospital Visits within Community Type in the United States
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 16
10.3390/jcm10163457
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Role of miRNAs in Normal Endometrium and in Endometrial Disorders: Comprehensive Review

by
Kamila Kolanska
1,2,3,*,
Sofiane Bendifallah
1,2,3,
Geoffroy Canlorbe
2,4,
Arsène Mekinian
5,
Cyril Touboul
1,2,3,
Selim Aractingi
2,6,
Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet
1,2,3 and
Emile Daraï
1,2,3
1
Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, 4 Rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
2
INSERM UMRS 938, Sorbonne Université, Site Saint-Antoine, 27 Rue Chaligny, CEDEX 12, 75571 Paris, France
3
Centre Expert En Endométriose (C3E), Groupe de Recherche Clinique en Endométriose (GRC6), Sorbonne Université, 4 Rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
4
Service de Chirurgie et Cancérologie Gynécologique et Mammaire, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière, Charles-Foix, Sorbonne Université, 47/83, Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
5
Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France
6
Faculté de Médecine Paris 5 Descartes, 12 Rue de l’Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(16), 3457; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163457
Submission received: 10 June 2021 / Revised: 15 July 2021 / Accepted: 29 July 2021 / Published: 4 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics & Gynecology)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The molecular responses to hormonal stimuli in the endometrium are modulated at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional stages. Any imbalance in cellular and molecular endometrial homeostasis may lead to gynecological disorders. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in a wide variety of physiological mechanisms and their expression patterns in the endometrium are currently attracting a lot of interest. miRNA regulation could be hormone dependent. Conversely, miRNAs could regulate the action of sexual hormones. Modifications to miRNA expression in pathological situations could either be a cause or a result of the existing pathology. The complexity of miRNA actions and the diversity of signaling pathways controlled by numerous miRNAs require rigorous analysis and findings need to be interpreted with caution. Alteration of miRNA expression in women with endometriosis has been reported. Thus, a potential diagnostic test supported by a specific miRNA signature could contribute to early diagnosis and a change in the therapeutic paradigm. Similarly, specific miRNA profile signatures are expected for RIF and endometrial cancer, with direct implications for associated therapies for RIF and adjuvant therapies for endometrial cancer. Advances in targeted therapies based on the regulation of miRNA expression are under evaluation.

1. Introduction

The human endometrium is the only tissue that undergoes cyclic monthly structural modifications including proliferation, differentiation and shedding of the superficial layer during the so-called menstrual phase [1]. During the proliferative phase, from day 1 of menses to ovulation day, the superficial layer regenerates from the basal layer under the action of estradiol. In the secretory phase, progesterone induces decidualization in the estradiol-primed endometrium, a crucial step for embryo implantation [2,3]. These structural and functional modifications at the cellular and intercellular levels are finely orchestrated by numerous extrinsic and intrinsic factors. The molecular responses to hormonal stimuli are modulated at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional stages. Imbalance in cellular and molecular endometrial homeostasis may lead to gynecological disorders such as endometriosis, implantation failure, and endometrial cancer [4,5,6,7,8].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding small RNAs composed of about 21–25 nucleotides. They modify the expression of around 60% of proteins at a post-transcriptional level. To date, 3000 miRNAs have been identified. A single miRNA can control the expression of several messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and a single mRNA may be targeted by more than one miRNA, thus creating a complex network of cooperative regulation [9].
miRNAs are involved in a broad variety of physiological mechanisms such as morphogenesis, differentiation, apoptosis, and cellular metabolism [10]. Expression levels of some miRNAs are associated with endometrial receptivity [11] and fluctuate according to progesterone blood levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation [12]. Their implication in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and endometrial cancer has been described [13,14]. Recently, we have shown that some miRNA expression profiles are associated with the prognosis of endometrial cancer [15].

2. Methodology

We identified relevant original studies in English language through a search of the MEDLINE (2010 to present) database using the following terms: “miRNA”, “miR”, “endometrium”, “recurrent implantation failure”, “endometriosis”, “endometrial cancer”. A first selection was made by eliminating redundant articles and retaining the most recent publication. Studies in languages other than English, review articles, meeting abstracts and posters were excluded.

3. miRNA Biogenesis and Function

miRNAs are non-coding RNAs composed of about 22 nucleotides. In animals, they are involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of protein expression. While they can be encoded by solitary genes controlled by their own promoters and regulatory sequences, most of the animal miRNAs are organized in tandem and arranged in clusters. Thus, they are frequently co-regulated together with other members of the cluster [16].
miRNAs are transcribed from introns of protein-coding genes or from the intergenic regions mainly by RNA polymerase II and, less frequently, by RNA polymerase III [17,18]. The primary miRNAs are then cleaved into stem-loop pre-miRNAs about 60–70-nt-long either by Drosha RNase III endonuclease or by an alternative Drosha-independent mirtron pathway. Pre-miRNAs are actively exported to the cell cytoplasm and cleaved by the Dicer enzyme, which removes the loop structure to form mature miRNA duplexes with an overhang at the newly formed 3′ end. Dicer guides the so-formed miRNA duplexes to the Argonaute (AGO) protein—part of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC)—which unwinds the duplexes to form single-stranded miRNA-5p and miRNA-3p products. The mature miRNA is integrated into RISC. Target mRNAs are bound to the miRNA–RISC complex and are thus deactivated as the ribosomal assembly is repressed. Bound mRNAs are stored in cytoplasmic structures called P-bodies, from which they are released upon a cellular signal or destroyed [19,20].
The endometrial expression of miRNAs is cell-dependent and their biogenesis is finely regulated by the physiopathological profile of the cell, the microenvironment, and environmental factors. Expression is dependent on a single nucleotide polymorphism, and epigenetic modifications regulate transcription (methylation or acetylation of DNA, histone modifications) and interactions with RNA-binding proteins, and edit miRNA maturation [20].
miRNAs are characterized by an imprecise complementarity to their target mRNA [16]. According to the degree of complementarity, the target mRNA can either be degraded or its translation blocked. The action of miRNAs also varies according to the target mRNA binding site and can even, in some conditions, activate gene expression [20].
In addition to this complexity of miRNA action, a single miRNA can target numerous mRNAs, thus regulating hundreds of proteins and various networks [21]. On the other hand, one mRNA can also be targeted by different miRNAs [20].

4. miRNA Detection Methods

miRNA can be isolated from a wide variety of tissues and body fluids [22]. Their quality and quantity accessible for analysis depend on the tissue/fluid conservation methods and extraction protocols [22].
Several miRNA detection techniques are available, including electrochemical or potentiometric technologies, Northern blotting techniques, surface plasmon resonance, next-generation sequencing (NGS), microarrays, real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), NanoString® or immunoassays. All those technologies have advantages and drawbacks, with variable sensitivity and specificity, which could be a source of analytical bias and limit their utilization in routine practice [22]. Their principal characteristics are described in Table 1.

5. miRNAs and the Endometrial Cycle

5.1. The Endometrial Cycle

During the proliferative phase, a progressive proliferative growth of the endometrium is observed leading to a relative hypertrophy. This regular regeneration of the endometrial functional layer is a result of the proliferation and differentiation of epithelial and stromal stem/progenitor cells [23]. Numerous structural and molecular changes are brought about by estrogens. The functional layer of the endometrium is characterized by higher levels of expression of nuclear estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) in both the epithelial and stromal cells in parallel with higher estrogen blood levels [1].
On a molecular level, the control of endometrial proliferation is highly complex. Estradiol, the key hormone during this endometrial phase, regulates gene expression at the transcriptional level via its nuclear receptors ERα and ERβ.
After ovulation, under the action of progesterone, the estrogen-primed endometrium undergoes a secretory differentiation called decidualization characterized by morphological and molecular modifications of perivascular stromal cells and increased angiogenesis. This includes an afflux of immune cells, vascular remodeling, as well as proliferation and differentiation of stromal fibroblasts and glandular epithelial cells [24]. The endometrial stromal cells are characterized by an absence of expression of nuclear ER and an increased expression of PR [1]. Progesterone plays the main role in the secretory endometrial phase by inhibiting the estrogen-regulated pathways involved in cell proliferation and the cell cycle. Conversely, it induces transcription factors regulating proapoptotic and cell cycle pathways [25]. Its functions are mediated by two main nuclear progesterone receptor isoforms—PR-A and PR-B—which share a common structure [26]. However, the increase in the relative expression of PR-A to PR-B might inhibit progesterone signaling [27].

5.2. Endometrial miRNA Regulation by Estrogen and Progesterone

The regulation of miRNA action by sexual hormones is possibly connected to the modulation of Dicer and AGO activities [19].
The impact of steroid sexual hormones on the expression of miRNA has been studied in animal models. However, studies in zebrafish showed that estrogen-regulated expression of miRNA is both cell- and tissue-specific [28]. Thus, miRNA hormonal regulation findings cannot necessarily be extrapolated to other species or tissues.
Exposure of estradiol to human endometrial stromal cells in an in vitro culture induced up-regulation of miR-181b and let-7e, and down-regulation of mi-R27b [29]. Similarly, induction of miR-125b and miR-133a expression was observed in an in vitro culture of human endometrial epithelial cells exposed to progesterone [30,31]. The induction of miR-133a expression resulted in a proliferation of endometrial epithelial cells [31].
In vivo, the endometrial expression of miR-30b, miR-125b, miR-424, and miR-451 was found to be lower in women with high levels of blood progesterone, compared with women with low progesterone blood levels, at the moment of the ovulation trigger during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in an in vitro fertilization process [12].
Kuokkanen et al. [32] identified 49 miRNAs differentially expressed in the mid-secretory phase compared with the late proliferative phase in epithelial cells. Among the up-regulated miRNAs in the mid-secretory phase (compared with the late proliferative phase), miR-29b, miR-29c, miR-30b, miR-30d, miR-31, miR-193a-3p, miR-200c, miR-203, miR-204, miR-210, miR-345 and miR-582-5p showed the greatest differential expression levels. Conversely, the greatest differential expression levels among the down-regulated miRNAs in the late secretory phase were found for miR-105, miR-127, miR-134, miR-214, miR-222, miR-369-5p, miR-370, miR-376a, miR-382, miR450, miR-503 and miR-542-3p. In parallel, in the same study, transcriptomic analysis of the samples confirmed a down-regulation of 19 mRNAs in the mid-secretory phase predicted to be controlled by the identified miRNA.
Generally speaking, the pro-proliferative estrogen action on the miRNA profile is characterized by the inhibition of tumor suppressor miRNAs and induction of oncogene miRNA [33].

5.3. Endometrial Estrogen and Progesterone Action Regulation by miRNA

In the human endometrium, the action of estrogen is regulated by modifications in the expression of its nuclear receptors ERα and ERβ. The action of progesterone is dependent on the relative expression of the receptor isoforms PR-A and PR-B.
Little is known about miRNA regulation of ER in the endometrium. Bao et al. demonstrated that transfection of endometrial cancer cell lines with an miR-107 mimic resulted in a decreased expression of ERα at both the mRNA and protein levels. Inversely, transfection of the same cell line with an miR-107 inhibitor resulted in an increased expression of ERα at both levels [34]. Xiao et al. recently showed the impact of miR-22-5p on ERβ in endometrial stromal cells isolated from the eutopic endometrium of women with mild/severe endometriosis [35]. The transfection of these cells in an in vitro culture resulted in modifications of ERβ expression [35].
The expression of PR seems to be regulated by miR-194-3p, as the transfection of endometrial stromal cells with this miRNA in an in vitro culture resulted in a significant decrease in PR-A and PR-B protein expression [36]. In line with this finding, overexpression of miR-194-3p was correlated with the inhibition of endometrial stromal cell decidualization [36]. The same role has been described for miR-196a, as the transfection of endometrial stromal cells with this miRNA in an in vitro culture of endometrial cells resulted in decreased protein levels of PR-A and PR-B [37].
In in vitro studies, miR-92a promoted the proliferation of stromal endometrial cell lines. The transfection of this cell line with miR-92a resulted in progesterone resistance [38].
The functional analysis of miRNA showed that PRs are the predicted targets of miR-196a, miR-297, miR-575, miR-628–3p, miR-635, miR-921, miR-938 and miR-1184 [37].

6. miRNA and Embryo Implantation

Embryo implantation is a complex process during which a dialogue between the endometrium and the embryo is established. It takes place during a brief period of 4 days—called the receptive phase or the implantation window [2]—and is characterized by progesterone-induced immune tolerance, allowing embryo apposition, adhesion and invasion [1].
The success of embryo implantation is dependent on embryo quality, endometrial receptivity, and embryo–maternal interactions. The balanced expression of multiple molecules such as cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, lipids, and receptors is guaranteed by a fine autocrine, paracrine and juxtacrine regulation [39].
The presence of miRNAs in the uterine luminal fluid and their secretion in culture media suggest that they play a role in the implantation process. miRNAs seem to regulate uterine function as well as embryo development.
In mice, miR-223-3p is responsible for the reduction in pinopode formation [40] and, together with miR-181, is responsible for the down-regulation of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) expression [40,41]. Thus, the decreased expression of these two miRNAs is essential for initiating implantation [39].
Embryo apposition and adhesion require adhesive modifications in the apical surface of endometrial epithelium. The overexpression of Mucin-1, a transmembrane glycoprotein acting as an embryo attachment inhibitor, is related to embryo attachment failure. The expression of this protein in mice is probably regulated by miR-199a, let-7a and let-7b [42,43]. Conversely, type-1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R), regulated by miR-145, promotes adhesive interactions [44].
Trophoblastic invasion is facilitated by epithelial modifications reflecting an epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) with a decrease in cell polarization and remodeling of cell junctions. In a mouse model, miR-429—an miRNA involved in EMT regulation—has been shown to be down-regulated during implantation and its up-regulation resulted in a reduction in implantation sites by targeting protocadherin 8 [45]. On the other hand, miR-126-3p, which regulates integrin-α11 expression, and thus, modifies cell migration and invasion, is up-regulated in implantation sites [46]. miR-96 is also up-regulated in the implantation sites in early mouse pregnancy. It modulates the expression of anti-apoptotic factor Bcl-2 [47], which is involved in the decidualization process.
It has been suggested that miR-152-3p plays a role in embryo implantation and in the first days of pregnancy in the mouse. In epithelial endometrial cells, the expression of this miRNA, which is induced by progesterone, regulates the expression of GLUT3, which is involved in the regulation of intrauterine glucose concentration [48].
In in vitro cultures of human endometrial epithelial cells, increased miR-125b expression down-regulates the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-26 (MMP26), thus inhibiting cell movement and blocking embryo implantation [30]. On the other hand, in human endometrial stromal cells, miR-181a induces morphological transformation and regulates the expression of genes such as FOXO1A, PRL, IGFBP-1, DCN and TIMP3, which are involved in decidualization [49], and miR-222 modifies the expression of CDKN1C/p57kip2, which is involved in endometrial stromal cell decidualization and differentiation [50].
The expression of genes involved in endometrial maturation and its cyclic remodeling—such as CAST, CFTR, FGFR2, and LIF—are regulated by several miRNAs whose expression fluctuates according to the endometrial phase. miR-30b and miR-30d have been shown to be up-regulated, and miRNA-494 and miRNA-923 to be down-regulated in the receptive endometrium compared with the pre-receptive endometrium in healthy women [51].
miR-30b, miR-30d, miR-31 and miR-203 were found to be up-regulated during the implantation window compared with the proliferative phase [52]. The same study showed a down-regulation of miR-135a, miR-135b, miR-145 and miR-503.
The expression profiles of let-7, miR-17, the miR-30 family, miR-92 and miR-200 are associated with endometrial receptivity [11].

7. miRNA in Endometrial Disorders

Endometrial disorders associated with implantation failures, endometriosis and endometrial cancer are thought to arise from abnormal cellular and molecular endometrial homeostasis regulated at numerous stages of local gene expression.

7.1. Recurrent Embryo Implantation Failures (RIF)

RIF is defined as the absence of pregnancy after failure of implantation of at least three good-quality embryos [53] and is observed in up to 50% of couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatments. Identified causes of RIF are uterine abnormalities, spermatic factors, genetic abnormalities, hormonal and metabolic pathologies, thrombophilia, autoimmune diseases and excessive activation of the uterine immune profile [54,55].
At the molecular level, the expression of miR-145, which targets the mRNA coding for IGF1R [44], has been found to be up-regulated in women with RIF compared with fertile controls [56]. This study also showed up-regulation of nine other miRNAs (miR-23b, miR-27b, miR-99a, miR139-5p, miR-150, miR-195, miR-342-3p, miR-374b and miR-652) and down-regulation of three (miR-32, miR-628-5p and miR 874) in women with RIF [56]. The predicted target mRNA of the identified miRNAs is involved in adherent junction formation, Wnt signaling, cell adhesion, and the cell cycle. The predictive targets of miR-145—N-cadherin and netrin-4 (adhesion molecules)—were found to be down-regulated in women with RIF compared with fertile controls [56]. Similarly, H2AFX (involved in cell cycle arrest) and sFRP-4 (a Wnt signaling modulator), which are miR-23b targets, were also found to be down-regulated in women with RIF [56].
Another study of miRNA expression in the endometrium of women with RIF found up-regulation of six miRNAs (miR-29b-1-5p, miR-34b-3p, miR-138-1-3p, miR-146a-5p and miR-363-3p) [57].
The analysis of endometrial miRNA expression in women with ≥2 unsuccessful implantations compared to women with successful implantation after the first IVF attempt showed the up-regulation of miR-20b-5p, miR-155-5p and miR-330-5p and the down-regulation of miR-144-3p, miR-718 and miR-940 in women with RIF [58].
These miRNA modifications are summarized in Table 2.

7.2. Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a frequent gynecological condition where endometrium-like tissue is observed outside the uterus [62]. While the pathophysiological mechanism of endometriosis is not entirely clear, it is generally accepted that retrograde flux is implicated. However, changes in retrograde flux are frequently observed in the general population, including endometriosis-free women. Thus, other susceptibility factors play a role in the development and progression of endometriosis. Immunological and hormonal factors have been widely investigated [62]. The complex intracellular interactions between signaling pathways suggest that miRNAs may be implicated in the pathophysiology of endometriosis (Table 3) as they regulate numerous processes such as apoptosis and proliferation [63].
In the secretory phase of the eutopic endometrium in women with endometriosis, the miR-9 family and miR-34 are found to be down-regulated compared with healthy women [64]. The predicted target of miR-9 is Bcl-2, which is an anti-apoptotic protein whose expression is up-regulated in women with endometriosis [65].
The analysis of eutopic and ectopic endometrium in women with endometriosis found that miR-30c was down-regulated compared with the endometrium of healthy women [66]. This down-regulation was associated with an increased expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1). Transfection with this miRNA of endometrial stromal cells in an in vitro culture resulted in the down-regulation of PAI-1 and diminished cell proliferation, migration and invasion capacities [66].
Another study identified miR-196a as an overexpressed miRNA in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis compared with healthy women [37]. miR-196a is involved in the regulation of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway [37]. Conversely, miR-451 was found to be down-regulated in the eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis compared with healthy controls [67]. This down-regulation could be responsible for the promotion of proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis of endometrial cells [67].
Analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from the eutopic endometrium showed up-regulation of miR-200b and down-regulation of miR-145 and let-7b compared with mesenchymal stem cells from the endometrium of healthy controls [68]. Let-7 could have a regulatory impact on the expression of the genes involved in the maintenance of pluripotency of stem cells, their differentiation and self-renewal [69].
In women with progesterone-resistant endometriosis, defined as women without pelvic pain relief after progesterone treatment, miR-92a was found over-expressed in the eutopic endometrium compared with women with progesterone responsive endometriosis [38]. This over-expression was related to a decreased expression of PTEN, which is involved in the repression of cellular division and promotion of apoptosis [70].
Among the deregulated miRNAs in the ectopic endometrium of women with endometriosis compared with eutopic endometrium, 14 have been found to be up-regulated (miR-1, miR-29c, miR-99a, miR-99b, miR-100, miR-125a, miR-125b, miR-126, miR-143, miR-145, miR-150, miR-194, miR-223 and miR-365), and 8 down-regulated miRNA (miR-20a, miR-34c, miR-141, miR-142-3p, miR-196b, miR-200a, miR-200b and miR-424) [71].
The down-regulation of miR-34a-5p in ectopic endometrial tissue was correlated with the expression of VEGFA [60]. The regulation of this protein expression by miR-34a-5p was confirmed by the transfection of endometrial stromal cells with this miRNA in an in vitro culture, which resulted in down-regulation of VEGFA expression and diminution of the cell proliferation [60].
Analysis of ectopic endometrium found a down-regulation of miR-141-3p compared with eutopic endometrium and to endometrium from healthy controls [49]. This miRNA seems to be involved in the regulation of apoptotic factors, as its down-regulation resulted in elevated Bcl-2 expression and decreased Bax expression, thus inhibiting apoptosis [49].
It has been suggested that down-regulation of miR-200b and miR-200c is involved in the cell proliferation, migration and invasion capacities of endometrial cells [72,73]. Their action could be associated with EMT, which is regulated by ZEB1 and ZEB2 [72,73].
Zhou et al. identified miR-205-5p as being down-regulated in the ectopic endometrium of women with endometriosis compared with the normal endometrium of women with cervical epithelial cancer or leiomyomas [74]. In an in vitro culture of endometrial stromal cells, the authors demonstrated suppressed migration and invasion, and promotion of apoptosis after transfecting the cells with miR-205-5p. It has been suggested that angiopoietin-2 (ANGPT2) is the downstream mediator of this miRNA action [74]. miR-210-3p is also thought to be involved in the development of endometriosis as this miRNA was found to be up-regulated in both the eutopic and ectopic endometrium of women with endometriosis compared with the endometrium of healthy women [75]. This miRNA could be involved in cell proliferation and the DNA damage response to oxidative stress [75]. The role of miR-33b in endometrial proliferation regulation has also been suggested [76]: its expression is down-regulated in the ectopic endometrium compared to normal endometrial tissue. Transfection of endometrial cells with an miR-33b inhibitor in an in vitro culture resulted in increased cell proliferation. This was associated with a decreased expression of Caspase-3 and increased expression of VEGF and MMP-9 [76].
The association between endometriosis and infertility is not completely understood. During the implantation window, miR-543 was found to be down-regulated in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis compared with healthy controls [77]. In the normal endometrium, expression of miR-543 increases from the proliferative phase to the implantation window, which suggests that it may be involved in the implantation process, thus explaining the potential mechanism of fertility impairment in women with endometriosis [77].
Analysis of the eutopic endometrium from the mid-secretory phase in women with endometriosis showed an over-expression of miR-194-3p in endometrial stromal cells compared with women without endometriosis [36]. In a mouse model, this miRNA was found to be involved in the regulation of the STAT1/mTOR signaling pathway and its down-regulation in ectopic endometrial epithelial cells promoted cell proliferation and invasion [78]. In the eutopic endometrium of women with mild or minimal endometriosis, miR-194-3p was found to regulate PR expression and to increase the PR-A/PR-B mRNA ratio, thus impairing decidualization [36].
Analysis of ectopic stromal cells compared with the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis showed up-regulation of miR-139-5p, which can have a suppressive impact on the expression of HOXA10 [61], a gene involved in embryo implantation. Joshi et al. demonstrated a significant up-regulation of miR-29c in the mid-secretory phase in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis compared with healthy controls [79]. Transfection with miR-29c was associated with a decreased expression of FKBP4 and decreased decidualization response to progesterone in an in vitro culture of decidual cells [79]. Moreover, the authors showed that the excision of endometriotic lesions decreased the expression of miR-29c.
Hawkins et al. identified 10 up-regulated miRNAs (miR-29c, miR-100, miR-193a-3p, miR-193a-5p, miR-202, miR-485-3p, 509-3-5p, 574-3p, miR-708 and miR-720) and 12 down-regulated (miR-10a, miR-34c-5p, miR-141, miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-203, miR-375, miR-429, 449b, miR-504 and miR-873) in endometriomas compared with eutopic endometrium [80].
Table
Table 3. Hormonal regulation and function of deregulated miRNAs in endometriosis.
Table 3. Hormonal regulation and function of deregulated miRNAs in endometriosis.
miRNASex Steroid Hormone Regulation in EndometriumFunctionEndometriosis
Let-7 family Maintenance of pluripotency of stem cells, their differentiation and self-renewal [60]
Let-7b Regulation of Mucin-1 expression in mouseDown-regulated in mesenchymal stem cells from eutopic endometrium [59]
Let-7c-5p Up-regulated in endometriosis-associated infertility [29]
miR-1 Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-9 Regulation of Bcl-2 expression (apoptosis) [56]Down-regulated in secretory phase of eutopic endometrium [55]
miR-20a Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-22-5p Down-regulated in endometriosis-associated infertility [29]
miR-26bUp-regulated in implantation window compared with pre-receptive endometrium [43] (miR-26b-3p) Down-regulated in endometriosis-associated infertility [29]
miR-29cUp-regulated in secretory phase [24]Regulation of FKBP4 and decidualization response to progesterone [70]Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62,70]
miR-30c Regulation of PAI-1 [57]Down-regulated in eutopic and ectopic endometrium [57]
miR-33b Regulation of VEGF, MMP-9 and Caspase-3 and endometrium proliferation [67]Down-regulated in ectopic endometrial tissue [67]
miR-34 Down-regulated in secretory phase of eutopic endometrium [55]
miR-34a-5p Regulation of VEGFA expression and cell proliferation [51]Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [51]
miR-34c Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-92a Regulation of PTEN (repression of cellular division and promotion of apoptosis) [61]Up-regulated in eutopic endometrium in progesterone resistant endometriosis [30]
miR-99a Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-99b Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-100 Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-125a Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-125bUp-regulated by progesterone in vitro [22,23];
Down-regulated by progesterone if high progesterone blood level [7]		Inhibition of cell movement and blocking embryo implantation via regulation of MMP26 in vitroUp-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-126up-regulated in implantation sites in mouse [38]Regulation of integrin-α11 expressionUp-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-139-5p Regulation of HOXA10 expression [52]Up-regulated in ectopic stromal cells [52]
miR-141 Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-141-3p Regulation of apoptotic factors [41]Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [41]
miR-142-3p Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-143 Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-145 Regulation of IGF1R expression in mouse
Down-regulation of N-cadherin and netrin-4 (adhesion molecules) in RIF		Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
Down-regulated in mesenchymal stem cells from eutopic endometrium [59]
miR-150 Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-194 Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-194-3pRegulation of PR-A/PR-B ratio in eutopic endometrium in endometriosis [28]Regulation of STAT1/mTOR signaling pathway [69]Up-regulated in mid-secretory phase of eutopic endometrium [28]
miR-196a MEK/ERK signaling pathway [29]Up-regulated in eutopic endometrium [29]
miR-196b Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-199a Regulation of Mucin-1 expression in mouseUp-regulated in eutopic endometrium
miR-200a Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-200b Regulation of EMT via ZEB1 and ZEB2 [63]Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62,63]
Up-regulated in mesenchymal stem cells from eutopic endometrium [59]
miR-200cUp-regulated in secretory phase [24]Regulation of EMT via ZEB1, ZEB2 and MALAT1 [64]Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [64]
miR-205-5p Regulation of migration, invasion and apoptosis via ANGPT2 [65]Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [65]
miR-210-3pUp-regulated in secretory phase [24]Regulation of cell proliferation and DNA damage response to oxidative stress [66]up-regulated in eutopic and ectopic endometrium [66]
miR-223 Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-365 Up-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-424Down-regulated by progesterone if high progesterone blood level [7] Down-regulated in ectopic endometrium [62]
miR-451 Regulation of proliferation and apoptosis [58]Down-regulated in eutopic endometrium [58]
miR-543 Down-regulated in eutopic endometrium during implantation window [68]

7.3. Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer is the first most common gynecological cancer in developed countries, with 380,000 new cases diagnosed each year worldwide [81].
miRNA expression has been widely investigated in endometrial cancer. The pattern of their expression is associated with prognostic factors such as lymph node involvement, lymphovascular space invasion, overall survival and recurrence-free survival [82]. In a recent meta-analysis, Delangle et al. identified 54 over-expressed and 59 down-regulated miRNAs in tumoral endometrial tissue compared with healthy endometrium [82].
EMT is one of principal processes involved in cancer invasion and metastasis and is characterized by the phenotypical, morphological and molecular changes of cancer cells, resulting in increased mobility, loss of polarity, and decreased properties of cellular adhesion [83]. Numerous miRNAs have been implicated in the process of EMT in the literature (Table 4). In endometrial cancer, the up-regulation of miR-141, miR-200, miR-203, miR-205 and miR-429 and the down-regulation of miR-133 and miR-224 seem to be a molecular signature of EMT in endometrial cancer [84]. The let-7 family has been found to be involved in the promotion of EMT in endometrial carcinosarcomas [85]. The action of miR-141 and miR-200 is thought to be based on the regulation of ZEB1/ZEB2 expression involved in the regulation of E-cadherin expression [86,87,88]. Let-7 is thought to regulate the expression of the high mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2), an embryonic nuclear factor [85], which in turn regulates the expression of Snail, Slug, ZEB1, and ZEB2 inducing EMT [89].
Analysis of endometrial serous adenocarcinoma showed an up-regulation of miR-205 and down-regulation of miR-10b, miR-29b, miR-34b, miR-101, miR-133a, miR-133b, miR-152 and miR-411 compared with normal endometrium [90]. The expression of miR-10b and miR-29b was correlated with vascular invasion [90].
In endometrioid endometrial cancer, analysis of the miRNA endometrial profile showed the up-regulation of miR-106a and miR-144 and the down-regulation of miR-30d compared to controls [91]. Those miRNA seem implicated in the expression regulation of genes involved in EMT [91].

8. Perspectives

Cumulative data demonstrate that miRNAs are involved in various gynecological disorders, including endometriosis, with potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Thus, diagnostic tests supported by a specific miRNA signature according to the disorder could be developed. This could contribute to an early diagnosis for women with endometriosis and a subsequent change in the therapeutic paradigm. Similarly, such a diagnostic test could determine associated therapies for women with RIF, and adjuvant therapies for endometrial cancer. Advances in targeted therapies based on the regulation of miRNA expression are under evaluation.

9. Conclusions

miRNA are non-coding small RNAs responsible for the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. A single miRNA can control the expression of several mRNAs and a single mRNA may be targeted by more than one miRNA, thus creating a complex network of cooperative regulation. The action of each miRNA is tissue-specific and cannot be generalized to other organs.
miRNA expression patterns in the physiological and pathological endometrium are currently a hot topic of research. miRNA expression profile in the human endometrium varies according to the menstrual cycle and is regulated by sex steroids. On the other hand, miRNA can impact the action of sex steroids, so that modifications in miRNA expression profile in pathological endometrium could either be a cause or a result of the pathology.
Deregulated miRNA identified in RIF patients are frequently involved in adhesion, proliferation, and angiogenesis processes. In endometriosis the identified miRNA are frequently associated to proliferation, apoptosis and cell adhesion. Finally, miRNA involved in EMT are frequently found in endometrial cancer.
Recent progress allowing global analysis of known miRNA in the human endometrium may allow further understanding of their actions and hopefully lead to the development of diagnostic and/or theragnostic signatures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.K., G.C., S.A., N.C.-B. and E.D.; methodology, K.K. and S.B.; software, K.K. and S.B.; validation, K.K., A.M., C.T., S.A., N.C.-B. and E.D.; formal analysis, K.K., S.B., S.A. and N.C.-B.; investigation, K.K., G.C., A.M. and C.T.; resources, K.K., S.B., G.C., S.A., N.C.-B. and E.D.; data curation, K.K., S.B., G.C., A.M., C.T., S.A. and N.C.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, K.K., S.B., G.C. and N.C.-B.; writing—review and editing, K.K., A.M., C.T., S.A., N.C.-B. and E.D.; visualization, K.K., N.C.-B. and E.D.; supervision, C.T., S.A., N.C.-B. and E.D.; project administration, K.K., S.B., G.C. and N.C.-B.; funding acquisition, NA. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Felicity Neilson for editing the English of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Buffet, N.C.; Djakoure, C.; Maitre, S.C.; Bouchard, P. Regulation of the human menstrual cycle. Front Neuroendocrinol. 1998, 19, 151–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. D’hauterive, S.P.; Charlet-Renard, C.; Goffin, F.; Foidart, M.; Geenen, V. The implantation window. J Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 31, 440–455. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gellersen, B.; Brosens, I.A.; Brosens, J. Decidualization of the Human Endometrium: Mechanisms, Functions, and Clinical Perspectives. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2007, 25, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zondervan, K.T.; Becker, C.M.; Missmer, S.A. Endometriosis. Longo DL, éditeur. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1244–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yong, P.J.; Talhouk, A.; Anglesio, M.S. Somatic Genomic Events in Endometriosis: Review of the Literature and Approach to Phenotyping. Reprod. Sci. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Craciunas, L.; Gallos, I.; Chu, J.; Bourne, T.; Quenby, S.; Brosens, J.J.; Coomarasamy, A. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Updat. 2019, 25, 202–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, J.; Qin, H.; Yang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Laird, S.; Wang, R.; Chan, T.; Li, T.C. A comparison of transcriptomic profiles in endometrium during window of implantation between women with unexplained recurrent implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod. Camb. Engl. 2017, 153, 749–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Njoku, K.; Chiasserini, D.; Whetton, A.D.; Crosbie, E.J. Proteomic Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometrial Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Ferlita, A.L.; Battaglia, R.; Andronico, F.; Caruso, S.; Cianci, A.; Purrello, M. Non-Coding RNAs in Endometrial Physiopathology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Catalanotto, C.; Cogoni, C.; Zardo, G. MicroRNA in Control of Gene Expression: An Overview of Nuclear Functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Liu, W.; Niu, Z.; Li, Q.; Pang, R.T.; Chiu, C.N.; Yeung, W.S.-B. MicroRNA and Embryo Implantation. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 75, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, R.; Qiao, J.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Zhen, X.; Liu, P. MicroRNA array and microarray evaluation of endometrial receptivity in patients with high serum progesterone levels on the day of hCG administration. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2011, 9, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Raja, M.H.R.; Farooqui, N.; Zuberi, N.; Ashraf, M.; Azhar, A.; Baig, R. Endometriosis, infertility and MicroRNA’s: A review. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2021, 50, 102157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Donkers, H.; Bekkers, R.; Galaal, K. Diagnostic value of microRNA panel in endometrial cancer: A systematic review. Oncotarget 2020, 11, 2010–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Canlorbe, G.; Wang, Z.; Laas, E.; Bendifallah, S.; Castela, M.; Lefèvre, M.; Chabbert-Buffet, N.; Daraï, E.; Aractingi, S.; Méhats, C.; et al. Identification of microRNA expression profile related to lymph node status in women with early-stage grade 1–2 endometrial cancer. Mod. Pathol. 2016, 29, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ambros, V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature 2004, 431, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lee, Y.; Kim, M.; Han, J.; Yeom, K.-H.; Lee, S.; Baek, S.H.; Kim, V.N. MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 4051–4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Borchert, G.; Lanier, W.; Davidson, B.L. RNA polymerase III transcribes human microRNAs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 1097–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Klinge, C.M. miRNAs and estrogen action. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 23, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. De Sousa, M.C.; Gjorgjieva, M.; Dolicka, D.; Sobolewski, C.; Foti, M. Deciphering miRNAs’ Action through miRNA Editing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 11. [Google Scholar]
  21. Selbach, M.; Schwanhäusser, B.; Thierfelder, N.; Fang, Z.; Khanin, R.; Rajewsky, N. Widespread changes in protein synthesis induced by microRNAs. Nature 2008, 455, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kappel, A.; Keller, A. miRNA assays in the clinical laboratory: Workflow, detection technologies and automation aspects. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2017, 55, 636–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Munro, S.K.; Farquhar, C.M.; Mitchell, M.D.; Ponnampalam, A.P. Epigenetic regulation of endometrium during the menstrual cycle. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2010, 16, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gibson, D.; Greaves, E.; Critchley, H.; Saunders, P. Estrogen-dependent regulation of human uterine natural killer cells promotes vascular remodelling via secretion of CCL2. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 30, 1290–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lessey, B.A. Fine tuning of endometrial function by estrogen and progesterone through microRNAs. Biol. Reprod. 2010, 82, 653–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Evans, R.M. The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 1988, 240, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Patel, B.; Elguero, S.; Thakore, S.; Dahoud, W.; Bedaiwy, M.; Mesiano, S. Role of nuclear progesterone receptor isoforms in uterine pathophysiology. Hum. Reprod. Updat. 2015, 21, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cohen, A.; Shmoish, M.; Levi, L.; Cheruti, U.; Levavi-Sivan, B.; Lubzens, E. Alterations in Micro-Ribonucleic Acid Expression Profiles Reveal a Novel Pathway for Estrogen Regulation. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 1687–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reed, B.G.; Babayev, S.N.; Chen, L.X.; Carr, B.R.; Word, R.A.; Jimenez, P.T. Estrogen-regulated miRNA-27b is altered by bisphenol A in human endometrial stromal cells. Reproduction 2018, 156, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chen, C.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Li, R.; Qiao, J. MiR-125b regulates endometrial receptivity by targeting MMP26 in women undergoing IVF-ET with elevated progesterone on HCG priming day. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Pan, J.-L.; Yuan, D.-Z.; Zhao, Y.-B.; Nie, L.; Lei, Y.; Liu, M.; Long, Y.; Zhang, J.-H.; Blok, L.J.; Burger, C.W.; et al. Progesterone-induced miR-133a inhibits the proliferation of endometrial epithelial cells. Acta Physiol. 2016, 219, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kuokkanen, S.; Chen, B.; Ojalvo, L.; Benard, L.; Santoro, N.; Pollard, J.W. Genomic Profiling of MicroRNAs and Messenger RNAs Reveals Hormonal Regulation in MicroRNA Expression in Human Endometrium1. Biol. Reprod. 2010, 82, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Cochrane, D.R.; Cittelly, D.M.; Richer, J.K. Steroid receptors and microRNAs: Relationships revealed. Steroids 2011, 76, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Fan, Q.; Qiu, M.; Wang, Y. miR-107-5p promotes tumor proliferation and invasion by targeting estrogen receptor-α in endometrial carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 41, 1575–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xiao, L.; Pei, T.; Huang, W.; Zhou, M.; Fu, J.; Tan, J. MicroRNA22-5p targets ten-eleven translocation and regulates estrogen receptor 2 expression in infertile women with minimal/mild endometriosis during implantation window. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pei, T.; Liu, C.; Liu, T.; Xiao, L.; Luo, B.; Tan, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, G.; Duan, C.; Huang, W. miR-194-3p Represses the Progesterone Receptor and Decidualization in Eutopic Endometrium from Women with Endometriosis. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 2554–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, M.; Fu, J.; Xiao, L.; Yang, S.; Song, Y.; Zhang, X.; Feng, X.; Sun, H.; Xu, W.; Huang, W. miR-196a overexpression activates the MEK/ERK signal and represses the progesterone receptor and decidualization in eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 2598–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, M.; Peng, J.; Shi, Y.; Sun, P. miR-92a promotes progesterone resistance in endometriosis through PTEN/AKT pathway. Life Sci. 2020, 242, 117190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liang, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z. Role of microRNAs in embryo implantation. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2017, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dong, X.; Sui, C.; Huang, K.; Wang, L.; Hu, D.; Xiong, T. MicroRNA-223-3p suppresses leukemia inhibitory factor expression and pinopodes formation during embryo implantation in mice. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 1155–1163. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Chu, B.; Zhong, L.; Dou, S.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Wang, M. miRNA-181 regulates embryo implantation in mice through targeting leukemia inhibitory factor. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 7, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Inyawilert, W.; Fu, T.-Y.; Lin, C.-T.; Tang, P.-C. Let-7-mediated suppression of mucin 1 expression in the mouse uterus during embryo implantation. J. Reprod. Dev. 2015, 61, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Inyawilert, W.; Fu, T.-Y.; Lin, C.-T.; Tang, P.-C. MicroRNA-199a mediates mucin 1 expression in mouse uterus during implantation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2014, 26, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kang, Y.-J.; Lees, M.; Matthews, L.C.; Kimber, S.; Forbes, K.; Aplin, J.D. miR-145 suppresses embryo-epithelial juxtacrine communication at implantation by modulating maternal IGF1R. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Li, Z.; Gou, J.; Jia, J.; Zhao, X. MicroRNA-429 functions as a regulator of epithelial–mesenchymal transition by targeting Pcdh8 during murine embryo implantation. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 30, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Li, Z.; Jia, J.; Gou, J.; Tong, A.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X. Mmu-miR-126a-3p plays a role in murine embryo implantation by regulating Itga11. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2015, 31, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Yang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wu, M.; Geng, Y.; Li, R.; Xu, L. Expression of mmu-miR-96 in the endometrium during early pregnancy and its regulatory effects on stromal cell apoptosis via Bcl2. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 15, 1547–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Nie, L.; Zhao, Y.-B.; Zhao, D.; Long, Y.; Lei, Y.; Liu, M. Progesterone-induced miR-152 interferes with embryonic im-plantation by downregulating GLUT3 in endometrial epithelium. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 316, E557–E567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Yan, J.; Pan, X. miR-141-3p affects apoptosis and migration of endometrial stromal cells by targeting KLF-12. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2019, 471, 1055–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Qian, K.; Hu, L.; Chen, H.; Li, H.; Liu, N.; Li, Y. Hsa-miR-222 is involved in differentiation of endometrial stromal cells in vitro. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 4734–4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Altmäe, S.; Martinez-Conejero, J.A.; Esteban, F.J.; Ruiz-Alonso, M.; Stavreus-Evers, A.; Horcajadas, J.A.; Salumets, A. MicroRNAs miR-30b, miR-30d, and miR-494 Regulate Human Endometrial Receptivity. Reprod. Sci. 2012, 20, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Kresowik, J.D.K.; Devor, E.J.; Van Voorhis, B.J.; Leslie, K.K. MicroRNA-31 is significantly elevated in both human endometrium and serum during the window of implantation: A potential biomarker for optimum receptivity. Biol. Reprod. 2014, 91, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Thornhill, A.; Dedie-Smulders, C.; Geraedts, J.; Harper, J.; Harton, G.; Lavery, S.; Moutou, C.; Robinson, M.; Schmutzler, A.; Scriven, P.; et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium ‘Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)’. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Lédée, N.; Petitbarat, M.; Chevrier, L.; Vitoux, D.; Vezmar, K.; Rahmati, M.; Dubanchet, S.; Gahéry, H.; Bensussan, A.; Chaouat, G. The Uterine Immune Profile May Help Women With Repeated Unexplained Embryo Implantation Failure After In Vitro Fertilization. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 75, 388–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Chen, X.; Mariee, N.; Jiang, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C.C.; Li, T.C. Measurement of uterine natural killer cell percentage in the priimplantation endometrium from fertile women and women with recurrent reproductive failure: Establishment of a refer-ence range. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 217, 680-e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Revel, A.; Achache, H.; Stevens, J.; Smith, Y.; Reich, R. MicroRNAs are associated with human embryo implantation defects. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 2830–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Choi, Y.; Kim, H.-R.; Lim, E.J.; Park, M.; Yoon, J.A.; Kim, Y.S. Integrative Analyses of Uterine Transcriptome and MicroRNAome Reveal Compromised LIF-STAT3 Signaling and Progesterone Response in the Endometrium of Patients with Re-current/Repeated Implantation Failure (RIF). PLoS ONE. 2016, 11, e0157696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Chen, C.H.; Lu, F.; Yang, W.J.; Yang, P.E.; Chen, W.M.; Kang, S.T. A novel platform for discovery of differentially expressed microRNAs in patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil. Steril. 2021, 116, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shi, C.; Shen, H.; Fan, L.-J.; Guan, J.; Zheng, X.-B.; Chen, X.; Liang, R.; Zhang, X.-W.; Cui, Q.-H.; Sun, K.-K.; et al. Endometrial MicroRNA Signature during the Window of Implantation Changed in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure. Chin. Med. J. 2017, 130, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ma, Y.; Huang, Y.-X.; Chen, Y.-Y. miRNA-34a-5p downregulation of VEGFA in endometrial stem cells contributes to the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 8259–8264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rekker, K.; Tasa, T.; Saare, M.; Samuel, K.; Kadastik, Ü.; Karro, H. Differentially-Expressed miRNAs in Ectopic Stromal Cells Contribute to Endometriosis Development: The Plausible Role of miR-139-5p and miR-375. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Zondervan, K.T.; Becker, C.M.; Koga, K.; Missmer, S.A.; Taylor, R.N.; Vigano, P. Endometriosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer. 2018, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Taghavipour, M.; Sadoughi, F.; Mirzaei, H.; Yousefi, B.; Moazzami, B.; Chaichian, S. Apoptotic functions of mi-croRNAs in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of endometriosis. Cell Biosci. 2020, 10, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Burney, R.; Hamilton, A.; Aghajanova, L.; Vo, K.; Nezhat, C.; Lessey, B.; Giudice, L. MicroRNA expression profiling of eutopic secretory endometrium in women with versus without endometriosis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2009, 15, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Burney, R.O.; Talbi, S.; Hamilton, A.E.; Vo, K.C.; Nyegaard, M.; Nezhat, C.R.; Lessey, B.A.; Giudice, L.C. Gene Expression Analysis of Endometrium Reveals Progesterone Resistance and Candidate Susceptibility Genes in Women with Endometriosis. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 3814–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Chen, X.; Jiang, Y.; Pan, D. miR-30c may serve a role in endometriosis by targeting plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017, 14, 4846–4852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gao, S.; Liu, S.; Gao, Z.-M.; Deng, P.; Wang, D.-B. Reduced microRNA-451 expression in eutopic endometrium contributes to the pathogenesis of endometriosis. World, J. Clin. Cases 2019, 7, 2155–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mashayekhi, P.; Noruzinia, M.; Zeinali, S.; Khodaverdi, S. Endometriotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Epigenetic Pathogenesis: Deregulation of miR-200b, miR-145, and let7b in A Functional Imbalanced Epigenetic Disease. Cell J. 2019, 21, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Rehfeld, F.; Rohde, A.M.; Nguyen, D.T.T.; Wulczyn, F.G. Lin28 and let-7: Ancient milestones on the road from pluripotency to neurogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 2014, 359, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Sansal, I.; Sellers, W.R. The Biology and Clinical Relevance of the PTEN Tumor Suppressor Pathway. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004, 22, 2954–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Teague, O.E.M.C.; Van der Hoek, K.H.; Van der Hoek, M.B.; Perry, N.; Wagaarachchi, P.; Robertson, S.A. MicroRNA-regulated pathways associated with endometriosis. Mol. Endocrinol. Baltim. Md. 2009, 23, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Eggers, J.C.; Martino, V.; Reinbold, R.; Schäfer, S.D.; Kiesel, L.; Starzinski-Powitz, A.; Schüring, A.; Kemper, B.; Greve, B.; Götte, M. microRNA miR-200b affects proliferation, invasiveness and stemness of endometriotic cells by targeting ZEB1, ZEB2 and KLF4. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2016, 32, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Liang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, C.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, D.; He, J.; Hua, W.; Duan, P. miR-200c suppresses endometriosis by targeting MALAT1 in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Zhou, C.-F.; Liu, M.-J.; Wang, W.; Wu, S.; Huang, Y.-X.; Chen, G.-B. miR-205-5p inhibits human endometriosis progression by targeting ANGPT2 in endometrial stromal cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dai, Y.; Lin, X.; Xu, W.; Lin, X.; Huang, Q.; Shi, L.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; et al. MiR-210-3p protects endometriotic cells from oxidative stress-induced cell cycle arrest by targeting BARD1. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Yang, W.-W.; Hong, L.; Xu, X.-X.; Wang, Q.; Huang, J.-L.; Jiang, L. Regulation of miR-33b on endometriosis and expression of related factors. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 2027–2033. [Google Scholar]
  77. Yang, P.; Wu, Z.; Ma, C.; Pan, N.; Wang, Y.; Yan, L. Endometrial miR-543 Is Downregulated During the Implantation Window in Women With Endometriosis-Related Infertility. Reprod. Sci. 2018, 26, 900–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhao, Q.; Han, B.; Zhang, Y.; Su, K.; Wang, C.; Hai, P. Effect of miR-194-5p regulating STAT1/mTOR signaling pathway on the biological characteristics of ectopic endometrial cells from mice. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020, 12, 6136–6148. [Google Scholar]
  79. Joshi, N.R.; Miyadahira, E.H.; Afshar, Y.; Jeong, J.-W.; Young, S.L.; Lessey, B.A.; Serafini, P.C.; Fazleabas, A.T. Progesterone resistance in endometriosis is modulated by the altered expression of microRNA-29c and FKBP4. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 102, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Hawkins, S.M.; Creighton, C.J.; Han, D.Y.; Zariff, A.; Anderson, M.; Gunaratne, P.H.; Matzuk, M.M. Functional MicroRNA Involved in Endometriosis. Mol. Endocrinol. 2011, 25, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. World Health Organization. Datas from International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available online: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/online-analysis-table?v=2018&mode=cancer&mode_population=continents&population=900&populations=900&key=asr&sex=0&cancer=39&type=0&statistic=5&prevalence=0&population_group=0&ages_group%5B%5D=0&ages_group%5B%5D=17&nb_items=5&group_cancer=1&include_nmsc=1&include_nmsc_other=1 (accessed on 20 December 2019).
  82. Delangle, R.; De Foucher, T.; Larsen, A.K.; Sabbah, M.; Azaïs, H.; Bendifallah, S. The Use of microRNAs in the Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2019, 11, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Colas, E.; Pedrola, N.; Devis, L.; Ertekin, T.; Campoy, I.; Martínez, E. The EMT signaling pathways in endometrial carcinoma. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2012, 14, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Díaz-Martín, J.; Díaz-López, A.; Moreno-Bueno, G.; Castilla, M.Á.; Rosa-Rosa, J.M.; Cano, A. A core microRNA signature associated with inducers of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. J. Pathol. 2014, 232, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Romero-Pérez, L.; Castilla, M.Á.; López-García, M.Á.; Diaz-Martin, J.; Biscuola, M.; Ramiro-Fuentes, S.; Oliva, E.; Matias-Guiu, X.; Prat, J.; Cano, A.; et al. Molecular events in endometrial carcinosarcomas and the role of high mobility group AT-hook 2 in endometrial carcinogenesis. Hum. Pathol. 2013, 44, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kim, T.; Veronese, A.; Pichiorri, F.; Lee, T.J.; Jeon, Y.-J.; Volinia, S.; Pineau, P.; Marchio, A.; Palatini, J.; Suh, S.-S.; et al. p53 regulates epithelial–mesenchymal transition through microRNAs targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Otake, S.; Itoh, Y.; Omata, C.; Saitoh, M.; Miyazawa, K. ZEB1 and oncogenic Ras constitute a regulatory switch for stimulus-dependent E-cadherin downregulation. Cancer Sci. 2020, 112, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Park, S.-M.; Gaur, A.B.; Lengyel, E.; Peter, M.E. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 894–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Montserrat, N.; Mozos, A.; Llobet, D.; Dolcet, X.; Pons, C.; De Herreros, A.G.; Matias-Guiu, X.; Prat, J. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in early stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2012, 43, 632–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hiroki, E.; Akahira, J.-I.; Suzuki, F.; Nagase, S.; Ito, K.; Suzuki, T.; Sasano, H.; Yaegashi, N. Changes in microRNA expression levels correlate with clinicopathological features and prognoses in endometrial serous adenocarcinomas. Cancer Sci. 2009, 101, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Opławski, M.; Nowakowski, R.; Średnicka, A.; Ochnik, D.; Grabarek, B.O.; Boroń, D. Molecular Landscape of the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of miRNA detection methods (adapted from Kappel and Keller, 2017 [22]).
Table 1. Characteristics of miRNA detection methods (adapted from Kappel and Keller, 2017 [22]).
ApplicationSensitivitySpecificityAvailability
Electrochemical or potentiometricDiagnostic testHighExcellentLimited
Northern blottingValidation techniquePoorHighWidely available
NGSDiscovery, validation, diagnosticHighHighLimited
MicroarrayDiscovery, validation, diagnosticLowLowRather available
RT-qPCRValidation, diagnosticExcellentExcellentWidely available
NanoString®Validation, diagnosticHighHighLimited
ImmunoassayDiagnostic testLowLowLimited
Table
Table 2. Hormonal regulation and function of deregulated miRNAs in recurrent implantation failure.
Table 2. Hormonal regulation and function of deregulated miRNAs in recurrent implantation failure.
miRNASex Steroid Hormone Regulation in EndometriumFunction in the EndometriumRIF
miR-20b-5p Up-regulated [58]
miR-21
miR-21-3p
miR-21-5p		Up-regulated in implantation window compared with pre-receptive endometrium [51] Down-regulated [57]
Up-regulated [59]
miR-23b Regulation of H2AFX (involved in cell cycle arrest) and sFRP-4 (Wnt signaling modulator) expression [56]Up-regulated [56]
miR-27bDown-regulated by estrogen in vitro [29] Up-regulated [56]
miR-29bUp-regulated in secretory phase [32] Up-regulated [57]
miR-32 Down-regulated [56]
miR-34
miR-34a-5p
miR-34b		 Regulation of VEGFA expression and cell proliferation [60]Up-regulated [57]
miR-99a Up-regulated [56]
miR-138-1-3p Up-regulated [57]
miR-139-5p Regulation of HOXA10 expression [61]Up-regulated [56]
miR-144-3p Down-regulated [58]
miR-145Down-regulated in the implantation window [52]Regulation of IGF1R expression in mouse [44];
down-regulation of N-cadherin and netrin-4 expression (adhesion molecules) in RIF [56]		Up-regulated [56]
miR-146a-5p Up-regulated [57]
miR-150 Up-regulated [56]
miR-155-5p Up-regulated [58]
miR-195 Up-regulated [56]
miR-330-5p Up-regulated [58]
miR-342-3p Up-regulated [56]
miR-363-3p Up-regulated [57]
miR-374b Up-regulated [56]
miR-628Predicted target of progesterone [37] Down-regulated [56]
miR-652 Up-regulated [56]
miR-718 Down-regulated [58]
miR-874 Down-regulated [56]
miR-940 Down-regulated [58]
Table
Table 4. Hormonal regulation and function of deregulated miRNAs in endometrial cancer.
Table 4. Hormonal regulation and function of deregulated miRNAs in endometrial cancer.
miRNASex Steroid Hormone Regulation in EndometriumFunctionEndometrial Cancer
miR-10b vascular invasion [90]Down-regulated [90]
miR-29bUp-regulated in secretory phase [32]vascular invasion [90]Down-regulated [90]
miR-30d Promotion of EMT [91]Down-regulated [91]
miR-34b Down-regulated [90]
miR-101 Down-regulated [90]
miR-106 Promotion of EMT [91]Up-regulated [91]
miR-133Up-regulated by progesterone [31]Promotion of EMT [84]; promotion of endometrial epithelial cell proliferation [31]Down-regulated [90]
miR-141 Promotion of EMT [84]; regulation of ZEB1/ZEB2 expression [86,87,88]Up-regulated [84,90]
miR-144 Promotion of EMT [91]Up-regulated [91]
miR-152Up-regulated by progesterone [48]regulation of GLUT3 expression [48]Down-regulated [90]
miR-200 Promotion of EMT [84]; regulation of ZEB1/ZEB2 expression [86,87,88]Up-regulated [84]
miR-203Up-regulated in secretory phase and in implantation window [32]Promotion of EMT [84]Up-regulated [84]
miR-205 Promotion of EMT [84]Up-regulated [84,90]
miR-224 Promotion of EMT [84]Down-regulated [84]
miR-411 Down-regulated [90]
miR-429down-regulated during implantation in mouse [45]Promotion of EMT [84]Up-regulated [84]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kolanska, K.; Bendifallah, S.; Canlorbe, G.; Mekinian, A.; Touboul, C.; Aractingi, S.; Chabbert-Buffet, N.; Daraï, E. Role of miRNAs in Normal Endometrium and in Endometrial Disorders: Comprehensive Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163457

AMA Style

Kolanska K, Bendifallah S, Canlorbe G, Mekinian A, Touboul C, Aractingi S, Chabbert-Buffet N, Daraï E. Role of miRNAs in Normal Endometrium and in Endometrial Disorders: Comprehensive Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(16):3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163457

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kolanska, Kamila, Sofiane Bendifallah, Geoffroy Canlorbe, Arsène Mekinian, Cyril Touboul, Selim Aractingi, Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet, and Emile Daraï. 2021. "Role of miRNAs in Normal Endometrium and in Endometrial Disorders: Comprehensive Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 16: 3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163457

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop