Next Article in Journal
Psychiatric History and Overactive Bladder Symptom Severity in Ambulatory Urogynecological Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Comparing Outcomes in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 81,462 Patients
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Proposal of Treatment Strategy for Pedicle Fractures of the C2: An Analysis of 49 Cases

J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(17), 3987; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173987
by Jong-Beom Park 1, Sung-Kyu Kim 2,*, Hyoung-Yeon Seo 2, Jong-Hyun Ko 3 and Tae-Min Hong 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(17), 3987; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173987
Submission received: 13 July 2021 / Revised: 11 August 2021 / Accepted: 12 August 2021 / Published: 3 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

this is a nicely conducted study, the main flaws are the short follow-up time and small sample, but given the rarity of this type of injury, this is somehow acceptable. Main issues regarding the outcomes assessment. please find specific comments below.

line 46, please report the design of this study

line 43, please report aims and hypothesis of this study

line 76, is there a reference for this classification? are there data about its reliability? if not cloud you provide data or its reliability?

line 76, please be clear about how did you assess outcomes, outcomes used at follow-up are not reported

please avoid repetition in the results section, data are well reported in tables, no need for repetition in the text

line 138-140, what you mean by outcomes? how were success or failure defined? please report

start discussion section with your main findings, please be more concise and focused on your results

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

interesting topic, makes a specific pathology more transparent

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments were addressed adequately

thanks for your time and effort

Back to TopTop